DOCSLIB.ORG

A 003887 24.06.2020 Ref

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A 003887 24.06.2020 Ref A 003887 24.06.2020 Ref. Ares(2020)3284159 - 24/06/2020 Mr David Maria Sassoli President of the European Parliament Rue Wiertz 60 1047 Brussels Belgium IMI reference: Save number: imi.admin(2020)3760186 Brussels, 23 June 2020 Subject: Transmission of the IMI2 JU Annual Activity Report 2019 Dear Mr Sassoli, I am pleased to send you, in accordance with the Art 23 paragraph 3 of the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking (IMI2 JU) Financial Rules, the following documents: . IMI2 JU Annual Activity Report for the year 2019; . copy of the IMI2 JU Governing Board Decision approving this report; . copy of the IMI2 JU Governing Board Analysis and Assessment on the IMI2 JU Annual Activity Report 2019. This report has been published on the IMI2 JU website here: https://www.imi.europa.eu/about-imi/reference- documents. Sincerely yours, [e-signed] Pierre Meulien CC Elise Oukka, Iris Ontavilla Matschilles, Hugh Laverty, Auste Damaseviciute, Catherine Brett (IMI2 JU) Enclosures Pierre Meulien Tel +32 (0)2 221 8181 • Fax +32 (0)2 221 81 74 • www.imi.europa.eu Executive Director Postal address: IMI JU • TO56 • 1049 Brussels • Belgium ElectronicallyInnovative signed onMedicines 23/06/2020 Initiative 17:02 (UTC+02) (IMI) in accordance Visiting with article address: 4.2 (Validity Ave de of laelectronic Toison documents) d’Or 56-60 of Commission• 1060 Brussels Decision • 2004/563Belgium Ref. Ares(2020)3209112 - 19/06/2020 Annual Activity Report 2019 Copyright © 2020 Innovative Medicines Initiative In accordance with Article 17 of the Statutes of IMI2 JU annexed to Council Regulation (EU) No 557/2014 of 6.05.2014 and with Article 23 of the Financial Rules of IMI2 JU adopted by the IMI2 JU Governing Board on 27.05. 2020. The Annual Activity Report is made publicly available following approval by the IMI Governing Board. Annex 1 to the Decision of the IMI2 Governing Board no. IMI2 GB-DEC-2020-19 approved by the Governing Board of the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking on 19.06.2020 1 Contents Factsheet – IMI2 JU at a glance .......................................................................................................................... 4 Foreword .............................................................................................................................................................. 6 Executive summary ............................................................................................................................................. 8 1 Implementation of the Annual Work Plan 2019 .......................................................................................... 12 1.1 Key objectives in 2019 ....................................................................................................................... 12 1.2 Research & innovation activities ........................................................................................................ 15 1.2.1 Infectious diseases ........................................................................................................................ 15 1.2.2 Alzheimer’s disease and other neurological disorders .................................................................. 18 1.2.3 Diabetes ......................................................................................................................................... 20 1.2.4 Cancer ........................................................................................................................................... 20 1.2.5 Other challenges in health research and drug development ......................................................... 21 1.2.6 Collaboration among consortia and with external bodies and other sectors ................................. 24 1.3 Stakeholder engagement ................................................................................................................... 26 1.3.1 SME involvement ........................................................................................................................... 26 1.3.2 Patient involvement ....................................................................................................................... 26 1.3.3 Interactions and involvement with regulatory authorities ............................................................... 28 1.4 Calls for proposals and grant information .......................................................................................... 29 1.4.1 Launch and management of IMI2 JU Calls in 2019....................................................................... 29 1.4.2 Interim reviews for IMI projects ...................................................................................................... 46 1.4.3 Progress against key performance indicators (KPIs) and statistics .............................................. 53 1.5 Dissemination and information about projects results ....................................................................... 55 1.6 Operational budget execution ............................................................................................................ 59 1.7 EFPIA and IMI2 Associated Partner contributions ............................................................................ 64 2 Support to operations ................................................................................................................................. 74 2.1 Communication activities ................................................................................................................... 74 2.2 Legal and financial framework ........................................................................................................... 82 2.3 Budgetary and financial management ............................................................................................... 83 2.3.1 2019 budget approval .................................................................................................................... 83 2.3.2 Budget transfers............................................................................................................................. 85 2.3.3 Budget execution ........................................................................................................................... 86 2.3.4 Overview of the carry over appropriations to 2020 ........................................................................ 88 2.4 Procurement and contracts................................................................................................................ 90 2.5 IT and logistics ................................................................................................................................... 91 2.6 Human resources .............................................................................................................................. 93 2.7 Data protection .................................................................................................................................. 95 2.8 Access to documents ......................................................................................................................... 95 3 Governance ................................................................................................................................................ 96 3.1 Governing Board ................................................................................................................................ 96 2 3.2 Executive Director .............................................................................................................................. 96 3.3 States Representatives Group........................................................................................................... 96 3.4 Scientific Committee .......................................................................................................................... 96 3.5 Stakeholder Forum ............................................................................................................................ 97 3.6 Strategic Governing Groups (SGGs) ................................................................................................. 97 3.7 Associated Partners ........................................................................................................................... 98 4 Internal control framework ........................................................................................................................ 101 4.1 Financial procedures ....................................................................................................................... 101 4.2 Ex ante control on operational expenditure ..................................................................................... 102 4.3 Ex-post control of operational expenditure and error rates identified .............................................. 112 4.4 Audit of the European Court of Auditors .......................................................................................... 117 4.5 Internal audit .................................................................................................................................... 119 4.6 Risk management and conflict of interest ........................................................................................ 120 4.7 Fraud prevention and detection ....................................................................................................... 122 4.8 Compliance and effectiveness
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wellcome Trust Annual Report and Financial Statements 2017 Contents
    Annual Report and Financial Statements 2017 2 Wellcome Trust Annual Report and Financial Statements 2017 Contents Report from the Chair and the Director 5 Trustee’s Report 8 What we do 8 Review of Charitable Activities 9 Review of Investment Activities 18 Financial Review 29 Structure and Governance 34 Risk Management 37 Remuneration Report 40 Audit Committee Report 43 Independent Auditor’s Report 45 Financial Statements 58 Consolidated Statement of Financial Activities 58 Consolidated Balance Sheet 59 Statement of Financial Activities of the Trust 60 Balance Sheet of the Trust 61 Consolidated Cash Flow Statement 62 Notes to the Financial Statements 63 Reference and Administrative Details 117 3 Wellcome Trust Annual Report and Financial Statements 2017 “ At Wellcome, we believe in the power of ideas to improve health” Jeremy Farrar Director 4 Wellcome Trust Annual Report and Financial Statements 2017 Report from the Chair and the Director “Our core approach is funding people to explore great ideas, at every step of the way from discovery to impact” At Wellcome, we believe in the power of ideas to improve cause of maternal mortality in the world. It also includes health. Funded from our independent investment portfolio, supporting research in the humanities and social sciences, we support thousands of scientists and researchers in more such as a project which this year published ethical guidelines than 70 countries, as well as innovators, educators and artists. for involving pregnant women in Zika vaccine research. Together, we take on big problems, fuel imaginations and spark And resources like the Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell debate, working always to achieve better health for everyone.
    [Show full text]
  • The Electron Microscopy Science Technology Platform at the Francis
    The Francis Crick Institute is a The Electron biomedical discovery institute Microscopy dedicated to understanding the fundamental biology underlying Science health and disease. Its work Technology is helping to understand why disease develops and to translate Platform at discoveries into new ways to the Francis prevent, diagnose and treat illnesses such as cancer, heart Crick Institute disease, stroke, infections, and Lucy Collinson neurodegenerative diseases. An independent organisation, its founding partners are the Medical Research Council (MRC), Cancer Research UK, Wellcome, University College London, Imperial College London and King’s College London. The Crick was formed in 2015, with many of the Crick’s scientists joining from two ‘parent’ institutes, the MRC’s National Institute for Medical Research and Cancer Research UK’s London Research Institute, and in 2016 it moved into a brand new state-of- the-art building in central London which brings together 1500 scientists and support staff working collaboratively across disciplines, making it the biggest biomedical research facility under a single roof in Europe. © Nick Guttridge 4 ISSUE 46 JUNE 2017 5 Each microscope room is a six-sided shielded box, • The Phenom-World DelPhi benchtop SEM with walls that contain complex metallic layers has an integrated fluorescence microscope to attenuate DC fields, and an active cancellation for correlative imaging system to attenuate AC fields. Under each • The FEI Twin 120 kV TEM has a cryo stage for microscope is a concrete platform, cast in place, and screening vitrified macromolecular samples supported by air springs that remove environmental prior to imaging on 200 kV and 300 kV TEMs vibration to <1 Hz.
    [Show full text]
  • Predictive QSAR Tools to Aid in Early Process Development of Monoclonal Antibodies
    Predictive QSAR tools to aid in early process development of monoclonal antibodies John Micael Andreas Karlberg Published work submitted to Newcastle University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Engineering November 2019 Abstract Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have become one of the fastest growing markets for diagnostic and therapeutic treatments over the last 30 years with a global sales revenue around $89 billion reported in 2017. A popular framework widely used in pharmaceutical industries for designing manufacturing processes for mAbs is Quality by Design (QbD) due to providing a structured and systematic approach in investigation and screening process parameters that might influence the product quality. However, due to the large number of product quality attributes (CQAs) and process parameters that exist in an mAb process platform, extensive investigation is needed to characterise their impact on the product quality which makes the process development costly and time consuming. There is thus an urgent need for methods and tools that can be used for early risk-based selection of critical product properties and process factors to reduce the number of potential factors that have to be investigated, thereby aiding in speeding up the process development and reduce costs. In this study, a framework for predictive model development based on Quantitative Structure- Activity Relationship (QSAR) modelling was developed to link structural features and properties of mAbs to Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography (HIC) retention times and expressed mAb yield from HEK cells. Model development was based on a structured approach for incremental model refinement and evaluation that aided in increasing model performance until becoming acceptable in accordance to the OECD guidelines for QSAR models.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure of Human Aspartyl Aminopeptidase Complexed With
    Chaikuad et al. BMC Structural Biology 2012, 12:14 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6807/12/14 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Structure of human aspartyl aminopeptidase complexed with substrate analogue: insight into catalytic mechanism, substrate specificity and M18 peptidase family Apirat Chaikuad1, Ewa S Pilka1, Antonio De Riso2, Frank von Delft1, Kathryn L Kavanagh1, Catherine Vénien-Bryan2, Udo Oppermann1,3 and Wyatt W Yue1* Abstract Backround: Aspartyl aminopeptidase (DNPEP), with specificity towards an acidic amino acid at the N-terminus, is the only mammalian member among the poorly understood M18 peptidases. DNPEP has implicated roles in protein and peptide metabolism, as well as the renin-angiotensin system in blood pressure regulation. Despite previous enzyme and substrate characterization, structural details of DNPEP regarding ligand recognition and catalytic mechanism remain to be delineated. Results: The crystal structure of human DNPEP complexed with zinc and a substrate analogue aspartate-β- hydroxamate reveals a dodecameric machinery built by domain-swapped dimers, in agreement with electron microscopy data. A structural comparison with bacterial homologues identifies unifying catalytic features among the poorly understood M18 enzymes. The bound ligands in the active site also reveal the coordination mode of the binuclear zinc centre and a substrate specificity pocket for acidic amino acids. Conclusions: The DNPEP structure provides a molecular framework to understand its catalysis that is mediated by active site loop swapping, a mechanism likely adopted in other M18 and M42 metallopeptidases that form dodecameric complexes as a self-compartmentalization strategy. Small differences in the substrate binding pocket such as shape and positive charges, the latter conferred by a basic lysine residue, further provide the key to distinguishing substrate preference.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Base Pair in K-Turns That Confers Folding Characteristics and Correlates with Biological Function
    ARTICLE Received 16 Apr 2014 | Accepted 2 Sep 2014 | Published 29 Oct 2014 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6127 OPEN A critical base pair in k-turns that confers folding characteristics and correlates with biological function Scott A. McPhee1, Lin Huang1 & David M.J. Lilley1 Kink turns (k-turns) are widespread elements in RNA that mediate tertiary contacts by kinking the helical axis. We have found that the ability of k-turns to undergo ion-induced folding is conferred by a single base pair that follows the conserved AG pairs, that is, the 3b3n position. A Watson–Crick pair leads to an inability to fold in metal ions alone, while 3n ¼ Gor3b¼ C (but not both) permits folding. Crystallographic study reveals two hydrated metal ions coordinated to O6 of G3n and G2n of Kt-7. Removal of either atom impairs Mg2 þ - induced folding in solution. While SAM-I riboswitches have 3b3n sequences that would predispose them to ion-induced folding, U4 snRNA are strongly biased to an inability to such folding. Thus riboswitch sequences allow folding to occur independently of protein binding, while U4 should remain unfolded until bound by protein. The empirical rules deduced for k-turn folding have strong predictive value. 1 Cancer Research UK Nucleic Acid Structure Research Group, MSI/WTB Complex, The University of Dundee, Dow Street, Dundee DD1 5EH, UK. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to D.M.J.L. (email: [email protected]). NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:5127 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6127 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 & 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Living Healthier for Longer Sharing Data Saves Lives
    News from the Medical Research Council network Spring 2014 Leading science for better health MEASUREto How some MRC scientific workshops are making custom-made kit to enable pioneering research Living healthier for longer Supporting innovative ageing research through the Lifelong Health and Wellbeing initiative Sharing data saves lives Opinions from two MRC researchers Network can also be downloaded as a PDF at: www.mrc.ac.uk/network CONTENTS NEWS News COMMENT FROM £39.1m for improving data research 3 £39.1m for improving Science festival fun 4 John Let’s talk about dementia 7 data research Savill A £32m MRC investment, announced by Universities and Science the MRC Consortium for Medical Microbial Bioinformatics led by Minister David Willetts at the High Performance Computing and Warwick University, the Medical Bioinformatics partnership led People CHIEF EXECUTIVE Big Data Conference in London on 6 February, plus an additional by Imperial College London and University College London £7.1m, is the latest instalment of a £90m funding initiative to Partners which includes the Francis Crick Institute, will also Dr Jane Cope on the power of persuasion 9 In February, the Minister for tackle health and bioinformatics challenges for the advancement support career opportunities for computational scientists, Universities and Science David of medical research. technologists and programme leaders, enhancing the UK’s skills Willetts announced a £32m MRC in this area. investment into improving the UK’s Six major strategic awards will strengthen collaborative links, capability in, and capacity for, improve tools and infrastructure for researchers and support the Mr Willets said: “Making the most of large and complex data is a Latest discoveries medical bioinformatics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Diamond Light Source
    The Diamond Light Source ... a bright future for UK and World science Richard P. Walker, Technical Director What is Diamond ? • The largest scientific investment in the UK for 30 years • A synchrotron light source producing pinpoint UV and X-ray light beams of exceptional brightness • A ‘super microscope’ for new research opportunities into the structure and properties of matter What is Diamond ? • A Power Converter ! 15 MW of electrical power from the grid … 300-500 kW of X-rays … … but most of which only produces unwanted heat; only a fraction is selected for use in experiments. What is Synchrotron Radiation ? SR is electromagnetic radiation emitted when a high energy beam of charged particles (electrons) is deflected by a magnetic field. What’s so special about Synchrotron Radiation ? SR SR is emitted over a wide range of the electromagnetic spectrum, from Infra-red to hard X-rays Any desired radiation wavelength can be produced - enabling a very wide range of scientific and technological applications What’s so special about Synchrotron Radiation ? SR is very intense, and has extremely high brightness (emitted from a small area, with small angular divergence, determined by the properties of the electron beam) High brightness means: - it can be focused to sub-micron spot sizes: possibility of examining extremely small samples or investigating the structure and properties of objects with very fine spatial resolution - experiments can be carried out much more quickly: high through-put of samples or ability to follow chemical and biological reactions in real-time Diamond is a “third-generation” synchrotron radiation source • 1st generation: machines originally built for other purposes e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Basis of Mammalian Mucin Processing by the Human Gut O
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18696-y OPEN Structural basis of mammalian mucin processing by the human gut O-glycopeptidase OgpA from Akkermansia muciniphila ✉ ✉ Beatriz Trastoy 1,4, Andreas Naegeli2,4, Itxaso Anso 1,4, Jonathan Sjögren 2 & Marcelo E. Guerin 1,3 Akkermansia muciniphila is a mucin-degrading bacterium commonly found in the human gut that promotes a beneficial effect on health, likely based on the regulation of mucus thickness 1234567890():,; and gut barrier integrity, but also on the modulation of the immune system. In this work, we focus in OgpA from A. muciniphila,anO-glycopeptidase that exclusively hydrolyzes the peptide bond N-terminal to serine or threonine residues substituted with an O-glycan. We determine the high-resolution X-ray crystal structures of the unliganded form of OgpA, the complex with the glycodrosocin O-glycopeptide substrate and its product, providing a comprehensive set of snapshots of the enzyme along the catalytic cycle. In combination with O-glycopeptide chemistry, enzyme kinetics, and computational methods we unveil the molecular mechanism of O-glycan recognition and specificity for OgpA. The data also con- tribute to understanding how A. muciniphila processes mucins in the gut, as well as analysis of post-translational O-glycosylation events in proteins. 1 Structural Biology Unit, Center for Cooperative Research in Biosciences (CIC bioGUNE), Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Bizkaia Technology Park, Building 801A, 48160 Derio, Spain. 2 Genovis AB, Box 790, 22007 Lund, Sweden. 3 IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, 48013 ✉ Bilbao, Spain. 4These authors contributed equally: Beatriz Trastoy, Andreas Naegeli, Itxaso Anso.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure and Ligand Binding of the ADP-Binding Domain of the NAD+ Riboswitch
    Downloaded from rnajournal.cshlp.org on October 6, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Structure and ligand binding of the ADP-binding domain of the NAD+ riboswitch Lin Huang1, Jia Wang and David M. J. Lilley* Cancer Research UK Nucleic Acid Structure Research Group, MSI/WTB Complex, The University of Dundee, Dow Street, Dundee DD1 5EH, U.K. * To whom correspondence should be addressed 1. Current address : Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Medical Research Center, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510120 , P. R. China and RNA Biomedical Institute, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510120, P. R. China Keywords : Riboregulation; RNA structure; X-ray crystallography; metal ions; nucleotide binding Running title: The structure of the NAD+ riboswitch Submitted to the RNA journal 20 January 2020 Editorial enquiries to Professor Lilley: Tel: (+44)-1382-384243 Email: [email protected] Downloaded from rnajournal.cshlp.org on October 6, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press ABSTRACT The nadA motif is the first known NAD+-dependent riboswitch, comprising two similar tandem bulged stem-loop structures. We have determined the structure of the 5’ domain 1 of the riboswitch. It has three coaxial helical segments, separated by an ACANCCCC bulge and by an internal loop, with a tertiary contact between them that includes two C:G base pairs. We have determined the structure with a number of ligands related to NADH, but in each case only the ADP moiety is observed. The adenosine adopts an anti conformation, and forms multiple hydrogen bonds across the width of the sugar edge of the penultimate C:G base pair of the helix preceding the bulge, and the observed contacts have been confirmed by mutagenesis and calorimetry.
    [Show full text]
  • Wellcome Trust Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019 Is © the Wellcome Trust and Is Licensed Under Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 UK
    Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019 Table of contents Report from Chair 3 Report from Director 5 Trustee’s Report 7 What we do 8 Review of Charitable Activities 9 Review of Investment Activities 21 Financial Review 31 Structure and Governance 36 Social Responsibility 40 Risk Management 42 Remuneration Report 44 Remuneration Committee Report 46 Nomination Committee Report 47 Investment Committee Report 48 Audit and Risk Committee Report 49 Independent Auditor’s Report 52 Financial Statements 61 Consolidated Statement of Financial Activities 62 Consolidated Balance Sheet 63 Statement of Financial Activities of the Trust 64 Balance Sheet of the Trust 65 Consolidated Cash Flow Statement 66 Notes to the Financial Statements 67 Alternative Performance Measures and Key Performance Indicators 114 Glossary of Terms 115 Reference and Administrative Details 116 Table of Contents Wellcome Trust Annual Report 2019 | 2 Report from Chair During my tenure at Wellcome, which ends in The macro environment is increasingly challenging, 2020, I count myself lucky to have had the which has created volatility in financial markets. opportunity to meet inspiring people from a rich Q4 2018 was a very difficult quarter, but the diversity of sectors, backgrounds, specialisms resumption of interest rate cuts by the US Federal and scientific fields. Reserve underpinned another year of gains for our portfolio. We recognise that the cycle is extended, Wellcome’s achievements belong to the people and that the portfolio is likely to face more who work here and to the people we fund – it is challenging times ahead. a partnership that continues to grow stronger, more influential and more ambitious, spurred by The team is working hard to ensure that our independence.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Vaccine Against
    FEMS Microbiology Reviews, fuz030, 44, 2020, 123–153 doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuz030 Advance Access Publication Date: 16 December 2019 Review Article REVIEW ARTICLE Development of a vaccine against Staphylococcus Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/femsre/article/44/1/123/5679032 by guest on 28 September 2021 aureus invasive infections: Evidence based on human immunity, genetics and bacterial evasion mechanisms Lloyd S. Miller1,2,3,4,5,*, Vance G. Fowler, Jr.6,7, Sanjay K. Shukla8,9,Warren E. Rose10,11 and Richard A. Proctor10,12 1Immunology, Janssen Research and Development, 1400 McKean Road, Spring House, PA, 19477, USA, 2Department of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1550 Orleans Street, Cancer Research Building 2, Suite 209, Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA, 3Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1830 East Monument Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA, 4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 North Caroline Street , Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA, 5Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA, 6Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, 315 Trent Drive, Hanes House, Durham, NC, 27710, USA, 7Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, 40 Duke Medicine Circle, Durham, NC, 27710, USA, 8Center for Precision Medicine Research, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, 1000 North
    [Show full text]
  • Monoclonal Antibodies As an Antibacterial Approach Against Bacterial Pathogens
    antibiotics Review Monoclonal Antibodies as an Antibacterial Approach Against Bacterial Pathogens Daniel V. Zurawski * and Molly K. McLendon Wound Infections Department, Bacterial Diseases Branch, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +301-319-3110; Fax: +301-319-9801 Received: 23 February 2020; Accepted: 16 March 2020; Published: 1 April 2020 Abstract: In the beginning of the 21st century, the frequency of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has reached an apex, where even 4th and 5th generation antibiotics are becoming useless in clinical settings. In turn, patients are suffering from once-curable infections, with increases in morbidity and mortality. The root cause of many of these infections are the ESKAPEE pathogens (Enterococcus species, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter species, and Escherichia coli), which thrive in the nosocomial environment and are the bacterial species that have seen the largest rise in the acquisition of antibiotic resistance genes. While traditional small-molecule development still dominates the antibacterial landscape for solutions to AMR, some researchers are now turning to biological approaches as potential game changers. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs)—more specifically, human monoclonal antibodies (Hu-mAbs)—have been highly pursued in the anti-cancer, autoimmune, and antiviral fields with many success stories, but antibody development for bacterial infection is still just scratching the surface. The untapped potential for Hu-mAbs to be used as a prophylactic or therapeutic treatment for bacterial infection is exciting, as these biologics do not have the same toxicity hurdles of small molecules, could have less resistance as they often target virulence proteins rather than proteins required for survival, and are narrow spectrum (targeting just one pathogenic species), therefore avoiding the disruption of the microbiome.
    [Show full text]