DOCSLIB.ORG

Maricopa County Environmental Health Code

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Maricopa County Environmental Health Code Maricopa County Environmental Health Code January 27, 2021 MARICOPA COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CODE CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS REGULATION 1. Definitions The following definitions shall apply throughout this Environmental Health Code, unless a different meaning is clearly indicated by the context or is stated in another chapter. a. “Approved” or "approval" means acceptable to the Department and so stated in writing. b. “Board” means the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors. c. “Board of Health" means the Board of Health of Maricopa County. d. “Chairman” means the Chairman of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors. e. “Clerk” means the Clerk of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors. f. “Counsel” means an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Arizona. g. “County” means Maricopa County. h. “Department” means the Maricopa County Environmental Services Department. i. “Environmental Health Code” means all of the rules and regulations which are adopted by the Board of Health and the Board of Supervisors pursuant to A.R.S. 36-183.02 through 36-183.07, 36-184, 36-187(C), 11-251 Paragraphs 17 and 31, 11-251.05, 11- 251.08, 49-106, and 49-107, and which remain in force. j. “Environmental Health Officer” means the Director of the Maricopa County Environmental Services Department or his/her authorized Agents. k. “Municipality” means an incorporated area within Maricopa County. l. “Notice" means an enforcement Notice issued by the Environmental Health Officer. m. “Parties” means the Defendant and the County. n. “Permit” means a written permit to operate, issued by the Maricopa County Environmental Services Department. o. “Person” includes any natural individual, firm, trust, partnership, association, institution, public body, corporation, or any other entity and includes the plural as well as the singular, feminine as well as the masculine. 1-1 R 9-25-2013 p. “Predominately” pertains only to fees as used in this Chapter I, Regulation 5 a. of the Environmental Health Code and means 75% or greater of the operations of or proceeds generated by a 501(c)(3) charitable non-profit establishment that provides relief for the poor, distressed or under-privileged. q. “Public Water System Site” means the location where an actual or planned potable water system structure or set of structures are or will be operated and maintained by a public water system. Typical structures at a drinking water system site may include, but are not limited to, wells, treatment facilities, chlorinators, storage tanks, and pressure regulating facilities. Distribution system appurtenances, such as valves, fire hydrants, sampling ports, meters, service lines, and piping, may be a part of a drinking water system site, but do not in themselves constitute a drinking water system site. r. “Regulation” means the regulations in this Environmental Health Code and the regulations of the Arizona Departments of Health Services and Environmental Quality. REGULATION 2. Purpose The rules and regulations adopted and contained herein, and the enforcement thereof by the Department, are designed and intended to provide minimum standards for the protection of the health of the people of Maricopa County and to prevent the creation or maintenance of unhealthful, unsanitary conditions or public health nuisances, and shall be liberally construed to accomplish these purposes. REGULATION 3. Responsibilities - Right of Inspection a. The owner, person in charge of control, lessee, tenant, and occupant of every building, establishment, premises, place, potable water supply, sewage works, sewerage, drainage, or wastewater reclamation system has the duty to take all necessary, reasonable and usual precautions to keep, place and preserve the same in such condition, and to conduct and maintain the same in such manner, that it shall not be dangerous or deleterious to the public or in violation of the rules and regulations in this Environmental Health Code or the regulations of the Arizona Departments of Health Services and Environmental Quality. b. No person shall refuse to allow the Department to inspect fully any and all premises or facilities at any reasonable time, and no person shall molest or resist the Department in the discharge of its duties whether in inspections for application approval or for the enforcement of this Environmental Health Code. REGULATION 4. Permits, Service and Other Requirements a. No person shall conduct an operation or operate an establishment for which a permit is required without holding the necessary and valid permit to do so, unless otherwise specified in this Environmental Health Code. 1-2 R 1-27-2021 b. Permit application shall be made on forms provided by the Department and shall be completed in all pertinent details. c. (1) No application for permit shall receive approval and no permit shall be issued and no facility for which a permit is required shall be placed in operation until the applicant demonstrates to the Department full compliance with the provisions of this Environmental Health Code, unless otherwise specified in this Environmental Health Code. (2) The Environmental Health Officer may refuse to issue a permit to any person if the person fails to demonstrate sufficient reliability, expertise, integrity and competence to fulfill the requirements for permit and comply with applicable rules and regulations of this Environmental Health Code. d. Any person denied a permit based on Regulation 4.c.(2) of this Chapter may exercise the following options: (1) Request, in writing, that the Environmental Health Officer specify conditions necessary to provide reasonable assurance that full compliance with provisions of this Environmental Health Code will be achieved. The Environmental Health Officer within five (5) working days of the request shall specify said conditions; or (2) Request in writing a hearing before the Environmental Health Officer as specified in Chapter I, Regulation 6. e. In cases where the Department requires the submission of plans and specifications, no person shall commence construction unless the required plans have been approved. It shall be the full responsibility of said person that construction is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications. f. The approval of plans and specifications shall lapse and become invalid one year from the date of approval unless a substantial portion of the work described in the plans and specifications has commenced by such anniversary date. An approval of plans and specifications can be renewed for one year if an application for renewal is submitted within 180 days prior to expiration and a fee equal to one-half (1/2) of the flat fee or initial plan review fee is paid. The approval will be effective for one year from the date of expiration. g. (1) Permits are valid for one calendar year from the initial issue date unless revoked by the Department. All permit fees are nonrefundable. (2) Annual permit fees are due on the date the permit expires. If the annual permit fee is not paid on or prior to the due date, the permit shall be automatically extended for 30 days on the condition the annual permit fee and a permit reinstatement fee are paid within 30 days after the date the permit expired. If the permit holder fails to pay the annual permit fee and 1-3 R 7-22-2015 the permit reinstatement fee within the 30-day extension period, the permit shall be deemed expired and void. Each establishment, premises or vehicle that has not paid the annual permit fee and reinstatement fee within the 30-day extension period, shall immediately cease operating and may apply for a new permit pursuant to Regulation 4 of this chapter. (3) A permit reinstatement fee becomes due for failure to pay the permit fee within one calendar month of the permit fee due date. h. No permit is transferable from person-to-person or place-to-place. i. Each permit certificate shall be kept at the establishment, premise or designated vehicle and displayed in a conspicuous place designated by the Department. Where practicable, permits shall be framed and protected against damage and abuse. j. Permit fees are nonrefundable. REGULATION 5. Fees a. No permit shall be issued, and no permit is valid, until the permit fee is received by the Department, except that the operator of a charitable nonprofit establishment (which operates to provide relief predominantly for the poor, distressed or under- privileged) may apply to the Board of Health for a waiver of permit fee. A waiver of fee may be granted only to the operator of an establishment, which maintains a current 501(c)(3) tax exempt designation from the Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, who demonstrates to the Board of Health that payment of said fee will cause financial hardship. Board of Health granted fee waivers expire pursuant to the required permit listing in section d. of this regulation. Application for a permit fee waiver shall be made using forms provided by the Department. (1) Applications for waivers of Temporary Food Establishment fees will be processed on a first come, first served basis in accordance with Regulation 5 a. of this Chapter I of the Environmental Health Code. the Department shall only present a maximum of twenty-five (25) of such applications per event to the Board of Health. (2) A waiver of fees associated with the administering and issuance of a food employee certificate in compliance with A.R.S. § 41-1080, may be granted to the operator of an establishment, which maintains a current 501(c)(3) tax exempt designation from the Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service and must demonstrate to the Board of Health that payment of said fees will cause financial hardship. (3) To a current student, enrolled in a K-12 culinary arts school program or other similar curriculum-based programs requiring a food employee certificate from their students to be in compliance with this code.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 252:641 Individual and Small Public On-Site Sewage Treatment Systems
    Codification through the 2021 Legislative session Subchapters 1, 3, 12, 15; Appendix H and N Board adoption - February 19, 2021 Approved by Governor's signature on OK HB1046 on June 11, 2021 Effective date – September 15, 2021 TITLE 252. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CHAPTER 641. INDIVIDUAL AND SMALL PUBLIC ON-SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEMS Subchapter 1. General Provisions ..................................................................................................... 252:641-1-1 3. Soil Tests .................................................................................................................... 252:641-3-1 5. Building Sewer and Collection Systems .................................................................... 252:641-5-1 7. Septic Tanks ............................................................................................................... 252:641-7-1 9. Pump Tanks ............................................................................................................... 252:641-9-1 10. Aerobic Treatment Systems ................................................................................... 252:641-10-1 11. Subsurface Systems [REVOKED] ......................................................................... 252:641-11-1 12. Dispersal Fields ...................................................................................................... 252:641-12-1 13. Aerobic Systems [REVOKED].............................................................................. 252:641-13-1 15. Lagoons .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematical Modeling of the Performance of a Rotating Biological Contactor for Process Optimisation in Wastewater Treatment
    Mathematical Modeling of the Performance of a Rotating Biological Contactor for Process Optimisation in Wastewater Treatment Zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines DOKTOR-INGENIEURS von der Fakultät für Bauingenieur-, Geo- und Umweltwissenschaften der Universität Fridericiana zu Karlsruhe (TH) genehmigte DISSERTATION von Sanjay Dutta, M.Tech. aus Kalkutta, Indien Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 14. Februar, 2007 Hauptreferent: Prof. Dr. Ing. E.h. Hermann H. Hahn, Ph.D., Karlsruhe Korreferent: Prof. Dr. rer. nat. habil. Josef Winter, Karlsruhe Karlsruhe 2007 Dissertation genehmigt von der Fakultät für Bauingenieur-, Geo- und Umweltwissenschaften Universität Fridericiana zu Karlsruhe (TH) 2007 Hauptreferent: Prof. Dr. Ing. E.h. Hermann H. Hahn, Ph.D., Karlsruhe Korreferent: Prof. Dr. rer. nat. habil. Josef Winter, Karlsruhe Dutta, Sanjay Mathematical Modeling of the Performance of a Rotating Biological Contactor for Process Optimisation in Wastewater Treatment Karlsruhe: Universität Karlsruhe – Verlag Siedlungswasserwirtschaft Karlsruhe, 2007 (Schriftenreihe SWW – Band 126) Zugl.: Karlsruhe, Univ., Diss., 2007 ISBN 978-3-9809383-9-6 ISBN 978-3-9809383-9-6 Alle Rechte vorbehalten Satz: Institut für Wasser und Gewässerentwicklung Bereich Siedlungswasserwirtschaft Universität Karlsruhe (TH) Druck: E&B printware, Digital- und Schnelldruck GmbH, 76131 Karlsruhe Printed in Germany Vorwort 3 Vorwort des Herausgebers Scheibentauchkörper als biologische Reinigungselemente haben sich bislang einer eher auf spezifische Anschlussgrößen (im mittleren
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Review and Advisory Panel (Trap) Meeting
    T ECHNICAL R EVIEW AND A DVISORY P ANEL ONSITE SEWAGE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL SYSTEMS ADVISORY TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AUTHORITY: SECTION 381.0068, FLORIDA STATUTES TECHNICAL REVIEW AND ADVISORY PANEL (TRAP) MEETING DATE: Thursday, October 16, 2014 TIME: 10:00 a.m. PLACE: Conference call meeting Teleconference Phone Number: 888-670-3525 At the prompt, enter the Participant Code: 2980 214 500 For those who wish to attend the meeting in person, the conference call will originate from: Capital Circle Office Complex Conference Room 110 F 4025 Bald Cypress Way, Tallahassee, Florida 32399 THIS MEETING IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. Agenda 1. Introductions 2. Review minutes of last meeting 3. Old Business Rule Issues 12-07 ATU Maintenance Versus Drainfield Maintenance 14-01 Rule Reduction (continued from 9/25/2014) 4. New Business 5. Other items of interest to the Technical Review and Advisory Panel 6. Public Comment Scott Johnson Pam Tucker Martin Guffey Robert Baker PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER REAL ESTATE INDUSTRY SEPTIC TANK INDUSTRY SEPTIC TANK MANUFACTURER Glenn Bryant Russ Melling Scott Franz Sonia Cruz COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT CONSUMER SOIL SCIENTIST ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Victor Godlewski Ken Odom, Chair Roy Pence, Vice Chair LOCAL GOVERNMENT HOME BUILDING INDUSTRY HOME BUILDING INDUSTRY T ECHNICAL R EVIEW AND A DVISORY P ANEL ONSITE SEWAGE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL SYSTEMS ADVISORY TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AUTHORITY: SECTION 381.0068, FLORIDA STATUTES TECHNICAL REVIEW AND ADVISORY PANEL (TRAP) MEETING MINUTES DATE: Thursday, September 25, 2014 PLACE:
    [Show full text]
  • Treatment of Domestic Waste Water Using Natural Flocculants
    Int. J. LifeSc. Bt & Pharm. Res. 2012 Narmadha D and Mary Selvam Kavitha V J, 2012 ISSN 2250-3137 www.ijlbpr.com Vol. 1, No. 3, July 2012 © 2012 IJLBPR. All Rights Reserved Research Paper TREATMENT OF DOMESTIC WASTE WATER USING NATURAL FLOCCULANTS Narmadha D1* and Mary Selvam Kavitha V J1 *Corresponding Author: Narmadha D, [email protected] Wastewater generated from wastewater treatment plant contains odors some non pathogens, fecal Coliforms, fungus etc., and chemicals such as phenols, nitrate, chloride etc., in addition to usual constituents such as urine and faeces. The present investigation was hence made in wastewater treatment plant situated in Kallaraimedu of Kodaikanal. Presently the waste water is passing through an underground system to the wastewater plant. In this study analyze the Physio-chemical parameters and biological parameters of septic water before and after treatment with horse and cow dung; and portable water. Isolate and identify the microbes present in horse and cow dung by using biochemical tests. Keywords: Waste water, microbial treatment of waste, Flocculants INTRODUCTION such as urea, fruit sugars, soluble proteins, drugs, Wastewater can be defined as the flow of use pharmaceuticals, etc.; Inorganic particles such water discharged from homes, businesses, as sand, grit, metal particles, ceramics, etc.; industries, commercial activities and institutions Soluble inorganic material such as ammonia, which are directed to treatment plants by a road-salt, sea-salt, cyanide, hydrogen sulfide, carefully designed and engineered network of thiocyanates, thiosulfates, etc.; Animals such as pipes. This wastewater is further categorized and protozoa, insects, arthropods, small fish, etc.; defined according to its sources of origin as 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Scale Treatment Systems
    SMALL SCALE TREATMENT SYSTEMS . Paper presented at the Seminar on "Urban Wastewater a Lost Resource or an Opportunity" at Perth, Western Australia Kuruvilla Mathew and Goen Ho Environmental Science, Murdoch University August 1993 149 2 SMALL SCALE TREATMENT SYSTEMS Kuruvilla Mthew and Goen Ho Environmental Science, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Austarlia. 1. INTRODUCTION Inadequate or improper collection and disposal of liquid waste leads to pollution of surface and groundwater and pose major threats to public health and community well being. The emergence of big cities and industries has typically demanded centralised collection, treatment and disposal systems for liquid wastes. Most cities in developed countries have reticulated sewerage systems which collect and treat the wastes to acceptable standards. In fact a majority of municipal authorities and public health engineers consider the reticulated sewerage system with a modern high technology treatment system and disposal facility as the only suitable approach to liquid waste for a municipal area. Such systems require continuous and plentiful supply of water along with all the capital intensive infrastructure necessary for treatment and these conditions are not always easily fulfilled. Developing countries and smaller more isolated communities find the cost of providing such facilities to achieve the necessary public health requirements prohibitively high. In rural and semi-rural and particularly remote areas a centralised system generally costs much more on a per capita basis than a locally based independent system of liquid waste .disposal. In this context there are now a variety of options for wastewater treatment, disposal and reuse. Such systems can produce an effluent quality equal to or better than a conventional treatment plant.
    [Show full text]
  • Wastewater Treatment Technologies List.Cdr
    GK.TAMILGOD.ORG List Of Wastewater Treatment TECHNOLOGIES TECHNOLOGIES G K . T A M I L G O D . O R G G K . TA M I L G O D . O R G A Ta m i l Q A P o r t a l . Wastewater Treatment Technologies Activated sludge model Activated sludge systems Adsorption/Bio-oxidation process Advanced oxidation process Aerated lagoon Aerobic granular reactor Aerobic granular sludge technology Aerobic granulation Aerobic treatment system Anaerobic clarigester Anaerobic digester types Anaerobic digestion Anaerobic filter Anaerobic lagoon Anammox API oil-water separator Belt filter Bioconversion of biomass to mixed alcohol fuels Biofilters Bioreactor Bioretention Biorotor Capacitive deionization Carbon filtering Cesspit Chemical addition wastewater treatment Clarifier Coarse bubble diffusers Composting toilet Constructed wetland Cross-flow filtration Dark fermentation Decentralized wastewater system Diffuser (sewage) Page 01 G K . TA M I L G O D . O R G A Ta m i l Q A P o r t a l . G K . TA M I L G O D . O R G A Ta m i l Q A P o r t a l . Wastewater Treatment Technologies Dissolved air flotation Dissolved gas flotation Desalination Distillation EcocyclET systems Electrocoagulation Electrodeionization Electrodialysis Electrolysis Enhanced biological phosphorus removal Expanded granular sludge bed digestion Extended aeration Facultative lagoon Fenton's reagent Filtration Fine bubble diffusers Flocculation & sedimentation Flotation process Forward osmosis Froth flotation Hydrocyclone Imhoff tank Induced gas flotation Ion exchange Lamella clarifier (inclined plate clarifier)[1] Living machines Maceration (sewage) Media filter Membrane bioreactor Membrane distillation Membrane fouling Microbial fuel cell Microflotation Moving bed biofilm reactor Page 02 G K .
    [Show full text]
  • Chaptert 64E-6, Florida Administrative Code, Standards for Onsite Treatment and Disposal Systems
    STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CHAPTER 64E-6, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE STANDARDS FOR ONSITE SEWAGE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL SYSTEMS EFFECTIVE APRIL 28, 2010 PART I 64E-6.001 GENERAL --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 64E-6.002 DEFINITIONS ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 64E-6.003 PERMITS ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 64E-6.004 APPLICATION FOR SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION PERMIT --------------------------------------------------- 8 64E-6.005 LOCATION AND INSTALLATION -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11 64E-6.006 SITE EVALUATION CRITERIA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 13 64E-6.008 SYSTEM SIZE DETERMINATIONS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 14 64E-6.009 ALTERNATIVE SYSTEMS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 18 64E-6.010 SEPTAGE AND FOOD ESTABLISHMENT SLUDGE ---------------------------------------------------------- 23 64E-6.0101 PORTABLE RESTROOMS AND PORTABLE OR STATIONARY HOLDING TANKS ------------------ 27 64E-6.011 ABANDONMENT OF SYSTEMS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 31 64E-6.012 STANDARDS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, AND MAINTENANCE OF AEROBIC
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Terms Commonly Associated with Septic Systems
    Terms commonly associated with septic systems: Please note: some of the following terms are generic while some are precise legal definitions in the State of Washington. Please consult specific rules and regulations of your State and/or local jurisdiction other definitions regarding these and other terms associated with septic systems. A Anaerobic wastewater process: a three step bacterial respiration process that occurs Absorption Area - an area to which in the absence of oxygen. Heterotrophic wastewater is distributed for infiltration to bacteria (which do not require oxygen) the soil. oxidize material to form CO2 and water. The process is more complex than described Absorption Field – see Drainfield. here, involving also autotrophic bacteria and chemical processes in three stages: acid fermentation, acid regression, and alkaline Absorption Trench - a long narrow area fermentation. (excavation) which includes a pipe for the distribution of septic tank effluent. B Additive or septic additive, septic chemical, septic treatment, septic tank additive: A Baffle - a flow deflecting device used in septic additive is a chemical, bacteria, or septic tanks and distribution boxes to inhibit other product sold to be placed into a septic the discharge of floating solids, reduce the tank or septic absorption system, amount of settleable solids that exit, and purportedly to improve the function of the reduce the exit velocity of the wastewater. system, improve drainfield performance, avoid septic tank pumping, or other repair Basal area – the effective surface area or maintenance need. In a normal available to transmit the treated effluent conventional septic system additives are not from the filter media in a mound system into required, are illegal in some jurisdictions, the original receiving soils.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerobic Septic System for a Residential Apartments
    International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 06 Issue: 03 | Mar 2019 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 AEROBIC SEPTIC SYSTEM FOR A RESIDENTIAL APARTMENTS B. Aravindhan1, J. Arniha2, S. Ganeshkumar3, C. Gayathri4, S. Mohanasundari5 1,2,3,4UG Student, Department of Civil Engineering, Valliammai Engineering College, Tamilnadu, India 5Assistant professor (S.G), Department of Civil Engineering, Valliammai Engineering College, Tamilnadu, India ---------------------------------------------------------------------***---------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract - Aerobic septic treatment is a process used to convert domestic sewage into effluent that can be recycled with minimum impact on the environment, or directly reused. The latter is called water reclamation because treated sewage can be used for other purposes and it can be achieved by aerobic septic tank. An aerobic septic system collects influent from residential apartment similar to a septic tank system, but uses an aerobic process for digestion rather than just the anaerobic process used in septic system. The system consists of sedimentation tank, aeration tank, clarifier and a storage tank. Key words: Aeration process, Higher quality effluent, Pre-treatment stage, Aeration stage, settling stage, disinfecting stage, Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl). 1. INTRODUCTION In our country water scarcity will be the major threatening to future generation. This water scarcity can be reduced by reusing the waste water by adopting various waste water treatment systems. When suitable for the site and soil conditions, a traditional septic tank and soil absorption field is the ideal onsite wastewater system choice because of low cost, simplicity, no energy requirement, and low maintenance. Site limitations such as small lot, poor soil, high groundwater, shallow soil depth to rock.
    [Show full text]
  • For Domestic Wastewater
    Chapter 6: Wastewater Treatment and Discharge CHAPTER 6 WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DISCHARGE 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories 6.1 Volume 5: Waste Authors Deborah Bartram (USA), Michael D. Short (Australia), Yoshitaka Ebie (Japan), Juraj Farkaš (Slovakia), Céline Gueguen (France), Gregory M. Peters (Sweden), Nuria Mariana Zanzottera (Argentina), M. Karthik (India) Contributing Authors Shuhei Masuda (Japan) 6.2 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Chapter 6: Wastewater Treatment and Discharge Contents 6 Wastewater Treatment and Discharge ....................................................................................................... 6.7 6.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 6.7 6.1.1 Centralised treatment systems ...................................................................................................... 6.10 6.1.2 Decentralised treatment systems of domestic wastewater (onsite sanitation) ............................... 6.11 6.1.3 Emissions from receiving waters .................................................................................................. 6.12 6.1.4 Changes compared to 1996 Guidelines and Good Practice Guidance ......................................... 6.12 6.1.5 Changes compared to 2006 IPCC Guidelines ............................................................................... 6.12 6.2
    [Show full text]
  • Effectiveness of Selected Onsite Wastewater- Treatment Systems in Removing Pharmaceutical and Personal-Care Products
    EFFECTIVENESS OF SELECTED ONSITE WASTEWATER- TREATMENT SYSTEMS IN REMOVING PHARMACEUTICAL AND PERSONAL-CARE PRODUCTS 05-04/319 CONDUCTED 2006-2007 PREPARED BY BARNSTABLE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT SUPERIOR COURTHOUSE, ROUTE 6A BARNSTABLE, MASSACHUSETTS 02630 PREPARED FOR MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF RESOURCE PROTECTION AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION I APRIL, 2010 Effectiveness of Selected Onsite Wastewater-Treatment Systems in Removing PPCPs Page 1 of 11 EFFECTIVENESS OF SELECTED ONSITE WASTEWATER- TREATMENT SYSTEMS IN REMOVING PHARMACEUTICAL AND PERSONAL-CARE PRODUCTS PROJECT NUMBER 05-04/319 PREPARED BY GEORGE R. HEUFELDER, M.S., R.S. BARNSTABLE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT SUPERIOR COURTHOUSE, ROUTE 6A BARNSTABLE, MASSACHUSETTS 02630 PREPARED FOR MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF RESOURCE PROTECTION AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION I MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS Ian Bowles, Secretary DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Laurie Burt, Commissioner Effectiveness of Selected Onsite Wastewater-Treatment Systems in Removing PPCPs Page 2 of 11 EFFECTIVENESS OF SELECTED ONSITE WASTEWATER- TREATMENT SYSTEMS IN REMOVING PHARMACEUTICAL AND PERSONAL-CARE PRODUCTS Executive Summary A preliminary survey was conducted to determine the efficacy of selected advanced onsite septic systems for the removal of selected pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs). The following technologies were chosen for this survey: standard “Title 5” system comprised of a stone trench overlying 60 inches of sand, an aerobic treatment system that combined fixed film surfaced with activated sludge, a recirculating filter unit containing fibrous peat, a single pass filter with open-cell foam, an upflow sulfur-filled filter following an aerobic treatment unit and a recirculating sand filter designed in accordance with standard practice.
    [Show full text]
  • AEROBIC TREATMENT of a CTMP WASTEWATER USING a ROTATING BIOLOGICAL CONTACTOR by Renata Gabriela Mathys Basc
    AEROBIC TREATMENT OF A CTMP WASTEWATER USING A ROTATING BIOLOGICAL CONTACTOR by Renata Gabriela Mathys B.A.Sc.(Bio-Resource Engineering) University of British Columbia A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF APPLIED SCIENCE in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES CHEMICAL ENGINEERING We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA August 1991 © Renata G. Mathys, 1991 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department The University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada DE-6 (2/88) ABSTRACT Effluents from high-yield TMP and CTMP mills contain biochemical oxygen demand and toxicity levels that are much higher than the effluents from low-yield kraft mills and if not properly treated before disposal can impose environmental threats to water bodies. Therefore, this study was undertaken to demonstrate the ability of a rotating biological contactor to remove organic matter from such a CTMP wastewater when operated at different flowrates and temperatures. An apparatus was constructed to allow for temperature control of the wastewater and the flexibility to change flowrates and disc rotational speed.
    [Show full text]