Copyright by Rachel Ann Wise 2014
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Copyright by Rachel Ann Wise 2014 The Dissertation Committee for Rachel Ann Wise Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Losing Appalachia: Genre and Local Color’s Out-of-Place Objects, 1870-1920 Committee: Coleman Hutchison, Supervisor Phillip Barrish Matt Cohen Elizabeth S.D. Engelhardt Gretchen Murphy Losing Appalachia: Genre and Local Color’s Out-of-Place Objects, 1870-1920 by Rachel Ann Wise, B.A.; M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August 2014 Dedication For Bill Jones and the others who have gone. Your veil has been lifted. Acknowledgements I would like to thank my chair, Coleman Hutchison, for reminding me “the dissertation is a goddamn marathon.” Were it not for his guidance, I would still be nursing a side-stitch somewhere around mile ten. His honest and insightful feedback was instrumental in framing this project. I am also grateful to my other committee members, Phillip Barrish, Matt Cohen, Elizabeth S.D. Engelhardt, and Gretchen Murphy, for the time and attention they provided at crucial stages in this process. Each in their own way has helped me better understand how I want to inhabit disciplinary conversations and the academic world. I am also indebted to the Historical Society of Pennsylvania and the Library Company of Philadelphia for access to archival materials referenced in the dissertation. I wish to thank the friends and family who have given me emotional and intellectual support for which I can never fully repay them. Meghan Andrews, Laine Perez, Nikki Gray, Rachel Schneider, and Tekla Hawkins have been confidantes, encouragers, and truth tellers. My parents always believed I could do this and knew how to put things into perspective when the weeping and gnashing of teeth began. I am also grateful to Gary and Rose Burke of Frankfort’s The Meeting House Bed and Breakfast whose kindnesses and good food aided in the revision of “Losing Appalachia.” Finally, thank you, Craig, for not divorcing me. I probably deserved it v Losing Appalachia: Genre and Local Color’s Out-of-Place Objects, 1870-1920 Rachel Ann Wise, Ph.D. The University of Texas at Austin, 2014 Supervisor: Coleman Hutchison “Losing Appalachia” offers an alternative literary history of local color writing by touting a historically, culturally, and rhetorically situated Appalachia, one of the most perplexing of American regions. Most local color criticism takes the New England village as its starting point. Critics interested in material culture then interpret the sentimental folk objects found in the village as indicative of the genre’s middle-class investments and pastoral qualities. The project considers what it would look like to entertain the idea of a literature that is not written by—or concerned with elaborating on—the urban middle class. It proposes one way to make this intervention, which requires an attention to canon (texts) and things (material culture). In reading local color through Appalachia—a region long associated with aberrant cultural and material practices—“Losing Appalachia” argues for the importance of a ubiquitous though understudied form of material culture in local color texts: the cast off, repurposed, and inferior mass-produced product. Such material culture is out-of-place in local color texts, especially when it appears in ways that undercut dominant middle-class norms and expectations. vi Applying the theories of Michel de Certeau, the project focuses on how women writers like Rebecca Harding Davis, Alice Dunbar-Nelson, Mary Hunter Austin, Grace MacGowan Cooke, and Mary Wilkins Freeman used material culture to maneuver within the gendered constraints of generic form, cultural imperialism, and capitalist systems. They are, what I term, meta-localists who, through intentional formal practices, think about how literature aestheticizes the local. These writers are interested in what local color can tell us about the local as steadfastly local rather than as an extension of urban middle-class subjectivity. The following chapters examine show how diverse objects and ideologies are always pushing up against one another, destabilizing binaries that have been key to critical narratives about local color: modern and primitive, urban and rural, and center and margin. “Losing Appalachia” stresses the rhizomatic qualities of the genre and its uses, thus taking issue with historicist and feminist critics who argue that local color only performs one kind of cultural work. vii Table of Contents PREFACE: Losing Appalachia ...............................................................................1 CHAPTER ONE: Changing the Map ......................................................................3 LITERARY HISTORIES OF LOCAL COLOR ............................................3 WHY APPALACHIA?.................................................................................13 WHY MATERIAL CULTURE?..................................................................17 MULTIPLE ENTRYWAYS.........................................................................25 CHAPTER OVERVIEWS............................................................................32 CHAPTER TWO: Tourism and Performativity in Rebecca Harding Davis’s Appalachia and Alice Dunbar-Nelson’s Creole Louisiana...........................36 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................36 SILHOUETTES AND GENTEEL CRYSTALS..........................................41 PERFORMATIVITY AND THE LOCAL...................................................50 TOURIST TRAPS ........................................................................................56 RESISTING SYNECDOCHE AND METONYM.......................................71 ON GENRE AND THE PERSISTANCE OF THE LOCAL .......................81 CHAPTER THREE: The Local Production and Curation of Folk in Emma Bell Miles’s Appalachia and Mary Hunter Austin’s West...................................85 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................85 TEACHING THE PROGRESSIVE HOME.................................................91 REJECTING MIDDLE-CLASS NORMS..................................................102 CATALOGUING CIVILIZATION’S TRASHINESS...............................110 CURATING THE LOCAL AND THE INDIGENOUS HOME................117 ON GENRE AND THE POLITICS OF REPRESENTATION .................126 CHAPTER FOUR: “Loving to fool” with Things in the Industrial Towns of Grace MacGowan Cooke’s Appalachia and Mary Wilkins Freeman’s New England ....................................................................................................................131 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................131 LOCAL COLOR AND “THE LABOR QUESTION”...............................137 viii CRITIQUING MATERIAL “UPLIFT” .....................................................141 LOVING TO FOOL WITH THINGS ........................................................159 LOCAL SOLUTIONS AND THE MARRIAGE TROPE .........................168 ON GENRE AND THE USES OF NOSTALGIA .....................................175 Coda: Aesthetics, Trash, and the War on Poverty ...............................................180 HEIR TO THE PROGRESSIVE THRONE...............................................180 AT THE CROSS-SECTION OF POVERTY AND THE PASTORAL.....185 TRASH-HEAP TACTICIANS...................................................................190 ON GENRE AND THE STEADFASTLY LOCAL...................................201 Afterword: Dynamite-Crate Doors ......................................................................204 Bibliography ........................................................................................................206 ix PREFACE: Losing Appalachia It never occurred to us that we were Appalachian until my father saw it in black and white: “Appalachian immigrant; or child of.” It was the early 1990s, and he was applying for work with the City of Cincinnati. People still made jokes about the Norwood hillbillies flocking to work at the General Motors assembly plant; my new schoolmates would query if my mother were also my sister. When we were made to think about it at all, we did not eagerly adopt the label. To be “Appalachian” was to be from somewhere else, to be a punch line. I spent my college years at a private liberal arts school where I endeavored to lose my accent and blend in. Through exclusion, course offerings reinforced the idea that Appalachia, rurality, and working-class were categories to be left behind, themselves sites of cultural absence. I learned that the academy, literature, “Culture” with a capital “C,” and the middle class were mutually constitutive. Losing the Appalachia in me seemed imperative at the time. But I was the student who patched and hemmed her pants with duct tape, went home to pickup beds held together with green clothesline. I could never quite give up the pleasure of stretching out the life of a thing. It still feels like a middle finger. There is satisfaction in subverting a socio-economic system that requires certain populations to participate at a disadvantage. In the graduate classroom, Appalachia seemed to me lost among American literature’s drawing rooms. Even criticism on local color writing has had little to say about