DOCSLIB.ORG

126 Book Reviews

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
126 Book Reviews Book Reviews communication such as pictures or speech in the Dgl 235.80, US$131.00 (90-04-10265-5); early modern period were more complex than is vol. 2: pp. xlii, 489, Dgl 196.13, US$109 now usually assumed, and the medical perils of (90-04-120-12-2) (set 90-04-1213-0). reading in the eighteenth century, as analysed by Adrian Johns, were thought to be far more It is rare for a collection of fragments with pervasive than even Roy Porter has documented. commentary to sustain a passionate reading from The third section takes on the print revolution cover to cover commanded by a book. This one of the nineteenth century, where Jonathan does it. The two compact volumes of Philip Topham, Eugenia Rolda´n Vera, and James van der Eijk’s new Diocles combine solid Secord write of useful knowledge, progress and scholarship and a fine sense of textual detail with the dissemination of increasingly broad-based originality and power in the reconstruction of popularizations and other forms of public text. ideas, cultural climate and intellectual By the mid-nineteenth century, it is argued, personality from predominantly doxographic most significant science was appearing in material, and with reader-friendliness in the periodicals rather than books, and a noticeable presentation of what could easily appear arid demarcation between popular and e´lite had or esoteric. It makes thoroughly enjoyable emerged. The authors here show very reading, and not only for the specialist. Volume persuasively how writing and publishing helped I contains the texts with apparatus and in constructing the identities of science and translation, a general introduction, a list of the scientists at this key time. The section is rounded fragments with informative synopsis of the off by an essay on the Victorian editors of Bacon general themes, indices which include one of and the new ideologies of the period, revealing verbatim quotations, abbreviations and just how far past practitioners of science and concordances. Volume II is taken up by the medicine have been committed to using print to commentary, with an analytical introduction, establish the credentials of their own work. bibliography, an appendix, indices to the volume Several authors in fact touch on the issue of and an addenda et corrigenda. intellectual property and how the concept Van der Eijk’s edition supersedes by far the can usefully be regarded as inhering in the older one by Max Wellmann.1 Along with new social arrangements that build up around the material it brings a radical shift in focus, general printed page. approach and specific strategies. The In concluding this wide ranging, challenging relationship between Diocles and Aristotle is an and always thoughtful volume, Nick Jardine example of innovative historical reconstruction. discusses the implications for the sciences of the Van der Eijk rejects traditional ideas of quest for legitimacy though printed materials. ‘‘teacher–disciple’’ influence, defended by Books and the sciences in history is an influential scholars like Wellmann, Jaeger and authoritative, learned, and thoroughly readable others, in favour of a complex model of analysis that surely marks a milestone in the way intellectual cooperation between equals. His we approach our subject. perspective allows for divergence of opinion and a flexible chronology between the two Janet Browne, thinkers—simple issues which have nevertheless The Wellcome Trust Centre for the imposed artificial and far-reaching constraints on History of Medicine at UCL scholarship so far. Unlike Wellmann, who treated Diocles as one among other members of a Philip J van der Eijk, Diocles of Carystus: ‘‘Sicilian school’’ in Greek medicine and a collection of the fragments with translation and accorded him a minimal commentary, commentary. Volume one: Text and translation; Volume two: Commentary, Studies in Ancient 1 Medicine, vols 22 and 23, Leiden and Boston, Max Wellmann, Die Fragmente der sikelischen A€rzte Akron, Philistion und des Diokles von Karystos, Brill, 2000–2001, vol. 1: pp. xxxiv, 497, Berlin, 1901. 126 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.33.14, on 29 Sep 2021 at 09:19:32, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025727300008498 Book Reviews van der Eijk is alert to ‘‘why’’ and ‘‘how’’ direct acquaintance, the aims of ancient questions throughout but eliminates labels authorities—are always in focus. Judgement on devoid of explanatory force, such as ‘‘Sicilian’’, quotations, language and views attributed to ‘‘Aristotelian’’, ‘‘proto-Empiricist’’ or ‘‘proto- Diocles is conducted with welcome scepticism. Sceptic’’, choosing to treat Diocles as a free, On the one hand, no cut-and-dry boundaries are ‘‘independent medical thinker’’ who achieved drawn between ‘‘fragment’’, ‘‘testimonium’’, the first successful synthesis between theoretical ipsissima verba and paraphrase or direct speech and empirical principles in ancient Greek purporting to quote Diocles. Thus one gets the medicine. His approach belongs in the larger benefits of a non-committal guideline to terms movement of debunking old textbook myths, possibly derived from Diocles without any of the such as that of a ‘‘Coan versus Cnidian’’ school of disadvantages of an index. On the other hand, a medicine, which have tended for a long time to healthy demarcation is made between Diocles’ blind scholars to the real problems posed by views and the language which reports them and ancient testimonials. And this is the best way to often carries doctrinal implications of its own. do justice to one of the most prominent medical Scholarly positions adopted in the past are no less authorities of the Greek world in the fourth thoroughly subjected to scrutiny. There are century BC. Diocles is indeed the first medical plenty of insightful new interpretations of figure whose very broad array of interests and important material and elegant solutions to long activities maps out for us an important link debated problems; such is the beautifully between the philosophical ‘‘schools’’ of Plato developed comment on Fr 177, in which Diocles and Aristotle and the medical, so-called illustrates the view, asserted in the same work ‘‘Hippocratic’’, tradition. (Fr 176), that (some) causes (must?) remain The commentary provides learned summaries unknown. of previous scholarship, thorough notes on One strength of the commentary is the creation terminology, interesting conjectures and ample of an original section on ‘‘Context’’ for almost presentations of textual difficulties, meticulous every piece discussed. Nothing of the kind was scrutiny of insoluble puzzles and balanced attempted by Wellmann. These sections offer discussion of ambiguities. Alternative introductions to the often difficult subject-area interpretations are always given equal attention. where the fragment belongs. Even when they are The evidence is never forced when knowledge is minimal, one still finds the relevant references to impossible to attain, as in identifying materia primary and secondary literature. The ‘‘Context’’ medica and disease entities or establishing also makes available knowledge difficult to chronology. Particularly relevant on obtain, such as the lucid summary of Book 6 of methodological grounds are the elaborate Galen’s treatise on Simples or the descriptions analyses of doxographic modes of simplification of ancient diseases pieced together from and contamination, which are crucial for a correct appraisal of testimonials. So you learn in Fr 43b purport to reproduce Diocles and evaluating the how the attribution of one idea to several reliability of what is attributed to him. Van der Eijk authorities should have saved unnecessary shows, very plausibly, how the doxographer has research on ‘‘true’’ origins, and, in Frr 185–6, fabricated a ‘‘refutation’’of Herophilus and other post- Dioclean authorities, which he attributes to Diocles. how analysis of one simple element—Diocles’ But I doubt that the refutation draws on ‘‘ingredients manner of reporting—dispels a plethora of which, each individually, derive from Diocles’ speculations in scholarly literature.2 Issues which thought’’ (pp. 84–5). General beliefs in the existence of bear on the evaluation of sources—transmission, four humours or pneuma are too vague; what would be needed is some specific view on them, especially on pneuma in relation to seed theory. The only possible 2 Theory of an ‘‘elaborate refutation’’ of Dioclean ‘‘ingredient’’ confirmed by another source, Archidamus by Diocles, II, p. 364. See also on Frr the view that seed originates in the brain and spinal 51a–d (anomalia general cause of disease) or on Fr 40, marrow (cf Frr 41a and b), is annulled by the fact that which is guided by a systematic demarcation between the Anonymous also attributes to Diocles the rival view two main hermeneutic tasks: finding out which parts that seed originates in nutriment (pp. 30–31). 127 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.33.14, on 29 Sep 2021 at 09:19:32, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025727300008498 Book Reviews several sources. There are also summaries of reference edition of Diocles. Van der Eijk has ‘‘Contents’’ for individual fragments. These are produced an indispensable source-book for generally useful, especially for long pieces anyone working in ancient medicine which is a and intricate arguments,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Three Schools of Medicine
    Appendix 2: The Three Schools of Medicine Greek names, especially those of more obscure figures, are often cor- rupted in Arabic translations from Greek, the Arabic texts citing those translations, and the Hebrew and Latin texts dependent upon Arabic sources. The list of prominent Greek adherents of the Empiricist, Rationalist (or Dogmatist), and Methodist schools of medicine as found in the introduction to the epitome of The Medical Sects has not escaped this fate; I have not bothered to record all the variations of dotting and the like found in my six manuscripts. These lists obviously represent a Late Antique trope preserved with more or less fidelity in various Greek, Latin, and Arabic texts. The list of members of the three schools as found in our text is essentially identical to that of two other works: Yaḥyā al-Naḥwī’s talkhīṣ of The Medical Sects and a set of Latin lectures on The Medical Sects by one Agnellus of Ravenna (see table 4). Closely related is the list of names from the pseudo-Galenic Introduction to Medicine (Eisagōgē Iātros), which I have translated below. Another commentary on The Medical Sects by one John of Alexandria gives a somewhat different list, as does the list of Empiricists in Ibn Abī Uṣaybiʿah, most of whose names are indecipher- able. The one major textual difficulty with regard to these lists involves the list of Methodists, where MSS A and M, which were both copied around 1240 from an exemplar originating in the circle of Ibn al-Tilmīdh, add two names, Menodotus and Mnesitheus, and give the names in a slightly different order.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-48147-2 — Scale, Space and Canon in Ancient Literary Culture Reviel Netz Index More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-48147-2 — Scale, Space and Canon in Ancient Literary Culture Reviel Netz Index More Information Index Aaker, Jennifer, 110, 111 competition, 173 Abdera, 242, 310, 314, 315, 317 longevity, 179 Abel, N. H., 185 Oresteia, 197, 200, 201 Academos, 189, 323, 324, 325, 337 papyri, 15 Academy, 322, 325, 326, 329, 337, 343, 385, 391, Persians, 183 399, 404, 427, 434, 448, 476, 477–8, 512 portraits, 64 Achilles Tatius, 53, 116, 137, 551 Ptolemaic era, 39 papyri, 16, 23 Aeschylus (astronomer), 249 Acta Alexandrinorum, 87, 604 Aesop, 52, 68, 100, 116, 165 adespota, 55, 79, 81–5, 86, 88, 91, 99, 125, 192, 194, in education, 42 196, 206, 411, 413, 542, 574 papyri, 16, 23 Adkin, Neil, 782 Aethiopia, 354 Adrastus, 483 Aetia, 277 Adrastus (mathematician), 249 Africa, 266 Adrianople, 798 Agatharchides, 471 Aedesius (martyr), 734, 736 Agathocles (historian), 243 Aegae, 479, 520 Agathocles (peripatetic), 483 Aegean, 338–43 Agathon, 280 Aegina, 265 Agias (historian), 373 Aelianus (Platonist), 484 agrimensores, 675 Aelius Aristides, 133, 657, 709 Ai Khanoum, 411 papyri, 16 Akhmatova, Anna, 186 Aelius Herodian (grammarian), 713 Albertus Magnus, 407 Aelius Promotus, 583 Albinus, 484 Aenesidemus, 478–9, 519, 520 Alcaeus, 49, 59, 61–2, 70, 116, 150, 162, 214, 246, Aeolia, 479 see also Aeolian Aeolian, 246 papyri, 15, 23 Aeschines, 39, 59, 60, 64, 93, 94, 123, 161, 166, 174, portraits, 65, 67 184, 211, 213, 216, 230, 232, 331 Alcidamas, 549 commentaries, 75 papyri, 16 Ctesiphon, 21 Alcinous, 484 False Legation, 22 Alcmaeon, 310
    [Show full text]
  • Medicin and Philosophy in Direct Dialectic Relation During The
    Medicin and Philosophy in Direct Dialectic Relation During the Classical and Late Antiquity1 Medicina e Filosofia em Relação Dialética Direta Durante a Antiguidade Clássica e Tardia Medicina y Filosofía en Relación Dialéctica Directa Durante la Antigüedad Clásica y Tardía Sophia KARYMPALI-KYRIAZIS 2 Abstract: Medicine and Philosophy, in classical antiquity mainly, coexisted and joined hands as activities of the human intellect, with one exerting fruitful influence on the other in the course of time. The influence of philosophy on ancient medicine is generally accepted, as the theories of pre-Socratic philosophers from the 6th century BC for the interpretation of the world and human nature were the main inspiration for the formulation of the first medical texts. Natural philosophers from Ionia, such as Thales of Miletus, Anaximander, Anaximenes and Heraclitus, through their theories, laid the foundations towards future medical advances. Hippocrates of Kos, with his medical treatises in “Corpus Hippocraticum” was greatly influenced by the philosophical thought. Hippocrates is considered the “father of medicine” because he broadened the medical knowledge of his time and laid the foundations of medicine as science, releasing it from magic and superstitions. Plato and Aristotle refer to Hippocrates in their works and speak with respect about him acknowledging his enormous contribution to the healing of serious diseases. In the ancient world, Asclepius, who was considered a great healer of many serious diseases, was worshiped as the patron god of medicine. In his honor temples were erected and next to them great therapeutic centers, the well known “Asclepieia”, scattered in many cities of Ancient Greece and Asia Minor.
    [Show full text]
  • Medicine and Philosophy in Classical Antiquity
    MEDICINE AND PHILOSOPHY IN CLASSICAL ANTIQUITY This work makes available for the first time in one dedicated volume Philip van der Eijk’s selected papers on the close connections that ex- isted between medicine and philosophy throughout antiquity.Medical authors such as the Hippocratic writers, Diocles, Galen, Soranus and Caelius Aurelianus elaborated on philosophical methods such as causal explanation, definition and division, applying concepts such as the no- tion of nature to their understanding of the human body. Similarly, philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle were highly valued for their contributions to medicine. This interaction was particularly striking in the study of the human soul in relation to the body, as illustrated by approaches to topics such as intellect, sleep and dreams, and diet and drugs. With a detailed introduction surveying the subject as a whole and a new chapter on Aristotle’s treatment of sleep and dreams, this wide-ranging collection is essential reading for students and scholars of ancient philosophy and science. philip j. van der eijk is Professor of Greek at the Uni- versity of Newcastle upon Tyne. He has published widely on an- cient philosophy, medicine and science, comparative literature and patristics. He is the author of Aristoteles. De insomniis. De divinatione per somnum (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1994) and of Diocles of Carystus. A Collection of the Fragments with Translation and Commentary (2 vols., Leiden: Brill, 2000–1). He has edited and co-authored Ancient Histories of Medicine. Essays in Medical Doxography and Historiogra- phy in Classical Antiquity (Leiden: Brill, 1999) and co-edited Ancient Medicine in its Socio-Cultural Context (2 vols., Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi, 1995).
    [Show full text]
  • Black Bryony, Called by Some in the Common Tongue Bryonia and Others Cheironios Ambelos
    Dioscorides’s bruonia melaina is Bryonia alba , not Tamus communis , and an illustration labeled bruonia melaina in the Codex Vindobonensis is Humulus lupulus not Bryonia dioica 1 S.S. Renner 1*, J. Scarborough 2, H. Schaefer 1, H.S. Paris 3, and J. Janick 4 1 Department of Biology, University Munich, Menzinger Strasse 67, D-80638 Munich, Germany 2 School of Pharmacy and Departments of History and Classics, University of Wisconsin, 777 Highland Drive, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, USA 3 Department of Vegetable Crops and Plant Genetics, Agricultural Research Organization, Newe Ya’ar Research center, PO Box 1021, Ramat Yishay 30-095, Israel 4 Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Purdue University, 625 Agriculture Mall Drive, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-2010, USA * Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] Keywords: Botanical illustration, European Cucurbitaceae , medicinal plants, pharmaceutical uses, Pliny the Elder Abstract The Cucurbitaceae genus Bryonia contains ten species that are distributed throughout the Mediterranean to North Africa and from central Europe to Kazakhstan. References to the medicinal uses of species of Bryonia span two millennia, including two passages in Dioscorides’s De Materia Medica , written in about 65 CE. An illustrated copy of this text, known as the Codex Vindobonensis and dated 512 CE, is enriched with illustrations, including two labeled as bru ōnia or bryonia. Here we argue that while Dioscorides’s text clearly concerns the black- fruited B. alba and a red-fruited species, perhaps B. cretica or B. dioica , only one of the plates in the Codex shows a species of Bryonia , while the other shows Humulus lupulus .
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1: Greek and Islamicate Physicians
    Appendix 1: Greek and Islamicate Physicians Few of the ancient and medieval physicians and philosophers referred to in this book are household names. As in the underlying works of Galen, the epitomes mention various ancient physicians and philoso- phers by name; Galen, indeed, is our most important source of informa- tion for the doctrines of Hellenistic physicians. The individuals mentioned in connection with the composition of the epitomes are even more obscure. The following are the ancient physicians mentioned in the text of the epitome of On the Sects, including a few names given only in cer- tain manuscripts or mentioned elsewhere in the text. I have also included those mentioned in historical sources in connection with the composition of the epitomes and a few Islamicate physicians (most of whom are actually Christians) who appear in the historical documenta- tion of the epitomes or in the manuscripts. In most cases, I have given references only to standard reference sources, notably Pauly-Wissowa and its recent updates (RE, BNP), The Complete Dictionary of Scientific Biography (CDSB), Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques (DPA), The Encyclopaedia of Islam (EI), and Geschichte des arabischen Schriftums (GAS). Readers needing access to primary sources can easily trace them through these references. Acron of Agrigentum (fifth centuryBCE ). Physician, contemporary and fellow-townsman of Empedocles. Later Empiricists traced the origin of their school to him. He was known to Islamicate physicians through quotations as an authority on dietetics and as the first in the succession of physicians between Parmenides and Plato the Physician. BNP 1:113; DPA 1:50–51; GAS 3:22; RE 1:1199.
    [Show full text]
  • © in This Web Service Cambridge University
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-76751-4 - Galen and the World of Knowledge Edited by Christopher Gill, Tim Whitmarsh and John Wilkins Index More information Index Acts of Peter 101 Asclepiades of Bithynia 68, 69, 135, 143, 147, Adrian of Tyre 98 149, 151, 211, 217 Aeficianus 27, 291, 293–4, 298 Asclepius 295 Aelius Dionysius 166 Asia, ‘The Greek of’ 167–8 Aeschines 26 Asianism 14 Alcinous (Middle Platonist) 17, 251, astrology 37 253–7 Athenaeus of Attaleia 77, 214 Alexander of Damascus 76, 78, 286 Athenaeus of Naucratis 6, 10, 22, 34, 35 Alexandria 90, 149, 153, 239 Athens 14, 76 al-Mas‘udi 25 Atomists 290 al-Thanus 25 Attalus 240–1 Anastassiou, A. 154 Atticism 14, 31, 157–74 Anaxagoras 28 Atticus 245, 251 Andocides 26, 165 Andromachi, the (doctors) 28 Bacchius of Tanagra 143, 145, 147, 149, 151, 153, Annia Faustina 123 162, 163, 165, 166 Antigenes 123 Ballester, L. 262, 265 Antiphon 27 Barigazzi, A. 32 Apollinaris of Aezani 25 Barnes, J. 271 Apollonius Byblas 149, 152 Barton, T. 37, 38, 39 Apollonius of Kition 165, 166 Boethus, Flavius 61–2, 76, 123, 125, 263, 287–8, Arabic biography of Galen 27–9 294 Aratus 133 Boethus’ wife 118, 123, 125 Archidamus 217 Boudon-Millot, V. 32 Archigenes 34 Boys-Stone, G. 255 Archilochus 30 Ariphron 32 Callimachus of Bithynia 145 Aristarchus of Samothrace 149, 169 Callimachus of Cyrene 133 Aristides, Aelius 23 Callistus (grammarian) 19 Aristippus 186–7 case studies 115–31 Aristophanes (comic poet) 30–1, 161 Cato the elder 36 Aristophanes of Byzantium 165, 166, causality 257–8 169 Celsus 21 Aristotle 1, 16, 17, 22, 24, 28, 65, 66–73, Chinese medicine, ancient 121–2 76–82, 129, 133, 169, 208–9, 210, 214, Chrysippus 79, 133, 214, 288, 289, 291–2, 294, 216, 224, 247, 249–52, 261–81, 287, 288, 296–8 289, 290 Church Fathers 265 Arnim, H.
    [Show full text]
  • 126 Book Reviews
    Book Reviews communication such as pictures or speech in the Dgl 235.80, US$131.00 (90-04-10265-5); early modern period were more complex than is vol. 2: pp. xlii, 489, Dgl 196.13, US$109 now usually assumed, and the medical perils of (90-04-120-12-2) (set 90-04-1213-0). reading in the eighteenth century, as analysed by Adrian Johns, were thought to be far more It is rare for a collection of fragments with pervasive than even Roy Porter has documented. commentary to sustain a passionate reading from The third section takes on the print revolution cover to cover commanded by a book. This one of the nineteenth century, where Jonathan does it. The two compact volumes of Philip Topham, Eugenia Rolda´n Vera, and James van der Eijk’s new Diocles combine solid Secord write of useful knowledge, progress and scholarship and a fine sense of textual detail with the dissemination of increasingly broad-based originality and power in the reconstruction of popularizations and other forms of public text. ideas, cultural climate and intellectual By the mid-nineteenth century, it is argued, personality from predominantly doxographic most significant science was appearing in material, and with reader-friendliness in the periodicals rather than books, and a noticeable presentation of what could easily appear arid demarcation between popular and e´lite had or esoteric. It makes thoroughly enjoyable emerged. The authors here show very reading, and not only for the specialist. Volume persuasively how writing and publishing helped I contains the texts with apparatus and in constructing the identities of science and translation, a general introduction, a list of the scientists at this key time.
    [Show full text]
  • December 3, 1992 CHAPTER VIII
    December 3, 1992 CHAPTER VIII: EARLY HELLENISTIC DYNAMISM, 323-146 Aye me, the pain and the grief of it! I have been sick of Love's quartan now a month and more. He's not so fair, I own, but all the ground his pretty foot covers is grace, and the smile of his face is very sweetness. 'Tis true the ague takes me now but day on day off, but soon there'll be no respite, no not for a wink of sleep. When we met yesterday he gave me a sidelong glance, afeared to look me in the face, and blushed crimson; at that, Love gripped my reins still the more, till I gat me wounded and heartsore home, there to arraign my soul at bar and hold with myself this parlance: "What wast after, doing so? whither away this fond folly? know'st thou not there's three gray hairs on thy brow? Be wise in time . (Theocritus, Idylls, XXX). Writers about pederasty, like writers about other aspects of ancient Greek culture, have tended to downplay the Hellenistic period as inferior. John Addington Symonds, adhering to the view of the great English historian of ancient Greece, George Grote, that the Hellenistic Age was decadent, ended his Problem in Greek Ethics with the loss of Greek freedom at Chaeronea: Philip of Macedon, when he pronounced the panegyric of the Sacred Band at Chaeronea, uttered the funeral oration of Greek love in its nobler forms. With the decay of military spirit and the loss of freedom, there was no sphere left for that type of comradeship which I attempted to describe in Section IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Hippocrates in Context Studies in Ancient Medicine
    HIPPOCRATES IN CONTEXT STUDIES IN ANCIENT MEDICINE EDITED BY JOHN SCARBOROUGH PHILIP J. VAN DER EIJK ANN HANSON NANCY SIRAISI VOLUME 31 HIPPOCRATES IN CONTEXT Papers read at the XIth International Hippocrates Colloquium University of Newcastle upon Tyne 27–31 August 2002 EDITED BY PHILIP J. VAN DER EIJK BRILL LEIDEN • BOSTON 2005 Cover illustration: Late fifteenth-century portrait of Hippocrates sitting, reading. Behind him, two standing philosophers dispute (Wellcome Library, London). This book is printed on acid-free paper. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A C.I.P. record for this book is available from the Library of Congress. ISSN 0925–1421 ISBN 90 04 14430 7 © Copyright 2005 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Brill provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910 Danvers MA 01923, USA. Fees are subject to change. printed in the netherlands CONTENTS Preface ........................................................................................ ix Acknowledgements ...................................................................... xiii Abbreviations .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • GALEN on the Properties of Foodstuffs This Book Presents A
    Cambridge University Press 0521812429 - Galen: On the Properties of Foodstuffs Owen Powell Frontmatter More information GALEN On the Properties of Foodstuffs This book presents a translation of and detailed commentary on Galen’s De alimentorum facultatibus, his major work on the dynamics and kinetics of various foods. It is thus primarily a physiological trea- tise rather than a materia medica or a work on pathology. Galen com- mences with a short section on the epistemology of medicine, with a discussion on the attainment, through apodeixis, or demonstration, of scientific truth – a discussion which reveals the Aristotelian roots of his thinking. The text then covers a wide range of foods, both common and exotic. Some, such as cereals, legumes, dairy products and the grape, receive an emphasis that reflects their importance at the time; others are treated more cursorily. Dr Powell, a retired physician, discusses Galen’s terminology and the background to his views on physiology and pathology in his introduction, while John Wilkins’s foreword concentrates on the structural and cultural aspects of the work. is an Honorary Research Fellow in the Department of Classics and Ancient History at the University of Queensland. He is a retired physician who worked as Medical Superintendent for sixteen years at the Princess Alexandra Hospital in Brisbane and subsequently as Director of Research and Planning at the Queens- land Department of Health. He is a Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh and the Royal Australasian College of Physicians. is Reader in Greek Literature at the University of Exeter. He has published The Boastful Chef: the Discourse of Food in Ancient Greek Comedy () and, with Shaun Hill, produced a translation and commentary on the surviving work of Archestratus in The Life of Luxury: Europe’s Oldest Cookery Book ().
    [Show full text]
  • Greek Medicine from Hippocrates to Galen Studies in Ancient Medicine
    Greek Medicine from Hippocrates to Galen Studies in Ancient Medicine Edited by John Scarborough Philip J. van der Eijk Ann Ellis Hanson Joseph Ziegler VOLUME 40 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.nl/sam Greek Medicine from Hippocrates to Galen Selected Papers By Jacques Jouanna Translated by Neil Allies Edited with a Preface by Philip van der Eijk LEIDEN • BOSTON 2012 This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the cc-by-nc License, which permits any non-commercial use, and distribution, provided no alterations are made and the original author(s) and source are credited. An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libraries working with Knowledge Unlatched. More information about the initiative can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org. Cover illustration: Miniature from the rst page of Galen's Commentary on Hippocrates' Prognostic as preserved in a Latin manuscript from Naples, VIII D 25 f. 85. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Jouanna, Jacques. [Selections. English. 2012] Greek medicine from Hippocrates to Galen : selected papers / by Jacques Jouanna ; edited with a preface by Philip van der Eijk, translated by Neil Allies. p. cm. – (Studies in ancient medicine, ISSN 0925-1421 ; v. 40) Articles originally published in French. Includes index. ISBN 978-90-04-20859-9 (hbk. : acid-free paper) – ISBN 978-90-04-23254-9 (e-book) 1. Medicine, Greek and Roman–History. 2. Medicine, Greek and Roman–Philosophy. 3. Hippocrates. 4. Galen. I. van der Eijk, Philip. II. Allies, Neil. III. Title. R138.J685 2012 610.938–dc23 2012016074 This publication has been typeset in the multilingual “Brill” typeface.
    [Show full text]