Guns: Feeling Safe ≠ Being Safe
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
[ BEHAVIOR & BELIEF STUART VYSE Stuart Vyse is a psychologist and author of Believing in Magic: The Psychology of Superstition, which won the William James Book Award of the American Psychological Association. He is a fellow of the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry. Guns: Feeling Safe ≠ Being Safe n the days after the mass shooting in San Bernardino, California, in Ilate 2015, a dear friend who is a single mother made an impassioned plea on her Facebook page. After see- ing many calls for increased gun con- trol, she explained that she had been a victim of assault in the past and would not be giving up her handgun anytime soon. She said maintaining her per- mit was difficult to do—“as it should be”—but she was clearly upset about the many calls for additional controls. While I sympathize with my friend’s desire for security, she has fallen for one of the most common and most dangerous misconceptions Americans hold. According to a 2013 Gallup poll (Swift 2013), the top rea- son U.S. gun owners keep a firearm is for “personal safety/protection.” Fully 60 percent of gun owners gave this The Campaign against Gun pendently associated with an increase reason; the next most common reason Violence Research was “hunting” at 36 percent. in the risk of homicide in the home.” Sadly, buying a gun does not make In 1993, Arthur Kellermann and Indeed, controlling for other factors, you safer. To the contrary, the evi- colleagues published a landmark households where a gun was present dence suggests that bringing a gun study in the New England Journal were 2.7 times more likely to expe- into your home increases the chances of Medicine titled “Gun Ownership rience a homicide and 77 percent of you will be killed. You are to be for- as a Risk Factor for Homicide in the victims were killed by someone given if you have not heard more about the Home” (Kellermann et al. 1993). they knew: a spouse, partner, relative, this. There is an extremely profitable The Kellermann study examined 388 friend, roommate, or acquaintance. industry based on the myth that guns cases of homicide that occurred in the Kellermann and colleagues con- are an effective means of self-protec- home or within the property borders cluded: tion, and it would be bad for business of the home and an equal number Despite the widely held belief that if this information were more widely of matched control households. The guns are effective for protection, known. Furthermore, the myth that data were drawn from the most pop- our results suggest that they actu- weapons make you safer has benefited ulous counties in three different states ally pose a substantial threat to members of the household. People from a deliberate campaign against (Ohio, Tennessee, and Washington). who keep guns in their homes science and the collection of gun vi- Kellermann famously found that appear to be at greater risk of olence data. “keeping a gun in the home is inde- homicide in the home than people Skeptical Inquirer | March/April 2016 27 [ BEHAVIOR AND BELIEF STUART VYSE funding gun violence research (Dennis 2015). But last summer Congress qui- etly renewed the prohibition of firearms research, voting down an amendment that would have lifted the ban. When asked why the CDC amendment was not supported, then-Speaker of the House John Boehner replied, “Because guns are not a disease” (Bertrand 2015). Again in December of 2015, Con- gress passed another omnibus spending bill. Despite the efforts of Democrats to eliminate the Dickey amendment, it survived again, and the NRA-backed ban on gun violence research continues (Ferris 2015). What Does the Available Research Show? Although federal funding has been cut off for almost two decades, investiga- tors have found other ways to conduct who do not. Most of this risk is due to a substantially greater risk of research, and there are some consistent homicide at the hands of a family findings. member or intimate acquaintance. We did not find evidence of a pro- 1. Access to Firearms Increases the Risk tective effect of keeping a gun in the of Being a Victim of Homicide. home, even in the small subgroup Although federal of cases that involved forced entry. funding has been cut The primary result of the Keller- (p. 1090) mann study has held up over time. In off for almost two 2014, researchers from the University The Kellermann study caused quite of California at San Francisco pub- a stir, and pro-gun advocates were quick decades, investigators lished a meta-analysis in the Annals to try to criticize it. But the gun lobby have found other ways of Internal Medicine, summarizing all was not satisfied with merely trying to to conduct research, the available controlled studies (An- debunk the study. The National Rifle glemyer et al. 2014). They found the Association (NRA) acted to prevent re- and there are some odds of being a victim of homicide were search on gun violence altogether. consistent findings. between 1.6 and 3.0 times higher when The Kellermann study employed the victim had access to a firearm. The telephone and face-to-face interviews, wide availability of firearms is only one making it very expensive to conduct, of the factors contributing to the ho- and the investigators had received micide rate in the United States but, funding from the Center for Disease contrary to popular belief, you are safer Control (CDC) and Prevention’s Na- if you don’t have a gun at home than if tional Center for Injury Prevention “advocate or promote gun control.” In you do. (NCIP). The NRA response was to addition, Congress cut the CDC’s bud- advocate for the complete elimination get by $2.6 million, the same amount 2. Women Are Especially at Risk of the NCIP. They failed at that ef- that had been allocated for firearm in- of Homicide When a Firearm is fort, but they were able to effectively jury research in the previous year. The Present. block all federal funding of research on effect of the amendment was chilling, The same 2014 meta-analysis found gun violence. In what has come to be and all federal funding for firearm in- that the increased risk of homicide vic- called the Dickey Amendment—after jury research quickly disappeared, a timization created by access to a firearm its author, former U.S. Representative condition that is still in effect today was significantly greater for women Jay Dickey (R-Arkansas)—Congress (Jamieson 2013). than for men (Anglemyer et al. 2014). placed language in the 1996 omnibus Former Representative Dickey funding bill that prohibited any funds has subsequently changed his posi- 3. Access to Firearms Greatly Increases given to the CDC from being used to tion and is now in favor of the CDC the Risk of Suicide. 28 Volume 40 Issue 2 | Skeptical Inquirer Although it gets far less attention, For example, in April of 2015 a guns were no more effective than other suicide is a much bigger problem than study published in Preventive Medicine methods of self-defense in this regard. homicide. According to the National by David Hemenway of the Harvard Dr. Hemenway summarized the Center for Health Statistics, in 2013 School of Public Health and Sara J. Sol- findings this way: there were 2.5 times as many suicides nick of the University of Vermont ex- The National Crime Victimization as homicides in the United States, and amined data from the National Crime Surveys, the gold standard for crime many of them were committed using a Victimization Surveys for the years estimates, indicates that using a gun firearm. Of all firearm deaths, 63 per- 2007 through 2011 (Hemenway and in self-defense is quite rare (less cent were suicides and only 33 percent Solnick 2015). Hemenway and Sol- than 1 percent of contact crime) and that it does not appear to be were homicides. (The other 4 percent nick found that out of 14,000 episodes more effective than many other mea- Legal Intervention US Firearms Deaths, 2013 (source CDC) Undetermined Homicide Suicide Unintentional 05000 1 0,000 1 5,000 2 0,000 are for unintentional [accidents], un- determined, and legal interventions.) Furthermore, 51 percent of all sui- cides were committed with a firearm (National Center for Health Statistics 2015). Many suicides are impulsive acts that can often be prevented if there is time. Unfortunately, firearms are quick and highly lethal. Ready access to a gun makes it possible to act on impulse with tragically irreversible results. The 2014 meta-analysis also looked at controlled in which the victim came into contact sures of self-defense or protection in reducing the likelihood of being studies of suicide risk and found that with the offender (robberies, burglaries, injured. Not having a gun does not access to a firearm increased the odds assaults, etc.), the victim used a gun to render potential victims of crime of suicide by a ratio of 3.24-to-1 (Ang- threaten or attack the perpetrator in either helpless or easy marks. lemyer et al. 2014). only 127 cases (0.9 percent). Hemen- way and Solnick also found that men 4. Firearms Are Not Very Effective at and women were equally likely to be the A Dangerous Myth Deterring Crime. victims of contact crimes, but men were In 2012, the U.S. gun industry was One of the most popular argu- three times more likely to use a gun in estimated to be worth $31.8 billion ments in favor of firearm ownership is self-defense.