EFFECTS of Bischofia Javanica (BISHOPWOOD) on STAND STRUCTURE and SPECIES DIVERSITY in NATURAL and PLANTED VEGETATION TYPES in KAKAMEGA FOREST, KENYA

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

EFFECTS of Bischofia Javanica (BISHOPWOOD) on STAND STRUCTURE and SPECIES DIVERSITY in NATURAL and PLANTED VEGETATION TYPES in KAKAMEGA FOREST, KENYA EFFECTS OF Bischofia javanica (BISHOPWOOD) ON STAND STRUCTURE AND SPECIES DIVERSITY IN NATURAL AND PLANTED VEGETATION TYPES IN KAKAMEGA FOREST, KENYA BY BRIMAS WASWA KITUYI (BSc. AGRIC. EDUC. AND EXENSION) I56/CE/28406/2013 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE (PLANT ECOLOGY) IN THE SCHOOL OF PURE AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF KENYATTA UNIVERSITY SEPTEMBER, 2018 ii iii DEDICATION To my parents, my wife Linda and children – Lincoln, Brianna Leticia and Liam Bransyn for their unwavering support and encouragement throughout my studies. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I express my gratitude to the following for providing me with the opportunity and inspiration to embark on and complete this work. Firstly, I thank the almighty God for giving me the strength, health, wisdom and a sound mind to be able to pursue my studies. Secondly, my sincere appreciation goes to my supervisors – Dr. Emily Wabuyele of Kenyatta University Department of Plant Sciences and Dr. John Otuoma of the Kenya Forest Research Institute (KEFRI) for their guidance and oversight of the research. Their kind and meticulous input gave me the motivation and courage to forge ahead and complete this task. Finally, I thank Mr. Joel Mbogani, a member from the community around Kakamega forest for helping in providing local names of tree species and directing me to study sites. v TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION ......................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. DEDICATION ..................................................................................................................... ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ................................................................................................... iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................................... v LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................ viii LIST OF TABLES .............................................................................................................. ix LIST OF APPENDICES ...................................................................................................... x LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................. xi ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................ xii 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background Information .............................................................................................. 1 1.2 Statement of the problem and justification ..................................................................... 2 1.3 Objectives of the study ................................................................................................. 3 1.3.1 General objective ......................................................................................................... 3 1.3.1 Specific objectives ....................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Hypotheses ...................................................................................................................... 4 1.5 Significance of the study ................................................................................................ 4 2. LITERATURE REVIEW ................................................................................................. 5 2.1 Invasive plant species ..................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Ecological characteristics of an invasive species ........................................................ 5 2.3 Effects of invasive plant species on plant community structure .................................. 6 2.4 Distribution and invasive history of B. javanica .......................................................... 6 vi 2.5 Description of B. javanica ........................................................................................... 8 3. MATERIALS AND METHODS .................................................................................... 10 3.1 Study area ...................................................................................................................... 10 3.1.1 Location ...................................................................................................................... 11 3.1.2 Biodiversity and Economic Activities ........................................................................ 11 3.1.3 Forest blocks and Vegetation types in the study area ................................................. 12 3.2 Experimental Design ..................................................................................................... 13 3.2.1 Sample size ................................................................................................................. 14 3.2.2 Layout of plots ............................................................................................................ 15 3.3 Data collection ............................................................................................................... 16 3.4 Data analysis .................................................................................................................. 16 4.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION .................................................................................... 19 4.1 RESULTS ...................................................................................................................... 19 4.1.1 Occurrence, relative abundance and dominance of B. javanica ................................. 19 4.1.2 Relative abundance of B. javanica ............................................................................. 20 4.1.3 Relative basal area of B. javanica. ............................................................................. 21 4.1.4 Importance value index of B. javanica ....................................................................... 22 4.1.5 Stand structure and recruitment pattern of B. javanica .............................................. 23 4.1.5.1 B. javanica’s contribution to stem density in other vegetation types. ..................... 23 4.1.5.2 Recruitment and distribution of B. javanica in DBH size-classes .......................... 24 4.1.6 Effect of B. javanica recruitment on species diversity ............................................... 30 4.1.7 Effect of B. javanica recruitment on species evenness .............................................. 31 4.2 Discussion ...................................................................................................................... 32 4.2.1 Occurrence of B. javanica in vegetation types. .......................................................... 32 4.2.2 Relative abundance of B. javanica ............................................................................. 33 vii 4.2.3 Relative dominance of B. javanica ............................................................................. 34 4.2.4 Stand structure and recruitment pattern of B. javanica .............................................. 36 4.2.5 Effect of B. javanica recruitment on woody species diversity and evenness ............. 38 5.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................... 40 5.1 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................... 40 5.2 Recommendations ......................................................................................................... 40 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................... 42 APPENDICES ..................................................................................................................... 46 viii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2.1. B. javanica Blume at different stages of growth ............................................... 9 Figure 3.1: Image of Kakamega forest blocks indicating distribution of vegetation types . ............................................................................................................. 10 Figure 3.2: Three fractional forest design nesting sub-bocks in main blocks .................. 13 Figure 3.3: Rectangular sampling plot illustrating stratification of sampling units within the Sub-Blocks. .............................................................................................. 14 Figure 3.4: Illustration of plot layouts that were used for assessment (Not drawn to scale) .............................................................................................................. 15 Figure 4.1: Occurrence of B. javanica in vegetation types of Kakamega forest .............. 20 Figure 4.2: A comparison of woody seedling densities in different vegetation types of Kakamega forest. ........................................................................................... 25 Figure 4.3: A comparison of woody stem density of tree species in the 0.1–10.0 cm DBH size-class of different vegetation types in Kakamega forest. ............... 26 Figure 4.4: A comparison of tree species in the 10.1 and above DBH range in Kakamega forest. ..........................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Determination of Project Boundary to Facilitate Measuring and Monitoring of Carbon Stocks
    DETERMINATION OF PROJECT BOUNDARY TO FACILITATE MEASURING AND MONITORING OF CARBON STOCKS Ari Wibowo RM Wiwied Widodo Nugroho ITTO PD 519/08/Rev.1 (F): In Cooperation with Forestry Research and Development Agency Ministry of Forestry, Indonesia Bogor, 2010 DETERMINATION OF PROJECT BOUNDARY TO FACILITATE MEASURING AND MONITORING OF CARBON STOCKS ISBN 978-602-95842-6-4 Technical Report No 3. Bogor, May 2010. By: Ari Wibowo, RM Wiwied Widodo, and Nugroho This report is a part of Program “Tropical Forest Conservation for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation and Enhancing Carbon Stocks in Meru Betiri National Park, Indonesia” Collaboration between: • Pusat Penelitian Sosial Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Departemen Kehutanan (Center For Socio Economic and Policy on Forestry Research Ministry of Forestry) Jl. Gunung Batu No. 5 Bogor West Java Indonesia Phone : +62-251-8633944 Fax. : +62-251-8634924 Email : [email protected] Website : HUhttp://ceserf-itto.puslitsosekhut.web.idU • LATIN – the Indonesian Tropical Institute Jl. Sutera No. 1 Situgede Bogor West Java Indonesia Phone : +62-251-8425522/8425523 Fax. : +62-251-8626593 Emai : [email protected] and [email protected] Website : HUwww.latin.or.idUH • Meru Betiri National Park Department of Forestry Jalan Siriwijaya 53, Jember, East Java, Indonesia Phone : +62-331-335535 Fax. : +62-331-335535 Email : [email protected] Website : HUwww.merubetiri.comU This work is copyright. Except for the logos, graphical and textual information in this publication may be reproduced in whole or in part provided that it is not sold or put to commercial use and its source is acknowledged. LIST OF CONTENT LIST OF CONTENT ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights Section Reports
    DACS-P-00124 Volume 54, Number 5, September - October 2015 DPI’s Bureau of Entomology, Nematology and Plant Pathology (the botany section is included in this bureau) produces TRI- OLOGY six times a year, covering two months of activity in each issue. The report includes detection activities from nursery plant inspections, routine and emergency program surveys, and requests for identification of plants and pests from the public. Samples are also occasionally sent from other states or countries for identification or diagnosis. Highlights Following are a few of the notable entries from this Section Reports volume of TRI-OLOGY. These entries are reports of interesting plants or unusual pests, some of Botany 2 which may be problematic. See Section Reports for complete information. Entomology 6 Bactrocera dorsalis, Oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis, Oriental fruit fly. Based on female Nematology 10 Photograph courtesy of Gary J. Steck, the large number of flies detected in a concentrated DPI area of the Redland Agricultural District in late Plant Pathology 12 August, a quarantine area regulating the movement of oriental fruit fly host plants was established on 4 September 2015. All entities within the quarantine area of 98 square miles that are involved with the production, sale or distribution of oriental fruit fly host material have been placed under a compliance agreement outlining operational procedures and Pseudocercospora artanthes typical program requirements. irregular leaf spots caused by the fungal pathogen on Piper auritum (Vera Cruz Pseudocercospora artanthes (leaf spot) was found pepper). infecting Piper auritum (Vera Cruz pepper) at the Photograph courtesy of Robert M. Leahy, USDA Jacksonville Zoo and Gardens in Duval County.
    [Show full text]
  • (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae: Epicephala) and Leafflower Trees (Phyllanthaceae: Phyllanthus Sensu Lato [Glochidion]) in Southeastern Polynesia
    Coevolutionary Diversification of Leafflower Moths (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae: Epicephala) and Leafflower Trees (Phyllanthaceae: Phyllanthus sensu lato [Glochidion]) in Southeastern Polynesia By David Howard Hembry A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Science, Policy, and Management in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Rosemary Gillespie, Chair Professor Bruce Baldwin Professor Patrick O’Grady Spring 2012 1 2 Abstract Coevolution between phylogenetically distant, yet ecologically intimate taxa is widely invoked as a major process generating and organizing biodiversity on earth. Yet for many putatively coevolving clades we lack knowledge both of their evolutionary history of diversification, and the manner in which they organize themselves into patterns of interaction. This is especially true for mutualistic associations, despite the fact that mutualisms have served as models for much coevolutionary research. In this dissertation, I examine the codiversification of an obligate, reciprocally specialized pollination mutualism between leafflower moths (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae: Epicephala) and leafflower trees (Phyllanthaceae: Phyllanthus sensu lato [Glochidion]) on the oceanic islands of southeastern Polynesia. Leafflower moths are the sole known pollinators of five clades of leafflowers (in the genus Phyllanthus s. l., including the genera Glochidion and Breynia), and thus this interaction is considered to be obligate. Female moths actively transfer pollen from male flowers to female flowers, using a haired proboscis to transfer pollen into the recessed stigmatic surface at the end of the fused stylar column. The moths then oviposit into the flowers’ ovaries, and the larva which hatches consumes a subset, but not all, of the developing fruit’s seed set.
    [Show full text]
  • Tree Species Diversity and Distribution Patterns in Tropical Forests of Garo Hills
    RESEARCH ARTICLES Tree species diversity and distribution patterns in tropical forests of Garo Hills Ashish ~urnar''~**,Bruce G. ~arcot)and Ajai saxenals4 'wildlife Institute of India, Post Box 18, Chandrabani, Dehradun 248 001, India 'present Address: National Tiger ConservationAuthority, Bikaner House, Annexe 5, Shahjahan Road, New Delhi 110 01 1, India 'USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, 620 S.W. Main Street, Portland, OR 97205, USA 'Present address: Department of Ocean Development, Block 12, C.G.O. Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi 110 003, India pressure, particularly shifting cultivation (locally known We analysed phytosociological characteristics and diver- sity patterns of tropical forest tree species in Garo asjhzun)'. Nevertheless, pristine PFs of Garo Hills still occur Hills, western Meghalaya, Northeast India. The main as remnant patches in remote localities mainly in the inte- vegetation of the region included primary forests rior hills. SF growth originates from many years of prac- (PFs), secondary forests (SFs), and sal (Shoreu ro- tising jhm, resulting in patches of various forest ages bust~)plantations, with 162, 132, and 87 tree species dispersed across the area. Many recent studies4-' have des- respectively. The Shannon-Wiener diversity index of cribed vegetation characteristics and diversity of the tropical trees in PF was 4.27 (n = 21 one-ha belt-transects), forests of India and other parts of the world. Meghalaya, which is comparable to the world's richest tropical however, has remained, largely unstudied, except for our forests. Statistical results revealed that primary for- work and another landscape level asse~sment".~.Here, we ests were more tree-rich and diverse than secondary present empirical data on diversity of tree species in the forests or sal plantations.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal Arnold Arboretum
    JOURNAL OF THE ARNOLD ARBORETUM HARVARD UNIVERSITY G. SCHUBERT T. G. HARTLEY PUBLISHED BY THE ARNOLD ARBORETUM OF HARVARD UNIVERSITY CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS DATES OF ISSUE No. 1 (pp. 1-104) issued January 13, 1967. No. 2 (pp. 105-202) issued April 16, 1967. No. 3 (pp. 203-361) issued July 18, 1967. No. 4 (pp. 363-588) issued October 14, 1967. TABLE OF CONTENTS COMPARATIVE MORPHOLOGICAL STUDIES IN DILLENL ANATOMY. William C. Dickison A SYNOPSIS OF AFRICAN SPECIES OF DELPHINIUM J Philip A. Munz FLORAL BIOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICA OF EUCNIDE Henry J. Thompson and Wallace R. Ernst .... THE GENUS DUABANGA. Don M. A. Jayaweera .... STUDIES IX SWIFTENIA I MKUACKAE) : OBSERVATION UALITY OF THE FLOWERS. Hsueh-yung Lee .. SOME PROBLEMS OF TROPICAL PLANT ECOLOGY, I Pompa RHIZOME. Martin H. Zimmermann and P. B Two NEW AMERICAN- PALMS. Harold E. Moure, Jr NOMENCLATURE NOTES ON GOSSYPIUM IMALVACE* Brizicky A SYNOPSIS OF THE ASIAN SPECIES OF CONSOLIDA CEAE). Philip A. Munz RESIN PRODUCER. Jean H. Langenheim COMPARATIVE MORPHOLOGICAL STUDIES IN DILLKNI POLLEN. William C. Dickison THE CHROMOSOMES OF AUSTROBAILLVA. Lily Eudi THE SOLOMON ISLANDS. George W. G'dUtt A SYNOPSIS OF THE ASIAN SPECIES OF DELPII STRICTO. Philip A. Munz STATES. Grady L. Webster THE GENERA OF EUPIIORBIACEAE IN THE SOT TUFA OF 1806, AN OVERLOOI EST. C. V. Morton REVISION OF THE GENI Hartley JOURNAL OF THE ARNOLD ARBORETUM HARVARD UNIVERSITY T. G. HARTLEY C. E. WOOD, JR. LAZELLA SCHWARTEN Q9 ^ JANUARY, 1967 THE JOURNAL OF THE ARNOLD ARBORETUM Published quarterly by the Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University. Subscription price $10.00 per year.
    [Show full text]
  • Floristic Survey of Vascular Plant in the Submontane Forest of Mt
    BIODIVERSITAS ISSN: 1412-033X Volume 20, Number 8, August 2019 E-ISSN: 2085-4722 Pages: 2197-2205 DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d200813 Short Communication: Floristic survey of vascular plant in the submontane forest of Mt. Burangrang Nature Reserve, West Java, Indonesia TRI CAHYANTO1,♥, MUHAMMAD EFENDI2,♥♥, RICKY MUSHOFFA SHOFARA1, MUNA DZAKIYYAH1, NURLAELA1, PRIMA G. SATRIA1 1Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Technology,Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung. Jl. A.H. Nasution No. 105, Cibiru,Bandung 40614, West Java, Indonesia. Tel./fax.: +62-22-7800525, email: [email protected] 2Cibodas Botanic Gardens, Indonesian Institute of Sciences. Jl. Kebun Raya Cibodas, Sindanglaya, Cipanas, Cianjur 43253, West Java, Indonesia. Tel./fax.: +62-263-512233, email: [email protected] Manuscript received: 1 July 2019. Revision accepted: 18 July 2019. Abstract. Cahyanto T, Efendi M, Shofara RM. 2019. Short Communication: Floristic survey of vascular plant in the submontane forest of Mt. Burangrang Nature Reserve, West Java, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 20: 2197-2205. A floristic survey was conducted in submontane forest of Block Pulus Mount Burangrang West Java. The objectives of the study were to inventory vascular plant and do quantitative measurements of floristic composition as well as their structure vegetation in the submontane forest of Nature Reserves Mt. Burangrang, Purwakarta West Java. Samples were recorded using exploration methods, in the hiking traill of Mt. Burangrang, from 946 to 1110 m asl. Vegetation analysis was done using sampling plots methods, with plot size of 500 m2 in four locations. Result was that 208 species of vascular plant consisting of basal family of angiosperm (1 species), magnoliids (21 species), monocots (33 species), eudicots (1 species), superrosids (1 species), rosids (74 species), superasterids (5 species), and asterids (47), added with 25 species of pterydophytes were found in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • SEED LEAFLET Bischofia Javanica Blume
    Bischofia javanica Blume Kundu, Maitreyee; Schmidt, Lars Holger; Jørgensen, Melita Joan Published in: Seed Leaflet Publication date: 2012 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (APA): Kundu, M., Schmidt, L. H. (Ed.), & Jørgensen, M. J. (Ed.) (2012). Bischofia javanica Blume. Seed Leaflet, (157). Download date: 30. Sep. 2021 SEED LEAFLET No. 157 August 2012 Bischofia javanica Blume Taxonomy and nomenclature Species name: Bischofia javanica Blume Family: Euphorbiaceae Synonym(s): B. cummingiana Decne, B. oblongifolia Dec- ne, B. roperiana Decne, B. toui Decne, B. trifoliata Hook, Microelus roeperianus Wight & Arn., Stylodiscus trifoliastus Benn. Vernacular/Common name: Bishop wood, Java ce- dar, Toog tree (English), tuai (Filipino), bois de l’eveque (French), bhillar, kaen, kot semla, paniala, pankain (Hin- di), akagi (Japanese), gintungan (Javanese), Distribution and habitat The tree is native to southern and southeastern Asia, Australia, and China. It has been introduced as a fast growing ornamental tree in East Africa, South Africa, and in the United States. It grows up to an altitude of 1800 m. The species is usually found scattered in primary and old secondary dry and deciduous forest or monsoon forest, occasionally in evergreen forest, swamp and teak forest. The tree thrives in moist, shady places such as river banks, swamps and ravines. Annual rainfall in its habitat varies from 1250-2500 mm; also Bischofia javanicaBlume 1, tree habit; 2, fruiting twig; 3, female capable of growing in dry places provided access to flower with calyx removed; 4, male flower. From Plant ground water. It tends to be evergreen in moist locali- Resources of South East Asia 5(2).
    [Show full text]
  • Methods – UFORE Species Selection
    Methods Species Selector Application Tools for assessing and managing Community Forests Written by: David J. Nowak USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station 5 Moon Library, SUNY-ESF, Syracuse, NY 13210 A cooperative initiative between: For more information, please visit http://www.itreetools.org Species Selector Application Species Selector Application Introduction To optimize the environmental benefits of trees, an appropriate list of potential tree species needs to be identified based on the desired environmental effects. To help determine the most appropriate tree species for various urban forest functions, a database of 1,585 tree species (see Appendix A) was developed by the USDA Forest Service in cooperation with Horticopia, Inc (2007). Information from this database can be used to select tree species that provide desired functional benefits. This information, in conjunction with local knowledge on species and site characteristics, can be used to select tree species that increase urban forest benefits, but also provide for long-tree life with minimal maintenance. Purpose of Species Selection Program The purpose of the species selection program is to provide a relative rating of each tree species at maturity for the following tree functions, based on a user’s input of the importance of each function (0-10 scale): • Air pollution removal • Air temperature reduction • Ultraviolet radiation reduction • Carbon storage • Pollen allergenicity • Building energy conservation • Wind reduction • Stream flow reduction This program is designed to aid users in selecting proper species given the tree functions they desire. Methods Tree Information Information about the plant dimensions, and physical leaf characteristics (e.g., leaf size, type, and shape) of 5,380 trees, shrubs, cactus and palms were derived from the Horticopia database (www.horticopia.com).
    [Show full text]
  • Bischofia Javanica
    Invasive KISC Feasibility Combined Kauai Status HPWRA Impacts Status Score Score Score Bischofia EARLY HIGH RISK PRESENT javanica DETECTION (7) 7 6 13 (bishop wood) Initial PFC report completed: October 2017 PFC report updated as of: N/A Current Recommendation for KISC: Consider eradication pending scoring rank and committee review Knowledge Gaps and Contingencies: 1) Delimiting surveys surrounding known locations are required to gain knowledge of whether additional trees have established from cultivated sites. 2) Landowner cooperation is necessary to remove cultivated trees 3) An assessment of equipment and personnel costs to fell and remove two large, cultivated trees. 4) Outreach effort is necessary to increase chances that individuals at private residences are reported. Background Bischofia javanica (Phyllanthaceae), or “bishop wood”, is sometimes planted as a fast growing shade tree and is occasionally used as a forestry species (Staples and Herbst 2005). B. javanica gained a KISC status of “Early Detection” in 2010, when early detection surveys detected it in Princeville and recommended it for eradication. Control arrangements were investigated shortly afterwards, but obstacles associated with removing two large trees from a golf course stalled progress. Thus, the purpose of this prioritization assessment report is to reevaluate whether KISC should reattempt eradication (i.e. accept “Target” status) by scoring and comparing B. javanica to other “Early Detection” species known to Kauai. This will determine how much effort and resources should be spent convincing known land owners and assessing new sites, which may be a time consuming venture (See Table 5 in KISC Plant Early Detection Report for status terminology). Detection and Distribution 2010 surveys detected three B.
    [Show full text]
  • Rajaji Tiger Reserve- a Unique Repository of Biodiversity in Uttarakhand, India
    RAJAJI TIGER RESERVE- A UNIQUE REPOSITORY OF BIODIVERSITY IN UTTARAKHAND, INDIA Akash*1, Mohd Zakir2 and Navneet1 1Gurukula Kangri University;Haridwar, Uttarakhand, India 2Department of Biotechnology, Himalayan University, Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh, India *Correspondence: [email protected] ABSTRACT Indian Himalaya is well known for its rich and diverse biodiversity. For effective in situ conservation, India has elaborated protected area network. Rajaji Tiger Reserve (RTR) is the second largest protected area in Uttarakhand state after Corbett Tiger Reserve in Shivalik region of outer Himalaya. The continuous loss of species and degradation of ecosystems in the reserve since its establishment have raised various concerns within Shivalik landscape. We have collected information from published data, field investigation, as well as by conducting interviews with local people. Here we have presented the current scenario of ecological and biological diversity as well as the eco- tourism potentials in RTR. Further we have alsoanalyzedthe conservation status of flora and faunal species in RTR as per the status of IUCN. Keywords: Biodiversity, Species diversity, Rajaji Tiger Reserve, Shivalik INTRODUCTION Rajai Tiger Reserve: an overview The Himalaya is well known for its biodiversity richness and Rajaji National park (Now Rajaji Tiger Reserve) has inherited diverse cultural mosaic. It supports about 18,440 species of its name from Rajaji Sanctuary, which was one of the plants (Singh et al., 1996) 1,748 species of medicinal plants constituent unit by amalgation in which the National Park was (Samant et al., 1998), 241 mammalian species and 979 birds created in 1983, (Rasily 2008). Rajaji Sanctuary was named species. The representative biodiversity rich areas of the Indian after Rajaji C.
    [Show full text]
  • Tree/Shrub Species Code List As
    SppCode SpeciesName NewSpeciesName CommonName AB1 Abelia species abelia ABCH Abelia chinensis Abelia ABGR4 Abelia x grandiflora Glossy abelia DOHE2 Aberia gardneri Dovyalis hebecarpa Ceylon gooseberry AB Abies species fir ABAL Abies alba Silver fir ABAM Abies amabilis Pacific silver fir ABBA Abies balsamea Balsam fir ABBI Abies balsamea ssp. lasiocarpa Abies lasiocarpa var. lasiocarpa Rocky mountain alpine fir ABBI Abies balsamea var. fallax Abies lasiocarpa var. lasiocarpa Rocky mountain alpine fir ABPH Abies balsamea var. phanerolepis Abies x phanerolepis Balsam fir ABBI Abies bifolia Abies lasiocarpa var. lasiocarpa Rocky mountain alpine fir ABBO Abies borisii-regis Bulgarian fir; macedonian fir ABBR Abies bracteata Bristlecone fir ABCO Abies concolor White fir ABLO Abies concolor var. lowiana Sierra white fir ABFR Abies fraseri Fraser fir ABGR Abies grandis Grand fir ABHO Abies holophylla Manchurian fir ABHO2 Abies homolepis Japanese fir ABLA Abies lasiocarpa Subalpine fir ABBI Abies lasiocarpa var. lasiocarpa Rocky mountain alpine fir ABLO Abies lowiana Abies concolor var. lowiana Sierra white fir ABMA Abies magnifica California red fir ABSH Abies magnifica var. shastensis Abies x shastensis Shasta red fir ABPR Abies nobilis Abies procera Noble fir ABNO Abies nordmanniana Nordman fir ABPI Abies pinsapo Abeto de espaÑa ABPR Abies procera Noble fir ABBI Abies subalpina Abies lasiocarpa var. lasiocarpa Rocky mountain alpine fir ABBR Abies venusta Abies bracteata Bristlecone fir ABPH Abies x phanerolepis Balsam fir ABSH Abies x shastensis Shasta red fir AB3 Abutilon species Indian mallow ABBE Abutilon berlandieri Berlandier's indian mallow ABBE Abutilon californicum Abutilon berlandieri Berlandier's indian mallow ABER Abutilon eremitopetalum Hiddenpetal indian mallow ABGR3 Abutilon grandifolium Hairy indian mallow ABME2 Abutilon menziesii Ko'oloa 'ula ABPA Abutilon palmeri Palmer's indian mallow ABSA2 Abutilon sandwicense Greenflower indian mallow ABSA2 Abutilon sandwicense var.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Observations in June and July 2017 on the Biological Value of The
    Initial Observations in June and July 2017 on the Biological Value of the Natewa Peninsular Edited by Professor Martin Speight, University of Oxford & Dr Tim Coles, Operation Wallacea Participating scientists Professor Martin Speight, University of Oxford, UK Gillianne Brodie, University of South Pacific, Fiji Oliver Burdekin, Burdekin GIS, UK Greg Chamberlain, Independent Ecologist, UK Dr Tim Coles, Operation Wallacea, UK Dr Will Earle, INVAS Biosecurity, Ireland Joe England, University of Kent, UK Paul Hackett, Melbourne Birding, Australia Dr Greg Kerr, Australasian Wader Studies Group, Australia Dr Andrew Powling, University of Portsmouth, UK Nunia Thomas-Moko, Fiji Nature, Fjii Siteri Tikoca, University of South Pacific, Fiji Dr Roy Wiles, University of South Wales, UK Camp managers Sara Carlson, USA (marine camp) Matthew Norman, UK (marine camp) Shaun Andrews, Australia (forest camp) Jose Miguel, Portugal (forest camp) School groups who participated in the field surveys Aylesbury High School - Aylesbury, UK Beijing BISS International School, China Brigidine College Randwick, Sydney, Australia Cannon Hill Anglican College, Brisbane, Australia Douglas County High School, Castle Rock, Colorado, USA Hurstpierpoint College, Hurstpierpoint, UK Morrisons Academy, Taiwan Northcote High School, Melbourne, Australia Sacred Heart College Geelong, Melbourne, Australia St Olave's Grammar School, Orpington, Kent University Preparatory School, Redding, California USA Westlake Boys High School, Auckland, New Zealand INTRODUCTION Fiji has no substantially sized National Parks, which makes it virtually unique in the world. In most other countries, National Parks provide the focus for much of the total tourism visits and spend. Indeed, were it not for National Parks countries like New Zealand, Costa Rica, South Africa etc, would have many fewer visitors than currently.
    [Show full text]