History, As Well As How Keepers and Their Families Lived
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Thunder Bay National Marine Sanctuary
www.thunderbay.noaa.gov (989) 356-8805 Alpena, MI49707 500 WestFletcherStreet Heritage Center Great LakesMaritime Contact Information N T ATIONAL ATIONAL HUNDER 83°30'W 83°15'W 83°00'W New Presque Isle Lighthouse Park M North Bay ARINE Wreck 82°45'W Old Presque Isle Lighthouse Park B S ANCTUARY North Albany Point Cornelia B. AY Windiate Albany • Types ofVesselsLostatThunderBay South Albany Point Sail Powered • • • Scows Ships, Brigs, Schooners Barks Lake Esau Grand Norman Island Wreck Point Presque Isle Lotus Lake Typo Lake of the Florida • Woods Steam Powered Brown • • Island Sidewheelers Propellers John J. Grand Audubon LAKE Lake iver R ll e B HURON Whiskey False Presque Isle Point • Other • • Unpowered Combustion Motor Powered 45°15'N 45°15'N Bell Czar Bolton Point Besser State Besser Bell Natural Area Wreck Defiance (by quantityoflossforallwrecks) Cargoes LostatThunderBay • • • • Iron ore Grain Coal Lumber products Ferron Point Mackinaw State Forest Dump Scow Rockport • • • • 23 Middle Island Sinkhole Fish Salt Package freight Stone Long Portsmouth Lake Middle Island Middle Island Lighthouse Middle Lake • • • Copper ore Passengers Steel Monaghan Point New Orleans 220 Long Lake Creek Morris D.M. Wilson Bay William A. Young South Ninemile Point Explore theThunderBayNationalMarineSanctuary Fall Creek Salvage Barge &Bathymetry Topography Lincoln Bay Nordmeer Contours inmeters Grass Lake Mackinaw State Forest Huron Bay 0 Maid of the Mist Roberts Cove N Stoneycroft Point or we gi an El Cajon Bay Ogarita t 23 Cre Fourmile Mackinaw State -
Status and Extent of Aquatic Protected Areas in the Great Lakes
Status and Extent of Aquatic Protected Areas in the Great Lakes Scott R. Parker, Nicholas E. Mandrak, Jeff D. Truscott, Patrick L. Lawrence, Dan Kraus, Graham Bryan, and Mike Molnar Introduction The Laurentian Great Lakes are immensely important to the environmental, economic, and social well-being of both Canada and the United States (US). They form the largest surface freshwater system in the world. At over 30,000 km long, their mainland and island coastline is comparable in length to that of the contiguous US marine coastline (Government of Canada and USEPA 1995; Gronewold et al. 2013). With thousands of native species, including many endemics, the lakes are rich in biodiversity (Pearsall 2013). However, over the last century the Great Lakes have experienced profound human-caused changes, includ- ing those associated with land use changes, contaminants, invasive species, climate change, over-fishing, and habitat loss (e.g., Bunnell et al. 2014; Smith et al. 2015). It is a challenging context in terms of conservation, especially within protected areas established to safeguard species and their habitat. According to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), a protected area is “a clearly defined geographical space, recognised, dedicated and managed, through legal or other effective means, to achieve the long-term conservation of nature with associat- ed ecosystem services and cultural values” (Dudley 2008). Depending on the management goals, protected areas can span the spectrum of IUCN categories from highly protected no- take reserves to multiple-use areas (Table 1). The potential values and benefits of protected areas are well established, including conserving biodiversity; protecting ecosystem structures and functions; being a focal point and context for public engagement, education, and good governance; supporting nature-based recreation and tourism; acting as a control or reference site for scientific research; providing a positive spill-over effect for fisheries; and helping to mitigate and adapt to climate change (e.g., Lemieux et al. -
U.S. Lake Erie Lighthouses
U.S. Lake Erie Lighthouses Gretchen S. Curtis Lakeside, Ohio July 2011 U.S. Lighthouse Organizations • Original Light House Service 1789 – 1851 • Quasi-military Light House Board 1851 – 1910 • Light House Service under the Department of Commerce 1910 – 1939 • Final incorporation of the service into the U.S. Coast Guard in 1939. In the beginning… Lighthouse Architects & Contractors • Starting in the 1790s, contractors bid on LH construction projects advertised in local newspapers. • Bids reviewed by regional Superintendent of Lighthouses, a political appointee, who informed U.S. Treasury Dept of his selection. • Superintendent approved final contract and supervised contractor during building process. Creation of Lighthouse Board • Effective in 1852, U.S. Lighthouse Board assumed all duties related to navigational aids. • U.S. divided into 12 LH districts with inspector (naval officer) assigned to each district. • New LH construction supervised by district inspector with primary focus on quality over cost, resulting in greater LH longevity. • Soon, an engineer (army officer) was assigned to each district to oversee construction & maintenance of lights. Lighthouse Bd Responsibilities • Location of new / replacement lighthouses • Appointment of district inspectors, engineers and specific LH keepers • Oversight of light-vessels of Light-House Service • Establishment of detailed rules of operation for light-vessels and light-houses and creation of rules manual. “The Light-Houses of the United States” Harper’s New Monthly Magazine, Dec 1873 – May 1874 … “The Light-house Board carries on and provides for an infinite number of details, many of them petty, but none unimportant.” “The Light-Houses of the United States” Harper’s New Monthly Magazine, Dec 1873 – May 1874 “There is a printed book of 152 pages specially devoted to instructions and directions to light-keepers. -
REFUNDING BONDS of MACKINAC BRIDGE AUTHORITY; TRANSFER of AUTHORITY to STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT Act 13 of 1966
REFUNDING BONDS OF MACKINAC BRIDGE AUTHORITY; TRANSFER OF AUTHORITY TO STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT Act 13 of 1966 AN ACT to implement the provisions of section 14 of the schedule and temporary provisions of the constitution of this state by providing for the issuance and sale of full faith and credit bonds of the state to refund the outstanding bonds heretofore issued by the Mackinac bridge authority and upon such refunding to abolish the Mackinac bridge authority and to transfer the operation, maintenance, repair and replacement of the Mackinac bridge to the state highway department with power to fix and collect tolls, fees and charges for the use of the bridge, its services and facilities. History: 1966, Act 13, Imd. Eff. Apr. 6, 1966. The People of the State of Michigan enact: 254.361 Refunding bonds; issuance, purpose. Sec. 1. The state may borrow money and issue its refunding bonds for the purpose of refunding the following outstanding bonds issued by the Mackinac bridge authority, and agency and instrumentality of this state created by Act No. 21 of the Public Acts of the Extra Session of 1950, being sections 254.301 to 254.304 of the Compiled Laws of 1948, pursuant to Act No. 214 of the Public Acts of 1952, as amended, being sections 254.311 to 254.331 of the Compiled Laws of 1948, and a certain indenture between the Mackinac bridge authority and the Detroit trust company, dated July 1, 1953: (a) Bridge revenue bonds, series A (Mackinac straits bridge), dated July 1, 1953, in the principal sum of $79,800,000.00; (b) Bridge revenue bonds, series B (Mackinac straits bridge), dated July 1, 1953, in the principal sum of $20,000,000.00. -
Fact Sheet with Links to Key Information Can Be Accessed Online Here
Now is the time of reckoning for the decaying Enbridge Line 5 oil pipelines in the Straits of Mackinac and a proposed oil tunnel to replace them. On June 27, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel took decisive legal action on Line 5 in the Straits of Mackinac when she filed suit in Ingham County Circuit Court to revoke the 1953 easement that conditionally authorized Enbridge to pump oil through twin pipelines. Nessel’s lawsuit alleges that Enbridge’s continued operation of the Straits Pipelines violates the Public Trust Doctrine, is a common law public nuisance, and violates the Michigan Environmental Protection Act based on potential pollution, impairment, and destruction of water and other natural resources. Simultaneously, Governor Gretchen Whitmer and the natural resources and environmental protection agencies are defending the public’s rights and waters of the Great Lakes in Enbridge’s separate lawsuit against the state to build a tunnel under the Great Lakes for its oil pipelines to operate another 99 years. Gov. Whitmer also ordered the Michigan Department of Natural Resources to review violations of the Line 5 easement. As the state’s top leader and public trustee, the governor has the express legal authority to revoke the easement to start decommissioning the pipeline and to protect the Great Lakes. On June 6, Canada’s Line 5-owner Enbridge sued the State of Michigan to resuscitate a ‘Line 5’ oil tunnel deal and law rushed through in late 2018 at the end of the Snyder administration. Attorney General Dana Nessel in late March declared the oil tunnel law unconstitutional, triggering Gov. -
Mackinac Bridge Enters the Busy Season for Traffic and for Maintenance Work
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE TUESDAY, MAY 25, 2021 CONTACT: Kim Nowack, Mackinac Bridge Authority, 906-643-7600 Mackinac Bridge enters the busy season for traffic and for maintenance work May 25, 2021 -- As traffic picks up on the Mackinac Bridge for the traditional increase in warmer season travel, so does the work required to maintain this engineering icon. Contractor Seaway Painting is wrapping up five seasons devoted to stripping and repainting the bridge's twin ivory towers. At the same time, the Mackinac Bridge Authority's (MBA) team of dedicated maintenance staff is out on the bridge deck, replacing pieces of the original decking, repairing deck joints, and cleaning off a winter's worth of grit tracked onto the bridge. "Like with road work and maintenance anywhere else, the season for taking care of the Mackinac Bridge coincides with the peak of tourism travel in northern Michigan," said MBA Executive Secretary Kim Nowack. "We realize the views of the Straits of Mackinac are tempting, but we need customers to focus their attention on driving, especially when passing work zones on the bridge." Delays for work on the bridge are generally minimal, as most lane closures are removed for holidays and peak traffic periods, but in some cases those lane closures must remain in place even when traffic picks up. "We're all in a hurry to get where we're going, particularly when we're on vacation, but it's critically important that drivers slow down and set aside any distractions when they are passing through one of our work zones," Nowack said. -
Misery Bay Chapter 2
Existing Conditions The first step in developing a plan to protect the coastal resources of Misery Bay is to establish an accurate representation of existing cultural and environmental features within the study area. This chapter will present a series of maps and associated text to describe key features such as owner type, land uses, vegetation cover types, soils and geology. NEMCOG used information and digital data sets from the Center for Geographic Information, State of Michigan, Michigan Resource Information System, Alpena Township, Alpena County, Natural Resource Conservation Service, and U.S. Geological Survey. Information from the Alpena County Master Plan and Alpena Township Master Plan was used to develop a profile of existing conditions. Field surveys were conducted during 2003. Community Demographics Trends in population and housing characteristics can provide an understanding of growth pressures in a community. Population trends from 1900 and 2000 are summarized in Table 2.1. Population levels have risen and fallen twice in the last 100 years, first in the early part of the century and again in the 1980’s. The 1980 US Census recorded the largest population for Alpena Township and Alpena County at 10,152 and 32,315 respectively. During the 80’s decade, population fell by over five percent and has not climbed back to the 1980 US Census level. Table 2.1 Population Trends Alpena Township and Alpena County, 1900-2000 Alpena Township Alpena County Year Population % Change Population % Change 1900 1,173 --- 18,254 --- 1910 928 -20.9% 19,965 +9.4% 1920 701 -24.5% 17,869 -10.5% 1930 813 +16.0% 18,574 +3.9% 1940 1,675 +106.0% 20,766 +11.8% 1950 2,932 +75.0% 22,189 +6.9% 1960 6,616 +125.6% 28,556 +28.7% 1970 9,001 +36.0% 30,708 +7.5% 1980 10,152 +12.8% 32,315 +5.2% 1990 9,602 -5.4% 30,605 -5.3% 2000 9,788 +1.9% 31,314 +2.3% Source: U.S. -
Heritage Route 23 on the Great Lakes with a Hundred-Acre the Largest Falls in the Lower Peninsula
1 Great Lakes Maritime Heritage Center - 5 Alpena Bi-Path 10a Paul Bunyan 10b Shinga-ba-Shores Thunder Bay National Marine Sanctuary The Alpena Bi-Path is a bicycle and pedestrian ichigan Dive in and explore Great Lakes maritime heritage pathway throughout the City. Bike, walk, roller lpena,M at the Thunder Bay National Marine Sanctuary and blade and skateboard on the 18+ miles of paved Babe was white at the time he was built in A the Great Lakes Maritime Heritage Center. Thunder pathway and access all the waterfront parks in 1937/38 on the hill across from the Lookout Bay was designated as a national marine sanctuary the city. The Bi-Path follows along the top of the Inn. The legend was that a white cow on a hill to protect a nationally significant collection of breakwall at the marina, allowing an unobstructed signified good luck. In 1950, new owners bought nearly 200 shipwrecks that lie in Lake Huron off the view of Lake Huron. A section follows the shore the hill and Babe was painted blue. Paul was built coast of Alpena County, Michigan. These vessels of the Thunder Bay River through the Alpena in 1953. In 2006, Paul and Babe were moved to rest in an area known as Shipwreck Alley and tell County Fairgrounds. The Bi-Path encompasses the Maritime Heritage Trail located their present location and were restored in 2007. stories of the development of the Great Lakes region and the western expansion of the along the Thunder Bay River next to the Great Lakes Maritime Heritage Center and Shinga-ba-Shores is located across US 23 from Dinosaur Gardens. -
Senators Allen, Stamas and George Offered the Following Resolution: Senate Resolution No
Senators Allen, Stamas and George offered the following resolution: Senate Resolution No. 66. A resolution to express support for the efforts of the Department of History, Arts, and Libraries, the State Historic Preservation Office, and Presque Isle Township to reinstall the historic Fresnel Lens in the Presque Isle Lighthouse Tower. Whereas, Michigan’s lighthouses are important links to the state’s maritime heritage. Michigan has more than 120 lighthouses located along 3,200 miles of shoreline - more than any state in the nation. Our lighthouses have shaped and sculpted the state’s settlement, commerce, transportation, industry, and recreation; and Whereas, Presque Isle Light Station, on the Lake Huron shore of northeastern lower Michigan, was established at a critical location marking a turning point for vessels navigating the lake and has the tallest tower of any Great Lakes lighthouse accessible to the public. It has functioned as an aid to navigation since 1871; and Whereas, Approximately 65,000 visitors annually come to the Presque Isle Light Station seeking to learn more about Michigan’s maritime history and to tour an operational historic lighthouse. The Presque Isle Light Station, located on a pristine 98.75-acre parcel of land, was deeded by the United States Coast Guard to Presque Isle Township in 1997 for the study and preservation of maritime history; and Whereas, From 1871 to 2003, the Presque Isle Lighthouse Tower utilized a historic Fresnel Lens, invented by French physicist Augustin Fresnel in 1822. The Fresnel Lens could throw a beam of light 26 miles due to its unique design allowing the capture of all but 17 percent of its light versus other lenses of that time which lost between 97 and 83 percent of their light. -
2019 Parks and Recreation Guide
EMMET COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION Headlands International Dark Sky Park Camp Petosega ▪ Fairgrounds ▪ McGulpin Lighthouse Crooked River Locks ▪ Bike Trails ▪ Cecil Bay emmetcounty.org/parks-recreation 231-348-5479 | [email protected] 21546_ParksandRecGuide.indd 1 3/4/19 8:17 AM Welcome to Emmet County, Michigan Welcome to our Parks and Recreation Guide! In these pages, we’re going to give you a snapshot tour of Emmet County’s most special amenities, from our International Dark Sky Park at the Headlands to our vast, connected trail network, to our parks and beaches, towns and natural resources. This is a special place, tucked into the top of Michigan’s mitten in the Northwest corner, a place where radiant sunsetsWhere and extraordinary fallquality color complement fluffyof lifeand abundant snowfall and the most satisfying shoreline summers you’ve ever spent. It’s a place that for centuries has been home to the is Odawa Indian tribe and the descendants of settlers from French and British beginnings.everything Here, the outdoors is yours to explore thanks to foresight and commitment from local officials who think one of the best things we can do for the public is to provide access to lakes, rivers, nature preserves, trails, parks and all the points in between. Here, there’s no shortage of scenery as you traverse our 460 square miles, from the tip of the Lower Peninsula at the Mackinac Bridge, to quaint little Good Hart on the west, the famed Inland Waterway at our east, and Petoskey and Bay Harbor to the south. We hope you enjoy your tour -
Mcgulpin Point Lighthouse and Historic Site Is Located Historical Value
The story behind the ‘Big Rock’ Aid to Navigation own the hill from the lighthouse, the Big Straits of Mackinac rose and fell by as much as Getting Here McGulpin DRock, as it is known, rests partially in the 8 feet over periods of time. water. For centuries, it has held tremendous The McGulpin Point rock is approximately McGulpin Point Lighthouse and Historic Site is located historical value. 33.8 feet in horizontal circumference and adjacent to The Headlands International Dark Sky Park, Point It was described in a letter sent back to France 37 feet in vertical circumference. It is about 9 both just west of downtown Mackinaw City in in 1749 as being at times high and dry and at feet tall. An estimate of its weight is 54 tons. Northwest Michigan. other times completely covered by water. It is known as ‘Chi-Sin’ (“big rock”) in the native FROM MACKINAW CITY Lighthouse That led the letter-writer to conclude the Odawa language. Travel west on Central Ave., then turn north on Headlands/ Wilderness Park Dr. FROM SOUTHERN EMMET COUNTY Travel north on any of several main roads including M-119, Pleasantview Road, U.S. 31 or I-75. Go online for more history and event information: www.emmetcounty.org/mcgulpin/ Historic site interpretation 500 Headlands Drive • Mackinaw City, MI 49701 Interpretive displays, 231.436.5860 No charge commemorative coins, docents, gift shop to enter or and a self-guided cell phone tour keep to climb tower McGulpin Point’s history alive ... HOURS OPEN MEMORIAL DAY WEEKEND 10 a.m. -
Final 2012 NHLPA Report Noapxb.Pub
GSA Office of Real Property Utilization and Disposal 2012 PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS REPORT NATIONAL HISTORIC LIGHTHOUSE PRESERVATION ACT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Lighthouses have played an important role in America’s For More Information history, serving as navigational aids as well as symbols of our rich cultural past. Congress passed the National Information about specific light stations in the Historic Lighthouse Preservation Act (NHLPA) in 2000 to NHLPA program is available in the appendices and establish a lighthouse preservation program that at the following websites: recognizes the cultural, recreational, and educational National Park Service Lighthouse Heritage: value of these iconic properties, especially for local http://www.nps.gov/history/maritime/lt_index.htm coastal communities and nonprofit organizations as stewards of maritime history. National Park Service Inventory of Historic Light Stations: http://www.nps.gov/maritime/ltsum.htm Under the NHLPA, historic lighthouses and light stations (lights) are made available for transfer at no cost to Federal agencies, state and local governments, and non-profit organizations (i.e., stewardship transfers). The NHLPA Progress To Date: NHLPA program brings a significant and meaningful opportunity to local communities to preserve their Since the NHLPA program’s inception in 2000, 92 lights maritime heritage. The program also provides have been transferred to eligible entities. Sixty-five substantial cost savings to the United States Coast percent of the transferred lights (60 lights) have been Guard (USCG) since the historic structures, expensive to conveyed through stewardship transfers to interested repair and maintain, are no longer needed by the USCG government or not-for-profit organizations, while 35 to meet its mission as aids to navigation.