DOCSLIB.ORG

Factors Influencing Individuals Attitudes Toward Voluntary Active

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Factors Influencing Individuals Attitudes Toward Voluntary Active AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Donna A Champeau for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Public Health presented on November 23, 1994. Title: Factors Influencing Individual Attitudes Toward Voluntary Active Euthanasia and Physician Assisted Suicide. Redacted for privacy Abstract approved: Rebecca J. Donate lle Issues of right to life, as well as death have surfaced as topics of hot debate. In particular, questions about when and if individuals have the right to end their own lives have emerged and gained considerable attention as health policy issues having the potential to affect all Americans.. The purpose of this study was to identify the factors that are most likely to influence an individual's decision to support or not support voluntary active euthanasia (VAE) and physician assisted suicide (PAS) in specific medical situations. This study also examined the differences in medical vignettes by various demographic and attitudinal factors. Data were collected from a sample of classified staff members at two institutions of higher learning in Oregon. A survey was used to collect all data. Paired sample T- tests, stepwise multiple regression analysis and repeated measures multiple analysis of variance (MANOVA) were used to analyze the data. Based on survey results, there were significant differences in attitudes toward PAS and VAE for each medical vignette. Religious beliefs, fear of dependency, and fear of death were the most powerful predictors of individual support for PAS in each medical situation. In the case of VAE, there were differences in support on each medical situation in terms of the most powerful predictors: fear of dependency and religious beliefs for the cancer vignette, fear of dependency, religious beliefs, and age for the ALS vignette, and religious beliefs and fear of dependency for the paralysis vignette. The repeated measures MANOVA revealed that in general, the older the individual was, the less likely they were to support PAS or VAE. However, women over age 66 in this study were more likely to support VAE than were the males age 66 and over. Males in the 51-65 year old category were more supportive of VAE than females in this age category. Also, those who were more fearful of death were more likely to have a higher level of support for VAE. In all three vignettes (Cancer, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and paralysis) for both PAS and VAE, there was a significantly different level of support measured on a seven point Likert scale. FACTORS INFLUENCING INDIVIDUAL ATTITUDES TOWARD VOLUNTARY ACTIVE EUTHANASIA AND PHYSICIAN ASSISTED SUICIDE by Donna A. Champeau A THESIS submitted to Oregon State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Completed November 23, 1994 Commencement June 1995 Doctor of Philosophy thesis of Donna A. Champeau presented on November 23, 1994 APPROVED: Redacted for privacy Major Professor, r presenting Health Education Redacted for privacy Chair of Department of Public Health Redacted for privacy Dean of Graduate pool I understand that my thesis will become part of the permanent collection of Oregon State University libraries. My signature below authorizes release of my thesis to any reader upon request. Redacted for privacy Donna A. Champeau, Author ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to extend my gratitude to all the classified staff members that participated in this study. Their willingness to take the time to answer the questionnaire was greatly appreciated and made the completion of this study possible. For providing partial financial assistance I would like to acknowledge the College of Health and Human Performance at Oregon State University. This assistance was extremely helpful. Thanks are also given to my colleagues, and friends at Oregon State University for their encouragement and support throughout the final preparation of this thesis. A special thanks is given to my dear friend and associate graduate student, Jessica Hendersen for the encouragement and support that she so unselfishly gave during this entire process. For statistical assistance I would like to thank Laura Bond at Boise State University and Cheryl Kelber at the University of Milwaukee Wisconsin for their advice and suggestions in the analysis of data collected. A very special thanks to Laura for her willingness to provide many suggestions and much advise. I sincerely thank the members of my graduate committee, Drs. Rebecca Donatelle, Jan Hare, Anna Harding, Ray Tricker, and Jeff McCubben, for their valuable input and interest in this study. I am especially appreciative of the contributions of Dr. Jan Hare, my co-chair on this project, who gave generously of her time and counsel. Her expertise and understanding throughout this project have been invaluable to me. I would also like to extend the biggest thanks to my major professor, Dr. Rebecca Donate lle, who has given an incredible amount of her time and expertise not only on the completion of this final project but also throughout my entire doctoral study. Her mentoring and guidance provided me with experiences that were extremely helpful in my development as a health professional. Finally, I would like to thank my family for their unceasing encouragement, love, and understanding. I am especially thankful to my parents and my brother Ryan who have always stood behind me and have been a continual source of inspiration to me. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER I 1 INTRODUCTION 1 Statement of the Problem 6 Purpose of the Study 6 Research Questions 7 Significance of the Study 8 Delimitations 9 Limitations 9 Definition of Terms 10 CHAPTER II 11 REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE 11 Euthanasia: A Historical Overview 12 Types of Euthanasia 19 Arguments in Support of Euthanasia 22 Arguments Against Euthanasia 23 Factors Contributing to the Support or Lack of Support for Physician Assisted Suicide and Voluntary Active Euthanasia 25 Psychological Factors 25 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Page Religious Beliefs. 25 Fear of Death 26 Fear of Dependency 27 Demographic Variables 27 Age 28 Gender 28 Education 28 Summary 29 CHAPTER III 31 RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS 31 Subject Selection 31 Instrumentation 32 Procedure 33 Data Analysis 33 Research Question #1-#4 33 Research Questions #5, #6, #7, #8 34 Research Questions #9 and #10 35 CHAPTER IV 36 RESULTS 36 Sample 36 Research Question 1 41 Research Question 2 42 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Page Research Question 3 43 Research Question 4 44 Research Question 5 45 Research Question 6 48 Research Question 7 49 Research Question 8 51 Research Question 9 53 Research Question 10 55 CHAPTER V 57 DISCUSSION, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS 57 Discussion 57 Support for physician Assisted Suicide and Voluntary Active Euthanasia 57 Factors Most Predictive of Support for each Medical Vignette (PAS) 58 Factors Most Predictive of Support for each Medical Vignette (VAE) 60 Differences in vignettes by Demographic variables 61 Conclusions .62 Recommendations 64 REFERENCES 66 APPENDICES 73 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Page Appendix A Survey Cover Letter 74 Appendix B Euthanasia Survey 75 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Level of Support for the Right to Request PAS and VAE (Cancer Vignette) 37 2. Level of Support for the Right to Request PAS and VAE (ALS Vignette) 38 3. Level of Support for the Right to Request PAS and VAE (Paralysis Vignette) 39 4. Level of Support for the Likelihood to choose for themselves PAS and VAE (Cancer Vignette) 39 5. Level of Support for the Likelihood to choose for Themselves PAS and VAE (ALS Vignette) 40 6. Level of Support for the Likelihood to Choose for themselves PAS and VAE (Paralysis Vignette) 41 7. Paired t-test for differences between the Right to Request Physician Suicide and the Right to Request Voluntary Active Euthanasia for each Medical Vignette 42 8. Support for the Right to Request PAS versus the Right to Request VAE 42 9. Paired t-tests for differences between the likelihood to request physician assisted suicide and the likelihood to request voluntary active euthanasia for each medical vignette 43 10. Likelihood to Request PAS Versus Likelihood to Request VAE 43 11. Paired t-test for differences between Respondent's support for PAS and their likelihood of requesting PAS for each medical vignette 44 LIST OF TABLES (continued) Table Page 12. Support for the Right to Request PAS versus Respondent's Likelihood to Request PAS 44 13. Paired t-tests for differences between the support for and the likelihood to request voluntary active euthanasia for each medical vignette 45 14. Support for the Right to Request VAE versus Respondent's Likelihood to Request VAE 45 15. Multivariate Tests of Significance for the Main Effect of Vignette on Demographic Variables (PAS) 46 16. Means, Standard Deviations for three Vignettes for PAS by Demographic Variables of Gender and age 46 17. Multivariate Tests of Significance for Vignette by age Effect (PAS) 47 18. Multivariate Tests of Significance for Vignette by Gender Effect (PAS) 47 19. Multivariate Tests of Significance for The Main Effect of Vignette on Demographic Variables (VAE) 48 20. Means, Standard Deviations for three Vignettes for VAE by Demographic Variables of Gender and age 49 21. Multivariate Tests of Significance for The Main Effect of Vignette by Psychological Variables (PAS) 50 22. Means, Standard Deviations for three Vignettes for PAS by Psychological Variables of Fear of Death, Fear of Dependency, and Religious Beliefs 50 23. Multivariate Tests of Significance for The Main Effect of Vignette by Psychological Variables (VAE) 51 24. Means, Standard Deviations for three Vignettes for VAE by Psychological Variables of Fear of Death, Fear of Dependency, and Religious Beliefs 52 LIST OF TABLES (continued) Table Page 25. Multivariate Tests of Significance for the Interaction effect Vignette by Fear of Death 52 26. Multivariate Tests of significance for the three-way interaction effect Vignette by Fear of Death and Fear of Dependency (VAE) 53 27.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Physician-Assisted Suicide and Voluntary Euthanasia: Some Relevant Differences John Deigh
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 88 Article 14 Issue 3 Spring Spring 1998 Physician-Assisted Suicide and Voluntary Euthanasia: Some Relevant Differences John Deigh Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation John Deigh, Physician-Assisted Suicide and Voluntary Euthanasia: Some Relevant Differences, 88 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 1155 (Spring 1998) This Criminal Law is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 0091-4169/98/8803-1155 THE JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW& CRIMINOLOGY Vol. 88, No. 3 Copyright 0 1998 by Northwestern University, School of Law Prinfd in U.SA. PHYSICIAN-ASSISTED SUICIDE AND VOLUNTARY EUTHANASIA: SOME RELEVANT DIFFERENCES JOHN DEIGH" Yale Kamisar, in a series of influential articles on physician- assisted suicide and voluntary active euthanasia, has written elo- quently in opposition to legalizing these practices.1 Today he revisits the first of these articles, his seminal 1958 article, Some Non-Religious Views Against Proposed "Mercy-Killing"Legislation. 2 In that paper Professor Kamisar used the distinction between the law on the books and the law in action to quiet concerns about the harsh consequences of a blanket prohibition on mercy kill- ing. A blanket prohibition, after all, if strictly applied, would impose criminal punishment on physicians and relatives whose complicity in bringing about the death of a patient, or loved one was justified by the dying person's desperate condition and lucid wish to die.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of the Law of Assisted Dying in the United States
    SMU Law Review Volume 73 Issue 1 Article 8 2020 A History of the Law of Assisted Dying in the United States Alan Meisel University of Pittsburgh, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/smulr Part of the Health Law and Policy Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, and the Legal History Commons Recommended Citation Alan Meisel, A History of the Law of Assisted Dying in the United States, 73 SMU L. REV. 119 (2020) https://scholar.smu.edu/smulr/vol73/iss1/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in SMU Law Review by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. A HISTORY OF THE LAW O F ASSISTED DYING IN THE UNITED STATES Alan Meisel* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ........................................ 120 II. TERMINOLOGY ........................................ 120 III. HISTORY OF THE LAW OF CRIMINAL HOMICIDE . 123 A. THE LAW S O F SUICIDE AND ATTEMPTED SUICIDE ..... 124 B. THE LAW O F ASSISTED SUICIDE ....................... 125 IV. THE MODERN AMERICAN LAWS OF HOMICIDE, SUICIDE, ATTEMPTED SUICIDE, AND ASSISTED SUICIDE ................................................. 125 V. EUTHANASIA AND ASSISTED SUICIDE FOR THE TERMINALLY ILL ...................................... 127 A. NINETEENTH AND EARLY TWENTIETH CENTURY ...... 127 B. THE RENEWAL OF THE DEBATE, POST-WORLD WAR II ............................................... 129 C. THE EFFECT OF MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY AND THE “RIGHT TO DIE” ...................................... 130 D. THE “RIGHT TO DIE” AS A TRANSITIONAL STAGE TO ACTIVELY HASTENING DEATH ........................ 132 VI. THE GULF BETWEEN THEORY AND PRACTICE . 135 A. PROSECUTION OF LAY PEOPLE .......................
    [Show full text]
  • Euthanasia: a Review on Worldwide Legal Status and Public Opinion
    Euthanasia: a review on worldwide legal status and public opinion a b Garima Jain∗ , Sanjeev P. Sahni∗ aJindal Institute of Behavioural Sciences, O.P. Jindal Global University, India bJindal Institute of Behavioural Sciences, O.P. Jindal Global University, India Abstract The moral and ethical justifiability of euthanasia has been a highly contentious issue. It is a complex concept that has been highly discussed by scholars all around the world for decades. Debates concerning euthanasia have become more frequent during the past two decades. The fact that polls show strong public support has been used in legislative debates to justify that euthanasia should be legalised. However, critics have questioned the validity of these polls. Nonetheless, the general perceptions about life are shifting from a ‘quantity of life’ to a ‘quality of life approach’, and from a paternalist approach to that of the patient’s autonomy. A ‘good death’ is now being connected to choice and control over the time, manner and place of death. All these developments have shaped discussion regarding rights of the terminally ill to refuse or discontinue life- sustaining efforts or to even ask for actively ending their life. Key words: euthanasia, ethics, public opinion, law. 1. Background The moral and ethical justifiability of euthanasia has been a highly contentious issue. It is a complex concept that has been highly discussed by scholars all around the world for decades. One of the earliest definitions of euthanasia, by Kohl and Kurtz, states it as “a mode or act of inducing or permitting death painlessly as a relief from suffering” (Beauchamp & Davidson, 1979: 295).
    [Show full text]
  • Life and Learning Xix
    LIFE AND LEARNING XIX PROCEEDINGS OF THE NINETEENTH UNIVERSITY FACULTY FOR LIFE CONFERENCE at THE UNIVERSITY OF ST. THOMAS SCHOOL OF LAW MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 2009 edited by Joseph W. Koterski, S.J. KOTERSKI LIFE AND LEARNING XIX UFL University Faculty for Life University Faculty for Life was founded in 1989 to promote research, dialogue, and publication among faculty members who respect the value of human life from its inception to natural death, and to provide academic support for the pro-life position. Respect for life is especially endangered by the current cultural forces seeking to legitimize such practices as abortion, infanticide, euthanasia, and physician-assisted suicide. These topics are controversial, but we believe that they are too important to be resolved by the shouting, the news-bites, and the slogans that often dominate popular presentation of these issues. Because we believe that the evidence is on our side, we would like to assure a hearing for these views in the academic community. The issues of abortion, infanticide, and euthanasia have many dimensions–political, social, legal, medical, biological, psychological, ethical, and religious. Accordingly, we hope to promote an inter-disciplinary forum in which such issues can be discussed among scholars. We believe that by talking with one another we may better understand the values we share and become better informed in our expression and defense of them. We are distressed that the media often portray those favoring the value of human life as mindless zealots acting out of sectarian bias. We hope that our presence will change that image. We also believe that academicians united on these issues can encourage others to speak out for human life in their own schools and communities.
    [Show full text]
  • “Good Death” in Small Animals and Consequences for Euthanasia in Animal Law and Veterinary Practice
    animals Article Philosophy of a “Good Death” in Small Animals and Consequences for Euthanasia in Animal Law and Veterinary Practice Kirsten Persson 1,*, Felicitas Selter 2, Gerald Neitzke 2 and Peter Kunzmann 1 1 Stiftung Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover, Bünteweg 9, 30559 Hannover, Germany; [email protected] 2 Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany; [email protected] (F.S.); [email protected] (G.N.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 30 November 2019; Accepted: 7 January 2020; Published: 13 January 2020 Simple Summary: Euthanasia in veterinary practice is often discussed as one of the profession’s major burdens. At the same time, it is meant to bring relief to terminally ill and/or severely suffering animal patients. This article examines “euthanasia” from a philosophical perspective regarding different definitions and underlying basic assumptions concerning the meaning of death and welfare for nonhuman animals. These theoretical issues will then be discussed in relation to laws and guidelines on euthanasia and practical challenges with end-of-life decisions in small animal practice. Factors which are identified as potential causes of the complex problems regarding euthanasia are as follows: the confusing framework for euthanasia in law and soft regulations; the inclusion of many stakeholders’ perspectives in end-of-life decision-making; potential conflicts between the veterinarians’ personal morality and legal requirements and professional expectations; and, most of all, the veterinarians’ lack of awareness for underlying philosophical assumptions regarding possible understandings of euthanasia. Different practical suggestions are made to clarify and facilitate euthanasia in small animal practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Final
    In Pursuit of a Good Death: Responding to Changing Sensibilities in the Context of the Right to Die Debate A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Juridical Studies at the University of Sydney VICTORIA HILEY The Faculty of Law University of Sydney January 2008 ABSTRACT This thesis challenges a number of claims that are made in the context of the euthanasia debate: that there is only one version of the good death; that rights discourse is the most appropriate vehicle by which to secure legal recognition of a right to die; that the Netherlands is either a model for reform or the epitome of a slippery slope in its regulation of euthanasia; and that a key argument in the euthanasia debate, the sanctity of life doctrine, is a fixed, immutable concept. In this thesis I use process sociology, developed by Norbert Elias, in order to capture changing sensibilities toward death and dying in the common law jurisdictions (Australia, England, the United States of America, Canada and New Zealand) and in the Netherlands. At the same time I analyse changing attitudes among key groups whose work impacts upon the euthanasia debate namely, parliamentarians, law reform bodies, the judiciary and medical associations. My aim in adopting this approach is threefold. First of all, to examine evolving attitudes to death and dying in order to determine whether the institutions of law and medicine are responding in an adequate manner to changing sensibilities in the common law countries and in the Netherlands. Secondly, to highlight shifting balances of power within the euthanasia debate.
    [Show full text]
  • Informed Consent and Euthanasia: an International Human Rights Perspective1
    ICLR, 2018, Vol. 18, No. 2. INFORMED CONSENT AND EUTHANASIA: AN INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE1 Jessica McKenney American University Washington, USA [email protected] MCKENNEY, Jessica. Informed Consent and Euthanasia: An International Human Rights Perspective. International and Comparative Law Review, 2018, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 118–133. DOI: 10.2478/iclr-2018-0041. Summary: This Paper addresses the right to informed consent regarding euthanasia using international conventions and, to a lesser extent, national laws and policies. Spe- cifically, The United States, Belgium and the Netherlands will be examined. The Paper specifically discusses legal capacity, the right to consent and the right to information. Three stories are used to argue the importance of implementing effective safeguards for these rights and notes that these safeguards are necessary regardless of whether or not euthanasia is legalized in a state. This Paper also argues that patients should not be offered euthanasia for mental illnesses. The ethical debate surrounding whether eutha- nasia should be permitted generally is not discussed. Keywords: Informed Consent, Euthanasia, Terminally Ill, Mentally Ill, United States, Belgium, Netherlands, Human Rights 1. Introduction Death is an inevitable part of human existence that all people must face, and for most of us, the time and place of this death is unknown. But what if someone did know the time and place? What if that someone was a doctor or a nurse, or the very person that was going to experience death? To go a step further, what if these actors actually caused the death to occur at a specific time and place? If this is possible, then the people that are going to experience death at a given time are in great need of protection to ensure that their lives are not ended unwillingly.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission to Inquiry Into Voluntary Assisted Dying
    Submission to Inquiry into Voluntary Assisted Dying Joint Committee | South Australia | August 2019 This is page is left blank intentionally to allow for double-sided printing 2 “Palliative care services are not offering what a percentage of their patients desperately need. Palliative care has become a mantra chanted by … politicians and religious organisations opposing euthanasia.” − Clive Deverall, founder of Palliative Care WA “While pain and other symptoms can be helped, complete relief of suffering is not always possible, even with optimal palliative care.” – Palliative Care Australia “It is not the role of any health care team to suggest its ministrations can give meaning, purpose and dignity to a dying person’s remaining life if that person feels that these are irretrievably lost … palliative care is a model of care, not a moral crusade.” − Professor Michael Ashby, Director, Palliative Care, Tasmanian Health Service 3 This is page is left blank intentionally to allow for double-sided printing 4 What’s in this Submission INTRODUCTION Page 7 PART A What The Evidence Shows Page 9 The need for Voluntary Assisted Dying laws in Australia PART B Assisted Dying In South Australia Today Page 15 An incoherent, largely unregulated, and inequitable legal situation PART C Beyond Pain Page 31 Why more resources for palliative care alone will not address the need for Voluntary Assisted Dying PART D Responding To Key Arguments Against VAD Page 59 PART E Fear. Uncertainty. Doubt. Page 81 Tactics used to create an alarmist picture of assisted dying PART F Propaganda Case Studies Part 1. Fatal Flaws Page 105 Part 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Title 35 Public Health and Safety
    TITLE 35 - PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY CHAPTER 1 - ADMINISTRATION ARTICLE 1 - IN GENERAL 35-1-101. Local contributions; disposition. All monies paid to the state treasurer representing contributions by city councils, county commissioners, trustees of school districts, or other public agencies, for public health purposes, shall be set up and designated on the books of the state treasurer in a separate account, and shall be expended and disbursed upon warrants drawn by the state auditor against said account when the vouchers therefor have been approved by the department of health. 35-1-102. Sanitation of public institutions. It shall be the duty of the officers, managers, superintendents, proprietors and lessees of all hospitals, asylums, infirmaries, prisons, jails, schools, theaters, public places and public institutions to remedy any and all defects relating to the unsanitary condition of such institution, or institutions, as may be under their control, when such defects shall have been called to their attention in writing by the department of health. 35-1-103. Neglect or failure of officials to perform duty. Any member of the department of health, any county health officer, or any officer, superintendent, or principal of any city, town, county or institution named in this act, who shall fail or neglect to perform any of the duties herein required of them, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in the sum of not less than one hundred dollars ($100.00) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000.00), or shall be confined in the county jail for a period of not less than six (6) months, nor more than a year, or both.
    [Show full text]
  • Euthanasia: None Dare Call It Murder Joseph Sanders
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 60 | Issue 3 Article 9 1970 Euthanasia: None Dare Call It Murder Joseph Sanders Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Joseph Sanders, Euthanasia: None Dare Call It Murder, 60 J. Crim. L. Criminology & Police Sci. 351 (1969) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. THE JOuRxAL OF CRIMINAL LAW, CRIMJINOLOGY AND POLsCU SCIENCE Vol. 60, No. 3 Copyright © 1969 by Northwestern University School of Law Printed in U.S.A. EUTHANASIA: NONE DARE CALL IT MURDER JOSEPH SANDERS On August 9, 1967, Robert Waskin, a twenty- nature of the act, the status of the actor and the three year old college student, killed his mother victim, and the presence or absence of consent. by shooting her in the head three times. Warned The act itself may be one of commission or one of by the police that he did not have to make a omission. The former, which is the concern of this statement, Waskin allegedly said, "It's obvious, paper, is at the present time some degree of crimi- I killed her." He was arrested and charged with nal homicideA murder.' Waskin's act, however, was a special There are three reasonably identifiable groups type-a type that has troubled and perplexed both against, or for whom euthanasia may be com- laymen and legal theorists.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter Bill 0..70
    HB2534 *LRB10008419RLC18533b* 100TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY State of Illinois 2017 and 2018 HB2534 by Rep. Avery Bourne SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED: 720 ILCS 570/102 from Ch. 56 1/2, par. 1102 720 ILCS 570/204 from Ch. 56 1/2, par. 1204 720 ILCS 570/401 from Ch. 56 1/2, par. 1401 720 ILCS 570/402 from Ch. 56 1/2, par. 1402 Amends the Illinois Controlled Substances Act. Requires that to be illegal a drug analog must not be approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration or, if approved, it is not dispensed or possessed in accordance with State and federal law. Defines "controlled substance" to include a synthetic drug enumerated as a scheduled drug under the Act. Adds chemical structural classes of synthetic cannabinoids and piperazines to the list of Schedule I controlled substances. Includes certain substances approved by the FDA which are not dispensed or possessed in accordance with State or federal law and certain modified substances. LRB100 08419 RLC 18533 b CORRECTIONAL BUDGET AND IMPACT NOTE ACT MAY APPLY A BILL FOR HB2534 LRB100 08419 RLC 18533 b 1 AN ACT concerning criminal law. 2 Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois, 3 represented in the General Assembly: 4 Section 5. The Illinois Controlled Substances Act is 5 amended by changing Sections 102, 204, 401, and 402 as follows: 6 (720 ILCS 570/102) (from Ch. 56 1/2, par. 1102) 7 Sec. 102. Definitions. As used in this Act, unless the 8 context otherwise requires: 9 (a) "Addict" means any person who habitually uses any drug, 10 chemical, substance or dangerous drug other than alcohol so as 11 to endanger the public morals, health, safety or welfare or who 12 is so far addicted to the use of a dangerous drug or controlled 13 substance other than alcohol as to have lost the power of self 14 control with reference to his or her addiction.
    [Show full text]
  • Mcquiston, Terence
    by Terence McQuiston M.D. A FRESH PROPOSAL FOR EUTHANASIA LEGISLATION IN CANADA Here follows first an preface concerning my political experience with legalized euthanasia, then the summary of my proposal for the new legislation, and then the full text of my proposal for the new legislation with appendices. PREFACE: MY EXPERIENCE IN THE POLITICS OF LEGALIZED EUTHANASIA I am very familiar with the Dutch experience of legalized euthanasia, and have studied the issues around legalizing euthanasia over the years, involving myself politically during the 2009-2010 debate on BQ MP Francine Lalonde's bill to legalize physician-assisted suicide. As in Canada, legal euthanasia had its impetus in the Netherlands not by a decision of parliament but by a 1984 Supreme Court judgment overruling the criminal code prohibition of the practice. Thus, the Netherlands have had a 31 year head start on Canada, providing Canadians the opportunity to learn from and hopefully avoid their mistakes both in the legislation and the practice of euthanasia. At the time of the Lalonde bill's debate, I had correspondence with my Liberal MP, Michelle Simson, concerning the bill and Ms. Simson's involvement with the subsequent parliamentary committee on palliative care. In the course of this work, I networked through my physician contacts in the Netherlands to learn more about the Dutch experience of euthanasia, and helped a Dutch professor of biomedical ethics write an open letter to Canadians—and especially to MPs— on the challenges of attempting to contain the practice of euthanasia by legal regulations. (See Appendix A, "Legislating Euthanasia: Lessons from the Dutch Experience, March 2010".) In 2014, I traveled to Rotterdam and Utrecht to learn more and had an hour-long interview with Prof.
    [Show full text]