DOCSLIB.ORG

2019/20 Draft

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2019/20 Draft MOGALAKWENA 2019/20 REVIEW LOCAL MUNICIPALITY Integrated Development Plan Table of Contents LIST OF ACRONYMS ......................................................................................................................................... 9 MOGALAKWENA VISION, MISSION AND VALUES ............................................................................................. 10 CHAPTER ONE: THE PLANNING PROCESS ...................................................................................................... 13 1.1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 13 1.2. Legislative Background and Policy Imperatives .................................................................................... 13 1.2.1. The Objects of Local Government as set out in Section 52 of the Constitution ........................................ 13 1.2.2. National Spatial Development Perspective (NSDP) ................................................................................ 14 1.2.3. MTSF ................................................................................................................................................. 14 1.2.4. Government Programme of Action ....................................................................................................... 15 1.2.5. New Growth Path ................................................................................................................................ 15 1.2.6. National Development Plan (NDP) ........................................................................................................ 15 1.2.7. Outcome 9 .......................................................................................................................................... 16 1.2.8. Limpopo Development Plan (LDP) ........................................................................................................ 17 1.3. Institutional Arrangement to Drive IDP Process..................................................................................... 18 Figure 1: IDP review structure .......................................................................................................................... 18 1.4. Process Overview: Steps and Events (Process Plan) ............................................................................. 20 Content of the IDP/Budget/ Performance Process Plan....................................................................................... 20 Phases and Activities of the IDP /Budget/PMS process Plan ............................................................................... 20 Mechanisms and Procedures for Participation ................................................................................................... 20 Functions and context of public participation .................................................................................................... 20 Mechanisms for participation ........................................................................................................................... 21 Procedures for Participation ............................................................................................................................ 21 IDP Representative Forum (IDP Rep Forum) ...................................................................................................... 21 Public Consultation Meetings ........................................................................................................................... 21 IDP & Budget Review Time Schedule ................................................................................................................ 22 Implementation of the 2019/20 IDP & Budget Review Process Plan ..................................................................... 23 2019/20 IDP Review 1 1.5. Outcomes of the Public Participation Sessions ..................................................................................... 23 1.6. External Institutional Arrangements for the IDP Process ........................................................................ 24 1.6.1. Waterberg District IDP & PMS Manager’s Meetings................................................................................ 24 1.6.2. Limpopo Provincial Development Planning Forum ................................................................................ 24 1.7. CoGHSTA MEC Final IDP Assessment Report for 2018/19 ...................................................................... 24 1.8. 2017/18 IDP MEC Rating Results .......................................................................................................... 25 1.9. Alignment between IDP, Budget and PMS ............................................................................................. 25 1.10. Municipal Powers and Functions ......................................................................................................... 26 1.11. Priorities Issues from Municipal Perspective ........................................................................................ 27 CHAPTER TWO: MUNICIPAL PROFILE .............................................................................................................. 28 2.1. Overview ............................................................................................................................................ 28 2.2. Demographics .................................................................................................................................... 28 2.3. Population Trends .............................................................................................................................. 29 2.4. Age and Gender Distribution ............................................................................................................... 29 2.5. Number of Households ........................................................................................................................ 30 2.6. Number of Wards ................................................................................................................................ 30 2.7. Education Profile ................................................................................................................................ 30 2.8. Employment Profile ............................................................................................................................. 31 2.9. Income Categories .............................................................................................................................. 31 2.10. Unemployment Rates .......................................................................................................................... 31 CHAPTER THREE: SPATIAL RATIONALE .......................................................................................................... 32 3.1. Description of Municipal Area .............................................................................................................. 32 3.2. Spatial Rationale ................................................................................................................................. 33 3.3. Hierarchy of Settlements ..................................................................................................................... 33 3.4. Land Use Composition and Management Tools..................................................................................... 34 3.5. Growth Point Analysis ......................................................................................................................... 35 3.6. Land Claim Analysis ........................................................................................................................... 36 3.7. Land Availability Analysis ................................................................................................................... 36 2019/20 IDP Review 2 3.8. Informal Settlements and Land Invasions ............................................................................................. 36 3.9. Spatial Challenges and Opportunities................................................................................................... 37 3.9.1. Spatial Challenges .............................................................................................................................. 37 3.9.2. Spatial Opportunities .......................................................................................................................... 37 3.10. SPLUMA (Spatial Planning & Land Use Management Act) ...................................................................... 39 CHAPTER FOUR: ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS ................................................................................................ 40 4.1. Bio-Physical ....................................................................................................................................... 40 4.2. Climate Description ............................................................................................................................. 40 4.3. Rainfall............................................................................................................................................... 40 4.4. Temperature ....................................................................................................................................... 40 4.5. Topography .......................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Waterberg District Municipality Wetland Report | 2017
    WATERBERG DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY WETLAND REPORT | 2017 LOCAL ACTION FOR BIODIVERSITY (LAB): WETLANDS SOUTH AFRICA Biodiversity for Life South African National Biodiversity Institute Full Program Title: Local Action for Biodiversity: Wetland Management in a Changing Climate Sponsoring USAID Office: USAID/Southern Africa Cooperative Agreement Number: AID-674-A-14-00014 Contractor: ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability – Africa Secretariat Date of Publication: September 2017 Author: R. Fisher DISCLAIMER: The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. FOREWORD It is a great pleasure and honour for me to be part of Catchment. The Nylsvlei is the largest inland floodplain the ICLEI – Local Action for Biodiversity programme wetland system in South Africa. Nylsvlei is within in preservation of the biodiversity, and wetlands in the world renowned UNESCO Waterberg Biosphere particular of the Waterberg District Municipality. On Reserve. The Nylsvlei is our pride in Eco-Tourism, a behalf of the people of Waterberg District Municipality, leisure destination of choice in Limpopo. Nylsvlei I would like to thank ICLEI for choosing the district to Nature Reserve is a 40 square kilometre protected be part of this programme. Tourism and Heritage area, lying on the floodplain of the Nyl River and opens the door to new opportunities, and it is good the uppermost section of the Mogalakwena River. to focus on promoting and protecting our amazing The area has been declared a RAMSAR Wetland site wetlands to domestic and international tourists. Our because of its international biodiversity conservation district seeks to promote and preserve South Africa’s importance that is endemic to the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Commitment by the Executive Authority
    WATERBERG DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY STATEMENT OF COMMITMENT BY THE EXECUTIVE AUTHORITY EXECUTIVE MAYOR Cllr P.S. KEKANA According to the Municipal Systems Act, each Municipal amendments made considering the contract we made Council must, within a prescribed period after its elected with the people of Waterberg during the local government term, adopt a single, inclusive strategic plan for the elections. development of the municipality. However, our Predecessor Council already adopted a draft IDP. We, in The tasks given to local government entail more an endeavor to execute our political mandate, followed demanding capabilities and performance. This means that the path laid by them and adopted the draft IDP with we are not only expected to find the means for addressing 1 2008/2009 IDP REVIEW WATERBERG DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY traditional local government challenges of delivering should do so by putting in place targeted support basic services to the people, but we are supposed to find programmes for our women mayors and councillors, and strategies and mechanisms that are potent enough to not rejoice at their failures.The success of the integrated remove the many bottlenecks which stand in the way of development plan as enshrined herein caters also for sustainable development in a local jurisdiction. The IDP development of infrastructure is dependant on the document that we adopted will serve as a blue-print that competencies of Councillors, municipal officials, and will gauge service delivery and timely implementation. service providersInfrastructure is the cornerstone of social upliftment and economic development. In particular, fast The next five years will be fundamentally different tracking Infrastructure delivery will also contribute to the regarding the kind of support that both national and Accelerated Shared Growth Initiative for South Africa provincial government spheres will be providing to (ASGISA), and also assist in achieving the targeted municipalities.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustaining Water Supplies While Responding to Operational Requirements at De Beers Venetia Mine
    SUSTAINING WATER SUPPLIES WHILE RESPONDING TO OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS AT DE BEERS VENETIA MINE Gary Brown1 and Philip Erasmus2 1Golder Africa Associates, PO Box 6001, Halfway House, 1685. 2De Beers Venetia Mine, PO Box 668, Musina, 0900. ABSTRACT The intrepid novelist Rudyard Kipling’s portrayal of the Limpopo River as “the great, grey-green, greasy Limpopo River, all set about with fever trees …” does not reflect the real challenges De Beers Venetia Mine faces in abstracting raw water for their open cast kimberlite operation, located in the remote arid northern extremities of South Africa, approximately 80 km west of Musina and some 500 km north of Johannesburg, with the area presenting a mean annual precipitation value of 350 mm and annual evaporation rates in the order of 2 500 mm. Construction of Venetia Mine began in 1990, was officially opened in August 1992 and had reached full output in 1993. Venetia Mine is South Africa’s largest producer of diamonds. Production statistics for 2002 reflect total tonnages mined of 24,3 million of which 4,71 million tons of ore was processed and 5,08 million carats recovered. Despite the large catchment and many tributaries, the largest being the Shashe River, feeding the Limpopo River, the river is usually dry for most of the year. Ninety percent of the river’s runoff occurs from December to April. The Mine’s commitment to practising sound environmental management principles is reflected in its proud list of environmental orientated achievements. Despite these challenging conditions and strict statutory and self imposed restrictions to water abstraction for supply to the Mine, the Mine has since commissioning and with increased production not exceeded the overall water abstraction permit volumes and has demonstrated acute ability in integrating the supply of water for its operations between surface flow conditions in the Limpopo River and the ground water source within the Greefswald and Schroda aquifer.
    [Show full text]
  • Final IDP 2012
    MAYOR’S FOREWORD The year 2012 is special because it marks the centenary of the African National Congress which is the ruling party in the country and the majority party in our municipality. We acknowledge the fact that there are still challenges of poverty, inequality, unemployment, and underdevelopment even after 18 years in a democracy. This acknowledgement is informed by the challenges that were raised by the communities during Community Based Planning, IDP Analysis Phase, and prioritization of needs of the IDP/Budget process. As a municipality we have taken note of the State of the Nation Address, State of the Province Address, and the Budget of the Waterberg District in terms of infrastructure development in order to stimulate the economy of our municipality. In his State of the Nation Address, the State President has said that, “Firstly, we plan to develop and integrate rail, road and water infrastructure, centred around two main areas in Limpopo: the Waterberg in the Western part of the province and Steelpoort in the CLLR. T. A. MASHAMAITE eastern part. These efforts are intended to unlock the enormous mineral belt of coal, platinum, palladium, chrome and other minerals, in order to facilitate increased mining as well as stepped-up beneficiation of minerals.” This address calls for us as a municipality to capacitate our Local Economic Development section to be able to plan ahead for these developments which are intended to stimulate our economy. We re-commit ourselves as a municipality to work towards a clean audit report in 2014. We once more thank you for your support and wish all citizens well.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterberg District Municipality 2014/15
    WATERBERG DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY 2014/15 IDP TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. List of Acronyms…………………………………………………………………………………………………………9 2. Vision, Mission & Values ………………………………………………………………………………………………10-11 3. Foreword by the Mayor ………………………………………………………………………………………………..12 4. Executive Summary ……………………………………………………………………………………………………13-14 5. The Planning Process 5.1 Introduction, Framework plan, etc.………………………………………………………………………….15-21 5.2 Policies and Legislative Frameworks ……………………………………………………………………...21-27 5.3 Key aspects of the SONA and SOPA……………………………………………………………………...27-29 5.4 Powers and Functions ………………………………………………………………………………………29-30 5.5 Municipal Priority Issues …………………………………………………………………………………….30 5.6 IDP Process Plan ………………………………………………………………………………………….....31-36 5.7 Institutional Arrangements …………………………………………………………………………………...37 1 6. Situational Analysis 6.1 Description of the Municipal Area (MAP)…………………………………………………………………..38-39 6.2 DEMOGRAPHICS (1) Population Trends ………………………………………………………………………………………….40-42 (2) Age Distribution in terms of gender ……………………………………………………………………....42-43 (3) Male and Female …………………………………………………………………………………………..44-52 (4) Employment Profile …………………………………………………………………………………………53 (5) Unemployment Rates……………………………………………………………………………………….54 (6) Income levels ……………………………………………………………………………………………….55-56 (7) Education Profile ……………………………………………………………………………………………56-58 (8) People with Disabilities……………………………………………………………………………………..58-60 7. KPA – 1 SPATIAL RATIONALE 7.1 Spatial Analysis …………………………………………………………………………………………….62 (1) Settlement
    [Show full text]
  • Mogalakwena Mine Expansion Project
    MOGALAKWENA MINE EXPANSION PROJECT Phase 1 – Heritage Impact Assessment – Second Version Issue Date: 6 September 2019 Revision No.: 2 Project No.: 396 HIA + 27 (0) 12 332 5305 +27 (0) 86 675 8077 [email protected] PO Box 32542, Totiusdal, 0134 Offices in South Africa, Kingdom of Lesotho and Mozambique Head Office: 906 Bergarend Streets Waverley, Pretoria, South Africa Directors: HS Steyn, PD Birkholtz, W Fourie Declaration of Independence ▪ I, Polke Birkholtz, declare that – ▪ General declaration: ▪ I act as the independent heritage practitioner in this application ▪ I will perform the work relating to the application in an objective manner, even if this results in views and findings that are not favourable to the applicant ▪ I declare that there are no circumstances that may compromise my objectivity in performing such work; ▪ I have expertise in conducting heritage impact assessments, including knowledge of the Act, Regulations and any guidelines that have relevance to the proposed activity; ▪ I will comply with the Act, Regulations and all other applicable legislation; ▪ I will take into account, to the extent possible, the matters listed in section 38 of the NHRA when preparing the application and any report relating to the application; ▪ I have no, and will not engage in, conflicting interests in the undertaking of the activity; ▪ I undertake to disclose to the applicant and the competent authority all material information in my possession that reasonably has or may have the potential of influencing - any decision to be taken
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Geochronology of the Nyl River Floodplain Sediments, Limpopo Province, South Africa
    Geology and geochronology of the Nyl River floodplain sediments, Limpopo Province, South Africa Debra Colarossi A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Science, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Geology. Johannesburg 2013 Declaration I declare that this dissertation is my own, unaided work. It is being submitted for the Degree of Master of Science in the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. It has not been submitted before for any degree or examination in any other University. Signed: ______________________________ Date: ______________________________ ~ ii ~ Abstract The Nyl River floodplain, located in the Limpopo Province, is one of the few active sedimentary basins that exist within the South African interior, providing a unique opportunity to study the effect of climate change on fluvial systems. Progradation of tributary fans into the Nyl/Mogalakwena River has raised the surface by 30 m and forced the course of the river westwards towards the Waterberg. Periods of progradation deposited thick sequences of coarse-grained sediments with sand- to gravel-sized mean grain sizes and coarsely-skewed populations in the distal reaches of the tributary fans. These periods were interspersed with periods of relative non-deposition, when active sedimentation on the fan ceased and shallow lakes (or vleis) developed in the trunk river, resulting in deposition of fine-grained, organic-rich, floodplain sediment layers with silt-sized mean grain sizes and finely-skewed distributions in the extreme outer reaches of the tributary fan. The alternating progradational sequences and non-deposition events produced interlayered floodplain and fan deposits in the furthest reaches of the tributary fans along the banks of the Nyl/Mogalakwena River.
    [Show full text]
  • "Ivanplats Approved Social and Labour Plan, June 2021"
    SOCIAL AND LABOUR PLAN 2021-2025 Submitted as Annexure G, as contemplated in Regulation 46 of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act, 2002 (Act number 28 of 2008) Social and Labour Plan Regulation 46 (a) to (f) Revised March 2021 1 IVANPLATS (PTY) LTD- SOCIAL AND LABOUR PLAN: 2021 – 2025 – Rev11 Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES .............................................................................................................................................................. 5 LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................................................ 7 ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................................................................. 8 DEFINITIONS .................................................................................................................................................................... 9 PART ONE ...................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Regulation 46 (a): Preamble ......................................................................................................................................... 10 About Ivanplats (Pty) Ltd ........................................................................................................................................... 10 Submission
    [Show full text]
  • Limpopo Water Management Area
    LIMPOPO WATER MANAGEMENT AREA WATER RESOURCES SITUATION ASSESSMENT MAIN REPORT OVERVIEW The water resources of South Africa are vital to the health and prosperity of its people, the sustenance of its natural heritage and to its economic development. Water is a national resource that belongs to all the people who should therefore have equal access to it, and although the resource is renewable, it is finite and distributed unevenly both spatially and temporally. The water also occurs in many forms that are all part of a unitary and inter-dependent cycle. The National Government has overall responsibility for and authority over the nation’s water resources and their use, including the equitable allocation of water for beneficial and sustainable use, the redistribution of water and international water matters. The protection of the quality of water resources is also necessary to ensure sustainability of the nation’s water resources in the interests of all water users. This requires integrated management of all aspects of water resources and, where appropriate, the delegation of management functions to a regional or catchment level where all persons can have representative participation. This report is based on a desktop or reconnaissance level assessment of the available water resources and quality and also patterns of water requirements that existed during 1995 in the Limpopo Water Management Area, which occupies a portion of the Northern Province. The report does not address the water requirements beyond 1995 but does provide estimates of the utilisable potential of the water resources after so-called full development of these resources, as this can be envisaged at present.
    [Show full text]
  • Glimpopo Fact Sheet
    Fact Sheet 1 The Limpopo River flows over a total distance of The Limpopo basin covers almost 14 percent of the total 1,750 kilometres. It starts at the confluence of the Marico area of its four riparian states – Botswana, South Africa, and Crocodile rivers in South Africa and flows northwest Zimbabwe and Mozambique. And of the basin’s total area, of Pretoria. It is joined by the Notwane river flowing from 44 percent is occupied by South Africa, 21 percent by Botswana, and then forms the border between Botswana Mozambique, almost 20 percent by Botswana and 16 per- and South Africa, and flows in a north easterly direction. cent by Zimbabwe. At the confluence of the Shashe river, which flows in from Zimbabwe and Botswana, the Limpopo turns almost due Drainage Network The Limpopo river has a rela- east and forms the border between Zimbabwe and South tively dense network of more than 20 tributary streams and Africa before entering Mozambique at Pafuri. For the next rivers, though most of these tributaries have either season- 561 km the river flows entirely within Mozambique and al or episodic flows. In historical times, the Limpopo river enters the Indian Ocean about 60 km downstream of the was a strong-flowing perennial river but is now regarded town of Xai-Xai. as a weak perennial river where flows frequently cease. During drought periods, no surface water is present over The Basin The Limpopo river basin is almost circular large stretches of the middle and lower reaches of the in shape with a mean altitude of 840 m above sea level.
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Assesment and Utilisation
    Limpopo Water Management Area North Reconciliation Strategy Date: December 2015 Phase 1: Study planning and Process PWMA 01/000/00/02914/1 Initiation Inception Report Phase 2: Study Implementation PWMA 01/000/00/02914/2 Literature Review PWMA 01/000/00/02914/3/1 PWMA 01/000/00/02914/3 Supporting Document 1: Hydrological Analysis Rainfall Data Analysis PWMA 01/000/00/02914/4/1 PWMA 01/000/00/02914/4 Supporting Document 1: Water Requirements and Return Flows Irrigation Assessment PWMA 01/000/00/02914/5 PWMA 01/000/00/02914/4/2 Water Quality Assessment Supporting Document 2: Water Conservation and Water Demand PWMA 01/000/00/02914/6 Management (WCWDM) Status Groundwater Assessment and Utilisation PWMA 01/000/00/02914/4/3 Supporting Document 3: PWMA 01/000/00/02914/7 Socio-Economic Perspective on Water Yield analysis (WRYM) Requirements PWMA 01/000/00/02914/8 PWMA 01/000/00/02914/7/1 Water Quality Modelling Supporting Document 1: Reserve Requirement Scenarios PWMA 01/000/00/02914/9 Planning Analysis (WRPM) PWMA 01/000/00/02914/10/1 PWMA 01/000/00/02914/10 Supporting Document 1: Water Supply Schemes Opportunities for Water Reuse PWMA 01/000/00/02914/11A PWMA 01/000/00/02914/10/2 Preliminary Reconciliation Strategy Supporting Document 2: Environmental and Social Status Quo PWMA 01/000/00/02914/11B Final Reconciliation Strategy PWMA 01/000/00/02914/10/3 Supporting Document 3: PWMA 01/000/00/02914/12 Screening Workshop Starter Document International Obligations PWMA 01/000/00/02914/13 Training Report P WMA 01/000/00/02914/14 Phase 3: Study Termination Close-out Report Limpopo Water Management Area North Reconciliation Strategy i Executive summary The Department of Water and Sanitation (DWS) identified the need for a Reconciliation Strategy for the Limpopo Water Management Area (WMA) North to provide solutions for an adequate and sustainable water supply up to 2040.
    [Show full text]
  • MOGALAKWENA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY Page 1
    MOGALAKWENA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY Municipal Profile introduction The Housing Development Agency (“HDA”) is a national public development agency that promotes sustainable communities by making well located and appropriately planned land and buildings available for the development of human settlements. The Agency has developed and deployed an information system which includes municipal profiles for selected municipalities. The intent of this profile is to provide guidelines and advice to Provincial Department of Human Settlements as well as municipalities on efficient utilization of land and economic government infrastructure investments in support of integrated human settlements development. about the template The template was compiled for the Housing Development Agency using a number of different data sources. The 2011 Census information from StatsSA was used extensively to represent socio-economic information. The financial profile data was extracted from the municipalities’ most recent financial statements. The Integrated Development Plan (IDP), Housing Development Plan (MHDP) and Spatial Development Framework of each municipality also provided inputs into the municipal profile. Where possible, each source of information is quoted as Mogalakwena Local Municipality part of the specific figure, table or chart. Source: Municipal Demarcation Board (2013) The municipal profile is structured in the following sections: Mogalakwena Local Municipality is situated in the • Section 1 provides background information on the western quadrant of Limpopo, within the western municipality, including land use data; district of the Waterberg Municipality, and is bordered • Section 2 deals with demographic information such as by Aganang to the east, Mookgopong to the south, and population growth and income; Lephalale to the north. The municipality is almost 616 • Section 3 provides an economic overview of the 630 hectares in extent, of which 3,2% is developed.
    [Show full text]