Middle Eocene Lisbon Formation Miles O0123452 3 4 5

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Middle Eocene Lisbon Formation Miles O0123452 3 4 5 THE LITHOSTRATIGRAPHIC FRAMEWORK OF THE UPPERMOST CRETACEOUS AND LOWER TERTIARY OF EASTERN BURKE COUNTY, GEORGIA Paul F. Huddlestun and Joseph H. Summerour GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Lonice C. Barrett, CommissionerCommhioner ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION Harold F. Reheis, Director GEORGIA GEOLOGIC SURVEY William H. McLemore, State Geologist Atlanta 19961906 Bulletin 127 ABSTRACT One new formation, two new members, and a reclefhitionredefinition of an established lithostratigraphic unit are formally introduced here. The Oconee Group is formally recognized in the Savannah River area and four South Carolina Formations not previously used in Georgia by the Georgia Geologic Survey are recognized in easterndrnBurke County. The Still Branch Sand is a new formation and the two new members are the Bennock Millpond Sand Member of the Still Branch Sand and the Blue Bluff Member of the Lisbon Formation. The four South CarolinaCarob formations recognized in eastern Burke CountyCountY include the Steel Creek Formation and Snapp Formation of the Oconee Group, the Black Mingo Formation (undifferentiated), and the Congaree Formation. The Congaree Formation and Still Branch Sand are considered to be lithostratigraphic components of the Claiborne Group. The Congaree Formation is included in the Claiborne Group because it extends westward to the Chattahoochee River area of Georgia and Alabama, and perhaps farther west into Alabama. In this area, the Congaree has been called the TallahatlaTallahatta Formation for many years and the Alabama and w-rnwestern Georgia "Tallahatta""Tallahatla" is an essential formation of the Claiborne Group. The age and correlation of all of the lithostratigraphic unitaunits are discussed. In addition, the Pen Branch fault is recognized in the vicinity of Hancock Landing in eastern Burke County. i TABLETABLE OFOF CONrENTSCONTENlW IN"TRODUCTIONINTRODUCTION ............................................................1............................................................ 1 PurposePurposeandSeopeand Scope ..................................................... 11 LocationLocationofStudyAreaof Study Area .................................................. 11 PhysiographicPhysiographicsettingSetting ................................................... 11 PreviousPreviousWorkWork ....................................................... 11 MethodsMethods ............................................................. 33 AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements ..................................................... 33 GEOLOGYGEOLOGY ANDAND HYDROLOGYHYDROLOGY .................................................5 5 GeologicGeologicSettingSetting .......................................................5 5 HydrogeologicHydrogeologicSettingSetting ...................................................66 StructuralStruch.lralFeature~sFeatures ........................................................................................................ 10 10 STRATIGRAPHYSTRATIGRAPHY ...........................................................12 12 OconeeOconeeGroupGroup ................................................................................................................12 12 SteelSteelCreekFormationCreek Formation ........................................................................................1414 SnappSnappFormationFormation ................................................................................................1717 Undift'erentiatedUndifferentiatedBLackMingoFormationBlack Mingo Formation ...............................2323 ClaiborneClaiborneGroupGroup ......................................................3131 CongareeCongareeFormationFormation ............................................................................................3333 StillStillBranchSandBranch Sand ...............................................4343 BennockBennock MillpondMillpond SandSand Member.Member ............................................................. 4848 LisbonLisbonFormationFormation ...............................................5363 BlueBlue BluffBluff MemberMember ..................................................................................5656 McBeanMcBean LimestoneLimestone MemberMember ..................................6262 BarnwellBarnwellGroupGroup ..............................................................................................................6464 ClinchfieldClincMeldFomationFormation ..........................................................................................6666 UtleyUtley LimestoneLimestone MemberMember ....................................6666 DryDryBranchFormationBranch Formation ........................................................................................6868 TwiggsTwiggs ClayClay LithofaciesLithofacies .....................................7070 GriffinsGriflins LandingLanding MemberMember ........................................................................ 7070 IrwintonIrwinton SandSand MemberMember ............................................................................7171 TobaccoTobaccoRoadSandRoad Sand ..............................................7272 REFERENCESREFERENCESCITEDCITED .......................................................73 73 FIGURESFIGURES 1. IndexIndex mapmap ofof easterneastern BurkeBurke CountyCounty .........................................22 2. IndexIndex mapmap ofof corecore samplessamples withinwithin thethe Trans-RiverTrans-River FlowFlow ProjectProject areaarea ................4 4 3. TritiumTritium ProjectProject stratigraphicstratigraphic andand hydrostratigraphichydrostratigraphic unitsunits .........................7......................... 7 4. CorrelationCorrelation chartchart forfor thethe TritiumTritium ProjectProject studystudy areaarea andand a<ljacentadjacent regionsregions ..............88 5. North-southNorth-south cross-sectioncross-section betweenbetween TR92-4TR92-4 andand TR92-3TR92-3 ...........................99 6. MapMap showingshowing locationlocation ofof DunbartonDunbarton basinbasin andand PenPen BranchBranch andand MartinMartin faultsfaults onon SRSSRS ........ 1111 7. StructureStructure contourcontour mapmap ofof thethe toptop ofof thethe SteelSteel CreekCreek FormationFormation ....................1818 8. SnappSnapp FormationFormation isopachisopach mapmap ........................................................................................ 2121 9. StructureStructure contourcontour mapmap ofof thethe toptop ofof thethe SnappSnapp FormationFormation ................................................ 2222 10. UndifferentiatedUndifferentiated BlackBlack MingoMingo FormationFormation isopachisopach mapmap ...........................2727 ii 11. StructureStructure contourcontour mapmap ofof thethe toptop ofof thethe Undi1ferentiated.UndifferentiatedBlack Black MingoMingo FormationFormation .......28 28 12. Undi1ferentiated.UndifferentiatedBlack BWsMingo/Snapp Mingo/Snapp FormationsFormations isopachieopach mapmap ..................... 2929 13. CongareeCongarseFomtioniaopaCnmapFormation isopach map .................................................................................... 3939 14. StructureStructure contourcontour mapmap ofof thethe toptop ofof thethe CongareeCongaree FormationFormation ............................................ 4040 15. StillStiLlBranchSandiaopachmapBranch Sand isopach map ........................................................................................ 4646 16. StructureStructure contourcontour mapmap ofof thethe toptop ofof thethe StillStillBranch Branch SandSand ................................................ 4747 17. LisbonLisbon Formationc or mat ion isopach'bopach mapmap ........................................................................................ 5767 18. StructureStructure contourcontour mapmap ofof thethetop top ofof thethe LisbonLisbon FormationFormation ................................................ 6868 19. GeologicGeologic mapmap showingshaKingextent extent ofof BarnwellBarnwell GroupGroup ..............................................................65 66 TABLESTABLES 1. CoreCoredatafmmstudyareadata from study area ................................................5................................................ 6 2. CoreCore datadata fromfmm outsideoutside studystudy areaarea .......................................... 66 3. SteelSteel CreekCreek FormationFormation referencereference sectionssectionsin in easterneastern BurkeBurke Coun~County .................................... 1516 4. ThicknessThicknessvariationsforvariations for SteelSteel CreekCreekFormationFormation ................................................................ 1717 5. SnappSnapp FormationFormation referencereference sectionssections inin thethe SavannahSavannah RiverRiver areaarea ................... 1919 6. Undi1ferentiatedUndifferentiated BlackBlack MingoMingo FormationFormation referencereference sectionssections inin .....................25 26 7. CongareeCongaree FormationFormation referencereference sectionssections inin easterneastern BurkeBurke Coun~County ...................3536 8. CongareeCongaree FormationFormation referencereference sectionssections inin GeorgiaGeorgia westwest ofof BurkeBurke Coun~County .............36 36 9. StillStill BranchBranch SandSand referencereference sectionssections ................................................................................4546 10. BennockBennock MillpondMillpond SandSand MemberMember referencereference
Recommended publications
  • Download Guidebook As .Pdf
    CAROLINA GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY FIELD TRIP GUIDEBOOK November 13 – 15, 1992 GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF THE CENTRAL SAVANNAH RIVER AREA, SOUTH CAROLINA AND GEORGIA edited by Wallace Fallaw Department of Geology, Furman University, Greenville, SC 29613 Van Price Environmental Monitoring section, Westinghouse Savannah River Co., Aiken SC 29808 Front cover: Topography of the Central Savannah River Valley and surrounding area looking up-river. Copies of this guidebook can be obtained from: South Carolina Geological Survey Harbison Forest Road Columbia, South Carolina 29210-4089 ii WE THANK THESE CORPORATE SPONSORS FOR THEIR SUPPORT OF THE 1992 CAROLINA GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY MEETING J.H. HUBER CORPORATION Langley, South Carolina KENNECOTT RIDGEWAY MINING COMPANY Ridgeway, South Carolina RMT, INC. Greenville, South Carolina SOUTHEASTERN CLAY COMPANY Aiken, South Carolina GERAGHTY AND MILLER INC. Aiken, South Carolina FOSTER DIXIANA CORP. Columbia, South Carolina EXPLORATION RESOURCES INC. Athens, Georgia The United States Department of Energy and the South Carolina Geological Survey provided partial support for this guidebook. However, the opinions and interpretations expressed within are not necessarily those of the Department of Energy or the South Carolina Geological Survey. iii CONTENTS Road Log and Outcrops in the vicinity of the Savannah River Site (W.C. Fallaw, Van Price and Walter J. Sex- ton) . .. .1 Observations on general allo-stratigraphy and tectonic framework of the southeastern Atlantic Coast Regional Cross Section (DNAG E-5 Corridor) Georgia and South Carolina as they relate to the Savan- nah River Site. (Donald Colquhoun). .. .11 Outline of stratigraphy at the Savannah River Site. (W. C. Fallaw and Van Price) . .17 Stratigraphic relationships in Eocene out crops along Upper Three Runs at the Savannah River Site.
    [Show full text]
  • B-127 Lithostratigraphic Framework Of
    &A 'NlOO,G-3 &i flo, 12 7 g l F£i&f THE LITHOSTRATIGRAPHIC FRAMEWORK OF \;\ .-t "- THE UPPERMOST CRETACEOUS AND LOWER TERTIARY OF EASTERN BURKE COUNTY, GEORGIA Paul F. Huddlestun and Joseph H. Summerour Work Performed in Cooperation with United States Geological Survey (Cooperative Agreement Number 1434-92-A-0959) and U. S. Department of Energy (Cooperative Agreement Number DE-FG-09-92SR12868) GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION GEORGIA GEOLOGIC SURVEY Atlanta 1996 Bulletin 127 THE LITHOSTRATIGRAPHIC FRAMEWORK OF THE UPPERMOST CRETACEOUS AND LOWER TERTIARY OF EASTERN BURKE COUNTY, GEORGIA Paul F. Huddlestun and Joseph H. Summerour GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Lonice C. Barrett, Commissioner ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION Harold F. Reheis, Director GEORGIA GEOLOGIC SURVEY William H. McLemore, State Geologist Atlanta 1996 Bulletin 127 ABSTRACT One new formation, two new members, and a redefinition of an established lithostratigraphic unit are formally introduced here. The Oconee Group is formally recognized in the Savannah River area and four South Carolina Formations not previously used in Georgia by the Georgia Geologic Survey are recognized in eastern Burke County. The Still Branch Sand is a new formation and the two new members are the Bennock Millpond Sand Member of the Still Branch Sand and the Blue Bluff Member of the Lisbon Formation. The four South Carolina formations recognized in eastern Burke CountY include the Steel Creek Formation and Snapp Formation of the Oconee Group, the Black Mingo Formation (undifferentiated), and the Congaree Formation. The Congaree Formation and Still Branch Sand are considered to be lithostratigraphic components of the Claiborne Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Resources Inventory Map Document for Congaree National Park
    U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Directorate Geologic Resources Division Congaree National Park GRI Ancillary Map Information Document Produced to accompany the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) Digital Geologic Data for Congaree National Park cong_geology.pdf Version: 1/27/2014 I Congaree National Park Geologic Resources Inventory Map Document for Congaree National Park Table of Contents Geolog.i.c. .R...e..s.o..u..r.c..e..s.. .I.n..v.e..n..t.o..r..y. .M...a..p.. .D..o..c..u..m...e..n..t....................................................................... 1 About th..e.. .N...P..S.. .G...e..o..l.o..g..i.c. .R...e..s.o..u..r.c..e..s.. .I.n..v.e..n..t.o..r..y. .P...r.o..g..r.a..m........................................................... 2 GRI Dig.i.t.a..l. .M...a..p.. .a..n..d.. .S..o..u..r.c..e.. .M...a..p.. .C..i.t.a..t.i.o..n..s............................................................................. 4 Map Un.i.t. .L..i.s..t.......................................................................................................................... 5 Map Un.i.t. .D..e..s..c..r.i.p..t.i.o..n..s............................................................................................................. 7 Qme - M...o..v..e..d.. .e..a..r.t.h.. .(..H..o..l.o..c..e..n..e..).................................................................................................................................... 7 Qfw - F..r..e..s..h..w...a..t.e..r. .m...a..r.s..h.. .a..n..d.. .s..w....a..m..p.. .d..e..p..o..s..i.t.s.. .(.H...o..lo..c..e..n..e..)........................................................................................ 7 Qslk - S..a..n..d..h..i.l.ls.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy and Depositional Environments of Sediments from Five Cores from Screven and Burke Counties, Georgia by W
    U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Stratigraphy and Depositional Environments of Sediments from Five Cores from Screven and Burke Counties, Georgia By W. Fred Falls and David C. Prowell U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1603-A Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Energy and the Georgia Geologic Survey GEOLOGY AND PALEONTOLOGY OF FIVE CORES FROM SCREVEN AND BURKE COUNTIES, EASTERN GEORGIA Edited by Lucy E. Edwards CONTENTS Abstract Al Introduction . 1 Test Hole and Core Information 2 Previous Work 4 Acknowledgments 4 Stratigraphic Framework................................................................................................. 4 Cretaceous Stratigraphy 7 Cape Fear Formation 9 Middendorf Formation 10 Black Creek Group 10 Steel Creek Formation 11 Tertiary Stratigraphy 12 Ellenton Formation 12 Snapp Formation 13 Fourmile Branch/CongareelWarley Hill Unit 13 Santee Limestone 14 Barnwell Unit -............................................................................................. 16 Summary 17 References Cited 17 FIGURES 1. Index map showing the Savannah River Site and the location of stratigraphic test holes in the study area A2 2. Correlation diagram showing a generalized comparison of Cretaceous and Tertiary geologic units in the Southeastern United States 3 3-5. Gamma-ray, single-point resistance, and lithologic logs and geologic units of the- 3. Millhaven test hole in Screven County, Ga............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Synoptic Taxonomy of Major Fossil Groups
    APPENDIX Synoptic Taxonomy of Major Fossil Groups Important fossil taxa are listed down to the lowest practical taxonomic level; in most cases, this will be the ordinal or subordinallevel. Abbreviated stratigraphic units in parentheses (e.g., UCamb-Ree) indicate maximum range known for the group; units followed by question marks are isolated occurrences followed generally by an interval with no known representatives. Taxa with ranges to "Ree" are extant. Data are extracted principally from Harland et al. (1967), Moore et al. (1956 et seq.), Sepkoski (1982), Romer (1966), Colbert (1980), Moy-Thomas and Miles (1971), Taylor (1981), and Brasier (1980). KINGDOM MONERA Class Ciliata (cont.) Order Spirotrichia (Tintinnida) (UOrd-Rec) DIVISION CYANOPHYTA ?Class [mertae sedis Order Chitinozoa (Proterozoic?, LOrd-UDev) Class Cyanophyceae Class Actinopoda Order Chroococcales (Archean-Rec) Subclass Radiolaria Order Nostocales (Archean-Ree) Order Polycystina Order Spongiostromales (Archean-Ree) Suborder Spumellaria (MCamb-Rec) Order Stigonematales (LDev-Rec) Suborder Nasselaria (Dev-Ree) Three minor orders KINGDOM ANIMALIA KINGDOM PROTISTA PHYLUM PORIFERA PHYLUM PROTOZOA Class Hexactinellida Order Amphidiscophora (Miss-Ree) Class Rhizopodea Order Hexactinosida (MTrias-Rec) Order Foraminiferida* Order Lyssacinosida (LCamb-Rec) Suborder Allogromiina (UCamb-Ree) Order Lychniscosida (UTrias-Rec) Suborder Textulariina (LCamb-Ree) Class Demospongia Suborder Fusulinina (Ord-Perm) Order Monaxonida (MCamb-Ree) Suborder Miliolina (Sil-Ree) Order Lithistida
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1603-H
    Chap H-front.fm Page I Tuesday, July 11, 2000 9:25 AM U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Pollen Biostratigraphy of Lower Tertiary Sediments from Five Cores from Screven and Burke Counties, Georgia By Norman O. Frederiksen U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1603–H Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Energy and the Georgia Geologic Survey GEOLOGY AND PALEONTOLOGY OF FIVE CORES FROM SCREVEN AND BURKE COUNTIES, EASTERN GEORGIA Edited by Lucy E. Edwards Chap-H-contents.fm Page III Tuesday, July 11, 2000 9:28 AM CONTENTS Abstract .......................................................................................................................... H1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................1 Acknowledgments .................................................................................................. 2 Material and Methods .................................................................................................... 2 Correlations and Age Determinations ............................................................................ 2 Millhaven Test Hole........................................................................................................ 2 Ellenton Formation ................................................................................................. 2 Snapp Formation .................................................................................................... 6 Congaree Formation
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Paleontology of Five Cores from Screven and Burke Counties, Eastern Georgia
    U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Geology and Paleontology of Five Cores from Screven and Burke Counties, Eastern Georgia U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1603 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Energy and the Georgia Geologic Survey USGS science for a changing world Availability of Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey Order U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) publications by calling Documents. Check or money order must be payable to the the toll-free telephone number 1-888-ASK-USGS or contact­ Superintendent of Documents. Order by mail from— ing the offices listed below. Detailed ordering instructions, along with prices of the last offerings, are given in the cur­ Superintendent of Documents rent-year issues of the catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Government Printing Office Geological Survey." Washington, DC 20402 Books, Maps, and Other Publications Information Periodicals By Mail Many Information Periodicals products are available through Books, maps, and other publications are available by mail the systems or formats listed below: from— Printed Products USGS Information Services Box 25286, Federal Center Printed copies of the Minerals Yearbook and the Mineral Com­ Denver, CO 80225 modity Summaries can be ordered from the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office (address above). Publications include Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water- Printed copies of Metal Industry Indicators and Mineral Indus­ Supply Papers, Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, try Surveys can be ordered from the Center for Disease Control Circulars, Fact Sheets, publications of general interest, single and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and copies of permanent USGS catalogs, and topographic and Health.
    [Show full text]
  • FOR the COASTAL PLAIN of NORTH CAROLINA ~--E Roy"- Tj Y"",Cf'
    STRUCTURAL AND STRATIGRAPHIC FRAMEWORK FOR THE COASTAL PLAIN OF NORTH CAROLINA ~--e roY"- tJ y"",cf' Edited By Gerald R. Baum T:~-- w. Burleigh Harris ) And !~- Victor A. Zullo ;' -j Carolina Geological Society Field Trip Guidebook And October 19-21, 1979 Atlantic Coastal Plain Geological Association Wrightsville Beach, North Carolina Cover illustration: Major structural features of the North Carolina Coastal Plain. (Figure 1 from Harris, Zullo and Baum) Layout by Anne Virant-Lazar and Ben McKenzie Copies of this guidebook can be purchased fram: Geological Survey Section Department of Natural Resources and Community Development P. O. Box 27687 Raleigh, NC 27611 Ii CAROLI NA GEOLOGI CAL SOC IETY AND ATLANTIC COASTAL PLAIN GEOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION October 19-21, 1979 STRUCTURAL AND STRATIGRAPHIC FRAMEWORK FOR THE COASTAL PLAIN OF NORTH CAROLINA Edited by Gerald R. Baum Department of Geology College of Charleston Charleston, South Carolina 29401 W. Burleigh Harris and Victor A. Zullo Department of Earth Sciences University of North Carolina, Wilmington Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 Carolina Geological Society 1979 Officers President: Arthur W. Snoke Department of Geology University of South Carolina Columbia, South Carolina Vice-President: Robert E. Lemmon Department of Geography and Earth Sciences University of North Carolina at Charlotte Charlotte, North Carolina Secretary-Treasurer: S. Duncan Heron, Jr. Department of Geology Duke University Durham, North Carolina Membership Chairman: Paul Nystrom South Carolina Geological Survey Columbia, South Carolina Atlantic Coastal Plain Geological Association 1979 Officers Secretary-Treasurer: Tom Pickett Delaware Geological Survey University of Delaware Newark, Delaware Field Trip Leaders: Gerald R. Baum Department of Geology College of Charleston Charleston, South Carolina W.
    [Show full text]
  • Brachyura, Epialtidae
    Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica Mexicana / 73 (3) / A261220/ 2021 / 1 A new spider crab (Brachyura, Epialtidae) from the Castle Hayne Limestone Formation (Eocene), North Carolina, USA Un nuevo cangrejo araña (Brachyura, Epialtidae) de la Formación Caliza Castle Hayne (Eoceno), Carolina del Norte, EUA 1,* 2 1 Alessandro Garassino , Giovanni Pasini , Don Clements ABSTRACT 1 North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, ABSTRACT RESUMEN 11 West Jones Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27601, USA. A new spider crab, Eoinachoides bretoni Se describe un nuevo cangrejo araña, 2 Via Alessandro Volta 16, 22070 Appiano n. sp. (Epialtidae MacLeay, 1838) Eoinachoides bretoni n. sp. (Epialtidae Gentile (Como), Italy. from the Comfort Member of the MacLeay, 1838) del Miembro Comfort de * Corresponding author: (A. Garassino) Castle Hayne Formation (Eocene) la Formación Castle Hayne (Eoceno) en el [email protected] of Onslow County, North Carolina Condado de Onslow, Carolina del Norte (USA), is herein described, represent- (EUA), representa el segundo cangrejo ing the second spider crab recovered araña encontrado en este miembro. Aunque from this member. Although the la nueva especie no extiende el alcance estra- new species does not enlarge the tigráfico del género, restringido actualmente stratigraphical range for the genus al Eoceno-Mioceno, es el primer reporte para which is currently restricted from Norteamérica, extendiendo la distribución the Eocene to Miocene, it is the first paleobiogeográfica de Eoinachoides, limitada report in North America, extending actualmente al registro fósil de Sudamérica. the palaeogeographic distribution of Se proporciona una lista actualizada de las Eoinachoides, limited currently in the especies de crustáceos de la Formación Castle fossil record of South America.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1603-A
    Chap A-front.fm Page I Tuesday, July 11, 2000 8:35 AM U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Stratigraphy and Depositional Environments of Sediments from Five Cores from Screven and Burke Counties, Georgia By W. Fred Falls and David C. Prowell U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1603–A Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Energy and the Georgia Geologic Survey GEOLOGY AND PALEONTOLOGY OF FIVE CORES FROM SCREVEN AND BURKE COUNTIES, EASTERN GEORGIA Edited by Lucy E. Edwards Chap-A-contents.fm Page III Tuesday, July 11, 2000 8:36 AM CONTENTS Abstract .......................................................................................................................... A1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................1 Test Hole and Core Information ............................................................................. 2 Previous Work ........................................................................................................ 4 Acknowledgments .................................................................................................. 4 Stratigraphic Framework................................................................................................. 4 Cretaceous Stratigraphy ......................................................................................... 7 Cape Fear Formation ...................................................................................... 9 Middendorf Formation
    [Show full text]
  • UC Berkeley Paleobios
    UC Berkeley PaleoBios Title Paleogene chelonians from Maryland and Virginia Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7253p3tf Journal PaleoBios, 31(1) ISSN 0031-0298 Author Weems, Robert E. Publication Date 2014-05-27 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California PaleoBios 31(1):1–32, May 27, 2014 Paleogene chelonians from Maryland and Virginia ROBERT E. WEEMS Paleo Quest, 14243 Murphy Terrace, Gainesville, Virginia, 20155, USA; [email protected] Fossil remains of 22 kinds of Paleogene turtles have been recovered in Maryland and Virginia from the early Paleocene Brightseat Formation (four taxa), late Paleocene Aquia Formation (nine taxa), early Eocene Nanje- moy Formation (five taxa), middle Eocene Piney Point Formation (one taxon), and mid-Oligocene Old Church Formation (three taxa). Twelve taxa are clearly marine forms, of which ten are pancheloniids (Ashleychelys palmeri, Carolinochelys wilsoni, Catapleura coatesi, Catapleura sp., Euclastes roundsi, E. wielandi, ?Lophochelys sp., Procolpochelys charlestonensis, Puppigerus camperi, and Tasbacka ruhoffi), and two are dermochelyids (Eosphargis insularis and cf. Eosphargis gigas). Eight taxa represent fluvial or terrestrial forms (Adocus sp., Judithemys kranzi n. sp., Planetochelys savoiei, cf. “Trionyx” halophilus, “Trionyx” pennatus, “Kinosternoid B,” Bothremydinae gen. et sp. indet., and Bothremydidae gen. et sp. indet.), and two taxa (Aspideretoides virgin- ianus and Allaeochelys sp.) are trionychian turtles that probably frequented estuarine and nearshore marine environments. In Maryland and Virginia, turtle diversity superficially appears to decline throughout the Pa- leogene, but this probably is due to an upward bias in the local stratigraphic column toward more open marine environments that have preserved very few remains of riverine or terrestrial turtles.
    [Show full text]
  • An Unusual Nayadina (Bivalvia:Malleidae) from the Eocene of South Carolina
    AN UNUSUAL NAYADINA (BIVALVIA:MALLEIDAE) FROM THE EOCENE OF SOUTH CAROLINA RICHARD L. SQUIRES DEPJ\RTMENT OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE, CALIFORNIA 91.330 and ROGER W. PORTELL FLORIDA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE , FLORIDA 32611 Nayadina (Exputens) is a North Ameri­ sect10n of Route 6 and Route 5~), near the can, Eocene, warm-water, malleid bivalve town of Eutaw Spring, is c:;;hown on the U. with Old World Tethyan affinities. Three S. Geological Survey, 7.5 minute, Cross species are known, and the one with the Quadrang:f', 19X7 edition. The specimen is most widespread distribution is N. (E.) from the SanteP L1mt.>::-.torw and was em­ batequensis Squires, 1990, from northwest­ bedded in a gray, WE.'11-indurated bioclastic ern Jamaica, the southern part of Baja Cal­ limestonp containmg othE. r bivalves, the ifornia, Mexico, and western Washington. large benthie fo .... ammifr·ra [,epidocylina, In Jamaica, the age of this species is only and fragmPnt~ of nryozoanc:;;. No other generally known as Early to Middle Eo­ complete valvPs of Kx:putens were found in cene, but elsewhere its age is considered the quarry a 1thm.gh numE.·rou~ frdgments Early Eocene (Squires, 1990, 1992; Squires were detectpcf. and Goedert, in press). The second species Hdrris and Zt..lo ( 1980, fig. :{) corTPlated is the Early to Middle Eocene N. (E.) the Santee L1mestonp ~o thP Pntire llajasensis (Clark, 1934) from southern and Claiborne StagP ( M" ddlE. EocPrlE') of the central California, central Oregon, and Gulf Coast. Tl.Py also 111•prpn·tl'd this lime­ western Washington (Squires, 1990, 1992).
    [Show full text]