DOCSLIB.ORG

Recreation Plan 2019-2023

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Recreation Plan 2019-2023 Recreation Plan 2019-2023 A Joint Recreation Planning Effort by the Communities of: Alpena County Alpena Charter Township Green Township Ossineke Township Wilson Township i A JOINT RECREATION PLANNING EFFORT BY THE COMMUNITIES OF: Alpena County Alpena Charter Township Green Township Ossineke Township Wilson Township Recreation Plan Adopted_______ Prepared by: Northeast Michigan Council of Governments 80 Livingston Blvd Suite 8 P. O. Box 457 Gaylord, Michigan 49735 www.nemcog.org 989-705-3730 i RECREATION PLAN Table of Contents Chapter 1 Community Description _______________________________________________ 1-7 Extent of Plan Focus ________________________________________________________ 1-7 Location and Regional Setting ________________________________________________ 1-7 A Snapshot of Natural Features of the Community _______________________________ 1-8 Chapter 2 Administrative Structures ____________________________________________ 2-15 Alpena County Administration ______________________________________________ 2-15 Alpena Charter Township Administration ______________________________________ 2-22 Green Township Administration _____________________________________________ 2-24 Ossineke Township Administration ___________________________________________ 2-26 Wilson Township Administration ____________________________________________ 2-28 Chapter 3 Recreation Inventory ________________________________________________ 3-31 Alpena County Recreation Inventory _________________________________________ 3-31 Alpena Charter Township Recreation Inventory _________________________________ 3-36 Green Township Recreation Inventory ________________________________________ 3-39 Ossineke Township Recreation Inventory ______________________________________ 3-41 Wilson Township Recreation Inventory _______________________________________ 3-43 Other Recreational Properties within Alpena County _____________________________ 3-45 City of Alpena Recreation Inventory ________________________________________________________ 3-48 Privately Owned Recreational Assets _______________________________________________________ 3-58 Recreation Grant Inventories ________________________________________________ 3-66 Chapter 4 Planning Process ___________________________________________________ 4-68 Chapter 5 Goals, Objectives & Action Plan _______________________________________ 5-72 Shared Goals for All Entities _________________________________________________ 5-72 Alpena County Objectives & Action Plan ______________________________________ 5-73 General Objectives ______________________________________________________________________ 5-73 Facility-Specific Objectives ________________________________________________________________ 5-75 Alpena County Action Plan ________________________________________________________________ 5-76 Alpena Charter Township Goals & Objectives___________________________________ 5-91 Alpena Charter Township Action Plan _________________________________________ 5-91 Alpena Charter Township Basis for Action _____________________________________ 5-93 1-4 Green Township Goals & Objectives __________________________________________ 5-95 Green Township Action Plan ________________________________________________ 5-96 Ossineke Township Goals & Objectives ________________________________________ 5-98 Ossineke Township Action Plan _____________________________________________ 5-101 Wilson Township Goals & Objectives ________________________________________ 5-102 Wilson Township Action Plan_______________________________________________ 5-103 Chapter 6 APPENDIX A ______________________________________________________ 6-107 Chapter 7 APPENDIX B ______________________________________________________ 7-108 Chapter 8 APPENDIX C ______________________________________________________ 8-109 1-5 TABLE OF FIGURES Figure 1-1 – Location Map ........................................................................................................... 1-8 Figure 1-2 – Alpena County Water Resources Map ................................................................... 1-10 Figure 1-3 – Soil Maps ................................................................................................................ 1-12 Figure 1-4 – Alpena County Recreation Map ............................................................................. 1-14 Figure 2-1 – Alpena County Administrative Structure ............................................................... 2-18 Figure 2-2 – Alpena Charter Township Administrative Structure ............................................. 2-23 Figure 2-3 – Green Township Administrative Structure ............................................................ 2-24 Figure 2-4 – Ossineke Township Administrative Structure ....................................................... 2-26 Figure 2-5 – Wilson Township Administrative Structure ........................................................... 2-28 Figure 3-1 - Alpena County-owned Recreation Map ................................................................. 3-35 Figure 3-2 - Alpena Charter Township Recreation Map ............................................................ 3-38 Figure 3-3 - Green Township Recreation Map ........................................................................... 3-40 Figure 3-4 - Wilson Township Wolf Creek Property .................................................................. 3-43 Figure 3-5 – Wilson Township Recreation Map ......................................................................... 3-44 1-6 Chapter 1 COMMUNITY DESCRIPTION EXTENT OF PLAN FOCUS This Recreation Plan addresses recreational facilities and plans within the boundaries of Alpena County. This is a joint planning process to provide for recreation planning for the County of Alpena as well as the townships of Alpena, Green, Ossineke, and Wilson. These townships chose to jointly plan for the future of their recreation assets. The plan will evaluate the surrounding recreational opportunities as well as the socio-economic status of Alpena County and the surrounding area in order to determine recreational needs of the population and to plan for improvements which fit those needs. LOCATION AND REGIONAL SETTING Alpena County is located on the shores of Lake Huron in the northeast section of Michigan’s Lower Peninsula (see Figure 1-1 – Location Map). Covering 568 square miles, the county includes 363,520 acres. It is bordered by Presque Isle County to the north, Montmorency County to the west, Alcona County to the south and Lake Huron to the east. Alpena County is 24 miles long from north to south. East to west, the county varies from 20.8 miles to 30.8 miles, because of the irregular shoreline of Lake Huron. Additionally, there are several offshore islands in Lake Huron that are a part of the county. The following townships are located within the planning area for this document: Alpena, Green, Long Rapids, Maple Ridge, Ossineke, Sanborn, Wellington and Wilson. Also included in the planning area are the City of Alpena, the Census Designated Place of Ossineke, as well as the unincorporated places of Bolton, Cathro, Herron, Hubbard Lake, Lachine, Leer and Long Rapids. 1-7 FIGURE 1-1 – LOCATION MAP A SNAPSHOT OF NATURAL FEATURES OF THE COMMUNITY WETLANDS A wetland is land where water is found, either on the surface or near the surface, at any time during the year. Poorly drained soils and water loving vegetation also may be present. Wetlands are often referred to as marshes, swamps or bogs. Residents of Michigan are becoming increasingly aware of the value of wetlands. Beyond their aesthetic value, wetlands improve water quality of lakes and streams by filtering polluting nutrients, organic chemicals and toxic heavy metals. Wetlands are closely related to high groundwater tables and serve to discharge or recharge aquifers. By absorbing excess water when river levels are high and releasing water when levels are low, wetlands help prevent floods and droughts. Wetlands are also dynamic ecosystems, which are home to a wide variety of plants and animals. 1-8 There are numerous wetland areas scattered throughout Alpena County totaling over 36 thousand acres. In addition to the many inland wetland areas, Alpena County also has significant coastal wetlands scattered along it 61 miles of Lake Huron shoreline. These wetlands are important resting and feeding spots for migratory birds and help slow shoreline erosion by dissipating wave energy. WATER RESOURCES Alpena County is blessed with a great number and variety of water resources located throughout the county. Alpena County depends on its water resources for development, recreation and commerce. Because water resources are such a prominent and important component of the county, it is necessary to identify and review the different types, quantities and qualities of the water resources available in the county. There are 68 natural and artificial water bodies scattered throughout Alpena County that range in size from under 1 acre to thousands of acres. The largest water body in the county is Fletcher Pond hydroelectric reservoir. Shared with Montmorency County, the reservoir covers a total of 8,970 acres with 5,310 acres in Alpena County. The largest natural lake is Long Lake that covers 2,750 acres. Other large water bodies in the county include Beaver Lake, Turtle Lake, Devils Lake #1 and #2, Lake Winyah, Lake Besser, Sunset Lake, Grass Lake, Crooked Lake and Middle Lake. The Main Branch of the Thunder Bay River, with headwaters in Montmorency
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Economic Analysis of Critical Habitat Designation for the Piping Plover: Great Lakes Breeding Habitat
    April- 2001 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF CRITICAL HABITAT DESIGNATION FOR THE PIPING PLOVER: GREAT LAKES BREEDING HABITAT Final Addendum Division of Economics U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 4401 N. Fairfax Drive Arlington, VA 22203 April 2001 April- 2001 Prepared by: Robert Unsworth, Sarah Malloy, Leslie Katz and Jeremy Sinaikin Industrial Economics, Incorporated 2067 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, Massachusetts 02140 April- 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................1 IMPLICATIONS AND REVISED ESTIMATES FOR THE DRAFT ECONOMIC ANALYSIS....................................................................................................................................1 Revisions to Critical Habitat Units.....................................................................................2 Baseline Statutory and Regulatory Requirements .............................................................2 Socioeconomic Profile of the Critical Habitat Areas.........................................................8 Impacts of Critical Habitat Designation on Land Use: Federal, Tribal, State, Local, and Private Lands....................................................9 ECONOMIC COSTS OF CRITICAL HABITAT DESIGNATION..........................................................................................................................30 Number of Consultations and Technical Assistance Calls...............................................30 Costs of
    [Show full text]
  • Eurasian Ruffe (Gymnocephalus Cernua), Native to Northern Europe and Asia, Have Threatened the Great Lakes and Surrounding States Since the Late 1980S
    State of Michigan’s Status and Strategy for Eurasian Ruffe Management Scope Invasive Eurasian ruffe (Gymnocephalus cernua), native to northern Europe and Asia, have threatened the Great Lakes and surrounding states since the late 1980s. The goals of this document are to: • Summarize the current understanding level of the biology and ecology of Eurasian ruffe. • Summarize the current management options for Eurasian ruffe in Michigan. • Identify possible future directions of Eurasian ruffe management in Michigan. Biology and Ecology I. Identification Eurasian ruffe, also known as blacktail Gary Cholwek – National Biological Service or river ruffe, is a member of genus Gymnocephalus within Percidae. Eurasian ruffe is a small, aggressive, benthic fish native to Europe and Asia. The species resemble yellow perch with distinct walleye markings (McLean 1997). The Eurasian ruffe can be distinguished from other perch by their large, jointed dorsal fin composed of 11 to 16 spines with rows of dark spots between each spine. Adult ruffe are typically five to six inches long with large individuals rarely exceeding 10 inches. They have a small, downturned mouth, lack scales on their head, and are slimy when handled (McLean 1997). Eurasian ruffe have two dorsal fins, one spiny (anterior) and one soft (posterior), and are commonly mistaken for troutperch, which have only a single dorsal fin. Their coloration consists of an olive-brown dorsal surface, pale sides, and a yellow underside (Fuller 2014, Hajjar 2002). Eurasian ruffe have two ventral fins with sharp spines on the leading edges; the anterior fin has only one spine where the posterior fin has two spines.
    [Show full text]
  • Lighthouses – Clippings
    GREAT LAKES MARINE COLLECTION MILWAUKEE PUBLIC LIBRARY/WISCONSIN MARINE HISTORICAL SOCIETY MARINE SUBJECT FILES LIGHTHOUSE CLIPPINGS Current as of November 7, 2018 LIGHTHOUSE NAME – STATE - LAKE – FILE LOCATION Algoma Pierhead Light – Wisconsin – Lake Michigan - Algoma Alpena Light – Michigan – Lake Huron - Alpena Apostle Islands Lights – Wisconsin – Lake Superior - Apostle Islands Ashland Harbor Breakwater Light – Wisconsin – Lake Superior - Ashland Ashtabula Harbor Light – Ohio – Lake Erie - Ashtabula Badgeley Island – Ontario – Georgian Bay, Lake Huron – Badgeley Island Bailey’s Harbor Light – Wisconsin – Lake Michigan – Bailey’s Harbor, Door County Bailey’s Harbor Range Lights – Wisconsin – Lake Michigan – Bailey’s Harbor, Door County Bala Light – Ontario – Lake Muskoka – Muskoka Lakes Bar Point Shoal Light – Michigan – Lake Erie – Detroit River Baraga (Escanaba) (Sand Point) Light – Michigan – Lake Michigan – Sand Point Barber’s Point Light (Old) – New York – Lake Champlain – Barber’s Point Barcelona Light – New York – Lake Erie – Barcelona Lighthouse Battle Island Lightstation – Ontario – Lake Superior – Battle Island Light Beaver Head Light – Michigan – Lake Michigan – Beaver Island Beaver Island Harbor Light – Michigan – Lake Michigan – St. James (Beaver Island Harbor) Belle Isle Lighthouse – Michigan – Lake St. Clair – Belle Isle Bellevue Park Old Range Light – Michigan/Ontario – St. Mary’s River – Bellevue Park Bete Grise Light – Michigan – Lake Superior – Mendota (Bete Grise) Bete Grise Bay Light – Michigan – Lake Superior
    [Show full text]
  • Alpena Dates of Events
    >>>>>>o<<<<<< ALPENA DATES OF EVENTS. 18,62---lgo2. 25 CENTS. >>>>>>o<<< ARGUS, ALPENA, MICH. ALPENA DATE,SOF EARLY EVENTS On the follo*'ing pages are showD 'he dates of t'he principal hap,pen- rngs and events in the history of Aipen,a city, .A.lpena county, and some important da,tesin the history qf adjacent counties. The list has been co.mpiled with the greatesl nossible ac.curacyand is hrought up to January 1, 1I 1'5. As the years oass this little tboo'kw,ill become all the mcre valuable,. Preserve it for reference. It will make interesting reading and will settle many a dis- DUte. I a;39-ta4 0- First survey ,by the Unite(! ,States of lancls in Alpena eo'unty. The first sarvmill in Alpen,a coun- ty was erected at the mouth ol Devil River in 1844, by Jonathan Burteh and Ans.on Eldred. Darid D. Oliver built and opened a store on Thunder Bay Isiand, in 1845. ! at6- Simeon M. H,olden erected a frame bttiltling on Thunder Bay Island. I S,56- Nov. 26.-I)aniel ,Carter. $ife and daught.er, c,ame t0 Alpena, the {irst settlers. € { _.<--.-"€r' ra57_ Feb. T._AIpena county organize.d. Whac is now the city of rvas _\lpena then oalled x'remoni, ailii" ljrt election of county oflicers""0 in . November, Daniel ,carier ;;;';.# treasu.rer, rI :9.-?l:'rlsl,ip. the torrr.iri'r, cotnprising the entjre eounty. lf; Carter was atso the fi".t of Fremont. ;;;t;u.;, r850- _ In February, t g,b9, the name ot"' Fremont was changed t" .sr;"rul \ In,t8b8 the first s,c,hoolin Alpena was { held in ,a-rougn ooard eooDer srrop n on l9t t0, block 3, ot tfre-fUis,s vii- tage, oi { t Water street, witn ivrary L'arter as the teacher.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Equestrian Trails and Facilities Inventory
    Trail Length EQ User Trailer Parking Campground/Dispersed Campground GPS Campground Campground Trail Name (Associated Facility) Contact Phone Number County PRD District ETS Region GPS Coordinates (Trailhead) Trail Fee EQ Friends Group # Sites Comments (mi) Experience (#) Camping Coordinates Type Fee Latitude Longitude FEDERAL Alligator Hill Hiking Trail (Sleeping Northern Lower (231) 326.5134 Leelanau Cadillac 44.89254602 ‐86.02071762 9 Day-Use N/A N/A N/A N/A Bear Dunes National Lakeshore) Peninsula Bay De Noc Grand Island National Horses at Hiawatha are allowed on Multi-Day (Multiple Dispersed: at trailhead or Recreation Trail (Hiawatha National (906) 387.2512 Alger Western UP Upper Peninsula 45.91698979 ‐86.92329168 40 Rustic $0-$3 any trail or road unless otherwise Locations) along trail Forest) posted No horses allowed in Big Island Multi-Day (Multiple Dispersed: at trailhead or Delta Western Up Upper Peninsula Lake Wilderness or Rock River Locations) along trail Canyon Wilderness Bigelow Creek (Manistee National Southwest Lower Multi-Day (Multiple (231) 745.4631 Newaygo Cadillac Rustic Forest) Peninsula Locations) $5 Daily Hungerfod Lake Trail (Manistee Southwest Lower Multi-Day (Multiple Hungerford Trail Riders 48 Designated, 1 Vehicle pass required; Rustic camp (231) 745‐4631 Newaygo Cadillac 43. 701452 -85.622118 26.62 21 $15 Hungerford Trail Camp Rustic $15 Peninsula Locations) Association Group area limited to 14 consecutive days National Forest) Weekly Oakwood Horse Trail (Hiawatha Multi-Day (Multiple (906) 387.2512 Alger
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B - Brief History of the Area
    Appendix B - Brief History of the Area There are several book and web sites with historical information about Misery Bay and the Thunder Bay Group. A recently published book by Steve Tongue provides a detailed history of Thunder Bay Island, the lighthouses and life saving station.. Steve Tongue serves as historian for the Thunder Bay Island Preservation Society. While “magnificent in its desolation” today, Thunder Bay Island has a significant legacy: *The second oldest lighthouse still standing on Lake Huron *A lifesaving station which assisted in the rescue of over 1000 lives *A coast littered with the remains of ill-fated shipwrecks *A fishing colony that was home to Alpena’s earliest settlers *Legends of ghosts and the mysterious currents that draw ships to their destruction *Rocks carved with the names of the many who served on and visited the island for over 150 years *Rare plant and animal life drawn to its unique “alvar” ecosystem These are a few of the many fascinating stories told in Lanterns and Lifeboats. Beginning with the voyage of the Griffin in 1679, Thunder Bay Island has provided shelter along “Huron’s rockbound shore,” and its story mirrors our rich Great Lakes maritime heritage. Lanterns and Lifeboats connects the history “above the water line” with the Thunder Bay National Marine Sanctuary’s latest efforts to preserve and interpret the bay’s rich underwater archaeology. The book is available from the Thunder Bay Island Preservation Society (TBIPS) at P.O Box 212, Alpena, MI 49707. Please send a check for $14.95 plus $2.00 shipping and handling.
    [Show full text]
  • Area Recreation
    26 MontmorencyMontmorency CountyCounty FREE! 25 28 27 HEALY HARDWOOD RD. 26 29 RD. URBAN 28 27 30 29 ROYSTON RD. MUD LAKE 27 26 25 30 Cornwall CLARK BRIDGE RD. 27 26 25 30 29 28 Creek 26 25 30 29 TOMAHAWK28 LK. HWY. T33N 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 Flooding C-C ROAD 35 33 34 BONEYARD HWY. 35 36 31 32 RecreationRecreation 2012-2013MapMap 33 34 W. Branch Upper Rainy River 32 Black River Tomahawk Creek 31 32 33 34 35 36 Bear Den Lake Flooding 34 35 36 31 32 34 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 33 35 36 McMasters 31Creek 32 Silver Lake 5 4 32 OW OW RD. 1 6 £ 3 2 £ £ 4 £ £ Little Joe Lake £ 5 TWIN LAKES RD. £ £ Rainy 3 2 1 6 KOENIG RD. £ 6 5 4 MORR Lost Lakes 3 2 1 £ River £ 6 5 4 £ 5 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 Flooding HUBERT RD. 6 5 RD. BRANCH EAST Bush Lake £ MILLERSBURG RD. Wildfowl £ Ribble Lake Grass Lake £ 9 10 11 Lake 8 Tomahawk Creek £ 12 7 10 11 451 £ £ 9 £ Upper 8 Twin Lakes £ Tomahawk9 10 11 12 7 N. Branch Thunder Bay River £ £ 7 8 £ £ Lake 10 11 12 Lake 12 7 8 9 £ KYES RD. 8 9 10 11 12 £ 9 10 11 Geneva 7 8 £ . Ford Lake HARDWOOD LK. RD. £ £ £ BRANDT RD £ £ £ 14 £ TOMAHAWK LK. RD. 16 15 £ £ 17 COLLINS. RD. RUHL RD. RUHL 13 £ Virginia 14 18 £ £ Twin EDGAR RD. 15 £ Lake 16 £ £ Tomahawk 13 17 REIDER SCHOOL RD.
    [Show full text]
  • Eat Safe Fish Guide
    Michigan Department Health and Human Services’ Eat Safe Fish Guide Some fish contain chemicals that can harm your health. MDHHS tests filets of fish taken from Michigan’s lakes and rivers to learn which fish are safer to eat. The Eat Safe Fish Guide lists the fish that have been tested and how much is safe to eat. Inside the Guide About the Guide ............................................................... 5 Michigan DNR Fishing Laws ........................................... 5 Questions About Eating Safe Fish? ............................... 5 Choosing Safer Fish .......................................................... 6 My Michigan, MI Serving Size ........................................ 6 How much is MI Serving? ............................................... 6 Are you pregnant? ......................................................... 6 Special MI Serving Categories ........................................ 7 Get to know the 3Cs ......................................................... 8 Statewide Safe Fish Guidelines ....................................... 9 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) ............................. 10 Common Michigan Fish ................................................. 12 Fish Eating Guidelines by County ................................. 14 This page left blank on purpose. 4 www.michigan.gov/eatsafefish About the Guide The Eat Safe Fish Guide (ESF Guide) is provided by the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS). • The fish listed under each lake or river in the ESF Guide have been tested for chemicals. • Scientists from MDHHS test ONLY the filet of the fish - the part that you would eat - to determine the guidelines included in the ESF Guide. • MDHHS uses the test results from the fish filets to find the average amount of chemicals in the fish species from that lake or river. They use this information to determine how much fish is safe to eat per month. • The ESF Guide is not a rulebook. These are only guidelines to help you make safer choices for you and your family.
    [Show full text]
  • Four Mile Impoundment, Status of the Fishery Resource Report, 2017-234
    Michigan Dept. of Natural Resources 2017-234 Status of the Fishery Resource Report Page 1 Four Mile Impoundment Alpena County, T31N, R08E Thunder Bay River watershed, last surveyed 2016 Tim Cwalinski, Senior Fisheries Biologist, Gaylord Environment Four Mile Impoundment is a 98 acre waterbody located within the lower reaches of the Thunder Bay River in Alpena County near the town of Alpena (Figure 1). The impoundment was created in 1902 on a stretch of Thunder Bay River that possesses relatively high gradient when compared to other parts of the lower watershed (Cwalinski et al. 2006). The dam has been used for hydroelectric power generation since it was built, with the most recent license settlement agreement established in 1998 between the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and Thunder Bay Power Company. Current ownership of the dam is North American Hydro, though it is still managed by Thunder Bay Power Company. The storage area of the pond is 1000 acre-feet. The dam has a head of 28 feet, and no operating fish passage structure exists. The structure is considered a high or significant hazard (failure results in danger to individuals downstream with the potential for loss of human life) by the Michigan Department of Enviornmental Quality. This dam is located between Ninth Street dam in the city of Alpena and the Norway Dam (Seven Mile Dam) that impounds Lake Winyah. Four Mile Impoundment is a relatively small and narrow impoundment between two larger impoundments and dams. One small tributary, Fall Creek, enters the impoundment on the north shore. The shoreline of Four Mile Impoundment is relatively undeveloped, and under private ownership including some land owned by Thunder Bay Power Company.
    [Show full text]
  • Montmorency County, T30N, R2E Thunder Bay River Watershed, Last Surveyed 2013
    Michigan Dept. of Natural Resources 2013-165 Status of the Fishery Resource Report Page 1 Atlanta Pond Montmorency County, T30N, R2E Thunder Bay River Watershed, last surveyed 2013 Tim A. Cwalinski, Senior Fisheries Management Biologist Environment Atlanta Pond is an impounded reach of the upper Thunder Bay River in the town of Atlanta, Michigan in Montmorency County (Figure 1). The dam has a height of 15 feet and impounds an estimated 97 acres (Breck 2004), though the actual flooding appears much smaller based on observation. The dam is the responsibility of the Montmorency County drain commissioner, and local circuit court has established a legal lake level for Atlanta Pond. Operation and maintenance of the dam is overseen by the Montmorency County Drain Commissioner. The dam is a complete barrier to upstream fish passage. There is a top spillway at the dam which flows through an underground culvert and into the Thunder Bay River. This river is managed as a Type 4 trout stream downstream of the pond and is stocked annually with trout by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources. The pond has a maximum depth of about 9 feet, and most of the lake is less than 6 feet deep. The bottom substrate is primarily muck with sand in some near-shore areas. Aquatic vegetation, particularly in spring and summer, is prevalent. The majority of the shoreline of Atlanta Pond is privately owned and is a mixture of houses, a township park (Briley Township), and some wetland and upland forest. The township park is located near the dam and offers shoreline access, including a fishing pier that runs parallel to the shore near the dam.
    [Show full text]
  • The Watersheds of Northeast Michigan
    The Watersheds of Northeast Michigan What is a Watershed? Did you know that everywhere you are, you’re within a watershed? A watershed is an area of land that contains a common set of streams, rivers and lakes that all drain into a larger waterbody. Watershed boundaries follow natural features of the landscape, such as a ridgeline or a height-of-land (see diagram at right). Watersheds include both the water features within the area, as well as the land surrounding those water bodies. As a result of the connected nature of a watershed, all activities on the land and water can affect the condition of the larger watershed. A watershed can be divided into progressively smaller watersheds, which are often referred to as subswatersheds. For example, the Klacking Creek Watershed is one of many subwatersheds that can be identified within the larger Rifle River Watershed. Likewise, the Rifle River Watershed itself is part of the larger Lake Huron Watershed. Watershed diagram: www.upperdesplainsriver.org Huron Pines is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization and an equal opportunity provider. Our dynamic staff of ecologists, geographers, biologists and environmental educators think big and act quickly to ensure that Northeast Michigan’s watersheds and wild places will stay healthy and resilient for future generations. Located right in the center of the Great Lakes system, we have the unique privilege and responsibility to protect our treasured lands teeming with wildlife, and to sustain the world’s most important source of fresh water. Learn more at
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Assessment for Pterospora Andromedea Nutt
    Conservation Assessment For Pterospora andromedea Nutt. (Pine-drops) USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region Hiawatha National Forest November 2004 This Conservation Assessment was prepared to compile the published and unpublished information on Pterospora andromedea Nutt. This report provides information to serve as a Conservation Assessment for the Eastern Region of the Forest Service. It is an administrative study only and does not represent a management decision by the U.S. Forest Service. Although the best scientific information available was used and subject experts were consulted in preparation of this document and its review, it is expected that new information will arise. In the spirit of continuous learning and adaptive management, if the reader has any information that will assist in conserving this species, please contact the Eastern Region of the Forest Service – Threatened and Endangered Species Program at 310 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 580 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53203. Conservation Assessment for Pterospora andromedea ii Acknowledgements Outside Reviewers: We would like to thank our academic reviewers and agency reviewers outside of the United States Forest Service for their helpful comments on this manuscript. • Phyllis Higman, Botanist, Michigan Natural Features Inventory National Forest Reviewers: We also thank our internal National Forest reviewers for their suggestions and corrections and for providing element occurrences for their National Forests. Complete contact information is available under Contacts section. • Jan Schultz, Forest Plant Ecologist, on the Hiawatha National Forest • Sue Trull, Forest Botanist, on the Ottawa National Forest • Ian Shackleford, Botanist, on the Ottawa National Forest Herbarium and Heritage Data: We appreciate the sharing of occurrence information for this species from Heritage personnel both in the United States and Canada, along with the helpful assistance of Herbarium personnel.
    [Show full text]