Resettlement Planning Document

Short Resettlement Plan 2 Document Stage: Final Project Number: 34379 January 2010

Cambodia: Northwest Irrigation Sector Project for Po Pi Deum, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash and Kouch Noup Subprojects

Prepared by Resettlement Unit of the Ministry of Water Resources and Meteorology

The short resettlement plan is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature.

KINGDOM OF CAMBODIA NATION RELIGION KING

North-West Irrigation Sector Project

(Loan No. 2035-CAM [SF])

Resettlement Plan 2 for Po Pi Deum, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash and Kouch Noup Sub-Projects

FINAL

Resettlement Unit MOWRAM

16 October 2009

Po Pi Deum, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Kuch Noup and Tram Mneash Sub-Projects

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS...... i APPENDICES...... iv ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS...... iv Executive Summary...... v 1 INTRODUCTION ...... 1

1.1 Background...... 1

1.1.2 Po Pi Deum ...... 1

1.1.3 Anlong Svay ...... 1

1.1.4 Krouch Saeuch...... 2

1.1.5 Tram Mneash ...... 2

1.1.6 Kouch Noup...... 2

1.2 Resettlement Plan...... 3

1.3 LEAGAL FRAMEWORK AND POLICY ...... 3

1.3.1 Cambodian Laws and Regulation ...... 3

1.3.2 Government Resettlement Procedures...... 3

1.3.3 ADB Policies on Involuntary Resettlement...... 4

1.3.4 Principles of Resettlement ...... 4

1.4 The Cut-off Date of the Subprojects...... 6

1.5 Eligibility...... 6 2 PROJECT IMPACT ...... 6

2.1 Methodology ...... 6

2.1.1 Data Gathering Instrument(s) and Procedures...... 6

2.1.2 Participation of the Public in the Survey...... 7

2.1.3 Processing of Data ...... 7

3.2 RESULTS OF PO PI DEUM SUBPROJECT ...... 7

3.2.1 Result of Detailed Measurement Survey...... 7

3.2.2 Basics of Unit Cost Used in Calculating Compensation for this Subproject...... 10

3.2.3 Detailed Compensation and Entitlements...... 11

3.2.4 Socio-Economic Profile ...... 12

3.2.5 Public Participation and Consultation ...... 14

3.2.6 Implementation Schedule ...... 16

RU/MOWRAM i RP of Po Pi Deum, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

3.2.7 Costs and Budget...... 16

3.3 Results of Anglong Svay Subproject ...... 18

3.3.1 Results of the Detailed Measurement Survey ...... 18

3.3.2 Basics of Unit Cost Used in Calculating Compensation...... 21

3.3.3 Detailed Compensation and Other Entitlements ...... 21

3.3.4 Socio-Economic Profile ...... 22

3.3.5 Public Participation and Consultation ...... 23

3.3.6 Implementation Schedule ...... 25

3.3.7 Costs and Budget...... 26

3.4 Results of Krouch Saeuch Subproject...... 27

3.4.1 Results of the Detailed Measurement Survey...... 27

3.4.2 Basics of Unit Cost Used in Calculating Compensation...... 30

3.4.3 Detailed Compensation and Other Entitlements ...... 31

3.4.4 Socio-Economic Profile ...... 32

3.3.5 Public Participation and Consultation ...... 33

3.4.6 Implementation Schedule ...... 35

3.4.7 Costs and Budget...... 36

3.5 Results of Tram Mneach Subproject ...... 37

3.5.1 Results of the Detailed Measurement Survey...... 37

3.5.2 Basics of Unit Cost Used in Calculating Compensation...... 41

3.5.3 Detailed Compensation and Other Entitlements ...... 41

3.5.4 Socio-Economic Profile ...... 43

3.5.5 Public Participation and Consultation ...... 44

3.5.6 Implementation Schedule ...... 46

3.5.7 Costs and Budget...... 46

3.6 Results of Kouch Noup Subproject...... 48

3.6.1 Results of the Detailed Measurement Survey...... 48

3.6.2 Basics of Unit Cost Used in Calculating Compensation ...... 51

3.6.3 Detailed Compensation and Other Entitlements ...... 51

3.6.4 Socio-Economic Profile ...... 53

ii RP of Po Pi Deum, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

3.5.5 Public Participation and Consultation ...... 54

3.6.6 Implementation Schedule ...... 56

3.6.7 Costs and Budget ...... 56

3.7 Total resettlement cost for 5 subprojects...... 57 4 GRIEVANCE REDRESS ...... 58

4.1 Grievance Rights...... 58

4.2 Function...... 58

4.3 Steps Involved ...... 58

4.4 Make up of the Grievance Committee...... 59 5 ORGANIZATIONAL FRAMEWORK ...... 59

5.1 Institutions for Resettlement...... 60

5.1.1 Steering Committee...... 60

5.1.2 MOWRAM ...... 60

5.1.3 Service Provider managing the Agriculture Training Program...... 60

5.1.4 Resettlement Subcommittee...... 61

5.1.5 Provincial Agencies ...... 61

5.2 Monitoring and Evaluation...... 61

5.2.1 Indicators for In-house Monitoring ...... 62

5.2.2 External Monitoring Agent (EMA) ...... 62

iii RP of Po Pi Deum, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

APPENDICES

Appendix 1 DMS Questionnaire

Appendix 2 DMS Data Report

Appendix 3 Socio-economic Questionnaire

Appendix 4 Focus Group Discussion Questionnaire

Appendix 5 Public Information Booklet

Appendix 6 Replacement Cost Study Report

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

ADB Asian Development Bank AFD Agence Française de Dévelopment AHs Affected Household(s) APs Affected Person(s) DMS Detailed Measurement Survey EA Executing Agency EMA External Monitoring Agent FGDs Focused Group Discussions GRC Grievance Redress Committee ha Hectare IRC Inter-ministerial Resettlement Committee MEF Ministry of Economy and Finance MLMUPC Ministry of Land Management, Urban Planning and Construction MOWRAM Ministry of Water Resources and Meteorology MRD Ministry of Rural Development NGO Non-Government Organization NWISP North-West Irrigation Sector Project PDAFF Provincial Department of Agriculture, Forests and Fisheries PDF Provincial Department of Finance PDLMUPC Provincial Department of Land Management, Urban Planning and Construction PDWRAM Provincial Director of Water Resources and Meteorology PIB Public Information Booklet PIU Project Implementation Unit PMO Project Management Office (of MOWRAM) PRSC Provincial Resettlement Sub-Committee PRSC-WG Provincial Resettlement Sub-Committee Working Group RCS Replacement Cost Study RGC Royal Government of Cambodia RP Resettlement Plan RS Resettlement Subcommittee RU Resettlement Unit TOR Terms of Reference

iv RP of Po Pi Deum, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

Executive Summary

1. Po Pi Deum irrigation subproject of North-West Irrigation Sector Project (NWISP) will irrigate 1,100 ha for supplementary wet season and 68ha for mung bean. The expected outcomes of the project are to boost agriculture production for the beneficiaries in 4 communes, Rohat Toek, Bontheay Neang, Bort Trang and Reusey Krauk and will rehabilitate a village road as Flood Protection Embankment in Neangket. The project will rehabilitate barrage and surrounding embankment, a Main Canal, a Main Drain, a Secondary Canal, a Flood Protection Embankment/Road, two Regulators and 33 irrigation Turnouts.

2. The subproject components will affect property of households in the subproject area, and the impact and the necessary compensation are addressed in this Resettlement Plan (RP2). It documents the magnitude of the impact, public consultations, suitable solutions, and provides the mitigation measures to be implemented.

3. The construction of Po Pi Deum subproject will totally affect 105 households. A total of 236.52m 2 of rice land belonging to 9 AHs and 102.72m 2 of residential land belonging to 01 AHs have to be acquired for the subproject construction. However, the loss of agricultural land of the 9 AHs is not severe due to the percentage of that is less than 10% of their total productive holding land and 31 AHs are categorised in vulnerable households. For 10 lanless AHs and 6 business holders will be provided 2 relocation options, (1) they will be provided land plot of 7m x 15m for each landless AH and land area of 101m 2 market structure at the nearby existing place, and (2) they will get cash for self relocation.

4. The cost of Po Pi Deum subproject Resettlement Plan excluding administration cost is estimated at a total $67,079.99 with 15% contingency or $ 8,749.56 . Details are included in Table 3-2-9.

5. Anlong Svay irrigation subproject of NWISP will irrigate 795ha of rice land for supplementary wet season. The expected outcomes of the project are to boost agriculture production for the beneficiaries in 3 communes, Romlich, Ou Tapoang and Rusey Kraing and will construct road along Main Canal and reserve water in Anlong Svay reservoir by a Dam and Flood Embankment. The project will construct a Head Work, a Spillway, a Dam, 2 Flood Embankments, a Main Canal, 4 Secondary Canals, 3 Secondary Drains and 14 structures such as Box Culvert, Pipe Culvert, Cross Drains, head Regulator and Tail structure.

6. The subproject will affect properties of households in the subproject area. The affected properties and the necessary compensation are addressed in this Resettlement Plan (RP2). It documents the scope of the negative impact, public consultations, suitable solutions, and provides the mitigation measures to be implemented.

7. The construction of Anlong Svay subproject will totally affect 281 households. a total of 227,045.28m2 of rice land belonging to 268 AHs, 3,094.89m 2 of Chamkar land occupied by 4 AHs, 18.60m 2 of pond land used by an AH and 499.05m 2 of residential land of 4 AHs have to be acquired for the subproject construction. Moreover, of 272 AHs (268 AHs of rice land and 4 AHs of Chamkar land), 24 AHs are severely affected owing to their loss of productive land is more than 10% of their total holding land. 8. The total cost of Anlong Svay subproject Resettlement Plan excluding administration cost is estimated at a total $88,755.39 with 15% contingency or $ 11,576.79 . Details are included in Table 3-3-8.

9. Krouch Saeuch irrigation subproject of NWISP will irrigate 1,000ha of rice land for supplementary wet season. The expected outcomes of the project are to boost agriculture

v RP of Po Pi Deum, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects production for the beneficiaries in 3 communes, Trapeang Chong and Khnar Totueng and will construct road along Main Canal as well as rehabilitate village road in Kab Kralanh in to Flood Protection Embankment. The project will construct a Head Work, a Flood Embankment, a Main Canal, 3 Secondary Canals, a Main Drain and a Secondary Drain and 68 structures such as Box Culvert, Pipe Culvert, Cross Drains, Drain outlet, Open Flume, Oxcart Bridge, Gate, Head Regulator, Check/Drop and Tail structure.

10. The works will affect property of households in the subproject area, and the impacts and the necessary compensation are addressed in this Resettlement Plan (RP). It documents the magnitude of the impacts, the conduct of public consultations, the suitable solutions, and provides the mitigation measures to be implemented.

11. The construction of Krouch Saeuch subproject will totally affect 251 households. A total of 182,225.94m2 of rice land occupied by 204 AHs, 3,362.56m 2 of Chamkar land belonging to 10AHs and 1,942.73m2 of residential land used by 10 AHs have to be acquired for the subproject construction. However, of 214 AHs (204 AHs of rice land and 10 AHs of Chamkar land), there are only 23 AHs loses productive land more than 10% of their holding land.

12. The cost of Krouch Saeuch subproject Resettlement Plan excluding administration cost is estimated at a total $ 91,938.78 with 15% contingency equivalent to $ 11,992.01 . Details are included in Table 3-4-8.

13. Tram Mneash irrigation subproject of NWISP will irrigate 1,100ha of rice land for supplementary wet season. The expected outcomes of the project are to boost agriculture production for the beneficiaries in entire Thnaot Chum commune and will construct road along Main Canal. The project will construct a Main Canal, 4 Secondary Canals and a 2 Secondary Drain and 39 structures such as Head Regulator, Turnout, Proportional Divider, Cross Regulator, Boxes Culvert, Side Spillway, Check/Drop and Tail Escape structure.

14. The construction of Tram Mneash subproject will totally affect 348 households. A total of 164,059.45m2 of rice land, 7,369.24m2 of Chamkar, 7,732.88m2 of residential land and 55.12m2 of Pond land will be acquired for the subproject and 276 rice land holders, 13 Chamkar land holders, 39 residential land holders and a pond land holder will partially lose their rice land, Chamkar, residential and pond land, respecttively. Moreover, of 289 AHs (276 affected rice land holders and 13 affected Chamkar land holders), 59 AHs loses productive land more than 10% of their total holding productive land.

15. The cost of Tram Mneash subproject Resettlement Plan excluding administration cost is estimated at a total $ 132,102.92 including 15% contingency equivalent to $17,230.82 . Details are included in Table 3-5-9.

16. Kouch Noup irrigation subproject of NWISP will irrigate 790ha of rice land for supplementary wet season and 60ha of rice land during dry season. The expected outcomes of the project are to boost agriculture production for the beneficiaries in entire Kbal Trach commune and will rehabilitate road along Main and Secondary Canal. The project will construct a Head Work, a Dam, a Main Canal, 5 Secondary Canals and numbers of structures such as Box Culvert, Open Flume, Emergency Spillway, Oxcart Bridge, Check/Drop and Tail structure.

17. The construction of Kouch Noup subproject will totally affect 52 households. A total of 10,856.16m2 of rice land, 327.00m2 of Chamkar and 2,365.15m2 of residential land will be acquired for the subproject belonging to 21 rice land holders, 2 Chamkar land holders and 8 residential land holders respectively. All AHs will be partially affected on their rice, Chamkar and residential land. Of 23 AHs (21 affected rice land holders and 2 affected

vi RP of Po Pi Deum, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

Chamkar land holders), there are only 5 AHs lose productive land more than 10% of their total holding productive land. 18. The cost of Kouch Noup subproject Resettlement Plan excluding administration cost is estimated at a total $ 20,910.23 with 15% contingency or $ 2,727.42 . Details are included in Table 3-6-8.

19. This RP2 covers 5 subprojects such as Po Pi Deum, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash and Kouch Noup. As stated earlier, the natures of those five subprojects are different in the context of (1) scope and designs of the subproject construction, (2) subproject locations, and (3) local people preference and behavior. Therefore, the entitlements and resettlement costs for the subprojects are separated, and the total resettlement costs for all 5 subprojects are estimated at $472,137.31 (details are shown in Table 3.7.1).

20. There was a series of meetings and an Information Booklet was distributed to AHs in order to make them aware of (1) the project objectives in terms of social development through policy on Involuntary Resettlement of the Asian Development Bank (ADB), (2) the RP2 preparation procedures, and (3) AH’s participation in the subproject implementation. Detail Measurement Survey (DMS) was carried out in March 2009, in order to record the project impact on each AH. A socio-economic survey was also conducted during the time covering 20% of affected households (AHs) anchored in Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) with three target groups to assess the socio-economic situation and the needs of and impact on AHs.

21. Replacement Cost Study (RCS) was also carried out to establish compensation rates for the subprojects reflecting the market price of the affected properties. The compensation rate calculation of the affected assets caused by all 5 subprojects is based on the replacement cost study conducted by a local consultant who prepared this RP2. In addition to the compensation of their affected assets, the subprojects are required, under the agreed policy, to provide allowances to vulnerable households, transportation allowance and living assistance for relocating households and shop-houses. For severely affected households will participate in the agiculture extention and income restoration program under component 3 of the project.

vii NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

Figure 0-1: Location Map of Po Pi Deum, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash and Kouch Noup Subprojects

viii NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

To Banteay Meanchey Town

Mongkul Borey Town

Po Pi Deum Village

Figure 0-2: Map of Po Pi Deum Irrigation Subproject

ix NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

Figure 0-3: Map of Anlong Svay Irrigation Subproject

x NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

Figure 0-4: Map of Krouch Saeuch Irrigation Subproject

xi NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

Figure 0-5: Map of Tram Mneash Irrigation Subproject

xii NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

Figure 0-6: Map of Kouch Noup Irrigation Subproject

xiii NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background

22. Northwest Irrigation Sector Project (NWISP) is under the Loan No. 2035-CAM [SF] of Asian Development Bank (ADB) and grant from Agence Française de Dévelopment (AFD) for consultation services as well as counterpart fund from the Royal Government of Cambodia. The NWISP is implemented by Ministry of Water Resource and Meteorology (MOWRAM) and totally has 11 subprojects, namely Puley, Po Pi Deum, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash, Kouch Noup, Ta Saom, Kork Thnong, Canal No.1, Don Aov and Chork Reservoir. Of the 11 subprojects, Punley subproject was already prepared Resettlement Plan (RP) in 2008. The rest, 10 subprojects, have to be completed RP by the end of 2009 and those 10 subprojects are prepared in two separate RPs in order to facilitate the resettlement implementation and the timeframe for the project. The first RP (RP2) covers 5 subprojects, namely Po Pi Deum, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash and Kouch Noup. The second RP (RP3) will cover the other five subprojects, such as Ta Saom, Kork Thnong, Canal No.1, Don Aov and Chork Reservoir. The belows are contents of the first RP (RP2).

1.1.2 Po Pi Deum

23. Po Pi Deum irrigation scheme originally covered a huge area almost 10,000ha spreading over 10 communes of Mongkol Borey district. The site is located about 15 km to the south of Banteay Meanchey provincial town and close to the Mongkol Borey district town (Fig. 1-1 & 1-2).The scheme (The Po Pi Deum Main Canal scheme) was originally built in Khmer Rouge regime, in 1977, counting for 32 years old. Depending on the support from NGOs, the scheme was extended and rehabilitated several times by the PDWRAM, and followed by establishment of Farmer Water User groups in 2001 by Department of Irrigated Agriculture. Today, the scheme still can provide benefits to the farmers.

24. The subproject will rehabilitate or construct a barrage, a Main Canal, a Secondary Canal, a Main Drain, a Flood Projection Embankment/Road and other structures, to irrigate 1,100 ha rice land for supplementary wet season and 68ha for mung bean. The rehabilitation of barrage and surrounding embankment in Po Pi Deum village are required to acquire residential land, community rest hall for traveler, shop houses and vegetable stalls as well as houses of AHs. Main drain, two regulators and 33 irrigation Gate Boxes are newly constructed and it would require acquiring agricultural land, trees and structures. Secondary Canal is rehabilitated on existing Ekapheap canal and it would need to acquire houses, structures and trees. The flood protection dam is constructed on existing village road where some structures and trees will be cleared.

1.1.3 Anlong Svay

25. Anlong Svay subproject is located close proximity to the Phnov village in Romlech Commune, Bakan District, Pursat province about 35 Km to the Northwest of Pursat provincial town (Fig. 1-1 & 1-3). Its irrigation scheme includes an earth Dam across the Svay Don Keo River, Main and Secondary Canals that were constructed for the first time in Sangkum Reas Niyum regime during 1966 by the community labor forces. The Dam was damaged over the years by floods and was rehabilitated many times, but the scheme is still poorly functioned.

26. The rehabilitation and construction of the irrigation scheme of the subproject includes construction of a Head Work, a Spillway, 2 Flood Embankments, a Main Canal, 4 Secondary Canals, 3 Secondary Drains and 14 structures such as Box Culvert, Pipe Culvert, Cross Drains, head Regulator and Tail structure. The scheme is to irrigate 795ha of rice land during wet season and benefit to perhaps 480 households and will affect on assets and socio- economic of AHs as well as vulnerable households in the subproject area.

1 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

1.1.4 Krouch Saeuch

27. This subproject is located in Trapeang Chong and Khnar Totueng Communes, Bakan District, Pursat province about 22 Km to the Northwest of Pursat provincial town (Fig. 1-1 & 1-4). Its irrigation scheme was constructed in Khmer Rouge regime and was damaged over the years by floods. In 1994, Krouch Saeuch weir and dam was constructed and the side slope of the dam was repaired in 2004, but the scheme is still poorly functioned.

28. The rehabilitation and construction of the irrigation scheme of the subproject includes construction of a Head Work, a Dam in Kab Kralanh, Siphon on Damnak Ampil MC/Stueng Kambot, a Main Canal, 3 Secondary Canals, a Main Drain and a Secondary Drain and 68 structures such as box culvert, pipe culvert, cross drains, drain outlet, open flume, oxcart bridge, gate, head regulator, check/drop and tail structure. The scheme is estimated to irrigate 1,000ha rice land for supplementary irrigation scheme during wet season and benefit to perhaps 464 households. The water sources for the scheme come from Stueng Kambot and Damnak Ampil main canal running from Stueng Pursat River through an Automatic Water Gate. The scheme will affect on assets and socio-economic of AHs as well as vulnerable households.

1.1.5 Tram Mneash

29. The Tram Mneash subproject is located in Tnaot Chum Commune, Krakor District, Pursat province about 15 km to the Southeast of Pursat provincial town and approximately 6 km from Tnaot Chum commune center (Fig. 1-1 & 1-5). In 1962, 70m long Dam was built to divert water from Bomnork River for serving 6 villages. Since 1979, the scheme was badly damaged and has been abandoned for years.

30. The construction of a new irrigation scheme of the subproject is diverse on Barrage/ Spillway, a Main Canal, 4 Secondary Canals and a 2 Secondary Drain and 39 structures such as head regulator, turnout, proportional divider, cross regulator, boxes culvert, side spillway, check/drop and tail escape structure. The scheme is estimated to irrigate 1,100ha of rice land for supplementary irrigation scheme during wet season and benefit to 753 households. The water sources for the scheme come from Bomnork River. The construction of the scheme will affect on assets and socio-economic of AHs as well as vulnerable households in subproject area.

1.1.6 Kouch Noup

31. The Kouch Noup subproject is located in Kbal Trach Commune, Krakor District, Pursat province about 38 km to the Southeast of Pursat provincial town and 5km to the Kakor district town (Fig. 1-1 & 1-6). There have been several efforts in the past to build small dykes 1 across the O Kouch Noup in Kbal Trach commune for making irrigation schemes. The remaining dykes have been mostly destroyed over the years by floods.

32. The construction of a new irrigation scheme of the subproject includes construction of a Head Work, a Dam with 2 Spillways, a Main Canal, 5 Secondary Canals and numbers of structures such as Box Culvert, Open Flume, Emergency Spillway, Oxcart Bridge, Check/Drop and Tail structure. The scheme is estimated to irrigate 790ha of rice land for supplementary irrigation scheme during wet season and 60ha during dry season and benefit to perhaps 692 households. The water sources for the scheme come from O’ Kouch Noup. The scheme will affect on assets and socio-economic of AHs as well as vulnerable households in subproject area.

1 Include some construction during the Khmer Rouge regime. 2 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

1.2 Resettlement Plan

33. This RP2 assesses the various adverse social impact of constructing the water distribution canals and structures that will irrigate the command areas of (1) 1,100 ha rice land for supplementary wet season and 68ha for mung bean for Po Pi Deum, (2) 795ha of rice land for supplementary wet season for Anlong Svay, (3) 1,000ha of rice land for supplementary wet season for Krouch Saeuch, (4) 1,100ha of rice land for supplementary wet season for Tram Mneash and (5) 850ha of rice land for supplementary wet season for Kouch Noup. On the basis of the foregoing, appropriate mitigating measures will be laid out, including the resources needed, to help ensure that AHs are not worse off and that project objective are achieved. Depending on the type and severity of the project impact, mitigating measures will be spelled out in the RP2 including engineering and non-cash measures, and payment of compensation at replacement cost and other assistances to the AHs consistent with ADB’s Policy on Involuntary Resettlement. The RP2 will include the budget for compensation and allowances; and the agriculture training programs for AHs in the reservoir, severely AHs in the command area under the Project Component 3 of NWISP.

1.3 LEAGAL FRAMEWORK AND POLICY

1.3.1 Cambodian Laws and Regulation

34. The 1993 Constitution of Cambodia states that the “right to confiscate properties from any person shall be exercised only in the public interest as provided by law and shall require fair and just compensation in advance” (Article 44). Article 20 stipulates that “nobody shall be forced to transfer his or her ownership, if forcing is not necessary in the public interest and (if) no proper and just indemnity has been paid to the owner”.

35. The Land Law of 2001 (NS/RKM/0801/14, August 2001) governs land and property rights in Cambodia. Based on the provisions of the 1993 Constitution, it determines the regime of ownership of immovable properties that are defined as including land, trees and immovable structures.

36. The rights and responsibilities of the RGC with respect to eminent domain are specified in the Land Law. The RGC can acquire private land (i) for public purposes under condition of (ii) fair and just compensation, (iii) paid in advance. The Land Law, Article 5, states:

“No person may be deprived of his ownership, unless it is in the public interest. An ownership deprivation shall be carried out in accordance with the forms and procedures provided by law and regulations and after the payment of fair and just compensation in advance.”

1.3.2 Government Resettlement Procedures

37. The Land Law and other RGC regulations protect individual rights to ownership of land and to fair and just compensation when it is acquired for public purposes. Nonetheless, there are no laws or regulations regarding a) eminent domain or expropriation or b) valuation of assets to support the right to fair and just compensation. Moreover, there is no national policy for involuntary resettlement although a draft policy was submitted in 2002 to the Inter- Ministerial Resettlement Committee (IRC) and, at present, further work is ongoing under an ADB-funded technical assistance project to update and agree a policy and prepare a sub- decree on resettlement policy. 38. The Inter-Ministerial Resettlement Committee (IRC) was established in 1999. It is an ad-hoc body convened for specific projects under the chairmanship of the Ministry of Economy and Finance (MEF). The Resettlement Department (RD) within MEF acts as the secretariat for the IRC. The IRC is convened for specific projects, and is composed of

3 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects members of the Ministry of Economy and Finance, the Ministry of Water Resource amd Meteorology, the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF), and Ministry of Environment. Its role is to deal with all resettlement issues arising from development partner- funded projects requiring land acquisition and resettlement; this includes, among others, (i) determination of entitlements, (ii) approval of compensation rates, (iii) approval of the RP and (iv) provision of funds for compensation payments to APs for affected assets. 1.3.3 ADB Policies on Involuntary Resettlement

39. The project resettlement policy provides an opportunity for people who are dispossessed or displaced by the project to derive benefits from the same, consistent with the loan agreement and ADB’s social safeguards policies. The basic guiding principle of ADB's Policy on Involuntary Resettlement is that adverse social impacts in a project are avoided or minimized, resettlement mitigating measures are conceived and executed as development programs, and that AHs are given the opportunity to share in project benefits. The objective is to assist AHs restore or improve their production levels, income earning capacity, and living standards.

40. Moreover, customary and formal rights of AHs are recognized. The absence of formal legal title to land by some affected groups should not be a bar to compensation and that particular attention are paid to the needs of the poorest affected households, including those without legal title to assets, female-headed, the landless, headed by the elderly, and other vulnerable groups, such as ethnic minorities. Appropriate assistance will be provided to help them improve their status.

1.3.4 Principles of Resettlement

41. The principles of resettlement and compensation that apply in the NWISP, Po Pi Deum, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash and Kouch Noup sub-project are as following:

a. Acquisition of land and other assets, and resettlement of people will be minimized as much as possible.

b. All AHs residing in, working, doing business, cultivating land, or having rights over resources within the project area as of the cut-off date are entitled to compensation for their lost assets, incomes, jobs and businesses at replacement cost. Those displaced by the project will be provided additional relocation assistance and offered support during the transition period. Displaced persons will also be provided with appropriate development assistance in order to improve or at least restore their incomes and living standards to pre-project levels. Lack of legal rights will not bar the AP from entitlement to such compensation for his/her lost assets (improvements including structures, houses, crops, trees, etc.), businesses and incomes, and rehabilitation measures.

c. AHs will be entitled to full compensation for the entire affected assets at replacement cost, and in the case of loss of productive assets, incomes, jobs and employment, to additional development assistance that allows them to enhance or at least maintain their standard of living.

d. AHs affected by partial impact on their assets i.e. partial loss of land or structures and the remaining assets remain viable for continued use, where the livelihood is not land-based, the compensation for the affected assets will be paid in cash.

e. The compensation and rehabilitation measures to be provided are: (i) compensation at replacement cost for houses and other structures without depreciation or deductions for salvaged material; (ii) compensation at replacement cost for the loss of other fixed assets; (iii) compensation at the replacement cost of

4 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

the affected land or the provision of replacement land of equal agricultural productivity, residential quality and business potential, as the case may be, at a location acceptable to the AHs; (iv) cash compensation at replacement cost for affected businesses, means of livelihood and incomes; (v) rent allowance and assistance in finding alternate rental accommodation to tenant AHs; (vi) transport allowance and dislocation assistance during transition; and (vii) income restoration program, which includes on-farm and off-farm income earning activities, provision of appropriate skills training, and access to credit facilities; (viii) special assistance and allowances for AHs belonging to vulnerable groups.

f. Replacement agricultural land, premise/business plot will be as close as possible to the land that was lost and/or acceptable to the AHs. All replacement land for agriculture, residential and businesses will be provided with secure tenure status and without any additional cost, taxes, and surcharge to the AHs at the time of transfer.

g. Plans for acquisition of land and other assets and provision of rehabilitation measures will be carried out in consultation with the AHs who will receive prior information of the compensation and rehabilitation options available to them.

h. Where cultural minorities or indigenous peoples are affected, the social and economic benefits they receive would be in harmony with their cultural preferences and would be decided in consultation with affected communities.

i. Particular attention shall be paid to the needs of the poorest affected people and vulnerable groups. This may include households headed by females, the elderly, or disabled, and other vulnerable groups, particularly indigenous peoples. Appropriate assistance must be provided to help them improve their socio- economic status.

j. Any acquisition of, or restriction on access to resources owned or managed by AHs as a common property will be mitigated by arrangements ensuring access of those AHs to equivalent resources on a continuing basis.

k. AHs whose land or assets are temporarily taken by the works under the project will be fully compensated for their net loss of income and damaged assets, the latter at replacement cost. Assets which are only temporarily affected or inoperable, will be compensated at 10% of the replacement cost of affected assets provided that such assets or properties are required by the project for a maximum of 3 months. In case the assets are required by the project for periods longer than three months, the amount of compensation should be negotiated with the owner of said property.

I. The previous level of community services and access to resources will be maintained or improved after resettlement.

m. Financial and physical resources for resettlement and rehabilitation will be made available as and when required.

n. The RP will provide for a planned resettlement program and will include adequate institutional arrangements to ensure effective and timely design, planning, consultation and implementation of compensation, resettlement and rehabilitation measures. Project authorities will ensure effective coordination with relevant agencies for implementation of resettlement.

o. Adequate arrangements will be made for the effective supervision and monitoring of resettlement, both internally by the Government and externally by an independent organization to be hired for the purpose, to ensure compliance to the 5 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

resettlement policy and help ensure that AHs are able to rehabilitate themselves as planned.

1.4 The Cut-off Date of the Subprojects

42. The cut-off-dates for Po Pi Deum, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash and Kouch Noup subprojects were on 03 March 2009, on 26 March 2009, on 06 May 2009, on 24 June 2009, on 11 June 2009, respectively. The setting of the cut-off-date is the first date of public consultation meetings with Public Information Booklet (PIB) distribution to all AHs in each subproject.

1.5 Eligibility

43. AHs include anyone who at the cut-off date of the subproject was located within the subproject area or any of its component or subproject or part thereof, and would have their: a. Standard of living adversely affected; b. Right, title or interest in any house, land (including residential, commercial, agricultural and grazing land), water resources, or any other movable or fixed assets acquired or possessed, in full or in part, temporarily or permanently by public sector acquisition; or c. Business, occupation, place of work or residence or habitat adversely affected by public sector intervention.

44. "AHs" refers to households and consists of all members residing under one roof and operating as a single economic unit, who are adversely affected by the subproject. For resettlement purposes, subproject affected persons will be considered as members of the subproject affected households.

2 PROJECT IMPACT

2.1 Methodology

2.1.1 Data Gathering Instrument(s) and Procedures

45. Data collection to estimate land loss, affected structures and trees and other impact on AH and community in each subproject is mainly from Detail Measurement Survey (DMS) which is conducted by Inter-ministerial Resettlement Committee (IRC) working group in close coordination with PRSC working group and local authorities, using topographic alignment demarcation of canals, drainages and structures of each subproject from the service provider employed by MOWRAM. The service provider of the each subproject uses Total Station equipment to demarcate land take of canals, drainages and structures, then the working groups and the topographic group install concrete pole to mark out acquisition land for the subproject to measure the impact. The interview team will follow the topographic team to conduct socio-economic survey in order to find out more on magnitude of impact on each household such as vulnerable house hold, agricultural land ownership of each household, etc. The DMS documents are the contractual record of impact and losses agreed with AHs during the DMS, bearing the signature or thumb print of the household head and the village head. It will be used by the Provincial Department of Economy and Finance to delivery compensation to them.

46. In line with the DMS, socio-economic survey of 20% of AHs and a series of focus group discussions (FGDs) of each subproject were conducted by MOWRAM-RU under supervision of NWISP resettlement specialist covering a study of social impact on communities, households and individuals. The respondent households of socio-economic survey were randomly selected to interview following the DMS household listing. All database is used in Microsoft EXCEL. FGDs were conducted in four groups, about 60 persons representing affected villages.

6 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

2.1.2 Participation of the Public in the Survey

47. Members of the Commune Councils and village headmen took part in the DMS, the socio-economic survey of 20% of AHs, and the FGDs. All household interviewed, the inventory, and measurement of affected land and property were conducted with the assistance of the household heads and the village headmen.

2.1.3 Processing of Data

48. MOWRAM-RU processed the DMS data in Microsoft EXCEL software as tool to prepare the list of impact for preparing this RP2. This data is used to analysis for preparing RP by resettlement local consultant. The socio-economic survey data of each subproject is entered in SPSS format and FGDs data is recorded in Excel format and the two software tools is applied to do analysis for this RP2 preparation. Since the natures of impact of all 5 subprojects are different, the entitlements and the impact database from the DMS are separated for each subproject.

3.2 RESULTS OF PO PI DEUM SUBPROJECT

3.2.1 Result of Detailed Measurement Survey

49. The Detail Measurement Survey (DMS) was conducted in March 2009 after public dissemination meeting in Banteay Mean Chey municipality and affected villages with AH and non-AH to explain about the project, its beneficiary, DMS process, entitlement, compensation, etc. The result of DMS showed that there are 105 households affected by the subproject with affected assets of (1) agricultural and residential land, (2) structures and other structures, (3) trees, (4) community rest hall for traveler. Of the 105 AHs, there are 10 landless households and 31 AHs are falling into vulnerable groups. The detailed impact is shown below and summarizes in Table 3-2-6: a Matrix of Entitlements for Po Pi Deum Subproject.

Impact on Agricultural and Residential Land

50. According to the DMS, a total of 236.52m 2 of rice land belonging to 9 AHs and 102.72m 2 of residential land belonging to 01 AHs have to be acquired for the subproject construction. However, the loss of agricultural land of the 9 AHs is not severe due to the percentage of that is less than 10% of their total productive holding land.

Table 3-2-1: Impact on Agricultural and Residential Land in Po Pi Deum

Commune Rohat Toek Bontheay Neang Bort Trang Po Pi Anlong Borttrang Borttrang TOTAL Village Pong Ror Trang Kok Pnov Deum Thnan Thumkeut Toch AHs 1 3 2 1 1 1 1 10 Affected People 4 15 10 6 5 6 3 49 Areas of Affected Land (m 2) Rice Land - 134.37 34.00 16.00 21.75 18.00 12.40 236.52

Residential Land 102.72 ------102.72

Total Land Area 102.72 134.37 34.00 16.00 21.75 18.00 12.40 339.24

51. The agricultural land lost is from securing land for construction of irrigated gate boxes along Secondary Canal or Ekapheap Canal. The rehabilitation of the Secondary Canal of the subproject is not necessitate to attain agricultural land at the both sides of the canal because of the existing canal is large enough. The construction of a Main drain and Flood Protection Embankment/Road are also not necessary to acquired land because the Main Drain is constructed within the right-of-way of village road, 5m from central line and exiting Main

7 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

Canal which the local authority and villagers have been agreed with distance of right-of-way of 2m from its lowest point of embankment. Thus, total agricultural land acquisition for this subproject is only 236.52m 2 ( Tab. 3-2-1). The residential land lost is only from building of the embankment of the main barrage which is needed to take a part of residential land outside the right-of-way of the river embankment.

Impact on Houses and Other Structures:

52. In total, the construction of the subproject structures, canals and dam affects on 19 structures and 21 other structures of 38 AHs. Those are 5 shop-houses, 12 houses, a small shop, a community rest hall, two areas of concrete slab, 5 bamboo fences and 14 wooden fences. The 10 landless AHs and 7 movable food and vegetable stalls will need to be relocated at new place near by the existing place. Only Po Pi Deum village where barrage is rehabilitated to bring more water to the Main Canal has a lager impact compared to other villages. The DMS report presents that almost 60% of the impact on structures occurs in Po Pi Deum village, followed by Neangket village and Kok Pnov village ( Tab. 3-2-2). For 5 shop- house owners and the 7 movable stalls in Po Pi Deum village will lose their daily earning opportunity during the relocation period.

53. The 10 landless AHs have squatted on the embankment of barrage and Ekapheap Canal as Secondary Canal in subproject through a permission of local authority to temporary settle there for more than five years. They agree to relocate to new place when construction begins.

Table 3-2-2: Impact on Houses and Other Structures in Po Pi Deum

Commune Rohat Toek Bontheay Neang Bort Trang Reusey Krauk Total AH Total Po Pi Deum Kok Pnov Borttrang Toch Neangket Village Incidence Quantity AH Quantity AH Quantity AH Quantity AH Quantity Affected Structure Residential structure type "1" 6 148.98 m 2 3 47.96 m 2 - - 3 57.15 m 2 12 254.09 m 2 Shop-house 5 115.81 m 2 ------6 115.81 m 2 Shop ------1 15.00 m 2 1 15.00 m 2 Community rest hall 1 14.40 m 2 ------1 14.40 m 2 Concrete slab 2 45.24 m 2 ------2 45.24 m 2 Bamboo fence 1 23.00 m - - - - 4 140.00 m 5 163.00 m Wooden fence 9 198.10 m - - 2 49.00 m 3 59.50 m 14 306.60 m Total AH Incidence 24 - 3 - 2 - 11 - 40 - Total AH 22 - 3 - 2 - 11 - 38 - Affected Landless HHD Landless 4 - 3 --- 3 - 10 -

Impact on Trees:

54. In total, the construction of the structures, canals and Embankment/Road affect on 707 trees belonging to 88 AHs in nine villages. Most of the affect trees are situated along the ROW of the Main Canal, secondary Canal and the Embankment. Of the 707 trees, there are 15 categories of trees such as mango, sugar palm, coconut, Teuk Doh Kor, longan, papaya, guava, jack fruit, bamboo, jambolan, custard apple, banana, tamarind, Kraseing and other non-fruit trees ( Tab. 3-2-3).

55. Mango, sugar palm, banana and other non-fruit trees are the dominant affected trees of the subproject. But the essential productive trees of the villagers in the subproject are mango, coconut, Teuk Doh Kor, jackfruit, papaya, bamboo, banana and tamarind because it can contributes to their family livelihood. Sugar palm is not an important tree in the affected villages, since sugar production from palm juice is no long produced in the villages due to lack of fire wood as raw material and labor 2.

2 From consultation with those local people, the sugar palm is a labor intensive product. 8 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

Table 3-2-3: Loss of Trees in Po Pi Deum

Commune Name Rohat Toek Bontheay Neang Bort Trang Reusey Krauk Po Pi Anlong Borttrang Borttrang Chamka TOTAL Village Name Pong Ror Trang Kok Pnov Neangket Deum Thnan Thumkeut Toch Tadauk AHs 23 10 3 9 2 1 6 2 32 88 Total Affected Trees 199 137 13 70 26 6 17 5 234 707 Name and Number of Affected Trees

Mango 39 16 - 49 12 - 1 - 2 119 Sugar Palm 5 9 2 1 - 6 - - 92 115 Coconut 9 ------5 14 Teuk Doh Kor 4 ------1 5 Longan ------1 1 papaya 3 ------3 Guava ------5 5 Jackfruit 1 5 ------6 Bamboo 3 - - 2 6 - 1 4 2 18 Jambolan 2 1 - 4 - - 1 1 8 17 Custard Apple 3 1 ------4 Banana 81 50 - - - - 5 - 51 187 Tamarind - - - 1 - - - - - 1 Kraseing - 2 ------4 6 Others 49 53 11 13 8 - 9 - 63 206

Impact on Vulnerable Groups:

56. According to DMS data, a total of 31 vulnerable AHs have been identified from the total of 36 vulnerable group incidences of the subproject. They are ranked as vulnerable for at least one of the following reasons: they are woman-headed, aged-headed, disabled- headed, and/or with a monthly household income below the national poverty line ($14/month). Many of the AHs are ranked as vulnerable for more than one of the above reasons, in this case we have listed them in the figures shown in Table 3-2-4 below. Aged- headed and woman-headed AHs are high percentage of about 92% of the total vulnerable household incidences.

57. Each vulnerable AHs will receive an allowance of $150 3 per household. The allowance is to reduce their impoverishment risks and assist them to mitigate their vulnerability and get advantage of the project benefits.

Table 3-2-4: Impact on Vulnerable Groups in Po Pi Deum

Commune Rohat Toek Bontheay Neang Bort Trang Reusey Krauk Total Po Pi Anlong Borttrang Borttrang Chamka Incidence Village Pong Ror Trang Kok Pnov Neangket Deum Thnan Thumkeut Toch Tadauk of Affected Vulnerable Groups

Woman-headed AH 2 2 - 2 -- 1 - 6 13

Aged-headed AH 3 4 1 1 1 --- 10 20

Disabled-headed AH 1 ------1

Income below ------2 2 US$14/mth Total Incidence of 6 6 1 3 1 - 1 - 18 36 Vulnerable Group Total Vulnerable AH 6 5 1 3 1 - 1 - 14 31

3 This equals to 20kg of rice per person per month for 6 months. For average of 5 members in a family, it comes out with $150/AH. 9 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

Summary of Impact on Affected Households:

58. Table 3-2-5 below provides a summary of impact for the Po Pi Deum subproject.

Table 3-2-5: Summary of Project Impact in Po Pi Deum

AH Total No. Type of Impact Unit Remark Incidence Quantity I Structure 1 Residential structure type "1" m2 11 221.46 2 Shop-house m2 6 148.44 3 Small Shop m2 1 15.00 4 Community rest hall m2 1 14.40 5 Concrete slab m2 2 45.24 6 Bamboo fence M 5 163.00 7 Wooden fence M 14 306.60 8 Movable food and vegetable stall stall 7 7 II Land 1 Agricultural Land M2 1 236.52 2 Residential Land M2 9 102.72 3 Land Less AH 10 10 III Tree 1 Mango tree 28 119 2 Sugar Palm tree 13 115 3 Coconut tree 7 14 4 Teuk Doh Kor tree 4 5 5 Longan tree 1 1 6 Papaya tree 1 3 7 Guava tree 4 5 8 Jackfruit tree 2 6 9 Bamboo thicket 8 18 10 Jambolan tree 14 17 11 Custard Apple tree 4 4 12 Banana tree 30 187 13 Tamarind tree 1 1 14 Kraseing tree 4 6 15 Others tree 69 206 IV Vulnerable Group 1 Vulnerable Group AH 31 31

3.2.2 Basics of Unit Cost Used in Calculating Compensation for this Subproject

59. The replacement cost for residential land, productive agricultural land, trees and structures is calculated based on the price in neighboring regions and local markets in Po Pi Deum subproject area. This price survey responding to the agreed policy on compensation rates between the government and ADB. Based on this policy, an independent local consultant was engaged by IRC to conduct a replacement cost study in the affected area to establish the compensation rates for affected assets.

60. The survey was conducted in April 2009 with existing owners of land and tree, 30 AHs and 30 non-AHs, in 3 FGD meetings, with 3 village leaders, 4 carpenters groups, 5 vegetable vendors and 3 construction material shop-owners. This allowed a comprehensive study of

10 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects land prices (residential, rice and Chamkar land), and tree prices, labor cost, and house and other structure valuation surrounding Po Pi Deum area. The discussion below focuses on compensation rates for the relevant affected properties. The detailed compensation rates for affected assets are shown in Appendix 6 of this RP2.

3.2.3 Detailed Compensation and Entitlements

61. The implementation of Po Pi Deum subproject will result in the acquisition of lands, trees, and structures as described in Section 3.2. AHs will be compensated according to the resettlement policy and principles set out in Chapter 2 of this RP2. This section outlines the compensation and entitlements for each category of AHs. The compensation and other entitlements are summarized in Table 3-2-6.

Table 3-2-6: Entitlement Matrix of Po Pi Deum

Entitled No. Type of Impact Application Entitlements Person 1 Residential and 12 houses Owner or +Cash compensation of part or entire other structures 5 shop-houses person with structures will be based on replacement 38 AHs 1 shop customary cost of construction materials and labor 1 community rest usage rights without considering deprivation of affected hall structures and salvage materials after 2 concrete slabs demolishing; 5 bamboo fences +Cash compensation for community rest and hall to rebuilt at the same location; and 14 wooden +AH will be given sufficient time, 15 days, to fences deconstruct their subjected property Allowances: +Cash assistance of $60 for transportation allowance will be provided to 17 AHs (12 houses and 5 shop-houses) without repeating; +Cash assistance of $25 (or 20Kg of rice per AH per month) for living assistance during transition period will be provided to the 17 AHs; and +lf falling in one of the categories of vulnerability , cash assistance of $150 will be provided to each AH without repeating; 2 Relocating Business

12 AHs 5 shop-houses Owner or +The 12AHs who lose shops or stalls in and moveable 7 person with barrage right-of-way in Po Pi Deum village food and customary will have two relocation options: vegetable stalls usage rights a. Cash assistance for them to arrange relocation by themselves b. Receive 1.6m x 2.4m (or 3.84m 2) of space to install their stalls in a market shelter of 101m 2 near existing place in the same commune. The stalls will be made from wooden structure with concrete slab and corrugated zinc roof; and stalls provision will be selected by 12AHs through lottery method. 3 Residential Land 1 residential plot Owner or For the portion of the affected land: 1 AH person with +Cash compensation at replacement cost; customary +AH will be given sufficient time to harvest usage rights crops and 15 days to deconstruct structures on their subjected property; +lf falling in one of the categories of vulnerability, cash assistance of $150 for each AH without repeating.

11 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

Landless 10AHs 10 Landless AHs Owner or +AH will be given sufficient time to harvest person with crops and 15 days to deconstruct structures customary on their subjected property; usage rights There are two relocation options for 10 AHs: a. Cash assistance for them to arrange relocation by themselves b. Receive a land plot of 7m x 15m of residential land for each AH in relocation site near existing place in the same commune with basic infrastructure support such as road, toilet, wells and electricity 4; Allowance + Cash assistance of $60 for transportation allowance will be provided to AH without repeating; +Cash assistance of $25 (or 20Kg of rice per AH per month) for living assistance during transition period will be provided to AH; and +lf falling in one of the categories of vulnerability, cash assistance of $150 for each AH without repeating. 4 Farmland Marginal impact Owners with For the portion of the affected land: 9 AHs 9 AHs acceptable +Cash compensation at replacement cost; (recognized) and proof of +AH will be given sufficient time to harvest ownership crops on their subjected property +lf falling in one of the categories of vulnerability, cash assistance of $150 for each AH without repeating.

AHs without Not applicable acceptable proof of ownership, including lessees 5 Trees All types Owner or + Annual Crops: AHs will be given two (2) 88AHs 707 trees person with months notice that the land on which their customary crops are planted will be damaged or used usage rights by the subproject and that they must harvest their crops before land acquisition for the subproject; + Cash compensation for loss of crops based on an annual produce replacement cost; + Perennial Crops and Trees: AHs will be compensated for the loss of fruit and timber trees at replacement cost. The value will be calculated as the annual produce value multiplied by a 1 to 8 years factor, depending type of tree to yield.

3.2.4 Socio-Economic Profile

Demography:

62. The average household size is 5.22 per household. The DMS data indicates that 4.7% of household heads are below 30 years old. However, 22.43% of households have more than 6 people in the household because of extended family typically including aging parents and/or one or two adult children's spouses and children.

63. There are 54.7% women, slightly more than men. Almost 12% of affected households

4 If available at the local area and available of local tranismission line 12 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects are headed by women, and of these, 24% are less than 40 years old. 36% of the total population is below 20 years old, thus indicating there will be a good labor supply for their families, communities, and surrounding regions.

Poverty: 64. The measurement of household income and expenditure, housing type, assets, agricultural land possession size, number and type of livestock, and their declaration of food shortages indicate the incidence of poverty is about 72.64% in the sample population (based on $1.25/person/day), and of this 24.53% are considered extremely poor, i.e., have income lower than $14/person/month, inadequate shelter, insufficient land, food deficit for 2 months per year or more, and have insufficient income to purchase medicines and clothes. 77% of Women-headed households have income less than $1.25/person/day due to they experience inadequate labor for agriculture. This is understood that the local labor have migrated to other places in the country for other income generation as stated in paragraph 74 below, and it is very difficult to report the exact total income earning per month of those household in the socio-economic survey. 65. The data also indicate 21% of the affected households encounter health issues in their family, which is one of the major factors influencing the family financial crisis. The survey also indicates that 11.76% of households face food shortage.

Landholding:

66. The majority of affected lands in the subproject are located in Po Pi Deum village (reservoir and command area). On average, AHs hold 1.76 ha of land per household, but there is a wide variance among the households. The most frequently cited reason for poverty was insufficient land for farming and a large family to support. 41.12% of AHs possess land smaller than 1 ha and 67.29% own land less than 2 ha. AHs who own more than 4 ha of land (18.69%).

Education: 67. There are different education levels of people in the affected communities. Although almost 100% of the heads of AHs participated in primarily school, 7% are illiterate. Socio- economic survey indicates that 92.59% of children in the 6 to 12 year age range have studied in primary school, and 31.58% of children in the 13 to 18 year age range have entered junior high school. Only 10.53% studied in high school.

68. Average distance from home to primary school in Po Pi Deum sub-project is approximately 2km, which take 50 minute for children to walk. However, in Pong Ror and Po Pi Deum villages the distance to primary school is more than 3km, which generally takes more than an hour to walk and is therefore hard for the children.

Health:

69. Health is one of the main concerns of AHs. According to the survey, 34.60% of AHs households encounter health issues in their family, of which about 44.50% mentioned that their health issues are medium and serious for their families as well as unaffordable. AHs of Po Pi Deum Battrang Touch and Battrang Thom villages have to travel more than 8 km to Rusey Krourk commune center.

Situation of Women:

70. The socio-economic survey indicates that 55% of APs are women and 71% of adult women are working as rice farmer and the other 29% are working in non agriculture sector. The women are also responsible for taking care of children, house work and other work

13 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects around their houses such as planting vegetable, raising livestock, etc. The survey also found that young women are to work on non-agricultural sector, particularly, garment factory worker. For men, 39% of adult men are working in non-agricultural sector. That is because of culture, physical and security advantage of man.

Support for the Project:

71. According to the socio-economic survey, 88.5% of AHs thinks that the project will benefit them. 46.2% expect that the project will provide additional water for wet season cropping, while 50% expect additional water for dry season crops. 46.2% of AHs believe that the project will increase the fish population in the reservoir and become a major source of protein for the community, and 42.3% consider the project will provide other benefits. There is also a perception that the Project will lead to other supporting activities from NGOs such agricultural and livestock production skill training with their application providing significant production improvements.

Attitudes of AHs:

72. Base on the 20% sample in the socio-economic survey, about 95.8% of AHs prefers cash rather than land-for-land compensation. The other 4.2% prefer land-for-land with distance to the new land plots 0.5 to 3 km from the villages, 0.2 to 1 km from the irrigation network and within 0.5 km from the main road. The compensation land must be suitable for residential settlement for the residential land loss AP.

3.2.5 Public Participation and Consultation

Informing AHs:

73. A Subproject Steering Committee meeting was held on 27 February 2009 at the conference hall of Banteay Meanchey province chaired by Chairman of Provincial Resettlement Subcommittee (RRS) and deputy governor of Banteay Meanchey with participation from representatives of Resettlement Department of MEF, Resettlement Unit of MOWRAM, IRC Provincial Working Group and affected commune chiefs. The meeting focused on launching the DMS in Po Pi Deum and discussing on the (i) resettlement policy, (ii) public consultations with AHs, and (iii) background of the land usage in the Po Pi Deum.

74. Before DMS, on 03 to 05 March 2009, the IRC and PRS working group conducted 3 public consultations meeting with potential AHs. The each meeting explains (i) supporting and implementing agencies and agencies charging for DMS, preparing RP, monitoring RP and grievance redress, (ii) benefits of the subproject, (iii) resettlement issues and procedure, (iv) compensation and entitlement, (v) people participation in project, (vi) necessary document for DMS and (vii) open forum for discussion.

75. After the each meeting, Public Information Booklets were distributed to the participants in order to disseminating information on Involuntary Resettlement Policy of ADB, subproject benefits, participation with the project and other relevant information. AH who didn’t attend the meeting, would get the Booklets during DMS survey.

Focus Group Discussion with AHs:

76. A Focus Group Discussions with AHs were conducted from 8-9 April 2009 to investigate the impact of the subproject, socio-economic condition, village profile, training need assessment for livelihood restoration, and concern of AHs. The schedule of the meetings is in Table 3-2-7. The content of the discussions during the FGDs are summarized below, and the details for each meeting are provided.

14 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

Table 3-2-7: Record of Focus Group Discussion in Po Pi Deum

Wednesday, 8 April 2009 Thursday, 9 April 2009 Time: 9:00 a.m Venue: Po Pi Deum pagoda Time: 9:00 a.m Participation: Mixed Group from Po Pi Deum village Venue: Trang pagoda Time: 15:00 p.m Participation: Mixed Group from Kok Phnov, Venue: Neangket primary school Trang and Pong Ror villages Participation: Mixed Group from Neangket village

77. The main occupations of AHs in the subproject are (i) rice farmer, (ii) migrant worker in Thailand, (iii) doing small business in community, (iv) livestock and cattle farming, (v) vegetable farming (vi) fishing, (vii) transportation worker, (viii) running small TV, phone, motorbike and bike cycle repairing-shop, and (ix) skill worker such as carpenter, artisan, fishing tool maker, etc.

78. Increasing family income from rice farming, migrant working, serving as skill-workers and doing small business in the last five years make AHs living condition better. However, boarder dispute between Cambodia and Thailand, and economic downturn is reducing AH income. Moreover, rehabilitation of commune road and bridge, construction of school building, health center, community drainage, well and toilet also make a major impact on AH living condition. Nevertheless, present of NGOs and micro-credit agencies in region give AHs a good opportunity to get support and access to low interest loan for them to do small business and solve family health issue and housing and agriculture investment.

79. The many AHs are living under national poverty line in the subproject area, and some of them are very poor. The essential reasons of the poverty are because (i) a member of their families falls sick and their family saving is entirely used for health issues, (ii) they don’t have land for farming and no job, (iii) they are in debt because of family health, agriculture investment, particularly fertilizer investment and household expenditure, (iv) they have small farm land and large family member, but jobless, (iv) household head are vulnerable person, and (v) agriculture crop are damaged by drought, flood or insect.

80. Problems in agriculture mostly are: (i) lack of irrigation system for rice cultivation in wet and dry season, (ii) fertilizer and insecticide are expensive and unaffordable so some AHs are in debt to fertilizer and insecticide shop with high interest rate, (iii) lack of quality rice seed for cultivation, (iv) lack of agricultural technique, (v) agriculture market are depend on middleman and not stable, (vi) rate and insect destroy rice and (vii) experience flood and drought some time.

81. Small livestock and cattle is one of the main income, protein food, agricultural labor and organic fertilizer source for AHs. Currently, the AHs have experience hardship in raising livestock. The reasons are lack of fodder, particularly cattle since common grassland field was converted to private farm land, high animal food price, no veterinary in the region and low profit because of low selling price. The mood to raise cattle is decreasing as many farmers turn to using hand tractor for farming which are faster, do not need feeding, and can be used to transport agriculture products and to rent to neighborhood farmer.

82. With the project, the groups expect that the project will allow them to double crop (dry and wet season), have water for growing vegetable around their houses, and have more fish for in irrigations scheme.

83. The groups prefer land to cash compensation for who have small affected land and land to land compensation for who have large affected land or landless because they think of difficulty to purchase land and keep compensation money. If they use compensation money to buy land, their prefer location is within few kilometers from village. Most of participants of the 15 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects meetings plan to use the money to invest in business, agriculture equipment and household demands. The compensation money is by and large planned to be used with 2 to 4 months after payment.

84. Beside compensation, the groups address the need for more support from the project such as training on various suitable agricultural skills and off-farm training such as skill to repair machine, particularly hand tractor, pumping machine and motorbike and beauty make- up skills as well as hair cut. For vulnerable group, the aged-headed household needs health care support, the woman-headed household request to support their agricultural labor, the disable headed household and poor household need credit for business investment.

3.2.6 Implementation Schedule

85. Table 3-2-8 below provides a proposed implement schedule for the Po Pi Deum subproject.

Table 3-2-8: Implementation Schedule for RP of Po Pi Deum

2009 2010 Activity Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Approval of RP by IRC & ADB X Notice to Proceed with implementation X Final disclosure/concurrence of AHs X Vouchering X Delivery of compensation /entitlements x Agriculture training activities* X X X X X X X X X X X Internal & external monitoring X X X X X X X X X X External Monitoring X X X X X Submit compliance both internal and external X X X X X X X X X X monitoring report Evaluate RP implementation X X X Additional resettlement measures X X X Submission of RP Completion report X Approval of RP Completion report X * : the activities are to train AHs in the agriculture extension in component 3 of the NWISP.

3.2.7 Costs and Budget

Procedures for Flow of Funds

86. The IRC will request the Ministry of Economic and Finance (MEF) for funding for the implementation of the RP2. The funds will be forwarded to the Provincial Departments of Finance. Payment vouchers will be prepared at the Provincial Department of Economy and Finance with coordination from IRC-WG and PRSC-WG. Payment of compensation and other entitlements as described in Chapter 3 of the RP2 will be given in cash and will be distributed to AHs at village offices. The AHs will be notified through the village chiefs of the schedule of payment of compensation and other entitlements.

Compensation and Contingency Costs

87. The cost estimates for the implementation of the RP2 also include a provision for contingencies equivalent to 15% of the base cost of resettlement. MOWRAM and IRC will ensure that adequate funds are made available as and when necessary for the efficient and timely implementation of the resettlement activities.

16 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

Estimate of Resettlement Costs

88. The overall estimated costs excluding administration costs are shown in Table 3-2-9 below. Table 3-2-9: Estimated Costs for Implementation of the RP of Po Pi Deum

Rate No. Compensation Items Unit Quantity Cost US$ US$ I Compensation for Structure 1 Residential structure type "1" m2 40.00 221.46 8,858.40 2 Shop-house m2 40.00 148.44 5,937.60 3 Small Shop m2 25.00 15.00 375.00 4 Community rest hall m2 120.00 14.40 1,728.00 5 Concrete slab m2 8.00 45.24 361.92 6 Bamboo or wooden fence m 3.80 469.60 1,784.48 7 Movable food and vegetable stall stall 5.00 7.00 35.00 Sub-Total (1) 19,080.40 II Compensation for Land 1 Rice land m2 0.55 236.52 130.09 2 Residential land m2 2 102.72 205.44 Sub-Total (2) 335.53 III Compensation for Tree 1 Mango Tree 33 119 3,927.00 2 Sugar Palm Tree 25 115 2,875.00 3 Coconut Tree 35 14 490.00 4 Teuk Doh Kor Tree 30 5 150.00 5 Longan Tree 32 1 32.00 6 papaya Clump 3.75 3 11.25 7 Guava Tree 4.5 5 22.50 8 Jackfruit Tree 32 6 192.00 9 Bamboo Thicket 10 18 180.00 10 Jambolan Tree 15 17 255.00 11 Custard Apple Tree 5 4 20.00 12 Banana Clump 5.25 187 981.75 13 Tamarind Tree 25 1 25.00 14 Kraseing Tree 10 6 60.00 15 Others Tree 5 206 1,030.00 Sub-Total (3) 707 10,251.50 IV Allowance for Vulnerable Groups 1 Woman, Aged and Disable Household Head, AH 150 31 4,650.00 and Household income below US$ 14/mth Sub-Total (4) 4,650.00 V Allowance for Transportation Allowance for transportation within the 1 AH 60 17 1,020.00 village Sub-Total (5) 1,020.00 VI Living Assistance 1 Living Assistance during transition period AH 25 17 425.00 Sub-Total (6) 425.00 Preparation Land for Landless AH and VII Construction of new market 1 Preparation Land for Landless AH AH 1400 10 14,000.00 2 Construction of new market m2 101 85 8,568.00 17 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

Sub-Total (7) 22,568.00 Total Base Cost (sum 1-7 above) 58,330.43 Contingencies (15%) 8,749.56 Grand Total 67,079.99

3.3 Results of Anglong Svay Subproject

3.3.1 Results of the Detailed Measurement Survey

89. The Detail Measurement Survey (DMS) was conducted in March-April 2009 after public dissemination meeting at Pursat municipality and a meeting between affected villages and AHs and non-AHs. The meetings were to explain about the project, its beneficiary, DMS process, entitlements, compensation, etc to village leaders and AHs. The result of DMS showed that there are 281 AHs affected by the subproject with affected assets of stalls, land, trees, and vulnerable groups. Of the 281 AHs, there are 80 vulnerable AHs and no landless AHs due to small protion of their land is acquired by the subproject. The detailed impact is shown below and summarized in Table 3-3-5: a Matrix of Entitlements for Anlong Svay Subproject.

Impact on Agricultural, Chamkar, Pond and Residential Land:

90. According to the DMS, a total of 227,045.28m2 of rice land belonging to 268 AHs, 3,094.89m 2 of Chamkar land occupied by 4 AHs, 18.60m 2 of pond land used by an AH and 499.05m2 of residential land of 4 AHs have to be acquired for the subproject construction. Moreover, of 272 AHs (268 AHs of rice land and 4 AHs of Chamkar land), 24 AHs are severely affected owing to their loss of productive land is more than 10% of their total holding land.

91. The Prasat village has largest impact compared to other villages, where 101 AHs occupied 92,002.90m 2 of their rice land and 520.77m 2 of Chamkar land will be acquired for the subproject, while Kaunthnot village has 60 AHs with 45,821.78m 2 of their rice land followed by Phnov village with 43 AHs occupied rice land of 30,580.54m 2 and resiendtial land of 108.27m 2. The Rorngtakok village is less impact with 36 AHs and 31,644.12m 2 of rice land. The other villages, Robosraing, Kampong Kdey and Romlich have minor impact of the subproject ( Tab. 3-3-1).

Table 3-3-1: Impact on Agricultural, Pond & Residential Land in Anlong Svay (in m 2)

Rusey Affected Commune Romlich Ou Tapoang Kraing TOTAL Rorngtako Kampong Prey Affected Village Kaunthnot Romlich Phnov Robosraing Prasat k Kdey Phaourb AHs 60 5 43 18 101 36 10 8 281 Affected People 272 30 195 86 496 191 53 30 1353

Affected Land and Area (m 2) Rice Land 45,821.78 3,433.81 30,580.54 10,832.35 92,002.90 31,644.12 4,413.78 8,316.00 227,045.28 Chamkar Land - - - - 520.77 - 2,574.12 - 3,094.89 Pond Land ------18.60 - 18.60 Residential Land - - 108.27 - - - 390.78 - 499.05 Total Land Area 45,821.78 3,433.81 30,688.81 10,832.35 92,523.67 31,644.12 7,397.28 8,316.00 230,657.82

92. The DMS data also reports that the construction of Secondary Drain 3 will affect 4 lots of affected Chamkar land and one pond in Kampong Kdey and Prasat villages. The affected Chamkar lands are located in undeveloped land next and behind the residential lot of AHs which are used for planting vegetables and fruit trees and could be used for subdividing to residential lot in the future for their children. The pond was dug to keep water in wet season 18 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects and using it in dry season for plantation. Thus, the Secondary Canal 3 of the project will be a new source of water for the pond AH.

Impact on Structures:

93. In total, the construction of the subproject structures, canals and dam affects on 2 rest stalls of 2 AHs. The rest hall is small and movable and is installed on the embankment of Secondary Canal 1 using as rest shelter to protect farmers from sun and rain. The stall can be shift to new location when constructing the Secondary Canal 1.

Impact on Trees:

94. In total, the construction of the structures, canals and dam will affect 72 trees belonging to 14 AHs in 5 villages ( Tab. 3-3-2). Most of the affected trees, 57 trees are situated along Secondary Canal 3. Of 72 trees, there are 10 categories of trees such as mango, cashew, sugar palm, coconut, bamboo, jambolan, banana, tamarind, Kraseing and other non-fruit trees.

95. Sugar palm, Jambolan, cashew and other non-fruit trees are the dominant affected trees of the subproject. But the essential productive trees of the villagers in the subproject are mango, coconut, bamboo, banana and tamarind because it can contributes to their family income. Sugar palm is not an important tree in the affected villages, since sugar production from palm juice is no long produced in the villages. One of the main reasons is lack of fire wood as raw material for sugar production. Second is production of the sugar from palm need labor intensive.

Table 3-3-2: Loss of Trees in Anlong Svay

Affected Commune Romlich Ou Tapoang Kampong TOTAL Affected Village Kaunthnot Phnov Prasat Rorngtakok Kdey AHs 1 3 2 1 7 14 Total Affected Tree 4 11 4 1 52 72 Name and Number of Affected Tree

Mango 1 - - - 1 2 Cashew - 8 - - - 8 Sugar Palm 2 1 - - 15 18 Coconut - - - - 6 6 Bamboo 1 - - - 1 2 Jumbolan - - - - 11 11 Banana - - - - 5 5 Tamarind - - 1 - 2 3 Kroseing - - 1 - 1 2 Others - 2 2 1 10 15

Impact on Vulnerable Groups:

96. According to DMS data, a total of 80 vulnerable AHs have been identified from the total of 92 vulnerable group incidences of the subproject. They are ranked as vulnerable for at least one of the following reasons: they are woman-headed, aged-headed, disabled- headed, and/or with a monthly household income below the national poverty line ($14/month). Many of the AHs are ranked as vulnerable for more than one of the above reasons, in this case we have listed them in the figures shown in Table 3-3-3 below. Aged- headed and woman-headed AHs are covered about 72% of the total vulnerable household incidences.

19 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

97. In total, the subproject will impact on 80 vulnerable AHs, although there is a total of 92 incidences of vulnerability. The vulnerable AHs will receive an allowance of $150 per household regardless of one or more incidences of vulnerability they are falling to. The allowance is to reduce their impoverishment risks and assist them to mitigate their vulnerability and get advantage of the project benefits.

Table 3-3-3: Impact on Vulnerable Groups in Anlong Svay

Affected Commune Romlich Ou Tapoang Total Incident of Vulnerable Kampong Affected Village Kaunthnot Romlich Phnov Robosraing Prasat Rorngtakok Group Kdey

Affected Vulnerable Groups

Woman-headed AH 8 - 4 2 14 4 1 33

Aged-headed AH 3 1 4 3 17 3 2 33

Disabled-headed 3 1 1 - 8 2 - 15 AH Income below 3 - - - 8 - - 11 US$14/mth Total Incident of 17 2 9 5 47 9 3 92 Vulnerable Group Total Vulnerable 15 2 8 5 38 9 3 80 AH

Summary of Impact on Affected Households:

98. Table 3-3-4 below provides a summary of impact for the Anlong Svay subproject. Table 3-3-4: Summary of Project Impact in Anlong Svay AH No. Type of Impact Unit Total Quantity Remark Incidence I Structure 1 Movable rest stall stall 2 2 II Land 1 Agricultural Land m2 268 227,045.28 2 Chamkar Land m2 4 3,094.89 3 Pond Land m2 1 18.60 4 Residential m2 4 499.05 5 Loss more 10% of productive land AH 24 24 III Tree 1 Mango tree 1 2 2 Cashew tree 1 8 3 Sugar Palm tree 7 18 4 Coconut tree 2 6 5 Bamboo thicket 2 2 6 Jambolan tree 4 11 7 Banana tree 1 5 8 Tamarind tree 3 3 9 Kraseing tree 2 2 10 Others tree 7 15 IV Vulnerable Group 1 Vulnerable Group AH 80 80

20 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

3.3.2 Basics of Unit Cost Used in Calculating Compensation

99. The replacement cost for residential land, productive agricultural land, trees and structures is calculated based on the price in neighboring regions and local markets in Anlong Svay subproject area. This price survey responding to the agreed policy on compensation rates between the government and ADB. Based on this policy, an independent local consultant was engaged by IRC to conduct a replacement cost study in the affected area to establish the compensation rates for affected assets.

100. The survey was conducted in July 2009 with existing owners of land and tree, 30 AHs and 30 non-AHs, in 4 FGDs meetings, with 3 village leaders, 4 carpenters groups, 5 vegetable vendors and 3 construction material shop-owners. This allowed a comprehensive study of land prices (residential, rice and Chamkar land), and tree prices, labor cost, and house and other structure valuation surrounding Anlong Svay region. The discussion below focuses on compensation rates for the relevant affected properties. The detailed compensation rates for affected assets are shown in Appendix 6 of this RP2.

3.3.3 Detailed Compensation and Other Entitlements

101. The implementation of Anlong Svay subproject will result in the acquisition of lands, trees, and structures as described in Section 3-3. AHs will be compensated according to the resettlement policy and principles set out in Chapter 2 of this RP2. Table 3-3-5 depicts the compensation and entitlements for each category of AHs.

Table 3-3-5: Entitlement Matrix of Anlong Svay

Type of No. Application Entitled Person Entitlements Impact 1. Rest stall 2 affected rest Owner or person +Cash compensation for shifting structures will be based stalls with on replacement cost of labor to move the rest stall to the 2 AHs customary near by location; usage rights +AH will be given sufficient time, 15 days, to deconstruct their subjected property; and +lf falling in one of the categories of vulnerability, cash assistance of $150 for each category the AH belongs; 2. Residential 4 affected Owner or person For the portion of the affected land: Land residential plots with +Cash compensation for land at replacement cost; customary +Compensation for affected structures or trees at 4 AHs usage rights replacement cost; +AH will be given sufficient time to harvest crops and 15 days to deconstruct structures on their subjected property; +lf falling in one of the categories of vulnerability, cash assistance of $150 for each AH without repeating. 3. Chamkar 4 affected Owner or person For the portion of the land needed: Land Chamkar plots with +Cash compensation for land at replacement cost; customary usage +Compensation for affected trees at replacement cost; 4 AHs rights +AH will be given sufficient time to harvest crops and 15 days to deconstruct structures on their subjected property; +lf falling in one of the categories of vulnerability, cash assistance of $150 for each AH without repeating. 4. Pond Land 1 affected Pond Owner or person No compensation required because secondary canal 3 of with the subproject will be a new source of water to be used by 1 AH customary usage AH. rights 5. Farmland Marginal impact Owners with For the portion of the land needed: acceptable +Cash compensation is at replacement cost; 276 AHs 252 AHs (recognized) +AH will be given sufficient time to harvest crops on proof their subjected property of ownership +lf falling in one of the categories of vulnerability, cash assistance of $150 for each AH without repeating.

21 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

AHs without Not applicable acceptable proof of ownership, including lessees Severe impact Owners with +Cash compensation at replacement cost for the acceptable entire land losses, or land-to-land with secure tenure; 24 AHs (recognized) +Allowance and income restoration: (i) cash assistance proof of $150; (ii) the income restoration to be provided by the of ownership Project component 3; +lf falling in one of the categories of vulnerability, Cash assistance of $150 for each AH without repeating. AHs without Not applicable acceptable proof of ownership, including lessees Nil 4. Trees All types Owner or person + Annual Crops: AHs will be given two (2) months notice with that the land on which their crops are planted will be 14 AHs 72 trees customary usage damaged or used by the subproject and that they must rights harvest their crops in time; + Cash compensation for loss of crops based on an annual produce replacement cost;+ Perennial Crops and Trees: AHs will be compensated for the loss of fruit and timber trees at replacement cost. The value will be calculated as the annual produce value multiplied by a 1 to 8 years factor, depending type of tree to get yields.

3.3.4 Socio-Economic Profile

Demography:

102. Socio-economic survey which is conducted by RU and Resettlement Specialist from 01 to 03 July 2009 in Anlong Svay subproject. The survey indicates that the average household size of total AHs, 273 AHs, is 4.85 persons per household and it is higher than average national household size, 4.7 per household. The young household head, below 30 year-old, is consisted of 21% of total AHs and have household size below the average number of household size. Household size, which has more than 6 people in the household, is composed of 25% of total AHs and the household head age is above 45 year old.

103. There are 52% women, slightly more than men. Almost 12.10% of affected households are headed by women, and of these, 15.15% are less than 40 years old. This indicates a low rate of separation or divorce. 32.43% of the total population is below 20 years old, thus indicating there will be a good labor supply for their families, communities, and surrounding areas.

Poverty:

104. The measurement of household income and expenditure, housing type, assets, agricultural land possession size, number and type of livestock, and their declaration of food shortages indicate the incidence of poverty is about 60% in the sample population (based on $1.25/person/day), and of this 40% are considered extremely poor, i.e., have income lower than $14/person/month, inadequate shelter, insufficient land, food deficit for 2 months per year or more, and have insufficient income to purchase medicines and clothes. 105. The data also indicate 55% of the affected households encounter health issues in their family, which is one of the major factors influencing the family financial crisis. 25% of AHs declare that they are difficult of finding job and earning income for living. The survey also indicates that 11.76% of households face food shortage. Landholding:

22 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

106. On average, AHs hold 3.68 ha of land per household, but there is a wide variance among the households. The most frequently cited reason for poverty was insufficient land for farming and a large family to support. 13% of AHs possess land smaller than 1 ha and 35% own land less than 2 ha. AHs who own more than 4 ha of land (16%).

Education: 107. There are different education levels of people in the affected communities. Although almost 100% of the heads of AHs participated in primarily school, 7% are illiterate. Socio- economic survey indicates that 93% of children in the 6 to 12 year age range have studied in primary school, and 32% of children in the 13 to 18 year age range have entered junior high school. Only 11% studied in high school.

108. Average distance from home to primary school in Anlong Svay sub-project is approximately 1.2km, which take 18 minutes for children to walk. However, Kaun Thnot village the distance to primary school is more than 2km, which generally takes approximately 30 minutes to walk and is therefore hard for the children.

Health:

109. Health is one of the main concerns of AHs. According to the survey, 55% of AHs households encounter health issues in their family, of which about 35% mentioned that their health issues are medium and serious for their families as well as unaffordable. The average distance to hospital in Boeng Knar is 7 km. However, AHs of Phnov village has to travel more than 12 km to the hospital.

Situation of Women:

110. The socio-economic survey indicates that 52% of APs are women and most of adult women are working as rice farmer and the others are working in non agriculture sector, such as garment factory worker in urban area and migrant worker in Thailand. The women are also responsible for taking care of children, house work and other work around their houses such as planting vegetable, raising livestock, etc.

Support for the Project:

111. According to the socio-economic survey, almost 100% of AHs thinks that the project will benefit them. 71% expect that the project will provide additional water for wet and dry season cropping. 54% of AHs believe that the project will provide fish sources for the community and 19% consider the project will provide other benefits. There is also a perception that the Project will lead to other supporting activities from NGOs such agricultural and livestock production skill training with their application providing significant production improvements. Compensation Mode:

112. The socio-economic survey find out that 100% of AHs prefers cash rather than land- for-land compensation. But if the project provides land-for-land compensation, the criteria is: 1/distance to the new land is within 3 km from the villages, 2/ distance from irrigation is within 1 km, 3/distance from village road is within 1 km and 4/ replacement land is suitable for rice cultivation.

3.3.5 Public Participation and Consultation

Informing AHs:

113. A Subproject Steering Committee meeting was held on 25 March 2009 at the conference hall of Pursat province chaired by Chairman of Provincial Resettlement

23 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

Subcommittee (RRS) and governor of Pursat with participation from representatives of Resettlement Department of MEF, Resettlement Unit of MOWRAM, IRC Provincial Working Group and affected commune chiefs. The meeting focused on launching the DMS in Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash and Kouch Noup subproject and discussing on the (i) resettlement policy, (ii) public consultations with AHs, and (iii) background of the land usage in the four subprojects of Pursat.

114. Before DMS, on 26 to 27 March 2009, the IRC and PRS working group conducted 3 public consultations meeting with potential AHs. The each meeting explains (i) supporting and implementing agencies and agencies charging for DMS, preparing RP, monitoring RP and grievance redress, (ii) benefits of the subproject, (iii) resettlement issues and procedure, (iv) compensation and entitlement, (v) people participation in project, (vi) necessary document for DMS and (vii) open forum for discussion.

115. After the each meeting, Public Information Booklets were distributed to the participants in order to disseminating information on Involuntary Resettlement Policy of ADB, subproject benefits, participation with the project and other relevant information. AH who didn’t attend the meeting, would get the Booklets during DMS survey.

Focus Group Discussion with AHs:

116. A Focus Group Discussions with AHs were conducted from 1-3 July 2009 to investigate the impact of the subproject, socio-economic condition, village profile, training need assessment for livelihood restoration, and concern of AHs. The schedule of the meetings is in Table 3-3-6. The content of the discussions during the FGDs are summarized below, and the details for each meeting are provided.

Table 3-3-6: Record of Focus Group Discussion in Anlong Svay

Wednesday, 01 July 2009 Thursday, 02 July 2009 Friday, 3 July 2009 Time: 9:00 p.m Venue: Prasat village Participation: Vulnerable Group Time: 15:00 p.m from Prasat village Time: 9:00 a.m Venue: Prasat village Venue: Kaun Thnot village Participation: Mixed Group from Time: 15:00 p.m Participation: Mixed Group Prasat village Venue: Phnov village from Kaun Thnot village Participation: Mixed Group from Phnov village

117. The main occupations of AHs in the subproject are (i) rice farmer, (ii) vegetable farming, (iii) livestock and cattle farming, (iv) migrant worker in Thailand, (v) fishing, (vi) doing small business in community, (vii) garment factory and construction worker, (viii) transportation worker, (ix) fire wood collector from nearby forest, and (x) skill worker such as carpenter, artisan, fishing tool maker, etc.

118. Rehabilitation of village roads, construction of primary schools, community ponds and wells, pumping machine assistance during draught period and low interest loan from NGOs and banks as well as increasing of rice and livestock price are significant development in the subproject area of the last five years and that indirectly contribute improvement of people livelihood in the region. With good road middleman is accessible to purchase agricultural products in the villages. The new construction of primary school buildings makes children can go to school easily. The construction of community ponds and wells help people to be able to access to safe drinking water. Pumping machine and micro-catchment dams can supply some water for their rice field during drought period. The low interest loan from NGOs and banks allow the community borrowers to be able to pay back and promote small investment in community, particularly, agricultural investment. The high price of agricultural products in the

24 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects last few years provides more profits to farmers in the project areas as well as the entire country. Moreover, migrant working, serving as skill-workers and doing small business in the past few years are an essential factor to contribute to AHs living condition of people. However, boarder dispute between Cambodia and Thailand, and economic downturn is reducing AH income.

119. The many AHs are living under national poverty line in the subproject area, and some of them are very poor. The main reasons of the poverty are because (i) a member of their families falls sick and their family saving is entirely used for health issues, (ii) they don’t have land for farming and no job, (iii) they are in debt because of family health, agriculture investment, particularly fertilizer investment and household expenditure, (iv) they have small farm land and large family member, but jobless, (v) household head are vulnerable person, and (vi) agriculture crop are damaged by drought, flood or insect, (vii) they cannot afford to purchase fertilizer and animal food with high price.

120. Problems in agriculture mostly are: (i) lack of water for rice cultivation in wet and dry season, (ii) fertilizer, insecticide and agricultural equipment are very expensive, (iii) lack of quality rice seed for cultivation, (iv) lack of agricultural technique, (v) agriculture market are depend on middleman and not stable, (vi) rate and insect destroy rice and (vii) experience flood and drought some time.

121. Small livestock and cattle farming is one of the main income, protein food, agricultural labor and organic fertilizer source for AHs. Currently, the AHs have experience hardship in raising livestock. The reasons are lack of fodder, particularly cattle since common grassland field was converted to private farm land, high animal food price, no veterinary in the region and low profit because of low selling price. The mood to raise cattle is decreasing as many farmers turn to using hand tractor for farming which are more convenient than using cattle because it not need feeding, and can be used to transport agriculture products as well as to rent to neighborhood farmer.

122. With the project, the groups expect that the project will allow them to double crop (dry and wet season), have water for growing vegetable around their houses, and have more fish for fishing.

123. The groups prefer land to cash compensation. The compensation money will be used to purchase nearby rice land, livestock, cattle or fertilizer, or for other household needs. If they use compensation money to buy land, their prefer location is within few kilometers from village. The compensation money will be used with few months after payment.

124. Beside compensation, the groups address the need for more support from the project such as training on various suitable agricultural skills and off-farm training such as skill to repair machine, particularly hand tractor, pumping machine and motorbike and beauty make- up skills as well as hair cut. For vulnerable group, the aged-headed household needs health care support, the woman-headed household request to support their agricultural labor, the disable headed household and poor household need credit for business investment.

3.3.6 Implementation Schedule

125. Table 3-3-7 below provides a proposed implement schedule for the Anlong Svay subproject resettlement implementation.

25 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

Table 3-3-7: Implementation Schedule for RP of Anlong Svay

2009 2010 Activity Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Approval of RP by IRC & ADB X Notice to Proceed with implementation X Final disclosure/concurrence of AHs X Vouchering X Delivery of compensation /entitlements X Agriculture training activities* X X X X X X X X X X X Internal & external monitoring X X X X X X X X X X External Monitoring X X X X X Submit compliance both internal and external X X X X X X X X X X monitoring report Evaluate RP implementation X X X Additional resettlement measures X X X Submission of RP Completion report X Approval of RP Completion report X

* : the activities are to train AHs in the agriculture extension in component 3 of the NWISP.

3.3.7 Costs and Budget

Procedures for Flow of Funds

126. The IRC will request the Ministry of Economic and Finance (MEF) for funding for the implementation of the RP2. The funds will be forwarded to the Provincial Departments of Economy Finance. Payment vouchers will be prepared at the Provincial Department of Economy and Finance with coordination from IRC-WG, PRSC-WG. Payment of compensation and other entitlements as described in Chapter 3 of the RP2 will be given in cash and will be distributed at village offices. The AHs will be notified through the village chiefs of the schedule of payment of compensation and other entitlements.

Compensation and Contingency Costs

127. The cost estimates for the implementation of the RP2 also include a provision for contingencies equivalent to 15% of the base cost of resettlement. MOWRAM and IRC will ensure that adequate funds are made available as and when necessary for the efficient and timely implementation of the resettlement activities.

Estimate of Resettlement Costs

128. The overall estimated costs excluding administration costs are shown in Table 3-3-8 below. Table 3-3-8: Estimated Costs for Implementation of the RP of Anlong Svay

Rate No. Compensation Items Unit Quantity Cost US$ US$ I Compensation for Structure 1 Movable rest stall stall 10.00 2.00 20.00 Sub-Total (1) 20.00 II Compensation for Land 2 1 Rice Land m 0.25 227,045.28 56,761.32 2 2 Chamkar Land m 1.00 3,094.89 3,094.89

26 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

2 4 Residential m 1.43 499.05 713.64 Sub-Total (2) 60,569.85 III Compensation for Tree 1 Mango Tree 25.00 2 50.00 2 Cashew Tree 8.10 8 64.80 3 Sugar Palm Tree 25.00 18 450.00 4 Coconut Tree 28.00 6 168.00 5 Bamboo Thicket 7.50 2 15.00 6 Jambolan Tree 6.25 11 68.75 7 Banana Clump 4.20 5 21.00 8 Tamarind Tree 20.00 3 60.00 9 Kraseing Tree 8.10 2 16.20 10 Others Tree 5.00 15 75.00 Sub-Total (3) 72 988.75 Allowance for Vulnerable Groups and severe IV AH 1 Woman, Aged and Disable Household Head, and AH 150 80 12,000.00 Household income below US$ 14/mth 2 Ahs of loss > 10% of their productive land AH 150 24 3,600.00 Sub-Total (4) 15,600.00 Total Base Cost (sum 1-4 above) 77,178.60 Contingencies (15%) 11,576.79 Grand Total 88,755.39

3.4 Results of Krouch Saeuch Subproject

3.4.1 Results of the Detailed Measurement Survey

129. The Detail Measurement Survey (DMS) was conducted from May to June 2009 after public dissemination meeting at Pursat municipality and a meeting between affected villages and AHs and non-AHs. The meetings were to explain about the project, its beneficiary, DMS process, entitlements, compensation, etc to village leaders and AHs. The result of DMS showed that there are 251 AHs affected by the subproject with affected assets of wooden fence, land, trees, and vulnerable groups. The detailed impact is shown below and summarized in Table 3-4-5: a Matrix of Entitlements for Krouch Saeuch subproject.

Impact on Agricultural, Chamkar and Residential Land:

130. According to the DMS, a total of 182,225.94m2 of rice land occupied by 204 AHs, 3,362.56m2 of Chamkar land belonging to 10AHs and 1,942.73m2 of residential land used by 10 AHs have to be acquired for the subproject construction. However, of 214 AHs (204 AHs of rice land and 10 AHs of Chamkar land), there are only 23 AHs loses productive land more than 10% of their holding land.

131. The subproject totally affects on rice, Chamkar and residential land of 223 AHs in 10 villages of Trapeang Chong and Khnar Totueng communes, Bakan district. The most severely affected village is Stueng Kambot village, where 42 AHs have 42,106.81m2 of their rice land affected by the subproject and followed by Snay Toul, Kab Kralanh, Phtash Sla, and Bakan villages. The other villages, Trapeang Chong, Ou Rumchek, Khnar Totueng, Krouch Saeuch, and Thmei have minor impact on people properties (Tab. 3-4-1).

Table 3-4-1: Impact on Agricultural and Residential Land in Krouch Saeuch

27 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

Commune Name Trapeang Chong Khnar Totueng Trapeang Ou Kab Stung Snay Phtash Krouch Khnar TOTAL Village Name Bakan Thmei Chong Rumchek Kralanh Kambot Toul Sla Saeuch Totueng

AHs 17 27 14 31 42 33 10 26 11 12 223

Affected People 75 130 58 139 177 147 43 104 38 55 966 Affected Land and Area (m 2) Rice Land 9,054.57 7,307.46 9,272.38 22,207.27 42,106.81 37,331.10 9,912.60 31,315.06 4,341.64 9,377.05 182,225.94

Chamkar Land - 3,362.56 ------3,362.56

Reisdential Land - 619.50 - 1,323.23 ------1,942.73

Total Land Area 9,054.57 11,289.52 9,272.38 23,530.50 42,106.81 37,331.10 9,912.60 31,315.06 4,341.64 9,377.05 187,531.23

Impact on Structures:

132. The construction of Dam No. 2 of the subproject affects on 96m wooden fence of 1 AHs in Bakan village. The wooden fence is made of Krak column and barbed wire to mark land boundary and to secure properties of the owner. The fence is newly installed and easily removed by local labor with minor damage of fence material. Thus, the compensation for the fence should be provided as replacement cost of removing, installing and buying additional material costs. Moreover, the construction of the Main Canal affects a pumping well of AH in Kab Kralanh. The well will be compensated, basing on its replacement cost.

Impact on Trees:

133. In total, the construction of the structures, canals and dams affect on 443 trees belonging to 100 AHs in 8 villages ( Tab. 3-4-2). Most of the affected trees, 186 trees, are situated along Dam No.1 which is built on existing village road of Kab Kralanh and Bakan. Kab Kralanh has the largest number of affected trees, 266 trees belonging to 46 AHs and Bakan village where the Dam is constructed, is the second largest number of affected trees, 74 trees belonging to 10 AHs. Stueng Kambot and Snay Toul villages have almost the same number of affected trees, 38 and 37 trees, respectively. The other villages have minor affected trees.Of 443 trees, there are 16 categories of trees such as mango, sugar palm, coconut, Teuk Doh Kor, cashew, papaya, guava, citrus, jack-fruit, bamboo, custard apple, jambolan, banana, tamarind, Kraseing and other non-fruit trees.

134. Jambolan, mango, coconut, banana and other non-fruit trees are the dominant affected trees of the subproject. But the essential productive trees of the villagers in the subproject are mango, coconut, Teuk Doh Kor, papaya, citrus, bamboo, banana, jack-fruit and tamarind because it can contributes to their family livelihood. Sugar palm is not an important tree in the affected villages, since sugar production from palm juice is no long produced in the villages. One of the main reasons is lack of fire wood as raw material for sugar production. Second is production of the sugar from palm need labor intensive.

Table 3-4-2: Loss of Trees in Krouch Saeuch

28 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

Commune Name Trapeang Chong Khnar Totueng Ou Kab Stung Phtash Khnar TOTAL Village Name Bakan Snay Toul Thmei Rumchek Kralanh Kambot Sla Totueng AHs 10 1 46 18 12 3 8 2 100 Total Affected Trees 74 1 266 38 37 7 14 6 443 Name and Number of Affected Trees

Mango 11 - 36 - - - - - 47 Sugar Palm 3 - 15 - - - 1 - 19 Coconut 4 - 42 - - - - - 46 Teuk Doh Kor - - 20 - - - - - 20 Cashew - - 1 - - - - - 1 papaya - - 3 - - - - - 3 Guava 1 - 7 - - - - - 8 Citrus 4 - 21 - - - - - 25 Jackfruit - - 5 - - - - - 5 Bamboo 5 - 7 - - - - - 12 Jambolan 11 - 33 1 3 1 2 - 51 Custard Apple - - 2 - - - - - 2 Banana 4 - 40 - - - - - 44 Tamarind 1 - - 3 1 - - - 5 Kroseing - - 1 - 5 - 2 - 8 Others 30 1 33 34 28 6 9 6 147

Impact on Vulnerable Groups:

135. According to DMS data, a total of 58 vulnerable AHs have been identified from the total of 68 vulnerable group incidences of the subproject. They are ranked as vulnerable for at least one of the following reasons: they are woman-headed, aged-headed, disabled- headed, and/or with a monthly household income below the national poverty line ($14/month). Many of the AHs are ranked as vulnerable for more than one of the above reasons, in this case we have listed them in the figures shown in Table 3-4-3 below. Aged- headed and woman-headed AHs are covered about 79% of the total vulnerable household incidences.

136. The vulnerable AHs will receive an allowance of $150 per household regardless one or more incidences of vulnerability. The allowance is to reduce their impoverishment risks and assist them to mitigate vulnerability and get advantage of the project benefits.

Table 3-4-3: Impact on Vulnerable Groups in Krouch Saeuch

Commune Name Trapeang Chong Khnar Totueng Total Incident of Trapeang Ou Kab Stung Snay Phtash Krouch Khnar Village Name Bakan Thmei Vulnerable Chong Rumchek Kralanh Kambot Toul Sla Saeuch Totueng Group Affected Vulnerable Groups Woman-headed 3 1 - 6 4 2 - 1 2 1 20 AH

Aged-headed AH 4 5 4 4 4 2 2 1 4 4 34

Disabled-headed 1 1 - 2 2 - - 1 - - 7 AH Income below - 4 - 2 - - - - - 1 7 US$14/mth Total Incident of 8 11 4 1410 4 2 3 6 6 68 Vulnerable Group Total Vulnerable 8 9 4 11 7 4 2 3 5 5 58 AH

Summary of Impact on Affected Households:

137. Table 3-4-4 below provides a summary of impact for the Krouch Saeuch subproject. 29 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

Table 3-4-4: Summary of Project Impact in Krouch Saeuch

AH Total No. Type of Impact Unit Remark Incidence Quantity I Structure 1 Wooden fence m 1 96 2 Pumping well well 1 1 II Land 1 Rice Land m2 204 182,225.94 2 Chamkar Land m2 10 3,362.56 3 Residential m2 10 1,942.73 4 Loss more 10% of productive land AH 23 23 III Tree 1 Mango tree 25 47 2 Sugar Palm tree 11 19 3 Coconut tree 23 46 4 Teuk Doh Kor tree 11 20 5 Cashew tree 1 1 6 Papaya tree 2 3 7 Guava tree 4 8 8 Citrus tree 8 25 9 Jackfruit tree 4 5 10 Bamboo thicket 10 12 11 Jambolan tree 32 51 12 Custard Apple tree 2 2 13 Banana clump 16 44 14 Tamarind tree 4 5 15 Kroseing tree 5 8 16 Others tree 90 147 IV Vulnerable Group 1 Vulnerable Group AH 58 58

3.4.2 Basics of Unit Cost Used in Calculating Compensation

138. The replacement cost for residential land, productive agricultural land, trees and structures is calculated based on the price in neighboring regions and local markets in Krouch Saeuch subproject area. This price survey responding to the agreed policy on compensation rates between the government and ADB. Based on this policy, an independent local consultant was engaged by IRC to conduct a replacement cost study in the affected area to establish the compensation rates for affected assets.

139. The survey was conducted in July 2009 with existing owners of land and tree, 30 AHs and 30 non-AHs, in 3 FGDs meetings, with 3 village leaders, 4 carpenters groups, 5 vegetable vendors and 4 construction material shop-owners. This allowed a comprehensive study of land prices (residential, rice and Chamkar land), and tree prices, labor cost, and house and other structure valuation surrounding Krouch Saeuch region. The discussion below focuses on compensation rates for the relevant affected properties. The detailed compensation rates for affected assets are shown in Appendix 6 of this RP2.

30 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

3.4.3 Detailed Compensation and Other Entitlements

140. The implementation of Krouch Saeuch subproject will result in the acquisition of lands, trees, and structures as described in Section 3-4. AHs will be compensated according to the resettlement policy and principles set out in Chapter 2 of this RP2. Table 3-4-5 outlines the compensation and entitlements for each category of AHs.

Table 3-4-5: Entitlement Matrix of Krouch Saeuch

Type of No. Application Entitled Person Entitlements Impact 1. Wooden 1 affected Owner or person +Cash compensation for shifting structures will be based on fence and wooden fence with customary replacement cost of labor to move the wooden fence to the pumping and 1 affected usage rights nearby location; well pumping well +AH will be given sufficient time, 15 days, to deconstruct their subjected property; and 2 AH +lf falling in one of the categories of vulnerability, cash assistance of $150 for each category the AH belongs without repeating; 2. Residential 10 affected Owner or person For the portion of the land needed: Land residential plots with +Cash compensation at replacement cost; customary +AH will be given sufficient time to harvest crops and 15 10 AHs usage rights days to deconstruct structures on their subjected property; +lf falling in one of the categories of vulnerability, cash assistance of $150 for each AH without repeating.

3. Chamkar 10 affected Owner or person For the portion of the affected land: Land Chamkar plots with +Cash compensation at replacement cost; customary usage +AH will be given sufficient time to harvest crops and 15 10 AHs rights days to deconstruct structures on their subjected property; +lf falling in one of the categories of vulnerability, cash assistance of $150 for each AH without repeating.

4. Farmland Marginal impact Owners with For the portion of the land acquired: acceptable +Cash compensation at replacement cost and 204 AHs 181 AHs (recognized) + AH will be given sufficient time to harvest crops on proof their subjected property of ownership +lf falling in one of the categories of vulnerability, cash assistance of $150 for each AH without repeating.

AHs without Not applicable acceptable proof of ownership, including lessees Severe impact Owners with +Cash compensation at replacement cost for the land acceptable losses; 23 AHs (recognized) +Special Allowance: (i) cash assistance of $150; (ii) the proof income restoration to be provided by the Project component of ownership 3; +lf falling in one of the categories of vulnerability, Cash assistance of $150 for each AH without repeating. AHs without Not applicable acceptable proof of ownership, including lessees Nil

31 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

5. Trees All types Owner or person + Annual Crops: AHs will be given two (2) months notice with that the land on which their crops are planted will be 100 AHs 443 trees customary usage damaged or used by the subproject and that they must rights harvest their crops in time; + Cash compensation for loss of crops is at annual produce replacement cost;+ Perennial Crops and Trees: AHs will be compensated for the loss of fruit and timber trees at replacement cost. The value will be calculated as the annual produce value multiplied by a 1 to 8 years factor, depending type of tree to yield.

3.4.4 Socio-Economic Profile

Demography:

141. Socio-economic survey which is conducted by RU and Resettlement Specialist from 21 to 23 July 2009 in Krouch Saeuch subproject indicates that the average household size of total AHs is 4.26 persons per household and it is lower than average national household size, 4.7 per household. The young household head, below 30 year-old, is consisted of 19% of total AHs and have household size below the average number of household size. Household size, which has more than 6 people in the household, is composed of 12% of total AHs and the household head age is above 45 year old. That family is extended family typically including aging parents and/or one or two adult children's spouses and children.

142. There are 51% women, slightly more than men. Almost 8% of affected households are headed by women, and of these, 10% are less than 40 years old. This indicates a low rate of separation or divorce. 37% of the total population is below 20 years old, thus indicating there will be a good labor supply for their families, communities, and surrounding regions.

Poverty:

143. The measurement of household income and expenditure, housing type, assets, agricultural land possession size, number and type of livestock, and their declaration of food shortages indicate the incidence of poverty is about 38% in the sample population (based on $1.25/person/day), and of this 30% are considered extremely poor, i.e., have income lower than $14/person/month, inadequate shelter, insufficient land, food deficit for 2 months per year or more, and have insufficient income to purchase medicines and clothes.

144. The data also indicate 71% of the affected households encounter health issues in their family, which is one of the major factors influencing the family financial crisis. 23% of AHs declare that they are difficult of finding job and earning income for living. The survey also indicates that 32% of households face food shortage.

Landholding:

145. On average, AHs hold 3.10 ha of land per household, but there is a wide variance among the households. The most frequently cited reason for poverty was insufficient land for farming and a large family to support. 10% of AHs possess land smaller than 1 ha and 33% own land less than 2 ha. AHs who own more than 4 ha of land (16%). Residential land of AHs in the subproject is on average 2,120m 2 per household. This large residential land makes AHs having space to plant vegetables and fruit trees and to raise livestock.

Education:

146. There are different education levels of people in the affected communities. Although almost 100% of the heads of AHs participated in primarily school, 5% are illiterate. Socio-

32 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects economic survey indicates that 95% of children in the 6 to 12 year age range have studied in primary school, and 35% of children in the 13 to 18 year age range have entered junior high school. Only 12% studied in high school.

147. Average distance from home to primary school in Krouch Saeuch sub-project is approximately 1.6km, which take 24 minutes for children to walk. However, Krouch Saeuch village the distance to primary school is more than 1.8km, which generally takes approximately 27 minutes to walk and is therefore hard for the children.

Health:

148. Health is one of the main concerns of AHs. According to the survey, 55% of AHs households encounter health issues in their family, of which about 30% mentioned that their health issues are medium and serious for their families as well as unaffordable. The average distance to hospital in Boeng Knar is 7.5 km. However, AHs of Bakan and Kab Kralanch village has to travel more than 11 km to the hospital.

Situation of Women:

149. The socio-economic survey indicates that 51% of APs are women and most of adult women are working as rice farmer and the others are working in non agriculture sector, such as garment factory worker in urban area and migrant worker in Thailand. The women are also responsible for taking care of children, house work and other work around their houses such as planting vegetable, raising livestock, etc.

Support for the Project:

150. According to the socio-economic survey, almost 100% of AHs thinks that the project will benefit them. Besides, providing sufficient water in wet seasons, 46% of total AHs expects that the project will provide additional water for dry season cropping. 22% of AHs believe that the project will provide fish sources for the community and 16% consider the project will provide other benefits. There is also a perception that the Project will lead to other supporting activities from NGOs such agricultural and livestock production skill training with their application providing significant production improvements.

AHs Attitude:

151. The socio-economic survey find out that 100% of AHs prefers cash rather than land- for-land compensation. But if the project provides land-for-land compensation, the criteria is: 1/distance to the new land is within 3 km from the villages, 2/ distance from irrigation is within 1 km, 3/distance from village road is within 1 km and 4/ replacement land is suitable for rice cultivation.

3.3.5 Public Participation and Consultation

Informing AHs:

152. A Subproject Steering Committee meeting was held on 25 March 2009 at the conference hall of Pursat province chaired by Chairman of Provincial Resettlement Subcommittee (RRS) and governor of Pursat with participation from representatives of Resettlement Department of MEF, Resettlement Unit of MOWRAM, IRC Provincial Working Group and affected commune chiefs. The meeting focused on launching the DMS in Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash and Kouch Noup subproject and discussing on the (i) resettlement policy, (ii) public consultations with AHs, and (iii) background of the land usage in the four subprojects of Pursat.

33 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

153. Before DMS, on 6 to 7 May 2009, the IRC and PRS working group conducted 3 public consultations meeting with all AHs. The each meeting explains (i) supporting and implementing agencies and agencies charging for DMS, preparing RP, monitoring RP and grievance redress, (ii) benefits of the subproject, (iii) resettlement issues and procedure, (iv) compensation and entitlement, (v) people participation in project, (vi) necessary document for DMS and (vii) open forum for discussion.

154. After the each meeting, Public Information Booklets were distributed to the participants in order to disseminating information on Involuntary Resettlement Policy of ADB, subproject benefits, participation with the project and other relevant information. AH who didn’t attend the meeting, would get the Information Booklets during DMS survey.

Focus Group Discussion with AHs:

155. A Focus Group Discussions with AHs were conducted from 21 to 23 July 2009 to investigate the impact of the subproject, socio-economic condition, village profile, training need assessment for livelihood restoration, and concern of AHs. The schedule of the meetings is in Table 3-4-6. The content of the discussions during the FGDs are summarized below, and the details for each meeting are provided.

Table 3-4-6: Record of Focus Group Discussion in Krouch Saeuch

Tuesday, 21 July 2009 Wednesday , 22 July 2009 Time: 9:00 p.m Time: 9:00 p.m Venue: Stoeng Kambot village Venue: Phteak Sla village Participation: Mixed Group from Stoeng Participation: Mixed Group from Phteak Sla & Kambot & Kab Kralanh villages Krouch Saeuch villages

Time: 14:00 p.m Time: 14:00 p.m Venue: Bakan village Venue: Snay Toul village Participation: Mixed Group from Bakan & Ou Participation: Mixed Group from Snay Toul & Rumchek villages Thmey villages

156. The main occupations of AHs in the subproject are (i) rice farmer, (ii) livestock and cattle farming, (iii), migrant worker in Thailand (iv) vegetable farming, (v) fishing, (vi) garment factory and construction worker, (vii) doing small business in community, (viii) transportation worker, (ix) fire wood collector from nearby forest, and (x) skill worker such as carpenter, artisan, fishing tool maker, etc.

157. Rehabilitation of village roads, construction of primary schools, community ponds, wells, 4km irrigation canal, toilet, pumping machine corporative, assistance from NGOs in low interest loan, raising livestock, migrant worker, vegetable and flower farming, as well as increasing of rice and livestock price are significantly developmed in the subproject area. The essential factors of the last five years have contributed to improvement of AH livelihood for the last few years. With good road middleman is accessible to purchase agricultural products in the villages. The new construction of primary school buildings makes children accessible to school easily. The construction of community ponds, wells and toilets help AHs to be able to access to safe drinking water and have hygiene. Pumping machine corporative and irrigation canal supply water for some rice fields during drought period.

158. The low interest loan and livestock assistance from NGOs allow the community borrowers to be able to pay back and promote small investment in community, particularly, agricultural investment and to gain more income from raising livestock for their living. The high price of agricultural products, especially Somaly rice, in the last few years provides more profits to farmers in the project areas as well as the entire country. Moreover, migrant working, serving as skill-workers and doing small business in the past few years are an essential factor 34 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects to contribute to AHs living condition of people. However, boarder dispute between Cambodia and Thailand, and economic downturn is reducing AH income.

159. The many AHs are living under national poverty line in the subproject area, and some of them are very poor. The main reasons of the poverty are because (i) a member of their families falls sick and their family saving is entirely used for health issues, (ii) they don’t have land for farming and no job, (iii) they are experience drought and flood as well as fall into debt of agriculture investment, particularly fertilizer and household expenditure, (iv) they have small farm land and large family member, but jobless, (v) household head are vulnerable person, and (vii) they cannot afford to purchase fertilizer, animal food and fuel for agricultural machinery with high price.

160. Problems in agriculture mostly are: (i) drought and flood during cultivation seasons, (ii) fertilizer, insecticide and agricultural equipment are very expensive and incorrectly used, (iii) lack of quality rice seed for cultivation, (iv) lack of agricultural technique, (v) agriculture market are depend on middleman and not stable, (vi) rate and insect destroy rice and (vii) lack of money to invest in fertilizer and machinery for rice cultivation and animal food and animal stock for livestock.

161. Small livestock and cattle farming is one of the main income, protein food, agricultural labor and organic fertilizer source for AHs. Currently, the AHs have experience hardship in raising livestock. The reasons are lack of fodder, particularly cattle since common grassland field was converted to private farm land, high animal food price, no veterinary in the region and low profit because of low selling price. The mood to raise cattle is decreasing as many farmers turn to using hand tractor for farming which are more convenient than using cattle because it not need feeding, and can be used to transport agriculture products as well as to rent to neighborhood farmer.

162. With the project, the groups expect that the project will allow them to double crop (dry and wet season), have water for growing vegetable around their houses, and have more fish for fishing.

163. The groups prefer land to cash compensation. The compensation money will be used to purchase nearby rice land, livestock, cattle, agricultural equipment or fertilizer, or for other household needs. If they use compensation money to buy land, their prefer location is within few kilometers from village. The compensation money will be used with few months after payment.

164. Beside compensation, the groups address the need for more support from the project such as training on various suitable agricultural skills and off-farm training such as skill to repair machine, particularly hand tractor, pumping machine and motorbike and beauty make- up skills as well as hair cut. For vulnerable group, the aged-headed household needs health care support, the woman-headed household request to support their agricultural labor, the disable headed household and poor household need credit for business investment.

3.4.6 Implementation Schedule

165. Table 3-4-7 below provides a proposed implement schedule for the Krouch Saeuch subproject.

35 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

Table 3-4-7: Implementation Schedule for RP of Krouch Saeuch

2009 2010 Activity Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Approval of RP by IRC & ADB X Notice to Proceed with implementation X Final disclosure/concurrence of AHs X Vouchering X Delivery of compensation /entitlements X X Agriculture training activities* X X X X X X X X X X X Internal & external monitoring X X X X X X X X X X External Monitoring X X X X X

Submit compliance both internal and external X X X X X X X X X X monitoring report

Evaluate RP implementation X X X Additional resettlement measures X X X Submission of RP Completion report X Approval of RP Completion report X

* : the activities are to train AHs in the agriculture extension in component 3 of the NWISP.

3.4.7 Costs and Budget

Procedures for Flow of Funds

166. The IRC will request the Ministry of Economic and Finance (MEF) for funding for the implementation of the RP2. The funds will be forwarded to the Provincial Departments of Economy and Finance. Payment vouchers will be prepared at the Provincial Department of Economy and Finance with coordination of IRC-WG and PRSC-WG. Payment of compensation and other entitlements as described in Chapter 3 of the RP2 will be given in cash and will be distributed in village offices. The AHs will be notified through the village chiefs of the schedule of payment of compensation and other entitlements.

Compensation and Contingency Costs

167. The cost estimates for the implementation of the RP2 also include a provision for contingencies equivalent to 15% of the base cost of resettlement. MOWRAM and IRC will ensure that adequate funds are made available as and when necessary for the efficient and timely implementation of the resettlement activities.

Estimate of Resettlement Costs

168. The overall estimated costs excluding administration costs are shown in Table 3-4-8 below. Table 3-4-8: Estimated Costs for Implementation of the RP of Krouch Saeuch

Rate No. Compensation Items Unit Quantity Cost US$ US$ I Compensation for Structure 1 Wooden fence m 3.50 96.00 336.00 2 Pumping well 1 800.00 1.00 800.00 Sub-Total (1) 1,136.00 II Compensation for Land 36 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

2 1 Rice Land m 0.30 182,225.94 54,667.78 2 2 Chamkar Land m 1.10 3,362.56 3,698.82 2 3 Residential m 1.60 1942.73 3,108.37 Sub-Total (2) 61,474.97 III Compensation for Tree 1 Mango Tree 25.00 47 1,175.00 2 Sugar Palm Tree 25.00 19 475.00 3 Coconut Tree 28.00 46 1,288.00 4 Teuk Doh Kor Tree 25.00 20 500.00 5 Cashew Tree 8.10 1 8.10 6 papaya Tree 1.75 3 5.25 7 Guava Tree 2.70 8 21.60 8 Citrus Tree 3.50 25 87.50 9 Jackfruit Tree 25.00 5 125.00 10 Thicket 12 90.00 Bamboo 7.50 11 Jambolan Tree 6.25 51 318.75 12 Custard Apple Tree 3.50 2 7.00 13 Banana Clump 4.20 44 184.80 14 Tamarind Tree 20.00 5 100.00 15 Kroseing Tree 8.10 8 64.80 16 Others Tree 5.00 147 735.00 Sub-Total (3) 443 5,185.80 IV Allowance for Vulnerable Groups and severe AH Woman, Aged and Disable Household Head, 1 AH 150 58 8,700.00 andHousehold income below US$ 14/mth 2 Ahs of loss > 10% of their productive land AH 150 23 3,450.00 Sub-Total (4) 12,150.00 Total Base Cost (sum 1-4 above) 79,946.77 Contingencies (15%) 11,992.01 Grand Total 91,938.78

3.5 Results of Tram Mneach Subproject

3.5.1 Results of the Detailed Measurement Survey

169. The Detail Measurement Survey (DMS) was conducted from June to July 2009 after public dissemination meeting in Pursat municipality and a meeting between affected villages and AHs and non-AHs. The meetings were to explain about the project, its beneficiary, DMS process, entitlements, compensation, etc to village leaders and AHs. The result of DMS showed that there are 348 AHs affected by the subproject with affected properties of stalls, lands, trees, and vulnerable groups. The detailed impact is shown below and summarized in Table 3-5-6: a Matrix of Entitlements for Tram Mneash subproject.

Impact on Agricultural, Pond and Residential Land:

170. According to the DMS, a total of 164,059.45m2 of rice land, 7,369.24m2 of Chamkar, 7,732.88m2 of residential land and 55.12m2 of Pond land will be acquired for the subproject and 276 rice land holders, 13 Chamkar land holders, 39 residential land holders and a pond land holder will partially lose their rice land, Chamkar, residential and pond land, respecttively. Moreover, of 289 AHs (276 affected rice land holders and 13 affected Chamkar

37 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects land holders), 59 AHs loses productive land more than 10% of their total holding productive land.

171. Totally, the subproject affects on rice, Chamkar and residential land of 298 AHs in 7 villages, Chheuteal, Kandal, Dang Teukleach, Chambak Thum, Saen Pen, Tbeng Chrum and Boeng Veal of Tnaot Chum commune, Krakor district. The most severely affected village is Chheuteal village, where 67 AHs occupied rice land, Chamkar and residential lands of 44,110.18m2, will be affected by the subproject. Saen Pen is the second severely affected village where 55 AHs used 38,996.64m2 of their rice, Chamkar and residential lands will be acquired for the subproject. Detailed impact on land by village is shown in Table. 3-5-1.

172. The affected Chamkar land for this subproject is classified into two types. Type 1 is the Chamkar land, located near and behind residential lots where AHs plant vegetables and fruit trees for their family daily earning. This land could also use for subdivision as residential lots for their children in the future. Type 2 is located far from village and proximity to clear forest where AH is used for vegetable and other plant cultivation. The second affected Chamkar land type is belong to only one AH.

173. Affected pond is also placed near to residential and Chamkar land and is used to reserve raining water in wet season for watering plants in residential and Chamkar lands in dry season. The lost of affected pond is replaced by Secondary Canal 1 of the subproject.

Table 3-5-1: Impact on Agricultural, Residential and Pond Land in Tram Mneash

Commune Name Tnaot Chum TOTAL Dang Chambak Saen Tbeng Boeng Village Name Chheuteal Kandal Teukleach Thum Pen Chrum Veal AHs 67 16 41 45 55 73 1 298 Total Affected 294 64 209 196 262 333 4 1362 People Affected Land and Area m 2

Rice Land 38,190.21 7,714.13 21,702.27 19,477.97 37,847.64 37,070.23 2,057.00 164,059.45 Chamkar Land 1,380.23 - - 2,391.40 490.00 500.61 - 4,762.24 Type 1 Chamkar Land 2,607.00 ------2,607.00 Type 2 Reisdential Land 1,932.74 1,639.20 203.50 1,457.33 659.00 1,841.11 - 7,732.88

Pond Land - - - 55.12 - - - 55.12

Total Land Area 44,110.18 9,353.33 21,905.77 23,381.82 38,996.64 39,411.95 2,057.00 179,216.69

Impact on Structures:

174. The construction of entire subproject will affect 22 structures and other structures of 16 AHs such as one kitchen structure, one family shop, two stalls, one chicken pen, two pig pens, one drainage pipe, 11 wooden fences and 2 wells ( Tab. 3-5-2).

Table 3-5-2: Impact on Structures and other assets in Tram Mneash

38 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

Commune Tnaot Chum Chheuteal Kandal Chambak Thum Tbeng Chrum Saen Pen Total AH Total Village Incidence Quantity AH Quantity AH Quantity AH Quantity AH Quantity AH Quantity

Affected Structure Kitchen - - - - 1 7.50 m 2 - - - - 1 7.50 m 2 Shop - - 1 22.80 m 2 ------1 22.80 m 2 Stall - - 1 6.00 m 2 1 10.00 m 2 - - - - 2 16.00 m 2 Rice bin ------1 37.50 m 2 1 37.50 m 2 Chicken and pig pen - - - - 1 6.00 m 2 2 7.50 m 2 - - 3 13.50 m 2 Drainage pipe Ø0.8m 1 2.00 m ------1 2.00 m Wooden fence 4 129.60 m 3 110.00 m 1 29.70 2 77.50 m 1 23.00 m 11 369.80 m Well - - 1 1 well 1 1 well - - - - 2 2 wells Total AH Incidence 5 - 6 - 5 - 4 - 2 - 22 - Total AH 4 - 6 - 2 - 3 - 1 - 16 -

Impact on Trees:

175. In total, the constructions of the structures, canals and dams of the subproject affect on 948 trees belonging to 161 AHs in 7 villages ( Tab. 3-5-3). Most of the affected trees, 365 trees, are situated along the Secondary Canal 2 to be extended across Chheuteal, Tbeng Chrum and Saen Pen villages. Detailed affected trees by village are indicated in Table. 3-5- 3.

176. Of 948 trees; there are 16 categories of trees such as mango, sugar palm, coconut, Teuk Doh Kor, longan, cashew, guava, citrus, jack-fruit, bamboo, custard apple, jambolan, banana, tamarind, Kraseing and other non-fruit trees ( Tab. 3-5-3). Sugar palm is the most affected trees, 544 sugar palms or 57% of affected trees, in the subproject. The other dominant affected trees are mango, cashew, coconut and bamboo.

177. However, the essential productive trees in the subproject area are mango, sugar palm, coconut, Teuk Doh Kor, citrus, bamboo, banana, jack-fruit and tamarind because it can contribute to family livelihood. Sugar palm is an important tree in the subproject, since many households produce sugar from palm juice as their secondary income. The sugar production, here, is feasible because of available fire wood in nearby the subproject.

Table 3-5-3: Loss of Trees in Tram Mneash

Commune Name Tnaot Chum Dang Chambak Tbeng Boeng TOTAL Village Name Chheuteal Kandal Saen Pen Teukleach Thum Chrum Veal AHs 57 12 10 17 22 42 1 161 Total Affected Trees 373 106 34 136 112 186 1 948 Name and Number of Affected Trees

Mango 18 17 5 16 2 7 1 66 Sugar Palm 258 22 18 42 94 110 - 544 Coconut 16 22 1 18 1 1 - 59 Teuk Doh Kor 2 2 - 3 - - - 7 Longan 1 ------1 Cashew 17 17 6 21 1 - - 62 Guava 8 5 - 5 - 3 - 21 Citrus 2 1 - 2 - - - 5 Jackfruit 4 5 - 1 - - - 10 Bamboo 7 4 2 8 2 19 - 42 Jumbolan - - - - 2 3 - 5 Custard Apple 3 4 - 10 - 3 - 20 Banana 15 - - 5 - 12 - 32 Tamarind 6 1 - 3 2 13 - 25 Kroseing 3 3 2 - - 1 - 9 Others 13 3 - 2 8 14 - 40

39 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

Impact on Vulnerable Groups:

177. According to DMS data, a total of 118 vulnerable AHs have been identified from the total of 157 vulnerable group incidences in the subproject. They are ranked as vulnerable for at least one of the following reasons: they are woman-headed, aged-headed, disabled- headed, and/or with a monthly household income below the national poverty line ($14/month). Many of the AHs are ranked as vulnerable for more than one of the above reasons, in this case we have listed them in the figures shown in Table 3-5-4 below. Aged- headed and woman-headed AHs are covered about 85% of the total vulnerable household incidences.

178. The vulnerable AHs that have one or more incidences of vulnerability will receive an allowance of $150 per household. The allowance is to reduce their impoverishment risks and assist them to reduce their difficulties in living condition and get advantage of the project benefits.

Table 3-5-4: Impact on Vulnerable Groups in Tram Mneash

Commune Name Tnaot Chum Total Incident of Dang Chambak Saen Tbeng Boeng Village Name Chheuteal Kandal Vulnerable Teukleach Thum Pen Chrum Veal Group Affected Vulnerable Groups

Woman-headed AH 22 6 12 13 9 17 - 79 Aged-headed AH 12 2 6 16 4 14 - 54 Disabled-headed AH 2 2 3 2 2 - 1 12 Income below US$14/mth 5 2 1 2 1 1 - 12 Total Incident of Vulnerable Group 41 12 22 33 16 32 1 157 Total Vulnerable AH 29 7 17 23 14 27 1 118

Summary of Impact on Affected Households:

179. Table 3-5-5 below provides a summary of impact for the Tram Mneash subproject.

Table 3-5-5: Summary of Project Impact in Tram Mneash

AH Total No. Type of Impact Unit Remark Incidence Quantity I Structure 2 1 Kitchen m 1 7.50 2 2 Shop m 1 22.80 2 3 Stall m 2 16.00 2 4 Rice bin m 1 37.50 2 5 Chicken and pig pen m 3 13.50 6 Drainage pipe Ø0.8m m 1 2.00 7 Wooden fence m 11 369.80 8 Well well 2 2.00 II Land 1 Rice land m2 276 164,059.45 2 Chamkar land type 1 m2 12 4,762.24 3 Chamkar land type 1 m2 1 2,607.00 4 Residential land m2 39 7,732.88 5 Pond land m2 1 55.12

40 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

6 Loss more 10% of productive land AH 59 59 III Tree 1 Mango tree 19 66 2 Sugar Palm tree 140 544 3 Coconut tree 22 59 4 Teuk Doh Kor tree 4 7 5 Longan tree 1 1 6 Cashew tree 15 62 7 Guava tree 9 21 8 Citrus tree 3 5 9 Jackfruit tree 4 10 10 Bamboo thicket 23 42 11 Jumbolan tree 5 5 12 Custard Apple tree 7 20 13 Banana clump 6 32 14 Tamarind tree 19 25 15 Kroseing tree 9 9 16 Others tree 25 40 IV Vulnerable Group 1 Vulnerable Group AH 118 118

3.5.2 Basics of Unit Cost Used in Calculating Compensation

180. The replacement cost for residential land, productive agricultural land, trees and structures is calculated based on the price in neighboring regions and local markets in Tram Meash subproject area. This price survey responding to the agreed policy on compensation rates between the government and ADB. Based on this policy, an independent local consultant was engaged by IRC to conduct a replacement cost study in the affected area to establish the compensation rates for affected assets.

181. The survey was conducted in July 2009 with existing owners of land and tree, 30 AHs and 30 non-AHs, in 4 FGDs meetings, with 3 village leaders, 4 carpenters groups, 5 vegetable vendors and 4 construction material shop-owners. This allowed a comprehensive study of land prices (residential, rice and Chamkar land), and tree prices, labor cost, and house and other structure valuation surrounding Tram Mneash region. The discussion below focuses on compensation rates for the relevant affected properties. The detailed compensation rates for affected assets are shown in Appendix 6 of this RP2.

3.5.3 Detailed Compensation and Other Entitlements

182. The implementation of Tram Mneash subproject will result in the acquisition of lands, trees, and structures as described in Section 3-5. AHs will be compensated according to the resettlement policy and principles set out in Chapter 2 of this RP2. Table 3-5-6 outlines the compensation and entitlements for each category of AHs.

Table 3-5-6: Entitlement Matrix of Tram Mneash

Type of No. Application Entitled Person Entitlements Impact

41 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

1. Structures 22 affected Owner or person Cash compensation of part or entire structures will be based structures with customary on replacement cost of construction materials and labor 16 AH usage rights without considering deprivation and salvage materials after demolishing the structures; +AH will be given sufficient time, 15 days, to deconstruct their subjected property; and +lf falling in one of the categories of vulnerability, cash assistance of $150 for each category the AH belongs without repeating;

2. Residential 39 affected Owner or person For the portion of the land needed: Land residential plots with customary +Cash compensation at replacement cost; usage rights +AH will be given sufficient time to harvest crops and 15 39 AHs days to deconstruct structures on their subjected property; +lf falling in one of the categories of vulnerability, cash assistance of $150 for each AH without repeating.

3. Chamkar 13 affected Owner or person For the portion of the land needed: Land Chamkar plots with +Cash compensation at replacement cost; customary usage +AH will be given sufficient time to harvest crops and 15 13 AHs rights days to deconstruct structures on their subjected property;

+lf falling in one of the categories of vulnerability, cash assistance of $150 for each AH without repeating. 4. Pond Land 1 affected Pond Owner or person Compensation for pond is not required as the pond is with replaced by secondary canal 1 of the subproject. 1 AH customary usage rights 5. Riceland Marginal impact Owners with For the portion of the land needed: acceptable +Cash compensation is at replacement cost; 276 AHs 217 AHs (recognized) +Cash compensation for affected tree at replacement cost; proof and of ownership +AH will be given sufficient time to harvest crops on their subjected property +lf falling in one of the categories of vulnerability, cash assistance of $150 for each AH without repeating. AHs without Not applicable acceptable proof of ownership, including lessees Severe impact Owners with +Cash compensation at replacement cost for the acceptable affected land, 59 AHs (recognized) +Special Allowance and income restoration: (i) cash proof assistance of $150; (ii) the income restoration to be provided of ownership by the Project component 3; +If having affected tree +AH will be given sufficient time to harvest crops; +Cash compensation for affected perennials, and crop at replacement cost; +lf falling in one of the categories of vulnerability, Cash assistance of $150 for each AH without repeating. AHs without Not applicable acceptable proof of ownership, including lessees Nil 6. Trees All types Owner or person + Annual Crops: AHs will be given two months notice that with the land on which their crops are planted will be damaged or 161 AHs 948 trees customary usage used by the subproject and that they must harvest their rights crops in time; + Cash compensation for loss of crops at annual produce replacement cost;+ Perennial Crops and Trees: AHs will be compensated for the loss of fruit and timber trees at replacement cost. The value will be calculated as the annual produce value multiplied by a 1 to 8 years factor, depending type of tree to yield.

42 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

3.5.4 Socio-Economic Profile

Demography:

183. Socio-economic survey which is conducted by RU and Resettlement Specialist from 21 to 23 July 2009 in Tram Mneash subproject indicates that the average household size of total AHs is 4.43 persons per household and it is lower than average national household size, 4.7 per household. The young household head, below 30 year-old, is consisted of 8% of total AHs and have household size below the average number of household size. Household size, which has more than 6 people in the household, is composed of 18% of total AHs and the household head age is above 45 year old. That family is extended family typically including aging parents and/or one or two adult children's spouses and children.

184. There are 51% women, slightly more than men. Almost 22% of affected households are headed by women, and of these, 8% are less than 40 years old. This indicates a low rate of separation or divorce. 37% of the total population is below 20 years old, thus indicating there will be a good labor supply for their families, communities, and surrounding regions.

Poverty:

185. The measurement of household income and expenditure, housing type, assets, agricultural land possession size, number and type of livestock, and their declaration of food shortages indicate the incidence of poverty is about 36% in the sample population (based on $1.25/person/day), and of this 15% are considered extremely poor, i.e., have income lower than $14/person/month, inadequate shelter, insufficient land, food deficit for 2 months per year or more, and have insufficient income to purchase medicines and clothes.

186. The data also indicate 64% of the affected households encounter health issues in their family, which is one of the major factors influencing the family financial crisis. 17% of AHs declare that they are difficult of finding job and earning income for living. The survey also indicates that 50% of households face food shortage.

Landholding:

187. On average, AHs hold 1.46 ha of land per household, but there is a wide variance among the households. The most frequently cited reason for poverty was insufficient land for farming and a large family to support. 34% of AHs possess land smaller than 1 ha and 78% own land less than 2 ha. AHs who own more than 4 ha of land (2%). Residential land of AHs in the subproject is on average 1,257m 2 per household. This large residential land makes AHs having space to plant vegetables and fruit trees and to raise livestock.

Education:

188. There are different education levels of people in the affected communities. Although almost 100% of the heads of AHs participated in primarily school, 7% are illiterate. Socio- economic survey indicates that 95% of children in the 6 to 12 year age range have studied in primary school, and 36% of children in the 13 to 18 year age range have entered junior high school. Only 15% studied in high school.

189. Average distance from home to primary school in Tram Mneash sub-project is approximately 2 km, which take 30 minutes for children to walk. However, Chambak Thum village the distance to primary school is more than 2.8km, which generally takes approximately 43 minutes to walk and is therefore hard for the children.

Health:

43 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

190. Health is one of the main concerns of AHs. According to the survey, 64% of AHs households encounter health issues in their family, of which about 30% mentioned that their health issues are medium and serious for their families as well as unaffordable. The average distance to heath center in Saen Pen is 3 km. However, AHs of Boeng Veal village has to travel more than 5 km to the health center.

Situation of Women:

191. The socio-economic survey indicates that 51% of APs are women and most of adult women are working as rice farmer and the others are working in non agriculture sector, such as garment factory worker in urban area and migrant worker in Thailand. The women are also responsible for taking care of children, house work and other work around their houses such as planting vegetable, raising livestock, etc.

Support for the Project:

192. According to the socio-economic survey, almost 100% of AHs thinks that the project will benefit them. Besides, providing sufficient water in wet seasons, 100% of total AHs expects that the project will provide additional water for dry season cropping. 42% of AHs believe that the project will provide fish sources for the community and 21% consider the project will provide other benefits. There is also a perception that the Project will lead to other supporting activities from NGOs such agricultural and livestock production skill training with their application providing significant production improvements.

Affected Households Attitudes:

193. The socio-economic survey find out that 100% of AHs prefers cash rather than land- for-land compensation. But if the project provides land-for-land compensation, the criteria is: 1/distance to the new land is within 3 km from the villages, 2/ distance from irrigation is within 1 km, 3/distance from village road is within 1 km and 4/ replacement land is suitable for rice cultivation.

3.5.5 Public Participation and Consultation

Informing AHs:

194. A Subproject Steering Committee meeting was held on 25 March 2009 at the conference hall of Pursat province chaired by Chairman of Provincial Resettlement Subcommittee (RRS) and governor of Pursat with participation from representatives of Resettlement Department of MEF, Resettlement Unit of MOWRAM, IRC Provincial Working Group and affected commune chiefs. The meeting focused on launching the DMS in Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash and Kouch Noup subproject and discussing on the (i) resettlement policy, (ii) public consultations with AHs, and (iii) background of the land usage in the four subprojects of Pursat.

195. Before DMS, on 24 to 25 June 2009, the IRC and PRS working group conducted 3 public consultations meeting with potential AHs. The each meeting explains (i) supporting and implementing agencies and agencies charging for DMS, preparing RP, monitoring RP and grievance redress, (ii) benefits of the subproject, (iii) resettlement issues and procedure, (iv) compensation and entitlement, (v) people participation in project, (vi) necessary document for DMS and (vii) open forum for discussion.

196. After the each meeting, Public Information Booklets were distributed to the participants in order to disseminating information on Involuntary Resettlement Policy of ADB, subproject benefits, participation with the project and other relevant information. AH who didn’t attend the meeting, would get the Booklets during DMS survey.

44 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

Focus Group Discussion with AHs:

197. A Focus Group Discussions with AHs were conducted from 11-13 August 2009 to investigate the impact of the subproject, socio-economic condition, village profile, training need assessment for livelihood restoration, and concern of AHs. The schedule of the meetings is in Table 3-5-7. The content of the discussions during the FGDs are summarized below, and the details for each meeting are provided.

Table 3-5-7: Record of Focus Group Discussion in Tram Mneash

Tuesday, 11 August 2009 Wednesday, 12 August 2009 Thursday, 13 August 2009 Time: 8:30 p.m Venue: Tbaeng Chrum village Participation: Mixed Group from Time: 9:00 a.m Time: 10:00 p.m Tbaeng Chrum and Saen Pen village Venue: Chambak Thum Venue: Chheuteal village village Participation: Mixed Group Time: 14:00 p.m Participation: Mixed Group from Chheuteal village Venue: Dang Teuk Leach village from Chambak Thum village Participation: Mixed Group from Dang Teuk Leach and Kandal village

198. The main occupations of AHs in the subproject are (i) rice farmer, (ii) sugar palm producer, (iii), migrant worker in Thailand, (iv) livestock and cattle farming, (v) vegetable farming, (vi) garment factory and construction worker, (vii) doing small business in community, (viii) fire wood collector from nearby forest, etc.

199. Rehabilitation of village roads, construction of primary schools, health center, wells, assistance from NGOs in low interest loan, raising livestock, migrant worker, vegetable farming, as well as increasing of rice and livestock price are significant development in the subproject area and essential factors of the last five years to contribute to improvement of AH livelihood. With good road middleman is accessible to purchase agricultural products in the villages. The new construction of primary school buildings makes children accessible to school easily. The low interest loan and livestock assistance from NGOs allow the community borrowers to be able to pay back and promote small investment in community, particularly, agricultural investment and to gain more income from raising livestock for their living. The high price of agricultural products in the last few years provides more profits to farmers in the project areas as well as the entire country. Moreover, migrant working, serving as skill-workers and doing small business in the past few years are an essential factor to contribute to AHs living condition of people. However, boarder dispute between Cambodia and Thailand, and economic downturn is reducing AH income.

200. The many AHs are living under national poverty line in the subproject area, and some of them are very poor. The main reasons of the poverty are because (i) a member of their families falls sick and their family saving is entirely used for health issues, (ii) they don’t have land for farming and no job, (iii) they are experience drought and flood as well as fall into debt of agriculture investment, particularly fertilizer and household expenditure, (iv) they have small farm land and large family member, but jobless, (v) household head are vulnerable person and (vi) they cannot afford to purchase fertilizer, animal food and fuel for agricultural machinery with high price.

201. Problems in agriculture mostly are: (i) drought and flood during cultivation seasons, (ii) fertilizer, insecticide and agricultural equipment are very expensive and incorrectly used, (iii) lack of quality rice seed for cultivation, (iv) lack of agricultural technique, (v) agriculture market are depend on middleman and not stable, (vi) rate and insect destroy rice, (vii) lack of money to invest in fertilizer and machinery for rice cultivation and animal food and animal stock for livestock, (viii) land becomes unfertilized and fire wood for the sugar production is going to shortage soon.

45 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

202. Small livestock and cattle farming is one of the main income, protein food, agricultural labor and organic fertilizer source for AHs. Currently, the AHs have experience hardship in raising livestock. The reasons are high animal food price, no veterinary in the region and low profit because of low selling price.

203. With the project, the groups expect that the project will allow them to double crop (dry and wet season), have water for growing vegetable around their houses, and have more fish for fishing.

204. The groups prefer land to cash compensation. The compensation money will be used to purchase nearby rice land, livestock, cattle, agricultural equipment or fertilizer, or for other household needs. If they use compensation money to buy land, their prefer location is within few kilometers from village. The compensation money will be used with few months after payment.

205. Beside compensation, the groups address the need for more support from the project such as training on various suitable agricultural skills and off-farm training such as skill to repair machine, particularly hand tractor, pumping machine and motorbike and beauty make- up skills as well as hair cut. Moreover, since fire wood is becoming scare, the AHs need to energy saving stove and technique to productively produce good sugar from sugar palm juice. For vulnerable group, the aged-headed household needs health care support, the woman- headed household request to support their agricultural labor, the disable headed household and poor household need credit for business investment.

3.5.6 Implementation Schedule

206. Table 3-5-8 below provides a proposed implement schedule for the Tram Mneash subproject. Table 3-5-8: Implementation Schedule for RP of Tram Mneash

2009 2010 Activity Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Approval of RP by IRC & ADB X Notice to Proceed with implementation X Final disclosure/concurrence of AHs X Vouchering X Delivery of compensation /entitlements X Agriculture training activities* X X X X X X X X X X X Internal & external monitoring X X X X X X X X X X External Monitoring X X X X X Submit compliance both internal and external X X X X X X X X X X monitoring report Evaluate RP implementation X X X Additional resettlement measures X X X Submission of RP Completion report X Approval of RP Completion report X

* : the activities are to train AHs in the agriculture extension in component 3 of the NWISP.

3.5.7 Costs and Budget

Procedures for Flow of Funds

207. The IRC will request the Ministry of Economic and Finance (MEF) for funding for the implementation of the RP2. The funds will be forwarded to the Provincial Departments of

46 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

Economy and Finance. Payment vouchers will be prepared at the Provincial Department of Economy and Finance with coordination of IRC-WG and PRSC-WG. Payment of compensation and other entitlements as described in Chapter 3 of the RP2 will be given in cash and will be distributed in village offices. The AHs will be notified through the village chiefs of the schedule of payment of compensation and other entitlements.

Compensation and Contingency Costs

208. The cost estimates for the implementation of the RP2 also include a provision for contingencies equivalent to 15% of the base cost of resettlement. MOWRAM and IRC will ensure that adequate funds are made available as and when necessary for the efficient and timely implementation of the resettlement activities.

Estimate of Resettlement Costs

209. The overall estimated costs excluding administration costs are shown in Table 3-5-9 below. Table 3-5-9: Estimated Costs for Implementation of the RP of Tram Mneash

Rate No. Compensation Items Unit Quantity Cost US$ US$ I Compensation for Structure 2 1 Kitchen m 31.00 7.50 232.50 2 2 Small Shop m 15.00 22.80 342.00 2 3 Stall m 4.00 16.00 64.00 2 4 Rice bin m 31.00 37.50 1,162.50 2 5 Chicken and pig pen m 5.10 13.50 68.85 6 Drainage pipe Ø0.8m m 65.00 2.00 130.00 7 Wooden fence m 2.80 369.80 1,035.44 8 Well well 450.00 2.00 900.00 Sub-Total (1) 3,935.29 II Compensation for Land 2 1 Rice land m 0.30 164,059.45 49,217.84 2 2 Chamkar land type 1 m 0.81 4,762.24 3,857.41 2 3 Chamkar land type 2 m 0.15 2,607.00 391.05 2 4 Residential land m 1.15 7,732.88 8,892.81 Sub-Total (2) 62,359.11 III Compensation for Tree 1 Mango Tree 25.00 66 1,650.00 2 Sugar Palm Tree 30.00 544 16,320.00 3 Coconut Tree 28.00 59 1,652.00 4 Teuk Doh Kor Tree 25.00 7 175.00 5 Longan Tree 30.00 1 30.00 6 Cashew Tree 8.10 62 502.20 7 Guava Tree 3.00 21 63.00 8 Citrus Tree 3.50 5 17.50 9 Jackfruit Tree 30.00 10 300.00 10 Bamboo Thicket 7.50 42 315.00 11 Jumbolan Tree 7.00 5 35.00 12 Custard Apple Tree 4.00 20 80.00 13 Banana Clump 1.50 32 48.00 14 Tamarind Tree 22.00 25 550.00 47 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

15 Kroseing Tree 10.00 9 90.00 16 Others Tree 5.00 40 200.00 Sub-Total (3) 948 22,027.70 Allowance for Vulnerable Groups and severe IV AH 1 Woman, Aged and Disable Household Head, and AH 150 118 17,700.00 Household income below US$ 14/mth 2 Ahs of loss > 10% of their productive land AH 150 59 8,850.00 Sub-Total (4) 26,550.00 Total Base Cost (sum 1-4 above) 114,872.10 Contingencies (15%) 17,230.82 Grand Total 132,102.92

3.6 Results of Kouch Noup Subproject

3.6.1 Results of the Detailed Measurement Survey

210. The Detail Measurement Survey (DMS) was conducted in June 2009 after public dissemination meeting at Pursat municipality and a meeting between affected villages and AHs and non-AHs. The meetings were to explain about the project, its beneficiary, DMS process, entitlements, compensation, etc to village leaders and AHs. The result of DMS indicated that there are 52 AHs affected by the subproject with affected assets of stalls, land, trees, and vulnerable groups. The detailed impact is shown below and summarized in Table 3-6-6: a Matrix of Entitlements of Kouch Noup.

Impact on Agricultural and Residential Land:

211. According to the DMS, a total of 10,856.16m2 of rice land, 327.00m2 of Chamkar and 2,365.15m2 of residential land will be acquired for the subproject belonging to 21 rice land holders, 2 Chamkar land holders and 8 residential land holders respectively. All AHs will be partially affected on their rice, Chamkar and residential land. Of 23 AHs (21 affected rice land holders and 2 affected Chamkar land holders), there are only 5 AHs lose productive land more than 10% of their total holding productive land.

212. Totally, the subproject affects on rice, Chamkar and residential land occupied by 31 AHs in a single village, Kralanh of Kbal Trach commune, Krakor district (Tab. 3-6-1). The Chamkar land is located far from village and proximity to clear forest where AH is used for vegetable and other plant cultivation.

Table 3-6-1: Impact on Agricultural and Residential Land in Kouch Noup

Commune Name Kbal Trach TOTAL Village Name Kralanh Srer Reusey Phsa Trach AHs 31 - - 31 Total Affected People 100 - - 100

Areas of Affected Land (m 2) Rice Land 10,856.16 - - 10,856.16 Chamkar Land 327.00 - - 327.00 Reisdential Land 2,365.15 - - 2,365.15 Total Land Area 13,548.31 - - 13548.31

Impact on Structures:

48 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

213. The construction of the subproject will affect 29 structures and assets of 24 AHs such as three residential structure type 1, two residential structure type 2, two small shops, two stall structures, two access bridge made from drainage pipe, sixteen wooden fences and two wells ( Tab. 3-6-2).

Table 3-6-2: Impact on Structures and other assets in Kouch Noup

Commune Kbal Trach Kralanh Srer Reusey Phsa Trach Total AH Total Village Incidence Quantity AH Quantity AH Quantity AH Quantity

Affected Structure Residential structure type 1 3 66.25 m 2 - - - - 3 66.25 m 2 Residential structure type 2 2 44.25 m 2 - - - - 2 44.25 m 2 Shop 1 13.50 m 2 1 14.52 m 2 - - 2 28.02 m 2 Stall 2 20.55 m 2 - - - - 2 20.55 m 2 Drainage Pipe, Ø0.5m - - 1 5.00 m 1 3.00 m 2 8.00 m Wooden fence 10 367.90 m - - 6 177.00 m 16 544.90 m Well 1 1 well - - 1 1 well 2 2 wells Total AH Incidence 19 - 2 - 8 - 29 - Total AH 17 - 1 - 6 - 24 -

Impact on Trees:

214. In total, the constructions of the structures, canals and dams of the subproject affect on 120 trees belonging to 25 AHs in 3 villages ( Tab. 3-6-3). Among the 3 affected villages, Kralanh has the highest number of affected trees, 87 trees of 17 AHs, Srer Reusey is in the second rank, having 26 affected trees of 4 AHs and Phsa Trach has 7 affected trees of 4 AHs (Tab. 3-6-3).

215. Of 120 affected trees; there are 10 categories of trees such as mango, sugar palm, coconut, papaya, guava, bamboo, jambolan, tamarind, Kraseing and other non-fruit trees. Among affected trees, sugar palm is the most affected trees then jambolan, mango, coconut and non-fruit trees. Papaya, guava, tamarind, bamboo and Kroseing have small affected number.

216. However, the essential productive trees in the subproject are mango, sugar palm, coconut, bamboo, papaya and tamarind because it can contribute to family livelihood. Sugar palm is an important tree in the subproject, since many households produce sugar from palm juice as their secondary income. The sugar production, here, is feasible because of available fire wood in the area.

Table 3-6-3: Loss of Trees in Kouch Noup

49 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

Commune Name Kbal Trach TOTAL Village Name Kralanh Srer Reusey Phsa Trach AHs 17 4 4 25 Total Affected Trees 87 26 7 120 Number of Affected Tree Mango 12 - 1 13 Sugar Palm 33 - - 33 Coconut 8 - 3 11 papaya 3 - - 3 Guava 2 - - 2 Bamboo 1 - - 1 Jumbolan 3 19 2 24 Tamarind 2 - - 2 Kroseing 2 - - 2 Others 21 7 1 29

Impact on Vulnerable Groups:

217. According to DMS data, a total of 19 vulnerable AHs have been identified from the total of 22 vulnerable group incidences in the subproject. They are ranked as vulnerable for at least one of the following reasons: they are woman-headed, aged-headed, disabled- headed, and/or with a monthly household income below the national poverty line ($14/month). Many of the AHs are ranked as vulnerable for more than one of the above reasons, in this case we have listed them in the figures shown in Table 3-6-4 below. Aged- headed and woman-headed AHs are covered about 73% of the total vulnerable household incidences.

218. In total, the subproject will impact on 19 vulnerable AHs, although there is a total of 22 incidences of vulnerability. The vulnerable AHs that have one or more incidences of vulnerability will receive an allowance of $150 per household. The allowance is to reduce their impoverishment risks and assist them to improve their living condition during the resettlement and be advantageous from the project.

Table 3-6-4: Impact on Vulnerable Groups in Kouch Noup

Commune Name Kbal Trach Total Incident of Vulnerable Village Name Kralanh Srer Reusey Phsa Trach Group Affected Vulnerable Groups

Woman-headed AH 6 1 1 8

Aged-headed AH 6 1 1 8

Disabled-headed AH 1 - - 1

Income below US$14/mth 2 - 3 5

Total Incident of Vulnerable Group 15 2 5 22

Total Vulnerable AH 13 2 4 19

Summary of Impact on Affected Households:

219. Table 3-6-5 below provides a summary of impact for the Kouch Noup subproject.

Table 3-6-5: Summary of Project Impact in Kouch Noup

AH Total No. Type of Impact Unit Remark Incidence Quantity

50 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

I Structure 1 Residential structure type 1 m2 3 66.25 2 Residential structure type 2 m2 2 44.25 3 Shop m2 3 28.02 4 Stall m2 2 20.55 5 Drainage Pipe, Ø0.5m m 2 8.00 6 Wooden fence m 16 544.90 7 Well well 2 2 II Land 1 Rice land m2 21 10,856.16 2 Chamkar land m2 2 327.00 4 Residential land m2 8 2,365.15 5 Loss more 10% of productive land AH 5 5 III Tree 1 Mango tree 6 13 2 Sugar Palm tree 7 33 3 Coconut tree 4 11 4 Papaya tree 1 3 5 Guava tree 2 2 6 Bamboo thicket 1 1 7 Jumbolan tree 8 24 8 Tamarind tree 2 2 9 Kroseing tree 2 2 10 Others tree 13 29 IV Vulnerable Group 1Vulnerable Group AH 19 19

3.6.2 Basics of Unit Cost Used in Calculating Compensation

220. The replacement cost for residential land, productive agricultural land, trees and structures is calculated based on the price in neighboring regions and local markets in Kouch Noup subproject area. This price survey responding to the agreed policy on compensation rates between the government and ADB. Based on this policy, an independent local consultant was engaged by IRC to conduct a replacement cost study in the affected area to establish the compensation rates for affected assets.

221. The survey was conducted in July 2009 with existing owners of land and tree, 30 AHs and 30 non-AHs, in 1 FGD meetings, with 3 village leaders, 4 carpenters groups, 5 vegetable vendors and 4 construction material shop-owners. This allowed a comprehensive study of land prices (residential, rice and Chamkar land), and tree prices, labor cost, and house and other structure valuation surrounding Kouch Noup region. The discussion below focuses on compensation rates for the relevant affected properties. The detailed compensation rates for affected assets are shown in Appendix 6 of this RP2.

3.6.3 Detailed Compensation and Other Entitlements

222. The implementation of Kouch Noup subproject will result in the acquisition of lands, trees, and structures as described in Section 3-6. AHs will be compensated according to the resettlement policy and principles set out in Chapter 2 of this RP. Table 3-6-6 outlines the compensation and entitlements for each category of AHs.

Table 3-6-6: Entitlement Matrix of Kouch Noup

51 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

Type of No. Application Entitled Person Entitlements Impact 1. Structures 5 residential Owner or person +Cash compensation of part or entire structures will be structures with customary based on replacement cost of construction materials and 24 AHs usage rights labor without considering deprivation and savage materials 2 shops after demolishing the structures; +AH will be given sufficient time, 15 days, to deconstruct 2 stalls their subjected property; and Allowances: 2 drainage pipes +Cash assistance of $60 for transportation allowance will be provided to 4 AHs of 4 affected houses; 16 wooden +Cash assistance of $25 (or 20Kg of rice per AH per month) fences for living assistance during transition period will be provided to 4 AHs of 4 affected houses; and 2 wells +lf falling in one of the categories of vulnerability, cash assistance of $150 for each category the AH belongs without repeating; 2. Residential 8 affected Owner or person For the portion of the land needed: Land residential plots with +Cash compensation at replacement cost; customary +AH will be given sufficient time to harvest crops and 15 8 AHs usage rights days to deconstruct structures on their subjected property; +lf falling in one of the categories of vulnerability, cash assistance of $150 for each AH without repeating.

3. Chamkar 2 affected Owner or person For the portion of the land needed: Land Chamkar plots with +Cash compensation at replacement cost; customary usage +AH will be given sufficient time to harvest crops and 15 2 AHs rights days to deconstruct structures on their subjected property; +lf falling in one of the categories of vulnerability, cash assistance of $150 for each AH without repeating.

4. Riceland Marginal impact Owners with For the portion of the land acquired: acceptable +Cash compensation at replacement cost; 21 AHs 16 AHs (recognized) +AH will be given sufficient time to harvest crops on proof their subjected property of ownership +lf falling in one of the categories of vulnerability, cash assistance of $150 for each AH without repeating.

AHs without Not applicable acceptable proof of ownership, Including lessees Severe impact Owners with In addition to entitlements item 1, 2, and 3 acceptable +Special Allowance and income restoration: (i) cash 5 AHs (recognized) assistance of $150 will be provided; (ii) the income restoration proof to be provided by the Project component 3; of ownership +lf falling in one of the categories of vulnerability, Cash assistance of $150 for each AH without repeating. AHs without Not applicable acceptable proof of ownership, including lessees Nil 5. Trees All types Owner or person + Annual Crops: AHs will be given two months notice that with the land on which their crops are planted will be damaged or 25 AHs 120 trees customary usage used by the subproject and that they must harvest their rights crops in time; + Cash compensation for loss of crops at annual produce replacement cost; + Perennial Crops and Trees: AHs will be compensated for the loss of fruit and timber trees at replacement cost. The value will be calculated as the annual produce value multiplied by a 1 to 8 years factor, depending type of tree to yield.

52 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

3.6.4 Socio-Economic Profile

Demography:

223. Socio-economic survey which is conducted by RU and Resettlement Specialist in 27 July 2009 in Kouch Noup subproject indicates that the average household size of total AHs is 4 persons per household and it is lower than average national household size, 4.7 per household. The young household head, below 30 year-old, is consisted of 12% of total AHs and have household size below the average number of household size. Household size, which has more than 6 people in the household, is composed of 10% of total AHs and the household head age is above 45 year old. That family is extended family typically including aging parents and/or one or two adult children's spouses and children.

224. There are 55% women, slightly more than men. Almost 15% of affected households are headed by women, and of these,12% are less than 40 years old. This indicates a low rate of separation or divorce. 36% of the total population is below 20 years old, thus indicating there will be a good labor supply for their families, communities, and surrounding regions.

Poverty:

225. The measurement of household income and expenditure, housing type, assets, agricultural land possession size, number and type of livestock, and their declaration of food shortages indicate the incidence of poverty is about 36% in the sample population (based on $1.25/person/day), and of this 9% are considered extremely poor, i.e., have income lower than $14/person/month, inadequate shelter, insufficient land, food deficit for 2 months per year or more, and have insufficient income to purchase medicines and clothes.

226. The data also indicate 45% of the affected households encounter health issues in their family, which is one of the major factors influencing the family financial crisis. 27% of AHs declare that they are difficult of finding job and earning income for living. The survey also indicates that 43% of households face food shortage.

Landholding:

227. On average, AHs hold 1.25 ha of land per household, but there is a wide variance among the households. The most frequently cited reason for poverty was insufficient land for farming and a large family to support. 63% of AHs possess land smaller than 1 ha and 86% own land less than 2 ha. AHs who own more than 4 ha of land (6%). Residential land of AHs in the subproject is on average 1,966m2 per household. This large residential land makes AHs having space to plant vegetables and fruit trees and to raise livestock.

Education:

228. There are different education levels of people in the affected communities. Although almost 100% of the heads of AHs participated in primarily school, 9% are illiterate. Socio- economic survey indicates that 94% of children in the 6 to 12 year age range have studied in primary school, and 33% of children in the 13 to 18 year age range have entered junior high school. Only 14% studied in high school.

229. Average distance from home to primary school in Kouch Noup sub-project is approximately 2.6 km, which take 40 minutes for children to walk. However, Kralanh village the distance to primary school is more than 4 km, which generally takes approximately 60 minutes to walk and is therefore hard for the children.

Health:

53 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

230. Health is one of the main concerns of AHs. According to the survey, 45% of AHs households encounter health issues in their family, of which about 31% mentioned that their health issues are medium and serious for their families as well as unaffordable. The average distance to heath center in Krakor district hospital is 5 km. However, AHs of Kralanh village has to travel more than 7 km to the hospital.

Situation of Women:

231. The socio-economic survey indicates that 55% of APs are women and most of adult women are working as rice farmer and the others are working in non agriculture sector, such as garment factory worker in urban area and migrant worker in Thailand. The women are also responsible for taking care of children, house work and other work around their houses such as planting vegetable, raising livestock, etc.

Support for the Project:

232. According to the socio-economic survey, almost 100% of AHs thinks that the project will benefit them. Besides, providing sufficient water in wet seasons, 100% of total AHs expects that the project will provide additional water for dry season cropping. 30% of AHs believe that the project will provide fish sources for the community and 19% consider the project will provide other benefits. There is also a perception that the Project will lead to other supporting activities from NGOs such agricultural and livestock production skill training with their application providing significant production improvements.

Affected Households Attitudes:

233. The socio-economic survey find out that 100% of AHs prefers cash rather than land- for-land compensation. But if the project provides land-for-land compensation, the criteria is: 1/distance to the new land is within 3 km from the villages, 2/ distance from irrigation is within 1 km, 3/distance from village road is within 1 km and 4/ replacement land is suitable for rice cultivation. 3.5.5 Public Participation and Consultation Informing AHs:

234. A Subproject Steering Committee meeting was held on 25 March 2009 at the conference hall of Pursat province chaired by Chairman of Provincial Resettlement Subcommittee (RRS) and governor of Pursat with participation from representatives of Resettlement Department of MEF, Resettlement Unit of MOWRAM, IRC Provincial Working Group and affected commune chiefs. The meeting focused on launching the DMS in Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash and Kouch Noup subproject and discussing on the (i) resettlement policy, (ii) public consultations with AHs, and (iii) background of the land usage in the four subprojects of Pursat.

235. Before DMS, on 11 June 2009, the IRC and PRS working group conducted 3 public consultations meeting with potential AHs. The each meeting explains (i) supporting and implementing agencies and agencies charging for DMS, preparing RP, monitoring RP and grievance redress, (ii) benefits of the subproject, (iii) resettlement issues and procedure, (iv) compensation and entitlement, (v) people participation in project, (vi) necessary document for DMS and (vii) open forum for discussion.

236. After the each meeting, Public Information Booklets were distributed to the participants in order to disseminating information on Involuntary Resettlement Policy of ADB, subproject benefits, participation with the project and other relevant information. AH who didn’t attend the meeting, would get the Booklets during DMS survey.

Focus Group Discussion with AHs:

54 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

237. A Focus Group Discussions with AHs were conducted from 27 July 2009 in Kralanh pagoda with mixed group participants, 15 people, from Kralanh, Srer Rusey and Phsar Trach villages to investigate the impact of the subproject, socio-economic condition, village profile, training need assessment for livelihood restoration, and concern of AHs. The content of the discussions during the FGDs are summarized below.

238. The main occupations of AHs in the subproject are (i) rice farmer, (ii) fire wood collector from nearby forest, (iii) vegetable farming, (iv) fishing, (v) sugar palm producer, (vi) garment factory and construction worker, (vii) doing small business in community, (viii) livestock and cattle farming, etc.

239. Rehabilitation of village roads, construction of primary schools, wells, assistance from NGOs in low interest loan, raising livestock, vegetable farming, as well as increasing of rice and livestock price are significant development in the subproject area and essential factors of the last five years to contribute to improvement of AH livelihood. With good road middleman is accessible to purchase agricultural products in the villages. The new construction of primary school buildings makes children accessible to school easily. The low interest loan and livestock assistance from NGOs allow the community borrowers to be able to pay back and promote small investment in community, particularly, agricultural investment and to gain more income from raising livestock for their living. The high price of agricultural products in the last few years provides more profits to farmers in the project areas as well as the entire country.

240. The many AHs are living under national poverty line in the subproject area, and some of them are very poor. The main reasons of the poverty are because (i) a member of their families falls sick and their family saving is entirely used for health issues, (ii) they don’t have land for farming and no job, (iii) they are experience drought and flood as well as fall into debt of agriculture investment, particularly fertilizer and household expenditure, (iv) they have small farm land and large family member, but jobless, (v) household head are vulnerable person and (vi) they cannot afford to purchase fertilizer, animal food and fuel for agricultural machinery with high price.

241. Problems in agriculture mostly are: (i) drought and flood during cultivation seasons, (ii) fertilizer, insecticide and agricultural equipment are very expensive and incorrectly used, (iii) lack of agricultural technique, (iv) agriculture market are depend on middleman and not stable, (v) rate and insect destroy rice,

242. Small livestock and cattle farming is one of the main income, protein food, agricultural labor and organic fertilizer source for AHs. Currently, the AHs have experience hardship in raising livestock. The reasons are high animal food price, no veterinary in the region and low profit because of low selling price.

243. With the project, the groups expect that the project will allow them to double crop (dry and wet season), have water for growing vegetable around their houses, and have more fish for fishing.

244. The groups prefer land to cash compensation. The compensation money will be used to purchase nearby rice land, livestock, cattle, agricultural equipment or fertilizer, or for other household needs. If they use compensation money to buy land, their prefer location is within few kilometers from village. The compensation money will be used with few months after payment.

245. Beside compensation, the groups address the need for more support from the project such as training on various suitable agricultural skills and off-farm training such as skill to repair machine, particularly hand tractor, pumping machine and motorbike and beauty make- up skills as well as hair cut. For vulnerable group, the aged-headed household needs health care support, the woman-headed household request to support their agricultural labor, the disable headed household and poor household need credit for business investment. 55 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

3.6.6 Implementation Schedule

246. Table 3-6-8 below provides a proposed implement schedule for the Tram Mneash subproject.

Table 3-6-8Implementation Schedule for Tram Mneash

2009 2010 Activity Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Approval of RP by IRC & ADB X Notice to Proceed with implementation X Final disclosure/concurrence of AHs X Vouchering X Delivery of compensation /entitlements X Agriculture training activities* X X X X X X X X X X X Internal & external monitoring X X X X X X X X X X External monitoring X X X X X Submit compliance both external and internal X X X X X X X X X X monitoring report Evaluate RP implementation X X X Additional resettlement measures X X X Submission of RP Completion report X Approval of RP Completion report X

* : the activities are to train AHs in the agriculture extension in component 3 of the NWISP.

3.6.7 Costs and Budget

Procedures for Flow of Funds

247. The IRC will request the Ministry of Economic and Finance (MEF) for funding for the implementation of the RP. The funds will be forwarded to the Provincial Departments of Finance. Payment vouchers will be prepared at the Provincial Department of Finance. Payment of compensation and other entitlements as described in Chapter 3 of the RP will be given in cash and will be distributed in village offices. The AHs will be notified through the village chiefs of the schedule of payment of compensation and other entitlements.

Comepnsation and Contingency Costs

248. The cost estimates for the implementation of the RP2 also include a provision for contingencies equivalent to 15% of the base cost of resettlement. MOWRAM and IRC will ensure that adequate funds are made available as and when necessary for the efficient and timely implementation of the resettlement activities.

Estimate of Resettlement Costs

249. The overall estimated costs excluding administration costs are shown in Table 3-6-8 below. Table 3-6-8: Estimated Costs for Implementation of the RP of Kouch Noup

No. Compensation Items Unit Rate US$ Quantity Cost US$ I Compensation for Structure 2 1 Residential structure type 1 m 31.00 66.25 2,053.75 2 2 Residential structure type 2 m 53.00 44.25 2,345.25

56 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

2 3 Shop m 15.00 28.20 423.00 2 4 Stall m 4.00 20.55 82.20 5 Drainage Pipe, Ø0.5m m 65.00 8.00 520.00 6 Wooden fence m 2.80 544.90 1,525.72 7 Well well 450.00 2.00 900.00 Sub-Total (1) 7,849.92 II Compensation for Land 2 1 Rice land m 0.19 10,856.16 2,062.67 2 2 Chamkar land m 0.15 327.00 49.05 2 3 Residential land m 1.10 2,365.15 2,601.67 Sub-Total (2) 4,713.39 III Compensation for Tree 1 Mango Tree 25.00 13 325.00 2 Sugar Palm Tree 30.00 33 990.00 3 Coconut Tree 28.00 11 308.00 4 papaya Tree 2.00 3 6.00 5 Guava Tree 3.00 2 6.00 Thick 6 Bamboo 7.50 et 7.50 1 7 Jumbolan Tree 7.00 24 168.00 8 Tamarind Tree 22.00 2 44.00 9 Kroseing Tree 10.00 2 20.00 10 Others Tree 5.00 29 145.00 Sub-Total (3) 120 2,019.50 Allowance for Vulnerable Groups and IV severe AH 1 Woman, Aged and Disable Household Head, AH 150 19 2,850.00 and Household income below US$ 14/mth 2 Ahs of loss > 10% of their productive land AH 150 5 750.00 Sub-Total (4) 3,600.00 Total Base Cost (sum 1-4 above) 18,182.81 Contingencies (15%) 2,727.42 Grand Total 20,910.23

3.7 Total resettlement cost for 5 subprojects

250. This RP2 covers 5 subprojects such as Po Pi Deum, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash and Kouch Noup. As stated earlier, the natures of those five subprojects are different in the context of (1) scope and designs of the subproject construction, (2) subproject locations, and (3) local people preference and behavior. Therefore, the entitlements and resettlement costs for the subprojects are separated, and the total resettlement costs for all 5 subprojects excluding administration cost are estimated at $472,137.31 and shown in Table 3.7.1 .

Table 3.7.1: Total Resettlement Cost

No. Desription Cost US$ Total Resettlement Cost without External Monitoring and Replacement A Cost Sutdy 1 Resettlement cost for Po Pi Deum 67,079.99 2 Resettlement cost for Anlong Svay 88,755.39

57 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

3 Resettlement cost for Krouch Saeuch 91,938.78 4 Resettlement cost for Tram Mneash 132,102.92

5 Resettlement cost for Kouch Noup 20,910.23 Subtotal 400,787.31 B External Monitoring Cost 61,625.00

C Cost for Replacement Cost study 9,725.00

Total Resettlement Costs for 5 Subprojects 472,137.31

4 GRIEVANCE REDRESS

4.1 Grievance Rights

251. With reference to ADB policy, all AHs have the right to appeal against any aspect of decisions made not in accordance with the RP or with commitments given to them, or if they disagree with the level or manner of compensation, including that for land lost. The main objectives of the grievance procedure aim to provide a mechanism to ensure for accurate and fair compensation and resettlement program alleviation of any adverse effects on AHs, to mediate conflict and to avoid lengthy litigation that is unfair to Ahs. However, the complaint process will not be an obstacle to the project implementation. It also provides people a chance to express and resolve their objections or concerns about their compensation or assistance.

4.2 Function

252. The functions of the grievance process will be: a. To make all APs aware of the process of the RP and entitlement policy and of the timetable for implementation b. To provide support for the APs being relocated on problems arising out of their adjustment to their new environments c. To record grievances of the APs and categorise and prioritise those grievances that need to be resolved by the Grievance Redress Committee d. To report new developments to aggrieved parties and to assist the APs in dealing with these decisions of the Grievance Redress Committee (the GRC will be given the power to resolve all but the most serious of grievances and its decisions will not be contested in any other forum, except in the courts of law). 4.3 Steps Involved

253. The grievance process must be explained to every AH at the time of the public meetings and consultations and during the delivery of compensation and other entitlements. The process should be as follows: (i) First stage: AHs will present their complaints and grievances to the Village or Commune Resettlement Sub-committee or IRC working group and, if he or she wishes, to the nominated NGO working on the GRC. The NGO will record the complaint in writing and accompany the AH to meet the Village or Commune Resettlement Sub-Committee. The Sub-Committee will be obliged to provide immediate written confirmation of receiving the complaint. If after 15 days the aggrieved AH does hear from, or if the AH is not satisfied with the decision taken in the first stage, the complaint may be brought to the District Office. (ii) Second stage: The District Office has 15 days within which to resolve the complaint to the satisfaction of all concerned. If the complaint cannot be solved at this stage, the District Office will bring the case to the Provincial Grievance Redress Committee. 58 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

(iii) Third stage: The Provincial Grievance Redress Committee meets with the aggrieved party and tries to resolve the situation. The Committee may ask for a review of the DMS by the external monitor (EM). Within 30 days of the submission of the grievance, the Committee must make a written decision and submit copies to MOWRAM, the EM, the IRC and the AH. (iv) Final stage: If the aggrieved AH does not hear from the Provincial Grievance Redress Committee or is not satisfied, he/she will bring the case to Provincial Court. This is the final stage for adjudicating complaints. Within 30 days of the submission of the grievance, the Court must make a written decision and submit copies to MOWRAM, the EM, IRC and the AH. If any party is still unsatisfied with the Provincial Court judgment, he/she can bring the case to a higher-level court.

254. The grievance procedures do not take away the constitutional rights of any AH him or herself to lodge a complaint with the court at the municipal level. This may be followed by subsequent appeals to the court at the provincial level and national level, but the purpose of the grievance procedure is that citizens, particularly people in the municipal and commune/village level, will not need to take their complaints to the formal legal institutions and that most complaints will be settled at the lowest level. AHs will be exempted from all administrative, transfer and legal fees.

255. AHs do not have writing skills and the possibility of being able to express grievances verbally has been considered, however, AHs are encouraged to seek assistance from the EM, other local NGOs or other family members, village heads or community chiefs to write their grievances in paper and to have access to the DMS or other documentation, and to any survey or valuation by the EM, to ensure that where disputes do occur all the details have been recorded accurately enabling all parties to be treated fairly.

4.4 Make up of the Grievance Committee

256. Provincial Grievance Committee under the Provincial Resettlement Sub-Committee comprise of four permanent members and two local members. The Committee is chaired by the Provincial Governor or his representative and has members from the Provincial Head of the Department of Water Resources, the Provincial Head of the Department of Finance, Justice Department, a member from the external monitoring agency and, on a co-opted basis, one or more local leaders (such as the Village Head or Commune Chairman) familiar with the area and the circumstances of the complaint, one of whom at least should have been nominated by the AH and briefed to represent him or her. Co-opted members may include any local NGO nominated by the AH and the External Monitor contracted by the IRC. The External Monitor and any local NGO representing the AH may offer advocacy, advice or expert support, but may not vote.

5 ORGANIZATIONAL FRAMEWORK

257. For purposes of resettlement planning and implementation, including the conduct of DMS, consultation with and information to AHs, IRC chaired by MEF has convened a Resettlement Subcommittee – Working Group (PRSC-WG) of each subproject.

258. A Resettlement Unit in MOWRAM (MOWRAM-RU) and Resettlement Department of MEF are responsible for coordinating and managing all aspects of resettlement. MOWRAM- RU is responsible for supporting the PRSC-WG of each subproject and provincial authorities in the conduct of surveys and planning for resettlement in liaison with the IRC, Ministry of Agriculture Forestry and Fishery (MAFF) and MLMUPC. MOWRAM-RU will be responsible for supervising the detailed implementation of the RP on behalf of the Executing Agency. These organizational and management arrangements are applicable to all resettlement activities in the project.

59 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

5.1 Institutions for Resettlement 5.1.1 Steering Committee

259. The Steering Committee of each subproject comprising representatives of MEF, MOWRAM, Ministry of Rural Development (MRD), MAFF, MLMUPC and IRC will supervise all aspects of the subproject including resettlement.

5.1.2 MOWRAM

260. MOWRAM is responsible for implementing the irrigation and agriculture components of the Project on behalf of the Government of Cambodia. MOWRAM has established a PIU, based in Banteay Meanchey and Pursat, and headed by the Director of PDWRAM as Provincial Project Director of each subproject, to implement the irrigation components.

261. PIU personnel have been appointed to the PRSC-WG operating under the direction of MOWRAM-RU to work with the IRC, PRS and provincial authorities on implementation of the RP to minimize hardship of AHs. MOWRAM-RU will have the following tasks: a. consultation with the concerned AH together with the village leader and village development committee to identify and register land, agricultural development requirements and options of individual AHs; b. setting of a timetable for land acquisition and resumption of production of the AHs; c. identification of support agency, including NGO, PDLMUPC, village and commune chiefs responsible for specific support to the AHs; d. reporting to IRC and ADB on numbers, identities and needs of AHs registered for assistance; e. liaising with, service provider, NGO and PDAFF to ensure provision of agricultural training and extension to the severely affected households; f. liaising with IRC and Provincial Department of Finance (PDF) to ensure timely provision of any compensation to facilitate land acquisition and agricultural production support; g. review of options for inclusion in a MOWRAM and PRSC-WG managed agricultural relocation program in areas identified and surveyed by MOWRAM-RU for that purpose; h. monitoring of these actions by the EM and reporting on them to the IRC and ADB.

5.1.3 Service Provider managing the Agriculture Training Program 5

262. Service provider of component 3 of each subproject provides training on agriculture technique to AHs for improving their rice production and the severely AHs of each subproject for restoring their livelihood through entitle to demonstration programs and other benefits of agriculture training in component 3 of the subproject. The training program is agriculture extension training in component 3 of the project. Under this program, MOWRAM will assist them in participating the agricultural training, while the service provider of each subproject manages the training.

263. To achieve the aforementioned objective, the service provider will be asked to carry out the following major tasks: a. Situational analysis to find out the appropriate training to be provided to the target AP household; b. Development of appropriate curriculums for the training of AHs, as required; c. Delivery of farmer field training and on-farm demonstration; d. Introduction to seed selection and storage; e. Organization of self-help group among the AP household beneficiaries; and f. Provision of extension and backstop support to the AHs.

5 Includes also the off-farm training such as skill to repair machine, particularly hand tractor, pumping machine, motobike, and beauty make-up skills as well as hair cut. 60 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

5.1.4 Resettlement Subcommittee

264. A Resettlement Sub-committee (RS) of each subproject was assembled at each provincial level by the IRC, and will be responsible for the following resettlement activities: a. Liaising with the RU to carry out the overall implementation of resettlement activities in accordance with the resettlement policies specified in the RP; b. Amending or complementing the RP in coordination with concerning government agencies in case of any problems identified by internal and/or external monitoring of RP implementation to ensure that the objectives of the RP are met; c. Overall planning of the resettlement programs; d. Guiding and supervising the field staff to carry out the verification of inventory, finalization of entitlements, and assessment of final compensation; e. Submitting compensation / assistance costs for approval by the IRC, and allocation of needed resources; f. Informing AHs of the resettlement program and of their entitlements; in coordination with the local authorities; g. Supervising the compensation payment process and the implementation of the RP in all the communes; h. Providing support to the Provincial Grievance Committee to redress grievances concerning about resettlement; activities in collaboration with the local authorities and GRC; i. Providing training to the commune staff on planning and implementation of resettlement activities and on the principles of resettlement in accordance with the RP; j. Preparing periodic supervision and monitoring reports liaising with the MOWRAM resettlement unit on RP implementation then MOWRAM-RU will officially submit to the IRC and ADB.

5.1.5 Provincial Agencies

265. The office of the provincial and district Governors, provincial agencies of MRD, MAFF and MLM and Department of Finance assist the PRS in the following: a. Land ownership and land holding surveys; b. Establishing compensation prices for land, crops and other fixed assets; c. Validating tenure status of land and structure; and d. Land recovery and allocation.

266. Moreover, local authorities may be called on to assist the each RS in: a. Public information campaign, public participation and consultation; b. Finalizing compensation and entitlement forms for each AH; c. Payment of compensation and allowances; d. Planning and implementing all resettlement and rehabilitation activities in the district and commune level; e. Addressing all grievances in the commune in accordance with the established procedures; and f. Maintain record of all public meetings, grievances, and actions taken to address complaints and grievances. 5.2 Monitoring and Evaluation

267. The regular monitoring and evaluation of all efforts relating to involuntary resettlement will be coordinated by MOWRAM. The objectives are to help ensure that the RP is implemented as planned and that the mitigating measures carried out are adequate and effective in addressing the adverse social impact of the Project. The MOWRAM-RU will serve as the in-house monitoring body for the Project.

61 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

5.2.1 Indicators for In-house Monitoring

268. The following indicators will be monitored periodically by the RU: a. Compensation and entitlements are calculated at rates and procedures provided in the RP; b. AHs are paid as per agreement with project authorities; c. Public information, public consultation and grievance redress procedures are respected as described in the RP; d. The implementation of the Agriculture Training Program (ATP) carried out by a service provider; e. Public facilities and infrastructure affected by the Project are restored promptly; and, f. The transition between resettlement and the construction of the project is smooth.

5.2.2 External Monitoring Agent (EMA)

269. Besides the EA, an independent institution to carry out external monitoring and post- implementation evaluation of the approved RP is also essential to ensure the successful implementation of RP. The IRC will prepare the TOR for prospected EMA and will establish a contract for the monitoring of the RP.

270. The EMA will provide the IRC a copy of its quarterly monitoring reports. Then the IRC will forward the reports to MOWRAM and ADB simultaneously. This monitoring report will also be posted on ADB website as per the Public Communication Policy (PCP). The EMA will likewise conduct a Post-RP Implementation Evaluation Study in October 2010.

62 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

Appendix 1:

DMS QUESTIONNAIRE

63 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

64 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

65 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

66 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

67 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

68 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

69 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

70 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

71 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

72 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

73 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

Appendix 2:

DMS DATA REPORT

74 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects than 10% than Household Loss more more Loss ) 2 ¦ ¦ ¦¦ 2 2 22 102.72 dIPUmidIPUmi dIPUmidIPUmi ) Residen.L(m 2 12.40 34.00 16.00 21.75 18.00 Nation Nation ReligionKing RBHraCaNacRkkm<úCa 134.37 épÞdIb:HBal;¬m épÞdIb:HBal;¬m épÞdIb:HBal;¬m épÞdIb:HBal;¬m Kingdom Cambodia Of dIERs dIERs dIERs dIERs Cati sasnaCati RBHmhakSRt Rice land (m land Rice 45.24 5.24 236.52 102.72 Ce.slab MOWRAM.RU 49.00 59.50 198.10 23.00 140.00 bamboo wood m² Sao Channarith Sao Prepared by by Prepared 14.40 Affec.Structure Cmty rest Cmty Date Date :day: month: 2009 Year: 15.00 Shop Shop 115.81 GclnRTBüepSg²GclnRTBüepSg² GclnRTBüepSg²GclnRTBüepSg² House( m² ) m² House( ) m Fence( 3 9 57.15 8 9 50 54 11 13 47.96 49 148.98 epSg² 1 1 4 RksaMg 1 GMBil na tamarin krasaing other Cate.1 Cate.2m² house m²m² hall 5 81 50 51 eck n Banteay Meanchey Province Meanchey nBanteay eTob 2 6 1 1 RBIg 2 4 4 1 2 1 1 3 2 3 6 bJsSI Cerified by Cerified Tauch Ang Tauch Affected Tree Affected 5 1 xñúr Chief MOWRAM NWISP.PMU Chief RU of 3 RtEbk cMnYnedImeQIcMnYnedImeQI cMnYnedImeQIcMnYnedImeQI énKeRmageRsacRsBPaKBay½Bü extþbnÞaymanC½y 3 3 5 6 18 17 4 187 1 6 206 254.09 115.81 15.00 14.40 163.00 306.60 4 lðúg 1 emon longan papaya guava jackfruit bamboo jumbolan custard bana eBaF×BIredIm Subproject Subproject I of NorthwestIrrigation Project Sector TwkedaH Teuk Doh Ko Doh Teuk 5 1 1 2 dUg coconut 2 1 6 5 91 PoPi PoPi Deum etñat 6 4 1 1 1 1 10 49 12 39 5 9 4 119 115 14 5 sVay 4 3 3 dless dless 1 The Summary List of APs List Theofin APs Summary taragsegçbesdækic©sgÁm GnuKeRmag 1 7 1 cas;Cra RKYsarRkIRk RKYsarGt;dI 1 1 1 RsþIemm:ay 1 2 3 Team Leader Team Verified Verified by 5 92 28 1 11 3 1 2 1 Chheang Chhorlin Chheang

5 9 2 8 2 1 1 6 6 4 4 8 7 1 3 30 29 5 31 31 107 105 1 13 20 2 10 MC Canal DMS H/h H/h H/h H/h <14$/MH/h mango palm SC SC Name of Name of No. Affected Disable Widow Aged Income Lan Dam eQµaHRbLay cMnYnÉksar cMnYnRKYsar Bikar Mongkul Borey District Borey Mongkul Name Name of eQµaHeQµaH PUmi PUmi XMu XMu eQµaHeQµaH PUmi PUmi XMu XMu Village Commune and PUmi PUmi eBaF×BIredImeBaF×BIredIm XuM XuMrhat;Twk rhat;Twk PUmi PUmi BRg BRg XuM XuM bnÞaynag bnÞaynag PUmi PUmi BRg BRg XuM XuM bnÞaynag bnÞaynag PUmi PUmi RtagRtag XuM XuM bnÞaynag bnÞaynag PUmi PUmi eKakeBñAeKakeBñA XuM bnÞaynag XuM bnÞaynag PUmi PUmi cMkartaedakcMkartaedak XuM XuMbJsSIeRkak bJsSIeRkak PUmi PUmi nagektnagekt XuM XuMbJsSIeRkak bJsSIeRkak PUmi PUmi Gnøg;f¶an;Gnøg;f¶an; XuM XuMbt;Rtg; bt;Rtg; PUmi PUmi bt;Rtg;tUcbt;Rtg;tUc XuM XuM bt;Rtg;bt;Rtg; PUmi PUmi bt;Rtg;FMekItbt;Rtg;FMekIt XuM XuM bt;Rtg;bt;Rtg; PUmi PUmi bt;Rtg;tUcbt;Rtg;tUc XuM XuM bt;Rtg;bt;Rtg; PUmi PUmi nagektnagekt XuM XuMbJsSIeRkak bJsSIeRkak PUmi PUmi eBaF×BIredImeBaF×BIredIm XuM XuMrhat;Twk rhat;Twk PUmi PUmi BRg BRg XuM XuM bnÞaynag bnÞaynag PUmi PUmi BRg BRg XuM XuM bnÞaynag bnÞaynag PUmi PUmi RtagRtag XuM XuM bnÞaynag bnÞaynag PUmi PUmi eKakeBñAeKakeBñA XuM bnÞaynag XuM bnÞaynag PUmi PUmi cMkartaedakcMkartaedak XuM XuMbJsSIeRkak bJsSIeRkak PUmi PUmi nagektnagekt XuM XuMbJsSIeRkak bJsSIeRkak PUmi PUmi Gnøg;f¶an;Gnøg;f¶an; XuM XuMbt;Rtg; bt;Rtg; PUmi PUmi bt;Rtg;tUcbt;Rtg;tUc XuM XuM bt;Rtg;bt;Rtg; PUmi PUmi bt;Rtg;FMekItbt;Rtg;FMekIt XuM XuM bt;Rtg;bt;Rtg; PUmi PUmi bt;Rtg;tUcbt;Rtg;tUc XuM XuM bt;Rtg;bt;Rtg; PUmi PUmi nagektnagekt XuM XuMbJsSIeRkak bJsSIeRkak PoPi Deum Village, Rohattoek Com. Deum Village, Rohattoek PoPi Com. Villa, Banteayneang PongRor Com. Villa, Banteayneang PongRor Villa,Com. Trang Banteayneang Com. Vill, Phnov Banteayneang Kok Krauk Com. Reusey ChamkatadaukVill, Ket Com. Vill, Krauk Neang Reusey Thnan Vill,Com. Borttrang Anlong Vill,Tauch Com. Borttrang Borttrang Com. Borttrang Vill, Keut Borttrangthum Vill,Tauch Com. Borttrang Borttrang Ket Com. Vill, Krauk Neang Reusey srubTaMgGs;man 9 PUmi nig 4 XMu XMu 4 nig PUmi 9 srubTaMgGs;man 4 5 9 1 2 6 8 3 7 No Rsuk mgÁlburI Rsuk mgÁlburI l>r KN³kmµkarGnþrRksYgénkargaredaHRsaydIFøI nigpÞHsEm,g KN³kmµkarGnþrRksYgénkargaredaHRsaydIFøI KeRmagRbB½n§eRsacRsBPaKBay½Bü l>r l>rl>r Inter-Ministerial Resettlement Committee Inter-MinisterialResettlement Irrigation Project Sector Northwest

75 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects Aph/h than 10% than lose more 1 2 3 10 Others Kroseing Tamarin 1 1 2 2 Nation Religion Nation King 10 6 Kingdom Of Cambodia Banana Acasia RBHraCaNacRkkm<úCa Cati sasna RBHmhakSRt 1 1 2 1 5 1 Custard Custard apple 1 11 2 1 8 1 1 1 3 Bamboo Jumbolan Trees Affected Affected Jackfruit Citrus guava papaya 1 1 2 1 4 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 1 2 5 5 1 1 3 6 3 1 Mango Palm Coconut Fruit Milk Longan 2 m 2 m 17.05 20.92 25.84 28.00 24.00 2 Meanchey Province Province Meanchey m ent Shop Shop H. Stall 15.00 30.24 8.70 11.80 37.80 17.80 12.50 15.50 Affected Structure Affected 23.00 Bamboo Wood Slab() m² ) 2 14.40 ) hall rest (m 2 2 ) Cate.2 (m 2 2 36.00 13.68 25.00 25.22 14.08 Cate.1(m RmageRsacRsBPaKBay½Bü extþbnÞaymanC½y RmageRsacRsBPaKBay½Bü %of P.Land ) 2 tofProjectBanteay Northwest Sector in Irrigation 1- Main Canal ( MC ) ( Canal Main 1- Affected Land (m Land Affected Rice Chamkar Residential AffectedProduc. Land House(m) Fence District 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 m 3,200.00 2,400.00 ialAgr. Total 2 690.00 0.00 332.00 0.00 m Mongkul Borey Mongkul 2 2 usem 2 Commune, Commune, m taragBisþar esdækic©sgÁm GnuKeRmageBaF×BIredIm énKe GnuKeRmageBaF×BIredIm esdækic©sgÁm taragBisþar 2 m 1,600.00 3,200.00 320.00 4,800.00 4,800.00 5,600.002,400.00 1,600.00 11,600.00 3,530.00 440.00 2,400.00 5,400.00 330.00 3,530.00 600.00 5,400.00 20,000.00 1,600.00 20,000.00 15,000.00 4,000.00 60.00 19,000.00 17,600.0050,000.00 60.00 17,600.00 228.00 50,000.00 20,000.0016,400.00 1,920.00 20,000.00 10,000.0050,000.00 400.00 16,000.00 50,000.00 245.00 10,000.00 600.00 50,000.00 1,000.00 50,000.00 102.72 35.00 outside in Use notin Land Land Affec. Affec. Community Cem Rohatt Toek 1 1 2,400.00 1 Village, Village, Detail List of Socio-economyofSubprojec Deum PoPi income H/h H/h Po Deum Po Pi

H/h H/h Head Head Head <14$/m Head of Age Widow Aged Disable H/h Landless Land Land Land Resident 1 30 1 1 3,200.00 1 34 1 54 1 Sex 678 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 39 31 32333 of HHd of 1 53 1 59 1 43 1 33 1 59 1 531 46 1 1 33 1 40 1 4,800.00 711 60 1 1 32 1 60.00 38 1 4,800.00 56 1 42 1 20,000.00 35 1 40 1 33 1 1,700.00 59 20,000.00 1 55 M F HHD ChendaKimlen LeimKo Som Thoeng Meas Sitha Som Leang SengChhuoy SuonVoeung Chhem Nak Meas Map Yoeut Yan Luy Yang Phal Chiv KungKrak LoakVeak An Yat Chhem Saveth ChendaKoeu BouNop Meas Kemnay KhamLek SounKoy SengChhouy YermTuy 5 Household Name Household Mongkul Borey District Borey Mongkul cinþa KimeLn cinþa ELm kU Fwg suM mas suIfa lag sUm esg QYy sYn evOg Qim Nak; mas m:ab; y:an eyOt luy ya:g pl CIv Rkak; Kg; eLak vak; Gan y:at Qwm saevt eXO cinþa b‘U Nub mas KiméN xaM lik s‘un kuy esg QYy Ey:m Tuy CH CH0+000-000 CH0+000-000 CH0+000-000 CH0+000-000 CH0+000-000 CH0+000-000 CH0+000-000 CH0+000-000 CH0+000-000 CH0+000-000 CH0+000-000 CH0+000-000 CH0+000-100 CH0+250-300 CH 0+100-150 CH 0+150-200 CH 0+150-200 CH 0+200-250 CH 0+200-250 CH 0+250-300 CH 0+250-300 CH 0+300-350 CH 0+350-450 CH HH Qu. 1 2 3 4 1 1 002/001 2 2 002/002 3 3 002/003 4 4 002/004 5 5 002/005 6 6 002/006 7 7 002/007 8 8 002/008 9 9 002/009 10 10 002/010 11 11 002/011 12 12 002/012 13 13 002/013 14 14 002/014 15 15 002/015 16 16 002/016 17 17 001/001 18 18 001/002 19 19 001/003 20 20 001/004 21 21 001/005 22 22 001/006 23 23 001/007 Rsuk mgÁlburI mgÁlburI Rsuk No No No. No. 1- PUmi eBaF×BIredIm XuM rhat;Twk Rsuk mgÁlburI Rsukrhat;TwkmgÁlburI XuM eBaF×BIredIm PUmi 1- KN³kmµkarGnþrRksYgénkargaredaHRsaydIFøI nigpÞHsEm,g KN³kmµkarGnþrRksYgénkargaredaHRsaydIFøI KeRmagRbB½n§eRsacRsBPaKBay½Bü Inter-Ministerial Resettlement Committee Irrigation Sector Project Northwest DMS

76 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects Aph/h than 10% than lose more 1 4 2 5 Others 1 3 1 Kroseing Tamarin 1 1 3 1 48 11 11 1 1 23 1 5 5 1 6 16 20 4 10 115 2 7 12 Banana Acasia 1 6 Custard apple Custard 1 20 7 1 1 50 5 1 45 Bamboo Jumbolan Trees 5 5 Affected Affected Jackfruit Citrus guava papaya 4 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 4 2 2 1 3 3 2 3 1 1 6 4 6 5 1 1 5 1 1 4 3 1 3 1 5 10 5 Mango Palm CoconutFruit Milk Longan 2 m 2 m 2 m ent ent Shop ShopH. Stall 22.00 27.00 45.00 Affected Structure Affected Bamboo Wood Slab(m² ) ) 2 ) resthall (m 2 2 ) Cate.2 (m 2 2 Cate.1(m % of % P.Land ) 102.72 148.98 14.40 23.00 198.10 45.24 115.81 39 5 9 4 3 1 3 2 3 81 2 Affected Land (m Land Affected 34.00 2- Secondary Canal ( SC ) ( Canal Secondary 2- Rice Chamkar Residential 134.37 AffectedProduc. Land House(m) Fence 2 m District District District ialAgr. Total 2 m 503,852.00 2 2 Mongkul Mongkul Borey Mongkul Borey Mongkul usem 19,812 Mongkul Mongkul Borey 2 m 3,740.00 225.00 3,740.00 6,400.006,420.00 225.00 6,400.00 135.008,000.00 6,420.00 750.00 8,000.00 600 Commune, Commune, Commune, Commune, Commune, Commune, 2 m 4,856.00 2,800.00 56.00 7,600.00 72.77 1% 1,600.006,400.006,400.00 231.00 1,600.00 600.00 231.00 1,600.00 396.00 7,231.00 6,400.00 1,600.00 4,100.00 400.00 6,400.00 7,200.00 3,200.00 1,000.001,284.00 7,200.00 6,400.00 32.20 84.00 7,600.00 0% 490,390 50,000.00 1,540.00 50,000.00 12,160.00 891.0050,900.00 2,160.00 10,891.00 900.00 50,000.00 70,000.00 8,000.00 44.00 78,000.00 63,035.00 23,500.00 450.00 86,535.00 89,891.00 61,500.00 1,626.00 148,535.00 35,000.00 4,800.0013,600.00 630.00 3,200.00 35,000.0016,200.00 12.00 4,000.0070,084.00 24,800.00 800.00 16,000.00 200.00 2,514.00 20,000.00 0% 88,200.00 outside inUse not in Land Land Affec. Affec. Community Cem 180,256.00 42,660.00 1,835.00 220,060.00 15,522 Bantheayneang Bontheayneang Bantheayneang income H/h H/h Village, Village, Village, Village, Village, Village, Trang H/h H/h Head Head Head <14$/m Head Pongror PongRor of Age Widow Aged Disable H/h Landless Land Land Land Resident 1 64 1 1 1 38 1 Sex 678 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 39 31 32333 of HHd of 1 641 45 1 1 36 1 52 1 43 1 55 1 25,400.00 1,600.00 741 52 1 400.00 27,000.00 1 641 741 1 40,400.00 35 1 1 46 1 42 1 400.00 56 100,056.00 40,000.00 2,500.001 8,600.007 35 3,500.00 1 56.00 102,500.00 1 3 8,600.00 1 47 1 6213 46 1 1 11 1 41 1 51 1 14,800.00 68 32,000.001 47 1 1 120.005 46 47,200.00 29.40 1 4,000.00 0% 6,400.00 800.00 9,600.00 22.00 0% M F HHD 28 3 2 3 1 4 Chenda Budy Chenda KungNil Ben Nhep Reth La Sean Yerm Sareung Srey KhamPheang Champa Mai Koun In Panly Phon Kem Herm PhonSakorn Chhoeut Chhean Sun Thorngderng Chhom Mi Kem Herm Samley Nha Seap Dul Mon Set Vatt Mi Thorn Sav Long Yun ChhumMorn Chhatt Yamm Bunroeun Sot 5 Household Name Household cinþa b‘utDI cinþa nil Kg; b‘ín jwb er:t La Ey:m eson saerOg RsI xaM Pag ém: cM)a: GaM XYn palI Puk Kim Ehm saxn pun eQOt Qan fgEdg s‘un qMumI Kim Ehm sMlI j:a esob Dul est m:un v:at;mI sav fn yn; Lúg QuM m:n qat; yuaM b‘unerOn sut CH CH0+700 CH0+800 CH 0+100 CH 0+100 CH 0+300 CH 0+300 CH Total 31 HH Total 7 HH Total 4 HH Total 5 HH CH0+300-350 CH0+300-350 CH0+350-400 CH0+450-500 CH0+500-550 CH0+400-450 CH0+000-000 CH0+000-000 CH0+450-500 CH0+500-550 CH0+700-800 CH0+800-900 CH0+550-600 CH0+000-000 CH0+800-900 CH1+100-200 CH1+100-200 CH1+300-400 CH1+200-300 DMS DMS DMS DMS 8 4 5 HH Qu. 31 1 1 001/014 2 2 001/015 3 3 001/016 4 4 001/017 5 5 002/017 6 6 002/018 7 7 002/019 8 002/020 1 1 001/018 2 2 002/021 3 3 002/022 4 4 002/023 1 1 001/019 2 2 001/020 3 3 001/021 4 4 002/024 5 5 002/025 1 2 3 4 25 25 001/009 26 26 001/010 27 27 001/011 28 28 001/012 29 29 001/013 30 30 001/028 31 31 001/029 24 24 001/008 No No No. No. 2- PUmi BRg XuM bnÞaynag Rsuk mgÁlburI mgÁlburI Rsuk bnÞaynag BRgXuM PUmi 2- Rsuk mgÁlburI bnÞaynag BRgXuM PUmi 1- Rsuk bnÞaynag mgÁlburI XuM Rtag PUmi 2- DMS

77 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects Aph/h than 10% than lose more 8 8 1 2 1 4 1 Others 1 1 Kroseing Tamarin 1 Banana Acasia Custard apple Custard 3 1 1 1 3 1 3 6 4 6 2 1 2 4 1 1 12 4 1 Bamboo Jumbolan Trees Affected Affected Jackfruit Citrus 1 1 guava papaya 4 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 13 24 54 2 3 1 1 2 1 5 3 1 91 3 2 2 5 4 4 3 7 12 13 12 21 49 1 Mango Palm CoconutFruit Milk Longan 2 m 2 m 2 m ent ent Shop ShopH. Stall Affected Structure Affected Bamboo Wood Slab(m² ) ) 2 ) resthall (m 2 2 ) Cate.2 (m 2 2 16.96 10.50 57.15 16.00 15.00 16.50 30.15 47.96 Cate.1(m % of % P.Land ) 2 District Affected Land (m Land Affected 21.75 16.00 Rice Chamkar Residential AffectedProduc. Land House(m) Fence District District District 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 m Mongkul Mongkul Borey ialAgr. Total 2 m 800.00 Mongkul Borey Mongkul Mongkul Mongkul Borey Commune, Commune, Mongkul Borey Mongkul 2 2 usem 2 Commune, Commune, m Commune, Commune, 6,050.00 1,250.00 4,800.00 21.75 0% 28,800.00 2,200.00 141,600.00 30,000.00 2,275.00 30,000.00 Commune, Commune, Reusey Krauk Reusey 2 m 4,800.00 1,600.00 1,600.00 4,800.00 8,096.00 8,000.00 96.00 16,000.007,000.00 16.00 3,200.00 200.00 10,000.00 0% 115,000.00 47,800.00 12,800.0067,200.00 16,000.00 600.00 60,000.00 1,600.00 81,600.00 10,000.00 6,050.00 4,500.00 14,800.00 14,166.00 966.00 13,200.00 outside inUse not in Land Land Affec. Affec. Community Cem 150,000.00 600.00 600.00 150,000.00 190,462.00 29,400.00 5,062.00 216,400.00 100,000.00114,400.00 1,600.00 32,080.00 100,000.00 7,955.00 146,480.00 Village, Village, Bort Trang Bort Reusey Krauk Reusey Bantheayneang 1 1 1 1 Village, Village, Village, Village, income H/h Village, Village, H/h Chamka Tadauk Chamka

11 10,000.00 3,250.00 10,000.00 Kok Pnov Kok Neang Ket Anlong Anlong Thnan H/h H/h Head Head Head <14$/m Head of Age Widow Aged Disable H/h Landless Land Land Land Resident 1 51 11 1 47 1 1 34 1 1 1 Sex 678 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 39 31 32333 of HHd of 1 35 1 43 1 51 1 29 1 51 1 681 17 46 2 2 1 6,400.00 16,000.00 3 1,600.001 22,400.00 51 1 891 48 11 45 1 49 1 11,200.00 7517 74 1 1 1 1 1,200.00 3 11,200.00 1 3 3,200.00 2,080.00 2,080.00 5,280.00 1 40 1 55 2 1 63 12 39 M F HHD Ly Luoth Ly HormHoeum Ai Ut Tao Uon Reth Ngor Hang Hey Bun You MokLang PhabBuorlay Chet Chan Phally Sot Kout Chhay Tep Man Ai Sam-An Som Sary Yom Yoeun PrakThao ChhemTheng KlormToeung Sare Dorn Neung Tun 5 Household Name Household dn sari dn NWg Tn; lI lI lYt hm ehOn G‘ut éG GYn etA eg:a er:t hag hI yUr b‘un Lag m:uk fab; bYLay citþ can; pløI suTæ qayxut ma:n eTB éG sMGan sarI s‘um eyOn y:m R)ak; efa Qim efg eTOg xøm CH Total 9 HH Total 2 HH Total 8 HH Total 2 HH CH1+400-500 CH1+700-800 CH1+600-700 CH1+700-800 CH1+700-800 CH1+800-900 CH1+300-400 CH1+500-600 CH1+300-400 CH3+700-800 CH3+800-900 CH4+400-800 CH5+100-200 CH5+100-200 CH3+800-900 CH4+300-800 CH5+100-200 CH1+600-900 CH1+800-900 CH5+000-1000 CH4+800-5+200 DMS DMS DMS DMS 9 2 8 2 HH Qu. 1 1 001/022 1 2 3 4 2 2 001/024 3 3 001/023 4 4 001/025 5 5 001/026 6 6 001/027 7 7 002/026 8 8 002/027 9 9 002/029 1 1 001/030 2 2 001/031 1 1 001/032 2 2 001/033 3 3 001/034 4 4 001/035 5 5 001/036 6 6 002/033 7 7 002/034 8 8 002/035 1 1 002/028 2 2 002/030 No No No. No. 3- PUmi eKakeBñA XuM bnÞaynag Rsuk mgÁlburI Rsuk mgÁlburI bnÞaynag XuM eKakeBñA PUmi 3- Rsuk mgÁlburI bJsSIeRkak XuM cMkartaedak PUmi 4- Rsuk mgÁlburI bJsSIeRkak XuM nagekt PUmi 5- Rsuk bt;Rtg; mgÁlburI XuM Gnøg;f¶an; PUmi 6- DMS 78 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects Aph/h than 10% than lose more 1 1 1 2 6 3 1 1 Others Kroseing Tamarin 1 3 1 2 1 1 1 1 5 4 4 4 5 1 Banana Acasia Custard apple Custard 1 1 1 1 2 1 10 3 1 1 1 5 9 Bamboo Jumbolan Trees Affected Affected Jackfruit Citrus guava papaya 3 1 1 4 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 6 6 1 1 Mango Palm CoconutFruit Milk Longan 2 m 2 m 2 m 15.00 ent ent Shop ShopH. Stall 9.00 20.00 49.00 40.00 20.00 Affected Structure Affected 20.00 28.50 Bamboo Wood Slab(m² ) ) 2 ) resthall (m 2 2 ) Cate.2 (m 2 2 Cate.1(m % of % P.Land ) 2 3- Dam 3- District Affected Land (m Land Affected 18.00 12.40 Rice Chamkar Residential District AffectedProduc. Land House(m) Fence District District 2 m Mongkul Mongkul Borey ialAgr. Total 2 m 600.00 0.00 720.00 0.00 Mongkul Borey Mongkul 1,600.00 0.00 Mongkul Mongkul Borey Mongkul Borey Mongkul 2 2 Commune, Commune, usem Commune, Commune, 2 m Commune, Commune, Commune, Commune, 30,000.0030,000.00 640.00 30,000.00 640.00 18.00 30,000.00 70,000.0030,000.00 1,800.0015,000.00 70,000.00 3,200.00 30,000.00 855.00 15,000.00 Bort Trang Bort 2 m Bort Trang Bort 3,200.00 750.00 3,200.00 6,000.00 1,600.00 6,000.00 20,000.00 8,000.0020,000.00 8,000.00 900.00 28,000.00 900.00 12.40 28,000.00 0% 20,800.0025,000.00 1,500.00 20,800.00 59,000.00 3,000.00 25,000.00 20,000.00 8,460.00 59,000.00 12,000.0040,000.00 1,600.00 20,000.00 12,000.00 1,600.00 12,000.00 10,000.00 1,600.00 40,000.00 20,000.00 1,600.00 12,000.00 20,000.00 1,600.00 10,000.00 800.00 1,600.00 1,600.00 20,000.00 20,800.00 10,000.00 1,890.00 10,000.00 50,000.00 1,600.00 50,000.00 outside inUse not in Land Land Affec. Affec. Community Cem Village, Village, Borttrang Roeuseykrork Village, Village, Village, Village, income H/h Village, Village, H/h Borttrang Thumkeut Borttrang Neangket Borttrang Tauch Borttrang Borttrangtoch Borttrangtoch H/h H/h Head Head Head <14$/m Head of Age Widow Aged Disable H/h Landless Land Land Land Resident 1 60 1 1 48 1 1 74 1 1 3,200.00 1,600.00 3,200.00 Sex 678 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 39 31 32333 of HHd of 11 30 1 37 1 46 1 31 1 49 15 27 1 1 1 58 1 57 1 57 1 46 1 48 1 35 1 47 1 59 1 691 781 1 37 1 1 54 1 52 1 33 12,800.00 12,000.00 1,600.00 12,800.00 800.00 12,000.00 1 57 1 M F HHD Chhean Mao Chhean PhemChinna Yean Preab PenhSamnang PremSokhon Sun Put Teng Hang Sun Phon Sor Ly ProlitPhoin Sarath Yort KeatRann Chhan Chheng Sam Noch Penh Long KlormToeum Chheat Phiv Saveang Thuon Pho Choeun KlenSat Saody You SautTor Keo Lam Sun Saoret 5 Household Name Household Qan em:A RBab yan eRbm suxun BuF s‘un hgS etg pun s‘un lI s RBlit P½n y:t sara:t; Kat ra:n; Qwg qan Nuc sM Lúg eBj etOm xøm PIv Qat eCOn pU Xøin sat yUr esADI eta sUt Lam Ekv esAEr:t s‘un Piwm CinNa Piwm eBjsMNag saevog FYn CH CH2+900 CH3+000 CH2+900 CH+300-350 Total 1 HH Total 1 HH Total 6 HH CH3+000-100 CH3+500-600 CH3+200-300 CH3+200-300 CH2+900-000 CH2+900-000 CH2+800-900 CH3+100-200 CH2+800-900 CH2+300-400 CH2+200-300 CH2+100-200 CH1+900-000 CH3+100-200 CH0+000-1000 CH0+000-1000 CH0+000-1000 CH0+1000-2000 CH0+1000-2000 CH0+1000-2000 DMS DMS DMS 1 1 6 HH Qu. 1 1 002/032 1 1 001/050 2 2 001/051 3 3 001/052 4 4 001/053 5 5 001/054 6 6 001/055 1 1 001/037 2 2 001/038 3 3 001/039 4 4 001/040 5 5 001/041 6 6 001/042 7 7 001/043 8 8 001/044 9 9 001/045 1 2 3 4 1 1 002/031 10 10 001/046 11 11 001/047 12 12 001/048 13 13 001/049 14 14 002/036 15 15 002/037 16 16 002/038 No No No. No. 7- PUmi bt;Rtg;tUc XuM bt;Rtg; Rsuk mgÁlburI Rsuk bt;Rtg; mgÁlburI XuM bt;Rtg;tUc PUmi 7- mgÁlburI Rsuk bt;Rtg; XuM bt;Rtg;FMekIt PUmi 8- Rsuk bt;Rtg; mgÁlburI XuM bt;;Rtg;tUc PUmi 1- Rsuk mgÁlburI bJsSIeRkak XuM nagekt PUmi 2- DMS

79 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects Ap h/h than 10% than losemore 1 1 1 7 4 1 4 Others Kroseing Tamarin 7 4 5 1 2 5 1 1 10 Banana Acasia Custard apple Custard 1 Bamboo Jumbolan Trees Jackfruit Affected Affected 1 2 5 14 5 1 3 5 6 18 17 4 187 25 1 6 181 4 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 1 1 1 11511 2 6 512 52 Mango Palm CoconutFruit Milk Longan papaya guava Citrus 2 m MOWRAM.RU 2 m 2 m SaoChannarith Prepared by Prepared ent ent ShopH. Shop Stall Date :day: Date month: 2009 Year: 19.50 Affected Structure Affected 60.00 31.50 140.00 59.50 Bamboo Wood Slab(m² ) ) 2 ) resthall (m 2 2 ) Cate.2(m 2 2 Cate.1(m % of % P.Land ) 2 Affected Land (m Land Affected 236.52 102.72 254.09 14.40 163.00 306.60 45.24 115.81 119 11 Rice Chamkar Residential AffectedProduc. Land House Fence(m) Cerified by Cerified 2 m Tauch Ang Tauch Chief MOWRAM NWISP.PMU Chief RU of ialAgr. Total 2 m 645.00 0.00 217.50 0.00 2 2 usem 2 m 5,000.00 385.00 5,000.00 50,000.00 1,260.0010,400.00 50,000.00 768.00 10,400.00 30,000.00 1,600.00 30,000.00 10,000.00 1,440.00 10,000.00 40,000.0010,000.00 1,280.00 40,000.00 1,320.00 10,000.00 2 m 10,000.00 1,500.00 10,000.00 outside inUse in not Land Land Affec. Affec. Community Cem 319,400.00 272,800.00 800.00 40,810.50 593,000.00 1,658,883.00 551,612.00 1,400.00 96,314.50 2,189,927.00 income H/h H/h H/h H/h Head Head Head <14$/m Head of Age Widow Aged Disable H/h Landless Land Land Land Resident 1 44 1 1 77 1 1 65 1 11 38 1 47 1 71 1 51,200.00 1 1,240.00 51,200.00 15,200.00 1,600.00 15,200.00 Sex of HHd of 1 571 28 1 57 1 711 1 42 11 44 2,400.001 52 25,000.00 2,400.00 1 1,700.00 46 25,000.00 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 39 31 32 33 3 M F HHD 22 890 17 5 13 7 20 1 1 2 10 OkPhorn Siheng Hou PrackChanthorn EngYa Dy Noy Smach Sokhom Chheng Thuon RemSaren VanLay KeoLam Linda Soeu MockRoeup Mala Nou Ply Lun 5 Team Team Leader Verified by Verified Household Name Household Chheang Chhorlin Chheang «k «k pn sIuehg h‘U R)ak; can;fn eGg ya: DI Ny sµac; suxum FYn eqg rim sarin va:n éL Ekv Lam linda esO m:k; erOb nU ma:La ln; PøI CH CH2+800 CH2+100 CH2+800 CH2+700 CH2+700 CH2+600 CH2+300 CH2+200 Total 105 HH Total 29 HH CH2+600-700 CH2+500-600 CH2+200-300 CH2+200-300 CH2+200-300 CH0+600-700 DMS DMS HH Qu. 30 107 1 2 3 4 18 18 002/040 19 19 002/041 20 20 002/042 21 21 002/043 22 22 002/044 23 23 02/045 24 24 002/046 25 25 002/047 26 002/048 27 26 002/049 28 27 002/050 29 28 002/051 30 29 002/052 17 17 002/039 No No No. No. DMS 80 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

KN³kmµkarGnþrRksYgénkargaredaHRsaydIFøI nigpÞHsEm,g RBHraCaNacRkkm<úCa Inter-Ministerial Resettlement Committee Kingdom Of Cambodia KeRmagRbB½n§eRsacRsBPaKBay½Bü Cati sasna RBHmhakSRt Northwest Irrigation Sector Project Nation Religion King taragsegçbesdækic©sgÁm GnuKeRmag Gnøg;sVay énKeRmageRsacRsBPaKBay½Bü extþeBaF×sat; The Summary List of APs in Anlong Svay Subproject of Northwest Irrigation Sector Project In Pursat Province

Rsuk )akan Bakan District 222 l>rl>rl>r eQµaHeQµaH PUmiPUmi XMuXMu eQµaHRbLay cMnYnÉksar cMnYnRKYsar RsþIemm:ay cas;Cra Bikar cMNUl <14 Gt;dI cMnYnedImeQI Affected Tree GclnRTBüepSg² Affec.Structure épÞdIb:HBal;¬m ¦¦¦ Household Name of House( m² ) Fence( m ) Stall No Name of No. of Affected Widow Aged Disable H/h Income Landless sVay cnÞI etñat dUg b£sSI RBIg eck GMBil RksaMg epSg² dIERs dIcMkar RsHTwk RsHTwk dIPUmi Loss more Village and Commune Canal DMS H/h H/h H/h H/h <14$/M H/h mango cashew palm coconut bamboo jambolan banana tamarin krosang others Cate.1 Cate.2 bamboo wood m² Rice.L (m 2) Orchard (m²) Pond (m²) Residen.L(m 2) than 10% 1 1 PUmi kUnetñat XuM rMelc 12 9 2 2 1 8,061.17 Kaunthnot Village, Romlich Com. 2 2 PUmi rMelc XuM rMelc MC 1 1 253.08 Romlich Village, Romlich Commune 3 3 PUmi eBñA XuM rMelc 28 26 3 3 8 1 1 15,756.44 108.27 Phnov Village, Romlich Commune Sub-Total : 3 Villages 41 36 5 5 1 8 1 1 24,070.69 108.27 1 PUmi kUnetñat XuM rMelc 2522 2 2 1 2 1 2 7,006.56 Kaunthnot Village, Romlich Commune

2 PUmi rMelc XuM rMelc 1 1 1 2,147.13 Romlich Village, Romlich Commune SC1 3 4 PUmi re)aHraMg XuM GUrtae):ag 5 5 1 2,669.12 Robosraing Village, Otaporng Com. 4 5 PUmi R)asaT XuM rMelc 2 2 1 1 1 1,056.80 1 Prasat Village, Romlich Commune Sub-Total : 4 Villages 33304131 1 2 1 2 12,879.61 1

1 PUmi kUnetñat XuM rMelc 19 8 1 1 1 12,113.15 3 Kaunthnot Village, Romlich Commune SC2 2 PUmi R)asaT XuM rMelc 30 29 6 33 2 21,107.35 5 Prasat Village, Romlich Commune Sub-Total : 2 Villages 49 37 7 4 3 3 33,220.50 8 1 PUmi kUnetñat XuM rMelc 1 553.88 Kaunthnot Village, Romlich Commune 2 PUmi R)asaT XuM rMelc SC3 11 10 2 7,306.84 1 Prasat Village, Romlich Commune 3 6 PUmi eragtakuk XuM rMelc 16 15 1 1 12,316.20 2 Rorngtakok Village, Romlich Commu. Sub-Total : 3 Villages 28 25 1 3 20,176.92 3 1 PUmi rMelc XuM rMelc 1 1 158.20 Romlich Village, Romlich Commune 2 PUmi eragtakuk XuM rMelc SC4 4 41 1 1,132.36 Rorngtakok Village, Romlich Commu. 3 PUmi kUnetñat XuM rMelc 22 10 1 1 10,309.12 Kaunthnot Village, Romlich Commune Sub-Total : 3 Villages 27 15 2 1 1 11,599.68 1 PUmi kUnetñat XuM rMelc 14 10 1 1 1,470.44 Kaunthnot Village, Romlich Commune 2 PUmi rMelc XuM rMelc 2 2 1 875.40 Romlich Village, Romlich Commune 3 PUmi eragtakuk XuM rMelc SD1 1 1 1 60.00 Rorngtakok Village, Romlich Commu. 4 PUmi R)asaT XuM rMelc 5 5 1 1 3,146.01 Prasat Village, Romlich Commune 5 PUmi re)aHraMg XuM GUrtae):ag 11 10 2 5,761.66 Robosraing Village, Otaporng Com. Sub-Total : 5 Villages 33 28 2 5 1 11,313.51 1 PUmi R)asaT XuM rMelc 41 31 3 4 3 3 25,130.98 2 Prasat Village, Romlich Commune 2 PUmi re)aHraMg XuM GUrtae):ag 3 3 1 1 2,401.57 Robosraing Village, Otaporng Com. SD2 3 PUmi eragtakuk XuM rMelc 10 10 2 1 9,280.39 1 Rorngtakok Village, Romlich Commu. 4 PUmi kUnetñat XuM rMelc 5 4,028.68 Kaunthnot Village, Romlich Commune Sub-Total : 4 Villages 59 44 6 6 3 3 40,841.62 3

1 7 PUmi kMBg;kþI XuM rMelc 11 10 1 2 1 15 6 1 11 5 2 1 10 4,413.78 2,574.12 18.60 390.78 2 Kampong Kdey Village, Romlich Com.

2 PUmi eragtakuk XuM rMelc 14 6 1 1 8,855.17 Rorngtakok Village, Romlich Commu. SD3 3 PUmi R)asaT XuM rMelc 35 24 3 62 2 1 1 2 29,659.78 520.77 4 Prasat Village, Romlich Commune 4 PUmi kUnetñat XuM rMelc 4 1 1 2,278.78 Kaunthnot Village, Romlich Commune Sub-Total : 4 Villages 64 41 5 83 2 1 156 11153213 45,207.51 3,094.89 18.60 390.78 6 1 PUmi R)asaT XuM rMelc TD-SD2-3L 2 4,595.14 2 Prasat Village, Romlich Commune Sub-Total : 1 Village 2 4,595.14 2 1 PUmi eBñA XuM rMelc 25 17 1 1 1 1 14,824.10 1 Phnov Village, Romlich Commune Dam-Fee 2 PUmi éRBep¥ab XuM b¤sSIRkaMg 8 8 8,316.00 Prey Phaourb Vil., Ruseykraing Com. Sub-Total : 1 Village 33 25 1 1 1 1 23,140.10 1 srubTItaMgb:HBal;man ³ 8 PUm i nig 3 XMu 369 281 33 33 15 11 2 8 18 6 2 11 5 3 2 15 2 227,045.28 3,094.89 18.60 499.05 24

Cerified by Verified by Date :day: month: Year: 2009 Chief MOWRAM.RU of NWISP.PMU Team Leader Prepared by MOWRAM. RU

Tauch Ang Ich Sokmony Sao Channarith

81 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects Ap h/h Ap than 10% lose more Tamarin Krosang Others Banana Nation King Religion RBHraCaNacRkkm<úCa Trees KINGDOM OF CAMBODIA KINGDOM Cati sasnaCati RBHmhakSRt Palm Coconut Bamboo Jumbolan Cashew Mango 2 m Stall Bamboo Wood Steel Affected StructureAffected Affected Cate.2(m House (m) Fence Cate.1(m % of % P.Land Resi. Affec. Affec. Total t Province t Province 253.08 ) 2 8,061.17 3 34 53 35 36 37 38 39 404142 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 Affected Land (m Land Affected Affected Land Productive Rice Orch. Pond 253.08 8,061.17 2 m Total Agr. Total 15,000.00 81.45 81.45 0.54% 15,000.00 333.00 333.00 2.22% 30,000.00 272.0030,000.00 597.90 272.00 0.91% 40,000.00 597.90 806.92 1.99% 806.92 2.02% 16,000.00 121.25 121.25 0.76% ageRsacRsBPaKBay½Bü extþeBaF×sat; 2 m Residential 2 m ect ofectSector Northwest Project in Pursa Irrigation 2 2 use m use 1- Main Canal ( MC ( ) Canal Main 1- 2 m 25,500.0030,900.0010,015.0020,300.0030,000.00 500.0030,450.00 900.0020,200.00 25,000.0041,800.00 30,000.00 15.00 486.62 300.00 1,221.3028,900.00 10,000.00 500.00 20,000.00 450.00 30,000.00 823.93 200.00 30,000.00 1,800.00 65.7426,800.00 20,000.00 347.88 486.62 40,000.00 1,221.30 843.64 900.00 867.33 900.00 320.54 1.95% 28,000.0015,450.00 4.07% 823.93 900.00 1,407.37 65.7415,000.00 25,900.00 347.8859,300.00 8.24% 843.6416,600.00 0.33% 253.08 867.33 1.16% 320.54 450.00 2.81% 6,800.0051,200.00 1,407.37 2,500.00 4.34% 36,350.00 15,000.00 0.80% 56,800.0025,450.0020,225.00 5.03% 140.40 600.00 253.08 900.0020,375.00 842.0645,770.00 16,000.00 450.00 1,200.0015,300.00 0.98% 50,000.00 35,900.0040,500.00 292.77 450.0036,800.00 140.40 225.00 639.52 519.9432,000.00 25,000.00 842.06 375.00 20,000.00 120.00 0.94% 20,000.00 88.81 300.00 1.48% 45,650.00 172.91 292.77 500.00 15,000.00 1,800.00 58.18 40,000.00 639.52 306.22 519.94 2,000.00 35,000.00 1.83% 442.24 30,000.00 1,595.30 1.28% 1.45% 588.45 88.81 2,975.02 172.91 58.18 0.36% 306.22 0.86% 442.24 1,595.30 0.29% 0.67% 588.45 2,975.02 2.95% 3.99% 1.68% 9.92% 26,800.00 900.00 900.00 25,900.00 238,065.00 5,565.00 333,000.00 2 m Land Land Land Chamka outside Use in in not Land Land Land 1 1 1 3 1 3 31 2 2 4 1 1 1 11 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 Household Age Age Household 1 12 11 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 5 1 12 1 4 1 5 2 2 5 Male Femal taragBisþaresdækic©sgÁm GnuKeRmag Gnøg;sVay énKeRm 1 1 1 1 12 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 4 6 11111 2 152 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ Detail List of Socio-economy of Anlong Svay DetailSubproj List ofSvay ofSocio-economy Anlong income H/h H/h H/h 2 2 1 H/h H/h Head Head Head <14$/m Head Head of Age Widow Aged Disable H/h Landless Ethinic

1 70 1 1 1 48 1 1 36 1 1 56 1 1 28 1 65 11 1 35 1 52 Sex of HHd of 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1415161718192021222324 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 3 1 11 28 1 50 30 11 44 1 621 431 1 48 1 39 1 38 11 60 1 35 11 27 1 27 1 29 28 11 27 26 1 681 1 38 M F HHD 10 2 Kaunthnot Village, Romlich Commune, Bakan District Bakan Commune, Romlich Village, Kaunthnot Romlich Village, Romlich Commune, Bakan District Bakan Commune, Romlich Village, Romlich Phnov Village, Romlich Commune, Bakan District Bakan Commune, Romlich Village, Phnov Los Ly Los Tam Kai Man Sok Sos Sok Mas Kok Him Sen Man Nuoy Tam Tort Chum Sa Thy Uy Sa Lep Nen Kop Touch Hy Teng Kung Teng Kung Saum Koul Set Chev Chheang Ma Chheang Ma Tes Meu Sem Rem Him Las Sen Ly Sem Phos Yim Nget Mot Vork Simeang Chhen Kom Korn Herm Mom 5 Household Name Household las; lI taM ék ma:n sux suH sux m:H kuk esn hIum nYy ma:n taM Tt CMuM sar G‘uy FI Lwb sar kub enn hIu TUc Kg; etg Kg; etg Kl; sUm ecv sit ma: eQog ma: eQog emIu ets rwm swum hIum LH lI esn Pas; swm Eg:t yIm vk m:Ut eqn sIuemog xn xum Ehm mMu Bakan District Bakan CH2540-580 CH0+550-600 CH2+110-230 CH2+600-670 CH2+500-600 CH2+500-600 CH0+400-550 CH2+020-270 CH2+880-900 CH1+430-482 CH1+500-550 CH0+150-300 CH1+500-550 CH1+440-480 CH1+800-900 CH2+760-860 CH2+500-540 CH2+700-750 CH2+550-600 CH2+790-900 CH0+300-800 Total 9Total HH 1 HH CH1+960-2+20 CH0+950-1+60 CH2+270-2+340 CH2+580-2+740 CH0+850-1+100 CH0+920-1+960 CH0+950-1+270 CH0+850-1+380 DMS DMS 1 12 HH Qu. CH 1 2 3 4 1 Af.SC1 002/022 2 13 002/027 24 Af.SC1 002/028 002/029 5 36 002/030 47 001/045 58 001/047 69 001/048 7 003/021 1 1 001/049 1 12 Af.MC 002/024 001/038 3 24 002/021 35 002/023 46 Af.MC 002/025 003/023 7 58 002/026 69 002/031 7 003/029 10 811 Af.SC1 003/020 003/027 12 9 003/028 10 811 003/032 912 003/031 1013 003/030 1114 003/033 1215 001/035 1316 001/034 14 001/032 Rsuk )akan )akan Rsuk 1- PUmi kUnetñat XuM rMelc Rsuk )akan rMelc kUnetñat XuM PUmi 1- )akan Rsuk rMelc XuM rMelc PUmi 2- )akan Rsuk rMelc XuM eBñA PUmi 2- No No No. No. KN³kmµkarGnþrRksYgénkargaredaHRsaydIFøI nigpÞHsEm,g KN³kmµkarGnþrRksYgénkargaredaHRsaydIFøI KeRmagRbB½n§eRsacRsBPaKBay½Bü Inter-Ministerial Committee Resettlement Irrigation Project Sector Northwest DMS 82 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects 1 1 Ap h/h Ap than 10% lose more 1 Tamarin Krosang Others Banana Trees 1 1 2 Palm Coconut Bamboo Jumbolan 8 1 8 1 1 Cashew 1 Mango 2 1 1 2 1 2 m Stall Bamboo Wood Steel Affected StructureAffected Affected Cate.2(m House (m) Fence Cate.1(m % of % P.Land Resi. Affec. Affec. 108.27 Total ) 2 7,006.56 2,147.13 1,056.80 15,756.44 3 34 53 35 36 37 38 39 404142 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 Affected Land (m Land Affected Affected Land Productive Rice Orch. Pond 7,006.56 2,147.13 1,056.80 15,756.44 2 m Total Agr. Total 20,000.00 760.84 760.84 3.80% 70,000.0045,000.00 130.95 384.93 130.95 384.93 0.19% 0.86% 35,000.00 211.17 211.17 0.60% 2 m Residential 2 m 2 2 use m use 2 m 2- Secondary Canal 1 ( SC1 ) SC1 1 ( Canal Secondary 2- 2,160.007,080.00 1,250.00 80.00 910.00 7,000.00 70.48 61.86 70.48 61.86 7.75% 0.88% 36,100.00 200.00 900.00 35,200.00 31,070.00 1,070.00 30,000.00 32,000.0030,450.0036,800.0030,450.0050,450.0051,178.00 2,000.0031,500.00 450.00 30,000.0020,710.00 1,800.0040,000.00 30,000.00 450.00 35,000.00 244.50 450.00 1,800.00 30,000.00 284.18 1,178.00 765.7225,900.00 50,000.00 10.00 1,500.00 50,000.00 800.43 20,710.00 30,000.00 1,080.15 5,000.00 295.82 244.50 1,673.61 35,000.00 205.3620,900.00 284.18 765.7220,105.00 900.00 0.82% 747.8820,050.00 800.43 1,080.15 0.95% 25,000.0020,900.00 2.19% 35,000.00 295.82 1,673.61 2.67% 205.36 328.93 2.16% 900.0030,900.00 0.59% 5.58% 105.0035,900.00 747.88 20,000.00 0.99% 45,300.00 50.00 20,000.00 900.0040,600.00 20,000.00 2.14% 85.5030,100.00 20,000.00 328.93 44.4035,900.00 108.27 900.00 1.32% 25,450.00 32.47 175.80 900.0030,400.00 30,000.00 300.00 35,000.00 600.0030,300.00 45,000.00 85.50 100.00 62.1330,900.00 40,000.00 44.40 900.00 73.6545,375.00 30,000.00 459.52 450.0030,150.00 32.47 175.80 35,000.00 0.43% 625.02 400.0060,450.00 25,000.00 0.22% 944.91 10,000.0030,045.00 30,000.00 0.16% 765.80 375.00 300.00 0.88% 45,375.00 62.13 900.00 66.63 45,000.00 30,000.00 73.65 41.1645,450.00 459.52 30,000.00 10,000.00 150.00 625.02 0.21% 625.80 375.00 450.00 87.75 944.91 30,000.00 0.21% 1.02% 49.19 45.00 765.80 45,000.00 60,000.00 1.56% 36,100.00 30,000.00 884.12 66.63 3.15% 155.77 254.92 41.16 450.00 2.19% 35.53 625.80 45,000.00 0.27% 200.00 87.7510,170.00 0.14% 49.1920,900.00 900.00 2.09% 15.00 884.12 0.20% 35,200.00 155.77 254.92 0.16% 2,147.13 2.95% 35.53 170.00 0.35% 0.42% 900.00 10,000.00 0.12% 15.00 20,000.00 927.60 2,147.13 0.03% 129.20 6.10% 927.60 129.20 9.28% 0.65% 788,998.00 9,500.00 26,038.00 793,970.00 301,350.00 450.00 900.00 300,450.00 33.60 33.60 0.01% 1,010,900.00 20,450.00 10,450.00 1,135,450.00 2 m Land Land Land Chamka outside Use in in not Land Land Land 1 1 5 1 5 34 1 1 4 112 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 131 1 5 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 Household Age Age Household 1 23 1 1 1 2 1 3 2 1 22 1 4 1 1 1 21 12 42 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 2 42 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 6 1 Male Femal 1 1 1 11 11 1 1 11 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 4 8 4 12 35 1 5 6 14 41 4 3 1 13 35 41 7 1 5 1 32 2 1 4 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ income H/h H/h 1 H/h 3 3 2 2 1 1 1 H/h H/h Head Head Head <14$/m Head Head of Village, Romlich Commune, Bakan District Bakan Commune, Romlich Village, Age Widow Aged Disable H/h Landless Ethinic 1 49 1 30 1 40 1 23 1 63 1 1 50 1 1 38 1 1 47 1 60 1 1 Sex of HHd of Prasat Village, Romlich Commune, Bakan District Bakan Commune, Romlich Prasat Village, 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1415161718192021222324 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 3 11 24 27 11 54 1 45 1 49 34 1 50 1 1 1 11 51 25 11 28 1 31 28 11 45 1 23 1 381 521 36 1 28 1 54 1 11 25 1 30 1 47 1 46 1 41 1 32 1 27 1 30 1 45 45 1 541 1 79 1 M F HHD 16 11 22 3 Romlich Village, Romlich Commune, Bakan District Bakan Commune, Romlich Village, Romlich Kaunthnot Srong Tam Srong Man El Pas Vork Matt Sos Sa Him Matt Sos Tas Phaung Sok Kop Khali Sok Sa Lep Ly Lors You Keo Sen Phan You Matt Chas Nge Kam Sok Sos Sok Sok Pers Pes Kork Hy Sam Pagha Leng Meu Man Sa Kok Ham Sou Han Sou So Kem Pheap Mut Bo Kem Suong Phorn Suong Pros Hen Vy Keng Hong Heng Sophal Kung Hengly Chen Thorn Lun Teang Tim Chanthou Chrun Sokhoeun Yean Pov Ma Lorn Yean 5 Household Name Household sYg pn hiun Rbus exg vI ehg hug Kg; supl Cin ehglI ln; fn eTog TIm RCun cnæÚ eyon suexOn ma: eBA eyon ln eRsag taM EGl ma:n vk b:H ma:t;suH hIum sa ma:t;suH tH pUg kub sux xLisux Lwb sar las; lI Ekv yU panesn ma:t; yU egIu CH suk kam suH sux EBHsux eBH kk sM hIu eLg bBaØa ma:n emuI sar kuk haMs‘U haMs‘U Kwm sUr mut PaB Kwm bUr CH0350-450 CH0+50-150 CH0+50-900 CH0+50-100 CH1+00-100 CH1+200-300 CH0+650-850 CH0+300-500 CH1+700-800 CH2+460-550 CH1+150-200 CH1+600-900 CH1+900-970 CH1+200-400 CH1+550-580 CH1+626-682 CH1+380-440 CH0+500-600 CH0+500-600 CH0+500-600 CH0+300-400 CH0+500-550 CH0+000-100 CH0+400-500 CH0+350-400 CH0+200-250 CH0+600-650 CH0+000-100 CH0+250-300 CH0+610-620 CH0+500-600 CH0+400-500 CH0+350-400 CH0+400-450 CH0+650-700 CH0+300-350 CH1+200-300 CH0+500-650 CH1+100-120 Total 26 HH Total 22Total HH 1 HH Total 2 HH CH0+850-1+100 DMS DMS DMS DMS 1 2 28 25 HH Qu. CH 1 2 3 4 9 8 001/027 1 12 003/017 23 003/015 34 003/014 45 003/012 56 Af.SC1 001/015 001/024 7 68 001/018 7 001/014 1 1 002/017 1 12 001/022 2 001/023 18 1619 001/033 1720 001/031 1821 001/039 1922 001/046 2023 001/036 2124 001/043 2225 001/041 2326 003/022 2427 003/024 2528 003/025 26 003/026 10 911 001/020 1012 001/032 1113 001/029 1214 001/025 1315 001/016 1416 001/026 1517 001/030 16 001/017 19 1820 003/013 1921 001/012 2022 002/014 2123 Af.SD1 002/016 002/013 24 2225 Af.SC1 002/012 002/015 17 15 001/037 18 17 003/016 1- PUmi kUnetñat XuM rMelc Rsuk )akan Rsuk )akan rMelc kUnetñat XuM PUmi 1- )akan Rsuk rMelc XuM rMelc PUmi 2- Rsuk )akan rMelc XuM R)asaT PUmi 3- No No No. No. DMS

83 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects 1 1 1 1 1 3 Ap h/h Ap than 10% lose more Tamarin Krosang Others Banana Trees Palm Coconut Bamboo Jumbolan Cashew Mango 2 m Stall Bamboo Wood Steel Affected StructureAffected Affected Cate.2(m House (m) Fence Cate.1(m .00% % of % P.Land Resi. Affec. Affec. Total ) 2,669.12 2 12,113.15 3 34 53 35 36 37 38 39 404142 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 Affected Land (m Land Affected Affected Land Productive Rice Orch. Pond 2,669.12 12,113.15 2 m 4,800.00 705.00 705.00 14.69% Total Agr. Total 20,000.0010,000.00 284.58 2,065.73 284.58 2,065.73 1.42% 20.66% 40,000.00 996.51 996.51 2.49% 25,000.0030,000.00 153.1810,450.00 701.2560,000.00 631.5025,000.00 1,428.19 153.18 943.75 701.2535,000.00 0.61% 631.5030,000.00 2.34% 1,150.34 1,428.1920,000.00 527.50 6.04% 943.75 2.38% 50,000.00 593.75 3.78% 1,150.34 190.24 527.50 3.29% 593.75 1.76% 190.24 2.97% 0.38% 35,000.00 570.27 570.27 1.63% 2 m Residential 2 m 2 2 use m use 2 m 2- Secondary Canal 2 ( SC2 ) SC2 2 ( Canal Secondary 2- 4,800.00 9,300.00 2,100.00 7,200.008,148.00 101.304,950.00 48.00 8,100.00 101.30 1,304.87 450.00 1.41% 4,500.00 914.77 1,304.87 16.11% 914.77 20.33% 30,900.0035,000.00 27,000.0022,700.0031,600.00 900.00 30,000.00 2,000.00 2,700.00 25,000.0040,450.00 1,600.00 534.02 20,000.00 30,000.00 640.95 622.97 300.9120,400.00 534.02 450.0010,450.00 40,000.00 640.95 1.78% 622.9720,900.00 300.91 487.78 400.0030,900.00 2.56% 3.11% 20,000.00 450.00 1.00% 10,000.0020,900.00 51.59 900.00 487.78 900.0020,030.00 5.47 20,000.00 30,000.00 1.22% 491.17 801.93 51.59 900.0021,420.00 20,000.00 30.00 5.47 0.26% 17,000.00 20,000.00 803.75 420.0020,080.00 491.1725,500.00 0.05% 1,000.00 801.9315,900.00 96.45 20,420.00 2.46% 21,200.00 6,000.00 2.67% 20,900.00 2,000.00 625.00 6,000.00 803.75 15,000.00 80.0016,350.00 19,500.0025,850.00 20,000.00 900.00 4.02% 96.45 1,560.00 973.5531,350.00 1,200.00 450.00 15,000.00 1,400.56 900.00 20,000.00 625.00 450.00 0.48% 900.0020,900.00 20,000.00 226.50 400.00 15,450.00 305.6061,600.00 3.06% 25,450.00 1,560.00 973.55 232.50 1,350.00 1,339.55 1,400.56 30,000.00 901.48 8 6.49% 1,395.62 7.00% 226.50 900.00 305.60 1,600.00 20,000.00 1,339.55 232.50 60,000.00 1.51% 1.53% 585.60 901.48 1,692.34 8.67% 1.16% 1,395.62 3.54% 4.65% 1,692.34 585.60 2.82% 2.93% 147,200.00 7,200.00 140,000.00 168,830.00 4,030.00 480,250.00 2 m Land Land Land Chamka outside Use in in not Land Land Land 4 4 ct 1 1 1 41 1 1 2 1 1 43 1 4 3 4 1 1 1 21 6 1 1 Household Age Age Household District 2 1 12 1 2 1 1 3 2 11 2 4 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 13 1 21 21 1 1 3 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 4 8 22310 Male Femal 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 11 1 1 1 1 6 131 1 3 2 17 Bakan 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 4 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ income H/h H/h 1 1 H/h 1 Village, Romlich Commune, Commune, Romlich Village, 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H/h H/h Head Head Head <14$/m Head Head of Age Widow Aged Disable H/h Landless Ethinic 1 571 1 46 1 47 1 52 1 50 1 70 1 22 1 1 32 1 39 1 70 1 47 1 56 1 26 1 44 1 66 1 36 1 45 Robosraing Village, Otaporng Commune, Bakan Distri Bakan Otaporng Commune, Village, Robosraing Sex Kaunthnot of HHd of Prasat Village, Romlich Commune, Bakan District Bakan Commune, Romlich Prasat Village, 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1415161718192021222324 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 3 1 4 1 25 1 46 11 28 1 50 1 43 51 11 41 1 28 1 40 1 39 1 601 45 1 40 1 671 26 1 1 1 47 29 11 49 1 44 35 1 59 11 42 50 M F HHD 16 3 Sep Horn Sep Rem Chan Lim Ly Vanna Uon Sorn Hor Pas Vork El Kem Mes Kok Kai Tam Man Sok Him Tam Ly Nuoy Khak Phan Hy Sam Sen Phan Rob Tam Sok Kai Meu Keo Sok Kop Che Sem Tuon Khut Sem Phos Him Tum Tes Meu Mut Chen Moun Touch Ra Roeung Kuon Dorn Mom Put Lorn Hean Yoeum Bo San Chea Chan Mon Seu San Et Eam Torn Horn Pov Ngeit Laing Hok Vanna Loeu Vorn Voeun 5 Household Name Household siub siub h‘n can; rwum lI lIm GYn vNÑa eha sn vk bH: kwm Él m:H kuk taM ék ma:n sux taM hIum nYy lI panXak; sM hIu panesn taM r:Ub ék sux Ekv emIu kub sux swmCi Xut TYn Pas; swm hIum TMu emIu ets Cin mut mYn TUc erOg ra: Dn KYn mMuBuF ehon Ln bUr eyOm Ca san m:un can; sanþ sWu eGom Giut h‘n tn Eg:t eBA huk LaMg elO vNÑa evOn vn CH2+041 CH0+00-50 CH0+00-050 CH1600-650 CH2+50-100 CH1+00-050 CH1+150-250 CH1+300-350 CH1+250-300 CH1+350-400 CH1+350-400 CH0+300-350 CH0+450-500 CH0+650-700 CH0+700-750 CH0+900-950 CH0+150-200 CH0+800-900 CH0+800-900 CH0+150-200 CH0+500-550 CH0+250-300 CH0+150-200 CH0+000-150 CH0+350-400 CH0+750-800 CH0+200-250 CH1+450-500 CH1+650-700 CH2+450-550 CH1+800-900 CH2+000-050 CH2+120-140 CH2+140-220 CH1+550-600 CH1+400-500 CH1+200-300 CH2+250-400 CH2+100-150 Total 5 HH Total 8 HH CH1+950-2+00 DMS DMS 5 19 HH Qu. CH 1 1 002/018 2 23 002/020 34 002/019 45 003/018 5 003/019 1 Af.SC4 003/044 2 13 Af.MC 003/050 003/047 4 Af.MC 003/048 5 Af.MC 003/049 6 27 Af.SD1 003/050 003/045 8 39 Af.SC1 001/064 001/063 1 12 003/054 23 003/055 34 003/056 45 003/062 56 003/057 67 003/058 78 003/059 89 003/060 9 003/061 1 2 3 4 10 Af.SC1 001/062 11 412 001/061 513 001/060 614 Af.SC1 001/059 001/089 15 Af.SC4 002/044 16 717 Af.MC 002/045 002/043 18 819 Af.MC 002/042 002/041 10 1011 001/068 1112 001/067 1213 001/066 1314 001/065 Af.SD1 001/071 15 1416 001/070 15 001/069 4- PUmi re)aHraMg XuM GUrtae)a:g Rsuk )akan Rsuk )akan GUrtae)a:g XuM re)aHraMg PUmi 4- Rsuk )akan rMelc kUnetñat XuM PUmi 1- Rsuk )akan rMelc XuM R)asaT PUmi 2- No No No. No. DMS 84 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 Ap h/h Ap than 10% lose more Tamarin Krosang Others Banana Trees Palm Coconut Bamboo Jumbolan Cashew Mango 2 m Stall Bamboo Wood Steel Affected StructureAffected Affected Cate.2(m House (m) Fence Cate.1(m % 0% % of % P.Land Resi. Affec. Affec. Total 553.88 ) 2 7,306.84 21,107.35 3 34 53 35 36 37 38 39 404142 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 Affected Land (m Land Affected Affected Land Productive Rice Orch. Pond 553.88 7,306.84 21,107.35 2 m Total Agr. Total 18,000.00 419.78 419.78 2.33% 10,000.00 1,272.10 1,272.10 12.72% 15,000.00 553.88 553.8825,000.00 3.69% 1,186.78 1,186.78 4.75% 45,650.00 535.88 535.88 1.17% 2 m Residential 2 m 2 2 use m use 2 m 3- Secondary Canal 3 ( SC3 ) SC3 3 ( Canal Secondary 3- 9,450.002,725.008,200.00 450.00 9,000.00 225.005,450.007,200.00 2,500.00 297.36 100.00 13.09 8,100.00 450.00 1,146.00 900.00 297.36 5,000.00 6,300.00 3.30% 13.09 114.90 802.76 1,146.00 0.52% 1,800.00 14.15% 114.90 802.76 2.30% 12.74% 300.00 15,000.00 290.70 290.70 1.94% 35,200.0021,800.0025,450.00 900.0024,250.00 900.00 200.0020,900.00 20,900.00 35,000.0018,000.00 1,221.41 450.0032,550.00 157.14 25,000.00 1,750.00 900.00 22,500.00 1,800.0020,525.00 3.29 750.0016,350.00 20,000.00 1,221.41 224.00 31,800.00 157.14 300.00 277.50 900.00 5.84% 225.00 161.94 0.45% 450.00 20,300.00 3.29 15,900.00 224.00 76.63 277.50 1,635.8042,700.00 0.01% 1.00% 11,500.00 161.94 1.39% 1,800.0018,500.00 0.51% 30,300.00 900.00 1,635.80 300.0020,900.00 76.63 41,800.0016,500.00 1,000.00 10.29 0.38% 526.4618,900.00 15,000.00 5,000.00 1,500.0015,600.00 25,000.0010,900.00 17,000.00 448.50 900.00 1,650.00 300.00 20,000.00 64.55 16,200.0040,900.00 526.46 900.0010,000.00 755.29 600.00 1,535.48 18,000.0020,900.00 900.00 448.50 1.26% 15,000.0014,660.00 1,650.00 10,000.00 369.3322,600.00 64.55 2.99% 450.00 339.17 900.00 6.6 10,525.00 900.00 140.58 450.00 755.2920,900.00 1,535.48 40,000.00 160.00 0.38% 21,800.00 20,450.00 900.0017,100.00 14,500.00 3.78% 900.00 9.48% 436.82 369.3310,900.00 703.18 339.1718,240.00 21,700.00 900.00 653.95 140.58 525.0021,400.00 2.05% 900.00 900.00 1,178.57 10,000.00 2.26% 20,900.00 20,000.00 1.41% 900.00 436.82 661.38 900.00 703.18 1,047.70 1,098.00 16,200.00 240.00 653.95 10,000.00 900.00 1.09% 1,178.57 18,000.00 3.44% 602.49 25,000.00 4.51% 177.54 377.35 5.43% 1,047.70 1,631.01 661.38 1,098.00 5.01% 6.61% 5.49% 602.49 177.54 377.35 1,631.01 3.72% 1.78% 2.10% 6.52% 568,498.00 11,220.00 27,578.00 580,920.00 187,600.00 300.00 1,800.00 12,300.00 218,000.00 2 m Land Land Land Chamka outside Use in in not Land Land Land 1 2 1 1 1 ct 111 1 131 2 11 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 13 1 4 2 3 1 21 1 2 1 1 21 4 1 11 1 1 1 t Household Age Age Household 3 1 2 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 4 1 1 12 2 22 1 1 1 1 1 Male Femal 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 5 7 12401 10 7 43 2 21 211216 3 181 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ 1 income H/h H/h H/h 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 3 3 2 H/h H/h Head Head Head <14$/m Head Head of Age Widow Aged Disable H/h Landless Ethinic 1 30 1 50 1 56 1 35 1 28 1 84 1 21 1 30 1 35 1 41 1 30 1 25 1 49 1 25 1 40 1 85 1 51 1 65 1 26 1 26 1 45 1 39 Sex of HHd of 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1415161718192021222324 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 3 1 6 5 1 41 1 32 11 53 1 28 33 1 68 11 66 62 11 30 1 29 1 48 31 1 60 1 25 1 37 11 26 25 M F HHD 11 19 Rorngtakok Village, Romlich Commune, Bakan Distri Bakan Commune, Romlich RorngtakokVillage, Kaunthnot Village, Romlich Commune, Bakan Distric Bakan Commune, Romlich Village, Kaunthnot Prasat Village, Romlich Commune, Bakan District Bakan Commune, Romlich Prasat Village, Moeun Phoeun Moeun Thuon Cheim Peach Noeun Long Doeuk Pov Cheng Phoin Moeun Chet Pen Kuoch Bo Sar Ream Vuthy Um Heng Pac Noeun Pech Huon Chea Huoy Ngorn Mot Vork Pov Hen Seap Phai Seng Tit Choin Chen Roeung En Pov Phorn Chip Sos Soeun Ren Phal Kern Chu El Matt Soutam Srey Ker Nhen Pronh Reth Han Savorn Tit Yim Ngeit Samnang Mao kea Key Pha Ream Phoin Kung Vorn Chhun Mom Sar Phen Eam Chanda Ren 5 Household Name Household vk m:Ut emOn ePOn Ecm FYn enOn eBoc eDOk Lúg ecg eBA emOn P½NÐ Bin Cit bU KYc erom sr G‘Mu vuTæI )a:k ehg buic enOn Ca hYn gn hYy ehn eBA ép esob TiIt esg Cin Cn Giun erOg pn eBA sus CiIb er:n esOn Ekn pl Él Cu s‘UTaM m:at; Ek RsI eR)aj jin han er:t Tit sav:n Eg:t yIm em:AsMNag kI Ka erom pa Kg; P½NÐ Qun vn sr mMu eGom Pin er:n c½nÞda CH0+00-50 CH0+500-50 CH2+400-450 CH2+350-450 CH1+500-550 CH1+250-300 CH1+500-550 CH2+100-120 CH2+050-100 CH1+700-780 CH1+350-400 CH1+250-300 CH1+100-130 CH1+300-350 CH1+100-150 CH1+100-150 CH1+100-150 CH1+300-400 CH1+150-250 CH1+400-580 CH1+100-200 CH1+400-500 CH1+500-580 CH1+200-300 CH0+000-050 CH0+200-350 CH0+350-450 CH0+500-550 CH0+750-850 CH0+300-400 CH0+400-500 CH0+800-850 CH0+700-800 CH0+200-250 CH0+300-400 CH0+100-200 Total 29 HH Total 0 HH Total 10 HH CH0+900-1+00 CH0+950-1+00 CH0+950-1+100 DMS DMS DMS 1 30 11 HH Qu. CH 1 Af.MC 001/095 1 12 003/091 23 003/088 34 003/089 45 003/090 56 003/087 67 002/081 78 Af.SC3 002/080 001/105 9 8 001/103 1 12 002/074 23 002/075 34 002/076 45 Af.MC 002/077 002/078 6 57 002/079 68 001/097 79 001/099 8 001/101 1 2 3 4 18 1719 002/055 1820 002/054 1921 002/053 2022 002/052 2123 002/051 2224 002/050 2325 002/049 2426 002/048 2527 002/047 2628 002/046 2729 003/053 2830 003/052 29 003/051 10 911 001/102 10 001/104 10 911 001/100 1012 001/096 1113 001/098 12 003/083 17 16 002/056 1- PUmi kUnetñat XuMrMelc Rsuk)akan kUnetñat XuMrMelc PUmi 1- Rsuk)akan XuMrMelc R)asaT PUmi 2- Rsuk)akan XuMrMelc eragtakuk kUmi 3- No No No. No. DMS 85 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects 2 Ap h/h Ap than 10% lose more Tamarin Krosang Others Banana Trees Palm Coconut Bamboo Jumbolan Cashew Mango 2 m Stall Bamboo Wood Steel Affected StructureAffected Affected Cate.2(m House (m) Fence Cate.1(m % of % P.Land Resi. Affec. Affec. Total 158.20 ) 2 1,132.36 12,316.20 10,309.12 3 34 53 35 36 37 38 39 404142 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 Affected Land (m Land Affected Affected Land Productive Rice Orch. Pond 158.20 1,132.36 12,316.20 10,309.12 2 m Total Agr. Total 20,000.0025,000.0025,000.00 618.75 276.00 638.25 618.75 276.00 638.25 3.09% 1.10% 2.55% 20,000.00 812.50 812.50 4.06% 60,000.0032,700.00 31.67 224.0015,000.00 149.07 31.67 224.0070,000.0020,000.00 0.05% 0.69% 1,014.3910,450.0035,900.00 553.62 149.07 8.90 1,135.96 0.99% 1,014.39 553.62 1.45% 1,135.96 8.90 2.77% 3.16% 0.09% 160,000.00 1,080.96 1,080.96 0.68% 2 m Residential 2 m 2 2 use m use 2 m 4- Secondary Canal 4 ( SC4 ) SC4 4 ( Canal Secondary 4- 5- Secondary Drain 1 ( SD 1 1 SD) ( Drain 1 Secondary 5- 9,900.00 900.00 9,000.00 158.20 158.20 1.76% 6,720.00 420.00 6,300.006,700.00 165.10 400.00 165.10 6,300.00 2.62% 9,000.00 176.40 900.00 176.40 8,100.00 2.80% 68.00 68.00 0.84% 9,900.00 900.00 9,000.00 20,600.0028,600.0025,450.00 600.00 3,600.00 20,000.00 450.00 25,000.00 25,000.0036,800.00 1,086.85 65.8335,900.00 787.5516,400.0020,600.00 1,086.85 1,800.00 65.83 900.00 35,000.00 787.55 4.35% 90.00 35,000.00 0.33% 600.00 15,000.00 6.59 3.15% 20,000.0040,300.00 83.3525,300.00 354.9220,450.00 687.5052,270.00 6.59 300.0030,900.00 83.35 300.0030,160.00 354.92 40,000.00 687.50 450.00 0.02% 25,000.00 0.24% 20,000.00 2.37% 187.2030,300.00 3.44% 2,270.00 756.0015,080.00 569.10 900.00 50,000.00 160.00 30,000.00 200.05 30,000.00 187.20 584.40 300.00 756.00 554.40 80.00 569.10 30,000.00 0.47% 15,000.00 3.02% 303.60 2.85% 200.05 268.80 584.4020,020.00 554.40 0.40% 30,900.00 1.95% 40,450.00 1.85% 303.6011,350.00 268.8070,900.00 20.00 1.01% 450.00 20,000.00 1.79% 900.00 450.00 450.00 30,000.00 172.50 10,450.00 40,000.00 166.29 900.00 44.00 88.00 70,000.00 172.50 345.00 166.29 0.86% 44.00 88.00 0.55% 0.42% 345.00 0.22% 0.49% 109,700.00 3,390.00 105,000.00 162,000.00 2,000.00 160,000.00 248.40 248.40 0.16% 258,180.00 5,580.00 746,650.00 304,575.00 3,150.00 12,325.00 342,400.00 2 m Land Land Land Chamka outside Use in in not Land Land Land 1 1 t 23 2 3 1 2 1 111 2 1 1 1 1 31 1 1 13 12 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 District Household Age Age Household District 1 3 1 4 1 21 1 1 2 1 12 2 12 1 2 1 3 2 7 1 8 Male Femal 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 11 1 2 3 14 1 Bakan Bakan 2 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 44 719115 5 221 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ income H/h H/h H/h Village, Romlich Commune, Commune, Romlich Village, Village, Romlich Commune, Commune, Romlich Village, 1 1 1 1 1 1 H/h H/h Head Head Head <14$/m Head Head of 41 54 26 48 22 41 50 46 40 25 23 68 49 30 28 51 28 60 Age Widow Aged Disable H/h Landless Ethinic 1 49 1 601 43 1 1 1 50 1 28 1 28 1 29 1 511 1 23 1 1 23 1 38 1 Sex Kaunthnot Kaunthnot of HHd of 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1415161718192021222324 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 3 11 47 31 1 30 11 26 1 53 1 30 51 1 30 1 7 9 1 2 2 M F HHD 16 6 Rorngtakok Village, Romlich Commune, Bakan Distric Bakan Commune, Romlich Rorngtakok Village, Romlich Village, Romlich Commune, Bakan District Bakan Commune, Romlich Village, Romlich Kel Horn Kel Krem Yoeun Soeun Ren Saroeun Nhanh Heang Chot Morn Meun Mao Kerm 1 BoRuos 1 Pas Vork Las Him Las Him SosHim Luch Kob OeunMatt 1 MotSos 1 Hy Sam Meu Mat 1 Matt El 1 1 Che Sem SimSa 1 1 ElPhal Mot Vork 1 Ney El 1 1 Nop El Ley Som 1 Sa Kok MattSos Ly Nuoy 1 1 Sem Rem 1 Kok El 1 1 Ley Som Sos Him Vann Sos Matt El Ly Nuoy Tas Phong Sa Kok 5 Household Name Household kil h‘n eyOnRkwm er:n esOn ja:j; saerOn eCat h‘ag mWun m:n Exm em:A rs; bU vk b:H hIum LH hIum LH hIum suH kub luc ma:t; eGOn mU:t suH sM hIu ma:t; emIu Él ma:t; swmCi sa sIum pl EGl vk m:Ut Él NI Él Nub sUmLI sar kuk ma:t;suH nYy lI rwm swum Él kuk sUmLI hIum suH sus va:;n; Él ma:t; nYy lI tH pUg sar kuk CH0+00-50 CH0+50-110 CH0+50-100 CH0450-500 CH0+00-050 CH1+00-100 CH1+00-100 CH0+600-650 CH0+600-700 CH0+100-900 CH0+100-150 CH0+250-300 CH0+500-550 CH0+170-250 CH0+700-800 CH0+350-400 CH0+550-600 CH0+110-170 CH0+150-200 CH0+350-400 CH0+200-250 CH0+550-600 CH0+500-550 CH0+650-700 CH0+850-900 CH0+700-750 CH0+650-700 CH0+400-950 CH0+300-350 CH1+100-200 CH1+100-200 CH1+100-250 CH1+700-800 CH1+200-400 Total 15 HH Total 1 HH Total 4 HH Total 10 HH CH0+900-1+00 CH0+950-1+00 CH0+950-1+00 DMS DMS DMS DMS 1 4 16 22 HH Qu. CH 1 2 3 4 1 1 001/050 1 12 001/057 23 001/056 34 003/043 4 002/040 1 Af.SC1 001/051 2 Af.MC 001/054 3 Af.MC 002/035 4 Af.SD1 001/055 5 16 001/052 27 001/053 38 Af.SC1 002/034 002/033 9 Af.SD1 002/032 1 12 001/001 23 001/002 34 001/003 45 001/004 56 003/001 67 003/002 7 003/003 14 13 003/086 15 1416 003/085 15 003/084 10 411 003/034 512 003/038 613 003/037 714 Af.MC 003/036 003/035 15 816 003/040 917 Af.SD1 003/039 003/041 18 Af.SD1 003/042 19 Af.SC1 002/039 20 Af.SD1 002/038 21 Af.MC 002/037 22 10 002/036 1- PUmi rMelc XuM rMelc Rsuk )akan rMelc XuM rMelc PUmi 1- Rsuk )akan rMelc XuM eragtakuk PUmi 2- Rsuk rMelc )akan kUnetñat XuM PUmi 3- Rsuk )akan rMelc kUnetñat XuM PUmi 1- No No No. No. DMS 86 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects Ap h/h Ap than 10% lose more Tamarin Krosang Others Banana Trees Palm Coconut Bamboo Jumbolan Cashew Mango 2 m Stall Bamboo Wood Steel Affected StructureAffected Affected Cate.2(m House (m) Fence Cate.1(m % of % P.Land Resi. Affec. Affec. Total 60.00 875.40 ) 2 1,470.44 3,146.01 5,761.66 3 34 53 35 36 37 38 39 404142 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 Affected Land (m Land Affected Affected Land Productive Rice Orch. Pond 60.00 875.40 1,470.44 3,146.01 5,761.66 2 m Total Agr. Total 15,000.00 33.9420,000.00 1,219.39 33.94 0.23% 1,219.39 6.10% 22,500.00 433.84 433.84 1.93% 70,000.0030,000.00 63.00 91.5045,000.0045,000.00 17.25 63.00 24.50 91.50 0.09% 0.31% 17.25 24.50 0.04% 0.05% 20,000.00 935.00 935.00 4.68% 180,000.00 1,058.13 1,058.13 0.59% 2 m Residential 2 m 2 2 use m use 2 m 6- Secondary Drain 2 ( SD 2 2 SD) ( Drain 2 Secondary 6- 4,725.002,850.00 225.00 4,500.00 150.00 2,700.00 299.69 198.13 299.69 198.13 6.66% 7.34% 8,700.002,550.00 600.00 8,100.00 460.47 300.00 2,250.00 169.00 460.47 5.68% 169.00 7.51% 40,945.00 45.00 900.00 40,045.00 33,600.0030,450.0035,300.00 2,700.00 900.00 32,700.00 450.0040,900.00 300.00 73.00 30,000.00 35,000.00 450.00 26.0040,945.00 43.00 50.00 40,450.00 73.00 45.0030,900.00 49.50 900.00 0.22% 26.00 43.00 40,045.0010,045.0018,225.00 0.09% 0.12% 60.00 49.50 900.00 225.0015,000.00 30,000.0010,900.00 45.0065,400.00 0.12% 45,100.00 10,000.00 518.19 60.00 18,225.0020,000.00 3,600.0038,000.00 600.00 1,530.00 1,800.0042,000.00 0.15% 900.0020,900.00 63,600.00 1,200.0021,500.00 10,000.00 100.00 1,800.00 518.19 399.12 36,200.00 45,000.00 179.09 600.00 1,530.00 1.73% 2,000.00 997.16 830.79 900.00 40,000.00 1,500.00 6.00% 8.40% 20,000.0025,200.00 20,000.00 399.12 226.2021,800.00 179.0913,050.00 303.00 375.7221,800.00 0.63% 997.16 830.79 900.00 1.79% 40,900.00 900.00 200.0021,800.00 900.00 2.75% 1.85% 226.20 20,000.00 25,000.00 900.00 1,350.00 303.00 375.72 1,861.60 20,900.00 11,700.00 0.57% 900.00 426.78 1.52% 900.00 900.00 1.88% 574.09 7.22 20,900.00 40,000.00 1,208.00 1,861.60 369.22 426.78 9.31% 574.09 1.71% 7.22 1,208.00 2.75% 369.22 0.06% 5.78% 0.92% 66,745.00 225.00 1,320.00 65,425.00 164,000.00 450.00 650.00 162,950.00 443,970.00 3,150.00 7,270.00 626,250.00 465,800.00 4,800.00 16,000.00 629,800.00 123,100.00 600.00 122,500.00 825.90 825.90 0.67% 187,000.00 7,000.00 180,000.00 139.12 139.12 0.08% 2 m Land Land Land Chamka outside Use in in not Land Land Land 4 ct 1 2 1 District 11 1 3 3 2 2 11 13 3 1 1 1 2 151 2 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 4 2 1 3 2 Household Age Age Household 1 3 1 2 3 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 2 3 Male Femal Bakan District District 2 1 1 1 2 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 21 1 13 12 6 15 2 8 2 2 1 1 9 2 2 14 2 4 5 12 1 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ Bakan Bakan income H/h H/h H/h 1 1 2 Village, Romlich Commune, Commune, Romlich Village, 1 1 1 1 H/h H/h Head Head Head <14$/m Head Head of Age Widow Aged Disable H/h Landless Ethinic Village, Romlich Commune, Commune, Romlich Village, Village, Romlich Commune, Commune, Romlich Village, 1 30 1 471 1 48 1 58 1 27 1 37 1 45 1 63 1 1 76 1 1 56 1 1 28 1 50 1 Robosraing Village, Otaporng Commune, Bakan Distri Bakan Otaporng Commune, Village, Robosraing Rongtakok Sex of HHd of Prasat Village, Romlich Commune, Bakan District Bakan Commune, Romlich Prasat Village, 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1415161718192021222324 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 3 Prasat 11 30 1 30 1 50 1 45 1 26 1 23 23 1 701 1 681 1 1 30 1 61 33 1 11 29 52 1 38 11 761 37 1 37 11 37 1 24 1 44 6111 1 60 1 41 1 1 1 1 3 2 6 5 M F HHD 12 2 Romlich Kok Sa Kok Sos Sok Meu Matt Chas Tort Som Vann Kaley Sok Kaley Sok Ron Reim Moeun Meav Thorng Vang Hach Satt El Slem Sophat Yan Khom Chea Yun Bo Rem Soam Ran Vorn Song Sek SoKea Chun Noy Yan SoKun Lav Laing Hok Sov Kung Seit Sek Vuth Phork Vuth Phork Yoeun Mech Pheav Chea Sothea Reim Soeun Soeung Suon keo San Chea Neang Keo Vanna Loeu Phoin Moeun Khem Kem 5 Household Name Household kuk sar kuk suH sux ma:t; emIu Tt CH va:n; sUm xLIsux xLIsux Er:m run emov emOn va:g fg sat; hac Él søwm ya:n supat Ca xum bUr yn; esam er:m v:n ra:n; esk sug Cun suKa ya:n Ny Lav suKnæ huk LaMg Kg; s‘Uv esk Est ePaK vuF ePaK vuF eyOn muic Ca ePov Er:m suFa esOg esOn Ekv sYn Ca san Ekv nag elO vNÑa emOn P½NÐ kwm exm CH0450-550 CH0+00-200 CH1+700-800 CH1+500-600 CH1+500-700 CH1+600-800 CH1+600-800 CH1+500-700 CH1+100-200 CH1+100-300 CH0+700-800 CH1+100-200 CH0+850-900 CH0+800-900 CH0+800-850 CH0+800-900 CH0+600-700 CH0+100-200 CH0+200-300 CH0+300-400 CH0+400-500 CH0+500-600 CH0+350-450 CH0+350-450 CH0+300-500 CH0+100-300 CH0+250-300 CH0+350-450 CH0+300-350 CH0+500-600 CH0+700-750 CH0+600-650 CH0+150-200 CH0+650-700 CH0+600-650 CH0+250-300 Total 10 HH TotalTotal 2 HH 1 HH Total 5 HH Total 10 HH DMS DMS DMS DMS DMS 2 1 5 14 11 HH Qu. CH 1 2 3 4 8 Af.SD1 003/004 9 Af.SC1 002/001 1 12 002/008 2 001/008 1 1 002/007 1 12 001/007 23 001/006 34 001/005 45 003/005 5 003/006 1 12 003/011 23 003/010 34 003/009 45 003/008 56 003/007 67 001/011 78 001/010 89 001/009 9 002/009 1 12 001/073 23 001/075 34 001/074 45 001/076 56 001/078 67 001/077 78 Af.SC2 003/064 003/068 9 Af.SC2 003/067 10 811 002/002 912 002/003 1013 Af.SC1 002/004 002/005 14 Af.SC1 002/006 10 1011 Af.SD1 002/010 002/011 10 8 003/065 2- PUmi rMelc XuM rMelc Rsuk )akan Rsuk rMelc XuM rMelc PUmi 2- )akan Rsuk rMelc XuM eragtakuk PUmi 3- Rsuk )akan rMelc XuM R)asaT PUmi 4- Rsuk )akan GUtae)a:g XuM re)aHraMg PUmi 5- Rsuk )akan rMelc XuM R)asaT PUmi 1- No No No. No. DMS

87 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects 1 1 1 2 1 Ap h/h Ap than 10% lose more Tamarin Krosang Others Banana Trees Palm Coconut Bamboo Jumbolan Cashew Mango 2 m Stall Bamboo Wood Steel Affected StructureAffected Affected Cate.2(m House (m) Fence Cate.1(m % of % P.Land Resi. Affec. Affec. Total ) 2,401.57 9,280.39 2 25,130.98 3 34 53 35 36 37 38 39 404142 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 Affected Land (m Land Affected Affected Land Productive Rice Orch. Pond 2,401.57 9,280.39 25,130.98 2 m 8,100.00 294.40 294.40 3.63% Total Agr. Total 30,000.0010,000.00 957.28 714.1815,000.0060,000.00 327.22 957.28 539.78 714.18 3.19% 7.14% 327.2231,800.00 539.78 608.61 2.18% 0.90% 15,000.00 293.50 608.61 1.91% 293.50 1.96% 20,000.00 513.00 513.00 2.57% 13,500.00 680.00 680.00 5.04% 10,000.00 357.00 357.00 3.57% 2 m Residential 2 m 2 2 use m use 2 m 2,450.00 450.007,680.00 20,000.005,800.009,450.00 348.50 480.00 800.00 7,200.003,200.00 450.00 348.50 5,000.00 9,000.00 596.05 1.74% 20.24 1,297.844,050.00 400.005,450.00 2,800.00 596.05 1,297.84 20.24 450.00 8.28% 5.17 14.42% 3,600.00 0.40% 450.00 249.19 5,400.00 5.17 1,211.87 0.18% 249.19 1,211.87 6.92% 22.44% 52,700.0042,250.0046,200.00 1,800.00 1,350.00 900.0013,500.00 900.00 51,800.00 41,350.0026,800.00 1,200.0016,200.00 15.92 443.4010,450.00 45,000.0030,300.00 865.1620,900.00 1,800.00 900.00 25,000.00 15.92 443.40 450.00 15,300.00 300.00 180.56 10,000.00 0.03% 865.16 1.07% 1,437.01 30,000.00 900.0020,900.00 670.4226,800.00 20,000.00 1.92% 576.0310,000.00 450.00 1,114.64 180.5620,300.00 900.00 450.00 1,437.0110,900.00 900.0021,350.00 20,450.00 670.42 0.72% 25,900.00 9.39% 576.03 1,549.5415,300.00 1,114.64 6.70% 463.45 300.00 1.92% 900.00 5.57% 20,000.00 1,350.00 10,000.00 20,000.00 1,549.54 1,130.5016,900.00 1,800.0022,700.00 433.50 463.45 13,500.00 770.4361,400.00 7.58% 1,000.00 1.79% 1,800.00 21.37 900.00 1,130.50 900.0031,250.00 16,000.0010,900.00 21,800.00 433.50 770.4337,000.00 5.65% 1,400.00 261.0813,600.00 60,000.00 68.46 4.34% 35,000.00 21.37 3.85% 15,000.00 2,072.03 1,250.0025,600.00 900.00 0.16% 40,900.00 30,000.00 7,000.0021,500.00 261.08 10,000.00 3,600.00 1,096.8121,800.00 30,000.00 68.46 5,000.00 10,000.00 1,500.00 1.63% 997.27 2,072.03 1,282.81 30,000.00 600.00 13,500.00 0.31% 904.32 900.00 1,210.39 3.45% 25,000.00 1,500.00 1,378.34 1,096.81 40,000.00 1,800.00 20,000.00 227.25 20,000.00 1,282.81 997.27 893.69 3.66% 1,215.13 904.32 1,210.39 74.38 4.28% 9.97% 1,378.34 9.04% 4.03% 227.25 10.21% 1,215.13 893.69 0.91% 74.38 6.08% 2.23% 0.37% 578,730.00 7,200.00 22,580.00 806,050.00 101,000.00 2,800.00 3,200.00 97,800.00 252,550.00 24,050.00 228,500.00 2 m Land Land Land Chamka outside Use in in not Land Land Land 1 1 ct 1 1 3 2 1 3 1 112 1 1 2 4 1 1 1 1 11 1 12 2 1 1 1 4 1 11 1 123 1 2 4 2 2 Household Age Age Household 1 12 1 11 1 1 1 1 11 1 5 3 4 3 3 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 12 41 1 2 1 1 1 2 4 Male Femal 1 1 1 3 1 2 2 1 1 1 111 31 3 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 11 2 1 11 1 1 1 2 1 4 2 8 171 1 2 8 20 1 1 3 1 1 10 20 45 2 1 4 16 52 2 1 1 1 3 3 1 4 1 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ income H/h H/h H/h 3 4 3 3 1 1 2 1 H/h H/h Head Head Head <14$/m Head Head of Age Widow Aged Disable H/h Landless Ethinic 1 60 1 32 1 38 1 45 1 32 1 36 1 741 1 47 1 1 281 421 84 1 42 1 1 1 611 1 31 1 1 47 1 42 1 52 1 1 58 1 3 Robosraing Village, Otaporng Commune, Bakan Distri Bakan Otaporng Commune, Village, Robosraing Rongtakok Village, Romlich Commune, Bakan District Bakan Commune, Romlich RongtakokVillage, Sex of HHd of 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1415161718192021222324 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 3 1 59 11 45 1 70 1 50 1 40 67 1 11 56 1 53 1 451 46 1 39 1 31 11 35 1 1 61 1 57 1 54 1 26 26 11 59 21 11 27 1 671 49 1 41 1 55 1 25 7 3 M F HHD 25 16 Hoin Torn Hoin Pheap Mut Chanra Thoin Ky Chea Hork Chea Lorn Hean Vorn Voeun Pheing Pho Seap Saut Sin San Chrep Soeung Man Kop Vuthy Um Rim Ly Rors Norng Neang Ly Chroeng Soeun Ra Roeung Suon keo Soeun Sum Kim Hean Sam Hing Osman Matt Em Sos Sun Moeung Thim Cheim Vann Phal Sokhim Suy Chit Pin Noeun Sum Khon Deap Laisim Heng Yem Soin Kuon Sam Sinat Nhav Sinoeun Khet khom Heng Heng Lorn Reim Tum Nan Neang Deap Kel Sorn Ker Lach Sot Nheim Sothoeun 5 Household Name Household h‘n tn mut PaB Fn can;r:a Ca KI Ca h‘k ehon Ln evOn vn pU Epg sUt esob sanþ suIn Ej:m sueFOn esOg Rcwb kub m:an G‘uM vuT§I lI rIm ng r:s; lI nag esOn Rcwg erOg r:a Ekv sYn esOn s‘uM h‘an KIm huIg saM m:at; GUsµan EGm suH emOg s‘un Ecm FIm pl v:an; s‘uy suxXIm Bin Cit enOn s‘uM edob xun ehg éLsuIm s‘n ywm sM KYn j:av suINat Ext suIenOn ehg xum ln ehg Er:m TuM nagNan kil eDob Ek sn; sut Lac CH0+500-600 CH0+200-300 CH0+300-350 CH0+300-350 CH0+550-650 CH0+750-850 CH1+150-200 CH1+200-250 CH1+300-350 CH1+400-550 CH1+100-150 CH1+700-800 CH1+300-400 CH1+600-700 CH1+500-600 CH1+550-600 CH0+800-900 CH1+200-250 CH1+300-350 CH1+000-200 CH1+200-250 CH1+300-350 CH1+550-600 CH1+600-650 CH1+300-350 CH1+300-400 CH1+400-450 CH0+750-800 CH0+800-900 CH0+000-050 CH0+000-050 CH0+050-150 CH2+050-150 CH1+750-900 CH2+250-300 CH2+300-350 CH1+800-900 CH2+150-200 CH2+000-100 CH2+150-250 CH1+800-900 Total 31 HH Total 3 HH Total 10 HH CH0+950-1+800 CH0+900-1+000 CH1+950-2+050 DMS DMS DMS 3 41 10 HH Qu. CH 1 12 003/065 23 002/057 3 001/072 1 12 002/071 23 002/070 34 002/069 45 003/080 56 003/081 67 001/090 78 001/092 89 001/091 9 001/093 1 2 3 4 12 Af.SC1 002/058 13 914 002/059 1015 002/060 1116 Af.SC2 002/061 002/063 17 Af.SC2 002/064 18 1219 002/065 1320 002/066 1421 002/067 1522 002/068 1623 001/081 1724 Af.SC2 001/088 001/084 25 1826 001/087 1927 001/085 2028 001/086 2129 Af.SC2 001/080 001/082 30 Af.SD2 001/083 31 2232 003/072 2333 003/073 2434 003/074 2535 003/078 2636 003/079 2737 003/075 2838 003/076 2939 003/071 3040 Af.SC2 003/077 003/069 41 31 003/070 10 10 001/089 11 Af.SC2 003/066 2- PUmi re)aHraMg XuM GUtae):ag Rsuk )akan Rsuk )akan GUtae):ag XuM re)aHraMg PUmi 2- )akan Rsuk rMelc XuM eragtakuk PUmi 3- No No No. No. DMS

88 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects 1 1 Ap h/h Ap than 10% lose more 1 4 1 Tamarin Krosang Others Banana 2 1 Trees 1 13 22 4 5 1 44 1 1 3 5 1 5 Palm Coconut Bamboo Jumbolan Cashew 1 2 1 156 11152 110 2 Mango 2 m Stall Bamboo Wood Steel Affected StructureAffected Affected Cate.2(m House (m) Fence Cate.1(m 7% % of % P.Land 0.35% Resi. Affec. Affec. 390.78 0.00 293.98 0.00% 0.00 41.00 0.00% Total ) 4,028.68 7,006.50 8,855.17 2 3 34 53 35 36 37 38 39 404142 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 Affected Land (m Land Affected Affected Land Productive Rice Orch. Pond 4,028.68 4,413.78 ###### 18.60 8,855.17 2 m 7,200.00 510.10 510.10 7.08% Total Agr. Total 20,000.0020,000.0020,000.00 309.4725,000.00 788.57 1,531.2530,000.00 572.92 826.47 309.47 788.57 1,531.25 1.55% 572.92 3.94% 7.66% 826.47 2.29% 2.75% 35,000.00 1,011.1830,000.0013,500.0025,000.00 677.1620,000.00 327.32 1,011.18 659.11 699.84 2.89% 677.16 327.32 659.11 2.26% 699.84 2.42% 2.64% 3.50% 41,800.00 542.75 542.7520,000.0030,000.00 1.30% 58.19 598.07 58.19 598.07 0.29% 1.99% 15,000.00 214.9521,700.00 1,341.21 214.95 1.43% 1,341.21 6.18% 2 m Residential 2 m 2 2 use m use 2 m 6- Secondary Drain 3 ( SD 3 3 SD) ( Drain 3 Secondary 6- 6,000.009,900.00 600.00 5,400.00 900.00 634.80 9,000.00 644.75 634.80 11.76% 644.75 7.16% 5,400.007,200.00 9,900.00 900.00 4,500.00 900.00 13.66 9,000.00 293.21 13.66 0.30% 293.21 3.26% 18,900.0050,900.0031,350.00 2,700.0040,000.00 2,700.0011,000.00 16,200.00 900.00 450.00 900.0015,200.00 30,900.00 50,000.00 5,000.0020,900.00 1,000.00 35,000.00 1,591.5342,700.00 10,000.00 549.72 90.90 200.00 18.60 1,350.00 1,350.00 15,000.00 109.50 1,730.06 1,591.53 900.00 55.80 41,350.0016,800.00 20,000.00 12,700.00 3.18% 549.72 450.23 1,730.0640,000.00 753.16 1.57% 1,800.00 17.30% 15,450.00 900.0035,900.00 1,800.00 753.16 11,800.00 15,000.00 450.23 10,000.00 5.02% 30,000.00 909.14 242.62 1.09% 450.00 2,538.2631,800.00 900.00 15,000.00 35,000.00 200.74 909.14 242.62 701.10 2,538.26 1,800.00 7.70% 1.62% 19,500.00 30,000.00 8.46% 200.74 17.49 701.10 3,600.0018,900.00 900.00 1.34% 2.00% 18,600.00 1,817.00 17.49 900.00 18,000.00 0.06% 1,973.26 1,817.00 9.7 1,973.26 10.96% 246,850.00 4,950.00 14,000.00 274,650.00 152,650.00 1,800.00 15,850.00 325,300.00 2 m Land Land Land Chamka outside Use in in not Land Land Land 3 1 1 District 13 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 21 1 3 1 2 1 1 4 1 1 2 11 3 1 1 Household Age Age Household 1 21 1 1 11 1 5 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 3 2 1 2 1 31 5 4 3 2 2 1 2 15 1 3 14 Bakan Male Femal 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 8 16 2 3 5 15 3 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ income H/h H/h 1 H/h Village, Romlich Commune, Commune, Romlich Village, 1 2 H/h H/h Head Head Head <14$/m Head Head of Age Widow Aged Disable H/h Landless Ethinic 5 1 50 1 56 1 491 1 41 1 31 1 58 1 42 1 54 1 60 1 43 1 531 1 26 1 30 Rongtakok Village, Romlich Commune, Bakan District Bakan Commune, Romlich Rongtakok Village, Sex Kaunthnot Village, Romlich Commune, Bakan District Bakan Commune, Romlich Village, Kaunthnot of HHd of Prasat Village, Romlich Commune, Bakan District Bakan Commune, Romlich Prasat Village, 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1415161718192021222324 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 3 5 6 5 9 11 43 1 47 1 40 1 28 30 1 45 11 43 62 1 11 641 45 1 45 11 511 60 1 62 1 38 11 59 1 49 1 41 1 58 30 1 7211 1 37 53 1 M F HHD Kampong Kampong Kdey Tam Him Tam Him Tum Rob Tam Sen Phan Sos Sok Cham Nga Sary Chan Thou Pheav Kheit Soeng Noy Hol Pes Ny Pov Hen Khorn Sok Voeung Cheap Nang Chhorn Koeun Chan Lach Sot Sinoeun Khet Voeun Mein Ron Ben Pol Deap Kheit Soeng Thoeun Heang Thy Hen Kuon Sam Reim Tum Nan Neang Lach Sot Phat Keo Mao Kherm Boeun Bea Samnang Mao Uy Tep Bo Boin Keak Sa Pak Hach 5 Household Name Household taM huIm huIm TuM taM r:Ub panesn suH sux ga caM can; sarI Pav FU swg Ext hUl Ny nI eBH ehn eBA xn sux eCobevOg qn Nag can; eKOn sut Lac Ext suIenOn Em:n evOn bu‘ín r:un edob b:ul swg Ext h‘ag eFOn huwn FI sM KYn Er:m TuM nagNan sut Lac Ekv pat Exm em:A ebor ebOn em:AsMNag G‘uy eTB b‘n bU sarhÁak; hac ):ak CH3+50-100 CH2+550-600 CH2+350-450 CH2+450-500 CH2+300-450 CH2+550-628 CH0+000-150 CH0+250-450 CH0+000-050 CH0+500-600 CH0+400-500 CH0+600-700 CH0+600-700 CH0+200-300 CH0+500-600 CH0+050-100 CH0+150-200 CH1+050-100 CH0+700-800 CH0+700-750 CH2+700-800 CH2+100-250 CH2+800-850 CH2+650-700 CH2+850-900 CH2+750-800 CH2+750-800 CH3+100-150 CH1+150-200 CH1+150-250 CH0+800-950 CH0+900-950 CH0+750-900 Total 0 HH Total 10 HH Total 6 HH CH2+900-3+50 CH0+950-1+00 CH0+700-1+100 DMS DMS DMS 5 11 14 HH Qu. CH 2 Af.SC2 002/072 3 Af.SC2 003/082 4 Af.SC1 001/094 5 Af.SC1 001/025 1 12 002/082 23 002/083 34 001/106 45 001/109 56 001/108 67 Af.SC3 002/084 003/095 8 79 003/093 8 003/094 1 Af.SD2 001/110 2 Af.SD2 001/111 3 14 002/085 25 003/096 36 Af.SD3 003/111 003/109 7 48 003/107 59 Af.SD2 002/100 002/099 1 12 Af.SD3 002/089 002/090 3 24 002/086 35 002/087 46 002/088 5 003/097 1 Af.SC2 002/073 1 2 3 4 10 911 003/093 10 001/107 10 Af.SD2 002/098 11 Af.SD2 001/126 12 Af.SD2 001/125 13 614 Af.SD4 001/124 001/127 4- PUmi kUnetñat XuM rMelc Rsuk )akan )akan Rsuk rMelc XuM kUnetñat PUmi 4- Rsuk rMelc )akan kMBg;kþI XuM PUmi 1- Rsuk )akan rMelc XuM eragtakuk PUmi 2- Rsuk )akan rMelc XuM R)asaT PUmi 3- No No No. No. DMS

89 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects 1 1 1 1 1 2 Ap h/h Ap than 10% lose more 1 2 1 1 1 2 4 Tamarin Krosang Others Banana Trees Palm Coconut Bamboo Jumbolan Cashew Mango 2 m Stall Bamboo Wood Steel Affected StructureAffected Affected Cate.2(m House (m) Fence Cate.1(m 0% % of % P.Land Resi. Affec. Affec. Total ) 2,278.78 4,595.14 2 30,180.55 3 34 53 35 36 37 38 39 404142 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 Affected Land (m Land Affected Affected Land Productive Rice Orch. Pond 2,278.78 4,595.14 29,659.78 520.77 2 m 9,000.00 170.08 170.08 1.89% 5,400.00 1,135.258,100.00 1,074.38 1,135.25 21.02% 1,074.389,000.00 13.26% 945.94 945.94 10.51% 8,100.00 1,267.42 1,267.42 15.65% Total Agr. Total 19,500.0016,200.00 656.25 306.37 656.25 306.37 3.37% 1.89% 41,350.00 112.4120,000.00 394.24 112.41 0.27% 394.24 1.97% 20,000.00 3,327.72 3,327.72 16.64% 20,000.00 454.59 454.59 2.27% 15,000.00 926.01 926.01 6.17% 60,000.00 520.77 520.7725,000.00 297.15 0.87% 20,000.00 305.46 297.15 1.19% 305.4640,000.0035,900.0030,000.00 1.53% 738.24 171.17 34.67 738.24 171.17 34.67 1.85% 0.48% 0.12% 50,000.00 235.31 235.31 0.47% 2 m Residential 2 m 2 2 8- Dam - Fee Dam 8- - use m use 7- Canal TD-SD2-3L Canal 7- 2 m 6,750.009,000.009,000.00 1,350.00 5,400.00 900.00 351.37 8,100.00 900.008,100.00 8,100.00 324.969,000.00 532.53 351.37 6.51% 900.00 324.96 7,200.00 532.53 4.01% 1,460.64 6.57% 1,460.64 20.29% 31,600.00 1,600.00 135,900.00 36,350.0020,900.0015,990.0020,750.00 900.0020,000.00 450.0031,800.0023,100.00 35,900.00 900.0033,500.00 900.00 1,629.31 20,000.00 750.00 7,200.00 15,000.00 900.00 1,107.96 20,000.00 1,800.00 1,020.30 22,200.00 30,000.00 3,500.00 805.55 1,629.31 1,731.35 30,000.00 29.9417,000.00 1,107.96 4.54% 1,572.1241,350.00 1,020.30 5.54% 805.55 1,731.3515,000.00 6.80% 29.94 2,000.00 4.03% 1,572.12 7.8 1,350.00 15,000.00 40,000.00 0.10% 5.24% 1,305.0041,400.0021,600.00 658.7521,800.00 1,305.00 2,400.00 1,600.00 658.75 39,000.00 1,800.00 8.70% 20,000.0031,600.00 20,000.00 903.40 1.65% 1,749.60 1,750.43 1,600.00 903.40 1,749.60 30,000.00 1,750.43 1,334.70 2.32% 8.75% 41,800.00 8.75% 30,900.0015,900.0010,900.00 1,334.70 1,800.00 900.00 4.45% 40,000.00 900.00 30,000.00 900.00 529.05 15,000.00 10,000.00 836.91 451.69 709.80 529.05 836.91 451.69 1.32% 709.80 2.79% 3.01% 7.10% 463,290.00 11,700.00 26,000.00 683,450.00 2 m Land Land Land Chamka outside Use in in not Land Land Land 1 1 1 1 23 13 1 4 3 5 1 3 6 2 5 1 1 11 1 2 1 2 2 1 3 1 1 2 1 3 Household Age Age Household 1 31 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 3 2 2 13 1 1 2 4 3 2 1 2 2 11 1 1 2 1 1 Male Femal District 11 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 11 38 5 1 6 11 50 3 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ District Bakan Bakan income H/h H/h H/h 3 6 2 2 1 H/h H/h Head Head Head <14$/m Head Head of Age Widow Aged Disable H/h Landless Ethinic Village, Romlich Commune, Commune, Romlich Village, 1 39 1 25 1 47 1 481 1 51 1 561 1 49 1 38 1 621 1 62 1 1 50 1 47 1 25 1 29 1 48 1 1 47 1 451 37 1 17 Village, Romlich Commune, Commune, Romlich Village, Sex Kaunthnot Village, Romlich Commune, Bakan District Bakan Commune, Romlich Village, Kaunthnot of HHd of Prasat 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1415161718192021222324 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 3 3 1 1 1 1 49 11 48 1 29 1 67 60 1 11 50 281 61 1 1 1 62 11 671 49 1 1 37 57 11 43 611 11 1 29 1 28 40 1 61 11 65 35 1 1 45 M F HHD 18 Phnov Put Mom Put Chip Sos Thy Lorn Ruos Lach Lim Boay Tha Buok Nim Than Ngeit Sok Thy El Soeun Seang Eng Mom Pes Ny Vorn Voeun Rith Roeung Ky Chea Sorn Sen Sorn Sen Phal Duch Thuon Cheim Thim Cheim Roeung En Phun Phai Put Meu Ruos Lach Keak Sa Sa Matt Phy Phai Saroeun Phann Phai Vann Luch Kop Sem Rem Che Sem Saroeun Phorn Yoeum Bo Suon Keo Neang Sao Thav Chrun Khon Seang Chanlek Meak Hengly Chin 5 Household Name Household BuF mMuBuF sus CiIb LnFI Lac rs; e)ay lIm fa b‘Yk fn nIm Eg:t sux Él FI s‘ag esOn muM eGg nI eBH evOn vn erOg riT§i Ca KI esn sn esn sn pl Duc Ecm FYn Ecm FIm Guin erOg ép Pun emuI BuF Lac rs; sarhÁak; m:at; sar ép PI pan;saerOn v:an; ép kub luc rwm swum Ci suwm pn saerOn bUr eyOm Ekv sYn nag esA RCun fav esog xun maXcan;Lwk Cin ehglI CH1+50-100 CH1+100-350 CH0+700-800 CH1+000-100 CH1+700-750 CH1+300-350 CH1+300-450 CH1+550-750 CH1+300-500 CH1+650-700 CH1+500-550 CH1+500-550 CH2+000-050 CH2+000-150 CH1+700-800 CH1+500-550 CH1+500-550 CH2+400-550 CH2+100-250 CH2+650-700 CH2+200-300 CH2+150-200 CH2+350-450 CH2+250-400 CH2+500-650 CH2+200-300 CH3+300-325 CH3+300-325 CH3+150-250 CH0+000-300 CH0+300-365 CH0+500-550 CH0+350-750 CH0+300-350 CH0+400-500 CH0+000-050 Total 24 HH Total 1 HH Total 0 HH CH1+000-1+50 CH1+000-1+50 CH1+850-2+00 CH1+750-2+00 DMS DMS DMS 4 2 35 HH Qu. CH 8 Af.SC3 003/099 9 6 003/100 1 Af.SC4 003/111 2 Af.SC4 002/102 3 Af.SC4 002/101 4 1 001/128 1 Af.SC2 002/062 2 Af.SD2 001/079 1 12 002/110 23 002/108 34 002/107 45 Af.MC 002/109 002/103 7 Af.SD3 003/098 1 2 3 4 10 711 001/113 812 001/112 913 001/113 1014 001/118 1115 001/113 1216 001/116 1317 001/119 1418 Af.SD3 001/117 003/101 19 Af.SD3 003/104 20 1521 Af.SD3 003/102 003/103 22 1623 Af.SD3 001/120 003/105 24 1725 002/094 1826 Af.SD2 002/093 002/092 27 Af.SC3 002/091 28 1929 003/108 2030 Af.SD3 003/106 002/097 31 Af.SD3 002/096 32 2133 002/095 2234 001/122 2335 001/121 24 001/123 4- PUmi kUnetñat XuM rMelc Rsuk )akan )akan Rsuk rMelc XuM kUnetñat PUmi 4- Rsuk )akan rMelc XuM R)asaT PUmi 1- Rsuk rMelc )akan eBñA XuM PUmi 1- No No No. No. DMS

90 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects 1 Ap h/h Ap than 10% lose more 1 1 1 Tamarin Krosang Others Banana Trees Palm Coconut Bamboo Jumbolan Cashew Mango 2 2 818 6 2 11 5 3 215 24 2 m Stall Bamboo Wood Steel Affected StructureAffected Affected Cate.2(m House (m) Fence Cate.1(m % of % P.Land Resi. Affec. Affec. Total ) 2 3 34 53 35 36 37 38 39 404142 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 Affected Land (m Land Affected Affected Land Productive 29.28 3,094.89 18.60 221,842.77 499.05 Rice Orch. Pond MOWRAM. RU 2 800.00 14,824.10 14,824.10 m Total Agr. Total 30,000.00 92.2856,800.0015,000.00 692.80 92.28 252.90 0.31% 30,000.00 692.80 252.92 252.90 1.22% 1.69% 252.92 0.84% 10,000.00 168.00 168.00 1.68% 40,000.00 307.85 307.85 0.77% 35,000.00 575.3550,000.00 743.60 575.35 1.64% 743.60 1.49% Sao Sao Channarith Prepared by by Prepared 2 m Residential Date :day: Date month: 2009 Year: 2 m 2 2 use m use 2 m 83,896.00 300.00 84,340.00 265,996.00 9,879,660.00 218,7 15,900.0040,450.0061,350.00 900.0090,400.00 15,000.00 450.0030,450.00 1,350.0036,800.00 40,000.00 467.61 6,000.00 19.8040,450.00 2,790.00 400.0035,450.00 450.0030,900.00 90,000.00 1,800.0031,350.00 467.61 30,000.0040,900.00 35,000.00 512.7225,450.00 2,790.00 727.04 19.80 450.00 3.12% 10,000.00 645.00 450.00 40,000.00 900.00 46.50% 35,000.00 0.05% 1,350.00 30,000.00 499.80 900.00 30,000.00 1,476.12 512.72 450.00 727.04 40,000.00 26.59 645.00 849.75 25,000.00 0.57% 478.56 2.42% 1.84% 482.65 499.80 1,476.12 26.59 1.25% 849.75 4.22% 478.56 482.65 0.09% 2.83% 1.20% 1.93% 2 m Land Land Land Chamka outside Use in in not Land Land Land 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Household Age Age Household Cerified by Cerified 1 11 1 1 2 1 6 11 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Male Femal 1 1 1 1 Chief MOWRAM of Chief NWISP.PMU RU 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ income H/h H/h H/h H/h H/h Head Head Head <14$/m Head Head of Age Widow Aged Disable H/h Landless Ethinic 1 49 1 56 1 36 1 38 1 56 1 49 1 53 1 1 37 1 35 Sex of HHd of 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1415161718192021222324 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 3 1 28 11 29 47 1 38 1 26 1 54 11 30 1 33 26 11 26 29 M F HHD Lun Thorn Lun Sokha Lorn Pheap Phoin Naun Sao Set Chev Khom Khorn Teng Kung Sokha Hum Mai Mut Nom Koch Sophal Kung Thorn Lun Rann Huon Hul Duch Rorn Pech Pros Chhen Simi Duch Chanthan Suon Men Mos Chhen Simeang Chhen 5 Team Leader Verified by Verified Chheang Chhorlin Chheang Ang Tauch Household Name Household ln; fn ln suxa eqn sIuemog PnPaB NUn esA ecv sit xn xum Kg; etg suxa h‘uM mut ém: kuc NuM Kg; supl ln; fn h‘Yn r:an; h‘ul Duc buic r:n Qin Rbus suImIDuc sYn can;fn em:n m:us CH0+000-050 CH0+200-250 CH0+250-300 CH0+500-550 CH0+550-750 CH0+350-450 CH0+250-300 CH0+450-500 CH0+400-450 CH1+200-250 CH0+750-850 CH0+900-950 CH1+300-350 CH0+900-950 CH1+200-250 CH0+800-850 CH0+750-800 Total 17 HH 14 11 1 1 1 3 1 8 22 1 3 3 5 18 1 589,350.00 14,350.00 827, Total 273 HH 223 137 33 33 15 11 36 46 136 392 25 25 74 112 454 23 7,4 CH0+950-1+000 CH1+250-1+300 CH1+000-1+100 DMS DMS 25 361 HH Qu. CH 7 58 Af.MC 002/105 002/106 9 6 003/116 1 2 3 4 6 Af.MC 002/104 10 711 Af.MC 003/017 003/113 12 Af.MC 003/112 13 Af.MC 003/115 14 815 003/114 916 003/120 1017 002/114 Af.MC 002/112 18 Af.MC 002/113 19 1120 002/115 1221 003/121 1322 003/123 1423 003/119 1524 003/122 1625 003/118 17 002/111 No No No. No. DMS 91 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects Ap h/h Ap than 10% than lose more lose Trees Mango Palm Coconut Bamboo Jumbolan Acasa Tamarin Others Well Wood Dig Pump ) 2 2 Affected StructureAffected Affected House Fence's(m) Cate.1 (m Cate.1 MOWRAM.RU % of % Affec. P.Land 7.48% 4.14% 5.06% 4.83% 3.08% 3.00% 3.00% 2.88% Affec. Prepared by Prepared Sao Channarith ) 2 Date :day: Date month: Year: 2009 Affected Land (m Land Affected AffectedLand Productive 3 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 4344 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 828.00506.00483.00 828.00 900.00 506.00 450.00 483.00 576.00 900.00 450.00 576.00 Rice Orch. Pond Total Resi. 1,495.00 1,495.00 3,078.00 3,078.00 8,316.00 8,316.00 2 m Total Agr. Total 2 m Residential 2 m 2 2 use m use 2 Verified by Verified Team Leader Team m 2 m West Dam - - 1 Land Land Land Chamka $/Month outside Use in in not Land Land Land 102,400 21,800 2,400 100,000 1,800 20,000 20,189 11,500 189 1,500 20,000 10,000 16,500 1,500 15,000 21,000 1,000 20,000 31,200 1,200 30,000 10,070 70 10,000 Income Femal Household age age Household 12 1 1 32.52 14.31 1 1 11.93 1 211 1 827.36 1 31.82 Male usey District usey 1 2 22 67.07 1 1 11 1 1 81.30 11 1 48.78 21 211 1 2 3 8 234,659 9,659 225,000 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ H/h H/h Head Head Landless Ethinic Cerified by 2 H / H/ h Group Tauch Ang Ich Sokmony Vulnerable Chief MOWRAM.RU NWISP.PMU Chief of income 2 H/h H/h H/h Head Head Head <14$/m of Age Widow Aged Disable H/h 1 28 1 1 Prey Phaoap Village, Reusey Krang Commune, Mong Mong Re Commune, Krang Reusey Phaoap Village, Prey Sex of HHd 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16171819202122232425 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 3 11 28 1 21 5511 45 11 30 1 49 1 58 7 1 M F HHD Nhem Norn Nhem Sokea Keat Run Chan Phoeun Run Han Uk Sal Mok Yoeun Lay Soeung Phann HH 5 8 Household Name Household jwm Nn eKotsuKa can; run run ePOn G‘uk han m:uk sl; Lay eyOn pan; esOg Mong Reusey District Reusey Mong CH0+100-300 CH0+300-350 CH0+350-400 CH0+400-450 CH0+450-750 CH0+750-850 CH1+000-050 CH1+000-070 Total DMS 8 HH Qu. CH 1 2 3 4 1 12 001/232 23 001/233 34 001/234 45 001/235 56 001/236 67 001/237 78 001/238 8 001/239 No No No. No. DMS Rsuk emagbJsSI RsukemagbJsSI emagbJsSI Rsuk bJsSIRkaMg éRBep¥ab XuM PUmi 1-

92 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects 2 1 1 2 2 2 3 1 2 3 2 1 1 23 than 10% than Household Loss more more Loss ) 2 619.50 dIPUmi dIPUmidIPUmi 1,052.73 ,942.73 Residen.L(m ¦ ¦ ¦¦ 2 2 22 dIcMkar dIcMkardIcMkar dIPUmi 3,362.56 Orchard (m²) Orchard RBHraCaNacRkkm<úCa ReligionNation King épÞdIb:HBal;¬m épÞdIb:HBal;¬m épÞdIb:HBal;¬m épÞdIb:HBal;¬m Kingdom Of Cambodia ) Catisasna RBHmhakSRt 2 9,912.60 6,636.06 8,188.77 4,341.64 6,189.42 8,374.26 1,575.00 2,740.99 3,267.24 2,964.08 5,245.82 1,290.15 1,083.61 2,061.64 dIERs dIERs dIERsdIERs dIcMkar 20,308.74 16,650.19 21,098.16 12,306.65 10,216.90 Rice.L (m Rice.L 1 15,975.95 270.50 MOWRAM.RU Affec. Struc. Fence(m) pump 6 1 5 1 2 8 1 9,478.92 2 1 2 1 hers wood well 22 18 34,250.52 4 13 19 13 22 96.00 Prepared by by Prepared Sao Sao Channarith 2 4 1 2 7 Date :day: :day: Date month: 2009 Year: 3 21 21,798.07 1 3 Ig eTob eck GMBil RksaMg epSg² 1 3 1 1 7 1 1529 37,748.35 6 1 1 5 212 38,625.57 5 1 3 22 24,539.06 2 27 n Pursat Province n Pursat 6 5 40 1 5 4 4 1 ruit bamboo jambolan custa.apple banana tamarin krosang ot 1 1 Affected Tree Affected 4 2 cMnYnedImeQIcMnYnedImeQI cMnYnedImeQIcMnYnedImeQI 1 3 6 17 3 1 19 4 1 énKeRmageRsacRsBPaKBay½Bü extþeBaF×sat; Verified by Verified TeamLeader 4 1 4 37 Ich Sokmony Ich 3 1 Subproject Northwest I of Project Irrigation Sector 12 w palm coconutfruit milk papayafruit guava citrusf jack 1 4 4 3 6 1 1 4 26 47 1 19 46 20 3 8 25 5 12 51 2 44 5 8 147 96.00 1 182,225.94 3,362.56 1 sVay cnÞI etñat dUg TwkedaH lðúg RtEbk RkUcqµar xñúr b£sSI RB Krauch SeuchKrauch 8 1 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 3 2 2 2 3 5 3 1 2 4 58 gayrgeRKaH Gt;dI <14 1 cMNUl H/h Income H/h Vulnerable Landless 1 1 2 1 1 7 11 The Summary List of APs of of of List The APs Summary Disable Disable taragsegçbesdækic©sgÁm GnuKeRmag RkUcesIc 2 2 3 3 1 2 1 6 2 1 2 1 2 4 1 1 1 6 2 2 1 1 1 2 20 34 6 7 RsþIemm:ay cas;Cra Bikar 9 1 1 4 1 7 7 3 2 7 20 11 21 cMnYnRKYsar 3 3 2 5 4 8 7 5 3 2 8 7 5 1 3 2 21 21 4 4 18 15 2 11 35 22 34 31 1 2 1 4 24 11 20 16 14 18 17 13 11 12 9 4141 32 3221 6 21 2 4 1 1 8 4 7 261123717 11 3 3 4 1 19 4 6 1 5 4 1 40 5 4 1 13 4 1 3,267.24 2296.00 1,052.73 2,061.643,362.56 619.50 47 40 1 81 144 39 10 4 8 6 31 11 21 34 1 29 132,254.64 270.504 12 10 49 41 3 4 7 1 21 18 2 2 1 5 42 27 3 4 2 1 6 Cerified by 302 251 Tauch Ang Tauch

Chief Chief MOWRAM.RU NWISP.PMU of XMu XMu 2 No1 No2 MC Canal DMS H/h H/h H/h H/h <14$/M/ h H H/h mango cashe Dam SC2 SC3 SD1 SD2 Name of Name of No. Affected Widow Aged SC1 SC1 Dam-SFE Dam-SFE eQµaHRbLay eQµaHRbLay eQµaHRbLayeQµaHRbLay cMnYnÉksar Kapkralanh i nig nig i PUm 10 10 Name of eQµaHeQµaH PUmi PUmiXMu XMu eQµaHeQµaH PUmi PUmiXMu XMu Bakan District Bakan Sub-Total Sub-Total :Village 1 Sub-Total Sub-Total : Villages 1 Sub-Total Sub-Total : Villages 5 Sub-Total : Villages 4 Sub-Total : Villages 2 Sub-Total : Villages 2 Sub-Total : Villages 4 Sub-Total : Villages 2 Sub-Total : Villages 1 Village and Commune Village and PUmi PUmikab;RkLaj; kab;RkLaj; XuM RtBaMgCg XuM RtBaMgCg PUmi PUmi)akan )akan XuM RtBaMgCg XuM RtBaMgCg PUmi PUmisñayeTal sñayeTal XuM RtBaMgCg XuM RtBaMgCg PUmi PUmiGUrrMeck GUrrMeck XuM RtBaMgCg XuM RtBaMgCg PUmi PUmiRtBaMgCg RtBaMgCg XuM RtBaMgCg XuM RtBaMgCg PUmi PUmikab;RkLaj; kab;RkLaj; XuM RtBaMgCg XuM RtBaMgCg PUmi PUmisÞwgkMbut sÞwgkMbut XuM XuMRtBaMgCg RtBaMgCg PUmi PUmiRkUcesIc RkUcesIc XuM XuMxñarTTwg xñarTTwg PUmi PUmixñarTTwg xñarTTwg XuM XuMxñarTTwg xñarTTwg PUmi PUmisñayeTal sñayeTal XuM RtBaMgCg XuM RtBaMgCg PUmi PUmipÞHsøa pÞHsøa XuM XuMxñarTTwg xñarTTwg PUmi PUmiGUrrMeck GUrrMeck XuM RtBaMgCg XuM RtBaMgCg PUmi PUmiRtBaMgCg RtBaMgCg XuM RtBaMgCg XuM RtBaMgCg PUmi PUmifµI XuMfµI RtBaMgCg XuM RtBaMgCg PUmi PUmiRtBaMgCg RtBaMgCg XuM RtBaMgCg XuM RtBaMgCg PUmi PUmisñayeTal sñayeTal XuM RtBaMgCg XuM RtBaMgCg PUmi PUmipÞHsøa pÞHsøa XuM XuMxñarTTwg xñarTTwg PUmi PUmisÞwgkMbut sÞwgkMbut XuM XuMRtBaMgCg RtBaMgCg PUmi PUmixñarTTwg xñarTTwg XuM XuMxñarTTwg xñarTTwg PUmi PUmikab;RkLaj; kab;RkLaj; XuM RtBaMgCg XuM RtBaMgCg PUmi PUmi)akan )akan XuM RtBaMgCg XuM RtBaMgCg PUmi PUmikab;RkLaj; kab;RkLaj; XuM RtBaMgCg XuM RtBaMgCg PUmi PUmikab;RkLaj; kab;RkLaj; XuM RtBaMgCg XuM RtBaMgCg PUmi PUmi)akan )akan XuM RtBaMgCg XuM RtBaMgCg PUmi PUmisñayeTal sñayeTal XuM RtBaMgCg XuM RtBaMgCg PUmi PUmiGUrrMeck GUrrMeck XuM RtBaMgCg XuM RtBaMgCg PUmi PUmiRtBaMgCg RtBaMgCg XuM RtBaMgCg XuM RtBaMgCg PUmi PUmikab;RkLaj; kab;RkLaj; XuM RtBaMgCg XuM RtBaMgCg PUmi PUmisÞwgkMbut sÞwgkMbut XuM XuMRtBaMgCg RtBaMgCg PUmi PUmiRkUcesIc RkUcesIc XuM XuMxñarTTwg xñarTTwg PUmi PUmixñarTTwg xñarTTwg XuM XuMxñarTTwg xñarTTwg PUmi PUmisñayeTal sñayeTal XuM RtBaMgCg XuM RtBaMgCg PUmi PUmipÞHsøa pÞHsøa XuM XuMxñarTTwg xñarTTwg PUmi PUmiGUrrMeck GUrrMeck XuM RtBaMgCg XuM RtBaMgCg PUmi PUmiRtBaMgCg RtBaMgCg XuM RtBaMgCg XuM RtBaMgCg PUmi PUmifµI XuMfµI RtBaMgCg XuM RtBaMgCg PUmi PUmiRtBaMgCg RtBaMgCg XuM RtBaMgCg XuM RtBaMgCg PUmi PUmisñayeTal sñayeTal XuM RtBaMgCg XuM RtBaMgCg PUmi PUmipÞHsøa pÞHsøa XuM XuMxñarTTwg xñarTTwg PUmi PUmisÞwgkMbut sÞwgkMbut XuM XuMRtBaMgCg RtBaMgCg PUmi PUmixñarTTwg xñarTTwg XuM XuMxñarTTwg xñarTTwg PUmi PUmikab;RkLaj; kab;RkLaj; XuM RtBaMgCg XuM RtBaMgCg PUmi PUmi)akan )akan XuM RtBaMgCg XuM RtBaMgCg PUmi PUmikab;RkLaj; kab;RkLaj; XuM RtBaMgCg XuM RtBaMgCg Kapkralanh Vill,Trapaingchorng Com. Kapkralanh Vill,Trapaingchorng Com. Bakan Village, Trapaingchorng Com. Village, Tol Trapaingchorng Snay Com. Vill, Orumchek Trapaingchorng Vill,Com. Tra.chorng Trapaingchorng Com. Kapkralanh Vill,Trapaingchorng Com. Vill,Trapaingchorng Stungkambot Com. Village, Knatotoeng Krauchseuch Com. Village, Knatotoeng Knatotoeng Com. Village, Tol Trapaingchorng Snay Com. Ptas SlaVillage, Knatotoeng Com. Vill, Orumchek Trapaingchorng Vill,Com. Tra.chorng Trapaingchorng Com. Vill, Trapaingchorng Thmey Vill,Com. Tra.chorng Trapaingchorng Com. Village, Tol Trapaingchorng Snay Com. Ptas SlaVillage, Knatotoeng Com. Vill,Trapaingchorng Stungkambot Com. Village, Knatotoeng Knatotoeng Com. Kapkralanh Vill,Trapaingchorng Com. Bakan Village, Trapaingchorng Com. Kapkralanh Vill,Trapaingchorng 1 2 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 1 1 2 3 4 1 2 1 2 srubTItaMgb:HBal;man ³ ³ srubTItaMgb:HBal;man No l>r l>r l>rl>r 9 8 5 3 1 2 4 6 7 Rsuk )akan )akan Rsuk KN³kmµkarGnþrRksYgénkargaredaHRsaydIFøI nigpÞHsEm,g KN³kmµkarGnþrRksYgénkargaredaHRsaydIFøI KeRmagRbB½n§eRsacRsBPaKBay½Bü 10 Inter-Ministerial Committee Resettlement Irrigation Project Sector Northwest

93 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects 1 1 1 1 Ap h/h than than 10% lose more 1 2 1 3 1 Others Kroseing Tamarin Banana Nation ReligionNation King RBHraCaNacRkkm<úCa Kingdom Of Cambodia Custa.apple Cati sasna RBHmhakSRt 4 21 3 114 5 3 1 13 1 2 111 2 2 2 3 1 1 1 1 Bamboo Jumbolan Jackfruit Citrus Affected Trees Affected guava guava Fruit papaya Milk Fruit Milk 1 2 Palm Coconut Cashew 6 1 2 1 2 1 2 Mango 1 16 31 21 271 183 Affec. Struc. Fence Fence (m) Well % of % P.Land Bamboo Wood Dig Pump 0.00% 94.50 in Pursat Province Province Pursat in 176.00 Affec. Affec. 0.00 0.00 82.52 0.41% ) 646.28639.45323.40 3.23% 4.70% 1.29% 396.50811.50714.00 1.98% 765.00 5.41% 2.69% 727.02 1.83% 5.77% 678.90904.70462.17 1.94% 698.75 6.03% 169.20 1.50% 1.59% 379.93 0.21% 656.57 0.76% 515.04 1.88% 1.72% 225.00665.75480.60 1.13% 460.35 4.44% 544.50 2.12% 485.00 1.53% 648.90 12.10% 3.23% 2.45% 2 1,518.75 7.59% 1,672.801,120.57 3.35% 3.74% 1,092.421,000.48 1.34% 4.00% 5 36 37 38 41 42 43 44 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 61 62 63 64 Affected Land (m Land Affected Affected Productive Land 82.52 646.28 639.45 323.40 396.50 811.50 714.00 765.00 727.02 678.90 904.70 462.17 698.75 169.20 379.93 656.57 515.04 225.00 665.75 480.60 460.35 544.50 485.00 648.90 Rice Orch. Total Resi. 1,518.75 1,672.80 1,120.57 1,092.42 1,000.48 geRsacRsBPaKBay½Bü extþeBaF×sat; geRsacRsBPaKBay½Bü 2 81,800 41,800 50,000 15,000 26,500 13,600 m Total Agr. Total

15,975.95 15,975.95 270.50

2 m Residential 764,800 2 Subprojectof Sector ProjectNorthwest Irrigation m 1- Main Canal ( MC( ) Canal Main 1- 2 2 use m use 2 m Land Land Chamka in Use in in not Land Land Land 600 1500 25,000 3500 30,000 20,000 1500 26,500 400 20,000 1800 12,600 900 3600 500 15,000 3900 30,900 44,000 900 35,000 900 4000 20,000 20,000 841 50,000 1800 900 1800 41,800 900 81,800 10000 1350 30,000 1200 900 15,000 1200 35,000 450 30,000 3500 25,000 1800 20,000 600 15,000 450 4,500 2700 900 22,700

4500 32,991 District taragBisþar esdækic©sgÁm GnuKeRmag RkUcesIcénKeRma GnuKeRmag esdækic©sgÁm taragBisþar rict 1 1 3 1,200 1 3 111 14,400 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 18,600 1 31,400 48,900 35,900 2 1 4 23,600 Household age age Household 2 11 1 2 2 11 1 1 2 1 1 20,900 24,000 1 11 1 50,841 2 3 1 2 42,700 1 1 82,700 1 1 1 1 4 31,350 1 1 1 2 1 13,600 Male Femal 2 3 121 1 1 1 1 51 1 25,600 1 1 1 1 2 31,500 1 1 23,500 1 1 28,000 20,400 2 1 1 2 4,950 1 1 1 1 28,500 1 1 1 1 1 21,800 1 2 1 2 1 15,600 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ Detail ListDetail of Seuch Socio-economy of Krauch income Group H/h H/h H/h H/h Head Head Head <14$/m h/ H Head Widow Aged Disable H/h Vul.ble Landless 1 Literacy Doctor Kapkralanh Village, Trapaingchorng Commune, Bakan Bakan Commune, Trapaingchorng Village, Kapkralanh

of of 1-Yes Age Occup 1 50 1 1 48 1 60 11 1 361 1 44 1 1 1 Bakan Village, Trapaingchorng Commune, Bakan Dist Bakan Commune, Trapaingchorng Village, Bakan Sex 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 29 30 31 32 33 34 3 11 45 1 56 1 11 1 1 51 11 58 1 11 29 1 112811 36 1 11 1 1 37 11 46 1 11 29 1 11 41 1 11 39 1 116511 11 25 1 11 1 1 56 11 30 1 1 11 54 11 1 11 39 1 1 1 46 11 58 1 30 11 1 1 76 1 15,900 1 11 28 1 1 1 28 1 1 47 1 1 1 1 1 36,200 37 1 30,450 M F HHD HHD 2-No of HHd Hoeun Mao Hoeun Thorn Phat Chem Rom Ten Kann Ly Chuon Roeum Roeng Chak Soeun Pheap Sen Saren Kuoy HeimChheng Choch Chorn Pork Khon Phy Seng KhorChy Poch Long Nam Chhay Naren Roeun EmPres Phy Seng HeimChheng Ly Chuon Samneang En Voeun Mol Chhin Neak Vy Ven Pheap Sen Sareth Pak Un Dorn Sarorn Sabath Premkhon Saren Kuoy 5 Household Name Household ehOn ehOn em:A pat Fn r:um Cwm etn kan; lICYn ruwg erOm esOnck; PaB suin sarin KYy Ehm eqg CncUc b:k; xun esgPI eXa CI Lúug b:Uc qayNaM erOnNarin EGmeRBs esgPI Ehm eqg lICYn GuinsMenog m:ulevOn Qin nak; vin vI PaB suin ):ak; saer:t Gu‘ndn sm,tþisar:n eRbm xun sarin KYy Bakan District Bakan Total 21HH 222 20 20 2 1 1 3 19122026616271 625,191 CH0+650-900 CH1+650-750 CH1+550-650 CH0+200-450 CH0+200-450 CH0+500-600 CH1+450-550 CH1+000-150 CH1+200-350 CH1+100-200 CH0+550-600 CH0+350-450 CH0+200-350 CH0+600-700 CH0+400-550 CH0+450-550 CH1+350-450 CH0+050-100 CH0+000-050 CH0+150-200 CH0+000-150 CH0+000-050 CH0+100-200 CH1+150-250 CH0+750-850 CH1+000-150 CH1+250-350 CH0+800-900 CH1+500-600 CH0+850-1+50 CH0+900-1+00 DMS 24 HH Qu. CH 1 2 3 4 1 1 001/003 2 23 003/007 34 003/006 45 001/006 56 001/001 67 001/002 78 001/005 89 001/007 9 002/004 1 12 002/008 Af.MC 002/006 3 24 002/007 35 003/010 46 003/009 57 003/008 Af.MC 001/010 10 1011 003/005 1112 003/004 1213 003/002 1314 003/001 1415 002/003 1516 002/002 1617 002/001 1718 003/003 1819 002/005 Af.MC 002/014 20 Af.MC 002/015 21 Af.MC 002/012 22 1923 002/011 2024 002/010 21 002/013 Rsuk )akan )akan Rsuk No No No. No. KN³kmµkarGnþrRksYgénkargaredaHRsaydIFøI nigpÞHsEm,g KN³kmµkarGnþrRksYgénkargaredaHRsaydIFøI KeRmagRbB½n§eRsacRsBPaKBay½Bü Rsuk RtBaMgCg )akan XuM kab;RkLaj; PUmi 1- )akan Rsuk RtBaMgCg XuM )akan 2-PUmi Inter-Ministerial Resettlement Committee Inter-Ministerial Resettlement Sector Irrigation Project Northwest DMS 94 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects 1 1 1 Ap h/h than than 10% lose more 2 8 2 1 2 2 1 Others Kroseing Tamarin Banana Custa.apple 7 8 1 Bamboo Jumbolan Jackfruit Citrus Affected Trees Affected guava guava Fruit papaya Milk Fruit Milk Palm Coconut Cashew Mango Affec. Struc. Fence Fence (m) Well % of % P.Land Bamboo Wood Dig Pump Affec. Affec. 56.00 0.28% ) 640.71458.51402.50 3.20% 234.00 4.59% 2.01% 2.34% 206.40893.66 0.83% 8.94% 222.00213.00592.61 0.89% 2.13% 2.96% 546.75600.75427.50 3.65% 3.00% 1.53% 760.74429.46891.05 5.07% 511.94 1.03% 370.89 2.55% 2.56% 1.40% 577.50560.25 2.89% 2.80% 712.80 5.28% 2 1,104.351,073.60 11.04% 1.07% 5,096.25 7.28% 2,351.251,156.302,820.52 3.36% 3.85% 7.05% 1,149.501,181.251,169.30 2.87% 1,207.85 3.94% 1,224.00 2.60% 12.08% 1,421.00 3.06% 4.74% 5 36 37 38 41 42 43 44 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 61 62 63 64 Affected Land (m Land Affected Affected Productive Land 56.00 640.71 458.51 402.50 234.00 206.40 893.66 222.00 213.00 592.61 546.75 600.75 427.50 760.74 429.46 891.05 511.94 370.89 577.50 560.25 712.80 Rice Orch. Total Resi. 1,104.35 1,073.60 5,096.25 2,351.25 1,156.30 2,820.52 1,149.50 1,181.25 1,169.30 1,207.85 1,224.00 1,421.00 2 70,000 26,500 10,000 10,000 20,000 15,000 41,800 35,000 20,000 138,300 m Total Agr. Total

1,083.61 1,083.61 8,374.26 8,374.26

2,964.08 2,964.08 5,245.82 5,245.82 1,575.00 1,575.00 2 m Residential 75,000 215,000 193,700 63,000 2 m 2 2 2 - Secondary Canal 1 ( SC1 ) ( SC1 1 Canal Secondary - 2 use m use 2 m Land Land Chamka in Use in in not Land Land Land 450 10,000 450 15,000 1800 25,000 1200 10,000 5000 100,000 1800 10000 25,000 10,000 360 20,000 5000 20,000 5000 20,000 16,800 7,250 3600 20,000 8000 2400 28,000 12700 14,900 8000 3,210 2 32,400 2400 30,000 n District n istrict kan District kan strict 1 111 14,400 900 13,500 12 11 41,350 1 13 45,900 41,800 1350 40,000 900 1800 45,000 40,000 1 14 10,450 2 1 70,000 1 2 1 1 15,450 Household age age Household 12 11 22,450 2450 20,000 2 2 112 1 3 72,400 2400 70,000 2 2 1 1 Male Femal 121 1 1 20,900121 900 11 20,000 33,000 3000 30,000 1 11 1 1 1 10,000 1 2 1 26,800 151 1 1 1 1 1 31,500 40,900 1500 900 30,000 40,000 112 2 31 1 25,000 1 1 1 1 25,000 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ income Group H/h H/h H/h H/h Head Head Head <14$/m h/ H Head Village, Trapaingchorng Commune, Bakan District Bakan Commune, Trapaingchorng Village, Widow Aged Disable H/h Vul.ble Landless Literacy Stung Kambot Village, Trapaingchorng Commune, Baka Commune, Trapaingchorng Village, Stung Kambot Snay Tol Village, Trapaingchorng Commune, Bakan D Bakan Commune, Trapaingchorng Village, Tol Snay Kapkralanh of of 1-Yes Trapaingchorng Village, Trapaingchorng Commune, Ba Commune, Trapaingchorng Village, Trapaingchorng Age Occup Oromchek Village, Trapaingchorng Commune, Bakan Di Bakan Commune, Trapaingchorng Village, Oromchek 1 42 1 1 1 58 1 1 1 57 1 1 11 37 1 1 1 149111 1 1 1123,600 16411 1 1 11 130,400 Sex 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 29 30 31 32 33 34 3 11 25 11 29 1 11 40 1 11 59 1 1 40 1 11 1 16411 53 11 1 53 11 1 41 1 1 1 1 1 2 10,900 900 10,000 11 671 47 1 23 1 1 1 1 11 36 11 7011 1 1 43 1 11 36 1 59 1 1 1 167117211 2 11 11 29 1 29 1 2 1 1 11 11,200 2116411 39 1 1 1 1 111105,000 12311 11 28 1 46 11 1 65 45 2 1120,000 26,800 21 120,360 M F HHD HHD 2-No of HHd Khun En Khun Thuon Thaung Thuy Chea Veng Chhorn Phally Sao Chea Prum Soeun Chheng Lun Morm Soren Mel Oeun Lai Saroeun Nhem Sameat Puoch Leang Ly Nuon Phat Nuon Chhon Mao Chhoeun Kann Thy Sok Yein Yean Meas Mao Sal Hang Yein Yean Ruos Roeun Von Bot Roem Dy Sareth Suon Sareth Suon Phearum Chea Et Ben Huon Dy Pheap Sen HeimChheng Poch Long Mao Hoeun 5 Household Name Household nYnpat em:A qun eQOn kan; FI sux yan Ey:n em:A mas hgS sl; yan Ey:n erOn rs; v:un but DI rwm saer:t sYn saer:t sYn Parmü Ca b‘ín Guit DI hYn PaB suin Ehm eqg Lúug b:Uc ehOn em:A XuneGn efagFYn Fuy Ca qn evg pløI esA Ca RBuM eqg esOn m:m ln; muilsurin éL eGOn saerOn jwm saemot BYc lIIlag Total 4HH 5 44 1 1 1181 1541212,250 Total 9HH 74 8 8 1 1 0 0 2 343132264172Total 3HH 167,100 21Total 33 1HH 2 41 2 11 42 2112 66,210 Total 3HH 4 32 2 2 112421 41 71,800 CH1+400-500 CH1+650-750 CH0+650-750 CH1+100-200 CH1+750-850 CH2+700-900 CH2+200-250 CH1+850-900 CH2+200-300 CH2+300-350 CH2+350-450 CH2+300-350 CH2+700-800 CH2+800-900 CH2+600-700 CH0+750-850 CH0+000-050 CH0+600-700 CH0+650-900 CH0+050-100 CH0+200-400 CH0+400-500 CH0+650-850 CH0+500-650 CH0+400-500 CH0+200-400 CH0+500-650 CH0+750-850 CH1+050-150 CH1+250-450 CH1+900-2+200 CH0+850-1+000 CH0+900-1+050 DMS DMS DMS DMS DMS 5 4 3 5 11 HH Qu. CH 9 7 001/011 1 12 002/009 23 003/018 34 003/012 Af.MC 001/012 5 4 003/011 1 12 003/013 23 003/014 34 001/014 Af.MC 001/013 1 12 003/016 23 003/017 3 003/015 1 Af.MC 002/006 2 Af.MC 002/015 3 Af.MC 002/002 4 Af.MC 001/003 5 1 001/019 1 12 001/015 23 001/016 34 001/018 45 002/018 56 002/017 67 002/016 78 001/017 89 001/021 9 001/022 1 2 3 4 8 6 001/009 10 811 001/007 9 001/008 10 1011 001/023 1112 001/024 12 001/025 No No No. No. 3- PUmi sñayeTal XuM RtBaMgCg Rsuk RtBaMgCg )akan XuM sñayeTal PUmi 3- Rsuk )akan XuMRtBaMgCg GUrrMeck 4-PUmi )akan Rsuk RtBaMgCg XuM RtBaMgCg PUmi 5- Rsuk RtBaMgCg )akan XuM kab;RkLaj; PUmi 1- Rsuk RtBaMgCg )akan XuM sÞwgkMbut 2-PUmi DMS 95 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects 1 1 1 1 Ap h/h than than 10% lose more 3 5 2 3 5 5 2 13 2 Others Kroseing 1 3 1 Tamarin Banana Custa.apple Bamboo Jumbolan Jackfruit Citrus Affected Trees Affected guava guava Fruit papaya Milk Fruit Milk Palm Coconut Cashew Mango Affec. Struc. Fence Fence (m) Well % of % P.Land Bamboo Wood Dig Pump Affec. Affec. 6.34 0.08% 85.8352.90 0.50% 0.26% 98.64 0.99% 46.50 0.52% ) 397.30638.95747.05 2.60% 666.00 2.07% 673.20 3.74% 642.60 2.22% 349.12 2.24% 663.00 1.81% 1.00% 2.37% 867.93483.90421.35 8.68% 3.23% 1.56% 256.00553.00286.44 0.64% 2.21% 234.91 0.95% 2.61% 773.68785.62169.30 5.16% 3.93% 1.24% 866.81 7.41% 705.25663.00 11.19% 135.20 0.66% 786.19565.66 0.54% 2.25% 853.81 7.07% 2.13% 2 1,000.74 6.67% 2,171.811,816.00 5.43% 25.22% 1,483.684,896.80 5.93% 4.90% 1,683.971,545.00 33.68% 3.86% 5 36 37 38 41 42 43 44 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 61 62 63 64 Affected Land (m Land Affected Affected Productive Land 6.34 85.83 52.90 98.64 46.50 397.30 638.95 747.05 666.00 673.20 642.60 349.12 663.00 867.93 483.90 421.35 256.00 553.00 286.44 234.91 773.68 785.62 169.30 866.81 705.25 663.00 135.20 786.19 565.66 853.81 Rice Orch. Total Resi. 1,000.74 2,171.81 1,816.00 1,483.68 4,896.80 1,683.97 1,545.00 9,000 2 100,000 m Total Agr. Total 20,308.74 20,308.74 4,341.64 4,341.64

6,636.06 6,636.06

2 m 613,150 218,000 Residential 5,000 124,000 25,000 8,000 6,300 25,000 100,000 35,000 40,000 40,000 2 m 2 2 3 - Secondary Canal 2 ( SC2 ) ( SC2 2 Canal Secondary - 3 use m use 2 m Land Land Chamka in Use in in not Land Land Land 2,500 5450 36,815 44,850 2,000 100 10000 7,750 3,150 1,200 4,000 12,000 3,000 3,450 1 30,000 10000 20,000 strict 11 1 1 1 18,675 1 20,900 33751 15,300 900 1 20,000 11 27,900 11 1 42,700 90011 27,000 2 2700 1 2 40,000 8,850 16,000 1350 10002 7,500 15,000 3 12 1 1 26,200 104,000 21 47,000 2 4 43,000 Household age age Household 1 2 1 75,000 112 1 2 33,150 1 1 35,000 2250 5000 5000 30,900 30,000 1 33 2 2 1 1 27,000 8,100 1 1 1 1 35,040 40 35,000 26 1 1 13,050 1350 11,700 Male Femal 113 11 31,000111 11 1 30001 16,350 1 28,000 1 1 1350 13,700 15,000 2700 10,000 221 11 9,450 1 1 1 8,100 900 7,200 1 1 1 1 36,8002 1 4501 1350 35,450 1 1 20,600 1 55,000 3600 17,000 5000 25,000 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ income Group H/h H/h Village, Trapaingchorng Commune, Bakan District Bakan Commune, Trapaingchorng Village, H/h H/h Head Head Head <14$/m h/ H Head Widow Aged Disable H/h Vul.ble Landless Village, Knatotoeng Commune, Bakan District Bakan Knatotoeng Commune, Village, Literacy Snay Snay Tol Krauch Seuch Village, Knatotoeng Commune, Bakan Di Bakan Knatotoeng Commune, Village, Seuch Krauch of of 1-Yes Knatotoeng Age Occup 1471211 40 1 1 1 21 75 1 2 1149121 31,500 1 1500162111 1 49 30,000 161121 521 1 1 26 2 1 1 1 1 1 12 1 111 10,800 1 114,950 1800 140,900 9,000 1350 10000 900 13,600 40,000 Sex 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 29 30 31 32 33 34 3 1 70 1 44 1 1 11 28 11 48 1 1 29 2 11 1 1 57 1 26 1 11 1 51 1 1 11 71111 70111 27 11 30 1 1 1 36 1 1 11 1 1 42 11 1 28 1 11 1 6211 1 29 1 1 11 1 111 56 11 54 1 1 1 2912 1 1 115,000 16,800 1 11 1 50001 18001 51 140,000 10,000 1 1 40 15,000 1 11 1 1 1 53 11 1 48 1 11 48 1 1 51 1 10000 1 116611 1 20,9001 30,000 56 1 1 1 900 1 20,000 31 12 43,450 M F HHD HHD 2-No of HHd Kerm Kosal Kerm An Pha Phal Pha Khem Khat Chea Un Chhlonh Ttoeng Kann Puoch Bunthey Tauch Sok Kann Nhor Tep Vuthy Klaing Doeun Nhor Phalla Lao Phon Ouch Phally Lao Veat Seu Kimho Em Pov Chuop Eng Seng Sann Tun Thorn Prum Chheat Chhean Savay Uong Eng Seng Moeun Cheap Srey Chheim Kun Korng Thoeun Chuon Nem Prum Srey Phem Hong Sam Porn Ben Thy Hang Vorn Vorng Seap Prum Mao Meas Mao Touch Chamreun 5 Household Name Household Ekmkusl; Gan pa pl pa Xwm xat; Gu‘nCa qøÚj Twg kan; BYc bu‘nfI tUc sux kan; j: eTB XøaMgvuTI§ edOn j: pløa eLA pun G‘Uc plIø eLA evot suW EGmKwmhU CYb eBA esgeGg san; Tn; fn RBuM Qan eQot G‘Yg sav:ay esgeGg eCob emOn Eqm RsI kg KuN eFOn CYn eNm RBM em:A mas ePm RsI hug sM b‘ín Bn hgS FI cMerIn TUc v:n vg esob RBuM Total 20HH 155 20 22 2 1Total 3 7413221336281 11HH 92 1011 649,965 2 4 5 3238323293 288,850 Total 7HH 35 7 9 3 3 2311213 62 122,750 CH1+250-300 CH1+050-200 CH0+950-100 CH0+850-950 CH1+150-250 CH1+250-350 CH1+150-200 CH1+350-400 CH2+100-150 CH2+050-100 CH1+800-900 CH1+700-800 CH1+700-750 CH1+850-900 CH2+250-380 CH2+200-300 CH2+150-200 CH2+150-250 CH1+600-650 CH1+550-600 CH1+550-600 CH1+500-550 CH1+600-650 CH1+850-950 CH1+500-550 CH1+600-700 CH1+000-050 CH0+500-600 CH0+000-050 CH0+300-800 CH0+200-300 CH0+450-500 CH0+050-200 CH0+000-400 CH0+750-900 CH1+950-2+00 CH0+950-1+000 002/027 DMS DMS DMS 8 20 11 HH Qu. CH Af.SC1 1 12 001/033 23 001/032 34 001/031 45 001/032 56 001/030 67 002/028 78 002/029 89 002/030 9 003/026 1 12 001/029 23 001/027 34 001/028 45 002/026 6 57 003/024 6 003/023 1 12 003/045 23 003/044 Af.MC 003/042 4 35 001/051 46 002/048 57 001/050 68 002/046 79 002/045 8 003/043 1 2 3 4 8 7 003/022 14 1415 002/024 1516 002/023 1617 002/022 1718 002/025 1819 003/019 1920 003/021 20 003/020 10 1011 003/025 11 002/031 10 9 002/047 13 13 001/026 3- PUmi RkUcesIc XuM xñarTTwg Rsuk )akan Rsuk xñarTTwg )akan XuM RkUcesIc PUmi 3- Rsuk xñarTTwg )akan XuM xñarTTwg 4-PUmi Rsuk )akan XuMRtBaMgCg sñayeTal PUmi 1- No No No. No. DMS 96 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects DMS oN o No. No. No No 1- PUmi XuM GUrrMeck RtBaMgCg Rsuk )akan PUmi2- pÞHsøa XuM )akan xñarTTwg Rsuk 31 002/073 11 002/07413 10 002/075 12 9 002/076 11 8 10 002/054 17 002/05518 16 002/05617 15 001/05516 14 002/05315 13 001/05614 12 001/05713 11 001/05412 10 001/053 11 9 10 003/044 14 003/04316 13 15 002/04914 12 001/05213 11 12 11 001/049 10 11 001/078 7 9 001/076 Af.MC 001/079 8 6 7 001/077 Af.MC 003/072 6 5 003/073 5 4 003/070 4 3 003/069 3 2 003/071 2 1 1 003/048 8 003/050 9 7 003/047 8 6 7 003/049 6 5 003/045 5 4 002/052 4 3 002/051 3 2 002/050 2 1 1 4 3 2 1 Af.SC2 Af.SC2 HQ.CH Qu. HH 13 18 16 DMS DMS DMS 003/046 003/042 CH1+950-2+050 CH0+050-150 CH0+250-350 CH0+450-550 CH0+700-800 CH0+400-450 CH0+000-100 CH0+500-650 CH0+150-300 CH0+600-650 CH0+700-750 CH0+300-350 CH0+100-150 CH0+300-400 CH2+300-550 CH2+750-830 CH1+800-850 CH1+550-700 CH2+050-350 CH2+600-830 CH1+750-800 CH1+550-650 CH2+050-100 CH2+550-750 CH1+850-950 CH1+650-750 CH2+500-550 CH1+250-300 CH1+300-400 CH1+450-550 CH1+250-300 CH1+250-300 CH1+150-200 CH1+050-100 CH1+100-250 CH0+500-650 CH0+150-200 oa 7H 261 111131872 02 476,500 1 22 10 4 3 21 7 8 1 3 1 1 1 21 17 6 12 HH 17 Total oa 1H 11 322131 263,170 2 10 3 1 2 2 13 5 1 3 2 2 11 11 5 8 HH 11 Total 455,770 1 21 4 1 2 1 25 9 3 2 1 1 14 14 16 HH 14 Total suM esot rs;DI sarYnebO RBuM suxCa sy esA sYn saer:t ey:tDn rwmDI DucDn CU evuIn ey:nQun kayInexov suPab‘ín yiny:av Nub Ny eyOnkg sn bU sn NaM KaQYn Pan; emok vineRBOn FIQun saer:tywm BuM sMGUr Nub sar:n sun eBA BuM sU‘hug sun eBA évEsm rinsug qanEkv eKOn san Titü pan sM hug xwg tun CuM exOn b:g; Gag HouseholdName 5 SuonSareth Dy Roem SomSeat Dy Ruos Boeur Saroun Prum Sokchea SoiySao Dorn Yet Duch Dorn Chou Veun ChhunYen Kheav Kayin Ben Sophea Yav Yen Nop Noiy KorngYoeun Sorn Bo Sorn Nam Chhuon Kea Meak Phoin Proeun Ven ChhunThy Yem Sareth Pum Sam O Nop Sarorn Son Pov Pum Souhong Son Pov Serm Vai Song Ren KeoChhan San Koeun PhanTit SamHong Kloeng Ton Chum Khoeun Pang Ang of HHd of H H 2-No HHD HHD F M 711 1 57 1 1 1 1 21 1 45 1 1 1 1 61 1 1 1 1 68 1 29 1 1 1 1 1 33 1 1 57 1 1 1 26 1 1 1 46 1 1 39 1 1 1 1 1 42 1 24 1 1 1 1 1 28 1 49 1 1 1 1 2 38 1 1 49 1 1 46 1 1 1 1 1 39 1 29 1 1 48 1 1 1 50 1 1 1 48 1 1 48 1 1 29 1 72 1 01 21 41 61 92 12 32 52 72 03 23 43 34 33 32 31 30 29 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 Sex 011 1 1 30 1 1 56 1 1 1 34 1 1 1 24 1 1 1 36 1 1 1 1 32 1 1 62 1 2 1 48 1 2 40 1 2 1 29 1 1 40 1 Oromchek Village, TrapaingchorngCommune, Bakan D Ptas SlaPtas Village,Commune,Knatotoeng Bakan Distri g Occup Age fo 1-Yes of of Literacy io gdDsbeHh u.l Landless Vul.ble H/h Disable Aged Widow edHa ed<4/ Head H/h <14$/m Head Head Head / H/h H/h 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H/h 1 1 1 1 noeGopH/h Group income - -2 31 06 0 - -2 31 06 60+ 20-60 13-19 6-12. 0-5 60+ 20-60 13-19 6-12. 0-5 20,550 1 4,000 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 16,750 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 aeFemal Male 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Householdage ct 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 3 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 10,570 20,700 1 2 1 2 istrict 101,800 1 1,750 19,500 570 700 900 1,350 900 500 3,500 4,000 900 4,000 120 5,000 2,000 900 450 4,200 1,800 300 600 1,000 900 750 900 1,350 750 900 300 600 900 1,800 550 1,000 6,020 35,970 nUenti adLn Land Land Land not in in Use adLn Chamka Land Land 15,900 21,300 11,350 20,500 63,500 34,000 12,700 24,000 28,120 25,900 13,300 30,900 18,450 29,200 21,800 30,300 20,600 41,000 41,500 30,750 27,900 23,850 30,750 m 5,900 1,800 9,700 2,900 2 use m 4 - Secondary Canal 3 SC3 ( ) 2 400 3,000 900 20,350 m 2 502,000 15,000 10,000 20,000 60,000 30,000 11,800 20,000 11,300 30,000 18,000 25,000 20,000 30,000 20,000 40,000 40,600 30,000 27,000 22,500 30,000 Residential 20,900 25,120 25,000 5,000 1,500 9,100 20,000 100,000 15,000 10,000 20,000 20,000 3,000 477,300 272,820 m 2

2,9.621,098.16 21,098.16

1,5.916,650.19 16,650.19 8187 8,188.77 8,188.77 Total Agr. m 25,000 27,000 20,000 10,000 2 1,344.30 1,270.49 1,123.59 1,107.00 1,918.41 4,630.00 1,917.62 1,409.50 1,709.49 1,059.30 1,534.75 1,104.79 1,359.24 ieOc.TtlResi. Total Orch. Rice 655.00 900.00 651.20 180.00 461.44 912.50 127.00 110.00 146.00 307.25 223.43 714.00 836.11 732.90 775.79 775.54 195.44 354.68 417.45 499.04 635.68 199.23 220.99 9 9.41 Affected LandProductive Affected Affected Land(m 63 84 24 44 84 05 25 45 65 85 16 364 63 62 61 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 44 43 42 41 38 37 36 5 ,4.02.24% 12.70% 1,344.30 1,270.49 4.49% 1,123.59 9.80% 6.39% 1,107.00 1,918.41 15.43% 1.92% 4,630.00 1,917.62 3.47% 18.79% 1,409.50 1,709.49 3.92% 6.82% 3.68% 1,059.30 1,534.75 1,104.79 13.59% 1,359.24 2 5.04.37% 18.00% 3.12% 655.00 1.80% 900.00 2.31% 651.20 4.56% 180.00 461.44 912.50 0.42% 0.93% 0.73% 127.00 1.22% 110.00 146.00 307.25 1.24% 2.86% 4.18% 223.43 714.00 836.11 3.66% 51.72% 732.90 775.79 2.87% 0.65% 775.54 195.44 1.77% 354.68 2.78% 2.50% 2.54% 417.45 499.04 6.64% 635.68 1.10% 199.23 220.99 ) 94 0.25% 99.41 fe.Affec. Affec. .adBmo odDgPump Dig Wood Bamboo P.Land % of ec m Well (m) Fence Affec. Struc. Affec. M ang o Cashew amCoconut Palm Milk Fruit papaya guava Fruitguava Affected Trees Citrus Jackfruit aboJumbolanBamboo 3 7 2 1 1 Custa.apple Banana Tama rin 23 22 3 1 Kroseing 1 2 Others 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 6 lose more lose han 10%th Ap h/h Ap 1 1 1 97 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects 2 1 1 1 Ap h/h than than 10% lose more 4 2 2 Others 1 1 Kroseing Tamarin Banana Custa.apple 1 6 1 1 Bamboo Jumbolan Jackfruit Citrus Affected Trees Affected guava guava Fruit papaya Milk Fruit Milk Palm Coconut Cashew Mango Affec. Struc. Fence Fence (m) Well % of % P.Land Bamboo Wood Dig Pump Affec. Affec. 36.80 0.18% 42.0037.50 0.42% 0.13% 40.54 0.41% 75.29 0.38% ) 306.00200.00350.00 3.06% 157.50 0.67% 3.50% 160.35 0.26% 1.60% 769.00705.25 1.92% 610.00376.80 14.11% 0.87% 421.80 2.51% 913.10 0.60% 4.57% 503.00141.00 10.06% 945.25671.00 2.35% 2.36% 11.18% 150.00 0.15% 458.39800.50646.00 1.53% 525.60 8.01% 119.25 1.85% 1.75% 0.30% 2 1,105.16 7.37% 2,492.001,308.50 4.15% 1,095.16 4.36% 1.10% 1,007.00 2.52% 1,606.001,316.17 8.03% 6.58% 1,127.001,413.00 1.88% 4.71% 5 36 37 38 41 42 43 44 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 61 62 63 64 Affected Land (m Land Affected Affected Productive Land 36.80 42.00 37.50 40.54 75.29 306.00 200.00 350.00 157.50 160.35 769.00 705.25 610.00 376.80 421.80 913.10 503.00 141.00 945.25 671.00 150.00 458.39 800.50 646.00 525.60 119.25 Rice Orch. Total Resi. 1,105.16 2,492.00 1,308.50 1,095.16 1,007.00 1,606.00 1,316.17 1,127.00 1,413.00 5,000 2 10,000 20,000 30,000 35,000 100,000 100,000 m Total Agr. Total

6,189.42 6,189.42 9,912.60 9,912.60 1,290.15 1,290.15

2 m 70,000 40,000 6,000 30,000 40,000 15,000 5,000 10,000 10,000 70,000 15,000 30,000 20,000 6,000 30,000 137,000 20,000 20,000 60,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 10,000 30,000 60,000 10,000 30,000 40,000 10,000 Residential 455,000 180,000 2 m 2 2 5 - Secondary Drain 1 ( SD 1 ) SD1 ( 1 Drain Secondary - 5 use m use 9,880 255 2 m 20,500 10,600 31,400 15,255 61,500 12,625 33,000 41,120 Land Land Chamka in Use in in not Land Land Land 2,500 3,000 400 4,000 900 300 2,500 7,500 450 3,700 1,400 1,500 1,500 130 1,250 5,000 2,400 1,200 900 450 7,750 5,000 21,530 5,000 500 600 1,400 1,500 2,625 3,000 1,120 trict kan District kan akan District akan 1 1 6,450 1 11 1 1 4 1 1 2 1 60,450 2 2 1 63,700 1 1 1 111 10,130 1 1 1 12 1 71,250 20,000 1 1 32,400 2 2 2 21,200 3 1 1 40,900 Household age age Household 2 1 1 3 3 1 1 47,500 Male Femal 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 5,000 1 1 1 34,000 1 2 1 1 1 20,900 1 1 1 1 1 20,300 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 32,500 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ income Group H/h 1 1 1 1 1 1 H/h 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 H/h H/h Head Head Head <14$/m h/ H Head Widow Aged Disable H/h Vul.ble Landless 1 Literacy Snaytol Village, Trapaingchorng Commune, Bakan Dis Bakan Commune, Trapaingchorng Village, Snaytol Prapaingchorng Village, Trapaingchorng Commune, Ba Commune, Trapaingchorng Village, Prapaingchorng doctor Village, Trapaingchorng Commune, Bakan District Bakan Commune, Trapaingchorng Village, Trapaingchorng Village, Trapaingchorng Commune, B Commune, Trapaingchorng Village, Trapaingchorng of of 1-Yes Age Occup 1 56 11 1 39 11 1 36 1 1 1 5216711 1 1 1 1 39 1 1 1 1 371 1 62 1 143111 11 1 1 6,400 1 44 1 1 1 1 58 1 1 1 1 58 1 221 2 1 6,500 1 3 2 11,500 Thmey Sex 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 29 30 31 32 33 34 3 11 46 1 21 1 11 1 49 techer 1 1 21 1 43 techer 1 1 40 1 1 11 30 11 38 1 1 30 1 11 1 1 67 1 40 techer 1 1 1 1 42 1 1 6611116811 50 1 1 55 1 1 1 1 1 11 95,000 1 1 31 1 111 40 1 11 48 11 57 1 28 11 1 2 1 1 43,000 11 6,400 1 43 1 1 1 70 M F HHD HHD 2-No of HHd Nut Pruonh Nut Chan Pe Lav Chheng Khetvoin Chea Chrep Phai Sokchea Prum Neng Van Touch Sok Tuy Tann Yong Yang Chheng Pang Phon Soiy Pork Kheng Samnang Chea Nat Ty Savann Chou Khon Kheng Long Nhonh Phoin Meak Ven Proeun Et Keo Sambo Nov Sitha But Sao Yem Koeun Yon Sarom Chhuon My Pech Theng Thaung Khon Kheng Loeum Dorn Porn Ben Heng Bun Seyha Dy Chhuon Chhnorn Chhuon Meas Mao 5 Household Name Household nutRBYj can; Bi eqg Lav extþv½nþ Ca Rcwb ép suxCa RBuM v:an;eNg TUc sux tan;Tuy yg;y:ug ):ag eqg pun sy b:k; exg sMNag Ca Nat TI sav:an; CU g:un exg Luúg jú:j emokPan; eRBOn vin EkvGuit sMbUr enA QYn Qñn suIfa bu‘t ywm esA yun eKOn QYn saruM em:A mas mI buic efagefg g:un exg Dn elOm b‘ín Bn b‘un ehg DI sIha Total 7HH 52 6 7 12 3 1382 1792 144,750 Total 7HH 53 572 1 3Total 265 10HH 1 75 610 9 184,880 10 2 2 25122 5782 369,030 CH1+150-200 CH0+750-900 CH0+000-100 CH0+800-900 CH0+850-950 CH0+800-850 CH1+050-200 CH1+350-400 CH1+200-300 CH1+700-800 CH1+600-700 CH1+700-900 CH1+550-700 CH1+300-400 CH1+550-650 CH1+750-950 CH1+150-350 CH1+300-400 CH1+350-400 CH3+500-600 CH3+250-350 CH3+750-810 CH3+450-550 CH3+150-250 CH3+650-800 CH0+000-050 CH2+300-500 CH2+100-250 CH2+500-600 CH2+250-450 CH2+700-950 CH2+650-3+00 CH2+950-3+50 CH0+950-1+000 CH1+700-3+450 002/077 003/062 003/060 002/061 002/057 DMS DMS DMS 8 7 12 HH Qu. CH Af.SC3 Af.SC2 Af.SC2 Af.SD1 Af.SC2 1 2 3 4 1 1 001/082 2 23 001/080 34 003/075 45 003/074 56 002/078 7 68 001/081 7 002/079 1 12 003/061 23 003/063 34 003/058 45 003/059 56 002/063 67 002/064 78 001/068 89 001/067 9 001/066 1 12 003/067 23 003/068 34 002/070 45 002/071 56 002/072 67 001/075 7 001/074 1 Af.MC 003/042 2 13 003/056 24 003/053 5 36 002/059 7 48 002/060 5 002/058 10 1011 002/065 12 2- kUmi RtBaMgCg XuM RtBaMgCg Rsuk RtBaMgCg )akan XuM RtBaMgCg 2-kUmi Rsuk RtBaMgCg )akan XuM fµI PUmi 1- Rsuk )akan XuMRtBaMgCg RtBaMgCg 2-PUmi Rsuk RtBaMgCg )akan XuM sñayeTal PUmi 3- No No No. No. DMS 98 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects 1 1 Ap h/h than than 10% lose more 3 2 1 3 1 Others Kroseing 1 2 3 Tamarin Banana Custa.apple 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 3 0 2 4 2 Bamboo Jumbolan Jackfruit Citrus Affected Trees Affected guava guava Fruit papaya Milk Fruit Milk 1 1 Palm Coconut Cashew Mango Affec. Struc. Fence Fence (m) Well % of % P.Land Bamboo Wood Dig Pump Affec. Affec. 99.68 0.17% 42.2055.49 0.08% 0.28% ) 135.00240.90285.00 0.45% 208.00 1.20% 976.00 0.81% 2.60% 380.00 3.25% 613.80 1.52% 4.09% 120.00158.00 0.40% 986.25 0.79% 516.75 4.93% 386.33 1.29% 370.36 1.93% 310.51 1.85% 532.00 1.55% 3.55% 651.98 2.17% 894.00521.37 2.24% 497.00622.61 1.30% 936.44 1.13% 960.50 1.33% 383.80 2.08% 968.00 3.20% 407.00 0.96% 314.00 4.84% 3.20% 662.17 0.52% 1.66% 2 1,040.00 10.40% 3,088.53 12.35% 2,000.001,604.00 4.00% 5.35% 1,826.43 3.04% 1,406.27 2.56% 2,479.001,232.25 5.51% 3.08% 1,088.10 5.44% 5 36 37 38 41 42 43 44 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 61 62 63 64 Affected Land (m Land Affected Affected Productive Land 99.68 42.20 55.49 135.00 240.90 285.00 208.00 976.00 380.00 613.80 120.00 158.00 986.25 516.75 386.33 370.36 310.51 532.00 651.98 894.00 521.37 497.00 622.61 936.44 960.50 383.80 968.00 407.00 314.00 662.17 Rice Orch. Total Resi. 1,040.00 3,088.53 2,000.00 1,604.00 1,826.43 1,406.27 2,479.00 1,232.25 1,088.10 8,000 2 44,000 20,000 20,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 60,000 15,000 10,000 20,000 m Total Agr. Total 10,216.90 10,216.90

12,306.65 12,306.65 2 m Residential 380,000 46,800 25,000 50,000 20,000 45,000 40,000 45,000 40,000 60,000 25,000 12,700 20,000 30,000 60,000 30,000 20,000 55,000 50,000 20,000 35,000 30,000 20,000 15,000 30,000 40,000 30,000 30,000 20,000 593,000 2 m 900 1,800 750 2 2 6 - Secondary Drain 2 ( SD 2 ) SD2 ( 2 Drain Secondary - 6 use m use 2 m Land Land Chamka in Use in in not Land Land Land 10,650 1,800 1,500 1,800 900 3,600 1,800 10,000 3,000 900

500 2,500 1,600 900 900 1,800 800 4,000 1,500 1,200 1,800 1,350 1,500 2,400 500 1,800 2,400 1,600 2,700 23,920 1 28,000 2 1 13,600 11 1 1 1 21,800 16,350 1 1 1 46,800 1 22 11 25,000 2 2 21 1 1 32,500 1 10,000 11 61,600 11 1 30,900 111 20,900 1 1 20,000 56,800 1 1 50,800 3 3 24,750 ict Household age age Household 1 2 1 47,700 1 2 1 1 26,500 2 11 2 1 1 1 1 51,800 20,900 1 11 3 2 1 2 48,600 41,800 2 1 2 1 1 41,600 1 3 3 62,700 Male Femal 1 1 1 1 30,500 1 1 1 1 31,800 1 1 1 1 22,400 1 1 1 1 15,000 1 3 10 21 1 9 270,650 1 1 1 31,200 1 1 1 42,400 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ income Group H/h H/h Village, Trapaingchorng Commune, Bakan District Bakan Commune, Trapaingchorng Village, H/h H/h Head Head Head <14$/m h/ H Head Widow Aged Disable H/h Vul.ble Landless Literacy StungKambot of of 1-Yes Age Occup Ptas Sla Village, Knatotoeng Commune, Bakan Distr Bakan Knatotoeng Commune, Village, Ptas Sla 1421111 29 11 1 1 47 1 1 1 11 52 11 39 36,500 1 251 1 24 1 1 1 1 37 1 1 1 57 1 1 11 751 1 49 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 31,500 Sex 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 29 30 31 32 33 34 3 11 54 1 47 1 39 1 1 2 11 34 1 29 1 11 1 1 51 1 44 11 30 1 1 51 1 11 1 32 1 1 11 48 11 37 1 11 43 1 11 26 1 1 23 1 1 1 11 42 1 50 1 42 1 1 1 11 34 11 30 1 11 40 1 1 38 11 60 1 1 40 1 11 53 50 1 1 11 47 1 29 1 1 1 M F HHD HHD 2-No of HHd Suon Poang Suon Pang San Pho Moeun Thy Hang Sang Kroch Ro Roeun Torn Kloeng Roeung Tinh Thorng Phat Ruos Yeay Lay Sam Kea Nun Ol Sam Ram Chanthy Yang Pov Uy Yong Yang Nat Ty Ven Proeun Mai Meang Vy Peang Bunsophy Pum Sarim Sok Uk An Voeun Chhorn Phally Sao Khoeun Kerm Sophat Sam Soeun Chheng Sarann Chhorn Khem Khat Saroeun Nhem Sorn Vung Phatt Yen Thuok Chea Chhann You Sokchea Eam EmPres Sam Pung Oeun Chanthorn Meas 5 Household Name Household sYn e):ag sYn san ):ag emOnpU hgS FI sag RkUc erOnr:U tn xøwg erOg Tij pat fg yay rs; Lay sM nn;Ka sMGul ruaM y:agcn§I eBA G‘uy yg;y:ug Nat TI eRBOn vin emogém: vIBag b‘unsuPI BuM sarIm sux Gan G‘uk qn evOn pløI esA EkmeXOn supat sM eqg esOn qn sar:an; EGmeRBs sMeGOn Bug mas can;fn Xwm xat; saerOn jwm vgS sn yin pat; FYk Ca qan; yU eGomsuxCa CH0+00-250 Total 9HH 84 99 Total 15HH 135 1416 2 2 25316 45516 448,420 CH2+850-950 CH2+750-950 CH2+550-650 CH2+600-750 CH3+000-150 CH2+750-900 CH2+250-300 CH0+750-800 CH0+300-400 CH1+050-200 CH0+350-650 CH0+300-350 CH0+100-200 CH0+650-900 CH0+250-300 CH1+550-650 CH1+550-600 CH1+650-700 CH1+650-750 CH1+500-550 CH1+500-550 CH1+500-600 CH1+400-500 CH1+250-350 CH0+750-800 CH1+050-100 CH1+150-200 CH0+800-900 CH1+050-100 CH1+900-2+50 CH0+400-1+50 CH1+750-2+00 CH1+950-2+00 CH0+900-1+00 CH1+950-2+050 CH0+450-2+550 CH0+950-1+050 CH0+900-1+150 001/072 001/071 001/070 002/033 001/035 002/038 DMS DMS 18 12 HH Qu. CH Af.SD1 Af.SD1 Af.SD1 Af.SC1 Af.SC1 Af.SC1 1 2 3 4 9 6 001/059 1 12 002/069 23 002/068 34 002/067 45 002/066 56 001/073 7 8 9 6 001/069 1 12 001/037 23 002/034 4 35 002/032 46 001/036 7 58 001/038 Af.MC 003/027 9 6 003/028 10 711 001/060 812 001/062 913 001/061 1014 001/058 1115 003/054 1216 002/062 1317 001/065 1418 001/064 15 001/063 10 711 003/065 812 003/064 9 003/066 10 711 003/029 812 001/039 13 914 002/037 1015 002/036 1116 002/035 1217 001/043 13 001/041 No No No. No. 4- PUmi pÞHsøa XuM xñarTTwg Rsuk )akan xñarTTwg )akan Rsuk XuM pÞHsøa 4-PUmi Rsuk )akan XuMRtBaMgCg sÞwgkMbuk PUmi 1- DMS 99 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects 1 1 Ap h/h than than 10% lose more 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Others 1 Kroseing Tamarin 2 1 2 1 1 2 Banana Custa.apple 1 1 3 21 1 1 Bamboo Jumbolan Jackfruit Citrus Affected Trees Affected 1 7 guava guava Fruit papaya 1 Milk Fruit Milk 2 1 1 3 Palm Coconut 1 Cashew 1 2 2 1 1 2 Mango Affec. Struc. Fence Fence (m) Well % of % P.Land Bamboo Wood Dig Pump 0.00% 10.00%0.00%0.00% 2 1 2 2 4 2 2 12 80.50 148.00 187.00 134.00 Affec. Affec. 7.20 0.08% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ) 196.35360.00 0.42% 263.71530.00 1.20% 390.63 2.64% 569.95 1.77% 352.47 1.30% 946.14 0.81% 630.75 3.92% 285.18 7.01% 666.00 2.10% 616.69 3.17% 109.75 33.30% 480.89 1.76% 727.00 0.37% 379.22 1.60% 528.00 3.64% 3.79% 1.17% 409.26201.28 3.50% 627.29 1.72% 117.19336.78 1.57% 0.59% 3.37% 2 1,049.43 2.44% 1,041.99 10.42% 5 36 37 38 41 42 43 44 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 61 62 63 64 Affected Land (m Land Affected Affected Productive Land 7.20 196.35 360.00 263.71 530.00 390.63 569.95 352.47 946.14 630.75 285.18 666.00 616.69 109.75 480.89 727.00 379.22 528.00 409.26 201.28 627.29 117.19 336.78 Rice Orch. Total Resi. 1,049.43 1,041.99 9,000 2 46,800 35,000 70,000 13,500 35,000 30,000 11,700 30,000 30,000 30,000 45,000 m Total Agr. Total

21,798.07 21,798.07 2,740.99 2,740.99

2 m 30,000 30,000 10,000 50,000 11,700 1,116,800 112,400 Residential 2,000 20,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 20,000 9,000 9,000 30,000 40,000 43,000 30,000 2 m 7- Dam- SFE- No 1 No Dam- SFE- 7- 35,075 450 2 2 use m use 2 m Land Land Chamka in Use in in not Land Land Land 500 900 15,800 10000 8,150 900 900 900 2,700 1,800 25 500 900 2,000 1,500 1,800 10,000 2,400 1,200 3,600 rict 1 321 2,500 1 1 2 1 20,900 12,000 11 1 3 1 1 11,500 Household age age Household 2 1 1 1 1 2 3 30,900 1 2 1 2 31,800 1 1 1 1 40,450 Male Femal 2 1 1 12,600 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 21 1 1 2 1 1 1 50,900 1 1 2 1 2 22,700 1 1 1 1 30,900 1 11 1 1 10,800 1 9,025 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ income Group H/h H/h Village, Trapaingchorng Commune, Bakan District Bakan Commune, Trapaingchorng Village, 1 1 1 1 H/h H/h Head Head Head <14$/m h/ H Head Widow Aged Disable H/h Vul.ble Landless 1 1 1 11 1 11 1 1 1 Literacy Kapkralanh 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 of of 1-Yes Knatotoeng Village, Knatotoeng Commune, Bakan Dist Bakan Knatotoeng Commune, Knatotoeng Village, Age Occup 1 34 1 1 1 58 1 37 1 40 1 57 1 1 52 1 49 1 49148121 1 1 11 78 12 4 13,600 Sex 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 29 30 31 32 33 34 3 1 47 1 30 166111 41 11 63 11 1 48 1 11 1 23 1 1 11 1 1 57 1 28 1 1 55 1 1 1 1 11 34 1 54 11 28 2 1 1 1 53 1 45,400 1 1 1 31,200 38 11 1 51 1 1 1 27 11 1 59 11 1 55 1 84 11 36 1 48 51 M F HHD HHD 2-No of HHd Mao Theng Mao Leang Ly Eam Ting Hak Vorn Thuon Thaung Nhuy Lean Sameat Puoch Chea Un Virak Yat Yoeun So Kann Puoch Khem Khat Uk An Samoeun Duch Thol Oeung Soren Mel Srey Chheim NginHul Ry Sar 1Eng Seng 73 Koeun Sar 1 Suong Sar 1Nhorn Hon 1 1Thy Uon 1Phalla Roeng Chea Seim 1 41 Pin Chhay 1Hoiy Torng 1 34 1 Sok Uon 1 1Nov 1 Khuon 1 48 Soa Seim 1Nat Seim 1 Phon Kung 15,000 Yon Yorm Pung Sam Pung Oeun Sann Pov Samneang En 5 Household Name Household Bug sMeGOn Bug em:A efg lIIlag san; eBA eGom TIg vn hak; efagFYn lang:uy saemot BYc Gu‘nCa y:atvir³ eyOn sUr kan; BYc Xwm xat; Gan G‘uk saemOn Duc eGOg ful muilsurin Eqm RsI hu‘l gin rI s esgeGg eKOn s sYg s hun j:n GYnFI rwg pløa EsmCa qayBin hy Tg GYnsuk nUv xYn Esmesa GuinsMenog EsmNat Kg; pun y:m y:un Total 22HH 269 23 23 2Total 3 2 5HH 4 329272245341 34 5 6 11 681,575 12 3361 291 104,350 CH1+350-400 CH1+200-250 CH1+000-050 CH0+750-800 CH0+850-900 CH1+000-100 CH0+300-400 CH0+450-600 CH0+600-650 CH0+300-350 CH0+350-450 CH0+350-700 CH0+500-550 CH0+500-600 CH0+300-350 CH0+450-500 CH1+300-400 CH0+000-050 CH0+200-300 CH0+000-100 CH0+000-050 CH0+050-100 CH0+050-100 CH0+150-200 CH0+450-500 CH0+300-350 CH0+100-150 CH0+150-400 CH0+250-300 CH0+400-450 CH0+350-400 CH0+150-200 CH0+000-050 CH0+150-200 CH0+150-200 CH0+450-500 CH0+900-1+00 003/030 003/032 001/040 002/040 002/039 001/044 003/035 003/036 002/044 003/040 003/041 DMS DMS 7 35 HH Qu. CH Af.SD2 Af.SC1 Af.SC1 Af.SC1 Af.SC1 Af.SC1 Af.SD2 Af.SD2 Af.SC1 Af.SC1 Af.SC1 1 2 13 001/047 24 001/048 5 36 003/039 47 002/043 5 002/042 1 12 001/093 23 001/089 34 001/084 45 001/091 56 001/088 67 001/092 78 001/090 89 001/087 Af.MC 001/083 1 2 3 4 19 1420 003/031 21 1522 001/042 1623 003/034 1724 003/033 25 1826 002/041 27 28 1929 001/046 2030 001/045 31 32 33 2134 003/038 2235 003/037 10 911 001/085 10 001/086 12 11 003/082 18 No No No. No. 2- PUmi xñarTTwg XuM xñarTTwg Rsuk )akan Rsuk xñarTTwg )akan XuM xñarTTwg 2-PUmi Rsuk RtBaMgCg )akan XuM kab;RkLaj; PUmi 1- DMS 100 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects Ap h/h than than 10% lose more 1 1 1 1 1 1 Others Kroseing Tamarin 3 2 1 2 Banana 1 2 Custa.apple 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 Bamboo Jumbolan Jackfruit 1 1 3 Citrus Affected Trees Affected guava guava Fruit papaya Milk Fruit Milk 1 2 1 1 5 1 3 1 2 2 3 3 1 Palm Coconut Cashew 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 21 22 3 1 2 2 1 1 1 4 2 3 1 3 1 3 1 7 26 1 1237 17 3 1 194 6 5 1 40 1 13 Mango Affec. Struc. Fence Fence (m) Well % of % P.Land Bamboo Wood Dig Pump 0.00%0.00% 1 1 8 1 2 1 2 0.00% 0.00% 1 1 3.83% 5 0.00% 5.50 133.25 105.75 258.73 367.50 252.00 Affec. Affec. 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00% 0.00% 96.00 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.25 0.15% 71.70 0.14% ) 323.67 0.92% 185.90656.73528.00 0.93% 238.00 2.19% 129.00 1.76% 0.68% 1.29% 103.74 0.41% 574.00 392.00710.50 1.51% 3.55% 105.00123.82 1.05% 240.00466.66 0.62% 0.79% 4.67% 1 21 12 1 1 2 1,000.25 2.50% 3 5 36 37 38 41 42 43 44 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 61 62 63 64 574.00 240.00 466.66 Affected Land (m Land Affected Affected Productive Land 30.25 71.70 323.67 185.90 656.73 528.00 238.00 129.00 103.74 392.00 710.50 105.00 123.82 Rice Orch. Total Resi. 1,000.25 2 35,000 m Total Agr. Total

3,267.24 3,267.24 1,052.73 2 m 20,000 35,000 2,700 25,000 40,000 25,000 20,000 10,000 10,000 20,000 30,000 10,000 8,100 Residential 30,000 50,000 20,000 25,900 20,000 40,000 80,000 30,000 15,000 6,300 20,000 30,500 605,800 2 m 8- Dam- SFE- No 2 No Dam- SFE- 8- 1,800 900 3,000 2 2 use m use 2 m 35,900 41,800 26,500 20,900 30,900 11,500 50,900 Land Land Chamka in Use in in not Land Land Land 900 900 3,500 900 1,800 1,500 900 900 1,500 900 1,200 900 450 900 3,000 10,000 900 1,800 3,000 900 600 2,500 2,880 500 4,000 20,450 1 9,000 3 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 6,200 1 1 25,900 1 1 20,450 121 3 11 11 80,900 1 1 30,600 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 17,500 11 11 1 1 2 1 3 2 9,180 24,000 33,500 Household age age Household 1 1 2 1 1 1 11 2 1 1 1 21,800 43,000 Male Femal 1 1 1 31,200 1 1 1 1 1 26,800 1 1 2 1 20,900 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ income Group H/h H/h H/h H/h Head Head Head <14$/m h/ H Head Widow Aged Disable H/h Vul.ble Landless 1 11 2 12 12 1 1 1 11 12 1 11 1 1 21 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 11 11 11 11 11 1 1 1 11 131 1 1 111 20,900 2 13,000 1 21,800 Literacy Village, Trapaingchorng Commune, Bakan District Bakan Commune, Trapaingchorng Village, 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 of of 1-Yes Age Occup Bakan 1 58 1 53 1 38 1 46 1 56 1 46 1 2 11 59 1 1 1 1 1 21 34 1 1 23 1 55 Sex 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 29 30 31 32 33 34 3 1 39 1 47 11 29 40 1 48 1 24 1 1 11 39 59 1 41 11 1 1 44 28 11 2 55 1 39 1 1 11 25 1 37 1 65 1 38 1 50 63 1 44 1 50 1 29 1 2 1 30 M F HHD HHD 2-No of HHd Seim Thim Seim Sophal Cheung Eav Chea EanChea Lai Kerm Roeun Kerm 1 56 Soeun Norn Oeun Pek Soy Sok Sopheap Kao Kung Khon Yet Voi 1 NheanSoa 23 Ay Chheang 1Ry Rem 44 Sokun Kem Sophal Cheung Pin Chhay Ry Rem Soaphoin Tep 1Chroeun Eng 1 24 Nhean Soa Seun Sok 30 1 1 Sok Uon Chea Seim Khom Khon Yet Voi 1 48 Sokvy Sem Saruon Sam Sam Bal Krit Kreim Phai Yorng Nuon Ing Chancy Phuon Sar Thav Ky Thav Nguon Suy Nop Bunthoeun Samneang En 5 Household Name Household EsmFIm supl ecIg eGov Ca eGon Ca EkméL EkmerOn nnesOn EBk eGOn sUy suk suPaB ekA Kg; xun v½r ey:t esa ejon Gay Qag rI er:m bu‘neFOn Nub suKun kwm supl ecIg qayBin rI er:m esaP½N eTB eGgeRcOn esa ejon esIn sux GuinsMenog GYnsuk EsmCa xum xun v½r ey:t suxvI suwm sarYn sM )al; sM ERkm Rkit y:gép GuIg nYn PYn can;suI fav s fav KI gYn su‘y Total 32HH 2813 32 38 6 2 1 1 8 25113222412392 556,250 CH0+300-350 CH0+250-300 CH0+350-400 CH0+200-250 CH0+150-200 CH0+100-150 CH0+500-550 CH0+450-500 CH0+400-450 CH0+350-400 CH0+350-400 CH0+300-350 CH0+250-300 CH0+200-250 CH0+200-250 CH0+050-100 CH0+050-100 CH0+200-300 CH1+100-200 CH1+450-573 CH0+800-900 CH0+700-750 CH1+200-300 CH0+600-700 CH0+750-850 CH0+700-750 CH0+750-800 CH1+000-050 CH1+050-200 CH1+050-150 CH1+200-300 CH0+000-100 CH0+800-850 CH0+850-900 CH1+000-050 CH1+050-100 CH1+200-250 CH2+250-350 CH0+850-1+400 DMS 41 HH Qu. CH 1 12 002/095 23 002/096 34 001/100 45 001/099 56 003/086 67 003/087 78 003/088 89 003/089 9 003/090 1 2 3 4 14 1315 003/079 14 003/081 16 15 003/078 17 1618 003/077 17 003/076 19 1820 002/090 19 002/089 21 2022 002/088 21 002/087 23 22 002/086 24 2325 002/085 24 002/084 26 2527 002/083 26 002/082 28 2729 002/081 28 002/080 30 Dam.1 001/097 31 Dam.1 001/096 32 Dam.1 001/098 33 2934 001/095 30 001/094 35 Dam.1 003/085 36 31 003/083 37 Af.MC 003/084 38 Dam.1 002/091 39 Dam.1 002/092 40 32 002/093 41 Dam.1 002/094 10 10 001/106 13 12 003/080 No No No. No. 1- PUmi )akan XuM RtBaMgCg Rsuk )akan Rsuk RtBaMgCg )akan XuM )akan PUmi 1- DMS 101 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects Ap h/h than than 10% lose more 1 Others Kroseing Tamarin 4 5 8 146 24 Banana Custa.apple 1 1 1 5 4 4 1 22 1 4 Bamboo Jumbolan Jackfruit 1 1 11 Citrus Affected Trees Affected guava guava Fruit papaya 1 3 1 1 Milk Fruit Milk 2 3 1 1 Palm Coconut Cashew 4 4 3 6 1 1 1 Mango Affec. Struc. Fence Fence (m) Well % of % P.Land Bamboo Wood Dig Pump MOWRAM. RU Affec. Affec. Prepared by Prepared 0.00 0.00% 0.000.00 0.00% 0.00% 4 2 2 0.00 0.00% 2 70.0022.00 0.23% 1.22% ) 469.00800.00168.00 4.69% 245.00 4.00% 118.90 1.12%184.32 0.82% 476.00 0.85% 0.74% 1.90% 259.00 2 0.83% 2 Date Date :day: month: 2009 Year: 5 36 37 38 41 42 43 44 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 61 62 63 64 22.00 469.00 800.00 168.00 245.00 118.90 259.00 ,362.56 185,588.50 1,942.73 96.00 1 47 1 19 46 20 3 8 25 5 12 51 2 4 Affected Land (m Land Affected Affected Productive Land 70.00 184.32 476.00 Rice Orch. Total Resi. 2 m Total Agr. Total

2,061.64 3,362.56 5,424.20 619.50 96.00 11 3 4 1 4

2 m 115,000 20,000 30,000 14,000 25,000 30,000 31,200 35,000 30,000 50,000 404,700 10,000 25,000 15,000 5,000 Residential 2 m 9- Dam- Kap kralanh Dam- Kap 9- 54,110 1,600 1,800 1,800 130 Verified Verified by Team Team Leader 2 2 Ich Sokmony Ich Channarith Sao use m use 2 m 50,900 Land Land Chamka in Use in in not Land Land Land 118,600 6,742,871 5,000 101,870 435,501 7,756,770.00 182,225.94 3 3,600 4,000 3,000 4,000 1,800 7,000 7,000 1,200 1,500 1,200 900 29,400 10,000 900 5,000 900 21 2 1 11 33,000 1 14,000 1 1 1,800 4 32,800 1 2 31,200 Household age age Household 1 1 1 62 1 24,000 2 1 32,000 Male Femal 1 1 1 2 11 37,000 1 1 36,500 1 5 1 3 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ 29 60 111 294 35 32 55 108 318 27 Cerifiedby income Group H/h Tauch Ang Tauch H/h Chief MOWRAM.RU Chief NWISP.PMU of Village, Trapaingchorng Commune, Bakan District Bakan Commune, Trapaingchorng Village, H/h H/h Head Head Head <14$/m h/ H Head Widow Aged Disable H/h Vul.ble Landless 21 122 1 1 111 1 11 1 11 1 12 1 1 11 11 11 1 2 11,800 15,900 1 3 1 25,130 1 1 5,900 Literacy Kapkralanh 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 of of 1-Yes Age Occup 1 67 1 50 1 41 1 28 1 56 Sex 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 29 30 31 32 33 34 3 11 48 1 47 1 48 1 61 1 45 1 47 29 1 30 1 47 1 2 2 2 M F HHD HHD 2-No of HHd Nheim Chatt Nheim Rorn Hong Meng Hok Koeun Kerm Teap Chhorn Bo Kert Kean Koy Soeun Un Sarith Nheim En Vat Veng Chhoin Sok Et Chren Ing Soeun Norn 5 Household Name Household Ej:mcat; hug r:n em:g huk EkmeKOn qn eTob ekIt bUr ekon kUy G‘unesOn Ej:msarit v:at Gin Qn Evg G‘ít sux G‘Íg RCin nnesOn Total 2 HH Total 251 HH 219 83 244 269 20 34 7 7 58 Total 21HH 165 21 25 4 1 4 7 482252411312 464,810 CH2+150-250 CH1+700-850 CH1+500-600 CH1+450-500 CH2+250-300 CH1+500-600 CH2+350-383 CH1+850-900 CH1+650-700 CH2+000-050 CH0+000-100 CH0+000-050 CH0+100-180 CH1+600-2+000 DMS DMS DMS 3 21 302 HH Qu. CH 1 2 3 4 1 12 002/103 23 003/091 Dam.1 001/107 11 11 001/005 12 1213 001/104 1314 001/103 1415 001/102 1516 001/101 1617 002/101 1718 002/097 1819 002/102 1920 002/099 2021 002/098 21 002/100 1- PUmi kab;RkLaj; XuM RtBaMgCg Rsuk )akan Rsuk RtBaMgCg )akan XuM kab;RkLaj; PUmi 1- No No No. No. DMS 102 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects 6 1 1 1 7 5 1 1 5 2 1 2 3 1 1 2 18 59 than 10% than Household Loss more more Loss ) 2 96.00 207.00 203.50 585.00 1 452.00 9 452.00 243.00 446.50 2 585.00 1 1,396.20 1,221.50 3 1,457.33 dIPUmi dIPUmi dIPUmi Residen.L(m 55.12 épÞRsH épÞRsHépÞRsH dIPUmi ¦ ¦ ¦¦ 2 2 22 0.00 0.00 2,607.00 711.24 dIcMkar dIcMkardIcMkar épÞRsH Nation Religion King Religion Nation épÞdIb:HBal;¬m épÞdIb:HBal;¬m épÞdIb:HBal;¬m épÞdIb:HBal;¬m RBHraCaNacRkkm<úCa Orchard (m²) Orchard (m²) Pond Kingdom Of Cambodia Kingdom Cati sasna sasna RBHmhakSRt Cati 9 .11 0.00 55.12 1,457.33 10 ) 2 9,726.86 2,057.00 5,172.82 4,682.96 5,179.40 3,530.83 4,340.35 8,868.95 0.00 4,258.27 8,197.16 2,057.00 10,699.96 12,487.94 0.00 1,160.11 12,189.10 21,968.28 26,226.55 14,795.01 14,409.82 29,321.26 13,376.56 dIERs dIERs dIERsdIERs dIcMkar Rice.L (m Rice.L 1 4,183.30 1 2 164,059.45 2,607.00 55.12 7,732.88 MOWRAM.RU 43.50 2,400.00 0.00 57.00 32,056.85 0.00 2,588.61 12 34.00 19.00 43.50 2,400.00 0.00 96.00 1 23.00 91.00 91.00 8,703.65 29.70 369.80 Prepared by by Prepared Sao Channarith Sao 2 129.60 2 148.60 1 37,844.91 2,607.00 2,107.44 21 2 iamete0.8 wood Dig No. of Pipe of No. Fence(m) Well 7.50 Date:day: Year: month: 200 Tug pÞH)ay GclnRTBüepSg²GclnRTBüepSg² GclnRTBüepSg²GclnRTBüepSg² 16.00 37.50 22.80 22.80 37.50 16.00 7.50 2 4 1 1 5 2 1 3 1 22.80 2 1 2 2 12 n Pursat Province n Pursat osang others Shop.H(m²)bin Rice (m²) Stall Kitchen(m²) d 2 2 3 1 1 4 1 3 5 15 3 7 9 3 10 Ig Tab eck kasüa GMBil RksaMg epSg² tUblk;dUr CRgukrWR erag 1 1 1 1 1 énKeRmageRsacRsBPaKBay½Bü extþeBaF×sat; 2 3 4 1 3 4 1 5 4 7 2 8 7 5 1 3 1 2 4 7 1 2 fruit bamboo jambolan casta.apple banana acasa tamarin kr 4 3 Team Leader Affected Tree Affected Subproject of Subproject Project I Northwest Irrigation Sector RtaMmñas; Verified by Verified 2 2 1 cMnYnedImeQIcMnYnedImeQI cMnYnedImeQIcMnYnedImeQI 3 2 5 8 Tram Mneash 2 1 2 4 1 8 18 14 3 3 3 1 3 721 3 7 12 24 19 11 36 175 4 2 1 The Summary List of APs ofList Theof Summary APs hew palm coconutfruit milk longanfruit guava citrus jack 3 16 83 12 21 41 3 taragsegçbesdækic©sgÁmGnuKeRmag 2 1 50 1 1 1 2 14 5 6 12 15 16 66 62 54459 7 1 21 5 10 42 5 20 32 4 25 9 36 sVay cnÞI etñat dUg TwkedaH emon RtEbk RkUcqµar xñúr b£sSI RB 6 2 6 2 8 6 3 1 2 2 2 21 15 4 118 gayrgeRKaH e Vulnerable <14 1 4 21 14 2 1 8 4 1 1 cMNUl ar 1 2 7 2 1 Cerified by Cerified TauchAng Sokmony Ich 1 1 2 3 1 1 9 5 1 1 2 2 Chief NWISP.PMU MOWRAM.RU of Chief 1 2 2 4 3 1 6 7 4 1 1 5 1 6 1 1 11 15 2 79 54 12 12 7 4 30 1 11 21 22 41 67 17 7 1

6 4 1 1 1 1 3 8 6 1 1 9 9 1 1 1 1 1 423564 9 21741 38 28 1053 2 13 2091515 3 32 31 17 3 3 4 1 23 16 26 37 43 4324 1033 7 26 5 2 16 10 15 7 1417 7 14 4 1 67 62 18 18 3 3 30 16 21 44 18 3 5 2 1 8 10 5 3 2 16.00 7.50 29.701 26,984 73 15 12 13 94 85 18 7 2 4 23 163010520 2 10 1 6 4 4 15 2 414 41 31 21 431 8 2 19 104 95 19 13 2 3 29 8 1 283 5 2 1 3 2 14 2 6 12114 110 37.50 414 348 MC Name of Name of No. Affected Widow Aged Disable Incom H/h SC1 SC2 SC3 SC4 SD1 SD2 SD3 Dam Canal & Dam & Canal DMS H/h H/h H/h H/h <14$/Mh / H mango cas eQµaHRbLay eQµaHRbLay eQµaHRbLayeQµaHRbLay cMnYnÉksar cMnYnRKYsar RsþIemm:ay cas;Cra Bik Name of eQµaHeQµaH PUmi PUmiXMu XMu eQµaHeQµaH PUmi PUmiXMu XMu krakor District krakor Sub-Total :Sub-Total 3Villages :Sub-Total 2Villages :Sub-Total 3Villages :Sub-Total 2Villages :Sub-Total 1Villages :Sub-Total 2Villages :Sub-Total 2Villages :Sub-Total 2Villages :Sub-Total 1Villages Village Commune and PUmi PUmieQITal eQITal XuM etñatCuMXuM etñatCuM PUmi PUmidgTwknac dgTwknac XuM etñatCuM XuM etñatCuM PUmi PUmikNþal kNþal XuM XuMetñatCuM etñatCuM PUmi PUmidgTwknac dgTwknac XuM etñatCuM XuM etñatCuM PUmi PUmicMbk;FM cMbk;FM XuM XuMetñatCuM etñatCuM PUmi PUmieQITal eQITal XuM etñatCuMXuM etñatCuM PUmi PUmiEt,gRCuM Et,gRCuM XuM XuMetñatCuM etñatCuM PUmi PUmiEsneBn EsneBn XuM etñatCuM XuM etñatCuM PUmi PUmiEsneBn EsneBn XuM etñatCuM XuM etñatCuM PUmi PUmiEt,gRCuM Et,gRCuM XuM XuMetñatCuM etñatCuM PUmi PUmiEt,gRCuM Et,gRCuM XuM XuMetñatCuM etñatCuM PUmi PUmidgTwknac dgTwknac XuM etñatCuM XuM etñatCuM PUmi PUmikNþal kNþal XuM XuMetñatCuM etñatCuM PUmi PUmiEt,gRCuM Et,gRCuM XuM XuMetñatCuM etñatCuM PUmi PUmicMbk;FM cMbk;FM XuM XuMetñatCuM etñatCuM PUmi PUmiEsneBn EsneBn XuM etñatCuM XuM etñatCuM PUmi PUmiEt,gRCuM Et,gRCuM XuM XuMetñatCuM etñatCuM PUmi PUmibwgval bwgval XuM etñatCuMXuM etñatCuM PUmi PUmieQITal eQITal XuM etñatCuMXuM etñatCuM PUmi PUmidgTwknac dgTwknac XuM etñatCuM XuM etñatCuM PUmi PUmikNþal kNþal XuM XuMetñatCuM etñatCuM PUmi PUmidgTwknac dgTwknac XuM etñatCuM XuM etñatCuM PUmi PUmicMbk;FM cMbk;FM XuM XuMetñatCuM etñatCuM PUmi PUmieQITal eQITal XuM etñatCuMXuM etñatCuM PUmi PUmiEt,gRCuM Et,gRCuM XuM XuMetñatCuM etñatCuM PUmi PUmiEsneBn EsneBn XuM etñatCuM XuM etñatCuM PUmi PUmiEsneBn EsneBn XuM etñatCuM XuM etñatCuM PUmi PUmiEt,gRCuM Et,gRCuM XuM XuMetñatCuM etñatCuM PUmi PUmiEt,gRCuM Et,gRCuM XuM XuMetñatCuM etñatCuM PUmi PUmidgTwknac dgTwknac XuM etñatCuM XuM etñatCuM PUmi PUmikNþal kNþal XuM XuMetñatCuM etñatCuM PUmi PUmiEt,gRCuM Et,gRCuM XuM XuMetñatCuM etñatCuM PUmi PUmicMbk;FM cMbk;FM XuM XuMetñatCuM etñatCuM PUmi PUmiEsneBn EsneBn XuM etñatCuM XuM etñatCuM PUmi PUmiEt,gRCuM Et,gRCuM XuM XuMetñatCuM etñatCuM PUmi PUmibwgval bwgval XuM etñatCuMXuM etñatCuM Chheuteal Vill, Commune Thnot Chum Vill, Com. Thnot Chum Dorngtoekneach Kandal Vill, Commune Thnot Chum Vill, Com. Thnot Chum Dorngtoekneach Vill, Com. Chum Thom Chambak Thnot Chheuteal Vill, Commune Thnot Chum Vill, Com. Thnot Chum Tbeingchrum Sen Vill, Pen Commune Chum Thnot Sen Vill, Pen Commune Chum Thnot Vill, Com. Thnot Chum Tbeingchrum Vill, Com. Thnot Chum Tbeingchrum Vill, Com. Thnot Chum Dorngtoekneach Kandal Vill, Commune Thnot Chum Vill, Com. Thnot Chum Tbeingchrum Vill, Com. Chum Thom Chambak Thnot Sen Vill, Pen Commune Chum Thnot Vill, Com. Thnot Chum Tbeingchrum Veal Vill, Com. Thnot Boeng Chum 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 1 srubTItaMgb:HBal;man ³ 7 ³ srubTItaMgb:HBal;man 1XMu nig PUmi No l>r l>r l>rl>r 3 5 7 2 1 6 4 KN³kmµkarGnþrRksYgénkargaredaHRsaydIFøI nigpÞHsEm,g KeRmagRbB½n§eRsacRsBPaKBay½Bü Rsuk RkKr Inter-Ministerial ResettlementInter-Ministerial Committee Northwest SectorIrrigation Project

103 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ap h/h than 10% losemore 1 Others 1 Kroseing Tamarin 59 60 61 62 63 Acasa Banana Nation Religion King Religion Nation RBHraCaNacRkkm<úCa Kingdom Of Cambodia Kingdom Custa.apple Cati sasna RBHmhakSRt sasna Cati Jambolan Bamboo Jackfruit Trees Affected Affected Citrus guava Fruit guava Longan Milk Fruit Milk Coconut 1 3 2 1 1 2 1 Palm Cashew Mango 2 m 2 m 2 m 2 m Affected Structure Affected No. Pipeof Fence's(m) Well Shop Stall Rice Bin Kitchen diamete(0.8) Wood Dig 2 pen m pen Chiken pig & t Province t Province % of % Affec. P.Land 0.00% 2.42% 3.33% 0.16% 1.42% 5.50% 5.00% 4.42% 2.67% 3.87% 0.07% 0.37% 5.69% 3.82% 8.92% 0.39% 4.29% 8.94% 7.48% 7.63% 1.68% 0.00% 2.50% 0.00% 14.73% 57.92% 28.67% 15.83% 11.96% 16.20% 23.04% 10.26% Resi. Affec. 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.00 14.56 74.00 Total ) 2 3 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 4647 48 49 50 51 525354 55 56 57 58 Affected Land (m Land Affected Affected Productive Land ageRsacRsBPaKBay½Bü extþeBaF×sat; ageRsacRsBPaKBay½Bü 24.00 14.56 74.00 725.41833.68736.29354.00385.00695.00500.36 725.41 442.00 833.68 533.88 736.29 387.47 354.00 385.00 313.00 695.00 716.69 500.36 633.23 442.00 598.00 533.88 191.00 387.47 446.00117.00214.39 313.00 446.93 716.69 747.80 633.23 810.23 598.00 763.22 191.00 251.73 446.00 117.00 214.39 446.93 249.88 747.80 810.23 763.22 251.73 249.88 Rice Chamkar 1 Chamkar 2 Pond 1,151.852,052.00 1,151.85 2,052.00 ectSector Pursa Projectin ofNorthwest Irrigation 2 15,000 m 1- Main Canal ( MC ( ) Main Canal 1- Total Agr. Total

2 m Residential 2 m 2 use m use 2 m 900 600 10,000 10,000 900 5,000 1000 900 10,000 5,000 10,000 1750 20,000 800 7,000 7200 250 4,000 5,000 1500 600 5,000 5,000 10,000 900 625 25,000 5,000 800 1,200 300 150 20,000 20,000 900 2,500 5,000 600 30,000 900 5000 10,000 20,000 5,000 1500 15,000 900 30,000 225 375 15,000 25,000 300 5,500 1000 5,000 1000 5,000 3600 10,000 1050 1820 10,000 30,000 1550 10,000 taragBisþar esdækic©sgÁm GnuKeRmag RtaMmñas; énKeRm RtaMmñas; esdækic©sgÁm GnuKeRmag taragBisþar 2 m Land Land Land Chamka 11,550 7,800 Detail ListDetail ofSubproj of Socio-economy Tram Mneash 10,900 10,600 5,900 11,000 5,900 21,750 7,000 11,200 5,250 6,500 5,600 $/Month outside in Usein not Land Land Land 25,900 5,625 2,000 20,300 20,150 3,400 30,600 10,900 25,000 16,500 30,900 15,225 25,375 20,000 5,800 6,000 6,000 13,600 11,050 31,820 Income 1 28.55 11 26.54 42.68 1 1 14.34 1 1 11.51 rict 1 1 60.97 1 1 1 111 35.93 1 226.11 2 41.00 1 1 2 54.91 11 43.69 1 1 1 1 74.79 1 48.45 11 1 1 39.83 55.31 Household age age Household 2 3 1 21.62 1 3 1 1 1 116.86 1 1 1 64.06 Male Femal 1 12 1 1 1 1 1 3 69.14 1 59.34 1 23 1 1 1 21 1 2 1 1 60.36 1 64.02 1 1 56.91 1 1 1 67.47 1 1 1 1 2 57.31 1 2 3 3 1 76.58 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ H/h Head Landless H h / Group Vulnerable H/h income H/h Disable

Aged H/h H/h Head Head Head <14$/m Widow of Age 1 40 11 641 58 1 1 1 1 1 45 11 381 1 53 1 11 56 1 1 1 1 1 40 2 1 1 11 1 97.56 701 1 21.70 42 1 1 11 1 61 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 30.48 1 1 1 1 2 17.64 1 67.07 Chheuteal Village, Thnot Chum Commune, Krakor Dist Commune, Thnot Chum Village, Chheuteal Sex of HHd of 67891011 12 13 1415161718192021222324 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 3 11 43 1 31 1 38 1 33 1 40 38 1 55 11 51 1 36 40 11 35 46 1 23 11 47 31 1 46 1 40 11 38 1 50 1 36 39 M F HHD Chhuon Buntha Chhuon Leang Pal Samean Sen Cheun Men Phor Men Sarun Hor Savat Pal Nhen Yang Song Pen Khorn Yang Oeun Hang Pheap Teav Hun Huon Kimsan Mao Khom Chuop Bunseng Thoy Sam Ol Chhuon Map Chap Puthy Hen Kana Sou Khun Phuong Sal Seap At Chhuon Ream Yen Nep Sun Lea Sok Loeng Phor Men Koeun Soeng Chhoy Pen Sem Khen Leang Sou Chong Sen 5 Household Name Household QYn b‘unfa )a:l; lag Esn saemon min cWn min ePa eha sarun )a:l; sava:t y:g; ej:n Bin sug y:g; xn hg; eGOn Tav PaB hYt h‘un em:A KImsan CYb xum fUy b‘unesg QYn sMGul cab ma:b; BuTI§ hiun s‘U kaNa PYg Xun esob sl; QYn Gat yin erom s‘un Nib Lwg suxla min ePa swg ekOn Bin qUy Xinesm s‘Ur elog Esn cug Krakor District Krakor CH3+00-050 CH3+250-350 CH3+200-250 CH3+150-350 CH3+350-450 CH3+250-350 CH3+150-250 CH3+300-350 CH3+350-450 CH3+400-450 CH3+350-400 CH3+100-150 CH3+300-350 CH3+200-250 CH2+250-100 CH2+800-900 CH3+050-150 CH2+800-900 CH2+950-050 CH2+850-900 CH3+000-100 CH2+700-750 CH3+050-100 CH2+700-800 CH2+850-950 CH2+850-900 CH3+850-900 CH4+350-500 CH4+350-500 CH4+150-300 CH3+850-900 CH3+850-950 HH Qu. CH 1 1 001/003 1 2 3 4 2 23 001/004 34 001/002 45 001/001 56 002/003 67 002/004 78 002/002 89 002/001 9 003/001 10 1011 003/002 1112 003/005 1213 003/003 1314 003/004 1415 001/006 1516 001/008 1617 001/005 1718 001/007 1819 002/006 1920 002/007 2021 002/005 2122 002/008 2223 003/007 2324 003/006 2425 003/010 2526 003/009 2627 003/008 Af.MC 001/010 28 2729 001/013 2830 001/014 2931 001/012 3032 001/009 31 002/010 KN³kmµkarGnþrRksYgénkargaredaHRsaydIFøI nigpÞHsEm,g KN³kmµkarGnþrRksYgénkargaredaHRsaydIFøI KeRmagRbB½n§eRsacRsBPaKBay½Bü RsukRkKr Rsuk RkKr etñatCuM XuM eQITal PUmi 1- No No No. No. Inter-Ministerial Resettlement Committee Inter-Ministerial Northwest Irrigation Sector Project DMS 104 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ap h/h than 10% losemore 1 4 2 3 Others 1 Kroseing 1 Tamarin 59 60 61 62 63 Acasa 4 1 Banana Custa.apple Jambolan Bamboo Jackfruit Trees Affected Affected Citrus guava Fruit guava Longan Milk Fruit Milk Coconut 2 1 3 1 2 5 5 1 1 1 4 3 1 5 3 3 1 3 4 1 10 15 4 Palm 1 2 2 4 2 Cashew 2 4 2 1 1 10 5 7 4 11 14168312 8 4 15 121218 Mango 2 m 2 m 2 m 2 m Affected Structure Affected 50.00 31.60 33.00 2 15.00 No. Pipeof Fence's(m) Well Shop Stall Rice Bin Kitchen diamete(0.8) Wood Dig 2 pen m pen Chiken pig & Affec. % of % P.Land 0.00% 8.22% 0.00% 1.91% 0.00% 0.00% 1.76% 2.41% 2.37% 0.00% 2.48% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 7.43% 0.00% 0.00% 8.70% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 4.54% 0.00% 0.00% 3.62% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 28.91% 16.80% 18.72% 28.17% 31.60% 12.47% 30.90% 23.48% 18.54% 78.45% Resi. Affec. 78.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 0.00 0.00 34.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total ) 2 3 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 4647 48 49 50 51 525354 55 56 57 58 2,607.00 2,607.00 Affected Land (m Land Affected Affected Productive Land 411.00572.00336.00175.50 411.00 240.70936.00 572.00 660.00845.00 336.00 123.95 175.50 748.20 240.70 936.00 660.00 845.00 148.50 123.95 521.86 748.20 309.00 148.50927.00 583.90 521.86 454.45 309.00 927.00 454.45 Rice Chamkar 1 Chamkar 2 Pond 2,023.50 2,023.50 1,580.00 1,580.00 1,174.001,726.00 1,174.00 1,726.00 6,000 5,000 2 10,000 m Total Agr. Total

2 m 29,321.26 2,607.00 711.24 2 129.60 Residential 2 m 2 use m use 2 m 3825 72,000 10,000 600 1500 1050 5,000 30,000 900 20,000 5,000 2,800 1600 27,800 800 1,400 5,000 600 16,400 2700 20,000 900 2,000 1500 3,000 750 5,000 2000 1,000 1000 750 2,000 10,000 6,000 1600 5,000 750 750 5,000 600 6,000 900 5,000 450 8,000 2800 10,000 45,950 81,265 1600 10,000 1650 10,000 750 5,000 1575 400 7,000 5,000 1300 10,000 300 10,000 400 5,000 750 1,000 1200 225 5,000 2,200 1200 10,000 1125 1320 15,000 7,500 2 m Land Land Land Chamka 5,750 836,115 6,500 73,825 6,600 5,900 8,450 12,800 11,600 30,000 5,600 21,050 31,500 5,900 8,575 5,400 11,300 29,400 5,800 17,000 10,300 5,400 1,750 6,200 2,425 10,200 22,700 16,125 8,820 2,900 4,500 5,750 6,000 4,000 11,000 6,750 6,600 11,650 $/Month outside in Usein not Land Land Land Income 1 1 26.46 1 1 34.22 1 11 41.00 1 1 31.62 11 264.22 1 71.00 1 11 80.20 1 1 11 1 1 78.25 1 1 67.00 1 49.83 111 1 1 70.56 1 50.81 1 2 11 11 64.63 1 1 44.71 752.64 Household age age Household 1 3 1 1 70.12 2 3 2 1 121.46 Male Femal 1 2 1 2 123.17 1 12 21 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 42.68 1 107.00 94.10 1 21 2 4 1 30.69 1 2 1 55.69 2 2 2 2 126.01 2 11 1 11 1 1 1 46.54 1 1 1 46.13 1 55.28 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ H/h Head Landless H h / Group Vulnerable H/h income H/h Disable Aged H/h H/h Head Head Head <14$/m Widow of Age 1 431 49 1 38 1 11 1 52 11 701 1 1 29 117711 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111 1 491 1 1 40 1 21 10.12 521 1 43 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 22.03 11 1 1 30 2 1 2 41.97 1 11.95 70 11 25 1 2 1 63 2 11 1 1 40 43.69 1 39.53 1 27 1 65.54 1 1 28.45 Sex of HHd of 67891011 12 13 1415161718192021222324 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 3 11 56 1 45 1 59 1 48 1 46 1 29 56 1 43 1 46 1 48 11 38 1 47 31 1 33 11 39 1 25 1 56 48 1 48 1 621 1 27 11 47 1 1 47 39 1 1 1 97.56 M F HHD Sang Soeun Sang Neat Soiy Phach I Chhorn Yem Ra Phuong Veasna Luon Reim Kerm Troeng Noeun Kea Porng Haun Pen Boeur Dy Eun Soam Sithuon Pal Ron Vorng Ry Bo Tung Sokhon Thuor Dy Roeun Teav Eun Soam Roeun Lav Thlang Voeun Noiy Chea Kean Huot Theng Ker Tung Veng Kheang Vann Sam Soeung Reim Kerm Ron Vorng Boeun Khann Chhon Nov Ry Bo Sreymom Hang Kim Soiy Sivat Kung At Chhuon Chhen Chhan Chheng San Sear Sek Thy Ker Mao Pov 5 Household Name Household saMg esOn sy enot GIupac ywm qn PYg ra: lYn vasna Ekm Er:m Rtwg enOn eBagKa Bin hUn DI ebO esam GuWn )a:l; sIuFYn vg run bUr rI Tug suxun DI FY Tav erOn esam GuWn Lav erOn føag evOn Ca ny hYt eKon Ek efg Tug ev:g eXog vNÑ esOg sM Ekm Er:m vg run xan; ebOn enA qun bUr rI hag RsImuM sy Kwm Kg; suIv:at QYn Gat qan eqn san eqg esk esor Ek FI eBA em:A Total 67 HH 45 28 17 7 1 4 21 6 26 22 72 4 7 20 27 76 8 57,000 CH4+500-600 CH4+500-600 CH4+350-400 CH4+350-400 CH4+000-050 CH4+000-100 CH3+850-950 CH3+850-950 CH4+350-400 CH3+850-900 CH4+100-150 CH3+950-000 CH3+900-950 CH4+300-600 CH3+900-950 CH3+650-700 CH3+600-650 CH3+550-600 CH3+550-600 CH3+550-600 CH3+600-700 CH3+550-600 CH3+700-750 CH3+550-600 CH3+550-600 CH3+450-550 CH3+650-700 CH3+700-800 CH3+500-550 CH3+600-700 CH3+650-850 CH3+800-900 CH2+100-150 CH2+150-250 CH0+450-650 CH3+550-650 CH2+350-400 CH2+300-350 CH2+450-500 CH3+550-600 DMS 73 HH Qu. CH 1 2 3 4 34 3335 002/016 3436 002/015 3537 002/014 3638 002/013 3739 002/012 3840 002/011 3941 002/009 4042 003/016 4143 003/011 4244 003/014 4345 003/013 4446 003/012 4547 003/015 4648 001/011 4749 003/129 4850 001/126 4951 001/123 Af.MC 001/125 52 5053 001/124 5154 001/127 5255 001/122 5356 003/130 5457 003/128 5558 002/131 5659 001/121 Af.SC2 002/135 60 Af.MC 002/136 61 5762 002/130 5863 002/134 5964 002/133 Af.MC 003/131 65 6066 002/138 6167 001/129 6268 001/130 Af.MC 001/128 69 6370 003/133 6471 002/137 6572 003/132 6673 002/131 67 003/134 33 32 002/017 No No No. No. DMS 105 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ap h/h than 10% losemore 1 Others 1 1 Kroseing Tamarin 59 60 61 62 63 Acasa Banana Custa.apple Jambolan 1 1 1 Bamboo Jackfruit Trees Affected Affected Citrus guava Fruit guava Longan Milk Fruit Milk Coconut 2 1 7 1 2 2 42 2 1 3 Palm 3 42 2 3 1 19 2 3 1 4 1 Cashew 2 1 2141982 2124 4 1221 Mango 2 m 2 m 2 m 2 m 1 Affected Structure Affected 19.00 No. Pipeof Fence's(m) Well Shop Stall Rice Bin Kitchen diamete(0.8) Wood Dig 2 pen m pen Chiken pig & Affec. % of % P.Land 2.58% 7.20% 2.92% 0.80% 8.43% 1.98% 0.00% 0.00% 8.13% 0.00% 4.91% 0.00% 1.18% 0.00% 2.13% 0.00% 1.83% 0.00% 6.76% 0.00% 3.74% 1.03% 0.00% 3.51% 3.64% 8.64% 0.00% 3.64% 2.15% 10.51% 11.09% 19.32% 10.21% 11.34% 11.69% 12.04% Resi. Affec. 1,396.20 19.00 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 130.00 0.00 143.00 0.00 141.00 0.00 242.00 0.00 0.00 90.00 335.00 Total ) 2 3 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 4647 48 49 50 51 525354 55 56 57 58 Affected Land (m Land Affected Affected Productive Land 90.00 262.81720.00584.80241.46421.58297.55266.00 262.81 720.00 584.80 406.62 241.46 421.58 491.33 297.55 266.00 212.85 406.62182.50 68.60 491.33 113.60 212.85 182.50 223.00 635.60277.20364.00966.00245.00864.00 635.60 445.50 277.20 364.00567.00322.00 364.00 233.80 966.00 602.00 245.00 864.00 445.50 364.00 567.00 322.00 233.80 602.00 Rice Chamkar 1 Chamkar 2 Pond 1,546.15 1,546.15 1,109.001,691.00 1,109.00 1,691.00 2,106.50 2,106.50 2,000 5,000 5,000 2 20,000 60,000 10,000 m Total Agr. Total

2 - Secondary Canal 1 ( SC1 ( ) 1 Canal Secondary - 2 2 m 4,183.30 4,340.35 Residential 2 m 2 use m use 2 m 1500 15,000 1600 5,000 1600 225 60,000 1600 2,500 10,000 1200 30,000 1500 600 5,000 600 4000 700 10,000 1350 15,000 7,600 1200 10,000 5,000 1200 2025 10,000 1560 10,000 60,000 10,000 450 2000 10,000 25,000 7,000 1112 140 1200 27,000 17,000 5,000 300 2,400 500 1000 10,000 5,000 1200 5,000 10,600 16,585 9,725 2000 20,000 375 12,000 750 15,000 500 10,000 2 m Land Land Land Chamka 6,600 151,625 16,500 $/Month outside in Usein not Land Land Land 61,000 2,725 11,600 30,000 31,200 6,500 10,600 19,000 8,300 6,350 11,200 11,200 11,560 62,025 10,450 27,000 17,140 28,112 6,200 2,700 10,500 6,000 6,200 22,000 12,375 15,750 10,500 5,000 Income 11 60.97 40.65 District District 12 1 1 2 112.19 63.00 1 14 121 56.60 1 2 63.04 33 1 82.43 1 63.73 73.39 1 2 1 95.52 39.83 1 11 1 1 26.91 3 19.58 Household age age Household 1 4 13 3 2 1 80.89 1 1 1 117.27 1 1 1 83.33 2 1 2 1 1 74.39 Male Femal 1 1 2 2 1 94.63 1 1 12 11 1 1 1 2 75.00 1 1 1 1 47.96 75.40 11 1 3 1 1 2 1 85.44 95.93 1 1 2 2 69.77 4 3 18 2 4 13 184,185 1 1 1 2 1 87.80 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ H/h Head Landless H h / Group Vulnerable H/h income H/h Disable Aged H/h H/h Head Head Head <14$/m Widow of 56 Age Dorng Toekneach Village, Thot Chum Commune, Krakor Commune, ThotChum Village, Dorng Toekneach Dorng Toekneach Village, Thot Chum Commune, Krakor Commune, Thot Chum Village, Toekneach Dorng 1 42 1 1 3 2 49.18 1 54 11 1 571 1 48 11 54 1 2 1 1 64 1 2 1 90.15 1 2 1 1 1 21.54 Kandal Village, Thot Chum Commune, Krakor District Commune, ThotChum Village, Kandal Sex of HHd of 67891011 12 13 1415161718192021222324 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 3 11 49 1 23 37 11 50 1 43 1 40 51 111 1 40 1 59 1 49 1 40 1 45 1 1 27 1 27 1 36 1 1 48 1 2 58 1 29 27.47 50 11 42 1 51 1 31 47 11 26 37 11 51 53 11 55 48 M F HHD Uk Sokhen Uk Phork Nhoung Kloeng Nhel Porn Vorng Son Yang Eng Dy Hum Vy Yoeur Say Soeun Sang But Long Phach Y Meun Sem Ngin Nguon Din Nhoung Makara Tuy Mao Mech Kosal Nheam Savy Chou Lanh Seng Hin Pen Samoeun Sat Saboeun Sat Pheap Chou Pang Chou Oeun Nhoung Sokhen Uk ToemSong Hem Saveun Roeun Bem Kloeng Nhel Vorn Heng Vanney Mom Chheng Sok Chea Eam Yang Meas Poeun Pen 5 Household Name Household G‘uk G‘uk suexn jÚg ePaK jiúl xwøg vg b:n ya:g sun DI eGg vIh‘Mu say eyO saMg esOn Lúg b‘ut GuIpac mWun swum gYn gIn jÚg DIn mkr:a Tuy miuc em:A ejóm kusl; CU savI esg Laj; Bin hIun saemOn sat sat saebOn CUr PaB CU b:g; jÚg eGOn G‘uk suexn Twm sug huwm savWn b‘åm erOn júil xøwg ehg vn muM vNÑI sux eqg eGom Ca mas y:g; Bin eBOn CH4600-750 Total 7HH 71 1 1 2Total 1414 11 14512 HH 12 30,000 CH5+350-350 CH5+200-250 CH5+300-350 CH5+150-250 CH5+100-150 CH5+150-150 CH5+100-150 CH5+150-200 CH4+550-600 CH4+750-600 CH4+900-950 CH4+750-800 CH4+700-750 CH4+750-800 CH4+900-000 CH4+800-850 CH5+000-050 CH0+250-300 CH0+250-300 CH0+400-450 CH0+250-300 CH0+000-100 CH0+450-500 CH0+300-400 CH0+250-300 CH0+150-250 CH0+100-150 CH0+500-550 CH0+100-150 CH0+500-550 CH0+400-450 CH0+250-300 CH4+850-5+100 CH4+950-5+000 CH4+800-5+000 DMS DMS 8 13 HH Qu. CH 2 23 001/020 34 001/019 45 001/021 56 001/025 67 001/022 78 001/024 Af.SD1 001/023 1 Af.MC 001/016 2 13 001/017 Af.MC 001/018 4 25 001/015 36 002/020 47 002/019 58 003/018 69 003/017 7 003/019 1 12 001/028 23 001/027 34 001/030 45 001/029 Af.MC 001/026 6 57 002/040 68 002/039 79 002/038 Af.MC 002/037 1 2 3 4 1 1 001/018 10 811 003/021 912 003/020 1013 002/021 11 002/018 10 Af.SD1 002/036 11 812 002/041 913 003/039 1014 003/043 Af.SD1 003/041 15 11 003/040 2- PUmi dgTwknac XuM etñatCuM RkKr Rsuk etñatCuM XuM dgTwknac PUmi 2- Rsuk RkKr etñatCuM XuM kNþal PUmi 3- Rsuk RkKr etñatCuM XuM dgTwknac PUmi 1- No No No. No. DMS 106 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects 5 1 1 1 1 Ap h/h than 10% losemore 1 Others Kroseing Tamarin 59 60 61 62 63 Acasa Banana 2 1 2 Custa.apple Jambolan 2 Bamboo Jackfruit Trees Affected Affected Citrus guava Fruit guava Longan Milk Fruit Milk 1 3 1 1 Coconut 4 2 2 1 1 4 3 11 Palm 13 Cashew 4 2 5 2 1 2 3 3 1 1 12 2 10 1 4 2 4 2 Mango 2 m 2 m 2 m 2 m 1 10.00 Affected Structure Affected No. Pipeof Fence's(m) Well Shop Stall Rice Bin Kitchen diamete(0.8) Wood Dig 2 6.00 29.70 7.50 pen m pen Chiken pig & Affec. % of % P.Land 4.56% 2.17% 3.19% 2.29% 3.90% 1.65% 0.68% 0.00% 3.71% 2.95% 5.94% 5.50% 1.19% 2.23% 5.28% 2.08% 0.00% 0.00% 2.88% 7.06% 1.44% 0.00% 4.56% 6.36% 0.00% 3.80% 4.12% 4.17% 2.38% 0.00% 4.83% 0.00% 0.00% 2.73% 4.30% 2.13% 0.79% 11.50% 10.25% 49.53% Resi. Affec. 0.00 462.50 0.00 0.00 Total ) 2 55.12 55.12 3 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 4647 48 49 50 51 525354 55 56 57 58 Affected Land (m Land Affected Affected Productive Land 85.50 0.00 182.00884.00 0.00 0.00 341.00 0.00 228.00434.00318.50457.15195.00247.50101.50 228.00 370.50 434.00 147.35 318.50 594.00 457.15 195.00 247.50 550.00 101.50 118.75201.00 370.50 348.90264.00 147.35 312.00 594.00 575.00 550.00 201.00 287.50 118.75 706.25387.50 264.00 190.63 312.00 512.25456.25525.00 575.00 287.50 638.00 706.25 550.00823.00 387.50 625.00286.00 512.25 456.25 483.17 525.00 638.00 792.50 823.00 272.80 625.00 430.29 286.00 638.00 483.17 792.50 272.80 530.20 430.29 638.00 Rice Chamkar 1 Chamkar 2 Pond 1,103.00 1,103.00 9,000 1,600 2 m Total Agr. Total

2 m 12,189.10 Residential 2 m 2 use m use 2 m 375 5,000 600 5,000 600 10,000 800 10,000 8000 10,000 1,600 4000 2000 10000 450 1500 9,000 800 15,000 10,450 20,000 750 27,000 2500 30,000 7,000 13,052 600 20,000 300 15,000 2500 10,000 800 10,000 520 7,000 5,000 625 15,000 1,250 140 400 8,250 10,000 60 12,000 2000 10,000 2400 15,000 600 20,000 10000 2000 10,000 600 5,000 600 1,800 30 20,000 1,800 1000 5,000 500 300 10,000 875 5,000 15,000 600 10,000 5000 10,000 1200 3500 10,000 1000 400 1,800 5,000 30 16,800 1800 15,000 2 m Land Land Land Chamka 5,375 5,600 10,600 10,800 15,000 241,452 5,600 20,600 15,300 5,000 12,500 10,800 9,000 7,520 15,625 5,000 20,000 10,000 10,400 8,390 12,060 12,000 12,600 20,500 21,250 27,750 20,000 32,500 17,400 20,600 10,000 22,000 $/Month outside in Usein not Land Land Land 20,600 1,830 1,600 6,000 10,500 5,300 15,875 10,600 15,000 11,200 3,900 6,000 16,830 16,800 Income 1 83.33 1 30.48 1 4.75 1 1 36.61 1 10.85 1 34.55 1 1 16.05 strict 1 1 72.27 1 1 29.00 12 1 1 1 1 1 41.46 1 62.39 3 1 53.69 5 1 1 1 77.64 Household age age Household 1 1 2 56.91 1 1 1 21 100.20 1 3 2 70.52 1 1 1 2 46.95 Male Femal 1 1 12 1 1 1 43.73 1 1 2 90.50 1 1 11 1 1 1 2 69.51 1 93.53 1 1 21 1 1 1 2 25.60 11 1 3 89.79 1 2 16.26 1 2 1 1 1 26.54 1 1 1 1 1 35.77 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ H/h Head Landless H h / Group Vulnerable H/h income H/h Disable Aged H/h H/h Head Head Head <14$/m Widow of Age 1 631 1 801 1 44 1 1 46 1 11 421 1 1 66 11 1 51 1 54 2 1 1 1 48 1 1 1 1 49.18 1 21 53 1 57 1 1 1 11 1 2 561 71 110.65 1 1 1 2 11 48.78 1 661 1 1 701 1 47 1 11 62 1 1 11 1 1 1 721 1 49 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 8.33 45.12 1 1 54.87 2 50.60 Sex Chambak Thom Village, Thot Chum Commune, Krakor Di Commune, Thot Chum Village, Thom Chambak of HHd of 67891011 12 13 1415161718192021222324 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 3 1 39 1 49 1 42 11 52 1 651 36 1 1 641 30 1 1 69 1 37 11 1 60 1 11 11 1 29 1 57 1 3 1 1 30 5 2 1 2 46.95 1 1 33 1 30.56 1 1 3 1 49 44.16 11 3 38 1 651 60.16 54 1 1 58 1 38 1 1 1 1 2 4 3 37.80 91.86 M F HHD Um Ly Koeun Nget TopSuy Seam Sam Horn Phean Moy Mao Sorn Choeng Soan Sy Khuon Bun TauchDorn Ching Un Nhanh Ruos Chum Kvanchanly Son Koy Chhon Moal Norn Loek Nuon Keam Chheang Chou Seun Song Chum Hoeum Huor Uong Seat Pich TouchHoiy Chum Han Chandy Keat Loch Chhem Chhoeun Pann NilHeang Luch Phoeung Tona Mein Khoeun Bun NilHuor Ol Nhel Yat Sar NilHoan Nham Chhoeum TopChham Kheim Sem Kean Thaung Hort Chhem 5 Household Name Household G‘uM lIG‘uM Eg:t eKOn tub s‘uy sM esom epon h‘n em:A m:Uy Cwg sn sIu esan b‘un XYn tUc dn G‘un CIg rs; ja:j; CMu xVan;can;lI kuy sun em:al qun Lwk Nn ekom nYn CU eQog sug esIn CMu ehOm GYg hYr eBC sa‘t hy TUc CMu han eKot can;DI Qwm Lúc )a:n; eQOn nil ehog ePOg luc Em:n tUNa b‘un exOn nil hYr jil Gul sr y:at nil ehan jM eQOm tub qaM Exm swum efag Kan Qwm h‘t Total 21HH 1313 7 3 1 1 9 17 52213512293 30,000 CH0+050-100 CH0+450-500 CH0+550-600 CH0+750-600 CH0+600-650 CH0+550-600 CH0+600-650 CH0+600-700 CH0+700-750 CH0+550-700 CH0+750-800 CH1+700-750 CH1+800-850 CH2+050-100 CH1+900-950 CH2+100-150 CH2+050-100 CH1+900-000 CH1+800-900 CH1+800-850 CH2+200-250 CH2+150-200 CH2+000-050 CH1+800-900 CH1+750-800 CH2+100-150 CH1+550-600 CH1+450-500 CH1+200-250 CH1+150-200 CH1+400-450 CH1+300-400 CH1+200-250 CH1+450-500 CH1+450-550 CH1+550-650 CH1+300-400 CH1+100-150 CH1+200-250 CH0+900-1+200 DMS 26 HH Qu. CH 1 2 3 4 1 12 001/042 23 001/043 34 001/045 45 001/044 56 002/057 67 002/056 78 002/055 89 002/054 9 002/053 16 12 003/038 17 1318 003/042 1419 003/044 1520 003/046 1621 003/045 1722 002/042 1823 002/043 Af.SD1 002/044 24 1925 001/032 2026 001/031 21 001/033 10 1011 003/061 1112 003/060 1213 003/058 1314 003/057 1415 003/056 1516 003/059 1617 003/055 1718 003/054 1819 003/049 1920 003/051 2021 003/050 2122 003/053 2223 003/052 2324 002/049 2425 001/041 2526 001/040 2627 001/039 2728 001/038 2829 001/036 29 001/037 2- PUmi cMbk;FM XuM etñatCuM Rsuk RkKr etñatCuM XuM cMbk;FM PUmi 2- No No No. No. DMS 107 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects 1 1 Ap h/h than 10% losemore Others Kroseing 1 Tamarin 59 60 61 62 63 Acasa Banana Custa.apple Jambolan 1 1 2 Bamboo Jackfruit Trees Affected Affected Citrus guava Fruit guava Longan Milk Fruit Milk Coconut 8 1 6 3 2 4 2 4 4 5 1 3 3 1 1 7 11 19 10 Palm 8 3 1 1 7 Cashew 1 5 Mango 2 .50162141183 5218 10 5 3 2 5 m 2 m 2 m 2 m Affected Structure Affected No. Pipeof Fence's(m) Well Shop Stall Rice Bin Kitchen diamete(0.8) Wood Dig 2 pen m pen Chiken pig & % of % Affec. P.Land 0.00% 5.68% 0.88% 1.40% 3.68% 1.42% 1.48% 0.00% 2.05% 3.96% 6.04% 0.00% 0.00% 2.31% 2.60% 2.36% 7.04% 1.92% 0.00% 5.89% 0.00% 0.99% 1.84% 0.51% 0.00% 3.88% 4.23% 3.40% 0.00% 4.46% 0.00% 5.85% 0.00% 7.57% 0.00% 1.43% 0.00% 3.38% 12.30% Resi. Affec. 0.00 274.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 262.50 98.54 83.91 Total ) 2 3 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 4647 48 49 50 51 525354 55 56 57 58 Affected Land (m Land Affected Affected Productive Land 420.00 0.00 98.54 83.91 615.00625.00440.00420.75390.00185.00296.00 615.00 533.00 625.00 198.00 440.00 420.75 390.00 185.00 296.00 533.00 230.90 198.00 130.00283.00192.00589.00 230.90 130.00 275.40 283.00 192.00 388.00634.00 589.00 340.00891.00 275.40 585.00 388.00 757.00 634.00 340.00 237.50 891.00 337.50 585.00 757.00 237.50 275.00 337.50 Rice Chamkar 1 Chamkar 2 Pond 1,208.00 1,208.00 1,056.30 1,056.30 7,000 2 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 m Total Agr. Total

3 - Secondary Canal 2 ( SC2 ( ) 2 Canal Secondary - 3 2 1,300 m 10,000 20,000 10,000 10,000 16,500 16,600 10,000 15,000 12,000 10,000 10,000 25,000 10,000 10,000 5,000 15,000 10,000 15,000 10,000 10,000 14,795.01 2,391.40 55.12 1,457.33 6.00 29.70 1 10.00 7 Residential 2 m 1,500 5,000 4,000 950 1,100 2 use m use 5,000 800 2 m 300 5,000 600 20,000 1250 5,000 50,000 1,000 400 11,000 2,400 2,000 1,500 1,600 1000 5,000 600 1600 1000 10,600 13,000 1400 3000 10,000 26,000 2500 1600 10,000 2,500 10,000 600 1,500 3,900 1,575 7,000 5,000 950 800 4,500 1,396 800 30,000 1200 20,000 1800 20,000 400 3,000 2,000 300 24000 53,500 56,280 2 m Land Land Land Chamka 18,000 602,780 34.87 11,400 22,400 12,000 $/Month outside in Usein not Land Land Land 6,000 12,200 14,000 11,400 29,000 5,300 14,100 11,575 5,600 51,250 30,800 21,200 21,800 10,400 13,000 12,000 30,000 21,600 10,600 13,300 29,000 11,500 28,900 17,000 5,950 12,950 15,800 14,500 16,390 10,000 1,100 Income 1 7.47 1 75.20 1 37.96 1 2 1 48.29 rict 12 1 48.29 2 2 138.61 3 2 71.00 11211 1 1 95.93 3 66.00 1 1 68.12 2 65.00 121.34 Household age age Household 1 21 1 1 1 1 135.16 11 1 2 86.66 2 1 118.96 2 2 1 1 2 108.78 1 3 1 2 43.43 Male Femal 1 1 1 2 1 1 69.51 1 1 11 11 1 1 1 3 1 95.93 21 1 60.97 2 158.94 1 2 60.97 1 2 1 1 11 94.30 1 1 1 1 1 84.95 1 1 1 1 74.39 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ H/h Head Landless H h / Group Vulnerable H/h income H/h Disable Aged H/h H/h Head Head Head <14$/m Widow of Age 1 781 1 38 11 56 1 11 771 1 1 1 73 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 44.71 1 1 68.90 1 1 52.84 1 51 1 70 1 1 11 64 1 1 11 52 1 1 1 11 59.75 641 1 51 1 1 1 1 1 Chheuteal Village, Thnot Chum Commune, Krakor Dist Commune, Thnot Chum Village, Chheuteal Sex of HHd of 67891011 12 13 1415161718192021222324 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 3 1 38 11 53 42 11 701 42 1 851 1 1 40 11 521 1 2 1 1 1 48 2 1 1 1 1 65.00 84.55 1 2 1 61.50 11 29 1 49 44 1 601 11 50 1 39 1 55 1 1 25 1 34 1 47 1 32 46 11 11 36 1 34 1 31 1 29 1 1 43 71.13 54 M F HHD Sar Kimyeap Sar Oem Kmen Chheng Pann Lorn Pann Phallit Meas Seim Yang TesOu Ngann Phoeun Nem Kvann Heak Ruos Yon Meas In Oeun Reim Kerm Khem Sem Oeun Sam Yen Heun Pin Nup Yon Bora Korng Ry Bo Veasna Luon UkTheang Song Pen Hon Mork Mot Morm kean Yem Sam Soeung Heng Chhom Hoy Mork Team Soeum Morn Sith I San Leang Sou Heng Chhom Met Morm Hin Pen Haun Pen I Kimsan Seang Mork Mon Oem 5 Household Name Household s Kwmeyob Gwm Xµin )a:n; eqg ):an; Lun mas pløit Esmy:g; eTs G‘U ePOn ga:n; xVan; nwm rs; ehok mas yun eGOn GuIn Ekm Er:m Xwm suwm yuin sMeGOn Bin huWn nb; y:un kg bUr:a bUr rI lYn vasna G‘uk eFog Bin sug m:k; hun m:m m:Ut ywm eKon esOg sM Qm ehg m:k; hUy esOm etom siTi§ mn GIusan s‘Ur elog Qm ehg m:m em:t Bin huIn Bin hUn GIuKwmsan m:k; esog Gwm m:un CH+800-850 Total 41 HH 25 16 11 15 2 2 21 1 10 22 52 5 3 11 16 54 12 40,000 CH1+100-150 CH1+350-400 CH1+500-600 CH1+600-650 CH0+850-900 CH0+800-850 CH0+800-850 CH0+800-850 CH1+050-100 CH0+850-950 CH0+950-050 CH0+200-250 CH0+250-300 CH6+350-400 CH0+300-350 CH0+250-300 CH0+100-200 CH0+000-050 CH0+050-100 CH0+150-250 CH0+150-200 CH0+300-350 CH0+100-300 CH0+350-400 CH0+050-100 CH0+300-400 CH0+250-300 CH0+200-250 CH0+050-200 CH0+000-050 CH0+450-500 CH0+400-450 CH0+550-600 CH0+600-650 CH0+550-600 CH0+600-700 CH0+400-450 CH0+100-1+050 DMS 41 HH Qu. CH 1 2 3 4 1 12 003/066 23 001/049 34 001/051 45 001/050 56 001/048 67 001/047 78 001/046 Af.MC 002/059 9 8 003/065 30 30 002/048 31 3132 002/050 3233 002/051 3334 002/052 3435 003/048 3536 003/047 3637 002/045 3738 002/046 3839 002/047 3940 002/048 4041 001/034 41 001/035 10 911 003/064 1012 003/062 1113 003/067 1214 003/063 1315 003/068 1416 002/064 1517 002/063 1618 002/062 1719 002/061 1820 002/060 Af.MC 002/058 21 Af.SC2 002/067 22 1923 003/071 Af.MC 002/068 24 Af.MC 002/070 25 2026 002/069 2127 003/072 22 003/069 1- PUmi eQITal XuM etñatCuM Rsuk RkKr etñatCuM XuM eQITal PUmi 1- No No No. No. DMS 108 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects 1 1 1 1 Ap h/h than 10% losemore 1 2 2 1 1 Others 1 Kroseing 1 1 1 1 2 Tamarin 59 60 61 62 63 Acasa 2 10 Banana Custa.apple 1 Jambolan 5 13 1 1 1 1 Bamboo Jackfruit Trees Affected Affected Citrus guava Fruit guava Longan Milk Fruit Milk Coconut 1 1 3 3 6 2 1 23 2 4 3 22 1 1 4 2 7 7 14 18 12 11 11 Palm Cashew 3 8 2 2 2 3 41175421 2 7 3 5113 Mango 2 m 2 m 2 m 2 m Affected Structure Affected No. Pipeof Fence's(m) Well Shop Stall Rice Bin Kitchen diamete(0.8) Wood Dig 2 pen m pen 1.50 34.00 6.00 Chiken pig & % of % Affec. P.Land 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.49% 0.00% 3.10% 0.00% 1.20% 0.00% 0.81% 0.00% 0.40% 0.60% 0.24% 1.39% 3.88% 2.60% 0.46% 3.17% 5.34% 2.20% 8.91% 0.71% 0.00% 3.77% 2.48% 1.84% 4.40% 3.36% 0.00% 0.00% 2.97% 2.93% 2.02% 0.70% 6.00% 12.51% 12.27% 11.07% 20.38% Resi. Affec. 1,221.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 507.00 0.00 132.00 0.00 0.00 162.00 0.00 66.00 60.00 74.00 90.00 72.00 72.50 70.00 Total ) 2 3 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 4647 48 49 50 51 525354 55 56 57 58 Affected Land (m Land Affected Affected Productive Land 960.23205.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 90.00 72.50 70.00 500.50613.70123.00403.00 500.50 119.70 613.70 123.00 177.00 161.00 403.00 119.70 278.39388.46260.00 161.00 137.57316.92266.80703.50356.25 175.61 278.39 106.96 388.46 19.40 260.00 264.00 137.57830.00 58.87 316.92 703.50 495.00 266.80 184.44 356.25 440.00 106.96 504.00 264.00 830.00 297.00 495.00 486.00 184.44 202.00 440.00 480.00 504.00 297.00 486.00 202.00 480.00 Rice Chamkar 1 Chamkar 2 Pond 1,141.00 1,141.00 2 12,000 10,000 m Total Agr. Total

2 m 10,000 10,000 5,000 20,000 8,000 32,000 8,868.95 1,380.23 5,000 20,000 15,000 7,500 5,000 4,000 10,000 30,000 20,000 4,000 15,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 25,000 15,000 10,000 30,000 7,000 10,000 15,000 10,000 50,000 16,500 10,600 10,000 10,000 21,500 13,000 5,600 16,600

Residential 2 m 300 750 2,400 300 2,400 3,250 900 800 2 use m use 1,200 800 2 m 1,200 2,000 700 1,530 600 450 15000 51,400 63,046 600 2,400 750 750 1,000 30,000 3,200 1,500 600 1,500 400 625 1,200 2,100 1,125 5,000 20,000 1,500 900 1,500 5,000 2,375 1,000 1,600 750 750 600 600 1,600 1,600 400 300 2 m Land Land Land Chamka 482,940 11,200 10,700 6,530 32,300 20,600 8,450 5,600 22,400 15,750 8,250 6,000 7,200 50,750 18,900 10,900 11,500 30,400 20,625 5,200 17,100 11,125 16,200 30,800 11,500 10,900 27,375 23,900 16,250 16,000 11,600 30,750 1,450 10,600 6,500 16,600 10,400 17,400 $/Month outside in Usein not Land Land Land 300 Income 1 1 18.28 strict 2 1 2 58.78 11 1 2 1 1 43.41 91.46 12 1 61.00 2 93.08 1 1 2 24.43 11 1 1 1 73.75 100.32 Household age age Household 1 2 1 70.42 1 3 1 2 2 97.15 1 2 1 43.73 2 12 1 1 1 1 2 89.43 120.73 3 11 2 1 1 1 28.45 2 2 25.72 Male Femal 1 1 1 1 48.78 1 1 2 2 12 2 43.69 2 1 2 3 107.72 1 2 2 1 11 99.28 1 1 1 1 54.57 1 1 1 1 54.06 2 1 1 37.19 1 12 1 1 2 76.42 1 2 1 104.47 1 1 2 1 139.22 1 1 1 1 18.49 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ H/h Head Landless H h / Group Vulnerable H/h income H/h Disable Aged H/h H/h Head Head Head <14$/m Widow of Age 1 58 1 54 1 35 1 43 1 69 11 56 11 1 401 1 1 531 1 23 1 1 40 1 1 11 1 52 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11.78 1 1 21 1 76 1 1 1 52.84 1 28.04 1 41 21 60.56 1 41 1 1 51 1 2 82.52 1 1 2 2 55.69 Tbeing Chrum Village, Thot Chum Commune, Krakor Di ThotCommune, Chum Village, Chrum Tbeing Sex of HHd of 67891011 12 13 1415161718192021222324 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 3 1 53 11 31 1 47 1 741 43 11 46 43 111 49 711 11 1 64 47 11 1 2 51 11 17.27 1 50 30 11 2 1 47 1 11 1 24 42.07 1 701 1 84.00 11 44 1 39 1 34 1 1 46 651 11 36 49 1 1 1 1 1 42.68 1 1 1 1 25.40 1 47 M F HHD Nup Nup Yon Seam Lay Thea Chhit Soeun Sok Morm Lang Sopheap Mel Voan Hul OrKem OrThoeun Oeun Sam Yen Hoeun Eang Tork Seit Ra Yang Yeat Hen Huon Eang Khon Ny Nhean Korng Plang Chhun Sem Say Lim Ket Neit Thuch Sokhom Srey Hov Nuon Noeun Ben Eap Siv Et Oeun Kea Chuk Vung Veub Sarorn Pen Van Vorn Sarorn Chuk Saruon Chhem Van Cheng Yan Hen Reim Chhem Tho Korng Am Vein Samoeun Vein Rary Sun Ny Ly 5 Household Name Household nb; y:un Lay esom Qit Fa sux esOn Lagm:m miul suPaB h‘ul eva:n » Kim eGa eFOn yiun sMeGOn eGog ehOn Est tk y:g; r:a yat hiun eGog hYn nI xun kg ejon Qun pøg; say swum ekt lIm Fuc ENt RsI suxum nYnhUv b‘ín enOn sIuv eGob Giut eGOn Cuk Ka evIb vg; Bin sar:n v:n va:n Cuk sar:n Qwm sarYn ecg va:n y:an huin Qwm Er:m kg fUr Ev:n Gam Ev:n saemOn s‘un sarI lI nI Total 30HH 288 5 5 1 1 8 69163411711383 30,000 CH0+500-550 CH0+600-650 CH0+400-450 CH0+400-450 CH0+400-500 CH0+400-450 CH0+700-800 CH0+700-750 CH0+750-850 CH0+350-400 CH2+100-150 CH2+000-100 CH2+150-200 CH2+150-200 CH2+100-200 CH2+450-500 CH2+950-000 CH2+300-350 CH2+600-650 CH2+850-900 CH3+100-150 CH2+450-500 CH2+700-800 CH2+400-450 CH2+550-600 CH2+400-450 CH1+050-100 CH1+000-050 CH3+050-100 CH2+900-950 CH2+850-900 CH2+800-850 CH2+650-700 CH2+550-650 CH2+500-550 CH2+450-500 CH2+350-400 CH0+950-1+100 CH0+950-1+000 CH0+850-1+100 DMS 37 HH Qu. CH 1 2 3 4 1 12 003/083 23 001/065 34 003/084 45 002/084 56 002/083 67 003/089 78 003/094 89 003/085 9 003/091 28 Af.SC2 001/054 29 2330 001/055 2431 002/065 2532 003/070 2633 001/053 2734 002/066 2835 002/071 2936 001/056 3037 003/074 Af.SC2 001/052 10 1011 003/093 1112 002/095 1213 003/088 1314 003/092 1415 003/086 1516 003/090 1617 003/087 1718 002/072 1819 002/073 1920 003/076 2021 003/075 2122 001/057 2223 002/095 2324 002/094 2425 002/093 2526 002/092 2627 002/091 2728 002/090 2829 002/089 2930 002/088 30 002/087 2- PUmi Et,gRCuM XuM etñatCuM Rsuk RkKr Rsuk etñatCuM Et,gRCuM XuM PUmi 2- No No No. No. DMS 109 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ap h/h than 10% losemore 1 1 Others Kroseing 1 1 1 Tamarin 59 60 61 62 63 Acasa Banana 3 1 Custa.apple 1 1 2 6 Jambolan 1 Bamboo Jackfruit Trees Affected Affected Citrus guava Fruit guava Longan Milk Fruit Milk Coconut 8 7 5 1 2 1 2 3 15 13 Palm Cashew 1 5 3 1 1 4 721 3 7131217 93 Mango 2 m 2 m 2 m 2 m Affected Structure Affected 23.00 37.50 36 23.00 37.50 No. Pipeof Fence's(m) Well Shop Stall Rice Bin Kitchen diamete(0.8) Wood Dig 2 pen m pen Chiken pig & % of % Affec. P.Land 0.00% 0.47% 6.36% 0.54% 2.70% 6.25% 5.80% 8.85% 1.26% 1.83% 7.59% 4.76% 0.00% 1.45% 5.33% 2.08% 3.28% 3.51% 0.79% 1.13% 7.50% 8.71% 8.05% 4.75% 0.00% 0.88% 4.05% 3.00% 2.08% 9.80% 15.35% 14.38% 20.04% 11.16% 10.42% 10.25% 11.12% Resi. Affec. 207.00 1,160.11 7.50 34.00 0.00 0.00 39.00 0.00 83.00 94.00 121.50 37.70 177.00 90.12 70.00 Total ) 2 3 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 4647 48 49 50 51 525354 55 56 57 58 Affected Land (m Land Affected Affected Productive Land 94.00 37.70 90.12 70.00 636.00405.60462.50463.74354.00252.00183.37 636.00531.47 238.34 475.77 405.60 462.50 463.74 354.00 902.75 252.00 183.37 426.40 531.47 208.00 475.77 328.00287.50641.20246.00 902.75 625.00 490.00312.50 426.40 157.49 208.00 328.00 375.00 287.50 435.50 641.20 625.00 246.00 563.50712.50 312.50 556.00 157.49 375.00 405.00 435.50 450.00416.00 563.50 392.00 712.50 556.00 405.00 450.00 416.00 392.00 Rice Chamkar 1 Chamkar 2 Pond 1,074.50 1,074.50 124.00 1,025.00 1,025.00 4,000 7,000 2 62,400 m Total Agr. Total

88 2 m 7,000 8,000 10,699.96 490.00 20,000 10,000 15,000 4,000 10,000 5,000 5,000 8,000 12,487.94 380.61 7,400 5,000 20,000 7,000 8,000 20,000 7,000 10,000 7,000 10,000 10,000 2,000 3,200 5,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 15,000 15,000 3,000 Residential 2 m 1,200 22,238 5,600 450 2 use m use 5,200 42,965 2 m

1,200 1,200 900 585 600 300 750 625 800 750 2,500 2,250 400 1,200 1,500 600 900 400 900 1,200 7,500 625 900 750 20,000 800 900 900 200 1,400 750 1,200 1,200 25,000

2 m Land Land Land Chamka 269,838 17,500 4,000 21,200 11,200 15,900 4,585 10,600 7,300 5,750 5,625 8,800 5,750 22,500 9,250 7,850 9,200 21,500 7,600 10,900 400 7,900 10,000 11,200 2,625 4,100 20,750 8,450 5,800 10,900 15,088 450 10,900 8,000 10,200 16,400 3,750 $/Month outside in Usein not Land Land Land 9,200 Income 1 1 53.25 1 1 30.08 t 1 2 68.80 3 2 ###### 62,400 11 1 1 65.00 1 59.95 1 108.59 21 3 2 1 81.30 34.75 11 2 21 3 67.09 1 71.64 1 84.00 Household age age Household 1 11 2 1 1 32 1 1 35.60 43 1 80.48 3 1 1 150.81 11 70.32 31 4 1 2 1 41.00 2 103.63 1 2 1 2 74.89 1 11 11 2 3 94.18 1 1 100.81 95.52 Male Femal 1 1 2 2 2 99.18 1 1 2 1 27.43 1 1 1 11 1 2 1 1 1 56.38 3 100.10 1 1 1 1 42.68 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ H/h Head Landless H h / Group Vulnerable H/h income H/h Disable Aged H/h H/h Head Head Head <14$/m Widow of Age 1 471 1 48 1 511 1 47 1 29 1 1 66 1 11 1 39 1 11 1 2 59 1 2 2 1 1 2 11 1 59 55.28 2 1 1 79.67 1 11 1 1 46 29.30 1 11 29 27.80 1 49 1 1 42 1 64 11 38 1 11 55 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 41.05 2 27.43 1 18.25 Sen Pen Village, Thot Chum Commune, Krakor Distric Commune, Thot Chum Village, Pen Sen Sex of HHd of 67891011 12 13 1415161718192021222324 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 3 1 24 11 44 27 1 53 11 47 39 1 40 11 49 1 49 1 38 47 1 39 1 55 1 42 1 41 1 51 11 31 22 1 49 1 1 1 1 1 5.25 M F HHD Thap Phorn Thap Kea Touch Yein Yem Soeum Thap Kim Yem Noeum Ly Nam En Khan San At Cheng Soek Yang Chhoeun Lor Phol Kha Sokhom Ly Kimleang Leng 1Horn Ly 57 Phen Tor Leng Pen Soeun Chuk Mit Seng Sokhom Chao UchPum Sarorn Chuk Chanthy Sem Norm Krip Hon Krip Ho Krip Yoeun You Khean Soiy Kea Chuk Sok Yoem Chantha Touch Koeun Seim Sok Mein Nov Chuk Viet Neang Samen Srey 1Chorn Chin 52 5 Household Name Household fab; pn Ka TUc ywm Ey:n fab; esOm ywm KIm lI enOm Guin Nam sanþ xan ecg Gat y:g; suwk eLa eQOn xa pul lI suxum eLg Kwmlag lI hn eta ePn Bin eLg Cuk esOn esg mit ecA suxum G‘uc BuM Cuk sar:n esm cn§I RKIb Nm RKIb hun RKIb hUr yU eyOn sy eXon Cuk Ka ywm sux cnßa TUc EsmeKOn Em:n sux Cuk enA nagevot saemn RsI Cin cn Total 22HH 168 4 1 1 1 6 13132711415334 10,000 Total 43 HH 22 21 10 7 1 15 5 10 25 52 6 2 10 28 56 7 566,365 CH2+200-250 CH2+200-250 CH2+150-250 CH2+300-350 CH2+350-400 CH2+500-550 CH2+400-500 CH2+550-600 CH2+800-900 CH1+600-700 CH1+800-950 CH1+200-250 CH1+400-500 CH1+350-400 CH1+250-300 CH1+100-200 CH2+000-050 CH1+550-650 CH1+250-300 CH1+300-350 CH1+300-350 CH1+450-500 CH1+150-200 CH1+750-800 CH1+700-750 CH2+000-100 CH1+450-500 CH1+400-450 CH1+400-450 CH1+300-350 CH1+200-250 CH1+100-150 CH2+800-3+000 CH2+550-3+050 CH2+650-3+100 CH2+700-3+100 CH1+950-2+000 DMS DMS 43 24 HH Qu. CH 1 2 3 4 1 12 001/063 23 001/064 34 001/059 45 001/062 56 001/061 67 001/060 78 001/058 89 003/082 Af.SC2 003/083 31 31 002/086 32 3233 002/085 3334 001/076 3435 001/066 3536 001/067 3637 001/068 3738 001/071 3839 001/070 3940 001/069 4041 001/072 4142 001/073 4243 001/074 43 001/075 10 911 003/077 1012 003/078 1113 003/079 1214 003/080 1315 003/076 1416 003/081 Af.SC2 002/080 17 1518 002/082 1619 002/081 1720 002/079 1821 002/078 1922 002/077 2023 002/076 2124 002/075 22 002/074 3- PUmi EsneBn XuM etñatCuM Rsuk RkKr etñatCuM XuM EsneBn PUmi 3- No No No. No. DMS 110 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ap h/h than 10% losemore 3 Others 1 Kroseing Tamarin 3 2 59 60 61 62 63 Acasa Banana Custa.apple 1 Jambolan 1 1 2 1 Bamboo Jackfruit Trees Affected Affected Citrus guava Fruit guava Longan Milk Fruit Milk Coconut 3 3 2 6 1 2 1 6 1 7 8 5 12 Palm 1 5 Cashew 1 2 1 2 1 50 1 2 1 3 5 7 Mango 2 m 2 m 2 m 2 m Affected Structure Affected No. Pipeof Fence's(m) Well Shop Stall Rice Bin Kitchen diamete(0.8) Wood Dig 2 pen m pen Chiken pig & Affec. % of % P.Land 0.00% 6.93% 6.14% 5.09% 0.00% 4.58% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 5.79% 2.04% 6.65% 6.99% 1.85% 1.30% 3.96% 1.60% 3.82% 9.72% 6.96% 6.34% 7.63% 7.59% 7.71% 7.92% 0.00% 5.39% 4.54% 13.16% 12.11% 11.04% 17.00% 19.69% 40.34% 11.83% Resi. Affec. 452.00 182.00 270.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 68.75 Total ) 2 3 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 4647 48 49 50 51 525354 55 56 57 58 Affected Land (m Land Affected Affected Productive Land 68.75 613.60445.50180.00595.24527.00225.40 613.60 445.50 180.00 507.00 595.24 509.20 527.00 665.00 225.40 850.00984.54 507.00 279.78 509.20 147.94 665.00 223.96415.82319.31 850.00 378.52 984.54 971.83 279.78 373.90 147.94 223.96 759.00 415.82 319.31 378.52 971.83 591.50 373.90 949.99 759.00 538.78454.00 591.50 949.99 538.78 454.00 Rice Chamkar 1 Chamkar 2 Pond 1,039.50 1,039.50 1,310.001,053.002,421.001,104.00 1,310.00 1,053.00 1,210.20 2,421.00 1,104.00 1,210.20 1,391.791,145.001,252.50 1,391.79 1,145.00 1,252.50 2 m Total Agr. Total

4 - Secondary Canal 3 ( SC3 ( ) 3 Canal Secondary - 4 2 m 5,000 5,000 3,000 4,000 8,000 10,500 20,000 9,900 10,000 5,900 15,000 10,000 16,250 10,000 5,000 10,000 17,200 20,000 12,000 10,000 10,000 8,000 21,968.28 15,000 25,000 13,000 8,750 10,000 20,000 10,000 Residential 2 m 2,400 1,000 400 1,500 1,200 2 use m use 2 m 9450 25,350 250 1,200 400 400 400 500 800 1,400 750 660 1,250 600 600 600 1,600 600 1,200 900 800 10,000 3,000 5,000 1,250 1,500 900 615 1,200 300 400 625 750 2 m Land Land Land Chamka 323,600 17,600 57.27 66.58 38.29 66.58 63.02 61.38 74.39 93.90 24.69 52.84 15.04 71.14 89.59 71.14 64.00 57.04 74.39 119.91 102.84 104.26 127.03 5,250 6,200 3,400 20,000 4,400 8,400 12,900 20,800 11,300 10,750 6,560 15,600 10,600 17,250 10,600 6,600 10,600 15,900 $/Month outside in Usein not Land Land Land 10,800 9,950 16,000 750 1200 8,750 26,500 11,250 21,500 10,900 20,615 13,200 10,300 10,400 8,625 9,950 Income 1 1 2 1 28.86 istrict ct 1 1 1 1 31 12 2 1 1 1 2 2 11 1 2 1 2 1 1 89.43 Household age age Household 1 1 1 2 1 5 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 2 1 1 38.45 2 21 3 1 2 1 2 62.50 109.24 Male Femal 1 3 1 3 1 1 1 2 1 1 23 2 1 2 1 1 35.44 1 1 110.67 1 1 1 2 1 87.39 1 1 1 1 77.23 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ H/h Head Landless H h / Group Vulnerable H/h income H/h Disable 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 Aged 1 11 1 1 2 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 H/h H/h Head Head Head <14$/m Widow of Age 1 45 1 64 1 54 1 691 1 54 1 1 1 1 1 51 1 54 1 32 11 1 54 1 1 37 1 28.86 1 51 1 57 Sen Pen Village, Thnot Chum Commune, KrakorDistri Commune, Thnot Chum Village, Pen Sen Tbeing Chrum Village, Thnot Chum Commune, Krakor D Commune, Thnot Chum Village, Chrum Tbeing Sex of HHd of 67891011 12 13 1415161718192021222324 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 3 11 52 59 11 46 45 11 39 24 11 42 1 56 1 49 34 11 27 31 11 44 65 11 53 1 51 1 26 1 44 1 55 55 11 29 75 11 29 41 1 39 1 47 M F HHD Chuk Sarorn Chuk Dy You Koiy Vorn Ren Pin Yoeun You Chhay Mom Neat Soiy Sokhom Chao OrThoeun Chong Sen Kea Chuk Thoeun Vann Den You Saren You Saroeung Pin Vat Sok Hen Him Kry Kerm Phan Tat Hoeun Lor Kea Suk Yet Lonh Sarorng Pin Sarin Lor Oan Ma Born Sang Tongheng Sun Van Sok Torn Phou Sinat Pin Nal Sun Vang Shnuon Savin Bun Trin Khut Chhoeng Ruos Sambo Srey Keam Yoem Phorn Chhun 5 Household Name Household Cuk sar:n yU DI v:n ky Bin ern yU eyOn mMu éq sy enot ecA suxum eGa eFOn Esn cug Cuk Ka va:n; Fn yU Din yU sarin Bin saerOg va:t suk hIum ehn Ekm RKI tat pan eLa ehOn Ka s‘uk LÚj ey:t Bin sar:g eLa sarin ma: eGan saMg bn s‘un tugehg sux va:n PU tn Bin sIuNat s‘un Nal; s¶Ün vaMg b‘un savIn Xut RTIn rs; Qwg RsI sMbUr ywm Kam Qun pn Total 26 HH 22 11 5 2 6 3 8 14 37 1 4 6 18 36 1 20,000 CH0+000-100 CH0+250-950 CH0+400-450 CH0+500-550 CH0+550-600 CH0+600-700 CH1+050-100 CH0+000-050 CH0+050-100 CH0+200-300 CH0+350-400 CH0+400-450 CH0+500-550 CH0+550-600 CH0+700-950 CH1+050-200 CH1+400-500 CH1+850-900 CH1+600-700 CH1+650-750 CH1+600-650 CH1+750-800 CH2+000-100 CH1+650-700 CH1+800-850 CH1+450-550 CH1+350-400 CH1+300-600 CH1+850-950 CH1+600-800 CH2+000-150 CH2+000-100 CH2+250-350 CH2+200-250 CH2+250-400 CH2+150-400 CH0+950-1+050 CH1+250-2+350 DMS 33 HH Qu. CH 1 2 3 4 1 Af.SC2 001/077 2 13 001/078 24 001/079 35 001/080 Af.SC2 001/081 6 47 001/082 Af.MC 001/083 8 Af.SC2 001/084 9 Af.SC2 003/096 1 12 001/094 23 001/093 34 003/110 45 003/111 5 003/109 10 Af.MC 003/097 11 Af.SC2 003/098 12 513 003/099 614 003/100 715 003/101 816 003/102 917 003/103 1018 003/104 1119 001/086 1220 001/091 1321 001/085 1422 001/088 1523 001/089 1624 001/087 1725 001/090 1826 001/097 1927 003/107 2028 003/108 2129 003/105 2230 003/106 2331 002/102 2432 002/104 2533 002/103 26 002/105 1- PUmi EsneBn XuM etñatCuM RkKr Rsuk etñatCuM XuM EsneBn PUmi 1- RkKr Rsuk etñatCuM Et,gRCuM XuM PUmi 2- No No No. No. DMS 111 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects 1 1 1 Ap h/h than 10% losemore 3 Others Kroseing 2 2 Tamarin 59 60 61 62 63 Acasa Banana Custa.apple Jambolan 1 3 1 2 4 1 3 1 1 2 4 1 2 11 1 1 Bamboo Jackfruit Trees Affected Affected Citrus guava Fruit guava Longan Milk Fruit Milk Coconut 6 2 1 2 2 1 1 5 3 24 Palm Cashew 1 3 1 1 5 6 2 1 5 6 12 1 2 2 1 Mango 2 m 2 m 2 m 2 m Affected Structure Affected 43.50 No. Pipeof Fence's(m) Well Shop Stall Rice Bin Kitchen diamete(0.8) Wood Dig 2 pen m pen Chiken pig & Affec. % of % P.Land 0.00% 6.20% 0.00% 3.03% 2.47% 4.65% 0.00% 3.80% 0.00% 1.04% 0.18% 5.58% 2.53% 2.77% 6.22% 0.91% 0.00% 6.21% 0.00% 0.55% 3.85% 0.00% 1.65% 2.63% 6.43% 0.28% 0.08% 11.66% 13.56% 11.16% 10.08% Resi. Affec. 96.00 96.00 0.00% 43.50 203.50 203.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 54.00 23.22 Total ) 2 3 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 4647 48 49 50 51 525354 55 56 57 58 Affected Land (m Land Affected Affected Productive Land 54.00 23.22 558.00555.00 120.00455.00247.00465.00 558.00 678.00 555.00 455.00 279.00 247.00 465.00 379.60 678.00 506.00259.00279.00380.00 279.00 277.00112.00 379.60 102.00 506.00 259.00 315.00 279.00 273.00 380.00 192.50 277.00 112.00 164.50 102.00 504.00262.50 315.00 642.50168.00 273.00 192.50 164.50 504.00 262.50 642.50 168.00 Rice Chamkar 1 Chamkar 2 Pond 1,166.00 1,166.00 2,500 9,000 2 30,000 15,000 60,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 m Total Agr. Total

6 - Secondary Drain 1 ( SD ( ) 1 Drain 1 Secondary - 6 5 - Secondary Canal 4 ( SC 4 ) 4 SC ( 4 Canal Secondary - 5 2 m 2,400.00 120.00 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 5,000 25,000 10,000 11,200 10,000 20,000 1,800 50,000 10,000 25,000 15,000 15,000 5,000 5,000 10,000 4,258.27 5,000 5,172.82 Residential 2 m 1,200 5,075 15,525 2 use m use 2,350 4,900

25 1,050 1,275 2 m 5,000 450 525 1,350 150 2,000 1,600 20,000 200 600 20,000 5,000 1,200 900 1,200 200 75 1,500 900 1,500 675 1,350 100 1,200 5,000 20,000 5,000 2 m Land Land Land Chamka 10,525 2,000 12,400 5,075 16,350 5,100 6,200 238,600 59.68 21.30 40.00 10,450 10,250 11,350 10,150 7,000 26,600 20,000 10,200 29,000 20,600 11,200 10,025 20,900 900 5,000 10,000 51,500 10,900 26,500 15,675 25,000 5,000 20,000 $/Month outside in Usein not Land Land Land 16,050 Income 1 29.65 2 1 26.83 1 82.11 District 1 1 11 1 1 63.24 3 2 88.21 1 1 1 79.26 Household age age Household 2 2 1 80.75 2 1 1 2 109.34 1 51 1 2 2 20.31 1 11 1 25.20 1 2 50.81 3 1 2 105.69 Male Femal 1 2 1 2 1 4 1 1 1 133.73 1 1 3 1 132.15 2 1 2 2 3 60.36 3 1 3 34.50 1 1 1 2 2 2 21.66 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ H/h Head Landless H h / Group Vulnerable H/h income Village, Thnot Chum Commune, krakor District Commune, Thnot Chum Village, H/h Disable 1 1 3 1 1 Aged H/h H/h Head Head Head <14$/m Widow of Age Dorng Toekneach Village, Thot Chum Commune, Krakor Commune, Thot Chum Village, Toekneach Dorng Tbeing Tbeing Chrum 1 67 1 68 1 11 35 11 65 2 11 63 1 1 11 1 66 1 27.23 1 1 21 1 35 1 1 1 66 1 1 46 11 53 26.62 1 48 1 1 1 1 2 39.83 1 54 1 1 Sex of HHd of 67891011 12 13 1415161718192021222324 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 3 1 46 1 51 1 46 1 39 11 49 50 11 58 26 11 23 46 1 49 1 50 1 44 11 55 50 1 52 1 40 11 49 5511 49 1 50 1 3 1 5 35.00 M F HHD Say Soan Say Run Chhun Samoeun Srey Chhey Kin Hoeun Eang Chy Eang Yat Sen Tiv Tuot Sarin Phatt Ra Yang Phork Nhoung Yon Meas Lim Um UkSokhen Yoeur Say Son Yang Suong Mork Mao Sar Soan Sy Yang Meas Phat Yem Vorn Heng Cheim Nheam Soan Sy Sareth Oem Hon Bun Vy Hum Lorn Soeng Phy Meas Huy Soam OrSavoeun UkSokhen Son Yang 5 Household Name Household say esan Qun run RsI saemOn Kin qI eGog ehOn eGog CI esn y:at TYt TIv pat; sarIn y:g; r:a jÚg ePaK mas yun lwm G‘¿u G‘uk suexn say eyO ya:g sun m:k; sYg s em:A sIu esan mas y:g; ywm pat ehg vn ejom Ecm sIu esan Gwum saer:t b‘un hun vIh‘¿u ln swug mas PI esam h‘uy eGa saevOn G‘uk suexn ya:g sun Total 4HH 42 11 1 139 41 47,350 Total 9HH 72 12 3 13414222392 130,900 Total 16HH 149 431 6 18 82412311294 76,150 CH2+300-350 CH2+100-250 CH2+150-200 CH2+350-400 CH0+000-150 CH0+200-250 CH0+250-300 CH0+150-200 CH0+150-250 CH0+000-050 CH0+400-450 CH0+150-200 CH0+050-100 CH0+350-150 CH0+350-500 CH0+300-350 CH0+400-450 CH0+000-050 CH0+100-150 CH0+000-050 CH0+150-200 CH0+200-250 CH0+250-300 CH0+700-800 CH0+700-800 CH0+400-500 CH0+800-900 CH0+650-700 CH0+750-800 CH0+500-550 CH0+600-750 CH1+150-200 CH1+050-100 DMS DMS DMS 6 9 23 HH Qu. CH 1 2 3 4 6 6 002/108 7 78 002/106 89 002/107 9 002/109 1 Af.SC2 002/097 2 13 002/100 24 002/101 35 002/098 46 002/099 Af.SC2 002/096 1 Af.MC 003/029 2 13 003/025 24 003/023 Af.MC 003/024 5 36 003/027 Af.MC 003/026 7 48 003/028 59 003/022 6 002/023 10 711 002/022 812 002/024 913 002/026 1014 002/025 Af.SD1 001/019 15 1116 001/018 1217 001/016 Af.MC 001/020 18 1319 002/028 1420 002/029 1521 002/027 1622 003/032 Af.MC 002/032 23 Af.MC 001/023 1- PUmi Et,gRCuM XuM etñatCuM Rsuk Rsuk RkKr etñatCuM XuM Et,gRCuM PUmi 1- Rsuk RkKr etñatCuM XuM dgTwknac PUmi 1- No No No. No. DMS 112 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects 1 1 1 Ap h/h than 10% losemore 1 Others 1 1 1 1 Kroseing Tamarin 59 60 61 62 63 Acasa Banana Custa.apple Jambolan Bamboo Jackfruit Trees Affected Affected Citrus guava Fruit guava Longan Milk Fruit Milk Coconut 1 1 1 Palm 1 1 Cashew 8 7 4 2 1 3 3 2 4 2 Mango 2 m 2 m 2 m 6.00 2 m 22.80 Affected Structure Affected 91.00 22.80 6.00 15 3 3 14 3 3 51.00 40.00 No. Pipeof Fence's(m) Well Shop Stall Rice Bin Kitchen diamete(0.8) Wood Dig 2 pen m pen Chiken pig & Affec. % of % P.Land 2.62% 5.12% 4.62% 2.53% 0.48% 0.00% 4.60% 2.34% 1.80% 1.73% 4.13% 1.21% 3.30% 2.43% 1.23% 3.53% 2.00% 2.50% 0.73% 1.83% 1.08% 8.43% 3.15% 1.78% 1.14% 8.82% 2.75% 53.88% 11.99% Resi. Affec. 243.00 585.00 243.00 585.00 0.00 Total ) 2 3 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 4647 48 49 50 51 525354 55 56 57 58 Affected Land (m Land Affected Affected Productive Land 133.00511.50924.20506.13336.00660.00 133.00 511.50 924.20 506.13 336.00 660.00 460.00702.00270.00432.00825.50 460.00 121.13660.00121.49369.00 702.00 270.00 400.00 432.00 825.50 217.59 121.13 549.00 660.00 162.00 121.49 421.40 369.00 400.00 283.51 217.59 355.20 549.00 252.00 162.00 441.00 421.40 413.00 283.51 355.20 252.00 441.00 413.00 Rice Chamkar 1 Chamkar 2 Pond 2,205.001,000.00 2,205.00 1,270.75 1,000.00 1,270.75 5,075 5,000 9,000 1,225 2 20,000 30,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 15,000 30,000 10,600 62,400 20,000 m Total Agr. Total

7 - Secondary Drain 2 ( SD ( ) 2 Drain 2 Secondary - 7 2 m 3,530.83 9,726.86 Residential 2 m 2 use m use 2 m 13,025 20000 15,300 2 m Land Land Land Chamka 91.25 21,600 1600 20,000 700 11,200 700 10,600 1200 10,000 600 10,000 21,200 1200 20,000 6,200 1200 5,000 23,800 2200 1600 22,200 1,225 11,600 1600 10,000 75,000 5000 70,000 30,100 27,100 25,800 21,600 15000 100 30,000 2100 800 30,000 25,000 5000 1600 41,200 10,000 20,000 5000 20,000 1200 40,000 20,000 3,600 16,200 5,225 5,900 1200 15,000 225 900 5,000 5,000 5,150 150 5,000 $/Month outside in Usein not Land Land Land 16,500 1500 15,000 30,600 600 30,000 Income 1 3.98 2 17.68 1 1 29.26 2 1 51.82 istrict t 1 1 66.00 1 1 1 1 75.60 1 1 73.75 2 3 59.45 11 1 61.00 11 73.75 1 1 2 1 61.58 174.79 Household age age Household 1 31 1 1 1 2 102.00 1 1 81.30 Male Femal 1 2 2 1 67.07 1 1 1 3 85.36 1 2 1 1 1 73.87 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ H/h Head Landless H h / Group Vulnerable H/h income Village, Thnot Chum Commune, krakor District Commune, Thnot Chum Village, H/h Disable Aged H/h H/h Head Head Head <14$/m Widow of Age Tbeing Tbeing Chrum 1 35 1 42 1 471 1 761 1 41 1 11 1 33 11 1 58 1 1 1 1 821 1 1 23 11 59 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 21 1 72 1 1 1 47.25 1 11 30 57.80 1 1 1 14.22 1 73.17 43 1 51 1 70 1 47 1 481 1 47 1 1 1 20.91 Kandal Village, Thnot Chum Commune, Krakor Distric Commune, Thnot Chum Village, Kandal Sex Chambak Thom Village, Thnot Chum Commune, Krakor D Commune, Thnot Chum Village, Thom Chambak of HHd of 67891011 12 13 1415161718192021222324 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 3 1 50 1 53 1 47 11 53 1 46 45 11 36 46 1 51 11 56 37 11 51 791 1 42 1 1 65 1 1 1 2 25.77 1 50 M F HHD Nheam Cheim Nheam Kosal Nheam Porn Vorn Bunthoeun Keo Thuok Meas Hon Mein Tuon Heng Savy Heng Saruon Sorn Moeun Huot Hen Sok Im 1 I Tay In Porn 37 Seam Sat OrOeun Sithorn Seit Van Chen Buntha Srey UkSith Phein Khen Sambo So Keory Sot Nhean Korng Kimleang Leng 1Sarith Sun 57 UchSaratt Khon Ny Nhean Korng Her Sun Kry Kerm Hoeun Eang Son Koy Luch Phoeung Oeun Toem Roem Seim Tona Mein 5 Household Name Household ejom Ecm ejom kusl; vg b:n Ekv b‘uneFOn mas FYk m:m hun ehg TYn ehg savI sn sarYn hYt emOn suxehn GIum GIutay b:n GuIn saF esom eGa eGOn Est suIfn ecg va:n RsI b‘unfa G‘uk sit XinEpn sUr sM suT§ EkvrI kg ejon eLg Kwmlag s‘un sariTi§ G‘uc sara:t; nI xun kg ejon s‘un Ehr Ekm RKI eGog ehOn kuy sun ePOg luc Twm eGOn Esmrwm Em:n tUNa Total 12HH 510 622 2 7 14511 3162 182,850 Total 10HH 124 12 2 1 291143121 250,300 CH0+850-900 CH0+550-600 CH0+500-050 CH0+850-900 CH0+800-900 CH1+150-200 CH1+050-100 CH1+350-400 CH1+350-400 CH1+600-650 CH1+850-900 CH1+450-500 CH1+400-450 CH1+800-900 CH1+100-150 CH0+650-750 CH1+150-120 CH1+250-300 CH1+250-350 CH1+200-250 CH0+850-950 CH0+550-650 CH1+850-900 CH1+600-850 CH3+350-400 CH2+600-700 CH3+250-300 CH1+950-000 CH2+200-250 CH4+150-200 CH4+200-400 CH5+100-200 CH5+550-600 CH5+500-550 CH4+900-950 CH4+750-800 DMS DMS 15 16 HH Qu. CH 1 2 3 4 2 Af.MC 003/031 3 Af.MC 003/030 4 15 002/031 26 001/021 37 003/034 48 003/033 59 003/035 6 003/036 1 12 002/120 Af.SC2 002/121 3 24 002/122 35 001/110 46 001/109 57 001/108 68 001/107 79 001/111 Af.SC2 002/123 1 Af.SC1 001/118 2 Af.SC1 001/120 3 14 002/129 25 002/126 Af.SC1 002/125 1 Af.SD1 002/030 10 711 003/037 812 001/035 913 002/034 1014 002/033 1115 001/025 12 001/024 10 811 001/113 912 002/124 Af.SC2 003/122 13 Af.SD2 003/121 14 1015 001/112 Af.SC3 001/114 16 Af.SC2 003/123 2- PUmi kNþal XuM etñatCuM RkKr Rsuk etñatCuM XuM kNþal PUmi 2- Rsuk RkKr etñatCuM XuM Et,gRCuM PUmi 1- Rsuk RkKr etñatCuM XuM cMbk;FM PUmi 2- No No No. No. DMS 113 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ap h/h than 10% losemore Others Kroseing Tamarin 59 60 61 62 63 Acasa Banana Custa.apple Jambolan 1 6 1 7 1 Bamboo Jackfruit Trees Affected Affected Citrus guava Fruit guava Longan Milk Fruit Milk Coconut 1 1 4 2 1 1 1 3 5 1 8 Palm Cashew 1 1 2 11 2 1 Mango 2 m 2 m 9 2 m 2 m 22.80 16.00 37.50 7.50 66 62 544 59 7 1 21 5 10 42 5 20 32 4 25 9 36 59 Affected Structure Affected MOWRAM.RU No. Pipeof Fence's(m) Well Shop Stall Rice Bin Kitchen diamete(0.8) Wood Dig 2 Prepared by Prepared pen m pen Chiken pig & Sao Channarith Sao % of % Affec. P.Land 2.00% 3.94% 1.33% 0.80% 9.32% 1.71% 2.16% 2.45% 1.32% 0.44% 0.00% 1.62% 2.52% 2.08% 8.32% 0.00% 0.00% 4.11% 4.22% 4.50% 0.00% 5.52% 4.20% 3.74% 1.66% 0.00% 2.55% 0.65% 1.90% 3.75% 2.82% 2.83% 3.84% 2.40% 7.38% 7.11% 0.00% 9.80% 4.57% 13.41% 12.35% 10.29% Date :day: Date Year: month: 200 Resi. Affec. 0.00 0.00 0.00 39.50 63.86 Total ) 2 3 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 4647 48 49 50 51 525354 55 56 57 58 Affected Land (m Land Affected Affected Productive Land 39.50 63.86 240.00394.00160.00240.00932.00256.75216.00196.00 240.00 264.00 394.00 160.00 240.00 932.00 256.75 216.00 161.50 196.00 252.00 264.00 312.00831.90270.00329.00 161.50 337.50 252.00 450.00 312.00 450.50 831.90 276.00 270.00 168.00 329.00 396.00 337.50 331.50 450.00 884.00 450.50 381.80 276.00 168.00 370.50664.00750.00 396.00 423.00 331.50 283.00 884.00 384.00 381.80 240.00560.50 370.50 675.00 664.00 750.00 423.00 320.00 283.00 384.00 240.00 560.50 675.00 320.00 Rice Chamkar 1 Chamkar 2 Pond 1,341.00 1,341.00 1,470.002,057.00 1,470.00 2,057.00 64,059.45 4,762.24 2,607.00 55.12 7,732.88 13.50 2 369.80 2 9 - Dam - 9 8,000 9,000 8,000 4,000 2 10,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 10,600 20,000 m Total Agr. Total

8 - Secondary Drain 3 ( SD ( ) 3 Drain 3 Secondary - 8 2 m 4,682.96 5,179.40 8,197.16 Residential 2 m 2 Team Leader use m use Verified by Verified 2 m 2200 8,400 1000 5,148 800 900 16,575 2 m Land Land Land Chamka 204,375 10,900 900 10,000 12,500 20,400 16,225 2500 10,000 400 1225 20,000 15,000 12,300 12,000 15,450 300 2000 12,000 10,000 450 15,000 10,750 10,150 15,900 750 11,600 150 9,200 10,000 900 1000 10,000 11,500 15,000 5,048 1600 200 10,000 8,000 1500 10,000 48 8,000 10,650 15,600 5,000 3,450 900 36,200 22,300 750 15,625 800 600 9,900 15,000 450 1200 1500 8,500 3,000 35,000 20,000 625 15,000 7,625 900 7,600 20,840 625 7,000 840 20,000 14,000 4000 10,000 12,900 900 12,000 10,400 900 9,500 $/Month outside in Usein not Land Land Land 13,000 3000 10,000 Income 9 301,150 4,902,863 115,800 188,675 412,569 5,100,525.00 1 1 1 53.25 1 42.68 1 3 51.50 istrict 2 1 75.81 2 1 31 119.51 11 11 1 67.27 1 80.75 1 23.80 2 1 3 116.25 Household age age Household 1 11 3 3 46.74 1 1 2 52.84 1 1 1 3 1 62.27 2 11 2 1 2 1 54.74 11 219.51 1 1 1 43.69 Male Femal 1 1 3 11 3 3 1 72.15 1 1 77.23 1 2 1 1 69.10 1 1 1 1 40.44 2 1 1 1 1 97.56 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ H/h Head Landless H h / Group Vulnerable Cerified by Cerified TauchAng Sokmony Ich H/h income Chief MOWRAM.RU NWISP.PMU Chief of H/h Disable Village, Thnot Chum Commune, krakorDistrict Commune, Thnot Chum Village, Village, Thnot Chum Commune, krakor District Commune, Thnot Chum Village, Aged H/h H/h Head Head Head <14$/m Widow of Age Sen Pen Sen Boeng Veal 1 54 1 81 1 11 56 1 1 64 1 46 1 45 1 53 1 27 1 49 11 511 1 40 1 451 1 1 451 1 65 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 57.72 1 2 1 122.25 67.00 1 48 Tbeing Chrum Village, Thnot Chum Commune, Krakor D Commune, Thnot Chum Village, Chrum Tbeing Sex of HHd of 67891011 12 13 1415161718192021222324 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 3 1 46 1 58 1 48 11 27 1 49 39 11 47 1 611 60 11 34 1 44 1 42 1 1 581 27 1 31 1 60 11 11 1 1 31 27 211 2 49 2 51 35.20 1 53 1 21 51 99.28 1 43 51 1 45 1 68 11 45 1 1 1 1 1 1 85.00 3 1 71.54 M F HHD Long Boeun Long Yim Chea Ching Pin Kean Thaung Chanthy Chhoeng Tha Soeng Saroeung Pin Sopheap Pang Vat Sok Chhey Khen Yoeun You Sinan Pin Sophal Sek Ton Sun Hen Him Van Vorn Khean Soiy Thai Suong Sopheap Pang Yet Lonh Sarann Sun UchPum Soeum Suk Kea Suk Hoeun Eang Van Sok Sok Yoem Ky Moeung Huoy Seit Sivatt Suk Khen Cheap Heng Khit Pach Sok Yon Yoem Phorn Khit Hov Pel Phany Srey Sinat Ly Kea Ly Chhan Ma Yak Sen Saroeun Pol 5 Household Name Household Lúg ebOn Ca yIm biun CIg efag Kan qwg cn§I swg fa Bin saerOg )a:g suPaB va:t suk Kin qI yUr eyOn Bin sIuNan esk supl s‘un tun hIum ehn v:n va:n sy eXon sYg éf )a:g suPaB LÚj ey:t s‘un sara:n; G‘uc BMu esOm s‘uk Ka s‘uk eGog ehOn sux va:n ywm sux emOg KI Est hYy sIuva:t;s‘uk ecob Xin xit ehg sux )a:c ywm y:un xit pn biul hUv RsI panIñ lI sIuNat lI Ka ma: qan siun y:ak b:ul saerOn Total 1 HH 1 1 1 1 3 1 20,840 840 2,057.00 Total 348 HH 260 152 79 54 12 12 118 30 100 162 430 26 31 85 170 459 4 Total 7HH 78 21 2 1481Total 1291 7HH 122 11 94,600 2 149 2169Total 14HH 89 74,148 42 6 348172 7323 8,000 CH5+500-550 CH4+850-900 CH5+600-650 CH5+500-600 CH5+050-100 CH4+800-850 CH5+100-150 CH0+000-050 CH0+500-550 CH0+000-100 CH0+300-400 CH0+050-150 CH0+350-400 CH0+100-150 CH0+150-300 CH0+450-500 CH0+000-050 CH0+300-350 CH0+400-450 CH0+250-300 CH0+500-550 CH0+700-750 CH0+800-850 CH0+550-700 CH0+500-550 CH0+750-800 CH0+750-800 CH1+350-400 CH1+700-750 CH1+400-450 CH1+750-800 CH1+800-900 CH2+400-450 CH1+500-550 CH0+550-650 CH1+200-250 CH1+150-400 CH2+000-050 CH0+400-700 CH4+850-5+100 CH4+950-5+000 CH4+950-5+000 DMS DMS DMS DMS DMS 1 15 14 17 414 HH Qu. CH 7 48 003/124 59 003/127 Af.SC1 001/119 1 Af.SC2 002/111 2 13 002/114 24 001/095 35 001/099 Af.SC3 001/096 6 Af.SC2 003/113 7 Af.SC2 001/097 8 49 003/112 5 001/100 1 Af.SC2 003/115 2 Af.SC3 002/116 3 Af.SC2 002/115 4 15 001/101 26 001/102 37 003/116 48 001/106 59 001/104 6 001/103 1 1 003/135 1 2 3 4 6 3 003/126 10 611 001/116 712 001/117 Af.SC3 003/125 13 Af.SD3 001/115 14 Af.SC3 002/128 15 Af.SC3 002/127 10 Af.SC3 002/110 11 612 002/112 Af.SC2 002/113 13 714 001/098 Af.SC3 003/114 10 711 001/105 812 003/119 913 003/120 1014 003/118 1115 002/118 1216 003/117 1317 002/117 14 002/119 1- PUmi EsneBn XuM etñatCuM Rsuk RkKr etñatCuM XuM EsneBn PUmi 1- RkKr Rsuk etñatCuM Et,gRCuM XuM PUmi 2- Rsuk RkKr etñatCuM XuM bwgval PUmi 1- No No No. No. DMS 114 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects 1 1 than 10% than Household Loss more more Loss ) 2 856.00 220.58 3 1,288.57 dIPUmi dIPUmi dIPUmi Residen.L(m ¦ ¦ ¦¦ 2 2 22 188.00 1 139.00 856.00 188.00 139.00 dIcMkar dIcMkardIcMkar dIPUmi Orchard (m²) Orchard NationReligion King RBHraCaNacRkkm<úCa épÞdIb:HBal;¬m épÞdIb:HBal;¬m épÞdIb:HBal;¬m épÞdIb:HBal;¬m Kingdom Cambodia Of Catisasna RBHmhakSRt ) 2 7,575.91 1,288.57 1 7,575.91 dIERs dIERs dIERsdIERs dIcMkar Rice.L (m Rice.L MOWRAM.RU .55 10,856.16 327.00 2,365.15 5 20.55 13.50 14.52 Prepared by Prepared Sao Sao Channarith Date :day: :day: Date month: 2009 Year: 80.00 77.50 1 3,280.25 77.00 80.00 32.00 101.40 177.00 5 GclnRTBüepSg²GclnRTBüepSg² GclnRTBüepSg²GclnRTBüepSg² No. of Pipe of No. Fence(m) WellShop Small Stall House( m² ) m² House( 21.50 32.00 20.00 24.75 15.00 21.50 n Pursat Province n Pursat 5 3 2 1 3 1 11 1 6 29.25 1 osang others Cate.1 Cate.20.5 diamete wood Dig (m2) (m2) 1 1 1 11 24.75 15.00 77.50 1 13.50 3,280.25 220.58 3 1 acRsBPaKBay½Bü acRsBPaKBay½Bü extþeBaF×sat; 1 2 1 2 19 5 5 14.52 19 Affected Tree Affected 1 Verified by Verified Team Leader Team cMnYnedImeQIcMnYnedImeQI cMnYnedImeQIcMnYnedImeQI SubprojectIrrigationof I Northwest Sector Project Ich Sokmony Ich 3 2 3 4 4 Kuch Noup Noup Kuch oconut papayafruit guava bamboo jambolan acasa tamarin kr 4 5 24 1 1 2 5 sVay etñat dUg lðúg RtEbk b£sSI RBIg kasüa GMBil RksaMg epSg² 6 3 4 1 The Summary of The List of APs Summary taragsegçbesdækic©sgÁm GnuKeRmag KuCnb; énKeRmageRs gayrgeRKaH Gt;dI <14 1 1 3 3 4 H/h Income H/h Vulnerable Landless cMNUl 1 Disable Disable 1 1 2 1 cas;Cra Bikar 2 1 1 3 3 RsþIemm:ay 7 1 2 7 1 17 cMnYnRKYsar 7 73 1 3 1 18811 1 1 3 2 2 24 34 4 3 2 13 1 1 1 6 2 29.25 101.40 3 20.55 3177.001 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 5 4 3 3 71 1 1 7 2 2 2 17 17 3 3 6 1 4 1 2 1 3 20.00 77.00 17 13 2 1 1 3 4 5 17 17 13 56 52 8 8 1 5 19 133311 3 2 1 24 1 2 2 28 66.25 44.25 8 544.90 2 28.02 20 Cerified by Tauch Ang Tauch

Chief MOWRAM.RU Chief NWISP.PMU of XMu XMu MC Canal DMS H/h H/h H/h H/h <14$/Mh / H H/h mango palm c SC1 SC2 SC3 SC4 SC5 Name of Name of No. Affected Widow Aged Dam eQµaHRbLay eQµaHRbLay eQµaHRbLayeQµaHRbLay cMnYnÉksar i nig 1 nig i PUm Name Name of eQµaHeQµaH PUmi PUmiXMu XMu eQµaHeQµaH PUmi PUmiXMu XMu Sub-Total: 1 Villages Sub-Total: 1 Villages Sub-Total: 1 Villages Sub-Total: 1 Villages Sub-Total: 1 Villages Sub-Total: 1 Villages Sub-Total: 2 Villages krakor District krakor VillageCommune and PUmi PUmiRkLaj; RkLaj; XuM XuM k,alRtac k,alRtac PUmi PUmiRkLaj; RkLaj; XuM XuM k,alRtac k,alRtac PUmi PUmiRkLaj; RkLaj; XuM XuM k,alRtac k,alRtac PUmi PUmiRkLaj; RkLaj; XuM XuM k,alRtac k,alRtac PUmi PUmiRkLaj; RkLaj; XuM XuM k,alRtac k,alRtac PUmi PUmiERsbJsSI ERsbJsSI XuM k,alRtac XuM k,alRtac PUmi PUmiERsbJsSI ERsbJsSI XuM k,alRtac XuM k,alRtac PUmi PUmipSar pSar XuM k,alRtac XuM k,alRtac PUmi PUmiRkLaj; RkLaj; XuM XuM k,alRtac k,alRtac PUmi PUmiRkLaj; RkLaj; XuM XuM k,alRtac k,alRtac PUmi PUmiRkLaj; RkLaj; XuM XuM k,alRtac k,alRtac PUmi PUmiRkLaj; RkLaj; XuM XuM k,alRtac k,alRtac PUmi PUmiRkLaj; RkLaj; XuM XuM k,alRtac k,alRtac PUmi PUmiERsbJsSI ERsbJsSI XuM k,alRtac XuM k,alRtac PUmi PUmiERsbJsSI ERsbJsSI XuM k,alRtac XuM k,alRtac PUmi PUmipSar pSar XuM k,alRtac XuM k,alRtac Kralanh Vill, Kbaltrach Commune Kralanh Vill, Kbaltrach Commune Kralanh Vill, Kbaltrach Commune Kralanh Vill, Kbaltrach Commune Kralanh Vill, Kbaltrach Commune Vill, Srer Reusey Kbaltrach Commune Vill, Srer Reusey Kbaltrach Commune Trach Phsa Village, Kbaltrach Commune srubTItaMgb:HBal;man ³ 3 ³ srubTItaMgb:HBal;man 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 No l>r l>r l>rl>r 2 3 1 Rsuk RkKr KN³kmµkarGnþrRksYgénkargaredaHRsaydIFøI nigpÞHsEm,g KN³kmµkarGnþrRksYgénkargaredaHRsaydIFøI KeRmagRbB½n§eRsacRsBPaKBay½Bü Northwest Irrigation ProjectSector Northwest Inter-MinisterialCommittee Resettlement

115 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects 1 1 1 Aph/h than10% lose more 4 1 1 4 1 1 Others Kroseing 1 1 1 Bamboo Jumbolan Tamarin Nation Religion King Nation RBHraCaNacRkkm<úCa KingdomOf Cambodia Trees Affected Affected Catisasna RBHmhakSRt guava Fruit guava 1 2 1 1 Palm Coconut papaya 1 1 1 5 4 Mango 2 m 2 m Well 80.00 50.00 27.00 80.00 Affected Structure Affected diamete(0.5) Wood Dig Pump ) 2 2 )(m Cate.2 House 2 2 20.00 Cate.1 (m Cate.1 % of P.Land 0.35% 6.27% 0.71% 6.39% 4.70% 6.11% 6.22% 0.00% 7.10% 1.85% 7.36% 1.23% 0.16% 3.17% 9.89% 4.58% 0.88% 0.58% 1.14% 22.31% 25.38% 24.12% Affec. Affec. No.ofPipe Fence's(m) Shop Stall 856.00 21.50 32.00 463.18 249.00 in Pursat Province Province Pursat in ) 2 Affected Land (m Land Affected 139.00 188.00 139.00 856.00 21.50 32.00 5 4 Affected Productive Land 3 34 35 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 4243 44 45 4647 4849 50 51 52 545556 57 63.5037.61 63.50 37.61 50.00 50.00 23.75 23.75 44.0056.99 44.00 56.99 511.00621.60 511.00 621.60 204.79 735.55493.00122.00 735.55 246.16 493.00 122.00 246.16137.50 133.66 435.00507.60 137.50 435.00 507.60 Rice Orch. Pond Total Resi. RsBPaKBay½Bü extþeBaF×sat; RsBPaKBay½Bü 1,222.581,419.16 1,222.58 1,419.16 2,030.00 2,030.00 237.94 1,206.00 1,206.00 750 800 2 2,500 8,000 2,700 5,000 5,000 9,000 3,000 m 75,000 Total Agr. Total

7,575.91 7,575.911,288.57 20.00 77.00 14 121 3 1 188.00

900 2 m Residential 40,000 222,840 2,000 10,000 5,000 2 - 2 Dam 2 m 40,000 40,000 Subproject Project Sectorof Northwest Irrigation 1- Main Canal ( MC ) ( Canal Main 1- 2 2 use m use 3 - Secondary Canal 1 ( SC1 ) ( 1 Canal Secondary - 3 SC2 ) ( 2 Canal Secondary - 4 2 m 43,015 40,000 3,015 43,000 43,000 1,800

1,200 2915 40,000 100 40,000 3,000 3,000

5000 20,000

2 m Land Land Land Chamka ###### 40,000 23,850 3,000 2,500 3,800 6,200 3,000 9,000 8,000 80 10,900 45,000 2,700 30,576 76,200 750 3,390 40000 10,000 1200 75,000 900 900 2,490 9,100 10,900 40,000 5,750 13,500 40,800 750 5,000 3500 800 10,000 40,000 600 5,000 21,600 5,900 1600 900 20,000 5,000 7,000 25,000 5,900 2,915 40,100 21,500 5,240 2400 5,000 5,000 5000 5,000 10,000 15,000 $/Month outside Use in in not Land Land Land taragBisþar esdækic©sgÁm GnuKeRmag KuCnb; énKeRmageRsac KuCnb; GnuKeRmag esdækic©sgÁm taragBisþar Income 1 16.26 1 26.42 1 23.35 1 2 24.39 DetailList of ofNoup Socio-economy Kuch 1 11 22.35 23 1 2 1 3 1 1 48.17 2 72.68 89.83 1 1 22.00 11 1 83.33 2 56.91 1 2 19.83 t t t t Household age age Household 3 1 1 21 49.30 1 11 1 11 4 30.69 13 1 2 101.62 58.94 1 1 1 3 25 25 21,500 Male Femal 1 1 1 11 117.88 11 1 22 2 1 2 2 3 60.97 55.89 1 28.13 4 1 1 42.68 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ income Group H/h H/h H/h 1 1 1 H/h H/h Head Head Head <14$/m/ h H Head Head of Age Widow Aged Disable H/h Vulnerable Landless Ethinic

1 52 1 1 1 33 11 48 1 1 11 68 1 1 11 1 56 1 25.85 Kralanh Village, kbaltrach Commune, Krakor Distric Commune, kbaltrach Village, Kralanh Krakor Distric Commune, kbaltrach Village, Kralanh Krakor Distric Commune, kbaltrach Village, Kralanh Krakor Distric Commune, kbaltrach Village, Kralanh Sex of of HHd 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1516171819202122232425 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 3 2 1 29 1651161 36 1 11 41 1 1 35 53 111 52 1 47 1 39 11 111 2136.581 52 1 2115.60 41 1 44 32 11 63 43 1 111 1 47 56 11 39 164 36 1 55 1 1 11 130.48 1 56 M F HHD 2 143 33 6 94183 35253 152,576 HH HH HH chen Chorn teng Long Morn Sdeung Lek Morn Soin Sum Kheit Nhas Ny Pha Phoeun Sun keun Long Van Vorn Bun Satt Thon Pa Chy Chen Chik Yeay Van Vorn Kheit Nhas Ley Thuy Savy Duk Yuon Yor SumNov Chhean Long SuonPhalla NginHon KhattBoay Saran Soiy Chep Mao PhanPhy NginHon 5 Household Name Household s‘umnUv Luúg Qan sYn pløa gin hun xat;e)ay sy sar:an em:A cib panPI cncin Lúg etg esIþgm:n mnelx s‘uM s‘n j:as; Ext pa nI s‘un ePOn Lúg KWn vnv:an sat; b‘un ):a fun CinCI gin hun yayCIk vnv:an j:as; Ext Fuy LI savIDuk y: yYn Krakor District Krakor Total 2 Total 17 Total 2 CH0+050-150 CH0+650-800 CH0+200-300 CH0+350-400 CH1+050-150 CH0+350-450 CH1+000-050 CH0+850-900 CH1+900-950 CH0+650-850 CH1+150-200 CH1+200-250 CH1+100-150 CH0+250-350 CH0+450-550 CH0+250-300 CH0+550-600 CH0+600-650 CH1+600-700 CH0+000-200 CH2+050-100 CH1+600-650 CH1+350-400 CH2+100-150 CH1+450-550 CH1+750-950 CH1+950-2+50 CH0+200-1+050 DMS DMS DMS 2 2 17 No No. No. HH Qu. CH 2 2 002/017 1 12 002/019 2 002/018 1 12 001/014 23 002/001 34 002/004 45 003/004 56 003/005 67 003/006 78 002/003 89 002/005 9 001/005 1 Af.Dam 002/009 2 13 Af.SC1 002/007 001/008 4 Af.SC1 001/007 5 26 001/009 37 002/006 4 003/008 1 1 001/021 1 2 3 4 10 1011 001/006 1112 001/002 1213 003/002 1314 003/001 1415 003/003 1516 002/002 1617 001/003 17 001/001 No Rsuk RkKr Rsuk RkKr Rsuk k,alRtacRkKr XuM RkLaj; PUmi 1- Rsuk k,alRtacRkKr XuM RkLaj; PUmi 1- Rsuk k,alRtacRkKr XuM RkLaj; PUmi 1- Rsuk k,alRtacRkKr XuM RkLaj; PUmi 1- KN³kmµkarGnþrRksYgénkargaredaHRsaydIFøI nigpÞHsEm,g KN³kmµkarGnþrRksYgénkargaredaHRsaydIFøI KeRmagRbB½n§eRsacRsBPaKBay½Bü Inter-Ministerial Resettlement Inter-Ministerial Committee Resettlement Sector Irrigation Project Northwest DMS 116 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects 1 3 Aph/h than10% lose more 3 4 2 2 Others Kroseing 1 1 1 1 2 6 2 1 11 3 19 5 Bamboo Jumbolan Tamarin Trees Affected Affected guava Fruit guava 3 1 3 Palm Coconut papaya 4 4 1 11 3 1 13 1 1 1 1 3 1 Mango 2 m 9.00 11.55 2 m 13.50 Well 1 8.50 37.00 30.00 33.00 38.40 20.00 20.00 16.50 1 46.50 27.00 Affected Structure Affected 3177.001 1 3 2 1 5 14.52 3 47.00 5 14.52 diamete(0.5) Wood Dig Pump ) 2 2 15.00 32.00 29.25 29.25 101.40 20.5522443 2 1 16 MOWRAM.RU )(m Cate.2 House 2 2 25 44.25 8 544.90 2 28.02 20.551333 11 3 2 1 24 2 2 28 5 24.75 Cate.1 (m Cate.1 Prepared by Prepared Sao Channarith Sao % of P.Land 7.08% 23.20% Date :day: Date month: Year: 2009 Affec. Affec. No.ofPipe Fence's(m) Shop Stall 19.58 201.00 ) 2 Affected Land (m Land Affected Affected Productive Land 3 34 35 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 4243 44 45 4647 4849 50 51 52 545556 57 185.59707.57 185.59 707.57 Rice Orch. Pond Total Resi. 800 2 m 10,000 Total Agr. Total 3,280.25 3,280.25 220.58 24.75 15.00 77.50 1 13.50 4 5 1 111

900 900 500 2 8,000 3,000 1,050 1,190 m 8,000 Residential 5,500 122,300 20,000

10,000 10,000

4,000

30,000 10,000

5,000

2 000 66,850 493,640 10,856.16 327.00 10,856.16 2,365.15 66. m 1,080 2 2 use m use 10,545 10,000

5 - Secondary Canal 3 ( SC3 ) ( 3 Canal Secondary - 5 6 - Secondary Canal 4 ( SC ) 4 ( 4 Canal Secondary - 6 SC ) 5 ( 5 Canal Secondary - 7 2 Verified by Verified m Team Leader 11,900 2,000 3,660 2,100 3,150

1,800 450 1,860

1155 500 900 10,000 10,000 1,800 150 2,000 7,000 Ich Sokmony 2 m Land Land Land Chamka 15,805 50,500 23,660

2,100 10,900 3,150 1,800 1,655 900 11,800

7,000 2,000 28.10 25.39 14.22 42.68 51.34 41.15 10,900 15,000 600 11,200 10,000 10,000

4,450 1,860 8,800 10,000 7,000 15,900 20,300 30,000 240 31,080 50,000 30,000 5,150 10,000 5,000 $/Month outside Use in in not Land Land Land Income 1 2 18.82 1 1 20.32 1 1 3 21 2 1 1 1 1 11 11 91.46 1 11 20.73 2 3 21.46 1 27.07 1 1 23.37 1 2 2 1 33.96 1 146.34 1 1 10,000 t Household age age Household 1 1 1 2 85.36 1 1 11 1 1 85.36 2 1 36.09 Male Femal 1 1 12 1 62.19 1 1 111 50.40 1 11 1 2 13.90 1 12.80 1 2 1 1 1 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ 0-5 6-12. 13-19 20-60 60+ 1 1 1 1 Cerified by Tauch Ang Tauch 1 1 income Group H/h H/h Chief MOWRAM.RU NWISP.PMU ofChief H/h Village, kbaltrach Commune, krakor District Commune, kbaltrach Village, krakor District Commune, kbaltrach Village, 1 1 1 2 1 H/h H/h Head Head Head <14$/m/ h H Head Head of Age Widow Aged Disable H/h Vulnerable Landless Ethinic Srer Reusey Srer Reusey Srer 1501 11 38 1111 40 1 29.83 1 821 50 1 1 1 1 1 35 1 53 1 1 1 Kralanh Village, kbaltrach Commune, Krakor Distric Commune, kbaltrach Village, Kralanh Phsa Village, Kbaltrach Commune, Krakor District Commune, Kbaltrach Village, Phsa Sex of of HHd 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1516171819202122232425 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 3 1 64 179 1 1 11 11 27.31 11 40 1 541 27 1 36 54 11 1 25 11 47 11 47 1 33 29 1 1 22 13.73 1 56 11 42 1661501 1 40 1 40 1 11 2 11 12 112 65.04 8.33 61 11 1 3 13181 158 102,000 5 2 1 1 3 4 4 35 7 269 9,040 53,180 10,000 10,000 5,880 40,000 M F HHD 134 21 1 3 2412 453142 69,500 4412 8 8 1 5 19 4 1171853 5 41222697 394,616 432,970 12,000 133, HH HH HH HH Thorn Hoeun Thorn Nak Phal Samon Thou Sinit Muon Phea Phoeun Keal Hang MenglayChhut 1 Tho Theam Put Meun 22 Sarein San Naang Thap Him Hoiy Vanthoeun Uk On Sam At Net Soeng Chhoiy Nuon Yun keo Noeun Pov Sokun Doem HH IsmaelAtam khom Sao 1 Sas Tey 44 Chea Sot Vuth Chem Sernop Sann Malic Meu 1 1 Mao Chep Mao ThapMoeun 5 Household Name Household em:A em:A cib fn ehOn pl Nak; FU sam:un mYnsuInit ePOnPa hgS Kal em:gLay Qut Fam fU muWnBuF san saEr:n fab; NaMg hyhuIm v:an;eFOn G‘uk Gat sMGun fab; emOn suwg eNt nYnqy Ekv yn; eBA enOn DwmsuKuN GisµaÉl GaTaM xum esA tIsH Ca suT§ Cwm vuF san; EsNub emI m:alik Total 13 Total 52 Total 7 Total 7 Total 3HH 12 11 2 11 1142 30,000 Total 1 CH1+350-400 CH2+100-200 CH2+250-300 CH2+300-350 CH2+300-350 CH2+300-350 CH2+200-250 CH2+300-350 CH2+200-250 CH2+450-500 CH4+200-250 CH2+600-900 CH2+750-800 CH3+100-200 CH2+350-400 CH4+900-950 CH5+000-050 CH5+500-600 CH5+500-550 Ch5+350-400 CH5+750-800 CH5+450-500 CH5+600-650 CH5+600-650 CH2+900-2+00 CH2+950-3+00 CH4+950-5+00 DMS DMS DMS DMS DMS DMS 7 3 7 1 56 17 No No. No. HH Qu. CH 9 5 003/009 1 12 001/015 23 002/012 34 002/013 45 003/012 56 001/014 67 001/012 7 001/013 1 12 001/017 23 003/013 3 003/014 1 1 002/014 1 12 001/020 23 001/019 34 001/018 45 003/016 56 002/015 67 002/016 7 003/015 8 Af.SC1 003/007 1 2 3 4 10 611 002/009 712 002/010 813 002/011 914 003/011 1015 003/010 1116 001/011 1217 001/010 13 001/016 No 1- PUmi RkLaj; XuM k,alRtac Rsuk k,alRtacRkKr XuM RkLaj; PUmi 1- Rsukk,alRtac RkKr XuM ERsbJsSI PUmi 1- Rsukk,alRtac RkKr XuM ERsbJsSI PUmi 1- RkKr Rsuk k,alRtac XuM pSar PUmi 2- DMS 117 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

Appendix 3:

SOCIO-ECONOMIC QUESTIONNAIRE

118 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

Questionnaires for Socio-Economic Survey We are TA resettlement specialist and official of RU-MOWRAM, representing Ministry of Water Resources and Meteorology (MOWRAM) and Asian Development Bank (ADB) to conduct socio- economic survey for preparing Resettlement Plan (RP) of ………… Sub-Project. The survey aims to study present socio-economic of Affected Persons, magnitude of project impact and other information about affected households. Thus, the response to this questionnaire is very essential for you and for preparing RP.

I- General Information DMS code: ………………………… Date: ………………………… Interviewer Name: ……………………………………… Signature ……………………… Supervision by: ………………………………… Date: …………………………

1- Village Name: (1-Punley, 2-Svay Sar) 2- a/- Interviewee Name: ………………. b/- Sex: ( 1- male/ 2- female ) c/- Age: ………. d/- Relationship in family: ( 1. Household head/ 2. Income family member / 3. Under family support)

II- Socio-economic Information 1. Household Status, Income, Occupation and Members Relationship Main Monthly Secondary Monthly No. Sex Married Education Work place with head of Age Occupation Income Occupation Income 2* Status3* 4* 5* Household * (US$) (US$) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

1 Relationship with HH. head: {1} HH. Head {2} spouse {3} children {4} parent {5} other 2. Sex: {1} Male {2} Female 3. Married Status: {1} Single {2} Married {3} Divorced {4} Separate 4. Education Level: {0} Illiterate {1} Primary school {2} Secondary school {3} High school {4} Vocational training {5} University 5. Workplace: {1} Home {2} <1km. {3} 1-2kms. {4} 2-4kms. {5} > 4 Kms.

2- What are your family income as food from surrounding house and village? { 1. Fish or meat 2. Vegetable 3. Fruit 4. Others …………. }

3- Monthly household expense in Riels (please write detail expense and total in last row)

119 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

Health Others Vegetable Education Other food Agriculture Investment Entertainment Fish Fish andMeat Ceremony and

4- What is your total residential land area? { ………….. m 2}

5- Building type and construction materials

Building Type Type of Building Floor Area * House

* Type of building

House [1] Villa [2] brick or concrete house [3] hybrid brick and wooden house with tile roof [4] wooden house with tile roof [5] hybrid brick and wooden house with zinc or fibrocement roof [6] wooden house with zinc or fibrocement roof [7] wooden house with leave or thatch roof [8] small tree or bamboo house with leave or thatch roof.

6- Household Asset

Type of Asset No. of working No. of not working

Bicycle Motorbike / Moto Remork

Car Truck/ Mini bus Koyun Oxcart Cassette/CD/DVD Player/TV Telephone

Others >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7- What livestock do your family have ? How many ? Cow ………………….. Buffalo ……………….

120 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

Horse ………………. Pig ………………. Goat ………………. Chicken ……………. Duck ……………. Others ……………….. 8- How many farm land do your family have? ………………………. places and Please fill the below table for the qualification of your land

Cultivation No. of Crop Type Land Size Duration per Plantation Yield per Annual No. 2 on the land Location ( m ) year Time year Revenue

Total

9- Please fill the below table for the distance from home to your farm lands

Transport mode No. Distance from home to farm land (m)

1 2 3 4 5 6 10- What is your family difficulty in farming activities? { 1. Inundation / 2. Unfertile land / 3. Lack of capital investment / 4. Lack of farming Technique / 5. Lack of farming equipment and tools / 6. Insufficient farm land / 7. No irrigation system / 8. Others …………………………….

11- How many time did you experience crop damage for the last five years?...... times 1st ……% 2nd ……% 3rd ……% 4th ……% 5th ……% - What is the reason of the demage

121 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

1st …… 2nd …… 3rd …… 4th …… 5th ……

12- Does annual rice yield sufficiently support your family food supply? { 1. Yes / 2. No / 3. Surplus}

13- If not, how many months of shortages? {1. Less than a month / 2.Within 1 - 2 months 3. within 2 - 4 months / 4. Within 4 - 6 month / 5. Within 6 - 8 months / 7. > 8 months}

14- What condition does your family are? { 1. Don’t have enough money to purchase food 2. have adequate money to buy food, but not adequate to by clothes and medicine 3. have adequate money to buy food, clothes and medicines , but be unable to save 4. have enough money to buy food, clothes, medicines and some saving but unable to buy valuable assets, such as motorbike, TV, good furniture, etc. 5. have enough money to buy valuable asset such as motorbike, TV, good furniture... 6. have enough money to buy valuable asset and car 7. have enough money to buy any things according to our will}

15- What are the other difficulties in your family?

No. Other difficulties Serious Medium Light 1


2


3


4


5

16- What are the major issues in your community?

No. Other difficulties Serious Medium Light 1


2


3


4


5

17- Does Punley Sub-Project provide any benefit to your family? { 1. Yes / 2. No}

18- What kinds of benefit does you family get from the project? { 1. Have enough water for farming 1 time a year 2. have enough water for farming 2 times a year 3. gain more fish production than before 4. Others…………………………………………

19- What are the impact causing by the project on your family? And fill the box with number from 1 to 5 from very serious to slightly serious. { 1. …………………… 2. …………………… 3. …………………… 4. …………………… 5. …………………… }

20- What are your family solution to solve the impact? 1……………………………………. 2……………………………………. 3……………………………………. 4…………………………………….

21- What kind of compensation does your family want to get? { 1. Land-to-cash compensation / 2. Land-to-land compensation } 122 NWISP, Po Pi Dem, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash & Kouch Noup Subprojects

22- If land-to-land compensation is select, what are the criteria for selection suitable agricultural production land for your family? 1. Distance from village……… Km 2. Distance from irrigation……...Km 3. Soil type…………………………... 4. Distance from road …………..Km 5. Located outside flooding area in raining season { 1. Yes / 2. No } 6. Others………………………………………..

23- What your family is going to use the compensation money? and why? 1………………………………………… Because…………………………………………… 2………………………………………… Because…………………………………………… 3………………………………………… Because……………………………………………

24- If your household uses the money to purchase land, what type and location of land? Location……………………Distance from village………………..km Land type…………….

25. What is the land price of the area? …………………

26.Who are you going to buy from? 1…………………………… 2…...... 3……………………………

123 Po Pi Deum, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Kuch Noup and Tram Mneash Sub-Projects

Appendix 4:

FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION QUESTIONNAIRE

NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION QUESTIONNAIRE

GROUP:……………….

I. General Information: 1. Sex Male:…………………… Female: …………………… 2. Village: …………… Commune: …………… 3. Prepared by: - Coordinator: ………………… - Notetaker: ……………………… 4. Date: …………………………….. Started from ………. to ………… 6. Participants:

Nº Names Age Sex Relative to House hold head HH head status 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

II. Economy: 1. How do people make money in the village? Please list at least 15 jobs. Of 15 jobs, please select 8 jobs of main source income of people in communities and rank from 1: the most important to 8: lowest important. 2. What are the major changes in the region for the past 5 years, in term of development? 3. Do the changes contribute to improve living condition of people here for the past 5 years? 4. If yes, what are the main factors contribute to the improvement of living condition of the people? 5. What are the other factors which contribute to improvement of living condition of the people in the communities for the last 5 years?

6. What are the main factors which cause poverty issues on the poorest families for the last 5 years? 7. Please write list of the price of daily basic-need goods in the community? (Item, Unit, Price, Condition)

ii NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

8. Please descript the price of agricultural products, produced in the community? (Item, Unit, Price, Condition) 9. What is the labor cost of agriculture worker and carpenter? 10. What is the price of land in the region? And please fill the land price in the table below. 11. Please list down number of very poor, poor, middle class, and rich family in the village. 12. Why do they become poorest families? 13. What problem do people encounter in their agriculture activities (ex. farming technique, irrigation, fertilizer, seeds, equipment, land, labor, market, transportation, insecticide, etc.) 14. What is the situation of livestock production in community? 15. What are the near future jobs or income opportunities for community people? 16. For people who lost their land more than 10% of their total productive land what is the best way for compensation? 1./ Money 2./ Land 17. Besides, compensation what kind of assistance or services will they need to restore their income, especially relate to farming skill? Why? 18. Besides farming skill, what kind of skill do you think that is very help full to them to restore their income? Why? 19. How many members in the family should be provided training? 20. How many NGOs or Community Based Organizations (CBO) are in your community? What are their activities? What are their useful activities to community? 21. When they get compensation, what do people use this money for? 22. If government help you look for replacement land, how far from the village do you think is suitable for people, giving three options? What is the criterion for selection the site? What is the appropriate range of land cost? 23. If you get compensation money, how long do people take in order to be able to buy land? 24. Where are you going to buy land? 25. What land do you plan to buy? What price are you willing pay for the land? 26. What is the problem of women head of household and women issue in general? 27. What kind of assistances do you think it is very useful for women and women head of house hold?

III. FINAL COMMENT AND SUGGESTION

iii NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

Appendix 5:

PUBLIC INFORMATION BOOKLET

iv NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

KINGDOM OF CAMBODIA NATION RELIGION KING

Inter-ministerial Resettlement Committee

North-West Irrigation Sector Project

Ministry of Water Resources and Meteorology

Po Pi Deum, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash and Kouch Noup Sub-Projects

PUBLIC INFORMATION BOOKLET

26 February - 31 Julu 2009

v NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

Questionnaire 1 : What are the Po Pi Deum, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash and Kouch Noup (5 subprojects) Irrigation Sub-Projects? Answer : Royal Government of Cambodia (RGC) requested redevelopment of Po Pi Deum, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash and Kouch Noup Irrigation Sub-Projects in Pursat, Battambang and Banteay Meanchey provinces (three provinces) to Asian Development Bank (ADB) and Agence Française de Dévelopment (AFD). The subprojects are under ADB’s loan, Loan No. 2035-CAM [SF] for reconstruction of the irrigation schemes, AFD’s grant, covering for consultation services and RGC’s counterpart fund for preparing Resettlement Plan. The Public Information Booklet (PIB) is orientated for the 5 Sub-Projects and for raising awareness of Affected Persons (AHs) on the project and their policy.

Questionnaire 2 : Who is responsible for the 5 Irrigation Sub-Projects? Answer : Ministry of Water Resources and Meteorology (MOWRAM) in Phnom Penh takes fully responsible for redevelopment of the Irrigation Sub-Projects by closely collaborating with provincial authority through Provincial Department of Water Resources and Meteorology (PDWRAM) in the three provinces. Provincial implementation unit at PDWRAM will daily monitor progress of the project, including preparation of Resettlement Plan (RP) of the project. RP team of MOWRAM works together with IRC and Provincial sub-committee to prepare and carry out RP.

Questionnaire 3 : Does the project aim to provide benefit to villagers? Answer : The subprojects will irrigate the areas where there is insufficient water in raining season and the some area in dry season for rice plantation as well as increasing irrigation system capacity. If your rice land is in the existing system your land will be assisted to increase irrigated capacity. Affected Households (AHs) will be compensated for their lands, trees, crops and other properties at the replacement cost and paid for (i) vulnerable allowance such as poor household, disable household head, woman household head, aged household head and ethnic minority, (ii) transportation allowance, (iii) economic disruption allowance, (iv) income restoration.

Questionnaire 4 : What will be replaced if I lose my land because of the subproject? Answer : Affected land holders who have their land affected by the subproject will be compensated for their land losses at the replacement cost, because their land will be acquired for constructing irrigation canals. Other lost assets will be also compensated at the replacement cost. If the AHs who lose their land and want replacement land IRC will provide replacement land with similar or better productivity and they will have a right to possessing the land.

Questionnaire 5 : Will my family member and I be provided what kind of work during construction of the subproject? Answer : All AHs and farmers in command area are entitled to participate in the Embankmentp, canal and footpath construction as construction workers.

Questionnaire 6 : Is it required to have land title of the affected land in order to get cash or land to land compensation? Answer : Lack of official land ownership document is not an obstacle for AHs to get compensation and other assistances. The cut-off-dates for Po Pi Deum, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash and Kouch Noup subprojects were on 03 March 2009, on 26 March 2009, on 06 May 2009, on 24 June 2009, on 11 June 2009, respectively. Questionnaire 7 : Does compensation will be covered on houses or structures which are affected by the subproject?

vi NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

Answer : It does. Houses or structures which are affected by the subproject will be compensated at the replacement cost with additional allowance as stating in Table 1. No depreciation cost or left over materials of construction material will be deducted from the replacement cost of affected structures. AHs can construct houses or structures on relocation land which are located nearly former site, have basic facility and have an agreement from AHs. Questionnaire 8 : For affected perennial crops and trees, what are the solutions? Answer : For affected annual crops, AHs is provided suitable time, 2 months to harvest before beginning civil work. If AHs cannot harvest their mature rice, crops or fruits on time they will get compensation at the replacement cost. For trees the compensation will be also at replacement cost for total yield of five year (please Table 1).

Questionnaire 9 : What is replacement cost? Answer : Replacement cost is compensation rate of affected property which is estimated basing on current market price. An independent agency will be hired to study replacement cost for these subprojects.

Questionnaire 10 : For affected community property, what is the solution? Answer : Replacement of affected community property is required to have discussion with community or relevant agency. Affected building or structure such as bridge and road will be rehabilitated to be the same as pre-project condition or better off. If there is lose of expected income (example, community forest, and fish pond) the owner community will receive compensation at the replacement cost or relocates to a new place which have the same productivity capacity. Questionnaire 11 : If there is a relocation of house, commercial stall or other structures, what is the assistance from the project to rebuild those structures? Answer : Affected House or other structures which cannot be moved such as concrete and heavy wooden structures will be compensated at the replacement cost. For affected movable structures, allowances for relocating and transportation of the structure will be provided (Table 1). A discussion with shop, commercial stall owners or community representative will be made to get them participate in the relocation process of commercial structure to the new site. Questionnaire 12 : How does the project assist AHs or AHs who are severely affected and vulnerable? Answer : The severely AHs, losing agriculture land more than 10%, vulnerable AHs or relocated AHs will get special allowance to restore their living condition (Table 1).

Questionnaire 13 : When will DMS be conducted? Answer : The first DMS carried out in February-March 2008 after demarking contour lines in Po PI Deum Reservoir. The DMS team is composed of Provincial, District and Commune Sub-committee, an Independent Monitoring Agency and a representative from Non-Government Organization (NGO). The DMS for Po Pi Deum, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash and Kouch Noup subprojects will be started on 03 March 2009, on 26 March 2009, on 06 May 2009, on 24 June 2009, on 11 June 2009, respectively with participating from AHs and DMS working team. AHs and district local authority will be informed about the meeting schedule of the team. Questionnaire 14 : Is it necessary for AHs to immediately provide affected land and demolish affected house or other structures?

vii NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

Answer : It is not. The provision of affected land and demolition of house and other structures will be hold after providing compensation of those affected assets and other allowance assistance for 15 days and with consultation with AHs.

Table 1: Entitlement of AHs or AHs for receiving compensation and other assistances Type and Level Entitlement AHs or Compensation Policy and Implementation of Impact AHs Restoration Measurement 1. Loss of Land a. Temporary Legal land owner or Compensation is based on affected holder who has their replacement cost for loss property agricultural or land temporary and pay to land owner or holder to residential land affected during restore to the same condition as construction of the before the project or better than. project. b. Loss of land Occupant of There is no compensation on land The land in the right- in the right-of- agricultural or but they can benefit from fixed of-way of the canal, way of the residential land in asset compensation such as river, stream are the canal, river, the right-of-way of structures and trees as well as land located on the the canal, river, other restoration measearement. Embankment of canal, stream. stream.. river and stream embankment where it is risk of land slide and erosion. c. Permanent Legal land owner or As priority: If loss of land is affected holder registered in a: Compensation will be through minor or less than agricultural or the DMS. land to land compensation basing 10% of total AH residential land on AH selection to get agricultural agricultural land, AHs in command and residential land which have can chose land to equal area or productivity. cash compensation b: Land to cash compensation will for their affected be used basing on replacement land, equaling to cost without paying tax, registration replacement cost. fee or transferring fee. 2. Loss of house or other structures Affected house, Legal owner Cash compensation of part or commercial or registered in DMS. entire structures will be based on other private replacement cost of construction structures materials and labor without considering deprivation of the construction material and remain materials after demolishing the structures. 3. Loss of annual and perennial crops and tree Annual and Owner or occupant a. Annual crop: AHs will be Compensation shall perennial crops of the crops or tree. informed in advance for two be before and tree have month on acquisition of the construction by long life. cropping land and on harvesting provide sufficient dateline of their crop. The time to AHs to be compensation of the loss of the able to harvest crop crop will be at the replacement or fruit. cost of annual crop yield. b. Perennial crop and tree: AHs will be compensated on the loss of fruit and tree. The compensation will be calculated

viii NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

Type and Level Entitlement AHs or Compensation Policy and Implementation of Impact AHs Restoration Measurement basing on annual average yield for the past five years in order to restore AH income at the time from beginning of planting until harvest tree. 4. Loss of public or community property Public or Affected community a. Rehabilitating public or community or relevant community property. property government agency. b. Relocate to a new site in consultation with affected community and relevant local authority. 5. Allowance assistance and relocation a. It is for AHs who a. Transport allowance from USD Transportation required to move or 10 to 20 is for commercial stall. allowance relocate the b. Transport allowance of USD 40 structures to is for moving house or structure to unaffected area. nearby area. c. Transport allowance of USD 60 is for moving structure to different locatio n in the same village. d. Transport allowance of USD 70 is for moving structure to different location in the same commune. b. Living It is for AH who is a. Assistance is in cash equaling assistance required to move 20Kg of rice per AH per month or their structure back USD 25 per AH who has house or during 2 transition or to relocate to new structure smaller than 60m from period site. type 1A to 2D type. b. Assistance is in cash equaling 20Kg of rice per AH for 3 months or USD 75 per AH who has concrete or wooden house smaller than 60m 2 from type 2E to 4D. c. Assistance is in cash equaling to 20Kg of rice per AH for 6 months or USD 150 per AH for concrete or wooden house larger than 60m 2 from type 2E to 4D. c. Special AH loses their Assistance is in cash equaling assistance for agricultural land 20Kg of rice for each AH for 6 severely more than 10% of months or USD 150 per AH. affected AH their agricultural land. d. Special Vulnerable AH is: (i) This is an additional assistance to assistance for widow household replacement cost compensation of vulnerable AH head, (ii) disable affected property. Vulnerable AH household head, (iii) will get in cash special assistance aged household equaling 20Kg of rice per head, (iv) poor vulnerable AH for 6 months or household, (v) ethnic USD 150 per vulnerable AH. minority household.

ix NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

Appendix 6:

REPLACEMENT COST STUDY REPORT

x NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

KINGDOM OF CAMBODIA NATION RELIGION KING

The Inter-Ministry Resettlement Committee

North-West Irrigation Sector Project

(Loan No. 2035-CAM [SF])

FINAL REPORT

Replacement Cost Study for Po Pi Deum, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Kouch Noup and Tram Mneash Sub-Projects

By: Ung Nareth

August 2009

xi NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS…………………………………………………………………….ii ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ...... iv 1. INTRODUCTION ...... 2 2. METHODOLOGY ...... 2 2.1 Data Gathering Instruments and Procedures...... 2 2.2 Participation of Public in the Survey...... 2 2.3 Processing Data ...... 2 3. RESULT OF THE STUDY ...... 3 3.1 Po Pi Deum Subproject...... 3 3.2 Anlong Svay Subproject ...... 7 3.3 Krouch Saeuch Subproject ...... 10 3.4 Tram Mneash Subproject...... 15 3.5 Kouch Noup Subproject...... 18

APPENDICES Appendix 1 Replacement Cost Study Questionnaires…………………………24 Appendix 2 Terms of References………………………………………………..33

LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES Figure 1-1 Location map of the five Subprojects ...... 1 Figure 3-1 Land Use and land price map of Po Pi Deum...... 5 Figure 3-2 Land Use and land price map of Anlong Svay...... 8 Figure 3-3 Land Use and Land Price Map of Krouch Saeuch Subproject ...... 13 Figure 3-4 Land Use and Land Price Map of Tram Mneash Subproject...... 16 Figure 3-5 Land Use and Land Price Map of Kouch Noup Subproject...... 21

Table 3-1-1 List of relevant construction material of Po Pi Deum...... 3 Table 3-1-2 List of estimated price for structure element of Po Pi Deum...... 4 Table 3-1-3 List of trees, yield, fruit price and compensation year in Po Pi Deum...... 6 Table 3-1-4 Compensation Rate of Affected Asset of Po Pi Deum ...... 7 Table 3-2-1 List of trees, yield, fruit price and compensation year in Anlong Svay...... 9 Table 3-2-2 Compensation Rate of Affected Asset of Anlong Svay ...... 10 Table 3-3-1 List of relevant construction material of Krouch Saeuch...... 11 Table 3-3-2 List of the estimated price for structure element for Krouch Saeuch ...... 12 Table 3-3-3 List of trees, yield, fruit price and compensation year in Krouch Saeuch... .14

xii NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

Table 3-3-4 Compensation Rate of Affected Asset of Krouch Saeuch ...... 15 Table 3-4-1 List of trees, yield, fruit price and compensation year in Tram Mneash ...... 17 Table 3-4-2 Compensation Rate of Affected Asset of Tram Mneash...... 18 Table 3-5-1 List of relevant construction material of Kouch Noup ...... 19 Table 3-5-2 List of the estimated price for structure element of Kouch Noup ...... 20 Table 3-5-3 List of trees, yield, fruit price and compensation year in Kouch Noup ...... 22 Table 3-5-4 Compensation Rate of Affected Asset of Kouch Noup...... 22

xiii NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

ADB Asian Development Bank AFD Agence Française de Dévelopment AHs Affected Household(s) APs Affected Person(s) DMS Detailed Measurement Survey FGDs Focused Group Discussions ha Hectare IRC Inter-ministerial Resettlement Committee MOWRAM Ministry of Water Resources and Meteorology NWISP North-West Irrigation Sector Project PDAFF Provincial Department of Agriculture, Forests and Fisheries PIU Project Implementation Unit RCS Replacement Cost Study RP Resettlement Plan RU Resettlement Unit TOR Terms of Reference

xiv NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

Figure 0-1: Location Map of Po Pi Deum, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Kouch Noup and Tram Mneash Subprojects

1 NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

1. INTRODUCTION The Po Pi Deum, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Kouch Noup and Tram Mneash subprojects are five of the core subprojects in Northwest Irrigation Sector Project (NWISP), supported by Asian Development Bank (ADB) and Agence Française de Dévelopment (AFD). The subproject sites are located in Banteay Meanchey and Pursat provinces and along National Road No. 5 (see Figure. 1-1). The subprojects involve the reconstruction and improvement of the existing and construction of new schemes and aim to irrigate 4,945ha agricultural land. With this irrigated capacity, the subproject will construct 80km length of main canals, secondary canals, drainages and Embankments and hundreds of irrigation structures. The project is required to acquire approximately 55ha agricultural land, 1ha residential land, 1,800 tree and perennial crop as well as numbers of other properties such as well, fence, pond, etc. Thus, compensation on the losses of those assets at present market price is very vital for Affected Persons (APs). The objective of this study is to conduct a Replacement Cost Study (RCS) in Po Pi Deum, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Kouch Noup and Tram Mneash subproject regions in order to study current market price of the affected properties and establish reasonable and up-to-date compensation rate for different types of affected assets for calculating the Resettlement Plan (RP) budget of the subprojects. The study was conducted in April 2009 for Po Pi Deum subproject and in July 2009 for Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Kouch Noup and Tram Mneash subprojects. For each subproject, the study conducted on 30 AHs and non AHs, 4 carpenter groups, 3 shop owners, 2 seeds suppliers, 5 vendors, 3 village leaders and a Focus Group Discussion (FGD) of 3-5 different APs in the affected villages.

2. METHODOLOGY

2.1 Data Gathering Instruments and Procedures The establishment of replacement costs will be carried out based on information collected from both Desk research and Direct interviews with people in affected area, both those persons who are affected and not affected.

The Desk research will focus on relevant publications, Punley RP of NWISP in 2009, Sturng Chinit RP phase I, II and III in Kampong Thom province in 2006, budget estimation of Ta Saang Cham Bok and Kampong Chrey in Svay Reang province in 2008, replacement cost study of ADB Road Improvement Project, NR5 and NR6, in 2005.

The field survey of RCS is conducted in April 2009 for Po Pi Deum subproject and in July 2009 for Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Kouch Noup and Tram Mneash subprojects. For each subproject, the survey is conducted from 30 AHs and non AHs, 4 carpenter groups, 3 construction material shop owners, 5 vegetable and fruit vendors, 3 village leaders and in Focus Group Discussion (FGD) of 1-3 different AP groups in the affected villages.

2.2 Participation of the Public in the Survey Members of the Commune Council and village headmen took part in the household RPC survey of APs, and the FGDs. All household interviews and the FGD meetings were conducted with the assistance of the household heads, the village headmen, Inter- ministerial Resettlement Committee ( IRC) in the Banteay Meanchey and Pursat provinces and Resettlement Unit (RU) of Ministry of Water Resource and Meteorology (MOWRAM).

2.3 Processing of Data The data, which is collected from the field survey and secondary data, are processed in MS EXCEL software. The compensation rate calculations of RCS are also made in EXCEL.

2 NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

3. RESULT OF THE STUDY

3.1 Po Pi Deum subproject

Po Pi Deum subproject is the second subproject of NWISP in Banteay Meanchey province. The subproject is located about 15 km south of Banteay Meanchey provincial town and close to the Mongkul Borey district town. The subproject is build on existing irrigation scheme and is necessary to acquire, according to DMS data, rice and residential lands, 15 types of tree, 6 types of house and structure.

3.1.1 Replacement Costs from Various Groups

Houses and Other Structures

The survey of the construction materials is conducted on four carpenter groups in Po Pi Deum subproject and three construction material shops in Mongkul Borei district and Banteay Meanchey provincial town. The three locations are the sources of material supply to APs of the project. The synthesis of the material prices is reported in the Table 3-1-1 as below:

Table 3-1-1: List of relevant construction material of Po Pi Deum

NO CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS UNIT UNIT PRICE REMARK (US$) 1 Good timber m3 360.00 (1) 2 Mixed timber m3 290.00 (2) 3 Sub-standard timber m3 238.00 (3) 4 Bamboo (0.11m x 7m) pole 0.95 5 Bamboo (0.05m x 6m) pole 0.60 6 Bamboo for rafter ( Ф3cm x 4m x 20) bunch 2.75 7 Splitted bamboo (2mx20 pieces) bunch 3.75 8 Wooden window m2 40.00 9 Wooden door m2 50.00 10 Round wooden pole for column ( Ф15cmx5m) pole 6.75 11 Round wooden pole for column ( Ф10cmx4m) pole 4.80 12 Round wooden pole for column ( Ф8cmx4m) pole 3.60 13 Round wooden pole for wall & roof ( Ф5cmx4m) pole 2.40 14 Concrete footing pole (1.2m) pole 2.90 15 Roofing thatch from Sbov (1.2m) sheet 0.15 16 Roofing thatch from Sleuk Thnort (1.2m) sheet 0.12 17 Zinc roofing sheet (0.3mm) m2 2.10 18 Hollow or solid clay brick brick 0.05 19 Burnt clay roofing tile tile 0.12 20 Cement (Mountain) bag 3.85 21 Sand m3 11.00 22 Stone (4x6cm) m3 8.50 23 Gravel (1x2cm) m3 17.00 24 Steel bar tone 580.00 25 Steel nail kg 1.50 26 Steel wire kg 1.50 27 Black plastic roofing sheet (1m x 2m) Kg 1.20

Note: (1) : Good timber is typical timber for construction of wooden house and in good shape. This kind of timber is consisted of Trach, Pcheck, Chunlin, Cheu Teal, etc. (2) : Mixed timber is construction timber, which don’t have good size and mixed with different kind of low quality construction wood such as Cheul Teal, Svay, Phdeak, etc.

3 NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

(3) : Sub-standard timber is low qualify construction timber without proper size for construction. It is piece of timber with short, curve, broken timber.

Practically, the villagers in the project area construct their house through two ways: 1.) by contracting with carpenter for labor cost and 2.) Providing food to relative and neighbor for help them in construction. The first method is applied when the house is large and complicated. The second method is for small and simple structure which semi-skilled labor and unskilled labor can do. According to the survey, the labor cost for carpenter to construct typical wooden house with zinc roof is about US$ 15 per square meter or 20% of total construction cost. The labor for skilled carpenter is US$ 6 a day and unskilled labor is US$ 2.75 a day. The labor cost for simple small house through food for work is ranking from US$ 1.25 to US$ 3.25 per square meter or about 7% to 23% of total construction cost, depending on type of the structure.

Transportation cost of construction material shares approximately 5% of construction cost depending on construction material type. That is because the subproject is located close proximity to Svay and Monkul Borei urban area.

Basing on the material prices above and typical structure of houses, vendor stall, chicken pen type, the price per square meter can be estimated as Table 3-1-2 below:

Table 3-1-2: List of the estimated price for structure element of Po Pi Deum UNIT COST NO STRUCTURE ELEMENT UNIT (US$) I Column 1 Concrete column and beam m3 250.00 2 Concrete footing pole (1.2m) pole 2.90 3 Timber column (15cm x 15cm) m 8.10 4 Timber column (12cm x 12cm) m 5.19 5 Round wooden column ( Ф 15cm) m 1.35 6 Round wooden column ( Ф 10cm) m 1.20 7 Round wooden column ( Ф 8cm) m 0.90 8 Round wooden column ( Ф 5cm) m 0.60 II Floor 1 Wooden board floor and timber beam structure m2 17.00 2 Wooden board floor & timber structure (mixed wood) m2 12.80 3 Bamboo floor m2 3.60 4 Cement mortar slab m2 9.50 III Wall 1 Brick wall with plaster and paint (10cm thickness) m2 17.00 2 Wooden wall with wooden structure m2 8.55 3 Wooden wall with wooden structure (mixed timber) m2 5.95 4 Bamboo-plastic wall with wooden structure m2 2.10 5 Thatch wall with wooden structure m2 1.60 IV Window and door 1 Wooden door m2 40.00 2 Wooden window m2 50.00 3 Thatch window with bamboo structure m2 1.70 V Roof 1 Tile roof with wooden structure m2 32.00 2 Wooden structure for zinc roof (good timber) m2 8.70 3 Wooden structure for zinc roof (mixed timber) m2 6.65 4 Wooden structure for thatch roof (mixed timber) m2 4.81 5 Wooden structure for thatch roof (mixed timber/bamboo) m2 3.70 6 Wooden structure for small thatch roof (mixed timber/bamboo) m2 1.50 7 Zinc roofing sheet m2 2.10

4 NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

8 Thatch m2 1.00 Note: The price for the structure element about is excluded labor cost.

Residential and Agricultural Land

The survey is conducted on 30 affected owners and 30 non affected owners in 7 affected villages, 3 FGDs meetings and 3 village leaders. The survey indicates that the prices of agricultural and residential land are diverse depending on its proximity to village, road and irrigation and depending on fertility and level of accessibility to the land.

Figure 3-1: Land use and land price map of Po Pi Deum

Residential land market is small because people in affected villages rarely sell or buy residential land in the village and demand from outside is almost none since early 2009.

5 NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

There are very few selling cases recently in each village. The price of the residential land in Po Pi Deum subproject is from current selling data and willing to buy and sell data from the survey. The price is varied from US$ 2.00 per square meter in Po Pi Deum, Pongror, Trang and Barttrang Thom villages to US$ 5.55 per square meter in close proximity to Mongkul Borey town (See Figure 3-1). This price is varied depending on the location of the land such as proximity to village roads, RN5, village and district centers and business opportunity locations. According to DMS data, the affected residential land is only located in Po Pi Deum village of Rohat Teuk commune. Therefore, the residence land price for compensation could be concluded with US$ 2.00 per square meter (See Figure 3-1).

The market of agricultural land is also small in the subproject area. People sell their agricultural land when they strongly need money to solve their family health issues, pay family debt and migrate to other place. According to selling record and the record of willingness to sell and to buy of AP and non AP, the land price of rice land in subproject neighborhood is rank from US$ 4,500 at Southern of Po Pi Deum village to US$ 6,800 per hectare in the close proximity region to NR5. The affected rice land in the DMS record is only situated along Secondary Canal. The land price is US$ 5,500 per hectare (See Figure 3-1). The result of the detail land price survey is indicated in the map below:

Perennial Crop and Tree

The survey is conducted on 10 affected land owners and 10 non-affected land owners of perennial crop and tree and 5 vegetable vendors in the villages. The mango, sugar palm, coconut, Teuk Doh Kor, longan, papaya, guava, jackfruit, bamboo, jumbolan, custard apple, banana, tamarind and other non-fruit trees are the affected trees which APs plant in the subproject. AH and the villagers in the area rarely sell their garden agriculture product to the village venders, but keeping for family usage and sharing among their neighbors.

The yield, price and compensation year of each affected trees is described in Table 3-1-3 as below:

Table 3-1-3: List of trees, yield, fruit price and compensation year in Po Pi Deum

Unit Year for Compen Yield/ Price/y No Type of tree QTY Unit Unit price Compen sation year ear ($) ($) sation rate ($) 1 Mango 1 tree 264 fruit 0.025 6.600 5 33.00 2 Sugar palm 1 tree - - - - 8 25.00 3 Coconut 1 tree 30 fruit 0.233 6.999 5 35.00 4 Teuk Doh Kor 1 tree 240 fruit 0.025 6.000 5 30.00 5 Longan 1 tree 12 kg 0.667 8.001 4 32.00 6 Papaya 1 tree 15 fruit 0.250 3.750 1 3.75 7 Guava 1 tree 200 fruit 0.008 1.500 3 4.50 8 Jackfruit 1 tree 8 fruit 1.334 10.668 3 32.00 9 Bamboo 1 thicket 16 shoot 0.208 3.332 3 10.00 10 Jambolan 1 tree 30 can 0.125 3.750 4 15.00 11 Custard apple 1 tree 40 fruit 0.063 2.500 2 5.00 12 Banana 1 tree 7 hand 0.250 1.750 1 1.75 13 Tamarind 1 tree - - - 5.000 5 25.00 14 Kraseing 1 tree 400 fruit 0.008 3.333 3 10.00 15 Others 1 tree - - - - - 5.00

Other trees, which do not produce fruit for food, will be compensated for US$ 5 per tree.

6 NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

3.1.2 Compensation Rates

Basing on the Table 3-1-1 to Table 3-1-3 and Figure 3-1 the compensation rate for Po Pi Dem subproject can be concluded as Table 3-1-4 below:

Table 3-1-4: Compensation Rate of Affected Asset of Po Pi Deum

NO TYPE OF AFFECTED ASSET UNIT UNIT PRICE REMARK (US$) I Structure 1 Wooden fence m 3.80 (1) 2 Vendor stall m2 5.00 (2) 3 Chicken pen m2 6.50 (3) 4 Small shop m2 25.00 (4) 5 Residential structure type 1 (wood) m2 40.00 (5) 6 Residential structure type 2 (wood) m2 65.00 (6) 7 Concrete building with single floor and tile roof m2 120.00 (7) II Land 1 Residential land m2 2.00 2 Rice land in command area m2 0.55 III Tree 1 Mango tree 33.00 2 Sugar palm tree 25.00 3 Coconut tree 35.00 4 Teuk Doh Kor tree 30.00 5 Longan tree 32.00 6 Papaya tree 3.75 7 Guava tree 4.50 8 Jackfruit tree 32.00 9 Bamboo thicket 10.00 10 Jambolan tree 15.00 11 Custard apple tree 5.00 12 Banana tree 1.75 13 Tamarind tree 25.00 14 Kraseing tree 10.00 15 Others (non fruit tree) tree 5.00 Note: (1) : The fence is made from wood (Krak) with15cm diameter, 1.8m height, 1.5m distance of pole and 5 lines of barbed wire. (2) : The vendor stall is made from round timber and mixed timber in column and structure with thatch roof. (3) : The chicken pen is made of round wooden and bamboo structure and thatch roofing sheet. (4) : The house is made from mixed timber in floor, wall and structure and zinc roofing sheet and small structure. (5) : The house is made from good timber in floor, wall and structure and zinc roofing sheet. (6) : The house is composed of cement motor slab, concrete column and beam, 10cm brick wall with 2 sides plaster and paint, wooden roof structure and tile roof

3.2 Anlong Svay subproject

Along Svay is one of four subprojects of NWISP in Pursat province. The subproject is located about 35 km Northwest of Pursat provincial town and approximately 10km to the Beung Khnar, district town of Bakan. The subproject is estimated to irrigate 795ha for supplementary irrigation scheme in the wet season. The new scheme is required to acquire rice and residential lands and fruit trees. Since there is no impact on structures, the replacement cost study on structure price is not included. However, two moveable rest stalls to be affected by the subproject are paid for labor to carry those stall back from the land acquired for the

7 NWISP/Replacement Cost Study subproject. According to the replacement cost survey, the labor for carrying the stall is 40000 Riels each and in USD is about $10 each.

3.2.1 Replacement Costs from Various Groups

Residential and Agricultural Land

The survey is conducted on 30 affected owners and 30 non affected owners in 8 affected villages, 4 FGDs meetings and 4 village leaders. The survey indicates that the prices of agricultural and residential land are diverse depending on its proximity to village, road and irrigation as well as fertility of the land. The explosion of land price bubble in the world, last year, affects on the agricultural and residential land price of the subproject. Land speculation is lower than last year about 30%. That affects on land demand and makes the price down between 20% and 40%, depending on attractiveness of each location and local demand.

8 NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

Figure 3-2: Land use and land price map of Anlong Svay

The survey found that the residential land price of the affected villages is from US$8,600 per ha to US$25,000 per ha and agricultural land price is varied betweenUS$2,250 per ha to US$2,750 per ha (See Figure 3-2).

Pnov village is the most remote and less accessibility village of the subproject villages where it is situated in the middle of rice field and connected to main commune road by small road. That makes the land prices the lowest of the subproject region with $8,600 per ha for residential land and US$2,250 per ha for agricultural land (See Figure 3-2).

The highest land prices are in Robaoh Reang village, where it is located closest proximity to Ou Ta Paong commune center and RN5. The residential land price is US$25,000 per ha and where agricultural land price are reported as US$2,750 per ha (See Figure 3-2).

Affected residential land is to be found in Phnov and Kampong Kdey village where the land price is US$8,600 and US$20,000 respectively (See Figure 3-2). Kampong Kdey village has residential land impact with the subproject three time larger than Phnov village. Thus, average land price for residential land compensation is US$14,300 per ha.

The DMS data reports that the construction of Secondary Drain 3 impact on 3 lots of affected Chamkar land and one pond in Kampong Kdey and Prasat villages. The affected Chamkar lands are located in undeveloped land next and behind the residential lot and have an average price of US$ 10,000 per ha. The affected pond is used to contain rain water for irrigating fruit trees. With project, the pond is not necessary and the pond owner is able to get water from the Drain.

From Pnov, remote village at the South to Robaoh Reang, proximity village to RN5, the rice land price is from US$2,250 to 2,750 per ha among affected zones of 7 villages. Therefore, the average rice land price of the 7 villages is US$2,500 per ha.

Perennial Crop and Tree Construction of the subproject will affect on 9 types of fruit trees such as mango, cashew, sugar palm, coconut, bamboo, jambolan, banana, tamarind, Krasang and others non fruit trees. Palm, jambolan and cashew are reported as first, second and third rank of high affected number, respectively, in the DMS. Most of the trees are affected by Secondary Drain 3 in Kampong Kdey village.

Among those trees, none of them are planted for commercializing. The fruit trees are for household use and sometime for sharing with neighbors in the village. For palm tree, because of lack of fire wood, villager abandoned producing sugar. Palm juice, fruit and leafs are the only benefit of the tree. The yield, price and compensation year of each affected trees is described in Table 3-2-1 as below:

Table 3-2-1: List of trees, yield, fruit price and compensation year in Anlong Svay Price/ Year for Compen Yield/ Unit No Type of tree QTY Unit Unit year Compens sation year price ($) ($) ation rate ($) 1 Mango 1 tree 200 fruit 0.025 5.000 5 25.00 2 Cashew 1 tree 6 kg 0.450 2.700 3 8.10 3 Sugar palm 1 tree - - - - 8 25.00 4 Coconut 1 tree 28 fruit 0.200 5.600 5 28.00 5 Teuk Doh Kor 1 tree 200 fruit 0.025 5.000 5 25.00 6 Papaya 1 tree 14 fruit 0.125 1.750 1 1.75 7 Guava 1 tree 180 fruit 0.005 0.900 3 2.70 8 Jackfruit 1 tree 7 fruit 1.191 8.334 3 25.00 9 Bamboo 1 thicket 20 shoot 0.125 2.500 3 7.50 10 Jambolan 1 tree 25 can 0.063 1.563 4 6.25 11 Custard apple 1 tree 35 fruit 0.050 1.750 2 3.50 12 Banana 1 tree 7 hand 0.200 1.400 1 1.40 13 Tamarind 1 tree 20 kg 0.200 4.000 5 20.00 9 14 Kraseing 1 tree 360 fruit 0.008 2.700 3 8.10 15 Others 1 tree - - - - - 5.00 NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

Other trees, which do not produce fruit for food, will be compensated for US$ 5 per tree.

3.2.2 Compensation Rates

Basing on the Table 3-2-1 and Figure 3-2 the compensation rate for Anlong Svay subproject can be concluded as Table 3-2-2 below:

Table 3-2-2: Compensation Rate of Affected Asset of Anlong Svay UNIT PRICE NO. TYPE OF AFFECTED ASSET UNIT (US$) REMARK I Land 1 Rice land m2 0.25 2Chamkar land m2 1.00 3 Residential land m2 1.43 II Strcutures 1 Labor for carrying moveable stall unit 10 II Tree 1Mango tree 25.00 2Cashew tree 8.10 3Sugar palm tree 25.00 4Coconut tree 28.00 5 Teuk Doh Kor tree 25.00 6Papaya tree 1.75 7Guava tree 2.70 8Jackfruit tree 25.00 9Bamboo thicket 7.50 10Jambolan tree 6.25 11 Custard apple tree 3.50 12Banana tree 1.40 13Tamarind tree 20.00 14Kraseing tree 8.10 15Others tree 5.00

3.3 Krouch Saeuch subproject

Krouch Saeuch is the second subproject of NWISP in Pursat province. The subproject is located close to Anlong Svay subproject and about 22 km Northwest of Pursat provincial town, 8km to the Beung Khnar, district town of Bakan and few kilometers from Khnar Totueng and Trapeang Chong commune centers. The subproject is estimated to irrigate 1,000ha for supplementary irrigation scheme in the wet season. The new scheme is required to acquire rice and residential lands, structures and fruit trees.

3.3.1 Replacement Costs from Various Groups

Houses and Other Structures

The survey of the construction materials is conducted on four carpenter groups in Krouch Saeuch subproject and three construction material shops in Bakan district and Pursat provincial town. The synthesis of the material prices is reported in the Table 3-3-1 as below:

10 NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

Table 3-3-1: List of relevant construction material of Krouch Saeuch

NO CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS UNIT UNIT PRICE REMARK (US$) 1 Good timber m3 310.00 (1) 2 Mixed timber m3 250.00 (2) 3 Sub-standard timber m3 190.48 (3) 4 Bamboo (0.11m x 7m) pole 0.83 5 Bamboo (0.05m x 6m) pole 0.52 6 Bamboo for rafter ( Ф3cm x 4m x 20) bunch 2.38 7 Splitted bamboo (2mx20 pieces) bunch 1.43 8 Wooden window m2 32.00 9 Wooden door m2 40.00 10 Round wooden pole for column ( Ф15cmx5m) pole 5.95 11 Round wooden pole for column ( Ф10cmx4m) pole 4.17 12 Round wooden pole for column ( Ф8cmx4m) pole 3.10 13 Round wooden pole for wall & roof ( Ф5cmx4m) pole 1.90 14 Concrete footing pole (1.2m) pole 3.00 15 Roofing thatch from Sbov (1.2m) sheet 0.14 16 Roofing thatch from Sleuk Thnort (1.2m) sheet 0.12 17 Zinc roofing sheet (0.3mm) m2 2.10 18 Hollow or solid clay brick brick 0.04 19 Burnt clay roofing tile tile 0.12 20 Cement (Mountain) bag 3.85 21 Sand m3 6.00 22 Stone (4x6cm) m3 10.00 23 Gravel (1x2cm) m3 16.00 24 Steel bar tone 580.00 25 Steel nail kg 1.50 26 Steel wire kg 1.50 27 Barbed wire roll 30.00 28 Black plastic roofing sheet (1m x 2m) Kg 1.25

Note: (1) : Good timber is typical timber for construction of wooden house and in good shape. This kind of timber is consisted of Trach, Pcheck, Chunlin, Cheu Teal, etc. (2) : Mixed timber is construction timber, which don’t have good size and mixed with different kind of low quality construction wood such as Cheul Teal, Svay, Phdeak, etc. (3) : Sub-standard timber is low qualify construction timber without proper size for construction. It is piece of timber with short, curve, broken timber.

The survey shows that the labor cost for carpenter to construct typical wooden house with zinc roof is about US$ 15 per square meter or approximately 20% of total construction cost. The labor for skilled carpenter is US$ 6 a day and unskilled labor is US$ 2.75 a day. The labor cost for simple small house through food for work is ranking from US$ 1.25 to US$ 3.25 per square meter or about 7% to 23% of total construction cost, depending on type of the structure.

Transportation cost of construction material shares approximately 8% of construction cost depending on construction material type. That is because the subproject is located far from Pursat provincial town.

Basing on the material prices above and typical structure of houses, vendor stall, chicken pen type, the price per square meter can be estimated as Table 3-3-2 below:

11 NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

Table 3-3-2: List of the estimated price for structure element of Krouch Saeuch UNIT COST NO STRUCTURE ELEMENT UNIT (US$) I Column 1 Concrete column and beam m3 220.00 2 Concrete footing pole (1.2m) pole 3.00 3 Timber column (15cm x 15cm) m 6.98 4 Timber column (12cm x 12cm) m 4.47 5 Round wooden column ( Ф 15cm) m 1.19 6 Round wooden column ( Ф 10cm) m 1.04 7 Round wooden column ( Ф 8cm) m 0.78 8 Round wooden column ( Ф 5cm) m 0.48 II Floor 1 Wooden board floor and timber beam structure m2 14.62 2 Wooden board floor & timber structure (mixed wood) m2 11.00 3 Bamboo floor m2 3.15 4 Cement mortar slab m2 9.00 III Wall 1 Brick wall with plaster and paint (10cm thickness) m2 15.80 2 Wooden wall with wooden structure m2 7.36 3 Wooden wall with wooden structure (mixed timber) m2 5.18 4 Bamboo-plastic wall with wooden structure m2 2.00 5 Thatch wall with wooden structure m2 1.50 IV Window and door 1 Wooden door m2 32.00 2 Wooden window m2 40.00 3 Thatch window with bamboo structure m2 1.60 V Roof 1 Tile roof with wooden structure m2 28.80 2 Wooden structure for zinc roof (good timber) m2 7.83 3 Wooden structure for zinc roof (mixed timber) m2 5.73 4 Wooden structure for thatch roof (mixed timber) m2 4.81 5 Wooden structure for thatch roof (mixed timber/bamboo) m2 3.30 6 Wooden structure for small thatch roof (mixed timber/bamboo) m2 1.30 7 Zinc roofing sheet m2 2.10 8 Thatch m2 0.95 Note: The price for the structure element about is excluded labor cost.

Residential and Agricultural Land

The survey is conducted on 30 affected owners and 30 non affected owners in 10 affected villages, 4 FGDs meetings and 5 village leaders. The survey indicates that the prices of agricultural and residential land are also diverse depending on its proximity to village, road and irrigation as well as fertility of the land. The explosion of land price bubble in the world, last year, affects as well on the agricultural and residential land price of the subproject. Land speculation is lower than last year about 30%. That affects on land demand and makes the price down between 30%, depending on attractiveness of each location and local demand.

The survey found that the residential land price of the affected villages is from US$15,000 per ha in Krouch Saeuch village to US$45,000 per ha in Snay Toul and Thmei village and agricultural land price is varied between US$2,600 per ha in Bakan to US$3,400 per ha in Snay Toul and Thmei (See Figure 3-3).

Krouch Saeuch village is the less accessibility village of the subproject villages because of

12 NWISP/Replacement Cost Study poor road condition. That makes the land prices the lowest price of the subproject region with $15,000 per ha for residential land. However, the agricultural land in the village is almost middle price among subproject affected villages, US$3,200 per ha. The lowest agricultural land price, US$2,600 per ha, is in Bakan village, hence the land is high and lack of flooded water for rice cultivation (See Figure 3-3).

The land price in Snay Toul and Thmei villages is the highest price of the subproject area, since the location is proximity to RN5. The survey indicates that the residential land price of the villages is US$45,000 per ha and the agricultural land price is US$3,400 per ha ( Fig.3-3).

Affected residential land is in Kab Kralanh and Bakan villages where the Embankment will construct there. The residential land price for the affected area is US$16,000 per ha, which is use as compensation rate (See Figure 3-3).

The Embankment also affected on Chamkar land where is located in low and undeveloped land near residential land of Bakan village and villagers use for planting vegetable and fruit trees. The Chamkar land price in this area is US$11,000 per ha (See Figure 3-3).

The land price of the rice land in the affected areas is from US$2,600 to US$3,400 per ha, depending on the location. Stueng Kambot, Snay Toul, Phteas Sla and Kab Kralanh villages of 10 affected villages are shared 73% of affected rice land and the villages are most, second, third and fourth rank of affected land of the subproject. The rice land price can be concluded to US$3,000 per ha.

Figure 3-3: Land use and land price map of Krouch Saeuch

Perennial Crop and Tree

The subproject will affect on 15 types of fruit trees such as mango, sugar palm, coconut, Teuk Doh Kor, cashew, papaya, guava, citrus, jackfruit, bamboo, Jambolan, custard apple, banana, tamarind, Krasang and others non fruit trees. Jambolan, mango, coconut, banana, citrus, Teuk Doh Kor and palm are dominant in the DMS record. But the important fruit trees are coconut, Teuk Doh Kor, banana, jackfruit and mango. Most of the trees are affected by

13 NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

Main Canal and Embankment in Kab Kralahn and Bakan villages.

Among those trees, none of them are planted for commercializing. The fruit trees are for household use and sometime for sharing with neighbors in the village. For palm tree, because of lack of fire wood, villager abandoned producing sugar. Palm juice, fruit and leafs are the only benefit of the tree. The yield, price and compensation year of each affected trees is described in Table 3-3-3 as below:

Table 3-3-3: List of trees, yield, fruit price and compensation year in Krouch Saeuch

Unit Year of Compe Price/ No Type of tree QTY Unit Yield/ year Unit price Compen nsation year ($) ($) sation rate ($) 1 Mango 1 tree 200 fruit 0.025 5.000 5 25.00 2 Cashew 1 tree 6 kg 0.450 2.700 3 8.10 3 Sugar palm 1 tree - - - - 8 25.00 4 Coconut 1 tree 28 fruit 0.200 5.600 5 28.00 5 Teuk Doh Kor 1 tree 200 fruit 0.025 5.000 5 25.00 6 Papaya 1 tree 14 fruit 0.125 1.750 1 1.75 7 Guava 1 tree 180 fruit 0.005 0.900 3 2.70 8 Citrus 1 tree 200 fruit 0.009 1.750 2 3.50 9 Jackfruit 1 tree 7 fruit 1.191 8.334 3 25.00 10 Bamboo 1 thicket 20 shoot 0.125 2.500 3 7.50 11 Jambolan 1 tree 25 can 0.063 1.563 4 6.25 12 Custard apple 1 tree 35 fruit 0.050 1.750 2 3.50 13 Banana 1 tree 7 hand 0.200 1.400 1 1.40 14 Tamarind 1 tree 20 kg 0.200 4.000 5 20.00 15 Kraseing 1 tree 360 fruit 0.008 2.700 3 8.10 16 Others 1 tree - - - - - 5.00

Other trees, which do not produce fruit for food, will be compensated for US$ 5 per tree.

3.3.2 Compensation Rates

Basing on the Table 3-3-1 to Table 3-3-3 and Figure 3-1 the compensation rate for Krouch Saeuch subproject can be concluded as Table 3-3-4 below:

Table 3-3-4: Compensation Rate of Affected Asset of Krouch Saeuch NO TYPE OF AFFECTED ASSET UNIT UNIT REMARK PRICE (US$) I Structure

1 Wooden fence M 3.5 -1

2 Vendor stall M2 4.5 -2

3 Chicken pen M2 5.6 -3

4 Residential structure type 1 (wood) M2 35 -4

14 NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

5 Residential structure type 2 (wood) M2 56 -5

6 Concrete building with single floor and tile roof M2 115 -6

7 Pumping well well 800

II Land

1 Residential land M2 1.6

2 Chamkar land M2 1.1

3 Rice land in command area M2 0.3

III Tree

1 Mango tree 25 2 Cashew tree 8.1 3 Sugar palm tree 25 4 Coconut tree 28 5 Teuk Doh Kor tree 25 6 Papaya tree 1.75 7 Guava tree 2.7 8 Citrus tree 3.5 9 Jackfruit tree 25 10 Bamboo thicket 7.5 11 Jambolan tree 6.25 12 Custard apple tree 3.5 13 Banana tree 1.4 14 Tamarind tree 20 15 Kraseing tree 8.1 16 Others (non fruit tree) tree 5

Note: (7) : The fence is made from wood (Krak) with15cm diameter, 1.8m height, 1.5m distance of pole and 5 lines of barbed wire. (8) : The vendor stall is made from round timber and mixed timber in column and structure with thatch roof. (9) : The chicken pen is made of round wooden and bamboo structure and thatch roofing sheet. (10) : The house is made from mixed timber in floor, wall and structure and zinc roofing sheet and small structure. (11) : The house is made from good timber in floor, wall and structure and zinc roofing sheet. (12) : The house is composed of cement motor slab, concrete column and beam, 10cm brick wall with 2 sides plaster and paint, wooden roof structure and tile roof

3.4 Tram Mneash subproject

15 NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

Tram Mneash is the third subproject of NWISP in Pursat province. The subproject is located 15 km Southeast of Pursat provincial town and 6km from Tnaot Chum commune center. The subproject is estimated to irrigate 1,100ha for supplementary irrigation scheme in the wet season and is required to acquire rice and residential lands and fruit trees.

3.4.1 Replacement Costs from Various Groups

Houses and Other Structures

The survey of the construction materials is conducted on carpenter groups in the area parallel with Kouch Noup subproject. Since, the construction materials prices are similar to and the locations of construction material shops are for both Tram Mneash and Kouch Noup subprojects, the compensation rate for structures of this subproject will be the same as the rates for Kouch Noup subproject. The synthesis of the material prices is reported in the Table 3-5-2 below:

Residential and Agricultural Land

The survey is conducted on 30 affected owners and 30 non affected owners in 8 affected villages and 5 village leaders. The survey indicates that the prices of agricultural and residential land are also varied from one village to an others and the collapse of real-estate market also affected on the property price in the subproject region.

The land use of command area of the subproject is covered majority by paddy field, by abandoned field covered by shrub, shrub land, Chamkar and residential land. Then the command area surrounded by abandoned field covered by shrub, shrubland, grassland, deciduous forest, evergreen broad leafed forest and cleared forest.

The survey found that the residential land price of the affected villages is from US$6,500 per ha in Boeng Veal village to US$12,500 per ha in Tbaeng Chrum village and agricultural land price is varied between US$2,400 per ha in Boeng Veal to US$3,500 per ha in Tbaeng Chrum village (See Figure 3-4).

Beong Veal village is sited 10km South of RN5 and the most remote village of the subproject where the village is close to shrubland, abandoned field covered by shrub and deciduous forest. The residential land prices is US$6,500 per ha and the paddy land is US$2,400 per ha. The land price in Tbaeng Chrum village is the highest land price of the subproject area, since the location is proximity to RN5. The survey indicates that the residential land price of the village is US$12,500 per ha and the paddy land price is US$3,500 per ha ( Fig.3-4).

The DMS statistic shows that Chheuteal, Kandal, Dang Teuk Leach, Chambak Thum, Saen Pen and Tbaeng Chrum villages have affected residential land and the average residential land price of the six affected villages is US$10,300 per ha.

Chamkar land is divided into two types in the subproject: 1./ Chamkar land behind residential lot, within 60 to 200m from village road where villager can extend their residence and 2./ Chamkar land far from residential land and road where is located close to forest. The first Chamkar land have average price of US$8,100 per ha and the second Chamkar land is in Cheu Teal village and has a price of US$1,500 per ha (See Figure 3-4).

According to the DMS data, the subproject affects on rice land of 7 villages, Boeng Veal, Chheu Teal, Saen Pen, Tbaeng Chrum, Kandal, Dang Teuk Leach and Chambak Thum. The average rice land price of those villages is US$3,000 per ha.

16 NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

Figure 3-4: Land use and land price map of Tram Mneash

Perennial Crop and Tree

The subproject will affect on 15 types of fruit trees such as mango, sugar palm, coconut, Teuk Doh Kor, cashew, papaya, guava, citrus, jackfruit, bamboo, Jambolan, custard apple, banana, tamarind, Krasang, orange, Longan and others non fruit trees. Jambolan, mango, coconut, banana, citrus, Teuk Doh Kor and palm are dominant in the DMS record. But the important fruit trees are coconut, Teuk Doh Kor, banana, jackfruit and mango. Most of the trees are affected by Main Canal and Embankment in Kab Kralahn and Bakan villages.

Among those trees, none of them are planted for commercializing. The fruit trees are for household use and sometime for sharing with neighbors in the village. For palm tree, because of lack of fire wood, villager abandoned producing sugar. Palm juice, fruit and leafs are the only benefit of the tree. The yield, price and compensation year of each affected trees is described in Table 3-3-3 as below:

17 NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

Table 3-4-3: List of trees, yield, fruit price and compensation year in Tram Mneash

Other trees, which do not produce fruit for food, will be compensated for US$ 5 per tree.

Unit Year for Compens Yield/ Price/ No Type of tree QTY Unit Unit price Compens ation rate year year ($) ($) ation ($) 1 Mango 1 tree 200 fruit 0.025 5.000 5 25.00 2 Cashew 1 tree 6 kg 0.450 2.700 3 8.10 3 Sugar palm 1 tree 15 kg 0.250 3.750 8 30.00 4 Coconut 1 tree 28 fruit 0.200 5.600 5 28.00 5 Teuk Doh Kor 1 tree 200 fruit 0.025 5.000 5 25.00 6 Papaya 1 tree 16 fruit 0.125 2.000 1 2.00 7 Guava 1 tree 200 fruit 0.005 1.000 3 3.00 8 Citrus 1 tree 175 fruit 0.010 1.750 2 3.50 9 Jackfruit 1 tree 8 fruit 1.250 10.000 3 30.00 10 Bamboo 1 thicket 18 shoot 0.139 2.502 3 7.50 11 Jambolan 1 tree 28 can 0.063 1.750 4 7.00 12 Custard apple 1 tree 55 fruit 0.037 2.008 2 4.00 13 Banana 1 tree 7 hand 0.214 1.496 1 1.50 14 Tamarind 1 tree 22 kg 0.200 4.400 5 22.00 15 Kraseing 1 tree 445 fruit 0.008 3.338 3 10.00 16 Orange 1 tree 150 fruit 0.025 3.750 5 18.80 17 Longan 1 tree 15 kg 0.500 7.500 4 30.00 18 Others 1 tree - - - - - 5.00

3.4.2 Compensation Rates

Basing on the Table 3-4-1 to Table 3-4-3 and Figure 3-4 the compensation rate for Tram Mneash subproject can be concluded as Table 3-3-4 below:

Table 3-4-4: Compensation Rate of Affected Asset of Tram Mneash

NO TYPE OF AFFECTED ASSET UNIT UNIT PRICE REMARK (US$) I Land 1 Residential land m2 1.15 2 Chamkar land m2 0.25 3 Rice land in command area m2 0.30 II Tree 1 Mango tree 25.00 2 Cashew tree 8.10 3 Sugar palm tree 30.00 4 Coconut tree 28.00 5 Teuk Doh Kor tree 25.00 6 Papaya tree 2.00 7 Guava tree 3.00 8 Citrus tree 3.50 9 Jackfruit tree 30.00 10 Bamboo thicket 7.50 11 Jambolan tree 7.00 12 Custard apple tree 4.00 13 Banana tree 1.50 14 Tamarind tree 22.00

18 NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

15 Kraseing tree 10.00 16 Orange tree 18.80 17 Longan tree 30.00 18 Others tree 5.00

3.5 Kouch Noup subproject

Krouch Saeuch is the fourth subproject of NWISP in Pursat province. The subproject is located close to Anlong Svay subproject and about 38 km Southeast of Pursat provincial town, 5km to Kakor district town. The subproject is estimated to irrigate 850ha for supplementary irrigation scheme in the wet season. The new scheme is required to acquire rice and residential lands, structures and fruit trees.

3.5.1 Replacement Costs from Various Groups

Houses and Other Structures

The survey of the construction materials is conducted on four carpenter groups in Kouch Noup subproject and three construction material shops in Krakor district and Pursat provincial town. The synthesis of the material prices is reported in the Table 3-5-1 as below:

Table 3-5-1: List of relevant construction material of Kouch Noup

NO CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS UNIT UNIT PRICE REMARK (US$) 1 Good timber m3 300.00 (1) 2 Mixed timber m3 250.00 (2) 3 Sub-standard timber m3 190.00 (3) 4 Bamboo (0.11m x 7m) pole 0.75 5 Bamboo (0.05m x 6m) pole 0.45 6 Bamboo for rafter ( Ф3cm x 4m x 20) bunch 2.00 7 Splitted bamboo (2mx20 pieces) bunch 1.30 8 Wooden window m2 32.00 9 Wooden door m2 40.00 10 Round wooden pole for column ( Ф15cmx5m) pole 5.90 11 Round wooden pole for column ( Ф10cmx4m) pole 4.15 12 Round wooden pole for column ( Ф8cmx4m) pole 3.08 13 Round wooden pole for wall & roof ( Ф5cmx4m) pole 1.60 14 Concrete footing pole (1.2m) pole 3.00 15 Roofing thatch from Sbov (1.2m) sheet 0.14 16 Roofing thatch from Sleuk Thnort (1.2m) sheet 0.12 17 Zinc roofing sheet (0.3mm) m2 2.10 18 Hollow or solid clay brick brick 0.04 19 Burnt clay roofing tile tile 0.12 20 Cement (Mountain) bag 3.85 21 Sand m3 6.00 22 Stone (4x6cm) m3 10.00 23 Gravel (1x2cm) m3 16.00 24 Steel bar tone 580.00 25 Steel nail kg 1.50 26 Steel wire kg 1.50 27 Black plastic roofing sheet (1m x 2m) Kg 1.25

Note: (1) : Good timber is typical timber for construction of wooden house and in good shape. This kind of timber is consisted of Trach, Pcheck, Chunlin, Cheu Teal, etc.

19 NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

(2) : Mixed timber is construction timber, which don’t have good size and mixed with different kind of low quality construction wood such as Cheul Teal, Svay, Phdeak, etc. (3) : Sub-standard timber is low qualify construction timber without proper size for construction. It is piece of timber with short, curve, broken timber.

The survey shows that the labor cost for carpenter to construct typical wooden house with zinc roof is about US$ 15 per square meter or approximately 20% of total construction cost. The labor for skilled carpenter is US$ 6 a day and unskilled labor is US$ 2.75 a day. The labor cost for simple small house through food for work is ranking from US$ 1.25 to US$ 3.25 per square meter or about 7% to 23% of total construction cost, depending on type of the structure.

Transportation cost of construction material shares approximately 8% of construction cost depending on construction material type. That is because the subproject is located far from Pursat provincial town.

Basing on the material prices above and typical structure of houses, vendor stall, chicken pen type, the price per square meter can be estimated as Table 3-5-2 below:

Table 3-5-2: List of the estimated price for structure element of Kouch Noup UNIT COST NO STRUCTURE ELEMENT UNIT (US$) I Column 1 Concrete column and beam m3 220.00 2 Concrete footing pole (1.2m) pole 3.00 3 Small shop m2 15.00 4 Timber column (15cm x 15cm) m 6.75 5 Timber column (12cm x 12cm) m 4.32 6 Round wooden column ( Ф 15cm) m 1.18 7 Round wooden column ( Ф 10cm) m 1.00 8 Round wooden column ( Ф 8cm) m 0.77 9 Round wooden column ( Ф 5cm) m 0.40 II Floor 1 Wooden board floor and timber beam structure m2 14.55 2 Wooden board floor & timber structure (mixed wood) m2 11.00 3 Bamboo floor m2 3.15 4 Cement mortar slab m2 9.00 III Wall 1 Brick wall with plaster and paint (10cm thickness) m2 15.80 2 Wooden wall with wooden structure m2 7.32 3 Wooden wall with wooden structure (mixed timber) m2 5.18 4 Bamboo-plastic wall with wooden structure m2 1.95 5 Thatch wall with wooden structure m2 1.50 IV Window and door 1 Wooden door m2 32.00 2 Wooden window m2 40.00 3 Thatch window with bamboo structure m2 1.55 V Roof 1 Tile roof with wooden structure m2 28.65 2 Wooden structure for zinc roof (good timber) m2 7.78 3 Wooden structure for zinc roof (mixed timber) m2 5.73 4 Wooden structure for thatch roof (mixed timber) m2 4.81 5 Wooden structure for thatch roof (mixed timber/bamboo) m2 3.10 6 Wooden structure for small thatch roof (mixed timber/bamboo) m2 1.10 7 Zinc roofing sheet m2 2.10 8 Thatch m2 0.95

20 NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

Note: The price for the structure element about is excluded labor cost.

Residential and Agricultural Land

The survey is conducted on 30 affected owners and 30 non affected owners in 10 affected villages, 3 village leaders. The survey indicates that the prices of agricultural and residential land are also different from one village to another, depending on its proximity to village, road and irrigation as well as fertility of the land. At present, there are lack of land speculator, because of economic crisis and the price down between 30%, depending on attractiveness of each location and local demand.

The survey found that the residential land price of the affected villages is from US$11,000 per ha in Kralanh village to US$24,500 per ha in Phsar Trach village and agricultural land price is varied between US$1,600 per ha in Kralanh to US$4,000 per ha in Phsar Trach village (See Figure 3-5).

Kralanh village is the distant village of the subproject and is enclosed by woodlands, scatter trees, shrublands, bamboo and secondary forest. The paddy land prices is US$1,600 per ha for remote field and residential land price is US$11,000 per ha for the land along the village road (See Figure 3-5).

Phsar Trach village is the village where is situated close proximity to Krakor district town and RN5. The land price in village is the highest price, US$24,500 per ha for the residential land and US$4,000 per ha for the agricultural land (See Figure 3-5).

Affected residential land is Kralanh village where the Main Canal and Secondary Canal path through. The residential land price for the affected area is US$11,000 per ha, which is use as compensation rate (See Figure 3-5).

The construction of Main Canal and Dam also affected on Chamkar land of Kralanh village where villagers use for planting vegetable and fruit trees. The land is proximity to shrubland and woodland, which has a price of US$1,500 per ha. The compensation rate for Chamkar land in this area should be US$1,500 per ha (See Figure 3-5).

The affected rice land is only in Kralanh village where the rice land price is US$1,600, in South end to US$2,200 per ha, proximity to road and village center (See Figure 3-5). The average rice land price can be concluded to US$1,900 per ha.

21 NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

Figure 3-5: Land use and land price map of Kouch Noup

Perennial Crop and Tree

The subproject will affect on 9 types of fruit trees such as mango, sugar palm, coconut, papaya, guava, bamboo, jambolan, tamarind, Kraseing and others non fruit trees. Jambolan, mango and palm are dominant affected trees in the DMS record.

The fruit trees are used for household consumption and sharing with relative and neighbors. For palm tree, some villager still produces sugar because of availibity of fire wood in the near forest. The yield, price and compensation year of each affected trees is described in Table 3- 5-3 as below:

Table 3-5-3: List of trees, yield, fruit price and compensation year in Kouch Noup

22 NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

Other trees, which do not produce fruit for food, will be compensated for US$ 5 per tree. Unit Year for Compens Yield/ Price/ No Type of tree QTY Unit Unit price Compens ation rate year year ($) ($) ation ($) 1 Mango 1 tree 200 fruit 0.025 5.000 5 25.00 2 Sugar palm 1 tree 15 kg 0.250 3.750 8 30.00 3 Coconut 1 tree 28 fruit 0.200 5.600 5 28.00 4 Teuk Doh Kor 1 tree 200 fruit 0.025 5.000 5 25.00 5 Papaya 1 tree 16 fruit 0.125 2.000 1 2.00 6 Guava 1 tree 200 fruit 0.005 1.000 3 3.00 7 Citrus 1 tree 175 fruit 0.010 1.750 2 3.50 8 Jackfruit 1 tree 8 fruit 1.250 10.000 3 30.00 9 Bamboo 1 thicket 18 shoot 0.139 2.502 3 7.50 10 Jambolan 1 tree 28 can 0.063 1.750 4 7.00 11 Custard apple 1 tree 55 fruit 0.037 2.008 2 4.00 12 Banana 1 tree 7 hand 0.214 1.496 1 1.50 13 Tamarind 1 tree 22 kg 0.200 4.400 5 22.00 14 Kraseing 1 tree 445 fruit 0.008 3.338 3 10.00 15 Others 1 tree - - - - - 5.00

3.5.2 Compensation Rates

Basing on the Table 3-5-1 to Table 3-5-3 and Figure 3-5 the compensation rate for Kouch Noup subproject can be concluded as Table 3-5-4 below:

Table 3-5-4: Compensation Rate of Affected Asset of Kouch Noup

NO TYPE OF AFFECTED ASSET UNIT UNIT PRICE REMARK (US$) I Structure 1 Wooden fence m 2.80 (1) 2 Vendor stall m2 4.00 (2) 3 Chicken pen m2 5.10 (3) 4 Residential structure type 1 (wood) m2 31.00 (4) 5 Residential structure type 2 (wood) m2 53.00 (5) 6 Concrete building with single floor and tile roof m2 115.00 (6) II Land 1 Residential land m2 1.10 2 Chamkar land m2 0.15 3 Rice land in command area m2 0.19

III Tree 1 Mango tree 25.00 2 Sugar palm tree 30.00 3 Coconut tree 28.00 4 Teuk Doh Kor tree 25.00 5 Papaya tree 2.00 6 Guava tree 3.00 7 Citrus tree 3.50 8 Jackfruit tree 30.00 9 Bamboo thicket 7.50 10 Jambolan tree 7.00 11 Custard apple tree 4.00 12 Banana tree 1.50

23 NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

13 Tamarind tree 22.00 14 Kraseing tree 10.00 15 Others (non fruit tree) tree 5.00

Note: (1) : The fence is made from wood (Krak) with15cm diameter, 1.8m height, 1.5m distance of pole and 5 lines of barbed wire. (2) : The vendor stall is made from round timber and mixed timber in column and structure with thatch roof. (3) : The chicken pen is made of round wooden and bamboo structure and thatch roofing sheet. (4) : The house is made from mixed timber in floor, wall and structure and zinc roofing sheet and small structure. (5) : The house is made from good timber in floor, wall and structure and zinc roofing sheet. (6) : The house is composed of cement motor slab, concrete column and beam, 10cm brick wall with 2 sides plaster and paint, wooden roof structure and tile roof

24 NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

REPLACEMENT COST QUESTIONNAIRES

25 NWISP/Replacement Cost Study kMrgbBa¢IsMnYr sMrab;GegáttMéldIFøI nigdMNaM eyIg´CaRkumRbwkSarbs;RksYgFnFanTwk nig]tuniym nigFnaKaGPivDÆn_GasIu esñIrsMu[mkeFVIsMPas sMrg;Tinñ½y sMrab;erob cMEpnkar edaHRsay plb:HBal;dIFøI pÞHsMEbg RTBüsm,tþ i nigdMNaMepSg² sMrab;GnuKMeragRbB½n§eRsacRsB>>>>>>>>. kic©sMPasenH manbMNgcg; sikSaGMBI GRtatMélsMParH dMNaM nigRTBsm,tþi nig Rsg;ykBt’manepSgmYycMnYneTot rbs;RKYsarEdlTTYlrgplb:HBal; edaysarKMeragenH. dUcenH kartb;sMPasn_rbs; elakGñk mansarHsMxan; nigman GtßRbeyaCn_Nas; sMrab;elakGñk nigkareFVIEpnkar edaHRsayplb:HBal;enH. GñktbsMPasn_CaGñk³ == 1> mansMNg;b:HBal;edaysarKMerag ¼ 2> mandIlMenAdæanb:HBal;edaysarKMerag 3> mandIERsb:HBal;edaysarKMerag ¼ 4> mandIcMkarb:HBal;edaysarKMerag 5> mandMNaMb:HBal;edaysarKMerag ¼ 6> KµanGVIb:HBal;edaysarKMerageT = = _ =Bt’manTUeTA elxkUd ³ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> éf¶TI>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Ex>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>qñaM2009 eQµaHGñksMPasn_³>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> htßelxa>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1>1>1> eQµaHPUmi³ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>XuM>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rsuk>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2>2>2>k¼k¼k¼ eQµaHGñktbsMPasn_³>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> x¼x¼x¼ =ePT³ 1> Rbus ¼ 2> RsI K¼K¼K¼Gayu³>>>>>>>>>>>qñaMK¼ X¼X¼X¼ TMnak;TMngkñúgRKYsar³ 1> emRKYsar¼ 2> smaCikrkcMNUl[RKYsar¼ 3>mnusSkñúgbnÞúk = ggg¼g¼¼¼ elxTUrs½BÞ³ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> = = _=Bt’mansþIBITIpSardIFøI 1>1>1> etIGñkmandMNwgGMBIkarlk;dUrdIFIø enAtMbn;enHb¤eT? 1> dwg ¼ 2> mindwg 2>2>2> ebIdwg etIsUmGñkeqøIsMnYredIm,IbMeBjtaragxageRkam. lr eQµaHGñkTij nigGñklk; elxTUrs½BÞ RbePTdI TMhMdI tMél ¼ht 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

26 NWISP/Replacement Cost Study 3>3>3> ebIRKYsarGñkmanfvikarRKb;RKan etItMéldIéføb:unµanGñkKitfacg;Tij? lr RbePTdI TMhMdI tMél ¼ht 1 dIERskñúg Gag 2 dIERstMbn;eRkAGag 3 dIERsEk,rPUmi 4 dIéRB 5 dIlMenAdæan 4>4>4> ebIRKYsarGñkcg;lk; etItMéldIéføb:unµanGñkKitfacg;lk;? lr RbePTdI TMhMdI tMél ¼ht 1 dIERskñúgGag 2 dIERstMbn;eRkAGag 3 dIERsEk,rPUmi 4 dIéRB 5 dIlMenAdæan

_=Bt’mansþIBITinñpldMNaM nigTIpSarplitplksikmµ 1>1>1> cUreqøIysMnYrdUcteTAenHedIm,IbMeBjtaragxageRkamenH. lr RbePTdMNaM Ékta TinñplKitCaÉkta tMéllk;ecj 1 sVay 2 Etñat 3 Xñúr 4 cnÞI 5 RkUcqµar 6 RkUceBaFisat; 7 eTob 8 Eck 9 Lðúg 10 RksaMg 11 dUg 12 RBIg

27 NWISP/Replacement Cost Study 13 GMBil 14 RtEbk 15 TwkedaHeKa 16 Emon

2>2>2> etIRKYsarGñkykplitpldMNaM eTAlk;ÉNa? 1>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3>3>3> etIRKYsarGñkmandMNaMGVIxøHEdlmankt;RtakñúgbBa¢Iplb:HBal;edaysarKMerag? 1>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4>4>4> dMNaMNaxøHkñúgPUmiEdllicTwkmYyryHEtminbNþal[gab;edIm? 1>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 10>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

28 NWISP/Replacement Cost Study kMrgbBa¢IsMnYr sMrab;GegáttMélsMParHsMNg; eyIg´CaRkumRbwkSarbs;RksYgFnFanTwk nig]tuniym nigFnaKaGPivDÆn_GasIu esñIrsMu[mkeFVIsMPas sMrg;Tinñ½y sMrab;erob cMEpnkar edaHRsay plb:HBal;dIFøI pÞHsMEbg RTBüsm,tþ i nigdMNaMepSg² sMrab;GnuKMeragRbB½n§eRsacRsB …. kic©sMPasenH manbMNgcg; sikSaGMBI GRtatMélsMParH dMNaM nigRTBsm,tþi nig Rsg;ykBt’manepSgmYycMnYneTot rbs;RKYsarEdlTTYlrgplb:HBal; edaysarKMeragenH. dUcenH kartb;sMPasn_rbs; elakGñk mansarHsMxan; nigman GtßRbeyaCn_Nas; sMrab;elakGñk nigkareFVIEpnkar edaHRsayplb:HBal;enH.

GñktbsMPasn_Ca³ CaGñkem:Akarsasg;sMNg; = _ =Bt’manTUeTA elxkUd ³ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> éf¶TI>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Ex>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>qñaM2009 eQµaHGñksMPasn_³>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> htßelxa>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1>1>1> eQµaHPUmi³ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> XuM>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rsuk>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2>2>2>k¼k¼k¼ eQµaHGñktbsMPasn_³>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> x¼x¼x¼ =ePT³ 1> Rbus ¼ 2> RsI K¼K¼K¼Gayu³>>>>>>>>>>>qñaMK¼ XXX¼X¼¼¼ elxTUrs½BÞ³ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> = = _=Bt’mansþIBIsMPar³sMNg; 1>1>1> taragsMParHsMNg;EdleRbIR)as;CaTUeTAkñúgbrievNtMbn; lr eQµaHsMPar³sMNg; Ékta tMélÉkta tMélBlkmµ epSg²

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

29 NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20 3>3>3> etItMélsMNg;CamFümKitCaEmRtRkLab:unµan? cUrbMeBjtaragxageRkam. lr RbePTsMNg; Ékta tMélkñúgÉkta 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

4>4>4> etIsMNg;enHsg;ryHeBlb:unµan? - GaKarTI1³>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>éf¶ - GaKarTI2³>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>éf¶ - GaKarTI3³>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>éf¶ - GaKarTI4³>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>éf¶

30 NWISP/Replacement Cost Study kMrgbBa¢IsMnYr sMrab;GegáttMélsMParHsMNg;

GñktbsMPasn_Ca³ CaGñklk; rW m©as;edb:Ulk;sMPar³sMNg;= elxkUd ³ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> éf¶TI>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Ex>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>qñaM2009 eQµaHGñksMPasn_³>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> htßelxa>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> = _ =Bt’manTUeTA 1>1>1> eQµaHPUmi³ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> XuM>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rsuk>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2>2>2>k¼k¼k¼ eQµaHGñktbsMPasn_³>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> x¼x¼x¼ =ePT³ 1> Rbus ¼ 2> RsI K¼K¼K¼Gayu³>>>>>>>>>>>qñaMK¼ XXX¼X¼¼¼ elxTUrs½BÞ³ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> = = _=Bt’mansþIBIsMPar³sMNg; lr eQµaHsMPar³sMNg; Ékta xñat tMélÉkta 1 eQITalsMrab;eRKagGaKar

2 kþaeQITalsMrab;kMral rWCBa¢aMg

3 kUneQIsMrab;srsrpÞH

4 kUneQIsMrab;CBa¢aMgpÞH

5 b£sSIBIgBug

6 b£sSIrnab

7 bnÞHb£sSIRkgsMrab;eFVICBa¢aMg

8 Søwketñat

9 s,Úv

10 sgásIh_

11 hIVRbUsIum:g;t_

31 NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

12 ek,ÓgRskalij

13 ek,Ógk,ac;

14 ek,ÓgsIum:g;

15 sIum:g;t_

16 xSac; eRKIm

17 xSac; bUk

18 fµ 4/ 6 sm

19 fµ 1/ 2 sm

20 \dæRbehag

21 \dætan;

22 Edksrés

23 TueyaC½r PVC

24 EdkeKal

25 dIElg

26

27

28

29

30

31

32 NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

kMrgbBa¢IsMnYr sMrab;GegátTIpSarTijlk;dIFøI GñktbsMPasn_Ca³ CaGñkmandI minb:HBal;edaysarKMerag = elxkUd ³ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> éf¶TI>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Ex>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>qñaM2009 eQµaHGñksMPasn_³>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> htßelxa>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> = _ =Bt’manTUeTA 1>1>1> eQµaHPUmi³ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>XuM>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rsuk>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2>2>2>k¼k¼k¼ eQµaHGñktbsMPasn_³>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> x¼x¼x¼ =ePT³ 1> Rbus ¼ 2> RsI _ =Bt’mansþIBITIpSardIFøI 1> etIGñkdwgeTfakñúgPUmienHFøab;mankarlk;dUrdIFøIEdrb¤eTkñúgryHeBlfµI²enH? == 1> dWg ¼ 2> mindwg = ebImindwgsUmrMlgeTAsMnYrTI 3 2> ebIdwgsUmsMnYr edIm,IbMeBjtaragdUcxageRkam == lr eQµaHGñkTij nigGñklk; RbePTdI TMhMdI tMél ¼ht 1 2 3 4 5 3> ebIRKYsarGñkmanfvikarRKb;RKan etItMéldIéføb:unµanGñkKitfacg;Tij? lr RbePTdI TMhMdI tMél ¼ht 1 dIERs kñúg Gag 2 dIERseRkamGag 3 dIERsEk,rPUmi 4 dIéRB 5 dIlMenAdæan 4>4>4> ebIRKYsarGñkcg;lk; etItMéldIéføb:unµanGñkKitfacg;lk;? lr RbePTdI TMhMd I tMél ¼ht 1 dIERs kñúg Gag 2 dIERseRkamGag 3 dIERsEk,rPUmi 4 dIéRB 5 dIlMenAdæan

33 NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR CONSULTANT TO CONDUCT OF REPLACEMENT COST STUDY

This TOR is for the appointment of a consultant to carry out the replacement cost study of the Punley Subproject under Loan 2035-CAM (SF): Northwest Irrigation Sector Project (NISP) . This subproject will develop Po Pi Deum, Anlong Svay, Krouch Saeuch, Tram Mneash and Kouch Noup subprojects in Pursat, Battambang and Banteay Meanchey provinces.

The consultant will carry out a study of replacement cost for affected assets such as structures, secondary structures, trees/fruit trees, crops etc in the reservoir and additionally the replacement cost for land along main canals. For purpose of carrying out the service, the consultants shall arrange the required experts and the team members who shall perform the duties specified in the Terms of Reference attached in hereto.

The consultant shall submit to the IRC the type written papers/reports as required and specified in the Terms of Reference (Sample Outline of Report below).

I. Objectives

The team shall verify and establish compensation rates for land, crops, trees, structures, and other non-land based income (e.g. fishponds) to ensure that Project Affected Persons are compensated at replacement costs.

The team members will be composed of: District Resettlement Committee Representative from the Project Office (Resettlement Staff IRC/MPWT) Representative from the Project Supervision Consultant (Resettlement Specialist) Representative from the Affected Persons (APs) Representative from the affected village (not Affected Person) Engineer/Architect and Carpenter/Bricklayer

II. Approach

The establishment of replacement costs will be carried out based on information collected from both Desk research and Direct interviews with people in affected area, both those persons who are affected and those who are not affected.

Desk research will focus on relevant publications, materials of Government authorities, both at central and local levels. However, these materials will play the supporting role only. As the work is aimed at obtaining reasonable replacement costs for different types of affected assets, market evidences are the factors which most strongly base the formulation of these costs. Direct interviews with people in the affected area, both those, whose assets are affected by the Project and those, whose assets are not affected, will produce reliable data for establishment.

Methodologies to verify the replacement costs for each type of affected assets are described in the following parts.

34 NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

III. Methodology

3.1 Data collection

3.1.1 Structures The objective of this establishment is to determine whether the provincial prices enable APs to rebuild their affected structures. The establishment of compensation for affected structures is based on the principle of replacement cost. The information to base the establishment will mainly be collected from direct interviews with parties involved, including owners of structures (both those whose structures are affected by the Project and those whose structures are not affected), construction contractors specialized in residential building.

The interviews will be conducted based on a pre-developed interview guide, which will cover the following issues:

Interviews with owners of structures: − Construction materials: + Main materials they used for their current structures + Type of shops where they bought construction materials + Distance of transport + Origin of the materials (local or overseas) + Costs of various materials − Labor + Who built the structures: Owners themselves or Contractors, if owners built themselves, they use their own labor or hire other people

Interviews with construction contractors: − Main materials which are most used by the local people to build their structures − Costs of those main materials − Cost of labor − Average construction cost (cost per sq.m floor) for different types of houses according to different categories − Validation of provincial construction prices (cost per sq.m floor for each category)

The structures will include but not limited to the following: − Houses − Kitchens (in case they are separated from houses) − Toilets, bathrooms (in case they are separated from houses) − Breeding facilities − Wells − Any other structure associated to the house

SAMPLE SIZE: − Owners of structures affected by the Project : 30 households − Owners of structures not affected by the Project : 30 households − Construction contractors + State-owned construction companies, (if available) : 2 companies

35 NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

+ Private construction companies/groups : 5 companies − Shops retailing construction materials : 5 shop owners

3.1.2 Land

The objective of this establishment is to determine whether the provincial prices are sufficient or not to purchase the same quality and quantity of the lost land. The establishment of compensation for the loss of land is based on its market value. The best way to obtain this market value is to gather data of some sales of land, which have just taken place. However, the transfer of land use right does not always go along with such sales, which makes details of such sales not recorded. The consultant will make their best effort to collect those sales evidence to support the verification of provincial prices. In addition, information to base the establishment will be collected from direct interviews with owners of land in Project affected area, including those, whose land is resumed and those whose land is not. The interviews will cover the following issues: − The recent land use rights transfer in the area − The price, at which owners (affected and not affected persons) are willing to sell their land

Price of land will be differentiated based on the use of land, including: − Residential land − Garden land − Agricultural land − Forest land − Land with water surface for fishery cultivation

The price of agricultural, forest land and land with water surface for fishery cultivation will also be differentiated by quality of land and its capacity to produce income for the households.

SAMPLE SIZE: − Owners of affected land : 5 households − Owners of not-affected land (adjacent to affected land or within the village) : 5 households

3.1.3 Crops and Trees

The objective of this establishment is to determine whether the provincial prices paid to APs are equivalent, lower or higher than the average market price. The basis of the establishment is to determine the average market price for each type of crops and trees. The information to base the establishment will be collected from: − Secondary sources + Publications of National Statistical Office + Publications of Price Committee

− Primary source: − interviews with people who own the same crops and trees in the locality. The interviews will cover:

36 NWISP/Replacement Cost Study

+ Price, at which owners are willing to sell each type of their crops and trees. The prices for perennial trees will be differentiated by the age of the trees. - Market, team will investigate the sales price of outputs of different types of crops and trees in the market. SAMPLE SIZE: − Owners of crops and trees affected by the Project : 5 households − Owners of crops and trees not affected by the Project : 5 households − Seedling suppliers : 5 persons − Market vendors : 5 persons

SAMPLE OUTLINE OF REPORT

I. OVERVIEW OF THE SUB-PROJECTS

II. METHODOLOGY 2.1 Information collection 2.1.1 Study area 2.1.2 Sample size and Sample selection 2.1.3 Information to be collected 2.2 Information processing

III. RESULTS 3.1 Po Pi Deum Sub-project 3.1.1 Replacement costs from various groups 3.1.2 Comparison of Rates

3.2 Anlong Svay Sub-project 3.2.1 Replacement costs from various groups 3.2.2 Comparison of Rates

3.3 Krouch Saeuch Sub-project 3.3.1 Replacement costs from various groups 3.3.2 Comparison of Rates

3.4 Tram Mneash Sub-project 3.4.1 Replacement costs from various groups 3.4.2 Comparison of Rates

3.5 Kouch Noup Sub-project 3.5.1 Replacement costs from various groups 3.5.2 Comparison of Rates

IV. CONCLUSION

V. ANNEXES

Accurately completed questionnaires Documents gathered from various groups

37