DOCSLIB.ORG

ISRMUN 2018 ECOSOC Topic B Background Paper

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ISRMUN 2018 ECOSOC Topic B Background Paper The United Nations Economic and Social Council ! Committee: The United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) Topic B: Promoting economic development in indigenous communities Written by: Ivanna Jadra, Carolina Zarazua, Rodrigo Llaguno, Emilio Carrillo and Melisa Vargas I. Committee Background The United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) is the United Nations’ (UN) “central platform for reflection, debate, and innovative thinking on sustainable development.” It was established in 1946 and it is one of the six main organizations of the UN. Currently, ECOSOC has 54 member states, which are appointed by the General Assembly every three years. The committee’s headquarters is located in New York City and its current president is Marie Chatardová. Right now, the main focus of ECOSOC is the promotion of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which are a series of goals designed to promote economic development, end poverty and world hunger, encourage gender equality, etc. (About ECOSOC, ECOSOC, 2018). Moreover, ECOSOC furthers its mandate through collaboration with several subsidiary bodies such as the Commission on the Status of Women (CSW) and the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) (Subsidiary Bodies, ECOSOC, 2018). II. Topic information A) History of Topic According to the World Health Organization (WHO), indigenous communities are populations “that live within, or are attached to, geographically distinct traditional habitats or ancestral territories, and who identify themselves as being part of a distinct ! cultural group.” These communities are found all around the world and many countries have some located in strategic areas, while others are sometimes scattered throughout all of the territory. The UN estimates that there are around 370 million indigenous people living in more than 70 countries around the world. (WHO, 2007). On the other hand, economic development refers to “the adoption of new technologies, transition from agriculture-based to industry-based economy, and general improvement in living standards” (Business Dictionary, 2018). In various reports, the United Nations states that the rights of indigenous communities are violated daily. It also describes that these communities are some of the most disadvantaged and vulnerable groups in the world. This has led to little economic development and a lack of opportunities for them. Many indigenous communities live in extreme poverty and lack access to clean drinking water, electricity, medical centres and education, these communities are often isolated from the rest of the country’s population as well. According to Stephen Corry of The Guardian, governments tend to provide these communities with minimal interest because they are seen as “others” because of their beliefs, cultures and traditions, which are extremely important to indigenous communities and are often misunderstood by outsiders. Corry asserts that governments make little efforts to learn more about these communities and interpret their wanting to hold onto traditions as a rejection of progress that goes against the country (Corry, The Guardian, 2011). Colonialism also plays a strong role in why many indigenous communities lack economic development and support. The Guardian stated that the purpose of colonialism was to “take away their self-sufficiency, on their own territory, and lead them to glorious productivity, as menials, on someone else's.” This means that under colonialism, indigenous communities were not able to grow because their efforts were only to benefit their oppressors. Nothing went back into their own communities, ! creating a continuing cycle of poverty and destitution. Moreover, colonial stereotypes about indigenous communities continue to linger and this has caused great damage (Corry, The Guardian, 2011). For instance, the World Bank states that education is a must in order for economic development to occur. Without an education, people cannot obtain jobs, earn money and pay taxes which are then invested into the building of schools, hospitals, etc. (Patrinos, The World Bank, 2016). For many indigenous communities, access to education does not exist due to government budgets and investments. Furthermore, many indigenous communities do not trust government supported educational institutions due to a history of abuse and mistreatment towards indigenous children. (Corry, The Guardian, 2011). Non-profit organizations are attempting to help communities take control of their own economic development. Indigenous communities are now being encouraged to mix traditional with modern technology in order to earn a fair wage. For example,the company provides the community with a free online platform to sell indigenous fashion and textile items, all while promoting them as fair trade and sustainable. All profits return back to the communities and are then used to purchase necessary items such as medicine, books, etc. (Indigenous, 2018). Also, in order to meet educational needs, the Indigenous Education Institute (IEI), trains teachers within indigenous communities and funds the constructions of schools. The organization’s educational program is a mixture of indigenous knowledge and tradition with the learning standards of the local government (IEI, 2018). B) Current Issues Australia: According to the Australian government, the country is committed to ensuring that members of indigenous communities have the same economic opportunities as non-indigenous citizens. In its Indigenous Economic Development Strategy report for 2011-2018, the government outlined its plan for making economic ! development more equal. It aims to offer more educational opportunities with more schools, teachers and scholarships. This is important because Australia believes education teaches skills which will enable keep indigenous communities to obtain “meaningful work and to build financial self-reliance” (Australian Government, 2011). However, this plan has been widely criticized by indigenous communities because it does not provide them with opportunities for their input. Yawuru leader Patrick Dodson said, “There's a lot of aspiration and maybe good intention, but unless you get participation from Indigenous entities at a local level and community level, it's not going to work” (Robinson, ABC News, 2016). Peru: In Peru, 45% of its 30 million inhabitants identify as indigenous. The majority of the indigenous population reside in remote areas that are rich in natural resources. However, due to government policies and the promotion of big corporations, the indigenous communities do not have access to what is around them. Instead, they live in poverty, unable to sell or utilize the natural resources in their own communities. Moreover, most indigenous communities in Peru do not own the land they live on, making it even harder to promote economic development. Recently, the government granted more land rights to indigenous communities, however, reliance on governmental programs for food, water and medicine is still common (Murtough, Public Policy Peru, 2016). Fiji: In Fiji, the population is a almost evenly divided between indigenous Fijians and Indo-Fijians. However, within the country, the indigenous population are the dominate land owners and hold a majority in the government. Following the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in 2007, the government in Fiji began to debate the exact definition of the word “indigenous”. It later revealed that since indigenous communities within the nation were economically well developed, more needed to be done for non-indigenous groups. So, Fiji is unique since its indigenous communities ! have not been suppressed by years of colonialism, discrimination and inequality. Moreover, the indigenous population do not want to see poverty inflicted on others and have taken action in order to lift up non-indigenous groups living within the country (Allen and Xanthaki, ed., Reflections on the UN declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples, 2011). Mexico: In Mexico, indigenous communities are more likely to live in poverty than non- indigenous communities. Around 12% of the country’s population identifies as indigenous. According to the UN, indigenous communities are discriminated against in Mexico due to cultural misunderstandings and racism. The organization also said that indigenous communities in Mexico have historically faced higher levels of poverty and economic insecurity. For instance, 80.6 percent of nation’s indigenous population live in extreme poverty and the majority of indigenous children live under the poverty line on less than two United States dollars a day. The lack of food and opportunities makes it difficult for children to attend school, obtain employment and lift their families out of poverty. So, within Mexican indigenous communities poverty is often hereditary, with parents passing it onto children and so on, making it a never-ending process unlikely to end soon due to a lack of government action in recent years (Heath, Panoramas, 2016). Russia: Russia has around 30 northern indigenous communities. Most of them live in Siberia or other remote areas. Many struggle with difficulties such as high infant mortality rates, low life expectancy, high homicide rates, suicide and substance abuse problems. The UN has attributed these problems to Soviet Union era policies which brought about “the closure of so-called "futureless" indigenous villages, forced relocation of native populations into larger, often multi-ethnic settlements (where
Load more

Recommended publications
  • “The Fold Behind the Knee” Survival International’S Stephen Corry Reflects on the Words of Yanomami Shaman, Davi Kopenawa Xhosa Mysticism
    Issue 39 £2.50 Indie SSN 2050-568X (Online) Shaman for independent spirits “The fold behind the knee” Survival International’s Stephen Corry reflects on the words of Yanomami shaman, Davi Kopenawa Xhosa Mysticism The Desecration of Natural Power Sites Shamanism: Inviting a move towards an Earth Centred Consciousness? www.indieshaman.co.uk Indie Shaman Environmental and Accessibility WEBSITE https://indieshaman.co.uk/ POSTAL ADDRESS 18 Bradwell Grove Danesmoor Chesterfield Derbyshire S45 9TA EDITOR Indie Shaman is committed to minimize the effects of its June Kent activities on the environment. Indie Shaman Magazine is printed by Minuteman Press, Bristol, whose products are CONTACT Forestry Stewardship Council (FSC) www.fsc.org certificated [email protected] and meet the requirements of the Programme for the 01246 251768 Endorsement of Forest Certification Schemes (PEFC) Chain of Custody wwwpefc.org. All articles and images are © Indie Shaman 2009-2018 or to the artist, Indie Shaman is committed to aiming towards equality of photographer, writer where named accessibility. For this reason this magazine uses a book unless otherwise stated. All rights rather than traditional magazine layout, with clear print size reserved. and spacing. The views expressed in the articles We carried out research with the help of our subscribers to and advertisements in the Indie make sure we are providing the service you want and we Shaman Magazine are those of the value your feedback. If you have any comments or questions authors and are not necessarily those on any of the above please contact us: of the editor/Indie Shaman. by email to: [email protected] The editor/Indie Shaman takes no responsibility for errors, omissions or by post to: or the consequences thereof and or June Kent, Indie Shaman, for any actions taken in relation to 18 Bradwell Grove, Danesmoor any article herein or for any contract Chesterfield, Derbyshire, S45 9TA entered into with any third party.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigeneity and Development in Botswana the Case of the San in the Central Kalahari Game Reserve Jonathan Woof
    1 Indigeneity and Development in Botswana The Case of the San in the Central Kalahari Game Reserve Jonathan Woof 1 Abstract: This paper discusses how San involved with the Central Kalahari Game Reserve (CKGR) in Botswana express and interpret their sense of indigeneity amidst the systemic marginalization and discrimination that they have experienced. By looking in depth at the case in the CKGR, the nature of prominent San CSOs and impact of the ‘Global North,’ this paper finds that San affirm their sense of indigeneity by critiquing the post-colonial development discourse, attempting to restore their land rights in the CKGR and by implementing ‘life-projects’ which affirm their ontologies and traditions. The findings of the paper suggest that the concept of indigeneity is diverse and complex and may not be as liberating as its proponents hope. 2 Table of Contents Introduction, Methodology and Theoretical Framework .................................................... 1-11 Chapter 1: The Concept of Indigeneity and its Manifestations in Africa and in Botswana... 12-22 Chapter 2: Indigeneity Within the San Community ............................................................... 23-36 Chapter 3: Survival International’s Perception of Indigeneity Compared to the San Community .................................................................................................................................................. 37-41 Chapter 4: Current State of Affairs for the San in the CKGR .............................................. 42-46 Conclusion
    [Show full text]
  • Bushmen in the Tourist Imaginary
    Bushmen in the Tourist Imaginary Bushmen in the Tourist Imaginary By Roie Thomas Bushmen in the Tourist Imaginary By Roie Thomas This book first published 2016 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2016 by Roie Thomas All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-0156-9 ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-0156-0 I am grateful to Dr Jen Couch and Professor Margot Hillel of the Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, for their scholarly advice and encouragement. I also owe much to friends and academic colleagues in Botswana: Barbara Cain, Dithunya Lekoa, Eureka Mokibelo, Job Morris, Qaeqho Moses, Xukuri Xukuri, Peter Mwikisa and Leema Hiri. My family has always supported my adventures with somewhat bemused interest and several moments of trepidation. Thanks, dear ones, and sorry but there’s more Near-Death-by-Hippo, and hitching rides in ‘backies’ on the drawing board. And here’s to wondrous adventures of our own, Duncan. This book is for my daughters, Megan and Robyn, who just care. 0-1: “Full Moon Party”, tourist postcard. Marginalising of ethnic minorities in relation to animals within tourism is common in Botswana and other countries. As San spokesman Roy Sesana claims: ‘[i]n Botswana a Mosarwa is nothing.
    [Show full text]
  • Resistencia India Organizada : El Caso De Perú
    RESISTENCIA INDIA ORGANIZADA EL CASO DE PERÚ RESISTENCIA INDIA ORGANIZADA EL CASO DE PERÚ LUISA ABAD GONZÁLEZ RESISTENCIA INDIA ORGANIZADA: EL CASO DE PERÚ LUISA ABAD GONZÁLEZ 1a. Edición Ediciones Abya- Yala Av. 12 de octubre 14-30 y Wilson Casilla 17-12-719 Telef: 2506-267/ 2506-251 Fax: (593 2) 2506-267 E-mail: [email protected] htpp//:www.abayayala.org Diagramación: Ediciones Abya - Yala Quito-Ecuador ISBN: 9978-22-588-9 Impresión: Producciones digitales Abya-Yala Impreso en Quito Ecuador, 2006 AGRADECIMIENTOS Quisiera dedicar este libro a todas las organizaciones que inte- gran AIDESEP (la Asociación Interétnica de Desarrollo de la Selva Pe- ruana), pues a través de ellos pude conocer la verdadera realidad de los pueblos Indígenas de la Amazonía peruana y ellos son los que me han brindado una gran parte de los conocimientos que hoy atesoro. Especialmente quiero hacer mención a todas las Comunidades que integran la Federación Ijunbau Chapi Shiwag en el Distrito de Manseriche, Provincia de Alto Amazonas, pues con ellos fue con quien más tiempo conviví y quienes me tuvieron que aguantar mi inmadu- rez, inexperiencia y falta de desenvolvimiento en el medio selvático. En particular quiero mencionar a los habitantes de la Comunidad de San- ta Rosa, Sinchi Roca, Yanayaku y, muy significativamente a los de Nue- vo Israel. También quiero mencionar a las Comunidades del Alto Mara- ñón por donde pasé, ya fuera aprendiendo, ya acompañando a algún dirigente o recogiendo informes. Estas son: Comunidad Nazareth, Na- puruka, Huampami y Kusú-Pagat por un lado y, por otro, Santa María de Nieva, Japaime y las Comunidades que componen el territorio de Chamikar.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward Traditional Resource Rights for Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities Darrell A
    Beyond Intellectual Property: Toward Traditional Resource Rights for Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities Darrell A. Posey and Graham Dutfield INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH CENTRE Ottawa • Cairo • Dakar • Johannesburg • Montevideo • Nairobi • New Delhi • Singapore Published by the International Development Research Centre PO Box 8500, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1G 3H9 © International Development Research Centre 1996 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, or otherwise, without the prior permission of the International Development Research Centre. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the International Development Research Centre. Mention of proprietary names does not constitute endorsement of the product and is given only for information. IDRC BOOKS endeavours to produce environmentally friendly publications. All paper used is recycled as well as recyclable. All inks and coating are vegetable-based products. Contents Preface Acknowledgments Introduction Chapter 1: Who visits communities, what are they seeking, and why? Chapter 2 : What happens to traditional knowledge and resources? Chapter 3: Who benefits from traditional resources? Chapter 4: Will the community be informed? Chapter 5: What right do communities have to say “yes” or “no” to commercialization? Chapter 6: How can a community take legal action? Chapter 7: What are
    [Show full text]
  • Book Reviews 212 BOOK REVIEWS STEPHEN
    Book reviews BOOK REVIEWS STEPHEN CORRY, Tribal peoples for tomorrow’s world, Cookhill: Freeman Press 2011, 303 pp. On 13 September 2007, the UN General Assembly adopted a Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. The culmination of more than two decades of discussion, the event was heralded by the UN Secretary General as a ‘historic moment’ when governments and indigenous peoples ‘reconciled with their painful histories and resolved to move forward together on the path of human rights, justice and development.’1 The four countries that voted against the text at the time – Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States – have since endorsed it. But what does it actually mean for the estimated three hundred and seventy million indigenous people alive today? The answer, according to Stephen Corry, will depend on the extent to which the Declaration is accompanied by action from governments and by a far better understanding from their citizens about who indigenous people are and what they actually want. In Tribal peoples for tomorrow’s world, Corry – director of the NGO Survival International – distils forty years of work into a short, lively and accessible ‘beginners guide’ to tribal peoples and the challenges they face (p. iv). This is not an academic book: its message is political (proceeds from its sales go to Survival International), and it contains no references or bibliography. But there is still much in it that may be of interest to anthropologists, especially those studying tribal peoples currently engaged in struggles with governments over land and other resources. Corry begins with a nuanced discussion of the importance, and difficulty, of defining his key terms: people, indigenous, tribal.
    [Show full text]
  • Survival Is an Old Fighter, an Old Warrior
    For tribes, for nature, for all humanity Survival International Annual Report 2019 Survival is an old fghter, an old warrior Davi Kopenawa Yanomami Yanomami tribe, Brazil Survival International Charitable Trust TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS for the year ended 31 December 2019 Contents TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL REPORT Reference and administrative details 1 Objectives and activities 2 Achievements and performance 2 Plans for future periods 10 Structure, governance and management 10 Financial review 11 Statement of Trustees’ responsibilities 13 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Report of the independent auditors 14 Consolidated statement of financial activities 17 Balance sheets 18 Statement of cash flows 19 Notes to the financial statements 20 Company Number 1056317 Charity Registration Number 267444 Survival International Trustees’ Annual Report and Financial Statements TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL REPORT for the year ended 31 December 2019 REFERENCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE DETAILS Full name of the charity and registered address Survival International Charitable Trust 6 Charterhouse Buildings London EC1M 7ET Also known as Survival International, Survival Status of the Charity The organization is a charitable company limited by guarantee, incorporated on 31 May 1972 and registered as a charity on 30 November 1969. Charity registration number – 267444 (England and Wales) Company registration number – 1056317 Trustees The members of the Council, who are also Trustees under charity law, who served during the year and up to the date of this report, were as follows: C Braggio S Branford H Chandès M Davis (Honorary Treasurer) C Dixon G de Give D de Horna T Fraine R Hanbury-Tenison (Honorary President) T Hugh-Jones C Pearce J Sainsbury J Walker J Wilson J Wood (Honorary Chair) Chief Executive Stephen Corry Bankers The Bank of Scotland plc.
    [Show full text]
  • Relocation, Resistance and International Support in the Central Kalahari Botswana
    NEWS Kalahari conundrums: relocation, resistance and international support in the Central Kalahari Botswana James Suzman African Studies Centre, Cambridge University, Free School Lane, Cambridge CB3 9AN [email protected] Covering in excess of 52 000 km2, Botswana’s San that lived there depended almost entirely on Central Kalahari Game Reserve (CKGR) is one of hunting and gathering. Unlike much of the rest of the largest conservation areas in the world. It was the Kalahari the CKGR has no permanent surface established in 1961 with a view to protecting the water and this constrained human settlement and Kalahari ecosystem whilst simultaneously providing mobility patterns. During the brief wet seasons a secure home for the 3000 San (Bushmen) who G/wi and G//ana congregated at the shallow pans lived there. This remote place has recently achieved that brimmed with water following spectacular global notoriety following the Botswana Government’s thunderstorms. The long dry seasons were an efforts to evict its long-standing human inhabitants - altogether different story. First the pans would dry the G/wikhoen and G//anakhoen San and their up. Then those animals that could not survive on Bakgalagadi neighbours - in the name of the moisture content of their browse or graze alone “development”.1 After five long years of debate and trekked northwards in search of permanent water intrigue the Botswana Government announced in beyond the reserve’s boundaries. The relatively March 2002 that it had finally “convinced” the last large groups of people that congregated at the remaining inhabitants of the Central Kalahari Game pans broke up into much smaller kin-based units Reserve to bid farewell to the land of their ancestors and dispersed into the bush so that they could and move to resettlement centres outside of the exploit available resources as efficiently as reserve’s boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical State of Uncontacted Tribes in Peru
    Submission to UN CERD committee by Survival International (NGO in consultative status with ECOSOC), in consultation with FENAMAD (Indigenous Federation of Madre de Dios, Peru) For consideration in the forthcoming 95 Session of the CERD committee (23 April 2018 - 11 May 2018) Critical state of uncontacted tribes in Peru The Peruvian government has systematically failed to protect the territories of uncontacted tribes from encroaching loggers, miners, oil companies and road building projects, resulting in forced contact with thousands of highly vulnerable isolated Indians, with catastrophic consequences. Under international law - ILO Convention 169 - and Peru’s law 28736, uncontacted tribes have the right to their land and way of life. History has shown that forced contact with isolated tribal peoples has resulted in violence, the spread of disease, and ultimately the death of between 50- 90% of a tribe following contact. If these communities are to continue to thrive, Peru must act immediately to protect their lands, and demarcate those territories still awaiting official recognition. The Threats In January 2018, the Peruvian government ratified law 307231, which declares a “national interest” in extensive road building within and around the state of Ucayali. The law was approved despite the expressed concern of the Ministries of Environment and Culture, and without the free, prior and informed consent of indigenous peoples who live in the region. The network of proposed roads cuts through the heart of highly biodiverse Amazon forest that is home to a significant and diverse population of uncontacted Indians, and evidence shows that construction of a number of these highways is already illegally underway.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright © and Moral Rights for This Phd Thesis Are Retained by the Author And/Or Other Copyright Owners
    Brett, Peter (2015) The judicialisation of political order in Southern Africa. PhD Thesis. SOAS, University of London. http://eprints.soas.ac.uk/id/eprint/20390 Copyright © and Moral Rights for this PhD Thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non‐commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This PhD Thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this PhD Thesis, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the PhD Thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full PhD Thesis title", name of the School or Department, PhD PhD Thesis, pagination. 1 THE JUDICIALISATION OF POLITICAL ORDER IN SOUTHERN AFRICA Peter Brett Thesis submitted for the degree of PhD Department of Politics and International Studies, SOAS, University of London 2 Declaration for SOAS PhD thesis I have read and understood regulation 17.9 of the Regulations for students of the SOAS, University of London concerning plagiarism. I undertake that all the material presented for examination is my own work and has not been written for me, in whole or in part, by any other person. I also undertake that any quotation or paraphrase from the published or unpublished work of another person has been duly acknowledged in the work which I present for examination.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESS KIT Goethe Medal 2018
    PRESS KIT Goethe Medal 2018 CONTENTS 1. Press Release 2. Programme of the Award Ceremony 3. Awardee: Heidi and Rolf Abderhalden (Mapa Teatro) 4. Awardee: Claudia Andujar 5. Awardee: Péter Eötvös 6. Laudatory Speakers: Deniz Utlu, Stephen Corry and Albert Ostermaier 7. About the Goethe Medal Hannah Cuvalo Communication Goethe Medal Tel.: +49 30 25906 481 [email protected] Dr. Jessica Kraatz Magri press officer and head of the communication department Goethe-Institut Zentrale Tel.: +49 89 15921 249 [email protected] PRESS RELEASE GOETHE MEDALS CONFERRED IN WEIMAR The Colombian theatre-makers Heidi and Rolf Abderhalden from the Mapa Teatro collective, the Swiss-Brazilian documentary photographer and human rights activist Claudia Andujar and the Hungarian composer and conductor Peter Eötvös were awarded the Goethe Medal on 28 August. Every year the Goethe-Institut confers the official decoration of the Federal Republic of Germany to persons who have made a special contribution to international cultural dialogue. The president of the Goethe-Institut, Klaus-Dieter Lehmann, lauded the four awardees for their special dedication to making a new start after “catastrophe.” The conferment of the Goethe Medals at the Residenzschloss in Weimar was attended by Michelle Müntefering, the Minister of State for International Cultural Policy, Benjamin- Immanuel Hoff, the Thuringian Minister for Culture, Federal and European Affairs and Head of the State Chancellery, and the Mayor of the City of Weimar, Peter Kleine. In his opening speech, Klaus-Dieter Lehmann emphasised the ideas, the work and the artistic talents of the awardees, who have always been resolutely committed to emancipatory movements and positions and rebelled against repression and social injustice.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Networks and Evangelical Frontiers: Problems with Governance and Ethics in Cases of ‘Voluntary Isolation’ in Contemporary Amazonia
    Chapter 10 Indigenous Networks and Evangelical Frontiers: Problems with Governance and Ethics in Cases of ‘Voluntary Isolation’ in Contemporary Amazonia Marc Brightman and Vanessa Grotti Abstract The periodic emergence of indigenous peoples living in voluntary isola- tion in Amazonia have given rise to sensational media reports and heated academic debate. In this chapter we describe briefly the historical and contemporary relations between indigenous peoples in and out of isolation in the Guiana Shield region of North-eastern South America and discuss the role of indigenous missionaries in histories of contact. After considering these facts in relation to some of the general debates about isolated peoples and policy, we assess the ethical dimensions of the question of emergence from isolation. 10.1 Introduction: Hunter-Gatherers, Governance and History In many countries it is far from taken for granted that the rights and responsibilities of citizenship apply also to hunter-gatherers, who tend at best to be wards of the state. The ways in which states (together with various para-state actors such as non- governmental and intergovernmental organisations) define and carry out their responsibilities towards their citizens are important aspects of governance. Yet although states often deny indigenous peoples in general, and hunter-gatherers in particular, full recognition as citizens, this has not exempted such peoples from The original version of this chapter was revised. An erratum to this chapter can be found at DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-42271-8_14 M. Brightman (*) University College London, London, UK e-mail: [email protected] V. Grotti European University Institute, Fiesole, Italy e-mail: [email protected] © The Author(s) 2017 177 V.
    [Show full text]