DOCSLIB.ORG

Florida Department of Transportation, District 3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Florida Department of Transportation, District 3 PENSACOLA BAY BRIDGE PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT (PD&E) STUDY Appendix E to the Environmental Assessment Comments & Coordination Report SR 30 (US 98) From 17th Avenue To Baybridge Drive Escambia and Santa Rosa Counties, Florida Financial Project ID No. 409334-1 Federal Aid Project No. 4221-078-P March 2014 DRAFT Prepared by Reynolds, Smith, and Hills, Inc. at the direction of the Florida Department of Transportation, District 3 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that I am a registered professional engineer in the State of Florida practicing with Reynolds, Smith, and Hills, Inc., a Florida corporation authorized to operate as an engineering business (EB No. EB0005620) by the State of Florida Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Professional Engineers, and that I have supervised the preparation and approve the evaluation, findings, opinions, conclusions, and technical advice hereby reported for: Project: Pensacola Bay Bridge PD&E Study Location: SR 30 (US 98) from 17th Avenue to Baybridge Drive Report: Comments & Coordination Report Financial Project ID No.: 409334-1 This report includes a collection of correspondence with agencies, governmental entities, and the general public. I acknowledge that the content in this report is standard to the professional practice of transportation engineering and planning as applied through professional judgment and experience. Name: Daniel Kristoff, Jr., P.E. Florida PE Registration No.: 30379 Signature: _________________________________________ Date: _____________________________________________ Comments and Coordination Report SR 30 (US 98) Pensacola Bay Bridge ii Comments & Coordination Report For the SR 30 (US 98) Pensacola Bay Bridge PD&E Study TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1-1 2.0 State & Federal Agency Coordination ..................................................................... 2-1 2.1 United States Coast Guard .................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 State Historical Preservation Office (SHPO)........................................................ 2-9 2.3 Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) ................................. 2-17 2.4 Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) ......................... 2-19 2.5 National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) ....................................................... 2-27 2.6 United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) ............................................. 2-38 2.7 Naval Air Station Pensacola .............................................................................. 2-58 3.0 Local Government Coordination .............................................................................. 3-1 3.1 Coordination with the City of Pensacola .............................................................. 3-1 3.2 Coordination with the City of Gulf Breeze ......................................................... 3-10 4.0 Meetings & Correspondence with Local Entities ..................................................... 4-1 4.1 Project Kick-off Meetings (April 15-28, 2011) ....................................................... 4-1 4.2 Meeting with United Peninsula Association, Gulf Breeze (June 6, 2011) ............. 4-2 4.3 Meeting with Florida-Alabama TPO – Technical Coordination Committee, Gulf Breeze (February 23, 2012) ............................................................................................ 4-2 4.4 Meeting with Florida-Alabama TPO, Pensacola (March 12-14, 2012) .................. 4-3 Comments and Coordination Report SR 30 (US 98) Pensacola Bay Bridge iii 4.5 Meeting with City of Gulf Breeze (November 27, 2012) ....................................... 4-4 4.6 Meeting with City of Pensacola (November 27, 2012) ........................................ 4-10 4.7 Meeting with Individual Commercial Property Owner in Gulf Breeze ............... 4-13 4.8 Coordination with Baybridge Homeowners Association ..................................... 4-16 4.9 Coordination with Pensacola Bay Maritime Interests ........................................ 4-16 5.0 Project Advisory Group Meetings ............................................................................ 5-1 5.1 Project Advisory Group Meeting Number 1 (July 26, 2011) ................................. 5-1 5.2 Project Advisory Group Meeting Number 2 (December 6, 2011) .......................... 5-8 6.0 Public Meetings ..................................................................................................... 6-16 6.1 Comments and Responses From Corridor Workshop (August 11, 2011) ............ 6-16 6.2 Comments and Responses From Corridor Alternatives Meeting (October 18, 2011) 6-28 6.3 Comment and Responses From Public Alternatives Meeting (October 18, 2012) 6-33 7.0 Other Public Comments .......................................................................................... 7-1 7.1 Comments and Responses from E-mails, Letters, and Project Website ................ 7-1 7.2 Results of Project Website Survey Regarding Tolls ............................................ 7-35 8.0 Public Hearing ........................................................................................................ 8-1 8.1 Public Hearing Transcript ................................................................................... 8-1 Comments and Coordination Report SR 30 (US 98) Pensacola Bay Bridge iv LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit Title Page Exhibit 2.1.1 – 2011-05-25 E-mail from USCG..................................................................... 2-4 Exhibit 2.1.2 - 2013-05-21 E-mail from USCG ..................................................................... 2-6 Exhibit 2.1.3 - 2014-03-07 E-mail from USCG ..................................................................... 2-8 Exhibit 2.2.1: 2013-03-11 District 3 Letter to FHWA Requesting SHPO Concurrence ... 2-10 Exhibit 2.2.2: 2013-07-15 District 3 Letter to FHWA Requesting SHPO Concurrence ... 2-14 Exhibit 2.3.1: 2013-05-20 E-mail Summarizing FDEP Correspondence .......................... 2-18 Exhibit 2.4.1: 2013-08-19 FDOT Letter to FFWCC for Review of WEBAR & EFH ......... 2-20 Exhibit 2.4.2: 2013-10-16 FFWCC Letter to FDOT ........................................................... 2-23 Exhibit 2.5.1: 2013-07-31 FDOT Letter to NMFS for Review of WEBAR and EFH ......... 2-28 Exhibit 2.5.2: 2013-08-19 NMFS Teleconference Minutes ................................................. 2-33 Exhibit 2.5.3: 2013-08-23 NMFS Response to FDOT ......................................................... 2-35 Exhibit 2.6.1: 2013-07-31 FDOT Letter to USFWS Requesting Informal Section 7 Consultation ........................................................................................................................ 2-39 Exhibit 2.6.2: 2013-08-13 USFWS Teleconference Minutes .............................................. 2-43 Exhibit 2.6.3: 2013-08-30 USFWS Letter to FDOT ........................................................... 2-46 Exhibit 2.7.1: 2013-06-07 E-mail Correspondence with Naval Air Station Pensacola ..... 2-59 Exhibit 3.1.1: 2012-10-11 E-mail from Jerry Pate ............................................................... 3-2 Exhibit 3.1.2: 2012-11-28 E-mail from Rita Lee .................................................................. 3-5 Exhibit 3.1.3: 2012-11-29 Letter from Jerry Pate................................................................ 3-7 Exhibit 3.1.4: 2013-03-20 Vision Pensacola Concept ........................................................... 3-8 Exhibit 3.1.5: 2013-01-25 Vision Pensacola Concept ........................................................... 3-9 Exhibit 3.2.1: 2012-10-18 Letter from City of Gulf Breeze ................................................ 3-11 Exhibit 3.2.2: 2012-10-18 Concept Plan 1 - Central East Alternative .............................. 3-16 Exhibit 3.2.3: 2012-10-18 Concept Plan 2 - East Alternative ............................................ 3-17 Exhibit 3.2.4: 2013-04-16 Gulf Breeze Sketch Up Concept ............................................... 3-18 Exhibit 3.2.5: 2013-08 Gulf Breeze Most Livable City Plan (Page 23) ............................. 3-20 Exhibit 4.9.1: Correspondence with Gulf Intracoastal Canal Association ........................ 4-17 Exhibit 4.9.2: Correspondence with Port of Pensacola ...................................................... 4-20 Exhibit 4.9.3: Correspondence with American Waterways Operators .............................. 4-22 Exhibit 4.9.4: Correspondence with Pensacola Yacht Club ............................................... 4-24 Exhibit 7.2.1: Pensacola Bay Bridge Toll Survey Results ................................................. 7-35 Comments and Coordination Report SR 30 (US 98) Pensacola Bay Bridge v 1.0 Introduction This Comments and Coordination Report is a summary of the public and interagency coordination of the Pensacola Bay Bridge Project Development and Environment Study (PD&E) on SR 30 (US 98) from 17th Avenue to Baybridge Drive. This report contains documentation of comments and responses to all meetings and coordination with government leaders, government agencies, community groups and individual citizens, and identifying the key issues and pertinent information received. Comments and Coordination Report SR 30 (US 98) Pensacola Bay Bridge 1-1 2.0 State & Federal Agency Coordination
Load more

Recommended publications
  • January 22, 2018 (8:35 – 8:40) 3
    BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE (BPAC) MEETING AGENDA February 26, 2018 – 8:30 a.m. 310 Court Street, 1st Floor Conf. Room Clearwater, FL 33756 THE PLANNING COUNCIL AND METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION FOR PINELLAS COUNTY 1. CALL TO ORDER AND INTRODUCTIONS (8:30 – 8:35) 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – January 22, 2018 (8:35 – 8:40) 3. FORWARD PINELLAS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – February 14, 2018 (8:40 – 8:45) 4. SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PRESENTATION (8:45 – 9:00) 5. BEACHTRAN CLEARWATER (9:00 – 9:15) 6. PINELLAS TRAIL TRAIL COUNTER 2017 SUMMARY (9:15 – 9:30) 7. SPOTlight EMPHASIS AREAS UPDATE (9:30 – 9:40) A Vision for U.S. Highway 19 Corridor Gateway Area Master Plan Enhancing Beach Community Access 8. BPAC BUSINESS (9:40 – 9:55) A. Tri-County BPAC Meeting Overview – January 24, 2018 B. Florida Bicycle Association (FBA) C. Pinellas Trails, Inc. 9. AGENCY REPORTS (9:55 – 10:10) 10. OTHER BUSINESS (10:10 – 10:30) A. Membership B. Gulf Coast Safe Street Summit – February 27, 2018 C. Correspondence, Publications, Articles of Interest D. Suggestions for Future Agenda Topics E. Other 11. ADJOURNMENT (10:30) NEXT BPAC MEETING – MARCH 19, 2018 Public participation is solicited without regard to race, color, national origin, age, sex, religion, disability, or family status. Persons who require special accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act or persons who require translation services (free of charge) should contact the Office of Human Rights, 400 South Fort Harrison Avenue, Suite 300, Clearwater, Florida 33756; [(727) 464-4062 (V/TDD)] at least seven days prior to the meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • County by County Allocations
    COUNTY BY COUNTY ALLOCATIONS Conference Report on House Bill 5001 Fiscal Year 2014-2015 General Appropriations Act Florida House of Representatives Appropriations Committee May 21, 2014 County Allocations Contained in the Conference Report on House Bill 5001 2014-2015 General Appropriations Act This report reflects only items contained in the Conference Report on House Bill 5001, the 2014-2015 General Appropriations Act, that are identifiable to specific counties. State agencies will further allocate other funds contained in the General Appropriations Act based on their own authorized distribution methodologies. This report includes all construction, right of way, or public transportation phases $1 million or greater that are included in the Tentative Work Program for Fiscal Year 2014-2015. The report also contains projects included on certain approved lists associated with specific appropriations where the list may be referenced in proviso but the project is not specifically listed. Examples include, but are not limited to, lists for library, cultural, and historic preservation program grants included in the Department of State and the Florida Recreation Development Assistance Program Small Projects grant list (FRDAP) included in the Department of Environmental Protection. The FEFP and funds distributed to counties by state agencies are not identified in this report. Pages 2 through 63 reflect items that are identifiable to one specific county. Multiple county programs can be found on pages 64 through 67. This report was produced prior
    [Show full text]
  • Should Florida Toll Agencies Be Consolidated? by Robert W
    Policy Study 401 February 2012 Should Florida Toll Agencies Be Consolidated? by Robert W. Poole, Jr. and Daryl S. Fleming, Ph.D., PE Reason Foundation Reason Foundation’s mission is to advance a free society by developing, applying and pro- moting libertarian principles, including individual liberty, free markets and the rule of law. We use journalism and public policy research to influence the frameworks and actions of policymakers, journalists and opinion leaders. Reason Foundation’s nonpartisan public policy research promotes choice, competition and a dynamic market economy as the foundation for human dignity and progress. Reason produces rigorous, peer-reviewed research and directly engages the policy process, seeking strategies that emphasize cooperation, flexibility, local knowledge and results. Through practical and innovative approaches to complex problems, Reason seeks to change the way people think about issues, and promote policies that allow and encourage individu- als and voluntary institutions to flourish. Reason Foundation is a tax-exempt research and education organization as defined under IRS code 501(c)(3). Reason Foundation is supported by voluntary contributions from individuals, foundations and corporations. Acknowledgement This project was supported by a grant to Reason Foundation from Associated Industries of Florida. The analysis, findings and recommendations in this report are entirely those of the authors. Copyright © 2012 Reason Foundation. All rights reserved. Reason Foundation Should Florida Toll Agencies Be Consolidated? By Robert W. Poole, Jr. and Daryl S. Fleming, Ph.D., PE Executive Summary The 2011 Florida legislative session saw several proposals that would have consolidated some or all of the local toll authorities into the Florida Turnpike Enterprise (FTE).
    [Show full text]
  • Let It Take You Places
    states. Refer to map. to Refer states. GB 04 | 2021 | 04 GB Interoperable with other other with Interoperable el código QR. código el en español, escanee escanee español, en Para leer este folleto folleto este leer Para apps for iOS or Android. or iOS for apps account online or with FREE FREE with or online account SunPass.com Access and manage your your manage and Access program. Department of Transportation. of Department Check with rental agent about their toll toll their about agent rental with Check • SunPass® is a registered trademark of the Florida Florida the of trademark registered a is SunPass® at toll booths. toll at transponder upon returning the vehicle. the returning upon transponder Saturdays 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. 5 to a.m. 8:30 Saturdays You don’t have to wait in line line in wait to have don’t You Remember to remove your SunPass SunPass your remove to Remember • Monday–Friday, 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. and and p.m. 7 to a.m. 7 Monday–Friday, Call 1-888-TOLL-FLA (1-888-865-5352), (1-888-865-5352), 1-888-TOLL-FLA Call • (1-888-865-5352). 1-888-TOLL-FLA call or app, Android or Rock Stadium in Miami. in Stadium Rock Visit SunPass.com Visit • during rental period via SunPass.com, iOS iOS SunPass.com, via period rental during and Tampa, as well as Hard Hard as well as Tampa, and Download the free iOS or Android app app Android or iOS free the Download • Add vehicle to your SunPass account account SunPass your to vehicle Add • Miami, Orlando, Palm Beach Beach Palm Orlando, Miami, following ways: ways: following Lauderdale-Hollywood, Lauderdale-Hollywood, with you.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Florida Division of Bond Finance Notice
    State of Florida Division of Bond Finance Notice The following Official Statement does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy bonds. It is marked with a dated date and speaks only as of that date, which may be prior to the date the Official Statement was posted on this website. The Division of Bond Finance undertakes no obligation to update any information included therein except for certain annual and periodic reports which may be found on the EMMA website of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. This Official Statement may be removed from the website at any time. The information, estimates and expressions of opinion in the Official Statement are subject to change without notice and the posting of the Official Statement on this website does not imply that there has been no change in such information or the affairs of the State of Florida since the dated date of the Official Statement or date of posting such Official Statement. New Issue - Book-Entry Only This Official Statement has been prepared to provide information about the 2019A Bonds. Selected information is presented on this cover page for the convenience of the reader. To make an informed decision, a prospective investor should read this Official Statement in its entirety. Unless otherwise indicated, capitalized terms have the meanings given in Appendix A. $86,640,000 STATE OF FLORIDA Department of Transportation Sunshine Skyway Revenue Bonds, Series 2019A Dated: Date of Delivery Due: July 1, as shown on the inside front cover Bond Ratings
    [Show full text]
  • And Bridge Overloads
    FINAL REPORT Development of Risk Models for Florida's Bridge Management System (Reuters) Contract No. BDK83 977-11 John O. Sobanjo Florida State University Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering 2525 Pottsdamer St. Tallahassee, FL 32310 Paul D. Thompson Consultant 17035 NE 28th Place Bellevue, WA 98008 Prepared for: State Maintenance Office Florida Department of Transportation Tallahassee, FL 32309 June 2013 Final Report ii Disclaimer The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT), or Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Final Report iii SI* (MODERN METRIC) CONVERSION FACTORS APPROXIMATE CONVERSIONS TO SI UNITS SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL LENGTH in Inches 25.4 millimeters mm ft Feet 0.305 meters m yd Yards 0.914 meters m mi Miles 1.61 kilometers km SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL AREA in2 Square inches 645.2 square millimeters mm2 ft2 Square feet 0.093 square meters m2 yd2 square yard 0.836 square meters m2 ac acres 0.405 hectares ha mi2 square miles 2.59 square kilometers km2 SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL VOLUME fl oz fluid ounces 29.57 milliliters mL gal gallons 3.785 liters L ft3 cubic feet 0.028 cubic meters m3 yd3 cubic yards 0.765 cubic meters m3 NOTE: volumes greater than 1000 L shall be shown in m3 SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL MASS oz ounces 28.35 grams g lb pounds 0.454 kilograms
    [Show full text]
  • Review Expressway Authority Lease
    The Florida Senate Issue Brief 2011-227 October 2010 Committee on Transportation TOLL FACILITY LEASE-PURCHASE AGREEMENTS Statement of the Issue The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT or department) has, over the years, entered into lease-purchase agreements with legislatively-approved expressway and bridge authorities throughout the state. Under lease- purchase agreements, FDOT may provide financial support to pay the operations and maintenance costs for an authority‟s toll facilities, thereby enabling the gross toll revenues collected by the authority to be primarily used to pay its facilities‟ bond debt. Reimbursement to FDOT is typically not required until after the authority has met its debt service requirements. Upon completion of the lease-purchase agreement, ownership of the facility may be transferred back to the State and FDOT retains all operations and maintenance responsibility. Currently, Florida expressway and bridge authorities owe more than $379 million to FDOT under the terms of lease-purchase agreements. Discussion Toll facilities have been used throughout Florida as a means of financing road and bridge construction for many years. Very early in the state‟s history, most toll roads and bridges were constructed by private individuals or firms. Later, state governmental units began constructing toll facilities. In more recent years, toll facilities have been financed and constructed by specially created units of government operating primarily under local government control. These units, usually characterized as expressway or bridge authorities, arrange for construction of the facilities, including the required debt financing. In addition to FDOT which has a long history of planning, acquiring, constructing, operating, and maintaining toll facilities, there are numerous other authorities currently operating toll facilities and collecting and reinvesting toll revenues.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper #103 FDOT Experience with PBES for Small
    FDOT Experience with PBES for Small-Medium Span Bridges Steven Nolan, P.E, Florida Dept. of Transportation (1), (850) 414-4272, [email protected] Sam Fallaha, P.E, Florida Dept. of Transportation (1), (850) 414-4296, [email protected] Vickie Young, P.E, Florida Dept. of Transportation (1), (850) 414-4301, [email protected] (1) State Structures Design Office, 605 Suwannee St, Tallahassee FL. 32399 ABSTRACT In the last quarter century, some elaborate methods of accelerated bridge construction (ABC) have been explored and executed in Florida, predominately though necessity in the segmental construction. ABC techniques have also been applied to more traditional flat-slab and slab-on-girder bridges including: Prefabricated Bridge Elements and Systems (PBES), full size bridge moves, top down construction, and other efforts to minimize road user delays and environmental impacts. This paper focuses on four modest structural systems which were successfully implemented on FDOT construction projects since the initiation of FHWA’s Every Day Counts program. This discussion focuses on ABC structural systems for: Precast Intermediate Bent Caps, Precast Full-Depth Bridge Deck Panels, Prestressed Concrete Florida-Slab Beams, and Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Integrated Bridge Systems. INTRODUCTION Florida has been heavily involved in accelerated bridge construction activities (ABC) since the middle of the last century, primarily driven for economic advantage, with efforts predominantly led by the precast concrete industry. In the last quarter century, some elaborate methods of accelerated bridge construction have been explored and executed in Florida, predominately though necessity in the post-tensioned (PT) segmental construction to provide economy through speed of fabrication and erection, to offset significant mobilization and setup cost, specialized PT subcontractors and equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Authority Monitoring and Oversight FY 2009
    TransportationTransportation AuthorityAuthority MonitoringMonitoring andand OversightOversight FISCAL YEAR 2009 REPORT Transportation Authority Monitoring and Oversight Transportation Authority Monitoring and Oversight Florida Transportation Commission Fiscal Year Annual 2009 Report Fiscal Year Fiscal Year 2009 Annual Report Page iii Transportation Authority Monitoring and Oversight This page intentionally left blank. Page iv Fiscal Year 2009 Annual Report Table of Contents Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................ 1 Background .............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Actual Results .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 7 Established Toll Authorities ............................................................................... 15 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 17 Miami-Dade Expressway Authority
    [Show full text]
  • Imprisoning the Innocent: the "Knowledge of Law" Fiction
    Liberty University Law Review Volume 12 Issue 2 Article 6 January 2018 Imprisoning the Innocent: The "Knowledge of Law" Fiction Phillip D. Kline Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lu_law_review Recommended Citation Kline, Phillip D. (2018) "Imprisoning the Innocent: The "Knowledge of Law" Fiction," Liberty University Law Review: Vol. 12 : Iss. 2 , Article 6. Available at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lu_law_review/vol12/iss2/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Liberty University School of Law at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Liberty University Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLE IMPRISONING THE INNOCENT: THE “KNOWLEDGE OF LAW” FICTION Phillip D. Kline† I. THE PRESENT PROBLEM OF PUNISHING THE MORALLY INNOCENT Disorientation alarmed him. Ocie Mills was accustomed to deciding his direction and defining his purpose. But today, Monday, May 15, 1989, Ocie and his son Cary were reporting to prison, adjudged felons by the country they loved.1 *** Tension between individual liberty and the state, and the inherent metaphysical mysteries of that tension,2 are at least as old as humankind’s earliest discovered written stories. In The Epic of Gilgamesh, written from circa. 2150-1400 BC and considered the most ancient example of literature, † B.A. Central Missouri State University (1982); J.D., University of Kansas (1987). Phill Kline is an Associate Professor at Liberty University School of Law where he teaches Evidence, Bioethics and Law and Trial Practice. He served as a member of the Kansas House of Representatives (1993-2001), Kansas Attorney General (2003-2007) and Johnson County District Attorney (2007-2009).
    [Show full text]
  • December 2019 Progress Report
    PERFORMANCE OF EXISTING ABC PROJECTS: INSPECTION CASE STUDIES (ABC-UTC-2016-2-FIU02) Quarterly Progress Report For the period ending November 30, 2019 Submitted by: Armin Mehrabi Affiliation: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Florida International University Miami, FL Submitted to: ABC-UTC Florida International University Miami, FL 1. Background and Introduction Accelerated Bridge Construction (ABC) employs prefabricated bridge elements moved to the bridge location and installed in place. Accordingly, ABC reduces many uncertainties associated with construction processes and performance during service life. It also improves the life cycle cost by reducing construction time and traffic interruptions, better control over schedule, and normally by the higher quality of elements resulting in better life-cycle performance. Nevertheless, prefabricated elements need to be made continuous using cast-in-place joints. ABC “closure joints” connecting deck elements to each other and to the bridge girders have greater exposure to degrading environmental effects, and often there is more focus on their evaluation. These joints, expected to become serviceable quickly can therefore be viewed as critical elements of the ABC bridges. Instances of defective (leaky) joints have been reported, and concerns have been raised about the long-term durability of the joints. The long-term deflections and environmental loading can only exacerbate this situation. These may overshadow the many advantages of ABC specifically as life-cycle performance and costs are concerned. Hence, there have been questions on the long-term performance of ABC bridges. There have been limited investigations by some states to monitor the ABC bridges for determining their performance. ABC-UTC, through a collaborative effort by partner universities, is planning to embark on a coordinated and extensive inspection program to inspect several bridges in various states.
    [Show full text]
  • Sumter County Board of County Commissioners Executive Summary
    SUMTER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SUBJECT: Renew Contract with AECOM for RFQ 007-0-2016/RS Sumter County Continuing Contract for Construction Engineering Inspection (CEI) Services for FDOT Local Agency Program (LAP) Projects in Sumter County (Staff Recommends Approval). REQUESTED ACTION: Staff Recommends Approval Meeting Type: Regular Meeting DATE OF MEETING: 6/26/2018 CONTRACT: ☒ N/A Vendor/Entity: AECOM Effective Date: 6/26/2018 Termination Date: September 30, 2019 with a renewal option for 1 year Managing Division / Dept: Engineering / Public Works BUDGET IMPACT: 68,967 FUNDING SOURCE: 106-340-541-6531 Type: N/A EXPENDITURE ACCOUNT: Secondary Trust HISTORY/FACTS/ISSUES: The Board approved Contract with AECOM on October 26, 2016, in response to RFQ 007-0-2016/RS Sumter County Continuing Contract for Construction Engineering Inspection (CEI) Services for FDOT Local Agency Program (LAP) Projects in Sumter County. The original term of this Agreement commenced on October 25, 2016, and continue in full force for up to two (2) years through September 30, 2018, with the option to renew for an additional two (2) one-year terms. At this time staff recommends extending this contract for an additional one-year term, through September 30, 2019, with the option to renew for an additional one (1) one-year term to perform CEI Services on LAP Project. The next task under this agreement is for AECOM to perform CEI services for the C-475N contract being considered for construction award to Pave-Rite at this meeting. CEI Services will be performed on the attached time and material rates not to exceed the fee $68,967.
    [Show full text]