FY2019 Mid-Bay Annual Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

FY2019 Mid-Bay Annual Report • Jacobs . Traffic Engineers' Report for Fiscal Year 2019 Mid-Bay Bridge Authority MID-BAY Mid-Bay Bridge Authority Jacobs . Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................................. 1 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 2 2. Mid-Bay Bridge Authority System ........................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Traffic and Revenue Results and Comparison with Forecasts................................................................... 3 2.2 Rebate Results ........................................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Effect of Extraordinary Events .................................................................................................................... 6 3. Mid-Bay Bridge .......................................................................................................................................... 8 3.1 Traffic and Revenue Results .................................................................................................................... 10 3.2 Comparison with Forecast ........................................................................................................................ 18 3.3 Effect of Extraordinary Events .................................................................................................................. 19 3.4 Tolls and Inflation ...................................................................................................................................... 20 4. Walter Francis Spence Parkway ............................................................................................................ 26 4.1 Traffic and Revenue Results .................................................................................................................... 28 4.2 Comparison with Forecast ........................................................................................................................ 34 4.3 Effect of Extraordinary Events .................................................................................................................. 35 4.4 Tolls ........................................................................................................................................................... 37 5. External Factors ...................................................................................................................................... 39 5.1 Expansion of US 331 Bridge ..................................................................................................................... 39 5.2 Other Projects ........................................................................................................................................... 40 6. Traffic and Revenue-Related Services ................................................................................................. 41 Tables Table 1 Mid-Bay Bridge Authority System Actual vs. Forecast Toll Revenue, FY 2019 ........................................ 3 Table 2 Mid-Bay Bridge Authority System SunPass vs. Cash/TBP, FY 2019 ....................................................... 3 Table 3 Mid-Bay Bridge Authority System Actual vs. Forecast Traffic, FY 2019 ................................................... 4 Table 4 Mid-Bay Bridge Authority System Rebate Transactions and Changes – FY 2018 and FY 2019 ............ 5 Table 5 Mid-Bay Bridge Authority System Rebate Amounts and Changes – FY 2018 and FY 2019 .................. 5 Table 6 Mid-Bay Bridge Authority System Change in Traffic by Vehicle Class ....................................................... 6 Table 7 Mid-Bay Bridge Authority System Change in Traffic Market Share ............................................................ 6 Table 8 Mid-Bay Bridge Authority System Changes in Toll Revenue ..................................................................... 7 Table 9 Mid-Bay Bridge Actual vs. Forecast Toll Revenue, FY 2019 ..................................................................... 8 Table 10 Mid-Bay Bridge Actual vs. Forecast Traffic, FY 2019 .............................................................................. 8 Table 11 Mid-Bay Bridge Rebate Transactions and Changes – FY 2018 and FY 2019 ...................................... 9 Table 12 Mid-Bay Bridge Rebate Amounts and Changes – FY 2018 and FY 2019............................................. 9 Table 13 Mid-Bay Bridge Quarterly Toll Revenue, FY 2019 vs. FY 2018 ............................................................ 10 Table 14 Mid-Bay Bridge Traffic and Revenue, FY 1994-FY 2019 ...................................................................... 12 Table 15 Mid-Bay Bridge Monthly Traffic Fluctuations, FY 2019 .......................................................................... 14 Table 16 Mid-Bay Bridge Traffic and Toll Revenue, SunPass/TBP v. Cash, FY 2019......................................... 16 Table 17 Mid-Bay Bridge Actual and Forecasted Traffic, FY 2019....................................................................... 18 Table 18 Mid-Bay Bridge Change in Traffic by Vehicle Class .............................................................................. 19 Table 19 Mid-Bay Bridge Change in Traffic Market Share ................................................................................... 20 i Jacobs . Table 20 Mid-Bay Bridge Changes in Toll Revenue ............................................................................................. 20 Table 21 Mid-Bay Bridge History of Toll Increases ............................................................................................... 22 Table 22 Mid-Bay Bridge Passenger Car Toll Rate Adjusted to CPI .................................................................... 23 Table 23 Mid-Bay Bridge Toll vs. Consumer Price Index (CPI) ............................................................................ 24 Table 24 Walter Francis Spence Parkway Actual vs. Forecast Toll Revenue, FY 2019 ..................................... 27 Table 25 Walter Francis Spence Parkway Actual vs. Forecast Traffic, FY 2019 ................................................ 27 Table 26 Spence Parkway Rebate Transactions and Changes – FY 2018 and FY 2019 .................................. 28 Table 27 Spence Parkway Rebate Amounts and Changes – FY 2018 and FY 2019 ........................................ 28 Table 28 Walter Francis Spence Parkway Monthly Toll Revenue, FY 2019 vs. FY 2018 ................................... 29 Table 29 Walter Francis Spence Parkway Traffic and Revenue, FY 2014-FY 2019 .......................................... 29 Table 30 Walter Francis Spence Parkway Monthly Traffic Fluctuations, FY 2019 .............................................. 31 Table 31 Walter Francis Spence Parkway Traffic and Toll Revenue, SunPass vs. TBP, FY 2019 .................... 32 Table 32 Walter Francis Spence Parkway Actual and Forecasted Traffic, FY 2019 ........................................... 35 Table 33 Spence Parkway Change in Traffic by Vehicle Class ............................................................................ 35 Table 34 Spence Parkway Change in Traffic Market Share ................................................................................. 36 Table 35 Spence Parkway Changes in Toll Revenue .......................................................................................... 36 Table 36 Walter Francis Spence Parkway History of Toll Increases ................................................................... 38 ii Jacobs . Figures Figure 1 Mid-Bay Bridge Authority System Traffic and Toll Revenue, FY 2019 .................................................... 4 Figure 2 Mid-Bay Bridge Quarterly Toll Revenue Fluctuations, FY 2005-FY 2019 .............................................. 11 Figure 3 Mid-Bay Bridge Toll Revenue Trend, FY 1994-FY 2019 ........................................................................ 11 Figure 4 Mid-Bay Bridge Average Toll Revenue Trend, FY 1994-FY 2019 ......................................................... 14 Figure 5 Mid-Bay Bridge Monthly Traffic Fluctuations, FY 2019 .......................................................................... 15 Figure 6 Mid-Bay Bridge Traffic and Toll Revenue, FY 2019 ............................................................................... 17 Figure 7 Mid-Bay Bridge Quarterly Revenue Results, Actual vs. Forecast, FY 2019 .......................................... 19 Figure 8 Mid-Bay Bridge Impact of Inflation on the Cash, 2-axle Toll Rate .......................................................... 25 Figure 9 Walter Francis Spence Parkway Quarterly Received Toll Revenue Trends, FY 2014-FY 2019 .......... 30 Figure 10 Walter Francis Spence Parkway Toll Revenue Trend, 4-Quarter Moving Average, FY 2014-FY 2019 ............................................................................................................................................................................... 31 Figure 11 Walter Francis Spence Parkway Monthly Traffic Fluctuations, FY 2019............................................. 32 Figure 12 Walter Francis Spence Parkway Traffic and Toll Revenue, SunPass vs.
Recommended publications
  • Should Florida Toll Agencies Be Consolidated? by Robert W
    Policy Study 401 February 2012 Should Florida Toll Agencies Be Consolidated? by Robert W. Poole, Jr. and Daryl S. Fleming, Ph.D., PE Reason Foundation Reason Foundation’s mission is to advance a free society by developing, applying and pro- moting libertarian principles, including individual liberty, free markets and the rule of law. We use journalism and public policy research to influence the frameworks and actions of policymakers, journalists and opinion leaders. Reason Foundation’s nonpartisan public policy research promotes choice, competition and a dynamic market economy as the foundation for human dignity and progress. Reason produces rigorous, peer-reviewed research and directly engages the policy process, seeking strategies that emphasize cooperation, flexibility, local knowledge and results. Through practical and innovative approaches to complex problems, Reason seeks to change the way people think about issues, and promote policies that allow and encourage individu- als and voluntary institutions to flourish. Reason Foundation is a tax-exempt research and education organization as defined under IRS code 501(c)(3). Reason Foundation is supported by voluntary contributions from individuals, foundations and corporations. Acknowledgement This project was supported by a grant to Reason Foundation from Associated Industries of Florida. The analysis, findings and recommendations in this report are entirely those of the authors. Copyright © 2012 Reason Foundation. All rights reserved. Reason Foundation Should Florida Toll Agencies Be Consolidated? By Robert W. Poole, Jr. and Daryl S. Fleming, Ph.D., PE Executive Summary The 2011 Florida legislative session saw several proposals that would have consolidated some or all of the local toll authorities into the Florida Turnpike Enterprise (FTE).
    [Show full text]
  • Let It Take You Places
    states. Refer to map. to Refer states. GB 04 | 2021 | 04 GB Interoperable with other other with Interoperable el código QR. código el en español, escanee escanee español, en Para leer este folleto folleto este leer Para apps for iOS or Android. or iOS for apps account online or with FREE FREE with or online account SunPass.com Access and manage your your manage and Access program. Department of Transportation. of Department Check with rental agent about their toll toll their about agent rental with Check • SunPass® is a registered trademark of the Florida Florida the of trademark registered a is SunPass® at toll booths. toll at transponder upon returning the vehicle. the returning upon transponder Saturdays 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. 5 to a.m. 8:30 Saturdays You don’t have to wait in line line in wait to have don’t You Remember to remove your SunPass SunPass your remove to Remember • Monday–Friday, 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. and and p.m. 7 to a.m. 7 Monday–Friday, Call 1-888-TOLL-FLA (1-888-865-5352), (1-888-865-5352), 1-888-TOLL-FLA Call • (1-888-865-5352). 1-888-TOLL-FLA call or app, Android or Rock Stadium in Miami. in Stadium Rock Visit SunPass.com Visit • during rental period via SunPass.com, iOS iOS SunPass.com, via period rental during and Tampa, as well as Hard Hard as well as Tampa, and Download the free iOS or Android app app Android or iOS free the Download • Add vehicle to your SunPass account account SunPass your to vehicle Add • Miami, Orlando, Palm Beach Beach Palm Orlando, Miami, following ways: ways: following Lauderdale-Hollywood, Lauderdale-Hollywood, with you.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Florida Division of Bond Finance Notice
    State of Florida Division of Bond Finance Notice The following Official Statement does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy bonds. It is marked with a dated date and speaks only as of that date, which may be prior to the date the Official Statement was posted on this website. The Division of Bond Finance undertakes no obligation to update any information included therein except for certain annual and periodic reports which may be found on the EMMA website of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. This Official Statement may be removed from the website at any time. The information, estimates and expressions of opinion in the Official Statement are subject to change without notice and the posting of the Official Statement on this website does not imply that there has been no change in such information or the affairs of the State of Florida since the dated date of the Official Statement or date of posting such Official Statement. New Issue - Book-Entry Only This Official Statement has been prepared to provide information about the 2019A Bonds. Selected information is presented on this cover page for the convenience of the reader. To make an informed decision, a prospective investor should read this Official Statement in its entirety. Unless otherwise indicated, capitalized terms have the meanings given in Appendix A. $86,640,000 STATE OF FLORIDA Department of Transportation Sunshine Skyway Revenue Bonds, Series 2019A Dated: Date of Delivery Due: July 1, as shown on the inside front cover Bond Ratings
    [Show full text]
  • Review Expressway Authority Lease
    The Florida Senate Issue Brief 2011-227 October 2010 Committee on Transportation TOLL FACILITY LEASE-PURCHASE AGREEMENTS Statement of the Issue The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT or department) has, over the years, entered into lease-purchase agreements with legislatively-approved expressway and bridge authorities throughout the state. Under lease- purchase agreements, FDOT may provide financial support to pay the operations and maintenance costs for an authority‟s toll facilities, thereby enabling the gross toll revenues collected by the authority to be primarily used to pay its facilities‟ bond debt. Reimbursement to FDOT is typically not required until after the authority has met its debt service requirements. Upon completion of the lease-purchase agreement, ownership of the facility may be transferred back to the State and FDOT retains all operations and maintenance responsibility. Currently, Florida expressway and bridge authorities owe more than $379 million to FDOT under the terms of lease-purchase agreements. Discussion Toll facilities have been used throughout Florida as a means of financing road and bridge construction for many years. Very early in the state‟s history, most toll roads and bridges were constructed by private individuals or firms. Later, state governmental units began constructing toll facilities. In more recent years, toll facilities have been financed and constructed by specially created units of government operating primarily under local government control. These units, usually characterized as expressway or bridge authorities, arrange for construction of the facilities, including the required debt financing. In addition to FDOT which has a long history of planning, acquiring, constructing, operating, and maintaining toll facilities, there are numerous other authorities currently operating toll facilities and collecting and reinvesting toll revenues.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper #103 FDOT Experience with PBES for Small
    FDOT Experience with PBES for Small-Medium Span Bridges Steven Nolan, P.E, Florida Dept. of Transportation (1), (850) 414-4272, [email protected] Sam Fallaha, P.E, Florida Dept. of Transportation (1), (850) 414-4296, [email protected] Vickie Young, P.E, Florida Dept. of Transportation (1), (850) 414-4301, [email protected] (1) State Structures Design Office, 605 Suwannee St, Tallahassee FL. 32399 ABSTRACT In the last quarter century, some elaborate methods of accelerated bridge construction (ABC) have been explored and executed in Florida, predominately though necessity in the segmental construction. ABC techniques have also been applied to more traditional flat-slab and slab-on-girder bridges including: Prefabricated Bridge Elements and Systems (PBES), full size bridge moves, top down construction, and other efforts to minimize road user delays and environmental impacts. This paper focuses on four modest structural systems which were successfully implemented on FDOT construction projects since the initiation of FHWA’s Every Day Counts program. This discussion focuses on ABC structural systems for: Precast Intermediate Bent Caps, Precast Full-Depth Bridge Deck Panels, Prestressed Concrete Florida-Slab Beams, and Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Integrated Bridge Systems. INTRODUCTION Florida has been heavily involved in accelerated bridge construction activities (ABC) since the middle of the last century, primarily driven for economic advantage, with efforts predominantly led by the precast concrete industry. In the last quarter century, some elaborate methods of accelerated bridge construction have been explored and executed in Florida, predominately though necessity in the post-tensioned (PT) segmental construction to provide economy through speed of fabrication and erection, to offset significant mobilization and setup cost, specialized PT subcontractors and equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Authority Monitoring and Oversight FY 2009
    TransportationTransportation AuthorityAuthority MonitoringMonitoring andand OversightOversight FISCAL YEAR 2009 REPORT Transportation Authority Monitoring and Oversight Transportation Authority Monitoring and Oversight Florida Transportation Commission Fiscal Year Annual 2009 Report Fiscal Year Fiscal Year 2009 Annual Report Page iii Transportation Authority Monitoring and Oversight This page intentionally left blank. Page iv Fiscal Year 2009 Annual Report Table of Contents Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................ 1 Background .............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Actual Results .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 7 Established Toll Authorities ............................................................................... 15 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 17 Miami-Dade Expressway Authority
    [Show full text]
  • Florida's Turnpike All-Electronic Open Road
    Florida’s Turnpike All-Electronic Open Road Tolling Frequently Asked Questions October 2010 Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise (FTE) will introduce all-electronic open road tolling — a safer, more efficient, seamless method of collecting tolls from customers — on the Turnpike between Milepost 0 in Florida City and Milepost 47 at the Miami-Dade/Broward County line. The projected date for conversion to all-electronic open road tolling on this stretch of the Turnpike is early 2011. Florida’s Turnpike has always been a leader in the worldwide toll industry, and new technologies now allow the opportunity to collect tolls electronically from both SunPass and non-SunPass customers while providing a safe, cost effective and efficient transportation system for residents, businesses and visitors. Q. What is all-electronic open road tolling? A. All-electronic open road tolling is a set of technologies that allow for the payment of tolls electronically, using special equipment located on overhead gantries. Simply put, it refers to a toll road without cash tollbooths, where traffic flows unimpeded at ramp or highway speeds. Tolls are collected through a SunPass transponder or through TOLL-BY-PLATESM — a system that captures images of license plates and bills customers. All- electronic toll collection provides added convenience for drivers who no longer have to slow down or stop to pay a toll. Q. Why is Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise transitioning to all-electronic toll collection? A. Since SunPass was launched in 1999, the Turnpike’s goal has been to eliminate cash toll collection on its roads because electronic tolling is the safest, most convenient and most efficient way to pay tolls.
    [Show full text]
  • Department-Operated Facilities
    Florida Department of Transportation ENTERPRISE TOLL OPERATIONS Department-operated Facilities Garcon Point Bridge Page 57 • $7.1 million total toll revenue • 2.0 million total transactions • SunPass® participation increased to 49.2 percent during the year Mid-Bay Bridge and Walter Francis Spence Parkway Page 65 • $27.3 million total toll revenue • 10.2 million total transactions • SunPass® participation increased slightly to 64.7 percent during the year FY 2017 Annual Report 55 Florida Department of Transportation ENTERPRISE TOLL OPERATIONS THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 56 FY 2017 Annual Report Florida Department of Transportation ENTERPRISE TOLL OPERATIONS Garcon Point Bridge 6.1 BACKGROUND The Authority entered into a lease-purchase The Garcon Point Bridge is a 3.5-mile bridge that agreement with the Department, whereby the spans Pensacola/East Bay between Garcon Point Department maintains and operates the bridge (south of Milton) and Redfish Point (between Gulf and remits all tolls collected to the Authority as Breeze and Navarre) in southwest Santa Rosa lease payments. The term of the lease runs County. The bridge and roadway segments that concurrently with the bonds, and matures in 2028. comprise this facility are designated as SR 281 At that time the Department will own the bridge, and provide access to the Gulf Breeze peninsula assuming the bonds are fully paid. Should the from areas north and east of Pensacola Bay. On bonds, or any additional issuance of bonds, the south side of the bay, the road continues as a be outstanding in 2028, the lease term will one-mile, two-lane highway that connects to US be extended through the payoff date of the 98.
    [Show full text]
  • Department-Operated Facilities
    Florida Department of Transportation ENTERPRISE TOLL OPERATIONS Department-Operated Facilities Garcon Point Bridge Page 97 Page 93 • $5.2 million total toll revenue • 1.4• $4.3 million million total total transactionstoll revenue • Nearly 1.3 million total transactions • • SunPass SunPass participation participation increased increased to to36.2 39.2 percent percent during the year.during the year. Mid-Bay Bridge/Walter Francis Spence Parkway Page 107 • $17.0 million total toll revenue • 7.7 million total transactions • SunPass participation increased to 64.7 percent during the year. FY 2014 Annual Report 95 Florida Department of Transportation ENTERPRISE TOLL OPERATIONS THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 96 FY 2014 Annual Report Florida Department of Transportation ENTERPRISE TOLL OPERATIONS Garcon Point Bridge 8.1 Background Bonds. The two-lane bridge opened to traffic on The Garcon Point Bridge is a 3.5-mile bridge that spans May 14, 1999. Pensacola/East Bay between Garcon Point (south of Milton) and Redfish Point (between Gulf Breeze The Authority entered into a lease-purchase agree- and Navarre) in southwest Santa Rosa County. The ment with the Department, whereby the Department bridge and roadway segments that comprise this maintains and operates the bridge and remits all tolls facility are designated as SR 281 and provide access collected to the Authority as lease payments. The to the Gulf Breeze peninsula from areas north and term of the lease runs concurrently with the bonds, east of Pensacola Bay. On the south side of the bay, and matures in 2028. At that time the Department the road continues as a one-mile, two-lane highway will own the bridge, assuming the bonds are fully that connects to US 98.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida State University Libraries
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2018 Resilience of Transportation Networks Subject to Bridge Damage and Road Closures Richard Twumasi-Boakye Follow this and additional works at the DigiNole: FSU's Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING RESILIENCE OF TRANSPORTATION NETWORKS SUBJECT TO BRIDGE DAMAGE AND ROAD CLOSURES By RICHARD TWUMASI-BOAKYE A Dissertation submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2018 1 Richard Twumasi-Boakye defended this dissertation on July 19, 2018. The members of the supervisory committee were: John O. Sobanjo Professor Directing Dissertation Eric Chicken University Representative Ren Moses Committee Member Eren E. Ozguven Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the dissertation has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii To my family iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I take this opportunity to acknowledge all those who have guided, assisted and supported me during my period of research leading to the completion of this dissertation. First, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude to Dr. John Sobanjo for his immense support, mentoring and guidance throughout my studies at the Florida State University. I would also like to thank Dr. Ren Moses, Dr. Eren Ozguven, and Dr. Eric Chicken who served as my doctoral committee members for their invaluable inputs and support. Words are insufficient to express my appreciation to the Olawale family for their love and inspiration throughout my graduate studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Department of Transportation, District 3
    PENSACOLA BAY BRIDGE PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT (PD&E) STUDY Appendix E to the Environmental Assessment Comments & Coordination Report SR 30 (US 98) From 17th Avenue To Baybridge Drive Escambia and Santa Rosa Counties, Florida Financial Project ID No. 409334-1 Federal Aid Project No. 4221-078-P March 2014 DRAFT Prepared by Reynolds, Smith, and Hills, Inc. at the direction of the Florida Department of Transportation, District 3 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that I am a registered professional engineer in the State of Florida practicing with Reynolds, Smith, and Hills, Inc., a Florida corporation authorized to operate as an engineering business (EB No. EB0005620) by the State of Florida Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Professional Engineers, and that I have supervised the preparation and approve the evaluation, findings, opinions, conclusions, and technical advice hereby reported for: Project: Pensacola Bay Bridge PD&E Study Location: SR 30 (US 98) from 17th Avenue to Baybridge Drive Report: Comments & Coordination Report Financial Project ID No.: 409334-1 This report includes a collection of correspondence with agencies, governmental entities, and the general public. I acknowledge that the content in this report is standard to the professional practice of transportation engineering and planning as applied through professional judgment and experience. Name: Daniel Kristoff, Jr., P.E. Florida PE Registration No.: 30379 Signature: _________________________________________ Date: _____________________________________________ Comments and Coordination Report SR 30 (US 98) Pensacola Bay Bridge ii Comments & Coordination Report For the SR 30 (US 98) Pensacola Bay Bridge PD&E Study TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1-1 2.0 State & Federal Agency Coordination ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pensacola Bay Bridge Repairs Continue
    PENSACOLA BAY BRIDGE NOVEMBER 19, 2020 REPAIR UPDATE | 11.19.2020 IN THIS ISSUE 3 PENSACOLA BAY BRIDGE REPAIRS CONTINUE 5 A WORK IN PROGRESS 7 PROJECT REPAIR TIMELINE 9 SPAN REPAIR PROGRESS 11 BARGE RECOVERY UPDATE 13 FDOT COMMUTER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 15 FREE BUS SERVICE INFORMATION 1 | PENSACOLA BAY BRIDGE ReConnect Construction crews are working around the clock to repair the storm-damaged Pensacola Bay Bridge and restore traffic for this vital transportation link by March 2021. The bridge has been closed since mid-September after 27 construction barges escaped their moorings during Hurricane Sally. Four barges were lodged under the bridge contributing to the significant damage. Since that time, commuters have relied on the State Road 281/Garcon Point Bridge and State Road 87 for travel between Gulf Breeze and Pensacola. Tolls on the Garcon Point Bridge are currently suspended through Sunday, Dec. 13, 2020. | 2 PENSACOLA BAY BRIDGE REPAIRS CONTINUE Two additional bridge contractors and four salvage companies, mobilized by FDOT, are focusing their eorts on the outermost spans of the bridge to facilitate construction and minimize impacts to the existing structure. To date, more than 300 additional workers have been brought in to increase resources needed for demolition and reconstruction, salvage and pile operations, and concrete fabrication. FDOT has approved multiple construction design plans and is reviewing others for the permanent repairs needed to reestablish four lanes of trac by the targeted reopening in March 2021. The bridge will be reopened without vehicle weight restrictions and with the full 75-year design life. 3 | PENSACOLA BAY BRIDGE ReConnect CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST VIDEO UPDATE ON PENSACOLA BAY BRIDGE RECOVERY EFFORTS.
    [Show full text]