DOCSLIB.ORG

Facebook – Whatsapp: the Price Is…

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Facebook – WhatsApp: the price is… Facebook Market Cap (as of 21/02/2014): USD174.89bn Facebook, Inc. the listed US based company headquartered in Menlo Park, California, has signed a definitive agreement on Wednesday, the 19th of February to acquire the venture-backed WhatsApp Inc for USD16bn plus USD3bn in restricted stock units (RSU from now on). The deal is the largest acquisition of a venture-backed company in history, which also clearly puts it in the early lead for the single biggest venture return this year. It should be enough to consider that by itself this exit would satisfy the IRR requirement of the whole USD1.3bn fund of Sequoia that invested a mere USD58.3mln in the mobile messaging company. Ironically, one of the two co- founders, Brian Acton, was turned down for employment by Twitter and Facebook in 2009, when he was seeking a job after nine years of experience at Yahoo Inc. as infrastructure engineer. Shortly after the rejections, he met with former colleague Jan Koum and together founded Whatsapp, which after only 5 years, made them billionaires thanks to the company that refused Brian Acton. The total consideration agreed by Facebook will be paid both in cash (USD 4bn) and equity (USD 12bn). The equity part will be paid through the issue of circa 184mln shares, at a price of approximately USD 65.3 each based on the six-day average closing price preceding the announcement. Additionally, Facebook could pay up to USD 3bn, through the issue of another 46mln RSUs to WhatsApp employees which will vest in four years. The Class A common stock and RSUs issued to WhatsApp shareholders and employees upon closing will represent 7.9% of Facebook shares based on current shares and RSUs outstanding. The cash consideration will come from its reserves (USD 11.5bn as of 31 December 2013). The eye-dropping price tag comes latest in a series of acquisitions in the social media industry. In 2012, when Facebook announced the acquisition of photo-sharing app Instagram for $1bn, several investors criticized the move and the size of the deal, but it has since proven to be a very profitable decision. Although Instagram wasn’t generating any revenue at the time, its growth potential and the possible synergies with Facebook made it an invaluable investment target. Indeed, since the acquisition, the number of the app’s users has increased from 30mln to over 150mln, new features such as few seconds video playing were introduced and a profitable business model, based on advertisement, was implemented. Few months ago, Facebook was also the bidder for Snapchat, a photo-messaging app very popular among teenagers, valuing it at $3bn. Despite the fact that founder Evan Spiegel turned down the huge offer, we cannot ignore the characteristics that these companies targeted by Facebook have in common: a large, mostly young user base and all decisively mobile-oriented. Upon completion, WhatsApp will continue to operate independently within Facebook with product roadmap being unchanged. It will keep its headquarters in Santa Clara, California. All of the employees of the company will be retained and Jan Koum, the CEO and co-founder, will join Facebook Board of Directors, which may very well be one of the reasons why WhatsApp turned down an offer made by Google for a total consideration of USD 10bn, as two unnamed sources tell Fortune. In fact, in addition to making a lower bid, Google also reportedly didn’t offer WhatsApp CEO Jan Koum a seat on its board of directors as Facebook did. From a pure venture perspective, the purchase represents a huge win for Sequoia Capital. In fact, as shown in Table 1, while the only funding that WhatsApp had publicized was the $8 million Round A led by Sequoia, the company had raised two subsequent rounds of financing, including an unreported $50 Round C. Sequoia led both of those subsequent rounds, investing almost $60 million in WhatsApp over the years, which added up to a total ownership stake in the high teens, according to Techcrunch. Assuming such a level of ownership, Sequoia’ stake is now worth about $3 billion in cash and stock. The deal by itself could provide more than a 2x return on the $1.3 billion fund the initial WhatsApp investment came from and an astonishing 50x return on its investment in the company. Table 1: Funding Round Issuer Date Amount (USD m) Seed Sequoia Capital Oct-09 0.3 Round A Sequoia Capital Apr-11 8.0 Round B Sequoia Capital n.a. n.a. Round C Sequoia Capital Jul-13 50.0 Total Funding 58.3 Source: Techcrunch Sequoia estimates that 19% of the Nasdaq ‘s value is made up by firms they have funded. In fact, among its most successful deals there are Google, Yahoo, Paypal, Cisco Systems, Oracle, Apple, Youtube, Linkedin, Dropbox, Instagram… and now WhatsApp. Loking at these big names in the internet market what it’s actually curious is that the only one they apparently missed is just Facebook. WhatsApp is engaged in providing cross-platform mobile messaging application. The company has around 50 employees in total, 32 of which are engineers, and over 450m people use its service every month 70% of which are active on a given day. That compares to Facebook’s user base of 1.2 billion and lower engagement level of 62%. WhatsApp also disclosed that its user base has more than doubled in the past year and it continues to add at least one million users every day. A surprising figure is that WhatsApp now handles more than 19 billion messages per day, a figure that is approaching the text message (SMS) volume of the worldwide telecom industry, estimated to be worth USD 100bn market. Given the rapid growth of messaging apps and their popularity among younger people and outside North America, it should be no surprise that Facebook targeted WhatsApp. But isn’t the price too high? A necessary caveat is that FB is capitalizing on all-time high share price, by paying 75% of the hefty price-tag with stock (almost 80% if we consider the RSUs); however, this fact by itself would not justify a wasteful deployment of resources and it is on the contrary quite clear that the acquisition of WhatsApp is a great addition to Facebook’s mobile strategy. In particular, WhatsApp has an excellent positioning in Europe, where it is dominant into every country while Facebook mobile messaging system (Facebook Messenger) is doing quite poorly and occupies a niche position. With Facebook’s expertise and resources, WhatsApp stands ready to further strengthen his leading position and take advantage of the rapid penetration rate of smartphones. The 3-year CAGR in smartphone ownership between 2010 and 2013 is 46.5%, with global penetration just reaching 22% (or about 1.4bn smartphone owners). If we approximate the market share of WhatsApp with its Monthly Active Users (MAUs) and keep it constant (very conservative option since WA has grown its user base 115% in the last 9 months), we obtain 32% which we can use for a very quick-and-dirty, back-of-the-envelope valuation to judge whether the price paid is right. In a simplified DCF where WA does not change its business model, it is able to maintain a constant market share and smartphone ownership grows at a decreasing rate (stabilizing in 2021 at 5% per annum), the company will be worth a bit more than USD 16bn from the perspective of a buyer that discounts cash flows at a constant 9% rate, which can be reasonable for a large cap with an extremely light financial structure such as Facebook. Therefore, it seems that even a quick valuation provides support in favour of the price, and we did not take into account any of the inevitable synergies bound to be achieved by the merger. There is also another important strategic factor that has been doubtless considered by Zuckerberg and his advisors, that is the need of Facebook to establish itself as firmly as possible as the leading firm in mobile messaging and user utility, avoiding the risk of extinction that entangled former shining stars of the social network firmament such as MySpace. Facebook was advised by Allen & Company, LLC and Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP; and WhatsApp was advised by Morgan Stanley and Fenwick & West, LLP. The transaction is still subject to customary approval and closing conditions and full execution is expected by the end of August. All the views expressed are opinions of Bocconi Students Investment Club members and can in no way be associated with Bocconi University. All the financial recommendations offered are for educational purposes only. Bocconi Students Investment Club declines any responsibility for eventual losses you may incur implementing all or part of the ideas contained in this website. The Bocconi Students Investment Club is not authorised to give investment advice. Information, opinions and estimates contained in this report reflect a judgment at its original date of publication by Bocconi Students Investment Club and are subject to change without notice. The price, value of and income from any of the securities or financial instruments mentioned in this report can fall as well as rise. Bocconi Students Investment Club does not receive compensation and has no business relationship with any mentioned company. Copyright © Feb-14 BSIC | Bocconi Students Investment Club .
Recommended publications
  • Impact of Whatsapp Messenger on the University Level Students: a Psychological Study

    Impact of Whatsapp Messenger on the University Level Students: a Psychological Study

    © 2019 IJRAR February 2019, Volume 6, Issue 1 www.ijrar.org (E-ISSN 2348-1269, P- ISSN 2349-5138) Impact of WhatsApp Messenger on the University Level Students: A Psychological Study Dr. Mohammad Irfan1 Ms. Sonali Dhimmar 2 1. Assistant Professor, School of Business, Auro University, Surat, India, E-mail: [email protected], Mob: 88997-18677 2. Fellow Student, School of Business, Auro University, Surat, India, E-mail: [email protected], Mob: 70693-70309 ABSTRACT WhatsApp is an amazing application, and with the help of it we can connect ourselves to the society as well as whole world. It is an effective medium for the flow of information and ideas. WhatsApp is one of the medium of such technology. Now a days it is becoming a popular word among youth, which is available in the various electronic items such as I-Phone, Android, windows phone and computer also. The present study is focused on the impact of WhatsApp on the university level students, with reference to youth of Surat and Navsari, Gujarat. A quantitate approach was used to conducted research, data were collected from 105 respondents with structured questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of 25 items. The factor analysis was extracted the four factor from the data i.e. negatively affected, helpful, psychological change and essential. The outcome of study will reveal that WhatsApp is a medium of making communication easier and faster thereby by enhancing effective flow of information, idea sharing and connecting people easier. It is found that WhatsApp has also a profound negative impact on youth and adversely affects their education, behaviour and routine lives.
  • M&A @ Facebook: Strategy, Themes and Drivers

    M&A @ Facebook: Strategy, Themes and Drivers

    A Work Project, presented as part of the requirements for the Award of a Master Degree in Finance from NOVA – School of Business and Economics M&A @ FACEBOOK: STRATEGY, THEMES AND DRIVERS TOMÁS BRANCO GONÇALVES STUDENT NUMBER 3200 A Project carried out on the Masters in Finance Program, under the supervision of: Professor Pedro Carvalho January 2018 Abstract Most deals are motivated by the recognition of a strategic threat or opportunity in the firm’s competitive arena. These deals seek to improve the firm’s competitive position or even obtain resources and new capabilities that are vital to future prosperity, and improve the firm’s agility. The purpose of this work project is to make an analysis on Facebook’s acquisitions’ strategy going through the key acquisitions in the company’s history. More than understanding the economics of its most relevant acquisitions, the main research is aimed at understanding the strategic view and key drivers behind them, and trying to set a pattern through hypotheses testing, always bearing in mind the following question: Why does Facebook acquire emerging companies instead of replicating their key success factors? Keywords Facebook; Acquisitions; Strategy; M&A Drivers “The biggest risk is not taking any risk... In a world that is changing really quickly, the only strategy that is guaranteed to fail is not taking risks.” Mark Zuckerberg, founder and CEO of Facebook 2 Literature Review M&A activity has had peaks throughout the course of history and different key industry-related drivers triggered that same activity (Sudarsanam, 2003). Historically, the appearance of the first mergers and acquisitions coincides with the existence of the first companies and, since then, in the US market, there have been five major waves of M&A activity (as summarized by T.J.A.
  • In the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware Karen Sbriglio, Firemen’S ) Retirement System of St

    In the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware Karen Sbriglio, Firemen’S ) Retirement System of St

    EFiled: Aug 06 2021 03:34PM EDT Transaction ID 66784692 Case No. 2018-0307-JRS IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE KAREN SBRIGLIO, FIREMEN’S ) RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF ST. ) LOUIS, CALIFORNIA STATE ) TEACHERS’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM, ) CONSTRUCTION AND GENERAL ) BUILDING LABORERS’ LOCAL NO. ) 79 GENERAL FUND, CITY OF ) BIRMINGHAM RETIREMENT AND ) RELIEF SYSTEM, and LIDIA LEVY, derivatively on behalf of Nominal ) C.A. No. 2018-0307-JRS Defendant FACEBOOK, INC., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) PUBLIC INSPECTION VERSION ) FILED AUGUST 6, 2021 v. ) ) MARK ZUCKERBERG, SHERYL SANDBERG, PEGGY ALFORD, ) ) MARC ANDREESSEN, KENNETH CHENAULT, PETER THIEL, JEFFREY ) ZIENTS, ERSKINE BOWLES, SUSAN ) DESMOND-HELLMANN, REED ) HASTINGS, JAN KOUM, ) KONSTANTINOS PAPAMILTIADIS, ) DAVID FISCHER, MICHAEL ) SCHROEPFER, and DAVID WEHNER ) ) Defendants, ) -and- ) ) FACEBOOK, INC., ) ) Nominal Defendant. ) SECOND AMENDED VERIFIED STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page(s) I. SUMMARY OF THE ACTION...................................................................... 5 II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE ....................................................................19 III. PARTIES .......................................................................................................20 A. Plaintiffs ..............................................................................................20 B. Director Defendants ............................................................................26 C. Officer Defendants ..............................................................................28
  • Facebook, Inc. Annual Report 2016

    Facebook, Inc. Annual Report 2016

    Facebook, Inc. Annual Report 2016 Form 10-K (NASDAQ:FB) Published: April 27th, 2016 PDF generated by stocklight.com UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 __________________________ FORM 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 __________________________ (Mark One) x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 or ¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number: 001-35551 __________________________ FACEBOOK, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) __________________________ Delaware 20-1665019 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) 1601 Willow Road, Menlo Park, California 94025 (Address of principal executive offices and Zip Code) (650) 543-4800 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) __________________________ Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Class A Common Stock, $0.000006 par value The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (Title of each class) (Name of each exchange on which registered) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None (Title of class) Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No ¨ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes¨ No x Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
  • Received by the Regents May 21, 2015

    Received by the Regents May 21, 2015

    THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN REGENTS COMMUNICATION ITEM FOR INFORMATION Subject: Alternative Asset Commitments Background and Summary: Under a May 1994 Request for Action, the University may commit to follow-on investments in a new fund sponsored by a previously approved partnership provided the fund has the same investment strategy and core investment personnel as the prior fund. Pursuant to that policy, this item reports on the University's follow-on investments with the previously approved partnerships listed below. Sequoia Capital U.S. Venture Fund XV, L.P., a venture capital fund headquartered in Menlo Park, CA, will invest in early and growth stage technology companies located in the U.S. The focus will be on technology companies formed in the western part of the country, particularly California's Silicon Valley. The University committed $6 million to Sequoia Capital U.S. Venture Fund XV, L.P., in January 2015. Related Real Estate Fund II, L.P., is a New York, NY, based fund sponsored by The Related Companies that will invest in assets where the firm will leverage its extensive capabilities and resources in development, construction and real estate management to add value to the investments. The acquisitions will include underperforming assets in need of operational or development expertise, assets or companies with structural ownership issues, foreclosed multi-family assets, and special situations. It is expected the fund will be diversified by property type and geographic location. The University committed $35 million to Related Real Estate Fund II, L.P., in February 2015. GSO European Senior Debt Feeder Fund LP., a New York, NY, based fund sponsored by GSO Capital Partners LP, focuses on privately originated debt investments in healthy mid to large cap European companies with EBITDAs in the range of €50 million to €150 million (-$57 million to $170 million).
  • Annual Report 2018 – 2019 Contents a Letter to Our Community

    Annual Report 2018 – 2019 Contents a Letter to Our Community

    AnnuAl RepoRt 2018 – 2019 Contents A Letter to Our Community Dear Friends of Yale Center Beijing, Yale Center Beijing (YCB) is proud to celebrate its fifth anniversary this fall. Since its establishment on October 27, 2014, YCB is Yale University’s first and only university-wide center outside of the United States and continues to serve as an intellectual hub that draws luminaries from China, the U.S., and beyond. During 2018-2019, YCB hosted a variety of events and programs that advanced Yale's mission to improve our world and develop global leaders for all sectors, featuring topics ranging from health and medicine, technology and entrepreneurship, environment and sustainability, to politics, economics, and the arts and humanities. Over the past half-decade, YCB has become a prominent convening space that engages scholars and thought leaders in dialogues that foster openness, connectedness, and innovation. Today, the Center 1 is a key hub for Yale’s global activities, as programming that features Yale faculty, students, and alumni increased from A Letter to Our Community 33% of the Center’s activities in 2014-2015 to nearly 70% in 2018-2019. 2 Looking forward, as YCB aims to maintain and advance its standing as one of the most vibrant foreign university Yale Center Beijing Advisory Committee centers in China, the Center will facilitate and organize programming that: ± Enlighten—Promote interdisciplinary and transnational discourse, through the Yale Starlight Science Series, 4 the Greenberg Distinguished Colloquium, etc., and; Highlights of the Year ± Engage—Convene emerging and established leaders, whether from academia, business, government, or 8 nonprofit organizations, to discuss and tackle important issues in an ever-changing world, through programs Celebrating Five Years at Yale Center Beijing such as the Yale-Sequoia China Leadership Program and the Women’s Leadership Program.
  • Corporate Venturing Report 2019

    Corporate Venturing Report 2019

    Corporate Venturing 2019 Report SUMMIT@RSM All Rights Reserved. Copyright © 2019. Created by Joshua Eckblad, Academic Researcher at TiSEM in The Netherlands. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS LEAD AUTHORS 03 Forewords Joshua G. Eckblad 06 All Investors In External Startups [email protected] 21 Corporate VC Investors https://www.corporateventuringresearch.org/ 38 Accelerator Investors CentER PhD Candidate, Department of Management 43 2018 Global Startup Fundraising Survey (Our Results) Tilburg School of Economics and Management (TiSEM) Tilburg University, The Netherlands 56 2019 Global Startup Fundraising Survey (Please Distribute) Dr. Tobias Gutmann [email protected] https://www.corporateventuringresearch.org/ LEGAL DISCLAIMER Post-Doctoral Researcher Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG Chair of Strategic Management and Digital Entrepreneurship The information contained herein is for the prospects of specific companies. While HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Management, Germany general guidance on matters of interest, and every attempt has been made to ensure that intended for the personal use of the reader the information contained in this report has only. The analyses and conclusions are been obtained and arranged with due care, Christian Lindener based on publicly available information, Wayra is not responsible for any Pitchbook, CBInsights and information inaccuracies, errors or omissions contained [email protected] provided in the course of recent surveys in or relating to, this information. No Managing Director with a sample of startups and corporate information herein may be replicated Wayra Germany firms. without prior consent by Wayra. Wayra Germany GmbH (“Wayra”) accepts no Wayra Germany GmbH liability for any actions taken as response Kaufingerstraße 15 hereto.
  • Koum Y Acton, Fundadores De Whatsapp Y Nuevos Multimillonarios Autor: I

    Koum Y Acton, Fundadores De Whatsapp Y Nuevos Multimillonarios Autor: I

    Koum y Acton, fundadores de Whatsapp y nuevos multimillonarios Autor: I. Stepanenko Fecha: Friday 1st of October 2021 02:15:36 AM Los fundadores de WhatsApp, Jan Koum, de 38 años, y Brian Acton, de 42, evitan la atención de los medios de prensa y son de mucho mayor edad que el típico exestudiante que abandonó la universidad y ahora es director general de ese tipo de firmas. Y en una época en la que las compañías de redes sociales se están concentrando en anuncios publicitarios para generar ingresos, WhatsApp rechaza la idea de mostrar publicidad a los 450 millones de personas que usan su aplicación de mensajería móvil. De acuerdo a The Associated Press, la enorme cantidad de19,000 millones de dólares que Facebook va a pagar para quedarse con el servicio también es algo inusual, incluso a pesar de que otras empresas incipientes que aún no generan ingresos están siendo valuadas a precios elevadísimos. Koum y Acton están en el centro del mayor acuerdo de adquisición de una compañía respaldada por capital de riesgo. ¿Cómo fue que dos exingenieros de Yahoo que presenciaron el auge — y desplome — de las empresas .com a finales de la década de 1990 crearon una aplicación de enorme popularidad e hicieron que Facebook parezca un poquito envejecida? ¿Qué opinas de este par de amigos y lo que consiguieron con su creacion? Participa en nuestros Foros. «Jan mantiene pegada en su escritorio una nota de Brian que dice: ‘¡No anuncios! ¡No juegos! ¡No trucos!’. Sirve como recordatorio diario del compromiso a mantenerse concentrados en crear una experiencia enfocada únicamente en mensajes», escribió Jim Goetz, socio de Sequoia Capital, en un mensaje de blog sobre el acuerdo del jueves.
  • Ethics of Facebook: Analyzing the Social Network and Global Leader

    Ethics of Facebook: Analyzing the Social Network and Global Leader

    Ethics of Facebook: Analyzing the Social Network and Global Leader A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the School of Engineering and Applied Science University of Virginia • Charlottesville, Virginia In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Degree Bachelor of Science, School of Engineering Selwyn Hector Spring 2020 On my honor as a University Student, I have neither given nor received unauthorized aid on this assignment as defined by the Honor Guidelines for Thesis-Related Assignments Signature __________________________________________ Date __________ Selwyn Hector Approved __________________________________________ Date __________ Michael Gorman, Department of Engineering and Society Ethics of Facebook: Analyzing the Social Network and Global Leader Introduction As computing technology has grown, the internet and computers have become an essential part of people’s daily lives. According to data from the US Census, 81% of United States homes had a computer with internet access in 2016 and 76% of households had at least 1 one smartphone. Facebook is one of the internet’s largest services with 1.59 billion daily active 2 users and 2.41 billion monthly active users as of June 2019. ​ Facebook’s massive user base gives ​ it a platform to influence many parts of the world. Facebook began as a platform for connecting college students but now is a behemoth in entertainment, news, advertising, and more. Small decisions in how content is prioritized and what content is allowed to be posted have consequences across many cultures. This enormous power makes Facebook not only a social network that connects friends but a global leader that shapes the future. Unfortunately, the platform has been at the center of many controversies related to user 3,4 privacy, misinformation, and hate speech.
  • Private Equity Holdings Disclosure 06-30-2019

    Private Equity Holdings Disclosure 06-30-2019

    The Regents of the University of California Private Equity Investments as of June 30, 2019 (1) Capital Paid-in Capital Current Market Capital Distributed Total Value Total Value Description Vintage Year (2) Net IRR (3) Committed (A) Value (B) (C) (B+C) Multiple (B+C)/A) Brentwood Associates Private Equity II 1979 3,000,000 3,000,000 - 4,253,768 4,253,768 1.42 5.5% Interwest Partners I 1979 3,000,000 3,000,000 - 6,681,033 6,681,033 2.23 18.6% Alta Co Partners 1980 3,000,000 3,000,000 - 6,655,008 6,655,008 2.22 13.6% Golder, Thoma, Cressey & Rauner Fund 1980 5,000,000 5,000,000 - 59,348,988 59,348,988 11.87 30.5% KPCB Private Equity (Legacy Funds) (4) Multiple 142,535,631 143,035,469 3,955,643 1,138,738,611 1,142,694,253 7.99 39.4% WCAS Capital Partners II 1980 4,000,000 4,000,000 - 8,669,738 8,669,738 2.17 14.0% Brentwood Associates Private Equity III 1981 3,000,000 3,000,000 - 2,943,142 2,943,142 0.98 -0.2% Mayfield IV 1981 5,000,000 5,000,000 - 13,157,658 13,157,658 2.63 26.0% Sequoia Private Equity (Legacy Funds) (4) Multiple 293,200,000 352,355,566 167,545,013 1,031,217,733 1,198,762,746 3.40 30.8% Alta II 1982 3,000,000 3,000,000 - 5,299,578 5,299,578 1.77 7.0% Interwest Partners II 1982 4,008,769 4,008,769 - 6,972,484 6,972,484 1.74 8.4% T V I Fund II 1982 4,000,000 4,000,000 - 6,744,334 6,744,334 1.69 9.3% Brentwood Associates Private Equity IV 1983 5,000,000 5,000,000 - 10,863,119 10,863,119 2.17 10.9% WCAS Capital Partners III 1983 5,000,000 5,000,000 - 9,066,954 9,066,954 1.81 8.5% Golder, Thoma, Cressey & Rauner Fund II 1984
  • Announcement Discloseable Transaction Further

    Announcement Discloseable Transaction Further

    Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited and The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited take no responsibility for the contents of this announcement, make no representation as to its accuracy or completeness and expressly disclaim any liability whatsoever for any loss howsoever arising from or in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents of this announcement. ANNOUNCEMENT DISCLOSEABLE TRANSACTION FURTHER INTRODUCTION OF STRATEGIC INVESTORS TO A SUBSIDIARY The Board is pleased to announce that subsequent to the publishing of the voluntary announcement on the introduction of four First Round Strategic Investors to a subsidiary of the Company, AAC Optics (Changzhou) Co., Ltd.* ( 誠瑞光學（常州）股份有限公司 ) (AAC Optics) (previously known as AAC Communication Technologies (Changzhou) Co., Ltd.* (瑞聲通訊科技（常州）有限公司)) on 22 July 2020, AAC Optics, AAC Optics Controlling Shareholders and 18 new independent strategic investors entered into the Capital Increase Agreement and the Shareholders Agreement to further introduce strategic investors to the same subsidiary on 9 October 2020. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Capital Increase Agreement, the registered capital of AAC Optics will increase from RMB6,017,638,706 to RMB6,633,518,025, and, AAC Optics has agreed to issue to the Current Round Strategic Investors, and the Current Round Strategic Investors have agreed to subscribe for such entire increase in share capital, an aggregate of 615,879,319 newly issued shares, representing approximately 9.2845% of the equity interest of AAC Optics after the capital increase, at a consideration of RMB1,658,000,000. Upon completion of the Introduction of the Current Round Strategic Investors, the Company will hold 82.0219% of AAC Optics’ equity interest.
  • Resumo O Trabalho Analisa a Dinâmica Da Hashtag #Deletefacebook No Twitter, Que Alcançou O Ranking Dos Tópicos Mais Comentados Em Março De 2018

    Resumo O Trabalho Analisa a Dinâmica Da Hashtag #Deletefacebook No Twitter, Que Alcançou O Ranking Dos Tópicos Mais Comentados Em Março De 2018

    1 Resumo O trabalho analisa a dinâmica da hashtag #DeleteFacebook no Twitter, que alcançou o ranking dos tópicos mais comentados em março de 2018. A etiqueta online surgiu em meio à polémica sobre proteção de dados, quando houve midiatização sobre vazamento de informações envolvendo a empresa de marketing político Cambridge Analytica. O objetivo do estudo é encontrar as principais causas para o desempenho da etiqueta online. A abordagem metodológica é quantitativa e privilegia o método hipotético-indutivo. Consideram-se as possibilidades de que ou influenciadores digitais, ou a mídia tradicional, ou o movimento social tenha sido responsável por condicionar a opinião pública. Os resultados mostram que poucas postagens foram suficientes para um alto alcance da hashtag. A mensagem de maior engajamento é do criador do Whatsapp, Brian Acton, que sensibilizou as audiências ao mesmo tempo que perfis oficias da imprensa norte-americana endossaram o afastamento dos usuários do Facebook. Palavras-chave: opinião pública; privacidade; Facebook Abstract This article intends to analyze the #DeleteFacebook dynamics on Twitter. The hashtag reached on Trending Topics in March 2018. The hashtag appeared in a discussion of safe data, just when the media reported about Cambridge Analytica. The politic marketing company is involved on illegal process to get Facebook users information. The objective of the study is to find the main causes for the acting of the hashtag. The methodological approach is quantitative, and it privileges the hypothetical-inductive method. It is considered the possibility that digital influencers, or the traditional media, or the social movement has been responsible for conditioning the public opinion. The results show that few posts were enough for a high reach of the hashtag.