Xrd and Tem Studies on Nanophase Manganese

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Xrd and Tem Studies on Nanophase Manganese Clays and Clay Minerals, Vol. 64, No. 5, 488–501, 2016. 1 1 2 2 3 XRD AND TEM STUDIES ON NANOPHASE MANGANESE OXIDES IN 3 4 FRESHWATER FERROMANGANESE NODULES FROM GREEN BAY, 4 5 5 6 LAKE MICHIGAN 6 7 7 8 8 S EUNGYEOL L EE AND H UIFANG X U* 9 9 NASA Astrobiology Institute, Department of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, 10 À 10 1215 West Dayton Street, A352 Weeks Hall, Wisconsin 53706 11 11 12 12 13 Abstract—Freshwater ferromanganese nodules (FFN) from Green Bay, Lake Michigan have been 13 14 investigated by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), micro X-ray fluorescence (XRF), scanning electron 14 microscopy (SEM), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), and scanning 15 transmission electron microscopy (STEM). The samples can be divided into three types: Mn-rich 15 16 nodules, Fe-Mn nodules, and Fe-rich nodules. The manganese-bearing phases are todorokite, birnessite, 16 17 and buserite. The iron-bearing phases are feroxyhyte, goethite, 2-line ferrihydrite, and proto-goethite 17 18 (intermediate phase between feroxyhyte and goethite). The XRD patterns from a nodule cross section 18 19 suggest the transformation of birnessite to todorokite. The TEM-EDS spectra show that todorokite is 19 associated with Ba, Co, Ni, and Zn; birnessite is associated with Ca and Na; and buserite is associated with 20 2+ +2 3+ 20 Ca. The todorokite has an average chemical formula of Ba0.28(Zn0.14Co0.05 21 2+ 4+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 2+ 21 Ni0.02)(Mn4.99Mn0.82Fe0.12Co0.05Ni0.02)O12·nH2O. Barium is the main cation in the structural tunnels of 22 the todorokite. The average chemical formula of birnessite and Ca-buserite are: 22 + 2+ 4+ 3+ 2+ 4+ 3+ 23 Na0.14Ca0.19(Mn1.48Mn0.52)O4·nH2OandCa0.27(Mn1.46Mn0.54)O4·nH2O, respectively. Most nodules have 23 24 a concretionary structure of alternating Fe/Mn layers, commonly with a core of reddish feldspar containing 24 25 hematite micro-crystals. Other cores consist of goethite, cristobalite, tridymite, hercynite, hematite- 25 bearing quartz, coal, and chlorite-bearing rock fragments. The hexagonal or hexagonal-like structures of 26 26 hematite micro-crystals and clay minerals in the cores may serve as heterogeneous nucleation sites for the 27 Mn-oxides and Fe-(oxyhydr)oxides. The alternating Fe/Mn layers in FFNs might be caused by oscillatory 27 28 redox condition fluctuations at the sediment-water interface due to changes in water level. 28 29 Key Words—Birnessite, Buserite, Ferromanganese Nodule, Green Bay, Heterogeneous Nucleation, 29 30 HRTEM, Lake Michigan, Todorokite, XRD. 30 31 31 32 INTRODUCTION 32 33 that constitute the bulk of glacial debris (Rossmann and 33 34 Freshwater ferromanganese nodules (FFN) are known Callender, 1968; Edgington and Callender, 1970). The 34 35 to occur in lakes throughout North America (Harriss and glacial materials are quite permeable and thus easily 35 36 Troup, 1970; Callender et al., 1973; Sozanski and weathered under temperate climatic conditions (Callender 36 37 Cronan, 1979; Stein et al., 2001), Europe (Calvert and et al., 1973; Robbins and Callender, 1975). 37 38 Price, 1970; Kuleshov and Sterenberg, 1988), Asia The purpose of the present paper is to offer further 38 39 (Amirzhanov et al., 1992; Tan et al., 2006), and Africa evidence of trace element binding behavior, nucleation 39 40 (Williams and Owen, 1992; Kalindekafe, 1993). sites,andgrowthofGreenBaynodulesbyusingX-ray 40 41 However, no detailed investigation has been reported powder diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy 41 42 about nano-phase minerals and nucleation of ferroman- (SEM), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy 42 43 ganese nodules in freshwater environments. (HRTEM), and scanning transmission electron micro- 43 44 Green Bay FFN consist of alternating Fe/Mn layers scopy (STEM). The Mineralogy of Green Bay nodules is 44 45 around a central core, which undergo oscillatory changes todorokite, birnessite, buserite, feroxyhyte, goethite, 45 46 between reduced and oxidized conditions at the sediment- ferrihydrite, and proto-goethite with a guyanaite structure 46 47 water interface (Rossmann and Callender, 1968; Stein et (an intermediate phase between feroxyhyte and goethite) 47 48 al., 2001; Hlawatsch et al., 2002). Microbial communities (Lee et al., 2016). Given that the mineralogy of nanophase 48 49 are proposed to play a significant role in the mineraliza- Fe-(oxyhydr)oxides in Green Bay nodules were strongly 49 50 tion of ferromanganese nodules (Nealson and Myers, discussed in Lee et al., (2016), the present paper will 50 51 1992; Stein et al., 2001). The Mn(II) and Fe(II) in the focus on the mineralogy of nanophase Mn-oxides, the 51 52 nodules are derived from igneous/metamorphic minerals transformation pathways between birnessite, buserite, and 52 53 todorokite, and the associated trace elements Ba, Co, Ni, 53 54 and Zn. Furthermore, a model to describe Fe/Mn-mineral 54 55 * E-mail address of corresponding author: nucleation on core minerals was proposed and the texture 55 56 [email protected] of alternating Fe/Mn layers in Green Bay nodules was 56 57 10.1346/CCMN.2016.064032 described. 57 Vol. 64, No. 5, 2016 Nanophase manganese oxides from Lake Michigan 489 1 MATERIALS AND METHODS Experimental methods 1 2 Freshwater ferromanganese nodules 2 3 Multipoint Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface 3 4 Ferromanganese nodules, which were previously areas and Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) pore size 4 5 studied by Callender et al., (1973), were collected distributions were determined by N2-adsorption techni- 5 6 from the uppermost ~10 cm of lake-bottom sediments in ques using a Nova 4200e surface area and pore size 6 7 Green Bay, Lake Michigan. The samples vary in analyzer (Quantachrome instruments, Florida, USA) in 7 8 diameter from ~0.5 to ~5 mm and can be divided into: the Geoscience Department at the University of 8 9 Mn-rich nodules, Fe-Mn nodules, and Fe-rich nodules Wisconsin-Madison. Surface area analyses of a refer- 9 10 (Figures 1a, 1b, and 1c). Nodules from the northern area ence material (Cat. No. 2005, Quantachrome instru- 10 2 11 of Green Bay are primarily Fe-rich, whereas nodules ments, Florida, USA; 108.1 Ô 6.6 m /g) suggest that the 11 12 adjacent to the Menominee River are Mn-rich (Callender measurement error was within Ô 5%. 12 13 et al., 1973). Interestingly, the Fe/Mn ratios of FFNs Two types of samples were prepared: one sample as 13 14 increase from 0.7 in the central part of Green Bay to 10.8 polished thin sections (50 mm thickness) for in situ XRD; 14 15 in the north (Callender et al., 1973). and the other sample was crushed and colloidal particles 15 16 16 17 17 18 18 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 22 23 23 24 24 25 25 26 26 27 27 28 28 29 29 30 30 31 31 32 32 33 33 34 34 35 35 36 36 37 37 38 38 39 39 40 40 41 41 42 42 43 43 44 44 45 45 46 46 47 47 48 48 49 49 50 50 51 51 52 52 53 53 54 54 55 55 56 Figure 1. Optical images and element maps of Green Bay nodules: (a) Mn-rich nodules, (b) Fe-Mn nodules, (c) Fe-rich nodules, and 56 57 (dÀi) elemental maps and optical image of a nodule showing alternating Fe/Mn layers with an Fe-oxide-bearing quartz core. 57 490 Lee and Xu Clays and Clay Minerals 2 1 1 were collected from a suspension to eliminate possible the Mn-rich nodules, 120 and 132 m gÀ for Fe-Mn rich 1 2 1 2 large detrital grains, such as quartz, for use in heating nodules, and 100 and 114 m gÀ for Fe-rich nodules, 2 3 experiments. Mineral grains were also picked from cores respectively. Similarly, BJH adsorption surface areas 3 2 1 4 in the nodules for XRD analyses. XRD data were were 158 and 178 m gÀ for the Mn-rich nodules (inner 4 2 1 5 collected on a 2-D image-plate detector using a Rigaku part and outer layer), 144 and 165 m gÀ for the Fe-Mn 5 2 1 6 Rapid II instrument (Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) using nodules, and 115 and 124 m gÀ for the Fe-rich nodules 6 7 Mo-Ka radiation in the Geoscience Department. Two (Figure 2). The increased Mn-oxide content was 7 8 dimensional images were converted to produce conven- proportional to the increased surface area. In addition, 8 9 tional 2y vs. intensity patterns using Rigaku’s 2DP the outer layers of FFN have slightly larger surface areas 9 10 software. Percentages of mineral phases in the sample than the inner portion, consistent with the outer layers 10 11 were calculated using the Rietveld method by using having more poorly crystallized minerals as young-stage 11 12 JADE 9 software (MDI, California, USA). A pseudo- precipitates. The BJH pore size distribution analyses 12 13 Voigt method (Thompson et al., 1987) was used for show that the surface areas were dominated by nanopore 13 14 fitting the peak profiles. surfaces (<10 nm) (Figure 2). 14 15 Samples for SEM analysis were mounted onto glass 15 16 slides, polished, and coatedwithcarbon(~10nm).All In situ XRD results 16 17 SEM images were obtained using a Hitachi S3400N Diffraction data for selected regions of the thin section 17 18 variable pressure microscope (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) (Figure 3) showed that Mn-rich nodules were composed 18 19 with an energy-dispersive X-ray attachment. of todorokite, birnessite, buserite, quartz, and orthoclase.
Recommended publications
  • Redalyc.Mineralogical Study of the La Hueca Cretaceous Iron-Manganese
    Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas ISSN: 1026-8774 [email protected] Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México México Corona Esquivel, Rodolfo; Ortega Gutiérrez, Fernando; Reyes Salas, Margarita; Lozano Santacruz, Rufino; Miranda Gasca, Miguel Angel Mineralogical study of the La Hueca Cretaceous Iron-Manganese deposit, Michoacán, south-western Mexico Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas, vol. 17, núm. 2, 2000, pp. 142-151 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Querétaro, México Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=57217206 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas, volumen 17, número 2, 143 2000, p. 143- 153 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Geología, México, D.F MINERALOGICAL STUDY OF THE LA HUECA CRETACEOUS IRON- MANGANESE DEPOSIT, MICHOACÁN, SOUTHWESTERN MEXICO Rodolfo Corona-Esquivel1, Fernando Ortega-Gutiérrez1, Margarita Reyes-Salas1, Rufino Lozano-Santacruz1, and Miguel Angel Miranda-Gasca2 ABSTRACT In this work we describe for the first time the mineralogy and very briefly the possible origin of a banded Fe-Mn deposit associated with a Cretaceous volcanosedimentary sequence of the southern Guerrero terrane, near the sulfide massive volcanogenic deposit of La Minita. The deposit is confined within a felsic tuff unit; about 10 meters thick where sampled for chemical analysis. Using XRF, EDS and XRD techniques, we found besides todorokite, cryptomelane, quartz, romanechite (psilomelane), birnessite, illite-muscovite, cristobalite, chlorite, barite, halloysite, woodruffite, nacrite or kaolinite, and possibly hollandite-ferrian, as well as an amorphous material and two unknown manganese phases.
    [Show full text]
  • Metamorphism of Sedimentary Manganese Deposits
    Acta Mineralogica-Petrographica, Szeged, XX/2, 325—336, 1972. METAMORPHISM OF SEDIMENTARY MANGANESE DEPOSITS SUPRIYA ROY ABSTRACT: Metamorphosed sedimentary deposits of manganese occur extensively in India, Brazil, U. S. A., Australia, New Zealand, U. S. S. R., West and South West Africa, Madagascar and Japan. Different mineral-assemblages have been recorded from these deposits which may be classi- fied into oxide, carbonate, silicate and silicate-carbonate formations. The oxide formations are represented by lower oxides (braunite, bixbyite, hollandite, hausmannite, jacobsite, vredenburgite •etc.), the carbonate formations by rhodochrosite, kutnahorite, manganoan calcite etc., the silicate formations by spessartite, rhodonite, manganiferous amphiboles and pyroxenes, manganophyllite, piedmontite etc. and the silicate-carbonate formations by rhodochrosite, rhodonite, tephroite, spessartite etc. Pétrographie and phase-equilibia data indicate that the original bulk composition in the sediments, the reactions during metamorphism (contact and regional and the variations and effect of 02, C02, etc. with rise of temperature, control the mineralogy of the metamorphosed manga- nese formations. The general trend of formation and transformation of mineral phases in oxide, carbonate, silicate and silicate-carbonate formations during regional and contact metamorphism has, thus, been established. Sedimentary manganese formations, later modified by regional or contact metamorphism, have been reported from different parts of the world. The most important among such deposits occur in India, Brazil, U.S.A., U.S.S.R., Ghana, South and South West Africa, Madagascar, Australia, New Zealand, Great Britain, Japan etc. An attempt will be made to summarize the pertinent data on these metamorphosed sedimentary formations so as to establish the role of original bulk composition of the sediments, transformation and reaction of phases at ele- vated temperature and varying oxygen and carbon dioxide fugacities in determin- ing the mineral assemblages in these deposits.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington State Minerals Checklist
    Division of Geology and Earth Resources MS 47007; Olympia, WA 98504-7007 Washington State 360-902-1450; 360-902-1785 fax E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.dnr.wa.gov/geology Minerals Checklist Note: Mineral names in parentheses are the preferred species names. Compiled by Raymond Lasmanis o Acanthite o Arsenopalladinite o Bustamite o Clinohumite o Enstatite o Harmotome o Actinolite o Arsenopyrite o Bytownite o Clinoptilolite o Epidesmine (Stilbite) o Hastingsite o Adularia o Arsenosulvanite (Plagioclase) o Clinozoisite o Epidote o Hausmannite (Orthoclase) o Arsenpolybasite o Cairngorm (Quartz) o Cobaltite o Epistilbite o Hedenbergite o Aegirine o Astrophyllite o Calamine o Cochromite o Epsomite o Hedleyite o Aenigmatite o Atacamite (Hemimorphite) o Coffinite o Erionite o Hematite o Aeschynite o Atokite o Calaverite o Columbite o Erythrite o Hemimorphite o Agardite-Y o Augite o Calciohilairite (Ferrocolumbite) o Euchroite o Hercynite o Agate (Quartz) o Aurostibite o Calcite, see also o Conichalcite o Euxenite o Hessite o Aguilarite o Austinite Manganocalcite o Connellite o Euxenite-Y o Heulandite o Aktashite o Onyx o Copiapite o o Autunite o Fairchildite Hexahydrite o Alabandite o Caledonite o Copper o o Awaruite o Famatinite Hibschite o Albite o Cancrinite o Copper-zinc o o Axinite group o Fayalite Hillebrandite o Algodonite o Carnelian (Quartz) o Coquandite o o Azurite o Feldspar group Hisingerite o Allanite o Cassiterite o Cordierite o o Barite o Ferberite Hongshiite o Allanite-Ce o Catapleiite o Corrensite o o Bastnäsite
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Processing
    Mineral Processing Foundations of theory and practice of minerallurgy 1st English edition JAN DRZYMALA, C. Eng., Ph.D., D.Sc. Member of the Polish Mineral Processing Society Wroclaw University of Technology 2007 Translation: J. Drzymala, A. Swatek Reviewer: A. Luszczkiewicz Published as supplied by the author ©Copyright by Jan Drzymala, Wroclaw 2007 Computer typesetting: Danuta Szyszka Cover design: Danuta Szyszka Cover photo: Sebastian Bożek Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej Wybrzeze Wyspianskiego 27 50-370 Wroclaw Any part of this publication can be used in any form by any means provided that the usage is acknowledged by the citation: Drzymala, J., Mineral Processing, Foundations of theory and practice of minerallurgy, Oficyna Wydawnicza PWr., 2007, www.ig.pwr.wroc.pl/minproc ISBN 978-83-7493-362-9 Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................9 Part I Introduction to mineral processing .....................................................................13 1. From the Big Bang to mineral processing................................................................14 1.1. The formation of matter ...................................................................................14 1.2. Elementary particles.........................................................................................16 1.3. Molecules .........................................................................................................18 1.4. Solids................................................................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • Sugilite in Manganese Silicate Rocks from the Hoskins Mine and Woods Mine, New South Wales, Australia
    Sugilite in manganese silicate rocks from the Hoskins mine and Woods mine, New South Wales, Australia Y. KAWACHI Geology Department, University of Otago, P.O.Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand P. M. ASHLEY Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia D. VINCE 1A Ramsay Street, Essendon, Victoria 3040, Australia AND M. GOODWIN P.O.Bo• 314, Lightning Ridge, NSW 2834, Australia Abstract Sugilite relatively rich in manganese has been found at two new localities, the Hoskins and Woods mines in New South Wales, Australia. The occurrences are in manganese-rich silicate rocks of middle to upper greenschist facies (Hoskins mine) and hornblende hornfels facies (Woods mine). Coexisting minerals are members of the namansilite-aegirine and pectolite-serandite series, Mn-rich alkali amphiboles, alkali feldspar, braunite, rhodonite, tephroite, albite, microcline, norrishite, witherite, manganoan calcite, quartz, and several unidentified minerals. Woods mine sugilite is colour-zoned with pale mauve cores and colourless rims, whereas Hoskins mine sugilite is only weakly colour-zoned and pink to mauve. Within single samples, the chemical compositions of sugilite from both localities show wide ranges in A1 contents and less variable ranges of Fe and Mn, similar to trends in sugilite from other localities. The refractive indices and cell dimensions tend to show systematic increases progressing from Al-rich to Fe- Mn-rich. The formation of the sugilite is controlled by the high alkali (especially Li) and manganese contents of the country rock, reflected in the occurrences of coexisting high alkali- and manganese- bearing minerals, and by high fo2 conditions. KEYWORDS: sugilite, manganese silicate rocks, milarite group, New South Wales, Australia Introduction Na2K(Fe 3 +,Mn 3 +,Al)2Li3Sit2030.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geology of Manganese Nodules
    1.0 The Geology of Manganese Nodules James R. Hein1 and Sven Petersen2 1 U.S. Geological Survey, 400 Natural Bridges Dr., Santa Cruz, CA, 95060, USA 2 Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (GEOMAR), 24148 Kiel, Germany MANGANESE NODULES 7 1.1 The formation and occurrence of manganese nodules Manganese nodules are mineral concretions made up of manga- • diagenetically, in which minerals precipitate from sedi- nese and iron oxides. They can be as small as golf balls or as big ment pore waters – that is, seawater that has been modi- as large potatoes. The nodules occur over extensive areas of the fied by chemical reactions within the sediment. vast, sediment-covered, abyssal plains of the global ocean in water depths of 4 000 to 6 500 metres, where temperatures are just above The metal oxides that make up the precipitate attach to a freezing, pressures are high, and no sunlight reaches (Figure 2). nucleus – perhaps something as small and common as a bit of shell or a shark’s tooth – and very slowly build up around The manganese and iron minerals in these concretions precipi- the nucleus in layers. Their mineralogy is simple: vernadite tate (form a solid) from the ambient, or surrounding, water in two (a form of manganese oxide) precipitates from seawater; ways (Figure 3): todorokite (another manganese oxide) precipitates from pore • hydrogenetically, in which the minerals precipitate from cold waters; and birnessite (a third manganese oxide) forms from ambient seawater; and the todorokite. Depth region of potential nodule development Exclusive economic zone Seabed from 0 to 2 000 metres depth Seabed from 4 000 to 6 500 metres depth - the abyssal depth at which nodules are generally formed Land area Seabed from 2 000 to 4 000 metres depth Seabed below 6 500 metres depth Figure 2.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MICROHARDNESS of OPAQUE MINERALS VOL.I THESIS Submitted by B.B. YOUNG, B.Sc., A.R.S.M. Degree of Doctor of Philosophy In
    THE MICROHARDNESS OF OPAQUE MINERALS VOL.I THESIS Submitted by B.B. YOUNG, B.Sc., A.R.S.M. Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Science UNIVERSITY OF LONDON April, 1961 Department of Mining Geology, Imperial College, London. I CONTENTS VOL. 1 Page No. Abstracts 1 Acknowledgements 4 Introduction 5 Chapter I. THEORY OF HARDNESS 9 A. General 9 B. Nature of the bonding forces 10 C. Hardness in relation to polishing 14 D. Assessement of hardness 16 E. Microhardness testing instruments 22 Chapter II. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE 25 A. Methods of mounting sections 25 B. Relative merits of the mounting media used 30 C. Grinding and polishing techniques 32 D. Orientation of sections 36 E. Measurement of microhardness 44 F. Routine procedure 42 G. Accuracy and renroducibility of results 45 11 Page No. Chapter III. VARIATION OF MICROHARDNESS WITH LOAD 53 A. Variation of microhardness values with load 53 (a)General 53 (b)Results 60 (c)Discussion of the results 69 (d)Conclusions 77 B. The relation between load and grain size 78 (a)General 78 (b)Discussion 80 C. Variation of the deformation characteristics with load 88 Chapter IV. VARIATION OF MICROHATNESS WITH ORIENTATION 90 A. General 90 B. Microhardness values determined from randomly oriented sections 91 C. The relation, during indentation, between deformation processes and orientation 104 D. Microhardness values obtained on oriented sections of mineral 110 (a)General 110 (b)Discussion of the results 111 (i) Isometric minerals 111 (ii) Tetragonal minerals 130 (iii)Hexagonal mineral 139 iii Page No. (iv) Orthorhombic minerals 150 (v) Monoclinic minerals 163 (vi) Triclinic mineral E.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Scanned
    American Mineralogist, Volume 77, pages 670475, 1992 NEW MINERAL NAMES* JonN L. J,Annson CANMET, 555 Booth Street,Ottawa, Ontario KIA OGl' Canada Abswurmbachite* rutile, hollandite, and manganoan cuprian clinochlore. The new name is for Irmgard Abs-Wurmbach, in recog- T. Reinecke,E. Tillmanns, H.-J. Bernhardt (1991)Abs- her contribution to the crystal chemistry, sta- wurmbachite, Cu'?*Mnl*[O8/SiOo],a new mineral of nition of physical properties ofbraunite. Type the braunite group: Natural occurrence,synthesis, and bility relations, and crystal structure.Neues Jahrb. Mineral. Abh., 163,ll7- material is in the Smithsonian Institution, Washington, r43. DC, and in the Institut fiir Mineralogie, Ruhr-Universitlit Bochum, Germany. J.L.J. The new mineral and cuprian braunit€ occur in brown- ish red piemontite-sursassitequartzites at Mount Ochi, near Karystos, Evvia, Greece, and in similar quartzites on the Vasilikon mountains near Apikia, Andros Island, Barstowite* Greece.An electron microprobe analysis (Andros mate- C.J. Stanley,G.C. Jones,A.D. Hart (1991) Barstowite, gave SiO, 9.8, TiO, rial; one of six for both localities) 3PbClr'PbCOr'HrO, a new mineral from BoundsClifl 0.61,Al,O3 0.60, Fe'O, 3.0,MnrO. 71.3,MgO 0.04,CuO St. Endellion,Cornwall. Mineral. Mag., 55, l2l-125. 12.5, sum 97.85 wto/o,corresponding to (CuStrMn3tu- Electron microprobe and CHN analysis gavePb75.47, Mgoo,)", oo(Mn3jrFe|jrAlo orTif.[nCuStr)", nrSi' o, for eight (calc.)6.03, sum 101.46wto/o, cations,ideally CuMnuSiO'r, the Cu analogueof braunite. Cl 18.67,C l.Iz,H 0.18,O to Pb.orClrrrCr.or- The range of Cu2* substitution for Mn2' is 0-42 molo/oin which for 17 atoms corresponds The min- cuprian braunite and 52-93 molo/oin abswurmbachite.
    [Show full text]
  • Valid Unnamed Minerals, Update 2012-01
    VALID UNNAMED MINERALS, UPDATE 2012-01 IMA Subcommittee on Unnamed Minerals: Jim Ferraiolo*, Jeffrey de Fourestier**, Dorian Smith*** (Chairman) *[email protected] **[email protected] ***[email protected] Users making reference to this compilation should refer to the primary source (Dorian G.W. Smith & Ernest H. Nickel (2007): A System of Codification for Unnamed Minerals: Report of the SubCommittee for Unnamed Minerals of the IMA Commission on New Minerals, Nomenclature and Classification. Canadian Mineralogist v. 45, p.983-1055), and to this website . Additions and changes to the original publication are shown in blue print; deletions are "greyed out and struck through". IMA Code Primary Reference Secondary Comments Reference UM1886-01-OC:HNNa *Bull. Soc. Minéral. 9 , 51 Dana (7th) 2 , 1104 Probably an oxalate but if not is otherwise similar to lecontite UM1892-01-F:CaY *Am. J. Sci. 44 , 386 Dana (7th) 2 , 37 Low analytical total because F not reported; unlike any other known fluoride 3+ UM1910-01-PO:CaFeMg US Geol. Surv. Bull. 419, 1 Am. Mineral. 34 , 513 (Ca,Fe,Mg)Fe 2(PO4)2(OH)2•2H2O; some similarities to mitridatite UM1913-01-AsO:CaCuV *Am. J. Sci. 35 , 441 Dana (7th) 2 , 818 Possibly As-bearing calciovolborthite UM1922-01-O:CuHUV *Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk [6], 16 , 505 Dana (7th) 2 , 1048 Some similarities to sengierite 3+ UM1926-01-O:HNbTaTiU *Bol. Inst. Brasil Sc., 2 , 56 Dana (7th) 1 , 807 (Y,Er,U,Th,Fe )3(Ti,Nb,Ta)10O26; some similarities to samarskite-(Y) UM1927-01-O:CaTaTiW *Gornyi Zhurn.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Ore Deposits of the Central York Mountains, Western Seward Peninsula, Alaska
    Geology and Ore Deposits of p50 the Central York Mountains, I Western Seward Peninsula, S3 Alaska GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1287 O GC oc O es ^ HI » <=; HI i i QC GO eea 00 Geology and Ore Deposits of the Central York Mountains, Western Seward Peninsula, Alaska By C. L. SAINSBURY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1287 Description of the geologic structure, stratigraphy, petrology, and ore deposits of an area containing tin deposits and a new type of beryllium deposit UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1969 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WALTER J. HICKEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director Library, of Congress catalog-card No, 78-602244 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price $3.00 (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Abstract_ _______________________________________________________ l Introduction__________-__-_-______--__---------____________--_--__ 2 Location_ ___________________________________________________ 2 Purpose and scope of report_._--___-----_--____-________-_-_-_ 3 Methods of study__________-_---___--_--_-_.________._----___ 4 Acknowledgments __________-_-__----___---_______l______--____ 4 Previous work_____-__-__-----_-________--___________---____- 5 Sedimentary rocks._________-____-_-_____-___-_-___________----_-__ 6 Pre-Ordovician rocks___________________________________________ 7 Slate of the York region-____________________________________ 7 Argillaceous and dolomitic limestone.___--___-_______-----___ 9 Undifferentiated limestone and argillaceous and dolomitic lime­ stone_ ________________________________________________ 10 Summary of pre-Ordovician rocks_______-_-__________------_ 11 Lower Ordovician rocks.____-___-_--_____---__________-___--_-_ 12 Argillaceous limestone and limestone (shallow-water facies) _ _ _.
    [Show full text]
  • Implications for Ni Cycling in Marine Sediments
    This is a repository copy of Release of Ni from birnessite during transformation of birnessite to todorokite: Implications for Ni cycling in marine sediments. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/102613/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Atkins, AL, Shaw, S and Peacock, CL (2016) Release of Ni from birnessite during transformation of birnessite to todorokite: Implications for Ni cycling in marine sediments. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 189. pp. 158-183. ISSN 0016-7037 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2016.06.007 © 2016. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ *Manuscript 1 Release of Ni from birnessite during transformation of birnessite to todorokite: 2 Implications for Ni cycling in marine sediments 3 4 Amy L.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the Russell Society, Vol 4 No 2
    JOURNAL OF THE RUSSELL SOCIETY The journal of British Isles topographical mineralogy EDITOR: George Ryba.:k. 42 Bell Road. Sitlingbourn.:. Kent ME 10 4EB. L.K. JOURNAL MANAGER: Rex Cook. '13 Halifax Road . Nelson, Lancashire BB9 OEQ , U.K. EDITORrAL BOARD: F.B. Atkins. Oxford, U. K. R.J. King, Tewkesbury. U.K. R.E. Bevins. Cardiff, U. K. A. Livingstone, Edinburgh, U.K. R.S.W. Brai thwaite. Manchester. U.K. I.R. Plimer, Parkvill.:. Australia T.F. Bridges. Ovington. U.K. R.E. Starkey, Brom,grove, U.K S.c. Chamberlain. Syracuse. U. S.A. R.F. Symes. London, U.K. N.J. Forley. Keyworth. U.K. P.A. Williams. Kingswood. Australia R.A. Howie. Matlock. U.K. B. Young. Newcastle, U.K. Aims and Scope: The lournal publishes articles and reviews by both amateur and profe,sional mineralogists dealing with all a,pecI, of mineralogy. Contributions concerning the topographical mineralogy of the British Isles arc particularly welcome. Not~s for contributors can be found at the back of the Journal. Subscription rates: The Journal is free to members of the Russell Society. Subsc ription rates for two issues tiS. Enquiries should be made to the Journal Manager at the above address. Back copies of the Journal may also be ordered through the Journal Ma nager. Advertising: Details of advertising rates may be obtained from the Journal Manager. Published by The Russell Society. Registered charity No. 803308. Copyright The Russell Society 1993 . ISSN 0263 7839 FRONT COVER: Strontianite, Strontian mines, Highland Region, Scotland. 100 mm x 55 mm.
    [Show full text]