Artificial Reefs Feasibility Study

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Artificial Reefs Feasibility Study Artificial Reefs Feasibility Study AUGUST 2001 Prepared for The Marine Institute Edward O’Leary M.Sc. H.Dip. Tom Hubbard B.Sc. David O’Leary M.Sc. H. Dip. Coastal Resources Centre National University of Ireland Cork ISSN 1393 4643 Marine Resource Series, No. 20, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1 INTRODUCTION 3 1.1 Principal Aims and Objectives 3 1.2 Scope of the Study 3 1.3 Justification 3 2 THE ARTIFICIAL REEFS REVIEW 5 2.1 Introduction 5 2.2 Site Selection 6 2.3 Design & Materials 8 2.4 Legislation 12 2.5 Utilisation 14 2.5.1 Physical 2.5.2 Biological 2.5.3 Recreational 2.6 Monitoring 16 3 CONSULTATIONS 17 3.1 Introduction 17 3.2 Consultation with Regulatory Authority 17 3.2.1 Methodology 3.2.2 The current situation 3.3 Consultation with Local Stakeholders 21 3.3.1 Methodology 3.3.2 Site Selection 3.3.3 Constraint Mapping 3.3.4 Data Capture 4 SEA ANGLING SPECIES REVIEW 27 5 CONCLUSIONS 31 5.1 Conclusions with a national relevance 31 5.2 Conclusions with relevance to the Beara area 33 6 RECOMMENDATIONS 35 i O’Leary et. al.: Artificial Reefs Feasibility Study ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 37 REFERENCES 39 APPENDICES 43 APPENDIX I: National Legislation of Relevance to the Coastal Zone 43 APPENDIX II: European Legislation of Relevance to the Irish Coastal Zone 45 APPENDIX III: International Conventions of Relevance to the Irish Coastal Zone 47 ii Marine Resource Series, No. 20, 2001 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Marine Institute commissioned this study to review the current status of artificial reefs world-wide with a view to determining the feasibility of the development of a sea angling initiative based on the deployment and exploitation of artificial reefs. The study, conducted by the Coastal Resources Centre, National University of Ireland, Cork, includes a review of the current status of artificial reefs globally with a focus on site selection, reef design, construction material and reef use. The Beara Tourism Development Association has expressed an interest in developing a sustainable sea angling initiative based on the construction of a series of artificial reef sites. In response to this interest, the Beara Peninsula was used as a case study area for the purpose of determining feasible artificial reef site locations. Consultations with relevant regulatory bodies, local tourism development groups and the sea angling sector in the Beara Peninsula were an essential element of this study. The use and benefits of artificial reefs have been widely accepted with both ongoing research and national development programmes in place in over forty countries worldwide. In Japan for example, national programmes have been in operation for over twenty years. The Japanese have been at the forefront of reef design, construction and deployment since their inception. However, little research has ever been undertaken on artificial reefs in Ireland, to date one application for the creation of an artificial reef has been submitted to the Department of the Marine & Natural Resources. This initial application was rejected. From an Irish perspective, artificial reefs could potentially be utilised as a: ! soft engineering approach to coastal erosion; ! tool for the protection of sensitive habitats, biota and nursery grounds; ! possible tool in the removal of nutrients from waste discharge; ! means of increasing biodiversity and biomass; ! means of boosting inshore fisheries within our 12 mile waters; ! tool for the enhancement of crustacean and Molluscan fisheries (e.g. lobster) and ! for the algo culture sector. From a recreational perspective, reefs could be deployed in Irish waters to: ! enhance prospects for sea angling; ! enhance shore angling sites and ! be used as locations for diving and snorkeling. A wide range of materials and designs have been used in the construction and deployment of artificial reefs. Variations in the designs and materials used occur as a result of different goals and objectives for the creation of the reef (e.g., from coastal protection to SCUBA diving) in addition to the local availability of materials. Availability of materials accounts frequently for the choice of materials used in reef construction. In Ireland there is indicative support from the marine sector for the development and deployment of artificial reefs. Aquaculture, inshore fisheries, tourism and the environment could all potentially benefit from the deployment of such structures. The 1 O’Leary et. al.: Artificial Reefs Feasibility Study coming years are likely to see a significant increase in the development and deployment of reefs in Irish coastal waters. Artificial reefs are perceived as a potential solution to a number of problems currently experienced in Irish waters. Their use as a tool in coastal management may become relevant in the future and consequently further research needs to be conducted in this area. The development of marine-based wind power generating units is likely to act as a catalyst in this process. Preliminary research indicates that a sea-angling enterprise based around the construction of several artificial reefs placed strategically around the Beara Peninsula is feasible. Factors favouring such a development include the: ! recognised need to develop the sea angling sector in the Beara area; ! active support for such a venture from local tourism and inshore fishing groups; ! large variety of angling species and the number of potentially suitable artificial reefs in the area; ! artificial reef research undertaken to date in the area. However, a number of other factors are required to ensure the success of such a venture. These include the continued support of the inshore fishermen, sufficient financial resources to undertake research and development and the support of relevant state agencies. This study has identified a number of sites, which offer potential in terms of site suitability. These sites will have to be assessed on the basis of the final goal of the deployment, the finances available, and the type of reef units to be deployed. Only then can the final decisions be made as to the sites that best suit the task. In principle, however, both the Beara Tourism & Development Association and the Coastal Resources Centre, University College Cork are committed to the goal of developing a sustainable sea-angling sector that will incorporate artificial reef sites deployed around the Peninsula. 2 Marine Resource Series, No. 20, 2001 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Principal Aims and Objectives The principal aims of the study were to review the current status of artificial reefs worldwide, and to then attempt to identify potential sites for the location of artificial reefs within the vicinity of the Beara Peninsula. With these aims in mind, a number of important objectives were specified: 1. To complete a literature review on the current status of artificial reefs globally. This report would specifically focus on site selection, reef design, materials, construction, reef success, etc. 2. To undertake a review of the species most relevant to sea angling in the context of potential developments off the Beara Peninsula, West Cork. 3. To conduct meetings with local and national groups to ascertain information on the views on the use of artificial reefs and on information on potential sites for the location of reefs around the Beara Peninsula. 4. To carry out an assessment of potential sites around the Beara Peninsula on the basis of the physical, biological, oceanographic and socio-economic features of the sites. 1.2 Scope of the Study While the practical aspects of the study are confined to a body of water around the Beara Peninsula, West Cork, many aspects of this research work are of national relevance. This is particularly the case in terms of both the review of artificial reefs and the regulatory body consultations. 1.3 Justification Like most rural coastal locations in Ireland, the natural resources of the Beara Peninsula have strongly influenced its socio-economic development. This has resulted in activities based on the following primary sectors: fishing, aquaculture and agriculture. Despite this, the economic status of the Beara Peninsula is exemplified by: ! lower than average national income levels; ! higher than average national unemployment levels; ! subsistence agriculture on poor soils with very small farming units; ! high labour dependency ratios; ! inshore fishing from small boats; ! limited industrial development. 3 O’Leary et. al.: Artificial Reefs Feasibility Study While there has been significant effort in promoting this region for industrial development purposes, there are extreme difficulties in attracting sustainable industries to the area. The drawbacks such as location and poor infrastructure have made it unlikely that industrial development will create the necessary stable and long- term activity needed. For these reasons, the development of natural and marine resources in particular has been identified as offering a significant advantage in developing stable and acceptable long-term economic activity, offering work for which many of the skills required are available locally. The development of a sea-angling sector incorporating the construction of a series of artificial reefs could help to realise the following opportunities: ! An increase in the range of tourism products on offer in the Beara Peninsula, increasing the attractiveness of the Peninsula as a tourist destination. ! Socio-economic benefits from increased tourist throughput (both direct and indirectly). ! The benefit of aiding other fisheries, such as the lobster fishery. ! Enhanced habitat protection. ! Improvement of nature conservation and bio-diversity. ! Increased opportunities for diversification of the fishing fleet. 4 Marine Resource Series, No. 20, 2001 2 THE ARTIFICIAL REEFS REVIEW The following is a summary of an extensive review of the literature on artificial reefs, undertaken as part of this study. 2.1 Introduction The creation of artificial reefs on flat, featureless, sandy seabeds has been a form of enhancement for subsistence, commercial and sport fishing practiced in certain countries for centuries.
Recommended publications
  • Eel Grass Ballan Wrasse Slipper Limpet Dogfish Pink Sea Fan Diver With
    seasearch.qxd 03/06/04 11:08 Page 1 Algae Seaweeds are often overlooked Table 1: Species recorded per group and most common species found. whilst diving, although 25 species Phylum Common name Number of species Common species were recorded during the 2003 Algae Seaweeds 25 Kelp surveys. Many were simply Porifera Sponges 19 Boring sponge included as ’mixed reds’ or Golf ball sponge similar. Further training in Orange encrusting sponge seaweed identification may be Cnidaria Anemones, jellyfish 30 Snakelocks anemone required. hydroids, corals Jewel anemone Dead mens fingers Sponges Pink sea fan A variety of sponges were Annelida Worms 13 Keelworm Peacock worm recorded, however this group of Crevice tube worm animals is notoriously difficult to identify in situ so very few of the Crustacea Crabs, lobsters, 17 Edible crab prawns, barnacles Velvet swimming crab rarer or less well known species Spiny spider crab were reported. Mollusca Shells, sea slugs, 33 Topshell cuttlefish Limpet Anemones, Corals, Hydroids Sea lemon and Jellyfish Bryozoa Sea mats, sea firs 8 Sea mat 13 different anemones were Potato crisp bryozoan recorded, including the nationally Echinodermata Starfish, brittlestars, 16 Common starfish scarce yellow cluster anemone urchins, cucumbers Spiny starfish Parazoanthus axinellae that Edible urchin inhabits dark overhangs and Tunicates Seasquirts 13 Lightbulb seasquirt Baked bean seasquirt crevices. Jewel anemones were Pisces Fish 42 Cuckoo wrasse very common on the vertical Ballan wrasse rock faces of many of the dive Pollack sites. Bib Of the corals, pink sea fan was Total Species 218 found at a lot of sites, including some new records. Historic problems for the oyster ballan wrasse which were seen at large number of sites.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Biodiversity Snapshot. Isle of Man Appendices
    UK Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies: 2011 Biodiversity snapshot. Isle of Man: Appendices. Author: Elizabeth Charter Principal Biodiversity Officer (Strategy and Advocacy). Department of Environment, Food and Agriculture, Isle of man. More information available at: www.gov.im/defa/ This section includes a series of appendices that provide additional information relating to that provided in the Isle of Man chapter of the publication: UK Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies: 2011 Biodiversity snapshot. All information relating to the Isle or Man is available at http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-5819 The entire publication is available for download at http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-5821 1 Table of Contents Appendix 1: Multilateral Environmental Agreements ..................................................................... 3 Appendix 2 National Wildife Legislation ......................................................................................... 5 Appendix 3: Protected Areas .......................................................................................................... 6 Appendix 4: Institutional Arrangements ........................................................................................ 10 Appendix 5: Research priorities .................................................................................................... 13 Appendix 6 Ecosystem/habitats ................................................................................................... 14 Appendix 7: Species ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping the Distribution of Scale-Rayed Wrasse Acantholabrus Palloni in Swedish Skagerrak Using Angling Records
    Mapping the distribution of scale-rayed wrasse Acantholabrus palloni in Swedish Skagerrak using angling records Joacim Näslund1 and Markus Lundgren2 1 Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden 2 Swedish Anglers Association, Gothenburg, Sweden ABSTRACT In this paper, we map the distribution of scale-rayed wrasse Acantholabrus palloni in eastern Skagerrak based on a combination of verified and personally communicated angling records. Long thought to be occasional vagrants outside its known range in the eastern Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean Sea, we ask if this rare and understudied labrid has expanded its range and become established in Swedish waters. A recent surge in verified angling records in the Swedish Anglers Association’s specimen database Storfiskregistret provides information to suggest that this species should no longer be considered an occasional guest, but rather a species established in the Swedish parts of Skagerrak. These records are supported by additional personal communications with anglers. The species is currently well spread geographically along the Swedish Skagerrak coast, with many locations providing repeated captures of adult fish over multiple years. The typical Swedish catch sites are rocky reefs located between the general 40- and 80-m depth curves, likely influenced by currents bringing higher-salinity water from the North Sea. The present study show that angling records can provide an important, but underutilized, resource for mapping the distribution of data-deficient fish species. Subjects
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX 1 Classified List of Fishes Mentioned in the Text, with Scientific and Common Names
    APPENDIX 1 Classified list of fishes mentioned in the text, with scientific and common names. ___________________________________________________________ Scientific names and classification are from Nelson (1994). Families are listed in the same order as in Nelson (1994), with species names following in alphabetical order. The common names of British fishes mostly follow Wheeler (1978). Common names of foreign fishes are taken from Froese & Pauly (2002). Species in square brackets are referred to in the text but are not found in British waters. Fishes restricted to fresh water are shown in bold type. Fishes ranging from fresh water through brackish water to the sea are underlined; this category includes diadromous fishes that regularly migrate between marine and freshwater environments, spawning either in the sea (catadromous fishes) or in fresh water (anadromous fishes). Not indicated are marine or freshwater fishes that occasionally venture into brackish water. Superclass Agnatha (jawless fishes) Class Myxini (hagfishes)1 Order Myxiniformes Family Myxinidae Myxine glutinosa, hagfish Class Cephalaspidomorphi (lampreys)1 Order Petromyzontiformes Family Petromyzontidae [Ichthyomyzon bdellium, Ohio lamprey] Lampetra fluviatilis, lampern, river lamprey Lampetra planeri, brook lamprey [Lampetra tridentata, Pacific lamprey] Lethenteron camtschaticum, Arctic lamprey] [Lethenteron zanandreai, Po brook lamprey] Petromyzon marinus, lamprey Superclass Gnathostomata (fishes with jaws) Grade Chondrichthiomorphi Class Chondrichthyes (cartilaginous
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Fishes from Galicia (NW Spain): an Updated Checklist
    1 2 Marine fishes from Galicia (NW Spain): an updated checklist 3 4 5 RAFAEL BAÑON1, DAVID VILLEGAS-RÍOS2, ALBERTO SERRANO3, 6 GONZALO MUCIENTES2,4 & JUAN CARLOS ARRONTE3 7 8 9 10 1 Servizo de Planificación, Dirección Xeral de Recursos Mariños, Consellería de Pesca 11 e Asuntos Marítimos, Rúa do Valiño 63-65, 15703 Santiago de Compostela, Spain. E- 12 mail: [email protected] 13 2 CSIC. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas. Eduardo Cabello 6, 36208 Vigo 14 (Pontevedra), Spain. E-mail: [email protected] (D. V-R); [email protected] 15 (G.M.). 16 3 Instituto Español de Oceanografía, C.O. de Santander, Santander, Spain. E-mail: 17 [email protected] (A.S); [email protected] (J.-C. A). 18 4Centro Tecnológico del Mar, CETMAR. Eduardo Cabello s.n., 36208. Vigo 19 (Pontevedra), Spain. 20 21 Abstract 22 23 An annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Galician waters is presented. The list 24 is based on historical literature records and new revisions. The ichthyofauna list is 25 composed by 397 species very diversified in 2 superclass, 3 class, 35 orders, 139 1 1 families and 288 genus. The order Perciformes is the most diverse one with 37 families, 2 91 genus and 135 species. Gobiidae (19 species) and Sparidae (19 species) are the 3 richest families. Biogeographically, the Lusitanian group includes 203 species (51.1%), 4 followed by 149 species of the Atlantic (37.5%), then 28 of the Boreal (7.1%), and 17 5 of the African (4.3%) groups. We have recognized 41 new records, and 3 other records 6 have been identified as doubtful.
    [Show full text]
  • Mowi Ireland Integrated Pest Management Plan 2021
    Integrated Pest Management / Single Bay Management Plan MOWI IRELAND 2021 Page 1 of 7 Introduction Single Bay Management arrangements for fin-fish farms are designed to co-ordinate husbandry practices in such a way that best practice is followed and that stocking, fallowing and treatment regimens on individual farms are compatible with the arrangements on neighbouring farms. The goal is to ensure that practices on individual farms act synergistically to enhance the beneficial effects to the bay as a whole. A major component in this process is the build-up of a communication network between the operators. The non-confrontational environment of SBM meetings between licensed operators has proved a valuable forum in the process of conflict resolution and avoidance both within the industry and between the industry and its neighbours. The SBM process has proved very effective in enhancing the efficacy of lice control and in reducing the overall incidence of disease in the stocks. Single Bay Management plans are subject to revision for each production cycle. This arises out of changes in production plans related to: • New license applications • In response to changing markets • New husbandry requirements • Both internal company restructuring and inter-company agreement Crucial elements in the success of this plan are identified as; • separation of generations • fallowing of sites in between different year classes • strategic application of chemotherapeutants • good fish health management • close co-operation between farms This management strategy was endorsed by the then Dept. of Marine, the Sea Trout Task Force and the Irish Salmon Growers Association as fundamental to the rational management of the salmon farming industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Biological Research at Lundy
    Irving, RA, Schofield, AJ and Webster, CJ. Island Studies (1997). Bideford: Lundy Field Society Marine Biological Research at Lundy summarised in Tregelles ( 193 7) and are incorporated into the fljracombejauna andjlora (Tregelles, Palmer & Brokenshire 1946) and the Flora of Devon (Anonymous Keith Hiscock 1952). The first systematic studies of marine ecology at Lundy were undertaken by Professor L.A. Harvey and Mrs C.C. Harvey together with students of Exeter Introduction University in the late 1940s and early 1950s The earliest recorded marine biological studies near to (Anonymous 1949, Harvey 1951, Harvey 1952). These Lundy are noted in the work of Forbes (1851) who took studies again emphasised the richness of the slate dredge samples off the east coast of the island in 1848. shores especially when compared to the relatively The first descriptions of the seashore wildlife on Lundy impoverished fauna on the granite shores. A later are those published in 1853 by the foremost Victorian study (Hawkins & Hiscock 1983) suggested that marine naturalist and writer, P.H. Gosse, in the Home impoverishment in intertidal mollusc species was Friend (reproduced later in Gosse 1865). However, his due to the isolation of Lundy from mainland sources of descriptions are unenthusiastic, reveal nothing unusu­ larvae. al and draw attention to the very few species found on When marine biologists started to use diving the granite shores. There are further brief references to equipment to explore underwater around Lundy at Lundy in the literature of other Victorian naturalists. the end of the 1960s, they discovered rich and diverse Tugwell ( 1856) found the shores rich collecting communities and many rare species leading to a wide grounds and cites the success of a collecting party who range of studies being undertaken, both underwater (with the help of "an able-bodied man with a crowbar") and on the shore, in the 1970s and early 1980s.
    [Show full text]
  • Cleaner Fish in Aquaculture
    Reviews in Aquaculture, 1–49 doi: 10.1111/raq.12470 Cleaner fish in aquaculture: review on diseases and vaccination Toni Erkinharju1,2, Roy A. Dalmo1 , Miroslava Hansen2 and Tore Seternes1 1 Norwegian College of Fishery Science, UiT – The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway 2 Norwegian Veterinary Institute, Harstad, Norway Correspondence Abstract Toni Erkinharju, Roy A. Dalmo and Tore Seternes, Norwegian College of Fishery Combating and controlling sea lice causes large economic costs for the farmers, Science, UiT – The Arctic University of Norway, with estimated values of more than 305 million euros (€) per year. Increased resis- Post office Box 6050, Langnes, N-9019 tance against traditional chemotherapeutants due to evolutionary drivers in the Tromsø, Norway. Emails: sea lice combined with the lack of an effective vaccine and few other chemical [email protected], [email protected], treatments available are expected to cause these costs to increase. Several possible and [email protected] methods for managing sea lice infestations have been investigated, but only clea- Received 3 March 2020; accepted 17 June ner fish has proven to have an effect on lice levels. Cleaning activity is well known 2020. in marine fish and has been observed in the wild as a form of symbiosis between two species: one species, the ‘client’ fish, seek out the other species, the ‘cleaner’ fish, to have ectoparasites and dead tissue cleared from its body. The Atlantic lumpfish is a relatively new aquaculture species, and wild-caught mature fish are used as brood stock for farmed production. This poses a biosecurity risk, as wild fish can carry pathogens, and the use of quarantine and health screening is recom- mended.
    [Show full text]
  • REVIEW of the ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS of SALMON FARMING in SCOTLAND Executive Summary and Main Report
    A CONSORTIUM LED BY REVIEW OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF SALMON FARMING IN SCOTLAND Executive Summary and Main Report Issue 01 January 2018 The Scottish Parliament SAMS Research Services Ltd Registered Office: Lismore Suite, Malin House, The European Marine Science Park, Oban, Argyll PA37 1SZ T: +44 (0) 1631 559470 F: +44 (0) 1631 559001 E: [email protected] W: http://www.srsl.com Vat Registration No GB 828 9579 61 Company Registered in Scotland No. SC224404 CONTRIBUTORS The work within this review has been the effort of several researchers, who contributed on areas of their scientific expertise. An outline of the contributors for each section of the review is included below: Section 1 Prof. Paul Tett (SAMS) Section 2 Prof. Eric Verspoor (UHI; Rivers and Lochs Institute) Dr Donna-Claire Hunter (UHI; Rivers and Lochs Institute) Dr Mark Coulson (UHI; Rivers and Lochs Institute) Section 3 Prof. Paul Tett (SAMS) Dr Natalie Hicks (SAMS) Prof. Keith Davidson (SAMS) Section 4 Prof. Teresa Fernandes (Heriot Watt University) Dr Tom Nickell (SAMS SRSL) Section 5 Prof. Eric Verspoor (UHI; Rivers and Lochs Institute) Section 6 Prof. Douglas Tocher (University of Stirling) Section 7 Dr Steven Benjamins (SAMS) Dr Denise Risch (SAMS) Prof. Ben Wilson (SAMS) Ms. Anja Wittich (SAMS SRSL) Dr Clive Fox (SAMS) Section 8 Prof. Paul Tett (SAMS) Prof. Paul Tett is principle author and led the team of researchers who conducted the review. Additional review of the document was undertaken by Prof. Kenny Black, Dr Adam Hughes and Dr Tom Wilding (SAMS). Project Management was undertaken by Dr Lindsay Vare, with additional support from Dr Mark Hart and Dr Chris Allen (SAMS SRSL).
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Zoos
    AQUATIC ZOOS A critical study of UK public aquaria in the year 2004 by Jordi Casamitjana CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 METHODS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7 Definition ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7 Sampling and public aquarium visits --------------------------------------------------------------7 Analysis of the data --------------------------------------------------------------------------------10 UK PUBLIC AQUARIA PROFILE ------------------------------------------------------------------------11 Types of public aquaria ----------------------------------------------------------------------------11 Animals kept in UK public aquaria----------------------------------------------------------------12 Number of exhibits in UK pubic aquaria --------------------------------------------------------18 Biomes of taxa kept in UK public aquaria ------------------------------------------------------19 Exotic versus local taxa kept in UK public aquaria --------------------------------------------20 Trend in the taxa kept in UK public aquaria over the years ---------------------------------21 ANIMAL WELFARE IN UK PUBLIC AQUARIA ------------------------------------------------------23 ABNORMAL BEHAVIOUR --------------------------------------------------------------------------23 Occurrence of stereotypy in UK public aquaria --------------------------------------29
    [Show full text]
  • Management of the Live Wrasse Fishery
    D&SIFCA Potting Permit Byelaw Management of the Live Wrasse Fishery A Consultation on the Potting Permit Conditions ©Paul Naylor Management of the “Live” Wrasse Pot Fishery Revised report for all D&SIFCA stakeholders Version 3 August 2017 Page | 1 D&SIFCA Potting Permit Byelaw Version Control History Author Date Comment Version Final version for D&S IFCA quarterly Neil Townsend et al June 2017 1 meeting 15th June 2017 Updated report to show that the proposed fishery in Torbay did not Sarah Clark 02/08/2017 2 commence & detail the management measures taken by D&S IFCA Sarah Clark 16/08/2017 Minor amendments 3 Page | 2 D&SIFCA Potting Permit Byelaw Contents Page Part 1 Summary of D&SIFCA Officers’ recommendations 1. Fully Documented Fishery 4 2. Pot Limitations 4 3. Marking of Gear 4 4. Closed Season 5 5. Minimum and Maximum Conservation Reference Sizes 5 Part 2 Overview of the Byelaw and the consultation process 6. Overview of the Potting Permit Byelaw 5 7. Permits and review of conditions 6 8. Habitat Regulations Assessments 8 9. Communication for this review of permit conditions 9 10. Approval of the officers recommendations for additional consultation and a timetable of action 10 Part 3 Evidence base for the recommendations for management of the live wrasse pot fishery 11. The existing evidence base 11 12. References 16 13. Additional reports (hyperlinks) (informing the decision making process) 18 Part 4 Responses and observations 14. Introduction to the collected evidence 18 15. Overview of the written responses 18 16. CIFCA and SIFCA action 20 17.
    [Show full text]
  • Labrus Mixtus Linnaeus, 1758
    Labrus mixtus Linnaeus, 1758 AphiaID: 151501 CUCKOO WRASSE Gnathostomata (Infrafilo) > Pisces (Superclasse) © Vasco Ferreira © Vasco Ferreira - OMARE / Mai. 20 2018 © Vasco Ferreira © Vasco Ferreira © Vasco Ferreira 1 Sinónimos Assobio (designação local) Labrus carneus Ascanius, 1772 Labrus coeruleus Ascanius, 1772 Labrus coquus Gmelin, 1789 Labrus larvatus Lowe, 1852 Labrus lineatus Bonnaterre, 1788 Labrus luvarus Rafinesque, 1810 Labrus microlepidotus Bloch, 1792 Labrus ossifagus Linnaeus, 1758 Labrus quadrimaculatus Risso, 1827 Labrus trimaculatus Bonnaterre, 1788 Labrus variegatus Gmelin, 1789 Labrus varius Linnaeus, 1758 Labrus vetula Bloch, 1792 Sparus formosus Shaw, 1790 Referências MARTINS, R.; CARNEIRO, M., 2018. Manual de identificação de peixes ósseos da costa continental portuguesa – Principais Características Diagnosticantes. IPMA, I.P., 204p Gregory, P. 2003. Labrus mixtus Cuckoo wrasse. In Tyler-Walters H. and Hiscock K. (eds) Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Reviews. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. Available from: https://www.marlin.ac.uk/species/detail/1670 original description Linnaeus, C. (1758). Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Editio decima, reformata. Laurentius Salvius: Holmiae. ii, 824 pp., available online athttps://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542 [details] source of synonymy Eschmeyer, W. N.; Fricke, R.; van der Laan, R. (eds). (2017). Catalog of Fishes: Genera, Species, References. Electronic version., available online at http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/Ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp [details] basis of record Wheeler, A. (1992). A list of the common and scientific names of fishes of the British Isles. J. Fish Biol. 41(Suppl. A): 1-37 [details] additional source Froese, R.
    [Show full text]