DOCSLIB.ORG

November 18, 1982 SUBJECT: ADOPTION of SEGMENT of F

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
November 18, 1982 SUBJECT: ADOPTION of SEGMENT of F Presented: November 18, 1982 Adopted: November 18, 1982 # 82-53 SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF SEGMENT OF RESOLUTION F ROUTE ALICNMENT FROM ANACOSTIA OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS TO CONGRESS HEIGHTS STATION OF THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has adopted a regional rapid transit system (ARS-68, as revised); and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on November 28, 1972 to consider that portion of the proposed Metro F Route from approximately 285 feet west of 3rd Street, S.W. to the Anacostia River including the Navy Yard Station; and WHEREAS, the Board on March 22, 1973 adopted that proposed alignment and station location and access; and WHEREAS, the Board on February 13, 1975 directed that an Environmental Impact Study be prepared for the F Route from Anacostia River to its terminus; and WHEREAS, during this period an alternative analysis was done by an independent Regional Steering Committee at the request of the Urban Mass Transportation Administration; and WHEREAS, the Section Designer for Section F-3 of the F Route, including the Navy Yard Station, in May 1976 submitted construction cost estimates to the Authority which were considerably in excess of the programmed amount; and WHEREAS, the Board on October 7, 1976 amended the Environmental Impact Study for the F Route from the Anacostia River to its terminus to permit inclusion of Section F-3 and F-4 and the consideration of additional Section F-3 through F-8 alternatives in the District and Prince George's County; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Consultant on January 6, 1977 presented to the Board a preliminary report which recommended that only the "Southern Crossing" of the Anacostia River Alternative for Sections F-3, 4 & 5 of the F Route should be carried forward into the second more detailed phase of the Environmental Impact Study; and WHEREAS,Supersededthe Board on January 13, 1977 accepted the preliminary report of the Environmental Consultant for that portion of the F Route from approximately South Capitol Street to heyond the Anacostia Station, and directed that more detailed environmental study be performed on the alternative designated "Southern Crossing"; and WHEREAS, the Board on January 26, 1977 reaffirmed its resolution of January 13, 1977 as stated above and directed that all other alter­ natives for that portion of the alignment from the vicinity of South Capitol Street to beyond the Anacostia Station, namely, the "ARS Crossing" -2- and the "Northern Crossing" be dropped from further environmental study. Additionally, the Board noted that the following alignments beyond the Anacostia Station are incompatible with the "Soutbern Crossing" alignment and therefore shall also be dropped from further environmental study. Rail Shuttle Concepts Branch Route in ARS Corridor with Rail Shuttle in "B" Corridor. Branch Route in "B" Corridor with Rail Shuttle in ARS Corridor. ARS Alignment from Anacostia River to Naylor Road Station Old "B" Alignment following llartin Luther King, Jr. Avenue and Wheeler Road out to its intersection with the St. Elizabeth - B Corridor Alignment beyond the Soutbern Avenue Station. AND that the followiog alignments through Anacostia beyond the Anacostia Station and into Prince George's County would continue to be studied. Suitland Parkway - D.C. and Maryland (ARS Modified in llaryland) to a Branch Avenue Terminal Station. St. Elizabeth, Soutbern Avenue, ARS (Modified) Suitland Parkway to a Branch Avenue Terminal Station. This alignment would have a Southern Avenue Station as a given station and a Naylor Road Station as a given or future station. St. Elizabeths "B" Alignment (Wheeler Road) to a St. Barnabas­ Beltway or a Rosecroft Terminal Station. WHEREAS, the Board of Directors and the District of Columbia Council conducted a public hearing on December 16, 1977 to elicit the views and comments of the public with respect to the Environmental Impact Study of that portion of the F Route from M and 3rd Streets, S.W. to the D.C. -SupersededMaryland Boundary; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors and the Priuce George's County Council conducted a puhlic hearing on December 20, 1977 to elicit the views and comments of the public with respect to the Environmental Impact Study of that portion of the F Route from the D.C. - Maryland Boundary to the terminus of the line in the vicinity of the Capital Beltway in Prince George's County, Maryland; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors on June 22, 1978 resolved that the "Southern Crossing" of the Anacostia River be adopted, said alignment to be in lieu of the ARS alignment and southbound of the -3- Anacostia station (Anacostia Freeway at Howard Road) would generally follow the southside of Suitland Parkway to a station in the District at Alabama Avenue and 13th Street, S.E.; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors on March 13, 1980 resolved that the adopted Regional System be further modified so that the Branch (F) Route in Prince George's County would follow the Rosecroft Align­ ment south of the Alabama Avenue station; and WHEREAS, a suit was filed in June 1980 challenging, among other things, the adequacy of the public notice for the December 1977 hearing; and WHEREAS, the United States District Court for the District of Maryland ruled that the notice of public hearing published for the December 1977 hearings in the District of Columhia and Prince George's County was inadequate as notice of a proposed change of alignment; and WHEREAS, the Court held that if the WMATA Board desired to alter the 1968 ARS F Route alignment, it would he necessary to conduct new public hearings for that purpose; and WHEREAS, the Board instructed the staff to prepare and hold the required public hearings and that the required public hearings were held in the District of Columbia (June 15, 1982) and in Prince George's County (June 16, 1982); and WHEREAS, in preparation for the June 1982 public hearings, the Board directed the staff to have prepared a Comparative Alignment Study for distribution to all interested agencies and the public and for use by the Board. In preparing the Comparative Alignment Study, previous studies, including, inter alia, the Environmental Impact Study (August 1977), the Alternatives Analysis (1976-77), the Environmental Impact Statement prepared thru the Urban Mass Transportation Administration in cooperation with the WMATA, were utilized and updated. In addition, testimony of previous and current F Route public hearings was also considered by the staff in preparing its Review of Public Hearings on the Relocation of the ARS Branch (F) Route in the District of Columbia and Prince George's County, Maryland, to an alternative Route Alignment Supersededto Rosecroft, October 1982; and WHEREAS, tbe Board has called staff briefings to review the history and analysis of the F Route, the various studies, the public hearings testimony and the final staff review; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors was furnished and has carefully considered copies of the transcripts of the said public hearing together with the comments and proposals received within ten (10) days after the public hearing date, and comments of agencies, organizations, government bodies, persons and their firms, whose views were solicited pursuant to Article VI, Section 15, of the Compact; and -4- WHEREAS, the Board was furnished copies of the Comparative Analysis and .. Review..... as well as other pertinent documents and studies; and WHEREAS, the Board has considered the various alternative F Route alignments from the Anacostia Station (at 1-295) to a terminus in Prince George's County; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the ARS F Route alignment is hereby revised and amended by the adoption of the alignment from the Anacostia Station (at 1-295) to the Congress Heights Station location at Alabama Avenue near St. Elizabeths Hospital, as set forth immediately below: This alignment would begin south of Martin Luther King, Jr. Avenue along the Suitland Parkway and would continue south and then southeast on surface and aerial structure along the southeast side of the Parkway and then onto the grounds of the St. Elizabeths Hospital complex. It would then continue south in subway under the southeast portion of the hospital grounds and Alabama Avenue, continue south in subway along the east side of 13th Street, proceed southeast on aerial over Mississippi Avenue and Oxon Run Park, and under Southern Avenue to the District of Columbia-Maryland boundary. The Congress Heights Station would be located in subway under Alabama Avenue with an entrance point immediately north of Alabama Avenue leading to a passageway and a single mezzanine in the center portion of the station. The passageway would connect to an additional entrance point south of Alabama Avenue via a tunnel under the Avenue. Off-street bus and kiss & ride facilities would be located north of Alabama Avenue. The Off-street facilities would be accessible from BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board finds that the proper and timely performance of its function requires that this resolution be effectiveSupersededimmediately. Motion by Mr. Downs, seconded by Mr. Hartlove, and unanimously approved, as amended. Ayes: 6 - Rev. Moore, Mr. Hartlove, Mrs. Grotos, Mr. Downs, Mr. Barnett, and Mr. Alexander Resolution 82-53 superseded by resolution 84-24.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sports Capital Week Sportscapital.Dc.Gov
    Sports Capital Week sportscapital.dc.gov June 28, 2018 1 NATIONALS PARK OTHER CAPITAL SW WATERFRONT DATE AREA EVENTS RIVERFRONT EVENTS EVENTS (See Map 2) (See Map 2) All Day Side by Side Event *Capital Fringe Festival Calendar: SW Neighborhood Capital Riverfront & Thursday, July 12 8:00 PM 8:00 PM SW Waterfront All-Star Summer Riverfest *Hatsune Miku Expo Movie Screening The Anthem Canal Park MLB FanFest will take place at (See Maps 2, 3, 4) (See Maps 2, 3, 4) the Convention Center from Friday (7/13) through Tuesday 10:00 AM – 7:00 PM 10:00 AM – 10:00 PM (7/17) *Play Ball Park *The Assembly The Yards Park Lot A The Wharf *Ticketed events Friday, July 13 7:00 PM 7:00 PM All Day *All-Star Armed *Bullpen Concert *Capital Fringe Festival Forces Classic Half Street Fairgrounds SW Neighborhood Nationals Park All-Star Summer Riverfest Concert: 19th Street Band Yards Park sportscapital.dc.gov 2 NATIONALS PARK OTHER CAPITAL SW WATERFRONT DATE AREA EVENTS RIVERFRONT EVENTS EVENTS (See Maps 2 3, 5, 6) (See Maps 2 3, 5, 6) (See Map 7) Side by Side Event Calendar: 8:00 AM 10:00 AM – 10:00 PM Capital Riverfront & *The Color Run MLB *Assembly SW Waterfront All-Star 5K The Wharf The Yards Park Lot A All Day All Day 10:00 AM – 7:00 PM All-Star Summer *Capital Fringe Festival MLB FanFest will take place at *Play Ball Park Riverfest SW Neighborhood the Convention Center from The Yards Park Lot A Yards Park Friday (7/13) through Tuesday Saturday, July 14 12:00 PM – 8:00 PM (7/17) DC All Star Music Festival Randall Park *Ticketed events 8:00 PM *DC United
    [Show full text]
  • B. Approval of Exchange of Property at Congress Heights Station
    Planning, Program Development and Real Estate Committee Item IV- B May 8, 2014 Approval of Exchange of Property at Congress Heights Station with the District of Columbia Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary MEAD Number: Action Information Resolution: 200751 Yes No TITLE: Exchange of Property at Congress Heights Metro PRESENTATION SUMMARY: To request Board approval for an exchange of property interests between the District of Columbia and Metro at the north entrance of the Congress Heights Metro station. PURPOSE: To request Board approval for an exchange of property interests between the District of Columbia and Metro at the north entrance of the Congress Heights Metro station in order for Metro to acquire fee simple interest to the land under a portion of its facilities and to allow the District to redesign the street grid immediately west of the station area. DESCRIPTION: Metro and the District of Columbia have agreed in principle to the redesign of the access to the north entrance of the Congress Heights station in conjunction with the District's redevelopment of its property immediately west of the station. As part of the project, the District will convey to Metro full legal ownership of the land under a portion of Metro's facilities at that entrance and Metro will convey a portion of its property to the District in order to facilitate the new street grid. Key Highlights: The exchange of property interests will formally complete the acquisition of full property interests for Metro at the north entrance of Congress Heights station Background and History: When Metro opened the Congress Heights Metro station as part of the opening of the last phase of the Green Line in 2001, Metro did not have full legal rights to the property on the north entrance to the station.
    [Show full text]
  • DC Circulator Service Changes for June 24, 2018 ‐ Responses To
    DC Circulator Service Changes for June 24, 2018 ‐ Responses to Public Comments ID Name Comment Response from DDOT I am a Ward 6 (Capitol Hill area) resident who will be working in Ward 8 beginning this summer. I support the proposed changes because they will improve 1 A Kaufman travel to and around Ward 8 while helping community members access vital services and increase the connectivity between Wards 6 & 8. I am a Ward 7 resident who will be working in Ward 8 beginning this summer. I support the proposed changes because they will improve travel to and around 2 AD Saunders Ward 8 while helping community members access vital services and community supports. This route directly affects me and my commute on a daily basis. 3 A Donovan This route would be a great addition, and a stop at the new Wharf development would be really helpful. The Union Station‐ Navy Yard route has low ridership, especially during the mid‐day and on weekends (17 passengers boarding per hour, tied for 4th in the system). It also currently serves areas that do not demand high‐ Dear DDOT, We live in NE on Capitol Hill and frequently use the Union Station‐Navy Yard Metro route to take our daughter to school. In the summer we use the frequency, all‐day service. From end to end, the trip on the route often to go to Nationals games and to go to Yards Park. The proposed changes would severely impact my family's ability to get our daughter to school and DC Circulator is 28 minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2020 Transit Development Plan
    DC Circulator Transit Development Plan 2020 Update April 12, 2021 (Page intentionally left blank) DC Circulator 2020 TDP i April 2021 Transit Development Plan 2020 Update DRAFT Table of Contents 1.046T 46T Introduction46T ..............................................................46T .................................................... 1 46T 46T Purpose of the Transit Development Plan (TDP)46T ..............................................................46T ............ 1 46T 46T Transit Development Plan Process46T ..............................................................46T ................................. 3 2.046T 46T DC Circulator System Overview46T ..............................................................46T ....................... 4 46T 46T History46T ..............................................................46T ............................................................................. 4 46T 46T Organizational Structure46T 46T ............................................................................................................... 6 46T 46T Strategic Goals and Objectives46T ..............................................................46T ....................................... 6 46T 46T Levels of Service46T 46T ............................................................................................................................ 8 46T 46T Fare Structure46T ..............................................................46T ............................................................... 10 46T 46T Fleet
    [Show full text]
  • Detection of Radioactivity in Transit Stations
    Transit IDEA Program Detection of Radioactivity in Transit Stations Final Report for Transit IDEA Project 42 Prepared by: Dr. Eric P. Rubenstein Advanced Fuel Research, Inc. East Hartford, CT October 2006 Innovations Deserving Exploratory Analysis (IDEA) Programs Managed by the Transportation Research Board This Transit IDEA project was funded by the Transit IDEA Program, which fosters development and testing of innovative concepts and methods for advancing transit practice. The Transit IDEA Program is funded by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) as part of the Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP), a cooperative effort of the FTA, the Transportation Research Board (TRB) and the Transit Development Corporation, a nonprofit educational and research organization of the American Public Transportation Association (APTA). The Transit IDEA Program is one of four IDEA programs managed by TRB. The other IDEA programs are listed below. • NCHRP Highway IDEA Program, which focuses on advances in the design, construction, safety, and maintenance of highway systems, is part of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program. • High-Speed Rail IDEA Program, which focuses on innovative methods and technology in support of the Federal Railroad Administration’s (FRA) next-generation high-speed rail technology development program. • Safety IDEA Program, which focuses on innovative approaches for improving railroad safety and inter- city bus and truck safety. The Safety IDEA program is funded by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Ad- ministration and the FRA. Management of the four IDEA programs is coordinated to promote the development and testing of innova- tive concepts, methods, and technologies. For information on the IDEA programs, look on the Internet at www.trb.org/idea or contact the IDEA programs office by telephone at (202) 334-3310 or by fax at (202) 334-3471.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington, DC
    GREENING AMERICA’S THE ANACOSTIA CAPITALS METRO STATION AREA Washington, D.C. Greening America’s Capitals is a project of the Partnership for Sustainable Communities between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) to help state capitals develop an implementable vision of distinctive, environmentally friendly neighborhoods that incorporate innovative green building and green infrastructure strategies. EPA is providing this design assistance to help support sustainable communities that protect the environment, economy, and public health and to inspire state leaders to expand this work elsewhere. Greening America’s Capitals will help communities consider ways to incorporate sustainable design strategies into their planning and development to create and enhance interesting, distinctive neighborhoods that have multiple social, economic, and environmental benefits. Washington, D.C., was chosen in 2011 as one of five state capital cities to receive this assistance along with Montgomery, Alabama; Phoenix, Arizona; Jackson, Mississippi; and Lincoln, Nebraska. More information is at http://www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/greencapitals.htm. table of contents Executive Summary 1 Project Goals 3 Workshop 4 Site Analysis 6 Design Concepts 20 Case Studies 35 Next Steps 39 Appendix A: Workshop Sketches 40 Appendix B: South Capitol Street Project 44 Appendix C: Green Infrastructure Strategies 46 Greening America’s Capitals acknowledgments EPA DC
    [Show full text]
  • DHS HQ Consolidation at St. Elizabeths
    General Services Administration and Department of Homeland Security THE DHS HEADQUARTERS CONSOLIDATION AT ST. ELIZABETHS DRAFT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WASHINGTON, DC MAY 2020 DRAFT DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY HEADQUARTERS CONSOLIDATION AT ST. ELIZABETHS MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT 2 SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT PREPARED BY: U.S. General Services Administration National Capital Region IN COOPERATION WITH: Department of Homeland Security National Capital Planning Commission District of Columbia Department of Transportation May 8, 2020 This page intentionally left blank. Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Department Of Homeland Security Headquarters Consolidation at St. Elizabeths Master Plan Amendment 2 Responsible Agency: U.S. General Services Administration National Capital Region 1800 F Street, NW Washington, DC 20407 In Cooperation With: Department of Homeland Security National Capital Planning Commission District of Columbia Department of Transportation The U.S. General Services Administration is studying the impacts resulting from implementation of the proposed amendment (Master Plan Amendment 2) to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Headquarters Consolidation Master Plan in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act. Master Plan Amendment 2 re-evaluates development on the St. Elizabeths West Campus in Southeast Washington, DC, to accommodate 4.1 million gross square feet (gsf) of secure office and shared-use space, and 1.6 million gsf of associated parking. This Draft
    [Show full text]
  • The Operator's Story Appendix: Washington DC's Story
    Railway and Transport Strategy Centre The Operator’s Story Appendix: Washington DC’s Story © World Bank / Imperial College London Property of the World Bank and the RTSC at Imperial College London The Operator’s Story: Notes from Washington DC Case Study Interviews March 2017 Purpose The purpose of this document is to provide a permanent record for the researchers of what was said by people interviewed for ‘The Operator’s Story’ in Washington DC. These notes are based upon meetings between 13th – 16th June 2016. This document will ultimately form an appendix to the final report for ‘The Operator’s Story’ piece Although the findings have been arranged and structured by Imperial College London, they remain a collation of thoughts and statements from interviewees, and continue to be the opinions of those interviewed, rather than of Imperial College London. Prefacing the notes is a summary of Imperial College’s key findings based on comments made, which will be drawn out further in the final report for ‘The Operator’s Story’. Method This content is a collation in note form of views expressed in the interviews that were conducted for this study. Comments are not attributed to specific individuals, as agreed with the interviewees and WMATA. However, in some cases it is noted that a comment was made by an individual external not employed by WMATA (‘external commentator’), where it is appropriate to draw a distinction between views expressed by WMATA themselves and those expressed about their organisation. The Operator’s Story: Washington DC Case Study 2 Key Messages: Relevance to International Learning about Metro Operators This case study illustrates a large variety of international lessons about metro operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 District-Wide Planning Page ______Planning Process
    Chapter 2 District-wide Planning Page ________________________________________________________________________ Planning Process ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 39 Planning to the District’s Competitive Strengths .............................................................................................................................................................................. 43 A Green City ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 43 A Creative City.................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 45 An International City .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 46 A City of Public Places ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 47 A City of Distinctive Neighborhoods ................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • June-2016-Trinity-Metro-Survey-All
    Trinity Campus Community Survey on Metro SafeTrack Issues June 2016 Q1 I am a Answered: 310 Skipped: 2 Staff Adjunct Faculty CAS Student FT Faculty Trinity Ctr CED STUDENT BGS Student EDU Student NHP Student SPS Student Answer Choices Responses CAS Student 40.32% 125 SPS Student 12.90% 40 NHP Student 4.19% 13 EDU Student 9.68% 30 BGS Student 4.52% 14 CED STUDENT 1.29% 4 Trinity Ctr 0.32% 1 FT Faculty 4.84% 15 Adjunct Faculty 3.87% 12 Staff 18.06% 56 Total 310 # Other (please specify) Date 1 Entering Fall 2016 6/19/2016 10:37 AM 2 I also teach one course 6/16/2016 10:46 AM 3 Occupational therapy 6/12/2016 10:43 AM 4 MA school counseling 6/11/2016 10:26 AM 5 Graduate Student-MOT 6/11/2016 9:50 AM 6 Cas and nhp student 6/8/2016 8:20 AM 7 Instructional Staff 6/7/2016 2:27 PM 8 MOT student 6/7/2016 2:22 PM 1 / 10 Trinity Campus Community Survey on Metro SafeTrack Issues June 2016 Q2 I get to Trinity on Metro trains Answered: 310 Skipped: 2 Answer Choices Responses Every Day 36.45% 113 A few times a week 24.52% 76 A few times a month 17.74% 55 Never 21.29% 66 Total 310 2 / 10 Trinity Campus Community Survey on Metro SafeTrack Issues June 2016 Q3 If you do not take Metro trains to Trinity, please indicate your primary mode of transportation: Answered: 216 Skipped: 96 Answer Choices Responses Personal car 58.33% 126 Ride share or carpool 9.72% 21 Bike 0.46% 1 Walk 3.24% 7 Metro Bus (see below to add route number) 28.24% 61 Total 216 # Please indicate the bus lines you ride to Trinity: Date 1 92,80,70,79,H2,H3,H4 9/16/2016 6:07 PM 2 D8 80 8/29/2016
    [Show full text]
  • Priority Corridor Network Plan
    Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Priority Corridor Network Plan PRIORITY CORRIDOR NETWORK PLAN Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority PRIORITY CORRIDOR NETWORK PLAN Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority THE NEED FOR IMPROVED BUS SERVICES The Washington metropolitan area has Figure 1: Transit Modes Used Figure 2: Metrorail, Metrobus, and been growing steadily for the past 30 years Local Service Areas and is expected to continue to grow. Accord- ing to Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (MWCOG) estimates, jobs are expected to increase by 31 percent between 2008 and 2030, and population is expected to grow 26 percent over the same period. How- ever, the region is not growing uniformly. The outer suburbs are expected to grow much faster than the regional core, with dramatic increases in population and employment. The regional core and inner suburbs will still have the highest concentrations of jobs in 2030, but the inner and outer suburbs will have the ma- jority of the population. per year, and is expected to continue to grow Between 2000 and 2008, travel time by Me- as population and employment increase. This trobus has increased due to growing conges- The growth in population and employment growth has led to challenges for the Metrobus and the pattern of growth both are contribut- tion. For example, Route 52 on Fourteenth service. Not only has demand been increas- Street in Washington DC experienced nearly ing to increased vehicle travel. More people ing, but the added traffic congestion stem- are traveling longer distances to reach their a 14 percent increase in travel time, Route ming from regional growth has been increas- 29K on Little River Turnpike/Duke Street in places of employment and other destinations.
    [Show full text]
  • Congress Heights Station Apartment Renovation/ Addition
    Congress Heights Station Apartment Renovation/Addition Transportation Impact Study February 25,2014 927 15th Street, NW Sude900 Wsshmgton, DC 20005 Phone 202 370 6000 Fax 202 370 6001 mat/ www symmetradestgn com Board of ZoningBoard Adjustment of Zoning Adjustment District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia CASE NO.18731 Case No. 18731 EXHIBIT NO.25C 25C Congress He1ghts Stat1on Transportation Assessment Washmgton, DC February 25, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 Scope of Study 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 5 Ex1stmg Roadway Network 5 Transit Serv1ces 8 Pedestnan Fac1ht1es and Cond1t1ons 11 B1cycle Fac1l1t1es 14 Parkmg 14 Off-Street 14 On-Street 14 Refuse and Recycle Collect1on 18 Pavement Ma rkmgs 18 13th Street and Alabama Avenue 19 13th Street and Savannah Street 20 1 13 h Street and Congress Street 21 Congress Street and Savannah Street 22 Congress Street and Alabama Avenue .22 S1gnage 23 SAFETY ... 25 Crash HIStory 25 CONGRESS HEIGHTS STATION APARTMENT RENOVATION/ADDITION 27 S1te Access 27 Future Parkmg Supply. ........30 Loadmg 31 Tnp Generation 31 TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT 38 Board of Zoning Adjustment Page Iii District of Columbia Case No. 18731 25C Congress He1ghts Stat1on Transportation Assessment Washmgton, DC February 25, 2014 CONClUSIONS 39 LIST OF FIGURES F1gure 1 S1te location 3 F1gure 2 Aenal of S1te 4 F1gure 3 lane Conf1gu rat1on and Traff1c Control 7 F1gure 4 Transit Serv1ces 10 F1gure 5 Photograph of Sidewalk along Alabama Avenue north s1de lookmg east 11 F1gure 6 Pedestnan Fac1llt1es 13 F1gure 7 Parkmg Study Area 15
    [Show full text]