Native American Crime in the Northwest: 2004- 2005 – BIA Information from Alaska, Montana, Wyoming, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Native American Crime in the Northwest: 2004- 2005 – BIA Information from Alaska, Montana, Wyoming, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report: Document Title: Native American Crime in the Northwest: 2004- 2005 – BIA Information from Alaska, Montana, Wyoming, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington Author(s): Gary R. Leonardson, Ph.D. Document No.: 218937 Date Received: June 2007 This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally- funded grant final report available electronically in addition to traditional paper copies. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Native American Crime in the Northwest: 2004-2005 – BIA Information from Alaska, Montana, Wyoming, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington By Gary R. Leonardson, Ph.D. MPR 55 Rodeo Trail, Dillon, MT 59725 406-683-6424 [email protected] Prepared for the Montana Board of Crime Control October 2006 This project was supported by a grant awarded by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, in the Office of Justice Programs, at the U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of Justice. 1 This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author would like to thank the Bureau of Indian Affairs, the Bureau of Justice Statistics, and the Board of Crime Control for making this project possible. The staff members of each of these Federal and State agencies have been very helpful in providing direct assistance and background materials. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Gary R. Leonardson is the director of Mountain Plains Research in Dillon, Montana. He has been conducting private consulting work for 20 years, along with working at two universities. Dr. Leonardson has contracted with or done major statistical, research, and evaluation work for the Federal government, including the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention, Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, the Center for Disease Control, Indian Health Service, Bureau of Justice Assistance, U.S. Department of Education, National Institute of Corrections, and grants from the National Institutes of Health. He has been the project evaluator for nine major Federal projects, conducted numerous local and state research projects, evaluations, and surveys, and has assisted in examining many important issues including: substance use and abuse, disproportionate minority contact, teen pregnancy, mental health issues, prevention programs, pregnancy outcomes, rural issues, social impact assessments, educational programs, systems of care, aftercare programs, parole programs, minor in possession research, sentencing guidelines, drug task force assessments, substance abuse treatment outcomes, and related areas. 2 This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Number I. List of Tables 4 II. Executive Summary 5 III. Introduction 6 IV. Overall Results 7 V. Definitions 28 3 This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. I. LIST OF TABLES Table Number Page Number 1. Listing of Law Enforcement Agencies and Number of Offenses Reported 7 2. Listing of Crimes Committed/Crimes Cleared by Agency 9 3. Alcohol Involved in Crime Commission 11 4. Alcohol or Drug Involvement in Crime Commission 13 5. Numbers and Percent of Total for Different Type of Offenses 15 6. Types of Offenses – All Agencies Combined 17 7. Percent of Crimes Committed under the Influence of Alcohol 18 8. Percent of Crimes Committed under the Influence of Drugs 19 9. Percent of Crimes Committed under the Influence of Alcohol or Drugs 20 10. Offenses Cleared by Arrest of Exceptional Means 21 11. Comparison of Cleared Rates 22 12. Juveniles Compared with Overall Total 23 13. Percent Offenses Committed by Juveniles 23 14. Three Population Comparisons 24 15. Information for Crime Index Values 25 16. Index Crime Rates 26 4 This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • This project is important because very little information on tribal offenses has been reported. • Information was available on 38 of the 47 tribal agencies. • Overall, there was a high percent of reported offenses cleared by arrest or exceptional means with 60.7 percent in 2004 and 87.6 percent cleared in 2005. • In considering the total number of offenses for 2004 and 2005, alcohol was involved in about 40 percent of the offenses. • Alcohol use was most common for the offenses of: Archaeological Resource Protection Act (ARPA) violations (100%), disorderly conduct (73.0%), attempted forcible rape (65.8%), child abuse (63.2%), elderly abuse (58.1%), assault (56.4%), and aggravated assault (55.4%). • The influence of drug use was most common for the offenses of: prostitution/commercialized vice (43.5%), robbery (11.8%), homicide (11.1%), stolen property (10.8%), and fraud (10.2%). • The most common reported offenses were: drunkenness, disorderly conduct, liquor laws, assault, DWI, theft, domestic violence, suspicious person report, and drug violations. • The tribal agencies reported very high offense clearance rates with 60.7 percent cleared by arrest or exceptional means in 2004, and 87.6 percent of the offenses cleared in 2005. The offenses with the highest clearance rates included: liquor laws (96.6%), drunkenness (94.7%), disorderly conduct (93.6%), curfew and loitering (93.0%), homicide (92.6%, Archeological Resources Preservation Act (ARPA) violations (91.7%), and prostitution/commercialized vice (91.3%). • The overall Index crime rates of 1989 (using population method 1) and 1550- using population method 2) for 2004, and 2575(using population method 1), and 2007 (using population method 2) for 2005 were low when compared with the national rates of 3983 for 2004 and 3938 for 2005. 5 This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. III. INTRODUCTION According to the 2000 census, American Indians and Alaska Natives account for about 1.5 percent or 4.3 million people in the United States. Most (2.5 million) of these listed “American Indian” or “Alaska Native” as their only racial category, while some (1.8 million) indicated “ American Indian” or “Alaska Native” along with one or more additional race categories. It is estimated that nearly one-half (43.5%) of all American Indians/Alaska Natives resided on Federal reservations or in a tribal statistical area during the 2000 Census.1 The offense information for the report was provided by Office of Law Enforcement and Security within District 5 of the Bureau of Indian Affairs office in Billings, Montana. District 5 includes three Regions (Mountain, Northwest, and Juneau) with 47 Tribes, covering the states of Montana, Wyoming, Alaska, Idaho, Washington, and Oregon. 1 2000 Census, U.S. Census Bureau 6 This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. IV. OVERALL RESULTS Offenses Reported by Tribal Law Enforcement Agencies Reported offenses for 2004 and 2005 were available for 38 tribal law enforcement agencies located in the six western states of Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Alaska, Montana, and Wyoming. Most (21) of the reporting agencies submitted reports for 2004 and 2005, while some (11) only reported for 2005, and a few (6) only reported offense information for 2004. The data were submitted as summary information in either monthly, quarterly, or a yearly format. Table 1 – Listing of Law Enforcement Agencies and Number of Offenses Reported Law State Submitted Format # Off Submitted Format # Off Enforcement 2004 2004: 2004* 2005 2005: 2005** Unit Report: Monthly, Report: Monthly, Yes, No Yearly, Yes, No Yearly, Quarterly Quarterly Blackfeet MT No Report Yes
Recommended publications
  • Do I Have a Warrant in Oregon
    Do I Have A Warrant In Oregon Semipermeable and audiovisual Giancarlo methodise while Mahratta Welsh preconcerts her Aden uncleanly and stigmatize competitively. Hitlerite Ike usually unfree some Anasazis or patronages capriccioso. Three-dimensional Percy lithoprints acrimoniously. Consent from them may provide to have to particular problems before talking to have an issue to do have Duii offense was unaware that oregon warrant on their behavior and disclosure. Read what do have in oregon warrant a ruling that having proof that went unpaid. Oregon AG sues federal agencies over Portland arrests says tactics. If police declared a coast guard who conducted a citation for a record requests will defend the coronavirus? The Sheriff's Office is located at 250 North Baxter in Coquille Oregon. There have in oregon warrant for having problems come to do i got in a subpoena relating to patient consent. Hate crimes in oregon warrant. Out-of-State Arrest Warrants Warrant in game State. The dealer did not reside unless the crank, which contained no drugs or weapons, though a justice with four our children lived in full house. Jail would not available to do i expunge criminal cases a special concerns. Home FAQ Help Privacy tint Not Sell My Info Terms you Use. Check Oregon local site and national databases to arbitrary arrest spine and. 5 Arrest Warrant Records Records related to action written order chart by the slit on. Covid relief officer in oregon warrant public safety and do not having a citation for a warrant to patrol officer did not. Indiana Code 9-24-19-1 Class A infraction 2017 Indiana Code.
    [Show full text]
  • Crime Prevention Division, Portland Police Bureau FACT and FICTION About Crime in Oregon August, 1979
    If you have. \ issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. - -• / FACT AriD FICTION ABOUTCAIME IN OREGON '( \ PAI:PAAED BY TI1E OREGON LAW EnFORCEMErtT COUrtCIL • ------ - -- - ----- Cover design by Steve Minnick, Graphics Illustrator Crime Prevention Division, Portland Police Bureau FACT AND FICTION About Crime in Oregon August, 1979 Victor R. Atiyeh Governor "lames Brown Keith A. Stubblefield Chairman Administrator This study was supported in part by grants from the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration of the U.S. Department of Justice and the Mid-Willamette Valley Manpower Consortium. Point~ of view or opinions stated are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the U.S. Department of Justice. ---------- ------- ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors of this report are: Annie Monk Pamela Erickson Gervais Administrative Assistant and Planning and Data Analysis P1annlng and Data Analysis Unit Unit Supervisor Sincere appreciation is extended to all those whose valuable suggestions and information contributed greatly to this publication: Bob Watson, Administrator - Oregon Corrections Division Steve Cleveland, Chief Planner - Mid Wi11amette Valley COG Bill Cogswell, Chairman and Ira Blalock, Member - State Board of Parole Craig Van and Marcelle Robinson - Hillcrest School of Oregon Jeff Barnes, Director - Regional Automated Information Network Chuck Foster, Inst'~uctor - Chemeketa Conmunity College Jerry Winter, Deputy Administr'ator - Trial Court Services Cal Steward, School Liaison - Salem Police Department Lt. Tom Potter, Crime Prevention Division - Portland Police Bureau Wendy Gordon, Host/Producer - Mid-Morning, KOIN-TV Lt. Penny Orazettl, Planning & Research - Portland Police Bureau Chief Ro11ie Pean - Coos Bay Police Department Judge Irving Steinbock - Multnomah County Circuit Court Chief Jim Jones - Ontario Police Department Sheriff Jim Heenan - Marion County Sheriff's Office Karel Hyer, Academy Programs Chief - Board on Police Standards and Training Benjamin H.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Full Report 2007 5.Pdf PDF 1.8 MB
    The Northwest Power and Conservation Council’s Directory of Columbia River Basin Tribes Council Document Number: 2007-05 Table of Contents I. Introduction 1 II. Tribes and Tribal Confederations 5 The Burns Paiute Tribe 7 The Coeur d’Alene Tribe 9 The Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation 12 The Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation 15 The Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation 18 The Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon 21 The Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation 23 The Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon 25 The Kalispel Tribe of Indians 28 The Kootenai Tribe of Idaho 31 The Nez Perce Tribe 34 The Shoshone Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation 37 The Shoshone-Paiute Tribes of the Duck Valley Reservation 40 The Spokane Tribe of Indians 42 III. Canadian First Nations 45 Canadian Columbia River Tribes (First Nations) 46 IV. Tribal Associations 51 Canadian Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fisheries Commission 52 Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission 53 Upper Columbia United Tribes 55 Upper Snake River Tribes 56 The Northwest Power and Conservation Council’s Tribal Directory i ii The Northwest Power and Conservation Council’s Tribal Directory Introduction The Northwest Power and Conservation Council’s Tribal Directory 1 2 The Northwest Power and Conservation Council’s Tribal Directory Introduction The Council assembled this directory to enhance our understanding and appreciation of the Columbia River Basin tribes, including the First Nations in the Canadian portion of the basin. The directory provides brief descriptions and histories of the tribes and tribal confedera- tions, contact information, and information about tribal fi sh and wildlife projects funded through the Council’s program.
    [Show full text]
  • Alumni Magazine December 1980 Whitworth University
    Whitworth Digital Commons Whitworth University Whitworth Alumni Magazine University Archives 1980 Alumni Magazine December 1980 Whitworth University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.whitworth.edu/alumnimagazine Recommended Citation Whitworth University , "Alumni Magazine December 1980" Whitworth University (1980). Whitworth Alumni Magazine. Paper 368. https://digitalcommons.whitworth.edu/alumnimagazine/368 This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the University Archives at Whitworth University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Whitworth Alumni Magazine by an authorized administrator of Whitworth University. Vol.49/No. 2/ December 1980 I -2 concept of liberal arts, in contrast to the current version, did not hold the study of the arts and of vocational skills as mutually LIGHT AND exclusive. We need to see it in the contemporary milieu. How does It was Homecoming one make life most valuable, most football game, and a fulfilling? That, I think, is the heart student in the Whitworth of what we mean by a liberal LE1\RNINGrooting section found herself seated education." next to a pair of distinguished- Dr. Mounce stated his looking people. Their conversation philosophy of Chrtstian education was stimulating, and she was soon more fully in his article "The Dr. Robert H. Mounce, drawn into it. As the fourth quarter Marks of an Educated Person," neared its end, her friends left, but Christianity Today, November 2, on the eve of becoming she remained to continue talking 1979. In it he wrote, "The history with the two, President-Elect of Christian thought convinces us Robert Mounce and Whitworth that precisely where scholarship Whitworth's fifteenth Trustee Dorothy McLarren.
    [Show full text]
  • COAST SALISH SENSES of PLACE: Dwelling, Meaning, Power, Property and Territory in the Coast Salish World
    COAST SALISH SENSES OF PLACE: Dwelling, Meaning, Power, Property and Territory in the Coast Salish World by BRIAN DAVID THOM Department of Anthropology, McGill University, Montréal March, 2005 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy © Brian Thom, 2005 Abstract This study addresses the question of the nature of indigenous people's connection to the land, and the implications of this for articulating these connections in legal arenas where questions of Aboriginal title and land claims are at issue. The idea of 'place' is developed, based in a phenomenology of dwelling which takes profound attachments to home places as shaping and being shaped by ontological orientation and social organization. In this theory of the 'senses of place', the author emphasizes the relationships between meaning and power experienced and embodied in place, and the social systems of property and territory that forms indigenous land tenure systems. To explore this theoretical notion of senses of place, the study develops a detailed ethnography of a Coast Salish Aboriginal community on southeast Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada. Through this ethnography of dwelling, the ways in which places become richly imbued with meanings and how they shape social organization and generate social action are examined. Narratives with Coast Salish community members, set in a broad context of discussing land claims, provide context for understanding senses of place imbued with ancestors, myth, spirit, power, language, history, property, territory and boundaries. The author concludes in arguing that by attending to a theorized understanding of highly local senses of place, nuanced conceptions of indigenous relationships to land which appreciate indigenous relations to land in their own terms can be articulated.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington State Uniform Crime Report
    Washington Association of Sheriffs & Police Chiefs WASHINGTON STATE UNIFORM CRIME REPORT is prepared by Washington Uniform Crime Reporting Staff: Linda Schaffel, WUCR/NIBRS Manager Tonya Todd, Document Imager Kellie Lapczynski, Statistical Compiler THE WASHINGTON STATE UNIFORM CRIME REPORTING PROJECT IS A COOPERATIVE EFFORT OF: WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON STATE CRIMINAL SHERIFFS AND POLICE CHIEFS JUSTICE TRAINING COMMISSION 3060 Willamette Dr. NE 19010 – 1st Avenue South Lacey, WA 98516 Seattle, WA 98148 Phone: (360) 486-2380 Phone: (206) 835-7300 Fax: (360) 486-2381 Fax: (206) 439-3752 Website: www.waspc.org Website: www.cjtc.state.wa.us Donald G. Pierce, Michael D. Parsons, Ph. D., Executive Director Executive Director Front cover designed by Tonya Todd. Data clipart by © Crown copyright 1995 – 2003. CRIME IN WASHINGTON STATE - 2004 SUMMARY RATE OF INDEX CRIME - Index crimes in Washington State totaled 321,839 for 2004, constituting 52.7 offenses per 1,000 population. This represents an increase of 3.1% in the total number of index crimes over those reported in 2003. VALUE OF PROPERTY STOLEN AND RECOVERED- Property valued at $353,859,319 was reported stolen in 2004. Of this amount, $134,115,209 or 37.9% was recovered. Property stolen shows an increase of 7.0% over 2003. NUMBER OF LAW ENFORCE- MENT OFFICERS KILLED OR ASSAULTED- There were two law enforcement officers killed; one feloniously and one accidentally in 2004. A total of 1,101 law enforcement officers were assaulted during the year. Assaults on officers showed a decrease of 3.5% from the 1,140 officer assaults reported in 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Consultation with Tribes Regarding
    IN THE MATTER OF: FEDERAL CONSULTATION WITH TRIBES REGARDING INFRASTRUCTURE DECISION-MAKING HELD TUESDAY, OCTOBER 25, 2016 8:40 A.M. DAYBREAK STAR INDIAN CULTURAL CENTER 5001 BERNIE WHITEBEAR WAY SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98199 Meeting Consult With Tribes October 25, 2016 NDT Assgn # 22463-1 Page 2 1 PANEL MEMBERS PRESENT: 2 3 LAWRENCE ROBERTS 4 Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary 5 Department of the Interior 6 7 MICHAEL L. CONNOR 8 Deputy Secretary 9 Department of the Interior 10 11 DAVID F. CONRAD 12 Deputy Director 13 U.S. Department of Energy 14 Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs 15 16 DAWN STURDEVANT BAUM 17 Attorney Advisor 18 Department of Justice 19 Office of Tribal Justice 20 21 JODY A. CUMMINGS 22 Deputy Solicitor for Indian Affairs 23 Office of the Solicitor 24 Department of the Interior 25 Meeting Consult With Tribes October 25, 2016 NDT Assgn # 22463-1 Page 3 1 PANEL MEMBERS PRESENT: (CONTINUED) 2 3 BRIGADIER GENERAL SCOTT SPELLMON 4 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 5 6 LEONARD FORSMAN 7 Chairman Suquamish Tribe 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Meeting Consult With Tribes October 25, 2016 NDT Assgn # 22463-1 Page 4 1 TRIBAL CONSULTATION 2 TUESDAY, OCTOBER 20, 2016 3 8:35 A.M. 4 5 MR. CONNOR: Good morning, everybody. I 6 think we are ready to begin. Thank you for your 7 patience. Let me start by introducing 8 Representative Roberts, here in the Pacific 9 Northwest, Chairman Leonard Forsman Suquamish Tribe.
    [Show full text]
  • Hello Students!
    Hello Students! As we continue into the week of April 27th to May 1st we will begin transitioning out of our unit Since Time Immemorial and moving into Government. Do not forget to also complete the Journal Assignment. Our virtual meeting is Wednesday at 11:30. Assignments: - Finish Packet Since Time Immemorial - Complete Journal Asssignment - Complete Government Vocabulary Thank you. If you have any questions, email me. Mr. Kelton Government Vocabulary Pages 408-441 Define vocabulary term Use in a sentence Draw or Illustrate republic democracy citizen Constitution amendment executive branch judicial branch legislative branch Mr. Kelton’s Washington State History Class Week Six Student Name:____________________________ Class Period:______________________________ Date:____________________________________ Due Date:________________________________ Week Six: Since Time Immemorial: Spokane Tribe ~April 20th to April 24th Essential Question: What was life like for the Inland Northwest Tribes before white settlers arrived? What did they value? How did they live? How did life change with the settlement of Washington? Assignments: Image Examination and questions, Spokane Tribe Note Catcher Graphic Organizer Assessment: Spokane Tribe Tribal Concept Wheel Extended Learning: Expand your knowledge of the Spokane Tribe of Native Americans in Washington by watching a documentary and/or exploring these websites. Upper Columbia United Tribes website: https://ucut.org/members-tribes/ Warren Seyler (Spokane Tribe) YouTube Channel with video series on Tribal
    [Show full text]
  • Spokane Flag Redesign Official Voters Guide
    Spokane Flag Redesign Official Voters Guide Welcome! The vote you are about to participate in reflects the culmination of almost two years’ work by ordinary Spokane citizens, City officials, and dozens of artists from around the country. Spokane’s current flag (show on the next page) has been a subject of mockery in vexillological (that’s a fancy word for the study of flags!) circles for years. However, it wasn’t until Spokane resident and now Flag Commission member Max Nesbitt presented a proposal to redesign the flag in early 2019 that the ball officially got rolling and gears began to turn. Spokane Councilmember Kate Burke took up Max’s call and proposed a resolution to form this Commission which passed that summer, and the Commission was formed that fall. Comprising voices of a multitude of perspectives, the Commission represents a cross section of Spokane –artists, students, politicians, civil servants and more. We considered an initial 400 designs and a public poll held in December 2020 narrowed it down to 100 semi-finalists. The Commission has selected these 12 finalists because we feel they reflect a diversity of styles and inspirations while falling within the guidelines we set out in our opening meetings. Happy voting! Spokane Flag Commission Joshua Hiler, Chair – Council Appointee, District 3 Max Nesbitt – Council Appointee, District 2 Corey Marcoux – Council Appointee, District 1 John Mujica – Council Appointee, At Large Matthew Budke – Mayoral Appointee Glenn Ford – Spokane Tribe Jeff Ferguson – Spokane Tribe Andrew Whitver – Spokane Arts Commission Scyla Dowd – Youth Appointee Kate Burke – City Council Betsy Wilkerson – City Council The Current Spokane Flag Adopted in 1975, this flag has seen little to no use since then.
    [Show full text]
  • Juvenile Justice in Oregon
    JUVENILE JUSTICE IN OREGON An Analysis of the Performance of Oregon’s Juvenile Justice System and Specific Recommendations for Improvements Authored by Charles French Deputy District Attorney Retired John S. Foote Clackamas County District Attorney For Additional Information Contact [email protected] September 29, 2014 This report is dedicated to Bob and Dee Dee Kouns pioneers for victims’ rights in Oregon. After the murder of their daughter, Valerie Dee McDonald in 1980, they dedicated the rest of their lives to improving Oregon’s criminal justice system. Amongst many other accomplishments, their work lead directly to the overhaul of Oregon’s juvenile justice system in 1995. They have left a powerful legacy of volunteerism and public service which is a shining example to all who wish to serve our citizens. CONTENTS EXHIBITS ................................................................................................................................................... iii PREFACE ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 3 Juvenile system crime performance in Oregon. ....................................................................................... 3 Budget performance. ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Juveniles Arrested for Serious Felony Crimes in Oregon
    $ .. - JUVENILES ARRESTED FOR SERIOUS FELONY 97782 CRIMES IN OREGON AND "REMANDED" U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice TO ADULT CRIM1NAL COURTS: This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the A STATISTICAL STUDY person or organrzatlon orlgmatmg It. Pomts of view or oplnrons stated In this document are those of the authors and do not necessarlfy represent the offlclaf position or policies of the National Institute of Justice MARCH, 1985 Permission to reproduce this C~d material has been granted by Public Damain/NIJ US~b~~J:~ll~f-2~ . Jusflce_.. to the National Crlmmal Jusllce Reference Service I NCJRS) By James Paul Heuser, Ph. D. Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permlS' Researcher sian of the ~t owner Crime Analysis Center (\ \ I ~) Prepared under Grant #83-BJ-CX-K420 from the Bureau of Justice " Statistics of the U.S. Department of Justice. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the author and do not necessar ily represent official posi tions or poli­ cies of the Bureau of Justice Statistics or the Oregon Department of Justice. () ~ f' t ? \, b e Information regarding this study or copie~ of this report can be obtained by writing or calling: Acknowledgements Dr. Clinton C•. Goff, Supervisor Dr. James Paul Heuser, Researcher Crime Analysis Center Crime Analysis Center Department of Justice Department of Justice 100 Justice Building 100 Justice Building The author and the Crime Analysis Center would like to acknowledge the Salem, Oregon 97310 Salem, Oregon 97310 contributions of several people who made this study possible and/or who Phone: (503) 378-8056 Phone: (503) 378-4229 assisted in the research effort and the report preparation.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 9 STATE OF WASHINGTON; STATE OF NO. 10 OREGON; CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE CHEHALIS RESERVATION; COMPLAINT 11 CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE COOS, LOWER UMPQUA AND 12 SIUSLAW INDIANS; COW CREEK BAND OF UMPQUA TRIBE OF 13 INDIANS; DOYON, LTD.; DUWAMISH TRIBE; 14 CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE GRAND RONDE COMMUNITY OF 15 OREGON; HOH INDIAN TRIBE; JAMESTOWN S’KLALLAM TRIBE; 16 KALISPEL TRIBE OF INDIANS; THE KLAMATH TRIBES; MUCKLESHOOT 17 INDIAN TRIBE; NEZ PERCE TRIBE; NOOKSACK INDIAN TRIBE; PORT 18 GAMBLE S’KLALLAM TRIBE; PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANS; 19 QUILEUTE TRIBE OF THE QUILEUTE RESERVATION; 20 QUINAULT INDIAN NATION; SAMISH INDIAN NATION; 21 CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF SILETZ INDIANS; SKOKOMISH INDIAN 22 TRIBE; SNOQUALMIE INDIAN TRIBE; SPOKANE TRIBE OF 23 INDIANS; SQUAXIN ISLAND TRIBE; SUQUAMISH TRIBE; SWINOMISH 24 INDIAN TRIBAL COMMUNITY; TANANA CHIEFS CONFERENCE; 25 CENTRAL COUNCIL OF THE TLINGIT & HAIDA INDIAN TRIBES 26 OF ALASKA; UPPER SKAGIT COMPLAINT 1 ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON Complex Litigation Division 800 5th Avenue, Suite 2000 Seattle, WA 98104-3188 (206) 464-7744 1 INDIAN TRIBE; CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE 2 YAKAMA NATION; AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION; 3 ASSOCIATION OF KING COUNTY HISTORICAL ORGANIZATIONS; 4 CHINESE AMERICAN CITIZENS ALLIANCE; HISTORIC SEATTLE; 5 HISTORYLINK; MUSEUM OF HISTORY AND INDUSTRY; OCA 6 ASIAN PACIFIC ADVOCATES – GREATER SEATTLE; WASHINGTON 7 TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION; and WING LUKE 8 MEMORIAL FOUNDATION D/B/A WING LUKE MUSEUM, 9 Plaintiffs, 10 v. 11 RUSSELL VOUGHT, in his capacity as 12 Director of the OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET; 13 DAVID S.
    [Show full text]