DOCSLIB.ORG

RLA Site Catalog Page 1 of 211

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
RLA Site Catalog Page 1 of 211 RLA Site Catalog Page 1 of 211 RLA State Site No. Site No. County State Comment Mex Mexico General Country Provenience - {Miscellaneous} USA United States General Country Provenience Ala Alabama General State Provenience Ala 1 Alabama Coosa Site (Ta 1) Ala 2 1Br15 Alabama Site 1Br15 Ala 3 Alabama Ft. Morgan Peninsula, Mobile Bay Ala 4 Alabama Moundville Ala 5 Alabama Near Hodges, Franklin Co. Ala 6 Alabama Baldwin Co. Ala 7 Alabama Gulf Shores Als Alaska General State Provenience Ark Arkansas General State Provenience Ark 1 Arkansas Potter Site Ark 2 Arkansas Poinsett Co. Ark 3 Arkansas Poinsett Co. Arz Arizona General State Provenience Arz 3 Arizona Cal California General State Provenience Col Colorado General State Provenience Col 1 Colorado Lindenmeier Site Col 2 Colorado Paul Johnson Site Col 3 Colorado Hellmer Site Col 4 Colorado Apex Spring Site Del Delaware Fla Florida General State Provenience Fla 1 Florida Weeden Island Fla 2 Florida Cape Canaveral Fla 3 Florida Lake Apopka Fla 4 Florida Marsh Island, Wakulla Co. Fla 5 Florida Nine Mile Bridge Fla 6 Florida Hall Site, Wakulla Co. Fla 8 Florida Tucker Site, Franklin Co. Fla 9 Florida Two Mile Bottom, Wakulla Co. Fla 10 Florida Velda Mound, Leon Co. Research Laboratories of Archaeology, UNC-Chapel Hill RLA Site Catalog Page 2 of 211 RLA State Site No. Site No. County State Comment Fla 11 Florida Dubois Mound, Palm Beach Co. Fla 12 Florida Desoto Site, Cape Kennedy AFB Fla 13 Florida Burns Site, Cape Kennedy AFB Fla 15 Florida Fla 16 Florida Wakulla Co. Fla 17 Florida Wakulla Co. Fla 18 Florida Franklin Co. Fla 19 Florida Franklin Co. Fla 20 Florida Franklin Co. Fla 21 Florida Franklin Co. Fla 22 Florida Franklin Co. Fla 23 Florida Franklin Co. Fla 24 Florida Jefferson Co. Fla 25 Florida Franklin Co. Fla 26 Florida Franklin Co. Fla 27 Florida Wakulla Co. Fla 28 Florida Wakulla Co. Fla 29 Florida Wakulla Co. Fla 30 Florida Wakulla Co. Fla 31 Florida Wakulla Co. Fla 32 Florida Wakulla Co. Fla 33 Florida Leon Co. Fla 34 Florida Gadsden Co. Fla 35 Florida Gadsden Co. Fla 36 Florida Taylor Co. Fla 37 Florida Taylor Co. Fla 38 Florida Taylor Co. Fla 39 Florida Taylor Co. Fla 40 Florida Taylor Co. Fla 41 Florida Taylor Co. Fla 42 Florida Taylor Co. Fla 43 Florida Liberty Co. Fla 44 Florida Leon Co. Fla 45 Florida Wakulla Co. Fla 46 Florida Wakulla Co. Research Laboratories of Archaeology, UNC-Chapel Hill RLA Site Catalog Page 3 of 211 RLA State Site No. Site No. County State Comment Fla 47 Florida Wakulla Co. Fla 48 Florida Franklin Co. Fla 49 Florida Holmes Co. Fla 50 Florida Jackson Co. Fla 51 Florida Jackson Co. Fla 53 Florida Jefferson Co. Fla 54 Florida Leon Co. Fla 55 Florida Leon Co. Fla 56 Florida Leon Co. Geo Georgia General State Provenience Geo ? Georgia Unknown Geo 1 Georgia White Mound Geo 2 Georgia Little Shoulder Bone Geo 4 Georgia Stallings Island Geo 5 Georgia Keoke "A" Geo 6 Georgia Keoke "B" Geo 7 Georgia Mandeville Site Geo 8 Georgia Etowah Geo 9 Georgia Rock House, Estatoe Geo 11 Georgia Near Dillard Geo 12 Georgia Hightower Creek Geo 13 Georgia Near Young Harris Geo 14 Georgia Dooley's Creek Geo 15 Georgia Smith's Bridge Geo 16 Georgia Dooley's Creek #2 Geo 17 Georgia Near Young Harris #2 Geo 18 Georgia Nacouchee Valley Geo 19 Georgia St. Simons Island Geo 20 Georgia Kolomoki Geo 21 Georgia Sixtoe, Carter's Quarter Geo 22 Georgia Opposite Stallings Island Geo 23 Georgia Tugalo Geo 24 Georgia New Echota Geo 25 Rabun Georgia Geo 26 Rabun Georgia Research Laboratories of Archaeology, UNC-Chapel Hill RLA Site Catalog Page 4 of 211 RLA State Site No. Site No. County State Comment Geo 27 Rabun Georgia Geo 28 Rabun Georgia Geo 29 Rabun Georgia Geo 30 Rabun Georgia Geo 31 Rabun Georgia Geo 32 Rabun Georgia Geo 33 Rabun Georgia Geo 34 Rabun Georgia Geo 35 Rabun Georgia Geo 36 Rabun Georgia Geo 37 Rabun Georgia Geo 38 Rabun Georgia Geo 39 Rabun Georgia Geo 40 Rabun Georgia Geo 41 Rabun Georgia Geo 42 Rabun Georgia Geo 43 Rabun Georgia Geo 44 Rabun Georgia Geo 45 Rabun Georgia Geo 46 Towns Georgia Geo 47 Towns Georgia Geo 48 Towns Georgia Geo 49 Towns Georgia Geo 50 Union Georgia Geo 51 Union Georgia Geo 52 Union Georgia Geo 53 Union Georgia Geo 54 Union Georgia Geo 55 Union Georgia Geo 56 Union Georgia Geo 57 Union Georgia Geo 58 Union Georgia Geo 59 Union Georgia Geo 60 Union Georgia Geo 61 Union Georgia Research Laboratories of Archaeology, UNC-Chapel Hill RLA Site Catalog Page 5 of 211 RLA State Site No. Site No. County State Comment Geo 62 Union Georgia Geo 63 Union Georgia Geo 64 Union Georgia Geo 65 Union Georgia Geo 66 Union Georgia Geo 67 Union Georgia Geo 68 Lumpkin Georgia Geo 69 Lumpkin Georgia Geo 70 Georgia Nacoochee Mound Geo 71 White Georgia Geo 72 White Georgia Geo 73 White Georgia Geo 74 Towns Georgia Geo 75 Towns Georgia Geo 76 Towns Georgia Geo 77 Towns Georgia Geo 78 Towns Georgia Geo 79 Towns Georgia Geo 80 Towns Georgia Geo 81 Towns Georgia Geo 82 Towns Georgia Geo 83 Towns Georgia Geo 84 Towns Georgia Geo 85 Towns Georgia Geo 86 Towns Georgia Geo 87 Towns Georgia Geo 88 Towns Georgia Geo 89 Towns Georgia Geo 90 Towns Georgia Geo 91 Towns Georgia Geo 92 Towns Georgia Geo 93 Towns Georgia Geo 94 Towns Georgia Geo 95 Towns Georgia Geo 96 Towns Georgia Research Laboratories of Archaeology, UNC-Chapel Hill RLA Site Catalog Page 6 of 211 RLA State Site No. Site No. County State Comment Geo 97 Towns Georgia Geo 98 Towns Georgia Geo 99 Towns Georgia Geo 100 Towns Georgia Geo 101 Towns Georgia Geo 102 Union Georgia Geo 103 Georgia Bell Field Geo 104 Georgia Near Albany Geo 105 Lee Georgia Geo 106 Georgia Briar Creek Geo 107 Georgia Satolah Quad. Geo 108 Georgia Satolah Quad. Geo 113 Georgia Morris Site "A", Burke Co. Geo 114 Georgia Morris Site "B", Burke Co. Geo 115 Burke Georgia Geo 116 Georgia Ossabaw Island Geo 117 Georgia Ocmulgee National Monument Geo 121 Pierce Georgia Geo 123 Pierce Georgia Geo 124 McIntosh Georgia Geo 125 Georgia Geo 126 Georgia Geo 128 Georgia Geo 130 Georgia Geo 131 Georgia Geo 132 Georgia Geo 133 Georgia Geo 135 Georgia Geo 136 Georgia Geo 137 Georgia Geo 138 Georgia Geo 139 Georgia Geo 140 Georgia Geo 141 Georgia Geo 142 Georgia Research Laboratories of Archaeology, UNC-Chapel Hill RLA Site Catalog Page 7 of 211 RLA State Site No. Site No. County State Comment Geo 144 Georgia Geo 147 Georgia Geo 149 Georgia Geo 152 9Mc23 McIntosh Georgia Black Island Geo 153 9Bry7 Georgia Seven Mile Bend Ill Illinois General State Provenience Ind Indiana General State Provenience Ind 1 Indiana Angel Mound Site Ken Kentucky Ken ? Kentucky Unknown Ken 1 15McY708 McCreary Kentucky Ken 2 15McY709 McCreary Kentucky Ken 3 15McY710 McCreary Kentucky Ken 4 15McY711 McCreary Kentucky Ken 5 McCreary Kentucky Ken 6 McCreary Kentucky Ken 7 McCreary Kentucky Ken 8 Kentucky Ken 9 Kentucky Ken 12 Kentucky Ken 13 Kentucky Ken 14 Kentucky Ken 15 Kentucky Ken 16 Kentucky Ken 17 Kentucky Ken 18 Kentucky Ken 19 Kentucky Ken 20 Kentucky Ken 21 Kentucky Ken 22 Kentucky Ken 23 Kentucky Ken 24 Kentucky Ken 25 Kentucky Ken 26 Kentucky Ken 27 Kentucky Research Laboratories of Archaeology, UNC-Chapel Hill RLA Site Catalog Page 8 of 211 RLA State Site No. Site No. County State Comment Ken 28 Kentucky Ken 29 Kentucky Ken 30 Kentucky Ken 31 Kentucky Ken 32 Kentucky Ken 33 Kentucky Ken 34 Kentucky Ken 35 Kentucky Ken 36 Kentucky Ken 38 Kentucky Ken 39 Kentucky Ken 40 Kentucky Ken 41 Kentucky Ken 42 Kentucky Ken 43 Kentucky Ken 44 Kentucky Ken 45 Kentucky Ken 46 Kentucky Ken 47 Kentucky Ken 48 Kentucky Ken 49 Kentucky Ken 50 Kentucky Ken 51 Kentucky Ken 52a Kentucky Ken 52b Kentucky Ken 53 Kentucky Ken 54 Kentucky Lsa Louisiana General State Provenience Lsa 1 Louisiana Poverty Point Lsa 2 Louisiana Greenhouse Site Lsa 3 Louisiana Troyville Site Lsa 4 Louisiana Elkhorn Plantation Lsa 5 Louisiana Near Somerset Lsa 6 Louisiana Near Newellton (Te-1) Lsa 7 Louisiana Near Newellton (Te-5) Research Laboratories of Archaeology, UNC-Chapel Hill RLA Site Catalog Page 9 of 211 RLA State Site No. Site No. County State Comment Lsa 8 Louisiana Near Fitzhugh Lsa 9 Louisiana Weeks Island, Iberia Parrish Mar Maryland General State Provenience Mar 1 Maryland Mar 2 18Ce1 Maryland Mar 3 18Ce2 Maryland Mic Michigan General State Provenience Mic 1 Michigan Riverside Cemetery, Menominee Mic 2 Michigan Min Minnesota General State Provenience Mis Mississippi General State Provenience Mis 1 Mississippi Leland Mounds Mis 2 Mississippi Winterville Site Mis 3 Mississippi Deer Creek Site Mis 4 Mississippi Fatherland Mound Mis 5 Mississippi Natchez Village Mis 6 Mississippi Anna Mound Mis 7 Mississippi Arcola Mound Mis 8 Mississippi Jaketown Site Mis 9 Mississippi Shell Bluff Mound Mis 10 Mississippi Lake George Mis 11 Mississippi Alligator Mound Mis 12 Mississippi Emerald Mound Mis 13 Hancock Mississippi Mos Missouri General State Provenience Mos 1 Missouri Graham Cave Mos 2 Missouri Rubidoux #1 Mos 3 Missouri Cow Dung Cave Mos 4 Missouri Tourist Cave Mos 5 Missouri Devils Elbow Cave NeJ New Jersey General State Provenience NeM New Mexico General State Provenience NeY New York General State Provenience NoC North Carolina North Carolina NoC 31 North Carolina General State Provenience Research Laboratories of Archaeology, UNC-Chapel Hill RLA Site Catalog Page 10 of 211 RLA State Site No.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Archeological and Bioarcheological Resources of the Northern Plains Edited by George C
    Tri-Services Cultural Resources Research Center USACERL Special Report 97/2 December 1996 U.S. Department of Defense Legacy Resource Management Program U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Construction Engineering Research Laboratory Archeological and Bioarcheological Resources of the Northern Plains edited by George C. Frison and Robert C. Mainfort, with contributions by George C. Frison, Dennis L. Toom, Michael L. Gregg, John Williams, Laura L. Scheiber, George W. Gill, James C. Miller, Julie E. Francis, Robert C. Mainfort, David Schwab, L. Adrien Hannus, Peter Winham, David Walter, David Meyer, Paul R. Picha, and David G. Stanley A Volume in the Central and Northern Plains Archeological Overview Arkansas Archeological Survey Research Series No. 47 1996 Arkansas Archeological Survey Fayetteville, Arkansas 1996 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Archeological and bioarcheological resources of the Northern Plains/ edited by George C. Frison and Robert C. Mainfort; with contributions by George C. Frison [et al.] p. cm. — (Arkansas Archeological Survey research series; no. 47 (USACERL special report; 97/2) “A volume in the Central and Northern Plains archeological overview.” Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-56349-078-1 (alk. paper) 1. Indians of North America—Great Plains—Antiquities. 2. Indians of North America—Anthropometry—Great Plains. 3. Great Plains—Antiquities. I. Frison, George C. II. Mainfort, Robert C. III. Arkansas Archeological Survey. IV. Series. V. Series: USA-CERL special report: N-97/2. E78.G73A74 1996 96-44361 978’.01—dc21 CIP Abstract The 12,000 years of human occupation in the Northwestern Great Plains states of Montana, Wyoming, North Dakota, and South Dakota is reviewed here.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Affiliation Statement for Buffalo National River
    CULTURAL AFFILIATION STATEMENT BUFFALO NATIONAL RIVER, ARKANSAS Final Report Prepared by María Nieves Zedeño Nicholas Laluk Prepared for National Park Service Midwest Region Under Contract Agreement CA 1248-00-02 Task Agreement J6068050087 UAZ-176 Bureau of Applied Research In Anthropology The University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85711 June 1, 2008 Table of Contents and Figures Summary of Findings...........................................................................................................2 Chapter One: Study Overview.............................................................................................5 Chapter Two: Cultural History of Buffalo National River ................................................15 Chapter Three: Protohistoric Ethnic Groups......................................................................41 Chapter Four: The Aboriginal Group ................................................................................64 Chapter Five: Emigrant Tribes...........................................................................................93 References Cited ..............................................................................................................109 Selected Annotations .......................................................................................................137 Figure 1. Buffalo National River, Arkansas ........................................................................6 Figure 2. Sixteenth Century Polities and Ethnic Groups (after Sabo 2001) ......................47
    [Show full text]
  • Management Plan / Environmental Assessment, Atchafalaya National
    Atchafalaya National Heritage Area Heritage National Atchafalaya COMMISSION REVIEW- October 1, 2010 Vol. II SEPTEMBER 2011 Environmental Assessment Environmental Management Plan Note: This is a low resolution file of the painting, “Hope” to show artwork and placement. Artwork will be credited to Melissa Bonin, on inside front cover. AtchafalayaAtchafalaya NationalNational HeritageHeritage AreaArea MANAGEMENT PLAN / ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SEPT DRAFT MANAGEMENT PLAN / ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2011 As the nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has responsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural resources. This includes fostering sound use of our land and water resources; protecting our fish, wildlife, and biological diversity; preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historical places; and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The department assesses our energy and mineral resources and works to ensure that their development is in the best interests of all our people by encouraging stewardship and citizen participation in their care. The department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people who live in island territories under U.S. administration. Front cover photo credit: Louisiana Office of Tourism NPS ABF/P77/107232 SEPTEMBER 2011 Printed on recycled paper Atchafalaya National Heritage Area Management Plan/ Environmental Assessment Volume Two 1 2 CONTENTS OF VOLUME TWO CHAPTER
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Testing at Allenbrook (9Fu286), Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area, Roswell, Georgia
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL TESTING AT ALLENBROOK (9FU286), CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER NATIONAL RECREATION AREA, ROSWELL, GEORGIA Chicora Research Contribution 547 ARCHAEOLOGICAL TESTING AT ALLENBROOK (9FU286), CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER NATIONAL RECREATION AREA, ROSWELL, GEORGIA Prepared By: Michael Trinkley, Ph.D. Debi Hacker Prepared For: National Park Service Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area 1978 Island Ford Parkway Atlanta, Georgia 30350 Contract No. P11PC50748 ARPA Permit No. CHAT 2012-001 CHICORA RESEARCH CONTRIBUTION 547 Chicora Foundation, Inc. PO Box 8664 Columbia, SC 29202 803-787-6910 www.chicora.org December 3, 2012 This report is printed on permanent paper ∞ MANAGEMENT SUMMARY The investigations were conducted in saprolite rock that was designated Level 2 and compliance with ARPA Permit CHAT 2012-001 extended from 0.07 to 0.17m bs. This zone under contract with the National Park Service to represented fill and no artifacts were identified. examine archaeological features that may be associated with the foundation wall of the Level 3 was slightly deeper, extending Allenbrook House (9FU286, CHAT-98) and from 0.17 to 0.35m and consisted of identical determine if archaeological evidence of a previous compact mottled red (2.5YR 4/4) clay and porch on the south façade of the structure could saprolite rock that graded into a red clay (2.5YR be identified. 4/6) and saprolite rock. This fill was also sterile. The work was conducted by Dr. Michael Level 4 extended from 0.35 to 0.48m and Trinkley, RPA (who was on-site during the entire consisted of red clay (2.5YR 4/6) and saprolite project), Ms. Debi Hacker, and Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Athens, Georgia
    SOUTHEASTERN ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS & ABSTRACTS OF THE 73RD ANNUAL MEETING OCTOBER 26-29, 2016 ATHENS, GEORGIA BULLETIN 59 2016 BULLETIN 59 2016 PROCEEDINGS & ABSTRACTS OF THE 73RD ANNUAL MEETING OCTOBER 26-29, 2016 THE CLASSIC CENTER ATHENS, GEORGIA Meeting Organizer: Edited by: Hosted by: Cover: © Southeastern Archaeological Conference 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS THE CLASSIC CENTER FLOOR PLAN……………………………………………………...……………………..…... PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………………………………………………………….…..……. LIST OF DONORS……………………………………………………………………………………………….…..……. SPECIAL THANKS………………………………………………………………………………………….….....……….. SEAC AT A GLANCE……………………………………………………………………………………….……….....…. GENERAL INFORMATION & SPECIAL EVENTS SCHEDULE…………………….……………………..…………... PROGRAM WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 26…………………………………………………………………………..……. THURSDAY, OCTOBER 27……………………………………………………………………………...…...13 FRIDAY, OCTOBER 28TH……………………………………………………………….……………....…..21 SATURDAY, OCTOBER 29TH…………………………………………………………….…………....…...28 STUDENT PAPER COMPETITION ENTRIES…………………………………………………………………..………. ABSTRACTS OF SYMPOSIA AND PANELS……………………………………………………………..…………….. ABSTRACTS OF WORKSHOPS…………………………………………………………………………...…………….. ABSTRACTS OF SEAC STUDENT AFFAIRS LUNCHEON……………………………………………..…..……….. SEAC LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARDS FOR 2016…………………….……………….…….…………………. Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 59, 2016 ConferenceRooms CLASSIC CENTERFLOOR PLAN 6 73rd Annual Meeting, Athens, Georgia EVENT LOCATIONS Baldwin Hall Baldwin Hall 7 Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Atlatl Bibliography John Whittaker Grinnell College Version June 20, 2012
    1 Annotated Atlatl Bibliography John Whittaker Grinnell College version June 20, 2012 Introduction I began accumulating this bibliography around 1996, making notes for my own uses. Since I have access to some obscure articles, I thought it might be useful to put this information where others can get at it. Comments in brackets [ ] are my own comments, opinions, and critiques, and not everyone will agree with them. The thoroughness of the annotation varies depending on when I read the piece and what my interests were at the time. The many articles from atlatl newsletters describing contests and scores are not included. I try to find news media mentions of atlatls, but many have little useful info. There are a few peripheral items, relating to topics like the dating of the introduction of the bow, archery, primitive hunting, projectile points, and skeletal anatomy. Through the kindness of Lorenz Bruchert and Bill Tate, in 2008 I inherited the articles accumulated for Bruchert’s extensive atlatl bibliography (Bruchert 2000), and have been incorporating those I did not have in mine. Many previously hard to get articles are now available on the web - see for instance postings on the Atlatl Forum at the Paleoplanet webpage http://paleoplanet69529.yuku.com/forums/26/t/WAA-Links-References.html and on the World Atlatl Association pages at http://www.worldatlatl.org/ If I know about it, I will sometimes indicate such an electronic source as well as the original citation. The articles use a variety of measurements. Some useful conversions: 1”=2.54
    [Show full text]
  • An Intensive Surface Collection and Intrasite Spatial Analysis of the Archaeological Materials from the Coy Mound Site (3LN20), Central Arkansas
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 4-2004 An Intensive Surface Collection and Intrasite Spatial Analysis of the Archaeological Materials from the Coy Mound Site (3LN20), Central Arkansas William Glenn Hill Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Hill, William Glenn, "An Intensive Surface Collection and Intrasite Spatial Analysis of the Archaeological Materials from the Coy Mound Site (3LN20), Central Arkansas" (2004). Master's Theses. 3873. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/3873 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AN INTENSIVE SURFACE COLLECTION AND INTRASITE SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL MATERIALS FROM THE COY MOUND SITE (3LN20), CENTRAL ARKANSAS by William Glenn Hill A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degreeof Master of Arts Department of Anthropology WesternMichigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan April 2004 Copyright by William Glenn Hill 2004 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Foremost, my pursuit in archaeology would be less meaningful without the accomplishments of Dr. Randall McGuire, Dr. H. Martin Wobst, and Dr. Michael Nassaney. They have provided a theoretical perspective in archaeology that has integrated and given greater meaning to my own social and archaeological interests. I would especially like to especially thank my thesis advisor, Dr. Michael Nassaney, for the stimulating opportunity to explore research within this theoretical perspective, and my other committee members, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Woodland-Period Mound Building As Historical Tradition Dating The
    Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 15 (2017) 73–94 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jasrep Woodland-period mound building as historical tradition: Dating the mounds MARK and monuments at Crystal River (8CI1) Thomas J. Pluckhahn, Victor D. Thompson ABSTRACT Changes in monumental architecture are fundamental to the theory and practice of archaeology in eastern North America, yet we have rarely examined these changes at spatial and temporal scales commensurate with the lived experience of the people of the past. The problem is exemplified by the transition from conical burial mounds to truncated pyramids, or platform mounds. We report a combined total of 24 radiocarbon dates (10 reported here for first time) and four OSL dates from mounds at the Crystal River site (8CI1) in west-central Florida, among the most diverse Woodland-period mound complexes in the US Southeast. We then review the results of Bayesian modeling of mound construction episodes indicated by geophysical survey, small-diameter coring, and reviews of previous excavation. Finally, we synthesis the modeled start dates for mound construction episodes into a five- phase Bayesian model that allows us to approach mound building at Crystal River as a form of historical tradition characterized by both stasis and rapid change in architectural form. 1. Introduction from burial- to platform-mound architecture was not as tidy as pre- viously assumed. Knight (1990, 2001) presented evidence for Wood- Changes in monumental architecture are fundamental to the theory land-period platform mound building at the Walling site and, drawing and practice of archaeology in eastern North America (Anderson, 2012: from a roster of 55 mounds on 30 sites, went on to describe this as a 85–86), yet we have rarely examined these changes at spatial and “generalized phenomenon,” albeit with great variability in time and temporal scales commensurate with the lived experience of the people form.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Oklahoma
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE WISTER AREA FOURCHE MALINE: A CONTESTED LANDSCAPE A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By SIMONE BACHMAI ROWE Norman, OKlahoma 2014 WISTER AREA FOURCHE MALINE: A CONTESTED LANDSCAPE A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY BY ______________________________ Dr. Lesley RanKin-Hill, Co-Chair ______________________________ Dr. Don Wyckoff, Co-Chair ______________________________ Dr. Diane Warren ______________________________ Dr. Patrick Livingood ______________________________ Dr. Barbara SafiejKo-Mroczka © Copyright by SIMONE BACHMAI ROWE 2014 All Rights Reserved. This work is dedicated to those who came before, including my mother Nguyen Thi Lac, and my Granny (Mildred Rowe Cotter) and Bob (Robert Cotter). Acknowledgements I have loved being a graduate student. It’s not an exaggeration to say that these have been the happiest years of my life, and I am incredibly grateful to everyone who has been with me on this journey. Most importantly, I would like to thank the Caddo Nation and the Wichita and Affiliated Tribes for allowing me to work with the burials from the Akers site. A great big thank you to my committee members, Drs. Lesley Rankin-Hill, Don Wyckoff, Barbara Safjieko-Mrozcka, Patrick Livingood, and Diane Warren, who have all been incredibly supportive, helpful, and kind. Thank you also to the Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History, where most of this work was carried out. I am grateful to many of the professionals there, including Curator of Archaeology Dr. Marc Levine and Collections Manager Susie Armstrong-Fishman, as well as Curator Emeritus Don Wyckoff, and former Collection Managers Liz Leith and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Archeology Inventory Table of Contents
    National Historic Landmarks--Archaeology Inventory Theresa E. Solury, 1999 Updated and Revised, 2003 Caridad de la Vega National Historic Landmarks-Archeology Inventory Table of Contents Review Methods and Processes Property Name ..........................................................1 Cultural Affiliation .......................................................1 Time Period .......................................................... 1-2 Property Type ...........................................................2 Significance .......................................................... 2-3 Theme ................................................................3 Restricted Address .......................................................3 Format Explanation .................................................... 3-4 Key to the Data Table ........................................................ 4-6 Data Set Alabama ...............................................................7 Alaska .............................................................. 7-9 Arizona ............................................................. 9-10 Arkansas ..............................................................10 California .............................................................11 Colorado ..............................................................11 Connecticut ........................................................ 11-12 District of Columbia ....................................................12 Florida ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Occupation Polygons
    Polygon Date & Period Archaeological Phase Cultural - Historical Source & Comment Hist or Arch Pop & Sites Group Estimate 1 early 16th century Little Tennessee site 16th century Chiaha mid-16th century, Little Tennessee site cluster cluster and sites 7-19 and sites 7-19, Hally et al. 1990:Fig. 9.1; 16th century, Chiaha, three populations, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Little Tennessee cluster plus additional sites, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 2 early 16th century Hiwassee site cluster mid-16th century, Hiwassee site cluster, Hally et al. 1990:Fig. 9.1; 16th century, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Hiwassee cluster, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 3 early 16th century Chattanooga site cluster 16th century Napochies mid-16th century, Chattanooga site cluster, Hally et al. 1990:Fig. 9.1; 16th century Napochies, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Chattanooga site cluster, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 4 early 16th century Carters site cluster; 16th century Coosa mid-16th century, Carters site cluster, Hally et al. X Barnett phase 1990:Fig. 9.1; Barnett phase, Hally and Rudolph 1986:Fig. 15; 16th century Coosa, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Carters site cluster, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 5 early 16th century Cartersville site cluster; mid-16th century, Cartersville site cluster, Hally et Brewster phase al. 1990:Fig. 9.1; Brewster phase, Hally and Rudolph 1986:Fig. 15; 16th century, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Cartersville site cluster, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 6 early 16th century Rome site cluster; 16th century Apica mid-16th century, Rome site cluster, Hally et al.
    [Show full text]
  • North Carolina Archaeological Council Publication 14
    ADDENDUM I: A GUIDE TO RESEARCH PAPERS IN THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF NORTH CAROLINA ON FILE WITH THE ARCHAEOLOGY BRANCH OF THE NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY Thomas H. Hargrove Compiler NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL COUNCIL PUBLICATION NUl{BER 14 Published Jointly by the North Carolina Archaeological Council and the Archaeology Branch Division of Archives and History North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources Raleigh, 1981 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 1 AUTHOR INDEX 3 INDEX 65 CONTRIBUTING INSTITUTIONS 71 ii Introduction In 1980 the North Carolina Archaeological Council published a bibliography of archaeological papers on file with one of its member institutions. Appearing as Publication 13 in the Council Series, "A guide to research papers in the archaeology of North Carolina on file with the Archaeology Branch of the North Carolina Division of Archives and History" provided a list of 661 works to those involved with archaeological research or resource management. Most of these works, which cover archaeological projects throughout the state, were unpublished. Since the publication of that bibliography, the Archaeology Branch's file of dissertations, theses, articles, and contract reports on archaeology has grown. In addition, many of the major sources of published archaeological works in North Carolina have been indexed for use in environmental review at the branch. As a result, the number of additional references has led to the compilation of a second bibliography. As in the first bibliography, the works l1sted here represent a wide variety of research interests, techniques, formats, and purposes. The geographical focus varies from excavations of single structures or surveys of one-acre plots of land to overviews of physiographic regions that include one-third of the state.
    [Show full text]