DOCSLIB.ORG

The Political Constitution No More?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Political Constitution No More? Durham E-Theses The Political Constitution No More? TAYLOR, ROBERT,BRETT How to cite: TAYLOR, ROBERT,BRETT (2013) The Political Constitution No More?, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/10677/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk The Political Constitution No More? Robert Brett Taylor Abstract The British constitution has recently undergone some dramatic changes which, according to leading constitutional scholar Vernon Bogdanor, signals the demise of the 'old' political constitution and its replacement with a 'new' more legal constitution. The aim of thesis is to challenge the assertion that the British constitution is undergoing a fundamental transformation from a political to a legal constitution by conducting a thorough analysis of the extent to which the contemporary British constitution can still be said to resemble a political constitution. This will be achieved through an exhaustive examination of three key areas of the constitution: the Royal Prerogative; Constitutional Conventions; and the Human Rights Act 1998. In so doing, however, it is not the aim of this thesis to produce a simple either/or account of the British constitution, but instead to advance and provide evidence of a middle-ground between the two opposing schools of constitutionalism: complementary constitutionalism. It will be argued that both the legal and the political constitutions share many common characteristics and disagree with one another primarily, although not exclusively, on emphasis. No real world constitution, therefore, was or ever will be solely legal or solely political in character. A real world constitution is instead a complementary mixture of elements from both the legal and political schools which can be either primarily legal or primarily political in character. As a result, it will be shown that the British constitution, although undisputedly more legal, nevertheless remains primarily political. 1 The Political Constitution No More? Robert Brett Taylor Ph.D. Durham Law School Durham University 2013 2 Table of Contents Chapter One: Introduction 9 1. Where is the British Constitution Heading? 9 2. The Traditional British Constitution 10 3. The Constitutional Challenge 12 4. The Political Defence 14 5. The Political Constitution No More? 15 6. Aims and Objectives 20 7. Areas of Assessment 21 I. The Royal Prerogative 22 II. Constitutional Conventions 22 III. The Human Rights Act 1998 23 8. Membership of the European Union 24 9. A Primarily Political Constitution 28 Chapter Two: Complementary Constitutionalism 29 1. The Dichotomy of Law and Politics 29 2. The Legal Constitution 31 2.1 Higher Law, Human Rights, and Constitutional Review 31 2.2 Common Law Constitutionalism 34 3. The Political Constitution 36 3.1 J.A.G. Griffith 36 3.2 Civic Republicanism and Freedom as Non-domination 38 3 3.3 Adam Tomkins 39 3.4 Richard Bellamy 42 3.5 Disagreement, Participation, and Accountability 45 4. Complementary Constitutionalism 46 4.1 The Mixed Constitution 46 4.2 Democratic Participation and Political Accountability under the Legal Constitution 55 4.3 Legal Accountability under the Political Constitution 56 4.4 Constitutional Democracy 59 5. Conclusion 69 Chapter Three: The Royal Prerogative 70 1. Constitutionalism and the Crown 70 2. Failure to Control the Prerogative 72 2.1 The Glorious Revolution 1688: Parliament's Victory over the Crown 72 2.2 No Parliamentary Approval 75 2.3 No Positive Authority 76 2.4 Immunity from Judicial Review 79 3. Bringing the Prerogative under Control 80 3.1 Plugging the Gap in Accountability 80 3.2 Placing the Prerogative, or Controls on it, on a Statutory Footing 80 3.3 Extending Judicial Review 98 4. Conclusion 115 4 Chapter Four: Constitutional Conventions 117 1. The British Constitutional Dependency on Conventions 117 2. The Law-Convention Distinction 120 2.1 The Regulatory Purpose of Conventions 120 2.2 Flexibility and the Creation of Conventions 123 2.3 Recognition versus Enforcement 127 3. The Constitutional Significance of British Dependency 131 3.1 Regulatory and Foundational Conventions 131 3.2 Why Do Conventions Bind? 133 4. Strengthening Conventions 140 4.1 Codification and Justiciability 140 4.2 Clarity, Legitimacy, and Accountability 142 4.3 The Wright Committee Reforms 145 5. Conclusion 149 Chapter Five: The Human Rights Act 1998 150 1. A British Bill of Rights? 150 1.1 Law and Politics: Protecting Rights on Two Fronts 150 1.2 Weak-form Judicial Review 153 1.3 A Complementary Balance? 158 2. Legislative Rights Review 159 2.1 Fostering a Culture of Rights 159 2.2 Section 19 and the Joint Committee on Human Rights 161 2.3 Striking a Balance between Compliance and Contestability 164 5 2.4 Legislative Rights Review in Practice 169 3. Judicial Rights Review 178 3.1 Sections 2 and 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998 178 3.2 Section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998 180 3.3 Section 4 of the Human Rights Act 1998 196 4. Conclusion 206 Chapter Six: Conclusion 208 1. The Political Constitution No More? 208 2. Strengthening Political Controls 209 3. A Complementary Constitution 211 4. A Primarily Political Constitution 213 Bibliography 215 6 Statement of Copyright The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without the author’s prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. 7 Acknowledgments I would like to acknowledge the help and support of my supervisors Professor Roger Masterman and Professor Gavin Phillipson. 8 Chapter One INTRODUCTION 1. Where is the British Constitution Heading? In the absence of a codified constitution, constitutional lawyers have long been interested, not only with unearthing the British constitution, but in charting its future course. Contemporary public law discourse, however, has become dominated by an ongoing debate between two broad and seemingly opposed schools of constitutionalism – the legal and the political – both of which purport to provide the best framework from which compliance with constitutionalism can be achieved. Broadly speaking, the legal school makes the case for greater judicial oversight of constitutional issues, advocating constitutional review of primary legislation and powers of judicial strike down, whilst the political school reinterprets the traditional tenets of the British constitution in light of civil republicanism to make the case for greater reliance upon political forms of accountability. Determining the future course of the British constitution, therefore, has become increasingly polarised, with constitutional scholars seemingly fighting an ongoing battle for the very heart and soul of the British constitution. The British constitution has over the last half a century undergone some dramatic changes which, because they have ushered in greater reliance upon judicial forms of accountability, appears to signal the demise of the 'old' political constitution and its imminent replacement with a 'new' more legal constitution. The aim of thesis is to challenge the assertion that the British constitution is undergoing a fundamental transformation from a political to a legal constitution. In so doing, however, this thesis will not produce a simple either/or account of the British constitution, but instead make the case for a middle-ground between the two opposing schools of constitutionalism: complementary constitutionalism. Before discussing these aims in detail, along with the approach the thesis will take in order to achieve them, this chapter will first chart the various interpretations of and challenges to the British constitution since the late nineteenth century. 9 2. The Traditional British Constitution As Vernon Bogdanor and Stefan Vogenauer argue, ‘[c]onstitutions are generally enacted when a constitutional moment arrives, following war, revolution, or colonial independence.’1 By contrast, it has often been said that evolution and not revolution, is the hallmark of the British constitution.2 As Sir Ivor Jennings explains: The building has been constantly added to, patched, and partially re-constructed, so that it has been renewed from century to century; but it has never been razed to the ground and rebuilt on new foundations. If a constitution consists of institutions and not of paper that describes them, the British Constitution has not been made but has grown – and there is no paper.3 This is not to say, however, that the long road taken to reach the contemporary British constitution was an easy one. As this quote by Leslie Wolf-Phillips illustrates, the British constitution could be seen as the end result of many constitutional battles: The course of British constitutional developments has seen a sequence of invasions and foreign overlords, the squabbling of petty monarchs, the struggle between the nobility and the king for supremacy, the later struggle for domination between the king and parliament, the recognition of the supremacy of parliament over the king, the decline in the influence of the monarch, the rise of the middle classes in terms of constitutional recognition, and, finally, the decline of the power of the House of Lords and the central place of a House of Commons elected on a basis of universal adult suffrage.4 From the Norman Conquest, the Wars of the Roses, and the Reformation, to the Civil War, the Restoration, and the Glorious Revolution, the British constitution is unmistakably the culmination of many wars and revolutions.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Conservative Manifesto
    THE SCOTTISH CONSERVATIVE AND UNIONIST PARTY MANIFESTO 2016 THE SCOTTISH CONSERVATIVE AND UNIONIST PARTY MANIFESTO 2016 CHAPTER HEADING A STRONG OPPOSITION - A STRONGER SCOTLAND A STRONG OPPOSITION. A STRONGER SCOTLAND 1 THE SCOTTISH CONSERVATIVE AND UNIONIST PARTY MANIFESTO 2016 Contents RUTH DAVIDSON FOR A STRONG OPPOSITION Foreword ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 2 NO TO A SECOND REFERENDUM The facts ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Why it matters .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 Our commitment ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 HOLDING THE SNP TO ACCOUNT Our programme for
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections on Representation and Reform in the House of Lords
    Our House: Reflections on Representation and Reform in the House of Lords Edited by Caroline Julian About ResPublica ResPublica is an independent, non-partisan UK think tank founded by Phillip Blond in November 2009. In July 2011, the ResPublica Trust was established as a not-for-profit entity which oversees all of ResPublica’s domestic work. We focus on developing practical solutions to enduring socio-economic and cultural problems of our time, such as poverty, asset inequality, family and social breakdown, and environmental degradation. ResPublica Essay Collections ResPublica’s work draws together some of the most exciting thinkers in the UK and internationally to explore the new polices and approaches that will create and deliver a new political settlement. Our network of contributors who advise on and inform our work include leaders from politics, business, civil society and academia. Through our publications, compendiums and website we encourage other thinkers, politicians and members of the public to join the debate and contribute to the development of forward-thinking and innovative ideas. We intend our essay collections to stimulate balanced debate around issues that are fundamental to our core principles. Contents Foreword by Professor John Milbank and Professor Simon Lee, Trustees, 1 The ResPublica Trust 1. Introduction 4 Caroline Julian, ResPublica 2. A Statement from the Government 9 Mark Harper MP, Minister for Political and Constitutional Reform A Social Purpose 3. A Truly Representative House of Lords 13 The Rt Hon Frank Field, MP for Birkenhead 4. Association and Civic Participation 16 Dr Adrian Pabst, University of Kent 5. Bicameralism & Representative Democracy: An International Perspective 23 Rafal Heydel-Mankoo 6.
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (9MB)
    A University of Sussex PhD thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details 2018 Behavioural Models for Identifying Authenticity in the Twitter Feeds of UK Members of Parliament A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF UK MPS’ TWEETS BETWEEN 2011 AND 2012; A LONGITUDINAL STUDY MARK MARGARETTEN Mark Stuart Margaretten Submitted for the degree of Doctor of PhilosoPhy at the University of Sussex June 2018 1 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................ 1 DECLARATION .................................................................................................................................. 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 5 FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................... 6 TABLES ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates House of Commons Official Report General Committees
    PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT GENERAL COMMITTEES Public Bill Committee IMMIGRATION BILL Fourth Sitting Thursday 31 October 2013 (Afternoon) CONTENTS Examination of witness. Adjourned till Tuesday 5 November at five minutes to Nine o’clock. Written evidence reported to the House. PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS LONDON – THE STATIONERY OFFICE LIMITED £5·00 PBC (Bill 110) 2013 - 2014 Members who wish to have copies of the Official Report of Proceedings in General Committees sent to them are requested to give notice to that effect at the Vote Office. No proofs can be supplied. Corrigenda slips may be published with Bound Volume editions. Corrigenda that Members suggest should be clearly marked in a copy of the report—not telephoned—and must be received in the Editor’s Room, House of Commons, not later than Monday 4 November 2013 STRICT ADHERENCE TO THIS ARRANGEMENT WILL GREATLY FACILITATE THE PROMPT PUBLICATION OF THE BOUND VOLUMES OF PROCEEDINGS IN GENERAL COMMITTEES © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2013 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 109 Public Bill Committee31 OCTOBER 2013 Immigration Bill 110 The Committee consisted of the following Members: Chairs: †SIR ROGER GALE,KATY CLARK † Bain, Mr William (Glasgow North East) (Lab) † Milton, Anne (Lord Commissioner of Her Majesty’s Baker, Norman (Minister for Crime Prevention) Treasury) Dowd, Jim (Lewisham West and Penge) (Lab)
    [Show full text]
  • Grez Hidalgo2020.Pdf (1.770Mb)
    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. LEGISLATIVE SCRUTINY ON CONSTITUTIONAL GROUNDS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM PARLIAMENT THE CONTRIBUTION OF CONSTITUTIONAL COMMITTEES TO (POLITICAL?) RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CONSTITUTION PABLO SALVADOR GREZ HIDALGO Presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Edinburgh 2019 IN MEMORIAM FRANCISCO GREZ MORANDI iii ABSTRACT / LAY SUMMARY This thesis focuses on institutional arrangements designed to strengthen the ability of political institutions to assess the constitutional implications of legislation in the law-making process. It sheds light in the under-developed field of parliamentary constitutional assessments by bringing together disparate constitutional theory literature that discusses or touches upon the distinctiveness of this activity with a view to conceptualise “legislative scrutiny on constitutional grounds” (“LSGC”). The thesis distinguishes three alternative conceptions of LSCG: a legalistic conception, a conception of constitutional deliberation, and a conception of constitutional construction and development.
    [Show full text]
  • BIA Briefing on the Conservative Party Leadership Candidates
    BIA briefing on the Conservative Party leadership candidates June 2019 Contents The candidates...................................................................................................................................................... 2 The election process ............................................................................................................................................. 3 Biographies ........................................................................................................................................................... 4 Michael Gove ............................................................................................................................................ 4 Matt Hancock ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Mark Harper ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Jeremy Hunt ............................................................................................................................................ 6 Sajid Javid ................................................................................................................................................ 6 Boris Johnson .......................................................................................................................................... 7 Andrea Leadsom .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFTING MATTERS! SECOND EDITION PARLIAMENTARY COUNSEL OFFICE Contents
    SHAPING THE LAW OF SCOTLAND DRAFTING MATTERS! SECOND EDITION PARLIAMENTARY COUNSEL OFFICE Contents Contents Introductory matters Foreword by the Lord Advocate, James Wolffe QC viii Preface to the second edition by Andy Beattie, Chief Parliamentary Counsel x Why drafting matters by Andy Beattie, Chief Parliamentary Counsel xi Background xiii Parliamentary Counsel Office (PCO) xiii About this manual: status and use xiii Part 1: Drafting technique 1 Language 1 Plain language 1 Punctuation 1 Gender neutrality 2 Choice of language 2 Particular words and expressions 3 Style 7 Conjunctions 7 Paragraphing 8 Periods of time 9 Dates 11 Numbers and symbols 12 Letter labels (Tag letters (‘A’)) 13 Form and key components of Bills 15 Form and content of Scottish Parliament Bills 15 Presiding Officer’s recommendations as to style and content 15 Order of final provisions 17 Long title 18 Short title 19 Commencement provisions 19 Powers to make subordinate legislation 21 Form of subordinate legislation 23 Ancillary provision 24 Technicalities 26 Citation of enactments 26 Cross-references 26 Definitions 27 i PARLIAMENTARY COUNSEL OFFICE Contents Numbering 31 Schedules 33 Amendments and repeals 35 Textual amendments 35 Non-textual amendments 38 Formal headings and framework 38 Repeals 39 Specific legal expressions and terms 42 Referring to a Bill in another Bill 42 Referring to bodies corporate 42 Referring to the Scottish Ministers (individually and collectively) 42 Mode of trial 44 Referring to ‘charge’ and ‘proceedings’ 45 Types of court 45 Sheriffs and sheriff courts 45 Justice of the peace courts and relevant judicial officers 47 Part 2: Guidance on specific topics I.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of Proceedings
    House of Commons Political and Constitutional Reform Committee Minutes of Proceedings Session 2010-12 Proceedings of the Committee Wednesday 14 July 2010 Members present Mr Graham Allen, in the Chair1 Nick Boles Catherine McKinnell Mr Christopher Chope Sir Peter Soulsby Sheila Gilmore Mr Andrew Turner Simon Hart Stephen Williams Tristram Hunt 1. Declaration of interests Members declared their interests, in accordance with the Resolution of the House of 13 July 1992 (see Appendix). 2. Confidentiality of select committee proceedings The Committee considered this matter. Resolved, That the Committee takes note of the rules relating to the confidentiality of select committee proceedings. 3. Committee working methods The Committee considered this matter. Ordered, That the public be admitted during the examination of witnesses unless the Committee orders otherwise. Resolved, That witnesses who submit written evidence to the Committee are authorised to publish it on their own account in accordance with Standing Order No. 135, subject always to the discretion of the Chair or where the Committee orders otherwise. 4. Future programme The Committee considered this matter. Resolved, That the Committee meet tomorrow to take oral evidence from the Deputy Prime Minister on the coalition government’s programme of political and constitutional reform. 1 Mr Graham Allen was elected as the Chair of the Committee on 9 June 2010, in accordance with Standing Order No. 122B (see House of Commons Votes and Proceedings, 10 June 2010). Resolved, That the Committee inquire into the government bills expected before the summer recess which will provide for a referendum on the alternative vote, for fewer and more equally- sized constituencies, and for fixed-term parliaments.
    [Show full text]
  • Standing Orders Proceedings of the House of Lords
    HOUSE OF LORDS COMPANION TO THE STANDING ORDERS AND GUIDE TO THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS Laid before the House by the Clerk of the Parliaments 2007 PREFACE This is the 21st edition of the Companion to the Standing Orders of the House of Lords since Sir John Shaw-Lefevre, then Clerk of the Parliaments, compiled his first edition for private circulation in 1862. It is issued with the authority of the Procedure Committee. The House and its procedures have changed much in recent years, and continue to do so. This edition of the Companion reflects two particularly significant changes. First, on 4 July 2006 for the first time the House elected a Lord Speaker. Secondly, the Minutes of Proceedings have been replaced by the new publication House of Lords Business from the start of session 2006-07. The Companion is the authoritative guide to procedure, but it is by no means the only source of information for members. Others are the Handbook on facilities and services, booklets on participation in legislative business (from the Public Bill Office) and the General Guide to the Members’ Reimbursement Allowance Scheme (from the Finance Department). All such guidance is available on line. The Table Clerks and procedural offices are always available to advise members. PAUL HAYTER Clerk of the Parliaments i TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: THE HOUSE AND ITS MEMBERSHIP ........................1 Composition of the House.......................................................................1 Disqualification for membership.............................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Macmillan Law Masters Constitutional and Administrative
    Macmillan Law Masters Constitutional and Administrative Law MACMILLAN LAW MASTERS Series Editor Marise Cremona Business Law (2nd edn) Stephen Judge Company Law (3rd edn) Janet Dine Constitutional and Administrative Law (3rd edn) John Alder Contract Law (3rd edn) Ewan McKendrick Conveyancing (3rd edn) Priscilla Sarton Criminal Law (2nd edn) Jonathan Herring and Marise Cremona Employment Law (3rd edn) Deborah J. Lockton Environmental Law and Ethics John Alder and David Wilkinson Evidence Raymond Emson Family Law (2nd edn) Kate Standley Housing Law and Policy David Cowan Intellectual Property Law Tina Hart and Linda Fazzani Land Law (3rd edn) Kate Green Landlord and Tenant Law (3rd edn) Margaret Wilkie and Godfrey Cole Law of the European Union (2nd edn) Jo Shaw Law of Succession Catherine Rendell Law of Trusts Patrick McLoughlin and Catherine Rendell Legal Method (3rd edn) Ian McLeod Legal Theory Ian McLeod Social Security Law Robert East Torts (2nd edn) Alastair Mullis and Ken Oliphant Constitutional and Administrative Law Third Edition John Alder Newcastle Law School, University of Newcastle With contributions from Michael Haley, Barry Hough, Richard Mullender Law series editor: Marise Cremona Senior Fellow, Centre for Commercial Law Studies Queen Mary and Westfield College, University of London ,_ MACMilLAN ©John Alder, 1989, 1994, 1999 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London WlP OLP.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix: “Ideology, Grandstanding, and Strategic Party Disloyalty in the British Parliament”
    Appendix: \Ideology, Grandstanding, and Strategic Party Disloyalty in the British Parliament" August 8, 2017 Appendix Table of Contents • Appendix A: Wordscores Estimation of Ideology • Appendix B: MP Membership in Ideological Groups • Appendix C: Rebellion on Different Types of Divisions • Appendix D: Models of Rebellion on Government Sponsored Bills Only • Appendix E: Differences in Labour Party Rebellion Following Leadership Change • Appendix F: List of Party Switchers • Appendix G: Discussion of Empirical Model Appendix A: Wordscores Estimation of Ideology This Appendix describes our method for ideologically scaling British MPs using their speeches on the welfare state, which were originally produced for a separate study on welfare reform (O'Grady, 2017). We cover (i) data collection, (ii) estimation, (iii) raw results, and (iv) validity checks. The resulting scales turn out to be highly valid, and provide an excellent guide to MPs' ideologies using data that is completely separate to the voting data that forms the bulk of the evidence in our paper. A1: Collection of Speech Data Speeches come from an original collection of every speech made about issues related to welfare in the House of Commons from 1987-2007, covering the period over which the Labour party moved 1 to the center under Tony Blair, adopted and enacted policies of welfare reform, and won office at the expense of the Conservatives. Restricting the speeches to a single issue area is useful for estimating ideologies because with multiple topics there is a danger of conflating genuine extremism (a tendency to speak in extreme ways) with a tendency or requirement to talk a lot about topics that are relatively extreme to begin with (Lauderdale and Herzog, 2016).
    [Show full text]