DOCSLIB.ORG

Exploring Attitudes Toward Euthanasia Among Shelter Workers and Volunteers in Japan and the U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Exploring Attitudes Toward Euthanasia Among Shelter Workers and Volunteers in Japan and the U.S WellBeing International WBI Studies Repository 2016 Exploring Attitudes Toward Euthanasia Among Shelter Workers and Volunteers in Japan and the U.S. Maho Cavalier Humane Society University Follow this and additional works at: https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/hsu_students Part of the Animal Studies Commons, Bioethics and Medical Ethics Commons, and the Other Veterinary Medicine Commons Recommended Citation Cavalier, Maho, "Exploring Attitudes Toward Euthanasia Among Shelter Workers and Volunteers in Japan and the U.S." (2016). HSU STUDENT THESES AND CAPSTONE PROJECTS. 3. https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/hsu_students/3 This material is brought to you for free and open access by WellBeing International. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of the WBI Studies Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Running head: Exploring Attitudes Toward Euthanasia Among Shelter Workers and Volunteers in Japan and the U.S. Exploring Attitudes Toward Euthanasia Among Shelter Workers and Volunteers in Japan and the U.S. Maho Cavalier Humane Society University Exploring Attitudes Toward Euthanasia Among Shelter Workers and Volunteers in Japan and the U.S. 2 Table of Contents Abstract………………………………………………………………………… 3 Foreward……………………………………………………………………….. 5 Introduction……………………………………………………………………. 6 Euthanasia of Companion Animals: International Guidelines……………… 8 Euthanasia of Companion Animals: US Guidelines………………………… 10 Euthanasia: Perspectives from Western Philosophers……………………… 11 The Use and Definition of the Term “Euthanasia” in Japan……………..…. 13 Methods Used for Euthanasia in the US and Japan……………………..….. 15 Shelter Statistics and Euthanasia…………………………………………..... 20 No-Kill Movement………………………………………………………..… 23 Literature Review……………………………………………………………… 25 Attitudes toward Euthanasia………………………………………………… 26 The Effect of Euthanasia on the Shelter Workers Perform Euthanasia…….. 28 Research Methods……………………………………………………………… 34 Participants………………………………………………………………….. 34 Data Collection……………………………………………………………… 36 Data Analysis………………………………………………………………... 37 Timeline……………………………………………………………………... 39 Results………………………………………………………………………….. 40 When is Euthanasia Necessary and What is Suffering?.................................. 59 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………... 61 Appendix A: Participant Information………………………………………….. 69 Appendix B: Individual Interview Data……………………………………….. 70 References……………………………………………………………………… 76 Exploring Attitudes Toward Euthanasia Among Shelter Workers and Volunteers in Japan and the U.S. 3 Abstract Conflicts between foreign and Japanese volunteers concerning decisions to euthanize animals that are in terminal condition were noted during anecdotal observation by this author at a Japanese animal rescue shelter. Thus, this research was undertaken to explore attitudes of shelter staff in Japan. As a point of comparison, U. S. shelter workers were also interviewed. Twenty current or former shelter workers (16 participants from Japan and 4 participants from the U.S.), ranging in age from 20 to 65, were interviewed. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with the Japanese participants; e-mail and/or Skype were used to conduct the interviews with the participants living in the U.S. Grounded theory was employed to analyze the interview data. The analysis suggested that euthanasia is a difficult and emotional process for all of the participants, and many of them have experienced the "Caring-Killing Paradox" (Arluke, 1994: Arluke & Sanders,1996: Reeves et al., 2005.) Both Japanese and U.S. participants indicated that euthanasia is a humane option to eliminate prolonged suffering of animals, and when their quality of life is greatly diminished. Most of them agree that euthanizing animals for space and behavioral reasons may not be fair and should be avoided. Exploring Attitudes Toward Euthanasia Among Shelter Workers and Volunteers in Japan and the U.S. 4 There is a subtle yet notable characteristic among Japanese participants. They seem to be rather unsure about euthanasia in practice, while agreeing with and understanding its principle of eliminating suffering. This became more apparent when it comes to their pets. In short, it seems that there was some disparity between what they believe and what they actually do. In contrast, participants in the U.S. seemed to express, with confidence, that euthanasia is a humane option in certain cases for both shelter and owned companion animals. More research is needed to determine what influences this subtle difference, if it stems from cultural, religious or other factors. Exploring Attitudes Toward Euthanasia Among Shelter Workers and Volunteers in Japan and the U.S. 5 Foreward The author used to volunteer at a companion animal shelter in Tokyo that houses over 50 dogs, small to large, young to old. In 2014, the shelter informed volunteers that they were facing financial problems. In response to the situation, a group of the shelter volunteers, including Japanese and non-Japanese (three Americans, one Australian, one French, and two Japanese including the author) gathered and formed a group to strategize ways to help the shelter. In the course of the efforts, the group found out that their greatest cost is for veterinary care, which includes the care of terminally ill dogs that are in irreversible conditions. The group advocated strongly for euthanizing the terminally ill dogs, not because they have less value, but because the medical cost is hurting the shelter and also they thought that they have been getting unnecessary medical treatments to keep them alive despite their obviously terminal conditions and obvious suffering. However, the owner and the primary shelter staff have devoted themselves to the shelter’s “no-kill” policy over the past 10-15 years; therefore, they strongly disagreed with euthanizing any terminally ill animals even if those animals were suffering and had no chance of recovery. They also stated that, “miracles could happen.” The difference in attitudes between the Japanese shelter staff and the foreign volunteers at this same shelter was striking. Therefore, this research was undertaken to Exploring Attitudes Toward Euthanasia Among Shelter Workers and Volunteers in Japan and the U.S. 6 explore attitudes of shelter staff in Japan. As a point of comparison, U. S. shelter workers were also interviewed. While this debate about euthanizing shelter dogs was in full brew in this shelter in Japan, on the other side of the Pacific, the debate about euthanasia was making headlines due to the case of Brittney Maynard. Brittney Maynard was a young woman who chose to end her life via a physician-assisted euthanasia in Oregon. Ms. Maynard made the decision to end her own life as a result of suffering from terminal brain cancer. In Oregon, there is “Death with Dignity Act” that allows terminally ill Oregonians to end their lives through the voluntary self-administration of lethal medication (Oregon Government, 2015). The 29-year-old newlywed Maynard committed voluntary euthanasia on November 1, 2014. The news of Brittany’s decision sparked debate on euthanasia in America and also in Japan. The ongoing debate about euthanasia at the shelter and the case of Maynard in Oregon led the author to explore the topic of euthanasia, especially for owned companion animals. The questions that came to mind: how is euthanasia of owned companion animals viewed by the general public and shelter staff/volunteers in Japan? and how are these views different from those in the United States? Introduction Exploring Attitudes Toward Euthanasia Among Shelter Workers and Volunteers in Japan and the U.S. 7 There is little research on the attitudes toward euthanasia of companion animals in Japan. Anecdotal evidence seems to suggest that attitudes among the Japanese are different than those attitudes of natives of other first world countries. It was the author’s experience that the Japanese staff and volunteers at the shelter mentioned above believe that euthanasia is morally wrong because it is an act of “killing.” They also have expressed that they believe that euthanizing animals goes against nature and is a disrespectful and immoral action. In contrast, volunteers at this same shelter who are from Western countries believe that euthanasia is a way to help animals who are suffering, and is in fact, a way to respect the lives of animals. In this particular Japanese shelter, there was a clear division between those who are opposed to euthanasia and those who recognize euthanasia as a tool that might be used to end suffering. However, there is some evidence that indicates that there are shades of gray on the issue of euthanasia of companion animals. This study explored attitudes about euthanasia of companion animals. Specifically, this author was interested in exploring any possible differences between Japanese and American attitudes toward euthanasia in a shelter setting. This study also explored cultural components that may influence attitudes toward euthanasia in Japan and in the United States (US). This exploration was conducted via a search of the Exploring Attitudes Toward Euthanasia Among Shelter Workers and Volunteers in Japan and the U.S. 8 literature on euthanasia and interviews conducted with shelter workers and volunteers in Japan and in the US. Euthanasia of Companion Animals: International Guidelines The International Companion Animal Management Coalition (ICAM) is comprised of: the World Society for the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Adopt-An-ANGEL Adopt-An-ANGEL After I Mix
    Expanding Families One Pet at a Time March 2017 Priceless TM Celebrating the Bond Between Humans and Animals PawPrints Magazine's Homeless cover Model Photo by: Michael Cline Photography Petite, affectionate survivor looking for someone to celebrate life with! My name is Chili and I’m a 5-month-old kitten girl in search of a serious relationship. I was found wandering alone with a broken leg, but a Good Samaritan brought me to CARE. The kind folks here repaired my leg and, through it all, I never lost my purr. I’m now on the road to a full recovery and am ready to plant roots with that special someone. I am loving, cuddly and lots of fun. Imagine us snuggling together on the bed, exchanging kisses, talking about life over catnip and kitty treats. Interested? Let’s plan a first date: just call Coastal Animal Rescue Effort (CARE) at 910-256-2624 and ask for me. We can chat about ourselves over the phone, then arrange a meeting for some one-on-one time. Michael Cline Photography has my deepest gratitude for putting me on the path to true love with my cover photo. ORRELL & REINER, P.C. Dineen Animal Hospital Certified Public Accountants 1132 Floral Parkway - Wilmington, NC 28403 JEFF J. DINEEN, D.V.M. P.O. Box 4054 JAN BATTEN, D.V.M. Wilmington, NC 28406 EVE MILLS, D.V.M. JOANNE THOMPSON, D.V.M. Robert H. Orrell, III, CPA Anne W. Reiner, CPA (910) 799-3400 Tel. 910-799-3611 Cats ~ Dogs Hello up there! I’m Daisy, Looking for a sweet and I’m waiting for a dog and friendly feline cookie.
    [Show full text]
  • Vancouver BC V<S-"H 3\1--..'11
    Mayor .Council From: Mayor Lois Jackson Sent: Friday, October 13,20179:11 AM To: Mayor & Council Subject: FW: bi law support From: Chris Woodburn Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 ti::,~ AIYI To: Mayor Lois Jackson; Sylvia Bishop; Robert Campbell; Jeannie Kanakos; Heather King; Bruce McDonald; Ian Paton Subject: bi law support Thank you for hopefully passing the bi law regarding the sale of animals in stores. It's the right thing to do, Chris Woodburn Vancouver BC V<s-"H 3\1--..'11 3)c,- \t...\ll ·fc)UI')\cVYI 1v\.YL~ This message is provided in confidence and should not be forwarded to any external third party without authorization. If you have received this message in error, please notify the original sender immediately by telephone or by return email and delete this message along with any attachments. genda '" A_ FILE # 1:2/00 --0 ( :,-' 1 ---- -------------- From: Marianne L. Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2017 5:08 PM To: Mayor & Council Subject: Business license Bylaw #7670, 2017 Dear Mayor Jackson and Cow1cil- It is with great hope that I write to you asking for your support in passing the proposed bylaw that will prohibit the retail sale of dogs, cats and rabbits from pet stores in Delta. There are many compelling reasons to ban the sate of dogs,cats and rabbits. These animals do not come from reputable or responsible sources but from commercial facilities only interested in the bottom line: the almighty dollar. The conditions in which they are bred and raised are inhumane and substandard. A bylaw to ban the retail sale of pets and the inhumane business practices it supports will send the impOltant message that Delta is committed to the responsible and humane treatment of companion pets.
    [Show full text]
  • Physician-Assisted Suicide and Voluntary Euthanasia: Some Relevant Differences John Deigh
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 88 Article 14 Issue 3 Spring Spring 1998 Physician-Assisted Suicide and Voluntary Euthanasia: Some Relevant Differences John Deigh Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation John Deigh, Physician-Assisted Suicide and Voluntary Euthanasia: Some Relevant Differences, 88 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 1155 (Spring 1998) This Criminal Law is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 0091-4169/98/8803-1155 THE JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW& CRIMINOLOGY Vol. 88, No. 3 Copyright 0 1998 by Northwestern University, School of Law Prinfd in U.SA. PHYSICIAN-ASSISTED SUICIDE AND VOLUNTARY EUTHANASIA: SOME RELEVANT DIFFERENCES JOHN DEIGH" Yale Kamisar, in a series of influential articles on physician- assisted suicide and voluntary active euthanasia, has written elo- quently in opposition to legalizing these practices.1 Today he revisits the first of these articles, his seminal 1958 article, Some Non-Religious Views Against Proposed "Mercy-Killing"Legislation. 2 In that paper Professor Kamisar used the distinction between the law on the books and the law in action to quiet concerns about the harsh consequences of a blanket prohibition on mercy kill- ing. A blanket prohibition, after all, if strictly applied, would impose criminal punishment on physicians and relatives whose complicity in bringing about the death of a patient, or loved one was justified by the dying person's desperate condition and lucid wish to die.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Influencing Individuals Attitudes Toward Voluntary Active
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Donna A Champeau for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Public Health presented on November 23, 1994. Title: Factors Influencing Individual Attitudes Toward Voluntary Active Euthanasia and Physician Assisted Suicide. Redacted for privacy Abstract approved: Rebecca J. Donate lle Issues of right to life, as well as death have surfaced as topics of hot debate. In particular, questions about when and if individuals have the right to end their own lives have emerged and gained considerable attention as health policy issues having the potential to affect all Americans.. The purpose of this study was to identify the factors that are most likely to influence an individual's decision to support or not support voluntary active euthanasia (VAE) and physician assisted suicide (PAS) in specific medical situations. This study also examined the differences in medical vignettes by various demographic and attitudinal factors. Data were collected from a sample of classified staff members at two institutions of higher learning in Oregon. A survey was used to collect all data. Paired sample T- tests, stepwise multiple regression analysis and repeated measures multiple analysis of variance (MANOVA) were used to analyze the data. Based on survey results, there were significant differences in attitudes toward PAS and VAE for each medical vignette. Religious beliefs, fear of dependency, and fear of death were the most powerful predictors of individual support for PAS in each medical situation. In the case of VAE, there were differences in support on each medical situation in terms of the most powerful predictors: fear of dependency and religious beliefs for the cancer vignette, fear of dependency, religious beliefs, and age for the ALS vignette, and religious beliefs and fear of dependency for the paralysis vignette.
    [Show full text]
  • “Good Death” in Small Animals and Consequences for Euthanasia in Animal Law and Veterinary Practice
    animals Article Philosophy of a “Good Death” in Small Animals and Consequences for Euthanasia in Animal Law and Veterinary Practice Kirsten Persson 1,*, Felicitas Selter 2, Gerald Neitzke 2 and Peter Kunzmann 1 1 Stiftung Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover, Bünteweg 9, 30559 Hannover, Germany; [email protected] 2 Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany; [email protected] (F.S.); [email protected] (G.N.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 30 November 2019; Accepted: 7 January 2020; Published: 13 January 2020 Simple Summary: Euthanasia in veterinary practice is often discussed as one of the profession’s major burdens. At the same time, it is meant to bring relief to terminally ill and/or severely suffering animal patients. This article examines “euthanasia” from a philosophical perspective regarding different definitions and underlying basic assumptions concerning the meaning of death and welfare for nonhuman animals. These theoretical issues will then be discussed in relation to laws and guidelines on euthanasia and practical challenges with end-of-life decisions in small animal practice. Factors which are identified as potential causes of the complex problems regarding euthanasia are as follows: the confusing framework for euthanasia in law and soft regulations; the inclusion of many stakeholders’ perspectives in end-of-life decision-making; potential conflicts between the veterinarians’ personal morality and legal requirements and professional expectations; and, most of all, the veterinarians’ lack of awareness for underlying philosophical assumptions regarding possible understandings of euthanasia. Different practical suggestions are made to clarify and facilitate euthanasia in small animal practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Collective Rights Vs Individual Rights? Examining the “Right to Die.”
    William L. Saunders Collective Rights vs Individual Rights? Examining the “Right to Die.” Introduction Properly understood, there is no conflict between “collective rights” and “individual rights.” Part of the reason a conflict is assumed to exist is that a sound understanding of what constitutes a “right” has been lost. This is because often, and falsely, mere “wishes” are conflated with “rights.” Harvard Professor Mary Ann Glendon helpfully analyzed this in her book Rights Talk.1 True “collective rights” and true “individual rights” buttress each other and are better understood as aspects of “human rights.” Since human persons live in community, an aspect of human rights concerns communities (or societies or cultures) in which human beings live. However, those communities are not obligated to indulge every individual’s whim or purported “right.” Wishes and desires, even if deeply felt, do not constitute “rights.” Rather, rights properly understood are reflections of what is good for the human person. Society has an obligation to respect and promote the good of the human person, not an individual’s subjective desires. Recognizing and respecting legitimate individual human rights promotes the common good, and vice versa. Thus, a proper understanding of human rights reconciles alleged conflicts between “collective” and “individual” rights. However, false “rights” threaten the good of both the in- dividual and society. A purported new “right,” the “right to die,” illustrates these points. The first section of this paper will define what is meant by the “right to die.” The second section will show there is no foun- dation in the law for a “right to die.” The third section will explain why creating a new “right to die” is detrimental to society, particularly the medical profession, the elderly, the depressed, and the disabled.
    [Show full text]
  • Informed Consent and Euthanasia: an International Human Rights Perspective1
    ICLR, 2018, Vol. 18, No. 2. INFORMED CONSENT AND EUTHANASIA: AN INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE1 Jessica McKenney American University Washington, USA [email protected] MCKENNEY, Jessica. Informed Consent and Euthanasia: An International Human Rights Perspective. International and Comparative Law Review, 2018, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 118–133. DOI: 10.2478/iclr-2018-0041. Summary: This Paper addresses the right to informed consent regarding euthanasia using international conventions and, to a lesser extent, national laws and policies. Spe- cifically, The United States, Belgium and the Netherlands will be examined. The Paper specifically discusses legal capacity, the right to consent and the right to information. Three stories are used to argue the importance of implementing effective safeguards for these rights and notes that these safeguards are necessary regardless of whether or not euthanasia is legalized in a state. This Paper also argues that patients should not be offered euthanasia for mental illnesses. The ethical debate surrounding whether eutha- nasia should be permitted generally is not discussed. Keywords: Informed Consent, Euthanasia, Terminally Ill, Mentally Ill, United States, Belgium, Netherlands, Human Rights 1. Introduction Death is an inevitable part of human existence that all people must face, and for most of us, the time and place of this death is unknown. But what if someone did know the time and place? What if that someone was a doctor or a nurse, or the very person that was going to experience death? To go a step further, what if these actors actually caused the death to occur at a specific time and place? If this is possible, then the people that are going to experience death at a given time are in great need of protection to ensure that their lives are not ended unwillingly.
    [Show full text]
  • The Animal Shelter Guide to the Mutt-I-Grees® Curriculum
    THE ANIMAL SHELTER GUIDE TO THE MUTT-I-GREES® CURRICULUM www.education.muttigrees.org An initiative of The Pet Savers Foundation, the program development arm of North Shore Animal League America. Developed in collaboration with Yale University School of the 21st Century. An initiative of The Pet Savers Foundation, the program development arm of North Shore Animal League America Developed in collaboration with Yale University School of the 21st Century www.education.muttigrees.org The Animal Shelter Guide to the Mutt-i-grees® Curriculum Copyright © 2014: The Pet Savers Foundation FOREWORD THE ANIMAL SHELTER GUIDE TO THE MUTT-I-GREES® CURRICULUM A Mutt-i-gree® is any shelter animal who is either looking for a home or has been adopted from a shelter or rescue group into a loving environment. If you work or volunteer at an animal shelter, you’re probably a Mutt-i-grees® expert! North Shore Animal League America coined the word Mutt-i-gree® to change public perception of shelter pets and convey their desirability and availability. The concept evolved to become the Mutt-i-grees® Movement, a sustained campaign to bring an end to euthanasia by increasing both adoptions and spay/neuter programs. The movement also features a unique and crucial humane education element that encourages children - tomorrow’s pet owners - to become compassionate and responsible adopters. Like other social movements, the Mutt-i-grees® Movement represents the coming together of people from various fields who share common goals: individuals who have adopted pets; individuals who work or volunteer at public and private shelters and rescue groups; and educators, parents and concerned individuals who seek a more compassionate and humane world and want to improve the quality of life for people and the animals they love.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of New Evidence on Euthanasia's Slippery Slope Christopher James Ryan Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
    J7ournal ofMedical Ethics 1998;24:341-344 Pulling up the runaway: the effect of new evidence on euthanasia's slippery slope Christopher James Ryan Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia Abstract The details of our decline and exactly where we The slippery slope argument has been the mainstay of will end up vary from author to author, but, for all, many of those opposed to the legalisation of our original well-intended action placed us upon a physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia. In this slippery slope that is the genesis of future woes. paper I re-examine the slippery slope in the light of The slippery slope is the major weapon in the two recent studies that examined the prevalence of armamentarium of those who believe physician- medical decisions concerning the end oflife in the assisted suicide and voluntary euthanasia should In two studies have Netherlands and in Australia. I argue that these two remain illegal. recent times been that, taken together, provide a studies have robbed the slippery slope of the source of published strong rejoinder to the slippery slope. In the con- its power - its intuitive obviousness. Finally I propose text of the Australian parliament's quashing of the contrary to the the slope, that, warnings of slippery Northern Territory Rights of the Terminally Ill the available evidence suggests that the legalisation of suicide might actually decrease the Act and the US Supreme Court's deliberations physician-assisted over physician-assisted suicide the results of these prevalence of non-voluntary and involuntary studies could not have been more timely.
    [Show full text]
  • Walk for the Animals Details Inside! Pages 16 & 17
    Winter 2017 News from Humane Society of Broward County Walk for the Animals Details inside! Pages 16 & 17 Presented by The Humane Society of Broward County is a nonprofit organization funded by friends like you who care about animals. From your Board Chair, s we begin the new year of 2017, we do so with a heavy heart. Last year the HSBC placed nearly 7,000 animals, which was a rewarding On January 3rd, Marti Huizenga, a great friend to many people experience for us. One such animal – a cat – had been in our shelter for A– and most certainly to the homeless animals at the Humane Society of more than 250 days waiting for her new home! Finally she was given her Broward County – lost her battle with cancer and passed away. chance, and after being in her new home for a few days our staff received Everyone associated with the shelter – past, present and future – will be the following email from the new pet owner: “Hello! We rescued Miss forever grateful to Marti for her years of hands-on involvement with the Pepper a week ago! She’s so sweet and already has gone so far! We love our organization, her unwavering belief in our mission, and the importance sweet girl.” she placed on teaching young children the rewards that come from pet This is just one example of the impact the HSBC has on the lives of both ownership and that all living creatures must be treated with humane people and pets. kindness. Everything we are able to accomplish is made possible from the support Marti will be sorely missed.
    [Show full text]
  • North Little Rock E-Newsletter
    North Little Rock e-Newsletter Provided by Diane Whitbey, City Clerk and Treasurer July 2016 North Little Rock e-Newsletter If you have information you would like to share with other city employees, residents and businesses throughout North Little Rock, then let us know. The City Clerk’s office provides a monthly e-letter to those who subscribe through the North Little Rock website. To sign up, email [email protected]. July… July 16—National Corn Fritters Day Found at www.nationaldaycalendar.com/july/ July 17—National Yellow Pig Day July 1—National Postal Worker Day July 18—National Get Out of the Dog House Day July 2—National Anisette Day July 19—National Daiquiri Day July 3—National Eat Your Beans Day July 20—National Moon Day July 4—Independence Day July 21—National July 5—National Bikini Day JUNK FOOD DAY!!! July 22—National Hammock Day July 23—National Day of the Cowboy July 24—National Parent’s Day July 25—National Threading the Needle Day July 26—National Aunt and Uncle’s Day July 27—National Crème Brulee Day July 28—National Chili Dog Day Day July 6—National Fried Chicken Day July 29—National System Administrator Appreciation July 7—National Macaroni Day Day July 8—National Chocolate Almonds Day July 30—National Father-in-Law Day July 9—National Sugar Cookie Day July 31—National Mutt Day July 10—National Pina Colada Day July 11—National Simplicity Day Fireworks are prohibited in the July 12—National Jerky Day July 13—National French Fry Day City of North Little Rock July 14—National Nude Day Ordinance No.
    [Show full text]
  • Euthanasia: None Dare Call It Murder Joseph Sanders
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 60 | Issue 3 Article 9 1970 Euthanasia: None Dare Call It Murder Joseph Sanders Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Joseph Sanders, Euthanasia: None Dare Call It Murder, 60 J. Crim. L. Criminology & Police Sci. 351 (1969) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. THE JOuRxAL OF CRIMINAL LAW, CRIMJINOLOGY AND POLsCU SCIENCE Vol. 60, No. 3 Copyright © 1969 by Northwestern University School of Law Printed in U.S.A. EUTHANASIA: NONE DARE CALL IT MURDER JOSEPH SANDERS On August 9, 1967, Robert Waskin, a twenty- nature of the act, the status of the actor and the three year old college student, killed his mother victim, and the presence or absence of consent. by shooting her in the head three times. Warned The act itself may be one of commission or one of by the police that he did not have to make a omission. The former, which is the concern of this statement, Waskin allegedly said, "It's obvious, paper, is at the present time some degree of crimi- I killed her." He was arrested and charged with nal homicideA murder.' Waskin's act, however, was a special There are three reasonably identifiable groups type-a type that has troubled and perplexed both against, or for whom euthanasia may be com- laymen and legal theorists.
    [Show full text]