Hearing and Vision Loss Next- Generation Sequencing Panel

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hearing and Vision Loss Next- Generation Sequencing Panel HEARING AND VISION LOSS NEXT- GENERATION SEQUENCING PANEL 62 Southfield Ave. Stamford, CT 06902 P: 800-298-6470 Branford CT Lic#: CL-0830 F: 646-859-6870 Stamford CT Lic#: CL-1016 1 www.sema4.com 62 Southfield Avenue. Stamford, CT 06902 P: 800-298-6470 Branford CT Lic#: CL-0830 2 F: 646-859-6870 Stamford CT Lic#: CL-1016 www.sema4.com 62 Southfield Avenue. Stamford, CT 06902 P: 800-298-6470 Branford CT Lic#: CL-0830 3 F: 646-859-6870 Stamford CT Lic#: CL-1016 www.sema4.com Table of Contents GENETIC TESTING FOR HEARING AND VISION LOSS 5 GENETICS 5 INDICATIONS 5 TESTING METHODS, SENSITIVITY, AND LIMITATIONS 6 TURNAROUND TIME 8 SPECIMEN AND SHIPPING REQUIREMENTS 8 CUSTOMER SERVICES AND GENETIC COUNSELING 9 THE COMPREHENSIVE VISION LOSS PANEL 9 RETINAL DISEASE SUBPANEL 14 ALBINISM, HERMANSKY-PUDLAK SYNDROME, AND WAARDENBURG SYNDROME SUBPANEL 24 DEVELOPMENTAL EYE SUBPANEL (ANOPHTHALMIA/MICROPHTHALMIA/ANIRIDIA) 26 STICKLER & CATARACT SUBPANEL 28 THE COMPREHENSIVE HEARING LOSS PANEL 32 BRANCHIO-OTO-RENAL SYNDROME SUBPANEL 37 USHER SYNDROME SUBPANEL 38 ZELLWEGER SYNDROME SUBPANEL 39 REFERENCES 41 DISCLAIMER 41 62 Southfield Avenue. Stamford, CT 06902 P: 800-298-6470 Branford CT Lic#: CL-0830 4 F: 646-859-6870 Stamford CT Lic#: CL-1016 www.sema4.com Genetic Testing For HEARING AND VISION LOSS Hearing and/or vision loss can result from both genetic and non-genetic etiologies. In general, up to 50% of prelingual hearing loss has a genetic basis, as does up to 60% of congenital blindness among infants. Next generation sequencing (NGS) technology is ideal for diagnostic testing of these disorders due to the extreme locus heterogeneity and phenotypic overlap of the genes involved. Our customizable targeted NGS panel uses Agilent SureSelectTM XT target enrichment and Illumina HiSeq sequencing to detect pathogenic variants in genes involved in hearing and or vision loss. These genes were selected for inclusion based on literature review, clinical actionablity scores, and comparison with commercially available assays. The Hearing and Vision Loss Panel (308 genes) includes the Comprehensive Hearing Loss (92) and Comprehensive Vision Loss (250) panels. Hearing loss subpanels include Usher Syndrome (11 genes), Zellweger Spectrum Disorder (9), and Branchio-Oto-Renal Syndrome (3). Vision loss subpanels include Retinal Disease (154 genes), Albinism, Hermansky-Pudlak Syndrome, and Waardenburg Syndrome (18), Developmental Eye Disorders (21), and Stickler Disease and Cataracts (41). Customizable testing is available for ordering a hearing-specific or vision-specific gene panel. Targeted familial testing is also available. Genetic testing may clarify the cause of an individual’s deafness and/or vision loss, provide information on the likelihood of related health issues, and also establish risk to other family members and future generations. Genetics The disorders included in this panel may be inherited in an autosomal dominant (AD), autosomal recessive (AR), or X-linked manner (XL). For genes displaying an AD mode of inheritance, an affected parent carrying the mutated gene has a 50% chance of passing the variant on to an offspring, regardless of gender. Some of these genes are not fully penetrant, meaning that an individual may have a mutated gene but not display any of the signs/symptoms of the disorder. Additionally, these disorders may have variable expressivity indicating that individuals carrying the same pathogenic variant may display differing features and/or differing severity. For diseases with AR inheritance, the risk for a couple who are both carriers to have a child affected with the disease is 25% for each pregnancy. The parents of an affected child are most often obligate carriers (heterozygotes) and each carry one mutant allele (unless a de novo mutation occurs). An X-linked inheritance means that the risk of a male offspring with the disorder will be 50% if the mother carries an XL mutation. Depending on the X-inactivation pattern of the gene, a mother and her daughters may rarely be affected. Although X-linked diseases are normally transmitted from mother to son, transmission of an X-linked mutation will occur from an affected father to each daughter, but will not occur from father to son. Indications 1. Clinical status: to confirm a clinical diagnosis in an affected patient, in an individual with unknown status (no screening/evaluation), or in unaffected relatives of an affected patient (all screening/evaluations(s) normal). The purpose of the test may be diagnostic, carrier testing, familial follow-up on a known family variant, or prenatal testing for known variant(s). 62 Southfield Avenue. Stamford, CT 06902 P: 800-298-6470 Branford CT Lic#: CL-0830 5 F: 646-859-6870 Stamford CT Lic#: CL-1016 www.sema4.com 2. Treatment: to clarify the cause of an individual’s hearing and/or vision loss, provide information on the likelihood of related health issues, and guide treatment. 3. Family risk: to establish risk to other family members and future generations. For patients with a suspected syndrome or disorder, please consider individual gene sequencing or syndromic subpanels prior to ordering the full panel. Testing Methods, Sensitivity, and Limitations Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Agilent SureSelectTM XT technology uses a custom capture library to target the exonic regions of the genes listed below. These targeted regions are sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq2500 system with 100 bp paired-end reads. The DNA sequences are mapped to and analyzed in comparison with the published human genome build UCSC hg19 reference sequence. The targeted coding exons and splice junctions of the known protein-coding RefSeq genes are assessed for the average depth of coverage and data quality threshold values. In our validation, average coverage was greater than 500X per sample with 99% of regions covered at greater than 20X. Sanger sequencing, as indicated, is performed in both directions using BigDye Terminator chemistry on the ABI 3730 DNA Analyzer with target specific amplicons as a confirmatory method for NGS positive results. Sanger sequencing may also be used to supplement targets for which NGS returned a low depth of coverage (<20 reads) or poor mapping scores. False negative results may occur if rare variants interfere with amplification or annealing. In addition, SALSA® MLPA® P163-D1 probemix is used to test the copy number of GJB2 and GJB6 where all testing is approximately 99% accurate. This MLPA test will detect the two most common GJB6 deletions, del(GJB6-D13S18830) and del(GJB6-D13S1854). SALSA® MLPA® P461-A1 probemix is used to test the copy number of OTOA and STRC where all testing is approximately 99% accurate. The sensitivity of this NGS panel is estimated at 99% for single base substitutions. This NGS technology may not detect all small insertions/deletions and is not diagnostic for large duplications/deletions, repeat expansions, and structural genomic variation. Therefore, oligonucleotide array CGH is available for this test for deletion duplication analysis (please see details below). Variant interpretation and classification was performed based on the American College of Medical Genetics Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants (Richards et al, 2015). Frequency in control populations were evaluated based on the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC; http://exac.broadinstitute.org/) and Genome Aggregation Database (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). All potentially pathogenic variants may have been confirmed by either a specific genotyping assay or Sanger sequencing as indicated. Variants classified as likely benign in the proband and any further familial testing of such variants will only be confirmed by Sanger sequencing if indicated. Any benign polymorphisms identified during this analysis were not reported. Variant interpretations, based on current knowledge, may change over time as more information arises. Sanger Sequencing 62 Southfield Avenue. Stamford, CT 06902 P: 800-298-6470 Branford CT Lic#: CL-0830 6 F: 646-859-6870 Stamford CT Lic#: CL-1016 www.sema4.com Sanger sequencing, as indicated, was performed in both directions using BigDye Terminator chemistry with the ABI 3730 DNA analyzer with target specific amplicons. It also may be used to supplement specific guaranteed target regions that fail NGS sequencing due to poor quality or low depth of coverage <20 reads or as a confirmatory method for NGS positive results. False negative results may occur if rare variants interfere with amplification or annealing. Oligonucleotide array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (Optional Add-on) The customized oligonucleotide microarray is a highly-targeted exon-focused array capable of detecting medically relevant microdeletions and microduplications at a much higher resolution than traditional aCGH methods. Each array matrix has approximately one hundred and eighty thousand 60-mer oligonucleotide probes that cover the entire gene panel. This platform is designed based on human genome NCBI Build 37 (hg19) and the CGH probes are selected to target the exonic regions of 304 genes. This test does not include analysis of MT-RNR1, P2RX2, STRC, and RAB28. For the majority of genes there are a minimum of 4 probes per exon. For very large exons, probes are distributed evenly along the exon with 1 probe every 125 bp. In the untargeted backbone regions, this array has one probe every 42kb. All genomic coordinates are reported using human genome NCBI Build 37 (hg19). Copy number aberrations are identified using the Aberration Detection Method-2 (ADM2) algorithm with a sensitivity threshold of 6.0 (Agilent Technologies). The log2 ratio threshold values to detect aberrations are < -0.25 for copy number losses and > 0.25 for copy number gains. Please note that any inconsistencies in the reported biological familial relationships could significantly change the interpretation of these results. For reported CNVs with uncertain clinical significance, continued surveillance of the medical literature for new information is recommended. The sensitivity of this assay is estimated to be greater than 99% for microdeletions and microduplications in the exonic regions of 304 medically-relevant genes.
Recommended publications
  • Genetic Testing for Non-Cancerous Inheritable Diseases
    Genetic Testing for Non-Cancerous Inheritable Diseases Policy Number: Original Effective Date: MM.02.009 03/01/2010 Line(s) of Business: Current Effective Date: HMO; PPO; QUEST Integration 12/30/2016 Section: Medicine Place(s) of Service: Outpatient I. Description A genetic test is the analysis of human DNA, RNA, chromosomes, proteins, or certain metabolites in order to detect alterations related to an inheritable disorder. This can be accomplished by directly examining the DNA or RNA that makes up a gene (direct testing), looking at markers co-inherited with a disease-causing gene (linkage testing), assaying certain metabolites (biochemical testing), or examining the chromosomes (cytogenetic testing). Genetic tests are conducted for a number of purposes, including predicting disease risk, newborn screening, determining clinical management, identifying carriers, and establishing prenatal or clinical diagnoses or prognoses in individuals, families, or populations. Expanded Carrier Screening The American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG ) defines expanded panels as those that use next- generation sequencing to screen for mutations in many genes, as opposed to gene-by-gene screening (e.g., ethnic-specific screening or panethnic testing for cystic fibrosis). An ACMG position statement states that although commercial laboratories offer expanded carrier screening panels, there has been no professional guidance as to which disease genes and mutations to include. This policy does not address oncology-related genetic testing or pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). II. Criteria/Guidelines Note: For familial assessments, unless otherwise specified, family will be considered: first-, second- and third- degree relatives on the same side of the family. The maternal and paternal sides should be considered independently.
    [Show full text]
  • Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors Have Been Treated Separately
    EPIDEMIOLOGY z Sarcomas are rare tumors compared to other BONE AND SOFT malignancies: 8,700 new sarcomas in 2001, with TISSUE TUMORS 4,400 deaths. z The incidence of sarcomas is around 3-4/100,000. z Slight male predominance (with some subtypes more common in women). z Majority of soft tissue tumors affect older adults, but important sub-groups occur predominantly or exclusively in children. z Incidence of benign soft tissue tumors not known, but Fabrizio Remotti MD probably outnumber malignant tumors 100:1. BONE AND SOFT TISSUE SOFT TISSUE TUMORS TUMORS z Traditionally bone and soft tissue tumors have been treated separately. z This separation will be maintained in the following presentation. z Soft tissue sarcomas will be treated first and the sarcomas of bone will follow. Nowhere in the picture….. DEFINITION Histological z Soft tissue pathology deals with tumors of the classification connective tissues. of soft tissue z The concept of soft tissue is understood broadly to tumors include non-osseous tumors of extremities, trunk wall, retroperitoneum and mediastinum, and head & neck. z Excluded (with a few exceptions) are organ specific tumors. 1 Histological ETIOLOGY classification of soft tissue tumors tumors z Oncogenic viruses introduce new genomic material in the cell, which encode for oncogenic proteins that disrupt the regulation of cellular proliferation. z Two DNA viruses have been linked to soft tissue sarcomas: – Human herpes virus 8 (HHV8) linked to Kaposi’s sarcoma – Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) linked to subtypes of leiomyosarcoma z In both instances the connection between viral infection and sarcoma is more common in immunosuppressed hosts.
    [Show full text]
  • National Study of Microphthalmia, Anophthalmia, and Coloboma (MAC
    16 ORIGINAL ARTICLE J Med Genet: first published as 10.1136/jmg.39.1.16 on 1 January 2002. Downloaded from National study of microphthalmia, anophthalmia, and coloboma (MAC) in Scotland: investigation of genetic aetiology D Morrison, D FitzPatrick, I Hanson, K Williamson, V van Heyningen, B Fleck, I Jones, J Chalmers, H Campbell ............................................................................................................................. J Med Genet 2002;39:16–22 We report an epidemiological and genetic study attempting complete ascertainment of subjects with microphthalmia, anophthalmia, and coloboma (MAC) born in Scotland during a 16 year period beginning on 1 January 1981. A total of 198 cases were confirmed giving a minimum live birth preva- lence of 19 per 100 000. One hundred and twenty-two MAC cases (61.6%) from 115 different fami- See end of article for lies were clinically examined and detailed pregnancy, medical, and family histories obtained. A authors’ affiliations simple, rational, and apparently robust classification of the eye phenotype was developed based on ....................... the presence or absence of a defect in closure of the optic (choroidal) fissure. A total of 85/122 Correspondence to: (69.7%) of cases had optic fissure closure defects (OFCD), 12/122 (9.8%) had non-OFCD, and Dr D FitzPatrick, MRC 25/122 (20.5%) had defects that were unclassifiable owing to the severity of the corneal or anterior Human Genetics Unit, chamber abnormality. Segregation analysis assuming single and multiple incomplete ascertainment, Western General Hospital, respectively, returned a sib recurrence risk of 6% and 10% in the whole group and 8.1% and 13.3% Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK; in the OFCD subgroup.
    [Show full text]
  • Preconception Carrier Screening by Genome Sequencing: Results from the Clinical Laboratory
    The American Journal of Human Genetics, Volume 102 Supplemental Data Preconception Carrier Screening by Genome Sequencing: Results from the Clinical Laboratory Sumit Punj, Yassmine Akkari, Jennifer Huang, Fei Yang, Allison Creason, Christine Pak, Amiee Potter, Michael O. Dorschner, Deborah A. Nickerson, Peggy D. Robertson, Gail P. Jarvik, Laura M. Amendola, Jennifer Schleit, Dana Kostiner Simpson, Alan F. Rope, Jacob Reiss, Tia Kauffman, Marian J. Gilmore, Patricia Himes, Benjamin Wilfond, Katrina A.B. Goddard, and C. Sue Richards Supplemental Note: Clinical Report Carrier Results: Four Known Pathogenic Variants Detected. Gene Inheritance Disease Prevalence Variant Classification Pendred Syndrome/ Non- syndromic Autosomal Hearing Loss A c.1246A>C, SLC26A4 1/500 Pathogenic Recessive DFNB4 with (p.Thr416Pro) enlarged vestibular aqueduct Autosomal Spastic ++ c.1045G>A, SPG7 2-6/100,000 Pathogenic Recessive Paraplegia 7 (p.Gly349Ser) 3.7 Autosomal Alpha +++ -α HBA2 1-5/10,000 Pathogenic Recessive Thalassemia (α+- thalassemia) Autosomal Hereditary 1/200 – c.845G>A HFE Pathogenic Recessive Hemochromatosis 1/1000+ (p.Cys282Tyr) +: GeneReviews; ++: Genetics Home Reference; +++: orphan.net – varies with population; A- Generalized prevalence of all deafness and hearing loss Interpretation: A sample from this individual was referred to our laboratory for analysis of Next-Generation Genome Sequencing (NGS) and Sanger confirmation of variants identified in carrier screening for: (1) conditions with significantly shortened lifespan; (2) serious conditions; (3) mild conditions; (4) conditions with unpredictable outcomes: and (5) conditions that begin as adults. One known heterozygous missense variant, c.1246A>C (p.Thr416Pro) (NM_000441.1), was detected in exon 10 of the SLC26A4 gene of this individual by NGS.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Exome Sequencing Gene Package Vision Disorders, Version 6.1, 31-1-2020
    Whole Exome Sequencing Gene package Vision disorders, version 6.1, 31-1-2020 Technical information DNA was enriched using Agilent SureSelect DNA + SureSelect OneSeq 300kb CNV Backbone + Human All Exon V7 capture and paired-end sequenced on the Illumina platform (outsourced). The aim is to obtain 10 Giga base pairs per exome with a mapped fraction of 0.99. The average coverage of the exome is ~50x. Duplicate and non-unique reads are excluded. Data are demultiplexed with bcl2fastq Conversion Software from Illumina. Reads are mapped to the genome using the BWA-MEM algorithm (reference: http://bio-bwa.sourceforge.net/). Variant detection is performed by the Genome Analysis Toolkit HaplotypeCaller (reference: http://www.broadinstitute.org/gatk/). The detected variants are filtered and annotated with Cartagenia software and classified with Alamut Visual. It is not excluded that pathogenic mutations are being missed using this technology. At this moment, there is not enough information about the sensitivity of this technique with respect to the detection of deletions and duplications of more than 5 nucleotides and of somatic mosaic mutations (all types of sequence changes). HGNC approved Phenotype description including OMIM phenotype ID(s) OMIM median depth % covered % covered % covered gene symbol gene ID >10x >20x >30x ABCA4 Cone-rod dystrophy 3, 604116 601691 94 100 100 97 Fundus flavimaculatus, 248200 {Macular degeneration, age-related, 2}, 153800 Retinal dystrophy, early-onset severe, 248200 Retinitis pigmentosa 19, 601718 Stargardt disease
    [Show full text]
  • Megalencephaly and Macrocephaly
    277 Megalencephaly and Macrocephaly KellenD.Winden,MD,PhD1 Christopher J. Yuskaitis, MD, PhD1 Annapurna Poduri, MD, MPH2 1 Department of Neurology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Address for correspondence Annapurna Poduri, Epilepsy Genetics Massachusetts Program, Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2 Epilepsy Genetics Program, Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Department of Neurology, Fegan 9, Boston Children’s Hospital, 300 Electrophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children’s Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115 Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (e-mail: [email protected]). Semin Neurol 2015;35:277–287. Abstract Megalencephaly is a developmental disorder characterized by brain overgrowth secondary to increased size and/or numbers of neurons and glia. These disorders can be divided into metabolic and developmental categories based on their molecular etiologies. Metabolic megalencephalies are mostly caused by genetic defects in cellular metabolism, whereas developmental megalencephalies have recently been shown to be caused by alterations in signaling pathways that regulate neuronal replication, growth, and migration. These disorders often lead to epilepsy, developmental disabilities, and Keywords behavioral problems; specific disorders have associations with overgrowth or abnor- ► megalencephaly malities in other tissues. The molecular underpinnings of many of these disorders are ► hemimegalencephaly now understood, providing insight into how dysregulation of critical pathways leads to ►
    [Show full text]
  • Genes in Eyecare Geneseyedoc 3 W.M
    Genes in Eyecare geneseyedoc 3 W.M. Lyle and T.D. Williams 15 Mar 04 This information has been gathered from several sources; however, the principal source is V. A. McKusick’s Mendelian Inheritance in Man on CD-ROM. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998. Other sources include McKusick’s, Mendelian Inheritance in Man. Catalogs of Human Genes and Genetic Disorders. Baltimore. Johns Hopkins University Press 1998 (12th edition). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Omim See also S.P.Daiger, L.S. Sullivan, and B.J.F. Rossiter Ret Net http://www.sph.uth.tmc.edu/Retnet disease.htm/. Also E.I. Traboulsi’s, Genetic Diseases of the Eye, New York, Oxford University Press, 1998. And Genetics in Primary Eyecare and Clinical Medicine by M.R. Seashore and R.S.Wappner, Appleton and Lange 1996. M. Ridley’s book Genome published in 2000 by Perennial provides additional information. Ridley estimates that we have 60,000 to 80,000 genes. See also R.M. Henig’s book The Monk in the Garden: The Lost and Found Genius of Gregor Mendel, published by Houghton Mifflin in 2001 which tells about the Father of Genetics. The 3rd edition of F. H. Roy’s book Ocular Syndromes and Systemic Diseases published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins in 2002 facilitates differential diagnosis. Additional information is provided in D. Pavan-Langston’s Manual of Ocular Diagnosis and Therapy (5th edition) published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins in 2002. M.A. Foote wrote Basic Human Genetics for Medical Writers in the AMWA Journal 2002;17:7-17. A compilation such as this might suggest that one gene = one disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Bass – Glaucomatous-Type Field Loss Not Due to Glaucoma
    Glaucoma on the Brain! Glaucomatous-Type Yes, we see lots of glaucoma Field Loss Not Due to Not every field that looks like glaucoma is due to glaucoma! Glaucoma If you misdiagnose glaucoma, you could miss other sight-threatening and life-threatening Sherry J. Bass, OD, FAAO disorders SUNY College of Optometry New York, NY Types of Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects Paracentral Defects Nasal Step Defects Arcuate and Bjerrum Defects Altitudinal Defects Peripheral Field Constriction to Tunnel Fields 1 Visual Field Defects in Very Early Glaucoma Paracentral loss Early superior/inferior temporal RNFL and rim loss: short axons Arcuate defects above or below the papillomacular bundle Arcuate field loss in the nasal field close to fixation Superotemporal notch Visual Field Defects in Early Glaucoma Nasal step More widespread RNFL loss and rim loss in the inferior or superior temporal rim tissue : longer axons Loss stops abruptly at the horizontal raphae “Step” pattern 2 Visual Field Defects in Moderate Glaucoma Arcuate scotoma- Bjerrum scotoma Focal notches in the inferior and/or superior rim tissue that reach the edge of the disc Denser field defects Follow an arcuate pattern connected to the blind spot 3 Visual Field Defects in Advanced Glaucoma End-Stage Glaucoma Dense Altitudinal Loss Progressive loss of superior or inferior rim tissue Non-Glaucomatous Etiology of End-Stage Glaucoma Paracentral Field Loss Peripheral constriction Hereditary macular Loss of temporal rim tissue diseases Temporal “islands” Stargardt’s macular due
    [Show full text]
  • The Genetic Heterogeneity of Brachydactyly Type A1: Identifying the Molecular Pathways
    The genetic heterogeneity of brachydactyly type A1: Identifying the molecular pathways Lemuel Jean Racacho Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Postdoctoral Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctorate in Philosophy degree in Biochemistry Specialization in Human and Molecular Genetics Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology Faculty of Medicine University of Ottawa © Lemuel Jean Racacho, Ottawa, Canada, 2015 Abstract Brachydactyly type A1 (BDA1) is a rare autosomal dominant trait characterized by the shortening of the middle phalanges of digits 2-5 and of the proximal phalange of digit 1 in both hands and feet. Many of the brachymesophalangies including BDA1 have been associated with genetic perturbations along the BMP-SMAD signaling pathway. The goal of this thesis is to identify the molecular pathways that are associated with the BDA1 phenotype through the genetic assessment of BDA1-affected families. We identified four missense mutations that are clustered with other reported BDA1 mutations in the central region of the N-terminal signaling peptide of IHH. We also identified a missense mutation in GDF5 cosegregating with a semi-dominant form of BDA1. In two families we reported two novel BDA1-associated sequence variants in BMPR1B, the gene which codes for the receptor of GDF5. In 2002, we reported a BDA1 trait linked to chromosome 5p13.3 in a Canadian kindred (BDA1B; MIM %607004) but we did not discover a BDA1-causal variant in any of the protein coding genes within the 2.8 Mb critical region. To provide a higher sensitivity of detection, we performed a targeted enrichment of the BDA1B locus followed by high-throughput sequencing.
    [Show full text]
  • Ophthalmology
    Ophthalmology Information for health professionals MEDICAL GENETIC TESTING FOR OPHTHALMOLOGY Recent technologies, in particularly Next Generation Sequencing (NGS), allows fast, accurate and valuable diagnostic tests. For Ophthalmology, CGC Genetics has an extensive list of medical genetic tests with clinical integration of results by our Medical Geneticists. 1. EXOME SEQUENCING: Exome Sequencing is a very efficient strategy to study most exons of a patient’s genome, unraveling mutations associated with specific disorders or phenotypes. With this diagnostic strategy, patients can be studied with a significantly reduced turnaround time and cost. CGC Genetics has available 2 options for Exome Sequencing: • Whole Exome Sequencing (WES), which analyzes the entire exome (about 20 000 genes); • Disease Exome by CGC Genetics, which analyzes about 6 000 clinically-relevant genes. Any of these can be performed in the index case or in a Trio. 2. NGS PANELS For NGS panels, several genes associated with the same phenotype are simultaneously sequenced. These panels provide increased diagnostic capability with a significantly reduced turnaround time and cost. CGC Genetics has several NGS panels for Ophthalmology that are constantly updated (www.cgcgenetics.com). Any gene studied in exome or NGS panel can also be individually sequenced and analyzed for deletion/duplication events. 3. EXPERTISE IN MEDICAL GENETICS CGC Genetics has Medical Geneticists specialized in genetic counseling for ophthalmological diseases who may advice in choosing the most appropriate
    [Show full text]
  • American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology, Inc
    AMERICAN BOARD OF PSYCHIATRY AND NEUROLOGY, INC. CERTIFICATION EXAMINATION IN NEUROLOGY 2015 Content Blueprint (January 13, 2015) Part A Basic neuroscience Number of questions: 120 01. Neuroanatomy 3-5% 02. Neuropathology 3-5% 03. Neurochemistry 2-4% 04. Neurophysiology 5-7% 05. Neuroimmunology/neuroinfectious disease 2-4% 06. Neurogenetics/molecular neurology, neuroepidemiology 2-4% 07. Neuroendocrinology 1-2% 08. Neuropharmacology 4-6% Part B Behavioral neurology, cognition, and psychiatry Number of questions: 80 01. Development through the life cycle 3-5% 02. Psychiatric and psychological principles 1-3% 03. Diagnostic procedures 1-3% 04. Clinical and therapeutic aspects of psychiatric disorders 5-7% 05. Clinical and therapeutic aspects of behavioral neurology 5-7% Part C Clinical neurology (adult and child) The clinical neurology section of the Neurology Certification Examination is comprised of 60% adult neurology questions and 40% child neurology questions. Number of questions: 200 01. Headache disorders 1-3% 02. Pain disorders 1-3% 03. Epilepsy and episodic disorders 1-3% 04. Sleep disorders 1-3% 05. Genetic disorders 1-3% 2015 ABPN Content Specifications Page 1 of 22 Posted: Certification in Neurology AMERICAN BOARD OF PSYCHIATRY AND NEUROLOGY, INC. 06. Congenital disorders 1-3% 07. Cerebrovascular disease 1-3% 08. Neuromuscular diseases 2-4% 09. Cranial nerve palsies 1-3% 10. Spinal cord diseases 1-3% 11. Movement disorders 1-3% 12. Demyelinating diseases 1-3% 13. Neuroinfectious diseases 1-3% 14. Critical care 1-3% 15. Trauma 1-3% 16. Neuro-ophthalmology 1-3% 17. Neuro-otology 1-3% 18. Neurologic complications of systemic diseases 2-4% 19.
    [Show full text]
  • Joubert Syndrome Genereview
    Title: Joubert Syndrome GeneReview — Molecular Genetics: Less Common Genetic Causes Authors: Parisi M, Glass I Updated: June 2017 Note: The following information is provided by the authors listed above and has not been reviewed by GeneReviews staff. Joubert Syndrome: Less Common Genetic Causes ARL13B B9D1 B9D2 CEP41 IFT172 KIF7 OFD1 (CXORF5) PDE6D POC1B TCTN1 TCTN3 TMEM138 TMEM231 TMEM237 (ALS2CR4) TTC21B ARL13B Gene structure. ARL13B is a ten-exon gene that encodes a 428-amino acid protein. Pathogenic variants. Two families with a phenotype typical of classic Joubert syndrome had missense and/or nonsense variants in this gene; one of these individuals also had evidence of a retinopathy [Cantagrel et al 2008]. Normal gene product. ARL13B encodes ADP-ribosylation factor-like protein 13B, a member of the ADP-ribosylation factor-like family. Multiple transcript variants result from alternate splicing; two protein isoforms are known. The AR13B protein is a small GTPase in the Ras superfamily that contains both N-terminal and C-terminal guanine nucleotide-binding motifs. It is localized to the cilia and plays a role in cilia formation and maintenance as well as sonic hedgehog signaling. Abnormal gene product. In C elegans, pathogenic variants in the homolog arl13 exhibit defective cilium morphology, localization, and anterograde intraflagellar transport [Cevik et al 2010]. Mice with defects in the murine ortholog have neural tube defects and polydactyly, as well as an embryonic-lethal phenotype [Cantagrel et al 2008, Doherty 2009]. B9D1. See Tables A and B. B9D2. See Tables A and B. CEP41 Gene structure. The gene consists of 11 exons and spans approximately 50 kb.
    [Show full text]