DOCSLIB.ORG

Royal Canadian Navy Aircraft Carrier Her Majesty’S Canadian Ship Bonaventure – CVL 22 21 January 1957 – 3 July 1970

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Royal Canadian Navy Aircraft Carrier Her Majesty’S Canadian Ship Bonaventure – CVL 22 21 January 1957 – 3 July 1970 Royal Canadian Navy Aircraft Carrier Her Majesty’s Canadian Ship Bonaventure – CVL 22 21 January 1957 – 3 July 1970 Introduction In April 1962, the Canadian Government approved the acquisition of an aircraft carrier to replace Her Majesty’s Canadian Ship (HMCS) Magnificent (CVL 21), which had been on loan and was to be returned to the Royal Navy (RN). At the same time, a decision was taken to purchase and modernize an unfinished Second World War era aircraft carrier. The Royal Canadian Navy (RCN) set up a negotiating team to deal with the British Government and the Royal Navy. The RN argued that the contract to purchase the new carrier required that HMCS Magnificent be brought up to the latest “alterations and additions” (A&As) for her class before her return to the RN. These alterations were to include, among other modifications, an angled and strengthened deck. The RCN’s case was that these were modernizations and not A&As. Furthermore, the carrier being offered for purchase was being bought “as is”, therefore the RN must accept the return of HMCS Magnificent in an “as is” state. The Royal Navy was won over to the Canadian’s point of view and the negotiations were soon completed. A new project office for the Principal Royal Canadian Navy Technical Representative was established at Belfast, Northern Ireland, where the partially completed Majestic class, Light Fleet aircraft carrier, the ex-Her Majesty’s Ship (HMS) Powerful (R 95) was laying. Specifications With a length overall of 215 meters (705 ft) and a beam at the water line of 24 meters (79 ft), HMS Powerful was only slightly larger than HMCS Magnificent. Her hull had been first laid down in November 1943, but with the knowledge that the allies would be victorious in the war, completion of the ship was suspended following its launch in 1945. Completion work resumed in July 1952 with Canada’s official purchase of the British-built carrier, HMS Powerful. The ship had been redesigned to enable operation of modern fixed-wing aircraft by incorporating a 7.5 degree angled deck equipped with a steam catapult for launching aircraft. Improved arrester gear and a mirror landing system would enable safe recovery of her aircraft and her strengthened deck and aircraft lifts (elevators) would facilitate deck handling. Her anti-aircraft defences consisted of four twin, fully automatic, US pattern 3-inch/50-calibre guns. This term describes a deck-mounted gun that has a 3-inch bore. What’s In a Name? Selecting a new name for this, Canada’s only aircraft carrier was not taken lightly. The aircraft carriers that Canada had previously used on loan from the British (Nabob, Puncher, Warrior and Magnificent) had carried over their Royal Navy names. A name more readily identified with Canada was desired. Two cruisers had been named for Canadian provinces, Ontario and Quebec, so the name “Canada” was considered. However, it was recalled that Nazi Germany had changed the name, Deutschland, of one of its ships for fear of the effect on morale if it was sunk in combat. How would it look if HMCS Canada were to sink? On 10 December 1952, her new name was announced as HMCS Bonaventure (CVL 22), a name of some repute in the Royal Navy and the name of an island bird sanctuary in the St. Lawrence River. When HMCS Magnificent was in service, her nickname was “Maggie”, so naturally HMCS Bonaventure became affectionately known as “Bonnie”. Her historic motto “Non Por Nos Toz Seus”, meaning in English, “Not For Ourselves Alone”, was appropriate to the world situation. Electronics & Propulsion. HMCS Bonaventure had some three million dollars worth of electrical equipment delivered for installation, including some two million dollars worth of gun-fire controls and radar units. She, like HMCS Magnificent, was fitted with one, three-bladed propulsion screw and one four-bladed screw to reduce vibration when underway. “Bonnie’s” Aircraft. Fixed-wing aircraft to be carried on Bonaventure would initially include the McDonnell F2H-3 Banshee that had been purchased from the United States Navy (USN) for the fighter operational role. Next came the Canadian-built version of Grumman’s S2F Tracker anti- submarine warfare (ASW) aircraft. Rotary-winged types included the Sikorsky HO4S-3 helicopters of HS 50. A single Sikorsky HO4S-3 helicopter from HU 21 was embarked for plane guard duties. “Plane Guard” described a ship or helicopter that always accompanied an aircraft carrier and was available for all take-off and recovery operations, to be ready to respond to any launch or recovery mishap. Later, the Sikorsky CHSS-2 Sea King helicopter tasked also with the anti-submarine warfare role was added to the ship’s roster. Full power trials of “Bonnie” were carried out and the vessel’s flight deck was certified for use for both day and night operations. F2H-3 Banshee (Bill Upton Collection) CS2F Tracker (CASM Collection) HO4S of HS 50 and HU 21 (CASM Collection) CHSS-2 Sea King (CF Photo PCN68-558) Other Carrier Options. Before HMCS Bonaventure was commissioned, there was some talk of Canada buying additional aircraft carriers. At one point, consideration was given to purchasing a United States Navy Essex-class aircraft carrier for 4.4 million US dollars. In 1952, the Canadian Defence Liaison Staff had pressed for the purchase of the new Royal Navy HMS Hermes (R12), an advanced light fleet carrier. Neither proposal went forward. In 1986, after a very distinguished career, including armed operations during the 1982 Falklands War, HMS Hermes was sold to India and renamed Indian Naval Ship (INS) Viraat (R22) Commissioning HMCS Bonaventure. Plans to commission “Bonnie” in autumn of 1956 were delayed to permit workmanship standards to be evaluated throughout and pre-commissioning trials to be carried out. The new commissioning date was set for 17 January 1957 under her first Commanding Officer, Captain Harold V.W. Gross, RCN. Getting the crew ready for Bonaventure’s commissioning proved to be difficult. It had been intended to transfer most of the crew from the experienced members of HMCS Magnificent. However, “Maggie” was now involved in a United Nations (UN) operation in the Suez Canal zone, where it had transported Canadian Army personnel and their vehicles on peace-keeping operations. Therefore, three hundred new crewmembers were flown from Canada to supplement the one hundred RCN personnel, who were busy making things ready in Belfast. The newly arrived crewmembers were accommodated at Royal Air Force (RAF) Station Bishops, located just outside of Belfast as they could not be accommodated aboard Bonaventure. The final inspection of the ship was begun before signing the D448 Acceptance Form. Many deficiencies were found, including filthy engine room bilges, incomplete aviation fuel systems and incomplete catapult assemblies. Resolution of these problems was begun and, on 17 January 1957, the ship was ready for commissioning. The Navy White Ensign was raised and the guard of honour was inspected by the Honourable Ralph Campney, then Minister of National Defence. Mrs. Campney officially christened the ship and unveiled the ship '’Battle Honours”. However, the next day, the White Ensign came down and the ship was returned to the builders to complete alterations as prescribed in the contract. While it looked as if Canada had her new aircraft carrier, in fact, the ship was not formally accepted from the builders until they had rectified some 477 previously identified defects. In due course, all outstanding issues were resolved and the ship was accepted for sea trials. Operations – 1957 Following full-power sea trials, “Bonnie” moved to Portsmouth to load stores and ammunition. She visited various ports en route and conducted flying trials. Flying operations included launching and recovering two Hawker Sea Hawks, and two Fairey Gannets of the Fleet Air Arm (FAA), two RCN de Havilland Canada CS2F Trackers and two McDonnell F2H-3 Banshees from VX 10. The RCN aircraft were flown from HMCS Shearwater over the Atlantic to Royal Navy Air Station (RNAS) Ford. The Sea Hawks were the first jet aircraft to land aboard Bonaventure. The Gannet was a large, contra-rotating turboprop anti-submarine aircraft, which the RN and the British Government had hoped to sell to the RCN as they had done with Australia and Germany. In addition to loading stores and ammunitions at HM Dockyard, at Portsmouth, she loaded a special piece of cargo. Stowed covered on deck adjacent to the island was an experimental Saunders Roe hydrofoil, the predecessor to HMCS Bras D’Or, built in the United Kingdom for the Defence Research Board. Bonaventure then sailed for Halifax on 19 June and while en route exercised with a Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF) Lockheed P2V Neptune ASW aircraft. On her arrival in Halifax, HMCS Bonaventure received a tumultuous welcome by many dignitaries, including the Lieutenant-Governor of Nova Scotia, the Flag Officer Atlantic Coast (FOAC) and the Mayor of Halifax. She then lay alongside until September. The delay in her deployment was due to the modification of her bridge structure to accommodate a senior officer’s bridge, separate from the main bridge and the compass platform. The remainder of 1957 was devoted to smoothing the wrinkles out of the ship’s operations and getting the aircrew ready for flying operations prior to being involved in North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) exercises. Following a ten-day work-up in St. Margaret’s Bay, Nova Scotia, Bonaventure sailed on her first flying training exercise. Ten RCN Tracker pilots had qualified two months previous onboard the USS Wasp (CV 18) that also had an angled deck and employed mirror landing aids similar to those on the “Bonnie”.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FLAG of BOTSWANA - a BRIEF HISTORY Where in the World
    Part of the “History of National Flags” Series from Flagmakers FLAG OF BOTSWANA - A BRIEF HISTORY Where In The World Trivia You must be granted permission from the government to fly the flag. Technical Specification Adopted: 30th September 1966 Proportion: 2:3 Design: A light blue field with horizontal black stripe with white border. Colours: PMS – Blue: 284C Brief History On 31st of March 1885, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland established the Bechuanaland Protectorate when Boer freebooters threatened the people of Botswana. Rather than have a specific colonial flag the Union Jack of Great Britain and Ireland was flown. The Protectorate lasted until 1966 when Botswana became the independent country of the Republic of Botswana and gained its own flag. The flag is a blue field with horizontal black stripe with a white border. This design was specifically chosen to contrast with the flag of South African flag as the country was under apartheid and symbolises harmony and peace between black and European people. The Union Jack of Great Britain and Ireland The Flag of the Republic of Botswana (1885 to 1966) (1966 to Present Day) Coat of Arms of Botswana The Coat of Arms of Botswana were adopted in 1966 and features a shield with three cogwheels representing industry at the top, three waves representing water in the centre and a red bulls head representing cattle herding. At the sides of the shield are zebras; the right-hand zebra holds sorghum and the left hand zebra holds ivory. Underneath is the motto PULA that means ‘rain.’ The Standard of the President of Botswana The Standard of the President of Botswana takes the light blue field from the national flag with a white black-bordered circle with the Coat of Arms of Botswana in the centre.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Carrier Race? Yoji Koda
    Naval War College Review Volume 64 Article 4 Number 3 Summer 2011 A New Carrier Race? Yoji Koda Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Koda, Yoji (2011) "A New Carrier Race?," Naval War College Review: Vol. 64 : No. 3 , Article 4. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol64/iss3/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile Composite Default screen Koda: A New Carrier Race? A NEW CARRIER RACE? Strategy, Force Planning, and JS Hyuga Vice Admiral Yoji Koda, Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force (Retired) n 18 March 2009 JS Hyuga (DDH 181) was commissioned and delivered to Othe Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force (JMSDF). The unique characteris- tic of this ship is its aircraft-carrier-like design, with a “through” flight deck and an island on the starboard side. Hyuga was planned in the five-year Midterm De- fense Buildup Plan (MTDBP) of 2001 and funded in Japanese fiscal year (JFY) 2004 as the replacement for the aging first-generation helicopter-carrying de- stroyer (DDH), JS Haruna (DDH 141), which was to reach the end of its service life of thirty-five years in 2009. The second ship of the new class, JS Ise (DDH 182), of the JFY 2006 program, was commissioned 16 March 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • China Naval Modernization: Implications for US Navy Capabilities
    China Naval Modernization: Implications for U.S. Navy Capabilities—Background and Issues for Congress Updated May 21, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL33153 China Naval Modernization: Implications for U.S. Navy Capabilities Summary In an era of renewed great power competition, China’s military modernization effort, including its naval modernization effort, has become the top focus of U.S. defense planning and budgeting. China’s navy, which China has been steadily modernizing for more than 25 years, since the early to mid-1990s, has become a formidable military force within China’s near-seas region, and it is conducting a growing number of operations in more-distant waters, including the broader waters of the Western Pacific, the Indian Ocean, and waters around Europe. China’s navy is viewed as posing a major challenge to the U.S. Navy’s ability to achieve and maintain wartime control of blue-water ocean areas in the Western Pacific—the first such challenge the U.S. Navy has faced since the end of the Cold War—and forms a key element of a Chinese challenge to the long- standing status of the United States as the leading military power in the Western Pacific. China’s naval modernization effort encompasses a wide array of platform and weapon acquisition programs, including anti-ship ballistic missiles (ASBMs), anti-ship cruise missiles (ASCMs), submarines, surface ships, aircraft, unmanned vehicles (UVs), and supporting C4ISR (command and control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance) systems. China’s naval modernization effort also includes improvements in maintenance and logistics, doctrine, personnel quality, education and training, and exercises.
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Engineering Journal 64 Since 1982 CANADA’S NAVAL TECHNICAL FORUM Spring 2009
    Maritime Engineering Journal 64 Since 1982 CANADA’S NAVAL TECHNICAL FORUM Spring 2009 The Nine Minute Writing Challenge (Part II) The Challenge Moves East CNTHA News Inside! Also in this Issue: • First Frigate Rollout of the MASIS “Deployed Solution” • Forum: The Requirement for Requirements • A Measure of Seaworthiness West Coast “whale” watching — Photo: Brian McCullough HMCS Orca (PCT-55) may look like a killer backyard building project in this October 2008 photo, but the patrol training vessel was simply in for repairs at the Point Hope Maritime Limited shipyard in Victoria’s Upper Harbour. Maritime Engineering (Established 1982) Edition No. 64 Journal SPRING 2009 DEPARTMENTS Commodore’s Corner Engineering Knowledge — Understanding the requirement is fundamental in the search for solutions by Commodore Richard Greenwood .............................................................. 2 Letters An Engineer’s Tale — Diving in the Engine Room by Commodore (Ret.) Ed Murray .................................................................. 3 Forum The Requirement for Requirements (or how to get what you want) Director General by LCdr (ret.) Gordon Forbes ........................................................................ 4 Maritime Equipment Program Management Commodore Richard W. Greenwood, OMM, CD FEATURES The East Coast’s “Short Answer” to the Nine Minute Writing Challenge Senior Editor We asked participants at the 2008 MARLANT Naval Technical Capt(N) Mike Wood DGMEPM Chief of Staff Seminar to write about their biggest technical challenge in the navy. You should read what they wrote. Project Director by 71 Worthy Contributors ............................................................................. 7 Maritime Engineering Journal Lt(N) Patrick Fortin Materiel Acquisition and Support Information System — First Frigate Rollout of the MASIS “Deployed Solution” Production Editor / Enquiries Brian McCullough by LCdr Simon Paré, CP02 Chris Tucker and Janelle Mansfield ..............
    [Show full text]
  • Master Narrative Ours Is the Epic Story of the Royal Navy, Its Impact on Britain and the World from Its Origins in 625 A.D
    NMRN Master Narrative Ours is the epic story of the Royal Navy, its impact on Britain and the world from its origins in 625 A.D. to the present day. We will tell this emotionally-coloured and nuanced story, one of triumph and achievement as well as failure and muddle, through four key themes:- People. We tell the story of the Royal Navy’s people. We examine the qualities that distinguish people serving at sea: courage, loyalty and sacrifice but also incidents of ignorance, cruelty and cowardice. We trace the changes from the amateur ‘soldiers at sea’, through the professionalization of officers and then ships’ companies, onto the ‘citizen sailors’ who fought the World Wars and finally to today’s small, elite force of men and women. We highlight the change as people are rewarded in war with personal profit and prize money but then dispensed with in peace, to the different kind of recognition given to salaried public servants. Increasingly the people’s story becomes one of highly trained specialists, often serving in branches with strong corporate identities: the Royal Marines, the Submarine Service and the Fleet Air Arm. We will examine these identities and the Royal Navy’s unique camaraderie, characterised by simultaneous loyalties to ship, trade, branch, service and comrades. Purpose. We tell the story of the Royal Navy’s roles in the past, and explain its purpose today. Using examples of what the service did and continues to do, we show how for centuries it was the pre-eminent agent of first the British Crown and then of state policy throughout the world.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of the Phantom MTB and the Loss of HMCS Athabaskan
    Canadian Military History Volume 11 Issue 3 Article 2 2002 The Case of the Phantom MTB and the Loss of HMCS Athabaskan Michael Whitby [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/cmh Part of the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Whitby, Michael "The Case of the Phantom MTB and the Loss of HMCS Athabaskan." Canadian Military History 11, 3 (2002) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canadian Military History by an authorized editor of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Whitby: Phantom MTB and the HMCS <em>Athabaskan</em> The Case of the Phantom MTB and the Loss of HMCS A th abaskan Michael Whitby n the early dawn hours of 29 April 1944, the It was not unusual, therefore, for HMCS Idestroyer HMCS A th a b a ska n plunged to the H aida an d A th a b a ska n to learn during the depths of the English Channel, her hull wracked forenoon of 28 April that they had been ordered by two powerful explosions. One hundred and to screen HOSTILE 26, a minelaying mission twenty-eight young Canadians died with her. off the French coast about a 100 miles south of Fifty-two years later, in the article “I Will Never Plymouth.5 The Tribals’ role was to act as distant Forget the Sound of Those Engines Going Away: covering force for eight Motor L aunches (MLs) A Re-examination into the Sinking of HMCS of the 10th ML Flotilla that were to lay mines Athabaskan” that appeared in this journal, Peter about nine miles north of the eastern point of Dixon advanced the theory - which was the lie de Bas.6 Two MTBs were to provide close presented as fact - that the second explosion, escort to the minelayers, with Lieutenant- the one that sealed the destroyer’s fate, was Commander T.N.
    [Show full text]
  • Ships Depart Halifax After Hotel Quarantine
    Monday, April 20, 2020 Volume 54, Issue 08 www.tridentnewspaper.com Ships depart Halifax after hotel quarantine HMC ships Moncton and Ville de Québec both departed Halifax on Thursday, April 16 to prepare for potential deploy- ment as part of Operation LASER, the CAF response to the COVID-19 pandemic. To ensure the safety of the crew and the capability of the ships, all sailors were isolated in a Halifax hotel for 14 days prior to boarding. The ships will now remain at sea in Nova Scotian waters as they stay ready to assist Canadians if called upon. MARLANT PA 2 TRIDENTTRIDENT NEWS NEWS APRIL April 20, 6, 2020 PromotionCOVID-19 : Informations, ceremonies lignes continue directrices despite et socialressources distancing accessibles au public à l’intention Bydes Ryan Melanson, membres de l’Équipe de la Défense locale Trident Staff Nous sommes conscients du fait book à l’adresse www.facebook.com/ pourraient intéresser nos membres. MapleSeaLeaf queThe les Royal membres Canadian de notre Navy’s person ongo- - CANFLTLANTBaseHalifax. Cette HQ, note the ceremonycomprend was Suivez-nous! • BFC Halifax : @CFBHalifax ingnel effort n’ont topas recognize tous accès the au significant RED ou à aégalement necessary des step informations, as he prepared des for di -his • Commandant de la BFC Halifax : promotionl’intranet defrom l’Équipe the rank de ofla MasterDéfense. newrectives posting et des with ressources HMCS Toronto provinciales. Facebook @WardenNAtlantic SeamanPour cette to Petty raison, Officer, une grande 2nd Class partie is et“So fédérales we decided concernant to sort laof COVID-19.roll with • Forces maritimes de l’Atlantique : beginningdes informations to look asur little la COVID-19bit different.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol 6, Issue 3
    Crowsnest www.navy.forces.gc.ca Vol. 6, No. 3 Fall 2012 RIMPAC 2012 Largest multinational exercise breaks new ground By Lieutenant-Commander Nathalie Garcia as two teams from the Fleet Diving Unit stationed in Victoria. The Royal Canadian Air Force provided four fter months of preparation and weeks of CF-140 Aurora long-range patrol aircraft from 14 Wing training, 25,000 personnel from 22 nations Greenwood, N.S., and 19 Wing Comox, B.C.; seven Abreathed a collective sigh of relief as Rim of the CF-188 Hornet fighter jets from 3 Wing Bagotville, Que., Pacific (RIMPAC) Exercise 2012 came to a successful with augmentation from 4 Wing Cold Lake, Alta.; and end. two CH-124 Sea King detachments assigned to Conducted in the operating areas in and around the Algonquin and Ottawa. Hawaiian Islands and in the Southern California The Canadian Army provided more than 122 exercise areas, the world’s largest maritime exercise members from the 2nd Battalion of Princess Patricia’s officially ended August 3. It included more than 1,400 Canadian Light Infantry (PPCLI), including Canadian navy, army and air force personnel. augmentation from 1 PPCLI, 3 PPCLI, 1 Combat “I am truly pleased with what we have achieved as Engineer Regiment and 1 Field Ambulance. Finally, part of this exercise,” said Rear-Admiral Ron Lloyd, the more than 100 members of the Canadian Forces Deputy Combined Task Force Commander and the occupied a variety of staff and leadership positions most senior Canadian participating in the exercise. “The within the exercise. challenging scenarios allowed Canadians and our “A significant highlight was HMCS Victoria’s Mk 48 Pacific Rim partners to develop the skills we will need to torpedo shoot,” said Rear-Admiral Peter Ellis, work successfully with each other, wherever we may be Amphibious Assault Task Force Commander for the called upon to deploy.” exercise.
    [Show full text]
  • \Aircraft Recognition Manual
    Jf V t 9fn I 4-'!- Vw'^ ' 'o | ^ renai; 408.$ /•> ,A1.AI / -3o FM DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FM 30-30 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NavWeps 00-80T-75 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AFM 50-40 MARINE CORPS NavMC 2522 \AIRCRAFT RECOGNITION MANUAL SI ISSUED BY DIRECTION OF\ CHIEF OF BUREAU OF NAVAL WEAPONS \ \ I 4 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FM 30-30 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NavWeps 00-80T-75 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AFM 50-40 MARINE CORPS NavMC 2522 AIRCRAFT RECOGNITION MANUAL •a ISSUED BY DIRECTION OF CHIEF OF BUREAU OF NAVAL WEAPONS JUNE 1962 DEPARTMENTS OF THE ARMY, THE NAVY AND THE AIR FORCE, WASHINGTON 25, D.C., 15 June 1962 FM 30-30/NAVWEPS 00-80T-75/AFM 50-40/NAVMC 2522, Aircraft Recognition Manual, is published for the information and guidance of all concerned. i BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARIES OF THE ARMY, THE NAVY, AND THE AIR FORCE: G. H. DECKER, General, Umted States Army, Official: Chief of Staff. J. C. LAMBERT, Major General, United States Army, The Adjutant General. PAUL D. STROOP Rear Admiral, United States Navy, Chief, Bureau of Naval Weapons. CURTIS E. LEMAY, Official: Chief of Staff, United States Air Force, R. J. PUGH, Colonel, United States Air Force, Director of Administrative Services. C. H. HAYES, Major General, U.S. Marine Corps, Deputy Chief of Staff (Plans). H DISTRIBUTION: ARMY: Active Army : DCSPER (1) Inf/Mech Div Co/Btry/Trp 7-2 44-112 ACSI (1) (5) except Arm/Abn Div 7- 44-236 52 DCSLOG (2) Co/Trp (1) 8- 44-237 137 DCSOPS(5) MDW (1) 8-500 (AA- 44-446 ACSRC (1) Svc Colleges (3) AH) 44447 CNGB (1) Br Svc Sch (5) except 10-201 44^536
    [Show full text]
  • FROM CRADLE to GRAVE? the Place of the Aircraft
    FROM CRADLE TO GRAVE? The Place of the Aircraft Carrier in Australia's post-war Defence Force Subthesis submitted for the degree of MASTER OF DEFENCE STUDIES at the University College The University of New South Wales Australian Defence Force Academy 1996 by ALLAN DU TOIT ACADEMY LIBRARy UNSW AT ADFA 437104 HMAS Melbourne, 1973. Trackers are parked to port and Skyhawks to starboard Declaration by Candidate I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, it contains no material previously published or written by another person nor material which to a substantial extent has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma of a university or other institute of higher learning, except where due acknowledgment is made in the text of the thesis. Allan du Toit Canberra, October 1996 Ill Abstract This subthesis sets out to study the place of the aircraft carrier in Australia's post-war defence force. Few changes in naval warfare have been as all embracing as the role played by the aircraft carrier, which is, without doubt, the most impressive, and at the same time the most controversial, manifestation of sea power. From 1948 until 1983 the aircraft carrier formed a significant component of the Australian Defence Force and the place of an aircraft carrier in defence strategy and the force structure seemed relatively secure. Although cost, especially in comparison to, and in competition with, other major defence projects, was probably the major issue in the demise of the aircraft carrier and an organic fixed-wing naval air capability in the Australian Defence Force, cost alone can obscure the ftindamental reordering of Australia's defence posture and strategic thinking, which significantly contributed to the decision not to replace HMAS Melbourne.
    [Show full text]
  • Download: Flightlines MARCH/APRIL 2018
    March/April 2018 CANADIAN WARPLANE HERITAGE MUSEUM FIREFLY Canada’s Fireflies & WH632 THE ONLY WAAF To Go On A Wartime Bombing Raid MARCH/APRIL 2018 CANADIAN WARPLANE HERITAGE MUSEUM GIFT SHOP SHOP ONLINE @ warplane.com Questions? Call: 905-679-4183 ext. 232 or Email: [email protected] RECOMMENDED READING $2499 $4495 $3995 $2399 RCAF T-Shirt – Brand new design! EACH Available in green, red or yellow Canadian Warplane $1299 Heritage Museum Mug $1999 Avro Lancaster Tin Sign 14 oz. Heavyweight MARCH/APRIL 2018 CANADIAN WARPLANE HERITAGE MUSEUM MARCH/APRIL 2018 CANADIAN WARPLANE HERITAGE MUSEUM President & Chief Executive Officer David G. Rohrer Vice President – Facilities Manager Controller Operations Cathy Dowd Brenda Shelley Pam Rickards Curator Education Services Vice President – Finance Erin Napier Manager Ernie Doyle Howard McLean Flight Coordinator Chief Engineer Laura Hassard-Moran Donor Services Jim Van Dyk Manager Retail Manager Sally Melnyk Marketing Manager Shawn Perras Al Mickeloff Building Maintenance Volunteer Services Manager Food & Beverage Manager Administrator Jason Pascoe Anas Hasan Toni McFarlane Board of Directors Christopher Freeman, Chair Nestor Yakimik Art McCabe David Ippolito Robert Fenn Dennis Bradley, Ex Officio John O’Dwyer Marc Plouffe Sandy Thomson, Ex Officio David G. Rohrer Patrick Farrell Bruce MacRitchie, Ex Officio Stay Connected Subscribe to our eFlyer Canadian Warplane warplane.com/mailing-list-signup.aspx Heritage Museum 9280 Airport Road Read Flightlines online warplane.com/about/flightlines.aspx
    [Show full text]
  • HMCS Algonquin Prior to Her Doing Her Single Missile Shot at Barking Sands Range Off Hawaii
    Issue 9/ Numéro 9 NESOP Newsletter / Bulletin de l’OP(DEM) June/Juin 2001 The NESOP Le BULLETIN OP NEWSLETTER is (DEN) est publié par published by and les OP DEN de la for the NESOPs And The Survey Says…… Marine canadienne of the Canadian et à leur intention. Navy. It’s Ok, so the title was Our good SME has provided a Son but : aider les purpose; to keep “borrowed” from a game column that will help to sort out militaires à connaître members current show. Given the scope of the burning questions for us all. l’actualité en ce qui with items that what’s happened with the One thing is certain. If we set concerne le milieu reflect the MOC over the past six out to identify our MOC des OP DEN, en NESOP months, it’s rather fitting. deficiencies, we succeeded. If complétant community, by Coinciding with the release of we set out to document those l’information qui supplementing issue eight in Nov 00, the deficiencies, so the same types provient des sources information Combat Ops questionnaire of problems can be averted in officielles, et offrir provided by une tribune où les formal sources was making it’s rounds from the future, we succeeded. If we sea to shining sea. You know. set out to ensure that our unités peuvent and acting as a mettre en commun forum for sharing That survey that wanted to difficulties were made known know what you think you did. to the “powers that be”, we les sujets dignes unit-level items d’intérêt.
    [Show full text]