DOCSLIB.ORG

Arizona State Freight Plan (ADOT MPD 085-14)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arizona State Freight Plan (ADOT MPD 085-14) Working Paper Arizona State Freight Plan (ADOT MPD 085-14) Phase 2 Working Paper Inventory of State Freight Transportation System Assets Prepared for: Arizona Department of Transportation Prepared by: CPCS In association with: HDR Engineering, Inc. American Transportation Research Institute, Inc. Elliott D. Pollack & Company Dr. Chris Caplice (MIT) Plan*ET Communities PLLC (Leslie Dornfeld, FAICP) Gill V. Hicks and Associates, Inc. CPCS Ref: 14325 September 11, 2015 Arizona State Freight Plan Working Paper | Inventory of State Freight Transportation System Assets (ADOT MPD 085-14) Working Paper This working paper is the output of Phase 2 (of 11) in the development of the Arizona State Freight Plan. It describes Arizona’s multimodal freight transportation system—including highways, railways, air cargo airports, pipelines, and border crossings. Its purpose is to document the system’s assets and facilities, current flows over the system, and how well it performs. This working paper is provided for comment and discussion and should not be interpreted as final. Acknowledgements The CPCS team would like to thank the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) for its guidance and input in developing this working paper. The team also recognizes the considerable contribution of the transportation and logistics stakeholders consulted in the development of this working paper. Opinions Unless otherwise indicated, the opinions herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of ADOT or the State of Arizona. Contact Questions and comments on this working paper can be directed to: Marc-André Roy Donald Ludlow Project Director Project Manager T: +1.613.237.2500 x 306 T: +1.202.772.3368 [email protected] [email protected] Arizona State Freight Plan Working Paper | Inventory of State Freight Transportation System Assets (ADOT MPD 085-14) Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... i Freight Highway System ....................................................................................................................... ii Freight Rail System .............................................................................................................................. iii Air Cargo System .................................................................................................................................. iv Pipeline System .................................................................................................................................... iv Borders and International Freight Gateways ...................................................................................... iv Freight Clusters ..................................................................................................................................... v Top Freight Mobility Constraints .......................................................................................................... v Acronyms/Abbreviations ........................................................................................................... vi 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 8 Introduction: Economic Context .............................................................................................. 9 Project Objectives .................................................................................................................. 10 Purpose of this Working Paper .............................................................................................. 10 Methodology .......................................................................................................................... 11 Limitations .............................................................................................................................. 11 2 Freight Highway System ......................................................................................................... 12 Arizona’s Freight Highway System Assets .............................................................................. 13 Highway Freight Corridor Designations .......................................................................... 14 Highway Freight System Flows ............................................................................................... 19 Highway Freight System Performance ................................................................................... 22 Highway Freight Performance Measures ....................................................................... 22 Infrastructure Conditions ................................................................................................ 24 Capacity ........................................................................................................................... 27 Speed ............................................................................................................................... 29 Fluidity ............................................................................................................................. 29 Road Closures .................................................................................................................. 33 Safety .............................................................................................................................. 35 Highway Policy and Regulatory Issues ............................................................................ 37 Other Performance Measures ........................................................................................ 38 Arizona State Freight Plan Working Paper | Inventory of State Freight Transportation System Assets (ADOT MPD 085-14) 3 Freight Rail System ................................................................................................................. 39 Arizona’s Freight Rail System Assets ...................................................................................... 40 Overview of Freight Rail System Characteristics ............................................................ 40 Transcontinental Routes ................................................................................................. 43 Class I Branch Lines ......................................................................................................... 43 Short Lines ....................................................................................................................... 44 Key Commerce Corridors ................................................................................................ 44 Intermodal Terminals ...................................................................................................... 44 Freight Rail System Flows ....................................................................................................... 47 Freight Rail System Performance ........................................................................................... 50 Infrastructure Condition ................................................................................................. 51 Capacity ........................................................................................................................... 51 Freight Rail Operational and Infrastructure Problems and Needs ................................. 53 Potential Freight Rail Projects and Strategies for Investment Needed for Arizona ....... 54 Speed ............................................................................................................................... 54 Freight Rail Policy and Regulatory Issues ............................................................................... 55 4 Air Cargo System .................................................................................................................... 58 Arizona’s Air Cargo System Assets ......................................................................................... 59 Overview of Air Cargo Freight System Characteristics ................................................... 59 Key Air Cargo Facilities .................................................................................................... 62 Air Cargo System Flows .......................................................................................................... 63 PHX Air Cargo Operations ............................................................................................... 63 Air Cargo System Performance .............................................................................................. 65 Infrastructure Conditions ................................................................................................ 65 Air Cargo Policy and Regulatory Issues ........................................................................... 65 5 Pipeline System ...................................................................................................................... 67 Arizona’s Pipline System Assets ............................................................................................. 68 Key Pipeline Facilites ....................................................................................................... 68 Future Pipeline and Storage Projects.............................................................................. 73 Big Picture Considerations .............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Blending Hydrogen Into Natural Gas Pipeline Networks: a Review of Key Issues
    Blending Hydrogen into Natural Gas Pipeline Networks: A Review of Key Issues M. W. Melaina, O. Antonia, and M. Penev NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. Technical Report NREL/TP-5600-51995 March 2013 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Blending Hydrogen into Natural Gas Pipeline Networks: A Review of Key Issues M. W. Melaina, O. Antonia, and M. Penev Prepared under Task No. HT12.2010 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report 15013 Denver West Parkway NREL/TP-5600-51995 Golden, Colorado 80401 March 2013 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogen Storage for Mobility: a Review
    materials Review Hydrogen Storage for Mobility: A Review Etienne Rivard * , Michel Trudeau and Karim Zaghib * Centre of Excellence in Transportation Electrification and Energy Storage, Hydro-Quebec, 1806, boul. Lionel-Boulet, Varennes J3X 1S1, Canada; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (E.R.); [email protected] (K.Z.) Received: 18 April 2019; Accepted: 11 June 2019; Published: 19 June 2019 Abstract: Numerous reviews on hydrogen storage have previously been published. However, most of these reviews deal either exclusively with storage materials or the global hydrogen economy. This paper presents a review of hydrogen storage systems that are relevant for mobility applications. The ideal storage medium should allow high volumetric and gravimetric energy densities, quick uptake and release of fuel, operation at room temperatures and atmospheric pressure, safe use, and balanced cost-effectiveness. All current hydrogen storage technologies have significant drawbacks, including complex thermal management systems, boil-off, poor efficiency, expensive catalysts, stability issues, slow response rates, high operating pressures, low energy densities, and risks of violent and uncontrolled spontaneous reactions. While not perfect, the current leading industry standard of compressed hydrogen offers a functional solution and demonstrates a storage option for mobility compared to other technologies. Keywords: hydrogen mobility; hydrogen storage; storage systems assessment; Kubas-type hydrogen storage; hydrogen economy 1. Introduction According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), it is almost certain that the unusually fast global warming is a direct result of human activity [1]. The resulting climate change is linked to significant environmental impacts that are connected to the disappearance of animal species [2,3], decreased agricultural yield [4–6], increasingly frequent extreme weather events [7,8], human migration [9–11], and conflicts [12–14].
    [Show full text]
  • Storing Syngas Lowers the Carbon Price for Profitable Coal Gasification
    Carnegie Mellon Electricity Industry Center Working Paper CEIC-07-10 www.cmu.edu/electricity Storing syngas lowers the carbon price for profitable coal gasification ADAM NEWCOMER AND JAY APT Carnegie Mellon Electricity Industry Center, Tepper School of Business, and Department of Engineering and Public Policy, 254 Posner Hall, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213 Integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) electric power generation systems with carbon capture and sequestration have desirable environmental qualities, but are not profitable when the carbon dioxide price is less than approximately $50 per metric ton. We examine whether an IGCC facility that operates its gasifier continuously but stores the syngas and produces electricity only when daily prices are high may be profitable at significantly lower CO2 prices. Using a probabilistic analysis, we have calculated the plant-level return on investment (ROI) and the value of syngas storage for IGCC facilities located in the US Midwest using a range of storage configurations. Adding a second turbine to use the stored syngas to generate electricity at peak hours and implementing 12 hours of above ground high pressure syngas storage significantly increases the ROI and net present value. Storage lowers the carbon price at which IGCC enters the US generation mix by approximately 25%. 1 Carnegie Mellon Electricity Industry Center Working Paper CEIC-07-10 www.cmu.edu/electricity Introduction Producing electricity from coal-derived synthesis gas (syngas) in an integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) facility can improve criteria pollutant performance over other coal-fueled technologies such as pulverized coal (PC) facilities [1-5] and can be implemented with carbon capture and sequestration.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Innovative and Automated Freight Strategies and Technologies—Phase I Final Report
    Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA/TX-17/0-6837-1 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date ASSESSMENT OF INNOVATIVE AND AUTOMATED FREIGHT February 2017 STRATEGIES AND TECHNOLOGIES—PHASE I FINAL REPORT 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Curtis Morgan, Jeffery Warner, Allan Rutter, Dahye Lee, C. James Report 0-6837-1 Kruse, Dong Hun Kang, Mario Monsreal, Jolanda Prozzi, Juan Carlos Villa, Jeffrey Borowiec, Leslie Olson, David Bierling, and Edwin Varela 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Texas A&M Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System 11. Contract or Grant No. College Station, Texas 77843-3135 Project 0-6837 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Technical Report: Research and Technology Implementation Office March 2016 125 E. 11th Street 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Austin, Texas 78701-2483 15. Supplementary Notes Project performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. Project Title: Assessment of Innovative and Automated Freight Systems and Development of Evaluation Tools URL: http://tti.tamu.edu/documents/0-6837-1.pdf 16. Abstract Many innovative freight delivery strategies and technologies have been proposed to address the future freight needs of Texas’s growing population. Changes in both buying habits and a shift toward direct home package delivery threaten to dramatically change distribution patterns and increase the number of intercity and local delivery trucks on Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) roadways.
    [Show full text]
  • ACRP 03-31 Bibliography Last Update: June 15, 2016
    ACRP 03-31 Bibliography Last Update: June 15, 2016 Contents Air Cargo ....................................................................................................................................................... 2 Air Service ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 Economic....................................................................................................................................................... 9 Environmental ............................................................................................................................................. 13 Finance ........................................................................................................................................................ 16 Land Use ..................................................................................................................................................... 18 Media Kit ..................................................................................................................................................... 19 Noise ........................................................................................................................................................... 21 Role of the Airport ....................................................................................................................................... 23 ACRP 03-31: Resources Bibliography Page
    [Show full text]
  • Changing LNG Market Dynamics – Implications on Supply Security in the APEC Region
    Changing LNG Market Dynamics – Implications on Supply Security in the APEC Region APEC Oil and Gas Security Studies | Series 17 APEC Energy Working Group September 2020 APEC Project: EWG 01 2020S Produced by Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre (APERC) Institute of Energy Economics, Japan Inui Building, Kachidoki 11F, 1-13-1 Kachidoki Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0054 Japan Tel: (813) 5144-8551 Fax: (813) 5144-8555 E-mail: [email protected] (administration) Website: http://aperc.or.jp/ For Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Secretariat 35 Heng Mui Keng Terrace Singapore 119616 Tel: (65) 68919 600 Fax: (65) 68919 690 Email: [email protected] Website: www.apec.org © 2020 APEC Secretariat APEC#220-RE-01.9 ISBN: 978-981-14-7794-2 OGSS Series 17 Changing LNG Market Dynamics – Implications on Supply Security in the APEC Region 3 | P a g e TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................... 3 Foreword ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................... 7 Project coordinators .................................................................................................................. 7 Authors ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Editors
    [Show full text]
  • Colonización, Resistencia Y Mestizaje En Las Américas (Siglos Xvi-Xx)
    COLONIZACIÓN, RESISTENCIA Y MESTIZAJE EN LAS AMÉRICAS (SIGLOS XVI-XX) Guillaume Boccara (Editor) COLONIZACIÓN, RESISTENCIA Y MESTIZAJE EN LAS AMÉRICAS (SIGLOS XVI-XX) IFEA (Lima - Perú) Ediciones Abya-Yala (Quito - Ecuador) 2002 COLONIZACIÓN, RESISTENCIA Y MESTIZAJE EN LAS AMÉRICAS (SIGLOS XVI-XX) Guillaume Boccara (editor) 1ra. Edición: Ediciones Abya-Yala Av. 12 de octubre 14-30 y Wilson Telfs.: 593-2 2 506-267 / 593-2 2 562-633 Fax: 593-2 2 506-255 / 593-2 2 506-267 E-mail: [email protected] Casilla 17-12-719 Quito-Ecuador • Instituto Francés de Estudios Andinos IFEA Contralmirante Montero 141 Casilla 18-1217 Telfs: (551) 447 53 66 447 60 70 Fax: (511) 445 76 50 E-mail: [email protected] Lima 18-Perú ISBN: 9978-22-206-5 Diagramcación: Ediciones Abya-Yala Quito-Ecuador Diseño de portada: Raúl Yepez Impresión: Producciones digitales Abya-Yala Quito-Ecuador Impreso en Quito-Ecuador, febrero del 2002 Este libro corresponde al tomo 148 de la serie “Travaux de l’Institut Francais d’Etudes Andines (ISBN: 0768-424-X) INDICE Introducción Guillaume Boccara....................................................................................................................... 7 Primera parte COLONIZACIÓN, RESISTENCIA Y MESTIZAJE (EJEMPLOS AMERICANOS) I. Jonathan Hill & Susan Staats: Redelineando el curso de la historia: Estados euro-americanos y las culturas sin pueblos..................................................................................................................... 13 II. José Luis Martínez, Viviana Gallardo, & Nelson
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the Inter-American Foundation
    Grassroots Development J ournal of the Inter-American Foundation The IAF in Argentina VOLUME 24 NUMBER 1 2003 GrassrootsGrassroots DevelopmentDevelopment 20022002 23/123/1cov1 cov1 The Inter-American Foundation (IAF), an independent agency of the United States government, was created in 1969 as an experimental foreign assistance program. The IAF works to promote equitable, responsive and participatory self-help development by awarding grants directly to organizations in Latin America and the Caribbean. It also enters into partnerships with public and private sector entities to mobilize local, national and international resources for grassroots development. The IAF’s operating budget consists of congressional Grassroots Development appropriations and funds derived through the Social Progress Trust Fund. Journal of the Inter-American Foundation Frank Yturria, Chair, Board of Directors Patricia Hill Williams, Vice Chair, Board of Directors Publication Editor: Paula Durbin David Valenzuela, IAF President Photo Editor: Mark Caicedo Foreign Language Editions: Leyda Appel Grassroots Development is published in English and Spanish by the IAF’s Office of External Affairs. It appears on the IAF’s Web site at www.iaf.gov in English, Editorial Assistant: Adam Warfield Spanish and Portuguese versions accessible in graphic or text format. Original Design and Printing: U.S. Government Printing Office material produced by the IAF and published in Grassroots Development is in the public domain and may be freely reproduced. Certain material in this journal, however, has been provided by other sources and might be copyrighted. Reproduction of such material may require prior permission from the copyright holder. The editor requests source acknowledgement and a copy of any repro- duction.
    [Show full text]
  • University of California Santa Cruz What Makes Community Forestry Work? a Comparative Case Study in Michoacan and Oaxaca, Mexi
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ WHAT MAKES COMMUNITY FORESTRY WORK? A COMPARATIVE CASE STUDY IN MICHOACAN AND OAXACA, MEXICO A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSPHY in ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES by James Barsimantov June 2009 The Dissertation of James Barsimantov is approved: Professor Alan Richards, Chair Professor Daniel Press Professor Greg Gilbert i ii Table of Contents James Barsimantov – Doctoral Dissertation List of Tables iv List of Figures viii Abstract x Acknowledgements xi Chapter 1: Introduction 1 Chapter 2: Research Design and Methodology 18 Chapter 3: Is Community Forestry Related to Reduced Deforestation? An Analysis of 43 Eight Mexican States Chapter 4: Does Vertical Integration Matter? Social and Ecological Outcomes of 60 Community Forestry Programs Chapter 5: Internal and External Influences: Why do some communities attain higher 106 levels of vertical integration? Chapter 6:Vicious and Virtuous Cycles and the Role of External Non-Government 122 Actors in Community Forestry in Oaxaca and Michoacan, Mexico Chapter 7: Land cover change and land tenure change in Mexico’s avocado region: 140 Can community forestry reduce incentives to deforest for high value crops? Concluding Remarks 155 Appendix 1: Field Tools 160 Appendix 2: A Theoretical Model of Deforestation with Community Forestry 168 Appendix 3: Ecological Measures - Forest Transects 176 Bibliography 194 iii List of Tables James Barsimantov – Doctoral Dissertation Chapter 2 Table 2.1. A Schematic Approach to Case Selection of Mexican Forestry 20 Communities Table 2.2. Number and Percent of Communities by Level of Vertical Integration in 21 Oaxaca and Michoacan Table 2.3.
    [Show full text]
  • NATURAL GAS STORAGE: Actions Needed to Assess Inspection
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters October 2019 NATURAL GAS STORAGE Actions Needed to Assess Inspection Workload and Progress toward Safety Outcomes GAO-20-167 October 2019 NATURAL GAS STORAGE Actions Needed to Assess Inspection Workload and Progress toward Safety Outcomes Highlights of GAO-20-167, a report to congressional requesters Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found About 400 natural gas storage sites In 2018, the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Pipeline and Hazardous are important to the U.S. natural gas Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) set a goal for its natural gas storage system, providing about 30 percent of inspection program to inspect all approximately 400 natural gas storage sites the nation's energy. During a 2015 leak within 5 years, according to agency officials. PHMSA expected that all 25 eligible at a storage site near Los Angeles, states would help inspect sites, but only 10 states agreed to partner with the about 8,000 families were temporarily agency. As a result, the agency’s inspection workload increased by almost 60 relocated due to symptoms such as percent from when it set its goal, according to PHMSA data. Because of the migraines, nausea, and respiratory increase in its inspection workload over its preliminary estimate, PHMSA does problems. The leak raised concerns not have assurance that it has enough resources to meet its inspection goal. about health and safety risks from Furthermore, PHMSA has not used a workforce analysis to inform its budget other storage sites. In 2017, GAO recommended that PHMSA take requests.
    [Show full text]
  • Update to Gas Storage Needed to Support Electricity Generation
    Gas Storage Needed to Support Electricity Generation Prepared For The Utility Air Regulatory Group and the American Public Power Association An Update to Implications of Greater Reliance on Natural Gas for Electricity Generation (2010) June 2012 Update on Natural Gas Storage Needed to Support Electricity Generation Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Recent and Expected Additions to Storage .................................................................................................. 5 Generator Use of Storage ............................................................................................................................. 7 Use of Storage to Provide Reliability ............................................................................................................ 8 Generator Use of Storage for Imbalance Management ............................................................................. 10 Use of Storage to Provide Flexible Pipeline Services .................................................................................. 11 Competition for the Geology By Other Uses .............................................................................................. 14 Other Types of Storage May Increase in Relevance ................................................................................... 16 Final Thoughts ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Securing Air Cargo: Industry Perspectives
    SECURING AIR CARGO: INDUSTRY PERSPECTIVES HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND PROTECTIVE SECURITY OF THE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JULY 25, 2017 Serial No. 115–24 Printed for the use of the Committee on Homeland Security Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/ U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 27–978 PDF WASHINGTON : 2018 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Mar 15 2010 14:37 Jan 25, 2018 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 H:\115TH CONGRESS\17TP0725\27978.TXT HEATH Congress.#13 COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY MICHAEL T. MCCAUL, Texas, Chairman LAMAR SMITH, Texas BENNIE G. THOMPSON, Mississippi PETER T. KING, New York SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas MIKE ROGERS, Alabama JAMES R. LANGEVIN, Rhode Island JEFF DUNCAN, South Carolina CEDRIC L. RICHMOND, Louisiana LOU BARLETTA, Pennsylvania WILLIAM R. KEATING, Massachusetts SCOTT PERRY, Pennsylvania DONALD M. PAYNE, JR., New Jersey JOHN KATKO, New York FILEMON VELA, Texas WILL HURD, Texas BONNIE WATSON COLEMAN, New Jersey MARTHA MCSALLY, Arizona KATHLEEN M. RICE, New York JOHN RATCLIFFE, Texas J. LUIS CORREA, California DANIEL M. DONOVAN, JR., New York VAL BUTLER DEMINGS, Florida MIKE GALLAGHER, Wisconsin NANETTE DIAZ BARRAGA´ N, California CLAY HIGGINS, Louisiana JOHN H. RUTHERFORD, Florida THOMAS A. GARRETT, JR., Virginia BRIAN K. FITZPATRICK, Pennsylvania RON ESTES, Kansas BRENDAN P. SHIELDS, Staff Director KATHLEEN CROOKS FLYNN, Deputy General Counsel MICHAEL S.
    [Show full text]