THE DESIGN of MASONRY STRUCTURES and FOUNDATIONS Pie!Imt!Imvi!L!U!Il]!!!Mymi."Mi!»!Imii!™^^^

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE DESIGN of MASONRY STRUCTURES and FOUNDATIONS Pie!Imt!Imvi!L!U!Il]!!!Mymi. CORNELL UNIVERSITY UBRARIES ITHACA. N. Y. 14833 Fine Arts Library Sibley HaU TA 670. Wt"™"""'™'^'""-*"^ ^'l«IMaSf.,r^°!;ry.?«ryctures and fou 3 1924 015 370 269 Cornell University Library The original of tiiis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/cletails/cu31924015370269 THE DESIGN OF MASONRY STRUCTURES AND FOUNDATIONS pie!iMt!iMVI!l!U!il]!!!MyMi."mi!»!iMii!™^^^ "Ms Qraw^MlBook (a 7ne PUBLISHERS OF BOOKS FO B_ Coal Age ^ Electric Railway Journal Electrical World ^ Engineering News-Record American Machinist vlngenierfa Intemacional Engineering g Mining Journal "^ Power Chemical 6 Metallurgical Engineering Electrical Merchandising THE DESIGN OP MASONEY STRUCTUEES AND FOUNDATIONS BY CLEMENT C. WILLIAMS, C. E. PROFESSOR OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, UNIVERSITY OP KANSAS; CONSULTING ENGINEER; MEMBER AMERICAN SOCIETY OP CIVIL ENGINEERS; MEMBER AMERICAN RAILWAY ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION; MEMBER SOCIETY POR THE PROMOTION OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION FiBST Edition ' McGRAW-HILL BOOK COMPANY, Inc. NEW YORK: 370 SEYENTH AVENUE LONDON: 6 & 8 BOUVERIE ST., E. C. 4 1922 Copyright, 1922, by the McGkaw-Hill Book Company, Inc. THBJ MA.VI.T: PSBSB YOSH! 1» A PREFACE Due to investigations, both analytical and experimental, that have been made in recent years of the properties of masonry materials, the forces to which masonry structures are subjected, and the behavior of such structures, masonry design and con- struction have largely passed from the status of an art to that of a science, much as did bridge design after the invention of methods for calculating stresses in truss members. The extensive use of concrete with the studies that have been made to improve its quality and to secure economy in its use, and the development of reinforced concrete, a masonry material capable of sustaining tensile strains and requiring a stress analysis in order to propor- tion the steel, have contributed largely to this changed status in the design of masonry structures. This scientific understanding of masonry design has widened the use of masonry to include many structures for which other materials formerly were used exclusively, although for the most part, notwithstanding their diversity, these structures can be grouped about a comparatively few representative types. The soft and pleasing hues and outlines of masonry structures as well as their durability have appealed to builders from time immemorial, and masonry still offers the best means of building artistically and strongly with the economy that results from permanence. Moreover, there is an increasing demand in the design of engineering structures to secure not only stability and economy but something of elegance, grace and beauty in addition. Since good architectural treatment can be secured with but slight if any increase in the cost, it is appropriate that this phase of design should be given special attention in planning masonry structures. The present volume was prepared with a view to furnishing a textbook embodying these ideas. An attempt has been made to offer a mode of analyzing forces and calculating resulting stresses and to indicate an acceptable method of design. Extended discussion of moot questions and of variations in design are purposely avoided with the belief that these are of interest to the vi PREFACE practicing engineer rather than of use in the class room. An effort has been made to keep in mind the aesthetic features of design in the selection of illustrative examples and to mention briefly the underlying principles of good architectural treatment whenever they could be formulated, although no more could be accomplished in this direction, perhaps, than to call attention to the desirability of giving thought to this important phase of- design. A knowledge of mechanics on the part of the reader is assumed. No attempt was made to treat reinforced concrete completely, the brief chapter on this topic being for reference and to provide for those readers who have not previously pursued a course in this subject. The study of the design of masonry structures should preferably be preceded by a course in the mechanics of reinforced concrete. A brief historical review of masonry materials and construction was included with some recent patent litigation in mind as well as for its intrinsic interest. It is believed that the chapter on built up masonry and the one on plain concrete will serve to give the student the essential facts and principles involved, although the treatment is brief in each case. The consideration of foundations was reserved until after the loads that the superstructures transmit to the foundations had been studied. The arrangement and also the material included are the result of several years teaching the subject as well as some years practical experience in design and construction. LaWHENCE, Kan. C. C. W. January, 1922. — CONTENTS Page Chapter I. General Principles .... 1 Historical development of masonry construction.—Structures. Materials.—Factors affecting design.—Adequacy.—Economy. Aesthetics. Chapter II. Masonry Laid in Mortar 22 Elements of stone masonry.—Building stones.—Classification of stone masonry.—^Laying stone masonry.—Strength.—Stone bearing blocks.—Costs.—Brick masonry.—Manner of laying.—Strength. Corbeling.—Terra cotta.—Stucco. Chapter III. Plain Concrete 57 Nature of concrete.—Cements.—Aggregates.—Methods of propor- tioning.—Strength and other properties of concrete. —Effect of var- ious factors on the properties of concrete. —Expansion and contrac- tion.—Waterproofing concrete. Chapter IV. Reinforced Concrete. 108 General principles.—Derivation of formulas.—Beams.—Columns. —Slabs.—Practical design.—Elements of cost. Chapter V. Masonry Arches. .... ... 138 Determination of form of arch ring.—Analysis of stresses. Loading for maximum stress. —Design of an arch.—Arches with elastic piers. —Arch abutment. —Groined arches.—Architectural treatment of arch bridges. Chapter VI. Dams and Sea Walls . 205 Forces acting on a dam.—Conditions of stability. —Design of section.—Design of overflow dams.—Dam foundations. —Single arch dams.—Multiple arch dams.—Rock fill and core-wall earth dams.—Architectural treatment of dams. —Breakwaters and sea Chapter VII. Retaining Walls and Quay Walls . 249 Nature of materials retained.—Forces acting on a retaining wall. Theory of pressures.—Design of section.—Effect of cohesion. Types of wall sections.—Retaining grillage and slope walls. Relative economy.—Architectural treatment of walls.—Quay walls. Chapter VIII. Bridge Abutments and Piers 284 Functions of a bridge abutment.—Elements of design.—Forces acting.—Stability of an abutment.—Types of abutments.—Rela- tive economy. Forces acting on a bridge pier. —Stability.—Hollow piers. — Relative economy.—Appearance. vii — viii CONTENTS Page Chapter IX. Concbbte Viaducts and Trestles 324 Types of masonry bridges.—^Loads on bridges.—Girder bridges. Three hinged arch bridges.—Slab bridges.—Trestles.—Stresses in trestle frames.—Cantilever concrete bridges.—Waterproofing bridge floors. Chapter X. Culverts and Underground Conduits 349 Nature of loads and pressures.-^Water way required.—Distribu- tion of pressure through earth.—Stresses in pipe conduits.—Stresses in box culverts.—Rectangular culverts.—Arch culverts.—Stresses in a large conduit of curved section. Chapter XI. Bins and Chimnets 371 Nature of pressures in granular materials.—Shallow bins.—Deep bins.—Janssen's theory of pressures.—Interspace bins.—Design of foundation slab.—Design of silos.—Forces acting on a chimney. —Design of brick chimneys.—Design of reinforced concrete chimneys. Chapter XII. Masonry Forms and Falsework 407 General requirements.—Action of concrete in forms.—Typical forms.—Movable forms.—Arch centers.—Costs of form work. Chapter XIII. Foundations on Dry Ground 431 Classification of soils.—Bearing capacity of soils.—Modes of failure.—Investigations of foundation sites.—Wall and column footings.—Grillages.—Pile foundations.—Pile driving.—Support- ing capacity of piles. —Concrete piles. —Open well foundations. Costs. Chapter XIV. Open Foundatinos under Water. ... 477 Coffer-dams.—Sheet piling.—Open caissons.—Solidifying aqui- ferous strata.—Costs. Chapter XV. Foundations under Water. Pneumatic Process. 494 General principles.—Diving.—Pneumatic cylinders.—Pneumatic caisson.—Design of caisson.—Details of caisson.—^Launching, sinking and sealing the caisson.—Pneumatic caissons under buildings.—Physiological and pathological effects of compressed air. Costs. Appendix A 537 Appendix B 544 Index. ... 547 DESIGN OF MASONRY STRUCTURES AND FOUNDATIONS CHAPTER I GENERAL PRINCIPLES Introduction.—Masonry structures are those built of stone, or of stone-like (petrous), materials. In a primitive form, they were among the earliest types of structures erected by man, and the development from the earliest and crudest dolmens to the magnificent masonry edifices and bridges of the present day has been one of slow stages. The enduring character of masonry structures, the relative simplicity of the processes involved, the pleasing outlines usually obtained, together with the almost universal availability of the materials and the consequent moderate cost, render masonry construction one of the most important of the civil engineer's activities. Moreover, the importance of masonry construction is likely to be enhanced in the future by the growing scarcity of other structural materials, notably steel and timber, and the fact
Recommended publications
  • Static and Seismic Retrofit of Masonry Arch Bridges Case Studies
    Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management, Resilience and Sustainability – Biondini & Frangopol (Eds) © 2012 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-62124-3 Static and seismic retrofit of masonry arch bridges: case studies G.Tecchio, F. da Porto, P. Zampieri, C. Modena Department of Structural and Transportation Engineering, University of Padova, Italy C. Bettio S.M. Ingegneria srl, Via longhin 6, Padova, Italy ABSTRACT: Thousands of road and railway masonry arch bridges are still in operation in the Italian trans- portation network: most of them need being improved in their carrying capacity and to be upgraded to the standards of the current seismic code. In this paper three case-studies of the static and seismic retrofit of his- torical masonry arch bridges are presented, outlining some methodological approaches to the renewal inter- vention according to the different typological characteristics of the bridges and their state of maintenance. The main phases of work, combining both traditional and innovative strengthening techniques, are described. In the S.Gallo Bridge the load bearing capacity of the existing structure has been preserved and increased through a thickening of the old arch with a new layer of brick masonry and the application of CFRP laminates. Many refurbishment techniques, derived from the historical heritage restoration field, have been used for the Rio Moline Bridge, where new longitudinal internal brick spandrel walls connected to the extrados of the vaults have been built to share some of the load and enhance the seismic resistance. In the case of the Gresal Bridge the seismic vulnerability has been reduced by creating a new structural arrangement through a new rc slab anchored to the piers with vertical ties and restrained at the abutments, collaborating with the existing structure in carrying horizontal loads.
    [Show full text]
  • Mortar Mix No
    Mortar Mix No. 1102 PRODUCT DESCRIPTION when they become "thumb print" hard. This will make the mortar joint water-tight and provide a Basic use: QUIKRETE® Mortar Mix (#1102) is neat appearance. a type N masonry mortar for use in laying brick, Coverage: Refer to table 1 for approximate block or stone; and repairing of masonry walls. coverage for each bag size. Use for brick or stone fireplaces, brick walls, block walls, parge coats, tuck pointing, stucco Table 1: Mortar Mix Usage Chart and plaster. Bag Size Standard Block Standard ® 8" X 8" X 16" Brick Composition and materials: QUIKRETE (200 mm X 200 mm X 8" X 2" X 4" Mortar (Masonry) Mix consists of a uniformly 410 mm) (200 mm X 50 blended mixture of fine sand, and type N mm X 100 mm) masonry cement. 80-lb. 12 37 Packaging: Available in three sizes: 80 lbs. (36.3 kg) (36.3 kg), 60 lbs. (27.2 kg), and 40 lbs. (18.1 28 kg). 60 lbs. 9 (27.2 kg) Technical Data QUIKRETE® Mortar Mix meets and exceeds the 40 lbs. 6 19 physical property requirements of ASTM (18.1 kg) designation 387 (Standard Specifications for Packaged, Dry, Combined Materials for Mortar Tuck Pointing or Repointing and Concrete) and ASTM C 270 for Type N Mortar. Product achieves a compressive Mixing: Mix QUIKRETE Mortar Mix with just strength in excess of 750 psi (5.17 MPa) in 28 enough water to form a damp unworkable mix day. that retains its form when pressed into a ball in the hand.
    [Show full text]
  • Wall Tile Failure in the Physical and Recreational Training Building, HMCS Shearwater, Dartmouth, N.S
    NRC Publications Archive Archives des publications du CNRC Wall tile failure in the physical and recreational training building, HMCS Shearwater, Dartmouth, N.S. Tibbetts, D. C. For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous. Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur: https://doi.org/10.4224/20359026 Technical Note (National Research Council of Canada. Division of Building Research), 1962-05-01 NRC Publications Record / Notice d'Archives des publications de CNRC: https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=030d3c84-a61e-4721-abe0-14e7dc285439 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=030d3c84-a61e-4721-abe0-14e7dc285439 Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE. L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB. Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at [email protected]. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information. Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • MASONRY REPAIR/REPOINTING at 310B ROUTE 32 UNCASVILLE, MONTVILLE, CT
    MONTVILLE TOWN HALL 310b Route 32 Uncasville, Montville, Connecticut Specifications For MASONRY REPAIR/REPOINTING AT 310b ROUTE 32 UNCASVILLE, MONTVILLE, CT CLA Job No. 6765 February 2021 Prepared By: CLA Engineers, Inc. Consulting Engineers 317 Main Street Norwich, CT 06360 Ph: 860-886-1966 F: 860-886-9165 I. ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS II. INFORMATION FOR BIDDERS III. PROPOSAL FORMS 1. BID PROPOSAL 2. FORM OF BID BOND 3. NON-COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT OF PRIME BIDDER 4. STATEMENT OF BIDDER’S QUALIFICATIONS 5. PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORS IV. AGREEMENT AND BOND FORMS 1. CONTRACT AGREEMENT 2. CERTIFICATION 3. FORM OF PERFORMANCE BOND 4. FORM OF PAYMENT BOND V. GENERAL CONDITIONS VI. SPECIAL CONDITIONS VII. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS VIII. PHOTOGRAPHS Town of Montville CLA Engineers, Inc. Masonry Repair/Repointing, 310b Route 32. Civil · Structural · Survey I. ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS Town of Montville CLA Engineers, Inc. Masonry Repair/Repointing, 310b Route 32. Civil · Structural · Survey ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS TOWN OF MONTVILLE IS SOLICITING BIDS FOR MASONRY REPAIR/REPOINTING 310b ROUTE 32 UNCASVILLE, MONTVILLE, CT Sealed bids for MASONRY REPAIR/REPOINTING AT 310b ROUTE 32, UNCASVILLE, MONTVILLE, CT will be received at Montville Town Hall, 310 Norwich-New London Turnpike, Montville CT, until 10:00 am on April 6th, 2021, prevailing time, at which time they will be publicly opened and read aloud in the Town Council Chambers. The Contract generally consists of the repair and repointing of the existing exterior brickwork of Building #2 located at 310b Route 32, Uncasville, Montville, CT. The 2-story masonry building has prevalent cracking in the mortar throughout, cracks that extend through bricks, spalling of brick, and mortar loss occurring frequently.
    [Show full text]
  • International Building Lime Symposium Orlando, FL March 9-11, 2005
    ABSTRACTS International Building Lime Symposium Orlando, FL March 9-11, 2005 Lime: The What, Why, and How Why is Type S Hydrated Lime Special? Margaret L. Thomson Weaker Can Be Better: Learning from the Past Contributes to Sustainable K. Van Balen Construction Technology with Lime Building Lime -- Setting the Standard (ASTM & Other Standards Michael J. Tate Comparisons) Grouting Masonry Using Portland Cement-Lime Mortars David T. Biggs The Effects of Air-Entrained Lime on Cement-Lime Mortars W. Mark McGinley Role of Lime in the Preservation Movement Lime and Its Place in the 21st Century: Combining Tradition, Innovation, and Lauren B. Sickels-Taves & Science in Building Preservation Philip D. Allsopp “Past and Present Use of Lime as a Binder in Masonry and Pointing Mortar” K. Van Balen A Publication by the Dutch Monument Service within a Dutch-Flemish Collaboration Lime Mortars: Two Recent Case Studies Joshua Freedland & Edward A. Gerns Hydrated Lime as an Ingredient in Historic Restoration Repair Materials M. P. Edison Production of Building Lime Small Scale Traditional Lime Binder and Traditional Mortar Production for John Hughes et al. Conservation of Historic Masonry Buildings Variations in High-Calcium Lime Putty and Mortar Properties Resulting from E.F. Hansen et al The Use of Freshly-Slaked Quicklime and Commercial Dry Hydrated Lime A Critical Review of Techniques Used to Assess Carbonation in Lime Mortars R.M.H. Lawrence Development of A Standardized Laboratory Apparatus for Measuring Emley R.J. Godbey & Baseplate Rate of Absorption M.L. Thomson Lime in Construction: Lime Based Masonry Units, Grouts, & Soil Stabilization Autoclaved Aerated Concrete: A Lime-Based Technology Ronald E.
    [Show full text]
  • Substance and Practice
    SUBSTANCE AND PRACTICE BUILDING TECHNOLOGY AND THE ROYAL ENGINEERS IN CANADA Elizabeth Vincent .... Environment Canada Environnement Canada • ""!"'" Parks Service Service des parcs SUBSTANCE AND PRACTICE BUILDING TECHNOLOGY AND THE ROYAL ENGINEERS IN CANADA Elizabeth Vincent Studies in Archaeology Architecture and History National Historic Sites Parks Service Environment Canada ©Minister of Supply and Services Canada 1993. Available in Canada through authorized bookstore agents and other book­ stores. or by mail from the Canada Communication Group - Publishing. Supply and Services Canada. Ottawa. Ontario. Canada KIA OS9. Published under the authority of the Minister of the Environment. Ottawa, 1993. Editing: Sheila Ascroft Desktop Production: Lucie Forget Cover: Rod Won Cover illustration: front elevation of the Officers' Quarters. Fredericton, N.B.• 1851. (National Archives of Canada. Map Collection) Parks publishes the results of its research in archaeology, architecture and history. A list of publications is available from National Historic Sites Pub­ lications. Parks Service, Environment Canada. 1600 Liverpool Court, Ot­ tawa. Ontario. Canada KIA OH3. Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Vincent. Elizabeth Substance and practice: building technology and the Royal Engineers in Canada (Studies in archaeology, architecture and history. ISSN 0821-1027) Issued also in French under title: Le Genie royal au Canada, materiaux et techniques de construction. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN Q-660-14820-X DSS cat. no. R61-2/9-60E 1. Great Britain - Army - Military construction operations - History ­ 19th century. 2. Canada - History, Military - 19th century. 3. Building materials - Canada - History - 19th century. 1. Canadian Parks Service. National Historic Sites. Il, Title. Ill. Series. UG413.V561993 725' .18'0971 C93-099413-2 ~~_ll~~ .~(~~ _ <:OIl1I1lUnic..ition Cnmmunicutiou Ii --_._--~-_.._-_._--.- - I'uhtishin/.! FJitill1l TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword.
    [Show full text]
  • Repointing Masonry Walls
    TM TECHNOLOGY BRIEF October 2002 RESOURCE INFORMATION FROM THE INTERNATIONAL MASONRY INSTITUTE Section 6.2 Repointing Masonry Walls The durability and longevity of masonry is greater than that of any other building material, as evident in the thousands of old brick buildings throughout our neighborhoods and towns. When designed and constructed properly, masonry can last hundreds of years or more. To maximize the life of a masonry building, the mortar joints will need periodic maintenance during the building’s life cycle. As with any building product continuously exposed to the elements, the joints are susceptible to weathering, acids in the rain, seismic movement, building settlement, freezing and thawing cycles, impact damage, and dirt. When visual inspection reveals that the mortar joints are cracking or otherwise deteriorated, restoration is necessary to help maintain the integrity of the wall system. Commonly known as tuckpointing, “repointing” is the preferred term used to describe the process of cutting out deteriorated mortar joints in a masonry wall and filling in those joints with fresh mortar. The goals of a repointing job should be to remove and replace mortar in a way that will main- tain the structural properties of the wall, improve the appearance of the wall, and form weathertight joints. To accomplish this, the architect should produce drawings and specifications that will clearly state the requirements for mortar removal, joint preparation, preparation of pointing mortar, and placing mortar in the joints. For best results, use only contractors employing trained, skilled tuckpointers. Determining Scope The architect should determine the scope of the work with the assistance of the tuckpointing contractor.
    [Show full text]
  • Preservation Guide for Stone Masonry and Dry-Laid Resources
    PRESERVATION GUIDE FOR STONE MASONRY AND DRY-LAID RESOURCES ABBY GLANVILLE GREG HARTELL INTERN FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION SUMMER 2008 2 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 5 INTRODUCTION 7 OVERVIEW 8 CRATER LAKE: RESOURCES AT A GLANCE 10 MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES 16 DOCUMENTATION 37 GUIDELINE SUMMARY 38 HISTORIC PHOTOGRAPHS 43 ENDNOTES 45 BIBLIOGRAPHY 46 A PHOTOGRAPHIC INVENTORY OF MASONRY AND DRY-LAID FEATURES WITH AN INTERACTIVE MAP SHOWING THE LOCA­ TIONS OF THESE FEATURES WAS DEVELOPED IN TANDEM WITH THIS MANUAL AND IS ON FILE WITH PARK HISTORIAN, STEVE MARK. 3 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS MY SINCERE THANKS ARE EXTENDED TO THE FRIENDS OF CRATER LAKE NATIONAL PARK FOR THEIR SUPPORT OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION THROUGH THE GREG HARTELL INTERNSHIP. THIS INTERNSHIP ALLOWS GRADUA TE STU­ DENTS FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF OREGON'S HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROGRAM TO GAIN PROFESSIONAL EX­ PERIENCE THROUGH PRESERVATION RELATED PROJECTS AT CRATER LAKE NATIONAL PARK THANK YOU ALSO TO CRATER LAKE NATIONAL PARK SU­ PERINTENDENT CRAIG ACKERMAN FORMER INTERIM SU­ PERINTENDENT STEPHANIE TOOTH MAN, AND FORMER SUPERINTENDENT CHUCK LUNDY, AS WELL AS MARSHA MCCABE, CHIEF OF INTERPRETATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES, FOR THEIR SUPPORT OF THE GREG HARTELL INTERNSHIP FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION; MAC BROCK BRIAN COULTER, LINDA HILLIGOSS, LESLIE JEHNINGS, CHERI KILLAM BOMHARD, DAVE RlVARD, BOB SCHAEFER, LI A VELLA, AND JERRY WATSON FOR THEIR EXPERTISE, ADVICE, AND FEEDBACK; MARY BENTEROU, FOR PREPARING DIGITAL IMAGES OF DRAW­ INGS; KINGSTON HEATH, DIRECTOR OF THE UNIVERSITY OF OREGON'S HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROGRAM, AND TARA LKENOUYE FOR THEIR ASSISTANCE IN OBTAINING THIS INTERNSHIP; AND TO MY SUPERVISORS KARL BACH- MAN, CHIEF OF MAINTENANCE, WHOSE RESOURCEFUL­ NESS AND DEDICATION TO PRESERVING CULTURAL RE­ SOURCES WITHIN THE PARK MADE THIS WONDERFUL IN­ TERNSHIP PROJECT POSSIBLE, AND STEVE MARK, CRATER LAKE NATIONAL PARK HISTORIAN, WHOSE EXPERTISE IN THE PARK'S HISTORY AND ARCHITECTURE GREATLY EN­ RICHED BOTH THE INTERNSHIP EXPERIENCE AND THE CONTENT OF THIS MANUAL.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Factors Affecting the Durability of Repointing Mortars For
    REVIEW OF FACTORS AFFECTING THE DURABILITY OF REPOINTING MORTARS FOR OLDER MASONRY MADELEINE ROUSSEAU INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN CONSTRUCTION, NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL CANADA, OTTAWA, ON B UILDING E NVELOPE T ECHNOLOGY S YMPOSIUM • O CTOBER 2 0 0 6 R OUSSEAU • 7 7 ABSTRACT In older masonry structures, the mortar properties need to be compatible with the exist­ ing mortars and be “sacrificial” to the masonry. Inappropriate repointing materials and exe­ cution practices can result in permanent damage to older masonry assemblies, affecting their aesthetics qualities, historical value, performance, and service life. Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC), which is faced with the maintenance and refur­ bishing of the Canadian government’s older building stock, including the Parliament build­ ings, has been grappling with this problem for years. PWGSC and the National Research Council of Canada’s Institute for Research in Construction (NRC­IRC) have carried out con­ siderable research in the last two decades to evaluate mortar mixes properties for applica­ tion in cold climates susceptible to freeze­thaw action and salt damage. This paper will describe critical elements of mix selection, on­site execution, and curing to obtain a durable mortar that has no detrimental effects on the masonry. SPEAKER MADELEINE ROUSSEAU – INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN CONSTRUCTION, NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL CANADA, – OTTAWA, ON Madeleine Rousseau is an architect with 25 years experience in the area of moisture migration in exterior walls at the National Research Council Canada (NRC). For the last 10 years, Madeleine has participated in NRC research for durable repointing mortars that do not have a detrimental effect on older masonry, in the context of cold climates experiencing freeze­thaw action.
    [Show full text]
  • The Repointing of Historic Masonry Buildings
    The Repointing Of Historic Masonry Buildings Robert C. Mack, AIA and James S. Askins Historic Structures Consultant Published by SERMAC Industries Inc. PROLOGUE CONTENTS The restoration and rehabilitation of older buildings is one Prologue 2 of the most interesting, yet challenging, trends in architec­ Introduction 3 ture today. This work not only heightens our awareness of our past while preserving the character of our cities and WhyRepoint 3 neighborhoods, it also makes good practical sense. Re-use Logistic Planning 4 of existing structures saves building materials and energy Scaffolding 4 while providing usable space more quickly and at a lower cost than new construction. In addition, restoration and Contracts 5 rehabilitation efforts are creating many new jobs throughout Types 5 the country. Bonds 5 For many years. SERMAC Industries Inc. has been Scheduling 5 assisting in the maintenance of buildings; good maintenance Measurement & Payment 5 has given these buildings longer life while making them more pleasant places in which to work and live. More recently, Contract Documents 6 SERMAC has been active in the exterior cleaning and im­ Scope 7 provement of masonry buildings. We are gratified to have Temperature 7 had a role in the restoration of many significant buildings. Job Layout 7 In the interest of providing our clients and licensees with Final Tests 7 basic information concerning the repointing of masonry Technical Specifications 7 buildings, we are pleased to publish this booklet. Written by Robert C. Mack, a restoration architect, it is based in Test Panels 8 large part on material presented by James S. Askins, a masonry restoration specialist, during a symposium spon­ Planning & Research 8 sored by SERMAC on July 15, 1977; Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Underwater Bridge Repair, Rehabilitation, and Countermeasures
    Underwater Bridge Repair, Rehabilitation, and Countermeasures Publication No. FHWA-NHI-10-029 Pre-Publication Edition NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. The contents of this report reflect the views of the contractor who is responsible for the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the Department of Transportation. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein only because they are considered essential to the object of this document. The conduct of underwater bridge inspections and repairs may frequently require the use of divers. While this manual contains information on diving equipment, it is neither intended to train personnel in diving nor enumerate all diving safety concerns and regulations. Actual diving operations can be extremely hazardous and should be undertaken only by personnel adequately trained to cope with the conditions that may be encountered. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-NHI-10-029 4. Title and Subtitle 4. Report Date April 2010 Underwater Bridge Repair, Rehabilitation, and Countermeasures 6. Performing Organization Code: 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Terence M. Browne, P.E.; Thomas J. Collins, S.E., P.E.; Michael J. Garlich, S.E., P.E.; John E. O’Leary, S.E., P.E.; Katherine C.
    [Show full text]
  • Although Repairing a Leaning Chimney Or One That Is Leaking Smoke
    Although repairing a leaning chimney or one that is leaking smoke through the brick joints are jobs best left to a professional, there are some important repairs that anyone can perform. These include repairs to preserve the integrity of the brickwork and to avoid more serious and expensive work in the future. If your chimney has crumbling pointing or holes and cracks in the cap, doing the repairs yourself immediately will prevent further weakening and avoid the costly job of rebuilding or replacing it later. Getting up to the chimney might require some time and effort because scaffolding is usually necessary, but the repairs themselves are straightforward tasks. Repointing a Chimney Repointing a chimney does not require a great deal of mortar. QUIKRETE® Mortar Mix or Mason Mix is available in bags conveniently sized to provide just enough mortar for the present job or to have a little left over for other small jobs. QUIKRETE® Vinyl Concrete Patcher can be used instead for better adhesion. • QUIKRETE® Mortar Mix or Mason Mix or QUIKRETE® Vinyl Concrete Patcher • Mason's 2 lb. hammer • 3/8" chisel • Brush • Brick trowel • Mortarboard • Scaffolding • Heavy gloves • Safety glasses or goggles Cleaning and Repointing 1. Hold the chisel at a sharp angle to the joint while striking it with a hammer and knock out the crumbling joints to a depth of at least ½". Work the chisel along the joint about 1" at a time. 2. Chip out vertical joints first, then do horizontal joints. 3. Brush any loose particles of dirt or mortar out of the joints.
    [Show full text]