0700Navy.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

0700Navy.Pdf Legislators with shipyard constituencies join the campaign for additional ships and bigger budgets. The Navy Pushes for More HEN Ronald Reagan was Now, pro–Navy lawmakers on de- legitimate to describe this as a crisis President, his military fense committees insist the service now,” warned Robb. expansion built the Navy must buy more carriers, submarines, That is a controversial claim, to to some 600 ships. Today, cruisers, destroyers, and other ships say the least. Not all or even most Was the aircraft carrier USS Ronald over the next decade if the nation is defense experts think the Navy is in Reagan takes shape in a Virginia to meet its national security needs. such dire straits. Given the demise shipyard, the fleet comprises 315 They are joined by many Navy offi- of the Soviet Union—and with it, ships and is likely to be smaller by cials, who have begun openly calling the once huge and modern Soviet the time Reagan enters service in into question the official ship levels Navy—some question the necessity 2003. It is the smallest US Navy since that were set for their service only of, for example, large numbers of 1933, a fact noted frequently by the three years ago. Some warn that the hunter–killer submarines designed Navy and its backers in Congress. Navy already is short of submarines primarily for war at sea with the Since the end of the Cold War, as for intelligence missions and cargo Soviet fleet. defense spending declined, the Navy ships to transport troops and equip- Ivan Eland, director of defense has been retiring older ships faster ment overseas. policy studies at the Cato Institute than it has built new ones such as has claimed, “The nuclear attack Reagan, a 90,000-ton Nimitz–class “A Crisis Now” submarine force remains too large. carrier under construction at Newport The state of mind of the Navy’s ... The number of submarines could News Shipbuilding. Under Rea gan, political backers on Capitol Hill was be cut to 25 modern boats, while still the Navy ordered an average of 19 captured in a recent comment by Sen. fielding the best force in the world.” new ships per year. Since President Chuck Robb (D–Va.), whose state Critics argue that the pressure to Clinton took office, orders have aver- is home to the sprawling Newport build more ships comes from the aged six ships per year. News Shipbuilding complex. “It’s Navy’s desire to get its share of future 54 AIR FORCE Magazine / July 2000 US Navy photo by PH2 Matthew Magee J. Carrier USS Nimitz, cruiser USS Port Royal, and submarine USS Annapolis steam By Chuck McCutcheon in formation in the northern Persian Gulf. Navy’s latest budget plan contained $10.7 billion for eight warships. defense budgets and, with it, more by demanding more from our people candidates for increased force-level force structure. They maintain that and equipment. But this cannot go goals—attack submarines, surface the Navy is simply positioning itself on indefinitely. combatants, and amphibious ships. to compete more effectively with “As we approach the next Qua- So far, debate among lawmakers the other armed services, especially drennial Defense Review, the Navy has centered on whether to build in light of the Pentagon’s ongoing and Marine Corps will make the more warships rather than on the Quadrennial Defense Review. Results point that our force levels need question of whether the US Navy has of QDR 2001 will be announced to remain balanced with usage a sound strategy for deploying them early next year, and there will be a expected in the future security around the world. As the critics see change of administrations at about environment. ... Already, there is it, Congress should take a hard look the same time. growing evidence that our forces at the naval mission before agreeing In its most recent posture state- are stretched. ... The 1997 QDR to substantial increases in shipbuild- ment, the Navy Department’s lead- stated that a fleet of slightly more ing and naval aircraft procurement. ership telegraphed its intentions. than 300 ships was sufficient for Those who want a larger Navy It said: near-term requirements and was argue that modern warships allow “The Navy and Marine Corps con- within an acceptable level of risk. Washington to back up its diplomacy tinue to meet commitments primar ily Three years of high-tempo opera- and project power to remote waters, by drawing upon forward deployed tions, however, suggest that this as it has done in recent years in the ‘rotational’ forces rather than requir- amount should be reviewed in the Persian Gulf, Taiwan Strait, and ing additional deployments of units next QDR.” Adriatic. Critics who challenge that that have just returned from or are Within the last year, at least three view say it ignores the fact that the beginning to work up for deployment. categories of ships within the 300- open-ocean threat has essentially van- We have been able to do this mainly ship plan have emerged as specific ished. No longer does the Navy face AIR FORCE Magazine / July 2000 55 Given the demands on the federal budget and public complacency about the military’s size and shape, those who favor a larger Navy acknowledge that the odds are against success. “Is Congress institutionally, as a whole, ready to support the kind of shipbuilding program that I believe US Navy photo by PH2 Christian Eskelund we need to have?” Robb asked at a March 8 forum of shipbuilding and industry officials. “I would say no, regrettably.” The Administration’s Fiscal 2001 budget proposal to the Con- gress contained a request for $10.7 billion to build eight new ships. Sought in the package were three destroyers equipped with the Aegis air defense system for coordinating radar and missiles, The fleet is changing as modern Arleigh Burke–class Aegis destroyers (such as USS two amphibious ships, an aircraft McFaul, shown here) enter service. Some call for a significant increase in these and carrier, one attack submarine, and other surface combatants. one support ship. The Navy also said it would like the daunting task of protecting sea As such arguments ring across to have—but did not fund—a $1.2 lines of communications, conducting Washington, however, the Navy’s billion helicopter carrier to be built full-scale anti-submarine warfare, or fleet continues to be heavily utilized by Litton Industries in Pascagoula, taking the fight into the teeth of Soviet at sea. Because of such frequent utili- Miss., hometown of Senate Majority power on the rim of Eurasia. zation, and because naval technology Leader Trent Lott. It would be the is changing rapidly, Navy officials, eighth such ship Litton has built, if Expeditionary Competitors naval experts, and lawmakers say Congress provides the money to pay Moreover, note the skeptics, naval that it makes more sense to build for it. The ship is designed to carry forces have played a supportive role new ships than to keep old ones 1,800 Marines and their helicopters. in US military conflicts of the last around past their prime. Some law- Although critics say the carrier’s decade, from Desert Storm onward— makers—particularly those whose inclusion is intended merely to ap- with the exception of Desert Fox in districts have shipyards that depend pease a powerful Republican, Navy late 1998. Furthermore, they point on Navy contracts—are pushing the Secretary Richard Danzig has said out that the Navy and Marine Corps service to become more aggressive the ship was planned for the Fiscal no longer form the only expedition- about its needs. 2005 budget, and buying it sooner ary military force. The Air Force has One case in point: Rep. Duncan would be a reasonable decision if developed its own fast-deploying Hunter (R–Calif.), the chairman of the money is available. Aerospace Expeditionary Forces the House Armed Services Com- and reshaped its fleet of long-range mittee’s military procurement sub- Friends in High Places bombers to conduct conventional committee, represents a San Diego Lott, the son of a shipyard worker, operations, they observe. area district that is home to about has long been one of the indus- Some in the Navy frankly acknowl- a third of the 3,700 workers at Na- try’s most reliable allies. Although edge their concern about additional tional Steel and Shipbuilding Co., he has sought to ensure that Lit- service claims to the “presence” one of the “big six” US shipyards ton—Mississippi’s largest private mission. One of them is Navy Capt. that build all major Navy vessels. employer—receives enough orders Sam J. Tangredi, senior military The shipyards have survived in an to keep it afloat, he warns that he fellow of the QDR 2001 working era of reduced defense spending alone cannot build a broader base group at the National Defense Uni- through a blend of consolidation, of Congressional and public support versity. “Having disparaged the need creative cost-cutting such as sharing for the Navy. for naval forward presence, ... the projects, and the continued support “Is word [about the Navy’s de- Air Force now has discovered that of Congress. cline] getting out? Not sufficiently,” its Aerospace Expeditionary Forces At a Feb. 29 hearing on shipbuild- Lott said in a recent interview. provide forward presence,” Tangredi ing, Hunter bluntly told senior Navy “Armed Services Committee mem- wrote in the May issue of US Naval officials, “We’ve gotten almost bers know it. The people in the In stitute’s Proceedings. “[O]ur sister to the point where you gentlemen Navy and industry know it.
Recommended publications
  • A New Carrier Race? Yoji Koda
    Naval War College Review Volume 64 Article 4 Number 3 Summer 2011 A New Carrier Race? Yoji Koda Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Koda, Yoji (2011) "A New Carrier Race?," Naval War College Review: Vol. 64 : No. 3 , Article 4. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol64/iss3/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile Composite Default screen Koda: A New Carrier Race? A NEW CARRIER RACE? Strategy, Force Planning, and JS Hyuga Vice Admiral Yoji Koda, Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force (Retired) n 18 March 2009 JS Hyuga (DDH 181) was commissioned and delivered to Othe Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force (JMSDF). The unique characteris- tic of this ship is its aircraft-carrier-like design, with a “through” flight deck and an island on the starboard side. Hyuga was planned in the five-year Midterm De- fense Buildup Plan (MTDBP) of 2001 and funded in Japanese fiscal year (JFY) 2004 as the replacement for the aging first-generation helicopter-carrying de- stroyer (DDH), JS Haruna (DDH 141), which was to reach the end of its service life of thirty-five years in 2009. The second ship of the new class, JS Ise (DDH 182), of the JFY 2006 program, was commissioned 16 March 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • China Naval Modernization: Implications for US Navy Capabilities
    China Naval Modernization: Implications for U.S. Navy Capabilities—Background and Issues for Congress Updated May 21, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL33153 China Naval Modernization: Implications for U.S. Navy Capabilities Summary In an era of renewed great power competition, China’s military modernization effort, including its naval modernization effort, has become the top focus of U.S. defense planning and budgeting. China’s navy, which China has been steadily modernizing for more than 25 years, since the early to mid-1990s, has become a formidable military force within China’s near-seas region, and it is conducting a growing number of operations in more-distant waters, including the broader waters of the Western Pacific, the Indian Ocean, and waters around Europe. China’s navy is viewed as posing a major challenge to the U.S. Navy’s ability to achieve and maintain wartime control of blue-water ocean areas in the Western Pacific—the first such challenge the U.S. Navy has faced since the end of the Cold War—and forms a key element of a Chinese challenge to the long- standing status of the United States as the leading military power in the Western Pacific. China’s naval modernization effort encompasses a wide array of platform and weapon acquisition programs, including anti-ship ballistic missiles (ASBMs), anti-ship cruise missiles (ASCMs), submarines, surface ships, aircraft, unmanned vehicles (UVs), and supporting C4ISR (command and control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance) systems. China’s naval modernization effort also includes improvements in maintenance and logistics, doctrine, personnel quality, education and training, and exercises.
    [Show full text]
  • Cvf) Programme
    CHILD POLICY This PDF document was made available CIVIL JUSTICE from www.rand.org as a public service of EDUCATION the RAND Corporation. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE Jump down to document6 INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS NATIONAL SECURITY The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit POPULATION AND AGING research organization providing PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY objective analysis and effective SUBSTANCE ABUSE solutions that address the challenges TERRORISM AND facing the public and private sectors HOMELAND SECURITY TRANSPORTATION AND around the world. INFRASTRUCTURE Support RAND Purchase this document Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Europe View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non- commercial use only. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND mono- graphs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. Options for Reducing Costs in the United Kingdom’s Future Aircraft Carrier (cvf) Programme John F. Schank | Roland Yardley Jessie Riposo | Harry Thie | Edward Keating Mark V. Arena | Hans Pung John Birkler | James R. Chiesa Prepared for the UK Ministry of Defence Approved for public release; distribution unlimited The research described in this report was sponsored by the United King- dom’s Ministry of Defence.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Postgraduate School Thesis
    NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS A STUDY OF THE RUSSIAN ACQUISITION OF THE FRENCH MISTRAL AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT WARSHIPS by Patrick Thomas Baker June 2011 Thesis Advisor: Mikhail Tsypkin Second Reader: Douglas Porch Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED June 2011 Master‘s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS A Study of the Russian Acquisition of the French Mistral Amphibious Assault Warships 6. AUTHOR(S) Patrick Thomas Baker 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Naval Postgraduate School REPORT NUMBER Monterey, CA 93943-5000 9. SPONSORING /MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING N/A AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 20150213 DP Mission JDA2015 ENG
    PRESS RELEASE l THE 2015 JEANNE D’ARC MISSION MARINE NATIONALE THE JEANNE D’ARC MISSION Ensign training integrated into the operational deployment of Landing Helicopter Dock Dixmude and destroyer Aconit PRESS RELEASE l THE 2015 JEANNE D’ARC MISSION MARINE NATIONALE I 1 SUMMARY The Jeanne d’Arc mission: conducting today operations and preparing the future French Navy…………………………………………………………………………………………………….2 A multidimensional deployment …………………………………………………………………….3 The 2015 promotion…………………………………………………………………………………..4 The Landing Helicopter Dock (LHD) Dixmude…… ………………………………………………..6 The embarked reaction force and Navy detachments…………………………………………….9 Captain de Briançon, commanding the LHD Dixmude …………………………………………. 10 The frigate type La Fayette (FLF) Aconit .........................................................................11 Captain Helluy, commanding the FLF Aconit…….. .............................................................13 PRESS RELEASE l THE 2015 JEANNE D’ARC MISSION MARINE NATIONALE I 2 THE JEANNE D’ARC MISSION CONDUCTING TODAY’S OPERATIONS WHILE PREPARING THE FUTURE FRENCH NAVY From March to July 2015, an amphibious group composed of LHD Dixmude and LSF Aconit will be deployed in the Indian ocean and then beyond the south of the sea of China even reaching the sea of Japan. Military operations and bilateral co-operation actions will be conducted during the mission. Meanwhile, the trained officers from the 2012 French Naval Academy promotion, as well as foreign officers, will carry out their first operational deployment. This will make these young officers acquire a solid military leader and seaman status through this “embedded” training, an experience of taking responsibilities opening their minds to the issues linked to this strategic area. FOUR MISSIONS AN OPERATIONAL MISSION Strategic pre-positioning: under the Chief of Staff’s command, the group can conduct operations of various kinds, ashore or at sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy News Week 35-2
    NAVY NEWS WEEK 35-2 27 August 2018 Russia debates giving up on building helicopter-carrier ships for its Navy Meduza 14:48, 20 august 2018 There‟s some confusion in Russia‟s shipbuilding business about whether or not the country is done trying to build helicopter carriers. Russia‟s industry and trade minister, Denis Manturov, said in an interview with the news agency Interfax on August 20 that these projects, “in a pure sense of the word,” are over, though the Navy will retain a few such ships. (Manturov added that Russia is still discussing the construction of a second aircraft carrier.) Almost immediately after the interview was published, however, a “high-placed source in Russia‟s shipbuilding industry” told RIA Novosti that the Defense Ministry hasn‟t yet made up its mind about the future of helicopter-carrier construction in Russia. In June 2017, Viktor Bursuk, the deputy head of Russia‟s Navy, said the country planned to acquire two helicopter-carrier ships and complete work on a new aircraft carrier before 2025. Moscow wanted to buy two Mistral-class helicopter-carrier ships from France, but the deal fell through in 2015, following the annexation of Crimea. Those vessels, built for Russia, were ultimately sold to Egypt. Source: https://meduza.io Competition to build cut-price frigates for Royal Navy relaunched Alan Tovey, Industry Editor 20 August 2018 • 1:35pm A computer-generated image of how the Type 31e ships could look The competition to build budget frigates for the Royal Navy has been relaunched after it was halted last month, with defence chiefs saying they had received “insufficient compliant bids”.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of the Helicopter As an Anti
    r ' THE EYES AND EARS OF THE CONVOY: Development of the helicopter as an anti... submarine weapon By Robert M. Browning Jr. 1 ~FIRST cOAst GOARD HELICOPTER DE IACHMI SIKORSKY HEL.ICOPTER AIRPORT BRIDGEPOR. L. TO R. - 1. E. H. FRAUENBERGER AOS. 2. J .A. BOONE A. M.M.1C. 3. L. BRZYCKI A.C.M.M . .__. ...................____ 4. A.N.flSHER LT. T --­ - CONN. JULY-7-1943 I The Eyes and Ears of the Convoy: Develop­ ment of the Helicopter as an Anti-submarine Weapon is a publication of the Coast Guard Historian's office and a Commandant's Bulletin insert for September 1993. A sim'lar version was publishea by the Air Force Historical Foun­ dation in the summer 1993 issue of Air Power History. For information about the Coast Guarc visit your oca, 'ibrary or write to the Coast Guard Historian's office at: Commandant (G­ CP-4), 2100 2nd St .. S.W., Washington, DC 20593. Text by Dr. Robert Browning. Editing, design and layout by PA3 Petey Milnes. Photos courtesy of the Coast Guard Historian·s office Front Cover: An HOS-1 helicopter (fore­ ground) and an accompanying HNS-1 are the only two helicopters that were flown by the Coast Guard during developmental stages in the 1940s. Inside Front Cover: The first Coast Guard helicopter detachment at Sikorsky Helicopter Airport in Bridgeport, Conn. ci. A • E R ( CK SQ N LT. CQ t. ~ OR Above: The first helicopter operations off the r. • IYI • • CGC Cobb in June 1944 . Back Cover: A Coast Guardsman tries out 0 • M • H ELG R E N LT .
    [Show full text]
  • Landing Together: Pacific Amphibious Development and Implications for the U.S. Fleet
    June 2016 Landing Together Pacific Amphibious Development and Implications for the U.S. Fleet PROJECT DIRECTOR Kathleen H. Hicks AUTHORS Kathleen H. Hicks Mark F. Cancian Andrew Metrick John Schaus A Report of the CSIS International Security Program About CSIS For over 50 years, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) has worked to develop solutions to the world’s greatest policy challenges. Today, CSIS scholars are providing strategic insights and bipartisan policy solutions to help decisionmakers chart a course toward a better world. CSIS is a nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, DC. The Center’s 220 full-time staff and large network of affiliated scholars conduct research and analysis and develop policy initiatives that look into the future and anticipate change. Founded at the height of the Cold War by David M. Abshire and Admiral Arleigh Burke, CSIS was dedicated to finding ways to sustain American prominence and prosperity as a force for good in the world. Since 1962, CSIS has become one of the world’s preeminent international institutions focused on defense and security; regional stability; and transnational challenges ranging from energy and climate to global health and economic integration. Thomas J. Pritzker was named chairman of the CSIS Board of Trustees in November 2015. Former U.S. deputy secretary of defense John J. Hamre has served as the Center’s president and chief executive officer since 2000. CSIS does not take specific policy positions; accordingly, all views expressed herein should be understood to be solely those of the author(s). © 2016 by the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1 Amphibious Ships and Craft
    Appendix 1 Amphibious Ships and Craft Ships ADCS Air Defence Control Ship AKA Attack Cargo Ship APA Attack Transport ATD Amphibious Transport Dock CVHA Assault Helicopter Carrier (later LPH) LPD Amphibious Transport Dock LPH Assault Helicopter Carrier LSC Landing Ship, Carrier LSD Landing Ship, Dock LSE(LC) Landing Ship, Emergency Repair (Landing Craft) LSE(LS) Landing Ship, Emergency Repair (Landing Ship) LSF Landing Ship, Fighter Direction LSG Landing Ship, Gantry LSH Landing Ship, Headquarters LSH(C) Landing Ship, Headquarters (Command) LSI Landing Ship, Infantry LSL Landing Ship, Logistic LSM Landing Ship, Medium LSM(R) Landing Ship, Medium (Rocket) LSP Landing Ship, Personnel LSS Landing Ship, Stern Chute LSS(R) Landing Ship, Support (Rocket) LST Landing Ship, Tank LST(A) Landing Ship, Tank (Assault) LST(C) Landing Ship, Tank (Carrier) LST(D) Landing Ship, Tank (Dock) LST(Q) administrative support ship LSU Landing Ship, Utility LSV Landing Ship, Vehicle MS (LC) Maintenance Ship (Landing Craft) MS (LS) Maintenance Ship (Landing Ship) M/T Ship Motor Transport Ship W/T Ship Wireless Tender 212 Appendix 1 213 Barges, craft and amphibians DD Duplex Drive (amphibious tank) DUKW amphibious truck LBE Landing Barge, Emergency repair LBK Landing Barge, Kitchen LBO Landing Barge, Oiler LBV Landing Barge, Vehicle LBW Landing Barge, Water LCA Landing Craft, Assault LCA(HR) Landing Craft, Assault (Hedgerow) LCA(OC) Landing Craft, Assault (Obstacle Clearance) LCC Landing Craft, Control LCE Landing Craft, Emergency Repair LCF Landing Craft, Flak
    [Show full text]
  • INDO-PACIFIC the Future of the PLA Navy's Shipborne Helicopter Force
    INDO-PACIFIC The Future of the PLA Navy’s Shipborne Helicopter Force OE Watch Commentary: China’s Shipborne Weapons journal recently featured a multi-part series discussing China’s ongoing program to develop a dedicated helicopter carrier, the Type 075. The first part of the series featured an analysis of the various pros and cons of other amphibious assault ships. The accompanying passage is from a subsequent part of the same discussion and hones in on the question of which indigenously produced attack and transport helicopters are best suited for the Chinese navy’s needs. Currently, China’s helicopters aboard its transports and surface combatants are limited in niche anti-submarine warfare (ASW) and transport roles. China’s navy PLAAF Changhe WZ-10. needs a dedicated shipborne helicopter force to provide direct fires and transport Source: 3GO*CHN-405/mjordan_6 via Wikimedia, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PLAAF_Changhe_ WZ-10_-_Jordan.jpg, CC BY-SA 3.0 capabilities in support of amphibious operations. Building several Type 075 helicopter carriers similar to US landing helicopter docks (LHD) would allow a full complement of helicopters in both attack and transport roles. China’s geography naturally lends itself to helicopters, but technological bottlenecks in engine design, composite materials for lightweight airframes had slowed China’s ability to produce capable rotor-wing aircraft indigenously. The Chinese military has seen a marked increase in its use of helicopters of all types. While they were previously mostly concentrated in the Army, the Navy and Air Force have gradually adopted more helicopters including attack variants. Over the past decade, the number of Army aviation regiments were expanded and later enlarged to a brigade.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Canadian Navy Aircraft Carrier Her Majesty’S Canadian Ship Bonaventure – CVL 22 21 January 1957 – 3 July 1970
    Royal Canadian Navy Aircraft Carrier Her Majesty’s Canadian Ship Bonaventure – CVL 22 21 January 1957 – 3 July 1970 Introduction In April 1962, the Canadian Government approved the acquisition of an aircraft carrier to replace Her Majesty’s Canadian Ship (HMCS) Magnificent (CVL 21), which had been on loan and was to be returned to the Royal Navy (RN). At the same time, a decision was taken to purchase and modernize an unfinished Second World War era aircraft carrier. The Royal Canadian Navy (RCN) set up a negotiating team to deal with the British Government and the Royal Navy. The RN argued that the contract to purchase the new carrier required that HMCS Magnificent be brought up to the latest “alterations and additions” (A&As) for her class before her return to the RN. These alterations were to include, among other modifications, an angled and strengthened deck. The RCN’s case was that these were modernizations and not A&As. Furthermore, the carrier being offered for purchase was being bought “as is”, therefore the RN must accept the return of HMCS Magnificent in an “as is” state. The Royal Navy was won over to the Canadian’s point of view and the negotiations were soon completed. A new project office for the Principal Royal Canadian Navy Technical Representative was established at Belfast, Northern Ireland, where the partially completed Majestic class, Light Fleet aircraft carrier, the ex-Her Majesty’s Ship (HMS) Powerful (R 95) was laying. Specifications With a length overall of 215 meters (705 ft) and a beam at the water line of 24 meters (79 ft), HMS Powerful was only slightly larger than HMCS Magnificent.
    [Show full text]
  • MIDDLE EAST, NORTH AFRICA Iran to Re-Launch “Helicopter Carrier”
    MIDDLE EAST, NORTH AFRICA Iran to Re-Launch “Helicopter Carrier” OE Watch Commentary: The Iranian navy has had a tough Source: “Nav-e Balgardabir ‘Kharg’ beh Darya Bazgosht (Kharg couple of years. In November 2016 the Iranian frigate Alvand and [Helicopter] Carrier Returned to the Sea),” Fars News Agency, 20 June the supply ship Bushehr became stranded in the South African 2018. https://www.farsnews.com/news/13970330000921 port of Durban on the Indian Ocean, curtailing a high-profile mission to sail into the Atlantic Ocean. Not only did the mission Kharg a helicopter carrier of the Islamic Republic of Iran, after major fail, but the Iranian navy had to rely on the generosity of the South overhauls taking four years, has been deployed as the largest Western African government to feed its crews while the ships underwent Asian vessel on the maritime mission. According to the Fars News multi-month repairs. More recently, the Iranian destroyer Agency, the Kharg helicopter carrier along with the Sabalan destroyer Damavand sank after striking a jetty in the Caspian port of Bandar have deployed as the 54th marine flotilla to the Gulf of Aden, northern Anzali. After the Iranian navy denied the incident, bloggers Indian Ocean, and the Bab al-Mandab Strait. subsequently released video footage of the Damavand sinking (See: “Iran: Warship Sinks after Mishap,” OE Watch, March 2018). The accompanying excerpted article seeks to reset the Iranian navy’s image: It describes the return to service of the Iranian “helicopter carrier” Kharg and the destroyer Sabalan. What the article glosses over, however, are the capabilities of the ships.
    [Show full text]