Lenten Penance Services & Confession Times 2020
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Appendix 5 Station Descriptions And
Appendix 5 Station Descriptions and Technical Overview Stage 2 light rail transit (LRT) stations will follow the same standards, design principles, and connectivity and mobility requirements as Stage 1 Confederation Line. Proponent Teams were instructed, through the guidelines outlined in the Project Agreement (PA), to design stations that will integrate with Stage 1, which include customer facilities, accessibility features, and the ability to support the City’s Transportation Master Plan (TMP) goals for public transit and ridership growth. The station features planned for the Stage 2 LRT Project will be designed and built on these performance standards which include: Barrier-free path of travel to entrances of stations; Accessible fare gates at each entrance, providing easy access for customers using mobility devices or service animals; Tactile wayfinding tiles will trace the accessible route through the fare gates, to elevators, platforms and exits; Transecure waiting areas on the train platform will include accessible benches and tactile/Braille signs indicating the direction of service; Tactile warning strips and inter-car barriers to keep everyone safely away from the platform edge; Audio announcements and visual displays for waiting passengers will precede each train’s arrival on the platform and will describe the direction of travel; Service alerts will be shown visually on the passenger information display monitors and announced audibly on the public-address system; All wayfinding and safety signage will be provided following the applicable accessibility standards (including type size, tactile signage, and appropriate colour contrast); Clear, open sight lines and pedestrian design that make wayfinding simple and intuitive; and, Cycling facilities at all stations including shelter for 80 per cent of the provided spaces, with additional space protected to ensure cycling facilities can be doubled and integrated into the station’s footprint. -
Ward 16 Master THEME EN
Draft Budget 2020 – Ward 16 – River Councillor Riley Brockington Ward investments in 2020 Infrastructure • $31.2 million on infrastructure, including: o $5.5 million to rehabilitate Mooney’s Bay trunk sewer o $6.8 million for integrated road, sewer, and water work along Claymor and Senio avenues o $5.9 million for integrated road, sewer and water work along Larkin Street, Larose Avenue and Lepage Avenue o $8.8 million on structure renewal, including culverts along the Airport Parkway at Walkley Road, and O-Train overpasses at Heron Road, Riverside Drive and Walkley Road o $3.95 million to resurface Riverside Drive between Hunt Club and Walkley roads Transportation • $817 million to fund Stage 2 of Ottawa’s light-rail transit system, extending service to Limebank Station with a link to the Ottawa Macdonald–Cartier International Airport, adding 12 kilometres and eight stations along the Trillium Line, south of Greenboro Station • $125,000 to reconstruct sidewalks and curbs to improve road safety along McCarthy Road between Plante Drive and the rail crossing • $30,000 to apply high-friction asphalt on Prince of Wales Drive at Kochar Drive • $20,000 to repair streetlight cables at Kenzie Street and Leaside Avenue • $6,000 to replace streetlight poles on Riverside Drive at Malhotra Court Parks and facilities • $500,000 on renewal projects, including: o $85,000 for building improvements to the Water Services facility on Clyde Avenue o $80,000 for upgrades to the Deborah Anne Kirwan Pool o $270,000 for concrete walkways and retaining walls at -
A History of Commissions: Threads of an Ottawa Planning History
Document generated on 09/24/2021 11:42 p.m. Urban History Review Revue d'histoire urbaine A History of Commissions Threads of An Ottawa Planning History Ken Hillis Volume 21, Number 1, October 1992 Article abstract Early planning in Ottawa takes the form of a piece-meal architectural URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1019246ar admixture. On paper there remains a series of largely unrealized proposals DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1019246ar designed to promote an image symbolic of national identity. Successive federal and municipal agencies worked to various degrees of success to augment See table of contents Ottawa's appearance and amenity. British planner Thomas Adams' departure from, and the subsequent demise of the Federal Commission of Conservation in the early 1920's marked a low point in efforts to evolve comprehensive Publisher(s) planning strategies. The career of Noulan Cauchon, first head of the Ottawa Town Planning Commission, aimed to keep the notion of planning alive in the Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine city. Certain of his little-acknowledged proposals bear remarkable similarity to the pre-W.W. II planning efforts of MacKenzie King and Jacques Greber. ISSN Cauchon's legacy endures in proposals which appear to have been incorporated into federal planning activities during the post-war era. 0703-0428 (print) 1918-5138 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Hillis, K. (1992). A History of Commissions: Threads of An Ottawa Planning History. Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine, 21(1), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.7202/1019246ar All Rights Reserved © Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine, 1992 This document is protected by copyright law. -
Project Synopsis
Final Draft Road Network Development Report Submitted to the City of Ottawa by IBI Group September 2013 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Objectives ............................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Approach ............................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Report Structure .................................................................................................. 3 2. Background Information ...................................................................... 4 2.1 The TRANS Screenline System ......................................................................... 4 2.2 The TRANS Forecasting Model ......................................................................... 4 2.3 The 2008 Transportation Master Plan ............................................................... 7 2.4 Progress Since 2008 ........................................................................................... 9 Community Design Plans and Other Studies ................................................................. 9 Environmental Assessments ........................................................................................ 10 Approvals and Construction .......................................................................................... 10 3. Needs and Opportunities .................................................................. -
Dr. Hossen Lokhat Planning Rationale for 348 Woodroffe Avenue: Zoning
Dr. Hossen Lokhat Planning Rationale for 348 Woodroffe Avenue: Zoning By-law Amendment June 24, 2010 Prepared by: 14 Colonnade Road, Suite 150 Ottawa ON K2E 7M6 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction............................................................................................................1 2.0 Overview of Subject Property...............................................................................1 3.0 Current Zoning for the Site ..................................................................................2 4.0 History of Zoning for the Site ...............................................................................2 5.0 Area Context and Adjacent Uses..........................................................................3 6.0 Transportation and Transit Network ..................................................................3 7.0 Proposed Zoning ....................................................................................................3 8.0 Policy Framework .................................................................................................3 8.1 Provincial Policy Statement (2005).................................................................3 8.2 City of Ottawa Official Plan (2003)................................................................4 9.0 Regulatory Framework .........................................................................................7 9.1 City of Ottawa Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2008-250............................7 10.0 Requested Zoning By-law Amendment ...............................................................8 -
Ottawa Transportation Report.Pdf
OTTAWA THE IMPACT OF TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS ON HOUSING VALUES IN THE OTTAWA REGION Don R Campbell, Senior Analyst Melanie Reuter, Director of Research Allyssa Epp, Research Analyst WWW.REINCANADA.COM AUTHORS Don R. Campbell, Senior Analyst, REIN Ltd Melanie Reuter, Director of Research, REIN Ltd Allyssa Fischer, Research Analyst, REIN Ltd © The Real Estate Investment Network Ltd. 6 – 27250 58 Cr Langley, BC V4W 3W7 Tel (604) 856-2825 Fax (604) 856-0091 E-Mail: [email protected] Web Page: www.reincanada.com Important Disclaimer: This Report, or any seminars or updates given in relation thereto, is sold, or otherwise provided, on the understanding that the authors – Don R. Campbell, Melanie Reuter, Allyssa Fischer, and The Real Estate Investment Network Ltd and their instructors, are not responsible for any results or results of any actions taken in reliance upon any information contained in this report, or conveyed by way of the said seminars, nor for any errors contained therein or presented thereat or omissions in relation thereto. It is further understood that the said authors and instructors do not purport to render legal, accounting, tax, investment, financial planning or other professional advice. The said authors and instructors hereby disclaim all and any liability to any person, whether a purchaser of this Report, a student of the said seminars, or otherwise, arising in respect of this Report, or the said seminars, and of the consequences of anything done or purported to be done by any such person in reliance, whether in whole or part, upon the whole or any part of the contents of this Report or the said seminars. -
Where to Dispose of Used Needles and Crack Pipes
WHERE TO DISPOSE OF USED NEEDLES AND CRACK PIPES For the health and safety of our community and sanitation workers, sharps (needles, crack pipes/glass stems) and other biohazardous waste must be disposed of properly and not placed in the garbage or recycling bins (By-law 2006-396, Schedule “J”). Residents should place their sharps in a non-breakable, puncture-proof container with a lid (no larger than a two litre pop bottle or measurements 15” by 4 ½ “), and drop it off at one of the City’s Needle Drop Boxes listed below. Containers larger than a two litre pop bottle can be dropped off at the Ottawa Public Health offices located at 100 Constellation Drive or 179 Clarence Street. Pharmacies participating in the Take It Back! Program also accepts used needles. Locations of these pharmacies are listed on the reverse side of this sheet. One-day Household Hazardous Waste Depots located at various sites across the City also accept used needles. For the schedule of operation, please visit Ottawa.ca/recycle and click on Disposal of Special Items. For more information regarding the City’s Needle Disposal Program please visit Ottawa.ca/health. LOCATION OF NEEDLE DROP BOXES AIDS Committee of Ottawa Fire Stations Parking Garage 700-251 Bank Street - Inside 141 Clarence Street - Outside 2355 Alta Vista Drive – Outside 200 Beechwood Avenue - Outside Bell Pharmacy Queensway-Carleton Hospital 1700 Blair Road – Outside 737 Gladstone Avenue - Outside 3045 Baseline Road - Outside 1445 Carling Avenue – Outside Bellevue Community Centre (OCH) 500 Charlemagne -
Nepean Kanata Barracudas Welcome to Long Course Invitational April 13-15, 2018
Nepean Kanata Barracudas Welcome to Long Course Invitational April 13-15, 2018 Hosted by: The Nepean Kanata Barracudas Swim Club Nepean Sportsplex 1701 Woodroffe Avenue Nepean, ON K2G 1W2 Sanctioned by: Swim Ontario General Information Date: April 13 – 15, 2018 Hosted by: Nepean Kanata Barracudas Location: Nepean Sportsplex, 1701 Woodroffe Ave. Nepean, ON K2G 1W2 Facility: 8-lane, 50m competition pool with Kieffer lane ropes and Quantum electronic timing and scoreboard. Competition Coordinator: Doug Nielsen Meet Manager: Megan Dodge - [email protected] Officials: Christie McMann – [email protected] Sanction: Sanctioned by Swim Ontario. All current Swimming/Natation Canada (SNC) rules will be followed. Please note that Swimming Canada Competition Warm-Up Safety Procedures will be in effect. The full document can be viewed HERE. For club and provincial meets, a swimsuit that covers more of the body such as modesty swimwear or religious cover- ups is permitted providing that the fabric is permeable open mesh textile material and does not give the swimmer an advantage. The full interpretation can be viewed HERE. Advanced notification or for clarification of interpretation please see the Competition Coordinator. Eligibility: All athletes must be registered as Competitive swimmers with SNC, or any other amateur swimming organization recognized by FINA. A valid SNC registration number is required for all Canadian swimmers, and entries without a SNC registration number will be declined entry. Split Times: The procedure for obtaining an 'Official Split' now requires that coaches make the request to the session referee or meet management on the “Official Split Request” form prior to the race. The split for the lead-off leg in relays will still be regarded as an official split and therefore no request by coaches is needed for relays. -
140 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
140 bus time schedule & line map 140 Billings Bridge View In Website Mode The 140 bus line (Billings Bridge) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Billings Bridge: 9:19 AM - 3:06 PM (2) Heron Park: 9:02 AM - 2:49 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 140 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 140 bus arriving. Direction: Billings Bridge 140 bus Time Schedule 25 stops Billings Bridge Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 9:19 AM - 3:06 PM Walkley / Ryder 1871 Walkley Road, Ottawa Tuesday 9:19 AM - 3:06 PM Walkley / Heron Wednesday 9:19 AM - 3:06 PM 1833 Walkley Road, Ottawa Thursday 9:19 AM - 3:06 PM Walkley / Holly Friday 9:19 AM - 3:06 PM 1635 Walkley Road, Ottawa Saturday 10:10 AM - 5:40 PM Walkley / Heron Walkley / Ad. 1680 Walkley / Heatherington 140 bus Info 1581 Walkley Road, Ottawa Direction: Billings Bridge Stops: 25 Walkley / Ad. 1570 Trip Duration: 14 min 144 Reardon Private, Ottawa Line Summary: Walkley / Ryder, Walkley / Heron, Walkley / Holly, Walkley / Heron, Walkley / Ad. 1680, Baycrest / Cedarwood Walkley / Heatherington, Walkley / Ad. 1570, Baycrest Drive, Ottawa Baycrest / Cedarwood, Baycrest / Heron, Heron / Baycrest, Heron / Finn, Heron / Alta Vista, Heron / Baycrest / Heron Evans, Heron / Bank, Heron / Gilles, Clementine / 1530 Heron Road, Ottawa Heron, Clementine / Richard, Clementine / Guertin, Clementine / Rockingham, Clementine / Belanger, Heron / Baycrest Belanger / Clementine, Bank / Lamira, Bank / Kilborn 1490 Heron Road, Ottawa Pathway- -
Phase One Environmental Site Assessment Proposed Commercial Building 2900 Woodroffe Avenue Ottawa, Ontario
Phase One Environmental Site Assessment Proposed Commercial Building 2900 Woodroffe Avenue Ottawa, Ontario Submitted to: Woodroffe Square Inc. c/o Lloyd Philips & Associates Ltd. 1827 Woodward Dr., Suite 109, Ottawa, ON K2C 0P9 Phase One Environmental Site Assessment Proposed Commercial Building 2900 Woodroffe Avenue Ottawa, Ontario May 10, 2019 Project: 64900.01 experience • knowledge • integrity GEMTEC Consulting Engineers and Scientists Limited 32 Steacie Drive Ottawa, ON, Canada K2K 2A9 May 10, 2019 File: 64900.01 – R01 Woodroffe Square Inc. c/o Lloyd Philips & Associates Ltd. 1827 Woodward Dr., Suite 109, Ottawa, ON K2C 0P9 Re: Phase One Environmental Site Assessment 2900 Woodroffe Avenue Ottawa, Ontario Enclosed is our Phase One ESA report for the above-noted project based on the scope of work presented in our proposal. This report was prepared by Katherine Rispoli, M.A.Sc., P.Eng, ing., with senior review performed by Drew Paulusse, B.Sc. _______________________________ _______________________________ Katherine Rispoli, M.A.Sc., P.Eng., ing. Drew Paulusse, B.Sc. KR/DP Enclosures P:\0. Files\64900\64900.01\Phase One ESA\Report\64900.01_PhaseOneESA_RPT01_V01_2019-05-10.docx Report to: Woodroffe Square Inc. ii Project: 64900.01 (May 10, 2019) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY GEMTEC Consulting Engineers and Scientists Limited (GEMTEC) was retained by the Woodroffe Square Inc. to carry out a Phase One Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) for Proposed Commercial Building located at 2900 Woodroffe Avenue in Ottawa, Ontario (hereafter referred to as “the subject property”). The subject property is an enhanced investigation property as defined by Ontario Regulation 153/04. The primary objective of this Phase One ESA was to identify any former or current potentially contaminating activities at the subject property and its vicinity to determine if they create any areas of potential environmental concern on the subject property. -
Pathway Network for Canada's Capital Region 2006 Strategic Plan PLANI
Pathway Network for Canada’s Capital Region 2006 Strategic Plan PLANI-CITÉ i June 2006 Pathway Network for Canada’s Capital Region 2006 Strategic Plan THE VISION The National Capital Commission (NCC) and its partners propose the following as a framework for the planning and development of the Capital Pathway network for the next 10 years: Multi-purpose use The Capital Pathway network covers Canada’s Capital Region in its entirety. It is a multi-purpose recreational and tourist network, which also supports non-motorized commuting vocations. Accessibility and safety The network extends to and links natural and built areas. Through its layout and design standards, the network encourages a quality user experience and accessibility, emphasizing the recognition of the “Green Capital”, and highlighting symbolic points of interest within the Capital. The network provides access to waterways, green spaces, cultural and heritage features while supporting the protection of natural areas and offering a wide range of easily accessible services. User education and awareness programs targeting pathway sharing in a respectful and tolerant manner result in a safe and pleasant experience. Connectivity The network, through its linkage with local cycling routes and regional/national trails, is connected to other non-motorized transportation networks within the region to encourage sustainable transportation and forms a key component of Canada’s Capital recreational and cycling experience. Recognition The network, as a result of its multi use vocation, its extensive and far reaching system of pathways and connection with regional, provincial and national trails and pathways within and outside Canada’s Capital Region as well as the quality of the experience is regarded as one of North America’s best. -
Report Template
1 Report to/Rapport au : Transportation Committee Comité des transports November 27, 2012 27 novembre 2012 Submitted by/Soumis par : Nancy Schepers, Deputy City Manager/Directrice municipale adjointe, Planning and Infrastructure/Urbanisme et Infrastructure Contact Person / Personne ressource: Bob Streicher, Acting Manager/Gestionnaire par intérim, Transportation Planning/Planification des transports, Planning and Growth Management/Urbanisme et Gestion de la croissance (613) 580-2424 x 22723, [email protected] CITY WIDE / À L’ÉCHELLE DE LA VILLE Ref N°: ACS2012-PAI-PGM-0260 SUBJECT: JOINT STUDY TO ASSESS CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURES ON THE NATIONAL CAPITAL GREENBELT – STUDY REPORT OBJET : ÉTUDE CONJOINTE VISANT À ÉVALUER LES EFFETS CUMULATIFS DES INFRASTRUCTURES DE TRANSPORT SUR LA CEINTURE DE VERDURE DE LA CAPITALE NATIONALE – RAPPORT D’ÉTUDE REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS That the Transportation Committee receive this report for information. RECOMMANDATIONS DU RAPPORT Que le Comité des Transports prenne connaissance de ce rapport. BACKGROUND The purpose of this study undertaken in partnership with the National Capital Commission (NCC) was to identify projects within the Transportation Master Plan (TMP) and other transportation projects that have emerged since the completion of the TMP that could have an impact on the environmental integrity of the federal Greenbelt lands. By examining the cumulative effects of the construction of this infrastructure on the Greenbelt lands, a framework now has been established to ensure that the associated Environmental Assessments (EAs) that require federal approval will move forward more expediently. 2 One of the NCC’s mandates is to protect the Greenbelt. Current practice has been that the NCC only comments or provides input on projects that are identified in its Greenbelt Master Plan (GBMP).