Download: Flightlines MARCH/APRIL 2018
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
View Instruction Sheet (.Pdf)
Belcher Bits Decal BD17: Seafire, Firefly, Sea Fury & Tracker 1/72 In December 1945, the Naval Air branch of the Royal Canadian Navy was estab- lished and initially equipped with the Supermarine Seafire XV and Fairy Firefly FR.1. By 1949, the Seafire had been replaced by the Hawker Sea Fury, and the original batch of Fireflies upgraded to FR IV and AS.5, being phased out a year later by the Grumman TBM. These aircraft represent the first stages of the RCN Naval Air branch as it was being developed from its Fleet Air Arm roots. By the mid-50s, Canada’s operational role was changing and becoming more closely linked with the US, and the final group of aircraft used by the RCN were all US designs (F2H Banshee and S2F Tracker) This decal sheet allows the modeller to build a Seafire XV and Firefly FR.1 in either of the operational schemes in which they served. It also provides markings for the first carrier based operational scheme for the Sea Fury. Some of the Sea Furies were originally delivered and used in the current FAA scheme of EDSG over Sky, but that scheme was not common. Finally, this sheet provides markings for Grumman Trackers in RCN service. Although this aircraft lasted well past the RCN era, this sheet covers the inital schemes. Unlike many Belcher Bits decals, this sheet is not generic, and specific aircraft are covered, although common lettering sizes mean some other Seafires and Fireflies are possible with a bit of mixing and matching. Specific schemes illustrated are: 1. -
Master Narrative Ours Is the Epic Story of the Royal Navy, Its Impact on Britain and the World from Its Origins in 625 A.D
NMRN Master Narrative Ours is the epic story of the Royal Navy, its impact on Britain and the world from its origins in 625 A.D. to the present day. We will tell this emotionally-coloured and nuanced story, one of triumph and achievement as well as failure and muddle, through four key themes:- People. We tell the story of the Royal Navy’s people. We examine the qualities that distinguish people serving at sea: courage, loyalty and sacrifice but also incidents of ignorance, cruelty and cowardice. We trace the changes from the amateur ‘soldiers at sea’, through the professionalization of officers and then ships’ companies, onto the ‘citizen sailors’ who fought the World Wars and finally to today’s small, elite force of men and women. We highlight the change as people are rewarded in war with personal profit and prize money but then dispensed with in peace, to the different kind of recognition given to salaried public servants. Increasingly the people’s story becomes one of highly trained specialists, often serving in branches with strong corporate identities: the Royal Marines, the Submarine Service and the Fleet Air Arm. We will examine these identities and the Royal Navy’s unique camaraderie, characterised by simultaneous loyalties to ship, trade, branch, service and comrades. Purpose. We tell the story of the Royal Navy’s roles in the past, and explain its purpose today. Using examples of what the service did and continues to do, we show how for centuries it was the pre-eminent agent of first the British Crown and then of state policy throughout the world. -
We Envy No Man on Earth Because We Fly. the Australian Fleet Air
We Envy No Man On Earth Because We Fly. The Australian Fleet Air Arm: A Comparative Operational Study. This thesis is presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Murdoch University 2016 Sharron Lee Spargo BA (Hons) Murdoch University I declare that this thesis is my own account of my research and contains as its main content work which has not previously been submitted for a degree at any tertiary education institution. …………………………………………………………………………….. Abstract This thesis examines a small component of the Australian Navy, the Fleet Air Arm. Naval aviators have been contributing to Australian military history since 1914 but they remain relatively unheard of in the wider community and in some instances, in Australian military circles. Aviation within the maritime environment was, and remains, a versatile weapon in any modern navy but the struggle to initiate an aviation branch within the Royal Australian Navy was a protracted one. Finally coming into existence in 1947, the Australian Fleet Air Arm operated from the largest of all naval vessels in the post battle ship era; aircraft carriers. HMAS Albatross, Sydney, Vengeance and Melbourne carried, operated and fully maintained various fixed-wing aircraft and the naval personnel needed for operational deployments until 1982. These deployments included contributions to national and multinational combat, peacekeeping and humanitarian operations. With the Australian government’s decision not to replace the last of the aging aircraft carriers, HMAS Melbourne, in 1982, the survival of the Australian Fleet Air Arm, and its highly trained personnel, was in grave doubt. This was a major turning point for Australian Naval Aviation; these versatile flyers and the maintenance and technical crews who supported them retrained on rotary aircraft, or helicopters, and adapted to flight operations utilising small compact ships. -
•Œan Unusual Voyage in Far Northern Waters╊1 the Royal Canadian
Canadian Military History Volume 22 Issue 4 Article 4 2013 “An unusual voyage in far northern waters”1 The Royal Canadian Navy’s first postwar forays into the Arctic, 1946-1950 Richard O. Mayne Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/cmh Part of the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Richard O. Mayne "“An unusual voyage in far northern waters”1 The Royal Canadian Navy’s first postwar forays into the Arctic, 1946-1950." Canadian Military History 22, 4 (2013) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canadian Military History by an authorized editor of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. : “An unusual voyage in far northern waters”1 The Royal Canadian Navy’s first postwar forays into the Arctic, 1946-1950 Published34 by Scholars Commons @ Laurier, 2013 1 Canadian Military History, Vol. 22 [2013], Iss. 4, Art. 4 “An unusual voyage in far northern waters”1 The Royal Canadian Navy’s first postwar forays into the Arctic, 1946-1950 Richard O. Mayne o one in Canada knew it was Important studies have there. The automatic weather Abstract: Looking at the Royal addressed the larger strategic N Canadian Navy’s operational station set up on the shore of context of challenges to Canadian record between 1945 to 1950 it northern Labrador by the German would appear that one exercise, sovereignty in the Arctic during submarine U-537 in October 1943 two deployments, and a scientific and immediately after the Second was undiscovered until 1981, when a expedition in the Arctic was not the World War.3 This article, by contrast, German researcher alerted Canadian type of commitment that matched the focuses on the RCN’s activities in growing strategic significance of this authorities. -
Fairey Swordfish
Last updated 1 December 2020 ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FAIREY SWORDFISH |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| B.3593 • Mk. I W5856 built by Blackburn Aircraft at Sherburn-in-Elmet: ff 21.10.41 (Blackburn) RNFAA service in Mediterranean theatre 42/43 Fairey Aviation, Stockport: refurbished for Canada .43 Mk.IV (to RCAF as W5856): BOC 15.12.44: SOC 21.8.46 Mount Hope AB ONT: storage and disposal .45/46 Ernest K. Simmons, Tillsonburg ONT .46/70 (open storage on his farm, one of 12 derelict Swordfish sold at auction on the farm 5.9.70) J. F. Carter, Monroeville, Alabama: rest. began 9.70/76 Sir W. J. D. Roberts/ Strathallan Aircraft Collection, Auchterader, Scotland: arr. in crates 7.8.77/85 G-BMGC Strathallan Aircraft Collection, Auchterader 31.10.85/90 British Aerospace/ The Swordfish Heritage Trust 10.90/93 (by road to BAe Brough14.12.90 for rest. using wings from NF389, ff 12.5.93) RN Historic Flight, RNAS Yeovilton 22.5.93/20 (flew as "RN W5856/A2A City of Leeds", grounded 10.03, long-term rest. at Yeovilton, ff 19.6.15 repainted as “Royal Navy W5856/4A”) (RN Historic Flight officially disbanded 31.3.19) G-BMGC Fly Navy Heritage Trust/ Navy Wings. Yeovilton 17.3.20 -
Aircraft Carriers Royal Canadian Navy (Rcn)
CANADA AVIATION MUSEUM AIRCRAFT AIRCRAFT CARRIERS ROYAL CANADIAN NAVY (RCN) Prepared by Commander E.J. L’Heureux CD, RCN (Ret’d) Introduction Naval Aviation had its start only eight years after the Wright Brothers first flew their “Flyer” at Kill Devil Hill, Kitty Hawk, North Carolina, USA, in 1903 and less than two years after J.A.D. McCurdy made the first airplane flight at Baddeck, on Bras D’Or Lake, Nova Scotia. It was in 1911 that Eugene Ely, an exhibition pilot, flew a Curtiss off the deck of the United States Ship (USS) BIRMINGHAM at anchor in Hampton Roads, Virginia, and flew it to Norfolk. Two months later he flew from Camp Selfridge to a 120 foot wooden deck fitted on the USS PENNSYLVANIA anchored in San Francisco Bay, proving the feasibility of the aircraft carrier. It would not be many years before the fledgling country of Canada was to participate in carrier based aviation, initially through the pilots who flew with the Royal Navy (RN) and latterly through the acquisition of aircraft carriers themselves. This story is a synopsis of that participation. Aircraft Carrier Development In the formative era of aircraft carrier development navies were tied to the concept that the bigger the ship and the larger the guns the more capable the navy. The bireme and trireme, referring to the numbers and layers of oars used in Greek and Roman galleons, gave way to the wooden hulls and big guns of later ships used in the Napoleonic Wars, and the battles of the Nile and Trafalgar. -
The Royal Canadian Navy and the Mainguy Commission
Wilfrid Laurier University Scholars Commons @ Laurier Theses and Dissertations (Comprehensive) 2016 A Sickly Season: The Royal Canadian Navy and the Mainguy Commission Keith D. Calow Wilfrid Laurier University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/etd Part of the Canadian History Commons, Legal Commons, and the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Calow, Keith D., "A Sickly Season: The Royal Canadian Navy and the Mainguy Commission" (2016). Theses and Dissertations (Comprehensive). 1878. https://scholars.wlu.ca/etd/1878 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations (Comprehensive) by an authorized administrator of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Sickly Season: The Royal Canadian Navy and the Mainguy Commission By Keith Douglas Calow B.A., Wilfrid Laurier University, 1988 LLB, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University, 1991 M.A. Wilfrid Laurier University, 2005 THESIS/DISSERTATION Submitted to the Faculty of History in partial fulfilment of the requirements for Doctor of Philosophy in History Wilfrid Laurier University © Keith Douglas Calow 2016 ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the proceedings of the Mainguy Commission, which was established in 1949 to investigate and report on a series of three “incidents” of collective disobedience which had taken place aboard Canadian warships in the early months of that year. The “incidents” were the culmination of a series of challenges that the senior staff was already endeavouring to address internally. Media and political attention to the indiscipline, however, brought the minister to insist that there be a public enquiry. -
Firefly F1, FR1, NF1 for Prepar3d V4
Firefly F1, FR1, NF1 For Prepar3D v4 Ed. 20180917 1 | P a g e Ed. 20180917 Background The Fairey Firefly was originally designed to fill specification 8/39 for a two seat, single engine, front gun fighter for the Fleet Air Arm, broadly to replace the Fulmar which was about to enter service as a rush measure. Subsequent experience led to an update to the requirement to specification 5/40 which refined the details. Due to other demands on Fairey, notably the Barracuda, the first Firefly F1s weren’t delivered until March 1943, with 1770 forming as the first operational squadron in July 1944. 1770 was soon in action taking part in the pre-D-Day attacks on the Tirpitz. Subsequent operations would see 1770, 1771, and 1772 operating in the Indian and Pacific Oceans with Fireflies being the first British built combat aircraft to fly over the Japanese islands. Towards the end of the war the radar equipped FR.1 and NF.1 were introduced, the former using it for armed reconnaissance, the later for night interception. Both arrived in the Pacific too late to take part in combat but were busy throughout the region up to the outbreak of the Korean War when 827 squadron took part in the first air strike of the war with its F.1 and FR.1 aircraft. The Mk1 Fireflies were also operated by the Canadian, Netherlands, and Thai Navies as well as the Ethiopian Air Force and the Thai Air Force after an abortive coup attempt led to combat aircraft being removed from the Navy! 2 | P a g e Ed. -
C O N T E N T S
C O N T E N T S Page Preface Chapter I Shipboard Terms 5 Chapter II Recruiting and Conditions of Service 9 Chapter III Uniforms 11 Chapter IV Ranks 16 Chapter V Salutes and Ceremonial 20 Chapter VI Laws of the Sea and Punishments 24 Chapter VII More Customs 31 Chapter VIII A Few Expressions 41 Chapter IX Wardroom Customs 46 Chapter X Odds and Ends 52 - - 2 C U S T O M S O F T H E N A V Y LIEUTENANT COMMANDER A.D. TAYLOR, CD, RCN 1956 Revised 1961 - - 3 PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION There is a wealth of fascinating lore behind many of the routine practices of our naval profession of which many serving officers and men are not aware, or at least do not appreciate. In this small volume are recorded some of the more interesting of the nautical customs and traditions - their origin, development and present form. It is hoped that this book will in some way help to check the present tendency noted in civilian circles and in the press to condemn our alleged unswerving allegiance to "the traditions of Nelson's day". A custom that has no apparent basis is quite meaningless and therefore must be reluctantly observed. If these pages should serve to enlighten, to make at least some of the naval customs and traditions meaningful, they will amply have served their purpose. In the Queen's Regulations and Admiralty Instructions is an order that "...every officer...shall... in all respects conform himself to the established customs and practices of Her Majesty's Service at Sea". -
Royal Canadian Navy Aircraft Carrier Her Majesty’S Canadian Ship Bonaventure – CVL 22 21 January 1957 – 3 July 1970
Royal Canadian Navy Aircraft Carrier Her Majesty’s Canadian Ship Bonaventure – CVL 22 21 January 1957 – 3 July 1970 Introduction In April 1962, the Canadian Government approved the acquisition of an aircraft carrier to replace Her Majesty’s Canadian Ship (HMCS) Magnificent (CVL 21), which had been on loan and was to be returned to the Royal Navy (RN). At the same time, a decision was taken to purchase and modernize an unfinished Second World War era aircraft carrier. The Royal Canadian Navy (RCN) set up a negotiating team to deal with the British Government and the Royal Navy. The RN argued that the contract to purchase the new carrier required that HMCS Magnificent be brought up to the latest “alterations and additions” (A&As) for her class before her return to the RN. These alterations were to include, among other modifications, an angled and strengthened deck. The RCN’s case was that these were modernizations and not A&As. Furthermore, the carrier being offered for purchase was being bought “as is”, therefore the RN must accept the return of HMCS Magnificent in an “as is” state. The Royal Navy was won over to the Canadian’s point of view and the negotiations were soon completed. A new project office for the Principal Royal Canadian Navy Technical Representative was established at Belfast, Northern Ireland, where the partially completed Majestic class, Light Fleet aircraft carrier, the ex-Her Majesty’s Ship (HMS) Powerful (R 95) was laying. Specifications With a length overall of 215 meters (705 ft) and a beam at the water line of 24 meters (79 ft), HMS Powerful was only slightly larger than HMCS Magnificent. -
Lester Pearson and the Unwarranted Primacy of Peacekeeping BOOK
BOOK EXCERPT PASSAGES Fatal distraction: Lester Pearson and the unwarranted primacy of peacekeeping J.L. Granatstein The eminent Canadian historian Jack Granatstein frames a provocative question in the title of his timely book Who Killed the Canadian Military? His answer: every prime minister since Diefenbaker has de-emphasized or degraded the role and relevance of the Canadian armed forces as instruments of national security and the national interest. Even from post-Cold War strengths of 90,000 in the early 1990s, Canada’s forces have declined by half in the decade since, in which a new and unpredictable threat, global terrorism, has emerged. Quite apart from the mustering out of Canada’s forces and the rusting out of their equipment, Canadians have seen Canada primarily in a peacekeeping role, ever since Lester B. Pearson won the Nobel Peace Prize for proposing the United Nations Emergency Force in the Middle East in 1956. What was peacekeeping then has become today a very different and more dangerous vocation. In this exclusive excerpt from his new bestseller, Granatstein asserts that “Mike” Pearson inadvertently played a role in diminishing the strength of Canada’s military. « Qui a tué l’armée canadienne ? », s’interroge l’éminent historien canadien Jack Granatstein, qui a coiffé de ce titre provocant son dernier ouvrage (Who Killed the Canadian Military ?). Tous les premiers ministres depuis Diefenbaker, répond-il, qui ont successivement amoindri ou déconsidéré le rôle de cette institution chargée d’assurer notre sécurité et de défendre l’intérêt national. Déjà érodées au lendemain de la guerre froide avec 90 000 soldats au début des années 1990, les Forces canadiennes ont vu depuis cet effectif décroître de moitié alors qu’apparaissait l’imprévisible menace du terrorisme international. -
AWARDS to the ROYAL CANADIAN NAVY for KOREA
AWARDS to the ROYAL CANADIAN NAVY for KOREA BANFIELD, Nelson Ralph, Lieutenant, CD - Mention in Despatches - RCN / HMCS Sioux - Awarded as per Canada Gazette of 27 September 1952. He was made an Acting Warrant (Electrician) on 01 July 1944. He served in HMCS Sioux (DDE – 224) at a Warrant(L) beginning on 01 July 1944. He then served in HMCS Uganda (LCB – 66) beginning on 7 August 1945. He was promoted to Lieutenant(L) on 15 December 1948. He joined HMCS Sioux (DDE – 225) on 02 July 1950 as an electrical officer. After his tour in Korea, he was posted to Naval Headquarters on 17 May 1952. He was then posted to staff of Principal Naval Officer (PNO) west coast in Esquimalt on 27 September 1954. Promoted to Lieutenant-Commander(L) on 10 November 1955. To HMCS Kootenay (DDE – 258) on 30 December 1957. To HMCS Fraser (DDE – 233) on 20 February 1954. To the Staff of Principal Naval Officer Montreal on 2 May 1960. Promoted to Commander on 01 January 1964. To HMCS Niagara / Washington as Naval Member for the Combined Joint Staff on 31 July 1964. BANFIELD. Nelson Ralph, 0-4184, A/Wt(El) [1.7.44] RCN HMCS SIOUX(225) DDE, (?) Wt(L) [1.7.44] HMCS UGANDA(66) LCB, (7.8.45-?) Lt(L) [15.12.48] HMCS SIOUX(225) DDE, (2.7.50-?) CD~[?] NSHQ (17.5.52-?) MID~[27.9.52] St/PNO/West Coast, (27.9.54-?) LCdr(L) [10.11.55] HMCS BYTOWN(D/S) for HMCS KOOTENAY(258) DDE, stand by, (30.12.57-?) HMCS FRASER(233) DDE, (20.2.59-?) (140/60) PNO/Montreal(E57) (2.5.60-?) (430/60) Cdr [1.1.64] NMCJS/Washington/Niagara(E52) (31.7.64-?) “Mentioned for his hard work, cheerfulness, resourcefulness and ingenuity, which combined to keep the electrical equipment in the HMCS Sioux in a high state of efficiency.” * * * * * BONNER, Albert Leo, Chief Petty Officer Second Class (CPO2), BEM, CD - Distinguished Service Medal - RCN / HMCS Nootka - Awarded as per Canada Gazette of 20 December 1952.