Appendix C Archaeological Reports
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
APPENDIX C ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORTS January 15, 2016 ORIGINAL REPORT Archaeological Overview of the Proposed O-Train Extension, Greenboro Station to Riverside South, Ottawa, Ontario Submitted to: Peter Steacy, P.Eng. MMM Group Limited 1145 Hunt Club Road, Suite 300 Ottawa, Ontario K1V 0Y3 Report Number: 1401140 (5000) Distribution: 1 e-copy - MMM Group Limited REPORT 1 copy - Golder Associates Ltd. ARCHAEOLOGICAL OVERVIEW O-TRAIN EXTENSION - GREENBORO STATION TO RIVERSIDE SOUTH Executive Summary The Executive Summary highlights key points from this Archaeological Overview only, for complete information and findings as well as limitations, the reader should examine the complete report. MMM Group Limited (MMM) retained Golder Associates Limited (Golder) to undertake an Archaeological Overview of the proposed O-Train Extension including a section which extends from Greenboro Station to Riverside South (Bowesville Road). The section is located in the historic Township of Gloucester, Carleton County, City of Ottawa, within parts of Lots 3 to 19 Concession 3, and Lots 18 and 19 Gore between Concession 2 and 3. The objectives of this Archaeological Overview will be to identify previous archaeological work conducted in the area and to provide recommendations, based on the previous work, as to what further archaeological assessments may be necessary, such as Stage 1, 2, 3 or 4 assessments. The overview will provides maps indicating areas of: previous archaeological study, registered archaeological sites, and recommendations for further archaeological assessment. A pre-contact and historical summary of the east Ottawa area has been provided for context, as well as three informative historical maps dating to 1825, 1863 and 1879. The results of this Archaeological Overview have formed the basis for the following recommendations: 1) That a detailed and current Stage 1 archaeological assessment is recommended for the area of the O-Train extension from Greenboro Station to Riverside South (Bowesville Road). This recommendation is in agreement with the previous report: “Stage 1 Archaeological & Heritage Assessment of the proposed North-South Corridor Light Rail Transit Project, Geographic Townships of Gloucester & Nepean, City of Ottawa”. The Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport (MTCS) has also recommended that a specific Stage 1 archaeological assessment for the Greenboro Station to Riverside South section of the extension is the most appropriate approach (e-mail communication, Sept. 16, 2014). This recommended Stage 1 archaeological assessment would take into consideration areas of previous archaeological assessments, as well as areas where significant ground disturbance has occurred, such as: utility lines, roads, buildings and parking lots (Map 6, p.17). This recommended Stage 1 archaeological assessment should take precedence over the other assessments noted below. This recommended Stage 1 archaeological assessment will provide information about the property’s geography, history, previous archaeological fieldwork and current land conditions. Most importantly this assessment will be consistent with the current MTCS’ Standards and Guidelines for Consultant Archaeologists (2011). The report will also provide recommendations for archaeological assessment(s), if deemed necessary. January 15, 2016 Report No. 1401140 (5000) i ARCHAEOLOGICAL OVERVIEW O-TRAIN EXTENSION - GREENBORO STATION TO RIVERSIDE SOUTH 2) That Stage 2 archaeological assessments as recommended in Heritage Quest Inc’s/Golder’s 2006 report be conducted. This assessment affects an area south of Hunt Club Road to the airport link; Concession 3 Lots 6 to 9 (Map 6, p.17), and an area at the southern end of the O-Train Extension; Concession 3 Lots 19 and 19 (Map 6, p.17). As this assessment and recommendations were accepted before the MTCS’s 2011 Standards and Guidelines for Consultant Archaeologists, the methodology of the Stage 2 archaeological assessment may very slightly from that outlined in Heritage Quest Inc’s/Golder’s previous report. 3) That a Stage 2 archaeological assessment as recommended in Ground Truth Archaeology’s 2006 report be conducted. This assessment affects the southern end of the O-Train Extension; Lots 18 and 19, Concession 3 and Lots 18 and 19 Gore, between Concession 2 and 3 (Map 6, p.17). Other archaeological assessments have occurred within this area and have been completed and require no further work (see below for further information and Map 6, p.17) As this assessment and recommendations were accepted before the MTCS’s 2011 Standards and Guidelines for Consultant Archaeologists, the methodology of the Stage 2 archaeological assessment may very slightly from that outlined in Ground Truth Archaeology’s report. 4) That the additional study areas noted in this overview (Map 6, p.17) are free of cultural heritage value and do not require further assessment. January 15, 2016 Report No. 1401140 (5000) ii ARCHAEOLOGICAL OVERVIEW O-TRAIN EXTENSION - GREENBORO STATION TO RIVERSIDE SOUTH Project Personnel Client Contact: Peter Steacy, MMM Group Limited Project Director: Troy Skinner Project Manager: Troy Skinner Discipline Lead: Brandy Lockhart (P386) Discipline Senior Review: Hugh Daechsel (P051) Report Author: Helen Moore (R359) Geomatics Technician: Bojan Radojevic Administrative Support: Courtney Adey January 15, 2016 Report No. 1401140 (5000) iii ARCHAEOLOGICAL OVERVIEW O-TRAIN EXTENSION - GREENBORO STATION TO RIVERSIDE SOUTH Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................................ i PROJECT PERSONNEL .......................................................................................................................................................... iii 1.0 PROJECT CONTEXT ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Development Context .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Historical Context ................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2.1 Pre-contact History......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2.2 Post-contact History ....................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2.3 Gloucester Township ..................................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Archaeological Context ........................................................................................................................................ 4 1.3.1 Archaeological Assessments ......................................................................................................................... 4 1.3.2 Archaeological Sites....................................................................................................................................... 5 2.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................................. 6 3.0 ADVICE ON COMPLIANCE WITH LEGISLATION .......................................................................................................... 7 4.0 IMPORTANT INFORMATION AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS REPORT ........................................................................... 8 5.0 BIOGRAPHY AND SOURCES ......................................................................................................................................... 9 6.0 MAPS .............................................................................................................................................................................. 11 7.0 CLOSURE ....................................................................................................................................................................... 18 MAPS Map 1: Key Plan ....................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Map 2: Study Area ................................................................................................................................................................... 13 Map 3: Historic Maps ............................................................................................................................................................... 14 Map 4: Previous Archaeological Assessments ......................................................................................................................... 15 Map 5: Registered Archaeological Sites .................................................................................................................................. 16 Map 6: Archaeological Recommendations ............................................................................................................................... 17 January 15, 2016 Report No. 1401140 (5000) iv ARCHAEOLOGICAL OVERVIEW O-TRAIN EXTENSION - GREENBORO STATION TO RIVERSIDE SOUTH 1.0 PROJECT CONTEXT MMM Group Limited (MMM) retained Golder Associates