DOCSLIB.ORG

To Download the World War

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
To Download the World War Starter booklet.indb 1 16/04/20 5:10 PM TEAM YANKEE M1 ABRAMS TANK M1PLATOON ABRAMS TANK PLATOON — TEAM YANKEE • TANK UNIT • CHOBHAM ARMOUR • M1 ABRAMS TANK PLATOON • THERMAL IMAGING • COURAGE 4+ SKILL 4+ MORALE 4+ ASSAULT 4+ The United States have the most powerful armed forces in the world. They stand ready to defend Western Europe from the 4x M1 Abrams 32 POINTS REMOUNT 2+ COUNTERATTACK 4+ red horde poised across the Iron Curtain. Armoured troops’ powerful M60 Patton tanks or state of the art M1A1 Abrams 3x M1 Abrams 24 POINTS tanks, as well as the scouts deploy forward in their M3 Bradleys to thwart the enemy’s progress! IS HIT ON 4+ 2x M1 Abrams 16 POINTS FRONT SIDE TOP M1 TEAM YANKEE OPTION 18 8 2 • Replace any or all M1 Abrams with IPM1 IPM1 19 10 2 COMBAT TEAM ZULU Abrams for +1 point per tank. ARMORED COMBAT TEAM TACTICAL TERRAIN DASH CROSS COUNTRY DASH ROAD DASH CROSS M1 ABRAMS — TEAM YANKEE 14”/35CM 18”/45CM 28”/70CM 32”/80CM 2+ • TANK FORMATION • CHOBHAM ARMOUR • The biggest strengths of the IPM1 Abrams is • THERMAL IMAGING • COURAGE 3+ SKILL 3+ MORALE 3+ ASSAULT 4+ its mobility and armour. With a moving Rate WEAPON RANGE ROF ANTI- FIRE- NOTES REMOUNT 2+ COUNTERATTACK 3+ HALTED MOVING TANK POWER Advanced Stabiliser, Of Fire (ROF) of 2 they easily outmanoeuvre M68 105mm gun 40”/100CM 2 2 20 2+ IS HIT ON 4+ Laser Range nder M1 ABRAMS FRONT SIDE TOP any Soviet tank on the battlefield, and their .50 cal AA MG 20”/50CM 3 2 4 5+ ARMORED COMBAT TEAM HQ 7.62mm AA MG 16”/40CM 1 1 2 6 TU101b M1 18 8 2 19 Front Armour gives them an armour save 7.62mm MG 16”/40CM 1 1 2 6 2x M1 Abrams 16 POINTS IPM1 19 10 2 against anything on the tabletop. 1x M1 Abrams 8 POINTS TACTICAL TERRAIN DASH CROSS COUNTRY DASH ROAD DASH CROSS TEAM YANKEE 14”/35CM 18”/45CM 28”/70CM 32”/80CM 2+ OPTIONS ROF ANTI- FIRE- • Replace any or all M1 Abrams with IPM1 WEAPON RANGE HALTED MOVING TANK POWER NOTES M60 PATTON TANK M60PLATOON PATTON Advanced Stabiliser, TANK PLATOON — TEAM YANKEE Abrams for +1 point per tank. M68 105mm gun 40”/100CM 2 2 20 2+ Laser Range nder • TANK UNIT • THERMAL IMAGING • IPM1 Abrams tanks have Front armour 19 instead of 18, .50 cal AA MG 20”/50CM 3 2 4 5+ M60 PATTON TANK PLATOON and Side armour 10 instead of 8. 7.62mm AA MG 16”/40CM 1 1 2 6 COURAGE 4+ SKILL 4+ 7.62mm MG 16”/40CM 1 1 2 6 4x M60 Patton 16 POINTS MORALE 4+ ASSAULT 4+ 3x M60 Patton 12 POINTS REMOUNT 4+ COUNTERATTACK 4+ YOUR FIRST ARMY 2x M60 Patton 8 POINTS IS HIT ON 4+ FRONT SIDE TOP ARMOUR ARMOUR For your first games we recomend fielding the following force against the Soviet half of the starter set. Once you The M60 Patton has the same gun as the 15 8 2 have played a few games look at the what next section on IPM1 tank, giving it plenty of punch, but TACTICAL TERRAIN DASH CROSS COUNTRY DASH ROAD DASH CROSS M1 ABRAMS M60 PATTON page 10 to see how you can expand your army. lacks some of the other improvements of the 10”/25CM 14”/35CM 20”/50CM 24”/60CM 2+ TANK PLATOON TANK PLATOON WEAPON RANGE ROF ANTI- FIRE- NOTES TU102a 29 TU132 29 M1 Abrams Armored Combat Team HQ: newer Abrams. Use terrain to avoid getting HALTED MOVING TANK POWER 1x IPM1 Abrams Tank 9 points hit and manoeuvre into the Soviets flanks for M68 105mm gun 40”/100CM 2 2 20 2+ Stabiliser, Laser Range nder RECON M1 Abrams Tank Platoon: maximum benefit. .50 cal MG 20”/50CM 3 2 4 5+ 2x M1 Abrams Tanks 18 points 7.62mm MG 16”/40CM 1 1 2 6 M60 Patton Tank Platoon: M3 BRADLEY 2x M60 Patton Tanks 8 points SCOUT SECTION TEAM YANKEE TU171 54 M3 Bradley Scout Section: M3 BRADLEY SCOUTM3 SECTION BRADLEY 2x M3A2 Bradley 6 points SCOUT SECTION — TEAM YANKEE • TANK UNIT • AMPHIBIOUS • TOTAL 41 points M3 BRADLEY SCOUT SECTION • APPLIQUE ARMOUR • SCOUT • SPEARHEAD • COURAGE 4+ SKILL 4+ • THERMAL IMAGING • MORALE 4+ ASSAULT 4 2x M3 Bradley 5 POINTS REMOUNT 4+ COUNTERATTACK 5+ 2x M3A2 Bradley 6 POINTS IS HIT ON 4+ The Abrams is the latest gereneration of American Main Battle Tanks (MBTs). There are a few different versions of Abrams. FRONT SIDE TOP The key differences of the M1 and IPM1 are listed below. See the World War III: American book for even more options. M3A2 Bradley has Front Armour 5 instead of 3, Side Armour 4 instead of 2, and has Applique Armour. M3 3 2 1 M3A2 M1 ABRAMS IPM1 ABRAMS The M3A2 Bradley boasts a powerful 5 4 1 The M1 Abrams was the initial production model of Abrams The IPM1 Abrams (Improved Performance M1) is essentially TOW-2 missile. At Anti-Tank 23 this is TACTICAL TERRAIN DASH CROSS COUNTRY DASH ROAD DASH CROSS tanks and forms the bulk of American forces in Europe. an M1 tank that has extra armour.. 10”/25CM 16”/40CM 28”/70CM 32”/80CM 2+ a great option for destroying the Soviet ROF ANTI- FIRE- • 105mm gun • 105mm gun armour. The Bradley wasn’t design to slug WEAPON RANGE HALTED MOVING TANK POWER NOTES M242 25mm • Small stowage bins on turret side. • Long stowage bin on turret side it out with tanks like the heavily armoured Bushmaster gun 24”/60CM 3 2 8 5+ Anti-helicopter, Stabliser • Small stowage bustle on turret rear • Large stowage bustle on back of turret Abrams though so make sure you kill what- TOW-2 missile 8”/20CM 1 23 3+ Guided, HEAT • Full length bazooka skirts • Bazooka skirt cut-out in front of rear drive wheel 48”/120CM ever you shoot at. They also have a 25mm 7.62mm MG 16”/40CM 1 1 2 6 Bushmaster gun with an excellent rate of fire that can shred enemy vehicles like the Soviet BMPs. Starter booklet.indb 2 16/04/20 5:10 PM Starter booklet.indb 3 16/04/20 5:10 PM IPM1 ABRAMS M60 PATTON ASSEMBLY M3A2 BRADLEY ASSEMBLY ASSEMBLY This model can also be built as an: This model can also be built as either an M3 • M1 Abrams, or M3A2 Bradley, Visit our website for more • M1A1 Abrams, and details and assembly guides. Visit our website for more details and assembly guides. OR M3A2 BRADLEY M60 PATTON Join the global World War III: Team Yankee Community at our Visit the Official discussion group at World War III: Team Yankee portal at FACEBOOK.COM/GROUPS/ WWW.TEAM-YANKEE.COM IPM1 ABRAMS TEAMYANKEEGAME Starter booklet.indb 4 16/04/20 5:10 PM Starter booklet.indb 5 16/04/20 5:10 PM RED BANNER T-80 TANK COMPANYT-80 TANK COMPANY — RED BANNER • TANK UNIT • ERA • INFRA-RED (IR) • T-80 TANK COMPANY The Soviet Union’s most powerful forces are stationed in East Germany poised on the border with West Germany ready to COURAGE 4+ SKILL 5+ 10x T-80 89 POINTS MORALE 3+ ASSAULT 5+ strike at a moment’s notice. They are equipped with the very best Soviet industry has to offer, from the latest sophisticated 9x T-80 79 POINTS REMOUNT 3+ COUNTERATTACK 4+ missile firing T-80 and T-64 tanks to versatile BMP infantry fighting vehicles, there will be little that the corrupt capitalist 8x T-80 69 POINTS IS HIT ON 3+ armies of NATO can do to stop them. Soon the western workers will be free and the dawn of a new socialist age will begin! FRONT SIDE TOP 7x T-80 59 POINTS 6x T-80 50 POINTS 20 10 2 RED BANNER 5x T-80 40 POINTS TACTICAL TERRAIN DASH CROSS COUNTRY DASH ROAD DASH CROSS BREAKTHROUGH TANKTANK BATTALIONBATTALION 4x T-80 31 POINTS 14”/35CM 18”/45CM 28”/70CM 32”/80CM 2+ T-80 — RED BANNER 3x T-80 22 POINTS ROF ANTI- FIRE- WEAPON RANGE HALTED MOVING TANK POWER NOTES • TANK FORMATION • ERA • INFRA-RED (IR) • Advanced Stabiliser, Brutal, COURAGE 3+ SKILL 4+ OPTIONS 125mm 2A46 gun 32”/80CM 1 1 22 2+ Laser Range nder MORALE 2+ ASSAULT 5+ • Add AT-11 Sniper missiles to all T-80 tanks Optional 16”/40CM 1 1 22 3+ Guided , HEAT, Tandem Warhead REMOUNT 3+ COUNTERATTACK 3+ for +1 point per tank. AT-11 Sniper missile 48”/120CM 12.7mm AA MG 20”/50CM 3 2 4 5+ T-80 IS HIT ON 3+ • Fit up to three T-80 tanks with Mine TANK BATTALION HQ FRONT SIDE TOP 7.62mm MG 16”/40CM 1 1 2 6 TS137 Clearing Devices for +1 point. 20 10 2 1x T-80 8 POINTS TACTICAL TERRAIN DASH CROSS COUNTRY DASH ROAD DASH CROSS OPTIONS 14”/35CM 18”/45CM 28”/70CM 32”/80CM 2+ RED BANNER • Add AT-11 Sniper missile for +1 point. ROF ANTI- FIRE- WEAPON RANGE HALTED MOVING TANK POWER NOTES Advanced Stabiliser, Brutal, T-64 TANK COMPANYT-64 125mm 2A46 gun 32”/80CM 1 1 22 2+ Laser Range nder TANK COMPANY — RED BANNER Optional 16”/40CM 1 1 22 3+ Guided, HEAT, Tandem Warhead AT-11 Sniper missile 48”/120CM • TANK UNIT • BDD ARMOUR • INFRA-RED (IR) • T-64 TANK COMPANY 12.7mm AA MG 20”/50CM 3 2 4 5+ COURAGE 4+ SKILL 5+ 7.62mm MG 16”/40CM 1 1 2 6 10x T-64 55 POINTS MORALE 3+ ASSAULT 5+ 9x T-64 49 POINTS REMOUNT 3+ COUNTERATTACK 4+ YOUR FIRST ARMY 8x T-64 43 POINTS IS HIT ON 3+ ARMOUR ARMOUR FRONT SIDE TOP For your first games we recomend fielding the following 7x T-64 37 POINTS force against the American half of the starter set.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LSHM November 2020 Newsletter
    The Lone Star Dispatch WOW November is here and alas no MillenniumCon this year. This would have been our 23rd year holding the November 2020 event. I will personally miss seeing old 2020 LSHM Officers friends, making new ones and having an Charlie Torok [email protected] President absolute fun weekend of gaming. We Joe Wicker [email protected] Vice President Ian Straus [email protected] will take a “rain-check” this year and Mike Gomez [email protected] Mark Leroux [email protected] look forward to MillenniumCon 2021. Oscar Barela [email protected] Mark Sanchez [email protected] Nate Culver [email protected] This year I would ask that you re-new or Robert Williams [email protected] sign up for membership in LSHM. We normally get about 90% of our 2020 membership at MillenniumCon – so this year we will rely on you taking care of your membership on-line or by mail. See page 2 of the newsletter for details. Thanks so much for your continued support for the club and our effort to promote and sponsor the hobby of War- Inside this issue: Gaming across Texas. Welcome & BOD update Upcoming Events Past Games played Future Events planned Bolt Action Games Gamers Workbench Flames of War – WWII Flames of War – Team Yankee SAGA Games Battle Reports Product Review Sponsors and Advertisers Have an absolutely great November, Discounts to Members Veterans Day, and Thanksgiving. Please The Lone Star Historical Miniatures (LSHM). let us know how you are doing. We promote miniatures wargaming in primarily historical periods but also fantasy/sci-fi.
    [Show full text]
  • Projected Acquisition Costs for the Army's Ground Combat Vehicles
    Projected Acquisition Costs for the Army’s Ground Combat Vehicles © MDart10/Shutterstock.com APRIL | 2021 At a Glance The Army operates a fleet of ground combat vehicles—vehicles intended to conduct combat opera- tions against enemy forces—and plans to continue to do so. Expanding on the Army’s stated plans, the Congressional Budget Office has projected the cost of acquiring such vehicles through 2050. Those projections include costs for research, development, test, and evaluation (RDT&E) and for procurement but not the costs of operating and maintaining the vehicles. CBO’s key findings are as follows: • Total acquisition costs for the Army’s ground combat vehicles are projected to average about $5 billion per year (in 2020 dollars) through 2050—$4.5 billion for procurement and $0.5 billion for RDT&E. • The projected procurement costs are greater (in constant dollars) than the average annual cost for such vehicles from 2010 to 2019 but approximately equal to the average annual cost from 2000 to 2019 (when spending was boosted because of operations in Iraq). • More than 40 percent of the projected acquisition costs of Army ground combat vehicles are for Abrams tanks. • Most of the projected acquisition costs are for remanufactured and upgraded versions of current vehicles, though the Army also plans to acquire an Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle, which will replace the Bradley armored personnel carrier; an Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle, which will replace the M113 armored personnel carrier; and a new Mobile Protected Firepower tank, which will be lighter than an Abrams tank. • The Army is also considering developing an unmanned Decisive Lethality Platform that might eventually replace Abrams tanks.
    [Show full text]
  • FEBRUARY/MARCH 2017. Issue 01
    FEBRUARY/MARCH 2017. Issue 01. READY FOR WHEREVER YOUR MISSION TAKES YOU ELAMS TOC: The ELAMS TOC Primary mission is to provide effective, reliable space for execution of battlefield C4I. MECC® Shower/Latrine: The AAR MECC® is a fully customizable ISO that allows you to mobilize your mission. SPACEMAX® The SPACEMAX® shelter provides lightweight, durable solutions for rapidly deployable space that reduces costs and risk. 2 armadainternational.com - february/march 2017 MADE IN armadainternational.com - february/march 2017 3 www.AARMobilitySystems.com THE USA FEBRUARY/MARCH 2017 www.armadainternational.com 08 AIR POWER COST VERSUS CREDIBILITY Andrew Drwiega examines maritime patrol aircraft procurement, and the options available for air forces and navies on a budget. 14 20 26 LAND Warfare TURING STIRLING CLASS WAR CATCH-22 VEHICLES FOR CHANGE Stephen W. Miller examines how the designs of Thomas Withington examines the Link-22 tactical Andrew White uncovers some of the latest light armoured vehicles are changing around data link, its workings and what it heralds for advances in vehicle technology to help the world. tomorrow’s naval operations. commandos reach their objectives. 32 38 FUTURE TECHNOLOGIES SEA POWER 44 THE MAN WHO FELL TO EARTH WHAT LIES BENEATH LAND Warfare Parachute technology is over a century old and is Warship definitions are becoming increasingly PREVENTION IS BETTER THAN CURE being continually refined, thanks to advances in blurred due to technological advances. Are we Claire Apthorp explores some of the innovative design and manufacturing, Peter Donaldson moving towards the multipurpose combatant, asks methods being adopted for military vehicle finds out. Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bradley Fighting Vehicle-The Troops Love It Just Like Its Partner-In
    The Bradley Fighting Vehicle-The Troops Love It Just like its partner-in-combat the Ml Abrams tank, the Army's new M2 Bradley Infantry Fighting Vehicle is rolling off the assembly line in grow­ ing numbers and finding an enthusias­ tic welcome in the units where it is be­ ing assigned. From the battalion com­ manders down to the squad leaders who fight from the Bradley there is high praise for its speed, agility, fire­ power and protection from artillery fragments and small caliber weapons. Also, just like the Abrams tank, the Bradley has been subject to a great deal of uninformed and polemical crit­ icism leading to its current less-than­ optimal press image. In truth, the Bradley, now fielded in 17 battalions, is a very successful piece of equip­ ment. It does what it was intended to do and does it very well. It deserves more objective treatment by the press and other critics who do not under­ stand its function. The Bradley exists to provide infan­ trymen and cavalry scouts a protected fighting platform on the battlefield where they function as partners of a combined-arms team, closely integrat­ ed with tanks, artillery, aviation and air defense weapons. For the first time our infantry soldiers can move into a new dimension-aboard a protective vehicle from which they can fight the enemy, with the firepower, agility and speed which assures continuous effec­ tiveness on a modern battlefield. This is not just a matter of getting the infantry to the battle. It is the de­ mand that infantry and tanks fight to­ gether, that both be there offering their strengths and protecting the oth­ er's weaknesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Free Team Yankee: World War Iii Pdf
    FREE TEAM YANKEE: WORLD WAR III PDF Phil Yates | none | 27 Nov 2015 | Battlefront Miniatures Ltd | 9780994120625 | English | Auckland, New Zealand Team Yankee - Wikipedia Uh-oh, it looks like your Internet Explorer is out of date. For a better shopping experience, please upgrade now. Javascript is not enabled in your browser. Enabling JavaScript Team Yankee: World War III your browser will allow you to experience all the features of our site. Learn how to enable JavaScript on your browser. NOOK Book. Audio MP3 on CD. Home 1 Books 2. Read an excerpt of this book! Add to Wishlist. Sign in to Purchase Instantly. Members save with free shipping everyday! See details. Overview This revised and updated edition of the classic Cold War novel Team Yankee reminds us once again might have occurred had the United States and its Allies taken on the Russians in Team Yankee: World War III, had cooler geopolitical heads not prevailed. When Nazi Germany was destroyed, it was evident that Russian tank armies had become supreme in Europe, but only in counterpart to US air power. Likewise when the Russians overran Berlin they sent a signal to the Allies what their land armies could accomplish. Thankfully the tense standoff continued on either side of the Iron Curtain for nearly half a century. During those years, however, the Allies beefed up their ground capability, while the Soviets increased their air capability, even as the new jet and missile age began thanks much to captured German scientists on both sides. Team Yankee posits a conflict that never happened, but which very well might have, and for which both sides prepared for decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin 10-Final Cover
    COLD WAR INTERNATIONAL HISTORY PROJECT BULLETIN Issue 10 Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, D.C. March 1998 Leadership Transition in a Fractured Bloc Featuring: CPSU Plenums; Post-Stalin Succession Struggle and the Crisis in East Germany; Stalin and the Soviet- Yugoslav Split; Deng Xiaoping and Sino-Soviet Relations; The End of the Cold War: A Preview COLD WAR INTERNATIONAL HISTORY PROJECT BULLETIN 10 The Cold War International History Project EDITOR: DAVID WOLFF CO-EDITOR: CHRISTIAN F. OSTERMANN ADVISING EDITOR: JAMES G. HERSHBERG ASSISTANT EDITOR: CHRISTA SHEEHAN MATTHEW RESEARCH ASSISTANT: ANDREW GRAUER Special thanks to: Benjamin Aldrich-Moodie, Tom Blanton, Monika Borbely, David Bortnik, Malcolm Byrne, Nedialka Douptcheva, Johanna Felcser, Drew Gilbert, Christiaan Hetzner, Kevin Krogman, John Martinez, Daniel Rozas, Natasha Shur, Aleksandra Szczepanowska, Robert Wampler, Vladislav Zubok. The Cold War International History Project was established at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington, D.C., in 1991 with the help of the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and receives major support from the MacArthur Foundation and the Smith Richardson Foundation. The Project supports the full and prompt release of historical materials by governments on all sides of the Cold War, and seeks to disseminate new information and perspectives on Cold War history emerging from previously inaccessible sources on “the other side”—the former Communist bloc—through publications, fellowships, and scholarly meetings and conferences. Within the Wilson Center, CWIHP is under the Division of International Studies, headed by Dr. Robert S. Litwak. The Director of the Cold War International History Project is Dr. David Wolff, and the incoming Acting Director is Christian F.
    [Show full text]
  • Army Transformation and Modernization: Overview and Issues for Congress
    Order Code RS20787 Updated March 11, 2004 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Army Transformation and Modernization: Overview and Issues for Congress nae redacted Specialist in National Defense Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Summary The U.S. Army continues an ambitious program intended to transform itself into a strategically responsive force dominant in all types of ground operations. As planned, its Future Force will eventually meld all ongoing initiatives into a force based on a high- tech Future Combat System (FCS). Its Current Force is beginning to provide a new combat capability, based on current-technology armored vehicles, for the mid-intensity combat operations that seem prevalent in today’s world. Its current “legacy force” of existing systems is being modernized and maintained to ensure effective light and heavy force capabilities until the Future Force is realized. This short report briefly describes the program and discusses issues of feasibility, viability, and affordability of potential interest to Congress. It will be updated as events warrant. Background Modernization is not a new issue or objective for U.S. military forces, but it has taken on new urgency because of: the post-Cold War downsizing and procurement reductions, the new global environment and unexpected requirements, and the promise of a “revolution in military affairs” (RMA) suggested by rapid developments in computers, communications, and guidance systems. The last notable surge in modernization culminated during the “Reagan build-up” of the 1980's. Weapons and doctrines developed and fielded in that era made fundamental contributions to United States successes in the Cold War, the Gulf War, and Kosovo.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Vehicle Options Arising from the Barrel Type Piston Engine
    Journal of Power Technologies 101 (1) (2021) 22–33 Military vehicle options arising from the barrel type piston engine Pawe l Mazuro1 and Cezary Chmielewski1,B 1Warsaw University of Technology B [email protected] Abstract in terms of efficiency, meaning that piston engines can deliver enhanced range and endurance. This is benefi- The article reviews knowledge about requirements for engines in cial in missions requiring a stopover for refueling and state-of-the-art unmanned aerial vehicles and tanks. Analysis of particularly useful for unmanned supply, observation design and operational parameters was carried out on selected and maritime missions. turboshaft and piston engines generating power in the range of 500 - 1500 kW (0.5 - 1.5 MW). The data was compared In contrast, land combat vehicles have significantly with the performance of innovative, barrel type piston engines, different drive unit requirements. High mobility en- which are likely to become an alternative drive solution in the ables the vehicle to rapidly change location after de- target vehicle groups. tection. To this end, the torque curve as a function of the rotational speed of the shaft is of decisive im- portance. Keywords: military UAV, tanks, turboshaft engines, piston engines, barrel type piston engines The complexity of tank engines adds an additional layer of requirements, impacting the reliability and durability of the power unit, and they come with re- 1 Introduction lated manufacturing and operating costs. In military land vehicles, the engine should be as small This article consolidates knowledge on options and as possible; the space saved can be used for other capabilities arising from use of the barrel type piston purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Brazilian Tanks British Tanks Canadian Tanks Chinese Tanks
    Tanks TANKS Brazilian Tanks British Tanks Canadian Tanks Chinese Tanks Croatian Tanks Czech Tanks Egyptian Tanks French Tanks German Tanks Indian Tanks Iranian Tanks Iraqi Tanks Israeli Tanks Italian Tanks Japanese Tanks Jordanian Tanks North Korean Tanks Pakistani Tanks Polish Tanks Romanian Tanks Russian Tanks Slovakian Tanks South African Tanks South Korean Tanks Spanish Tanks Swedish Tanks Swiss Tanks Ukrainian Tanks US Tanks file:///E/My%20Webs/tanks/tanks_2.html[3/22/2020 3:58:21 PM] Tanks Yugoslavian Tanks file:///E/My%20Webs/tanks/tanks_2.html[3/22/2020 3:58:21 PM] Brazilian Tanks EE-T1 Osorio Notes: In 1982, Engesa began the development of the EE-T1 main battle tank, and by 1985, it was ready for the world marketplace. The Engesa EE-T1 Osorio was a surprising development for Brazil – a tank that, while not in the class of the latest tanks of the time, one that was far above the league of the typical third-world offerings. In design, it was similar to many tanks of the time; this was not surprising, since Engesa had a lot of help from West German, British and French armor experts. The EE-T1 was very promising – an excellent design that several countries were very interested in. The Saudis in particular went as far as to place a pre- order of 318 for the Osorio. That deal, however, was essentially killed when the Saudis saw the incredible performance of the M-1 Abrams and the British Challenger, and they literally cancelled the Osorio order at the last moment. This resulted in the cancellation of demonstrations to other countries, the demise of Engesa, and with it a promising medium tank.
    [Show full text]
  • The Uncertain Role of the Tank in Modern War: Lessons from the Israeli Experience in Hybrid Warfare
    No. 109 JUNE 2016 The Uncertain Role of the Tank in Modern War: Lessons from the Israeli Experience in Hybrid Warfare Michael B. Kim The Uncertain Role of the Tank in Modern War: Lessons from the Israeli Experience in Hybrid Warfare by Michael B. Kim The Institute of Land Warfare ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY AN INSTITUTE OF LAND WARFARE PAPER The purpose of the Institute of Land Warfare is to extend the educational work of AUSA by sponsoring scholarly publications, to include books, monographs and essays on key defense issues, as well as workshops and symposia. A work selected for publication as a Land Warfare Paper represents research by the author which, in the opinion of ILW’s editorial board, will contribute to a better understanding of a particular defense or national security issue. Publication as an Institute of Land Warfare Paper does not indicate that the Association of the United States Army agrees with everything in the paper but does suggest that the Association believes the paper will stimulate the thinking of AUSA members and others concerned about important defense issues. LAND WARFARE PAPER No. 109, June 2016 The Uncertain Role of the Tank in Modern War: Lessons from the Israeli Experience in Hybrid Warfare by Michael B. Kim Major Michael B. Kim currently serves as the Squadron Executive Officer for the 8th Squadron, 1st Cavalry Regiment, 2d Stryker Brigade Combat Team, 2d Infantry Division. Prior to his current position, he graduated from the Command and General Staff College (CGSC), Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, and completed the Art of War Scholars Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Latest from the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine (SMM), Based on Information Received As of 19:30, 6 November 2018 | OSCE
    11/7/2018 Latest from the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine (SMM), based on information received as of 19:30, 6 November 2018 | OSCE Latest from the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine (SMM), based on information received as of 19:30, 6 November 2018 KYIV 7 November 2018 This report is for the media and the general public. The SMM recorded more ceasere violations in Donetsk region and fewer in Luhansk region, compared with the previous reporting period. It observed recent damage to civilian properties caused by shelling in residential areas of Staromykhailivka. The SMM saw weapons in violation of withdrawal lines on both sides of the contact line. The SMM recorded ceasere violations near the Petrivske disengagement area. The Mission’s access remained restricted in all three disengagement areas; it was also restricted near Novoazovsk - close to the border with the Russian Federation – as well as near Oleksandrivske, Bezimenne, Zaichenko and Troitske.* The SMM facilitated and monitored adherence to the ceasere to enable repairs to the Petrivske water pumping station near Artema, power lines near Zolote-5/Mykhailivka and damaged houses in Marinka and Krasnohorivka, as well as to enable demining near Nyzhnoteple. In Kyiv, the SMM followed up on media reports of searches at apartments and oces of two activists. In Donetsk region, the SMM recorded more ceasere violations[1], including, however, fewer explosions (about 220), compared with the previous reporting period (about 235 explosions).[2] On the evening and night of 5-6 November, the SMM camera at the Donetsk Filtration Station (DFS) (15km north of Donetsk) recorded seven undetermined explosions and 70 projectiles in ight (from west to east), all at an assessed range of 0.5-4km south and south-south-west.
    [Show full text]
  • Playbook Part 1
    MBT Playbook 1 PLAYBOOK GMT Games, LLC P.O. Box 1308, Hanford, CA 93232-1308 • www.GMTGames.com © 2016 GMT Games, LLC 2 MBT Playbook TABLE OF CONTENTS 8.0 TO&Es . 2 9.2.3 Point Values of Units . 6 8.1 Military Formations . 2 9.2.4 Objectives . 7 8.1.1 Headquarters – HQ . 2 9.2.4.1 Meeting Engagement . 7 8.1.2 Ad-Hoc Formations . 2 9.2.4.2 Delaying Action . 7 8.1.2.1 Over-Strength Formations . 2 9.2.4.3 Defensive Engagement . 7 8.1.2.2 Under-Strength Formations . 2 9.2.4.4 Counterattack . 7 8.2 Unit Summary Charts . 3 9.2.5 Determining Victory Margin . 7 8.2.1 Individual Units . 3 10.0 27 September 1987 . 8 8.2.2 Point Values . 3 10.1 Overview . 8 8.2.2.1 Vehicle, Towed & Helicopter Point Values . 3 10.2 Soviet OB . 9 8.2.2.2 Leg Unit Point Values . 3 10.2.1 Group of Soviet Forces Germany (GSFG) . 9 8.2.2.3 Artillery Battery Unit Point Values . 3 10.2.2 Central Group of Forces (CGF) . 9 8.2.2.4 Fixed-Wing Aircraft Point Values . 3 10.3 NATO OB . 9 9.0 The Scenarios . 3 10.3.1 NATO CENTAG (US 7th Army) . 9 9.1 Scenario Format . 3 10.3.2 NATO NORTHAG (BAOR) . 9 9.1.1 Situation . 3 NATO TO&E . 11 9.1.2 Map . 3 SOVIET TO&E . 15 9.1.3 Setup . 3 US Unit Summary Chart .
    [Show full text]