Agents of the Hidden Imam
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Agents of the Hidden Imam: Shiite Juristic Authority in Light of the Doctrine of Deputyship Ali-Ahmad Rasekh A Thesis In the Department of Religion Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Religion) at Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada © Ali-Ahmad Rasekh 2015 ii CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES This is to certify that the thesis prepared By: Ali-Ahmad Rasekh Entitled: Agents of the Hidden Imam: Shiite Juristic Authority in Light of the Doctrine of Deputyship and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Religion) complies with the regulations of the University and meets the accepted standards with respect to originality and quality. Signed by the final examining committee: Dr. F. Shaver Chair Dr. L. Takim External Examiner Dr. J. Carty External to Program Dr. R. Foltz Examiner Dr. L. Orr Examiner Dr. L. Clarke Thesis Supervisor Approved by: Dr. L. Orr, Graduate Program Director July 23, 2015 Dr. A. Roy, Dean, Faculty of Arts and Science iii ABSTRACT Agents of the Hidden Imam: Shiite Juristic Authority in Light of the Doctrine of Deputyship Ali-Ahmad Rasek, Ph.D. Concordia University, 2015 Deputyship deals with the issue of leadership in Twelver Shiism in a situation in which the Imam is believed to be only temporarily absent and still the possessor of ultimate religious and political authority. The jurists were recognized as the deputies of the Imam; this was and still is the source of their legitimacy and authority. There was, however, no consensus about the areas Deputyship would cover. This was due both to caution about trespassing on the prerogatives of the Imam and the unavailability of power to Shiites. The theoretical constraint changed with the lengthening of the Occultation after 940, and the practical constraint was also loosened due to instances of Shiite political power, principally in Iran. Change in thought about Deputyship, however, is very slow until the twentieth century, so that it can be detected and evaluated in juristic and theological texts and sometimes also in historical developments only over the long term. Close to the Occultation, the jurists confined their Deputyship and thus authority to juridical issues and Quranic punishments. In the sixteenth century under the Safavids, they expanded Deputyship to a wider range of religious matters through new interpretations of Shiite jurisprudence. They did not, however, possess or claim actual political authority, and their prominence was due rather to their social, economic and political influence and growth of religious institutions. It was in nineteenth-century Persia under the Qājārs that an interpretation of deputyship was introduced that would grant the jurists political power and upon which a further, even more political interpretation and actual jurist-led Islamic state was established by Khomeini in the twentieth century. The dissertation argues, contrary to views in a substantial literature on Shiism and Weber, that the jurists form a third category of charismatic authority after the Prophet and Imams. The chief and essential source of juristic charisma is Deputyship of the Imam, i.e. office charisma. A second source is personal qualities, which help the office charisma to flourish. Shiite jurists who possess personal in addition to office charisma and act, in the Weberian sense, “exceptionally” gather more followers. The dissertation makes a contribution to Weberian theory by arguing that charisma and charismatic office continue to evolve after the pure charismatic event. The emergence of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini is a recent striking instance. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my deep and eternal gratitude to Professor Lynda Clarke. I am endlessly indebted to my advisor for helping to improve and enrich the dissertation, as well as edit it. Prof. Clarke’s kindness will always remain alive in my memory. I pleased to offer my warm thanks to Professor Leslie Orr for her informative classes and unfailing guidance. Prof. Orr read and re-read the dissertation and suggested valuable corrections. I would also like to thank Distinguished Professor Emeritus Michel Despland, from whom I learned many new things; and Professor Richard Foltz, Director of the Centre for Iranian Studies, for his helpful comments and also for nominating me for the PARSA Award. With the submission of my dissertation, I remember and appreciate all my teachers: professors Marc Lalonde, Bilal Kuspinar, Ira Robinson, Michael Oppenheim, Norma Joseph, and Carly Daniel-Hughes. Many thanks to Munit Merid, Assistant to the Chair and Undergraduate Programs Assistant, and Tina Montandon, Graduate Program Assistant. Finally and foremost, I owe the greatest debt of gratitude to my family members, Masouma, Fatima, Sapida, and Ershad. My family not only fully supported me, but also understood the importance to me of my studies. I apologize that I could not provide a better life for them though I did my best to save them from experiencing the difficulties I and my generation suffered due to the troubles of my beloved country, Afghanistan. v Contents Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 Chapter One: Re-reading post-Occultation juristic authority ................................................ 11 Prophetic charisma and its routinization ....................................................................... 13 Imamic charisma ........................................................................................................... 25 Charisma of the jurist .................................................................................................... 33 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................... 60 Chapter Two: First moment of Deputyship: Struggling with political limitation .................. 65 Life and times ................................................................................................................ 67 Ideas and influence ........................................................................................................ 69 Contemporary politicization of the image of Mufīd ..................................................... 71 Key terms and concepts ................................................................................................. 75 The Imam’s amīrs, hākims, and wālīs ........................................................................... 79 The jurists and judgeship ............................................................................................... 80 The jurists and leadership of Friday prayer ................................................................... 83 Deputyship and jihād ..................................................................................................... 86 Commanding good and forbidding evil ........................................................................ 87 Deputyship and religious taxes ..................................................................................... 88 The jurist as a charismatic figure .................................................................................. 91 Deputyship from an unjust ruler is deputyship from the Imam .................................... 94 Analysis and conclusion ................................................................................................ 97 Chapter Three: Karakī and niyābah: The dilemma of two sultans ...................................... 104 Life and times .............................................................................................................. 105 Key terms and concepts ............................................................................................... 108 Scope of the mujtahid’s niyābah ................................................................................. 115 The jurists and Friday prayer ...................................................................................... 119 vi The jurists and judgeship ............................................................................................. 122 Niyābah from the Imam and working with an unjust ruler ......................................... 123 Enjoining good and forbidding evil and jihad ............................................................. 128 The jurists and religio-political taxes .......................................................................... 129 Analysis and conclusion .............................................................................................. 134 Chapter Four: Khomeini and the doctrine of wilāyah: Reviving the Prophet’s authority ... 141 Life and times .............................................................................................................. 143 Key terms and concepts ............................................................................................... 146 Personal charisma through politicization .................................................................... 154 Khomeini’s political theology ..................................................................................... 161 Working for an unjust ruler denied ............................................................................. 168 Khums ....................................................................................................................