DOCSLIB.ORG

Votes and Proceedings for 9 Sep 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

No. 341 Monday 9 September 2019 Votes and Proceedings Corrected consequent to the Speaker’s Statement of 25 September 2019 The House met at 2.30 pm. Prayers 1 Questions to the Secretary of State for Education 2 Speaker's Statement: Intention to stand down as Speaker 3 Royal Assent The Speaker reported that the Queen had signified Royal Assent to the following Acts under the Royal Assent Act 1967: Kew Gardens (Leases) Act 2019 European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 2) Act 2019 4 Applications for emergency debate (Standing Order No. 24) (1) Mr Dominic Grieve proposed that the House should debate the matter of prorogation with imminence of an exit from the European Union and that an humble Address should accordingly be presented to Her Majesty. The Speaker put the application to the House. Leave was refused by the House, but the assent of not fewer than 40 Members standing in support was obtained. Debate to be held as the first item of business today for a maximum of two hours. (2) Jeremy Corbyn proposed that the House should debate the matter of the welcome completion of all Parliamentary stages of the European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 6) Bill and the matter of the importance of the rule of law and Ministers' obligation to comply with the law. The Speaker put the application to the House. Leave given. Debate to be held as the second item of business today for a maximum of ninety minutes. 2 Votes and Proceedings: 9 September 2019 No. 341 5 Emergency Debate (No. 1) (Standing Order No. 24) Prorogation with the imminence of an exit from the European Union and an humble Address to be presented to Her Majesty Motion made and Question proposed, That this House has considered the matter of prorogation with the imminence of an exit from the European Union and accordingly resolves— That an humble Address be presented to Her Majesty, that she will be graciously pleased to direct Ministers to lay before this House, not later than 11.00 pm Wednesday 11 September, all correspondence and other communications (whether formal or informal, in both written and electronic form, including but not limited to messaging services including WhatsApp, Telegram, Signal, Facebook messenger, private email accounts both encrypted and unencrypted, text messaging and iMessage and the use of both official and personal mobile phones) to, from or within the present administration, since 23 July 2019 relating to the prorogation of Parliament sent or received by one or more of the following individuals: Hugh Bennett, Simon Burton, Dominic Cummings, Nikki da Costa, Tom Irven, Sir Roy Stone, Christopher James, Lee Cain or Beatrice Thompson; and that Ministers be further directed to lay before this House no later than 11.00 pm Wednesday 11 September all the documents prepared within Her Majesty's Government since 23 July 2019 relating to operation Yellowhammer and submitted to the Cabinet or a Cabinet Committee.—(Mr Dominic Grieve.) The Speaker announced a time limit on backbench speeches (Standing Order No. 47(1)). Mr Nicholas Brown claimed to move the closure (Standing Order No. 36). Question put, That the Question be now put. Question agreed to and Main Question accordingly put. The House divided. Division No. 444 Ayes: 311 (Tellers: Nic Dakin, Bambos Charalambous) Noes: 302 (Tellers: Stuart Andrew, Iain Stewart) Question accordingly agreed to. Resolved, That this House has considered the matter of prorogation with the imminence of an exit from the European Union and accordingly resolves— That an humble Address be presented to Her Majesty, that she will be graciously pleased to direct Ministers to lay before this House, not later than 11.00 pm Wednesday 11 September, all correspondence and other communications (whether formal or informal, in both written and electronic form, including but not limited to messaging services including WhatsApp, Telegram, Signal, Facebook messenger, private email accounts both encrypted and unencrypted, text messaging and iMessage and the use of both official and personal mobile phones) to, from or within the present administration, since 23 July 2019 relating to the prorogation of Parliament sent or received by one or more of the following individuals: Hugh Bennett, Simon Burton, Dominic Cummings, Nikki da Costa, Tom Irven, Sir Roy Stone, Christopher James, Lee Cain or Beatrice Thompson; and that Ministers be further directed to lay before this House no later than 11.00 pm Wednesday 11 September all the documents prepared within Her Majesty's Government since 23 July 2019 relating to operation Yellowhammer and submitted to the Cabinet or a Cabinet Committee. No. 341 Votes and Proceedings: 9 September 2019 3 6 Emergency Debate (No. 2) (Standing Order No. 24) The welcome completion of all Parliamentary stages of the European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 6) Bill and the matter of the importance of the rule of law and Ministers' obligation to comply with the law Motion made and Question proposed, That this House has considered the welcome completion of all Parliamentary stages of the European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 6) Bill and the matter of the importance of the rule of law and Ministers' obligation to comply with the law.—(Jeremy Corbyn.) Mr Nicholas Brown claimed to move the closure (Standing Order No. 36). Question put, That the Question be now put. Question agreed to and Main Question accordingly put. Resolved, That this House has considered the welcome completion of all Parliamentary stages of the European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 6) Bill and the matter of the importance of the rule of law and Ministers' obligation to comply with the law. 7 Section 3(2) of the Northern Ireland (Executive Formation etc) Act 2019 Motion made and Question proposed, That this House has considered the Report pursuant to Sections 3(1), 3(6), 3(7), 3(8), 3(9) and 3(10) of the Northern Ireland (Executive Formation etc) Act 2019 - regarding Executive formation; transparency of political donations; higher education and a Derry university; presumption of non-prosecution; Troubles prosecution guidance; and abortion law review, which was laid before this House on Wednesday 4 September.—(Secretary Julian Smith.) Ninety minutes after commencement of proceedings on the motion, the Deputy Speaker put the Question necessary to bring proceedings to a conclusion (Standing Order No. 16). Question agreed to. 8 Parliamentary Buildings (Restoration and Renewal) Bill: Programme (No. 2) Motion made and Question put forthwith (Standing Order No. 83A(7)), That the following provisions shall apply to the Parliamentary Buildings (Restoration and Renewal) Bill for the purpose of supplementing the Order of 21 May 2019 (Parliamentary Buildings (Restoration and Renewal) Bill: Programme): Consideration of Lords Amendments (1) Proceedings on consideration of Lords Amendments shall (so far as not previously concluded) be brought to a conclusion one hour after their commencement. Subsequent stages (2) Any further Message from the Lords may be considered forthwith without any Question being put. (3) The proceedings on any further Message from the Lords shall (so far as not previously concluded) be brought to a conclusion one hour after their commencement.—(Iain Stewart.) Question agreed to. 9 Parliamentary Buildings (Restoration and Renewal) Bill: Consideration of Lords Amendments Lords Amendment 1 agreed to. Lords Amendments 2 to 12 agreed to. 4 Votes and Proceedings: 9 September 2019 No. 341 10 Early parliamentary general election (No. 2) (Section 2 of the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011) Motion made and Question proposed, That there shall be an early parliamentary general election.—(The Prime Minister.) Tuesday 10 September 2019 Ninety minutes after commencement of proceedings on the motion, the Speaker put the Question necessary to bring proceedings to a conclusion (Standing Order No. 16). The House divided. Division No. 445. Ayes: 293 (Tellers: Iain Stewart, Stuart Andrew) Noes: 46 (Tellers: Tom Brake, Ben Lake) Question accordingly agreed to, the number of Members voting in favour of the motion being fewer than two thirds of the number of seats in the House (including vacant seats). 11 Suspension of sitting The Speaker suspended the sitting. House adjourned. Other Proceedings Lords Messages 12 European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 6) Bill The Lords agree to the European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 6) Bill without amendment. 13 High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill (Carry over) The Lords communicate that they have come to the following resolution: If a Bill in the same terms as those in which the High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill stood when it was brought to the Lords in this Session is brought to the Lords from the House of Commons in the next Session— (a) the proceedings on the bill in the next Session shall be pro forma in regard to every stage through which the Bill has passed in this Session; (b) any petition deposited against the Bill in this Session shall be taken to be deposited against the bill in the next Session; and (c) the Standing Orders of the House of Lords applicable to the Bill, so far as complied with or dispensed with in this Session, shall be deemed to have been complied with or (as the case may be) dispensed with in the next Session. Public petitions 14 Public Petitions (1) A public petition from residents of York relating to Proroguing Parliament was presented by Rachael Maskell. No. 341 Votes and Proceedings: 9 September 2019 5 (2) A public petition from residents of Tadros Court, Ercolani Avenue and Roperies in the Windsor Gate Development relating to the Windsor Gate Development, High Wycombe was presented by Mr Steve Baker. General Committees: Reports 15 First Delegated Legislation Committee Mr Virendra Sharma (Chair) reported the draft Statutory Auditors, Third Country Auditors and International Accounting Standards (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019. 16 Second Delegated Legislation Committee Sir Edward Leigh (Chair) reported the draft Financial Services (Miscellaneous) (Amendment) (EU Exit) (No.
Recommended publications
  • Parliamentary Conventions

    Parliamentary Conventions

    REPORT Parliamentary Conventions Jacqy Sharpe About the Author Jacqy Sharpe is a former Clerk in the House of Commons. Her period as Clerk of the Journals provided her with significant insight into the historical and contemporary context of parliamentary conventions and procedure. Message from the Author With thanks to Dr Andrew Blick, Sir David Beamish, Helen Irwin and Sir Malcolm Jack for their comments on drafts of this paper. The conclusions, and any errors or omissions, are, of course, the responsibility of the author. Parliamentary Conventions Executive Summary “General agreement or consent, as embodied in any accepted usage, standard, etc”1 “Rules of constitutional practice that are regarded as binding in operation, but not in law”2 “[B]inding rules of behaviour accepted by those at whom they are directed. A practice that is not invariable does not qualify.”3 A list of various conventions with a note on how, if at all, they, or the approaches to them, have lately been modified or changed: CONVENTION CURRENT POSITION Conventions relating to behaviour in the House of Commons Speaking in the House of Commons Members should address the House through the Chair Although both questioned and frequently breached, and refer to other Members in the third person, by the convention is generally accepted constituency or position. Except for opening speeches, maiden speeches and Accepted and generally observed where there is special reason for precision, Members should not read speeches, though they may refer to notes Attendance at debates Members
  • The House's Power to Call for Papers

    The House's Power to Call for Papers

    House of Commons Procedure Committee The House’s power to call for papers: procedure and practice Ninth Report of Session 2017–19 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 15 May 2019 HC 1904 Published on 20 May 2019 by authority of the House of Commons Procedure Committee The Procedure Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to consider the practice and procedure of the House in the conduct of public business, and to make recommendations. Current membership Mr Charles Walker MP (Conservative, Broxbourne) (Chair) Bob Blackman MP (Conservative, Harrow East) Mr Peter Bone MP (Conservative, Wellingborough) Bambos Charalambous MP (Labour, Enfield, Southgate) Sir Christopher Chope MP (Conservative, Christchurch) Nic Dakin MP (Labour, Scunthorpe) Chris Elmore MP (Labour, Ogmore) Sir David Evennett MP (Conservative, Bexleyheath and Crayford) Helen Goodman MP (Labour, Bishop Auckland) Mr Ranil Jayawardena MP (Conservative, North East Hampshire) Sir Edward Leigh MP (Conservative, Gainsborough) David Linden MP (Scottish National Party, Glasgow East) Melanie Onn MP (Labour, Great Grimsby) Nick Smith MP (Labour, Blaenau Gwent) Gareth Snell MP (Labour (Co-op)) Alison Thewliss MP (Scottish National Party, Glasgow Central) Mr William Wragg MP (Conservative, Hazel Grove) Powers The powers of the Committee are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No. 147. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication Committee reports are published on the Committee’s website at www.parliament.uk/proccom and in print by Order of the House. Evidence relating to this report is published on the inquiry publications page of the Committee’s website.
  • DRAFTING MATTERS! SECOND EDITION PARLIAMENTARY COUNSEL OFFICE Contents

    DRAFTING MATTERS! SECOND EDITION PARLIAMENTARY COUNSEL OFFICE Contents

    SHAPING THE LAW OF SCOTLAND DRAFTING MATTERS! SECOND EDITION PARLIAMENTARY COUNSEL OFFICE Contents Contents Introductory matters Foreword by the Lord Advocate, James Wolffe QC viii Preface to the second edition by Andy Beattie, Chief Parliamentary Counsel x Why drafting matters by Andy Beattie, Chief Parliamentary Counsel xi Background xiii Parliamentary Counsel Office (PCO) xiii About this manual: status and use xiii Part 1: Drafting technique 1 Language 1 Plain language 1 Punctuation 1 Gender neutrality 2 Choice of language 2 Particular words and expressions 3 Style 7 Conjunctions 7 Paragraphing 8 Periods of time 9 Dates 11 Numbers and symbols 12 Letter labels (Tag letters (‘A’)) 13 Form and key components of Bills 15 Form and content of Scottish Parliament Bills 15 Presiding Officer’s recommendations as to style and content 15 Order of final provisions 17 Long title 18 Short title 19 Commencement provisions 19 Powers to make subordinate legislation 21 Form of subordinate legislation 23 Ancillary provision 24 Technicalities 26 Citation of enactments 26 Cross-references 26 Definitions 27 i PARLIAMENTARY COUNSEL OFFICE Contents Numbering 31 Schedules 33 Amendments and repeals 35 Textual amendments 35 Non-textual amendments 38 Formal headings and framework 38 Repeals 39 Specific legal expressions and terms 42 Referring to a Bill in another Bill 42 Referring to bodies corporate 42 Referring to the Scottish Ministers (individually and collectively) 42 Mode of trial 44 Referring to ‘charge’ and ‘proceedings’ 45 Types of court 45 Sheriffs and sheriff courts 45 Justice of the peace courts and relevant judicial officers 47 Part 2: Guidance on specific topics I.
  • Standing Orders Proceedings of the House of Lords

    Standing Orders Proceedings of the House of Lords

    HOUSE OF LORDS COMPANION TO THE STANDING ORDERS AND GUIDE TO THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS Laid before the House by the Clerk of the Parliaments 2007 PREFACE This is the 21st edition of the Companion to the Standing Orders of the House of Lords since Sir John Shaw-Lefevre, then Clerk of the Parliaments, compiled his first edition for private circulation in 1862. It is issued with the authority of the Procedure Committee. The House and its procedures have changed much in recent years, and continue to do so. This edition of the Companion reflects two particularly significant changes. First, on 4 July 2006 for the first time the House elected a Lord Speaker. Secondly, the Minutes of Proceedings have been replaced by the new publication House of Lords Business from the start of session 2006-07. The Companion is the authoritative guide to procedure, but it is by no means the only source of information for members. Others are the Handbook on facilities and services, booklets on participation in legislative business (from the Public Bill Office) and the General Guide to the Members’ Reimbursement Allowance Scheme (from the Finance Department). All such guidance is available on line. The Table Clerks and procedural offices are always available to advise members. PAUL HAYTER Clerk of the Parliaments i TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: THE HOUSE AND ITS MEMBERSHIP ........................1 Composition of the House.......................................................................1 Disqualification for membership.............................................................1
  • Macmillan Law Masters Constitutional and Administrative

    Macmillan Law Masters Constitutional and Administrative

    Macmillan Law Masters Constitutional and Administrative Law MACMILLAN LAW MASTERS Series Editor Marise Cremona Business Law (2nd edn) Stephen Judge Company Law (3rd edn) Janet Dine Constitutional and Administrative Law (3rd edn) John Alder Contract Law (3rd edn) Ewan McKendrick Conveyancing (3rd edn) Priscilla Sarton Criminal Law (2nd edn) Jonathan Herring and Marise Cremona Employment Law (3rd edn) Deborah J. Lockton Environmental Law and Ethics John Alder and David Wilkinson Evidence Raymond Emson Family Law (2nd edn) Kate Standley Housing Law and Policy David Cowan Intellectual Property Law Tina Hart and Linda Fazzani Land Law (3rd edn) Kate Green Landlord and Tenant Law (3rd edn) Margaret Wilkie and Godfrey Cole Law of the European Union (2nd edn) Jo Shaw Law of Succession Catherine Rendell Law of Trusts Patrick McLoughlin and Catherine Rendell Legal Method (3rd edn) Ian McLeod Legal Theory Ian McLeod Social Security Law Robert East Torts (2nd edn) Alastair Mullis and Ken Oliphant Constitutional and Administrative Law Third Edition John Alder Newcastle Law School, University of Newcastle With contributions from Michael Haley, Barry Hough, Richard Mullender Law series editor: Marise Cremona Senior Fellow, Centre for Commercial Law Studies Queen Mary and Westfield College, University of London ,_ MACMilLAN ©John Alder, 1989, 1994, 1999 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London WlP OLP.
  • Parliament and Brexit

    Parliament and Brexit

    and Brexit Foreword The Brexit process revealed many things. Not least, it taught us a lot about Parliament’s somewhat contested place in our system of government. Throughout the Article 50 period the House of Commons in particular wielded significant influence over a minority government – so much so that Theresa May was moved to criticise Parliament in a live address to the British people. So what have we learned? And where does Parliament go from here? This report draws on the expertise of some of the leading scholars in the field. They’ve been asked to explore the role that Parliament has played to date on Brexit, as well as the challenges and opportunities that Parliament is likely to face during phase two of the UK-EU negotiations. I’d like to express my heartfelt thanks to Tim Bale, Adam Cygan and Meg Russell (very ably assisted by Lisa James) for pulling this report together. It is they who have marshalled the various contributors and ensured that what follows is of the highest possible standard. I’d also like to thank the contributors for responding enthusiastically and efficiently to comments, suggestions and edits. Finally, thanks also go to Navjyot Lehl, who has coordinated the whole process and managed the design of the report with her customary professionalism and good humour. The report that follows makes an important and original contribution on an extremely important topic. I hope you find it both interesting and enlightening. Professor Anand Menon, Director, The UK in a Changing Europe Printed March 2020 The UK in a Changing Europe is an impartial and independent organisation created to make the findings of academic research easily available to the widest possible audience.
  • Brexit Timeline

    Brexit Timeline

    BREXIT TIMELINE BREXIT TIMELINE 1 BREXIT TIMELINE 6 December 2005 David Cameron becomes Conservative leader David Cameron wins the leadership of the Conservative Party. In the campaign, he promises to take the party out of the European People’s Party (EPP) grouping in the European Parliament 1 October 2006 Cameron first conference speech In his first conference speech, David Cameron implores his party to stop ‘banging on about Europe’ 4 June 2009 European Parliament elections The 2009 European Parliament elections see the UK Independence Party (UKIP) finished second in a major election for the first time in its history. 22 June 2009 Conservative Party form new grouping Conservative MEPs form part of a new group in the European Conservatives and Reformists group (ECR), as the party formally leaves the EPP. 20 May 2010 Coalition agrees to status quo on Europe The Coalition Agreement is published, which states that ‘Britain should play a leading role in an enlarged European Union, but that no further powers should be transferred to Brussels without a referendum.’ 5 May 2011 Alternative Vote referendum The UK holds a referendum on electoral reform and a move to the Alternative Vote. The No to AV campaign – led by many figures who would go on to be part of Vote Leave – wins decisively by a margin of 68% to 32%. 9 December 2011 David Cameron vetoes The Prime Minister vetoes treaty change designed to help manage the Eurozone crisis, arguing it is not in the UK’s interest – particularly in restrictions the changes might place on financial services. 23 January 2013 The Bloomberg Speech In a speech at Bloomberg’s offices in central London, David Cameron sets out his views on the future of the EU and the need for reform and a new UK-EU settlement.
  • Brexit: Status and Outlook

    Brexit: Status and Outlook

    Brexit: Status and Outlook Derek E. Mix, Coordinator Analyst in European Affairs Shayerah Ilias Akhtar Specialist in International Trade and Finance Kristin Archick Specialist in European Affairs October 4, 2019 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov R45944 SUMMARY R45944 Brexit: Status and Outlook October 4, 2019 After the 2016 referendum in which 52% of voters in the United Kingdom (UK) favored leaving the European Union (EU), Brexit was originally scheduled to occur on March 29, 2019. In early Derek E. Mix, Coordinator 2019, however, Parliament repeatedly rejected the withdrawal agreement negotiated between Analyst in European Affairs Prime Minister Theresa May’s government and the EU without supporting any alternative. In [email protected] April 2019, the EU granted the UK an extension until October 31, 2019. Shayerah Ilias Akhtar Specialist in International Recent Developments and Possible Scenarios Trade and Finance After becoming Prime Minister in July 2019, Boris Johnson asserted that Brexit will take place [email protected] on October 31 and that he will not request another extension. Johnson declared his intention to Kristin Archick renegotiate a new agreement with the EU that drops the Northern Ireland backstop provision, Specialist in European which would keep the UK in the EU customs union until the two sides agreed on their future Affairs trade relationship. The backstop provision was included in the rejected withdrawal agreement as [email protected] an insurance policy to maintain an open border between Northern Ireland (part of the UK) and the Republic of Ireland (an EU member state) while safeguarding the rules of the EU single For a copy of the full report, market.
  • Votes and Proceedings for 5 Nov 2019

    Votes and Proceedings for 5 Nov 2019

    No. 15 Tuesday 5 November 2019 Votes and Proceedings The House met at 11.30 am. Prayers 1 Questions to the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs 2 Urgent Question: Intelligence and Security Committee report on Russia (Christopher Pincher) 3 Statement: Thomas Cook customers (Secretary Andrea Leadsom) 4 Historical Institutional Abuse (Northern Ireland) Bill [Lords]: Second Reading Bill read a second time. Motion made and Question put forthwith (Standing Order No. 63(2), That the Bill be committed to a Committee of the whole House.—(Maggie Throup.) Question agreed to. Committee today. 5 Historical Institutional Abuse (Northern Ireland) Bill [Lords]: Committee of the whole House The House resolved itself into a Committee (Order, today). (In the Committee) Clauses 1 to 34 agreed to. Schedules 1 and 2 agreed to. Bill to be reported, without Amendment. ________________ The Deputy Speaker resumed the Chair. Maggie Throup reported, That the Committee had gone through the Bill and made no Amendment. 6 Historical Institutional Abuse (Northern Ireland) Bill [Lords]: Third Reading Bill read the third time and passed, without Amendment. 2 Votes and Proceedings: 5 November 2019 No. 15 7 Business of the House (Today) Ordered, That, at this day’s sitting, the Speaker shall not adjourn the House until he has reported the Royal Assent to any Act agreed upon by both Houses.—(Maggie Throup.) 8 Valedictory debate Motion made and Question proposed, That this House has considered matters to be raised before the forthcoming Dissolution.—(Maggie Throup.) The Deputy Speaker announced a time limit on backbench speeches (Standing Order No.
  • Bill [AS AMENDED at STAGE 2]

    Bill [AS AMENDED at STAGE 2]

    Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill [AS AMENDED AT STAGE 2] CONTENTS Section PART 1 INTERPRETATION Application of Part 1 1 Application of Part 1 Commencement 2 Commencement of Acts of the Scottish Parliament 3 Commencement of Acts of the Scottish Parliament and Scottish instruments: time Powers 4 Exercise of powers before commencement of Act of the Scottish Parliament 5 Power to appoint to an office 6 Power to revoke, amend and re-enact 7 Carrying out of powers and duties more than once 8 Additional powers on commencement by order References to legislative provisions 9 References to Acts of the Scottish Parliament 10 References to Acts of Parliament 11 References to Acts of the Parliaments of Scotland 12 References to EU instruments 13 References to portions of legislative provisions 14 References to other legislative provisions Repeals 15 Effect of repeal generally 16 Effect of repeal on existing rights 17 Effect of repeal on existing liability to certain penalties 18 Temporary Acts of the Scottish Parliament and Scottish instruments 19 Effect of repeal and re-enactment Application of legislation to the Crown 20 Application of Acts and instruments to the Crown Forms 21 Forms SP Bill 27A Session 3 (2010) ii Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill Meaning of words and expressions used in legislation 22 Number 23 References to time of day 24 Meaning of words and expressions used in instruments 25 Definitions 26 Service of documents PART 2 SCOTTISH STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS Definition 27 Definition of “Scottish
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)

    Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)

    Tuesday Volume 620 31 January 2017 No. 102 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Tuesday 31 January 2017 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2017 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 793 31 JANUARY 2017 794 have set a target to grow this sector by a further 10% of House of Commons global share in the next two decades. What more money could be put into the satellite sector from the industrial Tuesday 31 January 2017 strategy challenge fund? Greg Clark: My hon. Friend raises an important The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock point. We say in the strategy that we should build on our strengths, and the satellite sector is a shining British PRAYERS strength that is creating huge numbers of jobs. It is specified throughout the industrial strategy as an area [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] in which we want the industry to work together to ensure that, in particular, we are training the technicians ROYAL ASSENT and engineers of the future, which is what we have been doing. Mr Speaker: I have to notify the House, in accordance with the Royal Assent Act 1967, that the Queen has Mr Adrian Bailey (West Bromwich West) (Lab/Co-op): signified her Royal Assent to the following Acts: The industrial strategy rightly points out the crucial Policing and Crime Act 2017 significance of investment in science for our future economy and productivity.Given that the USA, Germany Wales Act 2017.
  • Brexit: Status and Outlook

    Brexit: Status and Outlook

    Brexit: Status and Outlook Updated February 13, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45944 SUMMARY R45944 Brexit: Status and Outlook February 13, 2020 The United Kingdom (UK) formally withdrew from membership in the European Union (EU) on January 31, 2020. Under the withdrawal agreement negotiated by the two sides, the UK is to Derek E. Mix, Coordinator continue applying EU rules during a transition period scheduled to run through the end of 2020. Analyst in European Affairs During the transition period, the UK and the EU are expected to begin negotiating the terms of their future relationship, including trade and economic relations as well as cooperation on foreign policy, security, and a range of other issues. Shayerah Ilias Akhtar Specialist in International Trade and Finance Overview of Developments After the 2016 referendum in which 52% of voters in the UK favored leaving the EU, Brexit was Kristin Archick originally scheduled to occur in March 2019. In early 2019, Parliament repeatedly rejected the Specialist in European withdrawal agreement negotiated between then-Prime Minister Theresa May’s government and Affairs the EU. Boris Johnson became prime minister in July 2019, following May’s resignation. Given continued deadlock over Brexit in the UK, the EU granted the UK a series of extensions. In October 2019, EU and UK negotiators reached a new withdrawal agreement altering the Northern Ireland backstop provision, which was a main sticking point to Parliament passing the original deal. Under the new deal, Northern Ireland (part of the UK) is to maintain regulatory alignment with the EU (essentially creating a customs border in the Irish Sea) to preserve an open border with the Republic of Ireland (an EU member state) while safeguarding the rules of the EU single market.