DOCSLIB.ORG

DHS HQ Consolidation at St. Elizabeths

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DHS HQ Consolidation at St. Elizabeths General Services Administration and Department of Homeland Security THE DHS HEADQUARTERS CONSOLIDATION AT ST. ELIZABETHS DRAFT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WASHINGTON, DC MAY 2020 DRAFT DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY HEADQUARTERS CONSOLIDATION AT ST. ELIZABETHS MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT 2 SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT PREPARED BY: U.S. General Services Administration National Capital Region IN COOPERATION WITH: Department of Homeland Security National Capital Planning Commission District of Columbia Department of Transportation May 8, 2020 This page intentionally left blank. Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Department Of Homeland Security Headquarters Consolidation at St. Elizabeths Master Plan Amendment 2 Responsible Agency: U.S. General Services Administration National Capital Region 1800 F Street, NW Washington, DC 20407 In Cooperation With: Department of Homeland Security National Capital Planning Commission District of Columbia Department of Transportation The U.S. General Services Administration is studying the impacts resulting from implementation of the proposed amendment (Master Plan Amendment 2) to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Headquarters Consolidation Master Plan in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act. Master Plan Amendment 2 re-evaluates development on the St. Elizabeths West Campus in Southeast Washington, DC, to accommodate 4.1 million gross square feet (gsf) of secure office and shared-use space, and 1.6 million gsf of associated parking. This Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement evaluates the No Action Alternative and two Action Alternatives. Questions or comments on the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement should be addressed to: Attention: Mr. Paul Gyamfi Office of Planning and Design Quality Public Buildings Service – National Capital Region U.S. General Services Administration 1800 F Street, NW, Room 4400 Washington, DC 20407 [email protected] If you wish to comment on the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement, you may submit comments electronically or directly by mail. Comments on the Draft Supplemental EIS must be postmarked or sent electronically by July 2, 2020. Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment – including your personal identifying information – may be made public at any time. While you may request in your comment that your personal identifying information be withheld from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. This page intentionally left blank. DHS Headquarters Consolidation at St. Elizabeths Master Plan Amendment 2 Executive Summary INTRODUCTION The U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) prepared this Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to assess impacts of the proposed amendment (Master Plan Amendment 2) to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Headquarters Consolidation Master Plan (Master Plan) at St. Elizabeths in Southeast Washington, DC. The No Action alternative and the proposed action alternatives at the St. Elizabeths West Campus are studied in detail in the Draft Supplemental EIS. The Draft Supplemental EIS has been prepared pursuant to: • The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) • Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations to implement NEPA contained in Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) 1500 to 1508 • GSA Public Buildings Service NEPA Desk Guide The original Master Plan was completed in December 2008 and called for DHS Headquarters components to be co-located in 4.5 million gross square feet (gsf) of office and ancillary space along with 1.5 million gsf of associated parking on the St. Elizabeths West and East Campuses in Southeast Washington, DC (GSA, 2008a). The Master Plan was amended in 2012 (Master Plan Amendment 1) to specify the development of 750,000 gsf of the 4.5 million gsf office space, plus associated parking, on the St. Elizabeths East Campus (East Campus) North Parcel to house the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (GSA, 2012b). Master Plan Amendment 2 eliminates development on the East Campus and re-evaluates development on the St. Elizabeths West Campus (West Campus) to accommodate 4.1 million gsf of secure office and shared-use space, and 1.6 million gsf of associated parking on the West Campus only. ES.1 PURPOSE AND NEED The GSA has prepared this Draft Supplemental EIS to assess impacts of the proposed Master Plan Amendment 2 to the Master Plan) (GSA, 2008a; GSA, 2012). The proposed Master Plan Amendment 2 eliminates development on the East Campus and re-evaluates development on the West Campus to accommodate 4.1 million gsf of secure office and shared-use space, and 1.6 million gsf of associated parking on the West Campus only. Draft Supplemental EIS i May 2020 DHS Headquarters Consolidation at St. Elizabeths Master Plan Amendment 2 As this document is a supplement to the Master Plan Amendment 1 EIS (2012 EIS), it focuses on the impacts of building on the plateau site of the West Campus as well as impacts of constructing a facility on the Sweetgum Lane site on the western side of the West Campus as shown in Figure 1-1. This Draft Supplemental EIS does not include impacts from site-specific actions already included in the 2008 Record of Decision (ROD) for the 2008 Final EIS on the St. Elizabeths Campus Master Plan for the Consolidated Headquarters of the Department of Homeland Security (2008 EIS). GSA’s purpose for this proposed action is to support the continued consolidation of the DHS Headquarters offices at the West Campus. The proposed action is needed for efficiency, to reflect the current condition of the historic buildings, to reduce costs, and to accelerate completion of the DHS consolidation. ES.2 ALTERNATIVES GSA has developed alternatives to construct 1.2 million gsf of secure office space on the plateau site, and 175,000 gsf of secure office space on the Sweetgum Lane site. The alternative development process resulted in the following alternatives being studied in detail in the Draft Supplemental EIS. ES.2.1 No Action Alternative No Action—GSA would develop the West Campus as described in the Master Plan as approved by NCPC on January 8, 2009. This would provide for the following on St. Elizabeths: • Development of 1,141,133 gsf of office and related space on the plateau site • No development on the Sweetgum Lane site • Parking at a ratio of one space for every four employees (1:4) resulting in 1.3 million gsf of parking above and below grade The development of office space and parking on the North Parcel of the East Campus, originally included in Master Plan Amendment 1, is no longer feasible and not part of the No Action Alternative. ES.2.2 Action Alternatives Alternative A—GSA would develop the plateau and Sweetgum Lane sites on the West Campus as follows: • 1.2 million gsf of secure office space within the plateau site organized into three separate office structures • 175,000 gsf of office space on the Sweetgum Lane site Draft Supplemental EIS ii May 2020 DHS Headquarters Consolidation at St. Elizabeths Master Plan Amendment 2 Alternative B—GSA would develop the plateau and Sweetgum Lane sites on the West Campus as follows: • 1.2 million gsf of secure office space within the plateau site in two separate office structures with enclosed courtyards • 175,000 gsf of office space on the Sweetgum Lane site Alternative A and Alternative B would each include the following improvements: • An additional 1,014 employee parking spaces on the West Campus resulting in a 1:4 parking ratio • Sidewalk along streets and walkways between buildings • Specific improvements to the ravine including enhanced pedestrian connections and landscaping • Engineering for stabilization of steep slopes including building foundations • Realignment of site drainages and landscaping in response to building design • Shuttle bus drop-off locations • Shipping/receiving areas for buildings • Electric power, communications, and utility corridors designed for buildings and site improvements • Stormwater management controls ES.3 SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES Potential direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts associated with each of the alternatives are assessed in this Draft Supplemental EIS. A comparison of these impacts for each alternative is provided below. Detailed information on impacts is located in Chapter 4, Environmental Consequences. Draft Supplemental EIS iii May 2020 DHS Headquarters Consolidation at St. Elizabeths Master Plan Amendment 2 Issue No Action Alternative Alternatives A and B Natural Resources • No impacts to geology • No impacts to geology • Direct, long-term, negligible, adverse • Direct, long-term, minor adverse impacts to impacts to topography from grading topography and construction activities • Direct and indirect, long-term, minor, • Direct, long-term, minor, adverse adverse impacts from the removal of soils impact from removal of soils • Disturbance of 1 acre of soil by demolition • Total soil disturbance of 6 acres • Total soil disturbance from construction of • Direct, long-term, negligible adverse 8 acres under Alternative A and 9 acres impact from soil erosion under Alternative B Geology, • • Direct, long-term, moderate, adverse Topography, No indirect impact to geology and impacts due to soil erosion and risk of slope and Soils topography failure (Section 4.2.1) • Indirect, minor, adverse impact from soil erosion • No indirect
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nichols Design Associates, Inc. EXHIBIT: 4
    Nichols Design Associates, Inc. Mount Pleasant Library Report EXHIBIT: 4 Mount Pleasant Fire Safety Articles/Press Releases (a) Washington Post: DeauvilleApts: 2008.03.14 (b) DCPL Press Release: 2008.03.13 (c) WTOP “Trouble spots”: 2009.08.13 (d) DC FEMS Press Release: 2002.06.30 (e) Washington Post: DCFD & WASA: 2007.10.05 (f) US Red Cross Announcement: 2009.03.18 D.C. Blaze Displaces Nearly 200 - washingtonpost.com http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/13/AR... Sign In | Register Now TODAY'S NEWSPAPER Subscribe | PostPoints NEWS POLITICS OPINIONS BUSINESS LOCAL SPORTS ARTS & LIVING GOING OUT GUIDE JOBS CARS REAL ESTATE RENTALS CLASSIFIEDS SEARCH: | Search Archives washingtonpost.com > Metro > The District » THIS STORY: READ + | WATCH + | Comments D.C. Blaze Displaces Nearly 200 Northwest Apartment Building Had History of Code Violations By Petula Dvorak and Allison Klein GALLERY Washington Post Staff Writers Friday, March 14, 2008 The fire that ripped through a four-story apartment building in Mount Pleasant yesterday, leaving almost 200 people homeless, came after years of complaints about living conditions from tenants and the D.C. government. Business Jobs Legal Jobs THIS STORY Computer Jobs Management Jobs D.C. Blaze Displaces Nearly 200 Construction Jobs Media Jobs How to Help Education Jobs Non-Profit Jobs Engineering Jobs Sales Jobs Fire Destroyed Mount Pleasant Apartment Building Healthcare Jobs Science Jobs Fire Destroyed Mount Pleasant Apartment View All Items in This Story Find Your Dream Job Now! Building keywords location A major fire a year ago today ravaged a Mount Pleasant In recent months, the owners of the apartment building, displacing nearly 200 people.
    [Show full text]
  • B. Approval of Exchange of Property at Congress Heights Station
    Planning, Program Development and Real Estate Committee Item IV- B May 8, 2014 Approval of Exchange of Property at Congress Heights Station with the District of Columbia Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary MEAD Number: Action Information Resolution: 200751 Yes No TITLE: Exchange of Property at Congress Heights Metro PRESENTATION SUMMARY: To request Board approval for an exchange of property interests between the District of Columbia and Metro at the north entrance of the Congress Heights Metro station. PURPOSE: To request Board approval for an exchange of property interests between the District of Columbia and Metro at the north entrance of the Congress Heights Metro station in order for Metro to acquire fee simple interest to the land under a portion of its facilities and to allow the District to redesign the street grid immediately west of the station area. DESCRIPTION: Metro and the District of Columbia have agreed in principle to the redesign of the access to the north entrance of the Congress Heights station in conjunction with the District's redevelopment of its property immediately west of the station. As part of the project, the District will convey to Metro full legal ownership of the land under a portion of Metro's facilities at that entrance and Metro will convey a portion of its property to the District in order to facilitate the new street grid. Key Highlights: The exchange of property interests will formally complete the acquisition of full property interests for Metro at the north entrance of Congress Heights station Background and History: When Metro opened the Congress Heights Metro station as part of the opening of the last phase of the Green Line in 2001, Metro did not have full legal rights to the property on the north entrance to the station.
    [Show full text]
  • DC Circulator Service Changes for June 24, 2018 ‐ Responses To
    DC Circulator Service Changes for June 24, 2018 ‐ Responses to Public Comments ID Name Comment Response from DDOT I am a Ward 6 (Capitol Hill area) resident who will be working in Ward 8 beginning this summer. I support the proposed changes because they will improve 1 A Kaufman travel to and around Ward 8 while helping community members access vital services and increase the connectivity between Wards 6 & 8. I am a Ward 7 resident who will be working in Ward 8 beginning this summer. I support the proposed changes because they will improve travel to and around 2 AD Saunders Ward 8 while helping community members access vital services and community supports. This route directly affects me and my commute on a daily basis. 3 A Donovan This route would be a great addition, and a stop at the new Wharf development would be really helpful. The Union Station‐ Navy Yard route has low ridership, especially during the mid‐day and on weekends (17 passengers boarding per hour, tied for 4th in the system). It also currently serves areas that do not demand high‐ Dear DDOT, We live in NE on Capitol Hill and frequently use the Union Station‐Navy Yard Metro route to take our daughter to school. In the summer we use the frequency, all‐day service. From end to end, the trip on the route often to go to Nationals games and to go to Yards Park. The proposed changes would severely impact my family's ability to get our daughter to school and DC Circulator is 28 minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • THE STREETS of WASHINGTON DC 10Th Pl SE 10Th Street NE
    THE STREETS OF WASHINGTON DC 10th Pl SE 10th Street NE 10th Street NE 10th Street NE 10th Street NW 10th Street NW 10th Street NW 10th Street NW 10th Street SE 10th Street SW 11th Pl NE 11th Pl NE 11th Pl SE 11th Street NE 11th Street NE 11th Street NE 11th Street NW 11 th Street NW 11th Street SE 12th Pl NE 12th Pl NE 12th Pl NE 12th Pl NW 12th Pl SE 12th Pl SE 12th Street Expressway 12th Street NE 12th Street NE 12th Street NE 12th Street NE 12th Street NW 12th Street NW 12th Street NW 12th Street NW 12th Street NW 12th Street SE 12th Street SE 12th Street SW 13 1/2nd Street NW 13th Pl NE 13th Pl NE 13th Pl NW 13th Pl NW 13th Pl SE 13th Street NE 13th Street NE 13th Street NE 13th Street NW 13th Street NW 13th Street NW 13th Street NW 13th Street NW 13th Street SE 13th Street SE 13th Street SE 13th Street SW 14t h Pl NE 14th Pl NW 14th Pl SE 14th Pl SE 14th Street NE 14th Street NE 14th Street NE 14th Street NW 14th Street NW 14th Street NW 14th Street NW 14th Street NW 14th Street NW 14th Street SE 14th Street SE 14th Street SW 15th Pl NW 15th Pl SE 15th Street NE 15th Street NE 15th Street NE 15th Street NW 15th Street NW 15th Street NW 15th Street NW 15th Street NW 15th Street SE 15th Street SE 15th Street SE 15th Street SW 16th Pl NE 16th Street NE 16th Street NE 16th Street NE 16th Street NW 16th Street NW 16th Street NW 16th Street NW 16th Street NW 16th Street NW 16th Street NW 16th Street SE 16th Street SE 17th Pl NE 17th Pl NE 17th Pl SE 17th Pl SE 17th Street NE 17th Street NE 17th Street NE 17th Street NE 17th Street NW 17th
    [Show full text]
  • NACE National Capital Parks - East ROAD INVENTORY (1100 SERIES FMSS LOCATIONS)
    Page 1 of 12 Cycle 6 NPS / RIP Route ID Report Report Date: 10/08/2019 (Numerical By Summary Route and Subcomponent #) Shading Color Key White = Paved Routes, DCV Driven Grey = Paved Routes, DCV not Driven Black = Non-NPS Routes = Concession Route Yellow = Unpaved Routes, DCV not Driven Blue = Paved Parking Areas Green = Unpaved Parking Areas DCV = Data Collection Vehicle Red text denotes: MRL = Manually Rated Line *Unpaved route data (mileages and square footage) were collected by the Road Inventory Program (RIP) MRP = Manually Rated Polygon only when the Cycle Collected is "6", otherwise the unpaved information was provided by NPS. PKG = Parking Areas NC = Not Collected NACE National Capital Parks - East ROAD INVENTORY (1100 SERIES FMSS LOCATIONS) Route FMSS Route Description Maintenance Paved Unpaved Total Area Surf. Area Route Name District No. Number FLTP Miles Miles Mileage (SQ FT) Type Map Cycle Collected Iteration Collected Functional Class Concession From To 0012 6 2 51896 KENILWORTH PARK ACCESS FROM DEANE AVENUE NE AND TO END AT BARRIER AT MP KENILWORTH YES 0.78 0.32 1.10 3 AS 2 LEE STREET SPUR ON RIGHT 1.10 PARK 0013 6 2 52184 ANACOSTIA DRIVE FROM MIDDLE OF FREDERICK TO END OF ROUTE 0016ZZ ANACOSTIA PARK YES 2.05 0.04 2.09 1 AS 1 DOUGLAS BRIDGE OVERPASS (S (ANACOSTIA PAVILION CAPITAL STREET) LOOP ROAD) AND ROUTE 0908 (ANACOSTIA BOAT RAMP PARKING) 0014 6 2 52188 GOOD HOPE ROAD FROM PARK BOUNDARY TO ROUTE 0013 ANACOSTIA PARK YES 0.07 0 0.07 1 AS 1 (NORTHWEST SIDE OF I-295 (ANACOSTIA DRIVE) OVERPASS) 0015 6 2 52192 NICHOLSON STREET
    [Show full text]
  • The 2020 Transit Development Plan
    DC Circulator Transit Development Plan 2020 Update April 12, 2021 (Page intentionally left blank) DC Circulator 2020 TDP i April 2021 Transit Development Plan 2020 Update DRAFT Table of Contents 1.046T 46T Introduction46T ..............................................................46T .................................................... 1 46T 46T Purpose of the Transit Development Plan (TDP)46T ..............................................................46T ............ 1 46T 46T Transit Development Plan Process46T ..............................................................46T ................................. 3 2.046T 46T DC Circulator System Overview46T ..............................................................46T ....................... 4 46T 46T History46T ..............................................................46T ............................................................................. 4 46T 46T Organizational Structure46T 46T ............................................................................................................... 6 46T 46T Strategic Goals and Objectives46T ..............................................................46T ....................................... 6 46T 46T Levels of Service46T 46T ............................................................................................................................ 8 46T 46T Fare Structure46T ..............................................................46T ............................................................... 10 46T 46T Fleet
    [Show full text]
  • Public Land for Public Good
    PUBLIC LAND FOR PUBLIC GOOD Making the Most of City Land to Meet Affordable Housing Needs Coalition for Smarter Growth October 2012 Coalition for Smarter Growth DC • MD • VA PUBLIC LAND FOR PUBLIC GOOD Making the Most of City Land to Meet Affordable Housing Needs October 2012 Other housing reports by the Coalition for Smarter Growth Affordable Housing Production on Public Land for the District of Columbia: Results and Opportunities June 2012 What’s Affordable “Workforce Housing” for the District of Columbia? PRINCIPAL AUTHORS Cheryl Cort, Matt Schuneman, and Stewart Schwartz March 2012 with assistance from Carla Maria Kayanan and Marion Phillips Building Stronger Communities: Moving Toward a Comprehensive Housing Strategy for Prince ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors and the Coalition for Smarter Growth are solely George’s County 2010 responsible for the content of this report. Our donors, including the foundations that provide general support for our Ensuring Housing Opportunities in Fairfax: Making work, were not involved in the drafting of the report and bear the Most of the One Penny Fund by Serving Working Families with the Greatest Need no responsibility for the content. 2007 With this in mind, we wish to thank the Prince Charitable Affordable Housing Isn’t Cheap: The Status of Need for Dedicated Local Revenue for Affordable Trusts, the Naomi and Nehemiah Cohen Foundation, The Morris Housing Production and Preservation in the and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation, the Community Foundation Washington D.C. Region for the National Capital Region, the Share Fund, and the March 2005 MARPAT Foundation. The Affordable Housing Progress Report: What the Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 District-Wide Planning Page ______Planning Process
    Chapter 2 District-wide Planning Page ________________________________________________________________________ Planning Process ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 39 Planning to the District’s Competitive Strengths .............................................................................................................................................................................. 43 A Green City ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 43 A Creative City.................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 45 An International City .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 46 A City of Public Places ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 47 A City of Distinctive Neighborhoods ................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Dupont Park Historic Resources Study Final Robinson & Associates
    Fort Dupont Park Historic Resources Study Final Robinson & Associates, Inc. November 1, 2004 Page 1 ______________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS I. LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS 2 II. PURPOSE AND METHODOLOGY 5 III. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANCE 6 IV. HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT 20 1. Pre-Civil War History 20 2. 1861-65: The Civil War and Construction of Fort Dupont 25 3. Post-Civil War Changes to Washington and its Forts 38 4. The Planning and Construction of the Fort Drive 48 5. Creation of Fort Dupont Park 75 6. 1933-42: The Civilian Conservation Corps Camp at Fort Dupont Park 103 7. 1942-45: Antiaircraft Artillery Command Positioned in Fort Dupont Park 116 8. History of the Golf Course 121 9. 1938 through the 1970s: Continued Development of Fort Dupont Park 131 10. Recreational, Cultural, and African-American Family Use of Fort Dupont Park 145 11. Proposals for the Fort Circle Parks 152 12. Description of Fort Dupont Park Landscape Characteristics, Buildings and Structures 155 V. BIBLIOGRAPHY 178 VI. KEY PARK LEGISLATION 191 Fort Dupont Park Historic Resources Study Final Robinson & Associates, Inc. November 1, 2004 Page 2 ______________________________________________________________________________________ I. LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1 Fort Dupont Park is located in the southeast quadrant of Washington, D.C. 7 Figure 2 Fort Dupont Park urban context, 1995 8 Figure 3 Map of current Fort Dupont Park resources 19 Figure 4 Detail of the 1856-59 Boschke Topographical Map 24 Figure 5 Detail
    [Show full text]
  • June-2016-Trinity-Metro-Survey-All
    Trinity Campus Community Survey on Metro SafeTrack Issues June 2016 Q1 I am a Answered: 310 Skipped: 2 Staff Adjunct Faculty CAS Student FT Faculty Trinity Ctr CED STUDENT BGS Student EDU Student NHP Student SPS Student Answer Choices Responses CAS Student 40.32% 125 SPS Student 12.90% 40 NHP Student 4.19% 13 EDU Student 9.68% 30 BGS Student 4.52% 14 CED STUDENT 1.29% 4 Trinity Ctr 0.32% 1 FT Faculty 4.84% 15 Adjunct Faculty 3.87% 12 Staff 18.06% 56 Total 310 # Other (please specify) Date 1 Entering Fall 2016 6/19/2016 10:37 AM 2 I also teach one course 6/16/2016 10:46 AM 3 Occupational therapy 6/12/2016 10:43 AM 4 MA school counseling 6/11/2016 10:26 AM 5 Graduate Student-MOT 6/11/2016 9:50 AM 6 Cas and nhp student 6/8/2016 8:20 AM 7 Instructional Staff 6/7/2016 2:27 PM 8 MOT student 6/7/2016 2:22 PM 1 / 10 Trinity Campus Community Survey on Metro SafeTrack Issues June 2016 Q2 I get to Trinity on Metro trains Answered: 310 Skipped: 2 Answer Choices Responses Every Day 36.45% 113 A few times a week 24.52% 76 A few times a month 17.74% 55 Never 21.29% 66 Total 310 2 / 10 Trinity Campus Community Survey on Metro SafeTrack Issues June 2016 Q3 If you do not take Metro trains to Trinity, please indicate your primary mode of transportation: Answered: 216 Skipped: 96 Answer Choices Responses Personal car 58.33% 126 Ride share or carpool 9.72% 21 Bike 0.46% 1 Walk 3.24% 7 Metro Bus (see below to add route number) 28.24% 61 Total 216 # Please indicate the bus lines you ride to Trinity: Date 1 92,80,70,79,H2,H3,H4 9/16/2016 6:07 PM 2 D8 80 8/29/2016
    [Show full text]
  • List of Advisory Neighborhood Commissioners in the November 3, 2020 General Election
    List of Advisory Neighborhood Commissioners in the November 3, 2020 General Election ANC/SMD Name Address Zip Phone Email Address Date of Pick-up Date Filed 1A01 Layla Bonnot 1434 Parkwood Pl., NW 20010 703-217-1181 [email protected] 7/20/20 8/4/20 1A02 Dieter Lehmann Morales 1445 Oak Street, NW 20010 214-620-1422 [email protected] 6/29/20 1/31/20 1A03 Zach Rybarczyk 1400 Irving Street, NW 20010 202-567-7091 [email protected] 6/29/20 8/4/20 1A04 Chris Hall 3549 Holmead Place, NW 20010 202-577-1143 [email protected] 7/28/20 8/4/20 1A05 Karyn C. Miller 1530 Monroe Street, NW 20010 202-809-3388 [email protected] 6/26/20 7/31/20 1A06 Judson Wood 1360 Kenyon Street, NW 20010 615-513-8820 [email protected] 6/26/20 7/10/20 1A07 Mukta Ghorpadey 3524 11th Street, NW 20010 339-225-1499 [email protected] 6/30/20 7/23/20 1A08 Kent Boese 608 Rock Creek Church Rd., NW 20010 202-904-8111 6/29/20 7/6/20 1A09 Michael Wray 743 Morton Street, NW 20010 202-807-7310 [email protected] 6/26/20 7/27/20 1A10 Rashida E. Brown 430 Irving Street, NW 20010 202-903-4561 [email protected] 6/30/20 7/13/20 1A11 Dotti Love Wade 1116 Columbia Rd., NW 20009 202-640-3627 [email protected] 7/10/20 8/5/20 1A12 1B01 Larry Handerhan 533 U Street, NW 20001 202-599-4930 [email protected] 7/21/20 8/3/20 1B02 Daniel C.
    [Show full text]
  • Day Trips Washington Is Located in an Area That Is Rich in Historic Lore And
    c Washington is located in an area that is rich in historic lore and natural beauty. From much of this can be found within a short drive from the city. Get off the main roads and the bustling sounds of a Chesapeake Bay harbor to the utter stillness of a Blue Ridge wander slowly across the country. You may be surprised what you find. To start you Day Trips mountaintop, from the small, old tobacco farms of southern Maryland to the grand on your way, here are a few day trips to areas, all but one of which are maintained by estates of Virginia's hunt country, you will find a richness of scenery and history. And the National Park Service, that you may find interesting. Antietam National Battlefield Site Tourmobile Service The park is 40 kilometers (25 miles) from Frederick, Md., (15 miles) from Washington at 9200 Old Dominion Drive. Parking in downtown Washington is severely limited, and via Alt. U.S. 40 and Md. 34. In one of the bloodiest, most Open from dawn to dusk daily. 759-2915. searching for a parking space can be frustrating. To ferocious battles of the war, Robert E. Lee was stopped complement the public transportation system the from invading the North. Five days later, Lincoln Greenbelt Park National Park Service provides concessioner-operated announced that on January 1, 1863, he would issue the Take exit 2 3 of the Capital Beltway (I-495), south on Tourmobile service that stops at all major points of inter­ Emancipation Proclamation. Stop at the visitor center for Kenilworth Avenue, left on Md.
    [Show full text]