DOCSLIB.ORG

MOVEMENTS, HABITAT USE, and ACTIVITY PATTERNS of a TRANSLOCATED GROUP of ROOSEVELT ELK by Matthew Mccoy a Thesis Prese

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MOVEMENTS, HABITAT USE, and ACTIVITY PATTERNS of a TRANSLOCATED GROUP of ROOSEVELT ELK by Matthew Mccoy a Thesis Prese MOVEMENTS, HABITAT USE, AND ACTIVITY PATTERNS OF A TRANSLOCATED GROUP OF ROOSEVELT ELK by Matthew McCoy A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of Humboldt State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science June, 1 986 MOVEMENTS, HABITAT USE, AND ACTIVITY PATTERNS OF A TRANSLOCATED GROUP OF ROOSEVELT ELK by Matthew McCoy A F gam Director, Natural Resources Graduate Program 86/W-66/06/10 Natural Resources Graduate Program Number Ala M. Gillespi9( ABSTRACT In March 1982, 17 Roosevelt elk (Cervus elaphus roosevelti) were captured at Gold Bluffs Beach, Humboldt County, California and translocated to an enclosure 4 km east of Shelter Cove, Humboldt County. The animals were released from the enclosure in November 1982. Data were collected for eight radio-collared animals (seven adult females and one 4-year old male) January to December 1983. The number of herds varied from one (January through March) to four (October through December). Three female herds moved 45 km, 58 km, and 84 km south of Shelter Cove, while the radio-collared male remained within 16 km of Shelter Cove. Home range locations varied seasonally. Home range sizes were largest during the summer reflecting migrational and exploratory movements. Habitat use was disproportionate to habitat availability at the home range level during each season. Cultivated grasslands and riparian areas were used in proportions greater than their availability. Coastal Prairie use was greater than that available except in the Shelter Cove area. Shrub and forest habitat types were generally used less than that available. Animal distances to nearest road and water varied seasonally, but were greatest for radio-collared females during the spring. Use of cover was greatest during spring and summer and was correlated with increased temperature and decreased cloud cover. Activity followed a diurnal pattern with extended periods of activity (two or more hours) occurring at sunrise and sunset and shorter iii iv periods (about one hour) occurring at night and during the day. The amount of activity decreased significantly (p < 0.02) during the year. Animals were most active during the winter (43 percent of a 24—hour period) and least active during the fall (36 percent of a 24—hour period). ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would especially like to thank Dr. R. Golightly, my major professor, for his advice, support, patience, and friendship. His efforts are largely responsible for the completion of this thesis. I would also like to thank the members of my graduate committee: Drs. D. Kitchen and K. Fulgham, for their advice and criticism. The Bureau of Land Management provided a vehicle, maps, and equipment. The California Department of Fish and Game provided radio-telemetry equipment and the animals. Humboldt State University provided additional equipment and computer facilities. Residents in the study area provided useful information and support. Special thanks to M. Bivin for offering encouragement, helpful criticism, and for being a friend. B. Hardenbrook and J. Grenier also provided much appreciated manuscript reviews. B. Burger was more helpful than he could have imagined. Thanks to all the people who remained friends and offered support through the ups and downs. I am a better person for knowing them. Finally, I wish to thank my family for their support and encouragement. This thesis is dedicated to the memory of my father, I regret he could not be here to enjoy it. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS LIST OF TABLES ix LIST OF FIGURES xi INTRODUCTION 1 STUDY AREA 5 Habitat Types 5 Grassland 5 Shrubland 7 Forest 7 Riparian 8 MATERIALS AND METHODS 10 Capture and Release 10 Animal Data Collection 11 Habitat Data Collection 13 Animal Data Analysis 14 Definition of Season, Herd, and Movement 14 Test for Independence 15 Home Range Area 15 Habitat Use 15 Comparison of Distance Variables Between Seasons 16 Slope and Climate 16 vi vii TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Page Activity Pattern 17 Deliniation of Habitat Types 17 RESULTS 18 Movements and Home Ranges 18 Habitat Types 22 Habitat Use 22 Use of Grassland Habitats 32 Use of Shrub and Forest Habitats 32 Use of Riparian Habitats 33 Distance to Road 33 Distance to Water 33 Distance to Cover 36 Slope 36 Climate 36 Activity Pattern 40 Time Spent Active 40 Specific Behaviors 42 DISCUSSION 45 Movements and Home Ranges 45 Habitat Use 49 Use of Grassland Habitats 49 Use of Shrub and Forest Habitats 50 Use of Riparian Habitats 50 Distance to Road 51 Distance to Water 51 viii TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Page Distance to Cover 52 Slope 52 Climate 53 Activity Pattern 53 Time Spent Active 54 Time Allocation to Specific Activities 56 Conclusions 58 REFERENCES CITED 60 APPENDIX A. Animal Capture 68 APPENDIX B. Animal Movements 70 APPENDIX C. Habitat Sampling 72 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1 Herd Movements of Translocated Roosevelt Elk, Humboldt and Mendocino Counties, California, January-December 1983. 19 2 Seasonal Averages of Individual Home Range Areas (ha) for Translocated Roosevelt Elk, Humboldt and Mendocino Counties, California, Winter-Fall 1983. 21 3 Total Hectares and Total Number of Hourly Locations of Translocated Roosevelt Elk by Activity for each Habitat Type in the Study Area, Humboldt and Mendocino Counties, California, January-December 1983. 27 4 Habitat Use by Bull #201RW, Humboldt County, California, Winter-Fall 1983. 28 5 Habitat Use by the Red Herd (Cows #226R and #233B), Humboldt and Mendocino Counties, California, Winter-Fall 1983. 29 6 Habitat Use by Cow #231W, Humboldt and Mendocino Counties, California, Winter-Fall 1983. 30 7 Habitat Use by the Orange Herd (Cows #2290, #236RWB, #237Y, and #240G), Humboldt and Mendocino Counties, California, Winter-Fall 1983. 31 8 Yearly and Seasonal Breakdown of Animal Distances to Road for Translocated Roosevelt Elk, Humboldt and Mendocino Counties, California, Winter-Fall 1983. 34 9 Yearly and Seasonal Breakdown of Animal Distances to Water for Translocated Roosevelt Elk, Humboldt and Mendocino Counties, California, Winter-Fall 1983. 35 10 Yearly and Seasonal Breakdown of Animal Distances to Cover for Translocated Roosevelt Elk, Humboldt and Mendocino Counties, California, Winter-Fall 1983. 37 11 Slope Use by Translocated Roosevelt Elk, Humboldt and Mendocino Counties, California, January-December 1983. 38 12 Correlation Between Habitat Type Used (Grassland, Riparian, and Forest) and Climatic Variables (Ambient Temperature, Cloud Cover, Precipitation, and Wind Speed) for Translocated Roosevelt Elk, Humboldt and Mendocino Counties, California, Spring-Fall 1983. 39 is LIST OF TABLES (CONTINUED) Table Page 13 Percentage Time Spent in Specific Active and Inactive Behaviors for Several Herbivores. 57 14 Dominant Plant Species in the Seven Grassland Subgroups Determined Using Cluster Analysis, Humboldt and Mendocino Counties, California. 72 15 Dominant Plant Species in the Three Shrubland Subgroups Determined Using Cluster Analysis, Humboldt and Mendocino Counties, California. 73 16 Dominant Plant Species in the Seven Forest Subgroups Determined Using Cluster Analysis, Humboldt and Mendocino Counties, California. 74 17 Dominant Plant Species in the Three Riparian Subgroups Determined Using Cluster Analysis, Humboldt and Mendocino Counties, California. 75 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1 Initial Trap Site and Study Area for the Translocation of Roosevelt Elk, Humboldt and Mendocino Counties, California, February 1982 through December 1983. 6 2 Study Area for the Translocation of Roosevelt Elk, Humboldt and Mendocino Counties, California, January-December 1983. 20 3 One-hundred, 90, and 50 Percent Home Range Estimates (Convex Polygon), with Number of Observations Used in the 100 Percent Estimate, of Bull #201RW, January-December 1983. 23 4 One-hundred, 90, and 50 Percent Home Range Estimates (Convex Polygon), with Number of Observations Used in the 100 Percent Estimate, of the Red Herd (Cows #226R and #233B), January-December 1983. 24 5 One-hundred, 90, and 50 Percent Home Range Estimates (Convex Polygon), with Number of Observations Used in the 100 Percent Estimate, of Cow #231W, January-December 1983. 25 6 One-hundred, 90, and 50 Percent Home Range Estimate (Convex Polygon), with Number of Observations Used in the 100 Percent Estimate, of the Orange Herd (Cows #2290, #236RWB, #237Y, and #240G), January-December 1983. 26 7 Percentage Time Collared Roosevelt Elk Were Observed Active during each Hour, Humboldt and Mendocino Counties, California, Winter-Fall 1983. 41 8 Monthly Breakdown of Specific Active Behaviors Based on 5-minute Scan Data for Translocated Roosevelt Elk, Humboldt and Mendocino Counties, California, January-December 1983. 43 9 Monthly Breakdown of Specific Inactive Behaviors Based on 5-minute Scan Data for Translocated Roosevelt Elk, Humboldt and Mendocino Counties, California, January-December 1983. 44 10 Percentage Time Spent Active (during a 24-hour Period) as a Function of Body Weight (log w( kg )) of Several Herbivores. 55 11 Location of Prebaited Trap Sites in Prairie Creek Redwoods State Park and Redwood National Park, Humboldt County, California, February 1982. 69 xi INTRODUCTION Historically, Roosevelt elk (Cervus elaphus roosevelti) were found in the Pacific states from the Olympic Peninsula, Washington to San Francisco Bay, California and inland to the Cascade Mountains (Murie 1951). Overhunting and habitat loss have reduced California's Roosevelt elk population numbers and restricted their distribution (Orr 1937, Mandel 1979). Translocations
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bulletin of the United States Fish Commission Seattlenwf
    THE FUR SEALS AND OTHER LIFE OF THE PRIBILOF ISLANDS, ALASKA, IN 1914 By Wilfred H. Osgood, Edward A. Preble, and George H. Parker I Blank page retained for pagination CONTENTS. Palll!. LgTTERS OF TRANSMITTAL........•...........'............................................. II LETTER OF SUBMITTAL................... ................................................. 12 INTRODUCTION............... .. 13 Personnel and instructions. ............................................................. 13 Investigations by Canada and Japan... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. IS Itinerary , .. " . .. IS Impartial nature of the investigation " '" . 16 Acknowledgments................. 16 THg PRIBILOF ISLANDS..................................................................... 17 General description...................... .. 17 Vegetation. 18 Climate............. 18 CHARACTER AND HABITS OF THE FUR SEAL IN BRIEF....... ................................. 18 G'eneral characteristics. ................ .. .............................................. 18 Range.................................................................................. 18 , Breeding habits ; ........................ 19 Habits of bachelors : ......................... 20 Age of seals... ;. ....................................................................... 20 SEALING HISTORY IN BRIEF................................................................. 21 Russian management " .. .. 21 American occupation and the leasing system : . .. ... 21 The growth of pelagic sealing , "".. .. .. .. 22 The Paris Tribunal
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of How Dominance Rank Within a Herd of Resident Burchell’S Zebra (Equus Burchelli) at Ndarakwai Ranch Correlate to Frequencies of Other Behaviors
    SIT Graduate Institute/SIT Study Abroad SIT Digital Collections Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection SIT Study Abroad Fall 2010 Seeing Stripes: A Study of How Dominance Rank Within a Herd of Resident Burchell’s Zebra (Equus Burchelli) at Ndarakwai Ranch Correlate to Frequencies of Other Behaviors. Alexandra Clayton SIT Study Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection Part of the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Clayton, Alexandra, "Seeing Stripes: A Study of How Dominance Rank Within a Herd of Resident Burchell’s Zebra (Equus Burchelli) at Ndarakwai Ranch Correlate to Frequencies of Other Behaviors." (2010). Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection. 899. https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/899 This Unpublished Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the SIT Study Abroad at SIT Digital Collections. It has been accepted for inclusion in Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection by an authorized administrator of SIT Digital Collections. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Seeing Stripes A study of how dominance rank within a herd of resident Burchell’s zebra (Equus burchelli) at Ndarakwai Ranch correlate to frequencies of other behaviors. Alexandra Clayton Advisor: Reese Matthews SIT Wildlife Conservation and Political Ecology Fall 2010 Acknowledgements There are so many people that made this project possible, but I would first like to thank Peter Jones for allowing me the chance to conduct my study at Ndarakwai, and for allowing two Internet- starved students to use your wireless! It is a beautiful place and I hope to return someday. I also want to thank Thomas for letting us camp outside his house and to Bahati for making us the best chapatti and ginger tea we’ve ever had, and for washing our very muddy clothes.
    [Show full text]
  • Jyoti (2019). Crowding, Group Size and Population Structure of The
    PLATINUM The Journal of Threatened Taxa (JoTT) is dedicated to building evidence for conservaton globally by publishing peer-reviewed artcles online OPEN ACCESS every month at a reasonably rapid rate at www.threatenedtaxa.org. All artcles published in JoTT are registered under Creatve Commons Atributon 4.0 Internatonal License unless otherwise mentoned. JoTT allows allows unrestricted use, reproducton, and distributon of artcles in any medium by providing adequate credit to the author(s) and the source of publicaton. Journal of Threatened Taxa Building evidence for conservaton globally www.threatenedtaxa.org ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) Communication Crowding, group size and population structure of the Blackbuck Antilope cervicapra (Linnaeus, 1758) (Mammalia: Cetartiodactyla: Bovidae) in the semi-arid habitat of Haryana, India Deepak Rai & Jyot 26 July 2019 | Vol. 11 | No. 9 | Pages: 14194-14203 DOI: 10.11609/jot.4788.11.9.14194-14203 For Focus, Scope, Aims, Policies, and Guidelines visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/editorialPolicies#custom-0 For Artcle Submission Guidelines, visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/submissions#onlineSubmissions For Policies against Scientfc Misconduct, visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/editorialPolicies#custom-2 For reprints, contact <[email protected]> The opinions expressed by the authors do not refect the views of the Journal of Threatened Taxa, Wildlife Informaton Liaison Development Society, Zoo Outreach Organizaton, or
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology and Habitat Suitability of Cape Mountain Zebra (Equus Zebra Zebra) in the Western Cape, South Africa
    Ecology and habitat suitability of Cape mountain zebra (Equus zebra zebra) in the Western Cape, South Africa by Adriaan Jacobus Olivier Thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Masters of Science at Stellenbosch University Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Faculty of AgriScience Supervisor: Dr Alison J. Leslie Co-supervisor: Dr Jason I. Ransom December 2019 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Jaco Olivier December 2019 Copyright © 2019 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved ii Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Abstract Endemic to South Africa, the Cape mountain zebra (Equus zebra zebra) historically occurred throughout the Western Cape, and parts of the Northern and Eastern Cape. However, due to human impacts fewer than 50 individuals remained by the 1950’s. Conservation efforts over the past 50 years have resulted in the population increasing to over 4700 individuals and having moved on the IUCN red list, from Critically Endangered to Least Concern. As there are still many isolated meta-populations, CapeNature established a Biodiversity Management Plan for the conservation of Cape mountain zebra in the Western Cape. In 2001, 15 (six males and nine females) Cape mountain zebra was reintroduced into Bakkrans Nature Reserve, situated in the Cederberg Wilderness Area of South Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the Ram in the Impala (Aepyceros Melampus) Mating System
    University of Pretoria etd – Oliver, C M (2005) The role of the ram in the impala (Aepyceros melampus) mating system by Colin Malcolm Oliver Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MSc. (Veterinary Science) in the Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria July 2002 University of Pretoria etd – Oliver, C M (2005) The role of the ram in the impala (Aepyceros melampus) mating system by Colin Malcolm Oliver Project Supervisor: Professor J.D. Skinner Veterinary Wildlife Unit Faculty of Veterinary Science Onderstepoort 0110 South Africa. ABSTRACT The role of territoriality was investigated using 25 impala rams in a site in South Africa. Field data were used to determine known rams as territorial and bachelors, as well as aspirant and indeterminate. The mean territorial tenure was 67.25 days, with a mean territory size of 21.0 ± 11.27 ha, compared to the home ranges of 34.1 ha ± 9.03 ha for territorial and 58.8 ha ± 33.35 ha for bachelor males. Territory boundaries seemed to remain constant through the season, and are smaller when bordering important features such as water holes, which appear to be neutral in terms of territoriality. Mating was observed on three separate dates between 16 May - 4 June 2001, three times by territorial males, the exception being an aspirant ram. The most important diurnal behaviour was feeding, followed by watching, walking, ruminating, resting and licking salt. It was found that bachelors browse more than territorial males, and all males browse and lick salt more in the non-rut.
    [Show full text]
  • SKNP Wildlife Journal December 2017
    WILDLIFE REPORT SINGITA KRUGER NATIONAL PARK, SOUTH AFRICA For the month of December, Two Thousand and Seventeen Photo: Jacques Briam Temperature Rainfall Recorded Sunrise & Sunset Average minimum: 20°C (68°F) For the period: 58 mm Sunrise: 05h08 Average maximum: 33°C (91°F) For the year to date: 464 mm Sunset: 18h44 Minimum recorded: 14°C (57°F) Maximum recorded: 40°C (104°F) In the final month of 2017, we experienced warmer days and the increased promise of rain. The summer sun in the early morning brought with it the call of a multitude of bird species, that were in full song throughout the month. It also got hot very quickly, and the shortage of standing water early in the month meant that a late morning drives back along the N’wanetsi River would lead to regular sightings of zebra, giraffe, wildebeest, impala and elephants coming down to the riverine area for food, water and shade. Impala lambing season is still in full swing, but the young lambs have also now been joined by many young blue wildebeest. We have also had sightings of the odd sounder of warthog piglets. Most of the migrant bird species had arrived by the end of the month, particularly after some rain that fell in the latter parts of December. With the increased amount of standing water, there has been a boom in frog and insect activity, which has in turn, brought locally nomadic bird species from near and far. We are now seeing large amounts of lesser spotted eagles, and white stork, as they feast on insects and most notably, termites as they erupt after rain.
    [Show full text]
  • Accounting for Intraspecific Variation Transforms Our Understanding of Artiodactyl Social Evolution
    ACCOUNTING FOR INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION TRANSFORMS OUR UNDERSTANDING OF ARTIODACTYL SOCIAL EVOLUTION By Monica Irene Miles Loren D. Hayes Hope Klug Associate Professor of UC Foundation Associate Professor of Biology, Geology, and Environmental Science Biology, Geology, and Environmental Science (Chair) (Committee Member) Timothy Gaudin UC Foundation Professor of Biology, Geology, and Environmental Science (Committee Member) ACCOUNTING FOR INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION TRANSFORMS OUR UNDERSTANDING OF ARTIODACTYL SOCIAL EVOLUTION By Monica Irene Miles A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Degree of Master of Science: Environmental Science The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Chattanooga, Tennessee December 2018 ii Copyright © 2018 By Monica Irene Miles All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT A major goal in the study of mammalian social systems has been to explain evolutionary transitions in social traits. Recent comparative analyses have used phylogenetic reconstructions to determine the evolution of social traits but have omitted intraspecific variation in social organization (IVSO) and mating systems (IVMS). This study was designed to summarize the extent of IVSO and IVMS in Artiodactyla and Perissodactyla, and determine the ancestral social organization and mating system for Artiodactyla. Some 82% of artiodactyls showed IVSO, whereas 31% exhibited IVMS; 80% of perissodactyls had variable social organization and only one species showed IVMS. The ancestral population of Artiodactyla was predicted to have variable social organization (84%), rather than solitary or group-living. A clear ancestral mating system for Artiodactyla, however, could not be resolved. These results show that intraspecific variation is common in artiodactyls and perissodactyls, and suggest a variable ancestral social organization for Artiodactyla.
    [Show full text]
  • Baja California & Sea of Cortez
    Baja California & Sea of Cortez Naturetrek Tour Report 23 March - 4 April 2013 Humpback breaching Dolphin reflections Osprey Speckled Rattlesnake Report & images compiled by Lee Morgan Naturetrek Cheriton Mill Cheriton Alresford Hampshire SO24 0NG England T: +44 (0)1962 733051 F: +44 (0)1962 736426 E: [email protected] W: www.naturetrek.co.uk Tour Report Baja California & Sea of Cortez Tour Leader: Lee Morgan Naturetrek Naturalist Rob Nawojchik Local Naturalist M/V Searcher: Captain Aaron Remy Kenny Merrell, Cole Crafton, Joe Soares, Cameron Cribben, Charles Howell, Geri-Sue Kruse Participants: Dee Allbutt Mary Packwood Andy Smith Lisa Houghton-Smith Dawn Howsam Gail Perrins Ester Marciano Feldman Joseph Marciano Dara Reaper June Sparham Fernando Caldeira-Saraiva Ze Carrapichano Sandie Bates Dave Sharples Jennifer Sharples Martin Singfield Jane Appleton Phil Burgess Bev Burgess Ian Moore Geraldine Moore Elaine Clueit Alan Lester Catrin Lester Liz Leyden Day 1 Saturday 23rd March London to San Diego The group met at London Heathrow in the morning ready for departure. There was a delay because of snow and ice at Heathrow, then a connecting flight from Dallas, but we eventually arrived in San Diego early in the evening. A short shuttle bus journey to our hotel and we quickly checked into our rooms. After a long day of travel, most of the group took the chance of an early night. © Naturetrek July 13 1 Baja California & Sea of Cortez Tour Report Day 2 Sunday 24th March San Diego – Board M/VSearcher We awoke early to a sunny San Diego morning and while a few people ventured out for a pre-breakfast walk, by 9am most of the group were ready to go out and explore.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Behavioural Trade-Offs Made by Blue Wildebeest (Connochaetes Taurinus): the Importance of Resources, Predation and the Landscape
    Understanding the behavioural trade-offs made by blue wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus): the importance of resources, predation and the landscape Rebecca Dannock Bachelor of Science (Hons) in Zoology A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2016 School of Biological Sciences Abstract Prey individuals must constantly make decisions regarding safety and resource acquisition to ensure that they acquire enough resources without being predated upon. These decisions result in a trade-off between resource acquisition behaviours (such as foraging and drinking) and safety behaviours (such as grouping and vigilance). This trade- off is likely to be affected by the social and environmental factors that an individual experiences, including the individual’s location in the landscape. The overall objective of my PhD was to understand the decisions a migratory ungulate makes in order to acquire enough resources, while not becoming prey, and to understand how these decisions are influenced by social and environmental factors. In order to do this, I studied the behaviour of blue wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus) in Etosha National Park, Namibia, between 2013 and 2015. I studied wildebeests’ behaviour while they acquired food and water and moved within the landscape. Along with observational studies, I also used lion (Panthera leo) roar playbacks to experimentally manipulate perceived predator presence to test wildebeests’ responses to immediate predation risk. For Chapter 2 I studied the foraging-vigilance trade-off of wildebeest to determine how social and environmental factors, including the location within the landscape, were correlated with wildebeests’ time spent foraging and vigilant as well as their bite rate.
    [Show full text]
  • Giraffid 8(1)
    Giraffid Newsletter of the IUCN SSC Giraffe & Okapi Specialist Group Note from the Co-Chairs Volume 8(1), September 2014 Giraffe conservation efforts have never been as internationally prominent as Inside this issue: they are today – exciting times! The Giraffe Conservation Foundation’s launch of World Giraffe Day – 21 June 2014 resulted in the biggest single event for giraffe The first-ever World Giraffe Day 2 conservation in history, bringing together a network of like-minded enthusiasts GiraffeSpotter.org – A citizen science online platform for giraffe observations 5 from around the world to raise awareness and funds. This first annual event can only get bigger and better, and a great step towards a ‘One Plan’ approach for Rothschild’s refuge 6 giraffe. A historic overview of giraffe distribution in Namibia 8 In this issue of Giraffid Paul Rose and Julian further explore the steps taken Going to new length: A ‘One Plan towards building a more collaborative approach between the in situ and ex situ Approach’ for giraffe 13 communities, based initially on critical research and now undertaking targeted Enrichment methods used for Giraffa efforts to save giraffe. From studbook analysis to historical distributions of camelopardalis and Gazella dama mhorr giraffe, and oxpeckers to flamingos, this issue is filled with interesting tales and at East Midland Zoological Society 15 stories, not to forget David Brown’s piece on lion vs. giraffe! Clawing their way to the top: Lion vs. Over the past six months the IUCN SSC Giraffe & Okapi Specialist Group have giraffe! 19 worked hard to undertake the first-ever IUCN Red List assessments of all giraffe New project: Giraffe within the Free State Nature Reserve 20 (sub)species.
    [Show full text]
  • Internet Research Cheetahs Page of 1
    Internet Research Cheetahs CHEETAHS http://animals.nationalgeographic.com/animals/mammals/cheetah/ The cheetah is the world's fastest land mammal. With acceleration that would leave most automobiles in the dust, a cheetah can go from 0 to 60 miles (96 kilometers) an hour in only three seconds. These big cats are quite nimble at high speed and can make quick and sudden turns in pursuit of prey. Before unleashing their speed, cheetahs use exceptionally keen eyesight to scan their grassland environment for signs of prey—especially antelope and hares. This big cat is a daylight hunter that benefits from stealthy movement and a distinctive spotted coat that allows it to blend easily into high, dry grasses. When the moment is right a cheetah will sprint after its quarry and attempt to knock it down. Such chases cost the hunter a tremendous amount of energy and are usually over in less than a minute. If successful, the cheetah will often drag its kill to a shady hiding place to protect it from opportunistic animals that sometimes steal a kill before the cheetah can eat. Cheetahs need only drink once every three to four days. Female cheetahs typically have a litter of three cubs and live with them for one and a half to two years. Young cubs spend their first year learning from their mother and practicing hunting techniques with playful games. Male cheetahs live alone or in small groups, often with their littermates. Most wild cheetahs are found in eastern and southwestern Africa. Perhaps only 7,000 to 10,000 of these big cats remain, and those are under pressure as the wide-open grasslands they favor are disappearing at the hands of human settlers.
    [Show full text]
  • EAZA Best Practices Guidelines for Elephants 2020
    EAZA Best Practice Guidelines for Elephants second edition published 2020 EAZA Elephant Best Practice Guidelines 2020 Editorial team (in alphabetical order): Petra Bolechova, Zoo Liberec, Czech Republic Marcus Clauss, University of Zurich, Switzerland Danny de Man, EAZA Office Cordula Galeffi, Zürich Zoo, Switzerland Sander Hofman, Antwerpen Zoo, Belgium Jeroen Kappelhof, Rotterdam Zoo, The Netherlands Guy Kfir, Ramat Gan Zoo Bo Kjellson, Boras Zoo, Sweden Thomas Kölpin, Wilhelma Zoo Stuttgart, Germany Arne Lawrenz, Wuppertal Zoo, Germany Imke Lüders, GEOLifes, Germany Andrew McKenzie, Chester Zoo, UK Con Mul, Ouwehands Zoo, The Netherlands Ann-Kathrin Oerke, German Primate Centre Göttingen, Germany Jana Pluhackova, Ostrava Zoo, Czech Republic Fiona Sach, ZSL, UK Willem Schaftenaar, Rotterdam Zoo, The Netherlands Christian Schiffmann, University of Zurich, Switzerland Harald Schmidt, Rotterdam Zoo, The Netherlands Endre Sos, Budapest Zoo, Hungary Lars Versteege, Beekse Bergen, The Netherlands The Editorial team would like to acknowledge that the EAZA Best Practise Guidelines for Elephants (2020) are based on the BIAZA Elephant Management Guidelines (2019), and thus thank the editors and all the contributors of these BIAZA guidelines for the enormous contribution to these EAZA guidelines. Any amendments made to content during development of these EAZA Best Practise Guidelines have not been endorsed by those contributors. EAZA Elephant Taxon Advisory Group core group Chair: Thomas Kölpin, Wilhelma Zoo Stuttgart, Germany Vice-chair: Jana Pluhackova, Ostrava Zoo, Czech Republic Asian elephant EEP coordinator: Harald Schmidt, Rotterdam Zoo, The Netherlands African elephant EEP coordinator: Arne Lawrenz, Wuppertal Zoo, Germany Disclaimer Copyright (2020) by EAZA Executive Office, Amsterdam. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in hard copy, machine-readable or other forms without advance written permission from the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA).
    [Show full text]