Importance of Native Vegetation to Beneficial Insects and Its Role in Reducing Insect Pest Damage in Cotton
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Importance of native vegetation to beneficial insects and its role in reducing insect pest damage in cotton I.C. Rencken1,2, L. Silberbauer1,2, N. Reid12 and P. Gregg1,3 1 Australia and Australian Cotton Cooperative Research Centre, AUSTRALIA 2 School of Environmental Science and Natural Resource Management, University of New England, Armidale NSW AUSTRALIA 3 School of Rural Science and Agriculture, University of New England, Armidale NSW AUSTRALIA Correspondence author [email protected]; [email protected] Importance of native vegetation to beneficial insects and its role in reducing insect pest damage in cotton ABSTRACT Introduction Conservation biological control is one of the strat- Australian cotton production extends from south- western New South Wales to Emerald in central egies in integrated pest management (IPM). Its aim Queensland. Insect pests are a major constraint to is to conserve naturally occurring predators within cotton production and cause estimated yield losses of the agricultural landscape. Modifying the land- between 50-90% (Fitt, 1994). Most control measures scape to enhance predator efficiency, referred to are directed at Helicoverpa armigera and Helicoverpa as habitat management, is one of the methods used punctigera (bollworms). Other pests include Tetranychus in conservation biological control. Habitat man- urticae (red spider mite), Thrips tabaci (thrips), Aphis gossyppi (aphids), Austroasca viridgrisea (jassids) and agement, until recently has largely been ignored Bemesia tabaci (whitefly) (Fitt, 1994). Chemical pesti- within many IPM programs. Area wide manage- cides play an important role in control. More recently ment of pests has changed this perception and production costs, environmental issues and concerns there is now a realisation that events outside the about resistance have all contributed to reducing the crop impacts on events within the crop. Many dependence on chemical pesticides. The Australian generalist predators have been identified within cotton industry is exploring alternative measures with varying amounts of success. Some examples include cotton agro-ecosystems in Australia. To be effec- the use of new generation pesticides, host plant resis- tive, large populations of generalist predators are tance, beneficial insects, habitat diversity and transgenic required within the cotton agro-ecosystem before Bt cottons directed at Helicoverpa control (Fitt, 2000). pest establishment within the cotton. The surround- ing native vegetation, weeds and winter crops pro- Bt cotton has the potential to reduce pesticide vide resources for generalist predators. The man- use by as much as 50-70% (Fitt, 2000). The adoption of Bt cotton, along with a resistance management pro- agement of these resources provides the key in gram has been gradual and controlled in Australia (Fitt generating and maintaining populations of gen- and Wilson, 2000). Whilst there are concerns about eralist predators within the cotton agro-ecosystem. the use of transgenic plants, the reduction in pesticide The aim of this study (which is in its first year) is to sprays should improve the survival rate of beneficial investigate a range of vegetation types and as- insects in cotton production areas. Beneficial insects sess their value in supporting populations of gen- may play a critical role in maintaining populations of pests species not controlled by the Bt cotton. Reports eralist predators with the view to enhancing the from the USA suggest that pest complexes may change predator efficiency in cotton agro-ecosystems. The as a result of the use of Bt cotton (Turnipseed and following vegetation types were sampled: open Greene, 1996). woodland with hummock grassland and other her- baceous plants, sown pasture, dry land lucerne, a The importance of beneficial insects and the con- windbreak of planted native trees and open river- tribution they make towards pest control within IPM pro- grams is recognized by the Australian cotton industry. ine forest. The sampling was carried out with a A review of beneficial insect research in the Australian suction sampler and all collected predators identi- cotton industry identified 123 predatory species that fied. Soil samples were also collected to establish feed on Helicoverpa and red spider mite (Johnson, et over wintering sites of predators. The age and al., 2000). The report also highlighted the lack of phenology of vegetation was recorded to identify knowledge surrounding the biology and ecology of resources, e.g. flowers provided by vegetation these predators. The reductions in pesticide use and selection of “softer” sprays have contributed to con- types. The presence of juveniles was also noted as serving beneficial insects. However, this is only the first this indicates the presence of oviposition sites. The step and further research is required to understand the movement of predators from the surrounding veg- ecology of beneficial insects. This will aid in establish- etation into newly planted cotton fields was inves- ing a framework for manipulating the agricultural en- tigated with colonization studies. Newly planted vironment to maximize the effectiveness of beneficial fields were sampled at weekly intervals to estab- insects (Johnson, et al., 2000). The focus of most IPM programs has been within the field and ecological pro- lish the colonization pattern of the field. The pat- cesses outside of fields have largely been ignored. tern is an indicator of predator mobility, which has Views of control strategies are changing and with the implications for the management of resources, and adoption of area wide pest management there is a re- sampling of the cotton. The preliminary results alization that the habitat surrounding cropped and fal- are presented and discussed. low fields should also be included when considering pest management strategies (Landis and Marino 1999). 1360 World Cotton Research Conference-3 2003 Cape Town - South Africa Most agricultural landscapes are dominated by Experimental procedure large fields with straight edges, generally low levels of plant and animal diversity with high levels of distur- A cotton production area was selected along the bance (Landis and Marino, 1999). Australian cotton Mauls Creek road in the Namoi valley in northern New farms vary in size from 500 to 15000 ha of produc- South Wales, Australia. The site had a number of dis- tion. Cotton agro-ecosystems range from virtual mo- tinct non-crop vegetation types. The vegetation types nocultures surrounded by grazing pastures to diverse were all within a 2 km radius of each other and adjoin- cropping systems with winter and summer crops (Fitt, ing cotton properties. The following vegetation types 1994). This arrangement can result in the fragmenta- were identified; a planted native windbreak (north/south tion and isolation of non-crop habitats. Pests seem to aspect and east/west aspect), riverine trees (two sites), behave differently in these simplified ecosystems and communal grazing lands (two sites), pastures (two sites) have larger populations and higher reproduction rates and dry land lucerne (two sites). An opportunist weed, (Speight, 1993). This, however, does not seem to be turnip weed (Rapistrum rugosum) and an irrigated win- the case for beneficial insects as they appear to require ter wheat crop were also sampled. Irrigated cotton certain resources which are lacking in some agricul- was sampled adjacent to the non-crop vegetation dur- tural systems. A means of mitigating the negative ef- ing the cotton growing season. fects of agricultural disturbances is to reintroduce di- versity within the agricultural landscape (Speight, 1993). All the vegetation was sampled with a suction sampler (modified Homelite HB Blower Vac). A 100 m Through manipulating and conserving the veg- x 200 m rectangle was marked out in the communal etation around agricultural fields, it may be possible to grazing lands, dryland lucerne and pastures. The long make essential resources available to predators, thus axis of the rectangle was divided into five equal parts moderating the impact of disturbances on natural of 20 m. One randomly selected 20 m transect was predator populations (Altieri and Letourneau, 1982). sampled within each 20 m x 20 m sub-plot on each Resources used by predators include overwintering sites, sampling occasion. Insects from each sample were breeding sites, alternate food sources, pollen and fa- collected in a gauze net bag, transferred into a plastic vorable microclimates (Landis et al., 2000). It is, how- bag and frozen on site prior to transport to the Univer- ever, important to select vegetation that provides re- sity of New England for sorting. sources required by the generalist predators (Speight 1993) and does not favor pests. The windbreaks were comprised of 12 native trees species that were randomly planted along the north/ It has been well documented that increasing crop south and east/west border of the cotton property. In diversity within cotton agro-ecosystems through plant- each windbreak, three tree species were identified and ing lucerne strips or alternate crops such as sorghum five replicates of each species were sampled with the and winter wheat enhances beneficial insect numbers suction sampler. The sampling unit was an individual (Walker et al., 1997; Mensah and Kahn, 1997). There tree, sampling the branches at 1.5 m height for a pe- is a production cost in planting lucerne strips and it is riod of two minutes. Trees sampled in north/south