MBTA System Map-Downtown-2012

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

MBTA System Map-Downtown-2012 Captains R ay W . ve Lowell Commuter Rail 95 W illiams S 92 o Pine S Bellingham St. Harvard Square, Cambridge 83 A Highland w ve. Beacon S A 90 Red Line 111 87 Albion St. Medford St. nside A tmouth St. ay t t Cottage St. ve. Thurston St. ve. 92 Park St. 77 Red Line = Station entrance 96 A W Bur Lowell St. Dar 89 Summer St. 101 McGrath Hwy Commandants t W Massachusetts Hudson St. 93 Boatswains als atts St. Hancock St. EVERETT 000 = Bus route terminal 88 School St. Kensington 112 77 Cherry St. ve. Mystic 111 alden St. 90 Broadway Garfield A Orange Line Ashland St. 105 CHELSEA ve. W Admir W ay 83 CrownCrocker St. St. A 104 Richdale Marshall St. Cross St. East A Br 000 alnut St. hill Commuter Rail eakwater Dr = Bus stop Brastow ve. ve. Maverick St. 96 ve. W A Central A Cedar St. Central St. A Ave. Montrose St. ve. Minnesota ve. 109 Hawthorne St. Richdale Elm St. A ve. 116 A A Eastside Ave. A Wisconsin r A ve. Have Mason St. ve. ve. Gilman Porter St. Michigan Linden Sycamore St. 114 117 Shurtleff St. Garden St. Cambridge St. Mt. Pleasant Madison St. Bonair St. Broadway Square Illinois Essex St. Eastern Ave. 66 . 92 Bradley St. 459 V Highland Indiana incent St. PORTER Medford St. Arlington Congress Ave. 86 City Otis St. 95 Lower tunnel (upper tunnel Sunday) Ave. 80 90 Suf W 1 Pearl St. folk St. Hall 89 101 Rockport/Newburyport Commuter Rail Brattle St. esley St. A Upland Rd.alnut ernon St. Oxford St. School St. Everett ve. SOMERVILLE Wigglesworth St. Broadway Highland St. 71 73 Mt. V W 83 Summer St. Somerville Rush St. 90 112 McGrath Hwy Ave. Upper tunnel A High School V McArdle Bridge Berkeley St. irginia St. Pearl St. Willow St. 69 ve. Glen St. 1A ve. Arlington St. 87 alnut St. Dorrance St. 72 74 A 85 Gilman St. Cross St. 68 Avon St. W Cutter St. Marginal St. Beacon St. 88 90 Webster St. 86 92 104 Addison St. 75 77 78 Bellevue W Craigie St. Church St. 66 Lowell St. Belmont St. Spring St. Highland ashington St. Summer St. Beacham St. 89 93 105 Alford St. 86 96 72/75 Forest St. Ibbetson St. Grandview 1 A Lancaster Somerville W 77 Oxford St. 80 ordsworth St. Harvard St. Ave. von Hill St. Pearl St. 90 95 109 Atherton St. 96 Pleasant A 80 Rush St. 91 101 CT2 459 to Downtown Hilliard St. A ve. Flint St. A ve. Boston via Logan Airport Story St. Prentiss St. Prescott St. Byron St. Mt. ve. Hurlbut St. Preston Rd. Harris St. Pitman St. A Glen St. Terminal C and Auburn St. 1 Bowdoin St. Summit ve. Saratoga St. * F Spring St. Oliver St. P SULLIVAN Ted Williams Tunnel Bates St. it Summer St. Cross St. W 68 c Central St. Laurel St. Putnam St. Brattle St. Garfield St. h Ave. SQUARE Spice St. ordsworth * Gray St. b 77 69 Eustis St. u 90 120 Massachusetts r ve.Aldersey St. Myrtle St. Nay St. St. 66 Boston St. Byron St. g Somerville A Hamlet St. Pinckney St. Chaucer St. 86 Crescent St. C 93 111 JFK St. Linnaean ASt. o A Loring St. St. Glendon von St. m ve. inal Munroe St. W Condor St. A m V Parker St. ve. Chappie St. CHARLESTOWN = Access to bus tunnels alker St. Sacramento St. Ca u 83 Granite St. T Bennington St. t School St. er ay ufts St. Franklin St. Medford St. Chelsea St. 92 St. Putnam Martin St. rver St. R St. Martin St. Harrison ashington St. Falcon St. St. Brooks * ail Quincy St. 85 W St. Church St. Greenville St. ve. Roland St. Bremen St. Wendell St. Park St. alnut St. A Baldwin St. Gorham St. N. Mead St. Homer St. W ve. CT2 W. Eagle St. E. Eagle St. Central Square, Cambridge 87 A Horace St. St. 80 91 Cobble Shelby St. 120 Properzi W Dane St. Russell St. Bow St. Main St. Bunker Hill St. Hill Belmont St. erminal St. arren Prospect Hill 86 T Shepard Hammond Auburn St. 112 Cowper St. 64 Mellen St. W 1 ve. White St. Garden St. 88 ashington St. Cook St. Coleridge St. A Blue Line W Concord Langdon St. Museum St. Park St. ay Lake St. Union New W 83 ashington St Allston St. ve. Oak St. Prescott St. Hanson St. Dane St. Dane SomervilleSquare Rutherford Medford St. Prospect91 A Ave. A Everett St. Mystic St. ve. Bonner Monmouth St. St. McGrath Hwy Lowell Commuter Rail Elm St. Properzi W Mansfield St. 64 CENTRAL Bryant A Inner Belt Rd. ve. Joy St. WOOD ISLAND Irving St. Norfolk St 72 86 Eden St. Bartlett St. Holden Polk St. ve. 16th St. Chauncy St. W 1 Bishop Francis Putnam St. 1 A Border St. A 121 72/75 ebster ve. 5th CT1 Berkeley St. Brooks St. 75 83 Pearl St. 112 Allen Dr Oxford St. Divinity St. Scott St. ashington St. 87 Bartlett St. Massachusetts W Magazine St 47 A Lexington St. Follen St. A Farrar St. St. Allen Somerville 13th St. 74 St. Linden 120 Merriam St. ve. ufts St. renton St. Columbia St ve. T Perry St. Sullivan St. T Lovell St. Summer St. Chelsea St. CT1 Pine St 78 renton St. 121 A Corey St. Parkdale St. 86 Line St. Rose St. Ave. T 93 121 Marion St. 47 Waterhouse St. ve. Salem St. 1 Magnus Ave. Prospect St. Inner Belt Rd. Pearl St Kirkland St. Bunker HillV St.ine St. 93 Douglass ve. Poplar St. Concord St. Decatur St. Frankfort St. 64 A Marion St. Adrian St. Linwood St. 47 66 74 Newton St. School St. Prescott St. Red Line Magnolia Ave. Charlestown St. Main St. T Massport Logan Airport Shuttles 70 Franklin St 68 aldo Ave. remont St. 9th St. Chelsea St. 75 Lexington St. Princeton St. SEE W Concord High St. ve. Bennington St. CT2 A 70A Beacon St. 91 Prospect St. 1-800-23-LOGAN www.massport.com 69 77 Mt. V 1 INSET ve. ve. 85 3rd 83 64 71 78 Mason St. Garden St. A A Chestnut St. Saratoga St. EAST P Auburn St Massachusetts Oak St. W ernon St. CT1 ve. 8th St. 11 All terminals Quincy St. Roberts Rd. ebster 5th St. 91 70 72 86 A Medf Sumner Rd. rowbridge St. Irving St. Hovey W 1 T Concord 73 96 arren St. 120 70A 69 Cambridge St. Houghton St. Fitchbur 93 BOSTON 22 Airport Station–Terminals A and B CT1 ord St A London St. Brattle St. Bolton St. g Commuter Rail 72/75 Prospect St. ve. Green St 83 Springfield St. Austin St. AIRPORT A Leonard St. Havre St. Cambridge Monument 33 Airport Station–Terminals C and E ve South St. 92 93 Rindge & Latin Union St. Winthrop St. Paris St. 73 Felton St. Main St. 64 Mt. High School Marie St. Porter St. 55 Airport Station–Terminals A , B , C , and E = Off-peak Sidney St Oak St. Auburn St. HARVARD COMMUNITY 92 (substitute for rts. 22 and 33 during non-peak 1 Broadway ve. remont St. Msgr O'Brien Hwy A 69 T Ash St Norfolk St. Columbia St. COLLEGE P Elm St. 1A Bremen St. hours: 4 AM-11 AM & 10 PM-1 AM) 64 aul Dudle 68 Ellery St. ve. 87 Chelsea St. = Rush hour Willow St. 69 22 33 are St. A Rutherford Dana St. Landsdowne St Hunting St. Charlestown Bennett71 St. 69 W 93 66 Water Shuttle Dock–Harborside Dr.–All Prescott St. Harding St. 80 88 68 Navy Yard Liverpool St. Ellsworth . Ave. 55 66 terminals. Airport Station (7 AM to 11 AM) y ve. White A Lambert St. Gore St. Border St. Meridian St. 88 Harvard St. Highland CT2 JFK St.Winthrop St. Massachusetts Cambridge St. Dunster St. Fayette St. 111 171 88 All Terminals–North Cargo Area–Satellite Parking Holyoke St. Chatham St. Downtown Boston Bik Linden St. Amory St. Porter St. Maple Sciarappa St. 3rd St. East St South St. 1 Antrim St. e Path Inman St. Hampshire St. 69 Gilmore Br L Federal St. 85 P Mt. 83 LECHMERE New St. Bremen St. 92 Auburn St. Windsor St. N. W Orleans St. Willow St. Murdock St. Otis St. A Msgr North Point Blvd 93 86 ve. 8th St. ay Franklin St. 66 rowbridge St. 7th St. ashington St. Bridge Frankfort St. 6th St. E T C Berkshire St. Middlesex . O'Brien Hwy Sumner St. Gove St. W 5th St. h 11 Winter St. olfe St. hens St. CAMBRIDGE Terminal W ebster Thorndike St. County a Arch St. Ellery St. est St. 91 Plympton St. Y r Cottage St. Grant St.At Centre St. ork St. Cardinal Medeiros Ave le Union St. Courthouse Prospect St. Fulkerson St. 33 55 DeW s MAVERICK . Museum W t Havre St. Dana St. Norfolk St. York Pl. o Geneva St. ashington St. A Spring St. w 114 P Devonshire St. CambridgeSide Shuttle Broadway ve W Putnam Kendall/MIT– n 66 88 7 Green St. Hancock St. Harvard St. Plymouth St. 93 F 116 DOWNTOWN DOWNTOWN 1st St. CambridgeSide Galleria Hurley St. EZ e Everett St. Elm St. r CROSSING 448 Anderson Bridge Commercial St. r 117 120 171 CROSSING Franklin St. Market St. 3rd St. Charles River Dam Franklin St. Lee St. Bristol St. 617-621-8666 1 y T A Charter St. emple Pl Larz 64 120 449 Banks St. Red Line eeks Bridge ve.
Recommended publications
  • CHAPTER 2 Progress Since the Last PMT
    CHAPTER 2 Progress Since the Last PMT The 2003 PMT outlined the actions needed to bring the MBTA transit system into a state of good repair (SGR). It evaluated and prioritized a number of specific enhancement and expansion projects proposed to improve the system and better serve the regional mobility needs of Commonwealth residents. In the inter- vening years, the MBTA has funded and implemented many of the 2003 PMT priorities. The transit improvements highlighted in this chapter have been accomplished in spite of the unsus- tainable condition of the Authority’s present financial structure. A 2009 report issued by the MBTA Advisory Board1 effectively summarized the Authority’s financial dilemma: For the past several years the MBTA has only balanced its budgets by restructuring debt liquidat- ing cash reserves, selling land, and other one-time actions. Today, with credit markets frozen, cash reserves depleted and the real estate market at a stand still, the MBTA has used up these options. This recession has laid bare the fact that the MBTA is mired in a structural, on-going deficit that threatens its viability. In 2000 the MBTA was re-born with the passage of the Forward Funding legislation.This legislation dedicated 20% of all sales taxes collected state-wide to the MBTA. It also transferred over $3.3 billion in Commonwealth debt from the State’s books to the T’s books. In essence, the MBTA was born broke. Throughout the 1990’s the Massachusetts sales tax grew at an average of 6.5% per year. This decade the sales tax has barely averaged 1% annual growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Actions to Transform Mobility
    Actions to Transform Mobility TRANSPORT KENDALL Navigating the Growth and Transformation of Kendall Square Introduction The Kendall Square has undergone a dramatic transformation over the past 40 years. The scientists, engineers and entrepreneurs in Kendall Square together have created one of the most dynamic innovation districts in the world. Kendall’s innovation ecosystem is dependent on the talent and resources of institutions and companies located in close proximity. Close connections to Boston’s medical centers, investment resources, and education institutions have likewise been invaluable. Kendall Square has become central to Massachusetts’s economy attracting talent from every corner of the state, however Kendall is not as geographically central within the regional transit system as downtown Boston. Despite this, Kendall has grown from one red line station into a model transit-oriented development district with a truly multi-modal commute pattern, supported by the City of Cambridge’s progressive parking and transportation demand policies. Kendall has spurred the emergence of new districts focused on life science and technology innovation throughout the region. The state’s economic growth is dependent on reliable transportation connections between where people live and work. Transport Kendall seeks to maintain and enhance the transit-oriented development model in Cambridge. To do this, Transport Kendall promotes future investment in the transit system to serve this economic hub, while relieving congestion and supporting regional
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Impact Report
    July 24, 2015 Matthew A. Beaton, Secretary Executive Office of Energy & Environmental Affairs Attention: MEPA Office – Holly Johnson, MEPA #14590 100 Cambridge Street, Suite 900 Boston, MA 02114 RE: The Station at Riverside, MEPA #14590 Dear Secretary Beaton: The Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC) regularly reviews proposals deemed to have regional impacts. The Council reviews proposed projects for consistency with MetroFuture, the regional policy plan for the Boston metropolitan area, the Commonwealth’s Sustainable Development Principles, the GreenDOT initiative, consistency with Complete Streets policies and design approaches, as well as impacts on the environment. BH Normandy Riverside, the Proponent, proposes to redevelop an MBTA property at Riverside Station on Grove Street in Newton, off Exit 22 of Interstate 95 (Route 128). Since the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) filing in 2011, the proposed project has been downsized, but still is a significant development project in Greater Boston. The current proposal is for a mixed-use redevelopment in and around the current parking lot for the MBTA’s Riverside Station, the western terminus of the MBTA Green Line "D" Branch light rail line. The project site is defined as the 22.35 acres owned by the MBTA, which currently consists of the MBTA rail yard operations, a Green Line maintenance facility, a bus terminal facility, and surface parking. A 9.38-acre parcel will be leased to the Proponent for redevelopment. An Intermodal Commuter Facility (ICF) will be constructed on approximately 2.11 acres and will be operated by the MBTA. The MBTA will continue its operations on the remaining approximately 10.86 acres.
    [Show full text]
  • MIT Kendall Square
    Ridership and Service Statistics Thirteenth Edition 2010 Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority MBTA Service and Infrastructure Profile July 2010 MBTA Service District Cities and Towns 175 Size in Square Miles 3,244 Population (2000 Census) 4,663,565 Typical Weekday Ridership (FY 2010) By Line Unlinked Red Line 241,603 Orange Line 184,961 Blue Line 57,273 Total Heavy Rail 483,837 Total Green Line (Light Rail & Trolley) 236,096 Bus (includes Silver Line) 361,676 Silver Line SL1 & SL2* 14,940 Silver Line SL4 & SL5** 15,086 Trackless Trolley 12,364 Total Bus and Trackless Trolley 374,040 TOTAL MBTA-Provided Urban Service 1,093,973 System Unlinked MBTA - Provided Urban Service 1,093,973 Commuter Rail Boardings (Inbound + Outbound) 132,720 Contracted Bus 2,603 Water Transportation 4,372 THE RIDE Paratransit Trips Delivered 6,773 TOTAL ALL MODES UNLINKED 1,240,441 Notes: Unlinked trips are the number of passengers who board public transportation vehicles. Passengers are counted each time they board vehicles no matter how many vehicles they use to travel from their origin to their destination. * Average weekday ridership taken from 2009 CTPS surveys for Silver Line SL1 & SL2. ** SL4 service began in October 2009. Ridership represents a partial year of operation. File: CH 01 p02-7 - MBTA Service and Infrastructure Profile Jul10 1 Annual Ridership (FY 2010) Unlinked Trips by Mode Heavy Rail - Red Line 74,445,042 Total Heavy Rail - Orange Line 54,596,634 Heavy Rail Heavy Rail - Blue Line 17,876,009 146,917,685 Light Rail (includes Mattapan-Ashmont Trolley) 75,916,005 Bus (includes Silver Line) 108,088,300 Total Rubber Tire Trackless Trolley 3,438,160 111,526,460 TOTAL Subway & Bus/Trackless Trolley 334,360,150 Commuter Rail 36,930,089 THE RIDE Paratransit 2,095,932 Ferry (ex.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal and Management Control Board Transportation Board Room June 25, 2018 12:30 P.M
    MBTA Logo, Charles D. Baker, Governor, Karyn E. Polito, Lieutenant Governor, Stephanie Pollack, MassDOT Secretary & CEO, Luis Manuel Ramírez, General Manager & CEO, MassDOT logo Fiscal and Management Control Board Transportation Board Room June 25, 2018 12:30 p.m. MEETING MINUTES Present: Director Steven Poftak, Director Brian Lang and Director Monica Tibbits-Nutt Quorum Present: Yes Others Present: Secretary Stephanie Pollack, MassDOT Director Joe Sullivan (departed at 1:34 p.m.) Luis Ramirez, Jeffrey Gonneville, Marie Breen, Owen Kane, Mike Abramo, Nathan Peyton, David Abdoo, Jackie Goddard, Evan Rowe, Scott Hamwey, Jessica Casey, Beth Larkin, Heather Hume, Laurel Paget-Seekins, Kat Benesh, Dan Grabauskus and David Scorey At the call of Vice Chair Poftak, a meeting of the Fiscal and Management Control Board (Board) was called to order at 12:36 p.m. at the State Transportation Building, Transportation Board Room, 10 Park Plaza, Boston, Massachusetts. Vice Chair Poftak opened up the public comment period for items appearing on the agenda. The first speaker Richard Prone, MBTA’s Duxbury Advisory Board Representative, commented on the addition of commuter rail evening trains. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Ten Park Plaza, Suite 4510, Boston, MA 02116 www.mbta.com Next, Louise Baxter, from TRU, read testimony of behalf of the TRU, relative to AFC 2.0 and the Better Bus project. Lastly, Marilyn McNabb commented on the Ride’s transition to Transdev. Next, was the approval of the meeting minutes of June 11, 2018. On motion duly made and seconded, it was: VOTED: to approve the minutes of June 11, 2018. Director Tibbits-Nutt abstained from voting.
    [Show full text]
  • Citi Frozen Fenway 2014 Faqs WHAT FANS NEED to KNOW
    Citi Frozen Fenway 2014 FAQs WHAT FANS NEED TO KNOW What time will gates open for games on Dec 28, 31; Jan. 2, 4, 7, 8, 9, and 11? Fenway Park gates will open one hour prior to the start of the games. December 28: gates will open at 5:30 p.m. December 31: gates will open at 9:15 a.m. January 2: gates will open at 2:30 p.m. January 4: gates will open at 3:00 p.m. January 7: gates will open at 3:00 p.m. January 8: gates will open at 12:30 p.m. January 9: gates will open at 6:30 p.m. January 11: gates will open at 2:00 p.m. What time will gates open on the two Community Skating and Sledding days on December 29 and January 1? Fenway Park gates will open at 8:30 a.m., a half hour before the first Community Skating and Sledding time. Patrons with tickets to one of the Community Skating and Sledding days are asked to arrive 30 minutes before their scheduled time. Session times are indicated on all tickets. What time will gates open for New Year’s Eve at Fenway Park on December 31? Gate E will open at 4:30 p.m., a half hour before the first New Year’s Eve skating time. Patrons with tickets to one of the New Year’s Eve skating sessions may enter anytime after 4:30 p.m. Designated skating sessions are indicated on all tickets. Will ice skates be provided at the ballpark for the community skating days and New Year’s Eve event? Skates will not be provided at Fenway Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Building a Better T in the Era of Covid-19
    Building a Better T in the Era of Covid-19 MBTA Advisory Board September 17, 2020 General Manager Steve Poftak 1 Agenda 1. Capital Project Updates 2. Ridership Update 3. Ride Safer 4. Crowding 5. Current Service and Service Planning 2 Capital Project Updates 3 Surges Complete | May – August 2020 Leveraged low ridership while restrictions are in place due to COVID-19 directives May June July August D Branch (Riverside to Kenmore) Two 9-Day Closures C Branch (Cleveland Circle to Kenmore) E Branch (Heath to Symphony) Track & Signal Improvements, Fenway Portal Flood 28-Day Full Closure 28-Day Full Closure Protection, Brookline Hills TOD Track & Intersection Upgrades Track & Intersection Upgrades D 6/6 – 6/14 D 6/20 – 6/28 C 7/5 – 8/1 E 8/2 – 8/29 Blue Line (Airport to Bowdoin) Red Line (Braintree to Quincy) 14-Day Closure Harbor Tunnel Infrastructure Upgrades On-call Track 2, South Shore Garages, Track Modernization BL 5/18 – 5/31 RL 6/18 -7/1 4 Shuttle buses replaced service Ridership Update 5 Weekday Ridership by Line and Mode - Indexed to Week of 2/24 3/17: Restaurants and 110 bars closed, gatherings Baseline: limited to 25 people Average weekday from 2/24-2/28 100 MBTA service reduced Sources: 90 3/24: Non-essential Faregate counts for businesses closed subway lines, APC for 80 buses, manual counts at terminals for Commuter Rail, RIDE 70 vendor reports 6/22: Phase 2.2 – MBTA 6/8: Phase 2.1 60 increases service Notes: Recent data preliminary 50 5/18-6/1: Blue Line closed for 40 accelerated construction Estimated % of baseline ridership
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Capacity Evaluation
    Riverside Redevelopment - Transportation Impact and Access Study (TIAS) Revised 2020-02-13 Transit Capacity Evaluation Because the project site will be integrated with the existing transit station, public transit plays an important role in how people will get to and from the site. As such, an in-depth analysis of the existing transit system and its ability to accommodate future passenger demands was prepared. This section contains the following information: › Methodolgy › Existing MBTA Green (D) Line Capacity o Planned MBTA Green Line (D) Improvements › Existing MBTA Bus Service Capacity › Current and Future Transit Operations › Projected Ridership and Distribution of Project Generated Transit Trips › Future Transit Service Capacity Analysis Methodolgy In an effort to understand the potential for additional ridership, available capacity was estimated on transit lines that could be utilized for access to and from the site. For this study, the MBTA Green Line rapid transit (subway) line and the MBTA Route 558 bus service were evaluated for project impacts on passenger capacity. The capacity analysis results in a comparison of the expected demand for transit to the planned capacity of the service. Thus, for the subway and bus lines, we first identify the service segments that are expected to be used by riders generated by the proposed development project. For each service, we identify the peak passenger load point – the service segment that is most crowded, based on existing ridership, by time of day (for buses it’s by trip; for subway, it’s by 30-minute service period). These passenger loads are compared against the service’s capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Soft Landing & Living
    GUIDE TO SOFT LANDING & LIVING Babson’s Unofficial Guide for International Students and Partners 2021-2022 Edition INTRODUCTION - - - - - - - - We welcome you to the Babson family. This new stage in your life will be very exciting. But we also know uprooting your life is pretty disruptive and settling somewhere new can be very overwhelming and stressful. We understand, we have walked down that lane. We are here to help. This is why we have gathered information from the experience of other international students and partners, as well as locals, to help you plan and transition to your new life in Boston and at Babson. We have also shared some tips and recommendations to make your life easier and fun while you are here. 2 This guide was started by alumni Peter Rovick (MBA ‘09), was updated by grad partner Erica Jornales (Partner of MBA ’19), and has been updated ever since by grad students and partners. This year we have been working on including information that will speak to single students, to couples, and to families, as we know your needs in some cases might be different. We hope you find this guide helpful and in the future help keep it up to date for other generations. If you have a thought or advice to share please send it to [email protected]. Disclaimer: This document is not officially endorsed by Babson College. “ Change is hard at first, messy in the middle and gorgeous at the end. -Robin Sharma ” 3 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 2 BEFORE YOU TRAVEL AND FIRST DAYS ....................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA District 1964-Present
    Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA district 1964-2021 By Jonathan Belcher with thanks to Richard Barber and Thomas J. Humphrey Compilation of this data would not have been possible without the information and input provided by Mr. Barber and Mr. Humphrey. Sources of data used in compiling this information include public timetables, maps, newspaper articles, MBTA press releases, Department of Public Utilities records, and MBTA records. Thanks also to Tadd Anderson, Charles Bahne, Alan Castaline, George Chiasson, Bradley Clarke, Robert Hussey, Scott Moore, Edward Ramsdell, George Sanborn, David Sindel, James Teed, and George Zeiba for additional comments and information. Thomas J. Humphrey’s original 1974 research on the origin and development of the MBTA bus network is now available here and has been updated through August 2020: http://www.transithistory.org/roster/MBTABUSDEV.pdf August 29, 2021 Version Discussion of changes is broken down into seven sections: 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA 2) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Eastern Mass. St. Ry. Co. Norwood Area Quincy Area Lynn Area Melrose Area Lowell Area Lawrence Area Brockton Area 3) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Middlesex and Boston St. Ry. Co 4) MBTA bus routes inherited from Service Bus Lines and Brush Hill Transportation 5) MBTA bus routes initiated by the MBTA 1964-present ROLLSIGN 3 5b) Silver Line bus rapid transit service 6) Private carrier transit and commuter bus routes within or to the MBTA district 7) The Suburban Transportation (mini-bus) Program 8) Rail routes 4 ROLLSIGN Changes in MBTA Bus Routes 1964-present Section 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) succeeded the Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) on August 3, 1964.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Analysis for BRT in the Greater Boston Area
    Technical Analysis for BRT in the Greater Boston Area October 2014 In 2013, through a grant from the Barr Foundation, the Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (ITDP) began a technical analysis to determine which corridors could have the potential for gold-standard bus rapid transit (BRT). ITDP is a non-profit that focuses on the design and implementation of BRT systems around the world and has helped to design many of the gold-standard BRTs outside of the US. To date, there are no gold-standard BRTs in the US but there is good potential for Boston to build the first. Initial Corridor Selection Existing Ridership When determining which corridors are ripe for BRT, ITDP applies a methodology that it has used in all of the systems it has helped to design – that is, to focus on the existing ridership as an indication of where BRT could be most successful. BRT infrastructure is generally designed to provide the greatest time savings for the greatest number of people so looking at where the greatest numbers of people currently travel is an important first step. Often, it is the instinct of governments to build BRT where there is no mass transit at all – not even a bus line. But where there are currently no buses, one must rely on a slow build-up of demand over time and it could be years before buses are full and high frequency can be justified. This could lead to empty bus lanes and negative public perception of the project. It also means new operating costs to be carried by the transit agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Line Extension Project EEA #13886
    Draft Environmental Impact Report/ Environmental Assessment and Section 4(f) Statement Green Line Extension Project EEA #13886 Volume 1 | Text October 2009 Executive Office of Transportation and Public Works U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT/ ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (DEIR/EA) AND DRAFT SECTION 4(F) EVALUATION FOR THE GREEN LINE EXTENSION PROJECT CAMBRIDGE, SOMERVILLE, MEDFORD, MASSACHUSETTS STATE PROJECT NO. 13886 Prepared Pursuant to the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 23, Part 771, Section 119 (23 CFR 771.119); 49 U.S.C. Section 303 [formerly Department of Transportation Act of 1966, Section 4(f)] and the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act M.G.L. CH 30 Sec. 61 through 62H by the FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and the COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS (EOT) Draft Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Green Line Extension Project Assessment and Draft Section 4(f) Evaluation Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations Secretary’s Certificate on the EENF Executive Summary 1 Introduction and Background .......................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Project Summary .................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.3
    [Show full text]