Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs Volume 11 a Catalog of Scolytidae and Platypodidae Article 7 (Coleoptera), Part 1: Bibliography

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs Volume 11 a Catalog of Scolytidae and Platypodidae Article 7 (Coleoptera), Part 1: Bibliography Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs Volume 11 A Catalog of Scolytidae and Platypodidae Article 7 (Coleoptera), Part 1: Bibliography 1-1-1987 R–S Stephen L. Wood Life Science Museum and Department of Zoology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602 Donald E. Bright Jr. Biosystematics Research Centre, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada 51A 0C6 Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbnm Part of the Anatomy Commons, Botany Commons, Physiology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Wood, Stephen L. and Bright, Donald E. Jr. (1987) "R–S," Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs: Vol. 11 , Article 7. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbnm/vol11/iss1/7 This Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. 1 1 1987 Wood. Bricht: Catalog Bibliography R 479 R *R. L. K. 1917. Margborrens harjningar i vara skogar, ' Volga semidesert], Trud lusl Lc 18:10 Skogvaktaren 1917:224. (). 0- P. 1948. Borkenkaferbefall R. im Bezirk Bade... Allge- 1962. The length ol the passages and ihe numbci meine Forst- unci Holzwirtschaftliche Zeitung of offspring of bark beetles depending on the den- 59:193-194. (en). sity ol the settlemenl (using Kholodl n •Rabaglia, Robert 1980. Scoh/- J. Twig-crotch feeding by pine sliool beetle as an example |In Russian] tus multistriatus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and Akademiia NaukSSSR, Laboratoriia Lesovedeniia evaluation ofinsecticides for control. Unpublished Soobshcheniya 6: 167 190 1 thesis, State University of New York, College of 1964, Zascitalesaot vrcdnyh i nasekomyh j Protci Environmental Science Forestry, Syracuse. ; and ing forests from harmful insei ts Izdati () Nauka, Moscow 132 p. 1 Rabaglia. Robert J., and Gerald Norman Lanier 1981. 1966. Vliyaniye Zhirotnykh na produktivnosl A note priority on the oiHylurgopinus rufipes and lesnykh biogeotsenozov [Influence ol annuals Hylastes salebrosus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). upon the productivity of forest biogeocoenoses]. Canadian Entomologist 113(6):565-566. (tx). Pages 5 68 in [zdatelstvo "Nauka". Akademiya 1983. Effects of multiline components on twig- Nank SSSB. Laboratoriya Lesovedcniya, Moskva crotch feeding by European elm bark beetles. 128 p. [English translation ( lanada Department ol Journal of Chemical Ecology 9(12):1513-1524. Forestry and Rural Development, Translation No. (bv). 89. 128 p. |. (ee). 1984. Twig feeding by Scolytus multistriatus * (Co- 1968. Rol i znacenie rastitel'nojadnyh nasekomyh leoptera: Scolytidae) within-tree distribution and v lesu [The role and significance of phytophagus use for assessment of mass trapping. Canadian insects in the forest]. Izdatel'stvo Nauka, M Entomologist 116(7): 1025- 1032. (bv). 235 p.O- •Rabasse, J M. 1980. Les insectes ravageurs des cypres Raffa, Kenneth Francis 1980. The role of host resis- en France. Pages 217-222 in V. Grasso and P. tance in the colonization behavior, ecology and Raddi (eds.), II Cipresso: malattie e difesa. Eu- evolution of bark beetles. Unpublished disserta- ropean Economic Community, Agrimed., Flo- tion, Washington State University, Pullman. 137 rence, Italy. 255 p. (). p. (bv ec lib). Rabate, R. 1911. Reeherches sur la mortalite du Prunier. 1981. The role of host resistance in the coloniza- Progres Agricole et Viticole 1911:197-202. (en). tion behavior, ecology and evolution of bark Rabinowitz, D. 1977. Effects of a mangrove borer Poe- beetles. Dissertation Abstracts 40(05-B):1746. cilips rhizophorae, on propagules of Rhizophora (bv ec). harrisonii in Panama. Florida Entomologist Raffa, Kenneth Francis \nd Alan Andrew Berryman 60:129-134. (lib). 1980. Flight responses and host selection by bark •Rabstejnek. O. 1947. Nekolik poznatku o prubehu beetles. Pages 213-233 in A. A. Bern man and L. kurovcove kalamity [Einige Bemerkungen zum Safranyik (eds.). Dispersal of forest insects: evalu- Verlauf der Borkenkaferkalamitat], Ceskosloven- ation, theory and management implications. sky Les 23:369-370. (). Washington State University, Cooperative Exten- * 1978. Pozerkykurovcu. LesnickaPrace57(l). (). sion Service. 278 p. (bv). Radovanovic, Zivorad. 1959. Neka zapazanja o razvoju 1982a. Accumulation of monoterpenes and asscx i- trozubog borovog potkornjaka (Ips acuminatus L.) ated volatiles following inoculation of grand fir u sastojinama crnog i bijelog bora na podrucju with a fungus transmitted by the fir engraver, donje krivaje [Einige Beobachtungen uber die Scolytus centralis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Cana- Entwicklung des dreizehnigen Kiefernborken- dian Entomologist 114(91:797-810. (en ec kafers in den Kiefernbestanden des Gebietes 1982b. Gustatory cues in the orientation of Den- Donjakrivaja]. Narodni Sumar 13(9/10):577-584. droctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae 1 to (hb). host trees. Canadian Entomologist 114(2 .97-104. Radulescu. A. 1934. Deee mor ulmii [Warum sterben (ay ec hb). die Ulmen]. Revista Padurilor 46:589-592. (). 1982c. Physiological differences between lodge- •Rafes. P. M. 1957. Insect pests of forest plants in Naryn pole pines resistant and susceptible to the moun- sands of the semi-desert Transvolgas. Zoologis- tain pine beetle and associated microorganisms. cheskii Zhurnal 36:1455-1466. (). Environmental Entomology 11:486—192. ec 1960a. Formirovanie mira nasekomyh v lesnyh 1983a. Physiological aspects of lodgepole pine nasazdenijah na Narynskih peskah polupustyn- wound responses to a fungal symbiont of the nogo Zavolz ja [The insect world in forest stands on mountain pine beetle. Dcndroctonus pondi the Naryn sands in the Trans-Volga semi-desert]. (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Canadian Entomologist Trud. Inst. Les. 48:129-188. (en).' 115:723-734 in 1960b. Nasekomye-vrediteli topolej, osin i iv, 1983b. The role of host plant resistance the proizrastajuscih na Narynskih peskah polupustyn- colonization behavior and ecology of bark beetles nogo Zavolz ja [Insect pests of poplars, aspens and (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Ecological Monographs willows growing on the Naryn sands in the Trans- 53(l):27-50 (b\ e< 480 Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs No. 11 *Ragenovich, Iral R 1973. Laboratory studies on the 1979. Forest insect and disease conditions in the developmental biology of Thanasimus dubius. Southwest 1978. United States Department of Fab. (Coleoptera: Cleridae). Unpublished thesis, Agriculture, Forest Service, Southwestern Re- Mississippi State University, State College. 34 p. gion, Forest Insect and Disease Management, Al- ' () buquerque, New Mexico. 27 p. (en). 1976a. Evaluation of the southern pine beetle in- 1980a. Effects of subzero Fahrenheit tempera- festations on the Daniel Boone National Forest, tures on southern pine beetle populations in the Kentucky. United States Department of Agricul- southern Appalachians. Southern Journal of Ap- ture, Forest Service, Southern Region, State and plied Forestry 4(4):201-203. (ec). Private Forestry, Forest Pest Management, Re- 1980b. Southwestern Region (R-3). Pages 20-24 port 76-1-25. (en). in P. W. Orrand H. D. Brown, Forest insect and 1976b. Evaluation of the southern pine beetle disease conditions in the United States, 1978. infestations on the George Washington and Jeffer- United States Department of Agriculture, Forest son National Forests, Virginia. United States De- Service, iv + 83 p. (en). partment ofAgriculture, Forest Service, Southern 1982. Biological evaluation, spruce beetle, Fort Region, State and Private Forestry, Forest Pest Apache Indian Reservation, Arizona. LTnited Management, Report 76-1-20. (en). States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, 1976c. Evaluation of the southern pine beetle in- Southwestern Region, State and Private Forestry, festation on the National Forests of Georgia. Report R3-82-6. 22 p. (en). United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Ragenovich. IralR., and Jack E. Coster. 1974. Evalua- Service, Southern Region, State and Private tion of some carbamate and phosphate insecticides Forestry, Forest Pest Management. Report 76-1- against southern pine beetle and Ips bark beetles. 23. (en). Journal of Economic Entomology 67(6):763-765. 1976d. Evaluation of the southern pine beetle (en). infestations on the National Forests of South Caro- Racnander.J , andCh Solbreck. 1981. Effectiveness of lina. United States Department of Agriculture, different types of pheromone traps used against Forest Service, Southern Region, State and Pri- lps typographies (L.) (Col. , Scolytidae) in Sweden. vate Forestry, Forest Pest Management, Report Anzeiger fur Schadlingskunde Pflanz-Umwelt- 76-1-21. (en)'. schutz 54:104-108. (bv en ms). 1977a. An evaluation of sub-zero temperatures on Ragusa, Enrico. 1922. Coleotterinuoviopoeoconosciuti southern pine beetle populations in North Caro- della Sicilia [Scolytidae, p. 128-129]. Bulletino lina, Tennessee, and Georgia. United States De- delta Societa Entomologica Italiana 53:31-36, 85- partment of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern 100, 121-30. (ds). Region and Southeastern Area, Forest Pest Man- 1924. Gli Ipidae della Sicilia. Bulletino della Soci- agement, Report 77-1-9. (ec). eta Entomologica Italiana 56:114-118. (ds). 1977b. Evaluation of several concentrations of Rahov, V. A.andE. I. Uspenskij. 1967. Multiplication of Chlorpyrifos for remedial and preventive control bark beetles on clear fellings
Recommended publications
  • Celtis Tenuifolia) in Ontario
    Photo: Allen Woodliffe Dwarf Hackberry (Celtis tenuifolia) in Ontario Ontario Recovery Strategy Series Recovery strategy prepared under the Endangered Species Act, 2007 2013 Ministry of Natural Resources About the Ontario Recovery Strategy Series This series presents the collection of recovery strategies that are prepared or adopted as advice to the Province of Ontario on the recommended approach to recover species at risk. The Province ensures the preparation of recovery strategies to meet its commitments to recover species at risk under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk in Canada. What is recovery? What’s next? Recovery of species at risk is the process by which the Nine months after the completion of a recovery strategy decline of an endangered, threatened, or extirpated a government response statement will be published species is arrested or reversed, and threats are which summarizes the actions that the Government of removed or reduced to improve the likelihood of a Ontario intends to take in response to the strategy. species’ persistence in the wild. The implementation of recovery strategies depends on the continued cooperation and actions of government agencies, individuals, communities, land users, and What is a recovery strategy? conservationists. Under the ESA a recovery strategy provides the best available scientific knowledge on what is required to For more information achieve recovery of a species. A recovery strategy outlines the habitat needs and the threats to the To learn more about species at risk recovery in Ontario, survival and recovery of the species. It also makes please visit the Ministry of Natural Resources Species at recommendations on the objectives for protection and Risk webpage at: www.ontario.ca/speciesatrisk recovery, the approaches to achieve those objectives, and the area that should be considered in the development of a habitat regulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Cossidae (Lepidoptera) of the Russian Caucasus with the Description of a New Species
    Zootaxa 4044 (2): 270–288 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4044.2.5 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F398B9F3-11AA-4105-A2DE-2F42D97BE737 Cossidae (Lepidoptera) of the Russian Caucasus with the description of a new species ROMAN V. YAKOVLEV1, 2, 7, ALEXANDER N. POLTAVSKY3, ELENA V. ILYINA4, VALERIY I. SHCHUROV5 & THOMAS J. WITT6 1Altai State University, South Siberian Botanical garden, Lenina 61, RF-656049, Barnaul, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] 2Tomsk State University, Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecology, Lenina pr. 36, 634050 Tomsk, Russia E-mail: [email protected] 3Botanical Garden, Southern federal University, Botanicheskij spusk 7, Rostov-on-Don, 344041, Russia 4Daghestan Sci. Centre of Russian Academy of Sciences, M. Gadzhieva 45, Makhachkala, Daghestan Republic, Russia 5The Federal Budget Institution «Russian Centre of Forest Health» branch «Centre of Forest Health of Krasnodar Region», Odesskiy pr-d 4, 350080, Krasnodar, Russia E-mail: [email protected] 6Museum Witt, Tengstrasse 33, D-80796, Munich, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] 7Corresponding author Abstract An annotated list of the Cossidae of the Russian portion of the Caucasus including 20 species from 11 genera and two subfamilies is presented for the first time. A new species Cryptoholcocerus daghestanica sp. nov. is also described. Key words: Cossidae, new species, fauna, Caucasus, Daghestan, Cryptoholcocerus daghestanica Introduction With a global distribution, Cossidae (Insecta, Lepidoptera) comprise about 1000 known species, 800 of them being recorded from the Old World (Yakovlev 2011; Nieukerken et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of the Sex Pheromone of the Tree Infesting Cossid Moth Coryphodema Tristis (Lepidoptera: Cossidae)
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Identification of the Sex Pheromone of the Tree Infesting Cossid Moth Coryphodema tristis (Lepidoptera: Cossidae) Marc Clement Bouwer 1*, Bernard Slippers 2, Dawit Degefu 2, Michael John Wingfield 2, Simon Lawson 3, Egmont Richard Rohwer 4 1 Department of Chemistry/Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, Gauteng, South Africa, 2 Department of Genetics/Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, Gauteng, South Africa, 3 Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry/Ecosciences Precinct, University of the Sunshine Coast, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia, 4 Department of Chemistry/Center for Chromatography, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, Gauteng, South Africa * [email protected] Abstract OPEN ACCESS The cossid moth (Coryphodema tristis) has a broad range of native tree hosts in South Af- Citation: Bouwer MC, Slippers B, Degefu D, Wingfield MJ, Lawson S, Rohwer ER (2015) rica. The moth recently moved into non-native Eucalyptus plantations in South Africa, on Identification of the Sex Pheromone of the Tree which it now causes significant damage. Here we investigate the chemicals involved in Infesting Cossid Moth Coryphodema tristis pheromone communication between the sexes of this moth in order to better understand its (Lepidoptera: Cossidae). PLoS ONE 10(3): ecology, and with a view to potentially develop management tools for it. In particular, we e0118575. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118575 characterize female gland extracts and headspace samples through coupled gas chroma- Academic Editor: Marcelo Gustavo Lorenzo, tography electro-antennographic detection (GC-EAD) and two dimensional gas chromatog- Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, BRAZIL raphy mass spectrometry (GCxGC-MS).
    [Show full text]
  • Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States
    Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States September 1993 OTA-F-565 NTIS order #PB94-107679 GPO stock #052-003-01347-9 Recommended Citation: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States, OTA-F-565 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, September 1993). For Sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office ii Superintendent of Documents, Mail Stop, SSOP. Washington, DC 20402-9328 ISBN O-1 6-042075-X Foreword on-indigenous species (NIS)-----those species found beyond their natural ranges—are part and parcel of the U.S. landscape. Many are highly beneficial. Almost all U.S. crops and domesticated animals, many sport fish and aquiculture species, numerous horticultural plants, and most biologicalN control organisms have origins outside the country. A large number of NIS, however, cause significant economic, environmental, and health damage. These harmful species are the focus of this study. The total number of harmful NIS and their cumulative impacts are creating a growing burden for the country. We cannot completely stop the tide of new harmful introductions. Perfect screening, detection, and control are technically impossible and will remain so for the foreseeable future. Nevertheless, the Federal and State policies designed to protect us from the worst species are not safeguarding our national interests in important areas. These conclusions have a number of policy implications. First, the Nation has no real national policy on harmful introductions; the current system is piecemeal, lacking adequate rigor and comprehensiveness. Second, many Federal and State statutes, regulations, and programs are not keeping pace with new and spreading non-indigenous pests.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beetle Fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and Distribution
    INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 20, No. 3-4, September-December, 2006 165 The beetle fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and distribution Stewart B. Peck Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada stewart_peck@carleton. ca Abstract. The beetle fauna of the island of Dominica is summarized. It is presently known to contain 269 genera, and 361 species (in 42 families), of which 347 are named at a species level. Of these, 62 species are endemic to the island. The other naturally occurring species number 262, and another 23 species are of such wide distribution that they have probably been accidentally introduced and distributed, at least in part, by human activities. Undoubtedly, the actual numbers of species on Dominica are many times higher than now reported. This highlights the poor level of knowledge of the beetles of Dominica and the Lesser Antilles in general. Of the species known to occur elsewhere, the largest numbers are shared with neighboring Guadeloupe (201), and then with South America (126), Puerto Rico (113), Cuba (107), and Mexico-Central America (108). The Antillean island chain probably represents the main avenue of natural overwater dispersal via intermediate stepping-stone islands. The distributional patterns of the species shared with Dominica and elsewhere in the Caribbean suggest stages in a dynamic taxon cycle of species origin, range expansion, distribution contraction, and re-speciation. Introduction windward (eastern) side (with an average of 250 mm of rain annually). Rainfall is heavy and varies season- The islands of the West Indies are increasingly ally, with the dry season from mid-January to mid- recognized as a hotspot for species biodiversity June and the rainy season from mid-June to mid- (Myers et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter Alaska Entomological Society
    Newsletter of the Alaska Entomological Society Volume 12, Issue 1, March 2019 In this issue: Some food items of introduced Alaska blackfish (Dallia pectoralis T. H. Bean, 1880) in Kenai, Alaska8 Announcements . .1 Two new records of mayflies (Ephemeroptera) Arthropods potentially associated with spruce from Alaska . 11 (Picea spp.) in Interior Alaska . .2 Changes in soil fungal communities in response to A second Alaska record for Polix coloradella (Wals- invasion by Lumbricus terrestris Linnaeus, 1758 ingham, 1888) (Lepidoptera: Gelechioidea: Oe- at Stormy Lake, Nikiski, Alaska . 12 cophoridae), the “Skunk Moth” . .5 Review of the twelfth annual meeting . 19 Announcements New research to assess the risk of ticks tat suitability and probabilistic establishment model to dis- cover the climatic limits and probability of tick survival and tick-borne pathogens in Alaska in Alaska. For more information on ticks in Alaska and to learn how you can Submit-A-Tick, please visit: https: The geographic range of many tick species has expanded //dec.alaska.gov/eh/vet/ticks (website is in develop- substantially due to changes in climate, land use, and an- ment) or contact Dr. Micah Hahn ([email protected]). imal and human movement. With Alaska trending to- wards longer summers and milder winters, there is grow- ing concern about ticks surviving further north. Recent th passive surveillance efforts in Alaska have revealed that 69 Western Forest Insect Work Confer- non-native ticks—some with significant medical and vet- ence erinary importance—are present in the state. There is a new collaborative effort between the University of Alaska, The 69th Western Forest Insect Work Conference will the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, and the Of- be held April 22–25 2019 in Anchorage, Alaska at fice of the State Veterinarian to understand the risk of the Anchorage Marriott Downtown.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT 2020 Plant Protection & Conservation Programs
    Oregon Department of Agriculture Plant Protection & Conservation Programs ANNUAL REPORT 2020 www.oregon.gov/ODA Plant Protection & Conservation Programs Phone: 503-986-4636 Website: www.oregon.gov/ODA Find this report online: https://oda.direct/PlantAnnualReport Publication date: March 2021 Table Tableof Contents of Contents ADMINISTRATION—4 Director’s View . 4 Retirements: . 6 Plant Protection and Conservation Programs Staff . 9 NURSERY AND CHRISTMAS TREE—10 What Do We Do? . 10 Christmas Tree Shipping Season Summary . 16 Personnel Updates . .11 Program Overview . 16 2020: A Year of Challenge . .11 New Rule . 16 Hawaii . 17 COVID Response . 12 Mexico . 17 Funding Sources . 13 Nursery Research Assessment Fund . 14 IPPM-Nursery Surveys . 17 Phytophthora ramorum Nursery Program . 14 National Traceback Investigation: Ralstonia in Oregon Nurseries . 18 Western Horticultural Inspection Society (WHIS) Annual Meeting . 19 HEMP—20 2020 Program Highlights . 20 2020 Hemp Inspection Annual Report . 21 2020 Hemp Rule-making . 21 Table 1: ODA Hemp Violations . 23 Hemp Testing . .24 INSECT PEST PREVENTION & MANAGEMENT—25 A Year of Personnel Changes-Retirements-Promotions High-Tech Sites Survey . .33 . 26 Early Detection and Rapid Response for Exotic Bark Retirements . 27 and Ambrosia Beetles . 33 My Unexpected Career With ODA . .28 Xyleborus monographus Early Detection and Rapid Response (EDRR) Trapping . 34 2020 Program Notes . .29 Outreach and Education . 29 Granulate Ambrosia Beetle and Other Wood Boring Insects Associated with Creosoting Plants . 34 New Detections . .29 Japanese Beetle Program . .29 Apple Maggot Program . .35 Exotic Fruit Fly Survey . .35 2018 Program Highlights . .29 Japanese Beetle Eradication . .30 Grasshopper and Mormon Cricket Program . .35 Grasshopper Outbreak Response – Harney County .
    [Show full text]
  • “Can You Hear Me?” Investigating the Acoustic Communication Signals and Receptor Organs of Bark Beetles
    “Can you hear me?” Investigating the acoustic communication signals and receptor organs of bark beetles by András Dobai A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science In Biology Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario © 2017 András Dobai Abstract Many bark beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) species have been documented to produce acoustic signals, yet our knowledge of their acoustic ecology is limited. In this thesis, three aspects of bark beetle acoustic communication were examined: the distribution of sound production in the subfamily based on the most recent literature; the characteristics of signals and the possibility of context dependent signalling using a model species: Ips pini; and the acoustic reception of bark beetles through neurophysiological studies on Dendroctonus valens. It was found that currently there are 107 species known to stridulate using a wide diversity of mechanisms for stridulation. Ips pini was shown to exhibit variation in certain chirp characteristics, including the duration and amplitude modulation, between behavioural contexts. Neurophysiological recordings were conducted on several body regions, and vibratory responses were reported in the metathoracic leg and the antennae. ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank my supervisor, Dr. Jayne Yack for accepting me as Master’s student, guiding me through the past two years, and for showing endless support and giving constructive feedback on my work. I would like to thank the members of my committee, Dr. Jeff Dawson and Dr. John Lewis for their professional help and advice on my thesis. I would like to thank Sen Sivalinghem and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Alder Canopy Dieback and Damage in Western Oregon Riparian Ecosystems
    Alder Canopy Dieback and Damage in Western Oregon Riparian Ecosystems Sims, L., Goheen, E., Kanaskie, A., & Hansen, E. (2015). Alder canopy dieback and damage in western Oregon riparian ecosystems. Northwest Science, 89(1), 34-46. doi:10.3955/046.089.0103 10.3955/046.089.0103 Northwest Scientific Association Version of Record http://cdss.library.oregonstate.edu/sa-termsofuse Laura Sims,1, 2 Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, 1085 Cordley Hall, Corvallis, Oregon 97331 Ellen Goheen, USDA Forest Service, J. Herbert Stone Nursery, Central Point, Oregon 97502 Alan Kanaskie, Oregon Department of Forestry, 2600 State Street, Salem, Oregon 97310 and Everett Hansen, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, 1085 Cordley Hall, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331 Alder Canopy Dieback and Damage in Western Oregon Riparian Ecosystems Abstract We gathered baseline data to assess alder tree damage in western Oregon riparian ecosystems. We sought to determine if Phytophthora-type cankers found in Europe or the pathogen Phytophthora alni subsp. alni, which represent a major threat to alder forests in the Pacific Northwest, were present in the study area. Damage was evaluated in 88 transects; information was recorded on damage type (pathogen, insect or wound) and damage location. We evaluated 1445 red alder (Alnus rubra), 682 white alder (Alnus rhombifolia) and 181 thinleaf alder (Alnus incana spp. tenuifolia) trees. We tested the correlation between canopy dieback and canker symptoms because canopy dieback is an important symptom of Phytophthora disease of alder in Europe. We calculated the odds that alder canopy dieback was associated with Phytophthora-type cankers or other biotic cankers.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancing Our Partnerships Fomentando Nuestra Colaboración
    Proceedings of the 1st Joint Meeting of the 12th National Symposium on Forest Parasites and the 54th Western Forest Insect Work Conference (WFIWC) Memorias de la Primera Reunión Conjunta XII Simposio Nacional de Parasitología Forestal y 54ava Conferencia de Entomología Forestal del Oeste Guadalajara, México November 3-6, 2003 Enhancing our Partnerships Fomentando Nuestra Colaboración i Proceedings of the 1st Joint Meeting of the 12th National Symposium on Forest Parasites and the 54th Western Forest Insect Work Conference (WFIWC) Memorias de la Primera Reunión Conjunta XII Simposio Nacional de Parasitología Forestal y 54ava Conferencia de Entomología Forestal del Oeste Guadalajara, Mexico November 3-6, 2003 Enhancing our Partnerships Fomentando Nuestra Colaboración Compiled by / Recopilación de: Brytten E. Steed USDA Forest Service Forest Health Protection 4746 S. 1900 E. Ogden UT 84403, USA NOT FOR CITATION / NO USAR PARA REFERENCIA INFORMATION FOR CONFERENCE MEMBERS ONLY / INFORMACIÓN SOLAMENTE PARA MIEMBROS DE LA CONFERENCIA The contents of these proceedings are not available for citation or publication without consent of the author. Articles were reformatted but printed approximately as submitted. Authors are responsible for content. El contenido de este documento no esta disponible para citar o publicar sin el consentimiento del autor. Los artículos fueron reformateados pero impresos aproximadamente como fueron remitidos. Los autores son los responsables del contenido. i ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITTEES / COMITES ORGANIZADORES Steering
    [Show full text]
  • Boring Beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae, Buprestidae, Cerambycidae) in White Spruce (Picea Glauca (Moench) Voss) Ecosystems of Alaska
    United States Department of Agriculture Effect of Ecosystem Disturbance Forest Service on Diversity of Bark and Wood- Pacific Northwest Research Station Boring Beetles (Coleoptera: Research Paper PNW-RP-546 April 2002 Scolytidae, Buprestidae, Cerambycidae) in White Spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) Ecosystems of Alaska Richard A. Werner This publication reports research involving pesticides. It does not contain recommenda- tions for their use, nor does it imply that the uses discussed here have been registered. All uses of pesticides must be registered by appropriate state and federal agencies, or both, before they can be recommended. CAUTION: Pesticides can be injurious to humans, domestic animals, desirable plants, and fish or other wildlife—if they are not handled or applied properly. Use all pesticides selectively and carefully. Follow recommended practices for the disposal of surplus pesticides and pesticide containers. Author Richard A. Werner was a research entomologist (retired), Pacific Northwest Research Station, 8080 NW Ridgewood Drive, Corvallis, OR 97330. He is currently a volunteer at the Pacific Northwest Research Station conducting research for the Long Term Ecological Research Program in Alaska. Abstract Werner, Richard A. 2002. Effect of ecosystem disturbance on diversity of bark and wood-boring beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae, Buprestidae, Cerambycidae) in white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) ecosystems of Alaska. Res. Pap. PNW-RP-546. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 15 p. Fire and timber harvest are the two major disturbances that alter forest ecosystems in interior Alaska. Both types of disturbance provide habitats that attract wood borers and bark beetles the first year after the disturbance, but populations then decrease to levels below those in undisturbed sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Hughes Raps GOP, Issues Debate Call
    Welfare—Where to Place the Emphasis? *Y FRANK W. HAJtBOUft gram is "very iMdtqpate." Mayor Lewis T. O/Ukilo wys Mr, Blum last week toadied iht sorest *r4"pt>8§iKly weak- m - Where to piece the emphasis? tht vtofftm b "bffew human decency sUUKtards." est point in the case for expanded welfare when be said; feg needy families In distress-getting rid of the Wetfart director Mrs. Harry W. Norman agrees that "much MECCA FOR DEADBEATS? "deadbeMs'V-ainring taxpayers' money—or spending more «(it? more" could be dose for welfare recipients—but not without "If we participate in the state welfare program, this mo* These *re qosstton* facing the Borough Council, the bor- more funds, even if the borough decides to accept state aid. niclpality could become a mecca for all the welfare deadbeats ough nwMftr, «nd the local welfare director. Under the borough's program, welfare recipients get a food in the area. In addition, we will lose local control." In (be nW future—probably within a month—the govern- and fuel allowance, in most cases $16 maximum per family Councilman Martin C. Lohsea, noting a few days ago that ing body will decide whether to (tart participating in the per week for food. The total amount spent is kept down by this year's welfare funds are already becoming depleted, asked tup's public assistance (welfare) program, and increase the not paying other costs. It is an arbitrary "dividing line" de- that the "deadbeats" be cleared off the relief rolls immediately. welfare service here—or to continue to "go it alone." cided, on by the director.
    [Show full text]