DOCSLIB.ORG

Table 10. Bacterial Gene Expression in the Nodule

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table 10. Bacterial Gene Expression in the Nodule Table 10. Bacterial gene expression in the nodule GI Name Description SLR SD Increased in Rm1021 bacteroids compared to Rm1021 grown in TY medium 14523116 SMa0112 Conserved hypothetical 2.07 0.52 14523122 SMa0121 Hypothetical 5.28 0.60 14523123 SMa0123 Conserved hypothetical 4.09 1.16 14523124 SMa0124 GroEL3 chaperonin 4.50 0.46 14523125 SMa0125 GroES3 chaperonin 4.35 0.26 14523165 SMa0191 Conserved hypothetical 2.32 0.26 14523166 SMa0193 Conserved hypothetical 2.50 0.43 14523189 SMa0229 Conserved hypothetical 1.74 0.21 14523190 SMa0232 Conserved hypothetical 3.10 0.24 14523293 SMa0407 Conserved hypothetical 3.13 0.27 14523315 SMa0453 Similar to Yle from A. tumefaciens 1.92 0.22 14523318 SMa0462 Conserved hypothetical 2.05 0.25 14523325 SMa0471 Conserved hypothetical 1.98 0.42 14523326 SMa0473 Conserved hypothetical 1.17 0.34 14523327 SMa0475 TRm17a transposase 2.51 0.28 14523328 SMa0476 TRm17b transposase 3.71 1.02 14523341 SMa0498 LysR family transcriptional regulator 3.84 0.46 14523384 SMa0576 Leu or Leu/Val/Ile transport binding protein 4.28 0.60 14523385 SMa0579 Adenylate cyclase 1.94 0.71 14523412 SMa0625 Hypothetical 4.29 0.47 14523419 SMa0636 Conserved hypothetical 4.18 1.07 14523433 SMa0661 Conserved hypothetical 3.59 0.92 14523439 SMa0667 Conserved hypothetical 3.57 0.31 14523440 SMa0669 Conserved hypothetical 2.00 0.25 14523445 SMa0677 Glutamate/aspartate transport protein 2.50 0.62 14523453 SMa0689 Conserved hypothetical 3.36 0.33 14523454 SMa0690 Conserved hypothetical 4.57 0.49 14523491 SMa0751 Aromatic-ring hydroxylating dioxygenase 3.86 1.22 14523492 SMa0752 Dioxygenase reductase subunit 4.47 0.79 14523493 SMa0753 Conserved hypothetical 2.93 0.85 14523493 SMa0753 Conserved hypothetical 2.85 0.35 14523494 SMa0754 Hypothetical 3.09 0.98 14523500 SMa0762 FixK2 transcriptional regulator 6.84 0.87 14523501 SMa0763 Conserved hypothetical 8.23 0.72 14523502 SMa0765 FixN2 cytochrome c oxidase polypeptide I 5.88 0.52 14523503 SMa0766 FixO2 cytochrome c oxidase 5.64 0.57 14523504 SMa0767 FixQ2 cbb3-type cytochrome oxidase 6.97 0.23 14523505 SMa0769 FixP2 cytochrome c oxidase 6.87 0.99 14523506 SMa0771 Conserved hypothetical 5.76 0.69 14523507 SMa0772 NodL Nod factor acetyltransferase 5.49 1.33 14523508 SMa0773 NoeA host specific nodulation protein 3.00 0.35 14523509 SMa0774 NoeB host specific nodulation protein 2.20 0.63 14523534 SMa0810 FixU nitrogen fixation protein 5.02 0.85 14523535 SMa0811 FdxN ferredoxin 5.66 0.15 14523536 SMa0814 NifB FeMo cofactor biosynthesis protein 7.09 0.14 14523538 SMa0815 NifA transcriptional activator 6.20 0.32 GI Name Description SLR SD 14523539 SMa0816 FixX ferredoxin-like protein 5.58 0.27 14523540 SMa0817 FixC oxidoreductase 6.35 0.86 14523541 SMa0819 FixB electron transfer flavoprotein alpha chain 6.99 0.42 14523542 SMa0822 FixA electron transfer flavoprotein beta chain 6.93 0.68 14523544 SMa0825 NifH nitrogenase Fe protein 7.54 0.75 14523545 SMa0827 NifD nitrogenase Fe-Mo alpha chain 6.41 0.45 14523547 SMa0829 NifK nitrogenase Fe-Mo beta chain 6.45 0.35 14523548 SMa0830 NifE oxidoreductase 8.02 0.58 14523549 SMa0831 NifX nitrogen fixation protein 4.94 0.62 14523550 SMa0833 Conserved hypothetical 6.97 1.19 14523551 SMa0834 FdxB ferredoxin III 3.96 0.68 14523552 SMa0835 Hypothetical 10.5 kDa ORF, upstream from syrA 3.51 1.46 14523553 SMa0838 SyrA protein involved in EPS production 5.81 0.62 14523556 SMa0846 Conserved hypothetical 1.97 0.61 14523557 SMa0848 Hypothetical, upstream from syrM 2.21 0.30 14523558 SMa0849 SyrM transcriptional regulator 4.25 1.36 14523575 SMa0872 Hypothetical (ORF 110) 1.74 0.32 14523576 SMa0873 NifN Nitrogenase Fe-Mo cofactor biosynthesis protein 1.61 0.46 14523633 SMa0981 NtrR2 transcriptional regulator 1.79 0.15 14523634 SMa0983 Hypothetical 2.64 0.26 14523635 SMa0985 LysR-family transcriptional regulator 3.01 0.42 14523641 SMa0997 Transposase fragment 1.96 0.46 14523687 SMa1073 TRm23b IS ATP-binding protein 3.90 1.65 14523692 SMa1079 TspO tryptophan rich sensory protein 2.04 0.54 14523694 SMa1082 Conserved hypothetical 2.12 0.29 14523704 SMa1096 Conserved hypothetical 2.16 0.32 14523707 SMa1100 Conserved hypothetical 2.57 0.35 14523715 SMa1118 HspC2 heat shock protein 3.03 0.91 14523719 SMa1126 Conserved hypothetical 2.27 0.25 14523720 SMa1128 DegP4 protease 2.64 0.79 14523723 SMa1132 Hypothetical 6.99 1.16 14523724 SMa1134 Hypothetical 5.23 0.53 14523725 SMa1136 Conserved hypothetical 4.70 0.45 14523728 SMa1141 Fnr/Crp family transcriptional regulator 3.01 0.45 14523731 SMa1147 Conserved hypothetical 2.41 0.71 14523736 SMa1154 Conserved hypothetical 2.23 0.75 14523748 SMa1169 Conserved hypothetical 1.74 0.55 14523770 SMa1201 Conserved hypothetical 2.38 0.52 14523771 SMa1207 FixK-like regulator 3.51 1.40 14523772 SMa1208 FixS1 nitrogen fixation protein 5.33 0.36 14523773 SMa1209 FixI1 copper transport ATPase 2.75 0.34 14523774 SMa1210 FixH nitrogen fixation protein 4.64 0.28 14523775 SMa1211 FixG iron sulfur membrane protein 5.55 0.61 14523777 SMa1213 FixP1 di-heme cytochrome c 6.36 0.21 14523778 SMa1214 FixQ1 cbb3-type cytochrome oxidase 6.02 0.53 14523779 SMa1216 FixO1 c-type cytochrome 5.53 0.64 14523780 SMa1220 FixN1 Heme b / copper cytochrome c oxidase subunit 6.08 0.93 14523781 SMa1223 FixM flavoprotein oxidoreductase 7.85 0.46 14523786 SMa1231 Conserved hypothetical 3.02 0.79 14523849 SMa1334 Conserved hypothetical 2.80 0.76 14523852 SMa1339 ABC transporter 2.01 0.18 14523920 SMa1455 Conserved hypothetical 2.30 0.30 GI Name Description SLR SD 14523921 SMa1456 Conserved hypothetical 1.97 0.28 14523953 SMa1515 Hypothetical 1.51 0.20 14524122 SMa1770 Conserved hypothetical 1.63 0.44 14524135 SMa1797 Hypothetical 3.38 0.41 14524201 SMa1910 Conserved hypothetical 4.16 1.17 14524205 SMa1918 Conserved hypothetical 2.30 0.81 14524207 SMa1921 Hypothetical 2.41 0.65 14524208 SMa1924 Conserved hypothetical 1.88 0.32 14524256 SMa2009 Conserved hypothetical 5.38 0.93 14524257 SMa2011 Hypothetical 3.69 0.21 14524281 SMa2055 Conserved hypothetical 2.38 0.26 14524340 SMa2167 Conserved hypothetical 1.45 0.20 14524360 SMa2215 GntR-family transcriptional regulator 3.23 0.14 14524386 SMa2263 Hypothetical 2.02 0.29 14524391 SMa2273 Hypothetical 2.66 0.57 14524392 SMa2275 Conserved hypothetical 5.06 1.20 15139922 SMb20047 Hypothetical 1.71 0.37 15139923 SMb20048 Transcriptional regulator 2.06 0.46 15139924 SMb20049 FusA2 elongation factor G 2.19 0.42 15139938 SMb20066 Hypothetical 1.27 0.47 15139974 SMb20102 Acetoin catabolism regulator 1.58 0.17 15139990 SMb20118 Conserved hypothetical 1.30 0.46 15140033 SMb20161 Hypothetical 2.24 1.08 15140094 SMb20231 ABC transporter, sugar 2.39 0.55 15140095 SMb20232 ABC transporter 2.02 1.15 15140117 SMb20255 Conserved hypothetical 2.10 0.23 15140190 SMb20331 Conserved hypothetical 2.86 0.36 15140199 SMb20340 Conserved hypothetical 1.60 0.36 15140214 SMb20355 Hypothetical 2.84 1.03 15140224 SMb20365 ABC transporter, iron 2.62 1.38 15140320 SMb20465 Conserved hypothetical 2.35 0.31 15140339 SMb20484 ABC transporter, sugar 3.30 0.63 15140363 SMb20508 ABC transporter, sugar 2.28 0.29 15140369 SMb20515 Chemotaxis methyltransferase 1.58 0.17 15140370 SMb20516 Response regulator 2.44 0.55 15140374 SMb20520 Conserved hypothetical 4.20 0.45 15140375 SMb20521 Conserved hypothetical 3.38 0.40 15140376 SMb20522 Conserved hypothetical 2.97 0.51 15140383 SMb20531 RpoE RNA polymerase ECF sigma factor 1.73 0.39 15140391 SMb20539 CyaF6 adenylate cyclase 3.52 1.34 15140407 SMb20544 ISRm14 protein 3.08 0.35 15141392 SMb20592 RpoE RNA polymerase sigma factor 4.77 0.35 15141394 SMb20594 AmcY amicyanin precursor 3.49 0.14 15141415 SMb20615 ThiC thiamine biosynthesis protein 2.09 0.36 15141416 SMb20616 ThiO thiamine biosynthesis oxidoreductase 1.48 0.45 15141242 SMb20647 Conserved hypothetical 2.31 0.71 15141259 SMb20665 ISRm17 partial transposase 2.16 0.20 15141267 SMb20673 ABC transporter 2.77 1.19 15141312 SMb20717 LacI-family transcriptional regulator 2.18 0.63 15140443 SMb20818 MocD hydrocarbon oxygenase 3.59 0.47 15140444 SMb20819 MocE ferredoxin of the Rieseke type 4.48 0.39 15140445 SMb20820 MocF ferredoxin reductase 5.56 1.00 GI Name Description SLR SD 15140446 SMb20821 ATP/GTP-binding hydroxymethyltransferase 3.62 0.89 15140452 SMb20827 Transposase 2.82 0.83 15140465 SMb20837 Conserved hypothetical, transmembrane 1.93 1.17 15140468 SMb20840 Conserved hypothetical 2.63 0.25 15140471 SMb20843 AlgI involved in acetylating a cell surface saccharide 2.12 0.18 15141047 SMb20866 Conserved hypothetical 3.24 0.59 15141089 SMb20906 Hypothetical 2.46 0.51 15141100 SMb20914 Conserved hypothetical 2.19 0.67 15140956 SMb20947 ExoX posttranscriptional repressor 2.06 0.26 15140964 SMb20953 Conserved hypothetical, exported 4.39 0.45 15140501 SMb21044 ATP-dependent DNA ligase 3.86 0.91 15140582 SMb21118 Hypothetical 2.46 0.78 15140764 SMb21212 Conserved hypothetical 1.57 0.29 15140625 SMb21236 ATP/GTP-binding protein 1.56 0.43 15140683 SMb21294 Hsp20-family small heat shock protein 2.74 0.83 15140684 SMb21295 Hsp20-family small heat shock protein 2.44 0.73 15140689 SMb21300 DeoC deoxyribose-phosphate aldolase 1.78 0.31 15140690 SMb21301 Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1.48 0.26 15140795 SMb21333 Hypothetical 2.07 0.43 15140807 SMb21345 ABC transporter, sugar uptake 2.07 0.21 15141112 SMb21399 Conserved hypothetical 3.02 0.29 15141114 SMb21400 Conserved hypothetical 3.32 0.64 15141123 SMb21409 Hypothetical 3.32 0.20 15141158 SMb21442 Conserved hypothetical 3.12 0.27 15141159 SMb21443 Conserved hypothetical 2.04 0.15 15141161 SMb21445 DNA topoisomerase I 5.09 0.34
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WO 2017/014762 Al 26 January 2017 (26.01.2017) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2017/014762 Al 26 January 2017 (26.01.2017) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, C12Q 1/68 (2006.01) HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, (21) International Application Number: MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PCT/US201 5/0414 15 PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, (22) International Filing Date: SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, 2 1 July 20 15 (21 .07.2015) TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (25) Filing Language: English (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, (26) Publication Language: English GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, (71) Applicant: OMNIOME, INC. [US/US]; 4225 Executive TZ, UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, Square, Suite 440, La Jolla, California 92037 (US). TJ, TM), European (AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU, IE, IS, IT, LT, LU, (72) Inventors: VIJAYAN, Kandaswamy; 4465 Vision Drive, LV, MC, MK, MT, NL, NO, PL, PT, RO, RS, SE, SI, SK, Unit 6, San Diego, California 92121 (US).
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Materials
    Supplementary Materials Figure S1. Differentially abundant spots between the mid-log phase cells grown on xylan or xylose. Red and blue circles denote spots with increased and decreased abundance respectively in the xylan growth condition. The identities of the circled spots are summarized in Table 3. Figure S2. Differentially abundant spots between the stationary phase cells grown on xylan or xylose. Red and blue circles denote spots with increased and decreased abundance respectively in the xylan growth condition. The identities of the circled spots are summarized in Table 4. S2 Table S1. Summary of the non-polysaccharide degrading proteins identified in the B. proteoclasticus cytosol by 2DE/MALDI-TOF. Protein Locus Location Score pI kDa Pep. Cov. Amino Acid Biosynthesis Acetylornithine aminotransferase, ArgD Bpr_I1809 C 1.7 × 10−4 5.1 43.9 11 34% Aspartate/tyrosine/aromatic aminotransferase Bpr_I2631 C 3.0 × 10−14 4.7 43.8 15 46% Aspartate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase, Asd Bpr_I1664 C 7.6 × 10−18 5.5 40.1 17 50% Branched-chain amino acid aminotransferase, IlvE Bpr_I1650 C 2.4 × 10−12 5.2 39.2 13 32% Cysteine synthase, CysK Bpr_I1089 C 1.9 × 10−13 5.0 32.3 18 72% Diaminopimelate dehydrogenase Bpr_I0298 C 9.6 × 10−16 5.6 35.8 16 49% Dihydrodipicolinate reductase, DapB Bpr_I2453 C 2.7 × 10−6 4.9 27.0 9 46% Glu/Leu/Phe/Val dehydrogenase Bpr_I2129 C 1.2 × 10−30 5.4 48.6 31 64% Imidazole glycerol phosphate synthase Bpr_I1240 C 8.0 × 10−3 4.7 22.5 8 44% glutamine amidotransferase subunit Ketol-acid reductoisomerase, IlvC Bpr_I1657 C 3.8 × 10−16
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Methylation Seeing the Forest for the Trees: a Wide Perspective on RNA-Directed
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on August 16, 2012 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Seeing the forest for the trees: a wide perspective on RNA-directed DNA methylation Huiming Zhang and Jian-Kang Zhu Genes Dev. 2012 26: 1769-1773 Access the most recent version at doi:10.1101/gad.200410.112 References This article cites 31 articles, 9 of which can be accessed free at: http://genesdev.cshlp.org/content/26/16/1769.full.html#ref-list-1 Related Content Spatial and functional relationships among Pol V-associated loci, Pol IV-dependent siRNAs, and cytosine methylation in the Arabidopsis epigenome Andrzej T. Wierzbicki, Ross Cocklin, Anoop Mayampurath, et al. Genes Dev. August 15, 2012 26: 1825-1836 Email alerting Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article - sign up in the box at the service top right corner of the article or click here Topic Articles on similar topics can be found in the following collections Collections Chromatin and Gene Expression (146 articles) Plant Biology (29 articles) To subscribe to Genes & Development go to: http://genesdev.cshlp.org/subscriptions Copyright © 2012 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on August 16, 2012 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press PERSPECTIVE Seeing the forest for the trees: a wide perspective on RNA-directed DNA methylation Huiming Zhang1 and Jian-Kang Zhu1,2,3 1Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA; 2Shanghai Center for Plant Stress Biology, Shanghai Institutes of Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200032, China In this issue of Genes & Development, Wierzbicki and remaining subunits of Pol IV and/or Pol V are different but colleagues (pp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennsylvania State University
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School Graduate Program in Plant Biology IDENTIFICATION OF SMALL RNA PRODUCING GENES IN THE MOSS PHYSCOMITRELLA PATENS A Dissertation in Plant Biology by Ceyda Coruh 2014 Ceyda Coruh Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2014 The dissertation of Ceyda Coruh was reviewed and approved* by the following: Michael J. Axtell Associate Professor of Biology Dissertation Advisor Chair of Committee Claude dePamphilis Professor of Biology Sarah M. Assmann Waller Professor of Biology Anton Nekrutenko Associate Professor of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Teh-hui Kao Distinguished Professor of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Chair, Intercollege Graduate Degree Program in Plant Biology *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School iii ABSTRACT In plants, a significant fraction of the genome is responsible for making regulatory small RNAs. These ubiquitous, endogenous small RNAs are currently categorized into two groups: microRNAs (miRNAs) and small interfering RNAs (siRNAs). They are produced by Dicer-Like (DCL) proteins and utilized by Argonaute (AGO) proteins to guide repressive regulation of target mRNAs and/or chromatin selected on the basis of small RNA-target complementarity at the transcriptional or post-transcriptional levels. 21 nt miRNAs and 24 nt heterochromatic siRNAs are the two major types of small RNAs found in angiosperms (flowering plants). The small RNA populations in angiosperms are dominated by 24 nt heterochromatic siRNAs which derive from intergenic, repetitive regions and mediate DNA methylation and repressive histone modifications to targeted loci in angiosperms. However, the existence and extent of heterochromatic siRNAs in other land plant lineages has been less clear.
    [Show full text]
  • Materials and Methods
    Effects of Hybridization on Heterochromatic Small Interfering RNA and Gene Expression in Zea mays by Travis Korry Coleman A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Plant Agriculture Guelph, Ontario, Canada © Travis Coleman, January, 2017 ABSTRACT EFFECTS OF HYBRIDIZATION ON HETEROCHROMATIC SMALL INTERFERING RNA AND GENE EXPRESSION IN ZEA MAYS Travis Korry Coleman Advisor: University of Guelph, 2016 Associate Professor Lewis N. Lukens Despite decades of research, the molecular nature of heterosis is not completely understood. Heterosis for quantitative traits is controlled by the cumulative effects of multiple genes and regulatory elements, each of which may exhibit differing modes of action. While dominance and over-dominance theories can account for some of the genetic control of heterosis, neither provides a complete account. There is a growing body of evidence that implicates small RNAs as non-coding elements which may play a role in the manifestation of heterosis upon hybridization. In particular, 24-nt heterochromatic small interfering RNAs (hetsiRNAs) may play a role in mediating trans-genomic interactions via DNA methylation when two genomes come into contact in an F1 nucleus. Recent research in Arabidopsis thaliana has demonstrated that hetsiRNAs show non-additive expression upon hybridization, with the majority of hetsiRNAs being downregulated. This research seeks to examine such trends in non-additive hetsiRNA expression in commercial maize germplasm. Small RNA were isolated and deep sequenced from leaf tissue samples of two inbred lines and their F1 hybrid. In order to examine the effects of reducing hetsiRNAs in hybridization, each genotype was also sampled in each of two mediator of paramutation 1 (mop1) allelic states.
    [Show full text]
  • The Microbiota-Produced N-Formyl Peptide Fmlf Promotes Obesity-Induced Glucose
    Page 1 of 230 Diabetes Title: The microbiota-produced N-formyl peptide fMLF promotes obesity-induced glucose intolerance Joshua Wollam1, Matthew Riopel1, Yong-Jiang Xu1,2, Andrew M. F. Johnson1, Jachelle M. Ofrecio1, Wei Ying1, Dalila El Ouarrat1, Luisa S. Chan3, Andrew W. Han3, Nadir A. Mahmood3, Caitlin N. Ryan3, Yun Sok Lee1, Jeramie D. Watrous1,2, Mahendra D. Chordia4, Dongfeng Pan4, Mohit Jain1,2, Jerrold M. Olefsky1 * Affiliations: 1 Division of Endocrinology & Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA. 2 Department of Pharmacology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA. 3 Second Genome, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA. 4 Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. * Correspondence to: 858-534-2230, [email protected] Word Count: 4749 Figures: 6 Supplemental Figures: 11 Supplemental Tables: 5 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online April 22, 2019 Diabetes Page 2 of 230 ABSTRACT The composition of the gastrointestinal (GI) microbiota and associated metabolites changes dramatically with diet and the development of obesity. Although many correlations have been described, specific mechanistic links between these changes and glucose homeostasis remain to be defined. Here we show that blood and intestinal levels of the microbiota-produced N-formyl peptide, formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLF), are elevated in high fat diet (HFD)- induced obese mice. Genetic or pharmacological inhibition of the N-formyl peptide receptor Fpr1 leads to increased insulin levels and improved glucose tolerance, dependent upon glucagon- like peptide-1 (GLP-1). Obese Fpr1-knockout (Fpr1-KO) mice also display an altered microbiome, exemplifying the dynamic relationship between host metabolism and microbiota.
    [Show full text]
  • Generated by SRI International Pathway Tools Version 25.0, Authors S
    Authors: Pallavi Subhraveti Peter D Karp Ingrid Keseler An online version of this diagram is available at BioCyc.org. Biosynthetic pathways are positioned in the left of the cytoplasm, degradative pathways on the right, and reactions not assigned to any pathway are in the far right of the cytoplasm. Transporters and membrane proteins are shown on the membrane. Anamika Kothari Periplasmic (where appropriate) and extracellular reactions and proteins may also be shown. Pathways are colored according to their cellular function. Gcf_000442315Cyc: Rubellimicrobium thermophilum DSM 16684 Cellular Overview Connections between pathways are omitted for legibility. Ron Caspi lipid II (meso phosphate diaminopimelate sn-glycerol containing) phosphate dCTP 3-phosphate predicted ABC RS07495 RS12165 RS03605 transporter RS13105 of phosphate lipid II (meso dCTP sn-glycerol diaminopimelate phosphate 3-phosphate containing) phosphate Secondary Metabolite Degradation Storage Compound Biosynthesis Tetrapyrrole Biosynthesis Hormone Biosynthesis Aromatic Compound Aldehyde Degradation UDP-N-acetyl- Biosynthesis undecaprenyl- a mature (4R)-4-hydroxy- an L-glutamyl- a [protein]-L- queuosine at Macromolecule Modification myo-inositol degradation I α-D-glucosamine adenosylcobinamide a purine L-canavanine 5'-deoxyadenosine sec Metabolic Regulator Biosynthesis Amine and Polyamine Biosynthesis polyhydroxybutanoate biosynthesis siroheme biosynthesis methylglyoxal degradation I diphospho-N- peptidoglycan 2-oxoglutarate Gln β-isoaspartate glu position 34 ser a tRNA indole-3-acetate
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics and Function of DNA Methylation in Plants
    REVIEWS Dynamics and function of DNA methylation in plants Huiming Zhang1,2*, Zhaobo Lang1,2 and Jian- Kang Zhu 1,2,3* Abstract | DNA methylation is a conserved epigenetic modification that is important for gene regulation and genome stability. Aberrant patterns of DNA methylation can lead to plant developmental abnormalities. A specific DNA methylation state is an outcome of dynamic regulation by de novo methylation, maintenance of methylation and active demethylation, which are catalysed by various enzymes that are targeted by distinct regulatory pathways. In this Review, we discuss DNA methylation in plants, including methylating and demethylating enzymes and regulatory factors, and the coordination of methylation and demethylation activities by a so- called methylstat mechanism; the functions of DNA methylation in regulating transposon silencing, gene expression and chromosome interactions; the roles of DNA methylation in plant development; and the involvement of DNA methylation in plant responses to biotic and abiotic stress conditions. DNA methylation at the 5ʹ position of cytosine contrib- and regulatory factors are generally not lethal. However, utes to the epigenetic regulation of nuclear gene expres- DNA methylation appears to be more crucial for devel- sion and to genome stability1,2. Epigenetic changes, opment and environmental- stress responses in plants including DNA methylation, histone modifications and that have more complex genomes. Recent findings histone variants and some non- coding RNA (ncRNA) have uncovered important
    [Show full text]
  • Dissertation
    DISSERTATION Titel der Dissertation „Heterochromatin components are required for limiting biogenesis of siRNAs to sequences targeted for DNA elimination in Tetrahymena “ Verfasser Jan Henrik Suhren angestrebter akademischer Grad Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) Wien, 2015 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt: A 794 685 490 Dissertationsgebiet lt. Studienblatt: Molekulare Biologie, DK: RNA Biology Betreuerin / Betreuer: Dr. Kazufumi Mochizuki Table of contents Table of contents 1 Index of Figures 3 Abstract 5 Zusammenfassung 7 1. Introduction 9 1.1 Heterochromatin 9 1.2 RNA Interference 10 1.3 Small RNA Biogenesis 11 1.4 Silencing by RNAi 12 1.5 Nuclear RNAi Pathways and heterochromatin 13 1.5.1 Nuclear RNAi in S. pombe 14 1.5.2 RNA-directed DNA methylation in Arabidopsis thaliana 15 1.5.3 Nuclear RNAi in C. elegans 17 1.5.4 Nuclear piRNAs in genome defense 17 1.6 Boundary elements regulate heterochromatin spreading 19 1.7 The model organism Tetrahymena thermophila 22 1.8 Nuclear dimorphism and genome rearrangements in Tetrahymena thermophila 22 1.9 Small RNA pathways in Tetrahymena 25 1.10 Small RNA-directed DNA elimination 25 1.10.1 Two types of IESs 25 1.10.2 Biogenesis and scanning of Early-scnRNAs 27 1.10.3 Late-scnRNA biogenesis is heterochromatin dependent 27 2. Results 31 2.1 Coi6p is an HP1-like protein 31 2.2 Coi6p is specifically expressed during conjugation 32 2.3 Coi6p localizes to heterochromatin foci in the new macronucleus 34 2.4 Coi6p specifically binds to IESs in vivo 36 2.5 Coi6p is required for DNA elimination 38 2.6 Chromo-
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Detection of Pol IV/RDR2-Dependent Transcripts At
    Downloaded from genome.cshlp.org on October 3, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Detection of Pol IV/RDR2-dependent transcripts at the genomic scale in Arabidopsis reveals features and regulation of siRNA biogenesis Shaofang Li1, Lee E. Vandivier2, Bin Tu1, Lei Gao1, So Youn Won1, Shengben Li1, Binglian Zheng3, Brian D. Gregory2, and Xuemei Chen1,4,* 1Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, Institute of Integrative Genome Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA 2Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, 433 S. University Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA 3State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering and Institute of Plant Biology, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China 4Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA * Address correspondence to: [email protected] Keywords: siRNA, CHH DNA methylation, Pol IV, Pol II, RDR2, DRM2, CMT2 Running title: Genome-wide discovery of Pol IV/RDR2 products 1 Downloaded from genome.cshlp.org on October 3, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Abstract 24 nucleotide small interfering (siRNAs) are central players in RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM), a process that establishes and maintains DNA methylation at transposable elements to ensure genome stability in plants. The plant-specific RNA polymerase IV (Pol IV) is required for siRNA biogenesis and is thought to transcribe RdDM loci to produce primary transcripts that are converted to double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs) by RDR2 to serve as siRNA precursors. Yet, no such siRNA precursor transcripts have ever been reported. Here, through genome-wide profiling of RNAs in genotypes that compromise the processing of siRNA precursors, we were able to identify Pol IV/RDR2-dependent transcripts from tens of thousands of loci.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bayesian Model for Inference of Metabolic Divergence Among Microbial Communities
    BiomeNet: A Bayesian Model for Inference of Metabolic Divergence among Microbial Communities Mahdi Shafiei1., Katherine A. Dunn2., Hugh Chipman3, Hong Gu1, Joseph P. Bielawski1,2* 1 Department of Mathematics & Statistics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, 2 Department of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, 3 Department of Mathematics & Statistics, Acadia University, Wolfville, Nova Scotia, Canada Abstract Metagenomics yields enormous numbers of microbial sequences that can be assigned a metabolic function. Using such data to infer community-level metabolic divergence is hindered by the lack of a suitable statistical framework. Here, we describe a novel hierarchical Bayesian model, called BiomeNet (Bayesian inference of metabolic networks), for inferring differential prevalence of metabolic subnetworks among microbial communities. To infer the structure of community-level metabolic interactions, BiomeNet applies a mixed-membership modelling framework to enzyme abundance information. The basic idea is that the mixture components of the model (metabolic reactions, subnetworks, and networks) are shared across all groups (microbiome samples), but the mixture proportions vary from group to group. Through this framework, the model can capture nested structures within the data. BiomeNet is unique in modeling each metagenome sample as a mixture of complex metabolic systems (metabosystems). The metabosystems are composed of mixtures of tightly connected metabolic subnetworks. BiomeNet differs from other unsupervised methods by allowing researchers to discriminate groups of samples through the metabolic patterns it discovers in the data, and by providing a framework for interpreting them. We describe a collapsed Gibbs sampler for inference of the mixture weights under BiomeNet, and we use simulation to validate the inference algorithm.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling and Computational Prediction of Metabolic Channelling
    MODELING AND COMPUTATIONAL PREDICTION OF METABOLIC CHANNELLING by Christopher Morran Sanford A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Graduate Department of Molecular Genetics University of Toronto © Copyright by Christopher Morran Sanford 2009 Abstract MODELING AND COMPUTATIONAL PREDICTION OF METABOLIC CHANNELLING Master of Science 2009 Christopher Morran Sanford Graduate Department of Molecular Genetics University of Toronto Metabolic channelling occurs when two enzymes that act on a common substrate pass that intermediate directly from one active site to the next without allowing it to diffuse into the surrounding aqueous medium. In this study, properties of channelling are investigated through the use of computational models and cell simulation tools. The effects of enzyme kinetics and thermodynamics on channelling are explored with the emphasis on validating the hypothesized roles of metabolic channelling in living cells. These simulations identify situations in which channelling can induce acceleration of reaction velocities and reduction in the free concentration of intermediate metabolites. Databases of biological information, including metabolic, thermodynamic, toxicity, inhibitory, gene fusion and physical protein interaction data are used to predict examples of potentially channelled enzyme pairs. The predictions are used both to support the hypothesized evolutionary motivations for channelling, and to propose potential enzyme interactions that may be worthy of future investigation. ii Acknowledgements I wish to thank my supervisor Dr. John Parkinson for the guidance he has provided during my time spent in his lab, as well as for his extensive help in the writing of this thesis. I am grateful for the advice of my committee members, Prof.
    [Show full text]