Type and Distribution of Sensilla in the Antennae of the Red Clover Root Borer, Hylastinus Obscurus
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Lessons from Genome Skimming of Arthropod-Preserving Ethanol Benjamin Linard, P
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Archive Ouverte en Sciences de l'Information et de la Communication Lessons from genome skimming of arthropod-preserving ethanol Benjamin Linard, P. Arribas, C. Andújar, A. Crampton-Platt, A. P. Vogler To cite this version: Benjamin Linard, P. Arribas, C. Andújar, A. Crampton-Platt, A. P. Vogler. Lessons from genome skimming of arthropod-preserving ethanol. Molecular Ecology Resources, Wiley/Blackwell, 2016, 16 (6), pp.1365-1377. 10.1111/1755-0998.12539. hal-01636888 HAL Id: hal-01636888 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01636888 Submitted on 17 Jan 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 1 Lessons from genome skimming of arthropod-preserving 2 ethanol 3 Linard B.*1,4, Arribas P.*1,2,5, Andújar C.1,2, Crampton-Platt A.1,3, Vogler A.P. 1,2 4 5 1 Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 6 5BD, UK, 7 2 Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot 8 SL5 7PY, UK, 9 3 Department -
Sensory Organs on the Antennae of the Ground
Agronomy Research 1(2), 221–228, 2003 Antennal sensilla in ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) A. Ploomi1, E. Merivee1, M. Rahi2, J. Bresciani3, H. P. Ravn4, A. Luik1and V. Sammelselg5 1 Institute of Plant Protection, Estonian Agricultural University, Kreutzwaldi 64, 51014, Tartu, Estonia; e-mail: [email protected] 2 Institute of Zoology and Botany, Estonian Agricultural University, Riia 181, 51014 Tartu, Estonia 3 Veterinary and Agricultural University, Bülowsvej 13, DK 1870, Frederiksberg C, Denmark 4 Danish Forest and Landscape Research Institute, Hoersholm Kongevej 11, DK 2970, Hoersholm, Denmark 5 Institute of Physics, University of Tartu, Riia 142, 51014 Tartu, Estonia Abstract. The antennal sensilla of male and female ground beetle species Bembidion lampros Hbst., Bembidion properans Steph. and Platynus dorsalis Pont. (Coleoptera, Carabidae) were investigated by using a scanning electron microscope. The filiform antennae of ground beetles consist of the scape, pedicel and 9 flagellomeres. Thirteen different sensillar types were distiguished. These were: four types of sensilla chaetica, two types of sensilla trichodea, six types of sensilla basiconica, pit-organs sensilla coeloconica, and small domes sensilla campaniformia. Sensilla chaetica 4 occur only on the antennae of P. dorsalis, and sensilla trichodea 1 only on the antennae of Bembidion species. No sexual differences in the types of sensilla were found on the antennae of these three species. The possible functions are discussed and three types of sensilla were considered as olfactory, sensilla trichodea 2 and sensilla basiconica 1 and 2. Olfactory sensilla trichodea 2 and sensilla basiconia 1 form clear dorsal and ventral sensillar fields on the flagellomeres, which seems to be common in ground beetles. -
Oregon Invasive Species Action Plan
Oregon Invasive Species Action Plan June 2005 Martin Nugent, Chair Wildlife Diversity Coordinator Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife PO Box 59 Portland, OR 97207 (503) 872-5260 x5346 FAX: (503) 872-5269 [email protected] Kev Alexanian Dan Hilburn Sam Chan Bill Reynolds Suzanne Cudd Eric Schwamberger Risa Demasi Mark Systma Chris Guntermann Mandy Tu Randy Henry 7/15/05 Table of Contents Chapter 1........................................................................................................................3 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 What’s Going On?........................................................................................................................................ 3 Oregon Examples......................................................................................................................................... 5 Goal............................................................................................................................................................... 6 Invasive Species Council................................................................................................................. 6 Statute ........................................................................................................................................................... 6 Functions ..................................................................................................................................................... -
Studies on the Clover Root Borer
STUDIES ON THE CLOVER ROOT BORER, HYMSTINUS OBSCURUS (KARSHAM) DISSERTATION Presented in Partial FuliiIlment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By KENNETH PAUL FRUESS, B.S., M.S. The Ohio State University 1957 Approved by: Adviser Department of Zoology and Entomology ACKSQttffiCMST^TS ?he research for this dissertation was done a t the Ohio Agricultural Experiment Station, W o o s t e r , Ohio, w h e r e I was employed as a Research Assistant from June, 1 9 5 ^ j to March, 1957. I am grateful for the facilities offered t > y this instituition and for the aid of .many members of the stafr d u r i n g my s t a y there. I wish especially to thank Dr, C » -ft. Weaver, wino encouraged this research and offered many h e l p f u H suggestions and criticisms. I also wish to thank Dr, Ralph H . Davidson, w h o acted as n y adviser at The Ohio State University a n d directed m y work there. Valuable information was supplied t y the f ol lowing persons a m is gratefully acknowledged: Mr. A, Dickason, Oregon State College; Dr, Ray T, Everly, Purdue University,* Dr. G-eorge G. Gyrisco and Mr, Carlton S, Koehler, C o r n e l l University; and Dr, A. K. Woodside, Virginia Agricultural Experiment Sts/tion. ii TABLE OF CON TENTS Page INTRODUCTION ........ 1 PART I. THE CLOVER ROOT BORER ................... 2 Taxonomic Position ................... -
Arizona Administrative Code Between the Dates of October 1, 2020 Through December 31, 2020 (Supp
3 A.A.C. 4 Supp. 20-4 December 31, 2020 Title 3 TITLE 3. AGRICULTURE CHAPTER 4. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE - PLANT SERVICES DIVISION The table of contents on the first page contains quick links to the referenced page numbers in this Chapter. Refer to the notes at the end of a Section to learn about the history of a rule as it was published in the Arizona Administrative Register. Sections, Parts, Exhibits, Tables or Appendices codified in this supplement. The list provided contains quick links to the updated rules. This Chapter contains rule Sections that were filed to be codified in the Arizona Administrative Code between the dates of October 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020 (Supp. 20-4). Table 1. Fee Schedule ......................................................47 Questions about these rules? Contact: Name: Brian McGrew Address: Department of Agriculture 1688 W. Adams St. Phoenix, AZ 85007 Telephone: (602) 542-3228 Fax: (602) 542-1004 E-mail: [email protected] Website: https://agriculture.az.gov/plantsproduce/industrial- hemp-program The release of this Chapter in Supp. 20-4 replaces Supp. 20-3, 1-50 pages Please note that the Chapter you are about to replace may have rules still in effect after the publication date of this supplement. Therefore, all superseded material should be retained in a separate binder and archived for future reference. i PREFACE Under Arizona law, the Department of State, Office of the Secretary of State (Office), accepts state agency rule filings and is the publisher of Arizona rules. The Office of the Secretary of State does not interpret or enforce rules in the Administrative Code. -
A Reference Library of DNA Barcodes for French Saproxylic Beetles (Insecta, Coleoptera)
Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e4078 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.3.e4078 Data Paper PASSIFOR: A reference library of DNA barcodes for French saproxylic beetles (Insecta, Coleoptera) Rodolphe Rougerie‡,§, Carlos Lopez-Vaamonde§, Thomas Barnouin|, Julien Delnatte ¶, Nicolas Moulin#, Thierry Noblecourt|, Benoît Nusillard¤, Guillem Parmain¤, Fabien Soldati |, Christophe Bouget¤ ‡ Muséum national d'Histoire Naturelle, Sorbonne Universités, Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), UMR 7205 – CNRS, MNHN, UPMC, EPHE, Paris, France § INRA UR633 Zoologie Forestière, Orléans, France | Office National des Forêts (ONF), Laboratoire National d'Entomologie Forestière, Quillan, France ¶ Independent researcher, Avignon, France # Entreprise Nicolas Moulin Entomologiste, Bihorel, France ¤ IRSTEA Ecosystèmes Forestiers, Nogent-Sur-Vernisson, France Corresponding author: Rodolphe Rougerie ([email protected]) Academic editor: Axel Hausmann Received: 17 Sep 2014 | Accepted: 24 Feb 2015 | Published: 04 Mar 2015 Citation: Rougerie R, Lopez-Vaamonde C, Barnouin T, Delnatte J, Moulin N, Noblecourt T, Nusillard B, Parmain G, Soldati F, Bouget C (2015) PASSIFOR: A reference library of DNA barcodes for French saproxylic beetles (Insecta, Coleoptera). Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e4078. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.3.e4078 Abstract Saproxylic beetles – associated with dead wood or with other insects, fungi and microorganisms that decompose it – play a major role in forest nutrient cycling. They are important ecosystem service providers and are used as key bio-indicators of old-growth forests. In France alone, where the present study took place, there are about 2500 species distributed within 71 families. This high diversity represents a major challenge for specimen sorting and identification. The PASSIFOR project aims at developing a DNA metabarcoding approach to facilitate and enhance the monitoring of saproxylic beetles as indicators in ecological studies. -
2011 Biodiversity Snapshot. Isle of Man Appendices
UK Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies: 2011 Biodiversity snapshot. Isle of Man: Appendices. Author: Elizabeth Charter Principal Biodiversity Officer (Strategy and Advocacy). Department of Environment, Food and Agriculture, Isle of man. More information available at: www.gov.im/defa/ This section includes a series of appendices that provide additional information relating to that provided in the Isle of Man chapter of the publication: UK Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies: 2011 Biodiversity snapshot. All information relating to the Isle or Man is available at http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-5819 The entire publication is available for download at http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-5821 1 Table of Contents Appendix 1: Multilateral Environmental Agreements ..................................................................... 3 Appendix 2 National Wildife Legislation ......................................................................................... 5 Appendix 3: Protected Areas .......................................................................................................... 6 Appendix 4: Institutional Arrangements ........................................................................................ 10 Appendix 5: Research priorities .................................................................................................... 13 Appendix 6 Ecosystem/habitats ................................................................................................... 14 Appendix 7: Species .................................................................................................................... -
The Isabella Plantation Conservation Management Plan February 2012
The Isabella Plantation Conservation Management Plan February 2012 Isabella Plantation Landscape Conservation Management Plan 2012 Prepared by The Royal Parks January 2012 The Royal Parks Rangers Lodge Hyde Park London W2 2UH Tel: 020 7298 2000 Fax: 020 7402 3298 [email protected] i Isabella Plantation Conservation Management Plan CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................. 3 Richmond Park ............................................................................................................................................. 3 The Management Plan ................................................................................................................................ 4 Aims of the Isabella Plantation Management Plan ................................................................................ 4 Structure of the Plan .................................................................................................................................. 6 2.0 GENERAL AND MANAGEMENT CONTEXT ............................... 7 Location ......................................................................................................................................................... 7 Existing TRP Management Framework ................................................................................................ 10 Management Structure of Richmond Park .......................................................................................... 10 Landscape Management -
Review of the Coverage of Urban Habitats and Species Within the UK Biodiversity Action Plan
Report Number 651 Review of the coverage of urban habitats and species within the UK Biodiversity Action Plan English Nature Research Reports working today for nature tomorrow English Nature Research Reports Number 651 Review of the coverage of urban habitats and species within the UK Biodiversity Action Plan Dr Graham Tucker Dr Hilary Ash Colin Plant Environmental Impacts Team You may reproduce as many additional copies of this report as you like, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with English Nature, Northminster House, Peterborough PE1 1UA ISSN 0967-876X © Copyright English Nature 2005 Acknowledgements The project was managed by David Knight of English Nature, and we thank him for his advice and assistance. Thanks are also due to Mark Crick and Ian Strachan of JNCC for their comments on the draft report and information on the current UKBAP review, and English Nature library staff for their invaluable assistance with obtaining reference materials. We especially thank the following individuals and their organisations for their valuable comments on the consultation draft of this report: George Barker, John Box, Professor Tony Bradshaw, John Buckley (The Herpetological Trust), Paul Chanin (for The Mammal Society), John Davis (Butterfly Conservation), Mike Eyre, Tony Gent (The Herpetological Conservation Trust), Chris Gibson (English Nature), Eric Greenwood, Phil Grice (English Nature), Mathew Frith, Nick Moyes, John Newbold (for The National Federation of Biological Recorders), Dominic Price (Plantlife), Alison Rasey (The Bat Conservation Trust), Ian Rotherham (Sheffield University), Richard Scott (Landlife), Martin Wigginton and Robin Wynde (RSPB). Additional information and advice was also provided by Dan Chamberlain, Rob Robinson, and Juliet Vickery (British Trust for Ornithology) and Will Peach (RSPB). -
Fauna of Click Beetles (Coleoptera: Elateridae) in the Interfluve of Rivers Moksha and Sura, Republic of Mordovia, Russia
BIODIVERSITAS ISSN: 1412-033X Volume 19, Number 4, July 2018 E-ISSN: 2085-4722 Pages: 1352-1365 DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d190423 Fauna of click beetles (Coleoptera: Elateridae) in the interfluve of Rivers Moksha and Sura, Republic of Mordovia, Russia ALEXANDER B. RUCHIN1,, LEONID V. EGOROV1,2, GENNADY B. SEMISHIN1 1Joint Directorate of the Mordovia State Nature Reserve and National Park «Smolny», Saransk, Dachny per., 4, 430011, Russia. email: [email protected] 2State Nature Reserve «Prisursky», Lesnoi, 9, Cheboksary, 428034, Russia. email: [email protected] Manuscript received: 31 May 2018. Revision accepted: 23 June 2018. Abstract. Ruchin AB, Egorov LV, Semishin GB. 2018. Fauna of click beetles (Coleoptera: Elateridae) in the interfluve of Rivers Moksha and Sura, Republic of Mordovia, Russia. Biodiversitas 19: 1352-1365. The results of the study of fauna of click beetles in the Republic of Mordovia are presented. By now, 58 species of click beetles have been recorded here. Adrastus pallens is a new record for the republic. As per the literature information, 6 species of click beetles (Agriotes pilosellus, Melanotus crassicollis, Melanotus fusciceps, Liotrichus affinis, Pseudanostirus globicollis, Stenagostus rufus) are known and these indications require confirmation. Two species (Agriotes acuminatus, Limoniscus suturalis) are excluded from the fauna. Taking into account the literary information in the fauna of Mordovia, 64 species of Elateridae are known. Agrypnus murinus, Agriotes lineatus, Agriotes obscurus, Agriotes sputator, Dalopius marginatus, Ampedus balteatus, Ampedus pomorum, Hemicrepidius niger, Athous subfuscus, Prosternon tessellatum, Selatosomus aeneus are among the mass species. A list of the species is presented, which with a high degree of probability can still be found in the republic. -
Atlas of Yorkshire Coleoptera (Vcs 61-65)
Atlas of Yorkshire Coleoptera (VCs 61-65) Part 8 - Elateroidea - Families Eucnemidae to Cantharidae Introduction This is Part 8 of the Atlas and covers the Families Eucnemidae, Throscidae, Elateridae, Drilidae, Lycidae, Lampyridae and Cantharidae Each species in the database is considered and in each case a distribution map representing records on the database (at 1/10/2017) is presented. The number of records on the database for each species is given in the account in the form (a,b,c,d,e) where 'a' to 'e' are the number of records from VC61 to VC65 respectively. These figures include undated records (see comment on undated records in the paragraph below on mapping). As a recorder, I shall continue to use the vice-county recording system, as the county is thereby divided up into manageable, roughly equal, areas for recording purposes. For an explanation of the vice-county recording system, under a system devised in Watson (1883) and subsequently documented by Dandy (1969), Britain was divided into convenient recording areas ("vice-counties"). Thus Yorkshire was divided into vice-counties numbered 61 to 65 inclusive, and notwithstanding fairly recent county boundary reorganisations and changes, the vice-county system remains a constant and convenient one for recording purposes; in the text, reference to “Yorkshire” implies VC61 to VC65 ignoring modern boundary changes. For some species there are many records, and for others only one or two. In cases where there are five species or less full details of the known records are given. Many common species have quite a high proportion of recent records. -
Beetles from a Typical Ancient Chiltern Beechwood R Fortey (RF), R Booth (RB), M Barclay (MB) and M Geiser (MG)
Beetles from a typical ancient Chiltern beechwood R Fortey (RF), R Booth (RB), M Barclay (MB) and M Geiser (MG) published online February 2019 Summary Lambridge Wood on the edge of Henley-on-Thames is an ancient, semi-natural woodland typical of many Chiltern beechwoods. It has a well-documented history that was described in The Wood for the Trees (Fortey 2016) proving its ancient pedigree, and that it was a ‘working woodland’ until the middle of the last century, since when it has had minimal management. Over five years the beetle fauna of part of the wood has been sampled, including the canopy, up to 253 species were found, which were identified in the Natural History Museum, London. Of this total, about 20% are local or Notable, and most of these are associated with ancient woodlands, including saproxylic species. Notes are given on some of these taxa. Species collected from identified fungi are discussed in more detail. This ‘snapshot’ may serve as a benchmark to help monitor future changes in this special habitat. Introduction Figure 1. Lambridge Wood: the study area in April 2015, when bluebells feed Meligethes and Epuraea species. Photo by Jacqueline Fortey. Beech woodland is particularly characteristic of high ground on the southern part of the Chiltern Hills. During the nineteenth and early twentieth century these beech stands were associated with a chair manufacturing industry centred on High 48 Wycombe, Bucks. In South Oxfordshire, the area west of Henley-on-Thames has a wealth of such beech woods, one of which, Lambridge Wood, is the subject of this report.