DOCSLIB.ORG

Juvenile Justice in Oregon

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Juvenile Justice in Oregon JUVENILE JUSTICE IN OREGON An Analysis of the Performance of Oregon’s Juvenile Justice System and Specific Recommendations for Improvements Authored by Charles French Deputy District Attorney Retired John S. Foote Clackamas County District Attorney For Additional Information Contact [email protected] September 29, 2014 This report is dedicated to Bob and Dee Dee Kouns pioneers for victims’ rights in Oregon. After the murder of their daughter, Valerie Dee McDonald in 1980, they dedicated the rest of their lives to improving Oregon’s criminal justice system. Amongst many other accomplishments, their work lead directly to the overhaul of Oregon’s juvenile justice system in 1995. They have left a powerful legacy of volunteerism and public service which is a shining example to all who wish to serve our citizens. CONTENTS EXHIBITS ................................................................................................................................................... iii PREFACE ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 3 Juvenile system crime performance in Oregon. ....................................................................................... 3 Budget performance. ................................................................................................................................ 4 Casey Foundation performance across the nation. .................................................................................. 5 I. OREGON’S JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM ....................................................................................................... 7 Adoption of Casey Foundation practices. ................................................................................................. 7 1. Reduction in juvenile detention. ...................................................................................................... 8 2. Risk assessment tools. ....................................................................................................................... 8 3. Low rates of formal or informal supervision and sanctions. ............................................................ 9 4. Keeping offenders away from court control and supervision. ....................................................... 13 5. Low use of detention for supervision violations. ............................................................................ 14 II. COMPARISONS BETWEEN OREGON AND NATIONAL JUVENILE SYSTEM PERFORMANCE. .................... 17 A. Juvenile arrest rates. ....................................................................................................................... 17 B. Juvenile crime in Oregon................................................................................................................ 19 C. Juvenile referrals in Oregon. ........................................................................................................... 28 D. Juvenile recidivism rates in Oregon. ............................................................................................... 28 II. PURPORTED BUDGET SAVINGS ............................................................................................................... 35 A. County budget savings. ................................................................................................................... 35 B. State budget savings. ...................................................................................................................... 40 RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................................................. 41 Overview ................................................................................................................................................. 41 1. Return to the Fundamental Principles Contained in ORS 419C.001 ............................................... 41 2. New Definition of Recidivism .......................................................................................................... 42 3. Annual Reports on the performance of both county juvenile departments and OYA ................... 43 4. Enhanced Collaboration in Our Juvenile Justice System ................................................................. 44 5. Strengthen the definition of “scientifically based research” in ORS 182.515(5) ............................ 45 6. Application of “Truth in Sentencing” for Juveniles Committed to OYA .......................................... 46 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................................... 49 Juvenile Justice in Oregon 9/29/2014 Page i APPENDIX A: Oregon Counties - Juvenile Arrests, Petitions, Detention, and One-Year Recidivism Statistics .................................................................................................................................................................... 51 APPENDIX B: Public Safety and Budget Performance of Casey Foundation JDAI Sites .............................. 55 A. JDAI Public Safety Performance .......................................................................................................... 55 1. JDAI public safety performance measures ...................................................................................... 56 2. Crime rate performance at JDAI sites v. national rates. ................................................................. 58 B. Budgetary performance at JDAI sites. ................................................................................................ 66 APPENDIX C: 2010 – Youth Disposed for Criminal Referral – 12 month Juvenile Criminal Referral Recidivism by Dispositional Category* ....................................................................................................... 71 APPENDIX D: Oregon Juvenile Justice Policy Memo ................................................................................... 73 APPENDIX E: Response to Policy Memo ................................................................................................... 103 A. Clackamas Juvenile Department by Ellen Crawford, Director, March 24, 2014.pdf ........................ 103 B. The OJDDA Perspective Juvenile Justice Policy Practices and Outcomes in Oregon, April 17, 2014.pdf .............................................................................................................................................................. 103 C. Juvenile Justice in Lane County from Crisis to Opportunity by Al Levine, Youth Services Division Manager, Lane County Division of Youth Services, April 22, 2014.pdf ................................................. 103 D. Oregon Youth Authority by Fariborz Pakseresht, Director, May 1, 2014.pdf .................................. 103 Page ii 9/29/2014 Juvenile Justice in Oregon EXHIBITS Charts Chart 1. Pre-Adjudication Detention Rate .................................................................................................... 8 Chart 2. Percentage of Juvenile Referrals with Petitions Filed ................................................................... 10 Chart 3. Oregon Counties Percentage of Juvenile Petitions Filed .............................................................. 11 Chart 4. Placement Beds Used for Supervision Violations.......................................................................... 14 Chart 5. Closed Custody Placement Beds Used for Supervision Violations ................................................ 15 Chart 6. Juvenile Violent Index Crime Arrest Rate ...................................................................................... 19 Chart 7. Juvenile FBI Violent Index Crime Trends ....................................................................................... 20 Chart 8. Juvenile Property Index Crime Arrest Rates .................................................................................. 20 Chart 9. Juvenile FBI Property Index Crime Trends .................................................................................... 21 Chart 10. Oregon Juvenile Drug Arrest Rates ............................................................................................. 21 Chart 11. Juvenile Drug Abuse Arrest Trends ............................................................................................. 22 Chart 12. Juvenile Illegal Drug Use Rate in Past 30-Days ............................................................................ 22 Chart 13. Juvenile Cocaine Use Rate in Past One-Year ............................................................................... 23 Chart 14. Juvenile Marijuana Use Rate in Past One-Year ........................................................................... 23 Chart 15. Juvenile Drug Addiction in Past One-Year ................................................................................... 24 Chart 16. Ratio of Juvenile Drug Arrests to Court Referrals ....................................................................... 25 Chart 17. Juveniles Needing but Not Receiving Drug Treatment ............................................................... 26 Chart 18. Juvenile Total Arrest Rate ..........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Do I Have a Warrant in Oregon
    Do I Have A Warrant In Oregon Semipermeable and audiovisual Giancarlo methodise while Mahratta Welsh preconcerts her Aden uncleanly and stigmatize competitively. Hitlerite Ike usually unfree some Anasazis or patronages capriccioso. Three-dimensional Percy lithoprints acrimoniously. Consent from them may provide to have to particular problems before talking to have an issue to do have Duii offense was unaware that oregon warrant on their behavior and disclosure. Read what do have in oregon warrant a ruling that having proof that went unpaid. Oregon AG sues federal agencies over Portland arrests says tactics. If police declared a coast guard who conducted a citation for a record requests will defend the coronavirus? The Sheriff's Office is located at 250 North Baxter in Coquille Oregon. There have in oregon warrant for having problems come to do i got in a subpoena relating to patient consent. Hate crimes in oregon warrant. Out-of-State Arrest Warrants Warrant in game State. The dealer did not reside unless the crank, which contained no drugs or weapons, though a justice with four our children lived in full house. Jail would not available to do i expunge criminal cases a special concerns. Home FAQ Help Privacy tint Not Sell My Info Terms you Use. Check Oregon local site and national databases to arbitrary arrest spine and. 5 Arrest Warrant Records Records related to action written order chart by the slit on. Covid relief officer in oregon warrant public safety and do not having a citation for a warrant to patrol officer did not. Indiana Code 9-24-19-1 Class A infraction 2017 Indiana Code.
    [Show full text]
  • Crime Prevention Division, Portland Police Bureau FACT and FICTION About Crime in Oregon August, 1979
    If you have. \ issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. - -• / FACT AriD FICTION ABOUTCAIME IN OREGON '( \ PAI:PAAED BY TI1E OREGON LAW EnFORCEMErtT COUrtCIL • ------ - -- - ----- Cover design by Steve Minnick, Graphics Illustrator Crime Prevention Division, Portland Police Bureau FACT AND FICTION About Crime in Oregon August, 1979 Victor R. Atiyeh Governor "lames Brown Keith A. Stubblefield Chairman Administrator This study was supported in part by grants from the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration of the U.S. Department of Justice and the Mid-Willamette Valley Manpower Consortium. Point~ of view or opinions stated are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the U.S. Department of Justice. ---------- ------- ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors of this report are: Annie Monk Pamela Erickson Gervais Administrative Assistant and Planning and Data Analysis P1annlng and Data Analysis Unit Unit Supervisor Sincere appreciation is extended to all those whose valuable suggestions and information contributed greatly to this publication: Bob Watson, Administrator - Oregon Corrections Division Steve Cleveland, Chief Planner - Mid Wi11amette Valley COG Bill Cogswell, Chairman and Ira Blalock, Member - State Board of Parole Craig Van and Marcelle Robinson - Hillcrest School of Oregon Jeff Barnes, Director - Regional Automated Information Network Chuck Foster, Inst'~uctor - Chemeketa Conmunity College Jerry Winter, Deputy Administr'ator - Trial Court Services Cal Steward, School Liaison - Salem Police Department Lt. Tom Potter, Crime Prevention Division - Portland Police Bureau Wendy Gordon, Host/Producer - Mid-Morning, KOIN-TV Lt. Penny Orazettl, Planning & Research - Portland Police Bureau Chief Ro11ie Pean - Coos Bay Police Department Judge Irving Steinbock - Multnomah County Circuit Court Chief Jim Jones - Ontario Police Department Sheriff Jim Heenan - Marion County Sheriff's Office Karel Hyer, Academy Programs Chief - Board on Police Standards and Training Benjamin H.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington State Uniform Crime Report
    Washington Association of Sheriffs & Police Chiefs WASHINGTON STATE UNIFORM CRIME REPORT is prepared by Washington Uniform Crime Reporting Staff: Linda Schaffel, WUCR/NIBRS Manager Tonya Todd, Document Imager Kellie Lapczynski, Statistical Compiler THE WASHINGTON STATE UNIFORM CRIME REPORTING PROJECT IS A COOPERATIVE EFFORT OF: WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON STATE CRIMINAL SHERIFFS AND POLICE CHIEFS JUSTICE TRAINING COMMISSION 3060 Willamette Dr. NE 19010 – 1st Avenue South Lacey, WA 98516 Seattle, WA 98148 Phone: (360) 486-2380 Phone: (206) 835-7300 Fax: (360) 486-2381 Fax: (206) 439-3752 Website: www.waspc.org Website: www.cjtc.state.wa.us Donald G. Pierce, Michael D. Parsons, Ph. D., Executive Director Executive Director Front cover designed by Tonya Todd. Data clipart by © Crown copyright 1995 – 2003. CRIME IN WASHINGTON STATE - 2004 SUMMARY RATE OF INDEX CRIME - Index crimes in Washington State totaled 321,839 for 2004, constituting 52.7 offenses per 1,000 population. This represents an increase of 3.1% in the total number of index crimes over those reported in 2003. VALUE OF PROPERTY STOLEN AND RECOVERED- Property valued at $353,859,319 was reported stolen in 2004. Of this amount, $134,115,209 or 37.9% was recovered. Property stolen shows an increase of 7.0% over 2003. NUMBER OF LAW ENFORCE- MENT OFFICERS KILLED OR ASSAULTED- There were two law enforcement officers killed; one feloniously and one accidentally in 2004. A total of 1,101 law enforcement officers were assaulted during the year. Assaults on officers showed a decrease of 3.5% from the 1,140 officer assaults reported in 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Juveniles Arrested for Serious Felony Crimes in Oregon
    $ .. - JUVENILES ARRESTED FOR SERIOUS FELONY 97782 CRIMES IN OREGON AND "REMANDED" U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice TO ADULT CRIM1NAL COURTS: This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the A STATISTICAL STUDY person or organrzatlon orlgmatmg It. Pomts of view or oplnrons stated In this document are those of the authors and do not necessarlfy represent the offlclaf position or policies of the National Institute of Justice MARCH, 1985 Permission to reproduce this C~d material has been granted by Public Damain/NIJ US~b~~J:~ll~f-2~ . Jusflce_.. to the National Crlmmal Jusllce Reference Service I NCJRS) By James Paul Heuser, Ph. D. Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permlS' Researcher sian of the ~t owner Crime Analysis Center (\ \ I ~) Prepared under Grant #83-BJ-CX-K420 from the Bureau of Justice " Statistics of the U.S. Department of Justice. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the author and do not necessar ily represent official posi tions or poli­ cies of the Bureau of Justice Statistics or the Oregon Department of Justice. () ~ f' t ? \, b e Information regarding this study or copie~ of this report can be obtained by writing or calling: Acknowledgements Dr. Clinton C•. Goff, Supervisor Dr. James Paul Heuser, Researcher Crime Analysis Center Crime Analysis Center Department of Justice Department of Justice 100 Justice Building 100 Justice Building The author and the Crime Analysis Center would like to acknowledge the Salem, Oregon 97310 Salem, Oregon 97310 contributions of several people who made this study possible and/or who Phone: (503) 378-8056 Phone: (503) 378-4229 assisted in the research effort and the report preparation.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Justice for Victims of Crime in Oregon C1
    This booklet was published with the generous support of Erin Olson Law Office of Erin Olson, P.C. Portland, Oregon www.erinolsonlaw.com John Devlin Rosenthal, Greene & Devlin, P.C. Portland, Oregon www.rgdpdx.com Civil Justice Don Corson The Corson & Johnson Law Firm for Victims Eugene, Oregon www.CorsonJohnsonLaw.com of Crime in For referrals to an attorney or more information, Oregon please call the National Crime Victim Bar Association at 202-467-8716 2000 M Street, NW, Suite 480 Washington, DC 20036 202-467-8753 [email protected] www.victimbar.org an affiliate of: ©2013 National Center for Victims of Crime Printing 9/13, 9M CIVIL JUSTICE FOR VICTIMS OF CRIME IN OREGON C1 13172NCVC_NCVBA_Oregon_v4.indd 4-1 9/18/13 2:30 PM Table of Contents Civil Justice for I. Purpose of This Booklet ............................................2 II. Victims’ Financial Losses and Victims of Crime Potential Sources of Compensation ........................2 in Oregon III. Why File a Civil Lawsuit? ..........................................3 IV. Criminal Versus Civil Justice ...................................4 V. Parties in a Civil Suit ................................................8 VI. Statutes of Limitations and Notice Requirements ................................................9 VII. Types of Civil Lawsuits ..............................................9 VIII. Common Defenses to Civil Liability .....................11 IX. Filing a Civil Lawsuit ..............................................11 X. Victim Privacy ..........................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • National Origin and Barriers to Accessing Justice
    Online CLE National Origin and Barriers to Accessing Justice 1 Access to Justice credit From the Oregon State Bar CLE seminar The ABCs of Oregon Legal Services: Accessibility, Barriers, and Challenges, presented on June 14, 2018 © 2018 Chanpone Sinlapasai. All rights reserved. ii Chapter 2 National Origin and Barriers to Accessing Justice CHANPONE SINLAPASAI Marandas & Sinlapasai PC Lake Oswego, Oregon Contents Presentation Slides . 2–1 U .S . Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Office for Victims of Crime Pamphlet— What You Can Do If You Are a Victim of a Crime . 2–11 . Executive Office for Immigration Review Organizational Chart . 2–13 U .S . Department of Homeland Security Organizational Chart . 2–15 U .S . Citizenship & Immigration Services Organizational Chart . 2–17. Homeland Security U Visa Law Enforcement Certification Resource Guide for Federal, State, Local, Tribal and Territorial Law Enforcement . .2–19 . Chapter 2—National Origin and Barriers to Accessing Justice The ABCs of Oregon Legal Services: Accessibility, Barriers, and Challenges 2–ii Chapter 2—National Origin and Barriers to Accessing Justice NATIONAL ORIGIN AND BARRIERS TO ACCESSING JUSTICE Presented by: Chanpone Sinlapasai Marandas Sinlapasai, PC [email protected] ROAD MAP OF PRESENTATION 1. National origin types and Immigration law 2. The intersectionality of state and federal laws 3. Victims’ rights and the disconnect between state and federal courts The ABCs of Oregon Legal Services: Accessibility, Barriers, and Challenges 2–1 Chapter 2—National
    [Show full text]
  • Human Trafficking & Native Peoples in Oregon: a Human Rights Report
    Human Trafficking & Native Peoples in Oregon: A Human Rights Report May 2014 Prepared by the International Human Rights Clinic at Willamette University College of Law HUMAN TRAFFICKING & NATIVE PEOPLES IN OREGON: A HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT Prepared by the International Human Rights Clinic Willamette University College of Law Under the guidance and supervision of Professor Gwynne Skinner Student Editor: Hayley Weedn, Clinic Intern (Class of 2013) Legal Interns in the International Human Rights Clinic engaged in the fact-finding and prepared this report over the course of three academic semesters. Clinic Interns who worked on the fact-finding or final report were: Lead authors: Hayley Weedn (Class of 2013), Joseph Scovel (Class of 2014), and Jason Juran (Class of 2014) Other interns in the Clinic who worked on this project and contributed valuable time and effort: Emily Apel, Christine Baker, Laura Bloom, Joseph Elwood, Andrea Flanagan, and Michael Hicks. None of the authors of the Report identify as Native American. We realize this fact fairly creates questions about the Report’s credibility. We also realize that it inherently limits our understanding regarding Native cultures and the complex repercussions of colonization. We acknowledge the long history and impact of oppressive policies and other institutional forms of cultural destruction wrought by colonization that continues today. We also maintain the highest level of respect and reverence for Native Peoples and the Tribes of Oregon. For any mistakes we make, any insensitivity we show, or any offense or upset we cause, we apologize. Please know such mistakes or insensitivities were not intentional. We approached this project with the utmost respect for Native cultures and with humility.
    [Show full text]
  • Attorney General's 2009 Annual Report
    Dear Fellow Oregonians: On January 5, 2009, I was sworn into office as Oregon’s seventeenth Attorney General. That day, I issued a new mission statement for the Oregon Department of Justice. The statement reads: The mission of the Oregon Department of Justice is to provide outstanding legal and child support services to Oregonians and their government. We are dedicated to: Fighting crime and protecting crime victims; Improving the well-being of Oregon's children; Protecting the environment; Fighting for Oregon consumers, workers, investors, and taxpayers; Promoting a positive business climate; Providing great legal services to Oregon's state government; and Defending the rights of all Oregonians. Every day, the women and men of DOJ work with dedication, tenacity, and skill to accomplish this mission. In 2009 we achieved some great success. For example: The Department’s prosecutors and criminal investigators helped dismantle two major drug trafficking organizations based in Washington and Clackamas Counties in the largest state racketeering case ever prosecuted in Oregon. We created a new environmental crimes unit and filed major cases to hold polluters accountable, protect endangered species, and speed the clean-up of the toxic Hanford nuclear facility. We introduced and helped pass landmark legislation to protect victims of crime in Oregon’s courts. We joined Treasurer Ben Westlund to sue OppenheimerFunds, Inc., for mismanagement of the state’s College Savings Plan. In November, we reached a settlement that will divide $20 million among roughly 45,000 Oregonians who invested in the fund. We took swift legal action against pharmaceutical companies like Bayer, Pfizer, and Aventis, recovering over $16.8 million for Oregon consumers and taxpayers.
    [Show full text]
  • Indians in Oregon Today
    INDIANS IN OREGON TODAY OREGON MIDDLE SCHOOL – HIGH SCHOOL CURRICULUM Oregon Department of Education Rob Saxton, Deputy Superintendent of Public Instruction 255 Capitol St. NE Salem, OR 97310-0203 INDIANS IN OREGON TODAY OREGON MIDDLE SCHOOL – HIGH SCHOOL CURRICULUM Floy Pepper, Writer Oregon Department of Education Division of Special Student Services, Federal Programs Jerry Fuller, Associate Superintendent Robin A. Butterfield, Specialist Indian Education 2004 REVISIONS: Lou Farrow Andrea Morgan Assistant Director Social Sciences Curriculum Confederated Tribes of Umatilla Indian Oregon Department of Education Reservation Brenda Frank Minerva Soucie Education/Employment Director Education Director Klamath Tribe Burns-Paiute Tribe Marion Mercier Brad Victor Education Division Manager Indian Education Specialist Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde Oregon Department of Education Front cover: Konaway Nika Tillicum, Southern Oregon University 1 It is the policy of the State Board of Education and a priority of the Oregon Department of Education that there will be no discrimination or harassment on the grounds of race, color, sex, marital status, religion, national origin, age, or handicap in any educational programs, activities, or employment. Persons having questions about equal opportunity and nondiscrimination should contact the State Superintendent of Public Instruction at the Oregon Department of Education. The original document was produced by the Publications and Multimedia Center Oregon Department of Education Salem, Oregon 97310-0290
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Performance of Oregon's Juvenile Justice System
    JUVENILE JUSTICE IN OREGON An Analysis of the Performance of Oregon’s Juvenile Justice System and Specific Recommendations for Improvements Authored by Charles French Deputy District Attorney Retired John S. Foote Clackamas County District Attorney For Additional Information Contact [email protected] September 2, 2014 Juvenile Justice in Oregon 7/23/2014 Page 2 This page intentionally left blank CONTENTS EXHIBITS ................................................................................................................................................... iii PREFACE ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................. 3 Juvenile system crime performance in Oregon. ...................................................................................... 3 Budget performance. ............................................................................................................................... 4 Casey Foundation performance across the nation. ................................................................................. 5 I. OREGON’S JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM ...................................................................................................... 7 Adoption of Casey Foundation practices. ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon's Measure 11 Sentencing Reform Implementation and System Impact
    THE ARTS This PDF document was made available from www.rand.org as a public CHILD POLICY service of the RAND Corporation. CIVIL JUSTICE EDUCATION Jump down to document ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT 6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research NATIONAL SECURITY POPULATION AND AGING organization providing objective analysis and effective PUBLIC SAFETY solutions that address the challenges facing the public SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY and private sectors around the world. SUBSTANCE ABUSE TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Support RAND WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Public Safety and Justice View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non- commercial use only. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. This product is part of the RAND Corporation technical report series. Reports may include research findings on a specific topic that is limited in scope; present discus- sions of the methodology employed in research; provide literature reviews, survey instruments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research profes- sionals, and supporting documentation; or deliver preliminary findings. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure that they meet high standards for re- search quality and objectivity. Oregon's Measure 11 Sentencing Reform Implementation and System Impact Nancy Merritt, Terry Fain, Susan Turner Prepared for the National Institute of Justice The research described in this report was conducted by RAND's Public Safety and Justice for the National Institute of Justice, under grant 98-CE-VX-0030.
    [Show full text]
  • WHAT HAPPENS AFTER ARREST in OREGON? a Report On,The Disposition of Part I Felony.Arrests for 1979
    ,~--,~"""",---'­ ..... ~, National Criminal Justice Reference Service ", I This microfiche was produced from documents received for inclusion in the NCJRS data' base. Since NCJRS cannot exercise control over the physical condition of the documents submitted the individual frame quality will vary. The resolupon chart on 11 , this frame may be used to evaluate the document quality. ~ . - , " Microfilming I?Iocedures used to create this fiche comply with the standardfset forth in 41CFR 101-11.504. c' o "'I Points of view or opinions stated in this document are ", those of the author(s) and do not represent the official ~,~'>I< ., position or poliCies of the U. S. Department of JUStice. <tt l) National Institute of Justice Unit~d States Department of Justice Washington. D. C. 20531 \! -=-'~-~~~" ,-- - - --~ ...---- ---- ~- - WHAT HAPPENS AFTER ARREST IN OREGON? A Report on,the Disposition of Part I Felony.Arrests for 1979 -. t', , " '; \',' .. ; ~.' . .. .' WHAT'HAPPENS AFTER ARREST IN OREGON? by A Report on the Disposition of Part I Felony Arre&­ ; "'James P:auTHeuser, Ph •. D.:,Resear'ther " for 1979 , 'j ~ ". - ' .. ~,;: _ '1 • Oregon Law 'Enforcement' CounCil-' ,. ~'! .' '... , ."' ~. ~ .' ~ .: o \) , <tHttlthe Ass i stance of Prepared by the Stahley T. Woodwell, Data Processing OREGON LAW ENFORCEMENT COUNCIL Pearl B. Heath August, 1982 and Jeanne Bittner . ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS " U.S. Department of Justice '.~.\ This study was conducted by members of the Crime Analysis Center of the Oregon National Institute of Justice Law Enforctment Council (OlEC). Mr. Stan Woodwell, Programmer Analyst, did This document .has been reproducetl exactly as received from the the computer programming to compile the data and to put it in a format for sta­ pe~~?n ~r organization originating it.
    [Show full text]