A Small B Chromosome in the Grasshopper Ommexecha Virens (Ommexechidae)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Caracterização Cariotípica Dos Gafanhotos Ommexecha Virens E Descampsacris Serrulatum (Orthoptera-Ommexechidae)
UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE PERNAMBUCO-UFPE CENTRO DE CIÊNCIAS BIOLÓGICAS – CCB PROGRAMA DE PÓS – GRADUAÇÃO EM CIÊNCIAS BIOLÓGICAS –PPGCB MESTRADO Caracterização cariotípica dos gafanhotos Ommexecha virens e Descampsacris serrulatum (Orthoptera-Ommexechidae) DANIELLE BRANDÃO DE CARVALHO Recife, 2008 DANIELLE BRANDÃO DE CARVALHO Caracterização cariotípica dos gafanhotos Ommexecha virens e Descampsacris serrulatum (Orthoptera-Ommexechidae) Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Biológicas da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, UFPE, como requisito para a obtenção do título de Mestre em Ciências Biológicas. Mestranda: Danielle Brandão de Carvalho Orientador(a): Drª Maria José de Souza Lopes Co-orientador(a): Drª Marília de França Rocha Recife, 2008 Carvalho, Danielle Brandão de Caracterização cariotípica dos gafanhotos Ommmexeche virens e Descampsacris serrulatum (Orthoptera ommexechidae). / Danielle Brandão de Carvalho. – Recife: A Autora, 2008. vi; 74 fls. .: il. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Biológicas) – UFPE. CCB 1. Gafanhotos 2. Orthoptera 3. Taxonomia I.Título 595.727 CDU (2ª. Ed.) UFPE 595.726 CDD (22ª. Ed.) CCB – 2008 –077 Caracterização cariotípica dos gafanhotos Ommexecha virens e Descampsacris serrulatum (Orthoptera-Ommexechidae) Mestranda: Danielle Brandão de Carvalho Orientador(a): Drª Maria José de Souza Lopes Co-orientador(a): Drª Marília de França Rocha Comissão Examinadora • Membros Titulares Aos idosos mais lindos e amados, meus pais Josivaldo e Bernadete e minha avó materna Anizia (in memorian) As professoras Maria José de Souza Lopes e Marília de França Rocha. SUMÁRIO AGRADECIMENTOS i LISTA DE FIGURAS iii LISTA DE TABELAS iv LISTA DE ABREVIATURAS v RESUMO vi I. INTRODUÇÃO 12 II. OBJETIVO GERAL 13 II.1. OBJETIVOS ESPECÍFICOS 13 III. REVISÃO DA LITERATURA 14 III.1. -
And Descampsacris Serrulatum (Serville, 1831) (Orthoptera, Ommexechidae): Karyotypes, Constitutive Heterochromatin and Nucleolar Organizing Regions
COMPARATIVE A peer-reviewed open-access journal CompCytogenOmmexecha 5(2): 123–132 virens (2011) (Thunberg, 1824) andDescampsacris serrulatum (Serville, 1831)... 123 doi: 10.3897/CompCytogen.v5i2.960 RESEARCH ARTICLE Cytogenetics www.pensoft.net/journals/compcytogen International Journal of Plant & Animal Cytogenetic, Karyosystematics, and Molecular Systematics Ommexecha virens (Thunberg, 1824) and Descampsacris serrulatum (Serville, 1831) (Orthoptera, Ommexechidae): karyotypes, constitutive heterochromatin and nucleolar organizing regions D.B. Carvalho1, M.F. Rocha2, V. Loreto1, A.E.B. Silva3, M.J. Souza1 1 Departamento de Genética, Centro de Ciências Biológicas/CCB, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco/ UFPE, Av. Prof. Moraes Rego s/n, Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil CEP:50732-970 2 Instituto de Ciências Biológi- cas/ICB, Universidade de Pernambuco /UPE, Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil 3 Departamento de Botânica, Centro de Ciências Biológicas/CCB, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco/ UFPE Corresponding author: V. Loreto ([email protected]) Academic editor: Ilya Gavrilov | Received 5 November 2010 | Accepted 19 May 2011 | Published 30 June 2011 Citation: Carvalho DB, Rocha MF, Loreto V, Silva AEB, Souza MJ (2011) Ommexecha virens (Thunberg, 1824) and Descampsacris serrulatum (Serville, 1831) (Orthoptera, Ommexechidae): karyotypes, constitutive heterochromatin and nucleolar organizing regions. Comparative Cytogenetics 5(2): 123–132. doi: 10.3897/JHR.v5i2.960 Abstract Chromosomes of Ommexecha virens and Descampsacris serrulatum (Ommexechidae) were analyzed through conventional staining, C-banding, base specific fluorochromes, silver nitrate impregnation (AgNO3), and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) with probe for 45S rDNA. The two species pre- sented diploid number 2n= 23,X0 in males and acrocentric autosomes, except the pair one that presented submetacentric morphology. The X chromosome has distinct morphology in the two analyzed species, be- ing a medium acrocentric in O. -
Multiple Patterns of Scaling of Sexual Size Dimorphism with Body Size in Orthopteroid Insects Revista De La Sociedad Entomológica Argentina, Vol
Revista de la Sociedad Entomológica Argentina ISSN: 0373-5680 [email protected] Sociedad Entomológica Argentina Argentina Bidau, Claudio J.; Taffarel, Alberto; Castillo, Elio R. Breaking the rule: multiple patterns of scaling of sexual size dimorphism with body size in orthopteroid insects Revista de la Sociedad Entomológica Argentina, vol. 75, núm. 1-2, 2016, pp. 11-36 Sociedad Entomológica Argentina Buenos Aires, Argentina Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=322046181002 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Trabajo Científico Article ISSN 0373-5680 (impresa), ISSN 1851-7471 (en línea) Revista de la Sociedad Entomológica Argentina 75 (1-2): 11-36, 2016 Breaking the rule: multiple patterns of scaling of sexual size dimorphism with body size in orthopteroid insects BIDAU, Claudio J. 1, Alberto TAFFAREL2,3 & Elio R. CASTILLO2,3 1Paraná y Los Claveles, 3304 Garupá, Misiones, Argentina. E-mail: [email protected] 2,3Laboratorio de Genética Evolutiva. Instituto de Biología Subtropical (IBS) CONICET-Universi- dad Nacional de Misiones. Félix de Azara 1552, Piso 6°. CP3300. Posadas, Misiones Argentina. 2,3Comité Ejecutivo de Desarrollo e Innovación Tecnológica (CEDIT) Felix de Azara 1890, Piso 5º, Posadas, Misiones 3300, Argentina. Quebrando la regla: multiples patrones alométricos de dimorfismo sexual de tama- ño en insectos ortopteroides RESUMEN. El dimorfismo sexual de tamaño (SSD por sus siglas en inglés) es un fenómeno ampliamente distribuido en los animales y sin embargo, enigmático en cuanto a sus causas últimas y próximas y a las relaciones alométricas entre el SSD y el tamaño corporal (regla de Rensch). -
Orthoptera: Caelifera)
Insect Systematics & Evolution 44 (2013) 241–260 brill.com/ise Re-evaluation of taxonomic utility of male phallic complex in higher-level classification of Acridomorpha (Orthoptera: Caelifera) Hojun Song* and Ricardo Mariño-Pérez Department of Biology, University of Central Florida, 4000 Central Florida Boulevard Orlando, FL 32816, USA *Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Published 25 October 2013 Abstract The current higher classification of the orthopteran superfamily group Acridomorpha is largely based on interpretation of male phallic structures. Internal male genitalia have been considered as an excellent taxonomic character because of a widespread belief that they are less subject to selective pressures from environment, and thus more stable than external characters. Furthermore, based on a notion that evolu- tion proceeds from simple to complex, early taxonomists who shaped the higher classification of Acridomorpha considered those groups with less differentiated and membranous phallic structures as primitive and used this notion to deduce a phylogeny of Acridomorpha. In this study, we test these ideas based on a cladistic analysis of male phallic structures and a character optimization analysis to assess the level of homoplasy and synapomorphy for those phallic characters that have been traditionally used for the Acridomorpha systematics. We also perform an independent test of the phylogenetic utility of male phal- lic structures based on a molecular phylogeny. We show that while some phallic structures have strong phylogenetic signal, many traditionally used characters are highly homoplasious. However, even those homoplasious characters are often informative in inferring relationships. Finally, we argue that the notion that evolution proceeds in increasing complexity is largely unfounded and difficult to quantify in the higher-level classification of Acridomorpha. -
Theodore J. Cohn Research Successful
METALEPTEAMETALEPTEA THE NEWSLETTER OF THE ORTHOPTERISTS’ SOCIETY President’s Message [1] PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE By MICHAEL SAMWAYS President he 11th Congress of bership and [2] INTRODUCING OUR NEW Orthopterology in Kun- Occasional EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ming, China and orga- Publications. nized by Professor Long He also start- [3] SOCIETY NEWS Zhang, was the largest ed to move TT yet, and immensely the Society [3] The Theodore J. Cohn Research successful. There were many stimu- into a truly Fund: A call for applications lating sessions and a great exchange international [4] Symposium Report by MATAN of ideas. Already, this has led to some organization, SHELOMI fruitful new liaisons among several of especially the delegates. The outcomes of some through the [5] OS GRANT REPORTS of these new interactions we will no activity of the Regional Representa- doubt see unfold at our next Congress tives. Of course, Chuck is still an [5] Searching for a hope: An expedi- in Brazil in 2016. active member of the Society and tion in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest continues to give advice on matters by JULIANA CHAMORRO-RENGIFO The Ted Cohn Research Fund of organization. We wish Chuck all The late Ted Cohn was not only a the best in devoting his time to seeing [6] Microbial community structure dedicated Orthopterist, but also an his university Faculty on its way as reflects population genetic struc- extraordinarily dedicated member of its Dean. Thanks, Chuck, for all you ture in an ecologically divergent grasshopper by TYLER JAY RASZICK our Society. As well as being a Past have done for the Society! President twice, he personally saw [7] CONTRIBUTED ARTICLES that many young researchers were Welcome to our new Executive endowed with funds to undertake Director [7] Scattered Recollections: The exciting new research projects. -
U1 Sndna Clusters in Grasshoppers: Chromosomal Dynamics and Genomic Organization
Heredity (2015) 114, 207–219 & 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0018-067X/15 www.nature.com/hdy ORIGINAL ARTICLE U1 snDNA clusters in grasshoppers: chromosomal dynamics and genomic organization A Anjos1, FJ Ruiz-Ruano2, JPM Camacho2, V Loreto3, J Cabrero2, MJ de Souza3 and DC Cabral-de-Mello1 The spliceosome, constituted by a protein set associated with small nuclear RNA (snRNA), is responsible for mRNA maturation through intron removal. Among snRNA genes, U1 is generally a conserved repetitive sequence. To unveil the chromosomal/ genomic dynamics of this multigene family in grasshoppers, we mapped U1 genes by fluorescence in situ hybridization in 70 species belonging to the families Proscopiidae, Pyrgomorphidae, Ommexechidae, Romaleidae and Acrididae. Evident clusters were observed in all species, indicating that, at least, some U1 repeats are tandemly arrayed. High conservation was observed in the first four families, with most species carrying a single U1 cluster, frequently located in the third or fourth longest autosome. By contrast, extensive variation was observed among Acrididae, from a single chromosome pair carrying U1 to all chromosome pairs carrying it, with occasional occurrence of two or more clusters in the same chromosome. DNA sequence analysis in Eyprepocnemis plorans (species carrying U1 clusters on seven different chromosome pairs) and Locusta migratoria (carrying U1 in a single chromosome pair) supported the coexistence of functional and pseudogenic lineages. One of these pseudogenic lineages was truncated in the same nucleotide position in both species, suggesting that it was present in a common ancestor to both species. At least in E. plorans, this U1 snDNA pseudogenic lineage was associated with 5S rDNA and short interspersed elements (SINE)-like mobile elements. -
Re-Description of Tenuitarsus Orientalis Kevan, 1959
et International Journal on Emerging Technologies 12 (1): 39-42(2021) ISSN No. (Print): 0975-8364 ISSN No. (Online): 2249-3255 Re-description of Tenuitarsus orientalis Kevan, 1959 (Pyrgomorphidae: Orthoptera) from Pakistan Kousar Parveen Memon 1, Waheed Ali Panhwar 1* and Abdul Manan Shaikh 1 1M.S Research Scholar, Department of Zoology, Shah Abdul Latif University Khairpur Mirs Sindh, Pakistan. 1Assistant Professor, Department of Zoology, Shah Abdul Latif University Khairpur Mirs Sindh, Pakistan. 3Associate Professor, Department of Zoology, Shah Abdul Latif University Khairpur Mirs Sindh, Pakistan. (Corresponding author: Waheed Ali Panhwar) (Received 30 October 2020, Revised 21 December 2020, Accepted 11 January 2021) (Published by Research Trend, Website: www.researchtrend.net) ABSTRACT: Pakistan is the most unique and geographically important region with the Oriental, Palaelarctic and coexisting components with afro-tropical elements, which are suitable for breeding these insects particularly Pyrgomorphidae species. They are most spectacular grasshoppers causing severe damage to various crops. It was therefore present was designed to explore the Pyrgomorphid fauna especially, genus Tenuitarsus Bolívar, 1904 from this region. For the present study, surveys were carried out during the month of March 2019- August 2020 from different localities of district Khairpur Mirs Sindh, Pakistan. The samples were identified into single genus with single species i-e: Tenuitarsus orientalis Kevan, 1959. In this paper we re-describe Tenuitarsus orientalis Kevan, 1959. Beside this, morphometric variations of male and female are presented. Keywords: Pyrgomorphidae, Species, Morphometry, Grasshoppers, Damage, Checklist, Re-description. Abbreviations: NH, Natural History Museum; EL, Entomological Lab; LP, Length of Pronotum; LT, Length of Tegmina; LF, Length of Femur; TBL, Total body length the Faislababd only one species: Pyrgomorpha conica I. -
Evolution of the Insects
CY501-PIND[733-756].qxd 2/17/05 2:10 AM Page 733 Quark07 Quark07:BOOKS:CY501-Grimaldi: INDEX 12S rDNA, 32, 228, 269 Aenetus, 557 91; general, 57; inclusions, 57; menageries 16S rDNA, 32, 60, 237, 249, 269 Aenigmatiinae, 536 in, 56; Mexican, 55; parasitism in, 57; 18S rDNA, 32, 60, 61, 158, 228, 274, 275, 285, Aenne, 489 preservation in, 58; resinite, 55; sub-fossil 304, 307, 335, 360, 366, 369, 395, 399, 402, Aeolothripidae, 284, 285, 286 resin, 57; symbioses in, 303; taphonomy, 468, 475 Aeshnoidea, 187 57 28S rDNA, 32, 158, 278, 402, 468, 475, 522, 526 African rock crawlers (see Ambermantis wozniaki, 259 Mantophasmatodea) Amblycera, 274, 278 A Afroclinocera, 630 Amblyoponini, 446, 490 aardvark, 638 Agaonidae, 573, 616: fossil, 423 Amblypygida, 99, 104, 105: in amber, 104 abdomen: function, 131; structure, 131–136 Agaoninae, 423 Amborella trichopoda, 613, 620 Abies, 410 Agassiz, Alexander, 26 Ameghinoia, 450, 632 Abrocomophagidae, 274 Agathiphaga, 560 Ameletopsidae, 628 Acacia, 283 Agathiphagidae, 561, 562, 567, 630 American Museum of Natural History, 26, 87, acalyptrate Diptera: ecological diversity, 540; Agathis, 76 91 taxonomy, 540 Agelaia, 439 Amesiginae, 630 Acanthocnemidae, 391 ages, using fossils, 37–39; using DNA, 38–40 ametaboly, 331 Acari, 99, 105–107: diversity, 101, fossils, 53, Ageniellini, 435 amino acids: racemization, 61 105–107; in-Cretaceous amber, 105, 106 Aglaspidida, 99 ammonites, 63, 642 Aceraceae, 413 Aglia, 582 Amorphoscelidae, 254, 257 Acerentomoidea, 113 Agrias, 600 Amphientomidae, 270 Acherontia atropos, 585 -
Distribución Geográfica De Las Familias Romaleidae Y Ommexechidae (Orthoptera: Acridoidea) En El Uruguay
Distribución geográfica de las familias Romaleidae y Ommexechidae (Orthoptera: Acridoidea) en el Uruguay Andrea Listre Pasantía de la Licenciatura en Ciencias Biológicas. Orientador: Msc. Estrellita Lorier Realización de la pasantía en: Departamento de Biología Animal, Sección Entomología. Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República. Montevideo, Uruguay. 2009 1 Distribución geográfica de las familias Romaleidae y Ommexechidae (Orthoptera: Acridoidea) en el Uruguay ÍNDICE Resumen…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….3 Introducción……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….4 Objetivos…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….16 Hipótesis……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..16 Materiales y métodos………………………………………………………………………………………………….17 Resultados…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..22 Las familias Romaleidae y Ommexechidae en la colección de la Facultad de Ciencias………….22 Ecología de las especies………………………………………………………………………………………….25 Distribución de las familias Romaleidae y Ommexechidae en América del Sur…………………..32 Distribución de las familias Romaleidae y Ommexechidae en Uruguay………………………….…34 Riqueza de las familias Romaleidae y Ommexechidae en Uruguay…………………………….……40 Análisis de parsimonia de endemismos de las familias Romaleidae y Ommexechidae…….….42 Discusión…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...46 Conclusiones……………………………………………………………………………………………………………...50 Bibliografía………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...51 Agradecimientos………………………………………………………………………………………………………..56 Anexos……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….57 -
Karyotypes of Some Members of the Grasshopper Families Lentulidae and Charilaidae
184 Karyotypes of Some Members of the Grasshopper Families Lentulidae and Charilaidae M. J. D. White Department of Genetics, University of Melbourne, Australia Received June 7, 1966 Introduction The Lentulidae are a family of peculiar wingless South and East African grasshoppers. Dirsh (1956) stated that "In the structure of the phallic complex, the Lentulidae have more chraracters in common with the Pyrgomorphidae than with any other Acridoid family". But "the external characters of these two families, however, are very different" and (Dirsh 1961) "it is not possible to relate this family (i .e. the Lentulidae) to any other known family". The Charilaidae is another small family of South African grasshoppers, including three genera. It has been supposed to be related to the Pamphagidae, but Dirsh (1961) notes some pronounced differences in the phallic complex. The Charilaidae have one external feature which is unique among grasshoppers, a double median pronotal carina. Because of uncertainties as to the relationships of these families, it seems desirable to place on record some observations on their chromosome cytology. Materials and methods The species studied, and the localities of collection, were as follows: Lentulidae Mecostibus cf. nyassae Uv. 1 mi. E of Tshipise, Northern Transvaal Shelfordites nanus Uv. 4mi. E of Windsorton Road, Cape Province; 22mi. N of Kimberley, Cape Province; 24mi. INTof De Aar, Cape Province; 17mi. SE of Hopetown, Cape Province; 12mi. N. of Aberdeen, Cape Province: Middelburg, Cape Province Syrgus sp. near rehni Dirsh The Downs, 16mi. W of Ofcalaco, Transvaal Paralentula? marcida Rehn 2mi. NE of Bandolierkop, Transvaal P. prasinata Rehn 30mi. -
Order Orthoptera Oliver, 1789. In: Zhang, Z.-Q
Order Orthoptera Olivier, 1789 (2 suborders)1, 2, 3, 4 Suborder Ensifera Chopard, 1920 (6 superfamilies)5, 6 Superfamily Hagloidea Handlirsch, 1906 (1 extant family) Family Prophalangopsidae Kirby, 1906 (7 genera, 8 species) Superfamily Stenopelmatoidea Burmeister, 1838 (4 families) Family Anostostomatidae Saussure, 1859 (41 genera, 206 species) Family Cooloolidae Rentz, 1980 (1 genus, 4 species) Family Gryllacrididae Blanchard, 1845 (94 genera, 675 species) Family Stenopelmatidae Burmeister, 1838 (6 genera, 28 species) Superfamily Tettigonioidea Krauss, 1902 (1 family) Family Tettigoniidae Krauss, 1902 (1193 genera, 6827 species) Superfamily Rhaphidophoroidea Walker, 1871 (1 family) Family Rhaphidophoridae Walker, 1871 (77 genera, 497 species) Superfamily Schizodactyloidea Blanchard, 1845 (1 family) Family Schizodactylidae Blanchard, 1845 (2 genera, 15 species) Superfamily Grylloidea Laicharting, 1781 (4 families) Family Gryllidae Laicharting, 1781 (597 genera, 4664 species) Family Gryllotalpidae Leach, 1815 (6 genera, 100 species) Family Mogoplistidae Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1873 (30 genera, 365 species) Family Myrmecophilidae Saussure, 1874 (5 genera, 71 species) Suborder Caelifera Ander, 1936 (2 infraorders, 9 superfamilies)7, 8 Infraorder Tridactylidea (Brullé, 1835) Sharov, 1968 (1 superfamily)9, 10 Superfamily Tridactyloidea Brullé, 1835 (3 families) Family Cylindrachetidae Bruner, 1916 (3 genera, 16 species) Family Ripipterygidae Ander, 1939 (2 genera, 69 species) Family Tridactylidae Brullé, 1835 (10 genera, 132 species) Infraorder Acrididea (MacLeay, 1821) Sharov, 1968 (8 superfamilies)11 Superfamily Tetrigoidea Serville, 1838 (1 family) Family Tetrigidae Serville, 1838 (221 genera, 1246 species) Superfamily Eumastacoidea Burr, 1899 (8 families)12 Family Chorotypidae Stål, 1873 (43 genera, 160 species) 1. BY Sigfrid Ingrisch (for full address, see Author address after References). The title of this contribution should be cited as “Order Orthoptera Oliver, 1789. -
Biodiversity of Orthoptera 10
245 10 Biodiversity of Orthoptera Hojun Song Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA With more than 26,000 extant species, the 10.1 Taxonomic Classification Orthoptera are the most diverse order among and Phylogeny the polyneopteran insect lineages (Grimaldi and Engel 2005, Eades et al. 2015). The order includes The monophyly of the Orthoptera has been familiar singing insects, such as crickets and supported by morphological and molecular data katydids, as well as often‐devastating pests, such (Chopard 1949, Sharov 1968, Kevan 1982, Flook as grasshoppers and locusts (Gangwere et al. et al. 1999). Among many morphological and 1997). Orthopteran insects have diversified into physiological characters that define the Orthoptera numerous lineages that occupy every conceiva- (Chopard 1920; Slifer 1939; Judd 1947; Ragge ble terrestrial habitat outside the polar regions 1955; Dirsh 1957, 1973; Blackith and Blackith and play integral roles in their ecosystems 1968; Baccetti 1987b; Eades 2000), the presence of (Uvarov 1966, Kevan 1982). Such diversity in a cryptopleuron, developed from the lateral exten- form and function has attracted researchers who sion of the pronotum over the pleural sclerites use these insects as model systems for studying (Grimaldi and Engel 2005), and the jumping hind anatomy, bioacoustics, chemical ecology, evolu- legs are major diagnostic characters (Kevan 1982). tionary ecology, life‐history traits, neurobiology, Molecular phylogenetic studies based on riboso- physiology, and speciation (Uvarov 1966, 1977; mal RNA genes and mitochondrial genes have Baccetti 1987a; Chapman and Joern 1990; supported the monophyly of the order (Flook et al. Gangwere et al. 1997; Pener and Simpson 2009).