Dutch Agents 1940 – 1945 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dutch Agents 1940 – 1945 1 Dutch Agents 1940 – 1945 1 Dutch agents 1940 – 1945 By Frans Kluiters (New Version, September 2008)1 This is a comprehensive list of secret agents who infiltrated into the Netherlands on behalf of the Allied intelligence and action services during the period 1940 – 1945.2 It results from my research over the past twenty years, and was originally intended to help me find my way in the welter of names, code names and aliases mentioned in the literature on Second World War intelligence. The list is a compilation of material from old and new open sources and archives. Some forty years ago researcher G.P. van der Stroom made a similar list on the basis of secondary sources, which was used by L. de Jong for his official history of the Netherlands during the Second World War. Van der Stroom’s list was incomplete and contained some errors, but, having much of the same source material at my disposal, I started to compile my own list. In the 1990’s part of the archives of the Special Operations Executive (SOE) became available for research. However, these original documents often only contained the code names or aliases of their action agents, which makes it difficult to comprehend the meaning of these papers. That is why Ihave listed all the various code names and aliases of the agents, I have come across. A problem is that MI6 archives are closed to researchers. This means that information on intelligence agents can only be found in secondary sources and some Dutch archives. Therefore names and details of agents who were active in the Netherlands, but do not figure in these sources or in the available archives, may also be lacking in my list.3 There is a reason for assuming this, as major Desmond Morton, Winston Churchill’s personal assistant, wrote to Churchill in October 1941: ‘Various personal dislikes and intrigues figure in the story of which the essential point is whether the Dutch Secret Service has a right to demand particulars of British Secret Agents working in Holland. […] At first glance it would seem to me that neither the Dutch nor any other allied nations should claim a right to know all our Secret Agents in their countries even if in return they give us the names of the agents working for them. There will obviously be occasions when mutual disclosures are necessary to avoid confusion, but friendly cooperation between the Chiefs of the Secret Services concerned should meet all requirements.’ 4 Some agents were called ‘Engelandvaarders’, fleeing the Netherlands by sea, land or air, and succeeding in reaching Great Britain. Some of them were recruited straight away after being 1 Dates are given in accordance with NEN-ISO specification 8601 (2005). 2 Strictly speaking, one agent, Kiek, does not belong here, because he infiltrated into France instead of the Netherlands. He has been listed solely because of his Dutch nationality. Likewise, some Dutch agents who infiltrated on behalf of OSS into Austria, have been recorded. 3 During a discussion with the AIVD, the Dutch intelligence and security service, it became clear that – referring to a recently introduced bill – they believe that the identity of former Dutch intelligence agents should not be revealed. It is of course a noble aspiration for a service to assure their agents and informers eternal anonimity, but the protection of intelligence agents who were active long before the AIVD came into existence seems a holier-than-thou attitude. These agents worked for the Centrale Inlichtingendienst and their successor, Bureau Inlichtingen, and certainly not for any post-war security service (after the war Gerbrands and Pot for example worked for the BVD, the then Dutch security service, but no longer as agents). Furthermore, many of these agents were portrayed – with names, aliases and other personal details – by L. de Jong inhis historyof the Netherlands during the Second World War, and in numerous other publications. 4 TNA PREM, 3/221/13B. Note Morton to Churchill 19411024. Dutch Agents 1940 – 1945 2 interrogated at the Royal Victoria Patriotic School (later called the London Reception Centre) and the Dutch security service.5 Two British services were active in recruiting agents: MI6 (also known as the Secret Intelligence Service or SIS) and SOE, the Special Operations Executive. MI6 wanted agents for collecting information about the military situation on the continent. SOE wanted agents for sabotaging the German war machine. In order to effect this the two services collaborated with various successive Dutch secret services. Since the Dutch influence on policy, planning and carrying out of operations was minimal, and because these agents were only loosely affiliated to the Dutch services, especially in the years 1940-1942, I have simply called them MI6 or SOE agents. Officially, the MI6 agents were first employed by the Centrale Inlichtingendienst (CID), and the non- governmental – strictly speaking even illegal – ‘Contact Holland’, then the Bureau Voorbereiding Terugkeer/Bureau Militaire Voorbereiding Terugkeer, and lastly the Bureau Inlichtingen (BI).6 SOE came to work with the CID too, then with the Bureau Militaire Voorbereiding Terugkeer, but after the the Englandspiel debacle, the Bureau Bijzondere Opdrachten (BBO) took over. It was most fortunate that in May 2008 I was contacted by aviation historian Huub van Sabben, who offered to correct and amplify my list. As a result of his meticulous research into parachute drops above Holland, this list has gained in accuracy.7 Also my checking of a score of files in the National Archives in The Hague contributed to that result. Some questions have now been answered and, although some others remain, I think this list now forms a reliable source for historians. However, this is still an ongoing research project, so make sure that you use the latest version of my list. I hope it may contribute to your own research. On the other hand, I would be grateful for any comments on and/or additions to this list.8 Frans Kluiters February/September 2008. 5 If known, I have mentioned the location of these interrogation reports, along with other reports, in the archives. Some other enthusiastic researcher will have to check the RVPS interrogation reports in TNA WO 208/3663 – WO 208/3748 for reports relating to Dutchmen (unfortunately, this type of research is not financially supported by official Dutch historical institutions). 6 The tasks and functions of these organizations (except for ‘Contact Holland’) are specified in my book De Nederlandse inlichtingen- en veiligheidsdiensten. 7 Most of Van Sabben’s data come from RAF archives in TNA. 8 The NISA webmaster will be pleased to pass on your comments, corrections or additions to me (please specify your sources). www.nisa-intelligence.nl. Dutch Agents 1940 – 1945 3 ‘AART’ WEIJDEN, van der, J.L.9 ‘ABEL’ WIJNGAARDEN, van, L. ‘ABOR’ BAATSEN, A.A. ‘ADAM’ LOON, van, J.E. ‘ADAMS, P.’ BEUKEMA toe WATER, K.W.A. ‘ADMIRAL’ JONGE, de, H.G. ADRIAANSEN,Josephus (Sjef): 19190609 Woensdrecht – 19440808 Vught;10 MI6 agent; wireless operator to Steen; 19440110/11 (Princenhage, Breda, Noord-Brabant); detected by direction finding and arrested 19440714:11 @ training name Willem BOGERS; SEDBURGH; traffic plan12 St DAVID; BI internal code name LEONARDS; Witte BEEREN; field name J. BASTIAANSE.13 ‘AKKEREN, van, Jan’ DIESFELDT, J.H. ‘AKKERMAN’ ANDRINGA, L.T.C. ‘AKKI’ ANDRINGA, L.T.C. ‘ALBERT’ ORTT, F.D. ‘ALBERT’ WAAL, van de, M.W. ALBLAS,Aart Hendrik: 19180920 Middelharnis – 19440907 Mauthausen;14 MI6 agent; 19410704/0515 (near Nieuweschans, Groningen); with W/T set; arrested 19420716: @ code name ARAMIS; code name in the field KLAAS; J. ARNOLD; field name J. WOLTERS; field name Aart de WAARD; field name Klaas de JONG.16 © Oorlogsgravenstichting, ’s-Gravenhage / The Hague 9 Minor variations in the spelling of aliases could not be avoided (like ij y ei, d t, etc). 10 CBG. According to the OGS ‘Josephas’. 11 also http://www.woensdrecht.nl/asp/Actueel/Actueel.asp?nPageID=10663. 12 MI6 used the term ‘traffic plan’ for both the transmitter and the wireless traffic. SOE called it ‘signals plan’. 13 also NA MvO Londen 2745. 14 OGS. According to the CBG Alblas died 19440906 (in Linz). 15 Clark, Agents by moonlight, p. 14. 16 http://www.inghist.nl/Onderzoek/Projecten/BWN/lemmata/bwn1/alblas.\ also NAMvO Londen 2746.\ for Alblas’ telegrams: NA JUSLON 2163; MvO Londen 2159. Dutch Agents 1940 – 1945 4 ‘ALBRECHT’ JONGE, de, H.G. ALEBEEK, van, Joseph Lodewijk Theodorus Maria: 19160323 ’s-Hertogenbosch – 19900513 Heumen;17 MI6 agent; wireless operator; evening of 19431008 (near Malden, Gelderland); arrested 19441205; released 19450421; reported back 19450517:@ training name Van den BOSCH; traffic plan St MARTIN; BI internal code name BOL; ESSER; P. de LEEUW; field name J.L. BASTIAANSE.18 ‘ALEX’ LOENEN, van, H.L. ALTEN, van, Jan Pieter: 19211009 Vlissingen;19 BI agent; observer for the Albrecht group; to gather information in Germany; crossed Biesbosch 19450318/19; overrun20 19450404: @ Jan ZEELAND.21 ‘AMHERST’ RUYSCH van DUGTEREN, C.J.L. ‘ANDREW, St’ BERGMANN, A. ‘ANDRIES’ AUSEMS, A.W.M. ANDRINGA,Leonardus Theodorus Cornelis (Leo): 19131122 The Hague – 19440906 Mauthausen;22 SOE agent; a. to investigate the possibility of opening of a new sea-route for in- and ex-filtration, b. to reconnoitre specified targets in Noord-Brabant and to recruit saboteurs; 19420328/29 (near Holten, Overijssel);23 also under Molenaar; arrested 19420428:24 @ training name Leo AKKERMAN; operational name TURNIP; AKKI; Akki GIELEN; Leo HISTORIAN; code name in the field LEO; field name Willem van GIELEN; J. van ELZEN.25 ‘ANKE’ PALS, M. ‘ANTON’ AULNIS de BOUROUILL, d’, baron, P.-L. ‘ANTONIO’ WAAL, van de, M.W. ‘APOLLO’ SCHELLE, van, J.D.A.
Recommended publications
  • Utrecht CRFS Boundaries Options
    City Region Food System Toolkit Assessing and planning sustainable city region food systems CITY REGION FOOD SYSTEM TOOLKIT TOOL/EXAMPLE Published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and RUAF Foundation and Wilfrid Laurier University, Centre for Sustainable Food Systems May 2018 City Region Food System Toolkit Assessing and planning sustainable city region food systems Tool/Example: Utrecht CRFS Boundaries Options Author(s): Henk Renting, RUAF Foundation Project: RUAF CityFoodTools project Introduction to the joint programme This tool is part of the City Region Food Systems (CRFS) toolkit to assess and plan sustainable city region food systems. The toolkit has been developed by FAO, RUAF Foundation and Wilfrid Laurier University with the financial support of the German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture and the Daniel and Nina Carasso Foundation. Link to programme website and toolbox http://www.fao.org/in-action/food-for-cities-programme/overview/what-we-do/en/ http://www.fao.org/in-action/food-for-cities-programme/toolkit/introduction/en/ http://www.ruaf.org/projects/developing-tools-mapping-and-assessing-sustainable-city- region-food-systems-cityfoodtools Tool summary: Brief description This tool compares the various options and considerations that define the boundaries for the City Region Food System of Utrecht. Expected outcome Definition of the CRFS boundaries for a specific city region Expected Output Comparison of different CRFS boundary options Scale of application City region Expertise required for Understanding of the local context, existing data availability and administrative application boundaries and mandates Examples of Utrecht (The Netherlands) application Year of development 2016 References - Tool description: This document compares the various options and considerations that define the boundaries for the Utrecht City Region.
    [Show full text]
  • Ottoland, B 130’
    TOELICHTING BESTEMMINGSPLAN ‘Ottoland, B 130’ NL.IMRO.1927.BPb130OTL-VG01 Status: Vastgesteld Versie: 3.0 Langerak, 15-09-2015 Inhoudsopgave 1 INLEIDING ..............................................................................................................2 1.1 Aanleiding ........................................................................................................2 1.2 Ligging en begrenzing plangebied ..................................................................3 1.3 Vigerend bestemmingsplan ‘Buitengebied Graafstroom’ ................................3 1.4 Leeswijzer ........................................................................................................3 2 BESTAANDE SITUATIE.........................................................................................4 2.1 Algemeen ........................................................................................................4 2.2 Ruimtelijke structuur ........................................................................................4 2.2.1 Ontstaansgeschiedenis, Bebouwingsstructuren en –typologieën ............4 2.2.2 Huidig gebruik ...........................................................................................4 2.2.3 Ontsluiting van het plangebied .................................................................4 2.2.4 Waterstructuur ..........................................................................................4 3 BELEIDSKADER ....................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Provincie Utrecht / Gemeente Woerden BRAVO-Projecten 3, 4, 6
    Provincie Utrecht / gemeente Woerden BRAVO-projecten 3, 4, 6 en 8 Milieueffectrapport hoofdrapport Gemeente Woerden Woerden H Linschoten G t M Witteveen+Bos van Twickelostraat 2 postbus 233 7400 AE Deventer telefoon 0570 69 79 11 telefax 0570 69 73 44 INHOUDSOPGAVE blz. DEEL A: KERNINFORMATIE 1 1. INLEIDING 2 1.1. Voorgeschiedenis van het BRAVO-project 2 1.2. Waarover gaat het in dit MER? 3 1.3. Leeswijzer 4 1.4. De m.e.r.-procedure en de uiteindelijke afweging 5 1.4.1. De m.e.r.-procedure 5 1.4.2. De uiteindelijke afweging 7 1.5. Verband met andere procedures 7 2. PROBLEEMANALYSE EN DOEL 8 2.1. Ontstaan A12 BRAVO samenwerking 8 2.2. Probleemanalyse 9 2.2.1. Huidige ontsluitingsproblematiek Woerden en Harmelen 9 2.2.2. Huidige fileproblematiek Woerden 11 2.2.3. Huidig sluipverkeer in Woerden en Harmelen 12 2.2.4. Toekomstige situatie zonder de BRAVO-projecten 14 2.3. Doel van het voornemen 16 3. PROJECTEN EN PROJECTCOMBINATIES 17 3.1. De projecten 17 3.2. Toelichting op de projecten 17 3.2.1. BRAVO-project 3: Zuidelijke randweg Woerden 17 3.2.2. BRAVO project 4: Westelijke randweg Woerden 18 3.2.3. BRAVO project 6a: Zuidelijke randweg Harmelen 19 3.2.4. BRAVO project 6b: Westelijke randweg Harmelen 20 3.2.5. BRAVO project 6c: Oostelijke randweg Woerden 20 3.2.6. BRAVO project 8: Oostelijke randweg Harmelen 22 3.3. Projectcombinaties 23 3.4. Toelichting op de projectcombinaties 23 3.4.1. Variant A (2015): Autonome situatie + project 8 23 3.4.2.
    [Show full text]
  • RUMMY CONTENTS of the GAME 104 Playing Card Tiles
    RUMMY CONTENTS OF THE GAME 104 playing card tiles (Ace, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, Jack, Queen and King; two of each tile in four suits), 2 joker tiles, 4 tile racks. AIM OF THE GAME The aim is to be the first player to get rid of all the tiles on one’s tile rack. BEFORE THE GAME BEGINS Decide together, how many rounds you want to play. Place the tiles face down on the table and mix them. Each player takes one tile and the player with the highest number goes first. The turn goes clockwise. Return the tiles back to the table and mix all tiles thoroughly. After mixing, each player takes 14 tiles and places them on his rack, arranging them into either ”groups” or ”runs”. The remaining tiles on the table form the pool. SETS - A group is a set of either three or four tiles of the same value but different suit. For example: 7 of Spades, 7 of Hearts, 7 of Clubs and 7 of Diamonds. - A run is a set of three or more consecutive tiles of the same suit. For example: 3, 4, 5 and 6 of Hearts. Note! Ace (A) is always played as the lowest number, it can not follow the King (number 13). HOW TO PLAY Opening the game Each player must open his game by making sets of a ”group” or a ”run” or both, totalling at least 30 points. If a player can not open his game on his turn, he must take an extra tile from the pool.
    [Show full text]
  • Publieke Raadpleging Onder De Inwoners Van Molenlanden Over Het Samenlevingsprogramma
    Publieke raadpleging onder de inwoners van Molenlanden over het samenlevingsprogramma 2 april 2019 1 Inhoudsopgave Inhoudsopgave 2 Samenvatting 3 1. Resultaten 4 Samenlevingsprogramma: Wat vind jij belangrijk voor jouw dorp of stad? 4 2. Onderzoeksverantwoording 63 2.1. Methodiek 63 2.2. Leeswijzer 63 4. Toponderzoek 65 2 Samenvatting Op vraag "1 In het algemeen: Welke onderwerpen/thema’s zou je als eerste willen verbeteren in jouw dorp of stad?" reageert 86% van de respondenten met een eerste aan te pakken of verbeterpunt. 95% van deze respondenten geeft hier een nadere toelichting over. 64% van de respondenten reageert met een 2e aan te pakken of verbeterpunt. 68% van deze respondenten geeft hier een nadere toelichting over. 39% van de respondenten reageert met een 3e aan te pakken of verbeterpunt. 42% van deze respondenten geeft hier een nadere toelichting over. 6% van de respondenten zou niets aanpakken of verbeteren. 9% van de respondenten geeft aan het niet te weten. Op vraag "2 Op welke manier(en) wil je het liefst betrokken zijn/worden bij thema’s die in jouw dorp of stad spelen?" antwoordt 63% van de respondenten: "Ik wil actief betrokken zijn, door mee te doen aan een digitaal of schriftelijk onderzoek". Op vraag "2.1 Stel de gemeente gebruikt de door jouw gewenste manier(en) om verder in te gaan op de thema’s die belangrijk zijn in jouw dorp of stad. In hoeverre zou je verder in willen gaan op de thema’s middels de door jouw aangegeven manier?" antwoordt 56% van de respondenten: "Ik zou waarschijnlijk wel deelnemen".
    [Show full text]
  • Kavelruil Kamerik-Harmelen
    Nieuwsbrief 4 – april 2020 KAVELRUIL KAMERIK-HARMELEN Via deze nieuwsbrief informeren we u over de stand van zaken van de Kavelruil Kamerik- Harmelen en de samenhang met andere processen in het gebied. Heeft u na het lezen nog vragen? Op de laatste bladzijde vindt u gegevens van de contactpersonen. Gevolgen maatregelen coronavirus Het coronavirus heeft verstrekkende gevolgen voor ons allemaal. Wij wensen u kracht en wijsheid om hiermee om te gaan en hopen van ganser harte dat u en uw naasten allemaal gezond zijn en blijven. De landelijke maatregelen hebben ons genoodzaakt de in maart geplande bijeenkomsten te annuleren. We hebben in overleg met de Kavelruilcommissie besloten in ieder geval tot 1 juni 2020 geen fysieke bijeenkomsten te organiseren. Zodra dat weer mogelijk is plannen we een bijeenkomst om u bij te praten. Achter de schermen werken we wel door aan een aantal onderdelen. Met deze nieuwsbrief willen we u informeren over: Instelling Kavelruilcommissie Stand van zaken Integrale aanpak Planning De grondeigenaren en agrariërs in Kamerik treffen bij deze nieuwsbrief als bijlage ook een nieuwsbrief aan over het gebiedsproces Veenweiden in Beweging. 1 Instelling Kavelruilcommissie: Eerder hebben we u geïnformeerd dat het kavelruilproject door de Gebiedscommissie Utrecht-West is overgedragen aan de provincie Utrecht. Recent hebben Gedeputeerde Staten de Kavelruilcommissie formeel ingesteld als adviescommissie. De heer Wim Groeneweg, voormalig wethouder van de gemeente Woerden, is als voorzitter de heer Dick Boogaard opgevolgd, die om persoonlijke redenen genoodzaakt was te stoppen. Hij stelt zich hieronder kort voor: Beste mensen, Sinds kort mag ik uw nieuwe voorzitter zijn van de Kavelruilcommissie Kamerik-Harmelen.
    [Show full text]
  • 0714685003.Pdf
    CONTENTS Foreword xi Acknowledgements xiv Acronyms xviii Introduction 1 1 A terrorist attack in Italy 3 2 A scandal shocks Western Europe 15 3 The silence of NATO, CIA and MI6 25 4 The secret war in Great Britain 38 5 The secret war in the United States 51 6 The secret war in Italy 63 7 The secret war in France 84 8 The secret war in Spain 103 9 The secret war in Portugal 114 10 The secret war in Belgium 125 11 The secret war in the Netherlands 148 12 The secret war in Luxemburg 165 ix 13 The secret war in Denmark 168 14 The secret war in Norway 176 15 The secret war in Germany 189 16 The secret war in Greece 212 17 The secret war in Turkey 224 Conclusion 245 Chronology 250 Notes 259 Select bibliography 301 Index 303 x FOREWORD At the height of the Cold War there was effectively a front line in Europe. Winston Churchill once called it the Iron Curtain and said it ran from Szczecin on the Baltic Sea to Trieste on the Adriatic Sea. Both sides deployed military power along this line in the expectation of a major combat. The Western European powers created the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) precisely to fight that expected war but the strength they could marshal remained limited. The Soviet Union, and after the mid-1950s the Soviet Bloc, consistently had greater numbers of troops, tanks, planes, guns, and other equipment. This is not the place to pull apart analyses of the military balance, to dissect issues of quantitative versus qualitative, or rigid versus flexible tactics.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    37_599100 bindex.qxd 8/31/05 8:21 PM Page 353 Index basics of card games. See Ninety-Nine, 143–148 • A • also card games; cards Oh Hell!, 137–138 Accordion, 22–26 deck of cards, 10 Partnership Auction aces around, 205, 222 etiquette for playing, 17 Pinochle, 220–221 Alexander the Great (La playing a game, 14–17 Setback, 227–228 Belle Lucie), 31–35 preparing to play, 11–14 Spades, 163–169, 171 all pass (in President), 255 ranking card order, 11 big blind (in Poker), 285 allin (in Poker), 287 selecting a game, 17–19 Black Jack (Switch), American Contract Bridge Beggar My Neighbor (Beat 108–110 League (Web site), 185 Your Neighbor Out of Black Maria, 199 American Cribbage Con- Doors), 45–47 Black Peter card, 57 gress (Web site), 252 beggars (in President), 256 Blackjack Animals, 49–50 beginning to play. See basics aces and going high or announcement, 13 of card games low, 276–277 ante, 112, 285, 302 Benny (Best Bower), 154 betting in Casino auction (in Bridge), 13, 185 bets Blackjack, 271–272 Auction Pinochle anteing up (in Poker), 285 betting in Social bidding, 211–212, 213–214, bidding versus, 13 Blackjack, 265–266 218–219 calling (in Poker), 286 card values, 264 conceding your hand, 219 opening (in Poker), Casino Blackjack, 271–277 dealing, 212 294–296 croupiers, shoes, banks, discarding, 214–215 out of turn (in Poker), 288 pit bosses, 271 kitty, 212, 215–216 seeing (in Poker), 286 dealing in Casino Black- melds, 214–215 Bid Whist, 133–134 jack, 272–273 scoring, 216–218 bidding dealing in Social Black- strategies for play, betting versus, 13 jack, 263, 264–265 218–219 blind nil, 164, 167–168 doubling down, 275 Authors, 53–54 defined, 13 five or sixcard tricks, 269 dropping, 214 kibitzer, 271 listening to, 348 naturals, 267, 268 • B • for nil (zero), 164, origin of, 265 166–169, 171 paying players, 268 balanced hands (in COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL overbids, 214 selecting banker/ Spades), 166 safe, 214 dealer, 263 banker (in Blackjack), shooting the moon, Social Blackjack, 263–270 263–264, 266, 268, 271 196–197, 230, 234 splitting cards, 266, banking card games.
    [Show full text]
  • For the More Advanced Card Player, Rummy Can Be Played in a Number of Different Ways with Rules to Suit Different Age Groups
    Rummy For the more advanced card player, Rummy can be played in a number of different ways with rules to suit different age groups. Kids can beat their mates and then challenge the grown-ups. Rummy is a card game in which you try to improve the hand that you’re originally dealt. You can do this whenever it’s your turn to play, either by drawing cards from a pile (or stock) or by picking up the card thrown away by your opponent and then discarding a card from your hand. You can play Rummy with two or more players (for six or more players, you need a second deck of cards). You’ll also need a paper and pencil for scoring. The objective of Rummy Your aim is to put (or meld) your cards into two types of combinations: Runs: Consecutive sequences of three or more cards of the same suit Sets (or Books): Three or four cards of the same rank. If you are using two decks, a set may include two identical cards of the same rank and suit. REMEMBER In most Rummy games, unlike the majority of other card games, aces can be high or low, but not both. So, runs involving the ace must take the form A-2-3 or A-K-Q but not K-A-2 The first person who manages to make his whole hand into combinations one way or another, with one card remaining to discard, wins the game. How to play Rummy Follow the rules and instructions below to understand how to play Rummy from start to finish: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Approved Plants Handling Animal By-Products - Section Xiii
    LIST OF APPROVED PLANTS HANDLING ANIMAL BY-PRODUCTS - SECTION XIII Other registered operators - Transporters Approval Name of the TOWN/REGION Category, Activity, Product type and Associated activities Remarks Number establishment 29 EXPORTSLACHTERIJ J. OENERWEG 2 (cat 1 TRANS RAW) (cat 3 TRANS RAW) GOSSCHALK EN ZN. B.V. 8161PM EPE 37 GROENVELD B.V. SCHILLINGWEG 30 (cat 3 TRANS RAW) 2153PL NIEUW-VENNEP 149 TEN KATE VETTEN B.V. HANDELSWEG 22 (cat 3 TRANS FATOT FATOL) (cat 3 TRANS RAW) (cat 3 TRANS FATF) 9563TR TER APELKANAAL Modified on: 24SEP21 LIST OF APPROVED PLANTS HANDLING ANIMAL BY-PRODUCTS - SECTION XIII 1 / 765 LIST OF APPROVED PLANTS HANDLING ANIMAL BY-PRODUCTS - SECTION XIII Other registered operators - Transporters Approval Name of the TOWN/REGION Category, Activity, Product type and Associated activities Remarks Number establishment 174 OZLEM GROOTHANDEL DE GIEM 16 (cat 3 TRANS RAW) IN SHOARMAVLEES 7547SV ENSCHEDE 234 SLACHTERIJ ERP B.V. FRANSEWEG 8 (cat 3 TRANS PETR) 5469DZ ERP 348 VICE VERSA KANAALSTRAAT 15 (cat 3 TRANS SERE) KOELVRIESHUIS B.V. 5347KM OSS Modified on: 24SEP21 LIST OF APPROVED PLANTS HANDLING ANIMAL BY-PRODUCTS - SECTION XIII 2 / 765 LIST OF APPROVED PLANTS HANDLING ANIMAL BY-PRODUCTS - SECTION XIII Other registered operators - Transporters Approval Name of the TOWN/REGION Category, Activity, Product type and Associated activities Remarks Number establishment 430 AMERONGEN KAMPHUIS AMBACHTSWEG 15 (cat 3 TRANS PETR) B.V. 3771MG BARNEVELD 508 KOEL- EN IABC 5262 (cat 3 TRANS RAW) VRIESTRANSPORT 4814RD BREDA VOESENEK B.V. 531 KOEL- EN VRIESHUIS DE MOSSEL 2 (cat 3 TRANS RAW) JOS VELDBOER B.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Regionale Kampioenschappen THV Te Langerak/Nieuwpoort 7 Maart 2015
    Regionale kampioenschappen THV te Langerak/Nieuwpoort 7 maart 2015 pagina 2 van 13 Inhoudsopgave 1 Voorwoord burgemeester van Molenwaard ................................................. 4 2 Voorwoord directeur brandweer Zuid-Holland Zuid ..................................... 5 3 Voorwoord operationeel manager post Langerak/Nieuwpoort ...................... 6 4 Programma ............................................................................................ 7 5 Algemene informatie ............................................................................... 8 6 Informatie over de wedstrijden THV ......................................................... 9 7 Algemene richtlijnen voor de wedstrijd “THV” ......................................... 10 8 Wedstrijdschema .................................................................................. 12 9 Regionaal kampioenen THV .................................................................... 13 pagina 3 van 13 1 Voorwoord burgemeester van Molenwaard Beste brandweervrijwilliger, Op 7 maart vindt het Regionaal kampioenschap technische hulpverlening plaats. Een evenement dat dit keer georganiseerd wordt door het Cluster Drechtsteden- Noord/Molenwaard. Ik vind het een eer dat we dit jaar in Molenwaard gastheer mogen zijn. Vele vrijwilligers maken dit evenement mogelijk. Ik bedank hen voor hun voorbereidingen. De wedstrijd wordt een sportieve meting tussen de teams waarbij effectief en professioneel optreden centraal staat. Met veel bewondering kijk ik als burgemeester naar deze evenementen.
    [Show full text]
  • KV 2/961 – 962, Part I Englandspieland Nordpolaffair
    Reference abstracts of KV 2/961 – 962, Part I As to prevent for a too extensive document, I have decided to divide it into two sections. Englandspiel and Nordpol affair This document contains materials derived from these latter files Its purpose: is to be used as a kind of reference document, containing my personal selection of report sections; considered being of relevance. My input: I have in almost every case created transcripts of the just reproduced file content. However, adding my personal opinion; always accompanied by: (AOB, My comment) Please do not multiply this document Remember: that the section-copies still do obey to Crown Copyright This document is of an extraordinary content; in which personal fates of many brave men have been brought at stake, due to severe ignorance on the British S.O.E. side. Please consider before studying this file: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Englandspiel English version https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Englandspiel German language version https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Englandspiel Dutch language version As to confront you with a wider spectrum in this intriguing complex matter, I would like to proceed, after Giskes’ second chapter, in due course, with: Huntemann’s Case and Schreieder’s case By Arthur O. Bauer Giskes, Obstlt. Herman (Nordpol Spiel)(England Spiel) PF 601712 KV 2/961-1, page 2 6.5.45 To S.O.E. re Oberstleutnant (Obstlt.)Giskes and Uffz. Huntemann 16.5.45 Extract from report on Huntemann re Giskes, Filed 2.6.45. KV 2/961, page 3 20.5.45 To 12th AG asking for Giskes to be sent to UK as Category A case KV 2/961, page 8 Extract from OSS X-2 Paris report dated 22.5.45 on Edmund Grosskopf (PF 601671), former member of Abwehr III F (AOB, counter espionage) Lyons and FAK 313 (Front Aufklärungskommando 307 ‘Bonn’) (AOB, where the first ‘3’ points at, of course, the operational Abwehr section III; and the third number onto the European region) This Kommando performed only line crossings and hardly brought any information.
    [Show full text]