Inia Araguaiaensisand Inia Geoffrensis
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Interactions between children, teenagers and botos (Inia araguaiaensis and Inia geoffrensis) in markets and fairs of Eastern Amazon Angélica Lúcia Figueiredo Rodrigues, Gabriel Melo-Santos, Iara Ramos-Santos, Ana Marta Andrade, Danilo Leal Arcoverde, Leonardo Sena, Maria Luisa da Silva Date of deposit 09 05 2019 Document version Author’s accepted manuscript Access rights © 2019, Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. Citation for Figueiredo Rodrigues, A.L., Melos-Santos, G., and Ramos-Santos, published version I. (2019). Interactions between children, teenagers and botos (Inia araguaiaensis and Inia geoffrensis) in markets and fairs of Eastern Amazon. Ocean and Coastal Management, 172: pp137- 145. Link to published https://doi.org/j.ocecoaman.2019.02.005 version Full metadata for this item is available in St Andrews Research Repository at: https://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ 1 Abstract In this study we present the first record of interactions (ludic behavior, swimming and induced feeding) involving river dolphins known as botos (Inia sp.) and children/adolescents (from eight to 17 years old) at markets and fairs at the river front of two localities of Pará State, Brazil. We registered the reports of the participants using semi-structured interviews while they were working at the markets or when they were in the water to interact with river dolphins. We registered dolphins and human behavior using the ad libitum method. Most of the children interacting with botos were boys - we observed only two girls swimming with the dolphins. All the fish species offered to river dolphins are commercial. Tourists were often involved in interactions in the Santarém region, but not as frequently in the city of Mocajuba. Nevertheless, in both places human populations were aware of the interactions of children/adolescents with botos. The interviewees did not show fear of botos, as is common in other localities of Pará State. Although some of them attributed mystical powers to those animals. The children demonstrated to know about river dolphins behavior and morphology, as well as the occurrence of other species of aquatic mammals in the surrounding areas. Despite the diversity of aquatic mammals in those areas, we noticed that the knowledge of children regarded mainly botos and tucuxis (another river dolphin species), probably because these are the most conspicuous aquatic mammal species in the region. Furthermore, according to the reports of the interviewees these interactions between dolphins and humans have been going on for a long time in both areas, more than 30 years. The presence of newborn calves along our field observations indicate that this behavior may be passed down through generations of botos. In short, our results expand the knowledge regarding interactions between humans and Inia sp. in the Amazon. Moreover, it is essential to intensify the systematic research effort in order to evaluate effects of direct interaction activities on river dolphins and humans alike. In addition, educational measures in Eastern Amazon may promote realistic and efficient plans for the conservation of this species. Keywords: interactions, river dolphin, Amazon. 2 1. Introduction The evolutionary history of humankind was founded on experiences with other species considering both biological and cultural aspects of these interactions. The explanations for such relationships established between humans and other animal species may be found in the biophilia hypothesis by Wilson (1984), which states the existence of an innate emotional bond between human beings and other life forms (Manfredo, 2008). Also, biophilia is the fundamental interdisciplinary field to investigate those interactions (Kahn Jr, 1997). According to Descola (1998), there is a variation in the sympathy and attitudes towards animals according to cultural traditions. In this context, cetaceans have caught human attention for a long time, and some cultures, as in Greek mythology, those animals are seen as deities (Pantidou, 2014). Some authors point out that the sentiments and beliefs of humans regarding cetaceans are sufficient for considering the welfare of those species important (Barstow, 1991; Scheffer, 1991). The curiosity of men about cetaceans led to the confinement of various species in captivity. There are even some reports of an orca (Orcinus orca) in an enclosure made of nets while being attacked by soldiers armed with spears in Ancient Rome, and records of harbor porpoises (Phocaena phocaena) put into tanks of a privet collection in France during the 1400’s (Collet & Duguy, 1987). Furthermore, in recent years the frequency of direct interactions between humans and cetaceans has been increasing considerably due the larger amount of fisheries and tourism activities as dolphin and whale watching, and swimming with these animals (Lusseau, 2003; Lusseau & Bejder, 2007; Reeves et al., 2003; Samuels et al., 2000). Considering this increasing amount of interaction records between humans and cetaceans, our study focuses on interactions between humans and botos (Inia sp., Blainville, 1817), which are the largest of river dolphins and occur throughout the Amazon, Tocantins, Guamá and Orinoco river basins (Best & da Silva, 1989; Da Silva et al., 2008; Hrbek et al., 2014; Santos et al. 2012, 2014). The behavior of these dolphins towards humans varies from shy to curious and even though some local communities and tourists consider the species charismatic, the relationship between botos and humans are not always harmonious. In the case of fisheries, the damage dolphins inflict to the nets cause losses and negative reaction by fishermen (Iriarte & Marmontel, 2011; 2013). In the Amazon, interactions between dolphins 3 and men usually occur in fisheries (Iriarte & Marmontel, 2011; 2013) and social-cultural contexts in the case of legends and the commerce of byproducts of botos (Alves et al., 2010; Alves e Rosa, 2008), as well as in situations that attract tourism (Romagnoli, 2009; Alves et al., 2011; Alves et al., 2011). According to Alves and colleagues (2012), botos (Inia geoffrensis) demonstrate a tolerant behavior towards activities involving humans and therefore tend to get closer often and to interact more with people. On the other hand, Aliaga-Rossel and his colleagues (2006) report that areas with high human activity may disrupt the grouping behavior of Inia boliviensis. In Central Amazon, interactions between botos (Inia geoffrensis) and tourists became popular in riverside communities of Amazonas State, and have been catching increasing attention of local and international media, attracting thousands of Brazilians and foreign tourists interested in feeding and swimming with these animals (Romagnoli et al., 2011; Alves et al., 2012). Several studies describe the risks of interactions in which tourists swim with cetaceans (Constantine, 2001; Samuels & Bejder 2004; Romagnoli et al., 2011). Moreover, other studies also demonstrated that unplanned tourism increases the levels of stress hormones in disturbed animals and may induce physiological changes and alterations in the blood biochemistry (UNEP, 2006). In addition, Alves and colleagues (2012) reported that when populations of botos are conditioned with food these dolphins might become aggressive towards each other and humans. Other risks to the animals include changes in behavioral patterns, health, and the dependence on induced feeding, in addition to the harm by tourists during the interactions (Orams et al., 1996; Orams, 2002; Alves et al., 2011). In Eastern Amazon, more specifically in Pará State, Brazil, the influence of legends and myths related to river dolphins may lead children and teenagers to avoid such species, harmonious interactions are rare and hitherto not reported for this region (Rodrigues et al., 2012). Therefore, in this study we describe the interactions between children/adolescents and botos in markets/fairs in the towns of Mocajuba (lower Tocantins River) and Santarém (lower Tapajós River), in Pará State, Brazil, focusing on the context that those interactions occur and the most frequent behaviors observed in the process. 4 2. Methods 2.1 Study area We conducted our research in markets/fairs of two localities in Eastern Amazon, both located in Pará State, northern Brazil (Figure 1). One of these places is the town of Mocajuba (2°35’31”S, 49°28’60”W) in the lower reaches of the Tocantins River. The other market/fair is located in the city of Santarém (02°25’30”S e 54°42'50”W) in the lower Tapajós River at the confluence with the Amazon River. Both the Tocantins and Tapajós are clearwater rivers with intermediate fertility (Junk et al. 2011). The lifestyle of human populations working or depending on the markets we studied share some common Amazonian characteristics as the consumption and commerce of products originated from the forests and rivers, such as fruits, fish and herbs. Even though the city of Santarém has a larger population and is more urbanized than Mocajuba, the market located on the margins of the Tapajós River still retains traits that connect city, countryside and nature (Lefebvre, 2001, p. 68). Figure 1. Location of the study areas showing Mocajuba (lower Tocantins River) and Santarém (lower Tapajós River). 2.2 Data collection In order to contemplate the children’s knowledge