DOCSLIB.ORG

The Pink Triangle the Nazi War Against Homosexuals by Richard

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Pink Triangle the Nazi War Against Homosexuals by Richard The Pink Triangle The Nazi War Against Homosexuals By Richard Plant Acknowledgements I had the good fortune to receive encouragement from many women and men who saw me through the long years of work and worry. Four men have gone out of their way to help me; I will list them in order in which they have entered my life and this book; New Republic Books editor Marc Granetz, who let me, so to speak, into the house and gave me the first valid directions. My assistant, Hugh Murray, who never tired of checking esoteric data in various libraries. His broad knowledge of European and American history provided an invaluable perspective for my project and spurred me on to explore those murkier aspects of German history that I had feared defied transfer into English. Andrew Reubenfeld, whose kind heart did not keep him from using several red pencils and sharp scissors whenever he thought I was deviating from the main road. He also prevented the footnotes from overgrowing and choking the text. Finally, he held steady ehen I despaired of ever being able to accommodate the abundance of material. As a native born American, he conveyed an unobtrusive optimism that restrained my Central European philosophising and excessive Weltschmerz. Last, but definitely not least, I am indebted to my new editor, Steve Wasserman, who, al though he inherited me and was faced with an enormous task, i.e., to ready a large, complex manuscript for publication within a short time, displayed not only a never-flagging goodwill but a scholar’s knowledge of German politics and metapolitics which sometimes stunned me, but which vastly benefitted the book. Among thw women and men who stood by me, I want to mention the following: Iska Alter, Achim Besge, Zenos Booker, Alois Brands, Peter Chatel, Albert de Cocatrix, Charles Creegan, Richard Deppe, Page Grubb, Richard Hall, Gert Hekma, Erich Henschel, Winfried Hohmann, Justus Imfeld, Mrs, Kirsten Michalski-Kalow, Simon Karlinsky, Jonathan Katz, Hubert Kennedy, Mrs, Felix Kersten, Gary Krawford, Siegfried Kuhn, Jon Klysner, Rudiger Lautmann, Bill Long, David Marans, Lawrence Mass, Mrs, Elizabeth Meter-Plaut, Klaus Milich, Mrs Peggy Richard, Heinrich Siebel, Charles Simmons, James Steakley, Thomas Steele, Paul Tankersley, James Tierney, Stephen Worley, John Yancey. And I would like to thank Randy Schein for his expert typing of the final manuscript. PROLOGUE I fled Frankfurt am Main on February 27, 1933, the day the Reichstag went up in flames. I was fortunate. My father, however, a physician, a veteran, a Socialist and a Jew, had been arrested several weeks earlier. Because a few of his patients, though nominally members of the Nazi party, intervened in his behalf- this was possible during the early years of the Third Reich- he came home after only one month of imprisonment. He insisted I leave Germany as quickly as possible for Basel, Switzerland, and enrol at the university there. After encountering many obstacles, I succeeded in obtaining a passport, an object that had suddenly acquired enormous value. I gathered a few belongings and some luggage, and rushed to the Frankfurt railroad station to take the earliest train the Switzerland. Only years later did I realize how lucky I had been. Although the anti-Jewish and the anti-gay laws became officially part of the Nazi onslaught of terror in 1934-35, the crusade against various minorities had really begun long before. Brown shirted gangs of trigger –and hammer-happy youths, in an outbreak of “spontaneous” national outrage, had vandalized Jewish stores or thrashed the patrons of the few timid gay bars in Frankfurt. By June 1933, a few Swiss newspapers had reported with near incredulity that Hitler’s threats in Mein Kampf to expunge his enemies had not been empty posturing – that Jews, Social Democrats, Catholics, and labour leaders had been arrested or murdered; that, in short, a revolution was rocking Germany to its already shaky foundations. The Swiss never alluded to the Nazis’ anti-gay crusade –in part because this movement began only in full in June 1935, but also because in the 1930s no self-respecting publication would dare to discuss such a delicate subject. To what length the Nazi regime was prepared to carry the war against “non- Aryans” no Swiss newspaper could foresee. Yet another agency concerned with the public good, the Swiss Foreign ministry in Berne, did exhibit a knack for anticipating Hitler’s moves. A few weeks after my arrival in Basel, I had gone to the university, a sixteenth-century fortress overlooking the Rhine, to register as a graduate student in history and literature. About six months later the Foreign Ministry struck, ruling that foreign students could not attend classes in Switzerland unless they had been in the country for a certain length of time and had been given a provisional permit of residence. Fortunately, because I had registered in February, I was safe. By the time I was ready for my first class at the fortress, I had found a place to stay in the eccentric household of Gabrielle Gundermann, a very unmarried old lady, tiny and vivacious, a former coloratura soprano and telephone company employee. She insisted I call her “Miss Gaby”. I tried to settle down to the life of a financially insecure alien student. Like other fugitive German students I met, I had few forebodings of what was going to happen in Germany, though I harboured a profound worry. I spent some nights sleepless with anxiety. Certain events in Germany gradually made the situation clearer. The Frankfurter Zeitung, for example, one of the better liberal German dailies, not only acquired a new editorial staff, but its tone began to change markedly. Jewish names disappeared from the masthead. The paper now seemed to speak in code. In contrast, the small local liberal daily, the Basler Nationalzeitung, began to print more and more news about Germany, most of it shocking. Throughout the Nazi years the paper resisted the pressure put on it by German interests and compliant Swiss officials to change its anti-Nazi bias. Meanwhile, my father kept writing guarded letters to me. But he did not mention that one day the SS had put a uniformed guard in front of every Jewish physician. This I heard about late one night on Basel radio. 9 had left friends behind in Frankfurt. Ferdi Strom, an old classmate, had shared my brief tenure in one of the youth groups known as the Rovers. The leader of such a group usually expected the members, as his disciples to be loyal if not devoted. Soon I had discovered that a Rover leader had his favourites. Whether this went beyond arm-on-the-shoulder familiarity I could not tell then. In such brotherhoods a few adolescents had a little affairs, misty and romantic sessions around a blazing fire in the dark of the forest. Other boys, more down to earth, talked openly about “going with friends” and enjoying it. The leaders of these groups tended to disregard the relationships blossoming around them –unless they participated- just as they paid scant attention to the ideological debates that regularly erupted while we sat and talked around the campfire. I left the Rovers, a vaguely romantic association of mostly middle class Protestant and Catholic teenagers, and a similar Zionist brotherhood when, as an older teenager, I fell in love with the cinema. From Ferdi’s letters I learned what happened to the youth groups. After 1933 the Nazi’s forcibly dissolved all independent youth organisations, even the Catholic ones, hurled accusations of “homosexual degeneracy” against their leaders, and embarked on a campaign to enforce strictly heterosexual behaviour. By this time Ferdi, too, had left the Rovers. He also quit school. It was Ferdi who had explained and demonstrated the mysteries of sex to me and my friends. He was basically a street kid, tough, truculent, and wise. But he did not hold it against me that he had menial job at a pharmacy while I went to university. I had not kept in touch when he joined the Communist Youth League. On the night in 1933 when Hitler was inaugurated as chancellor, Ferdi phoned me very late, and his curses sounded drunk. A few weeks before my journey to Switzerland, I had gone to the pharmacy where Ferdi worked, and where I often picked up medicine for my father. I was shocked to see Ferdi wearing a brown shirt with a red, white, and black swastika armband, and I yelled at him. To Ferdi the brown uniform meant only that he could get a better job. He urged me to “get away from this mess,” and it was he who provided the useful channels for obtaining that indispensable passport. He never wavered. After I had settled in Basel het started sending me unsigned postcards with badly spelled messages that I could not always decipher, though mostly they concerned acquaintances who had disappeared or had been taken to jail. From the summer of 1935 on, Ferdi’s betrayed their meanings more clearly. Hans K, had “gone on a long vacation,” and someone nicknamed Veeidt had been “transferred to Berlin.” I did not know then about the new antigay legislation that had been introduced. Soon I began bombarding my father with letters urging him to leave Germany, even if it meant abandoning his patients and his valuable library. He did not listen to my pleas. My mother had died earlier of cancer; my sister, a musician, had found refuge in Holland- for a while. During my first term at Basel I had looked up distant relatives who lent support in many ways.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Die Fritsch-Krise Im Frühjahr 1938. Neun Dokumente Aus Dem Nachlaß Des Generalobersten
    Dokumentation Horst Mühleisen Die Fritsch-Krise im Frühjahr 1938. Neun Dokumente aus dem Nachlaß des Generalobersten I. Die Bedeutung der Dokumente Es gibt Skandale, die lange fortwirken und auch die Forschung immer noch be- schäftigen. Zu diesen gehört jener, der mit dem Namen des Generalfeldmarschalls Werner von Blomberg, des Reichskriegsministers und Oberbefehlshabers der Wehr- macht, sowie des Generalobersten Werner Freiherrn von Fritsch, des Oberbefehls- habers des Heeres, verbunden ist. Der Anlaß für Blombergs Entlassung am 4. Februar 1938 war seine Heirat mit einer Frau, deren Vorleben als kompromittiert galt. Fritsch aber war der Homose- xualität, des Vergehens nach § 175 Strafgesetzbuch, beschuldigt worden. Auch er erhielt am selben Tage, dem 4. Februar, seinen Abschied. Um die gegen Fritsch er- hobenen Vorwürfe aufzuklären, ermittelte sowohl die Geheime Staatspolizei als auch das Reichskriegsgericht. Dies waren die Tatsachen, die im Frühjahr 1938 indessen nur wenigen Perso- nen verlaßlich bekannt waren. Der Öffentlichkeit war mitgeteilt worden, die Ver- abschiedung von Blomberg und Fritsch sei aus gesundheitlichen Gründen erfolgt. Wenige Jahre nach Kriegsende, 1949, veröffentlichte Johann Adolf Graf Kiel- mansegg, Fritschs Neffe, eine Darstellung über den Prozeß des Reichskriegsge- richts gegen den Generalobersten1. Die persönlichen Zeugnisse, die der ehemali- ge Oberbefehlshaber des Heeres hinterlassen hat, waren indessen spärlich, da Fritsch keine umfangreiche Korrespondenz führte. Ferner standen Kielmansegg die Prozeßakten nicht zur Verfügung, da sie verbrannt waren. Fotokopien der Ak- ten und Verhandlungsstenogramme, die in nicht sehr zahlreicher Ausfertigung vorlagen, ebenso wie die Handakten des Verteidigers, des Grafen Rüdiger von der Goltz, wurden durch Bombenangriffe vernichtet2. Ob die Protokolle, die Reichs- kriegsgerichtsrat Dr. Karl Sack während des Prozesses führte, tatsächlich nach Kriegsende in die Hände der amerikanischen Besatzungsmacht gefallen sind3, ist ungewiß; bis heute sind sie nicht wieder aufgetaucht.
    [Show full text]
  • German Jews in the United States: a Guide to Archival Collections
    GERMAN HISTORICAL INSTITUTE,WASHINGTON,DC REFERENCE GUIDE 24 GERMAN JEWS IN THE UNITED STATES: AGUIDE TO ARCHIVAL COLLECTIONS Contents INTRODUCTION &ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 1 ABOUT THE EDITOR 6 ARCHIVAL COLLECTIONS (arranged alphabetically by state and then city) ALABAMA Montgomery 1. Alabama Department of Archives and History ................................ 7 ARIZONA Phoenix 2. Arizona Jewish Historical Society ........................................................ 8 ARKANSAS Little Rock 3. Arkansas History Commission and State Archives .......................... 9 CALIFORNIA Berkeley 4. University of California, Berkeley: Bancroft Library, Archives .................................................................................................. 10 5. Judah L. Mages Museum: Western Jewish History Center ........... 14 Beverly Hills 6. Acad. of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences: Margaret Herrick Library, Special Coll. ............................................................................ 16 Davis 7. University of California at Davis: Shields Library, Special Collections and Archives ..................................................................... 16 Long Beach 8. California State Library, Long Beach: Special Collections ............. 17 Los Angeles 9. John F. Kennedy Memorial Library: Special Collections ...............18 10. UCLA Film and Television Archive .................................................. 18 11. USC: Doheny Memorial Library, Lion Feuchtwanger Archive ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Jean Cocteau's the Typewriter
    1 A Queer Premiere: Jean Cocteau’s The Typewriter Introduction Late in April 1941, toward the close of the first Parisian theatre season fol- lowing the Defeat, Jean Cocteau’s La Machine à écrire (The Typewriter) opened, then closed, then reopened at the Théâtre Hébertot. Written in the style of a detective drama, the play starred the actor generally known—at least in the entertainment world at the time—as Cocteau’s sometime lover and perpetual companion, Jean Marais, as identical twin brothers. The re- views are curiously reticent about what exactly occurred at the Hébertot, and historians and critics offer sometimes contradictory pieces of a puzzle that, even when carefully put together, forms an incomplete picture. The fragments are, however, intriguing. Merrill Rosenberg describes how, on the evening of April 29, 1941, the dress rehearsal (répétition génerale), sponsored “as a gala” by the daily Paris-Soir and attended by various “dig- nitaries,” caused in the Hébertot’s auditorium a demonstration by members of the Parti Populaire Français (PPF). This disruption prompted Vichy’s ambas- sador to Paris, Fernand de Brinon, to order the withdrawal of the production (“Vichy’s Theatrical Venture” 136). Francis Steegmuller describes the disor- der that greeted the Typewriter premiere and the revival of Les Parents Terribles (at the Gymnase later that year): “stink bombs exploded in the theatres, and hoodlums filled the aisles and climbed onto the stage, shouting obscenities at Cocteau and Marais as a couple” (442).1 Patrick Marsh too notes that these plays “were seriously disrupted by violent scenes fomented by fascist sym- pathizers and members of the Parti Populaire Français” (“Le Théâtre 1 2 THE DRAMA OF FALLEN FRANCE Français .
    [Show full text]
  • THE PERSECUTION of HOMOSEXUALS in NAZI GERMANY Kaleb Cahoon HIST 495: Senior Seminar May 1, 2017
    THE PERSECUTION OF HOMOSEXUALS IN NAZI GERMANY Kaleb Cahoon HIST 495: Senior Seminar May 1, 2017 1 On May 6, 1933, a group of students from the College of Physical Education in Berlin arrived early in the morning to raid the office headquarters of the Institute for Sexual Research in Berlin. According to a contemporary anonymous report, the invading students “took up a military-style position in front of the house and then forced their way inside, with musical accompaniment… [and then] they smashed down the doors.”1 Once inside, the same group commenced to ransack the place: they “emptied inkwells, pouring ink onto various papers and carpets, and then set about the private bookcases” and then “took with them what struck them as suspicious, keeping mainly to the so-called black list.”2 Later that day, after the students had left “large piles of ruined pictures and broken glass” in their wake, a contingent of Storm Troopers arrived to complete the operation by confiscating nearly ten thousand books that they subsequently burned three days later.3 This raid was part of an overall campaign to purge “books with an un-German spirit from Berlin libraries,” undertaken early in the regime of the Third Reich. Their target, the Institute for Sexual Research founded by the pioneering German sexologist Magnus Hirschfeld, was one of the premier centers of progressive thought concerning human sexuality – most notably homosexuality – in the world.4 This episode raises a number of questions, including why Nazi leaders deemed this organization to possess “an un-German spirit” that thus warranted a thorough purge so early in the regime.5 The fact that Hirschfeld, like many other leading sexologists in Germany, was Jewish and that many Nazis thus regarded the burgeoning field of “Sexualwissenschaft, or the science of sex,” as “Jewish science” likely 1 “How Magnus Hirschfeld’s Institute for Sexual Science Was Demolished and Destroyed,” (1933) in The Third Reich Sourcebook, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Museumskoffer Kirche Im NS Bonhoeffer
    X 4.€$u0r ltCa," $res\c,^ t q /it /q45:,iY\ te'froäg[ Gegenstand Bedeutung Tä Bibel Sie steht für den Bezug Bonhoeffers zu seinem Glauben. Es studierte in Tübingen evangelische Theologie und nahm ein Auslandssemester (bzw. Stipendiat) im Rahmen seines Theologiestudium in New York war. Zusätzlich besuchte er in Tübingen Vorlesungen zum Thema Philosophie. Er studierte von 1923 bis 1927 , unteranderem auch in Rom und Berlin. Radio Am 1. Februar 1933 hielt Bonhoeffer den Radiovortrag ,,Wandlungen des Führerbegriffes". Er verlangte darin eine Begrenzung totaler Machtfülle des Kanzleramtes durch rechtsstaatliche Ordnung und Volkswohl. Doch der Vortrag wurde plötzlich unterbrochen, als die Kritik am nationalistischen Führerprinzip und Hitlerkult deutlich wurde Weltkarte Durch sein Studium und seine spätere Ausübung als verdeckter Ermittler pflegte er weltweit viele Kontakte. Inoffiziell (aus Sicht der Regierung) sollte er seine Auslandsbeziehungen zur Spionageabwehr zur Verfügung stellen, um vermeidliche Angriffe gegen die NS zu verhindern. Doch eigentlich nutzte er die daraus resultierende Freiheit zum Reisen, um sich für den Widerstand einzusetzen Wald lm sogenannten Finkenwald (bei Stettin) hielt Bonhoeffer Predigerseminare. Die dort anwesenden Vikare hatten sich für die Bekennende Kirche (BK) und gegen die Reichskirche entschieden. Die jungen Theologen lernten, wie sie mit den Belastungen und Bedrängnissen, die durch die BK anfiehlen, mithilfe eines konsequent christlichen Leben umzugehen haben. Buch Das von ihm verfasste Buch Ethik schrieb er während seines Rede- und Reiseverbotes (im Jahre 1941'). Sein Vater veranlasste, dass er eine Reiseerlaubnis zu seinem Elternhaus nach Berlin bekam. Dort zwischen dem Treiben seiner Neffen, Nichten, Geschwistern und Nachbarn begann er zu schreiben. Vertraut konnten sie sich über politische Angelegenheiten und ihren Meinungen diesbezüglich austauschen und darüber frei diskutieren, ohne die Angst vor gegenseitigem Verrat.
    [Show full text]
  • Plants, Power and Knowledge
    Impressum Global Histories: A Student Journal Issue 1, volume 1 (2015) ISSN 2366-780X Editors and editorial board members Editor: Alexandra Holmes Editorial Board: Oscar Broughton Leonhard Link Thomas Lindner Willem Van Geel Philipp Kandler Barbara Uchdorf Marius Oesterheld Maximilian Laun Yorim Dominique Spoelder Beninio McDonough Tranza Elisabeth Köller Iris Shahar Publisher information Founded in 2015 by students of the MA program ‘Global History’ at the Freie Universität and the Humboldt Univeristät in Berlin, the ‘Global Histories’ journal is a Berlin based bi-annual journal published in association with the Freie Univer- sität Berlin. Freie Universität Berlin Global Histories: a student journal Friedrich-Meinecke-Institut Koserstr. 20 14195 Berlin Sponsors This journal project is realized with generous support from Free University Berlin, specifically from the Global History Section of the Friedrich-Meinecke-Institut, the OJS e-publishing project at CEDIS, and the ZEDAT hostmaster team. Scope and purpose In response to the increasing interest in the ‘global’ as a field of inquiry, a per- spective, and an approach, ‘Global Histories: a student journal’ aims to offer a platform for debate, discussion and intellectual exchange for a new generation of scholars with diverse research interests. Global history can provide an opportu- nity to move beyond disciplinary boundaries and methodological centrisms, both in time and space. As students of global history at Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, our interest lies not in prescribing what global history is and what it is not, but to encourage collaboration, cooperation, and dis- course among students seeking to explore new intellectual frontiers. Publication frequency The journal is published twice yearly in June and December.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Adolf Hitler Spared the Judges: Judicial Opposition Against the Nazi State
    The rule of law, constitutionalism and the judiciary Why Adolf Hitler Spared the Judges: Judicial Opposition Against the Nazi State By Hans Petter Graver Abstract The Nazi regime had loyal judges who willingly transformed the liberal German law into an instrument of oppression, discrimination and genocide. This was achieved without substantially interfering with the operation of the courts and without applying disciplinary measures on the judges. But, not all judges were congenial servants of the regime—some resisted in their capacity as judges. Based on case-studies and existing literature, this Article distinguishes between two different lines of judicial opposition to those in power: Between opposition taking place in the open and opposition in secret, and between opposition within what is accepted by those in power as being within the law and opposition that is in breach of the law. The Article then seeks to explain the deference the regime gave to judicial by employing institutional theory and the concept of path dependence. Germany was deeply embedded in the Western legal tradition of emphasis on law as an autonomous institution with an independent judiciary. Dr. Hans Petter Graver is a Professor and previous Dean at the University of Oslo. The author would like to thank Stephen Skinner, David Fraser, and Dina Townsend for their helpful comments. The article is based on a public lecture held at St. Mary’s College, Durham UK, while the author was a fellow at the Institute of Advanced Study, University of Durham from October to December 2016. 846 German Law Journal Vol. 19 No. 04 A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Holocaust and Genocide in Art & Film
    32nd Annual Conference on the THE HOLOCAUST AND GENOCIDE IN ART & FILM April 18–20, 2012 millersville.edu/holocon 32nd Annual Conference on the Holocaust and Genocide & Holocaust Remembrance Week* Millersville University of Pennsylvania April 17–20, 2012 THE HOLOCAUST AND GENOCIDE IN ART & FILM Director Victoria Khiterer (Millersville University) Advisory Board Lawrence Baron (San Diego State University) David Engel (New York University) Zev Garber (Los Angeles Valley College) Antony Polonsky (Brandeis University) Michael Rubino! (Arizona State University) Committee Members Onek Adyanga (Millersville University) Robert Bookmiller (Millersville University) Dennis Downey (Millersville University) Jack Fischel (Millersville University) Tanya Kevorkian (Millersville University) Administrative Assistants Margaret Eichler (Millersville University) Ryan Barrick (Millersville University) Graduate Assistant Terri Monserrat (Millersville University) CONFERENCE PATRONS Mr. William W. Adams Lancaster Jewish Community Center Mr. William F. Bash Mr. P. Alan Loss Congregation Shaarai Shomayim Dr. and Mrs. Robert A. Matlin Mr. and Mrs. Michael Gleiberman Dr. and Mrs. Bruce H. Pokorney Dr. and Mrs. Clark R. Kaufman Robert and Stephanie Zuckerman Dr. Reynold S. Koppel Steven and Victoria Zuckerman The 32nd Annual Conference is pleased to acknowledge the support of the O"ces of the President and Provost and the University Honors College Special thanks to the Millersville University Phi Alpha Theta National History Honor Society, Honors College Student Association and Hillel Organization. *Thursday, April 19, 2012 is Holocaust Remembrance Day 1 Tuesday, April 17, 2012 7:30 – 9 p.m. WARSAW A Drama in Two Acts by William W. Adams Presented as an “Enhanced Reading” In 1943, a German family in Warsaw, Poland confronts the horror of the Holocaust and faces life-and-death decisions of its own.
    [Show full text]
  • Hin-Richter | Meinung
    Zeitgeschichte – Hin-Richter | Meinung https://www.sueddeutsche.de/meinung/justiz-nationalsozialismus-widerst... 11. Juni 2021, 18:58 Uhr Zeitgeschichte Hin-Richter Vor 65 Jahren machten Justiz und Gesellschaft der Bundesrepublik ihren Frieden mit den NS- Tätern - auf dem Rücken der Opfer. Der Bundesgerichtshof attestierte dem Justizmörder von Pastor Dietrich Bonhoeffer ein "einwandfreies Verfahren". Die Folgen waren verheerend. Kolumne von Heribert Prantl Es gibt falsche Urteile in einem Rechtsstaat. Es gibt auch sehr falsche Urteile. Und es gibt fürchter- lich falsche Urteile. Vor 65 Jahren hat das oberste Strafgericht des Rechtsstaats Bundesrepublik so ein fürchterlich falsches Urteil gefällt, mit verheerenden Folgen. Die fünf Richter des 1. Strafsenats des Bundesgerichtshofs haben, elf Jahre nach dem Ende des Zweiten Weltkriegs, den nationalso- zialistischen Richter Otto Thorbeck freigesprochen, der kein Richter, sondern ein Hin-Richter ge- wesen war. Die Richter des höchsten Strafgerichts der Bundesrepublik hätten ihn wegen Beihilfe zum Mord und Rechtsbeugung verurteilen müssen. Stattdessen attestierten sie ihm, er habe ein "einwandfreies Verfahren" geführt. Er hatte Pastor Dietrich Bonhoeffer und vier andere Wider- standskämpfer zum Tode verurteilt. Der Freispruch des Bundesgerichtshofs am 19. Juni 1956 steht exemplarisch für das Versagen der bundesdeutschen Justiz, die Schreibtischtäter des NS-Regimes strafrechtlich zu verfolgen. Dieses Urteil diskreditierte den Widerstand gegen Hitler. Es machte die Widerstandskämpfer zu Hoch- verrätern. Die Richter in Karlsruhe hielten sich die Ohren zu vor dem Satz, den Generalstaatsan- walt Fritz Bauer schon 1952 in einen Gerichtssaal gerufen hatte: "Ein Unrechtsstaat wie das Dritte Reich ist überhaupt nicht hochverratsfähig." Die höchsten Strafrichter erteilten stattdessen dem SS-Sturmbannführer Otto Thorbeck, Mitglied der NSDAP mit der Nummer 4 358 937, die juristi- sche Absolution für seine Tötungshandlungen unter dem Mantel des Rechts.
    [Show full text]
  • Pink Propositions
    Pink Propositions The Experience of Gay Men in Third Reich Concentration Camps Broc Gantt !1 Broc Gantt HIST:407 Dr. Phillips April 17, 2019 Introduction Hoards of scholarship exists on the Nazi regime and their sadistic concentration and extermination camps, but nevertheless one group seemed to fall through the cracks and go largely unnoticed by academia in the years since the camps were liberated. The men with the pink triangle have been repeatedly looked over and seen by many, it seems, as a group whose history of oppression under this tyrannical regime was something to be whisked aside rather than confronted head on. This practice would be deeply unfair to any group marginalized by such an evil regime, but it is even more unfair that history has focused so little on the experiences of the men who bore pink triangles, given that these men were often treated with a special brand of disgust and contempt by the Nazis. The men who were forced to wear pink triangles were, of course, those identified by the Nazis as “homosexuals”.1 In a system devised by the regime to categorize prisoners based on their alleged offenses, the homosexuals occupied one of the lowest rungs of the ladder; they were beneath violent criminals, political adversaries to the regime, immigrants, “Gypsies”, Jehovah’s Witnesses, and “asocials”.2 Based on 1 Heinz Heger, The men with the pink triangle: the true life-and-death story of homosexuals in the Nazi death camps (Los Angeles: Alyson Books, 1980), 31. 2 Heger, The men with the pink triangle, 31.
    [Show full text]
  • Blätter Zum Land“ Nem Prozess Durch Geschickte Verteidi- Gewidmet Werden
    Z B L Ä T T E R L BB LL ÄÄTT TT EE RR EXTRA A ZUM LAND F Für Freiheit und Recht P Der „20. Juli 1944“ und seine - Verbindungen in unsere Region Der Umsturzversuch des „20. Juli 1944“ wird in der D Bundesrepublik Deutschland traditionell als das zentrale Ereignis des deutschen Widerstandes gegen das N NS-Regime gewürdigt. Auch 60 Jahre danach ist jedoch in der breiten Öffentlichkeit noch A immer kaum bekannt, dass es innerhalb der militärischen und der zivilen Opposition bereits L 1938 Überlegungen gab, Adolf Hitler zu stürzen. Bis zum Sommer 1944 wurden sogar mehrere Attentats- und N Umsturzpläne entwickelt, wie- der verworfen oder schlugen fehl. I Fernschreiben Generaloberst Erich E Hoepners zur Heranziehung der Politischen Beauftragten und des Verbindungsoffiziers für den Wehrkreis XII Wiesbaden vom 20. Juli H 1944. In der Hektik entstanden einige Fehler. So heißt der Unterbeauftragte korrekt Koßmann, Hauptmann Kaiser sollte für den Wehrkreis XII und nicht R XIII herangezogen werden. Sämtliche dieser Vorhaben scheiterten Die absolute Mehrheit der Reichswehr an technischen Unwägbarkeiten, wegen und ihrer Führung stand loyal hinter der scharfen Sicherheitsvorkehrungen dem Diktator und Oberbefehlshaber und des NS-Regimes oder am Zaudern der folgte bis zuletzt willig seiner barbari- beteiligten Militärs. schen Kriegs- und Eroberungsstrategie. Oberst Stauffenberg (links im Bild) Der „20. Juli“ war keineswegs nur eine im Führerhauptquartier „Wolfschanze“. gemeinsame Aktion von wenigen oppo- sitionellen Militärs und Vertretern des konservativ-liberalen
    [Show full text]
  • 'Liberation Was Only for Others'
    70 Years After the Liberation 53 ‘Liberation Was Only For Others’: Breaking the Silence in Germany Surrounding the Nazi Persecution of Homosexuals W. JAKE NEWSOME, State University of New York at Buffalo n the spring of 1939, 22-year old Heinz Heger answered a summons by the local Gestapo in his hometown of Vienna. He was alarmed but could not recall breaking any law or Ipersonally offending any of the Nazi officials that seemed to be everywhere after Germany’s annexation of Austria one year earlier. An hour later, Heger stood before the desk of a Nazi bureaucrat, waiting to hear why he had been called to report. Finally, after an eternity of silence, the SS doctor looked up and spoke: ‘You are a queer, a homosexual, do you admit it?’ Without waiting for a reply, the official slammed shut a file on his desk and shipped Heger off to prison. As it turns out, Heger had indeed broken a law, Paragraph 175 of the German Penal Code, which strictly prohibited all homosexual activity between men. After he had served his six month sentence, Heger was immediately transferred to Sachsenhausen concentration camp, where he stayed until his transfer to the Flossenbürg concentration camp a year later.1 Through it all, Heger managed to keepCOPY a journal, and for the entry dated 23 April 1945, there are only two words: ‘Amerikaner gekommen’ (Americans came).2 After liberation, Heger made his way back to his home in Vienna, where he died in 1994 at the age of 77. Klaus Born, a young man from northwestern Germany, also found himself in trouble with the authorities.
    [Show full text]