DOCSLIB.ORG

World Bank Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ROAD DEPARTMENT OF THE MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE Public Disclosure Authorized CONTRACT: #SLRP III/CS/QCBS-01 Public Disclosure Authorized PREPARATION OF DETAILED DESIGN AND BIDDING DOCUMENTS FOR REHABILITATION OF 10 ROAD (Approx. 100 km) SECTIONS UNDER THE THIRD SECONDARY AND LOCAL RO ADS PROJECT (SLRPIII) Road Name: Tsalenjikha ~ Jvari ~ Jvarzeni section, km 1~km 7 (S 94) (Tsalenjikha ~ Sachino) Road No. 1, Stage I, Under the Terms of Reference Public Disclosure Authorized Environmental And Social Management Plan VOLUME Ⅵ Public Disclosure Authorized CONSULTANT: SUB-CONSULTANT: TBILISI 2015 PART 1: GENERAL PROJECT AND SITE INFORMATION INSTITUTIONAL &ADMINISTRATIVE Country Georgia Project title Rehabilitation of Tsalenjikha ~ Jvari ~ Jvarzeni section, km 1~km 7 (S 94) (Tsalenjikha ~ Sachino) Scope of project and Existing road pavement is in bad condition, with multiple damages and much deterioration. Many parts activity of asphalt pavement are totally dilapidated and longitudinal / transverse cracks are observed. Construction of new culverts is required because existing culverts are dysfunctional and damaged. Existing artificial structures such as pipes and a bridge shall be cleaned, repaired and in some of them replaced. The traffic facilities such as road signs, pencing, bus station, and etc. will be replaced and additional signs will be installed. Also, the junctions and yard entrances are to be repaired. General information of detailed design for rehabilitation work is as follows: - Design Speed: 60km/h - Width of carriageway: 6.0 - 8.0m - Width of shoulder: 0.75 - 1.0m - Number of Carriageway: 2 lane two directions - Pavement thickness: Asphalt surface layer (5cm), Stabilization (16cm) Institutional WB Project Management Local Counterpart and/or Recipient arrangements (Name (Project Team Leader) and contacts) Natalya Stankevich Giorgi Tsereteli Tsalenjikha Municipality Implementation WB Local Counterpart Local Contractor arrangements (Name Safeguard Supervision Supervision Inspectorate LtD “SSSS and contacts) Technical Supervisor Supervision Cheliabinsktranssognal” Darejan Kapanadze LtD “Roads Rehabilitation Georgian Branch and Modernization Raindi Kantaria Supervision Direction” Merab Jishiashvili SITE DESCRIPTION Tsalejikha-Jvarzeni motorway section km 1- km7 (Tsalenjikha-Sachino) Name of site Samegrelo region Tsalenjikha ~ Sachino section (Km 1.0 ~ km 7.0) of Tsalenjikha ~ Jvari ~ Jvarzeni road is secondary road Describe site location (S-94) located in Samegrelo regions. This road starts in Tsalenjikha village and ends at Sachino village. The total length of project road section is 7.22 km. Tsalenjikha Municipality and the State Forest Fund territories (2043 m2 in total ) under the National Forest Who owns the land? Agency of the Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Protection(LEPL). Description of Location: Road selected for rehabilitation is located in Samegrelo Region and passes through the territory geographic, physical, of Tsalenjikha municipality. It starts in city Tsalenjikha and passes villages Etseri and Paluri. Tsalenjikha- biological, geological, Jvarzeni road after section km1-km7 is lately rehabilitated through 2 kilometers before junction to the km28 hydrographic and socio- of Zugdidi-Jvari-Mestia-Lesdili secondery road. economic context Air - Air quality in the project area is good due to low traffic levels and the absence of industrial facilities. Water and Soil - No pollution is reported. Flora - In the above mentioned territory, the following tree-species are under direct impact of the project: Carpinus - 20 specimens; Cerasus silvestris - 4 specimens; Quercus - 20 specimens; Alnus - 3 specimens; Fagus - 3 specimens; Ficus carica - 1 specimen. In addition, there are 32 specimens of Castanea sativa within the project area. These trees are located within the territory of the State Forest Fund Fauna – The project road pass through the degraded territory and accordingly the fauna is not prevailed. Mostly fauna is presented by the species which does not need any special protecting measures. Due to the small area of the project, the impact on the fauna will be minimal. Noise - The current noise level is low due to low traffic levels and a lack of industrial facilities. Social - Tsalenjikha Municipality consists of 13 administrative-territorial units: 2 towns - Jvari, Tsalenjikha; 10 village unions: Obuji, Nakipu, Mikava, Jgali, Sachino, Chkvaleri, Muzhava, Pakhulani, Lia, Medani, Chale and 1 separate village - Etseri. Locations and distance Information for material resources nearest from project area 2 for material sourcing, Hauling Description Location Note especially inert distance, km aggregates, water, stones 1 Quarry Tsalenjikha municipality, Jvari, Tsalenjikha village 14 / 8 2 Borrow pit Tsalenjikha municipality 14 3 Disposal area Tsalenjikha municipality 8 4 Concrete plant Tsalenjikha municipality, Jvari, Tsalenjikha village 14 / 8 5 A/C plant Tsalenjikha municipality, Jvari village 14 6 Landfill Zugdidi municipality, Tsaishi village 40 LEGISLATION Identify national & The project triggers World Bank OP/BP 4.01 - Environmental Assessment and, according to its local legislation principles, has been classified as environmental Category B. The present EMP has been prepared to &permits that apply to meet requirements of OP/BP 4.01. project activity Georgian legislation does not require any type of environmental review, approval, or permitting for the project. Though according to the national regulatory system, (i) Contractor company must be licensed, (ii) Construction materials must be obtained from licensed providers, (iii) Once contractor wishes to open quarries, then the contractor must obtain respective license. (iv) If, in time of rehabilitation, contractor wishes to operate own asphalt or concrete (Or both) plants, he should have permission regarding specified limited level of pollutant substances in exhaust. (v) Disposal of the construction waste and excess ground generated in the course of earth works shall be placed in a selected locations agreed and approved by local governing bodies in written. (vi) Land plots along the road required for undertaking of planned works are subject to de-listing from the Territory of the State Forest Fund and transfer to the Road Department. The process is ongoing. (vii) Removal of every specimen of species entered to the Red List of Georgia is subject to formal permission from the Biodiversity Service of the Ministry of Environment and natural Resources of Georgia and in case of permission, shall be compensated at the ratio of 1:10. PUBLIC CONSULTATION Identify when / where Environmental Management Framework for the Secondary and Local Roads Project III was disclosed the public consultation through the RDMRDI web page and a stakeholder consultation meeting was held on 11/04/2014. The process shall take place present site-specific EMP was disclosed through the same media and also delivered in hard copies to the Talenjikha municipality. Consultation meeting with local communities was held and the minutes of this meeting was attached to this EMP ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1: Project Location Map Attachment 2: Minutes of public consultation; Attachment 3: Waste disposal agreement; Attachment 4: Borrowing license; Attachment 5: Asphalt plant operation agreement; Attachment 6: Other (as applicable) 3 PART 2: SAFEGUARDS SCREENING AND TRIGGERS ENVIRONMENTAL /SOCIAL SCREENING FOR SAFEGUARDS TRIGGERS Activity/Issue Status Triggered Actions A. Roads rehabilitation [x] Yes [ ] No If “Yes”, see Section 3 - A B. New construction of small traffic infrastructure [ ] Yes [x] No If “Yes”, see Section 3 - A C. Impacts on surface drainage system [x] Yes [ ] No If “Yes”, see Section 3 - B Will the site activity D. Historic building(s) and districts [ ] Yes [x] No If “Yes”, see Section 3 - C include/involve any of the E. Acquisition of land1 [ ] Yes [x] No If “Yes”, see Section 3 - D following? F. Hazardous or toxic materials2 [] Yes [x] No If “Yes”, see Section 3 - E G. Impacts on forests and/or protected areas [x] Yes [] No If “Yes”, see Section 3 - F H. Risk of unexploded ordinance (UXO) [ ] Yes [x] No If “Yes”, see Section 3 - G I. Traffic and Pedestrian Safety [x] Yes [ ] No ‘Yes”, see Section 3 - H ------------------------------------------------ 1 Land acquisition includes displacement of residents, change the way of life, this is concerning with land which was purchased/handed over and impact on persons living and/or unlawfully exist and or/performing business activities (Booths) on the land already purchased. 2Hazardous or toxic materials contain, but is not limited to: asbestos, toxic paints, hazardous dissolvent materials, removal of lead containing materials and etc. 4 PART 3: MITIGATION MEASURES ACTIVITY PARAMETER MITIGATION MEASURES CHECKLIST 0. General Conditions Notification and a) The local construction and environment inspectorates and communities have been notified of upcoming activities Worker Safety b) The public has been notified of the works through appropriate notification in the media and/or at publicly accessible sites (including the site of the works) c) All legally required permits have been acquired for construction and/or rehabilitation d) The Contractor formally agrees that all work will be carried out in a safe and disciplined manner designed to minimize impacts on neighboring residents and environment. e) Workers’ PPE will comply with international good practice (always hardhats, as needed masks and safety glasses,
Recommended publications
  • Distribution: EG: Bank of Jandara Lake, Bolnisi, Burs

    Distribution: EG: Bank of Jandara Lake, Bolnisi, Burs

    Subgenus Lasius Fabricius, 1804 53. L. (Lasius) alienus (Foerster, 1850) Distribution: E.G.: Bank of Jandara Lake, Bolnisi, Bursachili, Gardabani, Grakali, Gudauri, Gveleti, Igoeti, Iraga, Kasristskali, Kavtiskhevi, Kazbegi, Kazreti, Khrami gorge, Kianeti, Kitsnisi, Kojori, Kvishkheti, Lagodekhi Reserve, Larsi, Lekistskali gorge, Luri, Manglisi, Mleta, Mtskheta, Nichbisi, Pantishara, Pasanauri, Poladauri, Saguramo, Sakavre, Samshvilde, Satskhenhesi, Shavimta, Shulaveri, Sighnaghi, Taribana, Tbilisi (Mushtaidi Garden, Tbilisi Botanical Garden), Tetritskaro, Tkemlovani, Tkviavi, Udabno, Zedazeni (Ruzsky, 1905; Jijilashvili, 1964a, b, 1966, 1967b, 1968, 1974a); W.G.: Abasha, Ajishesi, Akhali Atoni, Anaklia, Anaria, Baghdati, Batumi Botanical Garden, Bichvinta Reserve, Bjineti, Chakvi, Chaladidi, Chakvistskali, Eshera, Grigoreti, Ingiri, Inkiti Lake, Kakhaberi, Khobi, Kobuleti, Kutaisi, Lidzava, Menji, Nakalakebi, Natanebi, Ochamchire, Oni, Poti, Senaki, Sokhumi, Sviri, Tsaishi, Tsalenjikha, Tsesi, Zestaponi, Zugdidi Botanical Garden (Ruzsky, 1905; Karavaiev, 1926; Jijilashvili, 1974b); S.G.: Abastumani, Akhalkalaki, Akhaltsikhe, Aspindza, Avralo, Bakuriani, Bogdanovka, Borjomi, Dmanisi, Goderdzi Pass, Gogasheni, Kariani, Khanchali Lake, Ota, Paravani Lake, Sapara, Tabatskuri, Trialeti, Tsalka, Zekari Pass (Ruzsky, 1905; Jijilashvili, 1967a, 1974a). 54. L. (Lasius) brunneus (Latreille, 1798) Distribution: E.G.: Bolnisi, Gardabani, Kianeti, Kiketi, Manglisi, Pasanauri (Ruzsky, 1905; Jijilashvili, 1968, 1974a); W.G.: Akhali Atoni, Baghdati,
  • Outline Terms of Reference for Construction Supervision Zugdidi-Jvari-Mestia-Lasdili Road Sections Km 74-80; Km 89 (Road and Tunnel); Km 91-103; Km 121-125

    Outline Terms of Reference for Construction Supervision Zugdidi-Jvari-Mestia-Lasdili Road Sections Km 74-80; Km 89 (Road and Tunnel); Km 91-103; Km 121-125

    OUTLINE TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION ZUGDIDI-JVARI-MESTIA-LASDILI ROAD SECTIONS KM 74-80; KM 89 (ROAD AND TUNNEL); KM 91-103; KM 121-125 A. Background and Objective 1. General 1. Georgia is located south of the Caucasus mountain range, with Russia to the north, Armenia and Turkey to the south, Azerbaijan to the east, and the Black Sea to the west. It has a population of 4.5 million. Georgia, due to its geographic location, provides the shortest transit link between Central Asia and Europe. Hence, transport plays a pivotal role in supporting the national economy, and development of the transport sector is vital to increasing economy of the region through reduced transport costs. 2. Objectives 2. The objective is to rehabilitate road infrastructure to improve accessibility and guarantee easy access to Mestia region all year round. Four project sections are located on Zugdidi-Jvari- Mestia-Lasdili Road, which is of national importance and connects Zeda Svaneti Region, Mestia and other villages of the Zugdidi Rayon and on the Tbilisi-Senaki-Leselidze corridor. These rehabilitation road works will play important role in socio-economic and tourist infrastructure development for this region. Rehabilitation and reconstruction works are funded by the Asian Development Bank (ADB) and the Government of Georgia as part of the Sustainable Urban Transport Investment Project. Overall management and coordination of implementation and supervision will be executed by the Municipal Development Fund of Georgia (MDF). 3. The present terms of reference (TOR) outline scope of work and requirements for the construction supervision of the rehabilitation works for four sections of Zugdidi-Jvari-Mestia- Lasdili road.
  • Economic Prosperity Initiative

    Economic Prosperity Initiative

    USAID/GEORGIA DO2: Inclusive and Sustainable Economic Growth October 1, 2011 – September 31, 2012 Gagra Municipal (regional) Infrastructure Development (MID) ABKHAZIA # Municipality Region Project Title Gudauta Rehabilitation of Roads 1 Mtskheta 3.852 km; 11 streets : Mtskheta- : Mtanee Rehabilitation of Roads SOKHUMI : : 1$Mestia : 2 Dushet 2.240 km; 7 streets :: : ::: Rehabilitation of Pushkin Gulripshi : 3 Gori street 0.92 km : Chazhashi B l a c k S e a :%, Rehabilitaion of Gorijvari : 4 Gori Shida Kartli road 1.45 km : Lentekhi Rehabilitation of Nationwide Projects: Ochamchire SAMEGRELO- 5 Kareli Sagholasheni-Dvani 12 km : Highway - DCA Basisbank ZEMO SVANETI RACHA-LECHKHUMI rehabilitaiosn Roads in Oni Etseri - DCA Bank Republic Lia*#*# 6 Oni 2.452 km, 5 streets *#Sachino : KVEMO SVANETI Stepantsminda - DCA Alliance Group 1$ Gali *#Mukhuri Tsageri Shatili %, Racha- *#1$ Tsalenjikha Abari Rehabilitation of Headwork Khvanchkara #0#0 Lechkhumi - DCA Crystal Obuji*#*# *#Khabume # 7 Oni of Drinking Water on Oni for Nakipu 0 Likheti 3 400 individuals - Black Sea Regional Transmission ZUGDIDI1$ *# Chkhorotsku1$*# ]^!( Oni Planning Project (Phase 2) Chitatskaro 1$!( Letsurtsume Bareuli #0 - Georgia Education Management Project (EMP) Akhalkhibula AMBROLAURI %,Tsaishi ]^!( *#Lesichine Martvili - Georgia Primary Education Project (G-Pried) MTSKHETA- Khamiskuri%, Kheta Shua*#Zana 1$ - GNEWRC Partnership Program %, Khorshi Perevi SOUTH MTIANETI Khobi *# *#Eki Khoni Tskaltubo Khresili Tkibuli#0 #0 - HICD Plus #0 ]^1$ OSSETIA 1$ 1$!( Menji *#Dzveli
  • Cultural-Humanitarian Fund “Sukhumi”

    Cultural-Humanitarian Fund “Sukhumi”

    Cultural -Humanitarian Fund “Sukhumi” (The results of the rapid assessment conducted by the Fund “Sukhumi” in its target regions) Ekaterine Gamakharia Fund “Sukhumi” 5/1/2020 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 1. Methodology and Demographics ............................................................................................................. 3 2. Key Findings .............................................................................................................................................. 4 2.1. Negative Impact of Covid-19 on the People’s Lives .......................................................................... 4 2.2. Covid-19 Impact on Gender Roles – Unequal Distribution of the Household Responsibilities ........ 5 2.3. Covid-19 Impact on Economic Security............................................................................................. 6 2.4. Covid-19 Impact on the Possibility to Receive Education ................................................................. 8 2.5. Covid-19 Impact on the Physical Safety of Women – Increased Domestic Violence ....................... 9 2.6. Covid-19 Impact on Food Security .................................................................................................. 11 2.7. Covid-19 Impact on Health Security ................................................................................................ 12 2.8. Covid-19 Impact on
  • Trems of Reference for Pcr Validation

    Trems of Reference for Pcr Validation

    IN.464-17 20 December 2017 Performance Evaluation Report Municipal Services Development Project and Municipal Services Development Project Phase 2 (Georgia) (Loans 2441 and 2534) The attached report is circulated at the request of the Director General, Independent Evaluation Department. For Inquiries: Walter Kolkma, Independent Evaluation Department (Ext. 4189) Ari Perdana, Independent Evaluation Department (Ext. 1891) Performance Georgia: Municipal Services Evaluation Development Project and Municipal Report Services Development Project Phase 2 Independent Evaluation Raising development impact through evaluation Performance Evaluation Report December 2017 Georgia: Municipal Services Development Project and Municipal Services Development Project Phase 2 This document is being disclosed to the public in accordance with ADB's Public Communications Policy 2011. Reference Number: PPE: GEO 2017-19 Project Numbers: 41198 and 43171 Loan Numbers: 2441-GEO(SF) and 2534-GEO(SF) Independent Evaluation: PE-803 NOTES (i) In this report, “$” refers to US dollars. (ii) For an explanation of rating descriptions used in Asian Development Bank evaluation reports, see ADB. 2006. Guidelines for Preparing Performance Evaluation Reports for Public Sector Operations. Manila Director General Marvin Taylor-Dormond, Independent Evaluation Department (IED) Deputy Director General Veronique Salze-Lozac’h, IED Director Walter Kolkma, Thematic and Country Division, IED Team leader Ari Perdana, Evaluation Specialist, IED Team members Ma. Patricia Lim, Senior Evaluation Officer, IED Jennifer Llaneta, Evaluation Assistant, IED (until October 2017) Christine Grace Marvilla, Evaluation Assistant, IED (from October 2017) The guidelines formally adopted by the Independent Evaluation Department (IED) on avoiding conflict of interest in its independent evaluations were observed in the preparation of this report. To the knowledge of IED management, there were no conflicts of interest of the persons preparing, reviewing, or approving this report.
  • Georgia Page 1 of 21

    Georgia Page 1 of 21

    Country Report on Human Rights Practices in Georgia Page 1 of 21 Georgia Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2006 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor March 6, 2007 The constitution of the Georgian republic provides for an executive branch that reports to the president, a unicameral Parliament, and an independent judiciary. The country has a population of approximately 4.4 million. In 2003 former president Shevardnadze resigned during what became known as the Rose Revolution. Mikheil Saakashvili won the presidency in 2004 with over 90 percent of the vote in an election, and his National Movement Party won a majority of seats in the Parliament. International observers determined that the 2004 presidential and parliamentary elections represented significant progress over previous elections and brought the country closer to meeting international standards, although several irregularities were noted. Civilian authorities generally maintained effective control of the security forces. The government's human rights record improved in some areas during the year, although serious problems remained. While the government took significant steps to address these problems, there were some reports of deaths due to excessive use of force by law enforcement officers, cases of torture and mistreatment of detainees, increased abuse of prisoners, impunity, continued overuse of pretrial detention for less serious offenses, worsened conditions in prisons and pretrial detention facilities, and lack of access for average citizens to defense attorneys. Other areas of concern included reports of government pressure on the judiciary and the media and - despite a substantial reduction due to reforms led by the president - corruption.
  • Upper Svaneti Adaptation Strategy to the Climate Change

    Upper Svaneti Adaptation Strategy to the Climate Change

    Upper Svaneti Adaptation Strategy to the Climate Change Tbilisi 2014 1 The present report is drafted in the process of preparation of Georgia’s Third National Communication to the UNFCCC. The preparation process involved a large group of specialists, representing: the Ministry of Environment and National Resources Protection of Georgia; the Ministry of Agriculture of Georgia; the Ministry of Energy of Georgia; the Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia; the Ministry of Labor, Health and Social Affairs of Georgia; the Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure of Georgia; the Ministry of Education and Science of Georgia; Georgian National Agency of Cultural Heritage Protection; National Environmental Agency; Institute of Geography; individual academic institutes; representatives of local government of Mestia municipality and local consultants engaged in tourism, health and agriculture, independent experts and NGOs. Published with the support of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Georgia "The views expressed in this publication belong to the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the United Nations or the United Nations Development Programme“ © UNDP Georgia 2014 Copyright Published in Georgia 2 Abbreviations ADA - Austrian Development Agency CDM - Clean Development Mechanism CTCN – Climate Technology Centre and Network CVD- Cardiovascular Diseases ENVSEC -Environmental Security Initiative EU –European Union EWS – Early Warning Systems GCF - Green Climate Fund GDP –Gross Domestic
  • 8 Socio-Economic Baseline WREP Sectional Replacement Project, Georgia Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Final

    8 Socio-Economic Baseline WREP Sectional Replacement Project, Georgia Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Final

    Chapter 8 Socio-Economic Baseline WREP Sectional Replacement Project, Georgia Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Final TABLE OF CONTENTS 8 SOCIO-ECONOMIC BASELINE ...................................................................... 8-1 8.1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 8-1 8.1.1 Approach ........................................................................................................ 8-1 8.1.2 Data Gathering ............................................................................................... 8-1 8.2 National Context ....................................................................................... 8-2 8.2.1 Data Quality Issues ......................................................................................... 8-2 8.2.2 National Background ...................................................................................... 8-3 8.2.3 Security Overview ........................................................................................... 8-3 8.2.4 National Economy ........................................................................................... 8-3 8.2.5 Transport Sector ............................................................................................. 8-5 8.2.6 Demographic Characteristics .......................................................................... 8-5 8.2.7 Ethnicity/Nationality ........................................................................................ 8-6 8.2.8 Incomes
  • DG Consulting

    DG Consulting

    REF. NO.: IDA/TGSP/CS/CQS/02-2016 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PREPARATION OF LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR CONSTRUCTION OF 500 KV JVARI-TSKALTUBO OVERHEAD TRANSMISSION LINE AND ASSOCIATED SUBSTATION ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT INTERIM REPORT TECHNICAL PART, BASELINE AND VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT CLIENT: JSC GEORGIAN STATE ELECTROSYSTEM PROJECT : TRANSMISSION GRID STRENGTHENING PROJECT (TGSP) – P147348 41380_INTERIM_ V11, TBILISI, AUGUST 2017 DG Consulting Ltd Address: 10, Mirza Gelovani Street, 0160, Tbilisi, Georgia; Registered in Georgia, No 205 280 998; Tel: +995 322 380 313; +995 599 500 778; [email protected] 41380_r01_v02_GSE_ESIA_JvariTskaltubo Page 2 of 196 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 8 ESIA Report Preparation Process and Structure ..................................................................... 9 2. Legal and Regulatory Framework .................................................................................................. 12 Georgian laws applicable for the environmental impact assessment .................................. 12 The technical standards and guidelines ........................................................................ 19 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment in Georgia .................................................... 20 Current EIA legislation ..................................................................................................
  • Glacier Change Over the Last Century, Caucasus Mountains, Georgia, Observed from Old Topographical Maps, Landsat and ASTER Satellite Imagery

    Glacier Change Over the Last Century, Caucasus Mountains, Georgia, Observed from Old Topographical Maps, Landsat and ASTER Satellite Imagery

    The Cryosphere, 10, 713–725, 2016 www.the-cryosphere.net/10/713/2016/ doi:10.5194/tc-10-713-2016 © Author(s) 2016. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Glacier change over the last century, Caucasus Mountains, Georgia, observed from old topographical maps, Landsat and ASTER satellite imagery Levan G. Tielidze Department of Geomorphology, Vakhushti Bagrationi Institute of Geography, Ivane, Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, 6 Tamarashvili st., 0177 Tbilisi, Georgia Correspondence to: Levan G. Tielidze ([email protected]) Received: 12 May 2015 – Published in The Cryosphere Discuss.: 17 July 2015 Revised: 29 February 2016 – Accepted: 11 March 2016 – Published: 21 March 2016 Abstract. Changes in the area and number of glaciers and global climate where other long-term records may not in the Georgian Caucasus Mountains were examined exist, as changes in glacier mass and/or extent can reflect over the last century, by comparing recent Landsat and changes in temperature and/or precipitation (e.g. Oerlemans ASTER images (2014) with older topographical maps (1911, and Fortuin, 1992; Meier et al., 2007). Regular and detailed 1960) along with middle and high mountain meteoro- observations of alpine glacier behaviour are necessary in re- logical stations data. Total glacier area decreased by gions such as the Georgian Caucasus, where the glaciers 8.1 ± 1.8 % (0.2 ± 0.04 % yr−1) or by 49.9 ± 10.6 km2 from are an important source of water for agricultural produc- 613.6 ± 9.8 km2 to 563.7 ± 11.3 km2 during 1911–1960, tion, and runoff in large glacially fed rivers (Kodori, Enguri, while the number of glaciers increased from 515 to 786.
  • GEORGIA Second Edition March 2010

    GEORGIA Second Edition March 2010

    WHO DOES WHAT WHERE IN DISASTER RISK REDUCTION IN GEORGIA Second edition March 2010 Georgian National Committee of Disaster Risk Reduction & Environment Sustainable Development FOREWORD Georgia is a highly disaster-prone country, which frequently experiences natural hazards (e.g. earthquakes, floods, landslides, mudflows, avalanches, and drought) as well as man-made emergencies (e.g. industrial accidents and traffic accidents). Compounding factors such as demographic change, unplanned urbanization, poorly maintained infrastructure, lax enforcement of safety standards, socio-economic inequities, epidemics, environmental degradation and climate variability amplify the frequency and intensity of disasters and call for a proactive and multi-hazard approach. Disaster risk reduction is a cross-cutting and complex development issue. It requires political and legal commitment, public understanding, scientific knowledge, careful development planning, responsible enforcement of policies and legislation, people-centred early warning systems, and effective disaster preparedness and response mechanisms. Close collaboration of policy-makers, scientists, urban planners, engineers, architects, development workers and civil society representatives is a precondition for adopting a comprehensive approach and inventing adequate solutions. Multi-stakeholder and inter-agency platforms can help provide and mobilize knowledge, skills and resources required for mainstreaming disaster risk reduction into development policies, for coordination of planning and programmes,
  • Realizing the Urban Potential in Georgia: National Urban Assessment

    Realizing the Urban Potential in Georgia: National Urban Assessment

    REALIZING THE URBAN POTENTIAL IN GEORGIA National Urban Assessment ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK REALIZING THE URBAN POTENTIAL IN GEORGIA NATIONAL URBAN ASSESSMENT ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) © 2016 Asian Development Bank 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City, 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines Tel +63 2 632 4444; Fax +63 2 636 2444 www.adb.org Some rights reserved. Published in 2016. Printed in the Philippines. ISBN 978-92-9257-352-2 (Print), 978-92-9257-353-9 (e-ISBN) Publication Stock No. RPT168254 Cataloging-In-Publication Data Asian Development Bank. Realizing the urban potential in Georgia—National urban assessment. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank, 2016. 1. Urban development.2. Georgia.3. National urban assessment, strategy, and road maps. I. Asian Development Bank. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. This publication was finalized in November 2015 and statistical data used was from the National Statistics Office of Georgia as available at the time on http://www.geostat.ge The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by ADB in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.