Cg 2011 by Stephen August Meserve. All Rights Reserved

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cg 2011 by Stephen August Meserve. All Rights Reserved c 2011 by Stephen August Meserve. All rights reserved. THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF HEALTH: DEATH, DISEASE AND DISTRIBUTION BY STEPHEN AUGUST MESERVE DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2011 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor William T. Bernhard, Chair Professor Robert D. Pahre Associate Professor Jude C. Hays Associate Professor Brian J. Gaines Abstract Death and disease exact a heavy toll on citizens in democracies. In response, citizens expect elected politicians to alleviate their suffering by providing public health funding to afflicted areas. I argue that the funding of health policy in democracies is subject to distributional incentives similar to other government policies. Patterns of government control, partisan- ship, strategic importance and quality of legislative representation condition the provision of public health funding within countries. In turn, public health spending conditions district mortality outcomes. I examine evidence from turn of the century France, United States and modern India to test this theory. First, I consider qualitative evidence of the distri- bution of health funds. I then assemble administrative district level electoral, budgetary and health information and predict levels of health funding and resulting mortality rates. Political importance, not just need, plays a prominent role in determining who lives and dies in democracies. This has profound implications for the plight of modern democracies facing disease threats. ii To the friends and family who picked me back up. iii Acknowledgments This project went through numerous twists and turns before arriving where it is. I would like to thank my adviser William Bernhard, who created a supportive environment for me and gave me the time to find my own way with this project while reading draft after draft. Thanks also to my other committee members for their help, in particular to Robert Pahre for his big picture advice and Jude Hays for his methodological thoughts. Fellow graduate students also helped shape this project intellectually over the years, especially Neill Mohammad, Dan Pemstein and Carie Steele. I also give my thanks to current and past members of the University of Illinois political science department for their advice on various drafts and presentations of this work. Finally, many people gave me a lot of love during this project, especially when times were tough. Grateful thanks to my parents, Janet and Peter, my brother, Jeffrey, and my fianc´ee,Carie. My close friends also helped me get here with their patience and support. Thanks to Neil Baer, Todd Borrowman, Christina Head, Neill Mohammad, Shweta Moorthy and Dan Pemstein. iv Table of Contents Chapter 1 Deadly Politics . 1 Chapter 2 A Theory of Public Health Resource Distribution . 8 Chapter 3 Third Republic France 1910-1940 . 31 Chapter 4 The United States 1900-1950 . 82 Chapter 5 India 1971-1999 . 114 Chapter 6 Politics and Health in Democracies . 142 References . 145 v Chapter 1 Deadly Politics Distribution lies at the heart of democratic politics. Democratic institutions often strive to ensure that representatives are elected by an equal number of voters but cannot ensure that all voters are equally advantaged in the political process. While a simplistic understanding of democracy describes it as a form of majority rule, where parties currently in power make decisions benefiting the majority of the voters, this does not capture the incentives of parties and politicians for reelection. In practice, the realities of democratic politics may subvert the public good or majority will by making certain voters more politically important than others. Parties and politicians seeking reelection respond to this pattern of electoral importance by favoring some voters over others, creating winners and losers using government policy. The logic of political survival motivates politicians to distribute public policy not according to need or equity, but according to political importance. This project focuses on the hitherto undescribed role of domestic distribution in public health funding. Most scholars consider health funding an ethical or technical problem. Getting the type of treatments right, nailing down the science of medicine and then making sure that public health budgets are appropriately large is the focus of scholarly and policy discussions of public health. It may seem natural to assume that the goal of health policy for political decision makers is simple: the reduction of misery within their borders. After all, one of the first priorities of the state is to ensure all its inhabitants' basic physical security. The integrity of this assumption breaks down, however, when considering the constraints of scarce resources, especially in developing democracies. In the face of limited resources, democratic politicians cannot realistically satisfy their populations' health needs completely. 1 How, then, are health distribution decisions made? Will politicians distribute using a solely need based approach? I argue that political importance, not just citizen need, plays a prominent role in de- termining who receives health assistance in democracies. To explain health funding and mortality patterns, I treat public health as a political problem. Elected politicians dis- tribute public health funding to districts in order to meet their political needs, rather than medical necessity. They seek to maximize their own reelection chances rather than lives saved. As a consequence, politically influential constituencies will be more likely to receive public health assistance. I develop a theory explaining politician motivations to distribute health resources and identify the determinants of government health provision. In particular, I identify four sources of political importance: electoral support levels of parties currently holding power, strategically important electoral districts, patterns of health partisanship and representation by influential legislators. I contend that these constituencies will receive extra public health funding and have lower mortality rates. I test my hypotheses in a novel empirical environment. Policymakers and scholars largely confine discussion of political trade-offs in health and mortality to the modern developing world. Developing world politicians, however, play a complex political game with interna- tional organizations. The interests of exogenous international actors make valid analysis of the domestic politics of health in modern developing cases extremely difficult. I overcome this problem by instead analyzing early 20th century countries experiencing health crises of similar severity without aid from international actors. I test my distributional theory of health in the late French Third Republic (1910-1940) and turn of the century United States (1900-1950). Modeling health spending and mortality in this period isolates the domestic distribution of health and sidesteps the serious problem of causal contamination from in- ternational actors. Finally, an analysis of India (1971-1999), a modern case, rounds out the empirics in order to assess the salience of domestic health distribution in the presence of international interests. All of these countries experienced high mortality rates from a variety 2 of diseases such as influenza, malaria, tuberculosis and waterborne illness. Overall mortality rates in the early 20th century in Europe and North America were very similar to developing countries today. Politically motivated distribution of health funding has profound policy implications. My research suggests that more democracy is not, in itself, a panacea to health crises because democratic politicians distribute public health in order to secure elections. This runs counter to conventional wisdom advocated by many international organizations, who advance democracy promotion and increased transparency as solutions. Political competi- tion alters health patterns and therefore conditions who lives and dies within democracies. If politicians distribute health policy to accomplish domestic political goals, rather than eradicate health problems, even relatively well governed democratic countries may fail to adequately address citizen health needs. This jibes with cursory knowledge of current dis- ease patterns. Some of the most well governed, relatively democratic countries in Africa, for example, suffer the greatest in the struggle against HIV/AIDS. Democratic South African leaders famously did little to confront the scourge of HIV/AIDS (Butler 2005b, Willan 2004). Botswanan HIV/AIDs rates remain high. Poor health affects other developing democracies such as India as well. International health aid donors in particular must pay careful at- tention to patterns of distributional politics in order to help reduce disease and misery. This is especially important in the wake of recent international initiatives such as the 2005 Paris Declaration and 2008 Accra Agenda for Action that emphasize domestic ownership and control of international health programs. The trend towards more domestic control of international aid resources necessitates increased monitoring to ensure that funds are not used as distribution for domestically important, rather than highly vulnerable, populations. My work also contributes to the legislative studies and comparative political economy literatures on distributive politics by using an
Recommended publications
  • Special Editions 133
    MILAN St. PROTIĆ BETWEEN DEMOCRACY AND POPULISM POLITICAL IDEAS OF THE PEOPLE’S RADICAL PARTY IN SERBIA (The Formative Period: 1860’s to 1903) BETWEEN AND POPULISM DEMOCRACY , Protić . t M. S ISBN 978-86-7179-094-9 BELGRADE 2015 http://www.balkaninstitut.com MILAN St. PROTIĆ BETWEEN DEMOCRACY AND POPULISM POLITICAL IDEAS OF THE PEOPLE’S RADICAL PARTY IN SERBIA (The Formative Period: 1860’s to 1903) http://www.balkaninstitut.com INSTITUTE FOR BALKAN STUDIES SERBIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES AND ARTS SPECIAL EDITIONS 133 MILAN St. PROTIĆ BETWEEN DEMOCRACY AND POPULISM POLITICAL IDEAS OF THE PEOPLE’S RADICAL PARTY IN SERBIA (The Formative Period: 1860’s to 1903) Editor-in-Chief Dušan T. Bataković Director of the Institute for Balkan Studies BELGRADE 2015 http://www.balkaninstitut.com Publisher Institute for Balkan Studies Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts Belgrade, Knez Mihailova 35/IV Serbia www.balkaninstitut.com e-mail: [email protected] Reviewers Vojislav Stanovčić, member of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts Vojislav Pavlović, Institute for Balkan Studies, Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts Written in English by Author Design by Kranislav Vranić Printed by SVEN, Niš ISBN 978-86-7179-094-9 http://www.balkaninstitut.com Table of Contents Preface . 7 Prologue . 11 Chapter One THE ORIGINS . 17 Chapter Two THE HISTORY . 35 Chapter Three THE SOURCES . 61 Chapter Four THE CHARACTERISTICS . 83 Chapter Five THE STRUCTURE . 103 Chapter Six THE LEADERS . 121 EPILOGUE . 149 Bibliography. 173 Index . 185 http://www.balkaninstitut.com http://www.balkaninstitut.com PREFACE hen, upon my return from Bern, Switzerland, it was suggested to me Wto consider the publication of my Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • FRANCE and the REMILITARIZATION of the RHINELAND by GAYLE ANN BROWN, Bachelor of Arts Southeastern State College Durant1 Oklahom
    FRANCE AND THE REMILITARIZATION OF THE RHINELAND By GAYLE ANN BROWN, n Bachelor of Arts Southeastern State College Durant 1 Oklahoma 1967 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS July, 1971 FRANCE AND THE REMILITARIZATION "· OF THE RHINELAND ~ ..."'···-. Thesis Approved: ~~~TbeSAdviser ~ of the Graduate College 803826 ii PREFACE It is generally assumed that opposition to the German remilitari­ zation of the Rhineland in 1936 probably could have prevented World War II. Through an examination of the diplomatic documents published by the French government and the recollections of those who participated in the decisions that were made, this study attempts to determine why France failed to act. I acknowledge the attention of the members of my committee, Dr. Douglas Hale, Dr. George Jewsbury, and Dr. John Sylvester. To the en­ tire faculty of the Department of History at Oklahoma State University, I must express my deepest appreciation for the fairness, kindness, and confidence which I have recently been given. I am obligated to Dr. William Rock, of the Department of History at Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio, for his suggestion of the topic and his guidance in the initial preparation of my work. I am also indebted to the staff of the Oklahoma State University Library for their assistance in obtaining many sources. I am very grateful to my typist, Mrs. Dixie Jennings, for the sympathy which she has shown me, as well as for her fine work. The unceasing reassurance and support given me by my parents has been the primary factor in my ability to continue working against con­ stant discouragement.
    [Show full text]
  • Dataset of Electoral Volatility in the European Parliament Elections Since 1979 Codebook (July 31, 2019)
    Dataset of Electoral Volatility in the European Parliament elections since 1979 Vincenzo Emanuele (Luiss), Davide Angelucci (Luiss), Bruno Marino (Unitelma Sapienza), Leonardo Puleo (Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna), Federico Vegetti (University of Milan) Codebook (July 31, 2019) Description This dataset provides data on electoral volatility and its internal components in the elections for the European Parliament (EP) in all European Union (EU) countries since 1979 or the date of their accession to the Union. It also provides data about electoral volatility for both the class bloc and the demarcation bloc. This dataset will be regularly updated so as to include the next rounds of the European Parliament elections. Content Country: country where the EP election is held (in alphabetical order) Election_year: year in which the election is held Election_date: exact date of the election RegV: electoral volatility caused by vote switching between parties that enter or exit from the party system. A party is considered as entering the party system where it receives at least 1% of the national share in election at time t+1 (while it received less than 1% in election at time t). Conversely, a party is considered as exiting the part system where it receives less than 1% in election at time t+1 (while it received at least 1% in election at time t). AltV: electoral volatility caused by vote switching between existing parties, namely parties receiving at least 1% of the national share in both elections under scrutiny. OthV: electoral volatility caused by vote switching between parties falling below 1% of the national share in both the elections at time t and t+1.
    [Show full text]
  • The London School of Economics and Political Science
    The London School of Economics and Political Science «Les Belles Années du Plan»? Hendrik de Man and the Reinvention of Western European Socialism, 1914-36 ca. Tommaso Milani A thesis submitted to the Department of International History of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, September 2017. 1 DECLARATION I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgment is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 99,843 words. 2 ABSTRACT The thesis discusses the trajectory of the Belgian socialist thinker and activist Hendrik de Man (1885-1953) between 1914 and 1936 ca, with particular attention to his endeavours to renew Western European social democracy after the Great War. The first half of the thesis deals with de Man’s theoretical evolution. Having become convinced of the inadequacy of orthodox Marxism as a conceptual framework for the Left while serving as soldier and diplomat during WWI, de Man sought to overcome the split between reformism and revolutionary socialism by developing an ethical conception of socialism outlined in the book Zur Psychologie des Sozialismus (1926) and, subsequently, by elaborating planism, a democratic socialist ideology supposedly more in tune with the socio-economic conditions of the 1930s.
    [Show full text]
  • SDS's Failure to Realign the Largest Political Coalition in the 20Th Century
    NEW DEAL TO NEW MAJORITY: SDS’S FAILURE TO REALIGN THE LARGEST POLITICAL COALITION IN THE 20TH CENTURY Michael T. Hale A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY December 2015 Committee: Clayton Rosati, Advisor Francisco Cabanillas Graduate Faculty Representative Ellen Berry Oliver Boyd-Barret Bill Mullen ii ABSTRACT Clayton Rosati, Advisor Many historical accounts of the failure of the New Left and the ascendency of the New Right blame either the former’s militancy and violence for its lack of success—particularly after 1968—or the latter’s natural majority among essentially conservative American voters. Additionally, most scholarship on the 1960s fails to see the New Right as a social movement. In the struggles over how we understand the 1960s, this narrative, and the memoirs of New Leftists which continue that framework, miss a much more important intellectual and cultural legacy that helps explain the movement’s internal weakness. Rather than blame “evil militants” or a fixed conservative climate that encircled the New Left with both sanctioned and unsanctioned violence and brutality––like the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) counter intelligence program COINTELPRO that provide the conditions for a unstoppable tidal wave “with the election of Richard M. Nixon in 1968 and reached its crescendo in the Moral Majority, the New Right, the Reagan administration, and neo-conservatism” (Breines “Whose New Left” 528)––the key to this legacy and its afterlives, I will argue, is the implicit (and explicit) essentialism bound to narratives of the “unwinnability” of especially the white working class.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Globalisation: a Comparative Analysis of the New Radical Centre in France, Italy and Spain
    Department of Political Science Chair: Political Science The Politics of Globalisation: A Comparative Analysis of the New Radical Centre in France, Italy and Spain SUPERVISOR CANDIDATE Prof. Lorenzo De Sio Giuliano Festa Student Reg. No. 078422 ACADEMIC YEAR 2017/2018 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER ONE – MACRON, RENZI, RIVERA: THE REVENGE OF THIRD WAY POLITICS? ................... 3 1.1 BEYOND LEFT AND RIGHT? ................................................................................................................ 3 1.1.1 The legacy of Tony Blair ....................................................................................................... 4 1.1.2 A new triumvirate ................................................................................................................ 5 1.1.3 “What Emmanuel Macron grasped” ................................................................................... 5 1.2 EMMANUEL MACRON: TALE OF AN UNPRECEDENTED ELECTION ................................................................. 5 1.2.1 The candidature ................................................................................................................... 6 1.2.2 The road to success .............................................................................................................. 7 1.2.3 The glorious verdicts ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Elections '79 7 -Lojune
    Elections '79 7 -lOJune 110m voters elect 410 MEPs to European Parliament Voting figures and winners0 Directorate-General for Information and Public Relations Publications Division ·,·,., Ever.y effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the data in this publication but no guarantee can be givea that the figures or other entries will be completely consistent with ':.he final details published by the authorities in each of the Member States in every case. - 2 - ----.--- ---,- ---~---,----- ·-.-·--------- ·------·· --·- ..... ··-···- ·~--. ~~: ,__...:...:;To""""'t~,J _J____ B 1 DK 1 0 1 F 1 IRL _! __ L -+--~!:_ __j UK ;~.:L.:?.:'f' --+ ___ - ·------· 29.507.6921 1.274.778 382.721111.377.8181 4.756.77 193.898 5.368.75 (37.166) I 1.721.91!91 4.393.832 s 26,6% 23,4% 21,9% 40,8%1 23,611, 14,5% 15,3 21,7% 30,4% 32,7% ... 18 , J) 112~ 7 I 3 35 22 4 ~13 J 1 :1 9 1 1-- !32.820.~09 ~~:3.~-~~ -- 30.970 13.707.713(1.556.397) ~43.652 12.94-8~- ·;::.829) ~~::7~692 ~ CD I 29,6% 37,7% 1,8% 49,2% (7,7%) 33,1% 37,1- 36,1% 35,6% ~ 105 10 1'i\ o I 42 I 6 I 4_1_~-4----_2_- ---10 --·--- 6.861. 208 6.508.481 c (') 6,2% 35~~~~~ L j -r- 48,4% I) 63 ---+---3+-- ___ -----+ I -----+-~0- 14.940.043 145.804 81.933 112.1841 4.151.261 ---+10.343.10 (8.%1) 97.196 ~ COM 13,5% 2,7% 4,7% o.
    [Show full text]
  • Anglo-Italian Relations in the Red Sea and Zanzibar, 1880-1888
    ANGLO-ITALIAN RELATIONS IN THE RED SEA AND ZANZIBAR, 1880-1888 by TIMOTHY JOHN DAVIES A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS BY RESEARCH Department of History School of Arts and Laws University of Birmingham November 2017 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT When Italy became a fully united country in 1870, Britain was an enthusiastic supporter of the new state. This feeling was reciprocated, with Italy regarding Britain as her most sincere friend in Europe. In February 1887 Britain joined Italy, Germany and Austria-Hungary in the Mediterranean Agreements, by which Britain guaranteed support for Italy in the event of attack upon her. However, by then circumstances had changed. The British occupation of Egypt and the Mahdist uprising had led to Britain becoming a significant Power in North-East Africa. During the same period, Italy had started establishing colonial settlements on the Red Sea. This led to a conflict in the region between Italian and British interests. In addition, Franco-Italian friction increased as Crispi, the Italian Premier since August 1887, continually provoked France, culminating in a crisis which nearly tipped Europe into a full-scale war in 1888.
    [Show full text]
  • ……………………………………………… the Politics of Immigration: a New Electoral Dilemma for the Right
    Review of European and Russian Affairs vol. 2 issue 3/2006 © RERA 2006 all rights reserved ……………………………………………… The Politics of Immigration: a new electoral dilemma for the right and the left? Andrej Zaslove Abstract The success of radical right, anti-immigrant political parties and the recent riots in France are only two of the more publicized examples of how volatile the issue of immigration has become across Western Europe. It is often believed that the dichotomy between racism and anti-racism is quite clear. Right-wing and center-right parties and their electoral constituencies are less accepting of immigrants, while center-left and left-wing political parties and their supporters are more accommodating. In this paper, however, I argue that this distinction is not as clear as it is often perceived. Using Italy as my case study, I outline the various ideological positions on the left and the right, and within the left and right, vis-à-vis immigration legislation and important related issues such as integration and multiculturalism. In the second section, I then examine how these ideological positions respond to the realities of immigration and to new pressures from voters within civil society. The question is whether immigration has created a new electoral dilemma for both sides of the political spectrum. I examine whether: 1) left-wing parties are experiencing pressures from their traditional working class constituencies to be tougher on immigration and issues of law-and-order. How does this mesh with more liberal attitudes regarding policies that permit immigrants to enter, find work, and integrate into society? 2) The question is whether right-wing political forces are also experiencing an electoral dilemma between center-right voters who support less liberal immigrant legislation and their traditional business constituency who support center-right economic policy but also realize that they require immigrant labour.
    [Show full text]
  • Remapping the American Left: a History of Radical Discontinuity
    Remapping the American Left: A History of Radical Discontinuity James N. Gregory Is the American Left reemerging as a political force? Suddenly there are socialists in Congress, socialists on city councils, socialists in the Democratic Party, and much of the media has taken up the question of whether the Democratic Party is swinging to the left. If we are indeed seeing a new surge to the left and new phase of Ameri- can radicalism, it would not be the first time. This is something that has happened repeatedly in the past century. The particulars are new, but the cycles of movement reinvention appear to be a feature of American politics, one that historians have not adequately explored. American radicalism has been a vexing subject for many years. It was not long ago that historians could do little more than grieve, framing the subject as a story of failures and asking why- not questions. Why was there no revolution? Why wasn’t the US Left more like the European Left or the Canadian Left? Why did the Socialist Party fall apart? Why did the New Left fade?1 No longer. Books by Paul Buhle, Richard Flacks, Michael Kazin, Doug Rossinow, Howard Brick, Christopher Phelps, Rhodri Jeffrey- Jones, and Dawson Barrett have changed the tone, examining accomplishments as well as limitations, arguing that the Left has initiated significant transformations, especially involving the rights of previously excluded populations, while a century of radical action has also changed the dimensions of the civic sphere and democratic practice by fostering a culture of activism. The newer books do so in This article began as my presidential address at the Labor and Working- Class History Association banquet at the 2018 Organization of American Historians conference in Sacramento.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spartacist Uprising of 1919
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Marquette University Press Publications 1958 The Spartacist Uprising of 1919 Eric Waldman Ph.D Follow this and additional works at: https://epublications.marquette.edu/mupress-book THE SPARTACIST UPRISING MARQUETTE GERMAN STUDIES I The Spartacist Marquette German Studies, l Uprising of 1919 and the crisis of the German Socialist Movement: A study of the relation of political theory and party practice ERIC WALDMAN, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Political Science at Marquette University PRESS • MILWAUKEE �. MARQUETTE GERMAN SnmIES are published under the direction of the Institute of German Affairs of Marquette University. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 58-7265 @ Copyright, 1958, MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY PRESS, Milwaukee, Wisconsin Manufactured in the United States of America Acknowledgment T 1s A well known truism that most books reflect not only the effort of the author but an accumulation of thought and Istudy by many others who have completed research and publica­ tion in the same general area of investigation. This book is no exception to the rule, and the author has made extensive use of many excellent studies concerned with German political and his­ torical developments. No effort has been made to repeat descrip­ tive material found elsewhere, although references in the foot­ notes will direct the reader to more detailed historical studies. It is impossible to acknowledge our obligations to all of those who have directly or indirectly assisted with the writing of this study. However, the author's intellectual indebtedness to his for­ mer teacher, Professor Wolfgang H. Kraus, is of such magnitude that is must be foremost as we acknowledge assistance, advice, and constructive criticism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Attitudes of the British and French Liberal Parties Toward Socialist Parties, Trade Unions and Democratization During 1924-1925
    The attitudes of the British and French liberal parties toward socialist parties, trade unions and democratization during 1924-1925 Petrus Kauppinen YHIS050 [email protected] Master’s thesis Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Department of history and etnology March 2020 Table of contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Methodology and theoretical framework 2 1.2 Historiography and previous research 8 2. Political systems of Britain and France during 1920s 12 2.1 Political parties of Britain 13 2.1.1 The Liberal Party 13 2.1.2 Other political parties of Britain 16 2.2 Political parties of the French Third Republic 18 2.2.1 The Radical Party 19 2.2.2 Other political parties of the French Third Republic 21 2.3 Previous cooperation between the liberal and socialist parties 23 3. The attitudes of the liberals toward trade unions 25 3.1 Debate about amendments to the Trade Union Act 1913 27 3.2. French debate about granting amnesty for strikers of 1920 35 3.3 Comparison of British and French liberal parties regarding trade unions 40 4. The attitudes of the liberals toward the women’s suffrage 41 4.1 Women’s suffrage debate in Britain 42 4.2 Women’s suffrage debate in France 57 4.3 Comparison of British and French liberal parties regarding the women’s suffrage 66 5. Conclusions 69 6. Sources 74 Tiedekunta – Faculty Laitos – Department Humanistis-yhteiskuntatieteellinen tiedekunta Historian ja etnologian laitos Tekijä – Author Petrus Kauppinen Työn nimi – Title The attitudes of the British and French liberal parties toward socialist parties, trade unions and democratization during 1924-1925 Oppiaine – Subject Työn laji – Level Yleinen historia Pro gradu-tutkielma Aika – Month and year Sivumäärä – Number of pages Maaliskuu 2020 80 Tiivistelmä – Abstract Tässä pro gradu-tutkielmassa tarkastellaan ja vertaillaan Britanniassa ja Ranskassa käytyjä parlamenttikeskusteluita ammattiliitoista ja demokratisaatiosta liberaalipuolueiden näkökulmasta vuosina 1924-1925.
    [Show full text]