INLAND WATERS List of Lights, Buoys and Fog Signals 2009
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Charitable Impact (“CHIMP”) Foundation: Analysis of 11650 Gifts
Charitable Impact (“CHIMP”) Foundation: Analysis of 11,650 Gifts (2011-2018) Vivian Krause April 28, 2020 NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER This document offers a summary of the analysis, questions and opinions of the author, Vivian Krause. While the information herein is believed to be accurate and reliable, it is not guaranteed to be so as the information available to me is limited to publicly available data. The author makes this document available without warranty of any kind. Users of this material should exercise due diligence to ensure the accuracy and currency of all information. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice, and may become out-dated as additional information is identified, disclosed, or otherwise becomes available. This document may or may not be updated. Vivian Krause reserves the right to amend this document on the basis of information received after it was initially written. No part of this document may be reproduced, stored, distributed or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of Vivian Krause. Gifts Made By Charitable Impact Foundation (2011) # of % of Total Value of % of Total Amount of Gift By # of Gifts By $ of Gifts Gifts Gifts Gifts Value of Gifts <$10 68 12.1% $450 0.1% $10-$24 115 20.5% $2,484 0.6% $25-$49 95 16.9% $4,026 0.9% 491 87% $43,442 10% $50-$99 93 16.5% $8,195 1.9% $100-$249 78 13.9% $12,849 3.0% $250-$499 42 7.5% $15,438 3.6% $500-$999 35 6.2% $23,549 5.4% $1K-$2,499 18 3.2% $30,384 7.0% $2,500-$5K 8 1.4% $27,731 6.4% 65 12% $120,547 28% $5K-$10K 3 0.5% $24,060 5.5% $10K-$25K 1 0.2% $14,823 3.4% $25K-$50K 5 0.9% $158,858 36.6% $50K-$100K 0 0.0% $0 0.0% 6 1% $270,459 62% $100K- $1M 1 0.2% $111,601 25.7% $1M-$2M $2M-$20M 0 0% $0 0% >$20M Total: 562 100% $434,448 100% 562 100% $434,448 100% Summary: In 2011, almost 90 percent of CHIMP’s gifts were for less than $500 meanwhile one of CHIMP’s 562 gifts accounted for more than 60 percent of the total value of all gifts. -
LIST of LIGHTS and FOG SIGNALS 1St JANUARY 1896
OF F IC .E OF 1HE Commissioner of Lights . JUN30 1908 Department of Marine it Fisheries, , ADA._ LIST OF LIGHTS AND FOG-SIGNALS OS THE COASTS, RIVERS AN D LAKES OF THE DOMINION OF CANADA_ 0 F F I C CORRECTED TO THE OF THE Commissioner of Lights. 1st January, 189 J UN 30 1908 Department of Marine & Fisheries, T A. W.A., C •••1" AM A.- DEPARTMENT OF MARINE AND F OTTAWA PRINTED BY S. E. DAWSON, PRINTER TO THE QUEEN'S MOST EXCELLENT MAJESTY • 1896 LIST OF LIGHTS AND FOG-SIGNALS ON THE COASTS, RIVERS AND LA_K ES OF THE DOMINION OF CANADA UNDER THE CHARGE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MARINE AND FISHERIES. The Lights in the Bay of Fundy and on the southern and eastern coasts of Nova Scotia, those required for the winter passage of either steamers or ice boats to Prince Edward Island, the Light on the south-west point of St. Paul Island, and all the Lights in British Columbia, are exhibited all the year round. Ail other lights under the control of the Department of Marine and Fisheries are maintained in opera- tion whenever the navigation in the vicinity is open. Lights used sole as harbour lights are not exhibited when the harbour is closed, although the general navigation may remain open. Fishing lights are main- tained only during the fishing season. In any case where there is reasonable doubt whether the light is required it is kept in operation. All the Lightships in the River St. Lawrence below Quebec leave Quebec each spring for their stations as early as ice will permit. -
Final 2012 NHLPA Report Noapxb.Pub
GSA Office of Real Property Utilization and Disposal 2012 PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS REPORT NATIONAL HISTORIC LIGHTHOUSE PRESERVATION ACT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Lighthouses have played an important role in America’s For More Information history, serving as navigational aids as well as symbols of our rich cultural past. Congress passed the National Information about specific light stations in the Historic Lighthouse Preservation Act (NHLPA) in 2000 to NHLPA program is available in the appendices and establish a lighthouse preservation program that at the following websites: recognizes the cultural, recreational, and educational National Park Service Lighthouse Heritage: value of these iconic properties, especially for local http://www.nps.gov/history/maritime/lt_index.htm coastal communities and nonprofit organizations as stewards of maritime history. National Park Service Inventory of Historic Light Stations: http://www.nps.gov/maritime/ltsum.htm Under the NHLPA, historic lighthouses and light stations (lights) are made available for transfer at no cost to Federal agencies, state and local governments, and non-profit organizations (i.e., stewardship transfers). The NHLPA Progress To Date: NHLPA program brings a significant and meaningful opportunity to local communities to preserve their Since the NHLPA program’s inception in 2000, 92 lights maritime heritage. The program also provides have been transferred to eligible entities. Sixty-five substantial cost savings to the United States Coast percent of the transferred lights (60 lights) have been Guard (USCG) since the historic structures, expensive to conveyed through stewardship transfers to interested repair and maintain, are no longer needed by the USCG government or not-for-profit organizations, while 35 to meet its mission as aids to navigation. -
Lighthouses – Clippings
GREAT LAKES MARINE COLLECTION MILWAUKEE PUBLIC LIBRARY/WISCONSIN MARINE HISTORICAL SOCIETY MARINE SUBJECT FILES LIGHTHOUSE CLIPPINGS Current as of November 7, 2018 LIGHTHOUSE NAME – STATE - LAKE – FILE LOCATION Algoma Pierhead Light – Wisconsin – Lake Michigan - Algoma Alpena Light – Michigan – Lake Huron - Alpena Apostle Islands Lights – Wisconsin – Lake Superior - Apostle Islands Ashland Harbor Breakwater Light – Wisconsin – Lake Superior - Ashland Ashtabula Harbor Light – Ohio – Lake Erie - Ashtabula Badgeley Island – Ontario – Georgian Bay, Lake Huron – Badgeley Island Bailey’s Harbor Light – Wisconsin – Lake Michigan – Bailey’s Harbor, Door County Bailey’s Harbor Range Lights – Wisconsin – Lake Michigan – Bailey’s Harbor, Door County Bala Light – Ontario – Lake Muskoka – Muskoka Lakes Bar Point Shoal Light – Michigan – Lake Erie – Detroit River Baraga (Escanaba) (Sand Point) Light – Michigan – Lake Michigan – Sand Point Barber’s Point Light (Old) – New York – Lake Champlain – Barber’s Point Barcelona Light – New York – Lake Erie – Barcelona Lighthouse Battle Island Lightstation – Ontario – Lake Superior – Battle Island Light Beaver Head Light – Michigan – Lake Michigan – Beaver Island Beaver Island Harbor Light – Michigan – Lake Michigan – St. James (Beaver Island Harbor) Belle Isle Lighthouse – Michigan – Lake St. Clair – Belle Isle Bellevue Park Old Range Light – Michigan/Ontario – St. Mary’s River – Bellevue Park Bete Grise Light – Michigan – Lake Superior – Mendota (Bete Grise) Bete Grise Bay Light – Michigan – Lake Superior -
Letter to John Bromley RE Chimp Tech Inc. (28April2020)
Correspondence #7 Letter to Blake Bromley April 28, 2020 RE: Quest University, CHIMP and other Bromley Charities 1. Excerpts of the Financial Statements of CHIMP Foundation Showing Payments to Chimp Technology Inc. for $23 Million (2014-2018) (10 pages) 2. CHIMP Foundation: Analysis of 11,650 Gifts (2011-2018) (234 pages) Total: 253 pages April 28, 2020 To: John Bromley, President & CEO of Charitable Impact Foundation (“CHIMP”) c.c. Blake Bromley Christopher Richardson Leslie Brandlmayr Victoria Nalugwa Nadine Britton c.c. Neil Bunker, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Dr. George Iwama, President, Quest University Mr. Jordan Sturdy, MLA, West Vancouver-Sea to Sky RE: Quest University, CHIMP and other Bromley Charities Further to my letter of April 21, I am writing again to inquire about the role of CHIMP and other Bromley Charities in the early funding and start-up of Quest University. Last week, I asked to speak with you about gifts to CHIMP for a total of $120 million: Ø $ 34.4 million from Almoner Foundation (2011-2019) Ø $ 33.8 million from Foundation For Public Good (2017-2019) Ø $ 12.1 million from the Association for the Advancement of Scholarship (2012-2018) Ø $ 10.5 million from Eden Glen Foundation (2017) Ø $ 10.1 million from Timothy Foundation (2012-2017) Ø $ 7.0 million from Mighty Oaks Foundation (2014) Ø $ 4.0 million from Headwaters Foundation (2011) Ø $ 3.7 million from Homestead on the Hill Foundation (2018) Ø $ 3.4 million from Global Charity Fund (2014) Ø $ 1.0 million from Theanon Foundation (2011-2014) $ 120 million TOTAL On the basis of my research, it is clear to me that these gifts for $120 million stem from tax-receipted donations reported by charities involved with funds for starting Quest University. -
Alpena Dates of Events
>>>>>>o<<<<<< ALPENA DATES OF EVENTS. 18,62---lgo2. 25 CENTS. >>>>>>o<<< ARGUS, ALPENA, MICH. ALPENA DATE,SOF EARLY EVENTS On the follo*'ing pages are showD 'he dates of t'he principal hap,pen- rngs and events in the history of Aipen,a city, .A.lpena county, and some important da,tesin the history qf adjacent counties. The list has been co.mpiled with the greatesl nossible ac.curacyand is hrought up to January 1, 1I 1'5. As the years oass this little tboo'kw,ill become all the mcre valuable,. Preserve it for reference. It will make interesting reading and will settle many a dis- DUte. I a;39-ta4 0- First survey ,by the Unite(! ,States of lancls in Alpena eo'unty. The first sarvmill in Alpen,a coun- ty was erected at the mouth ol Devil River in 1844, by Jonathan Burteh and Ans.on Eldred. Darid D. Oliver built and opened a store on Thunder Bay Isiand, in 1845. ! at6- Simeon M. H,olden erected a frame bttiltling on Thunder Bay Island. I S,56- Nov. 26.-I)aniel ,Carter. $ife and daught.er, c,ame t0 Alpena, the {irst settlers. € { _.<--.-"€r' ra57_ Feb. T._AIpena county organize.d. Whac is now the city of rvas _\lpena then oalled x'remoni, ailii" ljrt election of county oflicers""0 in . November, Daniel ,carier ;;;';.# treasu.rer, rI :9.-?l:'rlsl,ip. the torrr.iri'r, cotnprising the entjre eounty. lf; Carter was atso the fi".t of Fremont. ;;;t;u.;, r850- _ In February, t g,b9, the name ot"' Fremont was changed t" .sr;"rul \ In,t8b8 the first s,c,hoolin Alpena was { held in ,a-rougn ooard eooDer srrop n on l9t t0, block 3, ot tfre-fUis,s vii- tage, oi { t Water street, witn ivrary L'arter as the teacher. -
Download Michigan
178 Ins INVENTORY REPORT ON JURISDICTIONAL STATUS OF FEDERAL AREAS WITHIN THE STATES As of June 30, 1962 Compiled by GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION ' . FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY /C: -,-� ' GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION SEP 3 1964 The President The White House Dear Mr. President: General Services Administration has completed the second comprehensive inventory of the jurisdictional status of Federal areas within the States. The compilation of this inventory reflects the interest which GSA, together with the Bureau of the Budget and the Department of Justice, have in the progress being made by all Federal agencies in adjusting the legislative status of their properties. / This inventory, which is enclosed herewith, directly com- plements the Inventory-Report on Real Property Owned by the United States Throughout the World, as of June 30, 1962, which was also published by GSA. The inventory will be made available to Federal agencies and State Governments for use as a ready reference to assist in the solution of jurisdictional status problems and in the development of appropriate remedial legislation. S. 815 and H. R. 4433 pending before Congress would facilitate the adjustment of legislative jurisdiction over Federal areas within the States. / Respect _ / ·'------- U. S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE NKTION�I •�r;!f�UL TURAL UBRI\Q BERtlARD L. BOUTIN Acimini:5trator DEC 1 7 1964 Enclosure C & R-PREP. • .. -� ....-- ....... �· . 76606 CON T·E,N TS Introduction: Page 1. Authority ------------------------------------- 1 2. Background------------------------------------ 1 3. Objectives ---------------------------- ------- 2 4. Source of Data-------------------------------- 4 5. Scope----------------------------------------- 4 6. Areas not Covered----------------------------- 4 7. Definitions-------------------�--------------- 5 8. Public Domain--------------------------------- 5 GeneralServices Administration Circular No. -
List of Lights Anf Fog Signals
0;•'FICE 0F 1H Commiss:onlf of Lights. J UN 30 1908 Department of Marine b. Fisheries, cer are _A., c 1•7 •■••■•••■•■•■••rmil * i 1r 9 LIST OF LIGHTS AND FOG SIGNALS ON THE COASTS, RIVERS AND LAKES OF THE DOMINION OF CANADA Clo FFICE OF H CORRECTED TO THE Commissioncr of Lights. JUN 30 1908 1st A_prii, 1901 Department of Marne & Fisheries, N DEPARTMENT OF MARINE AND FISHERIES OTTAWA GGVERNMENT PRINTING' BUREAU 1901 4 v • LIST OF LIGHTS AND FOG-SIGNALS ON THE COASTS, RIVERS AND LAKES OF THE DOMINION OF , CANAPA UNDER THE CHARGE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MARINE AND FISHERIES. The Lights in the Bay of Fundy and on the southern and eastern coasts of Nova Scotia, thoee required for the winter passage of either steamers or ice boats to Prince Edward Island, and all the Lights in British Columbia, are exhibited all the year found. All other lights under the control of the Department of Marine and Fisheries are maintained in opera- tion whenever the navigation in the vicinity is open. Lights used solely as harbour lights are not exhibited when the harbour is closed, although the general navigation may remain open. Fishing lights are main- tained only during the fishing season. In any case where there is re,asonable doubt whether the light is required it is kept in operation. All the Lightships in the River St. Lawrence below Quebec leave Quebec each spring for their stations as early as ice will permit. The Red island and White island lightships leave their stations for winter quarters on the 15th November annually. -
Lighthouse Bibliography.Pdf
Title Author Date 10 Lights: The Lighthouses of the Keweenaw Peninsula Keweenaw County Historical Society n.d. 100 Years of British Glass Making Chance Brothers 1924 137 Steps: The Story of St Mary's Lighthouse Whitley Bay North Tyneside Council 1999 1911 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1911 1912 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1912 1913 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1913 1914 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1914 1915 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1915 1916 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1916 1917 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1917 1918 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1918 1919 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1919 1920 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1920 1921 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1921 1922 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1922 1923 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1923 1924 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1924 1925 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1925 1926 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1926 1927 Report of the Commissioner of Lighthouses Department of Commerce 1927 1928 Report of the Commissioner of -
Belcher SAR Thesis
Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) as a tool for mapping remote geology as applied to the Belcher Islands, Nunavut, Canada by R. Troy Unrau A thesis submitted to the Clayton H. Riddell Faculty of Environment, Earth and Resources in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Bachelor of Science, Geological Sciences (B.Sc. G.Sc.) in Geophysics Department of Geological Sciences University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba © March 2009 Abstract The application of remote sensing techniques to determine, investigate and obtain information about geology is not new; however, most research has focused on using optical imagery. Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) is now being used rather than optical data for a number of reasons: it employs active imaging systems rather than passive ones; it penetrates all weather conditions including rain, snow and cloud-cover; and it can provide additional information on surface textures and rock fabrics when coupled with advanced digital processing techniques. Furthermore, the long wavelength along with interferometric techniques can be used to obtain surface elevations and dynamic information on surface deformation as a function of time. These techniques are known as Interferometric SAR (InSAR) and have recently been the primary focus of SAR research within the geological sciences. The original objective of this thesis is to carry out preliminary visual inspection of SAR data in the previously well-documented study area, the Belcher Islands. In this thesis, SAR is used to qualitatively investigate the boundaries between exposed geologic formations within the Belcher Islands, Nunavut, Canada, utilizing the visual texture and backscattering grey level tone of the processed SAR image data. -
Laying Down Special Conditions Governing Imports of Fishery Products Originating in Canada
15 . 9 . 93 Official Journal of the European Communities No L 232/43 COMMISSION DECISION of 26 July 1993 laying down special conditions governing imports of fishery products originating in Canada (93/495/EEC) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, the rules set out in Chapter V of the Annex to Directive 91 /493/EEC and regarding fulfilment of requirements Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European equivalent to those laid down by that Directive for the Economic Community, approval of establishments ; Having regard to Council Directive 91 /493/EEC of Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in 22 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for the accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary production and the placing on the market of fishery Committee, products ('), and in particular Article 1 1 thereof, Whereas a group of Commission experts has conducted an inspection visit to Canada to verify the conditions HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION : under which fishery products are produced, stored and dispatched to the Communiy ; Whereas the provisions of Canadian legislation on health Article 1 inspection and monitoring of fishery products may be considered equivalent to those laid down in Directive The Inspection Directorate of the Department of Fishe 91 /493/EEC ; ries and Oceans shall be the competent authority in Canada for verifying and certifying compliance of fishery Whereas the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (Minis products with the requirements of Directive 91 /493/EEC. tere des Peches et Oceans), the competent Canadian authority, and its Inspection Directorate (Direction des Services d'Inspection) are capable of effectively verifying the application of the laws in force ; Article 2 Whereas the procedure for obtaining the health certificate Fishery products originating in Canada must meet the referred to in point (a) of Article 11 (4) of Directive following conditions : 91 /493/EEC must also cover the definition of a model certificate, the minimum requirements regarding the 1 . -
Twenty-Ninth Update of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 03/03/2016 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2016-04692, and on FDsys.gov 6560-50-P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [FRL- 9943-17-OLEM] Twenty-Ninth Update of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: Since 1988, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has maintained a Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket (“Docket”) under Section 120(c) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). Section 120(c) requires EPA to establish a Docket that contains certain information reported to EPA by Federal facilities that manage hazardous waste or from which a reportable quantity of hazardous substances has been released. As explained further below, the Docket is used to identify Federal facilities that should be evaluated to determine if they pose a threat to public health or welfare and the environment and to provide a mechanism to make this information available to the public. This notice includes the complete list of Federal facilities on the Docket and also identifies Federal facilities reported to EPA since the last update of the Docket on August17, 2015. In addition to the list of additions to the Docket, this notice includes a section with revisions of the previous Docket list. Thus, the revisions in this update include 7 additions, 22 corrections, and 42 deletions to the Docket since the previous update. At the time of publication of this notice, the new total number of Federal facilities listed on the Docket is 2,326.