Differential Formononetin Content in Cultivars and Experimental
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Type and Distribution of Sensilla in the Antennae of the Red Clover Root Borer, Hylastinus Obscurus
Journal of Insect Science: Vol. 13 | Article 133 Palma et al. Type and distribution of sensilla in the antennae of the red clover root borer, Hylastinus obscurus Rubén Palma1,4a, Ana Mutis2b, Rufus Isaacs3c, Andrés Quiroz2d 1Doctorate Program in Sciences and Natural Resources. Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4811230, Araucanía, Chile 2Departamento de Ciencias Químicas y Recursos Naturales, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4811230, Araucanía, Chile Downloaded from 3Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 4Current address: Laboratorio de Interacciones Insecto-Planta, Universidad de Talca, Talca, Chile Abstract In order to determine the type, distribution, and structures of sensilla, the antennae of the red clo- http://jinsectscience.oxfordjournals.org/ ver root borer, Hylastinus obscurus Marsham (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae), were examined by light and electron microscopy (both scanning and transmission). Four different types of sensilla were identified in the club, and one type of chaetica was found in the scape and funicle of both male and female individuals. Chaetica and basiconica were the most abundant sensilla types in the club. They were present in the three sensory bands described, totaling ap- proximately 80% of sensilla in the antennal club of H. obscurus. Chaetica were predominantly mechanoreceptors, although gustatory function could not be excluded. Basiconica forms showed characteristics typical of olfactory sensilla. Trichoidea were not found in the proximal sensory by guest on April 29, 2015 band, and they exhibited abundant pores, suggesting olfactory function. Styloconica were the least abundant sensillum type, and their shape was similar to that reported as having hygro- and thermoreceptor functions. There was no difference in the relative abundance of antennal sensilla between males and females. -
Oregon Invasive Species Action Plan
Oregon Invasive Species Action Plan June 2005 Martin Nugent, Chair Wildlife Diversity Coordinator Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife PO Box 59 Portland, OR 97207 (503) 872-5260 x5346 FAX: (503) 872-5269 [email protected] Kev Alexanian Dan Hilburn Sam Chan Bill Reynolds Suzanne Cudd Eric Schwamberger Risa Demasi Mark Systma Chris Guntermann Mandy Tu Randy Henry 7/15/05 Table of Contents Chapter 1........................................................................................................................3 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 What’s Going On?........................................................................................................................................ 3 Oregon Examples......................................................................................................................................... 5 Goal............................................................................................................................................................... 6 Invasive Species Council................................................................................................................. 6 Statute ........................................................................................................................................................... 6 Functions ..................................................................................................................................................... -
Studies on the Clover Root Borer
STUDIES ON THE CLOVER ROOT BORER, HYMSTINUS OBSCURUS (KARSHAM) DISSERTATION Presented in Partial FuliiIlment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By KENNETH PAUL FRUESS, B.S., M.S. The Ohio State University 1957 Approved by: Adviser Department of Zoology and Entomology ACKSQttffiCMST^TS ?he research for this dissertation was done a t the Ohio Agricultural Experiment Station, W o o s t e r , Ohio, w h e r e I was employed as a Research Assistant from June, 1 9 5 ^ j to March, 1957. I am grateful for the facilities offered t > y this instituition and for the aid of .many members of the stafr d u r i n g my s t a y there. I wish especially to thank Dr, C » -ft. Weaver, wino encouraged this research and offered many h e l p f u H suggestions and criticisms. I also wish to thank Dr, Ralph H . Davidson, w h o acted as n y adviser at The Ohio State University a n d directed m y work there. Valuable information was supplied t y the f ol lowing persons a m is gratefully acknowledged: Mr. A, Dickason, Oregon State College; Dr, Ray T, Everly, Purdue University,* Dr. G-eorge G. Gyrisco and Mr, Carlton S, Koehler, C o r n e l l University; and Dr, A. K. Woodside, Virginia Agricultural Experiment Sts/tion. ii TABLE OF CON TENTS Page INTRODUCTION ........ 1 PART I. THE CLOVER ROOT BORER ................... 2 Taxonomic Position ................... -
Arizona Administrative Code Between the Dates of October 1, 2020 Through December 31, 2020 (Supp
3 A.A.C. 4 Supp. 20-4 December 31, 2020 Title 3 TITLE 3. AGRICULTURE CHAPTER 4. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE - PLANT SERVICES DIVISION The table of contents on the first page contains quick links to the referenced page numbers in this Chapter. Refer to the notes at the end of a Section to learn about the history of a rule as it was published in the Arizona Administrative Register. Sections, Parts, Exhibits, Tables or Appendices codified in this supplement. The list provided contains quick links to the updated rules. This Chapter contains rule Sections that were filed to be codified in the Arizona Administrative Code between the dates of October 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020 (Supp. 20-4). Table 1. Fee Schedule ......................................................47 Questions about these rules? Contact: Name: Brian McGrew Address: Department of Agriculture 1688 W. Adams St. Phoenix, AZ 85007 Telephone: (602) 542-3228 Fax: (602) 542-1004 E-mail: [email protected] Website: https://agriculture.az.gov/plantsproduce/industrial- hemp-program The release of this Chapter in Supp. 20-4 replaces Supp. 20-3, 1-50 pages Please note that the Chapter you are about to replace may have rules still in effect after the publication date of this supplement. Therefore, all superseded material should be retained in a separate binder and archived for future reference. i PREFACE Under Arizona law, the Department of State, Office of the Secretary of State (Office), accepts state agency rule filings and is the publisher of Arizona rules. The Office of the Secretary of State does not interpret or enforce rules in the Administrative Code. -
2011 Biodiversity Snapshot. Isle of Man Appendices
UK Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies: 2011 Biodiversity snapshot. Isle of Man: Appendices. Author: Elizabeth Charter Principal Biodiversity Officer (Strategy and Advocacy). Department of Environment, Food and Agriculture, Isle of man. More information available at: www.gov.im/defa/ This section includes a series of appendices that provide additional information relating to that provided in the Isle of Man chapter of the publication: UK Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies: 2011 Biodiversity snapshot. All information relating to the Isle or Man is available at http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-5819 The entire publication is available for download at http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-5821 1 Table of Contents Appendix 1: Multilateral Environmental Agreements ..................................................................... 3 Appendix 2 National Wildife Legislation ......................................................................................... 5 Appendix 3: Protected Areas .......................................................................................................... 6 Appendix 4: Institutional Arrangements ........................................................................................ 10 Appendix 5: Research priorities .................................................................................................... 13 Appendix 6 Ecosystem/habitats ................................................................................................... 14 Appendix 7: Species .................................................................................................................... -
Review of the Coverage of Urban Habitats and Species Within the UK Biodiversity Action Plan
Report Number 651 Review of the coverage of urban habitats and species within the UK Biodiversity Action Plan English Nature Research Reports working today for nature tomorrow English Nature Research Reports Number 651 Review of the coverage of urban habitats and species within the UK Biodiversity Action Plan Dr Graham Tucker Dr Hilary Ash Colin Plant Environmental Impacts Team You may reproduce as many additional copies of this report as you like, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with English Nature, Northminster House, Peterborough PE1 1UA ISSN 0967-876X © Copyright English Nature 2005 Acknowledgements The project was managed by David Knight of English Nature, and we thank him for his advice and assistance. Thanks are also due to Mark Crick and Ian Strachan of JNCC for their comments on the draft report and information on the current UKBAP review, and English Nature library staff for their invaluable assistance with obtaining reference materials. We especially thank the following individuals and their organisations for their valuable comments on the consultation draft of this report: George Barker, John Box, Professor Tony Bradshaw, John Buckley (The Herpetological Trust), Paul Chanin (for The Mammal Society), John Davis (Butterfly Conservation), Mike Eyre, Tony Gent (The Herpetological Conservation Trust), Chris Gibson (English Nature), Eric Greenwood, Phil Grice (English Nature), Mathew Frith, Nick Moyes, John Newbold (for The National Federation of Biological Recorders), Dominic Price (Plantlife), Alison Rasey (The Bat Conservation Trust), Ian Rotherham (Sheffield University), Richard Scott (Landlife), Martin Wigginton and Robin Wynde (RSPB). Additional information and advice was also provided by Dan Chamberlain, Rob Robinson, and Juliet Vickery (British Trust for Ornithology) and Will Peach (RSPB). -
Book of Abstracts O
Asociación Latino Americana de Ecología Química Associação Latino Americana de Ecologia Química Latin American Association of Chemical Ecology Book of Abstracts October 23-26, 2018, Valparaíso, Chile O 5th Congress of the Latin American Association of Chemical Ecology (ALAEQ) October 23-26, 2018 Valparaíso, Chile Organized by Latin American Association of Chemical Ecology (ALAEQ) 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Sponsors 4 Organizing Committee 5 Coordination Congress 5 Support Congress 5 Scientific Committee 6 Welcome Letter 7 Emergency plan infographic 8 Security zone 9 Program 13 Abstracts of Conferences 23 Abstracts of Symposiums 30 Abstracts of Oral Presentations 56 Abstracts of Posters 80 List of Authors 164 List of Participants 169 3 SPONSORS LINKS Website: www.alaeq5.ucv.cl Follow us: - 5th Congress ALAEQ - ALAEQ 4 ORGANIZING COMMITTEE Dr. Jan Bergmann – Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Chile. Dr. Eduardo Fuentes-Contreras – Universidad de Talca, Chile. Dra. Marcia González-Teuber – Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Chile. Dr. Cristian Villagra – Universidad Metropolitana de las Ciencias de la Educación, Chile. COORDINATION CONGRESS Dra. Waleska Vera Quezada – Universidad de Valparaíso, Chile. SUPPORT CONGRESS Abel Felipe de Oliveira Queiroz – PhD student of Chemistry and Biotechnology – Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Brazil. Claudio Navarro – Bach. of Education and Pedagogy in Biology in Natural Sciences – Universidad Metropolitana de las Ciencias de la Educación, Chile. Patricia Henríquez – M.Sc Entomology – Universidad Metropolitana de las Ciencias de la Educación, Chile. 5 SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Dra. Maria Sol Balbuena – Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Dra. Nancy Barreto – Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria, Colombia. Dra. Romina Barrozo – Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Dr. José Mauricio Simões Bento – Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil. -
Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs Volume 11 a Catalog of Scolytidae and Platypodidae Article 7 (Coleoptera), Part 1: Bibliography
Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs Volume 11 A Catalog of Scolytidae and Platypodidae Article 7 (Coleoptera), Part 1: Bibliography 1-1-1987 R–S Stephen L. Wood Life Science Museum and Department of Zoology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602 Donald E. Bright Jr. Biosystematics Research Centre, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada 51A 0C6 Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbnm Part of the Anatomy Commons, Botany Commons, Physiology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Wood, Stephen L. and Bright, Donald E. Jr. (1987) "R–S," Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs: Vol. 11 , Article 7. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbnm/vol11/iss1/7 This Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. 1 1 1987 Wood. Bricht: Catalog Bibliography R 479 R *R. L. K. 1917. Margborrens harjningar i vara skogar, ' Volga semidesert], Trud lusl Lc 18:10 Skogvaktaren 1917:224. (). 0- P. 1948. Borkenkaferbefall R. im Bezirk Bade... Allge- 1962. The length ol the passages and ihe numbci meine Forst- unci Holzwirtschaftliche Zeitung of offspring of bark beetles depending on the den- 59:193-194. (en). sity ol the settlemenl (using Kholodl n •Rabaglia, Robert 1980. Scoh/- J. Twig-crotch feeding by pine sliool beetle as an example |In Russian] tus multistriatus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and Akademiia NaukSSSR, Laboratoriia Lesovedeniia evaluation ofinsecticides for control. -
Hay and Pasture Crops and Covered with Very Short Hairs
Section E Alfalfa hay—Alfalfa caterpillar Colias eurytheme – also known as Orange Sulphur Colias philodice – also known as Clouded Sulphur Pest description and crop damage Adult is the common yellow butterfly with a black border on the wings. The caterpillar is green Hay and Pasture Crops and covered with very short hairs. It is seldom a pest in the Pacific Northwest (http://bugguide.net/node/view/3248). Sampling and thresholds Ten or more nonparasitized larvae per IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE USE 90° sweep, sometimes called a straight-line sweep. OF CHLORPYRIFOS: The State of Oregon has adopted new restrictive Management—chemical control rules on the use of chlorpyrifos-containing products ♦ alpha-cypermethrin (Fastac EC) at 0.014 to 0.025 lb ai/a. PHI 3 in Oregon. Please refer to Oregon Department of days for cutting or grazing. REI 12 hr. Retreatment interval 7 days. Agriculture Do not exceed 0.075 lb ai/a per season. Permanent Chlorpyrifos Rule at ♦ azadirachtin (Aza-Direct, Neemix 4.5)—See specific labels for https://www.oregon.gov/oda/programs/Pesticides/ rates. PHI 0 days. REI 4 hr. Aza-direct and Neemix 4.5 are OMRI- RegulatoryIssues/Documents/Documents/2020/ listed for organic use. ChlorpyrifosRule.pdf ♦ Bacillus thuringiensis aizawai or kurstaki (numerous products) at 0.25 to 1.5 lb ai/a. PHI 0 days. REI 4 hr. Most effective on small caterpillars; use highest recommended rate for fully developed ones. Evening applications increase efficacy. A spreader sticker may improve performance. OMRI-listed for organic use. (Group 11A) ♦ beta-cyfluthrin (Baythroid XL) at 0.0125 to 0.022 lb ai/a. -
RELACIÓN ENTRE LA INFESTACIÓN RADICAL DE Hylastinus Obscurus (MARSHAM) Y LA PRODUCIÓN DE CULTIVARES Y LÍNEAS EXPERIMENTALES DE TRÉBOL ROSADO (Trifolium Pratense L.)
UNIVERSIDAD DE LA FRONTERA FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS AGROPECUARIAS Y FORESTALES RELACIÓN ENTRE LA INFESTACIÓN RADICAL DE Hylastinus obscurus (MARSHAM) Y LA PRODUCIÓN DE CULTIVARES Y LÍNEAS EXPERIMENTALES DE TRÉBOL ROSADO (Trifolium pratense L.) Tesis presentada a la Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Forestales de la Universidad de La Frontera, como parte de los requisitos para optar al título de Ingeniero Agrónomo. DANIELA LORENA ALARCÓN ARANEDA TEMUCO – CHILE 2010 UNIVERSIDAD DE LA FRONTERA FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS AGROPECUARIAS Y FORESTALES RELACIÓN ENTRE LA INFESTACIÓN RADICAL DE Hylastinus obscurus (MARSHAM) Y LA PRODUCIÓN DE CULTIVARES Y LÍNEAS EXPERIMENTALES DE TRÉBOL ROSADO (Trifolium pratense L.) Tesis presentada a la Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Forestales de la Universidad de La Frontera, como parte de los requisitos para optar al título de Ingeniero Agrónomo. DANIELA LORENA ALARCÓN ARANEDA PROFESOR GUIA: ANDRÉS QUIROZ CORTEZ TEMUCO – CHILE 2010 TITULO “Relación entre la infestación radical de Hylastinus obscurus (MARSHAM) y la producción de cultivares y líneas experimentales de trébol rosado (Trifolium pratense L.)” PROFESOR GUÍA: Andrés Eduardo Quiroz Cortez Doctor en Química Departamento de Ciencias Químicas y Recursos Naturales Universidad de La Frontera PROFESOR CONSEJERO: Fernando Ortega Klose Ingeniero Agrónomo Ph D Centro Regional de Investigación INIA Carillanca CALIFICACIÓN PROMEDIO DE TESIS: II A mis padres, por su constante esfuerzo y ayuda para guiarme en el comienzo de mi carrera… III ÍNDICE Capitulo Pag. 1. -
Download Download
Insects and Other Arthropods of Economic Importance in Indiana in 1957 1 John V. Osmun, Purdue University The year 1957 in Indiana was characterized by conditions of high moisture and slightly lower temperatures, two conditions which combined to produce an abnormal insect season. Rainfall during the spring and early summer was between 3 and 4 inches above normal in most of the state, while early temperatures were 0.5° F. below normal average in the north and as much as 3° F. below in the southern area of Indiana during a similar period. That the conditions which prevailed were unusual is evidenced by a brief abundance analysis of the 10 insects and other arthropods normally rated by our entomology staff as the most important on crops and trees in Indiana. They are corn earworm, potato leafhopper, European corn borer, cutworms, smaller European elm bark beetle, meadow spittle bug, two-spotted mite, codling moth, Hessian fly, and aphids. Of these, only the meadow spittle bug, probably the elm bark beetle, and possibly the potato leafhopper were of normal or highly economic importance. Not only were high moisture and less desirable temperatures direct factors, but many host crops had not yet reached a desirable state of growth at periods of normal insect abundance. A detailed record of certain insects follows: Field Crop Insects Corn earworm (Heliothis zea (Boddie)). In 1956 the fall survey showed 50-85% of the ears infested in the state. There was no evidence of over-wintering as far north as Lafayette. In 1957, based on light trap records and field observation, the corn earworm was comparatively low (See tomato fruitworm), with counts ranging from 6.5% of the ears infested in the northern counties up to 43% in the southern most counties. -
The Native and Introduced Bark and Ambrosia Beetles of Michigan (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae) Anthony I
2009 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 101 The Native and Introduced Bark and Ambrosia Beetles of Michigan (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae) Anthony I. Cognato1, Nicolas Barc1, Michael Philip2, Roger Mech3, Aaron D. Smith1, Eric Galbraith1, Andrew J. Storer4, and Lawrence R. Kirkendall5 Abstract Our knowledge of the biogeography of Scolytinae of eastern temperate North America is very patchy. We used data from hand collecting, trapped material (from 65 of 83 counties), and museum collections, supplemented by literature records, to compile a list comprising 107 bark beetle species in 45 genera for Michigan, a state with an especially rich diversity of woody plants. We provide detailed collection data documenting 32 species not previously cata- logued for Michigan, 23 of which are new state records; the genera Trypophloeus and Trischidias are reported from Michigan for the first time. Fifteen Michigan scolytines are not native to North America; Ambrosiodmus rubricollis (Eich- hoff), Crypturgus pusillus (Gyllenhal), Euwallacea validus (Eichhoff), Xyleborus californicus Wood, Xylosandrus crassiusculus (Motschulsky) have not previously been found in the state. We report Michigan hosts for 67 species, including 49 new host associations for the 93 native species. Despite identifying over 4000 specimens for this study, we fully expect to find many more species: over 30 additional species occur in the Great Lakes region. ____________________ Faunistic studies are a first step towards a deeper understanding of the ecology of local biotic communities. These studies provide records of diversity and serve as reference points for the assessment of faunal differences due to time, space, or environmental conditions. To increase the understanding of regional scolytine faunas, we present a study begun in 1978 of the bark and ambrosia beetles of Michigan.